The Effects of Repeated Ejaculations on the Quality of Sperms Following Spinal Cord Injury
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE EFFECTS OF REPEATED EJACULATIONS ON THE QUALITY OF SPERMS FOLLOWING SPINAL CORD INJURY Rizwan Hamid MBBS FRCS Ed, FRCS (Urol) London Spinal Injuries Unit Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore & Institute of Urology, University College London A Thesis for submission to the University College London for the Degree of MD (Res) 2013 AUTHOR’S STATEMENT I, Rizwan Hamid, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm this has been indicated in the thesis. This work was performed at Spinal Research Centre at the London Spinal Injuries Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore by me under the supervision of Professor Michael Craggs, Professor of Applied Physiology, University College London. This project was part funded by ASPIRE (Spinal Cord Injury Charity). However the opinions in this thesis are those of the author. I confirm that this thesis has not been submitted elsewhere. 2 ABSTRACT Ejaculatory dysfunction after spinal cord injury (SCI) is common with more than 90% of SCI men unable to produce an ejaculate. If the ejaculate is obtained by vibro or electro ejaculation the motility, morphology and forward progression are all subnormal. The exact cause of deterioration of sperms is not known although a number of factors can lead to poor quality semen. A randomized control trial was designed to evaluate if repeated ejaculation with a Ferticare® vibrator can improve the sperm quality in chronic SCI men. All had a spinal cord lesion above thoracic level 10 with a minimum duration of 6 months. The subjects who vibro- ejaculated (VE) with a Ferticare® vibrator were randomised into the study or control arms. In the study arm VE was applied weekly for 3 months. In the control arm VE was given only once at the beginning and end of 3 months. The semen analysis was performed by two observers according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. A paired Student t test was used for statistical analysis. Forty two of 79 subjects (53%) vibro-ejaculated successfully. Thirty four were randomized into study (n=18) and control (n=16) arms. No serious adverse events were encountered. Only morphology and forward progression on WHO criteria demonstrated significant improvement. There was no statistical improvement in either volume, count or motility. It is concluded that repeated ejaculation can improve some parameters of sperm in the semen of SCI men. Hence, patients with a SCI above the level of T10 can improve their sperm quality by applying VE weekly for at least 3 months. It is hoped that larger scale multi-centre studies will be undertaken to confirm the effectiveness of repeated ejaculations. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are a number of people who helped me tremendously in this project. First and foremost I would like to thank Professor Mike Craggs. He envisaged the project and offered support and constructive critique at all stages of this work. Without his help this project would not have been completed. I would like to thank Mr Shah for giving me an opportunity to work in the Neuro-urology department and offering guidance all through my training in urology. His help in my career progression is greatly appreciated. This project would not have run smoothly without the dedication and support of Helen Bywater. I would like to thank her for patiently helping me set up, run and assist in completing this project. I would especially like to thank Sarah Knight for providing the most valuable input throughout my work, particularly in finalising the thesis. She always had time for my most basic enquiries and offered sincere help and support at the most crucial times. I want to thank ASPIRE, spinal cord injury charity for the financial support. Thanks to my parents who are my inspiration. I am grateful for their blessings and unconditional love for which there is no substitute and which I know will always continue. I dedicate this thesis to them. To my sons, Saad, Humza and Saiff, who motivate me and are the joy in my life. And finally to someone who has made this and all I do possible, my dearest wife, Sumur. I love you. 4 LIST OF CONTENTS Page Title page 1 Author’s statement 2 Abstract 3 Acknowledgements 4 List of contents 5 List of Abbreviations 12 List of Figures 13 List of Tables 19 List of Appendices 20 1 - INTRODUCTION 21 1.1 Spinal Cord Injury – Introduction 22 1.2 Normal sperm production and ejaculatory function 26 1.2.1 Normal sperm production 26 1.2.2 Neuro-anatomy of ejaculatory function 27 1.2.3 Autonomic nervous system 29 1.2.4 Somatic nervous system 31 1.2.5 Neuro-physiology of ejaculation 31 1.3 Characteristics of normal ejaculate 32 1.3.1 Semen analysis 32 1.3.2 Prostatic and seminal