Research Paper
GEOSPHERE Identification of a new source for the Triassic Langjiexue Group: Evidence from a gabbro-diorite complex in the Gangdese magmatic
GEOSPHERE, v. 16, no. 1 belt and zircon microstructures from sandstones in the Tethyan https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02154.1 Himalaya, southern Tibet 16 figures; 1 set of supplemental files Xuxuan Ma1,2, Zhiqin Xu3, Zhongbao Zhao1, and Zhiyu Yi1 1 CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Natural Resources, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA 3State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, China CITATION: Ma, X.X., Xu, Z.Q., Zhao, Z.B., and Yi, Z.Y., 2020, Identification of a new source for the Triassic Langjiexue Group: Evidence from a gabbro-diorite complex in the Gangdese magmatic belt and zircon ABSTRACT began no later than the Middle Triassic. Arc-affin- During the past decades, progress has been microstructures from sandstones in the Tethyan Hima- laya, southern Tibet: Geosphere, v. 16, no. 1, p. 407– ity magmatic rocks supplied some materials to the achieved on understanding the formation of the 434, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02154.1. Considerable debate persists as to the Triassic Langjiexue Group. This scenario sheds new light Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. However, many basic paleogeographic framework of the Neotethys and on the provenance of the Langjiexue Group and the questions remain open to debate. This study Science Editor: Shanaka de Silva the origin of the Late Triassic Langjiexue Group in Triassic paleogeography of the Neotethyan realm. focuses on the following issues: (1) the timing for Associate Editor: Christopher J. Spencer the Tethyan Himalaya. Triassic magmatic rocks in initial subduction of the Neotethyan oceanic lith- the Gangdese belt and Late Triassic Langjiexue sed- osphere; and (2) the tectonic setting of the Late Received 7 May 2019 Revision received 10 September 2019 iments play a pivotal role in addressing these issues. ■■ INTRODUCTION Triassic Langjiexue Group in the Tethyan Himalaya, Accepted 2 December 2019 Geochronological, petrological, and geochemical in other words, the provenance for the sediments analyses have been performed on the Middle Tri- An ongoing continent-continent collisional oro- of the Langjiexue Group. Published online 19 December 2019 assic gabbro-diorite complex (with crystallization gen, the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen, has attracted Recent studies have revealed that voluminous ages of ca. 244–238 Ma) from the Gangdese belt. much attention among the geological community calc-alkaline igneous rocks are exposed in the These plutonic rocks are characterized by relatively (Fig. 1; Yin and Harrison, 2000; Spencer et al., 2012). Gangdese magmatic belt, with ages ranging from
low MgO and high Al2O3 contents, calc-alkaline The Indo-Asian collision took place at ca. 60–50 Ma, Middle Triassic to Late Cretaceous (Ma et al., 2018a; trends, and depletion of Nb, Ta, and Ti, resem- triggering the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau (Ding et al., Wang et al., 2016a). The Middle Triassic to Jurassic bling low-MgO high-alumina basalts or basaltic 2016; Hu et al., 2015; Jin et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2016; magmatic rocks are ascribed to southward sub- andesites. These plutonic rocks exhibit depleted Zhu et al., 2015). However, the pre-plateau history of duction of the Bangong-Nujiang Tethyan oceanic
whole-rock εNd(t) values of ~+5 and zircon εHf(t) values the Lhasa terrane, especially the evolutionary history lithosphere beneath the Lhasa terrane (Zhu et al., peaking at ~+14. These features resemble those of of the Neotethyan Ocean, remains enigmatic (Li et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2017), or to the northward sub- rocks in a subduction-related arc setting. 2010; Zhu et al., 2010). The Gangdese magmatic belt, duction of the Neotethyan oceanic slab beneath the We also completed detrital zircon U-Pb dating located in the southern margin of the Lhasa terrane, Lhasa terrane (Guo et al., 2013b; Kang et al., 2014; and microstructure analysis for the sandstones of documents voluminous Middle Triassic to Late Cre- Ma et al., 2018a; Wang et al., 2016a). Whether the the Langjiexue Group in the Tethyan Himalaya. Zir- taceous subduction-related igneous activity (Ji et al., southward or northward model is correct, these con grains with ages >300 Ma are dominated by 2009; Meng et al., 2016a, 2019a; Mo et al., 2005a; results suggest that these magmatic rocks were preweathered and weathered surfaces as well as Wang et al., 2016a), indicating that the Gangdese generated in a convergent margin setting either fairly rounded to completely rounded scales, indi- magmatic belt experienced a protracted history prior as an active continental margin or intra-oceanic cating a high degree of polycyclicity. In contrast, to the Indo-Asian collision. Thus, study of the mag- arc. About 40% of the modern convergent margin 300–200 Ma ones are characterized by fresh sur- matic rocks in the Gangdese magmatic belt is very around the globe is interpreted as intra-oceanic faces and completely unrounded to poorly rounded important for deciphering the subduction-accretion subduction zones (Larter and Leat, 2003). This scales, indicating nearby sources. Collectively, our orogeny of the Gangdese magmatic belt and the raises the questions of whether an intra-oceanic This paper is published under the terms of the data, combined with published results, support framework of the Neotethyan realm before the final subduction system developed within the eastern CC‑BY-NC license. that the subduction initiation of the Neotethys collision and formation of the Tibetan Plateau. Neotethyan realm, and whether some intra-oceanic
© 2019 The Authors
GEOSPHERE | Volume 16 | Number 1 Ma et al. | New source for the Triassic Langjiexue Group Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/16/1/407/4925462/407.pdf 407 by guest on 29 September 2021 Research Paper
N 75°E 80°E 85°E 90°E 95°E 100°E 105°E LGR: Longgar rift ATF: Altyn Tagh fault Normal fault NTR: Nyima-Tingri rift HYF: Haiyuan fault Strike-slip fault XDR: Xainza-Dingjye rift JLF: Jiali fault Thrust fault elt YGR: Yadong-Gulu rift KF: Karakoram fault Suture zone enic b LST: Longmen Shan thrust rog MBT: Main Boundary thrust Eclogite zone sian o BNS: Bangong-Nujiang suture ral A XSF: Xianshuihe fault Cent AKS: Anymaqen-Kunlun suture IYS: Indus–Yarlung Tsangpo suture 40°N North China JSS: Jinsha suture LS: Longmu Co–Shuanghu suture SQS: South Qilian suture North Pamir Tarim block block SS: Shyok suture Central Pamir Qilian terrane TS: Tanymas suture Q K F im Qa South Pamir AT an T ida HY F K agh m b SQ F m te unl as S a rr un t in S or an erra T ak e AKS ne ar Kohistan K Songpan-Gan ze flysch complex 35°N SS Ladakh North Qiangtang J H B So SS i S NS uth Q m hi iangt a qu ang l an Gaize Shuanghu Amdo LS ay he a X T n f SF S o L ld Lhasa terrane -t IY Sumdo 30°N hr S JLF us R t b G L Linzhi
e R Xigaze Lhasa
lt T R R
N G India M D B Y South China T X block 0 500 km Figure 2
Figure 1. Tectonic map of the Tibetan Plateau showing the study location (modified after Kapp and Guynn [2004] and Yin and Harrison [2000]).
