DOCSLIB.ORG

Colloquium on the Spanish and King Mackerel Resources of the Gulf Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OFFICE COPY ONLY Proceedings: Colloquium on the Spanish and King. Mackerel Resources of the Gulf of Mexico Eugene L. Nakamura and Harvey R. Bullis, Jr. (Editors) Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission March 1979 No. 4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MACKEREL COLLOQUIUM Edited by EUGENE L. NAKAMURA National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Center Panama City, Florida and HARVEY R. BULLIS, JR. National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Center Miami, Florida Sponsored by GULF STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION Twenty-Eighth Annual Spring Meeting Brownsville, Texas March 16, 1978 l)roceedinxs of the Mackerel Colloquium, March 16, 1978 CONTENTS PJ~r~r-~ACE ........................................................................ v INTRODUCTION Eugene L. Nakamura ................ ; ............................... vii SESSION I: TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS Eugene L. Nakamura, Chairman 1. An Introduction to the Spanish mackerels, genus Scomberomorus. Bruce B. Collette and Joseph L. Russo ........................................ 3 2. Commercial and recreational fisheries for Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus maculatus. Lee Trent and Ernest A. Anthony .......................................... 17 3. Recreational and commercial fisheries for king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, in the South Atlantic Bight and Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A. Charles S. Manooch, III ................................................ 33 4. Evaluacion preliminary de la poblacion de sierra, Scomberomorus maculatus (Mitchill), frente a las costas de Veracruz. Takeyuki Doi and David Mendizabal ........................................ 43 5. King mackerel migrations. (Abstract) Roy 0. Williams and Doyle F. Sutherland .................................... 57 6. Distribution, seasonality and abundance of larval king and Spanish mackerels in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. (Abstract) John D. McEachren and John H. Finucane .................................... 59 7. Heavy metal contamination of Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus maculatus, and king mackerel, S. cavalla. G. M. Meaburn ...................................................... 61 8. Analysis of Florida Atlantic king mackerel monthly dockside prices. Fred J. Prochaska and James C. Cato ........................................ 67 9. Review of socio-economic workshop on mackerels. C. Bruce Austin ....................................................... 71 10. Preservation technology for Spanish mackerel and related species -- a literature review. Malcolm B. Hale ............................................ ·. ... 73 Questions and Comments ................................................... 79 SESSION II: PANEL DISCUSSION BY RESOURCE USERS Jack Brawner, Chairman 1. Introductory remarks. Jack Brawner ....................................................... 85 2. Discussion I. Roger D. Anderson ................................................... 86 3. Discussion II. B. J. Putnam ..................... ; ................................... .87 4. Discussion III. A. L. "Hoot" Hilpert .................. ; ............................... 89 5. Discussion IV. Walter C. Thompson .................................................. 91 6. Discussion V. Tony Stonnont ......................................... ·............. 93 7. Discussion VI. M. Harvey Weil ............................................ ·........... 95 Questions and Comments . ...... ; ....................... 97 ill iv Proceedings of the Mackerel Colloquium, March 16, 1978 CONTENTS (Continued) SESSION III:. PANEL DISCUSSION ON RESEARCH REQUIREMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT Dale S. Beaumariage, Chairman 1. Discussion I. Mark E. Chittenden, Jr. ....................... ~ ....................... 103 2. Discussion II. Albert C. Jones ...................................................... 105 3. Discussion III. H. Gary Knight ..................................................... 106 4. Discussion IV. Glenn F. Ulrich. 108 5. Discussion V. James C. Cato ...................................................... 109 Questions and Comments ..................... , ............................ 111 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION - Frederick A. Kalber .................................... 