DOCSLIB.ORG

Representation of Young People Both Domestically and at the International Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Representation of Young People Both Domestically and at the International Level City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2019 Representation of Young People both Domestically and at the International Level Juan Pablo Celis Garcia CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/800 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Representation of Young People both Domestically and at the International Level Juan Pablo Celis Garcia December 2018 Master’s Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of International Affairs at the City College of New York COLIN POWELL SCHOOL FOR CIVIC AND GLOBAL LEADERSHIP Advisor: Dr. Jean Krasno Second Reader: Professor Kimberly Gamble-Payne Table of Contents Abstract 3 Chapter 1: Introduction 5 Hypothesis 6 Case Studies 6 International Institutions and Their Approach to Representation 8 Chapter Two: Literature Review 11 Chapter Three: The Importance of Youth Representation 16 Chapter Four: Case Studies 22 Sweden 23 Costa Rica 24 Nigeria 25 Brazil 27 Chapter Five: IPU Report and Recommendations 32 Chapter Six: Youth Representation at United Nations and World Bank 39 Chapter Seven: Policy Recommendation and Conclusion 49 Bibliography 54 2 Representation of Young People Both Domestically and at the International Level Abstract Young people have played a crucial role in solving major global challenges. Their energy, innovation, passion, and creativity have allowed for the advancement and consolidation of society. However, till this day, youth continue to be excluded, discriminated against, and underrepresented within political spheres. This thesis evaluates youth representation within decision-making processes at the national and international levels. It comprises seven chapters that analyze the current narrative of inclusive participation of young people from international organizations, national governments, scholars, and independent institutions. Initially, this work considers the questions of how underrepresentation occurs and why young people are important today. The thesis examines the impact of young people in the most prominent sectors of society, such as education, health, migration, and labor. At the national level, Chapter Four looks into representation within four countries, Sweden, Costa Rica, Brazil, and Nigeria. The different case studies give a closer look at current national policies on the matter, and the restriction limiting youth participation that have prompted greater local activism. Moreover, the analysis of the IPU Report on Youth Participation in National Parliaments offers a general perspective on the current situation of low youth participation in parliaments, taking into consideration facts and figures from most recent data collected from national parliaments. Consequently, at the international level, this work evaluates 3 approaches and the current narrative of the United Nations and the World Bank in dealing with global youth issues. It concludes by confirming the argument that the cause of this underrepresentation is mainly due to age-restriction laws for public office positions within national governments, the wrong perception that youth lack experience and knowledge, and the preference of young people to participate in other forms of political participation. Lastly, the policy recommendation proposes strategies to improve the matter, primarily on a top to bottom approach. The suggestions entail strengthening research and data collection, holding governments accountable on their promises, increasing funding for youth programmes, educating the general population about the needed for youth representation, and fostering partnerships between governments, private sector, NGOs, and civil society. 4 Chapter 1: Introduction The participation of young people in public affairs is among one of the most important concerns in the debate on the extension of the democratic process. It is evident that the presence of young people in other types of collective action contributes to the creation of different participatory social experiences, yet there is little youth participation in formal political spaces. Today, more than 50% of the world’s population is under 30 years old (IPU, 2016). According to the 2018 Secretary-General Report, Africa is the youngest continent with 68% of its population under the age of 30, and Asia being the continent with the highest number of young people with 1.1 billion. Yet, according to the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), people under 30 years old make up less than 2% of the world’s members of parliament (IPU 2016). The Not Too Young to Run Campaign stated that 73% of countries restrict eligible young voters from running for governmental positions (UN DESA 2016). However, without extensive input from young people, we could risk the possibility of not considering youth as important contributors to the solutions of global challenges, such as climate change, peace, and security, and the protection