arc rocks are preserved in the Gangdese mag- configuration for the eastern Neotethyan realm, as the eastern Neotethyan realm, especially the Cim- matic belt. well as the possible source for the Langjiexue Group. meride and the northern Gondwana landmasses. The Late Triassic Langjiexue Group, exposed in The foregoing issues are closely related to the In this study, we discuss new results from the the Tethyan Himalaya belt, plays a pivotal role in opening of the Neotethyan Ocean. Based on the ca. 240 Ma gabbro-diorite complex in the Gang- reconstructing the framework of the Neotethyan paleogeographic reconstruction of the Pangea dese magmatic belt and microstructures of detrital realm. However, its tectonic affinity has been hotly supercontinent and the Neotethyan realm, the Neo- zircon grains of sandstones from the Late Triassic debated for decades. Models proposed to explain tethys has been suggested to have opened in the Langjiexue Group in the Tethyan Himalaya. Based the formation of the Langjiexue Group include basin- early Permian (Angiolini et al., 2003; Garzanti et al., on our combined analyses of regional geology, we fill during the initial rifting between the Indian and 1996; Kroner et al., 2016). However, as remnants propose the existence of another possible source Lhasa blocks (Dai et al., 2008; Webb et al., 2012), of the Neotethyan oceanic lithosphere, the Indus– in the Gangdese magmatic belt, which partly pro- forearc basin deposition due to the northward Yarlung Tsangpo ophiolites, whose formation is vided some source materials for the Langjiexue subduction of the Neotethyan oceanic lithosphere attributed to forearc extension, mainly fall into an sandstones. beneath the Lhasa terrane or an intra-oceanic arc age range of 130–120 Ma (Wu et al., 2014; Liu et al., (Li et al., 2010), passive continental margin deposi- 2016; Maffione et al., 2015; Xiong et al., 2017). Fur- tion along the northern or northwestern margin of thermore, the opening of the Neotethys has been ■■ GEOLOGICAL SETTING the Gondwana landmass (Cai et al., 2016; Cao et al., proposed to have been a byproduct of the south- 2018; Fang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2016b; Meng et al., ward subduction of the Bangong-Nujiang Tethys Tectonic Framework 2019b), and a multi-source model within the Neo- during the Late Triassic (Zhu et al., 2013; Yang et al., tethys (Li et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017). Thus this 2017). These debates necessitate more work to con- The Tibetan Plateau was formed through the question has been hindering our full understanding strain the opening of the Neotethys. This dispute sequential accretion of terranes to the southern of the reconstruction of the Triassic paleogeographic hampers our recognition of the tectonic regime for margin of the Asian continent (Yin and Harrison,
GEOSPHERE | Volume 16 | Number 1 Ma et al. | New source for the Triassic Langjiexue Group Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/16/1/407/4925462/407.pdf 408 by guest on 29 September 2021 Research Paper
2000). From north to south, these terranes include east-west–trending Gangdese magmatic belt, Lee et al., 2009b). The post-collisional (30–13 Ma) the Songpan-Ganze, Qiangtang, Lhasa, and Tethyan 2500 km in length and ~100 km in width, is located igneous rocks within the Gangdese magmatic belt Himalayan terranes separated by the Jinsha, Ban- immediately north of the Indus–Yarlung Tsangpo consist of S-type granites, adakites, basaltic dikes, gong-Nujiang, and Indus–Yarlung Tsangpo suture suture zone (Fig. 2; Yin and Harrison, 2000). Dia- and ultrapotassic to potassic volcanics (Chung et al., zones (Fig. 1; Zhang et al., 2014; Leary et al., 2016). basic gabbros, diorites, and granitoids, as well as 2005). Post-collisional porphyry-type Cu deposits Among these accreted terranes, the Lhasa terrane their eruptive equivalents, are tightly dispersed have been identified in the Gangdese magmatic belt is considered to have been the last block to aggre- within the Gangdese magmatic belt. Temporally, (Hou et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). gate with the Asian continent before the Indo-Asian the igneous rocks across the whole belt span a large collision (Yin and Harrison, 2000; Tapponnier et al., age range from 237 to 13 Ma (Ji et al., 2009; Wang 2001). Recent studies suggest that the Lhasa terrane et al., 2018; Meng et al., 2019a). These voluminous Tethyan Himalaya is not intact, and several suture zones are proposed magmatic rocks belong to four major flareups at within the Lhasa terrane, such as the Shiquanhe– 237–160 Ma, 100–80 Ma, 65–40 Ma, and 30–13 Ma. South of the Indus–Yarlung Tsangpo suture Yunzhug–Namu Tso and Sumdo ophiolite belts (Pan The first flareup has been suggested to have sub- zone, the Himalayan orogen is composed of, et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2007; Zeng et al., 2018). duction-related calc-alkaline affinity, owing to the from south to north, the Lesser Himalaya, Greater The Lhasa terrane is separated from the Tethyan subduction of the Neotethyan oceanic lithosphere Himalaya, and Tethyan Himalaya (Yin, 2006; Guil- Himalayan terrane by the Indus–Yarlung Tsangpo (Lang et al., 2017; Meng et al., 2016a). Two different lot et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2013; Leary et al., 2017). ophiolite belt, whose formation ages cluster around models have been proposed for the 100–80 Ma mag- The Greater Himalayan rocks are considered to be 130–120 Ma (Liu et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2017). matic flareup: one is ridge subduction (Guo et al., Indian basement that has been exhumed along 2013a; Zhang et al., 2010), and the other is extension the Main Central thrust (DeCelles et al., 2000). The due to slab rollback (Ma et al., 2015). The 65–40 Ma Tethyan Himalaya is separated from the Greater Gangdese Magmatic Belt magmatic flareup, represented by the Linzizong vol- Himalaya to the south by the Southern Tibet canic rocks and Quxu batholith, resulted from slab detachment system (Yin and Harrison, 2000). The The Gangdese magmatic belt occupies the rollback and breakoff associated with the Indo-Asian Tethyan Himalaya comprises southern and north- southern margin of the Lhasa terrane. The collision (Ding et al., 2003; Mo et al., 2003, 2005b; ern subzones, divided by the Gyirong-Kangmar
88°E 90°E 92°E 94°E 30° Gongbujiangda 220 Ma appinite Sumdo N (Ma et al., 2018b) 229 Ma granite 240 Ma gabbro- 226 Ma diorite (Meng et al., 2018) diorite (this study) 245 Ma andesite (Ji W.Q., personal (Wang et al., 2018) Nanmulin commun.) ca. 230 Ma volcanics Lhasa (Wang et al., 2016a) Dazhuqu Nymo Quxu Zedong Xigaze D2
Liuqu Langxian Bainang D1 Qusong 29° Renbu Qiongjie N Yardoi Jiangzi N Figure 3A Greater 0 100 km Yumen mélange Himalaya Kangma zone
Lake Quaternary Batholith Gabbro- Ophiolite Mélange Dazhuqu Xigaze Jurassic- Late Triassic Triassic Jurassic or Gangdese Greater Sampling N-vergent E- or SE-vergent diorite conglomerate forearc Cretaceous Langjiexue Gr. Changguo Cretaceous basement Himalaya location fold (D1) fold (D2) basin sediments volcanics Bima Fm.
Figure 2. Simplified map of the Gangdese magmatic belt and the Tethyan Himalaya showing the sampling location.
