T H A M E S V A L L E Y AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGIICCAALL S E R V I C E S
Field 8, West Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey
by Steve Ford
Site Code: WSR10/111
(SU 7270 6720)
Field 8, West Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
An Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey
For CgMs Consulting
by Steve Ford
Thames Valley Archaeological Services
Ltd
Site Code MFB10/46
June 2010 Summary
Site name: Field 8, West Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
Grid reference: SU 7270 6720
Site activity: Fieldwalking
Date and duration of project: 19th–20th October 2010
Project manager: Steve Ford
Site supervisor: Steve Ford
Site code: WSR 10/111
Area of site: c. 13 ha
Summary of results: A small number of certain and possible prehistoric struck flints were recorded, probably of later Neolithic or Bronze Age, along with a small number of sherds of post-medieval pottery. There is no marked clustering to the distribution of these finds across the site. These finds are likely to represent either casual loss or discard across the landscape, or the manuring of farmland using midden material generated from settlement sites.
Location and reference of archive: The archive is presently held at Thames Valley Archaeological Services, Reading and will be deposited with Reading Museum in due course.
This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder
Report edited/checked by: Steve Preston9 26.10.10 Jo Pine 9 26.10.10
i
Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47–49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading RG1 5NR
Tel. (0118) 926 0552; Fax (0118) 926 0553; email [email protected]; website : www.tvas.co.uk Field 8, West Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire An Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey
by Steve Ford
Report 10/111
Introduction
This fieldwalking study was commissioned by Mr Greg Pugh of CgMs Consulting, Burlington House, Lypiatt
Road, Cheltenham GL50 2SY on behalf of the University of Reading as an assessment of the archaeological potential of a parcel of land known as Field 8, West Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire (SU 7270 6720) (Fig. 1). The report constitutes a non-invasive stage of a process to determine the presence/absence, extent, character, quality and date of any archaeological remains that may be affected by development within the area.
The site
The study site comprises an irregular parcel of land centred at SU 727 672 and covering about 13ha, to the south- west of Shinfield. High Copse Farm lies to the east and Hyde End Lane forms the western boundary (Fig. 2). The river Loddon flows 1km to the south-east. The site is on more or less level ground at a height of 50m above
Ordnance Datum in the north, and 48m in the south. The underlying geology is valley gravel (BGS 1946). The land is currently under arable use with a recently emerged cereal crop present at the time the fieldwalking took place.
The fieldwork was carried out by Steve Ford and Danielle Milbank on 19th and 20th October 2010. The archive is currently held by Thames Valley Archaeological Services in Reading and will be deposited with
Reading Museum in due course. The site code is WSR10/111.
Planning background and development proposals
An outline application for resident development of Shinfield West has been submitted by the University of
Reading to Wokingham Borough Council (Application Reference O/2010/1432 Hollow Lane, South of Church
Lane, Hyde End Road, Shinfield, Reading). The whole proposal site, approximately 85ha in extent (Fig. 2), comprises an irregular shaped plot of farm land to the west of Shinfield (SU 7250 6800). The current report is concerned with only one field within this larger area, as the rest of the site was previously examined as part of the Loddon Valley Survey (Ford 1997).
1 The archaeological potential of the wider site has been highlighted in a desk-based assessment prepared by
CgMs (2008, updated 2010). The desk-based assessment summarizes the potential for archaeological deposits within the application site as moderate to low potential for Bronze Age-Neolithic activity and a moderate-high potential for Iron Age/Roman activity across the southern, northern and eastern-most extent of the application site. The southern half of field 8 (Fig. 2) has been designated in the Local Plan as an Area of High
Archaeological Potential due to the presence of cropmarks (possibly attributed to Iron Age activity) identified during aerial photographic survey. In summary, the potential of the site stems from its location on the fringes of the Loddon Valley within an area where there is a range of archaeological finds and sites recorded. Previous field survey (Ford 1997) located a dense scatter of struck flint within the overall proposal area with a small cluster of Roman pottery also noted.
Objectives and methodology
The fieldwalking took place along north–south lines spaced at 10m intervals and based on the National Grid.
Material was collected from units of 10m intervals along these lines with an average search width of 1m. This approximates to a 10% sample of the surface area of the site. The methodology is comparable with that practised in other regions of central southern England (Richards 1990; Ford 1987a, appendix 1), including across the remainder of the application area here, though the sample fraction here is higher. All pre-19th century artefacts
(primarily struck flint and pottery) were to be collected and retained. Dense scatters of brick/tile or burnt flint were to be recorded in the field but only a sample of material collected from these for dating purposes.