of human rights. Moreover, the underrepresentation of young people has been reflected within international organizations, such as the United Nations, where several Members States have not included youth representatives within their delegations. According to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), only 50 to 60 Member States, out of 193, have included Youth Delegates as part of their Permanent Missions (UN DESA 2013). For several years, UN agencies and non-governmental organizations have encouraged Member States to include youth representatives in their missions. UN 5 documents, such as the World Programme of Action for Youth and the Guide to Youth Delegates, have raised this issue of underrepresentation. However, there is no legally binding document that requires governments to include young people within delegations. This comparative underrepresentation of young people in elected or international bodies raises the following question: Why are young people underrepresented in public office positions within national governments and international organizations? To address this question, it is important to incorporate the principle of inclusivity, including a balance of participation, where young people, who make up a great percentage of the world’s population, are no longer left behind. Hypothesis The thesis asks this research question: Why are youth underrepresented in both national parliaments and international organizations? Are they systematically being discriminated against? By analyzing scholarly articles and reports, the thesis proposes the hypothesis that the lack of representation of young people in the political sphere is partially due to national age-restriction laws for public office positions, a sense that young people may not have enough experience, and the preference of young people to participate in other forms of political activism as a result of being left out of the democratic process. Case Studies Several scholarly articles, reports, and UN resolutions have previously addressed this issue of underrepresentation, at national and international levels, and lay out approaches to addressing the issue. Research has been undertaken by scholars from 6 Brazil, Costa Rica, and Sweden, as well as youth specialized agencies and organizations who have published important documentation regarding youth policies and youth development. Furthermore, this thesis analyzes previous UN General Assembly and Security Council resolutions, as well as data from the Youth Development Index and Inter Parliamentary Union. Defining “youth” as between the ages of 18 to 30, I have chosen four specific countries that will be the base of my research design and will guide me in answering my research question. I will further analyze current youth policies in Brazil, Costa Rica, Sweden, and Nigeria, as well as formal and non-formal ways for political participation of young people in each country. Moreover, by looking at documentation and data, it is useful to compare each case and deconstruct each nation’s youth policy to find answers to the issue of youth underrepresentation within governments. There is much more research and data to collect on youth governmental participation that could further explain: Why the lack of representation occurs; What the consequences are as a result of youth underrepresentation and; Why policy decision-making would benefit from greater youth participation. To address the issue, there is a need to examine the processes that involve creating national youth policies and youth intergovernmental resolutions, and how to reinforce Members State requirement to include more youth in policy-making positions and even consider establishing quotas. Sweden, with a minimum voting age of 18, also has a minimum age of 18 for candidacy as parliamentarians and higher-level positions (IPU Parline Database, 2016). Moreover, 12.3% of Parliamentarians in the country are under 30 years old. Rated High by the Youth Development Index with 0.794, Sweden is a country with greater levels of political participation of young people. In the case of Costa Rica, the age of candidacy for 7 parliament is 21 with a minimum voting age of 18. Its parliament contains only 3.5% of people under 30. However, the Youth Development Index has rated Costa Rica Very High on political participation of young
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Youth Declaration of Rights Vermont Youth Have the Right To
