Preterism, Futurism Or Historicism?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preterism, Futurism Or Historicism? Preterism, Futurism or Historicism? A Theological Analysis of three Interpretive Schools of Apocalyptic Prophecy within the Doctrine of the Last Things by Reinhardt Stander Dissertation presented in requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Department of Systematic Theology and Ecclesiology, Faculty of Theology, Stellenbosch University. Supervisor: Prof Robert R Vosloo Department: Systematic Theology and Ecclesiology, Faculty of Theology, Stellenbosch University March, 2021 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this thesis, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Signed: Reinhardt R. Stander Date: March 2021 Copyright © 2021 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT As the interest in eschatology within academia as well as amongst many Christians increases, the natural outflow of apocalyptic prophecy interpretation has given occasion to two main popular interpretations, namely futurism and preterism – even to the extent of questionably influencing politics and theocratic movements. With the aim of identifying an adequate school of apocalyptic interpretation within the discourse of eschatology, this theological study within systematic theology analyses the way apocalyptic prophecy is interpreted within broader discourses on eschatology. The different hermeneutical assumptions of the various interpretation schools of apocalyptic models are researched and challenged. Preterism, which assigns apocalyptic prophecy’s fulfilment to the past; futurism, which consigns apocalyptic prophecy’s fulfilment to the future; and historicism, which disperses apocalyptic prophecy’s fulfilment throughout the lapse of history, are the focus of this study. The study is directed towards determining whether the more adequate system for interpreting apocalyptic prophecy can be identified within the doctrine of the last things (eschatology). An analysis model is developed whereby the three interpretational schools are critically evaluated. The consequential proposal from this research is a historicist hermeneutic. iii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za OPSOMMING Twee prominente apokaliptiese interpretasiemodelle, naamlik preterisme en futurisme, het die afgelope tyd na vore getree as ‘n natuurlike uitvloeisel van die toenemende belangstelling in eskatologie onder akademici sowel as Christene, soms met ‘n twyfelagtige uitwerking op die politiek en teokratiese bewegings. Derhalwe het hierdie teologiese studie binne die dissipline van sistematiese teologie dit ten doel om ‘n toepaslike skool van apokaliptiese interpretasie te identifiseer binne die breër diskoers oor eskatologie. Die hermeneutiese aansprake van verskeie apokaliptiese interpretasieskole word ondersoek en uitgedaag. Die studie fokus op preterisme, wat die vervulling van apokaliptiese profesie in die verlede plaas; futurisme, wat die vervulling daarvan aan die toekoms koppel; en historisisme, wat aanvoer dat die vervulling van apokaliptiese profesie deur die loop van die geskiedenis plaasvind. Die studie is daarop gerig om te bepaal of die meer toepaslike sisteem van apokaliptiese interpretasie geïdentifiseer kan word binne die leer van die laaste dinge (eskatologie). Vir hierdie doeleinde word ‘n analisemodel ontwikkel vir die kritiese evaluering van bogenoemde interpretasieskole. Die voorstel wat hieruit voortvloei is ‘n historisistiese hermeneutiek. iv Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To Professor Robert Vosloo, I appreciate your patience and insight with reference to this research. Thank you for all the guidance and advice with your academic finesse. To Doctor Ron du Preez, I appreciate your willingness to give me relevant input in the study under question. To Edwin de Kock, for all the books donated to this study and the many phone calls of encouragement. To Sanri Theron, words cannot suffice nor express my appreciation for the many hours you have sacrificed towards this study in proofreading it. To Scott Mayer and family, for hosting me at their lovely home for 2 weeks while studying at McKee Library on the campus of Southern Adventist University. To Doctor Rick Remmers and the Executive Committee of the Chesapeake Conference of Seventh-day Adventists for their contribution to my studies. To my congregations Williamsport SDA Church, Tygerberg SDA Church, Parow SDA Church and Durbanville SDA Church, for all your love and support. To my wife, Irinda Stander, and children, Josua and Simoné, thank you for all your love and support through this period of study during which you sacrificed hundreds of hours. To all my special friends who supported me and my family during this time, also when life was particularly challenging amid this research: Retha and Francois van Zyl and children; Regardt, my brother; Patrick Stander and Daniel Arnolds; Mynhardt Branders and family; De Wet and Sanet van Aarde; Werner Eiselen and family; John Fortune; Roelof Geldenhuys; Eugene and Pikkie van Rensburg; Johan and Kobie Coetzee; and the many others… v Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DEDICATION To my parents, Wally and Ria Stander, and grandparents, Hendrik and Maureen Stander, and Koos and Chrissie van den Heever who have all inspired me from childhood with the blessed hope of the coming eschatos, Jesus Christ. vi Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 2 1.1.1 Eschatology and apocalyptic ....................