DOCSLIB.ORG

Tentative Program COM2019 (Conference on Multilingualism 2019) Leiden University 1 – 3 September 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tentative Program COM2019 (Conference on Multilingualism 2019) Leiden University 1 – 3 September 2019 Tentative program COM2019 (Conference on Multilingualism 2019) Leiden University 1 – 3 September 2019 Sunday, September 1st 11:30 – 12:15 Registration (Main Entrance Hall LIPSIUS Building) Coffee and Tea 12:15 – 12:30 Conference opening Including an address by the director Leiden Centre for Linguistics, Niels O. Schiller (LIPSIUS/011) 12:30 - 13:30 Keynote Speaker: Ludovica Serratrice (LIPSIUS/011) 13:30 - 14:30 Lunch (LIPSIUS/Entrance Hall) 13:30 - 14:30 Poster Session 1 (LIPSIUS/Entrance Hall) P1.1 Gaëlle Waked, Higher Institute of Exploring lexical profiles of bilingual Speech Therapy, Saint Joseph Lebanese children using the LITMUS- University Beirut; CLT in Lebanese Arabic Christel Khoury Aouad Saliby, Camille Messarra, Higher Institute of Speech Therapy, Saint Joseph University Beirut P1.2 Ane Theimann, University of Oslo; Verb-mediated prediction in young Ekaterina Kuzmina, Pernille Hansen, bilingual children University of Oslo P1.3 Sarah F. Phillips, New York Investigating the neural effects of University; code-switching on combinatory Liina Pylkkänen, New York processing with MEG University, New York University Abu Dhabi P1.4 Jia’en Yee, Universiti Putra Malaysia; Evidence for Morphological Ngee Thai Yap, Universiti Putra Decomposition? Malaysia; Theo Marinis, University of Konstanz P1.5 Emma Vanden Wyngaerd, Gender and code-switching Université Libre de Bruxelles P1.6 Ivo H.G. Boers, Universiteit Leiden Dutch as a Heritage Language: A morphosyntactic comparison between Dutch-Portuguese and Dutch-English bilinguals P1.7 Maria del Mar Cordero Rull, A Pilot Study on Adaptive Gesture Use Speech Acquisition & Perception, in Interaction with Non-native Pompeu Fabra University; Listeners Kirsten Bergmann, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences; Birgit Lugrin, University of Wuerzburg P1.8 Indu Vibha Meddegama; Championing heritage language School of Languages and Linguistics, maintenance endeavours: multilingual York St. John University Malayali women 14:30 – 15:50 Oral Presentation Session 1: Non-Literal Language Processing (LIPSIUS/011) T1.1 Francesca M.M. Citron, Lancaster Neural correlates of figurative 14:30 – 14:50 University, UK; language processing in proficient L2 Nora Michaelis, Freie Universität speakers and emotional engagement Berlin; Adele E. Goldberg, Princeton University T1.2 Evy Woumans, Ghent University; Moses or Noah? A case of ‘potato- 14:50 – 15:10 Sara Dhaene, Nicolas Dirix, Ghent potahto’ when using a foreign University language T1.3 Marianna Bolognesi, University of Demolishing walls and myths: 15:10 – 15:30 Oxford; Cognitive salience of literal and Ana Werkmann Horvat, Katrin Kohl, metaphorical meanings in L1 and L2 Aditi Lahiri, University of Oxford speakers T1.4 Mieke Slim, Ghent University; Priming of Logical Representations in 15:30 – 15:50 Peter Lauwers, Rob Hartsuiker, Monolingual and Bilingual Language Ghent University Comprehension 15:50 – 16:20 Afternoon break Coffee and tea (LIPSIUS/Entrance Hall) 16:20 – 17:40 Oral Presentation Session 2: Bilingualism and Cognitive Functioning (LIPSIUS/011) T2.1 Saskia Nijmeijer, University Medical The relation between speaking 16:20 – 16:40 Center Groningen, University of multiple languages and attentional Groningen; control: bilingualism influences Merel Keijzer, University of performance on an attentional blink Groningen Sander Martens, task University Medical Center Groningen; Marie-José van Tol, University Medical Center Groningen; Anna Wucher, University of Groningen T2.2 Fraibet Aveledo, University of The impact of bilingualism on general 16:40 – 17:00 Reading cognition in patients with multiple Yolanda Higueras, Hospital sclerosis Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Ariana Meldaña Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Arpita Bose, University of Reading; Theo Marinis, University of Konstanz; Christos Pliatsikas, University of Reading T2.3 Bazrina Ramly, Universiti Putra The relationship between language 17:00 – 17:20 Malaysia; dominance, proficiency level and Ngee Thai Yap , Universiti Putra working memory capacity with Malaysia; cognitive control capacity Theo Marinis, University of Konstanz T2.4 Kristy Sigmeth, University of Phonological Acquisition and 17:20 – 17:40 Münster, Germany; Inhibitory Control in L2 English Gregory Poarch, Romana Learners Kopečková, University of Münster 18:00 – 21:00 Drinks at Pakhuis Monday, September 2nd 9:30 – 10:30 Oral Presentation Session 3 Multilingualism in Society (PJVETH/1.01) T3.1 Afida Safriani, The Ohio State The socialization of multilingual learners 9:30 – 9:50 University into L2 academic community T3.2 Sugene Kim, Nagoya University of Faculty members' perceptions and 9:50 – 10:10 Commerce & Business; practices of translanguaging in the Seng P. Ong, Chih-Hao Chang, context of Japanese higher education Nagoya University of Commerce & Business T3.3 Seyed Hadi Mirvahedi, Nanyang Multilingualism in Singapore: