How the Commercial Value of Electronic Waste Has

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How the Commercial Value of Electronic Waste Has SHANGHAIED? HOW THE COMMERCIAL VALUE OF ELECTRONIC WASTE HAS DETERRED EFFORTS TO REGULATE ITS MOVEMENT FROM THE UNITED STATES TO CHINA THE RESULTING IMPACT ON THE CHINESE ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT∗ † ABSTRACT This article explores the legal and economic issues complicating the transboundary regulation of electronic waste (eWaste) generated in the United States, exported extraterritorially under the guise of commerce, and disposed of improperly in China. The economic issues stem from the commercial value of used electronic products on the Chinese market; notably the practical value of reusable electronic equipment and the material value of reclaimable resources found within used electronic products (e.g., copper, aluminum, iron, plastics, and steel). The legal issues stem from international and national policies designed to facilitate the transboundary movement of commerce between nations of the world: trade policies favorable to industrialized countries such as the United States and China. Federal, international, and Chinese laws regulating hazardous materials exportation from the U.S. to China provide exemptions for the legal exportation of used electronic products intended for recycling, reclamation, and/or reuse. When these legitimately exported “products” are mishandled during ∗ Copyright 2007 by . All rights reserved. This article was originally written to satisfy the requirements of the Second-Year Seminar course offered at the William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. The author wishes to thank Professor Charles D. Booth, who supervised the writing of this article and encouraged the author to explore this topic. All errors and omissions are, of course, the author’s own. † J.D. Candidate 2008, William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa; B.S., Environmental Health and Safety, Oregon State University. 1 transport or disposal, however, they are transformed – both physically and statutorily – into a hazardous waste. The substantive environmental and human health impacts resulting from the mismanagement of eWaste on Chinese soil have manifested in financial losses, prompting the Central Chinese Government to take legislative action. In 2007, China passed a law designed to fully regulate the importation and management of eWaste and electronic products; part of a nationwide effort to minimize the fiscal repercussions contributable to environmental and human heath deterioration. As U.S. Congress continues to discuss our duties to other nations currently accepting our hazardous wastes, China hopes its domestic regulations and policies are enough to control the mounting threats posed by the mismanagement of imported electronic waste. I. INTRODUCTION A 10-year-old girl in the southern province of Guangdong, China,1 is warned by her parents to stay away from the polluted rivers in which her family once played, their shores now covered with electronic debris. Her parents work diligently at the local electronics dismantling shop – disassembling televisions, computers, fax machines, cell phones, and other electronic equipment – exposing themselves to high levels of known carcinogens while contributing to the destruction of their local ecology, yet willing to endure both for some degree of 1 The region of Guiyu, in the southern province of Guangdong, China, is located approximately 150 miles northeast of Hong Kong. A Google search of the town and province (“Guangdong Guiyu”), without any reference to electronic waste, found 39 of the top 40 results pertain to electronic waste recycling, demonstrating the significant local area impact of the industry. Guiyu serves as a model for other regions in China impacted by the electronic waste industry. Google Search, Guangdong Guiyu (Feb. 22, 2007), available at http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Guangdong+Guiyu+& btnG=Search. 2 financial health.2 Meanwhile, the girl’s American counterpart splashes in the waters of a beautiful coastline, watching large cargo ships drift off harmlessly into the distance. Like most Americans, she is unaware these ships carry electronic waste;3 unwanted on domestic soil, yet coveted by developing countries working to transform our waste into their products. In 2005 and 2006, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted rules designed to facilitate proper domestic management of electronic waste (eWaste)4 and to protect developing countries from environmental damages caused by the mismanagement of eWaste materials generated in the United States and disposed of abroad.5 Despite this, factions within the domestic and foreign waste management industry continue to abuse still valid exceptions to U.S. standards governing eWaste handling and exportation. Certain types of electronic waste6 are granted specified exceptions to 2 “It's [the electronic waste recycling industry] dangerous, yes, but no money is more dangerous,” said an 18-year-old woman who came to Guiyu from a neighboring province for work. “No money means you'll die of hunger.” Peter S. Goodman, China Serves As Dump Site For Computers: Unsafe Recycling Practice Grows Despite Import Ban, Washington Post Foreign Service, p. A01 (Feb. 24, 2003). 