GEOSPHERE | Volume 16 | Number 1 Ma et al. | New source for the Triassic Langjiexue Group Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/16/1/407/4925462/407.pdf 409 by guest on 29 September 2021 Research Paper
thrust. The Mesozoic–Cenozoic strata in the Tethyan by the Kerguelen plume in the Indian plate due to were obtained at the Key Laboratory of Mineral Himalaya can be divided into the Langjiexue Group the rifting of the Gondwana landmass (Zhu et al., Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia, Ministry (Upper Triassic) and Lure (Lower Jurassic), Zhela 2009). Recently, Ao et al. (2018) proposed that these of Land and Resources of China, Jilin University (mid-Jurassic), Sangxiu (Upper Jurassic), Lakang dikes were probably formed in the Neotethyan (Changchun, China). The instrument coupled a (Lower Cretaceous), and Zongzhuo (Upper Creta- Ocean and hosted in the Langjiexue Group strata quadrupole ICP-MS (Agilent 7900) and 193 nm ArF ceous) formations (Ao et al., 2018). The southern during accretion in the Tethyan Himalayan prism. excimer laser (COMPexPro 102, Coherent) with zone is characterized by shallow-water carbonates an automatic positioning system. For the pres- and clastic sediments, whereas the northern zone ent work, laser spot size was set to 32 μm, laser is dominated by deep-water turbidites, shales, and ■■ ANALYTICAL METHOD energy density at 10 J/cm2, and repetition rate at cherts (Wang et al., 2016b). In the northern zone, the 8 Hz. Laser sampling used a 30 s blank, 30 s sam- Late Triassic Langjiexue Group sediments dominate Geochronology pling ablation, and 2 min sample-chamber flushing and occupy a huge area (Fig. 2). after the ablation. The ablated material was carried The Langjiexue Group was tectonically dis- Zircon U-Pb ages presented in this paper were into the ICP-MS by a high-purity helium gas stream placed to the south of the eastern Indus–Yarlung obtained in two laboratories. Zircon U-Pb ages of with a flux of 1.15 L/min. The whole laser path was Tsangpo suture zone (Fig. 2). It was thrust to the the gabbro-diorite complex were measured by fluxed with Ar (600 mL/min) in order to increase south over the Nieru Formation and Jurassic–Cre- using an Agilent 7500a inductively coupled plasma energy stability. The counting time was 20 ms for taceous strata of Tethyan Himalaya along the nearly mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) attached to a Coher- 204Pb, 206Pb, 207Pb, and 208Pb; 15 ms for 232Th and east-west–trending Lazi-Qiongduojiang-Zara thrust ent 193 nm laser ablation system at the State Key 238U; 20 ms for 49Ti; and 6 ms for other elements. and was thrust northward over the Indus–Yarlung Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Nanjing Calibrations for the zircon analyses were carried Tsangpo ophiolites along the east-west–trending University (Nanjing, China). The laser light beam out using NIST 610 glass as an external standard Greater Counter thrust in the north (Fang et al., had a diameter of ~32 μm with a repetition rate and Si as an internal standard. U-Pb isotope frac- 2018; Yin, 2006). This group is mainly composed of 5 Hz under a 70% energy condition. Isotope tionation effects were corrected using zircon 91500 of feldspar and/or lithic sandstone, siltstone, slate, mass fractionation was normalized through exter- (Wiedenbeck et al., 1995) as an external standard. and shale, deposited in a bathyal-abyssal sub- nal standard GEMOC GJ-1 with 207Pb/206Pb age = Zircon standard Plesovice (337 Ma) was also used marine fan environment (Zhang et al., 2015a). 608.5 ± 1.5 Ma (Jackson et al., 2004). The analyti- as a secondary standard to supervise the devia- The Langjiexue Group was subjected to intense cal accuracy was monitored through the Mud Tank tion of age measurement (Sláma et al., 2008). The deformation, characterized by the south-north zircon standard, which has an intercept age of 732 analytical results of detrital zircon U-Pb ages are convergence resulting in southward and north- ± 5 Ma (Black and Gulson, 1978). Zircon analyses presented in Table S2 (footnote 1), whereas the ward thrusts and east-west–trending axial planes were carried out in runs of 15 analyses including trace elemental results of magmatic zircon grains of folds (Fig. 3B; Li et al., 2010). Although strongly five zircon standards and up to 10 sample spots. from the plutonic rocks in the Gangdese belt and deformed, the Langjiexue Group only experienced The U-Pb dating results were calculated through the the detrital zircon grains from the sandstones of low- to medium-grade greenschist facies metamor- online software package GLITTER (ver. 4.4; http:// the Langjiexue Group in the Tethyan Himalaya are