115 Proceedings of the Mackerel Colloquium, March 16, 1978 PREFACE A colloquium on mackerels of the southeastern United mackerel and related species-a literature review" by M. B. States was held during the annual spring meeting of the Gulf Hale was not presented at the colloquium; it has been added, States Marine Fisheries Commission in Brownsville, Texas, because we believe it is relevant to the subject and purposes on March 16, 1978. The purposes of this colloquium were: of the colloquium. The paper by T. Doi and D. Mendizabal (I) to review what was known about the biology, fisheries, was presented in English by the second author; it is printed and economics of the king mackerel,Scomberomorus cavalla, here in Spanish with an English summary. and the Spanish mackerel,Scomberomorus maculatus; (2) to We have edited the questions and comments to enhance discuss the problems encountered by users of these resources clarity and to avoid repetition. Where our efforts failed, and to suggest possible solutions; and (3) to identify and please accept our apologies. suggest research needs to conserve and manage the mackerel Many people were helpfol in making this colloquium resources. The format of this colloquium was similar to that successful. Charles Lyles and Virginia Herring of the Gulf of the snapper-grouper colloquium held during the 1975 States Marine Fisheries Commission, Bob Jones of the annual fall meeting of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Com­ Southeastern Fisheries Association, Inc., Roger Anderson of mission. This colloquium consisted of three sessions to the Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Development Founda" achieve the above-stated purposes. tion, Inc., and Terry Leary of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery The proceedings were recorded on tape and subsequently Management Council were extremely helpful and cooper­ transcribed. Recordings of some of the proceedings of Ses­ ative in organizing the program, in arranging accommoda­ sion I were faulty, and therefore, transcriptions of these tions, artd in providing travel aid. Rita Bloechel, Donna instances were unavailable. Fortunately, the speakers had Kiner, and Carl Saloman of the NMFS Southeast Fisheries prepared formal papers, so that their contributions were not Center, Panama City Laboratory, were very helpful in pro­ lost. Unfortunately, some of the discussions and questions viding clerical and drafting services; and Catherine Campbell followingthose presentations were. Authors of two papers and Dottie Neely, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean in Session I wished to publish their research results elsewhere; Springs, Ms., gave their assistance with the final manuscript. therefore, only abstracts of their papers are presented here. To all of the above, and to all the participants and attendees The paper entitled "Preservation technology for Spanish of the colloquium, we express our thanks and gratitude. The Editors v Proceedings of the Mackerel Colloquium, March 16, 1978 INTRODUCTION Eugene L. Nakamura About a year ago, Harvey Bullis was asked by Charles waters. They have not gotten permission to do so.So indeed, Lyles, ExecutiveDirector of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries we do have some contentious issues to discuss, and we do Commission, to put together a colloquium on the mackerels have them in our southeastern region, so again I say, the of the southeast region. Harvey asked me to help him, and timeliness of this colloquium is really super. so we arranged this program for today. I got a telephone The format of our colloquium is going to be very much call from Harvey last week. He told me he couldn't make like the snapper-grouper colloquium that was held back in this meeting. He's in the U.S. delegation that is now in 1975 in Pensacola Beach. That colloquium was also spon­ Guyana conducting some fishery negotiations, and there sored by the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission. We was no way that he could get out of it, so he sends his are going to have three sessions. Session I is a technical regrets to everyone and also his sincere best wishes. He session, to be chaired by me. We have some nationally­ thought it would be much more interesting and fun to come and internationally-known experts here on this panel, and here. Wonder what he meant by fun? we are fortunate indeed to have them here to speak to us. I think that this colloquium is really timely. We have some In Session II, we are going to have a panel discussion by problems going on in the southeast concerning our mackerel resource users. That session will be chaired by Jack Brawner, resources. First of all, you all know that the Gulf of Mexico and we have a most distinguished group representing leaders Fishery Management Council and the South Atlantic Fishery of various user groups: people who are foremost fishermen Management Council have jointlylet a contract just recently in the hook-and-line fishery and the gill-net fishery; an to Centaur Management Consultants, Inc., of Washington, expert charter-boat captain; a representative of a sportfishing D.C., to develop a fishery management plan for the coastal club; a man that operates a bait-and-tackle shop and who pelagic species, and the main species involved in this group used to operate a marina; and a fellow from a private founda­ are the mackerels. Also' we have some controversies going tion who is trying to promote the development of some
Recommended publications
  • Diet of Wahoo, Acanthocybium Solandri, from the Northcentral Gulf of Mexico