3 Traveling alongside legitimate high-tech exports are huge containers that may hold as many as 1,000 used computers destined for unauthorized disposal. Elizabeth Grossman, Secret After-Life of Computers, NORTH SUBURBAN LIBRARY SYSTEM (Apr. 10, 2006), available at http://www.salon.com/news/ feature/2006/04/10/ewaste/print.html. 4 U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, Hazardous Waste Management System; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Program; Cathode Ray Tubes, 71 Fed. Reg. 145, 42927-42949 (Jul. 28, 2006) (to be codified at 40 C.F.R. pts. 9, 260, 261, and 271); and, U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, Hazardous Waste Management System; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Program; Mercury Containing Equipment, 70 Fed. Reg. 150, 45507-45522 (Aug. 5, 2005) (to be codified at 40 C.F.R. pts. 260, 261, 264, 265, 268, 270, and 273). 5 In promulgating strengthened rules and regulations for transboundary eWaste export, EPA concluded, “The comments, and data submitted by the commenters, have convinced us that unfettered export of CRTs for recycling could lead to environmental harm.” U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, Hazardous Waste Management System; Modification of the Hazardous Waste Program; Cathode Ray Tubes, 71 Fed. Reg. 145, 42927-42949, p. 42938 (July 28, 2006) (to be codified at 40 C.F.R. pts. 9, 260, 261, and 271). 6 Electronic waste materials excluded from some Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements include cathode-ray tubes (CRT) found in computer and television 3 federal hazardous waste regulations in order to facilitate legitimate recycling and encourage reuse – partly de-regulating them – allowing industrious eWaste ‘recyclers’ tremendous opportunity to take advantage of an insatiable global market for electronic materials unwanted in the United States.7 Such demand has allowed the raw material value of electronic waste as a commodity to eclipse the environmental and epidemiological costs attached to the mishandling of its toxic components on foreign soil. Most distressing to international human rights advocates and concerned Non-Government Organizations (NGOs);8 the environmental and occupational health rules that control eWaste disposal domestically are absent once these materials exit United States jurisdiction, leaving regulation to receiving countries often lacking adequate administrative structure and sanctioning powers. China – due to its desire for raw production materials,9 low employment wages,10 administrative and customs corruption,11 and deficient capacity on the monitors, and mercury-containing equipment (MCE) found in thermostats and circuit boards. CRT and MCE are excepted due to their mass volume of generation and subsequent EPA goal to facilitate recycling of these materials. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, Final Rules on Cathode Ray Tubes and Discarded Mercury-Containing Equipment (2006), available at http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/ hazwaste/recycle/electron/crt.htm; and, See 40 C.F.R. §§§ 261.39, .40, and .41 (2005) and 40 C.F.R. § 273 (2005). 7 The prolific international market for “second hand” products from developed to undeveloped countries, notably used computers from the United States to China, is valued in the billions of dollars. DAVID HUNTER, JAMES SALZMAN, & DURWOOD ZAELKE, INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY, p. 947 (2007). 8 For example, the Basel Action Network (BAN), founded in 1997 by longtime toxics activist Jim Puckett, is dedicated to monitoring transboundary eWaste activity and campaigning against its illegal exportation. Sasha Archibald, Leftovers / Not In Our Backyard: An Interview With Jim Puckett, CABINET MAGAZINE, ISSUE 16 (WINTER 2004/05); and, Terence Chea, Associated Press, American Electronic Waste Contaminates China and India (Aug. 17, 2005), available at http://www.minesandcommuni ties.org/Action/press708.htm. 9 Ma Hongchang, Senior Expert, Officer, Department of Pollution Control State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA), Beijing, Basel Convention and Implementation in China (Nov. 6, 1999), available at http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:ta ZwpMRiFcJ:www.bcrc.cn/downlo ad/meetings/reg1999bj2/ch04.pdf+basel+convention+and+china&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us. 10 Archibald, supra. 4 part of the government to centralize its rule12 – has established itself as a willing and able receiver of eWaste generated in North America,13 despite Chinese national
Recommended publications
  • Licensed Municipal Solid Waste Landfills County Facility Name
