DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrestrial Wildlife and Habitat Assessment on Bonneville Power Administration-Funded Wildlife Areas in Washington: Monitoring and Evaluation Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrestrial Wildlife and Habitat Assessment on Bonneville Power Administration-Funded Wildlife Areas in Washington: Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Terrestrial Wildlife and Habitat Assessment on Bonneville Power Administration-Funded Wildlife Areas in Washington: Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Michael A. Schroeder, Paul R. Ashley, and Matt Vander Haegen Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife May 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................8 VISION............................................................................................................................8 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE .....................................8 NORTHWEST POWER PLANNING COUNCIL........................................................11 Purpose.....................................................................................................................11 The Importance of Monitoring and Evaluation .......................................................15 Adaptive Management.............................................................................................17 MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...............................................................................18 FOCAL SPECIES AND HABITATS ...........................................................................18 Justification..............................................................................................................18 Description of Focal Habitats ..................................................................................19 Description of Focal Species ...................................................................................20 HABITAT EVALUATION PROCEDURES................................................................34 General Description .................................................................................................34 Methods for Open Habitats......................................................................................37 Methods for Forest and Riparian Habitats...............................................................44 Application of HEP Data to Wildlife.......................................................................46 MODIFIED HABITAT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES............................................49 Justification for Modification ..................................................................................49 Habitat Methods.......................................................................................................51 WILDLIFE MONITORING AND EVALUATION .....................................................53 Pygmy Rabbit...........................................................................................................54 Beaver ......................................................................................................................54 Western Gray Squirrel .............................................................................................55 Big Game .................................................................................................................55 Prairie Grouse ..........................................................................................................56 Great Blue Heron .....................................................................................................56 Mallard.....................................................................................................................56 Owls and Woodpeckers ...........................................................................................57 Songbirds .................................................................................................................57 Miscellaneous Surveys.............................................................................................60 SAGEBRUSH FLAT WILDLIFE AREA...........................................................................62 DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................62 UPPER MIDDLE MAINSTEM SUBBASIN ...............................................................65 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .........................................................................66 Habitat......................................................................................................................66 Mule Deer ................................................................................................................68 Prairie Grouse ..........................................................................................................69 General Bird Surveys...............................................................................................70 Miscellaneous Surveys.............................................................................................75 SCOTCH CREEK WILDLIFE AREA................................................................................77 DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................77 2 UPPER MIDDLE MAINSTEM AND UPPER COLUMBIA SUBBASINS................80 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .........................................................................82 Habitat......................................................................................................................82 Mule Deer and White-tailed Deer............................................................................84 Prairie Grouse ..........................................................................................................84 General Bird Surveys...............................................................................................86 BIRD SPECIES .............................................................................................................88 SWANSON LAKES WILDLIFE AREA ............................................................................93 DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................93 CRAB CREEK SUBBASIN..........................................................................................97 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .........................................................................97 Habitat......................................................................................................................97 Mule Deer ................................................................................................................98 Prairie Grouse ..........................................................................................................98 General Bird Surveys.............................................................................................100 Miscellaneous Surveys...........................................................................................104 SUNNYSIDE WILDLIFE AREA .....................................................................................105 DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................105 YAKIMA SUBBASIN ................................................................................................106 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .......................................................................107 