DOCSLIB.ORG

Phytophthora Antibodies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phytophthora Antibodies Phytophthora Antibodies gene_name sku Entry_Name Protein_Names Organism Length Identity Phytophthora nicotianae (Buckeye Hspa1l ARP48445_P050 Q6SL82_PHYNI Heat shock protein 70 rot agent) 657 100.00% Phytophthora nicotianae (Buckeye Hspa1l ARP48445_P050 Q6SL81_PHYNI Heat shock protein 70 rot agent) 655 100.00% Phytophthora nicotianae (Buckeye Hspa1l ARP48445_P050 Q6SL80_PHYNI Heat shock protein 70 rot agent) 655 100.00% Hspa1l ARP48445_P050 D0NGK0_PHYIN Heat shock protein 70 Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 654 100.00% Hspa1l ARP48445_P050 D0NGJ7_PHYIN Heat shock 70 kDa protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 653 100.00% Hspa1l ARP48445_P050 D0NGJ5_PHYIN Heat shock 70 kDa protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 653 100.00% Hspa1l ARP48445_P050 D0NGJ2_PHYIN Heat shock 70 kDa protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 663 100.00% GSM1 ARP47383_P050 D0NJR5_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 459 84.00% ORF Names:NFIA_085530 EMBL EAW18599.1OrganismNeosartorya fischeri (strain ATCC 1020 / DSM 3700 / FGSC A1164 / NRRL 181) (Aspergillus fischerianus) ARP47405_P050 D0MVY0_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 300 100.00% ORF Names:ACLA_068740 EMBL EAW13846.1OrganismAspergillus clavatus ARP43517_T100 D0MVV7_PHYIN Aspartate aminotransferase, mitochondrial Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 426 85.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00007366001 EMBL CAK69926.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP32462_P050 D0NFF5_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 528 76.00% ORF Names:TVAG_075420 EMBL EAX96736.1OrganismTrichomonas vaginalis ARP48281_P050 D0NRD5_PHYIN Peroxiredoxin‐2 Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 198 78.00% LOC548770 ARP49860_P050 D0N4S6_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 363 78.00% LOC100036778 ARP54825_P050 D0N4K6_PHYIN T‐complex protein 1 subunit epsilon Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 536 100.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00008167001 EMBL CAK71619.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP51477_P050 D0MU89_PHYIN Homogentisate 1,2‐dioxygenase Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 440 78.00% ORF Names:v1g194333OrganismNematoste lla vectensis (Starlet sea anemone) ARP48692_P050 D0N2E6_PHYIN Enoyl‐CoA hydratase/isomerase family, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 373 83.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00013765001 EMBL CAK78335.1OrganismParamecium Phytophthora infestans (Potato late tetraurelia ARP43007_P050 Q8H728_PHYIN Ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme blight fungus) 147 78.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00013765001 EMBL CAK78335.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP43007_P050 D0MQZ6_PHYIN Ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme E2, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 147 78.00% ORF Names:NFIA_006470 EMBL EAW17281.1OrganismNeosartorya fischeri (strain ATCC 1020 / DSM 3700 / FGSC A1164 / NRRL 181) (Aspergillus fischerianus) ARP34309_P050 D0NKA3_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 165 100.00% Ordered Locus Names:BMA10229_0019OrganismBurk holderia mallei (strain NCTC 10229) ARP37678_P050 D0NI79_PHYIN Voltage‐gated potassium channel subunit beta, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 261 75.00% nip7 ARP40832_P050 D0NPA8_PHYIN 60S ribosome subunit biogenesis protein NIP7 Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 180 85.00% aatf ARP38958_T100 D0N260_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 428 80.00% ORF Names:ACLA_010320 EMBL EAW12606.1OrganismAspergillus clavatus AVARP09055_T100 D0NIA6_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 149 90.00% ORF Names:ACLA_010320 EMBL EAW12606.1OrganismAspergillus clavatus AVARP09055_T100 D0MUE2_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 113 90.00% ORF Names:ACLA_010320 EMBL EAW12606.1OrganismAspergillus clavatus AVARP09055_T100 D0P4A0_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 149 90.00% ARP38015_T100 D0NC73_PHYIN Transcription factor BTF3‐like protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 162 76.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00013459001 EMBL CAK78012.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP38402_T100 D0NC35_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 236 91.00% ORF Names:ACLA_006330 EMBL EAW11876.1OrganismAspergillus clavatus ARP56469_P050 D0NI70_PHYIN Proteasome subunit beta type‐6, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 218 78.00% ORF Names:ACLA_006330 EMBL EAW11876.1OrganismAspergillus clavatus ARP56469_P050 D0MVQ0_PHYIN Proteasome subunit beta type‐6, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 673 78.