    Licensed Municipal Solid Waste Landfills County Facility Name (place ID#) Facility Type Secondary Id Address Phone No. Ashtabula Geneva Landfill (54419) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018758 4339 Tuttle Rd, Geneva, 44041 440‐466‐8804 Athens Athens‐Hocking Reclamation Center (3078) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018746 17970 US Rte 33, Nelsonville, 45764 740‐385‐6019 Brown Rumpke Waste Inc Brown County Landfill (3916) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018788 9427 Beyers Rd, Georgetown, 45121 513‐851‐0122 Clinton Wilmington Sanitary Landfill (6451) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018744 397 S Nelson Ave, Wilmington, 45177 937‐382‐6474 Coshocton Coshocton Landfill Inc (7032) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018823 19469 County Rd No 7, Coshocton, 43812 740‐787‐2327 Crawford Crawford County Landfill (7270) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018774 5128 Lincoln Hwy East, Bucyrus, 44820 513‐851‐0122 Defiance Defiance County Sanitary Landfill (12919) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018764 13207 Canal Rd, Defiance, 43512 419‐782‐5442 Erie Erie County Sanitary Landfill (13359) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018741 10102 Hoover Road, Milan, 44846 419‐433‐5023 Fairfield Republic Services Pine Grove Regional Facility (13668) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018818 5131 Drinkle Rd SW, Amanda, 43102 740‐969‐4487 Franklin SWACO Franklin County Sanitary Landfill (15005) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill MSWL018803 3851 London Groveport Rd, Grove City, 43123 614‐871‐5100 Gallia Gallia County Landfill (16671) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Operation and Management Workbook
    MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT WORKBOOK Revised April 2018 Preface In many ways, constructing, operating and maintaining a municipal solid waste landfill is similar to constructing, operating, and maintaining a highway, dam, canal, bridge, or other engineered structure. The most important similarity is that landfills, like other engineered structures, must be constructed and operated in a manner that will provide safe, long-term, and reliable service to the communities they serve. Proper design, construction, operation, monitoring, closure and post-closure care are critical because after disposal the waste can be a threat to human health and the environment for decades to centuries. This workbook is intended to provide municipal landfill operators and managers in Wyoming with the fundamental knowledge and technical background necessary to ensure that landfills are operated efficiently, effectively, and in a manner that is protective of human health and the environment. This workbook contains information regarding basic construction and operation activities that are encountered on a routine basis at most landfills. The basic procedures and fundamental elements of landfill permitting, construction management, monitoring, closure, post-closure care, and financial assurance are also addressed. The workbook includes informative tips and information that landfill operators and managers can use to conserve landfill space, minimize the potential for pollution, reduce operating costs, and comply with applicable rules and regulations. In addition to this workbook, operators and managers need to become familiar with the Wyoming Solid Waste Rules and Regulations applicable to municipal solid waste. The DEQ also provides numerous guidelines that may help understand regulatory requirements in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria C R Training Module Training
    Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5305W) EPA530-K-05-015 A R Introduction to Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria C R Training Module Training United States Environmental Protection September 2005 Agency SUBTITLE D: MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY CRITERIA CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Regulatory Summary .............................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Subpart A: General Requirements ................................................................................... 3 2.2 Subpart B: Location Restrictions ..................................................................................... 6 2.3 Subpart C: Operating Criteria .......................................................................................... 8 2.4 Subpart D: Design Criteria ..............................................................................................12 2.5 Subpart E: Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action ..........................................12 2.6 Subpart F: Closure and Post-Closure Care ......................................................................17 2.7 Subpart G: Financial Assurance Criteria .........................................................................19 Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Facility Criteria - 1 1. INTRODUCTION This module provides a summary of the regulatory criteria for municipal solid waste
    [Show full text]
  • Scam Recycling: E-Dumping on Asia by US Recyclers Sept 15, 2016 Scam Recycling: E-Dumping on Asia by US Recyclers