Language 10:10 – 10:30 Technological University management, Success, and Failure in 55 Years' Time 10:30 – 11:00 Morning break Coffee and tea 11:00 – 12:00 Keynote Speaker: Maria del Carmen Parafita Couto (PJVETH/1.01) 12:00 – 13:00 Oral Presentation Session 4: Code- Switching (PJVETH/1.01) T4.1 Bryan Koronkiewicz, The University Testing adverb position in in Spanish- 12:00 – 12:20 of Alabama English code-switching: Evidence from an acceptability judgment task T4.2 Vasundhara Srivastava, Indian Switching when you want, is beneficial: 12:20 – 12:40 Institute of Technology Guwahati; Evidence from self-paced reading task Bidisha Som, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati T4.3 Britta Schulte, University of CHAI? CHAI? !CHAI! – The role of accent 12:40 – 13:00 Potsdam; and gestures in medium repair in Serkan Yüksel, University of multilingual service encounters Potsdam 13:00 – 14:30 Lunch (PJVETH) 13:00- 14:30 Poster Session 2 (PJVETH/1.02 and 1.03) P2.1 Sugene Kim, Nagoya University of Japanese EFL learners’ attitudes Commerce & Business towards teachers’ translanguaging in Seng P. Ong, Nagoya University of EMI contexts Commerce & Business P2.2 Christer Johansson, University of Low cost of Code Switching Bergen; Eli Rugaard, Convertelligence; Hedda Dorthea Asperheim, University of Bergen; Zacharias Christoph Zatow, University of Bergen P2.3 Nihayra Leona, University of Education for All on Curaçao: The Amsterdam; Papiamentu, Dutch and English Rick de Graaff, Utrecht University Language Development of Secondary Education Students after Implementation of Two Mother-Tongue Based Bilingual Programs P2.4 Ernesto Roque Gutierrez, The Open Working memory as a predictor of University syntactic ability: a test of cognitive transfer P2.5 Alexandra Shaeffer, Nazarbayev Portfolio-based pedagogy in a University multilingual environment: An analysis of learning materials prepared by Kazakhstani teachers-in-training P2.6 Natalia Cherepovskaia, Universitat Processing of case morphology in L2 Pompeu Fabra; Russian Slioussar Natalia, Higher School of Economics, Saint-Petersburg State University; Denissenko Anna, Universitat Pompeu Fabra P2.7 Ute Walker, Massey University of EAP in a multilingual world: New Zealand opportunities and challenges of translingual practices P2.8 Jean Mathieu Tsoumou, Multilingualism in Internet-Based Complutense University of Madrid Communication in Congo-Brazaville: Language Use And Codeswiching P2.9 Reden Valencia Libo-on, Leiden Spanish and English in Multilingual University, University of Seville Philippines 14:30 – 15:30 Keynote: Kristin Lemhöfer (PJVETH/1.01) 15:30 – 16:00 Afternoon break Coffee and tea (PJVETH) 16:00 – 17:20 Oral Presentation Session 5: Bilingual Processing in the Sentence Context (PJVETH/1.01) T5.1 Marina Sokolova, Structural Prediction in Native and Non- 16:00 – 16:20 University of Southampton, Native Processing: Evidence from Northwestern University; Russian and English Roumyana Slabakova, University of Southampton, Norwegian University of Science and Technology T5.2 George Pontikas, University of Bilingual children process wh-questions 16:20 – 16:40 Reading; similarly to monolingual children: Ian Cunnings, University of evidence from a visual-world paradigm Reading; Theodoros Marinis, study University of Konstanz T5.3 Merel Muylle, Ghent University; On the limits of shared syntactic 16:40 – 17:00 Sarah Bernolet, University of representations: Priming between Antwerp; Dutch and an artificial language with Robert J. Hartsuiker, Ghent both same and different word order University T5.4 Theodora Papastefanou, University Evidence that language dominance 17:00 – 17:20 of Reading; changes over pre-school age in Greek- Theodoros Marinis, University of English bilingual children. Konstanz; Daisy Powell, University of Reading 19:30 - Conference Dinner at De Burcht Tuesday, September 3rd 9:00 – 10:20 Oral Presentation Session 6: Language Contact (PJVETH/1.01) T6.1 Qing Yang, Do Bi-dialectal Listeners Active Both 9:00 – 9:20 Leiden University Centre for Dialects During Spoken Word Linguistics Leiden Institute for Brain Recognition? and Cognition; Yiya Chen, Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition T6.2 Opangienla Kechu, Indian Institute of Bilingualism and/or complex social 9:20 – 9:40 Technology Guwahati; pragmatics makes salient cues Bidisha Som, Indian Institute of irrelevant: findings from two Technology Guwahati indigenous bilingual groups T6.3 Martin Kohlberger, Leiden University/ The Effects of Multilingualism in the 9:40 – 10:00 University of Texas at Austin Northern Andean Foothills T6.4 Melissa Irvine, University of Auckland
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction: Reconciling Approaches to Intra-Individual Variation in Psycholinguistics and Variationist Sociolinguistics
