Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities

APPENDIX B

Event Notification Report

EVENT NOTIFICATION REPORT

Plant Non work Service Environmental Injury Break-in Conduct Vehicle Related Motor Strike Theft Property Vehicle Accidents       

Date & Time Event Event Reported by Notification Form Date Completed Occurred Completed by

Project Team Names Project Name WHS or ENV Representative Project Manager Site Supervisor Engineers Leading Hand/s

1. DETAILS

Event Description (Describe event using key words) Event first reported to Date Time reported reported Event details (below) Details specific names, dates, times, equipment, organisation/s, etc.

What activity was being undertaken? Who was involved, time & duration of activity in progress

Location on site INSERT OR ATTACH MAP / SKETCH & PHOTOS TO NOTIFICATION (Show location in relations to site and key areas – intersections, plant, activity, services, pot hole locations, survey pegs, chainages)

2. PERSONS INVOLVED / & or near VICINITY Names of Directly Organisation Position Tile Capacity of Contact No. Statement Taken involved & involvement Witnesses (Direct / indirect witness) Y  Y  Y  Y 

3. IMMEDIATE ACTION TAKEN Tick items to signify the action taken immediately following the event occurring  Secure area / isolate  Subcontractor  Medical Centre Other: Workers retained Ambulance on site  Contacted Emergency  Photos of scene /  Spill control services area  Notified asset owner  D & A testing  Statements

6. EXTERNAL NOTIFICATIONS made at time of Event Occurrence Agency Notified Date / time Agency Notified Date / time notified notified SafeWork NSW  Subcontractor  WHS Co-ord responsible PM responsible EPA / DPIE  Police / Fire / Amb  (PM responsible, notify ER) Asset Owner  Police Event No. (if  PM responsible applicable) Client (Org)  Other (Name)  PM responsible

7. FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE INCIDENT Environment Equipment / materials  Noise  Surface gradient  Tampering of  Plant or equipment / conditions plant / failure equipment  Lighting  Dust / fume  Inadequate  Material / equipment maintenance too heavy / awkward  Vibration  Slip / trip hazard  Inadequate  Plant or equipment guarding unsuitable  Weather  Time /  Other: production pressures Work systems People  Hazard no identified  No / inadequate  No / Not followed  Drugs / alcohol risk assessment Procedure conducted  Hazard not reported  No / inadequate  Fatigue  Stress/ Pressures controls implemented  No/inadequate safe  Inadequate  Change of  Distraction / personal work procedure training / routine issues / stress supervision  Inadequate planning  Other:  Lack of  Other: communication Comment on selection

8. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Actions Assigned Completion Date Verified by to date complete

9. PM AND ER TO COMPLETE Matter has been reviewed, recorded, and correctly notified? Yes No   PM Signature: ER Signature: Date: Date:

APPENDIX C

Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

Construction Noise and Vibration Management Mamre Road South Precinct Kemps Creek

NOISE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Client: Frasers Property and Altis Property Partners

Reference: Date Issued: 1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc 24 March 2021

Document Information

Contact Details

75/45 Huntley St Alexandria NSW 2015 (02) 9666 5444 ABN: 35 607 558 707

Greg Pearce Mark Enersen Ph: 0450 337 375 Ph: 0409 317 416 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

Report Register

Date Revision Author Reviewer 10/12/18 R02C Matthew Bechara Greg Pearce 22/04/20 R02D Matthew Bechara Greg Pearce 17/11/20 R02E Matthew Bechara Greg Pearce 21/01/21 R02F Matthew Bechara Greg Pearce 22/01/21 R02G Matthew Bechara Greg Pearce 16/02/21 R02I Matthew Bechara Greg Pearce 26/02/21 R02J Matthew Bechara Greg Pearce 24/03/21 R02K Matthew Bechara Greg Pearce

Disclaimer

Reports produced by Acoustic Works are prepared for a particular Client’s objective and are based on a specific scope, conditions and limitations, as agreed between Acoustic Works and the Client. Under no circumstances shall information and/or report(s) prepared by Acoustic Works be used by other parties other than the Client without first obtaining written permission from Acoustic Works.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.Executive Summary ...... 5 2.Introduction ...... 7 3.Site Description ...... 7 3.1 Site Location ...... 7 3.2 Proposal ...... 8 3.3 Construction Staging and Activities ...... 8 3.4 Acoustic Environment ...... 9 4.Conditions of Approval ...... 10 5.Community Consultation ...... 19 6.Noise and Vibration Standards and Codes ...... 12 6.1 Assessing Vibration: A Technical Guideline 2006 ...... 13 6.1.1 Types of vibration ...... 13 6.1.2 Acceptable values for continuous and impulsive vibration (1-80Hz) ...... 13 6.1.3 Acceptable values for intermittent vibration ...... 14 6.1.4 Short-term works ...... 14 6.2 NSW Interim Construction Noise Guideline 2009 ...... 15 6.2.1 Assessment criteria ...... 15 6.2.1.1 Residential uses ...... 15 6.2.1.2 Other sensitive uses ...... 16 6.2.1.3 Commercial and industrial properties ...... 16 6.3 Australian Standard AS2107 ...... 17 6.4 Australian Standard AS2436 ...... 17 6.5 Australian Standard AS2670.2-1990 ...... 18 6.6 Australian Standard AS2187-2006 ...... 18 6.7 DIN 4150 – 2016 Part 3 ...... 18 7.Noise Monitoring and Receivers ...... 20 7.1 Monitoring locations and receivers ...... 20 7.2 Equipment ...... 21 7.3 Monitoring Procedure ...... 21 8.Existing Noise Levels ...... 22 8.1 Meteorological conditions ...... 22 8.2 Ambient background noise level ...... 22 9.Project specific criteria ...... 23 9.1 Construction noise criteria ...... 23 9.2 Construction vibration criteria ...... 23 10. Predicted Noise Levels ...... 24 10.1 Earthworks ...... 24 10.2 Construction ...... 26 11. Recommended Acoustic Treatments & Management Principles ...... 28 11.1 General comments ...... 28 11.2 Noise control ...... 28 11.3 Vibration Control ...... 29 11.4 Contingency Management Plan ...... 29 12. Conclusion ...... 29 13. Appendices ...... 30 13.1 Noise monitoring charts ...... 30 13.2 Noise Management Plan ...... 40 13.2.1 All activities ...... 41 13.2.2 Implementation of Management Plan ...... 41

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 3

13.2.3 Active Involvement ...... 41 13.2.4 Deliveries ...... 42 13.2.5 Onsite Mechanical Plant ...... 42 13.2.6 Complaints ...... 42 13.2.7 Review ...... 42 13.3 Noise monitoring ...... 43 13.3.1 Equipment ...... 43 13.3.2 Parameters ...... 43 13.3.3 Procedure for measuring noise ...... 44 13.3.3.1 Where to measure noise ...... 44 13.3.3.2 When to measure ambient noise ...... 44 13.3.3.3 When to measure noise from construction ...... 44 13.3.3.4 What to avoid ...... 44 13.3.3.5 Steps for measurement ...... 45 13.3.3.6 Information to be reported ...... 45 13.4 Construction vibration monitoring ...... 46

TABLE INDEX

Table 1: Application of codes and regulations ...... 12 Table 2: Preferred weighted RMS vibration acceleration values ...... 13 Table 3: Vibration dose values for intermittent vibration ...... 14 Table 4: Noise criteria for quantitative assessment - Residential ...... 15 Table 5: Noise criteria for quantitative assessment - Other uses ...... 16 Table 6: Noise criteria - Commercial and industrial premises ...... 16 Table 7: AS2670.2-1990 vibration multiplying factors ...... 18 Table 8: AS2187-2006 recommended peak particle velocity ...... 18 Table 9 – DIN4150 recommend peak particle velocity ...... 19 Table 10: Meteorological conditions – Horsley Park ...... 22 Table 11: Measured L90 noise levels ...... 22 Table 12: Applicable noise limits for construction work ...... 23 Table 13: Applicable vibration limits ...... 23 Table 14: Predicted earthworks noise impacts (Receivers 1 to 4) ...... 24 Table 15: Predicted earthworks noise impacts (Receivers 5 to B) ...... 25 Table 16: Predicted construction noise impacts (Receivers 1 to 4) ...... 26 Table 17: Predicted construction noise impacts (Receivers 5 to A) ...... 27

FIGURE INDEX

Figure 1: Site Location (Not to Scale) ...... 7 Figure 2: Receiver and noise monitoring locations ...... 20

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 4

1. Executive Summary The following report is in response to a request the Frasers Property and Altis Property Partners for a construction noise and vibration management plan for the proposed warehouse/industrial development located at Mamre Road South Precinct, Kemps Creek. This report provides a noise management plan and recommendations for noise control during earthworks and construction of the proposed development as required by in accordance with Penrith City Council requirements and the NSW Department of Planning and Environment’s Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) (Application Reference: SSD 9522) which requires the following matters to be addressed:

CNVMP Section Condition References Protection of the Warragamba Pipelines Corridor B34. Detailed design for the development must demonstrate compliance with the WaterNSW publication 11.3 Guidelines for development adjacent to the Upper Canal and Warragamba Pipelines. B48. The Applicant must prepare a Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP) for the development to the satisfaction of the Planning Secretary. The CNVMP must form part of a CEMP required by a) 12 condition C2 and must: b) 4 (a) be prepared by suitably qualified and experienced acoustic engineer(s); c) 7.1 & 10 (b) be approved by the Planning Secretary prior to the commencement of construction; d) 11 (c) identify the Mamre Anglican School as a sensitive receiver and include management measures to mitigate e) 11 daytime construction noise impacts on the operations of the school; f) 11 & 13.2, (d) describe procedures for achieving the noise management levels in EPA’s Interim Construction Noise refer to CEMP for Guideline (DECC, 2009) (as may be updated or replaced from time to time); further (e) describe the measures to be implemented to manage high noise generating works such as piling, in close information proximity to sensitive receivers; g) 6 (f) include strategies that have been developed with the community for managing high noise generating h) 11 & 13.2, works; refer to CEMP for (g) describe the community consultation undertaken to develop the strategies in condition B48(f); and further (h) include a complaints management system that would be implemented for the duration of the information development.

B49 The Applicant must: (a) not commence construction of any relevant stage until the Construction Noise and Vibration Management a) Noted Plan required by condition B48 is approved by the Planning Secretary; and b) Noted (b) implement the most recent version of the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan approved by the Planning Secretary for the duration of construction.

B50 Vibration caused by construction at any residence or structure outside the site must be limited to: (a) for structural damage, the latest version of DIN 4150-3 (1992-02) Structural vibration - Effects of a) 5.7 vibration on structures (German Institute for Standardisation, 1999); and b) 5.1 (b) for human exposure, the acceptable vibration values set out in the Environmental Noise Management Assessing Vibration: a technical guideline (DEC, 2006) (as may be updated or replaced from time to time).

B51 The limits in conditions B50 apply unless otherwise outlined in a CNVMP, approved as part of the CEMP Condition B50 is required by condition C2 of this consent. applicable

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 5

CNVMP Section Condition References C1 Management plans required under this consent must be prepared in accordance with relevant guidelines, and include: (a) detailed baseline data; (b) details of: (i) the relevant statutory requirements (including any relevant approval, licence or lease conditions); (ii) any relevant limits or performance measures and criteria; and (iii) the specific performance indicators that are proposed to be used to judge the performance of, or guide the implementation of, the development or any management measures; (c) a description of the measures to be implemented to comply with the relevant statutory requirements, limits, or performance measures and criteria; a) 8 (d) a program to monitor and report on the: b) 4 & 5 (i) impacts and environmental performance of the development; and c) 11 (ii) effectiveness of the management measures set out pursuant to paragraph (c) above; d) 13.3 (e) a contingency plan to manage any unpredicted impacts and their consequences and to ensure that e) 13.2 ongoing f) Refer to CEMP impacts reduce to levels below relevant impact assessment criteria as quickly as possible; g) 13.2 (f) a program to investigate and implement ways to improve the environmental performance of the h) 13.2.7 development (g) a protocol for managing and reporting any: (i) incident and any non-compliance (specifically including any exceedance of the impact assessment criteria and performance criteria); (ii) complaint; (iii) failure to comply with statutory requirements; and (h) a protocol for periodic review of the plan. Note: the Planning Secretary may waive some of these requirements if they are unnecessary or unwarranted for particular management plans

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 6

2. Introduction

This report is in response to a request the Frasers Property and Altis Property Partners for a construction noise and vibration management plan for the proposed warehouse/industrial development located at Mamre Road South Precinct, Kemps Creek. This report provides a noise management plan and recommendations for noise control during earthworks and construction of the proposed development as required by the NSW Department of Planning, Industry & Environment.

3. Site Description 3.1 Site Location The site is described by the following:

657-769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek Lot 34 on DP1118173 Lot X on DP421633 Lot Y on DP421633 Lot 22 on DP258414 Lot 1 on DP1018318 and is located at the western extent of the WSEA within the Penrith LGA.

Refer to Figure 1 for site location.

Figure 1: Site Location (Not to Scale)

Site

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 7

The site is bound by the following land uses: • North – the Water NSW Pipeline and SSD 7173 approved ‘First Estate’ industrial development, with the Erskine Business Park beyond • South – rural residential properties • East – Mamre Road with rural residential properties, schools and aged care beyond • West – South Creek with rural residential properties beyond.

The site has historically been used for low intensity agriculture and is primarily covered with pasture grass and limited stands of vegetation. The site has several dams in the central area and has a gradual fall from east to west towards South Creek.

3.2 Proposal The Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub (the Yards) is a regional warehouse and distribution complex located at Kemps Creek within the Penrith local government area (LGA) within the Western Sydney Employment Area (WSEA) (see Figure 1).

Frasers Property Australia Pty Ltd (Frasers) and Altis Bulky Retail Pty Ltd (Altis) jointly identified as ‘the Proponent’ obtained Development Consent SSD (State Significant Development) 9522 on 21 December 2020 from the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) for the ‘Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub’ comprising the construction of eight warehouse buildings over eight lots as the first stage of development, with estate works across the broader site comprising bulk earthworks to create building pads for future development, stormwater infrastructure and an internal road network including a north south distributor road connecting to the adjacent property, intersection upgrades and the widening of Mamre Road.

Specifically, SSD 9522 permits the following development: • Demolition of existing structures, site-wide earthworks, landscaping, stormwater and other infrastructure and an internal road network; • Construction and operation of eight warehouses comprising 162,355 m2 of floor space; • Intersection upgrade works in Mamre Road; • 744 parking spaces; and • 21-lot Torrens title subdivision over two stages, being Stage 1 residual lot subdivision (5 lots) and Stage 2 residual and development lot subdivision (17 lots).

3.3 Construction Staging and Activities

The Stage 1 development of the Yards comprises the subdivision of five lots within the site, along with demolition and site wide earthworks, landscaping, utilities, stormwater and the internal road networks. Stage 1 also includes the construction and operation of eight warehouses inclusive of 744 parking spaces and intersection upgrade works on Mamre Road.

The Stage 2 development comprises the subdivision of the remaining portion of the site into a further 17 lots.

Development on these lots is then anticipated to occur over a period of time to meet market demand and would be subject to future development applications.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 8

3.4 Acoustic Environment The surrounding area is primarily affected by road traffic from Mamre Road and potentially noise from existing nearby commercial/industrial activities.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 9

4. Conditions of Approval The requirements for the construction of the proposed development are contained in conditions B34 and B45 to B51 of the State-Significant Development consent (ref: SSD-9522, dated 21 December 2020):

“Protection of the Warragamba Pipelines Corridor B34. Detailed design for the development must demonstrate compliance with the WaterNSW publication Guidelines for development adjacent to the Upper Canal and Warragamba Pipelines.

Hours of Work B45. The Applicant must comply with the hours detailed in Table 4, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Secretary.

Table 4: Hours of Work Activity Day Time Earthworks and construction Monday – Friday 7am-6pm Saturday 8am-1pm Operation Monday – Sunday 24 hours

B46. Works outside of the hours identified in condition B45 may be undertaken in the following circumstances: (a) works that are inaudible at the nearest sensitive receivers; (b) works agreed to in writing by the Planning Secretary; (c) for the delivery of materials required outside these hours by the NSW Police Force or other authorities for safety reasons; or (d) where it is required in an emergency to avoid the loss of lives, property or to prevent environmental harm.

Construction Noise Limits B47. The development must be constructed to achieve the construction noise management levels detailed in the Interim Construction Noise Guideline (DECC, 2009) (as may be updated or replaced from time to time). All feasible and reasonable noise mitigation measures must be implemented and any activities that could exceed the construction noise management levels must be identified and managed in accordance with the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan required by condition B48 and mitigation measures in the Appendix 2.

Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan B48. The Applicant must prepare a Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (CNVMP) for the development to the satisfaction of the Planning Secretary. The CNVMP must form part of a CEMP required by condition C2 and must: (a) be prepared by suitably qualified and experienced acoustic engineer(s); (b) be approved by the Planning Secretary prior to the commencement of construction; (c) identify the Mamre Anglican School as a sensitive receiver and include management measures to mitigate daytime construction noise impacts on the operations of the school; (d) describe procedures for achieving the noise management levels in EPA’s Interim Construction Noise Guideline (DECC, 2009) (as may be updated or replaced from time to time);

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 10

(e) describe the measures to be implemented to manage high noise generating works such as piling, in close proximity to sensitive receivers; (f) include strategies that have been developed with the community for managing high noise generating works; (g) describe the community consultation undertaken to develop the strategies in condition B48(f); and (h) include a complaints management system that would be implemented for the duration of the development.