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Interpretation schools .................................................................................. 3 1.1.3 Apocalypticism ............................................................................................. 3 1.1.4 Reflection ..................................................................................................... 5 1.2 THE STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ............................................................. 6 1.2.1 The main research question ........................................................................ 6 1.2.2 The sub-questions ....................................................................................... 6 1.3 THE ELUCIDATION OF THE PROBLEM .......................................................... 7 1.3.1 Delimitations of the study............................................................................. 7 1.3.2 Definitions of key terms ............................................................................... 8 1.3.3 Presuppositions of the researcher ............................................................... 9 1.4 THE VALUE OF THE STUDY .......................................................................... 10 1.5 THE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 12 1.6 THE RESEARCH STRUCTURE ...................................................................... 13 1.7 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................. 14 CHAPTER 2: AN ANALYSIS MODEL FOR THIS RESEARCH .................................... 16 2.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 16 2.2 ANALYSIS MODEL .......................................................................................... 18 2.2.1 A Christological analysis ............................................................................ 20 vii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za 2.2.2 An apocalyptic analysis ............................................................................. 25 2.2.3 A prophetic image analysis ........................................................................ 36 2.2.4 An exegetical analysis ............................................................................... 41 2.2.5 A practical relevance analysis ................................................................... 54 2.3 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 58 CHAPTER 3: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRETERISM .............................................. 60 3.1 PRETERISM DEFINED ................................................................................... 60 3.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 60 3.1.2 Broad definition .......................................................................................... 61 3.1.3 Full preterism (or) historical critical preterism ............................................ 64 3.1.4 Partial preterism (or) moderate preterism .................................................. 66 3.2 MAPPING PRETERIST TEACHING ................................................................ 69 3.2.1 Dating of Revelation .................................................................................. 70 3.2.2 Time indicators
Recommended publications
  • The Glory of God and Dispensationalism: Revisiting the Sine Qua Non of Dispensationalism
    The Journal of Ministry & Theology 26 The Glory of God and Dispensationalism: Revisiting the Sine Qua Non of Dispensationalism Douglas Brown n 1965 Charles Ryrie published Dispensationalism Today. In this influential volume, Ryrie attempted to explain, I systematize, and defend the dispensational approach to the Scriptures. His most notable contribution was arguably the three sine qua non of dispensationalism. First, a dispensationalist consistently keeps Israel and the church distinct. Second, a dispensationalist consistently employs a literal system of hermeneutics (i.e., what Ryrie calls “normal” or “plain” interpretation). Third, a dispensationalist believes that the underlying purpose of the world is the glory of God.2 The acceptance of Ryrie’s sine qua non of dispensationalism has varied within dispensational circles. In general, traditional dispensationalists have accepted the sine qua non and used them as a starting point to explain the essence of dispensationalism.3 In contrast, progressive dispensationalists have largely rejected Ryrie’s proposal and have explored new ways to explain the essential tenants of Douglas Brown, Ph.D., is Academic Dean and Senior Professor of New Testament at Faith Baptist Theological Seminary in Ankeny, Iowa. Douglas can be reached at [email protected]. 2 C. C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today (Chicago: Moody, 1965), 43- 47. 3 See, for example, R. Showers, There Really Is a Difference, 12th ed. (Bellmawr, NJ: Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry, 2010), 52, 53; R. McCune, A Systematic Theology of Biblical Christianity, vol. 1 (Allen Park, MI: Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary, 2009), 112-15; C. Cone, ed., Dispensationalism Tomorrow and Beyond: A Theological Collection in Honor of Charles C.
