DOCSLIB.ORG

Invertebrates Invertebrates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Invertebrates Invertebrates invertebrates invertebrates 1 1 Livonia mammilla False Melon 59 Scutellastra chapmani Star Limpet 4 2 Birgus latro Coconut Crab 60 Lottia persona True Limpet 3 Charonia tritonis Triton's Trumpet 61 Tectonatica sp. Moon Snail 4 Lambis truncata Giant Spider Conch 62 Tenagodus australis Worm Shell 2 5 Syrinx aruanus Australian Trumpet 63 Nerita atramentosa Black Nerite DID YOU KNOW...? 3 6 Culcita novaeguineae Pin-cushion Starfish 64 Nodilittorina pyramidalis Tuberculated Noddiwink 5 7 Tutufa bufo Red-mouth Frog Shell 65 Cerithium echinatum Spikey Creeper 8 Turbo sp. Turban Snail 66 Gibbula sp. Top Snail The Phyllacanthus parvispinus Eastern Slate 9 Portunus pelagius Blue Swimmer Crab 67 Distorsio anus Distorted Triton 6 Pencil Urchin 98 is a herbivore. It comes 10 Dagnaudus petterdi Antlered Crab 68 Monetaria caputserpentis Snake Head Cowry out to feed at night. The mouth is on the 11 Lobatus gigas Pink Ear 69 Cribrarula cribraria Sieve Cowry underside of the body and is equipped 7 12 Linckia laevigata Azure Sea Star 70 Palmadusta asellus Asellus Cowry with five sharp teeth used to 13 Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda Horseshoe Crab 71 Ophionereis schayeri Schayer's Brittle Star scrape algae from the rocks. They 14 Metapenaeus sp. Speckled Shrimp 72 Ophiarachnella infernalis Sea Cucumber 15 Scyllarides squammosus Slipper Lobster 73 Tutufa bubo Giant Frog Shell are found along the east coast of 9 10 8 16 Ophiothrix martensi Martin’s Brittle Star 74 Pleuroploca trapezium Trapezium Horse Conch Australia, including Queensland 17 Pisaster ochraceus Purple Sea Star 75 Hexaplex (Muricanthus) radix Radish Murex and New South Wales. 18 Hypothalassia acerba Champagne Crab 76 Chicoreus denudatus Fronded Murex 19 Harpiosquilla sp. Mantis Shrimp 77 Murex pecten Venus Comb 12 20 Cassis cornuta Horned Helmet 78 Lambis truncata Giant Spider Conch 21 Ophiocoma dentata Toothed Brittle Star 79 Babylonia Zeylanica Indian Babylon 22 Plectaster decanus Mosaic Sea Star 80 Drupella rugosa Harmonious Drupe 23 Nectocarcinus tuberculosis Rough Rock Crab 81 Amoria zebra The Zebra Volute 14 11 24 Dardanus megistos Spotted Hermit Crab 82 Thalessa aculeata Aculeate Rock-shell 25 Cypraecassis rufa Red Helmet Shell 83 Sepia mestus Common Cuttlefish 13 17 26 Macrobrachium rosenbergii Giant Freshwater Prawn 84 Argonauta nodosa Paper Nautilus 15 27 Cherax destructor Smooth Shelled Yabby 85 Spirula spirula Ram's Horn 28 Halitosis australis New Zealand Paua Shell 16 86 Octopus cyanea Big Blue Octopus 29 Ptilometra australis Feather Star 87 Loligo australis Common Squid 30 Gorgonocephalus sp. Basket Star 20 88 Taeniogyrus sp. Sea Cucumber 31 Ozius deplanatus Reef Crab 89 Stichopus chloronotus Spikey Sea Cucumber 18 19 21 22 32 Carcinus maenas European Green Crab 90 Deima sp. Sea Cucumber 33 Tiarinia sp. Spider Crab 91 Hapalochlaena maculosa Blue-ringed Octopus 34 Tridacna maxima Burrowing Clam 92 Collossendeis sp. Sea Spider 35 Pecten maximus Great Scallop 93 Breynia australasiae Heart Urchin Test 36 Spondylus victoriae Long Spined Thorny Oyster 23 24 25 94 Breynia australasiae Heart Urchin 29 37 Scutus antipodes Elephant Slug 95 Demosponge Branching Sponge 30 38 Ancillista cingulata Girdled Ancilla 27 28 96 Demosponge Chimney Sponge 41 39 Tibia insulaechorab Arabian Tibia 26 39 97 Antipathidae Black Coral 40 Mitra mitra Episcopal Miter 40 42 43 98 Phyllacanthus parvispinus Eastern Slate Pencil Urchin 34 36 41 Terebra maculata Giant Marlin Spike 99 Paracentrotus lividus Purple Sea Urchin 31 33 42 Astropecten polyacanthus Comb Star 32 35 37 38 100 Acropora sp. Staghorn Coral 71 43 Euplectella sp. Venus Flower Basket 101 Heterocentrotus mammillatus Slate Pencil Urchin 44 Ixa sp. Hammer Head Crab 102 Echinometra mathaei Rock-boring Urchin 44 49 51 45 46 47 48 50 66 70 45 Cymothoidae Fish Louse 103 Goniastrea aspera Lesser Star Coral 52 54 53 57 59 61 62 69 72 65 46 Alpheid sp. Alpheid Shrimp 104 Onithochiton sp. Chiton 55 56 58 60 63 95 47 Gonodactylaceus fulcatus Mantis Shrimp 105 Ischnochiton australis Chiton 73 74 75 93 48 Myra sp. Nut Crab 106 Cryptoplax sp. Chiton 83 94 49 Amphibalanus Amphitrite Striped barnacle 84 78 107 Liolophura gaimardi Chiton 96 97 50 Dimya sp. Oyster 108 Fungia fungites Mushroom Coral 82 79 80 81 51 Dinocardium robustum Giant Cockle 52 Barnea australasiae Australian Angel's Wings 85 87 89 98 99 53 Bassina jacksoni Jackson's Bassina 100 54 Nucula sp. Marine Bivalve 88 90 55 Nucula sp. Marine Bivalve 101 102 103 56 Patelloida sp. True Limpet 86 108 91 92 107 57 Xenophora peroniana Carrier Shells 104 106 105 58 Patelloida sp. True Limpet !" UNE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM UNE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM !!.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Establishment of a New Genus for Arete Borradailei