    YOUTH DECLARATION OF RIGHTS VERMONT YOUTH HAVE THE RIGHT TO: EDUCATION MENTAL HEALTH Access free classes on Basic Life Skills (signing a lease, Have access to affordable mental health care budgeting, taxes, resumes, etc.) A personal break to handle their mental situation Equal opportunities and experiences in arts education Choose their own identity, whether that be sexual before, during, and after school orientation, religious identification, and/or gender A post-secondary education no matter their financial identification situation Have people in society who support their mental well-being A student-directed, safe space for afterschool support and community engagement free of charge NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Time outdoors during the school (or work) day A healthy environment that provides the basic necessities to all life Know about the environment, and what is being done to it EQUALITY & JUSTICE Have a say about what happens to the environment Explore their identities in a safe environment Safe recreation in the outdoors and in their communities Education on gun safety and to live in a gun-aware PHYSICAL HEALTH community that is educated and aware of proper gun usage Hygienic products, clothing, and utilities suitable for all Have their voices heard in legal decisions that affect climates and environments everyone Have access to outdoor recreational and natural spaces Be protected in all of their life circumstances, be able to (e.g., parks, fields, courts, lakes, pitches, trails, paths, etc.) have their own privacy in their environments,
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Gerontocracy? Addressing the Intergenerational Democratic Deficit
    The rise of gerontocracy? Addressing the intergenerational democratic deficit Dr Craig Berry on behalf of the Intergenerational Foundation May 2012 Intergenerational Foundation, www.if.org.uk, charity no: 1142 230 Contents Foreword 3 Executive summary 5 Introduction 10 1. Democracy and intergenerational equity 13 2. The intergenerational democratic deficit 20 3. Solutions? 44 Appendix: possible objections 66 2 Foreword Debate about the implications of the ageing character of our society has so far been directed towards economic issues, including imbalances in wealth and economic opportunities across the generations. It is now time for us to start considering the civic implications of inequalities arising from Britain's ageing society. The analysis set out in this paper by Dr Craig Berry shows that, if current trends continue, older cohorts may well come to exercise a disproportionate influence on the democratic process in future decades. We could be witnessing a fundamental reconfiguration of the electorate, which is putting more power into the hands of older people and reducing that which younger cohorts possess. Dr Berry's paper illustrates that the life-stages of voters matter more and more in our democracy. Understanding the significance and nature of age-based inequalities should form an important part of the agenda of those committed to the cause of reforming our political system. An electorate which includes a growing number of older people generates new imbalances in terms of voter turnout, voter registration, party support and the social and generational composition of the legislature. The coalition government's proposed changes to the system of voter registration, for instance, require particularly careful scrutiny if they are to avoid making generational inequalities worse.
    [Show full text]
  • National Youth Rights Association Jason Kende
    Board of Directors PO Box 5882 Christopher Coes -- Washington DC 20016 Scott Davidson http://www.youthrights.org [email protected] Laura Finstad Rich Jahn National Youth Rights Association Jason Kende Alex Koroknay-Palicz Johnathan McClure To: Federal Elections Commission Re: Rules regarding political contributions by minors Kathleen Miller Brad White In light of the December 10 Supreme Court's use of no uncertain terms in to strike down the Bi-Partisan Campaign Reform Act's provision that Board of Advisors individuals 17 and under were banned from political giving, the National Youth Rights Association urges a liberal interpretation of the rules Adam Fletcher when implementing the Court's ruling. To accommodate the decision Founder, Freechild.org in McConnell vs. FEC we believe the greatest deference must be paid David Hanson, Ph. D. to youth wanting to donate money to political campaigns and parties. Professor. State University ofNew York at Potsdam Specifically we recommend the following: 1. Minors 14-17 should be treated no differently from adults in the Bennett Haselton area of political donations. President. Peacefire 2. Minors between 7 and 14 should have an initial presumption of Grace Llewellyn capacity that is rebuttable. Author. "Teenage Liberation Handbook" 3. Minors 7 and under should have a rebuttable presumption of incapacity. Mike Males, Ph.D. 4. Minors should be able to donate from bank accounts where they Author. "Framing Youth" have full access to the funds, even if parents or guardians must Roderic Park, Ph. D. co-sign to open the account. Former chancellor. University ofColorado -­ If a hearing is scheduled, NYRA is interested in testifying.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Youth Advocacy May 5, 2021