    [Show full text]
  • Position on Preterism
    Quail Lakes Baptist Church’s Position on Preterism Written by Marc Maffucci for the Board of Elders 2015 When it comes to the interpretation of biblical prophecy there are four distinct systems of thought embraced by Christians today: 1. The Preterist view teaches that most prophetic events have already been fulfilled primarily in the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. 2. The Historicist view teaches that the present day is equal to the tribulation and thus prophecy has been and is being fulfilled in the current age. 3. The Idealist view, which teaches that biblical prophecies are a symbolic representation of the ongoing battle between good and evil, God and Satan. 4. The Futurist view that teaches the biblical prophecies have, by in large, yet to be fulfilled. Peterism is the focus of this paper. The term Preterism is derived from the Latin word “praeteritum” which means “something past.” Preterism itself has developed into two distinct schools of thought, one group adhering to “Full or Hyper preterism” and the other “partial preterism.” It is the “Full” or “Hyper Preterist” view that represents error such that we feel the need to clarify the teaching of Quail Lakes Baptist Church as it relates to this issue. Hyper Preterists believe that there is no prophecy of Scripture that has yet to be fulfilled. They assign fulfillment to the time period that spanned the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 to the fall of the Roman Empire in the 5th century. Hyper Preterists deny a future bodily return of Christ, a physical resurrection of the dead, and a physical renewal of the heavens and the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logic of Biblical Creationism and the Future
    Scholars Crossing Article Archives Pre-Trib Research Center May 2009 The Logic of Biblical Creationism and the Future Thomas D. Ice Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch Recommended Citation Ice, Thomas D., "The Logic of Biblical Creationism and the Future" (2009). Article Archives. 79. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch/79 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pre-Trib Research Center at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Article Archives by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LOGIC OF BIBLICAL CREATIONISM AND THE FUTURE Tom’s Perspectives by Thomas Ice With the recent death of Henry Morris, many have justly written tributes to him, who, along with John Whitcomb, gave birth to the now vibrant “young earth creation (YEC)” movement when they published their watershed book The Genesis Flood.1 One of the interesting things about the YEC movement is that many, probably a majority of the creation scientists are also dispensational premillennialists when it comes to their view of Bible prophecy. INTERPRETATIVE CONSISTENCY Morris and Whitcomb have always been outspoken dispensationalists and both link their literal views of Genesis with a literal view of Revelation and believe that consistency in interpretation demands a link between a literal Genesis and Revelation. “Where the Bible speaks plainly however, we do well to take it plainly,” notes Morris. “It surely does speak clearly concerning the reality of primeval special creation and the urgent importance of the creation message in the last days.”2 “’If you take Genesis literally,’ reasoned Morris, ‘you’re more inclined to take Revelation literally.’”3 Many have noted the consistent correlation between belief in a literal six-day creation as taught in Genesis and a literal view of the Book of Revelation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rapture in 2 Thessalonians 2:3
    Scholars Crossing Article Archives Pre-Trib Research Center May 2009 The Rapture in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 Thomas D. Ice Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch Recommended Citation Ice, Thomas D., "The Rapture in 2 Thessalonians 2:3" (2009). Article Archives. 82. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch/82 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pre-Trib Research Center at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Article Archives by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IS THE RAPTURE IN 2 THESSALONIANS 2:3? Tom's Perspectives by Thomas Ice Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, —2 Thessalonians 2:3 I believe that there is a strong possibility that 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is speaking of the rapture. What do I mean? Some pretribulationists, like myself, think that the Greek noun apostasia, usually translated “apostasy,” is a reference to the rapture and should be translated “departure.” Thus, this passage would be saying that the day of the Lord will not come until the rapture comes before it. If apostasia is a reference to a physical departure, then 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is strong evidence for pretribulationism. THE MEANING OF APOSTASIA The Greek noun apostasia is only used twice in the New Testament. In addition to 2 Thessalonians
    [Show full text]
  • The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2016 The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15 Rebekah Yi Liu [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Liu, Rebekah Yi, "The Background and Meaning of the Image of the Beast in Rev. 13:14, 15" (2016). Dissertations. 1602. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1602 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT THE BACKGROUNDS AND MEANING OF THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST IN REV 13:14, 15 by Rebekah Yi Liu Adviser: Dr. Jon Paulien ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STDUENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE BACKGROUNDS AND MEANING OF THE IMAGE OF THE BEAST IN REV 13:14, 15 Name of researcher: Rebekah Yi Liu Name and degree of faculty adviser: Jon Paulien, Ph.D. Date Completed: May 2016 Problem This dissertation investigates the first century Greco-Roman cultural backgrounds and the literary context of the motif of the image of the beast in Rev 13:14, 15, in order to answer the problem of the author’s intended meaning of the image of the beast to his first century Greco-Roman readers. Method There are six steps necessary to accomplish the task of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelical Millennialism in the Trans-Atlantic World, 1500–2000 Also by Crawford Gribben
    Evangelical Millennialism in the Trans-Atlantic World, 1500–2000 Also by Crawford Gribben: GOD’S IRISHMEN: THEOLOGICAL DEBATES IN CROMWELLIAN IRELAND THE IRISH PURITANS: JAMES USSHER AND THE REFORMATION OF THE CHURCH THE PURITAN MILLENNIUM: LITERATURE AND THEOLOGY, 1550–1682 RAPTURE FICTION AND THE EVANGELICAL CRISIS WRITING THE RAPTURE: PROPHECY FICTION IN EVANGELICAL AMERICA Evangelical Millennialism in the Trans-Atlantic World, 1500–2000 Crawford Gribben Long Room Hub Senior Lecturer in Early Modern Print Culture Trinity College Dublin, Ireland © Crawford Gribben 2011 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2011 978-0-230-00825-0 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2011 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010.