    Zoological Studies 46(4): 454-472 (2007) Establishment of a New Genus for Arete borradailei Coutière, 1903 and Athanas verrucosus Banner and Banner, 1960, with Redefinitions of Arete Stimpson, 1860 and Athanas Leach, 1814 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae) Arthur Anker1,* and Ming-Shiou Jeng2 1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Naos Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA. E-mail:[email protected] 2Research Center for Biodiversity, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan. E-mail:[email protected] (Accepted October 5, 2006) Arthur Anker and Ming-Shiou Jeng (2007) Establishment of a new genus for Arete borradailei Coutière, 1903 and Athanas verrucosus Banner and Banner, 1960, with redefinitions of Arete Stimpson, 1860 and Athanas Leach, 1814 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae). Zoological Studies 46(4): 454-472. Arete borradailei Coutière, 1903 and Athanas verrucosus Banner and Banner, 1960 are transferred to Rugathanas gen. nov., based on several unique features on the chelipeds, 3rd pereiopods, antennules, and mouthparts. The estab- lishment of Rugathanas enables the redefinition of Athanas Leach, 1814 and Arete Stimpson, 1860, and a for- mal revalidation of Arete, formerly a synonym of Athanas. Two important features, the number of pereiopodal epipods and the number of carpal segments of the 2nd pereiopod, are variable within Rugathanas gen. nov., but may be used to distinguish Athanas from Arete. The distribution ranges of R. borradailei (Coutière, 1903) comb. nov. and R. verrucosus (Banner and Banner, 1960) comb. nov. are considerably extended based on recently collected material from the Ryukyu Is., Japan; Kenting, southern Taiwan; and Norfolk I., off eastern Australia. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/46.4/454.pdf Key words: Alpheidae, New genus, Athanas, Arete, Indo-Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Predators and Grazers
    9 Invertebrate Predators and Grazers ROBERT C. CARPENTER Department of Biology California State University Northridge, California 91330 Coral reefs are among the most productive and diverse biological communities on earth. Some of the diversity of coral reefs is associated with the invertebrate organisms that are the primary builders of reefs, the scleractinian corals. While sessile invertebrates, such as stony corals, soft corals, gorgonians, anemones, and sponges, and algae are the dominant occupiers of primary space in coral reef communities, their relative abundances are often determined by the activities of mobile, invertebrate and vertebrate predators and grazers. Hixon (Chapter X) has reviewed the direct effects of fishes on coral reef community structure and function and Glynn (1990) has provided an excellent review of the feeding ecology of many coral reef consumers. My intent here is to review the different types of mobile invertebrate predators and grazers on coral reefs, concentrating on those that have disproportionate effects on coral reef communities and are intimately involved with the life and death of coral reefs. The sheer number and diversity of mobile invertebrates associated with coral reefs is daunting with species from several major phyla including the Annelida, Arthropoda, Mollusca, and Echinodermata. Numerous species of minor phyla are also represented in reef communities, but their abundance and importance have not been well-studied. As a result, our understanding of the effects of predation and grazing by invertebrates in coral reef environments is based on studies of a few representatives from the major groups of mobile invertebrates. Predators may be generalists or specialists in choosing their prey and this may determine the effects of their feeding on community-level patterns of prey abundance (Paine, 1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Marine Research, Sears Foundation for Marine Research