    Linguistics Vanguard 2021; 7(s2): 20200027 Lars Bülow* and Simone E. Pfenninger Introduction: Reconciling approaches to intra-individual variation in psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0027 Abstract: The overall theme of this special issue is intra-individual variation, that is, the observable variation within individuals’ behaviour, which plays an important role in the humanities area as well as in the social sciences. While various fields have recognised the complexity and dynamism of human thought and behav- iour, intra-individual variation has received less attention in regard to language acquisition, use and change. Linguistic research so far lacks both empirical and theoretical work that provides detailed information on the occurrence of intra-individual variation, the reasons for its occurrence and its consequences for language development as well as for language variation and change. The current issue brings together two sub- disciplines – psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics – in juxtaposing systematic and non- systematic intra-individual variation, thereby attempting to build a cross-fertilisation relationship between two disciplines that have had surprisingly little connection so far. In so doing, we address critical stock-taking, meaningful theorizing and methodological innovation. Keywords: psycholinguistics, variationist sociolinguistics, intra-individual variation, intra-speaker variation, SLA, language variation and change, language development 1 Intra-individual variation in psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics The overall theme of this special issue is intra-individual variation, that is, the observable variation within individuals’ behaviour, which plays an important role in the humanities area as well as in the social sciences. While various fields have acknowledged the complexity and dynamism of human behaviour, intra-individual variation has received less attention in regard to language use.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewpoints W 113
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics w Vol. 15 w No. 1 w 2005Viewpoints w 113 Viewpoints “Globalisation” and Applied Linguistics: post-imperial questions of identity and the construction of applied linguistics discourse Janina Brutt-Griffler University of York “Where are you from?” It’s a question we’ve all been asked at some point, in some place, in some language. It’s probably a question we’ve all put to someone else. When we ask it of others we attribute it to curiosity. When it is put to us, we attribute it to difference, since when posed by strangers, as it most often is, it is as a general rule based either on how we sound or how we look. And yet both our interrogator and we ourselves understand at some level that the question is meaningless, even impertinent. It is rooted in a mythical sense of space and place. Lurking just below the surface is an unasked, ultimately unanswerable question: “Where do you belong?” Like every other notion, that of belonging is not some natural idea with which all of us come into the world but one constructed socially, and therefore ultimately historically. It is rooted in a particular social order, one that seeks to assign persons to definite geographical and social spaces. When we invoke this notion of space and place – the attempt to assign, as if by natural dispensation, persons to particular ethnic, national or other origins or identities – we draw, consciously or unconsciously, on received notions inherited from the past. Linguistics has long established that any child born into this world can learn any language natively.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) Approach in SLA
    International Society of communication and Development among universities www.europeansp.org Modern Language Studies, ISSN: 0047-7729 Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) Approach in SLA Muhammad Makhdoumi, Hanye davatgari Asl, Masoud Zoghi Department of English Language Teaching, Ahar branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran Abstract The essence of Complex, Dynamic Systems Theory is that there is no stasis, only change. The processes of change are the consequences of interactions of variables over time. At least forty theories of SLA have been proposed, but it seems none of them gives a complete explanation of this complex process. The purpose of the study to recognize CDS features, controlling parameters, and SLA theories to support the idea that SLA is complex and dynamic process. Considering the proposed theories in SLA, features of complex systems and controlling parameters in SLA, the researcher has proposed a model based on CDST approach to explain the complexity involved in learning a second language. The method was narrative review research. Results will be advantageous for methodologies, theoreticians, syllabus designers and teachers, to involve social, cultural, factors in SLA processes. It will be also helpful to solve some of the long-lasting problems and present the fascinating, promising approach of CDST. © 2016 The Authors. Published by European Science publishing Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of European Science publishing Ltd. Keywords: CDS, CDST, SLA, language learning theories, CDS features. 1. Introduction This study maintains that previous endeavors to explain SLA and FLL should not be ignored. When different learning theories are combined, they provide a deeper and broader view of the learning process.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Testing and Assessment: an Advanced Resource Book Glenn Fulcher and Fred Davidson Language Testing and Assessment an Advanced Resource Book