    Diet of Wahoo, Acanthocybium Solandri, from the Northcentral Gulf of Mexico

    Diet of Wahoo, Acanthocybium solandri, from the Northcentral Gulf of Mexico JAMES S. FRANKS, ERIC R. HOFFMAYER, JAMES R. BALLARD1, NIKOLA M. GARBER2, and AMBER F. GARBER3 Center for Fisheries Research and Development, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, The University of Southern Mississippi, P.O. Box 7000, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39566 USA 1Department of Coastal Sciences, The University of Southern Mississippi, P.O. Box 7000, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39566 USA 2U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Sea Grant, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 USA 3Huntsman Marine Science Centre, 1Lower Campus Road, St. Andrews, New Brunswick, Canada E5B 2L7 ABSTRACT Stomach contents analysis was used to quantitatively describe the diet of wahoo, Acanthocybium solandri, from the northcen- tral Gulf of Mexico. Stomachs were collected opportunistically from wahoo (n = 321) that were weighed (TW, kg) and measured (FL, mm) at fishing tournaments during 1997 - 2007. Stomachs were frozen and later thawed for removal and preservation (95% ethanol) of contents to facilitate their examination and identification. Empty stomachs (n = 71) comprised 22% of the total collec- tion. Unfortunately, the preserved, un-examined contents from 123 stomachs collected prior to Hurricane Katrina (August 2005) were destroyed during the hurricane. Consequently, assessments of wahoo stomach contents reported here were based on the con- tents of the 65 ‘pre-Katrina’ stomachs, in addition to the contents of 62 stomachs collected ‘post-Katrina’ during 2006 and 2007, for a total of 127 stomachs. Wahoo with prey in their stomachs ranged 859 - 1,773 mm FL and 4.4 - 50.4 kg TW and were sexed as: 31 males, 91 females and 5 sex unknown.
  • Status and Prospects of Mackerel and Tuna Fishery in Bangladesh

    Status and Prospects of Mackerel and Tuna Fishery in Bangladesh

    Status and prospects of mackerel and tuna fishery in Bangladesh Item Type article Authors Rahman, M.J.; Zaher, M. Download date 27/09/2021 01:00:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/34189 Bangladesh]. Fish. Res.) 10(1), 2006: 85-92 Status and prospects of mackerel and tuna fishery in Bangladesh M. J. Rahman* and M. Zaher1 Marine Fisheries & Technology Station, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute Cox's Bazar 4700, Bangladesh 1Present address: BFRI, Freshwater Station, Mvmensingh 2201, Bangladesh *Corresponding author Abstract Present status and future prospects of mackerel and tuna fisheries in Bangladesh were assessed during July 2003-June 2004. The work concentrated on the fishing gears, length of fishes, total landings and market price of the catch and highlighted the prospects of the fishery in Bangladesh. Four commercially important species of mackerels and tuna viz. Scomberomorus guttatus, Scomberomorus commerson, Rastrelliger kanagurta, and Euthynnus affinis were included in the study. About 95% of mackerels and tuna were caught by drift gill nets and the rest were caught by long lines ( 4%) and marine set-bag-net (1 %). Average monthly total landing of mackerels and tunas was about 264 t, of which 147 t landed in Cox's Bazar and 117 tin Chittagong sites. Total catches of the four species in Cox's Bazar and Chittagong sites were found to be 956 and 762 t, respectively. The poor landing was observed during January-February and the peak landing was in November and July. Gross market value of the annual landing of mackerels and tunas (1,718 t) was found to be 1,392 lakh taka.
  • Studies on Some Japanese Fishes of The, Family Gempylidae