    School Mental Health Virtual Learning Series January 2021-August 2021 Youth MOVE National: Leveraging Youth Advocacy May 5, 2021 Technology Support • Slides will be posted on the NCSMH website (www.schoolmentalhealth.org) and emailed after the presentation to all registrants • Please type questions for the panelists into the Q&A box. • Use chat box for sharing resources, comments, and responding to speaker Web Mobile App Tiffany Beason Larraine Bernstein Taneisha Carter Elizabeth Connors NCSMH Faculty Coordinator Senior RA NCSMH Faculty Dana Cunningham Sharon Hoover Nancy Lever Jill PGSMHI Director NCSMH Co-Director NCSMH Co-Director Bohnenkamp NCSMH Faculty Oscar Morgan Michael Thompson Dave Brown MHTTC Project Director MHTTC Sr. TA Specialist Senior Associate School-based Training Behavioral Health Equities Perrin Robinson Britt Patterson Kris Scardamalia Communications Director NCSMH Faculty NCSMH Faculty Central East Geographical Area of Focus HHS REGION 3 Delaware District of Columbia Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia What Does Central East MHTTC Do? Actions • Accelerate the adoption and implementation of evidence‐based and promising treatment and recovery-oriented practices and services • Strengthen the awareness, knowledge, and skills of the behavioral and mental health and prevention workforce, and other stakeholders, that address the needs of people with behavioral health disorders • Foster regional and national alliances among culturally diverse practitioners, researchers, policy makers, funders, and the recovery community • Ensure the availability and delivery of publicly available, free of charge, training and technical assistance to the behavioral and mental health field National Center for School Mental Health MISSION: Strengthen policies and programs in school mental health to improve learning and promote success for America's youth • Focus on advancing school mental health policy, research, practice, and training • Shared family-schools-community mental health agenda Directors: Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Leadership As a Route to Greater Empowerment
    WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AS A ROUTE TO GREATER EMPOWERMENT DESKTOP STUDY OCTOBER 30, 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Mona Lena Krook, Darcy Ashman, Layla Moughari and Milad Pournik of Management Systems International. WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AS A ROUTE TO GREATER EMPOWERMENT DESKTOP STUDY Management Systems International Corporate Offices 200 12th Street South Arlington, VA 22202, USA Tel: + 1 703 979 7100 / Fax: +1 703 979 7101 Contracted under IQC No: AID-OAA-I-10-00002, Task Order No. AID-OAA-TO-13-00046 USAID Contracting Officer’s Representative: Julie Denham, DRG Center DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................................................................. II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 KEY FINDINGS OF THE DESKTOP STUDY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE PROGRAMMING .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Drinking Age
    Vermont Legislative Research Shop Lowering the Drinking Age The minimum legal drinking age fluctuated throughout the second half of the 20th century, yielding mixed results. After prohibition was repealed in 1933, almost every state set the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) at 21 years.1 In 1970 Congress lowered the voting age to 18, which began a movement to lower the drinking age, as well. During the Vietnam era, many people were outraged that 18 year‐olds were fighting overseas yet could not have a drink. In the period between 1970 and 1975, 29 states lowered their MLDA to 18, 19 or 20. A study by Alexander Wagenaar revealed that in states that had lowered their minimum age there was a 15 to 20% increase in teen automobile accidents.2 This information influenced 16 states to raise their MLDA to 21 between 1976 and 1983. Pressure from groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) led to the signing of the Uniform Drinking Age Act by President Ronald Reagan on July 17, 1984.3 This act mandated a significant decrease in federal transportation funding for states that did not raise their MLDA to 21. Worldwide, the United States has the highest MLDA, with others ranging from birth to age 20.4 The majority of countries have a MLDA of 18. In most of these countries, however, the family teaches responsible drinking from a very young age. Since 1960, over one hundred studies have been conducted to analyze the effects of raising the MLDA. This research was examined by Alexander Wagenaar to determine the trends that appeared in the conclusions.5 Some of these studies provided evidence supporting a MLDA of 21, while most others found no conclusive results.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Voter Participation
