DOCSLIB.ORG

Charting Constellations of Power: Texas Public Education Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Charting Constellations of Power: Texas Public Education Policy BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Fall 2017 Charting Constellations of Power: Texas Public Education Policy Hollie Wright Missouri State University, [email protected] As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Education Commons, Education Policy Commons, Other Anthropology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Hollie, "Charting Constellations of Power: Texas Public Education Policy" (2017). MSU Graduate Theses. 3226. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3226 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHARTING CONSTELLATIONS OF POWER: TEXAS PUBLIC EDUCATION POLICY A Master’s Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University TEMPLATE In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Applied Anthropology By Hollie Wright December 2017 Copyright 2017 by Hollie Wright ii CHARTING CONSTELLATIONS OF POWER: TEXAS PUBLIC EDUCATION POLICY Sociology and Anthropology Missouri State University, December 2017 Master of Science Hollie Wright ABSTRACT For decades, public education in Texas has been entrenched in neoliberalism-inspired policies that research shows largely fail to produce promised results and have a tendency to perpetuate the very problems advocates claim the policies will solve. This raises questions about the decision-makers and what is happening in the public education policy process. In line with Laura Nader’s directive for more anthropologists to make those in power the subject of their research, I used both ethnographic and social network analysis methods to ‘study up’ in Texas public education. This study describes some relationships of members of the Texas State Board of Education and Texas Legislature, discusses implications of these relationships, and offers things that members of the general public can do to become more involved in the public education policy decision-making process. My investigation revealed that some actors have high degree centrality in the network, that homophily is present, and that opportunities for the general public to become more involved already exist; however, many people are unaware of them. Furthermore, people who utilize those opportunities often are ignored due to their behavior, their lack of knowledge on key issues, and/or their inability to present a reasonable alternative. Educational policy and practice are resistant to change due to the high levels of homophily. If people want to change policy, they must take advantage of opportunities and learn better advocacy methods. KEYWORDS: studying up, Texas, public education, social network analysis, policy, neoliberalism, ethnography This abstract is approved as to form and content _______________________________ Margaret Buckner, PhD Chairperson, Advisory Committee Missouri State University iii CHARTING CONSTELLATIONS OF POWER: TEXAS PUBLIC EDUCATION POLICY By Hollie Wright A Master’s Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College Of Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science, Applied Anthropology December 2017 Approved: _______________________________________ Margaret Buckner, PhD _______________________________________ Bret Cormier, PhD _______________________________________ William Wedenoja, PhD _______________________________________ Julie Masterson, PhD: Dean, Graduate College In the interest of academic freedom and the principle of free speech, approval of this thesis indicates the format is acceptable and meets the academic criteria for the discipline as determined by the faculty that constitute the thesis committee. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student- scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank every person who participated in this study, especially when so many refused. I would also like to thank Dr. Margaret Buckner for her guidance and helping set me back on the straight and narrow when I was lost on my rabbit trails. I dedicate this thesis to Texas educators---those people who stand on the front lines in public education day in and day out with little reward or thanks. No matter the political climate or the policies that come and go, it is all of you who truly make Texas public education great. The debt owed to you for what you do can never be repaid. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Literature Review.................................................................................................................4 Neoliberal Policies and Reform in Public Education ..............................................4 Specifying Failure ....................................................................................................6 Unintended Realities of Neoliberal Policies and Reforms ......................................8 Investigating Policy and Networks ........................................................................11 ‘Studying Up’.........................................................................................................12 Political Actors, Social Network Analysis, and Centrality Measures ...................13 Homophily and Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF).......................................19 