    The Journal of Marine Research is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research on a broad array of topics in physical, biological, and chemical oceanography. In publication since 1937, it is one of the oldest journals in American marine science and occupies a unique niche within the ocean sciences, with a rich tradition and distinguished history as part of the Sears Foundation for Marine Research at Yale University. Past and current issues are available at journalofmarineresearch.org. Yale University provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes only. Copyright or other proprietary rights to content contained in this document may be held by individuals or entities other than, or in addition to, Yale University. You are solely responsible for determining the ownership of the copyright, and for obtaining permission for your intended use. Yale University makes no warranty that your distribution, reproduction, or other use of these materials will not infringe the rights of third parties. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. Journal of Marine Research, Sears Foundation for Marine Research, Yale University PO Box 208118, New Haven, CT 06520-8118 USA (203) 432-3154 fax (203) 432-5872 [email protected] www.journalofmarineresearch.org Bioerosion by two rock boring echinoids (Echinometra mathaei and Echinostrephus aciculatus) on Enewetak Atoll, Marshall Islands 1 2 by Anthony R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Obligate Symbiotic Association Between Crab Zebrida
    Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 August 2015 | 7(10): 7726–7728 Note The Toxopneustes pileolus A note on the obligate symbiotic (Image 1) is one of the most association between crab Zebrida adamsii venomous sea urchins. Venom White, 1847 (Decapoda: Pilumnidae) ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) comes from the disc-shaped and Flower Urchin Toxopneustes ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) pedicellariae, which is pale-pink pileolus (Lamarck, 1816) (Camarodonta: with a white rim, but not from the OPEN ACCESS white tip spines. Contact of the Toxopneustidae) from the Gulf of pedicellarae with the human body Mannar, India can lead to numbness and even respiratory difficulties. R. Saravanan 1, N. Ramamoorthy 2, I. Syed Sadiq 3, This species of sea urchin comes under the family K. Shanmuganathan 4 & G. Gopakumar 5 Taxopneustidae which includes 11 other genera and 38 species. The general distribution of the flower urchin 1,2,3,4,5 Marine Biodiversity Division, Mandapam Regional Centre of is Indo-Pacific in a depth range of 0–90 m (Suzuki & Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Mandapam Takeda 1974). The genus Toxopneustes has four species Fisheries, Tamil Nadu 623520, India 1 [email protected] (corresponding author), viz., T. elegans Döderlein, 1885, T. maculatus (Lamarck, 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected], 1816), T. pileolus (Lamarck, 1816), T. roseus (A. Agassiz, 5 [email protected] 1863). James (1982, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 2010) and Venkataraman et al. (2013) reported the occurrence of Members of five genera of eumedonid crabs T. pileolus from the Andamans and the Gulf of Mannar, (Echinoecus, Eumedonus, Gonatonotus, Zebridonus and but did not mention the association of Zebrida adamsii Zebrida) are known obligate symbionts on sea urchins with this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics, Infestation and Host Selection of Vexilla Vexillum, an Ectoparasitic Muricid of Echinoids, in Madagascar
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 61: 241–255, 2004 Published November 4 Dis Aquat Org Population dynamics, infestation and host selection of Vexilla vexillum, an ectoparasitic muricid of echinoids, in Madagascar Devarajen Vaïtilingon1, 3,*, Igor Eeckhaut2, 3, Didier Fourgon1, 3, Michel Jangoux1, 2, 3 1Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, CP 160/15, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F. D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium 2Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, Université de Mons-Hainaut, 7000 Mons, Belgium 3Aqua-lab, Institut Halieutique et des Sciences Marines, Université de Tuléar, BP 141, 601 Tuléar, Madagascar ABSTRACT: The symbiotic interaction, population and infestation dynamics of the muricid Vexilla vexillum (Gmelin, 1791) on 2 echinoid species, Tripneustes gratilla (Linnaeus, 1785) and Echinometra mathaei (Blainville, 1825), was investigated on the barrier reef off Toliara (Madagascar). V. vexillum is an ectoparasitic muricid which was exclusively found in association with sea urchins, on which it moves freely and browses over the integument. Host recovery from damage caused by muricid graz- ing was dependent on lesion size. Small lesions regenerated while larger ones were subjected to sec- ondary infections, which led to host death. A 27 mo survey (2000 to 2003) of the muricid’s population dynamics revealed annual recruitment episodes during the mid-summer season (December to Janu- ary). Patterns of recruitment peaks were apparently linked to its reproductive cycle. Demographic parameters including growth and mortality rates of the muricid were estimated from analysis of size- frequency distributions. Growth was described by the von Bertalanffy function. The model predicts that V. vexillum is a fast-growing species in which asymptotic shell length (L∞ = 1.024 cm) is reached 6 to 7 mo after recruitment.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts
    CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Josh Pederson / SIMoN NOAA Matt Wilson/Jay Clark, NOAA NMFS AFSC NMFS Southwest Fisheries Science Center GULF OF THE FARALLONES AND CORDELL BANK NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARIES Report of a Joint Working Group of the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries Advisory Councils Editors John Largier, Brian Cheng, and Kelley Higgason Working Group Members Sarah Allen, Point Reyes National Seashore Bob Breen, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Jenifer Dugan, Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara Brian Gaylord, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Edwin Grosholz, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Daphne Hatch, Golden Gate National Recreation Area Tessa Hill, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Jaime Jahncke, PRBO Conservation Science; CBNMS Advisory Council Judith Kildow, Ocean Economics Program Raphael Kudela, University of California, Santa Cruz John Largier (Chair), UC Davis; Bodega Marine Lab; GFNMS Advisory Council Lance Morgan, Marine Conservation Biology Institute; CBNMS Advisory Council David Revell, Philip Williams and Associates David Reynolds, National Weather Service Frank Schwing, National Marine Fisheries Service William Sydeman, Farallon Institute John Takekawa, United States Geological Survey Staff to the Working Group Brian Cheng, Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank national marine sanctuaries; UC Davis Kelley Higgason, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Sanctuary
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 560:87
    Vol. 560: 87–103, 2016 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published November 24 doi: 10.3354/meps11921 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Similar impacts of fishing and environmental stress on calcifying organisms in Indian Ocean coral reefs Timothy R. McClanahan1,*, Nyawira A. Muthiga1,2 1Wildlife Conservation Society, Marine Programs, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY, 10460 2Wildlife Conservation Society, Marine Programs, POB 99470, Kenya, 80107 ABSTRACT: Calcification and reef growth processes dominated by corals and calcifying algae are threatened by climate and fishing disturbances. Twenty-seven environmental, habitat, and spe- cies interaction variables were tested for their influence on coral and calcifier cover in 201 western Indian Ocean coral reefs distributed across ~20° of latitude and longitude and up to 20 m deep. These variables predicted more of the total between-site variance of calcifying organism cover (~50%) than coral cover (~20%). Satellite-derived environmental variables of temperature, light, and water quality predicted more of the coral and calcifier cover than feeding interactions when groups of related variables were analyzed separately. Nevertheless, when simultaneously eva - luating all variables, the environmental variables better predicted coral cover, but proxies of feed- ing interactions better predicted calcifier cover. Coral and calcifier cover were most consistently negatively influenced by sea surface temperature distributions (right skewness), but the orange- lined triggerfish Balistapus undulatus consistently had a strong positive association with coral and calcifier cover. Herbivorous fish and Diadematidae sea urchins were not positively associated with coral and calcifier cover. A primary prey of B. undulatus, the rock-boring sea urchin Echinometra mathaei, had a strong negative association with coral cover and particularly calcifier cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Ecology of Four Species of Sea Urchins (Genus <I>Echinometra</I