Elk..........................................................................................................................107 Mule Deer ..............................................................................................................108 Miscellaneous Surveys...........................................................................................108 WENAS WILDLIFE AREA..............................................................................................109 DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................109 YAKIMA SUBBASIN ................................................................................................111 FOCAL ........................................................................................................................111 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .......................................................................112 Habitat....................................................................................................................112 Elk..........................................................................................................................113 Mule Deer ..............................................................................................................114 Bighorn Sheep........................................................................................................115 Prairie Grouse ........................................................................................................115 General Bird Surveys.............................................................................................116 ASOTIN CREEK WILDLIFE AREA...............................................................................119 DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................119 ASOTIN SUBBASIN ..................................................................................................121
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synthesis of Biological Research On
    DRAFT FINAL November 2007 Review of Biological Research on Juvenile and Adult Salmonid use of Vancouver Lake Prepared by: Portland District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Review of Biological Research on Juvenile and Adult Salmonids and Survival at Vancouver Lake Abstract This document provides a synthesis of known biological research on juvenile and adult salmonids at Vancouver Lake, Vancouver Washington. This review of literature was prepared to support the Portland District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement with the Vancouver Lake Watershed Partnership under the Corps Section 536 program. This specialized Corps program authority promotes the improvement of tidally influenced off-channel habitat in the Lower Columbia River. The goal of this report is to provide the Corps of Engineers the best information available to make management decisions on whether or not to move forward with improving habitat for salmonids at Vancouver Lake. Background and Lake History Vancouver Lake (approximately 2,600 acres) provides a variety of functions to the surrounding community including wildlife habitat, flood control, boating, bird watching, hiking, hunting and other recreational activities as well as environmental education and stewardship opportunities. The Lower Columbia River has been impacted over the past 100 years by the implementation of navigation features associated with the Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Navigation Channel, urban and rural development, federally funded flood control projects, and flow fluctuations attributable to the Federal Columbia River Power System. The cumulative effect of these actions has contributed to the degradation of the quality and quantity of the off-channel habitat in the Columbia River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Guide for Yellow Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus Viscidiflorus)
    Plant Guide valuable forage especially during late fall and early winter YELLOW after more desirable forage has been utilized (Tirmenstein, 1999). Palatability and usage vary between RABBITBRUSH subspecies of yellow rabbitbrush (McArthuer et al., 1979). Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus (Hook.) Nutt. Yellow rabbitbrush provides cover and nesting habitat for Plant Symbol = CHVI8 sage-grouse, small birds and rodents (Gregg et al., 1994). Black-tailed jackrabbits consume large quantities of Contributed by: USDA NRCS Idaho Plant Materials yellow rabbitbrush during winter and early spring when Program plants are dormant (Curie and Goodwin, 1966). Yellow rabbitbrush provides late summer and fall forage for butterflies. Unpublished field reports indicate visitation from bordered patch butterflies (Chlosyne lacinia), Mormon metalmark (Apodemia mormo), mourning cloak (Nymphalis antiopa), common checkered skipper (Pyrgus communis), and Weidemeyer’s admiral (Limenitis weidemeyerii). Restoration: Yellow rabbitbrush is a seral species which colonizes disturbed areas making it well suited for use in restoration and revegetation plantings. It can be established from direct seeding and will spread via windborne seed. It has been successfully used for revegetating depleted rangelands, strip mines and roadsides (Plummer, 1977). Status Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status (e.g., threatened or endangered species, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values). Description General: Sunflower family (Asteraceae). Yellow rabbitbrush is a low- to moderate-growing shrub reaching mature heights of 20 to 100 cm (8 to 39 in) tall. The stems Al Schneider @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database can be glabrous or pubescent depending on variety, and are covered with pale green to white-gray bark.
    [Show full text]
  • Infection in Kangaroo Rats (Dipodomys Spp.): Effects on Digestive Efficiency
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 55 Number 1 Article 8 1-16-1995 Whipworm (Trichuris dipodomys) infection in kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spp.): effects on digestive efficiency James C. Munger Boise State University, Boise, idaho Todd A. Slichter Boise State University, Boise, Idaho Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Munger, James C. and Slichter, Todd A. (1995) "Whipworm (Trichuris dipodomys) infection in kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spp.): effects on digestive efficiency," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 55 : No. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol55/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 55(1), © 1995, pp. 74-77 WHIPWORM (TRICHURIS DIPODOMYS) INFECTION IN KANGAROO RATS (DIPODOMYS SPP): EFFECTS ON DIGESTIVE EFFICIENCY James C. Mungerl and Todd A. Slichterl ABSTRACT.-To dcterminc whether infections by whipworms (Trichuris dipodumys [Nematoda: Trichurata: Trichuridae]) might affect digestive eHlciency and therefore enel"/,,'Y budgets of two species ofkangaroo rats (Dipodomys microps and Dipodumys urdU [Rodentia: Heteromyidae]), we compared the apparent dry matter digestibility of three groups of hosts: those naturally infected with whipworms, those naturally uninfected with whipworms, and those origi~ nally naturally infected but later deinfected by treatment with the anthelminthic Ivermectin. Prevalence of T. dipodomys was higher in D. rnicrops (.53%) than in D. ordU (14%). Apparent dry matter digestibility was reduced by whipworm infection in D.