Conclusion .............................................................................................................21 Methods..............................................................................................................................23 Boundary Specification ..........................................................................................24 Relationship Selection ...........................................................................................26 Affiliation Inclusion ...............................................................................................27 Data Collection ......................................................................................................28 Participant Recruitment ................................................................................28 Interviews ......................................................................................................31 Observation and Publicly Available Sources ................................................32 Data Analysis .........................................................................................................33 Limitations .............................................................................................................36 Findings .............................................................................................................................38 Focal Actor Findings..............................................................................................38 Texas State Board of Education (SBOE) ......................................................38 Texas SEC and HCPE ...................................................................................42 Affiliations ....................................................................................................43 Texas Tea Party .................................................................................45 Moderates & ERC .............................................................................46 Texas Eagle Forum & Texas Home School Coalition (THSC) ........47 Social Network Analysis Findings: Relational Data, Centrality Measures, and Homophily .............................................................................................................48 Centrality, Power, and Homophily ...............................................................66 Affiliations ....................................................................................................73 Findings from Observations of Webcasts, Interview Responses, and Public Sources ..................................................................................................................81 Finding 1: Ideology Greatest Influence over Homophily and Actor Choice… ....................................................................................................81 Finding 2: Connections to Public Schools .................................................86 Finding 3: Problem with Awareness for Public Interaction.......................87 Finding 4: Problems with Engaging in Public Testimony .........................88 vi Finding 5: Poor Attendance at Public Meetings ........................................89 Finding 6: SBOE Conflict and Public Meetings ........................................90 Finding 7: Actions and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senate Finance Committee Interim Report August 2020
    Senate Finance Committee Interim Report August 2020 Please direct questions or comments to: Senator Jane Nelson Senate Finance Committee P.O. Box 12068 | Austin, Texas 78711 (512) 463-0370 Stacey Gilliam Committee Director Dave Nelson Senior Budget Advisor Anne Allensworth Senior Budget Analyst, Articles I, IV, & V Emily Schmidt Article III Braden Kennedy Articles VI, VII, & VIII Stephanie Hoover Committee Clerk Copies of this report were distributed in compliance with the State Depository Law and are available for public use through the Texas State Publications Depository Program at the Texas State Library and other state depository libraries. SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE 86th Legislature SENATOR JANE NELSON, Chair SENATOR JOAN HUFFMAN SENATOR JUAN "CHUY" HINOJOSA, Vice Chair SENATOR LOIS W. KOLKHORST SENATOR PAUL BETTENCOURT SENATOR ROBERT NICHOLS SENATOR BRIAN BIRDWELL SENATOR CHARLES PERRY SENATOR DONNA CAMPBELL SENATOR LARRY TAYLOR SENATOR PETE FLORES SENATOR ROYCE WEST SENATOR KELLY HANCOCK SENATOR JOHN WHITMIRE August 7, 2020 The Honorable Dan Patrick Lieutenant Governor of the State of Texas Capitol Building, Room 2E.13 Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Lt. Governor Patrick: The Senate Finance Committee submits this report in response to the interim charges you have assigned to this Committee. This report examines several topics, including research, cybersecurity, state investments, natural disaster funding, tax policy, and spending limits. The Committee met twice prior to the pandemic and took testimony on four charges covered in this report. Committee staff worked with agencies and stakeholders during the shutdown to gather information on charges relating to research and cybersecurity – issues that this Committee has worked on extensively over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Keysor