    [Show full text]
  • Millennialism, Rapture and “Left Behind” Literature. Analysing a Major Cultural Phenomenon in Recent Times
    start page: 163 Stellenbosch Theological Journal 2019, Vol 5, No 1, 163–190 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17570/stj.2019.v5n1.a09 Online ISSN 2413-9467 | Print ISSN 2413-9459 2019 © Pieter de Waal Neethling Trust Millennialism, rapture and “Left Behind” literature. Analysing a major cultural phenomenon in recent times De Villers, Pieter GR University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa [email protected] Abstract This article represents a research overview of the nature, historical roots, social contexts and growth of millennialism as a remarkable religious and cultural phenomenon in modern times. It firstly investigates the notions of eschatology, millennialism and rapture that characterize millennialism. It then analyses how and why millennialism that seems to have been a marginal phenomenon, became prominent in the United States through the evangelistic activities of Darby, initially an unknown pastor of a minuscule faith community from England and later a household name in the global religious discourse. It analyses how millennialism grew to play a key role in the religious, social and political discourse of the twentieth century. It finally analyses how Darby’s ideas are illuminated when they are placed within the context of modern England in the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth century. In a conclusion some key challenges of the place and role of millennialism as a movement that reasserts itself continuously, are spelled out in the light of this history. Keywords Eschatology; millennialism; chiliasm; rapture; dispensationalism; J.N. Darby; Joseph Mede; Johann Heinrich Alsted; “Left Behind” literature. 1. Eschatology and millennialism Christianity is essentially an eschatological movement that proclaims the fulfilment of the divine promises in Hebrew Scriptures in the earthly ministry of Christ, but it also harbours the expectation of an ultimate fulfilment of Christ’s second coming with the new world of God that will replace the existing evil dispensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mussolini and Rome in the Premillennial Imagination
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 6-24-2020 The Beast And The Revival Of Rome: Mussolini And Rome In The Premillennial Imagination Jon Stamm Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Stamm, Jon, "The Beast And The Revival Of Rome: Mussolini And Rome In The Premillennial Imagination" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 1312. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1312 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BEAST AND THE REVIVAL OF ROME: MUSSOLINI AND ROME IN THE PREMILLENNIAL IMAGINATION JON STAMM 130 Pages Premillennial dispensationalism became immensely influential among American Protestants who saw themselves as defenders of orthodoxy. As theological conflict heated up in the early 20th century, dispensationalism’s unique eschatology became one of the characteristic features of the various strands of “fundamentalists” who fought against modernism and the perceived compromises of mainline Protestantism. Their embrace of the dispensationalist view of history and Biblical prophecy had a significant effect on how they interpreted world events and how they lived out their faith. These fundamentalists established patterns of interpretation that in the second half of the 20th century would fuel the emergence of a politically influential form of Christian Zionism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herald of Christ's Kingdom
    The Herald This Journal and Its Mission of Christ’s Kingdom Char tered in 1918, the Pas to ral Bi ble Insti tute, Inc. was formed for the promo tion This journal brings you 192 of Christian knowledge. Its jour nal, The Herald of Christ’s Kingdom, stands pages of spir itual reading mate - firmly for the de fense of the only true foun da tion of the Chris tian’s hope now be ing rial each year on a va ri ety of so gener ally re pu di ated—re demp tion through the pre cious blood (1 Peter 1:19) of biblical sub jects. Each is sue also “the man Christ Je sus, who gave himself a ran som [a corre spond ing price, a substi - lists many Bible convent ions and tute] for all” (1 Tim o thy 2:6). Build ing upon this sure foun da tion the gold, sil ver, con fer ences where you will find and pre cious stones of the Word of God (1 Corin thi ans 3:11-15; 2 Pe ter 1:5-11), Chris tian fel low ship. In cluded in its fur ther mis sion is “to make all see what is the fel lowship of the mys tery, which ev ery is sue is News & Views, … has been hid in God … to the in tent that now … might be [made] known by four pages of current events, the church the man i fold wis dom of God”—“which in other ages was not made letters to the ed itor, and infor- known unto the sons of men, as it is now re vealed” (Ephe sians 3:5-10).