    [Show full text]
  • Texosporium Sancti-Jacobi, a Rare Western North American Lichen
    4347 The Bryologist 95(3), 1992, pp. 329-333 Copyright © 1992 by the American Bryological and Lichenological Society, Inc. Texosporium sancti-jacobi, a Rare Western North American Lichen BRUCE MCCUNE Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-2902 ROGER ROSENTRETER Bureau of Land Management, Idaho State Office, 3380 Americana Terrace, Boise, ID 83706 Abstract. The lichen Texosporium sancti-jacobi (Ascomycetes: Caliciales) is known from only four general locations worldwide, all in western U.S.A. Typical habitat of Texosporium has the following characteristics: arid or semiarid climate; nearly flat ground; noncalcareous, nonsaline, fine- or coarse-textured soils developed on noncalcareous parent materials; little evidence of recent disturbance; sparse vascular plant vegetation; and dominance by native plant species. Within these constraints Texosporium occurs on restricted microsites: partly decomposed small mammal dung or organic matter infused with soil. The major threat to long-term survival of Texosporium is loss of habitat by extensive destruction of the soil crust by overgrazing, invasion of weedy annual grasses and resulting increases in fire frequency, and conversion of rangelands to agriculture and suburban developments. Habitat protection efforts are important to perpetuate this species. The lichen Texosporium sancti-jacobi (Tuck.) revisited. The early collections from that area have vague Nadv. is globally ranked (conservation status G2) location data while more recent collections (1950s-1960s) by the United States Rare Lichen Project (S. K. were from areas that are now heavily developed and pre- sumably do not support the species. New sites were sought Pittam 1990, pers. comm.). A rating of G2 means in likely areas, especially in southwest Idaho, northern that globally the species is very rare, and that the Nevada, and eastern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Eutrophication: Vancouver Lake, WA, USA As a Model System for Assessing Multiple, Interacting Biotic and Abiotic Drivers of Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms
    water Article Beyond Eutrophication: Vancouver Lake, WA, USA as a Model System for Assessing Multiple, Interacting Biotic and Abiotic Drivers of Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms Gretchen Rollwagen-Bollens 1,2,*, Tammy Lee 1, Vanessa Rose 1 and Stephen M. Bollens 1,2 1 School of the Environment, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, 98686, USA; [email protected] (T.L.); [email protected] (V.R.); [email protected] (S.M.B.) 2 School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-360-546-9115 Received: 16 April 2018; Accepted: 8 June 2018; Published: 10 June 2018 Abstract: Eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs has contributed to an increase in the magnitude and frequency of harmful cyanobacterial blooms; however, the interactive effects of nutrient availability (eutrophication) and other abiotic and biotic drivers have rarely been comprehensively studied in the field. We undertook an eight-year (2005–2013) research program that assessed the interaction of multiple factors driving cyanobacterial blooms in Vancouver Lake, a large, shallow eutrophic lake in Washington, USA. Our program consisted of nearly continuous monthly or weekly monitoring of water quality and plankton community composition over eight years, as well as multiple zooplankton grazing experiments over three years. We found a relatively consistent seasonal succession of phytoplankton and zooplankton assemblages, and a pattern of interacting factors influencing cyanobacterial bloom dynamics. Typically, a combined effect of decreased dissolved inorganic nitrogen (N), a sudden increase of dissolved inorganic phosphorus (P), and a cascading effect of zooplankton grazing created a ‘perfect storm’ of conditions that promoted the rapid proliferation of cyanobacteria over the two to three weeks before a bloom.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Mammals of the National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho Dorald M
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 33 | Number 4 Article 6 12-31-1973 Small mammals of the National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho Dorald M. Allred Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Allred, Dorald M. (1973) "Small mammals of the National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 33 : No. 4 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol33/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. SMALL MAMMALS OF THE NATIONAL REACTOR TESTING STATION, IDAHO^ Dorald M. Allred= Abstract.— During studies of ectoparasites in 12 plant communities in 1966 and 1967, five types of traps were used to capture 2,478 mammals of the follow- ing 1 1 species: Dipodomys ordii, Euiamias minimus, Microtus montanus, Onychomys leucogaster, Perognathus parvus, Peromyscus maniculatus, Reithro- dontomys megalotis, Sorex merriami, Spermophilus townsendii, Neotoma cinerea, and Thomomys talpoides. The most abundant species was D. ordii and the least, M. montanus. Plant communities which contained the greatest number of species were the Chrysothamnus-Artemisia and Chrysothamnus-grass Tetradymia. Fewest species were found in the grass and Juniperus communities. Greatest populations were in the Juniperus and grass communities, and lowest populations in the Artemisia-Chrysothamnus, Artemisia- Atriplex, and Chrysothamnus-grass-Tetrady- mia associations. Between June 1966 and September 1967, ectoparasites were col- lected from mammals at the National Reactor Testing Station by personnel of Brigham Young University.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Scientific Assessment Report Vancouver Watershed Health