    Koy Kunkel_SC From: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2021 1:25 PM To: Senate Redistricting Subject: INETMAIL: Redistricting Public Input Date: 2021‐03‐13 First Name: Georgia Last Name: Keysor Title: N/A Organization: Self Address: City: Austin State: TX Zipcode: Phone: Affirm public info: I agree Regarding: Senate Message: March 13, 2021 Texas House Committee on Redistricting The Honorable Joan Huffman The Honorable Juan Hinojosa The Honorable Carol Alvarado The Honorable Paul Bettencourt The Honorable Brian Birdwell The Honorable Dawn Buckingham The Honorable Donna Campbell The Honorable Kelly Hancock The Honorable Bryan Hughes The Honorable Nathan Johnson The Honorable Eddie Lucio, Jr. The Honorable Jose Menendez The Honorable Robert Nichols The Honorable Angela Paxton The Honorable Charles Perry The Honorable Royce West The Honorable John Whitmire Good morning. My name is Georgia Keysor. I have taken the time to address this committee because I believe redistricting is an integral function of our democracy. When redistricting is used by incumbents to artificially preserve their majority, our democracy suffers. 1 The current system of closed door back room deal‐cutting partisan gerrymandering has resulted in politicians supporting policies that the vast majority of their constituents oppose, or opposing policies that the vast majority their constituents support. Case in Point? The wildly popular COVID Relief Bill. We know something like 90% of Americans support expanded background checks for gun purchases. We also know that because the gerrymandered majority GOP is owned lock, stock and barrel by the Russian funded NRA, the will of the people goes ignored. The majority of Americans support the LGBT community, a women’s right to control her own body and her destiny and the decriminalization of cannabis.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Capstone Paper
    Claire Misfeldt Communications Capstone Paper D1 #BiggerinTX, #COVID19: An Examination of Economy and Government as Ideograph between State, City, and County Officials in Texas on Twitter Introduction The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has transformed from a viral infection into a social phenomenon in the United States as issues of individual freedom and community action have become more apparent. States where the Republican party has the majority power, like Texas, saw high volumes of cases due to relaxed policies about mask wearing and building capacity. However, while state representatives were more adamant about reopening the State and continuing with business as usual, Texas city officials were trying to push for stay-at-home restrictions and mask mandates. This disconnection on COVID-19 responses in Texas, especially in the spring and summer of 2020, highlights the ever growing tension between state and city governments. Part of this is due to the fact that city officials, like in Houston, are more Democratic in terms of political party and are more willing to invoke government intervention for a crisis. Because of the differing political ideologies, conservative Texas state politicians and city officials saw more conflict than resolution in terms of agreeing how to respond to the pandemic. Besides communications concepts surrounding narrative and new media, there is also another layer to consider when examining politicians’ twitter accounts. As well as aiding in the polarization of American politics, the COVID-19 pandemic has also provided more evidence that poor, BIPOC communities are more susceptible to government inaction. These communities are 1 Claire Misfeldt Communications Capstone Paper D1 more likely to contract and die from COVID-19, possibly due to lack of universal healthcare and the fact that people in these communities make up a majority of the essential workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Years of the Texas Tribune
    “In a word, it’s all about… IMPACT.For five years we’ve delivered on our promise to cover public policy and politics with ambition and moxie — giving average citizens more reliable access to nonpartisan information, holding elected and appointed officials accountable and providing the greatest possible transparency into the inner workings of government. We really do believe that educating our friends and neighbors about the issues that affect every one of us will make them more thoughtful and productive in their daily lives. We all have a stake in a better Texas, and we believe The Texas Tribune is one way to get there.” — evan smith, ceo & editor-in-chief THE TEXAS TRIBUNE | 5 YEARS 03 INVENTING A NEW MODEL MISSION “We believe that civic discourse is in danger of becoming The Texas Tribune is the only member-supported, lessless informedinformed andand moremore reflexivelyreflexively partisan.partisan. WeWe believebelieve digital-first, nonpartisan news organization that informs that’s bad for democracy and bad for Texas. That’s why Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, we started The Texas Tribune.” politics, government and statewide issues. — john thornton, texas tribune founder “You can’t solve big policy and political problems if you don’t know about them, and you can’t know about them unless someone tees them up. We’re here to tee them up.” — ross ramsey, executive editor “I saw the opportunity to be part of the solution — to throw my experience nonprofit. Back in 2009, the number of full-time, On Nov. 3, 2009, The Texas Tribune and its and reputation behind an energetic start-up with the potential to change nonpartisan.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Criminal Justice Committee (84Th)