    Studies on Some Japanese Fishes of The, Family Gempylidae

    Studies on Some Japanese Fishes of the, Family Gempylidae KIYOMATSU M ATSUBARA and TAMOTSU IWAI l THOUGH TH E FISHES of the family Gempyli­ The few species comprising this family live dae have long been of interest to ichth yolo­ in the high seas and are widely distributed in gists and though considerable literature warm regions throughout the world . concerning this family has accumulated; the The measurements of various parts of the group still is far from being satisfactorily body were made in the same way as those understood. made by the senior author in his study on the Since the publication of " Gempylidae of scorpaenoid fishes ofJapan (Matsubara, 1943: Japan" by Dr. Toshij i Kamohara in 1938, 6-7). We have carefully observed the gill some additional facts have come to ligh t, and rakers stained by alizarin red and cleared by several discrepancies have been found to exist potassium hydroxide. between his descriptions and our specimens. Acknowledgments: .We wish to express our The present paper, supplementing Karno­ sincere gratitude to Mr. Vernon E. Brock, hara's, treats seven species of the family, re­ Dr. Carl L. Hubbs, Mr. T. Abe, Dr. T. Karno­ ferred to the genera N eoepinnul«, Bpinnula, hara, and Mr. M. Nakamura, all of whom Mimasea, Gempylus, Rexea, Nealotus, and helped us in various ways. We are also greatly Prometbicbtbys. The specimens thus far ex­ indebted to Messrs. G . Abe and S. Noda for amined were all taken by deep-sea trawlers assistance in 'obtaining material. Expenses for off the Pacific coast of J apan at a depth of investigations of deep-sea fishes were de­ about 100 fathoms, and all are depo sited in frayed from 1943 to 1945 by a research fun d the Department of Fisheries, Facult y of Agri- .
  • King Mackerel, Scomberomorus Caval/A, Mark-Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast

    King Mackerel, Scomberomorus Caval/A, Mark-Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast

    King Mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, Mark- Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast Item Type article Authors Schaefer, H. Charles; Fable, Jr. , William A. Download date 04/10/2021 08:14:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/26474 King Mackerel, Scomberomorus caval/a, Mark-Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast H. CHARLES SCHAEFER and WILLIAM A. FABLE, JR. Introduction reproductive capacity causing stock re­ Panama City Laboratory, began a co­ ductions and declining recruitment operative mark-recapture study on king King mackerel, Scomberomorus cav­ (Godcharles I). King mackerel have mackerel to determine movements in alla, is a coastal, pelagic scombrid been jointly managed by the South At­ both the Gulf of Mexico and along the found off the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of lantic and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Man­ Atlantic coast. Subsequently, biologists Mexico coasts. This species has histori­ agement Councils since the implemen­ from both agencies tagged king mack­ cally contributed to commercial and tation of the Coastal Pelagic Fishery erel (17,042 releases, 1,171 returns) recreational catches throughout its Management Plan (CPFMP) in 1983. from 1975 through 1979 (Sutherland range in the southeastern United States. The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and Fable, 1980; Sutter et aI., 1991; Commercial exploitation intensified for the U.S. king mackerel resource is Williams and Godcharles3). Results there in the 1960's with the introduc­ currently estimated at 26.2 million from this study indicated that the spe­ tion of large power-assisted gillnet pounds (NMFS2). cies consisted of at least two migratory boats and spotter aircraft.
  • Daily Ration of Japanese Spanish Mackerel Scomberomorus Niphonius Larvae