B49. The Applicant must: (a) not commence construction of any relevant stage until the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan required by condition B48 is approved by the Planning Secretary; and (b) implement the most recent version of the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan approved by the Planning Secretary for the duration of construction.

B50. Vibration caused by construction at any residence or structure outside the site must be limited to: (a) for structural damage, the latest version of DIN 4150-3 (1992-02) Structural vibration - Effects of vibration on structures (German Institute for Standardisation, 1999); and (b) for human exposure, the acceptable vibration values set out in the Environmental Noise Management Assessing Vibration: a technical guideline (DEC, 2006) (as may be updated or replaced from time to time). B51. The limits in conditions B50 apply unless otherwise outlined in a CNVMP, approved as part of the CEMP required by condition C2 of this consent.’

Further reference is made to the WaterNSW Guidelines for Development Adjacent to the Upper Canal and Warragamba Pipelines.

B2.4.5. Vibration Vibration impacts from construction activities such as jackhammering, pile driving or earthmoving may cause indirect damage to WaterNSW lands, assets or infrastructure. The Upper Canal is particularly structurally fragile due to its age and the Warragamba Pipelines are fragile due to their inner concrete lining, footings and expansion joints. At present, no Australian Standards exist for the assessment of damage caused by vibration. WaterNSW accepts Line 3 of Table 3 from the current German Standard DIN 4150 – Part 3 - “Structural Vibration Part 3: Effects of vibration in structures” as the maximum allowable limit of vibration acceptable at WaterNSW assets.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 11

5. Noise and Vibration Standards and Codes We provide the following summary of noise and vibration standards and codes that may be applicable to the construction works at the site. This may include;

• Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 • Protection of the Environment (Noise Control) Regulation 2008 • NSW Noise Policy for Industry • Assessing Vibration: A Technical Guideline 2006 • NSW Interim Construction Noise Guideline 2009 • Australian Standard AS2107 – Acoustics-Recommended Design Sound Levels and Reverberation Times for building interiors • Australian Standard AS2436 – Guide to noise control on construction, maintenance and construction sites. • Australian Standard AS 2670.2-1990 Evaluation of Human Exposure to whole body Vibration Part 2 Continuous and shock induced vibration in buildings (1 to 80 Hz) • Australian Standard 2187-2006 SAA Explosives Code, Part 2 - Use of Explosives • German Standard DIN 4150-3: 2016 Vibration in Buildings – Part 3: Effects on Structures

The application relevance of each of these is summarised as follows;

Table 1: Application of codes and regulations Applicable to Sets specific Code/standard title construction noise or noise or vibration Comments (abbreviated) vibration? goals? Protection of the Construction noise and vibration not Environment Operations Act Not mentioned No specifically referenced but may be 1997 implied Protection of the Construction noise and vibration not Environment (Noise Control) Not mentioned No specifically referenced but may be Regulation 2008 implied Construction noise is not dealt with by NSW Noise Policy for No No the NPfI as described in Section 1.5 of Industy2017 the policy Continuous, impulsive and intermittent Assessing Vibration: A Noise - No Yes vibration. Technical Guideline 2006 Vibration - Yes Based on BS6472-1992 Primarily for noise from construction NSW Interim Construction Noise - Yes Noise - Yes works that are regulated by the NSW Noise Guideline 2009 Vibration - No Vibration - No EPA Australian Standard AS2107 No Yes Not relevant to construction noise Applicable to noise associated with Australian Standard AS2436 Noise - Yes No construction Australian Standard Noise - No Specific vibration Used for vibration only AS2670.2 Vibration - Yes goals Australian Standard AS2187- Noise - No Specific vibration Relevant to demolition 2006 Vibration - Yes goals German Standard DIN 4150 Noise – No Yes Construction and demolition – Part 3 Vibration – Yes

Review of the relevant codes and standards listed above is provided in the following sections of this report.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 12

5.1 Assessing Vibration: A Technical Guideline 2006 5.1.1 Types of vibration There are three types of vibration as classified in the guide;

• Continuous - vibration continues uninterrupted for a defined period (usually throughout daytime and/or night-time). This type of vibration is assessed on the basis of weighted rms acceleration values • Impulsive - rapid build up to a peak followed by a damped decay that may or may not involve several cycles. The duration is short, typically less than 2 seconds. Impulsive vibration (no more than three occurrences in an assessment period) is assessed on the basis of acceleration values. • Intermittent - interrupted periods of continuous (e.g. a drill) or repeated periods of impulsive vibration (e.g. a pile driver), or continuous vibration that varies significantly in magnitude. Assessed on the basis of vibration dose values.

5.1.2 Acceptable values for continuous and impulsive vibration (1-80Hz) The relevant criteria for continuous and impulsive vibration are as follows;

Table 2: Preferred weighted RMS vibration acceleration values Preferred values Maximum values Assessment m/s2 m/s2 Type Location period x- and x- and y- z-axis z-axis y-axes axes Critical areas Day or night time 0.005 0.0036 0.01 0.0072

Day time 0.01 0.0071 0.02 0.014 Residences Night time 0.007 0.005 0.014 0.01 Continuous vibration Offices, schools, educational institutions Day or night time 0.02 0.014 0.04 0.028 and places of worship Workshops Day or night time 0.04 0.029 0.08 0.058

Critical areas Day or night time 0.005 0.0036 0.01 0.0072

Day time 0.3 0.21 0.6 0.42 Residences Night time 0.1 0.071 0.2 0.14 Impulsive vibration Offices, schools, educational institutions Day or night time 0.64 0.46 1.28 0.92 and places of worship Workshops Day or night time 0.64 0.46 1.28 0.92

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 13

5.1.3 Acceptable values for intermittent vibration Intermittent vibration is assessed using the vibration dose value (VDV) root-mean-quad method. VDV accumulates the vibration energy received over the daytime and night-time periods. The vibration dose methodology is as per standard BS 6472–1992.

The relevant criteria for vibration dose values are as follows;

Table 3: Vibration dose values for intermittent vibration Daytime Night time Location Preferred value Maximum value Preferred value Maximum value m/s1.75 m/s1.75 m/s1.75 m/s1.75

Critical areas 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.20

Residences 0.20 0.40 0.13 0.26

Offices, schools, educational 0.40 0.80 0.40 0.80 institutions and places of worship

Workshops 0.80 1.60 0.80 1.60

5.1.4 Short-term works Short-term works are works that occur for a duration of approximately one week. In accordance with the guide, the reference to short term works is as follows;

In circumstances where work is short term, feasible and reasonable mitigation measures have been applied, and the project has a demonstrated high level of social worth and broad community benefits, then higher vibration values (above the maximum) may apply. In such cases, best management practices should be used to reduce values as far as practicable, and a comprehensive community consultation program should be instituted. An example of a possible management strategy would be to restrict the times during which high vibration values occur to the least sensitive times of the day. Typical issues covered in a consultation program include a public contact point for handling complaints, and early notification of proposed operations and any significant change to operations.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 14

5.2 NSW Interim Construction Noise Guideline 2009 5.2.1 Assessment criteria The quantitative assessment method involves predicting airborne noise levels and comparing them with the levels in the relevant section of the Guideline. The noise criteria for quantitative assessment are shown below.

5.2.1.1 Residential uses Noise criteria assessed at residential properties is listed in Section 4.1.1 of the guideline. The relevant criteria and associated notes are as follows;

Table 4: Noise criteria for quantitative assessment - Residential

Criterion Time of day How to apply LAeq(15min) * The noise affected level represents the point above which there may be some community reaction to noise.

Where the predicted or measured LAeq (15 min) is greater than Noise affected the noise affected level, the proponent should apply all feasible RBL + 10dB and reasonable work practices to meet the noise affected level.

The proponent should also inform all potentially impacted residents of the nature of works to be carried out, the expected noise levels and duration, as well as contact details. The highly noise affected level represents the point above which Recommended there may be strong community reaction to noise. standard hours Where noise is above this level, the relevant authority (consent, determining or regulatory) may require respite periods by Highly noise restricting the hours that the very noisy activities can occur, taking into account: affected

75dBA 1. times identified by the community when they are less sensitive to noise (such as before and after school for works near schools, or mid-morning or mid-afternoon for works near residences 2. if the community is prepared to accept a longer period of construction in exchange for restrictions on construction times. A strong justification would typically be required for works outside the recommended standard hours.

The proponent should apply all feasible and reasonable work Outside recommended Noise affected practices to meet the noise affected level.

hours RBL + 5dB Where all feasible and reasonable practices have been applied and noise is more than 5 dB(A) above the noise affected level, the proponent should negotiate with the community.

For guidance on negotiating agreements see section 7.2.2. * Noise levels apply at the property boundary that is most exposed to construction noise, and at a height of 1.5 m above ground level. If the property boundary is more than 30 m from the residence, the location for measuring or predicting noise levels is at the most noise-affected point within 30 m of the residence.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 15

5.2.1.2 Other sensitive uses The following table presents management levels for noise at other sensitive land uses. The proponent should also consult with noise sensitive land use occupants potentially affected by noise from the works, to achieve a reasonable noise outcome.

Table 5: Noise criteria for quantitative assessment - Other uses

Management level Land use Assessment location LAeq(15min) Classrooms at schools and other 45dBA Internal educational institutions Hospital wards and operating 45dBA Internal theatres Places of worship 45dBA Internal Active recreation areas (characterised by sporting activities and activities which generate their own noise or 65dBA External focus for participants, making them less sensitive to external noise intrusion) Passive recreation areas (characterised by contemplative activities that generate little noise and where benefits are 60dBA External compromised by external noise intrusion, for example, reading, meditation) Depends on the use of the centre. Refer to the recommended Community centres Internal 'maximum' internal levels in AS2107 for specific uses.

5.2.1.3 Commercial and industrial properties Noise management levels for commercial and industrial premises are contained in Section 4.1.3 of the guideline.

Table 6: Noise criteria - Commercial and industrial premises

Management level Land use Assessment location LAeq(15min) External, most-affected Industrial 75dBA occupied point of the premises External, most-affected Offices, retail shops 70dBA occupied point of the premises Depends on the use. Refer to Other businesses e.g. theatre, the recommended 'maximum' Varies, refer to AS2107 childcare etc internal levels in AS2107 for specific uses.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 16

Where noise from construction works is above the ‘noise affected’ levels presented, the proponent should apply all feasible and reasonable work practices to minimise noise. The proponent should also inform potentially affected parties of the activities to be carried out, the expected noise impacts and duration.

If any of the following activities are to be undertaken, they should be factored into the quantitative assessment by adding 5 dB to the predicted levels;

• use of ‘beeper’ style reversing or movement alarms • use of power saws, such as used for cutting timber, rail lines, masonry, road pavement or • steel work • grinding metal, concrete or masonry • rock drilling • line drilling • vibratory rolling • rail tamping and regulating • bitumen milling or profiling • jackhammering, rock hammering or rock breaking • impact piling.

5.3 Australian Standard AS2107 Australian Standard 2107-2000 Acoustics-Recommended design sound levels and reverberation times for building interiors lists the desired noise levels for residential buildings. This standard includes the assessment of building services noise (i.e. mechanical services, hydraulics etc), and building components that exclude noise external to the building (e.g. traffic noise, industrial noise).

Section 2 Application - specifically states that the standard is not intended either for the assessment or prescription of acceptable noise levels from transient or variable noises such as construction.

5.4 Australian Standard AS2436 Australian Standard AS2436-2010 Guide to noise control on construction, maintenance and construction sites provides guidance in noise control in respect of engineering construction, maintenance and construction works. This includes guidance in investigation and identification of noise sources, measurement of sound and assessment, with a view to appropriate planning of measures for noise control.

AS2436 also contains a table of typical sound levels from construction plant and equipment, and a discussion of the effectiveness of acoustic treatments and acoustic screens and enclosures. Section 1.5 Regulatory Requirements states that the legislation for the control of noise on construction, maintenance and construction sites is generally the responsibility of the relevant State government or local Council body.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 17

5.5 Australian Standard AS2670.2-1990 Definitions of acceptable perceived vibration criteria can be found in AS 2670.2-1990 Evaluation of Human Exposure to whole body Vibration Part 2 Continuous and shock induced vibration in buildings (1 to 80 Hz). This code provides frequency weighted curves for acceptable vibration levels. These relate to a resultant of vibration in all three axis’; more specifically the x, y and z directions. The curves are based on multiples of a single base curve depending on type of receiver.

Table 7: AS2670.2-1990 vibration multiplying factors

Transient vibration Continuous or Place Time excitation with several intermittent vibration occurrences per day

Critical working areas (for Day example some hospital & 1 1 operating-theatres, some Night precision laboratories, etc.)

Day 2 to 4 30 to 90 Residential Night 1.4 1.4 to 20 Day

Office & 4 60 to 128 Night Day

Workshop & 90 to 128 8 Night

5.6 Australian Standard AS2187-2006 Australian Standard 2187-2006 SAA Explosives Code, Part 2 - Use of Explosives specifies acceptable levels of ground vibration to limit the probability of structural damage and human discomfort. The criteria presented in this Standard are summarised below;

Table 8: AS2187-2006 recommended peak particle velocity

Type of building or structure Particle velocity (Vp) mm/s

Historical buildings and monuments, and buildings of special 2 value and significance

House and low rise residential buildings, theatres, schools and 10 commercial buildings not included in item 3 below

Commercial and industrial buildings or structures of reinforced 25 concrete or steel construction

While the use of explosives is not expected for the site, the values presented in the table would still form an appropriate guide to reducing the risk of potential structural damage due to vibration from construction processes.

5.7 DIN 4150 – 2016 Part 3 German Standard DIN 4150 – 2016, “ Part 3 - Effects of vibration on structures” stipulates in section 5 the acceptable levels of vibration that can occur levels of ground vibration to limit the

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 18

probability of structural damage and human discomfort. The criteria presented in this Standard are summarised below.

Table 9 – DIN4150 recommend peak particle velocity Type of building or structure Particle velocity (Vp) mm/s Buildings used for commercial purposes, industrial buildings, and buildings of similar design 10 Dwellings and buildings of similar design and/or occupancy 5 Structures that, because of their particular sensitivity to vibration, cannot be classified under lines 1 and 2 and are of great intrinsic 3-5 value (e.g. listed buildings under preservation order)

6. Community Consultation Consultation meetings were conducted with community stakeholders on the 3rd and 4th February 2021. During the meetings, no concerns were raised with respect to construction noise, with the only concerns tabled relating to traffic impacts on Mamre Road during construction.

Due to the identification of Mamre Anglican School as a sensitive receiver in the State Significant Development consent, further consultation was undertaken in March 2021 with the principal of the school. The principal advised that given the distance between the site and the school they do not believe there will be a discernible impact. They further added they are comfortable with the proposed works proceding. The principal was provided with contact details should they have any queries or complaints as the development proceeds.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 19

7. Noise Monitoring and Receivers 7.1 Monitoring locations and receivers The nearest sensitive receiver locations were identified as follows;

1. Single storey residential dwellings are located south west of the site at Medinah Avenue, Luddenham. 2. A single storey residential dwelling is located east of the site at 654-674 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. 3. A single storey residential dwelling is located east of the site at 676-702 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. 4. A single storey residential dwelling is located east of the site at 706-752 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. 5. A single storey residential dwelling is located east of the site at 754-770 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. 6. A single storey residential dwelling is located south of the site at 771-781 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. 7. Residential dwellings are located north of the site at 579 Mamre Road, Orchard Hills. a) Industrial/warehouses are located north of the site at Mamre Road, Orchard Hills. b) Mamre Anglican School is located approximately 700m to the east of the site at 45 Bakers Lane.

These locations were chosen as being representative of the nearest sensitive receivers to the proposed development. Refer to Figure 2 for these locations.

Figure 2: Receiver and noise monitoring locations

A 7 2 3 B Noise Monitor A Site 4 Noise Monitor B

1 5 6

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 20

7.2 Equipment The following equipment was used to record noise levels:

• Two Rion NL42 Environmental Noise Monitors (SN# 00175548 & SN#01259207)) • Pulsar Model 105 Ltd Sound Calibrator (SN # 57417)

The Environmental Noise Monitors hold current NATA Laboratory Certification and were field calibrated before and after the monitoring period, with no significant drift from the reference signal recorded.

7.3 Monitoring Procedure Rion NL42 environmental noise monitors were placed at 8 Medinah Avenue, Luddenham and 676- 702 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek to measure ambient noise levels. The monitors were located in free field positions with the microphones approximately 1.4 metres above ground surface level. The noise monitors were set to record noise levels between the 11th and 19th April 2018.

Both environmental noise monitors were set to record noise levels in "A" weighting, Fast response using 15 minute statistical intervals. Ambient noise monitoring was conducted in accordance with Australian Standard AS1055:1997 Acoustics – Description and measurement of environmental noise. For the unattended noise monitoring locations refer to Figure 2.

Weather conditions were fine for the majority of the monitoring period, with some periods of intermittent wind and rain which had no effect on the measured data.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 21

8. Existing Noise Levels The following tables present the measured existing ambient noise levels from the unattended noise survey. Any periods of inclement weather or extraneous noise are omitted from the measured data prior to determining the overall results.