    2904 Floyd, Suite A | Dallas, TX 74204 | 214-442-1672 | www.texprotects.org Senate Criminal Justice Committee (84th) Clerk: Jessie Cox Phone: 512-463-0345 Room: SBH 470 Name Party Room Number Phone Number (top is Other Committees capitol number and bottom is district number) Chair Sen. John D CAP 1E.13 (512)-463-0115 Business & Commerce; Whitmire (Houston) (713)-864-8701 Finance Vice Chair Sen. Joan R CAP 1E.15 (512)-463-0117 Finance; State Affairs (Vice Huffman (Houston) (218)-980-3500 Chair) Sen. Konnie Burton R CAP GE.7 (512)-463-0110 Higher Education; Nominations; Veteran Affairs & Military Installations (Vice Chair) Sen. Brandon R EXT E1.606 (512)-463-0104 Agriculture, Water & Rural Creighton Affairs; Business & Commerce (Vice Chair); State Affairs Sen. Juan Hinojosa D CAP 3E.10 (512)-463-0120 Agriculture, Water & Rural (McAllen) (956)-972-1841 Affairs; Finance (Vice Chair); Natural Resources & Economic Development Sen. Charles Perry R EXT E1.810 (512)-463-0128 Agriculture, Water & Rural (Lubbock) (806)-783-9934 Affairs (Chair); Health & Human Services; Higher Education Sen. Leticia Van de D CAP 3S.3 (512)-463-0126 Higher Education; Putte (San Antonio) (210)-733-6604 Intergovernmental Relations Senate Education Committee (84th) Clerk: Holly Mabry McCoy Phone: 512-463-0355 Room: SBH 440 Name Party Room Number Phone Number Other Committees Sen. Larry Taylor R CAP GE.5 512-463-0111 Business & Commerce; Finance; (Pearland) 281-485-9800 Intergovernmental Relations Vice Chair Sen. Eddie D CAP 3S.5 512-463-0127 Intergovernmental Relations Lucio, Jr (Brownsville) 956-548-0227 (Chair); Natural Resources & Economic Development; Veteran Affairs & Military Installations; Veteran Affairs & Military Installations-S/C Border Security Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy & Legislative Outlook November 13, 2020 9 -- 11 AM CT
    Policy & Legislative Outlook November 13, 2020 9 -- 11 AM CT Presented in partnership with the City of San Antonio, Department of Neighborhood and Housing Services 1 9:00 AM Event Kick-Off Welcome by Leilah Powell, Executive Director, LISC San Antonio 9:05 Keynote Panel 2020 Election Results & What to Expect in 2021 • Matt Josephs, SVP LISC Policy, Washington DC • Mark Bordas, Managing Partner, Aegis Advocacy, Austin TX San Antonio Policy & Legislative Outlook, November 13, 2020 2 2020 Election Outcomes Control of the White House Potential Cabinet Secretaries: Treasury, HUD and HHS Lael Brainard Raphael Bostic Karen Bass Eric Garcetti Vivek Murthy Mandy Cohen Sarah Bloom Keisha Lance Bottoms Michelle Lujan Raskin Grisham Control of the Senate 117th Congress Democrats Republicans 48 50 116th Congress Control of the House of Representatives 117th Congress Democrats Republicans 218 202 116th Congress 117th Congressional Leadership (Anticipated) House (pending leadership elections) Speaker of the House: Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) Majority Leader: Steny Hoyer (D-MD) Minority Leader: Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) Senate (pending elections results) Majority Leader: Mitch McConnell (R-KY) Minority Leader: Chuck Schumer (D-NY) 117th Congress: Senate and House Appropriations Committee Leadership (Anticipated) Senator Richard Senator Patrick Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Rep. Kay Granger Shelby (R-AL): Chair Leahy (D-VT): Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), and (R-TX): Ranking of the Senate Ranking Member of Debbie Wasserman Schultz Member of the Appropriations the Senate (D-FL)
    [Show full text]
  • IDEOLOGY and PARTISANSHIP in the 87Th (2021) REGULAR SESSION of the TEXAS LEGISLATURE
    IDEOLOGY AND PARTISANSHIP IN THE 87th (2021) REGULAR SESSION OF THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE Mark P. Jones, Ph.D. Fellow in Political Science, Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy July 2021 © 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the Baker Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Baker Institute. Mark P. Jones, Ph.D. “Ideology and Partisanship in the 87th (2021) Regular Session of the Texas Legislature” https://doi.org/10.25613/HP57-BF70 Ideology and Partisanship in the 87th (2021) Regular Session of the Texas Legislature Executive Summary This report utilizes roll call vote data to improve our understanding of the ideological and partisan dynamics of the Texas Legislature’s 87th regular session. The first section examines the location of the members of the Texas Senate and of the Texas House on the liberal-conservative dimension along which legislative politics takes place in Austin. In both chambers, every Republican is more conservative than every Democrat and every Democrat is more liberal than every Republican. There does, however, exist substantial ideological diversity within the respective Democratic and Republican delegations in each chamber. The second section explores the extent to which each senator and each representative was on the winning side of the non-lopsided final passage votes (FPVs) on which they voted.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers in a New Political Landscape