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 81(1): 85–100, 2007 FeeDinG EcoloGY of Four SPecies of Sea URCHins (Genus ECHINOMETRA) in OKinaWA Yuji Hiratsuka and Tsuyoshi Uehara Abstract We studied the feeding ecology of four Echinometra species at five different sites in Okinawa in terms of distribution, food availability, and gut contents. Echinome- tra sp. A was widely distributed from the lower intertidal to submerged areas, while Echinometra mathaei (Blainville, 1825) was common in the upper subtidal and low- er intertidal areas. Echinometra sp. C and Echinometra oblonga (Blainville, 1825) were restricted to the upper intertidal zone. Although the diets of Echinometra spp. showed remarkable differences among sites and between seasons, 39.2%–80.7% of their gut contents usually consisted of plant material. Echinometra sp. A ingested a greater variety of plants than the other three species. The availability of major plants in the field was generally proportional to their abundance in the gut, except when Echinometra relied on imported drift plants or when feeding was restricted because of severe hydrodynamics. Benthic grazing was the primary feeding mode of Echinometra living on rock platforms, while drift feeding was pronounced when macrophytes were abundant in the habitat or surroundings. Our results suggest that despite differences in physical and nutritional environments among their micro- habitats, the four urchin species have essentially similar feeding types, modes, and preferences. The sea urchinEchinometra mathaei (Blainville, 1825) is reported to be widely dis- tributed throughout the tropical to warm Indo-Pacific regions and shows extensive morphological variation in test shape and spine color (Mortensen, 1943). Tsuchiya and Nishihira (1984, 1985) divided E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Near Future of Coral Reefs
    Environmental Conservation 29 (4): 460–483 © 2002 Foundation for Environmental Conservation DOI:10.1017/S0376892902000334 The near future of coral reefs TIMOTHY R. MC CLANAHAN* The Wildlife Conservation Society, PO Box 99470, Mombasa, Kenya Date submitted: 3 August 2001 Date accepted: 11 June 2002 SUMMARY numerous resources to millions of people. They are a In this paper the current status of coral reefs, predic- unique marine ecosystem in being characterized by a tions concerning the ecological state of coral reefs to geologic component, the deposition of calcium carbonate by the 2025 time horizon and the research needs that can corals, molluscs, foraminfera and algae (Kleypas et al. 2001). help understanding and management activities that These geologic structures leave good fossils that have might alleviate detrimental ecological changes are allowed scientists to track evolutionary change over millions of years (Veron 1995; Wood 1999). Relative to many other evaluated and discussed. The present rate of CO2 emissions will produce an atmospheric concentration ecosystems, evolutionary change on coral reefs is well docu- in 100 years not experienced during the past 20 million mented and ancient reefs have been a focus for numerous years and water temperatures above those of the past studies of past global change (Pandolfi 1999; Budd 2000). interglacial 130 000 years before present. Human influ- Reefs as an ecosystem and geologic structure have been ences on water temperatures, seawater chemistry remarkably persistent over time, but the species compo- (toxic substances, nutrients and aragonite saturation), sition of reefs has changed over time with most of the the spread of diseases, removal of species and food present reef species originating about 1–10 million years web alterations are presently changing reef ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Status, Prospects and Potentials of Echinoid Sea Urchins in Malaysia
    International Journal of Chemical, Environmental & Biological Sciences (IJCEBS) Volume 4, Issue 1 (2016) ISSN 2320–4087 (Online) Status, Prospects and Potentials of Echinoid Sea Urchins in Malaysia Md. Shamim Parvez1, M. Aminur Rahman1* and Fatimah Md. Yusoff 1,2 used for movement, capturing food as well as attaching to Abstract—Among the bottom-dwelling invertebrates, sea substrates. A stinging jaw (or small pinchers), called the urchins have been considered as the high-valued new marine pedicellariae, is also used for protection and to clutch the food bioresource in Asia. They inhabit the depths of coral reefs and rocky items. The mouth of sea urchin is located on the underside of shores that are covered with coralline algae and seaweeds. They are the organism and consists of a 5-pointed jaw called “Aristotle's usually spherical in shape, and their whole body is covered by Lantern” [1, 2]. The internal organs are enclosed in a hard numerous thorns or spines that act as defense mechanism against shell or "test" composed of fused plates of calcium carbonate