8.1 Meteorological conditions Meteorological observations during the unattended noise monitoring survey were obtained from the Bureau of Meteorology website (http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data), shown in Table 10 below.

Table 10: Meteorological conditions – Horsley Park Wind Rainfall 9am 3pm Day Date (mm) Speed Speed Direction Direction (km/h) (km/h) Wednesday 11/04/2018 0 11 N 4 NNE Thursday 12/04/2018 0 2 NW 15 NW Friday 13/04/2018 0 11 NNW 15 N Saturday 14/04/2018 0 19 NNW 31 NW Sunday 15/04/2018 0.2 24 WNW 20 WNW Monday 16/04/2018 0 4 N 11 WSW Tuesday 17/04/2018 0 6 WSW 20 ESE Wednesday 18/04/2018 0 2 NW 11 E Thursday 19/04/2018 0 4 WNW Calm Calm

8.2 Ambient background noise level The measured rating background noise levels (RBL) were determined in accordance with the NSW Noise Policy for Industry with levels for the different monitoring locations presented in Table 2.

Table 11: Measured L90 noise levels Receiver 1 Receivers 2 to 7 Day Date Background L90 dB(A) Background L90 dB(A) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Wednesday 11/04/2018 - 36.1 35.4 - 44.2 38.4 Thursday 12/04/2018 - 32.4 30.4 44.3 47.3 46.9 Friday 13/04/2018 - 33.4 28.0 47.1 46.4 45.4 Saturday 14/04/2018 37.5 33.2 28.4 47.5 45.9 44.1 Sunday 15/04/2018 37.7 28.7 23.6 45.6 37.5 33.5 Monday 16/04/2018 35.0 31.8 24.7 39.9 40.0 33.1 Tuesday 17/04/2018 36.1 30.3 26.8 38.0 36.3 28.8 Wednesday 18/04/2018 36.3 34.8 32.0 41.8 41.6 36.0 RBL 36 33 28 44 43 37

Note Receiver 1 daytime periods on 12th and 13th April 2018 were affected by extraneous noise and were omitted from the measured data.

The night time background level for Receiver 1 is below the minimum RBL as defined in the NSW Noise Policy for Industry (2017), therefore an RBL of 30dBA is applied in accordance with the policy for the night time period.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 22

9. Project specific criteria 9.1 Construction noise criteria Based on the relevant codes and standards and the measured background noise levels, the applicable construction/earthworks noise limits would be as follows;

Table 12: Applicable noise limits for construction work

Criterion LAeq(15min) Assessment Time Receiver Receiver location Receiver 1 Receivers 2-7 A B 46dBA noise affected 54dBA noise affected 75dBA External During standard 75dBA highly noise 75dBA highly noise construction hours - External affected affected Outside standard construction hours 41dBA 49dBA - External (daytime only) Management Level - - - 55/45dBA External/Internal** (Receiver B only)

**Note a +10dBA correction is added to the internal amenity criteria for external noise levels as per Section 2.6 of the NSW Noise Policy for Industry 2017 to account for external to internal noise attenuation.

9.2 Construction vibration criteria Based on the relevant codes and standards, the applicable vibration limits would be as follows;

Table 13: Applicable vibration limits

Preferred values Maximum values Assessment Type Measure Location x- and y- x- and y- period z-axis z-axis axes axes Continuous RMS acceleration Residences Day time 0.01 m/s2 0.0071 m/s2 0.02 m/s2 0.014 m/s2

Impulsive RMS acceleration Residences Day time 0.3 m/s2 0.21 m/s2 0.6 m/s2 0.42 m/s2 0.20 Intermittent Vibration dose value Residences Day time 0.20 m/s1.75 0.40 m/s1.75 0.40 m/s1.75 m/s1.75 All Peak particle velocity Residences Day time 10 mm/s - 10 mm/s -

Continuous RMS acceleration Schools Day time 0.02 m/s2 0.014 m/s2 0.04 m/s2 0.028 m/s2

Impulsive RMS acceleration Schools Day time 0.64 m/s2 0.46 m/s2 1.28 m/s2 0.92 m/s2 0.40 Intermittent Vibration dose value Schools Day time 0.80 m/s1.75 0.40 m/s1.75 0.80 m/s1.75 m/s1.75 All Peak particle velocity Schools Day time 10 mm/s - 10 mm/s - Warragamba All Peak particle velocity Day time 3 mm/s - 5 mm/s - Pipeline

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 23

10. Predicted Noise Levels Predicted noise associated with the earthworks and construction of the proposed development has been assessed based on the source noise levels and procedures contained in AS2436-2010, as well as the results of previous noise measurements and assessments conducted by Acoustic Works. Calculations are done, based on the earthworks and construction activities being at the closest relevant distance to each existing receiver.

It is noted that the calculations assume that all noise sources are operating simultaneously, at the closest point to the receiver in each case. In practice, this will generally not occur as process will be either spread over the site or occur on different days. The predicted noise levels represent the expected worst-case noise emissions due to site works.

10.1 Earthworks The predicted noise impacts of earthworks are summarised as follows;

Table 14: Predicted earthworks noise impacts (Receivers 1 to 4)

Receivers 10 1. Medinah Avenue 2. 654-674 Mamre Road 3. 676-702 Mamre Road 4. 706-752 Mamre Road 5. 754-770 Mamre Road 6. 771-781 Mamre Road 7. 579 Mamre Road a. Industrial Mamre Road LAeq 15 min b. Mamre Anglican School Compliance

int. dB(A) Mgmt Level Highly M gmt Noise noise Level

affected adj,T ext. dB(A) Highly Noise Affected

adj,T ext. dB(A) Noise Affected affected (Internal)

Aeq Aeq Aeq adj,T

Receiver Source Leq@1mSource dB(A) dB(A)* Correction Leq@1m dB(A) Corrected L L Description L Criteria 46 75 Excavator large 99 0 99 39 39 -10 Yes Yes n/a 1 Backhoe 96 0 96 40 40 -10 Yes Yes n/a Bulldozer 100 0 100 37 37 -10 Yes Yes n/a Grader 102 0 102 40 40 -10 Yes Yes n/a Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 33 33 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 28 28 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 17 17 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 32 32 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 46 46 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Excavator large 99 0 99 47 47 -10 Yes Yes n/a 2 Backhoe 96 0 96 48 48 -10 Yes Yes n/a Bulldozer 100 0 100 46 46 -10 Yes Yes n/a Grader 102 0 102 48 48 -10 Yes Yes n/a Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 43 43 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 29 29 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 28 28 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 42 42 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 54 54 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Excavator large 99 0 99 46 46 -10 Yes Yes n/a 3 Backhoe 96 0 96 47 47 -10 Yes Yes n/a Bulldozer 100 0 100 45 45 -10 Yes Yes n/a Grader 102 0 102 47 47 -10 Yes Yes n/a Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 42 42 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 28 28 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 27 27 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 41 41 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 53 53 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Excavator large 99 0 99 42 42 -10 Yes Yes n/a 4 Backhoe 96 0 96 42 42 -10 Yes Yes n/a Bulldozer 100 0 100 41 41 -10 Yes Yes n/a Grader 102 0 102 43 43 -10 Yes Yes n/a Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 38 38 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 24 24 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 22 22 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 49 49 2 Yes Yes n/a

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 24

Table 15: Predicted earthworks noise impacts (Receivers 5 to B)

int. dB(A) Mgmt Level Highly M gmt Noise

noise Level adj,T ext. dB(A) Noise Affected adj,T ext. dB(A) Highly Noise Affected affected

affected (Internal)

Aeq Aeq Aeq adj,T

Receiver Correction dB(A)* Correction Leq@1m dB(A) Corrected L L L Description Leq@1mSource dB(A) Criteria 54 75 Excavator large 99 0 99 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a 5 Backhoe 96 0 96 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a Bulldozer 100 0 100 34 34 -10 Yes Yes n/a Grader 102 0 102 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 31 31 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 23 23 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 16 11 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 30 25 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 42 42 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Excavator large 99 0 99 50 50 -10 Yes Yes n/a 6 Backhoe 96 0 96 51 51 -10 Yes Yes n/a Bulldozer 100 0 100 49 49 -10 Yes Yes n/a Grader 102 0 102 51 51 -10 Yes Yes n/a Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 46 46 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 29 29 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 30 25 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 45 40 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 57 57 2 No Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Excavator large 99 0 99 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a 7 Backhoe 96 0 96 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a Bulldozer 100 0 100 34 34 -10 Yes Yes n/a Grader 102 0 102 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 31 31 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 25 25 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 14 9 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 30 25 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 43 42 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 75 75 Excavator large 99 0 99 45 45 -10 Yes Yes n/a A Backhoe 96 0 96 46 46 -10 Yes Yes n/a Bulldozer 100 0 100 44 44 -10 Yes Yes n/a Grader 102 0 102 46 46 -10 Yes Yes n/a Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 41 41 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 29 29 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 25 20 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 40 35 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 52 52 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 45 Excavator large 99 0 99 0 0 27 n/a n/a Yes B Backhoe 96 0 96 0 0 27 n/a n/a Yes Bulldozer 100 0 100 0 0 25 n/a n/a Yes Grader 102 0 102 0 0 27 n/a n/a Yes Loader (wheeled) 97 0 97 0 0 22 n/a n/a Yes Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 0 0 21 n/a n/a Yes Truck passby 82 0 82 0 0 2 n/a n/a Yes Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 0 0 16 n/a n/a Yes Total 12 12 33 n/a n/a Yes

Earthworks noise levels are predicted to potentially be above the noise affected level of 54dBA at receiver 6 but are predicted to comply with the highly affected noise limit of 75dBA LAeq 15min at each of the receiver locations. Refer to Section 11.2 for mitigation measures.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 25

10.2 Construction The predicted noise impacts of construction works are summarised as follows;

Table 16: Predicted construction noise impacts (Receivers 1 to 4)

Highly M gmt adj,T ext. dB(A) Noise Affected adj,T ext. dB(A) Highly Noise Affected Noise noise Level

affected

Aeq Aeq

Aeq adj,T affected (Internal)

Receiver

Source Leq@1mSource dB(A)

Correction dB(A)* Correction

Corrected Leq@1m dB(A) Corrected

L L Description L Criteria 46 75 Concrete truck 95 0 95 41 41 -10 Yes Yes n/a 1 Concrete pump 94 2 96 42 42 -10 Yes Yes n/a Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 32 32 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 32 32 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 8 8 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 27 27 -10 Yes Yes n/a Forklift unloading 82 2 84 23 23 -10 Yes Yes n/a Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 40 40 -10 Yes Yes n/a Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 22 22 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 46 46 2 No Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Concrete truck 95 0 95 49 49 -10 Yes Yes n/a 2 Concrete pump 94 2 96 51 51 -10 Yes Yes n/a Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 40 40 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 29 29 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 24 24 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 37 37 -10 Yes Yes n/a Forklift unloading 82 2 84 33 33 -10 Yes Yes n/a Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 50 50 -10 Yes Yes n/a Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 33 33 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 55 55 2 No Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Concrete truck 95 0 95 48 48 -10 Yes Yes n/a 3 Concrete pump 94 2 96 50 50 -10 Yes Yes n/a Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 39 39 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 28 28 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 22 22 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a Forklift unloading 82 2 84 32 32 -10 Yes Yes n/a Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 49 49 -10 Yes Yes n/a Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 32 32 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 54 54 2 No Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Concrete truck 95 0 95 44 44 -10 Yes Yes n/a 4 Concrete pump 94 2 96 45 45 -10 Yes Yes n/a Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 34 34 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 24 24 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 17 17 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 32 32 -10 Yes Yes n/a Forklift unloading 82 2 84 28 28 -10 Yes Yes n/a Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 44 44 -10 Yes Yes n/a Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 28 28 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 50 50 2 Yes Yes n/a

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 26

Table 17: Predicted construction noise impacts (Receivers 5 to A)

Highly M gmt adj,T ext. dB(A) Noise Affected adj,T ext. dB(A) Highly Noise Affected Noise noise Level

affected

Aeq Aeq

Aeq adj,T affected (Internal)

Receiver

Source Leq@1mSource dB(A)

Correction dB(A)* Correction

Corrected Leq@1m dB(A) Corrected

L L Description L Criteria 54 75 Concrete truck 95 0 95 38 38 -10 Yes Yes n/a 5 Concrete pump 94 2 96 39 39 -10 Yes Yes n/a Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 28 28 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 23 23 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 11 11 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 25 25 -10 Yes Yes n/a Forklift unloading 82 2 84 21 21 -10 Yes Yes n/a Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 38 38 -10 Yes Yes n/a Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 21 21 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 43 43 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Concrete truck 95 0 95 52 52 -10 Yes Yes n/a 6 Concrete pump 94 2 96 54 54 -10 Yes Yes n/a Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 43 43 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 45 45 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 9 9 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 40 40 -10 Yes Yes n/a Forklift unloading 82 2 84 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 53 53 -10 Yes Yes n/a Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 36 36 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 58 58 2 No Yes n/a Criteria 54 75 Concrete truck 95 0 95 38 38 -10 Yes Yes n/a 7 Concrete pump 94 2 96 39 39 -10 Yes Yes n/a Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 28 28 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 25 25 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 9 9 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 25 25 -10 Yes Yes n/a Forklift unloading 82 2 84 21 21 -10 Yes Yes n/a Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 38 38 -10 Yes Yes n/a Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 22 22 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 44 44 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 75 75 Concrete truck 95 0 95 47 47 -10 Yes Yes n/a A Concrete pump 94 2 96 49 49 -10 Yes Yes n/a Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 38 38 -10 Yes Yes n/a Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 29 29 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck passby 82 0 82 20 20 -10 Yes Yes n/a Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 35 35 -10 Yes Yes n/a Forklift unloading 82 2 84 31 31 -10 Yes Yes n/a Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 48 48 -10 Yes Yes n/a Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 31 31 -10 Yes Yes n/a Total 53 53 2 Yes Yes n/a Criteria 45 Concrete truck 95 0 95 0 0 29 n/a n/a Yes B Concrete pump 94 2 96 0 0 30 n/a n/a Yes Power tools (electric) 83 2 85 0 0 19 n/a n/a Yes Compressor large (silenced) 85 2 87 0 0 21 n/a n/a Yes Truck passby 82 0 82 0 0 2 n/a n/a Yes Truck reverse alarm 92 5 97 0 0 16 n/a n/a Yes Forklift unloading 82 2 84 0 0 12 n/a n/a Yes Concrete pencil vibrator 95 0 95 0 0 29 n/a n/a Yes Saw (cutoff) 92 0 92 0 0 12 n/a n/a Yes Total 12 12 35 n/a n/a Yes

Construction noise levels are predicted to potentially be above the noise affected level of 54dBA at receivers 2 and 6 but are predicted to comply with the highly affected noise limit of 75dBA LAeq 15min at each of the receiver locations. Refer to Section 11.2 for mitigation measures.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 27

11. Recommended Acoustic Treatments & Management Principles 11.1 General comments For the majority of the works it is expected that noise will generally comply with the highly noise affected limit of 75dB(A) LAeq 15min for residential receivers. There is the potential for the works to exceed the noise affected limit of 54dBA LAeq 15min. In particular, noise from concrete trucks and pumps are calculated to have the highest potential impact to receiver locations. Therefore close liaising with nearby residences would be recommended, with unattended noise monitoring to be conducted at receivers 1, 2, 3 & 5 for a period of two weeks.

Due to proximity of Sydney Water pipeline, vibration levels should be continually monitored during the works to ensure vibration levels remain generally compliant with the criteria nominated in Section 5.6.

11.2 Noise control The following general acoustic treatments and management principles are recommended for the project:

1. The conditioned construction hours would be as follows: Monday to Friday 7 am to 6 pm Saturday 8 am to 1 pm No work on Sundays or public holidays 2. Unattended noise monitoring shall be conducted at Receivers 1, 2, 3 & 5 for a period of 2 weeks. If noise levels are found to be below “Noise Affected” limit as nominated in Section 9 and no complaints are received, no further monitoring is required. If noise levels are above the “Noise Affected” limit, additional mitigation measures shall be implemented, with their effectiveness to be confirmed by further unattended noise monitoring at the receivers where exceedances of the criteria were measured. 3. If further noise mitigation is required, acoustic barriers around the perimeter of the site can be installed during the works. If further noise reductions are required, install additional screening around noise sensitive areas. 4. Workers or delivery trucks shall not congregate at or outside the site before 7am. This is an important factor in managing noise from the site. 5. Assign the task of managing noise emissions to a person (the ‘responsible person’) that is likely to be present on-site most of the time that activity is occurring (usually the Site Manager). 6. Complaints will be handled in accordance with the Community Consultation Strategy (CCS) and Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP). 7. Noise mitigation measures shall be periodically reviewed and updated, with the effectiveness of any changes confirmed by unattended noise monitoring at affected receivers.

The noise management plan is described in more detail in the Appendices.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 28

11.3 Vibration Control In accordance with Condition B34 and the proximity to Sydney Water Pipeline, vibration is predicted to be an issue if not managed.

Therefore we recommend continued vibration monitoring at the northern site boundary with SMS waning system issued to the responsible persons onsite. The Responsible Person shall cease works that may be causing the vibration intrusion, and engage a qualified person to determine suitable management and physical controls to reduce excessive vibration to compliant levels from earthworks. If excessive vibration is determined, works generating the vibration cannot resume until satisfactory mitigation treatment is implemented.