    LANGUAGE TESTING AND ASSESSMENT Routledge Applied Linguistics is a series of comprehensive resource books, pro- viding students and researchers with the support they need for advanced study in the core areas of English language and Applied Linguistics. Each book in the series guides readers through three main sections, enabling them to explore and develop major themes within the discipline. • Section A, Introduction, establishes the key terms and concepts and extends readers’ techniques of analysis through practical application. • Section B, Extension, brings together influential articles, sets them in context and discusses their contribution to the field. • Section C, Exploration, builds on knowledge gained in the first two sections, setting thoughtful tasks around further illustrative material. This enables readers to engage more actively with the subject matter and encourages them to develop their own research responses. Throughout the book, topics are revisited, extended, interwoven and deconstructed, with the reader’s understanding strengthened by tasks and follow-up questions. Language Testing and Assessment: • provides an innovative and thorough review of a wide variety of issues from prac- tical details of test development to matters of controversy and ethical practice • investigates the importance of the philosophy of pragmatism in assessment, and coins the term ‘effect-driven testing’ • explores test development, data analysis, validity and their relation to test effects • illustrates its thematic breadth in a series of exercises and tasks, such as analysis of test results, study of test revision and change, design of arguments for test validation and exploration of influences on test creation • presents influential and seminal readings in testing and assessment by names such as Michael Canale and Merrill Swain, Michael Kane, Alan Davies, Lee Cronbach and Paul Meehl and Pamela Moss.
    [Show full text]
  • Gestures and Some Key Issues in the Study of Language Development Gullberg, Marianne; De Bot, Kees; Volterra, Virginia
    Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development Gullberg, Marianne; de Bot, Kees; Volterra, Virginia Published in: Gesture DOI: 10.1075/gest.8.2.03gul 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Gullberg, M., de Bot, K., & Volterra, V. (2008). Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. Gesture, 8(2), 149-179. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.2.03gul Total number of authors: 3 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Running title: Key issues in language development Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development Marianne Gullberg1, Kees de Bot2, & Virginia Volterra3 1 Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2 Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 3 Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, CNR In Gesture, 8(2), Special issue Gestures in language development, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing the Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing
    Cambridge Help Home > Catalogue > The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing Series: Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics Edited by John W. Schwieter Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario and University of Greenwich View list of contributors... Hardback (ISBN­13: 9781107060586) Also available in Adobe eBook For price and ordering options, inspection copy requests, and reading lists please select: Europe, Middle East and Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia and New Zealand Please note local prices may apply How does a human acquire, comprehend, produce and control multiple languages with just the power of one mind? What are the cognitive consequences of being a bilingual? These are just a few of the intriguing questions at the core of studying bilingualism from psycholinguistic and neurocognitive perspectives. Bringing together some of the world's leading experts in bilingualism, cognitive psychology and language acquisition, The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing explores these questions by presenting a clear overview of current theories and findings in bilingual processing. This comprehensive handbook is organized around overarching thematic areas including theories and methodologies, acquisition and development, comprehension and representation, production, control, and the cognitive consequences of bilingualism. The handbook serves as an informative overview for researchers interested in cognitive bilingualism and the logic of theoretical and experimental approaches to language science. It also functions as an instrumental source of readings for anyone interested in bilingual processing. • First book to provide a comprehensive overview of the field of bilingual processing • Contains contributions from leading experts in the field • Includes a section dedicated to bilingual language control, an emerging research area within bilingual processing Contents Part I.