predators. The sea urchin gonad has been used as luxury food and folk medicine by the peoples of certain countries. For this reason, sea covered by a thin dermis and epidermis. The test is rigid, and urchin became an important product and fetches high price in divides into five ambulacral grooves separated by five international markets. It also plays an important role towards interambulacral areas. Each of these areas consists of two rows providing employment opportunity and income source to the coastal of plates, so the sea urchin test includes 20 rows of plates in communities in many Pacific island countries including Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Title SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS IN
    SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS IN JAPANESE Title SEA-URCHINS Author(s) Tahara, Yutaka; Okada, Minoru; Kobayashi, Naomasa PUBLICATIONS OF THE SETO MARINE BIOLOGICAL Citation LABORATORY (1958), 7(1): 165-172 Issue Date 1958-12-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/174596 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTERS IN JAPANESE SEA-URCHINS') YUTAKA T AHARA Morphological Laboratory, Osaka Liberal Arts University MINORU OKADA Sakuranomiya Junior High School, Osaka City and NAOMASA KOBAYASHI Zoological Institute, Kyoto University With Plates VII-VIII and 5 Text-figures Introduction The sexual dimorphism in various forms of echinoids has hitherto been reported by many authors, as was excellently reviewed by E. B. HARVEY (1956). Independently from these discoveries of previous authors, T AHARA found the sexual difference of the genital papillae in Mespilia globulus, during his course of practical exercises of marine zoology for students in August, 1958, at the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory. Then, this observation was extended to other Japanese species of the sea urchin collected in the sea near the Laboratory, in cooperation with M. OKADA and N. KOBAYASHI. TAHARA studied the secondary sexual characters in Mespilia globulus, Toxopneustes pileolus and Tripneustes gratilla; OKADA in Echinostrephus aciculatus and Diadema setosum; and KoBAYASHI in Echinometera mathaei. The authors are deeply indebted to Dr. Huzio UTINOMI and Dr. Takasi TOKIOKA of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory and wish to express their hearty thanks to them for offering us convenience and various helpful suggestions and also for referring them to literatures. We wish to express deep gratitude to Dr. 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Challenges for Digital Morphology Biology Direct 2010, 5:45
    Ziegler et al. Biology Direct 2010, 5:45 http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/45 COMMENT Open Access OpportunitiesComment and challenges for digital morphology Alexander Ziegler*1, Malte Ogurreck2, Thomas Steinke3, Felix Beckmann2, Steffen Prohaska3 and Andreas Ziegler1 Abstract Advances in digital data acquisition, analysis, and storage have revolutionized the work in many biological disciplines such as genomics, molecular phylogenetics, and structural biology, but have not yet found satisfactory acceptance in morphology. Improvements in non-invasive imaging and three-dimensional visualization techniques, however, permit high-throughput analyses also of whole biological specimens, including museum material. These developments pave the way towards a digital era in morphology. Using sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea), we provide examples illustrating the power of these techniques. However, remote visualization, the creation of a specialized database, and the implementation of standardized, world-wide accepted data deposition practices prior to publication are essential to cope with the foreseeable exponential increase in digital morphological data. Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Marc D. Sutton (nominated by Stephan Beck), Gonzalo Giribet (nominated by Lutz Walter), and Lennart Olsson (nominated by Purificación López-García). Introduction non-invasive, digital imaging techniques offers a multi- The digital era, which has so successfully transformed tude of opportunities, but presents also numerous chal- scientific work in various disciplines, has also begun to be lenges which need to be discussed within the life sciences implemented in biology [1], but has not yet found satis- and bioinformatics communities. factory acceptance in morphology. Although this disci- pline is clearly at the heart of biological understanding, its Discussion digital implementation today is still in its infancy.
    [Show full text]