11.4 Contingency Management Plan If monitoring, inspections and/or auditing indicate that mitigation measures are not effective, Table 26 of the CEMP shall be consulted.

When additional mitigation measures are implemented, further unattended noise monitoring shall be conducted at receivers where exceedances were measured to confirm the effectiveness of the new mitigation measures.

12. Conclusion

A noise assessment has been conducted for the proposed industrial/warehouse construction at Mamre Road South Precinct, Kemps Creek. Specific criteria have been referenced for construction noise and vibration as required by the development approval. A management strategy has been recommended that ensures attention to noise complaints and includes a system for achieving reasonable outcomes.

With respect to vibration, the processes to be used during works may impact the nearby water pipeline and should be continually monitored throughout the works as noted in section 9.3. The essence of the construction noise and vibration management plan is to ensure good communication between the site manager and the nearby residents, and to limit the operational hours of machinery activities in accordance with regulatory requirements.

If you should have any queries please do not hesitate to contact us.

Report Compiled by: Report Reviewed by:

Matthew Bechara M.ArchSci MAAS Greg Pearce B.Eng (Mech) Senior Acoustic Consultant Director

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 29

13. Appendices 13.1 Noise monitoring charts

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 30

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 31

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 32

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 33

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 34

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 35

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 36

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 37

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 38

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 39

13.2 Noise Management Plan The overall aim of the noise management plan is to provide a program of actions and practices to minimise potential noise annoyance associated with onsite activities impacting adjacent properties.

Unattended noise monitoring is recommended at receivers 1, 2, 3 & 5 for a period of 2 weeks during construction to determine the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. If noise levels are below the “Noise Affected” criteria and no complaints are received, no further monitoring is required. If noise levels are above the criteria, additional mitigation measures shall be implemented, with their effectiveness to be confirmed by further unattended noise monitoring at the receivers where exceedances were measured.

Site management are to elect a “Responsible Person” who is responsible for implementation of the Noise Management Plan to ensure the aims and objectives are achieved. The “Responsible Person” should ensure actions are being carried out by management, staff and subcontractors and that it is reviewed at appropriate times.

Where possible, performance indicators should be used to ensure noise annoyance from onsite activities is minimised. The most apparent performance indicator is the number of complaints made with regards to noise annoyance. Complaints shall be handled in accordance with the Community Consultation Strategy (CCS) and Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP).

The effectiveness and time taken to act and remediate noise issues, if complaints are made, is also considered a performance indicator for the site.

The various elements, aims and actions of the noise management plan are as follows;

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 40

13.2.1 All activities

Element Operation of site works

Aim To limit the times of potentially noisy onsite activities

Allowed hours as follows: Monday to Friday 7 am to 6 pm Saturday 8 am to 1 pm Action No work on Sundays or public holidays

Workers or delivery trucks do not congregate outside the site before 6.45am.

13.2.2 Implementation of Management Plan

Element Responsible Person Aim Provide a personnel contact for the Noise Management Plan

The head contractor is to elect a "Responsible Person" who is onsite during construction hours and who has sufficient time and authority to implement the management plan.

Action The Responsible Person is to keep record of performance indicators and feedback from management, staff, subcontractors and adjacent noise receivers as appropriate.

The person would also be responsible for documenting changes/modifications to the Noise Management Plan.

13.2.3 Active Involvement

Element Responsible Person All management, staff and sub-contractors actively support and implement the Aim noise management plan.

The management, staff and Responsible Person should show active support and implementation for the management plan so that all are aware of the importance of the plan.

Notify staff and subcontractors of the importance of the management plan. Actions Action and practices of the management plan, where relevant, should also be placed in appropriate locations.

Responsible Person to implement notification new staff or subcontractors with respect to the Noise Management Plan.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 41

13.2.4 Deliveries

Element Deliveries Aim Minimise noise impacts from vehicle activities delivering to the site.

Deliveries only between; Monday to Friday 7 am to 6 pm Saturday 8 am to 1 pm Action No deliveries on Sundays or public holidays

Delivery trucks do not congregate outside the site before 6.45am.

13.2.5 Onsite Mechanical Plant

Element New equipment Aim Ensure new onsite equipment does not cause annoyance to noise sensitive receivers.

All fixed onsite mechanical plant (e.g. air conditioning for site sheds) must be designed Action and installed to satisfy noise requirements.

13.2.6 Complaints

Element Response to complaints Aim Provide a friendly and immediate response to complaints.

Action Refer to the Community Consultation Strategy for complaint handling.

13.2.7 Review

Element Schedule for the Review Process

To review the incidents/ complaints register and to ensure the Noise Management Plan Aim remains relevant to the operations/activities of the site.

Management is to review the incident/complaints register on a regular basis (at least fortnightly) to determine any common or recurring issues to be addressed.

The plan should be reviewed if processes or activities onsite are change/modified or new activities are introduced. Action

The plan should also be reviewed if noise complaints are being made with regards to a single activity or type of noisy activity occurring onsite.

Document all changes/modifications to the Noise Management Plan.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 42

13.3 Noise monitoring Initial unattended noise monitoring shall be conducted over a period of two weeks at receivers 1, 2, 3 & 5 to determine the effectiveness of mitigation measures. If levels are found to be below the “Noise Affected” level and no complaints are received, no further monitoring is required. If levels are found to be above the “Noise Affected” level, additional mitigation measures shall be implemented, with their effectiveness to be confirmed by further unattended noise monitoring at the receivers where exceedances were measured.

13.3.1 Equipment Sound level meters must have an accuracy at least equivalent to a Type 1 meter as described in Australian Standard AS1259. The sound level meter must be fitted with a windshield and must have a current laboratory calibration certificate or label in accordance with calibration requirements outlined in AS1259 and AS2659. Equipment should also be calibrated in the field in accordance with these standards.

The sound level meter must be capable of Leq measurement and statistical Ln measurement (e.g. L10, L90 etc), using the broadband 'A' scale frequency weighting.

13.3.2 Parameters For measurement of ambient noise (without site noise), the sound level meter must be set to the following parameters;

• 15 minute measurement duration. • Broadband • ‘Fast’ time response. • 'A' frequency weighting.

The measured descriptors of ambient noise are background noise LA90,15min and LAeq,15min.

For measurement of noise from construction activities at the site, the sound level meter must be set to the following parameters;

• 15 minute measurement duration. • 'Z' (Linear) frequency weighting for 1/3 octave frequency spectrum. • 'A' frequency weighting for overall broadband result. • ‘Fast’ time response.

The measured descriptors of site noise should include (when available on a sound meter); Leq, Lp, and 1/3 octave spectrum (to establish any tonal characteristics).

Measurement duration may change depending on the duration of each relevant source.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 43

13.3.3 Procedure for measuring noise 13.3.3.1 Where to measure noise In accordance with the code, noise levels should be measured at the property boundary that is most exposed to construction noise, at a height of 1.5 m above ground level. If the property boundary is more than 30 m from the residence, the location for measuring or predicting noise levels is at the most noise-affected point within 30 m of the residence. Typically this would be an outdoor location in the most exposed position in a receivers' yard. The address of locations for assessment should be those locations where complaints have been received.

The sound level meter should be held at arm’s length or set up on a tripod so the microphone is 1.5 metres above the ground. Where possible the measurement position should be 3 to 5 metres from walls, buildings and other reflecting surfaces.

The location of vegetation also needs to be considered, because noise levels can be increased locally by even a light breeze rustling leaves. Noise due to wind in vegetation can make accurate measurement difficult. Where possible, move away from nearby plants if rustling noise is present.

13.3.3.2 When to measure ambient noise Ambient noise should be measured when it is representative of minimum levels that would occur during the time the activity would typically be conducted. Suitable times may include;

• Prior to commencement of daily activities. • During smoko or lunchbreak (if site activities are ceased). • On RDO's (rostered days off). • After completion of daily activities.

Ideally, a number of ambient noise measurements should be taken at various times of day. Ambient noise measurement should only be done at times or locations unaffected by noise from the site.

13.3.3.3 When to measure noise from construction Measurements of construction noise should be taken at the time(s) when the noise is representative of the current maximum level of noise emanating from the site, or at times when a complaint has been received.

13.3.3.4 What to avoid The following conditions shall be avoided during the noise assessment;

• Average wind speed (at the microphone height) greater than 5m/s (approximately 20km/h). Typically at a wind speed of 5 m/s, leaves and branches would be in constant motion and the wind would extend a small flag. • Rain periods (if intermittent, any affected data can be excluded). • Other extraneous noise, such as train passby etc. • Noise such as talking or physically bumping the sound level meter in a manner that will affect the readings.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 44

13.3.3.5 Steps for measurement The steps for performing a noise measurement are as follows;

1. Calibrate the sound level meter before commencing noise measurements. The sound pressure level shown on the meter should match the stated sound pressure level for the calibrator being used. The equipment should not vary by more than 1 dB. If it has then the measurements may be invalid. 2. Ensure the meter is set to ‘Fast’ time weighting, ‘A’ frequency weighting for broadband measurement, 'Z' weighting for 1/3 octave measurement. Descriptors include L90, Leq, and LpA. 3. Measure the ambient noise level continuously for 15 minutes (where possible), excluding all distinct extraneous noises. If extraneous noise is present, pause the meter when this occurs or choose another measuring time or restart the measurement at another location. If more than one valid noise measurement of the ambient noise for a location is obtained, use the lowest level as the ambient noise level. Note the LA90,15min value and other relevant values as described above. Where it is not possible to continuously measure over a 15- minute period, then note the duration of the measurement. 4. Measure the noise emanating from the site, excluding all distinct extraneous noises. Note the duration of the measurement. Note the relevant measured values and description of the types of noise that were audible/measurable from the site. 5. Note whether the measured noise appears to contain tonal or impulsive characteristics and apply correction factors where appropriate. 6. Check the field calibration at the end of the monitoring period in accordance with Australian Standard IEC 61672.1-2004 and Australian Standard 2659. Re-monitoring may be required where there is a calibration drift greater than that allowed by the standards.

13.3.3.6 Information to be reported

Any reporting should be concise. The minimum requirements to be included in a report are;

• Date of measurements. • Time of measurements. • Person(s) performing measurements. • Equipment used for measurements. • Location of measurements. • Measured values. • Corrected values (where applicable). • Notes regarding audibility of noise sources. • Notes regarding any extraneous sources that may have influenced measurements. • Detail of instrumentation and calibration. • Meteorological conditions.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 45

13.4 Construction vibration monitoring The preferred measurement technique is one which records unfiltered data from which any desired values can later be determined, including frequency-weighted RMS and peak values.

Vibration monitoring equipment should be calibrated in accordance with relevant Australian or standards.

Vibration should be measured on a structural surface designed to support a person, with the floor or ground as the preferred reference surface. The z-axis (vertical) shall be measured. Ideally more than two points in a receiver location should be measured at one time to obtain space average vibration levels. If the above is not practicable, one position of the receiver location is chosen where, in the opinion of an authorised officer, the vibration level is the greatest. The locations should be either clearly marked or clearly defined on a diagram for later identification. The transducer should not be attached to a flexible floor covering which may damp the vibration. The transducer shall be firmly fixed in the position, and the method of fixing shall be reported.

Items to be reported include;

• Date and time of measurement. • Location of measurements (including diagram of measurement positions). • Equipment used for measurements (including calibration details). • Method of fixing of transducer. • Description of the type of equipment or source of vibration (where possible). • One-third octave band frequency analysis (1Hz to 80Hz) reported as z-axis r.m.s acceleration in units of ms-2. For each measurement this should include starting and ending time and brief description of events occurring within the measurement time frame. • Overall broadband peak particle velocity (ppv) reported as z-axis velocity in units of ms-1. For each measurement this should include starting and ending time and brief description of events occurring within the measurement time frame. • The results of the one-third octave band analysis and peak particle velocity analysis should be compared with the vibration limits. • Statement of whether the vibration complies with the recommended limits.

1018022 R02K Mamre Road Kemps Creek CNVMP.doc © Acoustic Works 2021 Page 46

APPENDIX D

Construction Air Quality Management Plan

This document has been prepared on behalf of Frasers Property Australia and Altis Property Partners by:

Northstar Air Quality Pty Ltd, Suite 1504, 275 Alfred Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060 www.northstarairquality.com | Tel: +61 (02) 9071 8600

Mamre Road South Precinct, 657-769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek

Construction Air Quality Management Plan

Addressee(s): Frasers Property Australia and Altis Property Partners

Report Reference: 20.1123.FR1V2

Date: 1 March 2021

Quality Control Study Status Prepared Checked Authorised INTRODUCTION Final Northstar GCG, MD MD LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS Final Northstar GCG, MD MD THE DEVELOPMENT Final Northstar GCG, MD MD BASELINE DATA Final Northstar GCG, MD MD AIR QUALITY STANDARDS Final Northstar GCG, MD MD AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Final Northstar GCG, MD MD REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT Final Northstar GCG, MD MD

Report Status Northstar References Report Status Report Reference Version Year Job Number (Draft: Final) (Rx) (Vx) 20 1123 F R1 V2 Based upon the above, the specific reference for this version of the report is: 20.1123.FR1V2

Final Authority This report must by regarded as draft until the above study components have been each marked as final, and the document has been signed and dated below.

Martin Doyle 1st March 2021

© Northstar Air Quality Pty Ltd 2021 Copyright in the drawings, information and data recorded in this document (the information) is the property of Northstar Air Quality Pty Ltd. This report has been prepared with the due care and attention of a suitably qualified consultant. Information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is in no way guaranteed. No guarantee of any kind is implied or possible where predictions of future conditions are attempted. This report (including any enclosures and attachments) has been prepared for the exclusive use and benefit of the addressee(s) and solely for the purpose for which it is provided. Unless we provide express prior written consent, no part of this report should be reproduced, distributed or communicated to any third party. We do not accept any liability if this report is used for an alternative purpose from which it is intended, nor to any third party in respect of this report.

20.1123.FR1V2 INTRODUCTION Page 2

Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ...... 6

1.1. Objectives and Targets ...... 6

2. LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS ...... 8

2.1. Legislation...... 8

2.2. Guidelines and Relevant Documents ...... 8

2.3. Project Approval Conditions ...... 8

3. THE DEVELOPMENT ...... 11

3.1. Environmental Setting ...... 11

3.2. Description of Development ...... 12

3.3. Hours of Construction ...... 12

3.4. Identification of Potential Emissions to Atmosphere ...... 12

3.5. Quantification of Potential Emissions to Atmosphere ...... 15

4. BASELINE DATA ...... 21

4.1. Meteorology ...... 21

4.2. Air Quality ...... 22

5. AIR QUALITY STANDARDS ...... 24

6. AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT ...... 25

6.1. Key Performance Indicators ...... 25

6.2. Air Quality Monitoring ...... 26

6.3. Emission Control Measures ...... 28

6.4. Contingency Plan ...... 33

6.5. Training ...... 33

7. REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT ...... 34

7.1. Non-Compliance, Corrective and Preventive Action ...... 35

7.2. Complaints Handling Procedure ...... 35

7.3. Record Keeping ...... 36

8. REFERENCES ...... 37

20.1123.FR1V2 INTRODUCTION Page 3

Tables

Table 1 Proposed targets and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) associated with the management of air quality 6 Table 2 Project Approval Conditions – air quality 8 Table 3 Anticipated areas and quantities associated with activities 13 Table 4 Proposed emissions controls 15 Table 5 Potential reduction in emissions through application of proposed emissions controls 17 Table 6 NSW EPA air quality standards and goals 24 Table 7 Key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with the management of air quality 25 Table 8 Air quality management measures adopted during development construction 29

Figures Figure 1 Development site location 11 Figure 2 Particulate emissions, Stage 1 construction – uncontrolled and controlled 18 Figure 3 Particulate emissions, Stage 2 construction – uncontrolled and controlled 18 Figure 4 Particulate emissions, Stage 3 construction – uncontrolled and controlled 19 Figure 5 Particulate emissions, all stages – uncontrolled and controlled 19 Figure 6 Particulate emissions, all stages, per day – uncontrolled and controlled 20 Figure 7 Annual wind roses 2013 to 2017, St Marys AQMS 21

Figure 8 PM10 measurements, Prospect 2014 22

Figure 9 PM10 measurements, Prospect 2014 23 Figure 10 Dust Deposition Gauge with Stand 27

Units Used in the Report

All units presented in the report follow International System of Units (SI) conventions, unless derived from references using non-SI units. In this report, units formed by the division of SI and non-SI units are expressed as a negative exponent, and do not use the solidus (/) symbol. For example, 50 micrograms per cubic metre would be expressed as 50 µg∙m-3 and not 50 µg/m3.