A record was made of conditions which may have influenced recovery rates, such as stoniness of ground, vegetation cover, bright sunlight and which individual walked which line. The topography was also recorded to assist in interpretation of the finds.
Results
Collection conditions
The site was fieldwalked by two individuals. The fieldwalked areas had been planted with a wheat/barley crop which was of low growth. In effect, the whole ground surface was observable. The weather was frequently sunny and for most of the survey area the ground was dry. A moderate proportion of stone (gravel) was present across the site.
2 Finds
Struck flint
In all, just eleven pieces of struck flint were recovered (Appendix 1). The distribution is shown in Figure 3. A moderate volume of natural flint was present on the site and some of the pieces collected are possibly of modern
(plough-struck) origin. Similarly, some of the flint may have been introduced to the site along with powdered chalk to lime the fields.
Chronology As a whole, the flint collection comprises only broad flakes with no indication of any narrow flakes indicative of a Mesolithic or earlier Neolithic component. The flakes in themselves though, are not well dated and could be of any date from the Mesolithic through to the end of the Bronze Age (Ford 1987b).
Interpretation of the struck flint distribution Before the recorded distribution of the lithic material can be interpreted in terms of its archaeological significance an assessment of the nature of the use and discard of struck flint and the activity represented by flint scatters is required. In contrast to pottery, which is predominantly used only on occupation sites, struck flint is worked, used, and discarded or lost, on, adjacent to, and away from occupied areas. Procurement of raw materials itself produces further material not necessarily located close to occupied areas, and as for pottery, used flint can end up in middens which are later used to manure arable fields. Durable flint, much of which is not chronologically distinctive, was widely used and discarded during much of prehistory, as settlement patterns and subsistence strategies changed. As such, it should not be surprising that struck flint can be widely distributed across the landscape without marked clustering, or with widespread clusters of higher density material representing repeated use of the same location over many generations (Foley 1981). Coupled to this are taphonomic processes such as ploughing and colluviation which can lead to the wide dispersal of originally dense and discrete scatters (Yorston et al. 1990). There is a further body of evidence to indicate that much early prehistoric occupation is now represented only by scatters of struck flint within the topsoil (Healy 1987). Large quantities of struck flint need not imply the presence of significant numbers of sub-surface features.
For this project, however, despite the sample size of 10% (line spacing 10m) contrasting with the 4% (line spacing of 25m) used by the Loddon Valley and East Berkshire Surveys (Ford 1997; Ford 1987a) the volume of flint finds recovered is very low. This is emphasized by comparison with three flint scatter ‘sites’ (LV40, LV84 and LV85) recorded by the Loddon Valley Survey (Ford 1997; fig. 7a) just to the north east of Field 8 where,
3 after allowing for the differences in sample size, up to 20 times as much struck flint was recovered. It seems most likely that the flint recovered here reflects off-site activity in the landscape in general.
Pottery
The pottery collection comprised just five pieces (Appendix 2) of late post-medieval pottery with the distribution as shown on Figure 6. The pattern is best interpreted as representing material incorporated into manure which is subsequently spread onto farmland.
Conclusion
The fieldwalking has resulted in the recovery of a very small amount of prehistoric struck flint and post- medieval pottery. None of the material is noteworthy in itself and the density recovered for both categories is best interpreted as representing casual loss/discard or manuring practice across the wider landscape. None of these finds appear to relate to the cropmarks reported for this area.