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00039204001 EMBL CAK77377.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP55757_P050 D0N4A1_PHYIN ADP‐ribosylation factor 2 Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 186 84.00% ORF Names:ACLA_081010 EMBL EAW06417.1OrganismAspergillus clavatus ARP56133_P050 D0MRX0_PHYIN 60S ribosomal protein L30, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 112 83.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00001142001 EMBL CAK74940.1OrganismParamecium Phytophthora infestans (Potato late tetraurelia ARP33126_T100 Q8H719_PHYIN Ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme blight fungus) 149 100.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00001142001 EMBL CAK74940.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP33126_T100 D0N590_PHYIN Ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme E2, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 149 100.00% ORF Names:SIAM614_26331 EMBL EAV41719.1OrganismLabrenzia aggregata IAM 12614 ARP55538_P050 D0MRA1_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 237 100.00% ORF Names:ACLA_034510OrganismAspergill Lipoyl synthase, mitochondrial (EC 2.8.1.8) (Lipoate synthase) Phytophthora infestans (Potato late us clavatus ARP48717_P050 LIPA_PHYIN (LS) (Lip‐syn) (Lipoic acid synthase) blight fungus) 383 92.00% Ordered Locus Names:Bcen2424_0813OrganismBurkh olderia cenocepacia (strain HI2424) ARP43559_T100 D0NGA5_PHYIN Glutaryl‐CoA dehydrogenase, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 420 92.00% ORF Names:ACLA_036820 EMBL EAW09477.1OrganismAspergillus clavatus ARP51893_P050 D0NUY3_PHYIN Coatomer protein complex, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 1243 92.00% Ordered Locus Names:Arth_2144OrganismArthrobact er sp. (strain FB24) ARP48133_P050 D0MUX1_PHYIN Trifunctional enzyme subunit beta, mitochondrial Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 445 78.00% ORF Names:OsI_021120OrganismOryza Phytophthora infestans (Potato late sativa subsp. indica (Rice) ARP56312_P050 Q8H726_PHYIN Proteasome subunit blight fungus) 250 78.00% ORF Names:OsI_021120OrganismOryza sativa subsp. indica (Rice) ARP56312_P050 D0MT27_PHYIN Proteasome subunit alpha, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 250 78.00% Phytophthora infestans (Potato late ywhag1 ARP54792_P050 Q8H729_PHYIN 14‐3‐3‐like protein blight fungus) 249 78.00% ywhag1 ARP54792_P050 D0NYS2_PHYIN 14‐3‐3 protein epsilon Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 249 78.00% Ordered Locus Names:Shewana3_1405OrganismShew Phytophthora infestans (Potato late anella sp. (strain ANA‐3) ARP54442_P050 Q8H718_PHYIN Electron transfer flavoprotein beta subunit blight fungus) 251 100.00% Ordered Locus Names:Shewana3_1405OrganismShew anella sp. (strain ANA‐3) ARP54442_P050 D0NF02_PHYIN Electron transfer flavoprotein subunit beta Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 251 100.00% ORF Names:AGAP009341OrganismAnophel es gambiae (African malaria mosquito) ARP57771_P050 D0N579_PHYIN Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory B subunit, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 494 92.00% ORF Names:AGAP009341OrganismAnophel es gambiae (African malaria mosquito) ARP57771_P050 D0N576_PHYIN Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 436 92.00% Phytophthora infestans (Potato late ARP48203_T100 Q8H716_PHYIN Enolase blight fungus) 454 92.00% ARP48203_T100 D0MYA4_PHYIN Enolase Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 454 92.00% ARP48203_T100 D0MYA3_PHYIN Enolase Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 454 92.00% ARP48203_T100 D0NNU8_PHYIN Enolase Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 457 100.00% Rac3 ARP55742_P050 D0N5G5_PHYIN Cell division control protein 42 Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 151 100.00% rnhB ARP40647_T100 D0NMT5_PHYIN Ribonuclease H2 subunit A, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 791 81.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00038381001 EMBL CAK70279.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP40458_P050 D0MUT9_PHYIN Signal recognition particle, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 511 84.00% Peptidylprolyl isomerase domain and WD repeat‐containing ppwd1 ARP55238_P050 D0NK90_PHYIN protein 1 Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 630 78.00% URA1 ARP41940_T100 D0MUE3_PHYIN Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 424 84.00% rps14 ARP40322_T100 D0P1W1_PHYIN 40S ribosomal protein S14 Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 150 92.00% ORF Names:LELG_04299 EMBL EDK46119.1OrganismLodderomyces elongisporus (Yeast) (Saccharomyces Phytophthora infestans (Potato late elongisporus) ARP48186_T100 Q8H730_PHYIN K+ channel protein blight fungus) 349 91.00% ORF Names:LELG_04299 EMBL EDK46119.1OrganismLodderomyces elongisporus (Yeast) (Saccharomyces elongisporus) ARP48186_T100 D0MYC1_PHYIN Voltage‐gated potassium channel subunit beta, putative Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 349 91.00% ARP32839_P050 D0N261_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 781 90.00% ARP32839_P050 D0N0U5_PHYIN Putative uncharacterized protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 233 84.00% Phytophthora infestans (Potato late PGK1 ARP48140_P050 Q8H721_PHYIN Phosphoglycerate kinase blight fungus) 414 85.