20.1123.FR1V2 INTRODUCTION Page 4

Common Abbreviations

Abbreviation Term

AQIA air quality impact assessment

AQMP air quality management plan

AQMS air quality monitoring station

BoM Bureau of Meteorology

CEMP construction environmental management plan

DEC Department of Environment and Conservation

DPI&E Department of Planning, Industry and Environment

EETM emission estimation technique manual

EPA Environmental Protection Authority

m-2 per square metre

m-3 per cubic metre

mg∙m-3 milligram per cubic metre of air

mg∙Nm-3 milligram per normalised cubic metre of air

µg∙m-3 microgram per cubic metre of air

month-1 per month

PM particulate matter

PM10 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm or less

PM2.5 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm or less

TSP total suspended particulates

20.1123.FR1V2 INTRODUCTION Page 5

1. INTRODUCTION

Frasers Property Australia and Altis Property Partners have engaged Northstar Air Quality Pty Ltd (Northstar) to provide a Construction Air Quality Management Plan (CAQMP), which forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) developed for the construction of a warehouse, logistics and industrial facilities hub (the development). The development is located at 657-769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek, NSW (the development site).

The development includes the demolition of existing structures, earthworks, construction of roads, hardstand areas and warehouses and offices (together, construction activities). This CAQMP identifies the potential sources of emissions of air pollutants associated with the proposed construction activities and provides measures to control each of those potential sources.

As part of the State Significant Development (SSD) Application, an air quality impact assessment was performed (Northstar Air Quality, 2020), which included a risk-based assessment of the potential impacts associated with construction dust. That assessment determined that with the implementation of appropriate controls, the risk of impacts associated with fugitive dust emissions from the construction of the development would be low.

The CAQMP has been performed by Northstar, a specialist air quality consultancy with extensive experience in the provision of air quality management plans. A CV for the principal author (Dr Martin Doyle) is provided as Appendix A).

1.1. Objectives and Targets

The key objectives of the CAQMP are to minimise emissions of air pollutants from the development site and to ensure that impacts to air quality are minimised and within the scope permitted by the Approval. To achieve these objectives, the summarised targets in Table 1 have been proposed for the management of air quality impacts during construction.

Table 1 Proposed targets and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) associated with the management of air quality

Measure Target Timeframe Responsibility Documentation

Visible dust emissions Any emissions of visible dust At all times Site supervisor Environmental investigated immediately. inspection Review controls applied and checklist increase controls or modify Site supervisor’s activities daily checklist

20.1123.FR1V2 INTRODUCTION Page 6

Measure Target Timeframe Responsibility Documentation

Spillage or track-out onto Any spillage or track-out on At all times Site supervisor Environmental public roads public roads to be cleaned inspection immediately checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

Maintenance of all plant All plant and equipment to be At all times Site supervisor Environmental and equipment used on maintained in accordance with inspection site in a proper and manufacturers specifications. checklist efficient condition Site supervisor’s All plant and equipment to be daily checklist Operation of all plant and operated efficiently. equipment used on site in a proper and efficient manner

Complaints regarding air Zero complaints. At all times Site supervisor Complaints quality Any complaints would be register investigated (see Section 7.2)

Meeting Project Approval Compliance with conditions At all times Site supervisor Environmental Conditions regarding air inspection quality checklist Construction Compliance Report

20.1123.FR1V2 INTRODUCTION Page 7

2. LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS

Provided below are the key relevant legislation, guidelines and other relevant documentation and Project Approval Conditions, as they relate to air quality impacts during construction of the development.

2.1. Legislation

Legislation relevant to the management of air quality for the development includes:

• Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act); • Protection of the Environment Operations Act, 1997 (POEO Act); • Protection of the Environment Operations (Clean Air) Regulation 2010 (POEO (Clean Air) Regulation 2010); and, • State Environmental Planning Policy (Western Sydney Employment Area) 2009.

2.2. Guidelines and Relevant Documents

Guidelines and other documentation relevant to the management of air quality for the development includes:

• NSW EPA Local Government Air Quality Toolkit – Air Quality Guidance Note – Construction sites; • Approved Methods for the Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in NSW (NSW EPA, 2016); and, • Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction (IAQM, 2016).

2.3. Project Approval Conditions

Project Approval Conditions have been issued by the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPI&E) for the development. The Conditions which apply to air quality are reproduced in Table 2.

Table 2 Project Approval Conditions – air quality

Number Condition Reference

Operation of All plant and equipment used on site, or to monitor the performance of Section 6.1 Plant and the development, must be: Equipment (a) maintained in a proper and efficient condition; and (b) operated in a proper and efficient manner. A24

Dust The Applicant must take all reasonable steps to minimise dust This document Minimisation generated during all works authorised by this consent.

B43

20.1123.FR1V2 LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS Page 8

Number Condition Reference

Construction Prior to the commencement of construction, the Applicant must prepare This document Air Quality a Construction Air Quality Management Plan (CAQMP) to the Management satisfaction of the Planning Secretary. The CAQMP must form part of Plan the CEMP required by condition C2 and must:

(a) be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced person(s); Section 1 B44 (b) detail and rank all emissions from all construction activities, including Section 3.4 particulate emissions; Section 3.5

(c) describe a program that is capable of evaluating the performance of Section 1.1 the construction and determining compliance with key performance Section 6 indicators;

(d) identify the control measures that will be implemented for each Section 6.3 emission source, including but not limited to: (i) exposed surfaces and stockpiles are suppressed by regular watering; (ii) all trucks entering or leaving the site with loads have their loads covered; (iii) trucks associated with the development do not track dirt onto the public road network; (iv) public roads used by these trucks are kept clean; (v) land stabilisation works are carried out progressively on site to minimise exposed surfaces; and

(e) nominate the following for each of the proposed controls: Section 6.1 (i) key performance indicator; (ii) monitoring method; (iii) location, frequency and duration of monitoring; (iv) record keeping; (v) complaints register; (vi) response procedures; and (vii) compliance monitoring.

Management Management plans required under this consent must be prepared in - Plan accordance with relevant guidelines, and include: Requirements (a) detailed baseline data; Section 4

(b) details of: Section 2 C1 (i) the relevant statutory requirements (including any relevant approval, Section 5 licence or lease conditions); Section 6.1 (ii) any relevant limits or performance measures and criteria; and (iii) the specific performance indicators that are proposed to be used to judge the performance of, or guide the implementation of, the development or any management measures;

20.1123.FR1V2 LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS Page 9

Number Condition Reference

(c) a description of the measures to be implemented to comply with the Section 6.3 relevant statutory requirements, limits, or performance measures and criteria;

(d) a program to monitor and report on the: Section 6 (i) impacts and environmental performance of the development; and Section 7 (ii) effectiveness of the management measures set out pursuant to paragraph (c) above;

(e) a contingency plan to manage any unpredicted impacts and their Section 6.4 consequences and to ensure that ongoing impacts reduce to levels below relevant impact assessment criteria as quickly as possible;

(f) a program to investigate and implement ways to improve the Section 7 environmental performance of the development over time;

(g) a protocol for managing and reporting any: Section 7 (i) incident and any non-compliance (specifically including any exceedance of the impact assessment criteria and performance criteria); (ii) complaint; (iii) failure to comply with statutory requirements; and

(h) a protocol for periodic review of the plan. Section 7

20.1123.FR1V2 LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS Page 10

3. THE DEVELOPMENT

The following provides a description of the context, location, and scale of the development, provides a description of the processes and phasing of the development activities on site. It also identifies the potential for emissions to air associated with the development.

3.1. Environmental Setting

The development site is located at 657-769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek, NSW. A map showing the location of the development site is provided in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 Development site location

Image courtesy of Google Maps

The closest residential property is approximately 110 metres (m) from the development site boundary to the south, with the closest major residential area 1.8 kilometres (km) to the north of the development site.

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 11

3.2. Description of Development

The development comprises the construction of a number of warehouse buildings over eight lots as the first stage of development, with estate works across the broader site comprising bulk earthworks to create building pads for future development, stormwater infrastructure and an internal road network including a north south distributor road connecting to the adjacent property, intersection upgrades and the widening of Mamre Road.

Specifically, SSD 9522 permits the following development:

• Demolition of existing structures, site-wide earthworks, landscaping, stormwater and other infrastructure and an internal road network; • Construction and operation of eight warehouses comprising 162 355 m2 of floor space; • Intersection upgrade works in Mamre Road; • 744 parking spaces; and • 21-lot Torrens title subdivision over two stages, being Stage 1 residual lot subdivision (5 lots) and Stage 2 residual and development lot subdivision (17 lots).

The Stage 1 development of the development comprises the subdivision of five lots within the site, along with demolition and site wide earthworks, landscaping, utilities, stormwater and the internal road networks. Stage 1 also includes the construction and operation of eight warehouses inclusive of 744 parking spaces and intersection upgrade works on Mamre Road.

The Stage 2 development comprises the subdivision of the remaining portion of the site into a further 17 lots.

Development on these lots is then anticipated to occur over a period of time to meet market demand and would be subject to future development applications.

3.3. Hours of Construction

Construction is permitted between the hours of 7.00am and 6.00pm, Monday to Friday, and 8.00am to 1.00pm on Saturdays. No construction activities will be performed on Sundays, or on public holidays.

3.4. Identification of Potential Emissions to Atmosphere

The activities to be performed during the construction of the development which may have the potential to impact upon air quality include:

• demolition of existing structures within the development site; • earthworks including stripping and stockpiling of topsoil, and cut and fill; • importation of fill from offsite; • movement of plant and equipment on the site and heavy vehicles on unpaved areas; and, • construction of hardstand areas, roads, and warehouses and offices.

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 12

The activities above would result in emissions of particulate matter (dust) and gaseous emissions through the combustion of fuel in vehicles, plant and machinery.

Of the activities outlined above, emissions associated with earthworks and the movement of heavy vehicles on unpaved areas have the greatest potential to impact on local air quality, and it is these activities which are examined in detail in this CAQMP. However, the controls outlined in this CAQMP consider all sources of emissions (refer Section 6.3).

The risk of dust impacts from a demolition/construction site causing loss of amenity and/or health or ecological impacts is related to the following (IAQM, 2014):

• The nature of the activities being undertaken; • The duration of the activities; • The size of the site; • The meteorological conditions (wind speed, direction, rainfall). Adverse impacts are more likely to occur downwind of the site and during drier periods; • Soil moisture content and soil type and erodibility; • The proximity of receptors to the activities; • The sensitivity of the receptors to dust; and • The adequacy of the mitigation measures applied to reduce or eliminate dust.

In addition, the risk of air quality impacts arising from exhaust emissions are related to the following:

• The number and type of plant and equipment being used; • The duration of use of each item of plant and equipment; • Appropriate operation and maintenance of plant and equipment; and • Compliance of plant and equipment with relevant emission standards.

The development will be constructed in three stages, with the following activities being performed in all stages:

• slash, clear and grub site (including demolition of existing structures); • strip topsoil and stockpile; • importing and compacting of any required fill material.

In Stage 1, the additional activity of cut and fill will also be performed. The anticipated areas, quantities and durations of activities performed during each stage are presented in Table 3. The aggregated stage duration is also provided, and it is noted that these may not equate to a simple addition of the duration of each activity due to overlapping and/or non-sequential activities in each stage.

Table 3 Anticipated areas and quantities associated with activities

Description Area/volume Anticipated duration

Stage 1 (total area 592 045 m2, anticipated total duration 336 days, including the following

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 13

Description Area/volume Anticipated duration

Slash, clear and grub site 592 045 m² 59 days

Strip topsoil and stockpile 118 409 m³ 40 days

Cut to fill 36 200 m³ 12 days

Import and compact fill 1 114 620 m³ 21 days

Stage 2 (total area 167 000 m2 anticipated total duration 114 days, including the following

Slash, clear and grub site 167 000 m2 15 days

Strip topsoil and stockpile 33 400 m3 11 days

Import and compact fill 330 000 m3 95 days

Stage 3 (total area 167 000 m2 anticipated total duration 122 days, including the following

Slash, clear and grub site 167 000 m2 15 days

Strip topsoil and stockpile 33 400 m3 11 days

Import and compact fill 325 000 m3 92 days

A number of ancillary activities such as construction of retaining walls, laying of asphalt, electrical installation, landscaping and construction of warehouses and offices will also take place, although the earthworks activities outlined in Table 3 would result in the greatest potential for emissions to air, and it is these activities which have been examined in detail.

It is also noted that areas where works have been completed, but where stabilisation is yet to be finalised, will also result in potential for particulate emissions. The quantification of emissions (refer Section 3.5) has conservatively assumed that all areas of the site in each stage are exposed at any one time.

The plant and equipment to be used during the construction of the development will include:

• 627 Scraper ×8 • Compactor ×6 • Water cart ×3 • Grader ×2 • Roller ×2 • Intermittent – Dozer, Backhoe, excavator, Dump truck

It is anticipated that up to 200 trucks would be involved in importing fill to the site, with these trucks being predominately ‘truck and dog’ configuration.

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 14

3.5. Quantification of Potential Emissions to Atmosphere

As required by the Project Approval Conditions, this CAQMP provides a quantification of emissions associated with construction activities and identifies the emission control measures which would be applied to each source.

Emissions have been estimated adopting activity data as outlined in Table 3, and emission factors for materials handling processes, movement of trucks on unpaved site roads, and wind erosion contained within the US EPA AP-42 emission factor compendium (US EPA, 1995 and updates). These factors are appropriate for adoption in Australia and are routinely adopted in the assessment of operations of a similar nature.

Emissions of total suspended particulate (TSP), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of

<10 microns (PM10), and PM2.5 have been calculated without the inclusion of controls. Emission controls have then been identified and applied to the sources of emissions to determine the likely reductions which could result through the implementation of those measures.

The proposed emission controls to be adopted during the construction of the development are outlined in Table 4, which include the requirement outlined in Condition B44 of the Consent conditions. Where a justifiable emission control efficiency is available in the literature (DSEWPC, 2012), these are noted and have been applied. A range of control measures are proposed, and are not limited to those for which a justifiable control efficiency is available (see Section 6.3).

Table 4 Proposed emissions controls

Measure Aim Anticipated emission control efficiency (%)

Watercarts and handheld water sprays on Minimise dust generation on haul roads, 50 site to control dust regularly exposed areas and during materials handling activities

Speed limits for vehicles on-site Reduce the potential for wheel - generated dust

Progressive stripping of site ahead of Minimise the area of exposed surface - workface to limit the amount of exposed available for wind erosion surface

Dust suppressant/hydromulching to areas Minimise the area of exposed surface 70 where final level achieved available for wind erosion

Sediment and erosion controls as per civil Avoid mobilisation of silt and sediment - design and approved soil and water which may be erodible by the wind management plan and erosion and sediment control plan

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 15

Measure Aim Anticipated emission control efficiency (%)

Street sweeping where required Remove silt and sediment from road and - hardstand surfaces which may become a source of wind-blown dust. This includes the public road network

Truck wash at exit Ensure that any material on truck wheels, - tyres and truck body does not track-out onto public roads

Trucks to have loads covered Ensure that all trucks entering or leaving - the site with loads have their loads covered

The following figures present the anticipated emissions during each stage of construction and associated with each broad source of emissions, before (uncontrolled) and after the application of the proposed control measures outlined in Table 4 (controlled).

Figure 2 Particulate emissions, Stage 1 construction – uncontrolled and controlled

Figure 3 Particulate emissions, Stage 2 construction – uncontrolled and controlled

Figure 4 Particulate emissions, Stage 3 construction – uncontrolled and controlled

Figure 5 Particulate emissions, all stages – uncontrolled and controlled

Figure 6 Particulate emissions, all stages, per day – uncontrolled and controlled

Also presented are the total anticipated emissions of particulate matter (uncontrolled and controlled) during the construction of the development as a whole (i.e. all stages), and also averaged by the length of the construction period.

Emissions of particulate matter are dominated by wind erosion and materials handling activities, should these not be appropriately controlled. Emissions from haulage activities are shown to be greater during Stage 1 construction, although control measures will be applied to all sources throughout the duration of construction.

The application of the emission control measures results in reductions in all three particulate size fractions (i.e.

TSP, PM10 and PM2.5), as presented in Table 5.

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 16

Table 5 Potential reduction in emissions through application of proposed emissions controls

Stage Reduction in emissions (%)

TSP PM10 PM2.5

1 64 67 72

2 66 68 73

3 66 68 73

All (mean of Stages 1-3) 64 67 72

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 17

Figure 2 Particulate emissions, Stage 1 construction – uncontrolled and controlled

Figure 3 Particulate emissions, Stage 2 construction – uncontrolled and controlled

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 18

Figure 4 Particulate emissions, Stage 3 construction – uncontrolled and controlled

Figure 5 Particulate emissions, all stages – uncontrolled and controlled

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 19

Figure 6 Particulate emissions, all stages, per day – uncontrolled and controlled

20.1123.FR1V2 THE DEVELOPMENT Page 20

4. BASELINE DATA

4.1. Meteorology

The meteorology of the area surrounding the development site was characterised in the SSD Application through the use of observations collected at the NSW DPI&E air quality monitoring station (AQMS) located at St Marys, approximately 4 km from the development site. Wind roses showing the frequency of wind speed and direction from 2013 to 2017, as presented in the SSD Application are shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7 Annual wind roses 2013 to 2017, St Marys AQMS

The wind roses indicate that from 2013 to 2017, winds at St Marys AQMS show similar patterns across the years, with a predominant south-westerly wind direction.

The majority of wind speeds experienced at St Marys AQMS over the 5-year period, 2013 to 2017 are generally in the range <0.5 metres per second (m∙s-1) to 5.5 m∙s-1 with the highest wind speeds (greater than 8 m∙s-1) occurring from a south westerly direction. Winds of this speed are not frequent, occurring <0.1 % of the observed hours over the 5-year period, at St Marys. Calm winds (<0.5 m∙s-1) occur during 32.5 % of hours on average across the 5-year period.