    Scam Recycling e-Dumping on Asia by US Recyclers The e-Trash Transparency Project Front Cover: One of what are believed to be 100’s of electronics junkyards in Hong Kong’s New Territories region, receiving US e-waste. The junkyards break apart the equipment using dangerous, polluting methods. ©BAN 2016 Back Inside Cover: KCTS producer Katie Campbell with Jim Puckett on the trail in New Territories, Hong Kong. ©KCTS, Earthfix Program, 2016. Back Cover: A pile of broken Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamps (CCFLs) from flat screen monitors imported from the US. CCFLs contain the toxic element mercury. ©BAN 2016. Page 2 Scam Recycling: e-Dumping on Asia by US Recyclers Sept 15, 2016 Scam Recycling: e-Dumping on Asia by US Recyclers Made Possible by a Grant from: The Body Shop Foundation Basel Action Network 206 1st Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: +1.206.652.5555 Email: [email protected], Web: www.ban.org Sept 15, 2016 Scam Recycling: e-Dumping on Asia by US Recyclers Page 3 Page 4 Scam Recycling: e-Dumping on Asia by US Recyclers Sept 15, 2016 Acknowledgements Authors: Eric Hopson, Jim Puckett Editors: Hayley Palmer, Sarah Westervelt Layout & Design: Jennifer Leigh, Eric Hopson Site Investigative Teams Hong Kong: Mr. Jim Puckett, American, Director of the Basel Action Network Ms. Dongxia (Evana) Su, Chinese, journalist and fixer Mr. Sanjiv Pandita, Indian/Hong Kong director of Asia Monitor Resource Centre Mr. Aurangzaib (Ali) Khan, Pakistani/Hong Kong, trader Guiyu, China: Mr. Jim Puckett, American, Director of the Basel Action Network Mr. Michael Standaert, American, journalist, Bloomberg BNA Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Anaerobic Digestion for Municipal Solid Waste
    Global Methane Initiative Overview of Anaerobic Digestion for Municipal Solid Waste Updated: October 2016 1 About This Presentation . Introduces the process of anaerobic digestion (AD) for municipal solid waste (MSW) . Provides an overview of anaerobic digestion microbiology . Helps you understand how you might benefit from AD . Guides you through the key areas to consider when developing an AD project . Reviews the status of AD globally and provides selected case studies Using Bookmarks to Navigate This presentation contains bookmarks to help you navigate. Using the panel on the left, click the bookmark to jump to the slide. For Chrome users, the bookmarks can be viewed by clicking on the bookmark icon ( ) at the top right of the screen. 2 Global Methane Initiative GMI is a voluntary, multilateral partnership that aims to reduce global methane emissions and to advance the abatement, recovery and use of methane as a valuable clean energy source. OBJECTIVES BENEFITS . Reduce anthropogenic methane . Decline in methane concentrations emissions and advance the and methane utilization will result recovery and use of methane in: while: – Sustainability – Enhancing economic growth – Energy security – Promoting energy security – Health and safety – Improving local air quality – Profitability and public health. 3 GMI Partners . Grew from 14 to 42 Partner governments, plus the European Commission . Accounts for nearly 70% of global anthropogenic methane emissions 4 Main Menu 1. Introduction – what is AD and why should it interest me? Click here for an introduction to AD 2. Is AD suitable for me? Click here for more info about the potential for AD 3. Step-by-step guide Click here for detailed information about the key issues to consider when developing an AD project 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Anaerobic Digestion? Anaerobic Digestion Occurs Naturally, in the Absence of Oxygen, As Bacteria Break Down Organic Materials and Produce Biogas
    The Benefits of Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste At Wastewater Treatment Facilities Why Anaerobic Digestion? Anaerobic digestion occurs naturally, in the absence of oxygen, as bacteria break down organic materials and produce biogas. The process reduces the amount of material and produces biogas, which can be used as an energy source. This technology is commonly used throughout the United States to break down sewage sludge at wastewater treatment facilities. In the past few years, there has been a movement to start adding food waste to anaerobic digesters already in place at wastewater treatment facilities. The anaerobic digestion of food waste has many benefits, including: • Climate Change Mitigation – Food waste in landfills generates methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Diverting food waste from landfills to wastewater treatment facilities allows for the capture of the methane, which can be used as an energy source. In addition to decreased methane emissions at landfills, there are greenhouse gas emissions reductions due to the energy offsets provided by using an on-site, renewable source of energy. • Economic Benefits – Wastewater treatment facilities can expect to see cost savings from incorporating food waste into anaerobic digesters. These include reduced energy costs due to production of on-site power and tipping fee for accepting the food waste. • Diversion Opportunities – Most municipalities are investing in ways to divert materials from landfills. This is usually due to reduced landfill space and/or recycling goals. Wastewater treatment facilities offer the opportunity to divert large amounts of food waste, one of the largest waste streams still going to landfills. Why Food Waste? Food waste is the second largest category of municipal solid waste (MSW) sent to landfills in the United States, accounting for approximately 18% of the waste stream.