    Daily Ration of Japanese Spanish Mackerel Scomberomorus Niphonius Larvae

    FISHERIES SCIENCE 2001; 67: 238–245 Original Article Daily ration of Japanese Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius larvae J SHOJI,1,* T MAEHARA,2,a M AOYAMA,1 H FUJIMOTO,3 A IWAMOTO3 AND M TANAKA1 1Laboratory of Marine Stock-enhancement Biology, Division of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, 2Toyo Branch, Ehime Prefecture Chuyo Fisheries Experimental Station, Toyo, Ehime 799-1303, and 3Yashima Station, Japan Sea-farming Association, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0111, Japan SUMMARY: Diel successive samplings of Japanese Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius larvae were conducted throughout 24 h both in the sea and in captivity in order to estimate their daily ration. Using the Elliott and Persson model, the instantaneous gastric evacuation rate was estimated from the depletion of stomach contents (% dry bodyweight) with time during the night for wild fish (3.0–11.5 mm standard length) and from starvation experiments for reared fish (8, 10, and 15 days after hatching (DAH)). Japanese Spanish mackerel is a daylight feeder and exhibited piscivorous habits from first feeding both in the sea and in captivity. Feeding activity peaked at dusk. The esti- mated daily ration for wild larvae were 111.1 and 127.2% in 1996 and 1997, respectively; and those for reared larvae ranged from 90.6 to 111.7% of dry bodyweight. Based on the estimated value of daily rations for reared fish, the total number of newly hatched red sea bream Pagrus major larvae preyed by a Japanese Spanish mackerel from first feeding (5 DAH) to beginning of juvenile stage (20 DAH) in captivity was calculated to be 1139–1404.
  • Simulations of Fishing Effects on the Southern Benguela Fish Community Using an Individual-Based Model: Learning from a Comparison with Ecosim

    Simulations of Fishing Effects on the Southern Benguela Fish Community Using an Individual-Based Model: Learning from a Comparison with Ecosim

    Ecosystem Approaches to Fisheries in the Southern Benguela Afr. J. mar. Sci. 26: 95–114 2004 95 SIMULATIONS OF FISHING EFFECTS ON THE SOUTHERN BENGUELA FISH COMMUNITY USING AN INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL: LEARNING FROM A COMPARISON WITH ECOSIM Y-J. SHIN*, L. J. SHANNON† and P. M. CURY* By applying an individual-based model (OSMOSE) to the southern Benguela ecosystem, a multispecies analysis is proposed, complementary to that provided by the application of ECOPATH/ECOSIM models. To reconstruct marine foodwebs, OSMOSE is based on the hypothesis that predation is a size-structured process. In all, 12 fish species, chosen for their importance in terms of biomass and catches, are explicitly modelled. Growth, repro- duction and mortality parameters are required to model their dynamics and trophic interactions. Maps of mean spatial distribution of the species are compiled from published literature. Taking into account the spatial component is necessary because spatial co-occurrence determines potential interactions between predatory fish and prey fish of suitable size. To explore ecosystem effects of fishing, different fishing scenarios, previously examined using ECOSIM, are simulated using the OSMOSE model. They explore the effects of targeting fish species in the southern Benguela considered to be predators (Cape hake Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus) or prey (anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus, sardine Sardinops sagax, round herring Etrumeus whiteheadi). Simulation results are compared and are generally consistent with those obtained using an ECOSIM model. This cross-validation appears to be a promising means of evaluating the robustness of model outputs, when separate validation of marine ecosystem models are still difficult to perform.
  • Fisheries of the Northeast