20.1123.FR1V2 BASELINE DATA Page 21

4.2. Air Quality

The air quality of the area surrounding the development site was characterised in the SSD Application through the use of observations collected at the NSW DPI&E AQMS located at Prospect and Liverpool. Particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) measurements collected during 2014 are presented in Figure 8 and Figure 9. Data from the year 2014 were adopted in the SSD Application as these were considered to be representative of the longer-term period. These data indicate that, during 2014, concentrations of both PM10 and PM2.5 were below the air quality criteria, although examination of data from more recent years indicates that concentrations can be elevated on occasion. These elevations have been shown to be generally related to the incidence of drought, dust storms and bushfires.

The aim of the CAQMP is to minimise the contribution of particulate matter resulting from the construction of the development.

Figure 8 PM10 measurements, Prospect 2014

20.1123.FR1V2 BASELINE DATA Page 22

Figure 9 PM10 measurements, Prospect 2014

20.1123.FR1V2 BASELINE DATA Page 23

5. AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

The NSW EPA Approved Methods for the Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in NSW (NSW EPA, 2017) lists the statutory methods that are to be used to model and assess emissions of criteria air pollutants from stationary sources in NSW and Section 7.1 of the Approved Methods clearly outlines the assessment criteria for the development.

The criteria listed in the Approved Methods are derived from a range of sources (including National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), National Environment Protection Council (NEPC), Department of Environment (DoE), World Health Organisation (WHO), and Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC)).

Where relevant to this CAQMP, the criteria have been adopted as set out in Section 7.1 of NSW EPA (2017) which are presented in Table 6 below.

Table 6 NSW EPA air quality standards and goals

Pollutant Averaging period Units(d) Criterion

-3 (a) Particulates (as PM10) 24 hours µg∙m 50

1 year µg∙m-3 25

-3 Particulates (as PM2.5) 24 hours µg∙m 25

1 year µg∙m-3 8

Particulates (as TSP) 1 year µg∙m-3 90

Particulates (as dust deposition) 1-year(b) g·m-2·month-1 2

1-year(c) g·m-2·month-1 4

Notes: (a): micrograms per cubic metre of air (b): Maximum increase in deposited dust level (c): Maximum total deposited dust level (d) Gas volumes are expressed at 25°C (298 K) and at an absolute pressure of 1 atmosphere (101.325 kPa)

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY STANDARDS Page 24

6. AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT

The air quality management measures to be adopted during the construction of the development have been determined through the quantification of emissions and the identification of major emissions sources as outlined in Section 3.5. Measures have also been identified through review of (NSW EPA, 2017) and (IAQM, 2014).

Key performance indicators (KPI) for the development are provided in Section 6.1. For the CAQMP as a whole, the following is provided, as required by the Project Approval Conditions:

• Monitoring method; • Location, frequency and duration of monitoring; • Record keeping; • Complaints register; • Response procedures; and, • Compliance monitoring.

6.1. Key Performance Indicators

As previously outlined, the key objectives of the CAQMP are to prevent visible emissions of dust from the development site and to ensure that impacts to air quality are minimised and within the scope permitted by the Approval. To achieve these objectives, the summarised targets in Table 1 have been proposed for the management of air quality impacts during construction.

Table 7 Key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with the management of air quality

Measure Target Timeframe Responsibility Documentation

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 25

Measure Target Timeframe Responsibility Documentation

Maintenance of all plant All plant and equipment to be At all times Site supervisor Environmental and equipment used on maintained in accordance with inspection site in a proper and manufacturers specifications checklist efficient condition Site supervisor’s All plant and equipment to be daily checklist Operation of all plant and operated efficiently equipment used on site in a proper and efficient manner

Complaints regarding air Zero complaints. At all times Site supervisor Complaints quality Any complaints would be register investigated (see Section 7.2)

Meeting Project Approval Compliance with conditions At all times Site supervisor Environmental Conditions regarding air inspection quality checklist Construction Compliance Report

Air quality impacts during construction are likely to be minor and manageable through the implementation of the control measures outlined in Section 6.3. The success of the CAQMP would, in part, be determined through compliance with the KPIs outlined above. To ensure that the development is operated in accordance with conditions of consent, dust deposition monitoring is proposed at four locations on the boundary of the development site, for the duration of works. A description of the proposed monitoring program is outlined in Section 6.2.

6.2. Air Quality Monitoring

The monitoring process is detailed below and will support the assessment of compliance for dust deposition against the criteria specified in Section 5. The process will consist of:

• Maintaining dust deposition monitoring devices at the development site in line with Australian / New Zealand Standard (AS) 3580.10.1:2016 and other relevant standards; • Collect dust samples each 30±2 days in accordance with AS 3580.10.1:2016 and other relevant standards and provide the collected samples to a NATA accredited laboratory for analysis; • Compile monitoring results over a 12-month sampling period and calculate the annual average dust deposition rate (as g∙m-2∙month-1) for each monitoring location; • Review the number, frequency and nature of any environmental complaints received over the same 12-month period, as relates to dust amenity issues;

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 26

• Produce a dust monitoring report specifying the results of the monitoring and whether compliance has been achieved; and, • If the monitoring results reveal an exceedance of the dust deposition criteria (in any month of monitoring), identify and apply further dust mitigation measures.

A review of the 12-month sampling period results will be undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced professional.

Monitoring is proposed at four locations on the boundary of the development site. These locations will generally reflect the northern, southern, eastern and western boundaries, and specific locations will be selected prior to construction to ensure that they meet the requirements of the relevant AS.

Monitoring will be conducted using dust deposition gauges (DDG) constructed in accordance with AS 3580.1.10:2016. This apparatus involves the collection of passing dust with a funnel and bottle arrangement. The dust emissions settle into the funnel from the ambient air and are collected in the bottle with any rainwater. The sampled mass deposition rate is calculated from the mass of solids collected from the bottle. The dust is collected over a monthly (30 day ± 2 day) period, and the results are expressed as g∙m-2·month-1.

A typical dust deposition gauge and stand is illustrated in Figure 10.

Figure 10 Dust Deposition Gauge with Stand

The monitoring locations will be sited in accordance with the requirements of ‘AS/NZS 3580.1.1:2007 Methods for sampling and analysis of ambient air - Guide to siting equipment, and AS/NZS 3580.10.1:2016.

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 27

The monitoring of dust deposition will be performed, and quality controlled in accordance with AS/NZ 3580.10.1:2016.

For every monthly (30 day ± 2 day) monitoring period the concurrent collection of all four gauges is required. The samples will be collected in accordance with AS/NZS 3580.10.1:2016.

After the NATA accredited laboratory has issued the monthly analysis report, the data will be reviewed by the site environmental representative and recorded in a database, which will be subsequently used to evaluate performance against the criteria specified in Section 5.

Unless otherwise required, an annual monitoring report will be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced professional, describing the methodology and comparing the dust deposition monitoring against the relevant criteria. The annual report can then identify whether further monitoring is required based on whether an exceedance of criteria has occurred.

Following an exceedance of the dust deposition criterion listed in Section 5, or a dust related incident that results in a complaint, within 24 hours the site environmental representative will notify NSW DPIE of the exceedance/incident. The likely causes of any exceedances will be reviewed, and additional mitigation measures to further reduce dust emissions from operations and activities on site will be investigated and implemented.

The DDG monitoring will provide details on whether the activities at the development site are being performed in accordance with development consent conditions. These measurements will be supplemented by visual inspections on a daily basis, and through the KPIs as outlined in Table 7.

6.3. Emission Control Measures

The emission controls measures to be employed at the development site during construction are outlined in Table 8.

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 28

Table 8 Air quality management measures adopted during development construction

ID Control Measure Source Responsibility Monitoring/audit/inspection

Identified through review of major emissions sources (Section 3.5)

AQ1 Watercarts and handheld water sprays on site to control dust (see also AQ25, AQ30), Section 3.5 Site supervisor Environmental inspection especially on exposed surfaces and stockpiles checklist

AQ2 Speed limits for vehicles on-site (see also AQ23) Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ3 Progressive stripping of site ahead of workface to limit the amount of exposed surface

AQ4 Dust suppressant/hydromulching to areas where final level achieved

AQ5 Sediment and erosion controls as per civil design (see also AQ17)

AQ6 Street sweeping where required

AQ7 Truck wash at exit

Identified through review of (NSW EPA, 2017) and (IAQM, 2014)

AQ8 Display the name and contact details of person(s) accountable for air quality and dust (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Construction Compliance Report issues on the site boundary. This may be the environment manager/engineer or the site manager.

AQ9 Display the head or regional office contact information. (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Construction Compliance Report

AQ10 Record all dust and air quality complaints, identify cause(s), take appropriate measures to (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection reduce emissions in a timely manner, and record the measures taken. checklist

AQ11 Make the complaints log available to the local authority when asked. (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Construction Compliance Report

AQ12 Record any exceptional incidents that cause dust and/or air emissions, either on- or (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection offsite, and the action taken to resolve the situation in the log book. checklist

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 29

ID Control Measure Source Responsibility Monitoring/audit/inspection

AQ13 Undertake daily on-site and off-site inspections where receptors (including roads) are (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection nearby, to monitor dust, record inspection results, and make the log available to the local checklist authority when asked. This should include regular dust soiling checks of surfaces such as Site supervisor’s daily checklist street furniture, cars and window sills within 100m of site boundary.

AQ14 Carry out regular site inspections to monitor compliance with the CAQMP / CEMP, record (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection inspection results, and make an inspection log available to the local authority when asked. checklist

AQ15 Increase the frequency of site inspections by the person accountable for air quality and (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection dust issues on site when activities with a high potential to produce dust are being carried checklist out and during prolonged dry or windy conditions. Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ16 Plan site layout so that machinery and dust causing activities are located away from (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection receptors, as far as is possible. checklist

AQ17 Avoid site runoff of water or mud after treatment and cleaning. (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ18 Keep site fencing, barriers and scaffolding clean using wet methods. (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ19 Cover, seed or fence stockpiles to prevent wind erosion (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ20 Ensure all on-road vehicles comply with relevant vehicle emission standards, where (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Construction Compliance Report applicable

AQ21 Ensure all vehicles switch off engines when stationary - no idling vehicles (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection checklist

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 30

ID Control Measure Source Responsibility Monitoring/audit/inspection Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ22 Avoid the use of diesel or petrol-powered generators and use mains electricity or battery (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Construction Compliance Report powered equipment where practicable

AQ23 Impose and signpost a maximum-speed-limit of 25 km∙h-1 on surfaced and 15 km∙h-1 on (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection unsurfaced haul roads and work areas (if long haul routes are required these speeds may checklist be increased with suitable additional control measures provided, subject to the approval Site supervisor’s daily checklist of the nominated undertaker and with the agreement of the local authority, where appropriate

AQ24 Only use cutting, grinding or sawing equipment fitted or in conjunction with suitable dust (IAQM, 2014), Site supervisor Environmental inspection suppression techniques such as water sprays or local extraction, e.g. suitable local exhaust (NSW EPA, checklist ventilation systems 2017) Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ25 Ensure an adequate water supply on the site for effective dust/particulate matter (IAQM, 2014), Site supervisor Environmental inspection suppression/ mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate (NSW EPA, checklist 2017) Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ26 Use enclosed chutes and conveyors and covered skips (IAQM, 2014), Site supervisor Environmental inspection (NSW EPA, checklist 2017) Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ27 Minimise drop heights from conveyors, loading shovels, hoppers and other loading or (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection handling equipment and use fine water sprays on such equipment wherever appropriate checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ28 Ensure equipment is readily available on site to clean any dry spillages, and clean up (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection spillages as soon as reasonably practicable after the event using wet cleaning methods. checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 31

ID Control Measure Source Responsibility Monitoring/audit/inspection

AQ29 Soft strip inside buildings before demolition (retaining walls and windows in the rest of (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection the building where possible, to provide a screen against dust). checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ30 Ensure effective water suppression is used during demolition operations. Hand held (IAQM, 2014), Site supervisor Environmental inspection sprays are more effective than hoses attached to equipment as the water can be directed (NSW EPA, checklist to where it is needed. In addition, high volume water suppression systems, manually 2017) Site supervisor’s daily checklist controlled, can produce fine water droplets that effectively bring the dust particles to the ground.

AQ31 Ensure sand and other aggregates are stored in bunded areas and are not allowed to dry (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection out, unless this is required for a particular process, in which case ensure that appropriate checklist additional control measures are in place Site supervisor’s daily checklist

AQ32 Ensure all vehicles entering and leaving the site with loads have their loads covered (IAQM, 2014) Site supervisor Environmental inspection checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

Other

AQ33 Inspect all plant and equipment regularly to ensure that it is maintained in accordance - Site supervisor Environmental inspection with manufacturers specifications checklist

AQ34 Inspect the operation of all plant and equipment to ensure that it is being operated in a - Site supervisor Environmental inspection proper and efficient manner checklist Site supervisor’s daily checklist

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 32

6.4. Contingency Plan

As required by Conditon C1 (e) of the Consent, a contingency plan to manage any unpredicted impacts and their consequences is required to ensure that ongoing impacts reduce to levels below the impact assessment criteria as quickly as possible.

Section 3.5 of the CEMP outlines the incident and non-compliance response and handling procedure, with Section 5.4 of the CEMP outlining the contingency management plan.

6.5. Training

All personnel, including employees, contractors and sub-contractors, are required to complete a project induction containing relevant environmental information before they are authorised to work on the development.

Air quality specific information to be covered in the project induction will include:

• Obligations under the project Conditions of Approval (including the CAQMP), including the identification of potential sources of air pollutants of concern and the mitigation measures to be implemented, including measures (e.g. use of water, cover exposed areas) during weather conditions where high levels of dust are probable; • Responsibilities relating to the management of air quality under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Protection of the Environment Operations (Clean Air) Regulation 2010; • Typical construction activities that may impact air quality and associated environmental safeguards; and • Incident response procedures.

A detailed description of the inductions and environmental training to be provided in outlined in Section 3.4 of the CEMP.

20.1123.FR1V2 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT Page 33

7. REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT

A daily site inspection will be performed by the Site Supervisor, and will include relevant checks to ensure that the air quality management measures outlined in Table 8 are achievable. Any identified remedial actions will be promptly addressed.

Monitoring of dust emissions will be performed through the daily site inspection and visible observations by the Site Supervisor. The dust control observations will be made during the morning and repeated as required to adequately account for changing conditions. A ‘Daily Checklist’ will be used to record each day’s visible dust plume observations, noting any potential sources that may change due to changing conditions or require further observation.

If conditions change significantly on-site subsequent to the performance of the daily check, further ‘ad-hoc’ checks will also be performed and documented in the same manner.

Training of staff and contractors will include dust management as outlined in Section 6.4.

Through observations made during the site check, or through notification by staff or contractors, the Site Supervisor will have the authorisation to review operations performed on-site and alter site activities and/or additional controls necessary to effectively manage those risks.

Key Performance Indicators for the operation of the Facility would be associated with the triggers in Table 7.

Revision of the AQMP would be performed as per Condition C8 of the consent (as relevant to air quality management):

Within three months of:

(a) the submission of a Compliance Report under condition C14; (b) the submission of an incident report under condition C10; (c) the approval of any modification of the conditions of consent; or, (d) the issue of a direction of the Planning Secretary under condition A2(b) which requires a review.

The AQMP would be subject to review after the first three months of operation, and then after every 6 months to ensure applicability to development activities. This meets the requirement of Condition C1(h) of the Conditions of consent.

Section 3.5 of the CEMP outlines the incident and non-compliance response and handling procedure.

20.1123.FR1V2 REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT Page 34

7.1. Non-Compliance, Corrective and Preventive Action

Environmental inspection and observation results are interpreted to identify actual and potential non- conformances and events that may result in nuisance, environmental harm and unacceptable loss of amenity or community complaints. The Environmental Representative and/or a public authority may also raise a non- compliance or improvement notice.

Where non-compliances are identified during regular inspections, corrective actions are raised, tracked and closed out through the inspection records.

Following the identification of a non-compliance, corrective and/or preventative actions will be identified and assigned to the appropriate person with set timeframes. Timeframes will be set to ensure any damage incurred is rectified and any chance of recurrence is eliminated as soon as practicable. An appropriate register will be used to assign, track and close out corrective actions.

7.2. Complaints Handling Procedure

A detailed description of the complaints handling procedure is outlined in Section 3.6 of the CEMP.

Frasers / Altis Property Partners will operate a telephone complaint line during the operating hours of the development site during construction, with the number publicly notified via the Frasers / Altis Property Partners website. All complaints must be investigated, and feedback will be provided to the petitioner or the pertinent agency in a timely manner.

For any complaint received relating to air quality impacts from the construction activities, the following measures will be taken:

• Site Supervisor to review and follow up all the complaints regarding dust within one business day of receiving the complaint; • Fill out the appropriate complaint form, including location of complaint and noting the time and date of the complaint/s and the identity and contact details of the complainant (if agreed to provide them). • Perform a site inspection, noting all dust producing activities taking place and the mitigation methods being used. If the complaint was related to an event in the recent past, if possible, note any dust or odour producing activities that were underway at that time and initiate any remedial action necessary. • As soon as possible, visit the area from where the complaint originated to ascertain if the issue persists. • It is important to verify if another source of dust other than the construction activities of the project is causing the complaint and collect appropriate evidence of this (photos and/or videos as appropriate). • Once investigations have been completed, contact the complainant to explain any problems found and remedial actions taken. • If necessary, update any relevant procedures to prevent any recurrence of problems and record any remedial action taken.