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00005940001 EMBL CAK64088.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP40574_P050 D0RMI3_PHYIN Amino acid/auxin permease‐like protein Phytophthora infestans T30‐4 268 81.00% ORF Names:GSPATT00005940001 EMBL CAK64088.1OrganismParamecium tetraurelia ARP40574_P050 D0RM23_PHYIN Amino acid/auxin permease‐like protein Phytophthora infestans
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein Remains Intrinsically Disordered When Covalently Attached to Proteasomal Target Proteins Jonas Barandun1,2, Fred F
    Barandun et al. BMC Structural Biology (2017) 17:1 DOI 10.1186/s12900-017-0072-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein remains intrinsically disordered when covalently attached to proteasomal target proteins Jonas Barandun1,2, Fred F. Damberger1, Cyrille L. Delley1, Juerg Laederach1, Frédéric H. T. Allain1 and Eilika Weber-Ban1* Abstract Background: The post-translational modification pathway referred to as pupylation marks proteins for proteasomal degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other actinobacteria by covalently attaching the small protein Pup (prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein) to target lysine residues. In contrast to the functionally analogous eukaryotic ubiquitin, Pup is intrinsically disordered in its free form. Its unfolded state allows Pup to adopt different structures upon interaction with different binding partners like the Pup ligase PafA and the proteasomal ATPase Mpa. While the disordered behavior of free Pup has been well characterized, it remained unknown whether Pup adopts a distinct structure when attached to a substrate. Results: Using a combination of NMR experiments and biochemical analysis we demonstrate that Pup remains unstructured when ligated to two well-established pupylation substrates targeted for proteasomal degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, malonyl transacylase (FabD) and ketopantoyl hydroxylmethyltransferase (PanB). Isotopically labeled Pup was linked to FabD and PanB by in vitro pupylation to generate homogeneously pupylated substrates suitable for NMR analysis. The single target lysine of PanB was identified by a combination of mass spectroscopy and mutational analysis. Chemical shift comparison between Pup in its free form and ligated to substrate reveals intrinsic disorder of Pup in the conjugate. Conclusion: When linked to the proteasomal substrates FabD and PanB, Pup is unstructured and retains the ability to interact with its different binding partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Yichen – Structure and Allostery of the Chaperonin Groel. Allosteric
    Literature Lunch 5-1-13 Yichen – J Mol Biol. 2013 May 13;425(9):1476-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.11.028. Epub 2012 Nov 24. Structure and Allostery of the Chaperonin GroEL. Saibil HR, Fenton WA, Clare DK, Horwich AL. Source Crystallography and Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, UK. Abstract Chaperonins are intricate allosteric machines formed of two back-to-back, stacked rings of subunits presenting end cavities lined with hydrophobic binding sites for nonnative polypeptides. Once bound, substrates are subjected to forceful, concerted movements that result in their ejection from the binding surface and simultaneous encapsulation inside a hydrophilic chamber that favors their folding. Here, we review the allosteric machine movements that are choreographed by ATP binding, which triggers concerted tilting and twisting of subunit domains. These movements distort the ring of hydrophobic binding sites and split it apart, potentially unfolding the multiply bound substrate. Then, GroES binding is accompanied by a 100° twist of the binding domains that removes the hydrophobic sites from the cavity lining and forms the folding chamber. ATP hydrolysis is not needed for a single round of binding and encapsulation but is necessary to allow the next round of ATP binding in the opposite ring. It is this remote ATP binding that triggers dismantling of the folding chamber and release of the encapsulated substrate, whether folded or not. The basis for these ordered actions is an elegant system of nested cooperativity of the ATPase machinery. ATP binds to a ring with positive cooperativity, and movements of the interlinked subunit domains are concerted.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMO and Ubiquitin in the Nucleus: Different Functions, Similar Mechanisms?