References
BGS,1946, British Geological Survey, 1:50,000, Solid and Drift Edition, sheet 268, Keyworth CGMS, 2008, ‘Archaeological desk-based assessment, Shinfield/Spencer’s Wood, Berkshire’ CgMa Consulting, London (updated 2010) Foley, R, 1981, Off-site Archaeology and Human Adaption in East Africa, BAR (Int Ser) 97, Oxford Ford, S, 1987a, The East Berkshire Archaeological Survey, Berkshire County Council Dept Highways Planning, Occas Pap 1, Reading Ford, S, 1987b, ‘Chronological and functional aspects of flint assemblages’, in A G Brown and M R Edmonds, (eds), Lithic Analysis and Later British Prehistory: Some Problems and Approaches, Brit Archaeol Rep 162, Oxford, 67–85 Ford, S, 1997, ‘Loddon Valley (Berkshire) fieldwalking survey’, Berkshire Archaeol J 75, (for 1994–7), 11–33 Healy, F, 1987, ‘Prediction or prejudice? The relationship between field survey and excavation’, in A G Brown and M R Edmonds (eds), Lithic Analysis and Later British Prehistory, BAR (Brit Ser) 162, Oxford, 9–18 Richards, J C, 1990, The Stonehenge Environs Project, Hist Buildings Monuments Comm (Engl) Rep 16, London Yorston, R, M, Gaffney, V L and Reynolds, P J, 1990, ‘Simulation of artefact movement due to cultivation’, J Archaeol Sci 17, 67–83
4 APPENDIX 1: Struck flint
East North Type 72570 67370 Flake 72590 67080 Flake 72610 67210 Flake 72620 67250 Flake 72630 67330 Flake 72640 67190 Flake 72720 67190 Bashed lump (ploughstruck?) 72780 67380 Flake 72870 67320 Flake (ploughstruck?) 72780 67320 Flake (ploughstruck?) 72800 67160 Flake
5 APPENDIX 2: Pottery occurrence by number and weight (in g) plotted by grid co-ordinate
East North No Wt Fabric 72600 67350 1 48 Post-medieval red ware, internal brown glaze 72670 67250 1 15 Brown stoneware 72710 67190 1 51 Post-medieval red ware rim 72710 67200 1 26 Stoneware, pale yellow interior, grey exterior 72740 67220 1 12 Post-medieval red ware, brown interior glaze
6 Slough
READING Maidenhead
Windsor
Hungerford Thatcham Bracknell Newbury Wokingham SITE
68000
SITE
67000
SU72000 73000 WSR10/111 Field 8, West Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire, 2010 Archaeological fieldwalking survey
Figure 1. Location of site within Shinfield and Berkshire.
Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Explorer 159 at 1:12500 Ordnance Survey Licence 100025880 1 1
1 R 5 56.1m 2 O 6 S E C R 32 9m O .1 F 9 T 5 2 4 W M 7 B 20 A 2 Y 17
1
2
2 5
4 SE
1
O 1 CL 8 LB OM
2 LS 3
1 MI El 8
Sub 8 Sta
Posts
5
1
1
0 1 H 1 Posts O 1 L L O
40 W 45.4m 6 C El Sub Sta H
U 7 R C
H L 7 4 2
L A
A
N 5 N E 4 E
9
53.3m 2 9 9 1 2 21 6
11 W 18 14
12 H 54.4m 1 E E A L'Ortolan OS CL T 4 Y F
E 1 R
l U I
S 6 B
u 1 5 9 IL E
B Tanks b 2 6 8 W S 1 7 L t a D
S
1 6 2
4 6 R
The O
Grove A
D Vic ara ge Co 9
ur o
t t 7
5 4 8 6
Gas 3
Pump House 8 56.4m 6 BM 43.60m Depot Gov E
N
A 1 L 6 H C R 2 U Toad Hall H 2
C 2m
1 .6
6 3 a 5 BM Hall s e V g a a er t ne t El Sub Sta s o C G Th h
e c L
H r O
2 11 av u U en h C 7 C E 0
t S
f
1 T
o r 1 6 5 E The Rowans c R y e n o 52.1m
H 58.5m
1 E 2 3 U
A VEN
Stockmans 9 A
5 V ES
1 RT
Cottage E 0 HI N 1
St Mary's 5 8 U 1 Norwood 7 Church E 4 BM
59 . THE MANOR 1 2 0 2 8 Church Farm 6m Shinfield
The House Lodge 6 Cottage
76 1
7 0 64 Shinfield Court 23 1
6 0
1 0 6 25 31 Pond 4 5 3
4 6
1 8 3
52 2 33 6 21 DEA 8 RDON WAY E 8c 8
8 N
2 1 4 b 8 A 8
L a 7 8 6 D 6 A 9 H O
2 R
4 C 1
2 8 M 5 R 6 EL 0 H 6 U C 1 Y H 3 W
94 Playground C 15 6 1 90 1
0 2 2 Pond 26 22
4 52 44
0 9 1 1
7 1 1 8 1 5 1
5
ELL CLOSE OB 1
3 SC
1
4 Posts
1
4
1 1
1 E 7 4 5
1 S 51 O
4 L
6 2
1 C
5 1
0 D 3 R
I 1
9 B
2 G
42.4m 8 N 4 9 O 3 El Sub Sta
1 2
3 14 3 S
3 2 S 8 K Y L 1 AR K
W 5
9 a A 2 5 3 Graveyard 3
8 2 Y 12 37 36 28 20 59 2 5 2 8 1
5 Y 0 7
WA 1
ARDON 6
DE 1
3 7
2 2 7 1 2 18 1
17 26 6 5 5
14 Stantons El Sub Sta 1 ack
Tr 0 1 8 E 1 CLOS LDER
E HO Shinfield
AN 2 0 L WAY 2 CH RDON A M Free Church UR DE
A Shinfield CH P E D V 4m
D a 1
O 7 9.