    [Show full text]
  • About the INTER and the INTRA in Age-Related Research: Evidence
    Linguistics Vanguard 2021; 7(s2): 20200028 Simone E. Pfenninger* About the INTER and the INTRA in age-related research: Evidence from a longitudinal CLIL study with dense time serial measurements https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0028 Abstract: This is the first longitudinal study to explore the best time and timing for regular versus bilingual language exposure in (pre)primary programs, using multiple measures over time so as to focus on fluctuations, trends and interactions in individual data as well as intra-individual variation over time. We studied children who had received 50/50 bilingual instruction in German and English (so-called ‘partial CLIL’ programs) as well as children in ‘minimal CLIL’ programs with almost uniquely monolingual German instruction (90% German, 10% English). Results show that, like other individual differences (ID) variables, the age factor behaves like a dynamic entity that changes over time and affects L2 literacy development differentially at different times. Furthermore, while an early age of first bilingual language exposure has no effect on the L2 development for the children in the minimal CLIL program, early-AO bilinguals in the partial CLIL program (age of first exposure 5) outperform the older-AO bilingual group (age of first exposure 7 and 9) in terms of accuracy and (syntactic and morphological) complexity but not in terms of lexical richness and fluency. Keywords: SLA, age factor, CLIL, complex dynamic systems, young learners, individual differences 1 Introduction The prevailing approach to SLA up to the beginning of this century was to focus on product-based explanations of SLA (Lowie and Verspoor 2015), which is reflected, among other things, in the assumption that the variation in interlanguage is either rather systematic or completely random and can be relegated to “(white) noise”.In particular, it was non-systematic, free intra-individual variation that had often been too readily dismissed as noise or measurement error or attributed to “outliers”.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding the Key to Successful L2 Learning in Groups and Individuals
    Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching Department of English Studies, Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz SSLLT 7 (1). 2017. 127-148 doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.7 http://www.ssllt.amu.edu.pl Finding the key to successful L2 learning in groups and individuals Wander Lowie University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Marijn van Dijk University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Huiping Chan University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Marjolijn Verspoor University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract A large body studies into individual differences in second language learning has shown that success in second language learning is strongly affected by a set of relevant learner characteristics ranging from the age of onset to moti- vation, aptitude, and personality. Most studies have concentrated on a limited number of learner characteristics and have argued for the relative importance of some of these factors. Clearly, some learners are more successful than oth- ers, and it is tempting to try to find the factor or combination of factors that can crack the code to success. However, isolating one or several global indi- vidual characteristics can only give a partial explanation of success in second language learning. The limitation of this approach is that it only reflects on rather general personality characteristics of learners at one point in time, 127 Wander Lowie, Marijn van Dijk, Huiping Chan, Marjolijn Verspoor while both language development and the factors affecting it are instances of complex dynamic processes that develop over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellis& Wulff.Pdf
    Ellis, N. C. and S. Wulff. Second Language Acquisition. In: E. Dabrowska and D. Divjak (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. 1 De Gruyter Mouton. Draft of December 31, 2012 1. Introduction This chapter introduces a cognitive-linguistic perspective on second language acquisition (L2A)1. Over the last 15 or so years, various aspects of L2 acquisition have been examined through a cognitive-linguistic lens, including phonology, morpho-syntax, lexis, syntax, and pragmatics. Likewise, various cognitive-linguistic frameworks including cognitive grammar, metaphor theory, and conceptual blending have been employed in L2 acquisition and teaching research. This chapter deliberately focuses on a construction grammar perspective on L2 acquisition. Robinson and Ellis (2008b), Littlemore (2009), and Tyler (2012) give broader overviews of cognitive-linguistic L2 learning and teaching research. In traditional generative approaches, language is understood as a modular system: phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics (and, in some versions of generative grammar, also pragmatics) are distinct subsystems. These modules are largely independent in structure and functioning from other human cognitive processes, and largely uninfluenced by the ways in which humans interact with the world. This view of language as a largely autonomous system comprised of largely autonomous subsystems has stipulated the assumption of a narrow language faculty (or Universal Grammar) and a broad language faculty (Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch 2002). The broad language faculty comprises cognitive abilities that are required for and assist in, but are not exclusive to, language acquisition and processing, such as the human auditory, motor, and vocal systems, short- and long-term memory, and (joint) attention, among others (Jackendoff 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees De Bot, and Wander Lowie University of Groningen Departments of English and Applied Linguistics