    Youth Voter Participation Youth Voter Participation Involving Today’s Young in Tomorrow’s Democracy Copyright © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) 1999 All rights reserved. Applications for permission to reproduce all or any part of this publication should be made to: Publications Officer, International IDEA, S-103 34 Stockholm, Sweden. International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will respond promptly to requests for permission for reproduction or translation. This is an International IDEA publication. International IDEA’s publications are not a reflection of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA’s Board or Council members. Art Direction and Design: Eduard âehovin, Slovenia Illustration: Ana Ko‰ir Pre-press: Studio Signum, Slovenia Printed and bound by: Bröderna Carlssons Boktryckeri AB, Varberg ISBN: 91-89098-31-5 Table of Contents FOREWORD 7 OVERVIEW 9 Structure of the Report 9 Definition of “Youth” 9 Acknowledgements 10 Part I WHY YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD VOTE 11 A. Electoral Abstention as a Problem of Democracy 13 B. Why Participation of Young People is Important 13 Part II ASSESSING AND ANALYSING YOUTH TURNOUT 15 A. Measuring Turnout 17 1. Official Registers 17 2. Surveys 18 B. Youth Turnout in National Parliamentary Elections 21 1. Data Sources 21 2. The Relationship Between Age and Turnout 24 3. Cross-National Differences in Youth Turnout 27 4. Comparing First-Time and More Experienced Young Voters 28 5. Factors that May Increase Turnout 30 C. Reasons for Low Turnout and Non-Voting 31 1. Macro-Level Factors 31 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for Standing in Local and Regional Elections
    28th SESSION Strasbourg, 24-26 March 2015 CG/2015(28)7FINAL 26 March 2015 Criteria for standing in local and regional elections Governance Committee Co-rapporteurs:1 Oleksii HONCHARENKO, Ukraine (R, SOC) and Viacheslav ROGOV, Russian Federation (L, ILDG) Resolution 382 (2015) .............................................................................................................................2 Recommendation 375 (2015) ..................................................................................................................3 Explanatory memorandum .......................................................................................................................6 Summary The right to stand for election at local or regional level is a key component of local and regional democracy. While there needs to be some regulation to weed out spurious candidates, the health of territorial democracy depends on the greatest possible proportion of the electorate being able to stand for election. The rapporteurs believe that there remain too many restrictions on standing for local and regional elections. The increase in mobility in Europe is raising expectations and highlighting the drawbacks of maintaining practices and regulations that are overly restrictive in this respect. Governments are invited to review their legislation with a view to removing unnecessary restrictions on standing for election. The Congress therefore asks its committees to work with the Venice Commission in drawing up a supplement to the Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters to address the issue of criteria for standing in local and regional elections. 1 L: Chamber of Local Authorities / R: Chamber of Regions EPP/CCE: European People’s Party Group in the Congress SOC: Socialist Group ILDG: Independent and Liberal Democrat Group ECR: European Conservatives and Reformists Group NR: Members not belonging to a political group of the Congress CG/2015(28)7FINAL RESOLUTION 382 (2015)2 1. The right to stand for election is a key component of local and regional democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brave New Generation Youth in Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Findings and Recommendations a Brave New Generation New Brave A
    A Brave New Generation Youth in Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Findings and Recommendations A Brave New Generation Foreword by Emir Kusturica, UNICEF National Ambassador for Federal Republic of Yugoslavia A Brave New Generation Youth in Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Findings and Recommendations Foreword by Emir Kusturica, UNICEF National Ambassador for Federal Republic of Yugoslavia A BRAVE NEW GENERATION • Youth in Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Findings and Recommendations Published by> UNICEF Belgrade For publisher> Jean‚Michel Delmotte, Head of UNICEF Office Layout design> Konstantin Petrovic Cover photograph> UNICEF \ Zoran Jovanovic Maccak Management team> UNICEF staff from Belgrade, Podgorica and Area Office for the Balkans Editor> Jane E. Foy Research> Vesna Ciprus Printed by> STOJKOV Printing House, Novi Sad Print run> 500 Published> March, 2002 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies of views of UNCIEF. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply on the part of UNICEF the expression of any opinion whatsoever concerning the legal status of the country or territory, or of its authorities, or the delimitations of its frontiers. UNICEF Belgrade Svetozara Markovica 58 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia Tel> (+381 11) 3602 100 Fax> (+381 11) 3602 199 E-mail> office¤unicef.org.yu A BRAVE NEW GENERATION • Youth in Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Findings and Recommendations Content Acronyms and Abbreviations . .7 Foreword . .9 Executive Summary . .11 Participation in Society . .12 Education and Learning . .13 Economics . .14 Health . .15 Young People in Need of Special Protection . .16 Conclusion . .17 Facts and Findings on Youth in FRY .