    Journal Homepage: Texas Education Review Published online: February 2020 Submit your article to this journal This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at www.review.education.texas.edu Teachers in a New Political Landscape ANDREA CHEVALIER The University of Texas at Austin MARY E. GONZÁLEZ Texas House of Representatives To cite this article: Chevalier, A., & González, M.E. (2019). Teachers in a new political landscape. Texas Education Review, 8(1), 102-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/7048 __________ Chevalier & González Teachers in a New Political Landscape ANDREA CHEVALIER The University of Texas at Austin MARY E. GONZÁLEZ Texas House of Representatives The political environment in the United States is undergoing rapid transformation (Mason, 2018; Price, 2008). While many scholars have focused on national dynamics (Darder, Baltodano & Torres, 2017; Fukayama, 2018; Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018; Price, 2018; Taylor, 2017), there have also been sig- nificant shifts at the state level. In particular, Texas has experienced both electoral and policy changes since the 2018 election cycle. A major catalyst for these statewide shifts is the positionality of teachers within the political landscape. Advocacy and electoral politics have changed the role of teachers in Texas. The growing political capital of teachers might not seem surprising, given that education has always been a central political talking point for state legislators in the Lone Star State. Commonly referenced as a priority during speeches, town halls, and in newsletters, pointing to education is a standard within Texas political discourse, especially to appease voters (Jenkins, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Katherine Thomas/Bruce Holter Meeting Date: April 25-26, 2019
    Agenda Item: 1.4 Prepared by: Katherine Thomas/Bruce Holter Meeting Date: April 25-26, 2019 Legislative Update The report which follows includes critical legislation currently being monitored by Board staff. The agency is following more than 200 House and Senate bills. At the time this report was prepared, 7,688 bills had been filed in the legislature. This is an increase of 5.8% percent from the previous legislative session. In the current legislative session, 13 bills include language which would amend the Nursing Practice Act (NPA). On May 6th, the 119th day of the session, any House bill not out of committee will no longer be eligible to continue forward in the legislative process. The last day of the regular legislative session is May 27th. The last day that the Governor can sign, veto or take no action on bills passed in the House and Senate is June 16th. The bills on the following pages are divided into two groups. All bills which would amend the NPA appear first. Following these bills are other bills which, if enacted, may require further action by the Board or Board staff. A full report on enacted legislation will be provided at the July, 2019 Board Meeting. This report is for information purposes. No action is required. Bills Amending Nursing Practice Act Continuing Education – Suicide Prevention HB 471 By Shawn Thierry Relating to required suicide prevention Amends Chapter training for certain health care 301 of the NPA. practitioners Expedited Texas Licensure for APRNs from Other States HB 912 By Donna Howard Relating to an expedited licensing Amends Chapter process for certain advanced practice 301 of the NPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Update
    January 29, 2021| Regular Session, Issue 3 | 87th Regular Session Every Friday, this newsletter will keep you up to speed on some of the legislation important to Texas Farm Bureau members that Austin staff are following. Please do not hesitate to contact the appropriate staff with any questions. Legislative Update Water SB 152 and companion HB 668: Relating to the regulation of groundwater conservation districts. Perry, Charles (R) and Harris, Cody (R) Summary: SB 152 and HB 668 empower landowners to protect their constitutional rights from illegal groundwater regulations. Current law does not require enough transparency or provide landowners with reasonable options to change or challenge bad regulations. If property owners are faced with an illegal regulation, they only have one option— to challenge the district’s action in court and take on the risk having to pay the district’s attorney fees. The language in SB 152 and HB 668 is currently being negotiated. The following description of the bills is based upon the current state of negotiations: 1. Requiring notice of a permit or permit amendment that will prevent a neighboring landowner from being able to drill a well on their property or drill at a particular location on their property. The local district will determine how that notice will be provided. This notice will give landowners who will be DIRECTLY affected by the district’s actions an opportunity to decide if they should participate in the permitting process to protect their right to drill a well. In some districts, spacing rules allow a neighbor to drill a well 50 feet from a property line.