    [Show full text]
  • RCRA Orientation Manual: Table of Contents and Foreword
    RCRA Saving Resources and Energy Orientation Manual 2014 RCRA Orienta Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Managing Materials Safely Promoting Recycling and eCycling Promoting Recycling and eCycling Reducing Priority Chemicals tion Manual 2014 tion Manual Forming Partnerships Forming Partnerships Reducing Priority Chemicals Reusing Industrial Materials Preventing Waste Reusing Industrial Materials United States Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5305W) Washington, DC 20460 Official Business Preventing Waste Penalty for Private Use $300 EPA530-F-11-003 October 2014 Recycled/Recyclable—Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on www.epa.gov/epawaste 100% (Minimum 50% Postconsumer) Recycled Paper RCRA Orientation Manual THIS MANUAL WAS DEVELOPED BY: THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATIONS, AND ANALYSIS OFFICE 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. WASHINGTON, DC 20460 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... i Chapter I: Introduction to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act .................................... I-1 Chapter II: Managing Solid Waste—RCRA Subtitle D ................................................................ II-1 Chapter III: Managing Hazardous Waste—RCRA Subtitle C ...................................................... III-1 Hazardous Waste Identification ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Waste and the Circular Economy
    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Electronic waste and the Circular Economy First Report of Session 2019–21 HC 220 Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Rt Hon Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) (Chair) Duncan Baker MP (Conservative, North Norfolk) Sir Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Feryal Clark MP (Labour, Enfield North) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Rt Hon Robert Goodwill MP (Conservative, Scarborough and Whitby) Ian Levy MP (Conservative, Blyth Valley) Marco Longhi MP (Conservative, Dudley North) Caroline Lucas MP (Green Party, Brighton, Pavilion) Cherilyn Mackrory MP (Conservative, Truro and Falmouth) Jerome Mayhew MP (Conservative, Broadland) John McNally MP (Scottish National Party, Falkirk) Dr Matthew Offord MP (Conservative, Hendon) Alex Sobel MP (Labour (Co-op), Leeds North West) Claudia Webbe MP (Independent, Leicester East) Nadia Whittome MP (Labour, Nottingham East) The following Member is a former member of the Committee: Mr Shailesh Vara MP (Conservative, North West Cambridgeshire) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152A. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal and Industrial Waste
    Municipal and Industrial Waste LESSON 1 Guiding Question: How does our current waste disposal impact our environment? • Identify the three categories of waste. Reading Strategy Before you read, use the headings in • Describe conventional waste disposal methods. this lesson to make an outline about waste management. As you read, fill in details that provide key information. Vocabulary waste, municipal solid waste, industrial waste, hazardous waste, sanitary landfill, leachate, incineration DID YOU EVER THiNK about all the items you throw in the trash each day? A paper napkin and empty yogurt container at breakfast; the 19.1 LESSON PLAN PREVIEW contents of your lunch tray; the empty water bottle and apple core from Real World Students list and an afternoon snack. And those are just items related to your meals! How discuss local sources of munici- about the plastic wrap that surrounds your news magazine? Or those pal and industrial waste. dried-up pens and markers you threw in the trash? The list is probably Differentiated Instruction much longer than you ever imagined. Now, think about the other people Less proficient readers use who live in your house … your city or town. Suddenly, the amount of figures and captions to clarify garbage becomes overwhelming. lesson concepts. 19.1 RESOURCES What Is Waste? In Your Neighborhood Activity, Where The three main categories of waste include municipal solid Waste Goes • Bellringer Video, Bottled waste, industrial waste, and hazardous waste. Water Backlash • Lesson 19.1 Work- sheets • Lesson 19.1 Assessment • Chapter 19 Overview Presentation As the world’s human population increases, and as we produce and con- sume more material goods, we generate more waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Waste Challenges: Environmental Risks of Gigatons of Mud, Dust and Sediment in Megadiverse Regions in Brazil