    Fisheries of the Northeast

    FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEAST AMERICAN BLUE LOBSTER BILLFISHES ATLANTIC COD MUSSEL (Blue marlin, Sailfish, BLACK SEA BASS Swordfish, White marlin) CLAMS DRUMS BUTTERFISH (Arc blood clam, Arctic surf clam, COBIA Atlantic razor clam, Atlantic surf clam, (Atlantic croaker, Black drum, BLUEFISH (Gulf butterfish, Northern Northern kingfish, Red drum, Northern quahog, Ocean quahog, harvestfish) CRABS Silver sea trout, Southern kingfish, Soft-shelled clam, Stout razor clam) (Atlantic rock crab, Blue crab, Spot, Spotted seatrout, Weakfish) Deep-sea red crab, Green crab, Horseshoe crab, Jonah crab, Lady crab, Northern stone crab) GREEN SEA FLATFISH URCHIN EELS (Atlantic halibut, American plaice, GRAY TRIGGERFISH HADDOCK (American eel, Fourspot flounder, Greenland halibut, Conger eel) Hogchoker, Southern flounder, Summer GROUPERS flounder, Winter flounder, Witch flounder, (Black grouper, Yellowtail flounder) Snowy grouper) MACKERELS (Atlantic chub mackerel, MONKFISH HAKES JACKS Atlantic mackerel, Bullet mackerel, King mackerel, (Offshore hake, Red hake, (Almaco jack, Amberjack, Bar Silver hake, Spotted hake, HERRINGS jack, Blue runner, Crevalle jack, Spanish mackerel) White hake) (Alewife, Atlantic menhaden, Atlantic Florida pompano) MAHI MAHI herring, Atlantic thread herring, Blueback herring, Gizzard shad, Hickory shad, Round herring) MULLETS PORGIES SCALLOPS (Striped mullet, White mullet) POLLOCK (Jolthead porgy, Red porgy, (Atlantic sea Scup, Sheepshead porgy) REDFISH scallop, Bay (Acadian redfish, scallop) Blackbelly rosefish) OPAH SEAWEEDS (Bladder
  • © Iccat, 2007

    © Iccat, 2007

    A5 By-catch Species APPENDIX 5: BY-CATCH SPECIES A.5 By-catch species By-catch is the unintentional/incidental capture of non-target species during fishing operations. Different types of fisheries have different types and levels of by-catch, depending on the gear used, the time, area and depth fished, etc. Article IV of the Convention states: "the Commission shall be responsible for the study of the population of tuna and tuna-like fishes (the Scombriformes with the exception of Trichiuridae and Gempylidae and the genus Scomber) and such other species of fishes exploited in tuna fishing in the Convention area as are not under investigation by another international fishery organization". The following is a list of by-catch species recorded as being ever caught by any major tuna fishery in the Atlantic/Mediterranean. Note that the lists are qualitative and are not indicative of quantity or mortality. Thus, the presence of a species in the lists does not imply that it is caught in significant quantities, or that individuals that are caught necessarily die. Skates and rays Scientific names Common name Code LL GILL PS BB HARP TRAP OTHER Dasyatis centroura Roughtail stingray RDC X Dasyatis violacea Pelagic stingray PLS X X X X Manta birostris Manta ray RMB X X X Mobula hypostoma RMH X Mobula lucasana X Mobula mobular Devil ray RMM X X X X X Myliobatis aquila Common eagle ray MYL X X Pteuromylaeus bovinus Bull ray MPO X X Raja fullonica Shagreen ray RJF X Raja straeleni Spotted skate RFL X Rhinoptera spp Cownose ray X Torpedo nobiliana Torpedo
  • Red Tunadishes of Red Tuna from Our Almadraba