Table S1. Zircon U-Pb dating results of the gabbro-diorite complex in the Gangdese magmatic belt, southern Tibet, China MEASURED RATIOS UNCORRECTED AGES (Ma) COMMON LEAD Concordance limit (ns) CORRECTED RATIOS CORRECTED AGES (Ma) Calculated concentration (ppm) Observed Correction Concordance Analysis 207 206 207 235 206 238 208 232 238 232 Assumed 207 206 207 235 206 238 208 232 Comment 206 Discordance 207 206 207 235 206 238 208 232 rr 238 232 207 206 207 235 206 238 208 232 Th U Th/U Pb/ Pb Pb/ U Pb/ U Pb/ Th U/ Th discordance Pb/ Pb Pb/ U Pb/ U Pb/ Th type % common Pb Pb/ Pb Pb/ U Pb/ U Pb/ Th U/ Th Pb/ Pb Pb/ U Pb/ U Pb/ Th (100%) 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s rt Central Min. rim 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s Central Min. rim 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s 1s stdgj01 0.05995 0.00079 0.80071 0.01278 0.09688 0.00136 0.02925 0.00189 80.53841 0.13797 0.9 -1 . 602 15 597 7 596 8 583 37 None Concordant . . -1 . 0.05995 0.00079 0.80071 0.01278 0.09688 0.00136 0.02925 0.00189 0.9 80.54 0.14 602 15 597 7 596 8 583 37 7.5 311.4 0.0 100.2 stdgj02 0.06045 0.0008 0.81851 0.01319 0.09821 0.0014 0.03301 0.00194 80.00618 0.13532 0.9 -2.7 . 620 16 607 7 604 8 656 38 None Concordant . . -2.7 . 0.06045 0.0008 0.81851 0.01319 0.09821 0.0014 0.03301 0.00194 0.9 80.01 0.14 620 16 607 7 604 8 656 38 7.7 319.4 0.0 100.5 phism (Li et al., 2016). www.glitter -gemoc.com/). Zircon U and Th concen- presented in Table S3 (footnote 1). mt01 0.06507 0.00128 1.08327 0.02289 0.12075 0.0018 0.03668 0.00147 1.80506 0.00783 0.9 -5.7 -0.3 777 22 745 11 735 10 728 29 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.06 . -5.7 -0.3 0.06507 0.00128 1.08327 0.02289 0.12075 0.0018 0.03668 0.00147 0.9 1.81 0.01 777 22 745 11 735 10 728 29 52.1 48.5 1.1 101.4 xm82-01 0.0531 0.00112 0.27714 0.00631 0.03785 0.00059 0.01112 0.00051 0.84716 0.00144 0.9 -28.6 -15.7 333 26 248 5 239 4 224 10 None Common Pb < det. lim. -1.01 . -28.6 -15.7 0.0531 0.00112 0.27714 0.00631 0.03785 0.00059 0.01112 0.00051 0.9 0.85 0.01 333 26 248 5 239 4 224 10 725.5 317.2 2.3 103.8 xm82-02 0.05079 0.00129 0.27109 0.00696 0.03871 0.00057 0.01248 0.00072 1.03654 0.00224 0.9 6 . 231 33 244 6 245 4 251 14 None Concordant . . 6 . 0.05079 0.00129 0.27109 0.00696 0.03871 0.00057 0.01248 0.00072 0.9 1.04 0.01 231 33 244 6 245 4 251 14 364.6 195.0 1.9 99.6 xm82-03 0.05101 0.00086 0.27454 0.00516 0.03903 0.00056 0.01225 0.00051 1.48385 0.00231 0.9 2.4 . 241 20 246 4 247 3 246 10 None Concordant . . 2.4 . 0.05101 0.00086 0.27454 0.00516 0.03903 0.00056 0.01225 0.00051 0.9 1.48 0.01 241 20 246 4 247 3 246 10 492.1 376.8 1.3 99.6 xm82-04 0.05295 0.00129 0.27709 0.0069 0.03795 0.00056 0.01156 0.00056 1.03941 0.00264 0.9 -27 -8.3 327 31 248 5 240 3 232 11 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.37 . -27 -8.3 0.05295 0.00129 0.27709 0.0069 0.03795 0.00056 0.01156 0.00056 0.9 1.04 0.01 327 31 248 5 240 3 232 11 264.0 141.6 1.9 103.3 xm82-05 0.05035 0.00077 0.26662 0.00465 0.03839 0.00054 0.01107 0.00044 1.46767 0.00215 0.9 15.3 . 211 18 240 4 243 3 223 9 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.83 . 15.3 . 0.05035 0.00077 0.26662 0.00465 0.03839 0.00054 0.01107 0.00044 0.9 1.47 0.01 211 18 240 4 243 3 223 9 563.0 426.4 1.3 98.8 xm82-06 0.05161 0.00109 0.27661 0.00615 0.03887 0.00057 0.01185 0.00052 1.22702 0.0029 0.9 -8.5 . 268 26 248 5 246 4 238 10 None Concordant . . -8.5 . 0.05161 0.00109 0.27661 0.00615 0.03887 0.00057 0.01185 0.00052 0.9 1.23 0.01 268 26 248 5 246 4 238 10 258.0 163.4 1.6 100.8 xm82-07 0.05174 0.00106 0.27519 0.00598 0.03857 0.00056 0.01148 0.00051 1.19447 0.00279 0.9 -11.1 . 274 25 247 5 244 3 231 10 None Concordant . . -11.1 . 0.05174 0.00106 0.27519 0.00598 0.03857 0.00056 0.01148 0.00051 0.9 1.19 0.01 274 25 247 5 244 3 231 10 270.9 167.0 1.6 101.2 xm82-08 0.0528 0.001 0.28516 0.00578 0.03916 0.00056 0.0114 0.00049 1.04494 0.00225 0.9 -23.1 -11.1 320 22 255 5 248 3 229 10 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.95 . -23.1 -11.1 0.0528 0.001 0.28516 0.00578 0.03916 0.00056 0.0114 0.00049 0.9 1.04 0.01 320 22 255 5 248 3 229 10 366.6 197.6 1.9 102.8 xm82-09 0.05288 0.00128 0.30417 0.00769 0.04171 0.00066 0.01121 0.0007 1.44029 0.00237 0.9 -19 -0.6 324 30 270 6 263 4 225 14 None Common Pb < det. lim. -1.42 . -19 -0.6 0.05288 0.00128 0.30417 0.00769 0.04171 0.00066 0.01121 0.0007 0.9 1.44 0.01 324 30 270 6 263 4 225 14 455.5 338.5 1.3 102.7 xm82-10 0.05189 0.00111 0.28018 0.00624 0.03915 0.00057 0.01175 0.00062 1.08907 0.00223 0.9 -12 . 281 26 251 5 248 4 236 12 None Concordant . . -12 . 0.05189 0.00111 0.28018 0.00624 0.03915 0.00057 0.01175 0.00062 0.9 1.09 0.01 281 26 251 5 248 4 236 12 388.8 218.5 1.8 101.2 xm82-11 0.05049 0.00148 0.26947 0.00802 0.0387 0.00063 0.01075 0.0007 1.35063 0.00279 0.9 12.7 . 218 40 242 6 245 4 216 14 None Concordant . . 12.7 . 0.05049 0.00148 0.26947 0.00802 0.0387 0.00063 0.01075 0.0007 0.9 1.35 0.01 218 40 242 6 245 4 216 14 308.0 214.7 1.4 98.8 xm82-12 0.0518 0.00109 0.27392 0.00605 0.03835 0.00056 0.01113 0.00058 1.02346 0.00213 0.9 -12.5 . 277 26 246 5 243 3 224 12 None Concordant . . -12.5 . 0.0518 0.00109 0.27392 0.00605 0.03835 0.00056 0.01113 0.00058 0.9 1.02 0.01 277 26 246 5 243 3 224 12 400.3 211.4 1.9 101.2 xm82-13 0.05385 0.00119 0.28644 0.00657 0.03858 0.00055 0.01185 0.00061 1.08562 0.00279 0.9 -33.7 -21.4 365 27 256 5 244 3 238 12 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.23 . -33.7 -21.4 0.05385 0.00119 0.28644 0.00657 0.03858 0.00055 0.01185 0.00061 0.9 1.09 0.01 365 27 256 5 244 3 238 12 246.8 138.2 1.8 104.9 xm82-14 0.05358 0.00101 0.28439 0.00557 0.03849 0.00052 0.01221 0.00075 0.71332 0.00125 0.9 -31.7 -22.4 353 22 254 4 243 3 245 15 None Common Pb < det. lim. 0.24 . -31.7 -22.4 0.05358 0.00101 0.28439 0.00557 0.03849 0.00052 0.01221 0.00075 0.9 0.71 0.01 353 22 254 4 243 3 245 15 810.9 298.5 2.7 104.5 xm82-15 0.05274 0.00168 0.2757 0.00875 0.03792 0.00064 0.00938 0.00074 1.31257 0.00258 0.9 -24.9 . 