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW SUMO and ubiquitin in the nucleus: different functions, similar mechanisms? Grace Gill1 Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA The small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO posttrans- tin, SUMO modification regulates protein localization lationally modifies many proteins with roles in diverse and activity. processes including regulation of transcription, chroma- This review focuses on recent advances in our under- tin structure, and DNA repair. Similar to nonproteolytic standing of SUMO function and regulation, drawing on a roles of ubiquitin, SUMO modification regulates protein limited set of examples relating to gene expression, chro- localization and activity. Some proteins can be modified matin structure, and DNA repair. Comparison of SUMO by SUMO and ubiquitin, but with distinct functional and ubiquitin activities in the nucleus reveals interest- consequences. It is possible that the effects of ubiquiti- ing differences in function and suggests surprising simi- nation and SUMOylation are both largely due to binding larities in mechanism. Thus, for example, modification of proteins bearing specific interaction domains. Both of transcription factors and histones by ubiquitin is gen- modifications are reversible, and in some cases dynamic erally associated with increased gene expression whereas cycles of modification may be required for activity. Stud- modification of transcription factors and histones by ies of SUMO and ubiquitin in the nucleus are yielding SUMO is generally associated with decreased gene ex- new insights into regulation of gene expression, genome pression. In some cases, SUMO and ubiquitin may di- maintenance, and signal transduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Conserved Ubiquitylation Sites in Conserved Proteins During Human Evolution
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOleCular meDICine 42: 2203-2212, 2018 Loss of conserved ubiquitylation sites in conserved proteins during human evolution DONGBIN PARK, CHUL JUN GOH, HYEIN KIM, JI SEOK LEE and YOONSOO HAHN Department of Life Science, Chung‑Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea Received January 30, 2018; Accepted July 6, 2018 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3772 Abstract. Ubiquitylation of lysine residues in proteins serves Introduction a pivotal role in the efficient removal of misfolded or unused proteins and in the control of various regulatory pathways Ubiquitylation, in which the highly conserved 76‑residue poly- by monitoring protein activity that may lead to protein peptide ubiquitin is covalently attached to a lysine residue of degradation. The loss of ubiquitylated lysines may affect substrate proteins, mediates the targeted destruction of ubiq- the ubiquitin‑mediated regulatory network and result in the uitylated proteins by the ubiquitin‑proteasome system (1‑4). emergence of novel phenotypes. The present study analyzed The ubiquitin‑mediated protein degradation pathway serves a mouse ubiquitylation data and orthologous proteins from crucial role in the efficient and specific removal of misfolded 62 mammals to identify 193 conserved ubiquitylation sites from proteins and certain key regulatory proteins (5,6). Ubiquitin 169 proteins that were lost in the Euarchonta lineage leading and other ubiquitin‑like proteins, including autophagy‑related to humans. A total of 8 proteins, including betaine homo- protein 8, Ubiquitin‑like
    [Show full text]
  • Mdm2-Mediated Ubiquitylation: P53 and Beyond
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2010) 17, 93–102 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1350-9047/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/cdd Review Mdm2-mediated ubiquitylation: p53 and beyond J-C Marine*,1 and G Lozano2 The really interesting genes (RING)-finger-containing oncoprotein, Mdm2, is a promising drug target for cancer therapy. A key Mdm2 function is to promote ubiquitylation and proteasomal-dependent degradation of the tumor suppressor protein p53. Recent reports provide novel important insights into Mdm2-mediated regulation of p53 and how the physical and functional interactions between these two proteins are regulated. Moreover, a p53-independent role of Mdm2 has recently been confirmed by genetic data. These advances and their potential implications for the development of new cancer therapeutic strategies form the focus of this review. Cell Death and Differentiation (2010) 17, 93–102; doi:10.1038/cdd.2009.68; published online 5 June 2009 Mdm2 is a key regulator of a variety of fundamental cellular has also emerged from recent genetic studies. These processes and a very promising drug target for cancer advances and their potential implications for the development therapy. It belongs to a large family of (really interesting of new cancer therapeutic strategies form the focus of this gene) RING-finger-containing proteins and, as most of its review. For a more detailed discussion of Mdm2 and its other members, Mdm2 functions mainly, if not exclusively, as various functions an interested reader should also consult an E3 ligase.1 It targets various substrates for mono- and/or references9–12. poly-ubiquitylation thereby regulating their activities; for instance by controlling their localization, and/or levels by The p53–Mdm2 Regulatory Feedback Loop proteasome-dependent degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitin Modifications