O t 9 1 R 9 4
6 h C
1 7 6 G M
5
K B
3
L 0
2 The Thatch 1 (
C 3 u A 6
L 0005 A
O m 1 TE 1
S 1
8 1 ) 3 E 2 2
3 8 7
7 3 8 9
M
0 A A 4
1
D 9 2
0
0001 3 3 D
O 1 2
2 2
C 4 7
K 9
7
68000 4
C
1
9 L 4
5
3 H
1
2 O 5
4 L
9 L 9 O W
4 L
50 A
1 N
3
9 5 E
43.0m 2 P 2 a t 5 1 h 3 46.9m 9
( u 1 m
) k 8 ac Tr D r a 4
in
2 4
B TC H Y 1 9 D 4
3 E 5 E 3 N
B
D P 7
L O A N
E 1
Path 1
1 5 in Dra N E h E
3 at R 2
P G 1
L O O H C Shinfield S House 47.5m
46.0m
3 May's Farm 5 Drain h Pat ll May's Farm Ha Car Park Tank ) in (um Dra Path Schoolgreen Hall Cobham e House Tre Little Paddock Bay age Cott elyn Ros
The Bell
6 6
7 and Bottle 6 (PH)
1 2
1
a 5 Shinfield Infant 6 50.3m and Nursery School BM 45.31m
3
The Royal e e Oak k r 1 0068 o le 1 (PH) o c 1 r 5 b h
g
n i 4 a 3 r H C School h t House Tu r 2 G d o e 3 o s 2 w C r w 3 e o ll u a n tt i o ls d M H i a a le t g a W 2 7
1 y M r IL e LW
g O r 1 RT u H S LA
NE 2
5 2 3 1 1
.2
1
m 43.9m 1 4 3
9
1
1
1 5
Hostel Ryeish Green 8
5 1 5 7 3a 5 3b 55 5 Playground
LB 3 1 th Allotment Gardens Pa H YD E EN D
LA
N 3 E 9 6 7
Pavilion Ryeish Green School
7
9
4 Leisure Centre 3 49.4m
9 1
D A 4
BM 49.99m O 9 R Playing Field D 6 N E
E D
Y 5
Moor Copse H 5 Builder's Piggery Yard Drain 2041 k c a Moor Copse r Path T
1 0
7 6 9239 Piggery 3 4239 D r a 44.2m i n
49.1m 6
7 D Drain ra GP in
7 Drain 1
7
5
7
9 Ryeish Farm
4424 8 Tanner's Copse
4 3924
Pavilion
P ath
Drain 1 Nullis Farm Track Wyverley 2917 9416
E N 48.8m A
L
H S High Copse 44.5m 0013 I E T Y r a R Farm c k Wilders Grove Farm
Nullis Farmhouse
n i
a
r
Mast D 1809
Pond
Silos 0007 Willow Barn BM 48.38m
GP
C
L High Copse A R The Cottage E
S
High Copse 1
2 G 1
7 9 3
8 R 1
E
E 7
6 6 9 D 9 N ra 0302 in 4 3 R
3
D BM 45.35m
5 B
2 4 9 2900 0006 2200
8 1200 1900 4000 5200 0700
8
1
1 6
3 8
E 3
l 4000 2200 1900 2900 High Copse S 4700 High Copse u
8 1
b 3 67000 9
4 S
0700 1
8 3 3 t 0006
3 3 5 a a B
C
L
A
R 6 E
S
2 44.5m G
R
E
E Allotment Gardens Track N
R
O Allotment A D E 1 ck
3 Tra N Gardens A L
D
1 LB N 7 E
E D Y H 9
3 2790
6 0 t D
1 f A o The Oaks r O C R 4488
8 n D
8 0 i
9 2
1 v N 5
E
5 E e N h E A C D
L
Marlows El Sub Sta The Y E ) H
E 5 The m Farm 2 Mead R u
T ( The Paddocks Walnut E h L t Orchard House P a 3
P Shinfield 2 Croft House P
A Three Cemetery Ways The 8
1 Stable 3
5 47.9m Cr
o C 9 ROF f T 1 t ROAD 9
r 4 d Co s y Greenfields 3 e
r e F 3 d o
d a
v
r e B i t n
I
h t
s r n
a e a c n l
2 y e c
r
l g
0 d d n - e e O
o G a
n l a
l
o - l Pond
i u e e 3383
e
l n v
S
t W g r 1982
y
t
l 9 i e a 4 t o L F Rose Cottage 3 t 3 H D o B r 44.8m C a i
s n 7
d
0
1 4
3
n 7
a
l
e
v