    sustainability Communication Mining Waste Challenges: Environmental Risks of Gigatons of Mud, Dust and Sediment in Megadiverse Regions in Brazil Flávio F. Carmo 1,* , Andressa O. Lanchotti 2 and Luciana H.Y. Kamino 1 1 Prístino Institute, Belo Horizonte 30462-180, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Public Prosecutor’s Office of the State of Minas Gerais, Operational Support Center for the Environmental Defense Prosecutor’s Office, Belo Horizonte 30190-100, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: fl[email protected] Received: 14 August 2020; Accepted: 2 October 2020; Published: 14 October 2020 Abstract: The management of long-lived mining wastes is a complex environmental challenge, but the subject is little discussed among the public, scientific community, and policymakers. The negative environmental impacts caused by mining wastes are severe and cause damage to human health and the loss and degradation of natural ecosystems. With the objective of stimulating discussion to advance the development of measures to contain threats to biodiversity and to mitigate negative impacts, we present an overview of total volumes of mining waste disposal in tailings dams and dump piles, discriminating them by ore type and biome. We highlight the major environmental risks and challenges associated with tropical forests, savannas, and freshwater ecosystems and possible limitations and advances in public policies and governance. The scale of this challenge is global, as some data show, for example, Brazil generated 3.6 billion tons of solid mining waste in dump piles in the period between 2008 and 2019. The volume is equivalent to 62% of the global mass of nonfuel minerals removed from the planet’s crust in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • RCRA's Critical Mission and the Path Forward
    PROTECTING COMMUNITIES • RESTORING LAND • CONSERVING RESOURCES RCRA’ S CRITICAL MISSION & THE PATH FORWARD Page | 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 2 RCRA IN A SNAPSHOT .................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION: TODAY, TOMORROW AND BEYOND.................................................................... 3 THE NEED FOR RCRA ............................................................................................................................................ 4 LAYING THE FOUNDATION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 RCRA’ S TRANSFORMATIONAL RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 5 RCRA’ S CONTINUING CHALLENGES ......................................................................................................................... 7 VISION FOR THE PROGRAM ...................................................................................................................................... 8 LOOKING AHEAD ................................................................................................................................................... 9 RCRA CLOSE-UP: EXISTING PROGRAMS AND CHALLENGES ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landfill Reclamation
    United States Solid Waste EPA530-F-97-001 Environmental Protection and Emergency Response July 1997 Agency (5306W) 1EPA Landfill Reclamation his fact sheet describes new and innovative technologies and products that meet the performance standards of the Criteria for Municipal Solid T Waste Landfills (40 CFR Part 258). Landfill reclamation is a relatively new approach used to expand municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill capacity and avoid the high cost of acquiring addi- tional land. Reclamation costs are often offset by the sale or use of recovered materials, such as recyclables, soil, and waste, which can be burned as fuel. Other important benefits may include avoided liability through site remediation, reductions in closure costs, and reclamation of land for other uses. Despite its many benefits, some potential drawbacks exist to landfill reclama- tion. This technology may release methane and other gases, for example, that result from decomposing wastes. It may also unearth hazardous materials, which can be costly to manage. In addition, the excavation work involved in reclamation may cause adjacent landfill areas to sink or collapse. Finally, the dense, abrasive nature of reclaimed waste may shorten the life of excavation equipment. To identify potential problems, landfill operators considering recla- mation activities should conduct a site characterization study. Landfill reclamation projects have been successfully implemented at MSW facilities across the country since the 1980s. This fact sheet provides information on this technology and presents case studies of successful reclamation projects. The Reclamation Soil Separation (Screening) A trommel (i.e., a revolving cylindrical sieve) Process or vibrating screens separate soil (including Landfill reclamation is conducted in a num- the cover material) from solid waste in the ber of ways, with the specific approach based excavated material.
    [Show full text]