20.1123.FR1V2 REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT Page 35

7.3. Record Keeping

The Site Supervisor will keep a record of any complaint made to the development site or any employee or any agent of the development in relation to air quality from the development site. A complaint register will be maintained and will be produced to any authorised officer of the EPA if requested. Records of individual complaints will include:

• Date and time of complaint. • Method by which the complaint was made. • Personal details of the complainant (if provided). • Nature of the complaint. • The details of an initial response to the complaint. • Action taken and any follow up actions. • If no action was taken, the reason why no action was taken. • Weather conditions corresponding to the time of the complaint will also be noted in the logbook for assessment purposes.

20.1123.FR1V2 REVIEW AND IMPROVEMENT Page 36

8. REFERENCES

IAQM. (2014). Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction.

Northstar Air Quality. (2020). Mamre Road South Precinct, 657 - 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. State Significant Development - Air Quality Impact Assessment. Reference 18.1080.FR2V11. Dated 23 April 2020.

NSW DEC. (2006). Technical Framework: Assessment and Management of Odour from Stationary Sources in NSW.

NSW DEC. (2006). Technical Notes: Assessment and Management of Odour from Stationary Sources in NSW.

NSW EPA. (2016). Approved Methods for the Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in New South Wales. NSW Environment Protection Authority.

NSW EPA. (2017). Approved Methods for the Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in New South Wales. NSW Environment Protection Authority.

NSW EPA. (2017). Local Government Air Quality Toolkit, Air quality guidance note, Construction sites.

20.1123.FR1V2 REFERENCES Page 37

APPENDIX A

20.1123.FR1V2 APPENDIX A Page 38 Martin Doyle Director

[email protected] 0447 452 777

qualifications background

 PhD Air Quality Meteorology (University of East Martin has almost 20 years of experience in the field of Anglia, UK, 2004) air quality, from academic research to public and  BSc (Hons) Environmental Science (University of private environmental consultancy. He completed his East Anglia, UK, 1998) doctorate in 2004 in air pollution meteorology and was  Certified Air Quality Professional (CAQP), Clean a Senior Research Associate at the University of East Air Society of Australia and New Zealand Anglia, which has the UK’s highest rating for the quality (CASANZ) of environmental research undertaken. His work has been included in UK Department of the Environment, membership Food and Rural Affairs Air Quality Expert Group state-

of-science reports on PM10 and NO2.  CASANZ NSW Branch Committee member 2007 His major areas of expertise include air quality - 2012 monitoring (including monitoring network design and  CASANZ NSW Branch Training Activities data analysis), emissions inventory development, Coordinator 2007 - 2012 atmospheric dispersion modelling (using TAPM,  CASANZ Federal Deputy Chair Training Activities CALPUFF, AUSPLUME, CALINE and AERMOD), Executive 2008 – 2010 greenhouse gas assessment and climate change impact assessment, independent peer review and special expertise performance of audits. Martin has significant experience across all sectors (see Martin provides a range of expertise including: overleaf) and broad experience in assessment of air

 Air quality and greenhouse gas impact pollutants including odour. assessment Use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and  Dispersion modelling studies including a range of other software to present data to non-specialists in specialist software easy to understand formats is one of Martin’s key  Ambient air quality and meteorology studies interests.  Satellite remote sensing  Geographical Information Systems (GIS)  Indoor air quality and occupational exposure assessment  Process & air pollution control due diligence and testing  Odour impact assessment and audit  Climate change impact assessment  Expert testimony and witness  Independent peer review and audit

APPENDIX E

Construction Traffic Management Plan

Prepared for FRASERS PROPERTY INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTIONS AND ALTIS PROPERTY PARTNERS

Construction Traffic Management Plan

Proposed Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub - SSD 9522 657-769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek

Ref: P1281r01 30/03/2021

[email protected] | +61 2 9083 6601 | Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000

Document Control

Project No: P1281r01

Project: Proposed Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub

657-769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek

Client: Frasers Property Industrial Constructions and Altis Property Partners

File Reference: P1281r01v9 SSD CTMP_657-769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek

Revision History

Revision Date Details Author Approved by

- 04/06/2020 Draft S. Hu A. Rasouli

1 01/07/2020 Draft M. Tangonan A. Rasouli

2 03/07/2020 Issue I M. Tangonan

A. Rasouli 3 03/09/2020 Issue II A. Rasouli T. Lewis

4 04/09/2020 Issue III A. Rasouli A. Rasouli

5 20/01/2021 Issue IV M. Tangonan J. Laidler

22/01/2021 Issue V J. Laidler J. Laidler

6 15/02/2021 Issue VI J. Laidler J. Laidler

7 01/03/2021 Issue VII J. Laidler J. Laidler

8 17/03/2021 Issue VIII J. Laidler J. Laidler

9 30/03/2021 Fix Typo J. Laidler J. Laidler

This document has been prepared for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, as expressly stated in the document. Ason Group does not accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents on this report by any third party. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements, information provided by the Client and other third parties.

Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...... 4 1.1 OVERVIEW ...... 4 1.2 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ...... 4 1.3 REPORT PURPOSE...... 7 1.4 EXCLUSIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...... 8 1.5 SSD CONTEXT ...... 8 1.6 SSD TRAFFIC GENERATION ...... 9 1.7 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ...... 9 1.8 TFNSW COMMENTS ...... 9 1.9 UPDATED TFNSW COMMENTS ...... 11 2 EXISTING SITUATIONS ...... 14 2.1 SITE LOCATION ...... 14 2.2 ROAD HIERARCHY ...... 14 2.3 ACTIVE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESS ...... 16 3 OVERVIEW OF WORKS ...... 18 3.1 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ARRANGEMENTS ...... 18 3.2 INDIVIDUAL LOT ACCESS ...... 20 3.3 HOURS OF WORK ...... 20 4 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN ...... 21 4.1 CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE MOVEMENTS ...... 21 4.2 TRUCK ACCESS ROUTES ...... 21 4.3 OTHER GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ...... 22 5 TRANSPORT IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...... 25 5.1 BACKGROUND ...... 25 5.2 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC GENERATION ...... 25 5.3 HEAVY VEHICLE TYPES ...... 26 5.4 TRAFFIC GENERATION SUMMARY ...... 26 5.5 IMPACTS ON SURROUNDING NETWORK ...... 29 6 PLAN ADMINISTRATION...... 34 6.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ...... 34 6.2 CONTINGENCY PLAN ...... 34 6.3 COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY ...... 37 6.4 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION ...... 38

Appendices

Appendix A) Drivers Code of Conduct

Appendix B) Lot 8 Access Swept Paths

Appendix C) Community Consultation

Appendix D) Traffic Control Plans

Appendix E) DPI Email

Appendix F) Evidence of Dilapidation Reports

1 Introduction

1.1 Overview

Ason Group has been engaged by Frasers Property Industrial Constructions and Altis Property Partners (Altis) to prepare a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) relating to the construction of the Kemps Creek Logistics Hub (the Proposal) at 657-769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek (the Site, also referred to Kemps Creek West Estate).

The Site is a regional warehouse and distribution complex located at Kemps Creek within the Penrith local government area (LGA) within the Western Sydney Employment Area (WSEA)

A site plan and an overview of its immediate surroundings are provided in Figure 1. Works are not to commence until this report, as required by condition B1, is approved by the Planning Secretary.

Figure 1: MSP Site Plan

1.2 Statutory Requirements

This CTMP is prepared in response to the requirements of the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Planning Requirements (SEARs) for the MSP Proposal (SSD 9522):

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 4

The following conditions have been imposed with respect to construction traffic management.

Table 1: SSD 9522 Approval - Compliance Table

Condition Requirement Response

A13 Where conditions of this consent require consultation with an identified party, the Applicant must:

consult with the relevant party prior to submitting Consultation has been undertaken with the schools the subject document to the Planning Secretary and aged care facility within Bakers Lane, as outlined for approval; and within Condition B2 b).

provide details of the consultation undertaken Reference should be made to Appendix C which including: provides evidence of consultation. . (i) the outcome of that consultation, matters resolved and unresolved; and (ii) details of any disagreement remaining between the party consulted and the Applicant and how the Applicant has addressed the matters not resolved.

B1 Prior to the commencement of construction, the Applicant must prepare a Construction Traffic Management Plan for the development to the satisfaction of the Planning Secretary. The plan must form part of the CEMP required by condition C2 and must:

a) be prepared by a suitably qualified and Consultants from Ason Group are suitably qualified experienced person(s) Traffic Engineers, with relevant “Prepare a Work Zone Traffic Management Plan” accreditation. Further consultation is expected to occur, following issue of development approval, prior to finalisation of this CTMP.

b) be prepared in consultation with Council, TfNSW, Consultation has been undertaken with the schools The Anglican Schools Corporation, Emmaus and aged care facility within Bakers Lane, as outlined Catholic College, Catholic Healthcare Emmaus within Condition B2 b). Retirement Village, Catholic Healthcare Emmaus Residential Aged Care Home and Trinity Catholic Reference should be made to Appendix C which Primary School provides evidence of consultation which has been undertaken to date.

c) detail the measures that are to be implemented to Refer Section 5.5 with regard to impacts to traffic ensure road safety and network efficiency during efficiency. This section concludes that construction construction; traffic can be satisfactorily mitigated to not have a material impact on the road network. Furthermore, Traffic Controllers (TC’s) and Traffic Control Plans (TCPs) shall be developed for works impacting public roads and will be approved by the Roads and Maritime Service Traffic Management Centre.

d) detail heavy vehicle routes, number of vehicles, The site access arrangements – relevant to each hours of construction, access (including interim stage - are outlined in subsequent sections of this left in and left out) and parking arrangements; report (Refer Section 5). Refer Section 3.3. Deliveries and contractor movements will be scheduled within these time periods

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 5

Condition Requirement Response

e) detail pedestrian safety measures; Pedestrian and cyclist management has been outlined within Section 4.3.5.

f) include specific measures to minimise impacts on Refer Section 3.3. Deliveries and contractor the nearby education precinct; movements will be scheduled outside school peak periods to minimise impacts on the nearby education precinct.

g) include a Driver Code of Conduct to: A driver Code of Conduct is a requirement of and included within this CTMP. (i) minimise the impacts of earthworks and construction on the local and regional road The Drivers Code of Conduct (included in Section network; 4.3.1) addresses ways to minimise the impacts on the road network, with other road users, ensure truck (ii) minimise conflicts with other road users, routes are utilised and to manage pedestrian including the students, staff, visitors and residents movements. of the neighbouring schools and aged care village; (iii) minimise road traffic noise, both on Bakers Lane and from construction vehicles on Site; and (iv) ensure truck drivers use specified routes and adhere to the speed restrictions on Bakers Lane;

h) include a program to monitor the effectiveness of The Contractor / Owner shall include a program to these measures monitor the effectiveness of the measures. Deliveries will be tracked against approved volumes and will keep a vehicle log - including rego & time of entry - for the purpose of assessing the effectiveness of these monitoring programs. These programs will be completed in accordance with Section 6.1.

i) if necessary, detail procedures for notifying Previous communication with stakeholders have residents and the community (including local been included within Appendix C. . schools), of any potential disruptions to routes. The Contractor will notify the community liaison representative when traffic conditions are expected to exceed parameters with within Condition Green of Table 11.

Meetings are to being organised to notify key stakeholders of any upcoming events. Reference should also be made to the Community Consultation Strategy currently being prepared by SLR.

B2 The Applicant must:

not commence construction until the Construction Noted and reiterated in Section 1.1. Traffic Management Plan required by condition B1 is approved by the Planning Secretary; and

implement the most recent version of the CTMP Refer Section 6.1 of this Plan which outlines approved by the Planning Secretary for the requirement for this Plan to be updated regularly. duration of construction.

C1 Management plans required under this consent must be prepared in accordance with relevant guidelines, and include:

detailed baseline data Refer to Section 2

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 6

Condition Requirement Response

details of: Relevant requirements are outlined in this table. Other specific requirements are detailed in Section 4 (i) the relevant statutory requirements (including any relevant approval, licence or lease conditions); (ii) any relevant limits or performance measures and criteria; and (iii) the specific performance indicators that are proposed to be used to judge the performance of, or guide the implementation of, the development or any management measures;

a description of the measures to be implemented Refer to Section 4 to comply with the relevant statutory requirements, limits, or performance measures and criteria;

a program to monitor and report on the: Refer Section 6.1 of this Plan which outlines requirement for this Plan to be updated regularly. (i) impacts and environmental performance of the development; and (ii) effectiveness of the management measures set out pursuant to paragraph (c) above;

a contingency plan to manage any unpredicted Refer Section 6.1 of this Plan which outlines the impacts and their consequences and to ensure requirement for this Plan to be updated regularly. that ongoing impacts reduce to levels below relevant impact assessment criteria as quickly as Traffic Control Plans — outlined in Section 4.3.7 — possible; shall be prepared to respond to specific work situations and subject to approval by the relevant Roads Authority (Council and/or Transport), providing a suitable level of independent oversight.

a program to investigate and implement ways to Refer Section 6.1 of this Plan which outlines improve the environmental performance of the requirement for this Plan to be updated regularly. development over time

a protocol for managing and reporting any: Management and reporting protocols are outlined in the Construction Environmental Management Plan. (i) incident and any non-compliance (specifically including any exceedance of the impact Reference is also made to Appendix A of this Plan in assessment criteria and performance criteria); relation to incident management. (ii) complaint; (iii) failure to comply with statutory requirements; and

a protocol for periodic review of the plan. Refer Section 6.1 of this Plan.

Refer to the Department of Planning, Industry & Environment’s Major Project Assessments website for a full list of all conditions of approval and other background documents.

1.3 Report Purpose

The purpose of this report is to detail a traffic plan for construction that seeks:

▪ to minimise traffic impacts on the surrounding road network,

▪ ensure safety and efficiency for workers, pedestrians and other road users, and

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 7

▪ provide information regarding the construction vehicle access routes and any changed road conditions (if applicable).

It is expected that this plan will be updated should any necessary changes to the currently proposed arrangements arise in the future. Any special events (if required) would be subject to a separate request for a specific permit not covered by this report.

1.4 Exclusions and Acknowledgements

Ason Group is responsible for the preparation of this Plan only and not for its implementation, which is the responsibility of the Contractor.

This plan only covers the access strategy onto Mamre Road and does not cover:

▪ Any works outside property boundaries or Mamre Road upgrade works which shall be subject to a separate plan and approval. It is noted that MU Group is in the process of preparing a separate CTMP to detail works related to changes to Mamre Road.

1.5 SSD Context

Specifically, SSD 9522 permits the following development:

• Demolition of existing structures, site-wide earthworks, landscaping, stormwater and other infrastructure and an internal road network;

• Construction and operation of eight warehouses comprising 162,355 m2 of floor space;

• Intersection upgrade works in Mamre Road;

• 744 parking spaces; and

• 21-lot Torrens title subdivision over two stages, being Stage 1 residual lot subdivision (5 lots) and Stage 2 residual and development lot subdivision (17 lots).

Further to the construction and operation of warehouses, the Proposal includes a total of 162,355m2 of building floor area, comprising:

▪ 153,865 m2 warehouse/industrial GFA; and

▪ 8,490 m2 of ancillary office.

Additionally, an indicative ultimate Master Plan (Ultimate MP), which includes the SSD and the remaining portion of the land (subject to separate DAs – Lots included in the grey area above), has been provided to Ason Group for the purpose of conservative traffic modelling / assessment. The indicative Ultimate MP comprises a total of 18 Lots, including 26 warehouse/industrial facility and associated offices.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 8

A total of 421,820m2 of building floor area is estimated under the indicative Ultimate MP, comprising:

▪ 401,250 m2 warehouse/industrial GFA; and

▪ 20,570 m2 of ancillary office GFA.

It is noteworthy that the SIDRA modelling undertaken as part of the submitted TIA refers to the Ultimate masterplan GFAs.

1.6 SSD Traffic Generation

Traffic generation associated with the SSD and the Ultimate MP are provided in below table.

Table 2: Traffic Generation

Development Site AM Peak (veh/hr) PM Peak (veh/hr) Daily (veh/day) Yield (m2)

MSP 162,355 411 303 4,388 (this SSDA)

MSP 421,820 1,042 768 11,136 (Indicative Ultimate MP)

1.7 Statutory Requirements

It is important to note that, the SSD has been completed and conditional approval was granted on 21 Dec 2020. Therefore, this CTMP notes that the above traffic volumes are approved for the operation of the Site and can be assumed as maximum capped traffic generation for the construction works.