o 66
r 1
G Spencers Wood
5 46.6m 1 1 Littlefields 7 Garden Centre Oakwood
1 1 Sunways Little Grove
4 SA 9 LMON CLO
SE 1
D 2 2 8
A 4876
O
R 6
2
1
S
4 1 9 D
N
5 5 A Elmside
L
a 7
E 1
V 0 O Pond
R 5
G 7 7 Burley Lodge Stud
0 12 1
5 14
P 1
a
264 5 27 t 6 h
266 ( Tank 270 u
m
) 1
6 7 7 1
1 6 H 1 2 o p
e 2
E H
S o
26 O u 0 L s
e 1
B C M 9 54.41m The Lodge 1 78 0 1 46.0m 3 0 18
2
1 5
9 TCB 0 2 T 2 B 3 18 349 52.1m U O
R B 2 LB 33 44 4764 49 2 H
4 T
2a
1 E
8
9
2 7 2 B Tank A 24 Z 2 I
L 214a
E 5
7
2
1
7 2
2 38 Pond
9 6
2 8360 9062 Hyde End Farm
Pond
1
8
1
8 1
3
1 a
6 47.2m
1 Hyde End
7
5 The Coach House 2 Lodge 12 226
50.0m
1 1 9 2 1 BM 50.66m 3 21 MO 4 0
NT 21
GO 6 1
M 9 The Dairy
E M 5 5 2 RY 4 A 5 DRIVE G 3 D Cottage
IL OA 1
2 L 1 R
3 2
5 C 241
9 D
9
7 L EN 1 O 202
S YDE L
E H T
7 E 1
1
9
1 47.9m
6
8
2 3 7
9 1
9
D 2 4 1
3 3 2
r 1 9 a 7
5
in 1 W 6
1
1 2
2 IN
S
1
1 T 2 2 9 O
N
2 C 0 1 9 3
2 L
1 O 2 0 1 7 2 1
0 SE
2 0
8 9 205
4
1 8
5 2
a
2 2 1
The 1
2 ck 2 2 9 a a
The Tennyson Tr
1 Cottage 2 Pa 1 th ( JOR um DAN
Playground 2 ) 23 CL Harmony OSE
1 House 0
1 35
9 3
S 1
14 Moss 7
U 0 3 Pond 2 15 House S 6 S
E
E X V Ashurst I 11 2 L R 4 A
N Sussex CENTURY D 1 E Lodge Rose LA NSDO Heath Playground WNE
GARDENS
7
5
2
a 2
5
1 2
Drain Meadow Cottage D ra in Quercus
Etudie Litanjus Sussex Track Cottage
Goshen D ra in Hardy Cottage f e D SU72000 SU73000 WSR10/111
N Field 8, West Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire, 2010 Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey
Figure 2. Location of Field 8 and Proposal area. Reproduced from Ordnance Survey digital mapping under licence.
0 500m Flint flake
Possible struck flint
Post-medieval pottery
67400
67300
e
n
a
L
d
n
E
e
d
y H
67200
67100
67000
SU72500 72600 72700 72800 72900 WSR10/111
N Field 8, West Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire, 2010 Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey Figure 3. Distribution of flint and pottery finds.
0 100m TIME CHART
Calendar Years
Modern AD 1901
Victorian AD 1837
Post Medieval AD 1500
Medieval AD 1066
Saxon AD 410
Roman AD 43 BC/AD Iron Age 750 BC
Bronze Age: Late 1300 BC
Bronze Age: Middle 1700 BC
Bronze Age: Early 2100 BC
Neolithic: Late 3300 BC
Neolithic: Early 4300 BC
Mesolithic: Late 6000 BC
Mesolithic: Early 10000 BC
Palaeolithic: Upper 30000 BC
Palaeolithic: Middle 70000 BC
Palaeolithic: Lower 2,000,000 BC Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47-49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 5NR
Tel: 0118 9260552 Fax: 0118 9260553 Email: [email protected] Web: www.tvas.co.uk