    Published as: Verspoor, M.H., K. de Bot & W.M. Lowie, “Dynamic systems theory and variation: a case study in L2 writing.” In H. Aertsen, M. Hannay & R. Lyall, Words in their places: a Festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie . Amsterdam: VU, 2004. pp. 407-421. MANUSCRIPT 1 Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees de Bot, and Wander Lowie University of Groningen Departments of English and Applied Linguistics Dynamic Systems Theory and Variation: a case study in L2 writing 1 Introduction As colleagues in another English Department, we have worked with Lachlan Mackenzie’s publications on a day-to-day basis in our classes: Principles and pitfalls of English grammar is used in our practical English grammar classes and Effective writing in English: a resource guide is often consulted when we run into persistent writing problems. In this paper we would like to address these common points of interest from a radically different perspective, namely Dynamic Systems Theory (DST), and rather than concentrating on how grammar and writing can be taught, we will examine if and how the writing and grammar of two beginning students develops without any specific teaching. We intend to raise one particular issue that presents a link between DST and SLA: variation. Our aim is to stimulate discussion on how variation should be viewed and interpreted, but we want to stress here that DST and its views on variation is not a theory on SLA in itself. It is merely a framework that offers a different perspective on language as a system. The structure of this contribution is as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Metacognition in Multilingual Learning a DMM Perspective
    3 Metacognition in Multilingual Learning A DMM Perspective Ulrike Jessner Introduction During recent years, research interest in the contact between more than two languages and the phenomenon of multilingualism has increasingly been expressed. Attitudes towards multilingualism among individuals and society at large have changed from being negative to seemingly embracing a higher level of awareness of the complexity and dynamics of the phenomenon. In this chapter, metacognition in multilingual learning and use is the focus. Following Haukås (2018, this volume), metacognition in this context refers to an “an awareness of and reflections about one’s knowledge, experiences, emotions, and learning”. Concerning reflections about one’s knowledge, Gombert (1992), for instance, viewed metalinguistic activities as a subfield of metacognition, He defined metalinguistic activities as activities of reflec- tion on language and its use as well as subjects’ ability to intentionally moni- tor and plan their own methods of linguistic processing, in comprehension and production (Gombert 1992, 13). To be aware of one’s learning means the ability to reflect upon, understand and control one’s learning. Thus, metacognitive knowledge is an important variable in the process of learning that underlies language learning strategies, “which are the techniques or procedures that facilitate a learning task” (Chamot 2001, 25). Since holistic approaches to bi- and multilingualism present the adequate prerequisite to understanding that the contact between languages leads to transfer phenomena not only on the linguistic but also on the cognitive level, the discussion in this chapter will begin with the work of Grosjean (1985) and Cook (1991) before moving on to Herdina and Jessner’s (2002) Dynamic Model of Multilingualism (hereafter DMM).
    [Show full text]
  • Language Development: Emergentist Theories
    Author's personal copy Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This article was originally published in the International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From O'Grady, W., 2015. Language Development: Emergentist Theories. In: James D. Wright (editor-in-chief), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 13. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 313–318. ISBN: 9780080970868 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. unless otherwise stated. All rights reserved. Elsevier Author's personal copy Language Development: Emergentist Theories William O’Grady, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI, USA Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Special symbols : Negation. c Universal quantification. Abstract The course of linguistic development is shaped by processing pressures that reflect the interaction of internal factors such as burden on working memory with external factors relating to experience. Two case studies help reveal the central role of internal pressures in determining both the properties of language and the manner in which those properties emerge over time, opening the door to a new perspective on development.
    [Show full text]