fluid 33 1.4 Patho-physiology of Ejaculatory failure in SCI men 33 1.4.1 Neuro-anatomy 33 1.4.2 Neuro-physiology 34 5 1.5 Literature Review 35 1.5.1 Characteristics of ejaculate after SCI 35 1.5.2 Ejaculatory dysfunction in SCI men 36 1.5.3 Medications for ejaculatory dysfunction in SCI men 37 1.5.4 Invasive techniques for sperm retrieval in SCI men 37 1.5.4.1 Direct aspiration from vas deferens 38 1.5.4.2 Electroejaculation for ejaculatory failure 38 1.5.4.3 Vibroejaculation for ejaculatory failure 41 1.5.4.4 Prostatic massage for ejaculatory failure 44 1.5.5 Distinctive semen profile in SCI men 45 1.5.5.1 Semen characteristics during acute phase following SCI 45 1.5.5.2 Semen characteristics during chronic phase following SCI 46 1.5.5.3 Role of seminal fluid in poor quality semen following SCI men 53 1.5.6 SCI men achieving successful fatherhood 56 1.5.6.1 Home insemination programme with intravaginal insemination 56 1.5.6.2 Home insemination programme with intrauterine programme 57 6 1.5.6.3 Assisted techniques for conception 57 1.5.7 Techniques to improve semen quality in SCI men 58 1.5.8 Deficiencies in the literature 59 1.6 Aim of the study 60 1.6.1 Null hypothesis 61 1.7 Summary 61 2 - MATERIALS AND METHODS 63 2.1 Overview of the project setting 64 2.2 Regulatory requirements 64 2.3 Study design 65 2.4 Subject selection 65 2.5 Subjects 66 2.6 Material & equipment 68 2.6.1 Microscope 68 2.6.2 Mini-therm stage warmer 70 2.6.3 Microscope slides and cover slips 72 2.6.4 Pipettes 72 2.6.5 pH strips 75 2.6.6 Plastic bottles 75 2.6.7 Haemocytometer 75 2.6.8 Solutions for assessment of morphology 77 2.6.9 Ferticare® personal vibrator 77 7 2.7 Performance of vibratory stimulus 79 2.7.1 Pre-procedure preparation 79 2.7.2 Demonstration of the Ferticare® personal vibrator 80 2.7.3 Use of Ferticare® vibrator to obtain semen sample 81 2.7.4 Collection of semen samples 84 2.7.5 Safe handling of semen samples 84 2.7.6 Loan of Ferticare® personal vibrator 84 2.8 Semen analysis 85 2.8.1 Macroscopic Examination 85 2.8.1.1 Liquefaction 85 2.8.1.2 Appearance 86 2.8.1.3 Volume 86 2.8.1.4 Viscosity 86 2.8.1.5 pH 87 2.8.2 Microscopic Examination 87 2.8.2.1 Preparation of sample for analysis of motility and forward progression 87 2.8.2.2 Assessment of sperm motility 88 2.8.2.3 Assessment of forward progression 91 2.8.2.4 Assessment of sperm count 91 2.8.2.5 Assessment of sperm morphology 98 2.9 Statistical analysis 101 8 3 - RESULTS 103 3.1 Overall account of subjects 104 3.2 Comparison between responders and non-responders 105 3.3 Predictors for successful ejaculations 105 3.4 Summary of total subjects attending for screening 109 3.5 Demographics of subjects entering the project 110 3.6 Analysis of subjects dropped from the project 114 3.7 Results of the experiment in study and control arms 115 3.7.1 Volume 115 3.7.2 pH 118 3.7.3 Motility 121 3.7.4 Forward Progression 124 3.7.5 Morphology 127 3.7.6 Count 130 3.7.7 Liquefaction 133 3.8 Detailed analysis of semen parameters in the study arm at monthly intervals 135 3.8.1 Volume 135 3.8.2 pH 137 3.8.3 Motility 139 3.8.4 Forward progression 141 3.8.5 Morphology 143 9 3.8.6 Count 145 3.9 Statistical comparison between the study and control arms 147 3.10 Statistical comparison of results within study and control arms 149 3.11 Dropouts due to non-compliance with protocol 151 3.12 Adverse events 151 4 - DISCUSSION 152 4.1 Summary of Results 153 4.2 Comparison of results with significant improvement 155 4.3 Comparison of results with no significant improvement 159 4.4 Predictors of success with vibro-ejaculations 161 4.5 Role of seminal fluids in poor semen quality following SCI 162 4.6 Methodological weaknesses 164 4.6.1 Uncontrollable variables 164 4.6.1.1 Enrolment of subjects 164 4.6.1.2 Effect of medications on sperm quality 165 4.6.1.3 Impact of urine infections on results 165 4.6.1.4 Weekly vibro-ejaculations at home 166 4.6.1.5 Monthly visit for study arm subjects 167 4.6.1.6 Dropout of subjects 167 4.6.2 Preparation and analysis of semen samples 167 4.6.3 Bliniding of the observers to evaluation 168 4.6.4 Success with vibro-ejaculation 169 10 4.7 Future Implication 170 4.7.1 The importance of finding statistical changes 170 4.7.2 Significance of unchanged parameters 171 4.7.3 Role of seminal plasma in poor quality semen in SCI men 171 4.7.4 The role of repeated ejaculations in improving sperm quality within home settings-yet defined 172 4.7.5 Cost implications 172 4.7.6 Need for large multicentre randomised control trial 173 4.8 Conclusions 174 4.9 Future research 175 Appendices 176 5 - REFERENCES 188 11 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BCR bulbo-cavernous reflex C cervical EEJ electro-ejaculation FDA federal drug administration FSH follicle stimulating hormone HR hip reflex ICSI Intracytoplasmic sperm insemination IVF in vitro fertilization