    [Show full text]
  • THEONOMY and ESCHATOLOGY | Some Reflections on Postmillennialism
    THEONOMY AND ESCHATOLOGY | Some Reflections On Postmillennialism By Richard B. Gaffin, Jr.1 Essential to the emergence of theonomy/(Christian) reconstructionism has been a revival of postmillennialism.2 Among current postmils, to be sure, there are some who are not recon- structionists, but all reconstructionists—whatever their differences—consider themselves post- mils. Or so it would have seemed until just recently with the unanticipated and apparently grow- ing impact of reconstructionist viewpoints in circles whose eschatology is characteristically premil. Still, for reconstructionism’s leading advocates, postmillennialism is plainly integral— whether logically or psychologically—to their position as a whole. Nonreconstructionist postmils would naturally deny any such connection. This chapter provides some partial, personally-tinged, yet, I hope, not entirely unhelpful reflections on the resurgent postmillennialism of the past 20-25 years. My reservations lie in at least four areas. DEFINING POSTMILLENNIALISM A large element of ambiguity cuts across much of today’s postmillennialism. Before trying to specify that ambiguity it will be helpful, historically, to give some attention to the fact that in the past, too, postmillennialism has not been the clearly defined, unambiguous position that some of its contemporary proponents make it out to be. It is fairly common to point out the inadequacy of our conventional designations pre, post, and a. But, no less commonly, in ensuing discussion that recognition recedes. As a result, efforts, for one, to distinguish between the postmil and amil positions get confused—usually, as it turns out, more than a merely terminological confusion. Who coined the term amillennial and when did it first begin to be used? Perhaps I’ve missed it somewhere, but the usual sources don’t seem to know or at least don’t say.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanism and the Reformation
    ROMANISM AND THE REFORMATION. ROMANISM AND THE REFORMATION FROM THE STANDPOINT OF PROPHECY. r,Y H. GRATTAN GUINNESS, F.R.G.S., ' ' " A uthor of Lightfor tke Last Days" The Approaching End of the Age" etc. TORONTO: S. R. BRIGGS, TORONTO WILLARD TRACT DEPOSITORY AND BIBLE DEPOT, CORNER OF YONGE AND TEMPERANCE STREETS. BUTLER & TANNER, THE SELWOOD PRINTING WORKS, FROME, AND LONDON. PREFACE. r I "'HE following lectures were delivered, by re- quest, under the auspices of the Protestant Educational Institute, at Exeter Hall, in the spring of this year. That Institute exists to do a much needed work to keep alive, especially in the hearts of the rising generation, some measure of intelligent sympathy with the Protestant traditions of our country. England's Protestantism has long been Eng- land's glory, and the direct cause of her unrivalled prosperity and peculiar pre-eminence among the nations of Europe. That Protestantism is now sustaining a double attack, from without and from within. Yet few seem fully alive to the danger. The late Lord Beaconsfield saw it clearly enough " however. Your empire and your liberties are " more in danger at this moment," he said, than when Napoleon's army of observation was en- viii Preface. camped at Boulogne." What would he have said had he lived to see the present position of affairs ! The Reformation of the sixteenth century, which gave birth to Protestantism, was based on Scrip- ture. It gave back to the world the Bible. It the it the errors and taught Scriptures ; exposed corruptions of Rome by the use of the sword of the Spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Realized Eschatology the Resurrection of the Dead
    www.thetfordcountry.com Richard Thetford Realized Eschatology The Resurrection of the Dead Introduction 1. Before we begin tonight’s lesson of “The Resurrection of the Dead,” I want to review briefly what Realized Eschatology or the 70 AD doctrine involves. A. It begins by taking the approach that ALL prophecy has been fulfilled, including those pertaining to the second coming of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, the judgment, and the end of the world. B. Furthermore, this doctrine revises the prophecies about Christ establishing his kingdom to say that the kingdom of Old Testament prophecy was fully established at the Lord’s second coming, when the dead were raised, when the world ended, and when the judgment occurred — ALL of which occurred in 70 AD at the destruction of Jerusalem. 2. Last night our lesson pertained to the second coming of Christ. The Realized Eschatologist believes that the second coming of Jesus happened in 70 AD and is not going to happen in the future. A. This position is believed because they make the second coming of Jesus figurative instead of literal. 3. Tonight I am going to be noting what the Realized Eschatologist believes and what the Bible teaches concerning the resurrection of the dead. Realized Eschatology (The Resurrection of the Dead) 1 www.thetfordcountry.com Richard Thetford Realized Eschatology View of the Resurrection 1. The 70 AD theorists believe and teach that the resurrection, about which the New Testament has much to say, has already occurred. A. It occurred in 70 AD when the Roman army destroyed the ancient city of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]