318 42 247 7 240 4 189 15 None Concordant . . -24.9 . 0.05274 0.00168 0.2757 0.00875 0.03792 0.00064 0.00938 0.00074 0.9 1.31 0.01 318 42 247 7 240 4 189 15 348.2 235.8 1.5 102.9 stdgj03 0.0602 0.00107 0.80717 0.01539 0.09726 0.0014 0.03225 0.0025 79.65983 0.13047 0.9 -2.1 . 611 19 601 9 598 8 642 49 None Concordant . . -2.1 . 0.0602 0.00107 0.80717 0.01539 0.09726 0.0014 0.03225 0.0025 0.9 79.66 0.13 611 19 601 9 598 8 642 49 8.3 340.7 0.0 100.5 Traditionally, the Langjiexue Group consists of trations were calculated by comparing the relative For all analyses, isotopic ratios and element stdgj04 0.06003 0.00113 0.81172 0.01622 0.09809 0.00143 0.02977 0.00249 79.63862 0.12894 0.9 -0.3 . 605 21 603 9 603 8 593 49 None Concordant . . -0.3 . 0.06003 0.00113 0.81172 0.01622 0.09809 0.00143 0.02977 0.00249 0.9 79.64 0.13 605 21 603 9 603 8 593 49 8.5 348.6 0.0 100.0 GPS 29°19 21.04 N 89°53 00.05 E
stdgj07 0.06009 0.00085 0.80789 0.01268 0.09752 0.00124 0.02888 0.00209 78.04461 0.14482 0.9 -1.2 . 607 15 601 7 600 7 575 41 None Concordant . . -1.2 . 0.06009 0.00085 0.80789 0.01268 0.09752 0.00124 0.02888 0.00209 0.9 78.04 0.14 607 15 601 7 600 7 575 41 8.8 363.8 0.0 100.2 stdgj08 0.06012 0.00086 0.81032 0.01275 0.09777 0.00125 0.03266 0.00219 75.76232 0.14208 0.9 -1.1 . 608 15 603 7 601 7 650 43 None Concordant . . -1.1 . 0.06012 0.00086 0.81032 0.01275 0.09777 0.00125 0.03266 0.00219 0.9 75.76 0.14 608 15 603 7 601 7 650 43 8.9 356.2 0.0 100.3 mt04 0.06385 0.00132 1.03338 0.02194 0.11738 0.00161 0.03556 0.00157 1.69213 0.0076 0.9 -3 . 737 23 721 11 715 9 706 31 None Concordant . . -3 . 0.06385 0.00132 1.03338 0.02194 0.11738 0.00161 0.03556 0.00157 0.9 1.69 0.01 737 23 721 11 715 9 706 31 69.2 62.2 1.1 100.8 xm84-01 0.05115 0.00092 0.27109 0.00519 0.03844 0.00051 0.01071 0.0004 1.48308 0.00298 0.9 -1.8 . 248 22 244 4 243 3 215 8 None Concordant . . -1.8 . 0.05115 0.00092 0.27109 0.00519 0.03844 0.00051 0.01071 0.0004 0.9 1.48 0.01 248 22 244 4 243 3 215 8 394.0 310.1 1.3 100.4 xm84-02 0.05108 0.00139 0.2685 0.00743 0.03813 0.00058 0.01096 0.00058 1.36763 0.0029 0.9 -1.4 . 244 36 241 6 241 4 220 12 None Concordant . . -1.4 . 0.05108 0.00139 0.2685 0.00743 0.03813 0.00058 0.01096 0.00058 0.9 1.37 0.01 244 36 241 6 241 4 220 12 384.8 279.3 1.4 100.0 xm84-03 0.05081 0.00124 0.26787 0.00674 0.03824 0.00057 0.011 0.00061 1.41101 0.00246 0.9 4.2 . 232 32 241 5 242 4 221 12 None Concordant . . 4.2 . 0.05081 0.00124 0.26787 0.00674 0.03824 0.00057 0.011 0.00061 0.9 1.41 0.01 232 32 241 5 242 4 221 12 549.2 411.2 1.3 99.6 xm84-04 0.05135 0.00081 0.27018 0.00464 0.03817 0.0005 0.01126 0.00046 0.91267 0.00138 0.9 -6 . 257 18 243 4 241 3 226 9 None Concordant . . -6 . 0.05135 0.00081 0.27018 0.00464 0.03817 0.0005 0.01126 0.00046 0.9 0.91 0.01 257 18 243 4 241 3 226 9 1138.6 551.4 2.1 100.8 xm84-05 0.05207 0.00106 0.27209 0.00566 0.0379 0.0005 0.01214 0.00069 2.22855 0.00419 0.9 -17.2 -0.2 288 25 244 5 240 3 244 14 None Common Pb < det. lim. 0.13 . -17.2 -0.2 0.05207 0.00106 0.27209 0.00566 0.0379 0.0005 0.01214 0.00069 0.9 2.23 0.01 288 25 244 5 240 3 244 14 299.4 354.0 0.8 101.7 xm84-06 0.05252 0.00192 0.27692 0.00998 0.03824 0.00066 0.01174 0.00099 1.63738 0.00344 0.9 -21.9 . 308 51 248 8 242 4 236 20 None Concordant . . -21.9 . 0.05252 0.00192 0.27692 0.00998 0.03824 0.00066 0.01174 0.00099 0.9 1.64 0.01 308 51 248 8 242 4 236 20 326.4 283.6 1.2 102.5 xm84-07 0.05103 0.00114 0.26982 0.00631 0.03835 0.00056 0.01097 0.00069 0.98976 0.00144 0.9 0.2 . 242 28 243 5 243 3 221 14 None Concordant . . 0.2 . 0.05103 0.00114 0.26982 0.00631 0.03835 0.00056 0.01097 0.00069 0.9 0.99 0.01 242 28 243 5 243 3 221 14 1119.6 588.0 1.9 100.0 xm84-08 0.05204 0.001 0.27413 0.00555 0.03821 0.00052 0.01121 0.00054 1.21146 0.00252 0.9 -16.1 -0.5 287 23 246 4 242 3 225 11 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.76 . -16.1 -0.5 0.05204 0.001 0.27413 0.00555 0.03821 0.00052 0.01121 0.00054 0.9 1.21 0.01 287 23 246 4 242 3 225 11 452.1 290.7 1.6 101.7 xm84-09 0.05073 0.00175 0.267 0.00913 0.03817 0.00063 0.01174 0.00108 1.15321 0.00226 0.9 5.8 . 229 49 240 7 241 4 236 22 None Concordant . . 5.8 . 0.05073 0.00175 0.267 0.00913 0.03817 0.00063 0.01174 0.00108 0.9 1.15 0.01 229 49 240 7 241 4 236 22 533.6 326.5 1.6 99.6 xm84-10 0.05103 0.00109 0.26858 0.00581 0.03818 0.00051 0.01221 0.00087 0.97011 0.00168 0.9 -0.3 . 242 26 242 5 242 3 245 17 None Concordant . . -0.3 . 0.05103 0.00109 0.26858 0.00581 0.03818 0.00051 0.01221 0.00087 0.9 0.97 0.01 242 26 242 5 242 3 245 17 813.2 418.6 1.9 100.0 xm84-11 0.05235 0.00136 0.27823 0.00724 0.03855 0.00056 0.01148 0.00097 0.81484 0.0013 0.9 -19.3 . 301 34 249 6 244 3 231 19 None Concordant . . -19.3 . 0.05235 0.00136 0.27823 0.00724 0.03855 0.00056 0.01148 0.00097 0.9 0.81 0.01 301 34 249 6 244 3 231 19 1135.1 490.8 2.3 102.0 the Jiangxiong, Jiedexiu, Zhangcun, and Songre signal intensity between the standard zircon GJ-1 concentrations of zircon grains were calculated xm84-12 0.05071 0.00131 0.26766 0.00688 0.03829 0.00054 0.01319 0.00109 1.14982 0.00238 0.9 6.5 . 