    npg Cell Research (2016) 26:399-422. REVIEW www.nature.com/cr Ubiquitin modifications Kirby N Swatek1, David Komander1 1Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK Protein ubiquitination is a dynamic multifaceted post-translational modification involved in nearly all aspects of eukaryotic biology. Once attached to a substrate, the 76-amino acid protein ubiquitin is subjected to further modi- fications, creating a multitude of distinct signals with distinct cellular outcomes, referred to as the ‘ubiquitin code’. Ubiquitin can be ubiquitinated on seven lysine (Lys) residues or on the N-terminus, leading to polyubiquitin chains that can encompass complex topologies. Alternatively or in addition, ubiquitin Lys residues can be modified by ubiq- uitin-like molecules (such as SUMO or NEDD8). Finally, ubiquitin can also be acetylated on Lys, or phosphorylated on Ser, Thr or Tyr residues, and each modification has the potential to dramatically alter the signaling outcome. While the number of distinctly modified ubiquitin species in cells is mind-boggling, much progress has been made to characterize the roles of distinct ubiquitin modifications, and many enzymes and receptors have been identified that create, recognize or remove these ubiquitin modifications. We here provide an overview of the various ubiquitin modifications present in cells, and highlight recent progress on ubiquitin chain biology. We then discuss the recent findings in the field of ubiquitin acetylation and phosphorylation, with a focus on Ser65-phosphorylation and its role in mitophagy and Parkin activation. Keywords: ubiquitin; proteasomal degradation; phosphorylation; post-translational modification; Parkin Cell Research (2016) 26:399-422.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Folding and Quality Control in the ER
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Protein Folding and Quality Control in the ER Kazutaka Araki and Kazuhiro Nagata Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kamigamo, Kita-ku, Kyoto 803-8555, Japan Correspondence: [email protected] The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) uses an elaborate surveillance system called the ER quality control (ERQC) system. The ERQC facilitates folding and modification of secretory and mem- brane proteins and eliminates terminally misfolded polypeptides through ER-associated degradation (ERAD) or autophagic degradation. This mechanism of ER protein surveillance is closely linked to redox and calcium homeostasis in the ER, whose balance is presumed to be regulated by a specific cellular compartment. The potential to modulate proteostasis and metabolism with chemical compounds or targeted siRNAs may offer an ideal option for the treatment of disease. he endoplasmic reticulum (ER) serves as a complex in the ER membrane (Johnson and Tprotein-folding factory where elaborate Van Waes 1999; Saraogi and Shan 2011). After quality and quantity control systems monitor arriving at the translocon, translation resumes an efficient and accurate production of secretory in a process called cotranslational translocation and membrane proteins, and constantly main- (Hegde and Kang 2008; Zimmermann et al. tain proper physiological homeostasis in the 2010). Numerous ER-resident chaperones and ER including redox state and calcium balance. enzymes aid in structural and conformational In this article, we present an overview the recent maturation necessary for proper protein fold- progress on the ER quality control system, ing, including signal-peptide cleavage, N-linked mainly focusing on the mammalian system.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared and Unique Properties of Ubiquitin and SUMO Interaction Networks in DNA Repair
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press PERSPECTIVE Shared and unique properties of ubiquitin and SUMO interaction networks in DNA repair Sjoerd J.L. van Wijk,1 Stefan Mu¨ ller,1 and Ivan Dikic1,2,3 1Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University School of Medicine, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; 2Frankfurt Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany In this issue of Genes & Development, Yang and col- residues of target proteins and can be conjugated either as leagues (pp. 1847–1858) identify new components of a monomers or as polymeric chains that are generally small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-like interaction net- linked through internal lysine residues (Ikeda and Dikic work that orchestrates and fine-tunes the Fanconi anemia 2008). Conjugation of Ub and SUMO typically