    INTEGRATED SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT REPORT VANCOUVER WATERSHED HEALTH ASSESSMENT Prepared for City of Vancouver, Washington Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. and Pacific Groundwater Group Note: Some pages in this document have been purposely skipped or blank pages inserted so this document will copy correctly when duplexed. INTEGRATED SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT REPORT VANCOUVER WATERSHED HEALTH ASSESSMENT Prepared for City of Vancouver Surface Water Management 4500 Southeast Columbia Way Vancouver, Washington 98661 Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1001 Southeast Water Avenue, Suite 290 Portland, Oregon 97214 Telephone: 503-228-4301 and Pacific Groundwater Group 2377 Eastlake Avenue East Suite #200 Seattle, Washington 98102 Telephone: 206-329-0141 February 20, 2019 CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Overview ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Study Area and Vicinity ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Inventory for Hubbell Trading Post National Historic Site
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Mammal Inventory for Hubbell Trading Post National Historic Site Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2010/376 ON THE COVER The deer mouse was one of the most abundant mammal species found during this inventory. Photograph by: John Good Mammal Inventory for Hubbell Trading Post National Historic Site Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2010/376 Shauna Haymond Holistic Wildlife Services NM, LLC 112 Hampton Roads Avenue Hampton, VA 23661 Richard E. Sherwin Department of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Science Christopher Newport University 1 University Place Newport News, VA 23606-2998 September 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natu- ral resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientif- ically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for White-Tailed Prairie Dog (Cynomys Leucurus)
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR WHITE -TAILED PRAIRIE DOG (CYNOMYS LEUCURUS ) IN WYOMING prepared by DOUGLAS A. KEINATH Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming December 2004 Keinath - Cynomys leucurus December 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphology............................................................................................................................. 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy .......................................................................................................................................4 Range and Distribution....................................................................................................................5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 5 General ............................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Shillapoo Wildlife Area Fish Passage Barrier and Fish Screen Scoping Report
    SHILLAPOO WILDLIFE AREA FISH PASSAGE AND DIVERSION SCREENING SCOPING REPORT HABITAT PROGRAM TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS DIVISION (TAPPS) BY TOM BURNS May 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wished to acknowledge the assistance of Brian Calkins, John Wienheimer and Jason Kunz in developing this report. Eva Wilder created the maps and tables for this report. Mike Barber provided guidance and editing. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….……………… 1 SITE DESCRIPTION……………………………………………….………………... 2 METHODS…………………………………………………………………………… 3 RESULTS…………………………………………………………………………….. 4 North Unit Field Evaluations…………………………………………………. 4 South Unit Field Evaluations…………………………………………………. 6 Vancouver Lake Unit Field Evaluations……………………………………… 8 DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………… 8 LITERATURE CITED……………………………………………………………….. 12 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Shillapoo Wildlife Area………………………………………………….…. 2 Figure 2. Shillapoo Wildlife Area, North Unit………………………….…………….. 5 Figure 3. Shillapoo Wildlife Area, South Unit………………………………………... 7 Figure 4. Shillapoo Wildlife Area, Vancouver Lake Unit…………………………….. 9 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. A two-year investigative summary of sites initially inventoried by WDFW In 2003…………………………………………………………………........ 11 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SHILLAPOO WILDLIFE AREA FISH PASSAGE AND DIVERSION SCREENING SCOPING REPORT TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS DIVISION (TAPPS) – HABITAT PROGRAM MAY 2007 Introduction This report summarizes the results of WDFW’s scoping efforts on the Shillapoo Wildlife Area to correct fish passage barriers
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Diversification of the Gall Midge Genus Asteromyia
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54 (2010) 194–210 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Evolutionary diversification of the gall midge genus Asteromyia (Cecidomyiidae) in a multitrophic ecological context John O. Stireman III a,*, Hilary Devlin a, Timothy G. Carr b, Patrick Abbot c a Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy., Dayton, OH 45435, USA b Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, E145 Corson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA c Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Box 351634 Station B, Nashville, TN 37235, USA article info abstract Article history: Gall-forming insects provide ideal systems to analyze the evolution of host–parasite interactions and Received 3 April 2009 understand the ecological interactions that contribute to evolutionary diversification. Flies in the family Revised 17 August 2009 Cecidomyiidae represent the largest radiation of gall-forming insects and are characterized by complex Accepted 9 September 2009 trophic interactions with plants, fungal symbionts, and predators. We analyzed the phylogenetic history Available online 16 September 2009 and evolutionary associations of the North American cecidomyiid genus Asteromyia, which is engaged in a complex and perhaps co-evolving community of interactions with host-plants, fungi, and parasitoids. Keywords: Mitochondrial gene trees generally support current classifications, but reveal extensive cryptic diversity Adaptive diversification within the eight named species. Asteromyia likely radiated after their associated host-plants in the Aste- Fungal mutualism Insect-plant coevolution reae, but species groups exhibit strong associations with specific lineages of Astereae. Evolutionary asso- Cryptic species ciations with fungal mutualists are dynamic, however, and suggest rapid and perhaps coordinated Parasitoid changes across trophic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]