228 34 241 6 242 3 265 22 None Concordant . . 6.5 . 0.05071 0.00131 0.26766 0.00688 0.03829 0.00054 0.01319 0.00109 0.9 1.15 0.01 228 34 241 6 242 3 265 22 477.5 291.4 1.6 99.6 xm84-13 0.05136 0.00135 0.26955 0.00718 0.03807 0.00056 0.01144 0.00086 1.13103 0.00223 0.9 -6.4 . 257 35 242 6 241 3 230 17 None Concordant . . -6.4 . 0.05136 0.00135 0.26955 0.00718 0.03807 0.00056 0.01144 0.00086 0.9 1.13 0.01 257 35 242 6 241 3 230 17 536.2 321.8 1.7 100.4 xm84-14 0.05272 0.00117 0.28472 0.00649 0.03917 0.00055 0.01216 0.00072 1.38822 0.00374 0.9 -22.2 -4.5 317 28 254 5 248 3 244 14 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.1 . -22.2 -4.5 0.05272 0.00117 0.28472 0.00649 0.03917 0.00055 0.01216 0.00072 0.9 1.39 0.01 317 28 254 5 248 3 244 14 234.5 172.7 1.4 102.4 xm84-15 0.05205 0.00108 0.27235 0.00585 0.03795 0.00052 0.01145 0.00072 1.14105 0.00247 0.9 -16.8 . 288 26 245 5 240 3 230 14 None Concordant . . -16.8 . 0.05205 0.00108 0.27235 0.00585 0.03795 0.00052 0.01145 0.00072 0.9 1.14 0.01 288 26 245 5 240 3 230 14 441.7 267.4 1.7 102.1 stdgj09 0.06056 0.00106 0.80927 0.01494 0.09693 0.00127 0.03169 0.00288 77.98914 0.16017 0.9 -4.6 . 624 19 602 8 596 7 631 56 None Concordant . . -4.6 . 0.06056 0.00106 0.80927 0.01494 0.09693 0.00127 0.03169 0.00288 0.9 77.99 0.16 624 19 602 8 596 7 631 56 7.2 297.0 0.0 101.0 stdgj10 0.05975 0.00104 0.80886 0.01489 0.0982 0.0013 0.02976 0.00272 79.53092 0.16175 0.9 1.6 . 595 19 602 8 604 8 593 53 None Concordant . . 1.6 . 0.05975 0.00104 0.80886 0.01489 0.0982 0.0013 0.02976 0.00272 0.9 79.53 0.16 595 19 602 8 604 8 593 53 7.2 302.9 0.0 99.7 GPS 29°19 19.55 N 89°52 54.63 E
stdgj03 0.06049 0.00084 0.81227 0.01279 0.0974 0.00128 0.03166 0.00185 79.56472 0.14211 0.9 -3.7 . 621 15 604 7 599 8 630 36 None Concordant . . -3.7 . 0.06049 0.00084 0.81227 0.01279 0.0974 0.00128 0.03166 0.00185 0.9 79.56 0.14 621 15 604 7 599 8 630 36 7.7 327.8 0.0 100.8 stdgj04 0.05976 0.00083 0.80653 0.01269 0.0979 0.00128 0.0298 0.00187 78.59283 0.13986 0.9 1.2 . 595 15 601 7 602 8 594 37 None Concordant . . 1.2 . 0.05976 0.00083 0.80653 0.01269 0.0979 0.00128 0.0298 0.00187 0.9 78.59 0.14 595 15 601 7 602 8 594 37 7.9 330.2 0.0 99.8 mt02 0.09092 0.0016 1.50064 0.02806 0.11972 0.00169 0.04449 0.00159 1.86835 0.00829 0.9 -52.4 -50.9 1445 17 931 11 729 10 880 31 Disc OK 1.99 0.34 -36.3 -23.6 0.07578 0.00371 1.22605 0.05716 0.11734 0.00177 0.03529 0.00048 0.74 1.87 0.01 1089 101 813 26 715 10 701 9 53.2 53.1 1.0 113.7 xm85-01 0.053 0.00119 0.27782 0.00653 0.03802 0.00057 0.01027 0.00045 1.1122 0.00203 0.9 -27.3 -11.7 329 28 249 5 241 4 207 9 None Common Pb < det. lim. -1.76 . -27.3 -11.7 0.053 0.00119 0.27782 0.00653 0.03802 0.00057 0.01027 0.00045 0.9 1.11 0.01 329 28 249 5 241 4 207 9 527.1 313.0 1.7 103.3 xm85-02 0.05481 0.0015 0.29499 0.00823 0.03904 0.00062 0.01059 0.00051 2.03366 0.00477 0.9 -39.7 -25.8 404 35 262 6 247 4 213 10 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.93 . -39.7 -25.8 0.05481 0.0015 0.29499 0.00823 0.03904 0.00062 0.01059 0.00051 0.9 2.03 0.01 404 35 262 6 247 4 213 10 175.1 190.1 0.9 106.1 xm85-03 0.0509 0.00073 0.27043 0.00438 0.03853 0.00051 0.01313 0.00047 0.71623 0.00087 0.9 3.2 . 236 17 243 4 244 3 264 9 None Concordant . . 3.2 . 0.0509 0.00073 0.27043 0.00438 0.03853 0.00051 0.01313 0.00047 0.9 0.72 0.01 236 17 243 4 244 3 264 9 1853.7 708.8 2.6 99.6 xm85-04 0.05082 0.00105 0.2723 0.00604 0.03886 0.00059 0.00938 0.00051 0.97611 0.00111 0.9 5.7 . 233 25 245 5 246 4 189 10 None Concordant . . 5.7 . 0.05082 0.00105 0.2723 0.00604 0.03886 0.00059 0.00938 0.00051 0.9 0.98 0.01 233 25 245 5 246 4 189 10 1553.7 809.7 1.9 99.6 xm85-05 0.05131 0.00081 0.2733 0.00473 0.03863 0.00051 0.01159 0.00045 0.74458 0.00112 0.9 -4.2 . 255 19 245 4 244 3 233 9 None Concordant . . -4.2 . 0.05131 0.00081 0.2733 0.00473 0.03863 0.00051 0.01159 0.00045 0.9 0.74 0.01 255 19 245 4 244 3 233 9 1154.5 458.9 2.5 100.4 xm85-06 0.05143 0.0012 0.27879 0.0067 0.03931 0.00057 0.01113 0.0005 1.50729 0.00359 0.9 -4.5 . 260 30 250 5 249 4 224 10 None Concordant . . -4.5 . 0.05143 0.0012 0.27879 0.0067 0.03931 0.00057 0.01113 0.0005 0.9 1.51 0.01 260 30 250 5 249 4 224 10 228.5 183.9 1.2 100.4 Formations. However, an increasing number of (U = 330 ppm, Th = 8 ppm) and the zircon samples using GLITTER. Concordia ages and diagrams xm85-07 0.05362 0.00211 0.28535 0.01091 0.03859 0.00065 0.01238 0.00119 1.14995 0.00275 0.9 -31.8 . 355 56 255 9 244 4 249 24 None Concordant . . -31.8 . 0.05362 0.00211 0.28535 0.01091 0.03859 0.00065 0.01238 0.00119 0.9 1.15 0.01 355 56 255 9 244 4 249 24 297.0 182.3 1.6 104.5 xm85-08 0.05042 0.00178 0.26445 0.00914 0.03807 0.00063 0.01449 0.00187 0.80655 0.00085 0.9 12.5 . 214 50 238 7 241 4 291 37 None Concordant . . 12.5 . 0.05042 0.00178 0.26445 0.00914 0.03807 0.00063 0.01449 0.00187 0.9 0.81 0.01 214 50 238 7 241 4 291 37 2171.2 934.9 2.3 98.8 xm85-09 0.05231 0.00123 0.27648 0.00651 0.03833 0.00053 0.01223 0.00079 1.13029 0.0022 0.9 -19.3 . 299 29 248 5 242 3 246 16 None Concordant . . -19.3 . 