    [Show full text]
  • Mike Toomey Mobilizes
    Perry’s Roomie Mike Toomey Mobilizes The Corporate Lobby to ‘Make Us Great Again’ State Library & Archives Commission. Then-State Reps. Mike Toomey & Rick Perry. Contents: Rep. Toomey 2 Revolving Door 3 Birth of a Dream Client 4 2002 Elections 6 Payback Time 8 Let’s Make a Deal 12 Dark Arts 13 Notes 16 Texans for Public Justice — January 2012 — www.tpj.org Perry’s Roomey Mike Toomey Mobilizes The Corporate Lobby to ‘Make Us Great Again’ After Texas’ pivotal 2002 elections the state’s three top politicians all hired lobbyists to run the government. “Republican leaders boldly began delivering on their promise to increase efficiency and cut waste just one week after they won control of every branch of Texas government,” observed the Texas Observer. “Rather than having corporations pay lobbyists millions of dollars to influence government, the state’s new leaders recruited some of Texas’ most powerful lobbyists to run the government directly.”1 The most feared and respected lobbyist then seizing power was gubernatorial Chief of Staff Valens “Mike” Toomey, who founded Perry’s “independent” Super PAC Make Us Great Again. At that time in late 2002 Toomey was at the top of his game. Twenty years earlier Houston-area voters had elected this attorney to one of just 36 Republican seats in the 150-member Texas House. Now a new Republican House majority was preparing to elect Texas’ first GOP House Speaker since reconstruction, thereby helping Congressman Tom DeLay redraw Texas’ congressional districts. Toomey, meanwhile, would head the staff of his friend Rick Perry, who would govern the state longer than any previous Texas governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Program Announcement
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Cultivate PR Cultivate PR Cultivate PR Sam Davidson Amanda Sprague Samantha Foster [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 512-689-7668 512-743-3941 512-670-6744 U.S. SENS. TED CRUZ & JOHN CORNYN TO JOIN CECILE RICHARDS, DAN RATHER AND MORE THAN 250 TOP SPEAKERS AT THE 2017 TEXAS TRIBUNE FESTIVAL FULL LINEUP AND PROGRAM NOW RELEASED Sept. 22-24 on the University of Texas at Austin campus AUSTIN, TEXAS (August 1, 2017) – The Texas Tribune is proud to announce the full program and schedule for its seventh-annual Festival, to be held Sept. 22-24 at the University of Texas at Austin. The event will host 250 legislators, thought-leaders and media in discussions tackling the state’s and the nation’s most pressing political issues. In a rare joint appearance, U.S. Sens. John Cornyn and Ted Cruz, both Republicans from Texas, will share the stage. Cornyn, the Senate Majority Whip, is the highest-ranking senator from Texas since Lyndon Johnson served as majority leader more than 50 years ago. Before being elected to the Senate in 2002, he previously served as a Texas Supreme Court justice and Texas attorney general. Cruz was the longest serving Solicitor General of Texas before being elected to the U.S. Senate in 2012 and has argued before the U.S. Supreme Court nine times. The Festival boasts a roster of more than 250 speakers and prominent figures from the worlds of public policy and politics, including Montana Gov. Steve Bullock; U.S. Rep.
    [Show full text]