    Red Tunadishes of Red Tuna from Our Almadraba

    GLUTEN CRUSTACEAN EGGS FISH PEANUTS MUSTARD MILK CELERY FRUIT PEELS SOYA SESAME SULPHUR DIOXIDE LUPINE SHELLFISH OurEntrees olive oil, possibly the best in the world SignatureRed Tunadishes of red tuna from our Almadraba Classic salad Tomato, lettuce, carrots, onions, eggs, olives 5,50 Warm salad of tuna fish 10,00 Tarifa salad Tomates from Conil, bullet tuna from the Almadraba, tender onions 8,00 Carpaccio of tuna loin and monkfish 10,00 King prawn salad Sauted prawns with chicory and green leaves 10,00 Rice with tuna sirloin [min. 2 pers.] [pers.] 12,00 Prawns carpaccio 11,00 Tuna loin tataki 14,00 Roasted octopus in its own juice 14,00 Tuna tartar 14,00 Grilled tiger king prawns 16,00 Tuna loin sashimi 18,00 La Pescadería style clams 16,00 Tuna loin fillet 20,50 White prawns 18,00 Grilled ventresca 23,00 Vegetables cream [consult] 6,00 Tuna tasting menu 4 varieties — Grilled low loin — Ventresca 29,00 — Cheeks — Tataki Fish soup 8,00 TheFish best ofof our thetwo seas Estrecho Fried fish Cooked with the best oil Chickpeas with small cuttlefish, prawns and seaweed 9,00 Fish croquettes 7,00 Spaghetti with clams and king prawns 13,00 Fried anchovies 8,00 Squid in black ink sauce with boiled rice 13,00 Marinated dogfish 8,50 Stuffed fresh pasta of the sea [consult] 12,00 Cuttlefish 10,00 Grilled squid with fresh vegetables 13,00 Special baby squid 14,00 Sea bass au gratin with alioli and blank ink rice 16,00 Fresh monkfish mozarabe style with couscous 17,00 18,00 Min.Rices 2 persons Grilled fresh fish from Tarifa Seafood rice dish [pers.]
  • Notice Calling for Suggestions, Views, Comments Etc from WTO- SPS Committee Members Within a Period of 60 Days on the Draft Noti

    Notice Calling for Suggestions, Views, Comments Etc from WTO- SPS Committee Members Within a Period of 60 Days on the Draft Noti

    Notice Calling for suggestions, views, comments etc from WTO- SPS Committee members within a period of 60 days on the draft notification related to Standards for list of Histamine Forming Fish Species and limits of Histamine level for Fish and Fishery Products. 1. In the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011, in regulation 2.5, relating to “Other Contaminants”, after sub-regulation 2.5.1 the following sub-regulation shall be inserted, namely:- “2.5.2 Histamine in Fish and Fishery Products contaminants, Toxins and Residues 1. Fish species having potential to cause histamine poisoning Sl.No. Family Scientific Name Common Name 1. Carangidae Alectis indica Indian Threadfish Alepes spp. Scad Atropus atropos Cleftbelly trevally Carangoides Yellow Jack bartholomaei Carangoides spp. Trevally Caranx crysos Blue runner Caranx spp. Jack/Trevally Decapterus koheru Koheru Decapterus russelli Indian scad Decapterus spp. Scad Elagatis bipinnulata Rainbow Runner Megalaspis cordyla Horse Mackerel/Torpedo Scad Nematistius pectoralis Roosterfish Oligoplites saurus Leather Jacket Pseudocaranx dentex White trevally Sl.No. Family Scientific Name Common Name Scomberoides Talang queenfish commersonnianus Scomberoides spp. Leather Jacket/Queen Fish Selene spp. Moonfish Seriola dumerili Greater/Japanese Amberjack or Rudder Fish Seriola lalandi Yellowtail Amberjack Seriola quinqueradiata Japanese Amberjack Seriola rivoliana Longfin Yellowtail Seriola spp. Amberjack or Yellowtail Trachurus capensis Cape Horse Mackerel Trachurus japonicas Japanese Jack Mackerel Trachurus murphyi Chilean Jack Mackerel Trachurus Yellowtail Horse Mackerel novaezelandiae Trachurus spp. Jack Mackerel/Horse Mackerel Trachurus trachurus Atlantic Horse Mackerel Uraspis secunda Cottonmouth jack 2. Chanidae Chanos chanos Milkfish 3. Clupeidae Alosa pseudoharengus Alewife Alosa spp. Herring Amblygaster sirm Spotted Sardinella Anodontostoma chacunda Chacunda gizzard shad Brevoortia patronus Gulf Menhaden Brevoortia spp.
  • The Story of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Is One of Intrigue, Filled with International Drama, Mafia Connections, and Plot Twists Worthy of a Movie