0.05231 0.00123 0.27648 0.00651 0.03833 0.00053 0.01223 0.00079 0.9 1.13 0.01 299 29 248 5 242 3 246 16 457.1 275.8 1.7 102.5 xm85-10 0.05239 0.0011 0.27494 0.00594 0.03806 0.00052 0.01139 0.00057 1.30246 0.00285 0.9 -20.8 -3.5 302 26 247 5 241 3 229 11 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.5 . -20.8 -3.5 0.05239 0.0011 0.27494 0.00594 0.03806 0.00052 0.01139 0.00057 0.9 1.3 0.01 302 26 247 5 241 3 229 11 313.4 217.9 1.4 102.5 xm85-11 0.05276 0.00131 0.27976 0.00711 0.03846 0.00057 0.01189 0.00072 1.19151 0.00252 0.9 -24.1 -2.8 318 32 250 6 243 4 239 14 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.16 . -24.1 -2.8 0.05276 0.00131 0.27976 0.00711 0.03846 0.00057 0.01189 0.00072 0.9 1.19 0.01 318 32 250 6 243 4 239 14 366.3 233.0 1.6 102.9 xm85-12 0.05104 0.0012 0.26971 0.00661 0.03832 0.00058 0.01349 0.00114 0.79812 0.00087 0.9 -0.1 . 243 30 242 5 242 4 271 23 None Concordant . . -0.1 . 0.05104 0.0012 0.26971 0.00661 0.03832 0.00058 0.01349 0.00114 0.9 0.8 0.01 243 30 242 5 242 4 271 23 2047.8 872.5 2.3 100.0 xm85-13 0.05193 0.00284 0.27504 0.01453 0.03844 0.00087 0.00586 0.00087 0.93218 0.00139 0.9 -14.2 . 282 79 247 12 243 5 118 17 None Concordant . . -14.2 . 0.05193 0.00284 0.27504 0.01453 0.03844 0.00087 0.00586 0.00087 0.9 0.93 0.01 282 79 247 12 243 5 118 17 938.4 467.0 2.0 101.6 xm85-14 0.05126 0.00086 0.27057 0.00491 0.03828 0.00051 0.01173 0.00066 0.96915 0.00127 0.9 -4.2 . 253 20 243 4 242 3 236 13 None Concordant . . -4.2 . 0.05126 0.00086 0.27057 0.00491 0.03828 0.00051 0.01173 0.00066 0.9 0.97 0.01 253 20 243 4 242 3 236 13 1175.6 608.3 1.9 100.4 xm85-15 0.05115 0.00123 0.27057 0.00673 0.03836 0.00059 0.01317 0.00122 0.63727 0.00072 0.9 -2 . 248 30 243 5 243 4 264 24 None Concordant . . -2 . 0.05115 0.00123 0.27057 0.00673 0.03836 0.00059 0.01317 0.00122 0.9 0.64 0.01 248 30 243 5 243 4 264 24 2397.6 815.7 2.9 100.0 stdgj05 0.06033 0.00093 0.80191 0.01351 0.09641 0.00126 0.02927 0.00219 75.47329 0.13476 0.9 -3.8 . 615 17 598 8 593 7 583 43 None Concordant . . -3.8 . 0.06033 0.00093 0.80191 0.01351 0.09641 0.00126 0.02927 0.00219 0.9 75.47 0.13 615 17 598 8 593 7 583 43 8.1 328.0 0.0 100.8 stdgj06 0.05988 0.00101 0.81463 0.01477 0.09868 0.00133 0.03327 0.00274 75.62695 0.13384 0.9 1.3 . 599 19 605 8 607 8 662 54 None Concordant . . 1.3 . 0.05988 0.00101 0.81463 0.01477 0.09868 0.00133 0.03327 0.00274 0.9 75.63 0.13 599 19 605 8 607 8 662 54 8.3 333.9 0.0 99.7 GPS 29°19 18.93 N 89°52 51.23 E
stdgj05 0.06054 0.00086 0.80289 0.01255 0.09622 0.00122 0.02916 0.00189 75.40149 0.13899 0.9 -5.2 . 623 15 598 7 592 7 581 37 None Concordant . . -5.2 . 0.06054 0.00086 0.80289 0.01255 0.09622 0.00122 0.02916 0.00189 0.9 75.4 0.14 623 15 598 7 592 7 581 37 8.1 328.6 0.0 101.0 stdgj06 0.05972 0.00085 0.8154 0.01297 0.09905 0.00129 0.03173 0.00186 75.67724 0.1375 0.9 2.7 . 593 16 605 7 609 8 631 36 None Concordant . . 2.7 . 0.05972 0.00085 0.8154 0.01297 0.09905 0.00129 0.03173 0.00186 0.9 75.68 0.14 593 16 605 7 609 8 631 36 8.3 338.2 0.0 99.3 mt03 0.06414 0.00146 1.04759 0.02412 0.1185 0.00165 0.0343 0.00148 1.80936 0.00855 0.9 -3.5 . 746 26 728 12 722 10 682 29 None Concordant . . -3.5 . 0.06414 0.00146 1.04759 0.02412 0.1185 0.00165 0.0343 0.00148 0.9 1.81 0.01 746 26 728 12 722 10 682 29 51.2 50.1 1.0 100.8 xm86-01 0.05128 0.00092 0.26797 0.00519 0.0379 0.00052 0.01046 0.00038 1.04884 0.00176 0.9 -5.5 . 253 22 241 4 240 3 210 8 None Concordant . . -5.5 . 0.05128 0.00092 0.26797 0.00519 0.0379 0.00052 0.01046 0.00038 0.9 1.05 0.01 253 22 241 4 240 3 210 8 702.1 398.2 1.8 100.4 studies suggest that the coeval Nieru Formation using the Microsoft Excel program Data Templat- were obtained using Isoplot/Ex (ver. 3.0) (Ludwig, xm86-02 0.05237 0.00113 0.27466 0.00623 0.03805 0.00055 0.01113 0.00052 1.42707 0.00246 0.9 -20.6 -1.8 302 27 246 5 241 3 224 10 None Common Pb < det. lim. -0.67 . -20.6 -1.8 0.05237 0.00113 0.27466 0.00623 0.03805 0.00055 0.01113 0.00052 0.9 1.43 0.01 302 27 246 5 241 3 224 10 487.6 376.3 1.3 102.1 xm86-03 0.05323 0.00117 0.27306 0.00631 0.03721 0.00055 0.01061 0.00052 0.93402 0.00142 0.9 -31 -17.1 339 27 245 5 236 3 213 10 None Common Pb < det. lim. -1.33 . -31 -17.1 0.05323 0.00117 0.27306 0.00631 0.03721 0.00055 0.01061 0.00052 0.9 0.93 0.01 339 27 245 5 236 3 213 10 952.6 481.1 2.0 103.8 xm86-04 0.05104 0.00088 0.26297 0.00488 0.03738 0.0005 0.01077 0.00039 1.17133 0.0021 0.9 -2.6 . 243 21 237 4 237 3 217 8 None Concordant . . -2.6 . 0.05104 0.00088 0.26297 0.00488 0.03738 0.0005 0.01077 0.00039 0.9 1.17 0.01 243 21 237 4 237 3 217 8 547.0 346.4 1.6 100.0 xm86-05 0.05235 0.00121 0.27198 0.00661 0.03768 0.00057 0.01059 0.00063 0.745 0.00092 0.9 -21.1 -0.3 301 29 244 5 238 4 213 13 None Common Pb < det. lim. -1.93 . -21.1 -0.3 0.05235 0.00121 0.27198 0.00661 0.03768 0.00057 0.01059 0.00063 0.9 0.75 0.01 301 29 244 5 238 4 213 13 1832.2 738.1 2.5 102.5 xm86-06 0.04857 0.0016 0.25804 0.00839 0.03854 0.0006 0.01138 0.00081 1.64737 0.00361 0.9 93.5 56.7 127 47 233 7 244 4 229 16 None Initially inv. disc. . . 93.5 56.7 0.04857 0.0016 0.25804 0.00839 0.03854 0.0006 0.01138 0.00081 0.9 1.65 0.01 127 47 233 7 244 4 229 16 260.4 232.0 1.1 95.5 xm86-07 0.05004 0.00097 0.26002 0.00522 0.0377 0.00049 0.01202 0.00057 1.32677 0.00254 0.9 21.5 7 197 24 235 4 239 3 242 11 None Initially inv. disc. . . 