relies on (FA) pathway and replication-coupled repair. This new the coordinated activity of the catalytic E1–E2–E3 triad, pathway emphasizes the intricate interplay of ubiquitin but compared with Ub, the SUMO conjugation machinery (Ub) and SUMO networks in the DNA damage response. is less complex. SUMO becomes activated by the dimeric UBA2 (Ub-associated domain 2)/AOS1 complex and is subsequently transferred to Ubc9, the only known SUMO E2 (Kerscher et al. 2006; Gareau and Lima 2010). Although Ubiquitin (Ub) and the related small ubiquitin-like mod- Ubc9 is able to transfer SUMO directly to substrates, it ifier (SUMO) (hereafter commonly referred to as ubiqui- typically interacts with SUMO E3 ligases that mediate an tin-like proteins ½UBLs) are part of sophisticated and optimal positioning of the SUMO-loaded E2 and the sub- complex post-translational modification systems (Deribe strate to allow for efficient substrate SUMOylation (Gareau et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitin-Interacting Motifs of Ataxin-3 Regulate Its Polyglutamine Toxicity Through Hsc70-4-Dependent Aggregation
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Ubiquitin-interacting motifs of ataxin-3 regulate its polyglutamine toxicity through Hsc70-4-dependent aggregation Sean L Johnson1, Bedri Ranxhi1, Kozeta Libohova1, Wei-Ling Tsou1*, Sokol V Todi1,2* 1Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University, Detroit, United States; 2Department of Neurology, Wayne State University, Detroit, United States Abstract Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) belongs to the family of polyglutamine neurodegenerations. Each disorder stems from the abnormal lengthening of a glutamine repeat in a different protein. Although caused by a similar mutation, polyglutamine disorders are distinct, implicating non-polyglutamine regions of disease proteins as regulators of pathogenesis. SCA3 is caused by polyglutamine expansion in ataxin-3. To determine the role of ataxin-3’s non- polyglutamine domains in disease, we utilized a new, allelic series of Drosophila melanogaster. We found that ataxin-3 pathogenicity is saliently controlled by polyglutamine-adjacent ubiquitin- interacting motifs (UIMs) that enhance aggregation and toxicity. UIMs function by interacting with the heat shock protein, Hsc70-4, whose reduction diminishes ataxin-3 toxicity in a UIM-dependent manner. Hsc70-4 also enhances pathogenicity of other polyglutamine proteins. Our studies provide a unique insight into the impact of ataxin-3 domains in SCA3, identify Hsc70-4 as a SCA3 enhancer, and indicate pleiotropic effects from HSP70 chaperones, which are generally thought to suppress polyglutamine degeneration. *For correspondence: [email protected] (W-LT); [email protected] (SVT) Introduction Competing interests: The Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3; also known as Machado-Joseph disease) is the most frequent authors declare that no dominant ataxia worldwide. SCA3 is caused by CAG repeat expansion in the gene ATXN3 that is competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function of FK506-Binding Protein 13 in Protein Quality Control Protects Plasma Cells from Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress- Edited By: Associated Apoptosis Harry W
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 02 March 2017 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00222 The Function of FK506-Binding Protein 13 in Protein Quality Control Protects Plasma Cells from Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress- Edited by: Associated Apoptosis Harry W. Schroeder, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1† 1 1 2 3 USA Mini Jeong , Eunkyeong Jang , Suk San Choi , Changhoon Ji , Kyungho Lee and Jeehee Youn1* Reviewed by: Michael A. Lynes, 1 Laboratory of Autoimmunology, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, University of Connecticut, USA South Korea, 2 Protein Metabolism Medical Research Center, Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Thierry Defrance, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), France Plasma cells (PCs) are exposed to intense endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress imposed *Correspondence: by enormous rates of immunoglobulin (Ig) synthesis and secretion. Therefore, protein Jeehee Youn [email protected] homeostasis is crucial for the survival of PCs, but its molecular mechanism remains largely unknown. Here, we found marked overexpression of FK506-binding protein 13 †Present address: Mini Jeong, (FKBP13) in long-lived PCs from autoimmune mice and investigated its function using Department of Biochemistry and a plasmacytoma cell line secreting IgA. FKBP13 expression was induced largely in the Molecular Biology, Korean Institute of Molecular Medicine and Nutrition, lumen of ER in response to treatment with an ER stressor tunicamycin or overexpression Korea University College of Medicine, of an adaptive unfolded protein response (UPR) protein X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1).