    [Show full text]
  • A HRC WG.6 34 IRQ 3 E.Pdf
    United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/34/IRQ/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 19 August 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty-fourth session 4–15 November 2019 Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Iraq* Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights I. Background 1. The present report was prepared pursuant to Human Rights Council resolutions 5/1 and 16/21, taking into consideration the periodicity of the universal periodic review. It is a summary of 54 stakeholders’ submissions1 to the universal periodic review, presented in a summarized manner owing to word-limit constraints. II. Information provided by stakeholders A. Scope of international obligations2 and cooperation with international human rights mechanisms and bodies3 2. MAAT, Al Karama, AI, MENA Rights and other stakeholders have stated that since the previous UPR cycle, the authorities have not taken any steps accede to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and the Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families.4 3. JAI and other stakeholders urged Iraq to join the International Criminal Court and to enforce the rule of law in Iraq.5 4. Al-Miezan recommended Iraq to ratify the International Labor Convention No. 130 of 1969 concerning medical care and patient support.6 5. Jiyan called on the Government to remove reservations entered to Articles 2 (f, g) and 16 of the CEDAW mandating states to repeal discriminatory laws and practices and ensure equality in all matters related to family and marital relations; and urged the Government to accept individual complaint procedure under ratified human rights treaties7 * The present document was not edited before being sent to United Nations translation services.
    [Show full text]
  • On Parliamentary Representation)
    House of Commons Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Session 2008–09 Volume II Written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 April 2009 HC 167 -II Published on 27 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) The Conference secretariat will be able to make individual submissions available in large print or Braille on request. The Conference secretariat can be contacted on 020 7219 0654 or [email protected] On 12 November 2008 the House of Commons agreed to establish a new committee, to be chaired by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP and known as the Speaker's Conference. The Conference has been asked to: "Consider, and make recommendations for rectifying, the disparity between the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people in the House of Commons and their representation in the UK population at large". It may also agree to consider other associated matters. The Speaker's Conference has until the end of the Parliament to conduct its inquiries. Current membership Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) (Vice-Chairman) Ms Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North & Stoke Newington) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mr David Blunkett MP (Labour, Sheffield, Brightside) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Mr Ronnie Campbell MP (Labour, Blyth Valley) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) Mr Parmjit Dhanda MP (Labour, Gloucester) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Dr William McCrea MP (Democratic Unionist, South Antrim) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith & The Border) Fiona Mactaggart MP (Labour, Slough) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Jo Swinson MP (Liberal Democrat, East Dunbartonshire) Mrs Betty Williams MP (Labour, Conwy) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Conference are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to Politics
    Equality and Human Rights Commission Research report 65 Pathways to politics Catherine Durose, Francesca Gains, Liz Richardson, Ryan Combs, Karl Broome and Christina Eason De Montfort University and University of Manchester Pathways to politics Catherine Durose, Francesca Gains, Liz Richardson, Ryan Combs, Karl Broome and Christina Eason De Montfort University and University of Manchester © Equality and Human Rights Commission 2011 First published Spring 2011 ISBN 978 1 84206 326 2 EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT SERIES The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Commission by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research team for further information about other Commission research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House The Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report as a PDF from our website: www.equalityhumanrights.com If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] Contents Page Tables and figures i Acknowledgements ii Executive summary v 1. Background 1 1.1 Why is diversity in representation important? 2 1.2 Scope of the research 3 1.3 Researching diversity and inter-sectionality 4 1.4 Self-identification and representation 5 1.5 Understanding barriers and pathways 6 1.6 Chronically excluded groups 7 1.7 Structure of the report 8 2.
    [Show full text]