21.5 7 0.05004 0.00097 0.26002 0.00522 0.0377 0.00049 0.01202 0.00057 0.9 1.33 0.01 197 24 235 4 239 3 242 11 423.7 304.0 1.4 98.3 xm86-08 0.05197 0.00103 0.2718 0.00561 0.03794 0.00052 0.01148 0.00053 1.35845 0.0027 0.9 -15.8 . 284 24 244 4 240 3 231 11 None Concordant . . -15.8 . 0.05197 0.00103 0.2718 0.00561 0.03794 0.00052 0.01148 0.00053 0.9 1.36 0.01 284 24 244 4 240 3 231 11 385.4 283.1 1.4 101.7 xm86-09 0.05154 0.00087 0.26955 0.0049 0.03794 0.0005 0.01119 0.00052 0.70242 0.00101 0.9 -9.6 . 265 20 242 4 240 3 225 10 None Concordant . . -9.6 . 0.05154 0.00087 0.26955 0.0049 0.03794 0.0005 0.01119 0.00052 0.9 0.7 0.01 265 20 242 4 240 3 225 10 1433.4 544.4 2.6 100.8 xm86-10 0.05138 0.00085 0.26739 0.00477 0.03775 0.0005 0.01147 0.00054 1.22561 0.00173 0.9 -7.5 . 258 19 241 4 239 3 231 11 None Concordant . . -7.5 . 0.05138 0.00085 0.26739 0.00477 0.03775 0.0005 0.01147 0.00054 0.9 1.23 0.01 258 19 241 4 239 3 231 11 848.6 562.4 1.5 100.8 xm86-11 0.05124 0.00098 0.2643 0.00537 0.03741 0.00052 0.01029 0.00055 0.87825 0.00128 0.9 -6 . 252 23 238 4 237 3 207 11 None Concordant . . -6 . 0.05124 0.00098 0.2643 0.00537 0.03741 0.00052 0.01029 0.00055 0.9 0.88 0.01 252 23 238 4 237 3 207 11 1110.0 527.1 2.1 100.4 xm86-12 0.05414 0.00143 0.27678 0.00746 0.03708 0.00057 0.00908 0.00053 1.21159 0.00233 0.9 -38.4 -23.4 377 34 248 6 235 4 183 11 None Common Pb < det. lim. -2.58 . -38.4 -23.4 0.05414 0.00143 0.27678 0.00746 0.03708 0.00057 0.00908 0.00053 0.9 1.21 0.01 377 34 248 6 235 4 183 11 459.5 301.0 1.5 105.5 xm86-13 0.04979 0.00083 0.25586 0.0046 0.03728 0.00049 0.01108 0.00056 0.75921 0.00108 0.9 27.9 11.2 185 20 231 4 236 3 223 11 None Initially inv. disc. . . 27.9 11.2 0.04979 0.00083 0.25586 0.0046 0.03728 0.00049 0.01108 0.00056 0.9 0.76 0.01 185 20 231 4 236 3 223 11 1340.1 550.2 2.4 97.9 xm86-14 0.05167 0.00091 0.2654 0.00498 0.03725 0.0005 0.01042 0.00052 0.99478 0.00167 0.9 -13.2 . 271 21 239 4 236 3 210 10 None Concordant . . -13.2 . 0.05167 0.00091 0.2654 0.00498 0.03725 0.0005 0.01042 0.00052 0.9 0.99 0.01 271 21 239 4 236 3 210 10 739.6 397.8 1.9 101.3 xm86-15 0.05187 0.00118 0.26858 0.00631 0.03755 0.00055 0.01041 0.00069 1.10199 0.00176 0.9 -15.3 . 280 28 242 5 238 3 209 14 None Concordant . . -15.3 . 0.05187 0.00118 0.26858 0.00631 0.03755 0.00055 0.01041 0.00069 0.9 1.1 0.01 280 28 242 5 238 3 209 14 731.9 436.1 1.7 101.7 stdgj07 0.05992 0.00098 0.80532 0.01415 0.09748 0.00128 0.02885 0.00237 78.38576 0.14431 0.9 -0.2 . 601 18 600 8 600 8 575 47 None Concordant . . -0.2 . 0.05992 0.00098 0.80532 0.01415 0.09748 0.00128 0.02885 0.00237 0.9 78.39 0.14 601 18 600 8 600 8 575 47 7.8 329.4 0.0 100.0 stdgj08 0.06021 0.00096 0.81103 0.01401 0.09771 0.00128 0.0327 0.00242 75.76306 0.14068 0.9 -1.8 . 611 18 603 8 601 8 650 47 None Concordant . . -1.8 . 0.06021 0.00096 0.81103 0.01401 0.09771 0.00128 0.0327 0.00242 0.9 75.76 0.14 611 18 603 8 601 8 650 47 7.9 323.8 0.0 100.3 GPS 29°19 18.93 N 89°52 46.12 E in the Kangma region, situated at the southern ev2b from the Australian Research Council National 2003). A common-Pb correction was applied using margin of the Langjiexue Group, also belongs to Key Centre for Geochemical Evolution and Metal- LA-ICPMS Common Lead Correction (ver. 3.15, 1 Supplemental Materials. Includes whole rock geo- this group. This formation shares similar stratal logeny of Continents (GEMOC). Each rock sample http://gemoc.mq .edu .au /TerraneChron /CommonPb. chemical, zircon U-Pb dating and Hf results of gabbro- assemblages and lithological features as well as was subject to one or several runs of 15 analyses. html), following the method of Andersen (2002). dioritic samples, as well as detrital zircon U-Pb ages fossil types (Cai et al., 2016; Li et al., 2010; Li et al., The analytical results are presented in Table S1 of The analytical data are presented on U-Pb con- and Hf isotopes of Langjiexue Group sandstones in 1 Tethyan Himalaya from this study and many other 2016). The Langjiexue Group is characterized by the Supplemental Materials . cordia diagrams with 2σ errors. The mean ages published papers. Detailed analytical methods and extensive ca. 130 Ma diabase dikes or intrusions Detrital zircon laser ablation (LA) ICP-MS are weighted means at the 95% confidence level metadata, as well as additional figures. Please visit (Fig. 3D), showing close affinity to oceanic island U-Pb geochronology and trace elements from (Ludwig, 2003). More detailed analytical parame- https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02154.S1 or access the full-text article on www.gsapubs.org to view the Sup- basalt (OIB)–type rocks (Zhu et al., 2009). These OIB sandstones, as well as trace elements for the mag- ters of zircon U-Pb dating can be seen in Text S1 plemental Materials. dikes were first proposed to have been generated matic zircon grains of the gabbro-diorite complex, (footnote 1).
GEOSPHERE | Volume 16 | Number 1 Ma et al. | New source for the Triassic Langjiexue Group Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/16/1/407/4925462/407.pdf 410 by guest on 29 September 2021 Research Paper