    [Show full text]
  • Urmylation and Trna Thiolation Functions of Ubiquitinlike Uba4urm1
    FEBS Letters 589 (2015) 904–909 journal homepage: www.FEBSLetters.org Urmylation and tRNA thiolation functions of ubiquitin-like Uba4ÁUrm1 systems are conserved from yeast to manq André Jüdes a, Folke Ebert a, Christian Bär a,b, Kathrin L. Thüring c, Aileen Harrer a, Roland Klassen a, ⇑ Mark Helm c, Michael J.R. Stark d, Raffael Schaffrath a, a Universität Kassel, Institut für Biologie, FG Mikrobiologie, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132 Kassel, Germany b Spanish National Cancer Centre, Melchor Fernandez Almagro 3, Madrid, Spain c Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Institut für Pharmazie und Biochemie, Staudinger Weg 5, 55128 Mainz, Germany d Centre for Gene Regulation & Expression, College of Life Sciences, MSI/WTB Complex, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK article info abstract Article history: The ubiquitin-like protein Urm1 from budding yeast and its E1-like activator Uba4 have dual roles in Received 12 January 2015 protein urmylation and tRNA thiolation pathways. To study whether these are conserved among Revised 11 February 2015 eukaryotes, we used gene shuffles to replace the yeast proteins by their human counterparts, Accepted 24 February 2015 hURM1 and hUBA4/MOCS3. As judged from biochemical and genetical assays, hURM1 and hUBA4 Available online 3 March 2015 are functional in yeast, albeit at reduced efficiencies. They mediate urmylation of the peroxiredoxin Edited by Michael Ibba Ahp1, a known urmylation target in yeast, and support tRNA thiolation. Similar to hUBA4, yeast Uba4 itself is modified by Urm1 and hURM1 suggesting target overlap between eukaryal urmylation pathways. In sum, our study shows that dual-function ubiquitin-like Urm1 Uba4 systems are con- Keywords: Á Urm1 (hURM1) served and exchangeable between human and yeast cells.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMO Playing Tag with Ubiquitin
    TIBS-872; No. of Pages 9 Review SUMO playing tag with ubiquitin 1 2 3 Gerrit J.K. Praefcke , Kay Hofmann and R. Ju¨ rgen Dohmen 1 Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne Biocenter, Zu¨ lpicher Straße 47a, D-50674 Cologne, Germany 2 Bioinformatics Group, Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 68, D-51429 Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany 3 Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne Biocenter, Zu¨ lpicher Straße 47a, D-50674 Cologne, Germany In addition to being structurally related, the protein modi- Similarly, SUMO modification has been implicated in fiers ubiquitin and SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifi- many important cellular processes including the control of er), share a multitude of functional interrelations. These genome stability, signal transduction, targeting to and include the targeting of the same attachment sites in formation of nuclear compartments, cell cycle and meiosis certain substrates, and SUMO-dependent ubiquitylation [3–5]. Whereas budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) in others. Notably, several cellular processes, including and fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) have only the targeting of repair machinery to DNA damage sites, one type of SUMO, multiple SUMO isoforms are present in require the sequential sumoylation and ubiquitylation of many metazoans. For example, four SUMO isoforms are distinct substrates. Some proteins promote both modifi- present in humans (Table 1). Only three of these (SUMO-1, cations. By contrast, the activity of some enzymes that SUMO-2 and SUMO-3) can be processed in vivo to bear the control either sumoylation or ubiquitylation is regulated C-terminal diglycine motif required for post-translational by the respective other modification.
    [Show full text]