    The Story of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Is One of Intrigue, Filled with International Drama, Mafia Connections, and Plot Twists Worthy of a Movie

    A brief from Sept 2017 Richard Herrmann The Story of Atlantic Bluefin Science-based management will ensure a healthy future Overview The story of Atlantic bluefin tuna is one of intrigue, filled with international drama, mafia connections, and plot twists worthy of a movie. The main character—Thunnus thynnus—is the largest and most athletic tuna, which can grow to the size of a small car and travel nearly as fast as one too. An Atlantic bluefin starts out no bigger than an eyelash and grows to several hundred pounds and more than 6 feet in length in less than a decade. Unlike most fish species, Atlantic bluefin are warm-blooded; the heat created in their huge swimming muscles enables bursting speed, sharp vision, and thought processing second to none in the fish world. They are among the Atlantic’s top predators, with few species they won’t eat—and even fewer that eat them. The fleets of fishing vessels plying the Atlantic—and hoping to cash in on the value that the species has in sushi markets in Japan and high-end restaurants around the world—present the greatest threat to the Atlantic bluefin. Fishermen are often paid more than $10,000 for a single Atlantic bluefin right at the dock. The value of a high- quality fish at the final point of sale can be tens of thousands of dollars. These transactions add up to be big business. A recent estimate set the value of Atlantic bluefin fishing at nearly $200 million at the dock in 2014— and over $800 million at the final point of sale.1 Experts estimate that, pound for pound, this species is the most valuable tuna in the world and likely the most valuable fish in the Atlantic Ocean or the Mediterranean Sea.
  • Rastrelliger Kanangurta (Cuvier) 1817 - Adult Common Name (If Available): Indian Mackerel Language: English

    Rastrelliger Kanangurta (Cuvier) 1817 - Adult Common Name (If Available): Indian Mackerel Language: English

    NATIONAL BIORESOURCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD Dept. of Biotechnology Government of India, New Delhi For office use: MARINE BIORESOURCES FORMS DATA ENTRY: Form- 1(general) Fauna: √ Flora Microorganisms General Category: Vertebrata (Zooplankton) Fish larvae Scientific name &Authority: Rastrelliger kanangurta (Cuvier) 1817 - Adult Common Name (if available): Indian mackerel Language: English Synonyms: Author(s) Status Rastrelliger Jorden and Starks 1908 Scomber canangurta Cuvier 1829 Classification: Phylum: Vertebrata Sub-Phylum: Super class: Pisces Class: Osteichthyes Sub- Class: Actinopterygii Super order: Teleostei Order: Perciformes Sub Order: Scombroidei Super Family: Family: Scombridae Sub-Family: Scombrinae Genus: Rastrelliger Species: kanangurta Authority: Rastrelliger kanangurta (Cuvier) 1817 Reference No.: Cuiver, G. 1817. Regene Animal, 2: 313. Peter, K.J. (1967) Larvae of Rastrelliger (mackerel) from the Indian Ocean. Bull. Nat. Inst. Sci. India, 38,854-863. Geographical Location: Tropical Indo – Pacific Coastal waters. Latitude: Place: Longitude: State: Environment Freshwater: Yes/ No Habitat: Salinity: Brackish: Yes/No Migrations: Temperature: Salt Water: Yes Depth range : Picture (scanned images or photographs of larval stages) Figs. 1-3. Larvae of Rastrelliger (Peter, 1967). Fig. 1. 2.7 mm. larva. Fig.2. 3.1 mm. Fig 3. 5.3 mm. larva Fig.4-6. Juveniles of Rastrelliger (Balakrishnan and Rao 1971) Fig.4. 16.9 mm. Fig. 5. 19.3 mm. Fig. 6. 22.4 mm. DATA ENTRY FORM: Form –2 (Fish/ Shell fish/ Others ) Ref. No.: (Please answer only relevant