1.8 TfNSW Comments

It is noteworthy that an earlier version of this report has been provided to TfNSW for review and feedback. Accordingly, the following comments have been provided on the draft version, included in TfNSW’s letter of 02 July 2020 and 26 February 2021. As such this CTMP has now been updated to address below requests.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 9

Table 3: TfNSW Comments and Ason Group’s Response

No. TfNSW Comments Ason Group Response

1 The Construction Access 1A for the development is via Construction Access 1A, previously proposed from the Bakers Lane. In Construction Access 1B, access into existing signalised intersection of Mamre Road / Bakers the development is via a temporary access road south Lane, is no longer envisaged as part of the interim of Bakers Lane whilst the intersection of Bakers Lane is arrangement of this CTMP. reconstructed. Having an alternate temporary access This CTMP allows for only one interim access onto Mamre south of an existing intersection is not ideal and Road which is discussed in Section 3.1.1. The interim preference is all traffic access should be maintained at access arrangement is to be located at the southern Construction Access 1A. boundary of the Site and will be in the form of left in / left out only access point including a deceleration lane. Once the ultimate intersection has been constructed towards the end of the Site’s construction, then access will be utilised via Mamre Rd x Bakers Lane – as is discussed in Section 3.1.2

2 Construction Access 1B is maintained during Stage 2 of This revised CTMP will only rely on one interim construction the development at the same time the intersection of access point which is discussed in Section 3.1.1. The Mamre Road and Bakers Lane is operational. It is interim construction access will be decommissioned and recommended Construction Access 1B should be removed from Mamre Road when the upgrade works at decommissioned/closed when intersection of Mamre Mamre Road / Bakers Lane are completed and from that Road and Bakers Lane is operational. Construction time all construction vehicles will access the Site via the Access 1B is not supported during Stage 2 works. upgraded signalised intersection. Reference should be made to Section 3.1.2 for further clarity.

3 The proposed Construction Access 3 north of This construction access is no longer proposed as part of intersection of Mamre Road and Bakers Lane for Stage this CTMP. 3 is not supported when access is possible via internal road network and an operational intersection of Mamre Road and Bakers Lane.

4 In the Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), Under the ultimate access arrangement, access from the there is no indication of the turnaround location for north shall be safely facilitated by the Bakers Lane signals construction traffic originating from the north. This will (as upgraded). need to be identified as part of the assessment of the During preliminary (interim) arrangements – when access development. to the site is restricted to left-in only - all contractors shall be advised of this restriction prior to attending the site and instructed to use the routes outlined by this Plan. Accordingly, reference should be made to the access route plans shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8.

In addition to the above, turning heads have been provided for the interim and ultimate access strategies as discussed in Section 3.1.

5 The proposed W8-234 (Access to construction site) Sign has been updated and included within Appendix B sign on the approach to the interim construction access as shown in Appendix B is not in the TfNSW (RMS) sign directory.

It is recommended to use a ‘No Left Turn’ (R2-6n_L) + ‘Construction vehicles accepted’ (R9-203-1) sign to discourage vehicles other than construction vehicles to access the site. – It is important to note that construction vehicles (light/heavy) are easily identified as authorised vehicles to avoid getting fined.

In this regard, below figure is provided to compare the previous construction access strategy (reviewed by TfNSW) as part of the earlier versions of the CTMP and the revised interim access strategy proposed

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 10

under this revised CTMP. As can be seen the previously proposed access 1A and 1C are now removed from this CTMP.

Figure 2: Previous Construction Access vs. Revised Interim Access

1.9 Updated TfNSW Comments

In addition to the above, it should be considered that the project team have maintained consultation with TfNSW with regard to traffic and transport-related elements of the CTMP. In line with consultation undertaken on the 16th December 2020, the following table summarises the most recent round of feedback provided by TfNSW.

Table 4: Updated TfNSW Comments

TfNSW Comments Ason Group Response

1 Detailed Traffic Control Plans are to be used to the The CTMP has been updated in line with TfNSW’s subject CTMP. comments, as well as additional feedback discussed with the project team. TfNSW require a detailed TCP to be included in the CTMP for the proposed temporary access off Mamre A detailed TCP for the left-in-left-out has been provided Road i.e., Left-In and Left-Out. within Appendix D.

2 Swept Path analysis of the largest construction vehicle Noted. TfNSW has acknowledged the swept path are to be provided. provisions of the previous CTMP. It should be noted that the swept paths have been revised based on updated documentation and are included with Lot 8.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 11

3 SIDRA analysis to be undertaken to determine the The SIDRA modelling component of the traffic studies has impacts of construction vehicle activity on the key been discussed with TfNSW and the project team in detail intersections surrounding the Site. to establish the following key points:

• TfNSW needs to see evidence of the impacts of the - Reference is made to SSD-9522 and refers to the construction traffic particularly to key intersections estate-wide SSD. Ason Group has undertaken the surrounding the site to see if there is a need to transport assessment for project, with subsequent propose mitigation measures so that the network approval granted in December 2020 . performance is still maintained at an acceptable level. - It has been discussed and acknowledged with the client that the level of anticipated construction traffic for the Site • The LILO Temp access on Mamre Road will not be is less than the operational vehicle movements for the required in the SIDRA Analysis Estate. This indicates that the lower volume of construction traffic to the Mamre Rd x Bakers Lane intersection is likely to yield improved results for the intersection over the modelled operational traffic volumes. Notwithstanding, a further SIDRA assessment was undertaken for the Mamre Rd x Bakers Lane for Base, and Base + Construction scenarios. The results of the modelling demonstrate a LoS of B and F during the respective AM and PM Periods and are outlined within Table 9 Accordingly, on this basis the level of construction traffic can be considered acceptable.

4 No construction vehicle movements are to occur during Noted. Construction traffic will not access the eastern leg school drop-off (8am-9:30am) and pick up (2:30pm to of Mamre Rd x Bakers Lane intersection. 4pm) times on school.

5 All demolition and construction vehicles are to be Noted and considered. contained wholly within the site and vehicles must enter the site before stopping.

1.10 DPIE Comments

In addition to the above, it should be considered that the project team have been in consultation with DPIE with regard to traffic and transport-related elements of the CTMP. The following table summarises the most recent round of feedback provided by DPIE.

Table 5: DPIE Comments

TfNSW Comments Ason Group Response

1 It is noted that comments from Transport for NSW Subsequent email by DPIE (dated 16 March 2021) (TfNSW) are included in Section 1.8 and 1.9 of the CTMP. outlines that TfNSW has reviewed the most recent version However, it is unclear whether TfNSW has reviewed the of the CTMP. most recent version of the document. Please provide evidence of consultation with TfNSW, particularly in A copy has been provided within Appendix E. relation to the most recent version of the plan.

2 It is noted the CTMP states on page 12 that ongoing All consultation required has been undertaken, as consultation with the high school in the locale of the site is required by TfNSW, therefore no more consultation is underway. Please clarify the nature of this consultation required. and whether it is in addition to the consultation evidenced in Appendix C of the CTMP.

3 Table 12 on page 38 of the CTMP should be updated to Table 12 (Now Table 13) has been updated to reflect the reflect further consultation undertaken, as evidenced in most recent consultation undertaken. Appendix C.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 12

4 Appendix C of the CTMP includes evidence of Evidence of consultation with Penrith Council for consultation with Penrith City Council (Council). Council dilapidation reports has been undertaken. states that the CTMP is acceptable “subject to dilapidation reports on existing Council assets within Bakers Lane and Evidence of this consultation can be found within James Erskine Drive.” Please provide evidence that these Appendix F. reports have been submitted to Council.

5 It is noted that the CTMP states on page 17 that All references to the use of Bakers Lane out side of construction vehicles are not to utilise Bakers Lane East school periods have been removed from this CTMP during the entirety of the construction works. However, on page 20 there are references to the use of Bakers Lane outside of school drop-off and pick up hours and HSC exam periods. Please remove the references on page 20.

6 Also on page 20, the CTMP refers to measures to be Comment deleted as there will be no heavy vehicles implemented to minimise the impact to the schools from related to the construction utilising Bakers Lane. Heavy Vehicles using Bakers Lane, however there are no measures listed.

7 Ensure all references to Tables in the CTMP are correct – Noted. for example, the reference on Page 37 to Table 6 should be Table 11.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 13

2 Existing Situations

2.1 Site Location

The Site is located within the Penrith City Council LGA and is bordered by Mamre Road to the east; the Sydney Water Warragamba Pipeline to the north; South Creek to the west; and rural land to the south. Properties included within the Site are as follows:

▪ Lot 34 in DP1118173 ▪ Lot Y in DP421633 ▪ Lot 22 in DP258414

▪ Lot X in DP421633 ▪ Lot 1 in DP1018318

2.2 Road Hierarchy

The road hierarchy in the locality is presented in Figure 2 and summarised below for key roads.

▪ Mamre Road – an arterial road servicing traffic between the Great Western Highway and M4 to the north and Elizabeth Drive to the south. In the vicinity of the MSP, Mamre Road generally provides 2 lanes for two-way traffic, with additional through movement and turning infrastructure at key intersections, specifically at Erskine Park Road and James Erskine Drive. Mamre Road has a posted speed limit of 80km/h.

▪ Erskine Park Road – a sub-arterial road servicing traffic between the Great Western Highway and M4 to the north, Mamre Road to the south-west, as well as linking Lenore Drive (Erskine Park Link Road) to the M7 to the east. Erskine Park Road provides 4 lanes for two-way traffic north-east from the intersection of Mamre Road. Erskine Park Road has a posted speed limit of 70km/h.

▪ James Erskine Drive – a local industrial access road, providing local access for the Erskine Park Industrial Precinct, which lies to the east of Mamre Road, northeast of the Precinct. James Erskine Drive provides 4 lanes for two-way traffic and provides additional turning infrastructure on the approach to Mamre Road. On-street parking is permitted; however, demand for this parking is low and therefore rarely used.

▪ Bakers Lane (East) – a two lane undivided Local Road which operates under a 60km/hr sign posted speed limit. Bakers Lane (East) provides primary access to a number of local schools and colleges in the area, with School Zone speed limit restrictions (40km/h) in operation during school peak periods. At present, Bakers Lane (East) forms a Signalised T intersection with Mamre Road.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 14

Figure 3: Road Hierarchy

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 15

2.3 Active and Public Transport Access

Existing public transport services & cycling routes in the vicinity of the MSP are presented in Figure 3.

2.3.1 Active Transport Connections

Bicycle lanes are provided along Erskine Park Road and sections of Mamre Road, in addition to carriageway shoulders that could also be utilised by cyclists.

2.3.2 Existing Bus Services

As shown in Figure 3, the MSP is not directly serviced by public transport operations at this time.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 16

Figure 4: Public Transport Services & Cycling Routes

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 17

3 Overview of Works

As mentioned in Section 1.3, this CTMP is focused on the internal construction of the MSP and the access onto Mamre Road, which will commence approximately 6 months ahead of external construction work. The access and traffic management required is outlined later within this report. Recognising the purpose and limitations of this CTMP, it is estimated that the total duration of the construction works will be approximately 26 months from the commencement date. Despite earlier version of the CTMP, the proposed construction works will not be undertaken in different stages.

It is again emphasised that there is no actual warehouse construction considered under this CTMP. Each warehouse would be subject to its own specific CTMP which is expected to be in response to the SSD approval conditions of consent and can be undertaken by the proposed appointed contractor.

3.1 Construction Access Arrangements

As mentioned before, recognising the ambiguity for timing of construction for each individual Lot, the proposed construction works is not planned to be undertaken in different stages. However, there will be 2 main access arrangement for the works which are described as follows. Notwithstanding, construction vehicles are not to utilise Bakers Lane East during the entirety of the construction works.

3.1.1 Interim Construction Access

A left in / left out access point (to/from Mamre Road) will be provided for the construction works which is proposed to be located at the southern boundary of the Site. A reduced copy of this access arrangement is provided in below figure.

This interim access point will service the proposed construction works until such time that the proposed Scenario 1A upgrades at Mamre Road / Bakers Lane signalised intersection are completed (as envisaged under the SSD submission). During this time, no construction vehicles shall utilise Bakers Lane East. Following completion of the signal upgrades, this interim access point will be removed. It is currently anticipated that the interim access arrangement will be in use for a period of approximately 18- 20 months.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 18

Figure 5: Interim Construction Access Arrangements

As can be seen in the above figure, a proposed turning head has been provided at the western boundary of Lot 8 which provides opportunity for U-turn for construction trucks, as necessary.

3.1.2 Ultimate Construction Access

Upon completion of the Mamre Road / Bakers Lane upgrade works (envisaged as part of the SSD submission), the interim access will be removed, and the construction traffic will access the Site via the upgraded (Mamre Road / Bakers Lane) signalised intersection, as shown below. It is expected that this access point will be utilised by construction vehicles for approximately 6 months prior to full completion of the construction works. During this time, no construction vehicles shall utilise Bakers Lane East. Furthermore, a turning head is also provided for this scheme to facilitate opportunities for construction vehicles to make U-turns, as necessary.

Furthermore, it is important to note that below ultimate construction access plan acknowledges the removal of the interim access point when the upgraded signalised intersection is completed.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 19

Figure 6: Ultimate Construction Access Arrangement

3.2 Individual Lot Access

Access to individual pads shall vary during the course of the construction works. However, internal traffic movements and access to work areas shall be managed, with suitable Traffic Control Plans prepared by Contractors and designed in accordance with Austroads—Guide to Temporary Traffic Management and AS1742.3, depending on the specific work area. As discussed before, construction of the access to each individual Lots is outside the scope of this CTMP.

3.3 Hours of Work

The construction working hours are expected to be as follows:

During General Construction:

7:00AM – 6:00PM Monday – Friday.

8:00AM – 1:00PM Saturday.

No work is to be undertaken on public holidays.

It may (on occasions) be necessary to undertake works outside of the above proposed working hours to minimise disruption to traffic; however, any works undertaken outside of these times will only occur with prior approval from Council and TfNSW.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 20

4 Traffic Management Plan

4.1 Construction Vehicle Movements

Construction vehicles (including trucks) will access the Site via an interim access to Mamre Road at the start of construction, reverting to use of the upgraded Mamre Road / Bakers Lane signalised intersection as the ultimate access once those upgrades are available.

4.2 Truck Access Routes

The implementation of the access route shall be done so in accordance with any and all conditions of consent received by the TfNSW.

4.2.1 Interim Construction Access Routes

Following construction access routes are proposed in accordance with the interim access arrangement (being left in / left out only):

Entry movements – ALL construction vehicle entry movements shall occur from Mamre Road south and via Elizabeth Drive roundabout (refer Figure 7).

Figure 7: Entry Movements

The appointed contractor shall ensure that these entry routes will be adhered to by ALL drivers. A copy of these routes is also provided in Drivers Code of Conduct attached in Appendix A of this CTMP. In

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 21

the event that any construction vehicle access from north, they are required to drive south and access Elizabeth Drive roundabout to make a U-Turn and enter the Site via the interim construction access crossover.

Exit movements – ALL construction vehicles exit movements shall occur from Mamre Road northbound via a left out exit movement at the interim construction access. Drivers travelling northbound will be able to continue driving north and those intending to drive south on Mamre Road are required to make a U-Turn at the existing James Erskine Drive roundabout (refer Figure 8).

Figure 8: Exit Movements.

The appointed contractor shall ensure that these exit routes will be adhered to by ALL drivers. A copy of these routes is also provided in Drivers Code of Conduct attached in Appendix A of this CTMP.

4.2.2 Ultimate Construction Access Routes

Ultimate access for construction vehicles will be provided via the upgraded signalised intersection of Mamre Road / Bakers Lane (as proposed in the SSD submission).

4.3 Other General Requirements

It is expected that a schedule for deliveries of materials and goods will be established prior to that day, with Traffic Controllers maintaining radio contact with construction vehicles at all times. Thus, at no time shall queueing occur on the public road network.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 22

The future Contractors shall prepare Vehicle Movement Plans (VMP) for on-site circulation for generating more than 20 truck movements (10 in, 10 out) per day.

In preparing relevant details VMPs, the contractor should:

▪ Minimise interaction with other work areas, as far as possible. ▪ Where possible, separate truck movements from contractor car parking areas ▪ Prepare Traffic Control Plans where necessary to provide additional management of on-site vehicle movements.

4.3.1 Driver Code of Conduct

All drivers shall adhere to the Driver Code of Conduct, as provided in Appendix A.

4.3.2 Contractor Parking

Contractor parking will be provided within the proposed site compounds, as indicated in above figures. No parking shall occur on Mamre Road or Bakers Lane.

4.3.3 Loading & Materials Handling

Handling of all materials throughout the construction shall adhere to the following.

▪ It is proposed that all material loading will occur within the construction site boundary.

▪ No loading is proposed to occur outside of the provisioned areas.

▪ Equipment, materials and waste will be kept within the construction site boundary. During later stages of construction, tie in works will be required within the kerbside of Mamre Road. Nevertheless, all works within Mamre Road corridor shall be subject to a separate CTMP specific to those works.

4.3.4 Road Occupancy

The internal construction of the MSP does NOT require any road occupancy within public roads. All tie in works to Mamre Road shall be subject to a separate CTMP, with relevant Road Occupancy Licences (ROL) obtained as necessary in consultation with TfNSW.

Noting that the external construction work is subject to a separate CTMP prepared by MU Group, detailed Traffic Control Plans (TCPs) on Mamre Road is not included as part of this CTMP; however, it is expected that at least a single northbound and southbound through traffic lane on Mamre Road shall be maintained through all construction periods, with detailed plans subject approval from the Traffic Management Centre (TMC) as part of formal ROL submissions.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 23

4.3.5 Pedestrian and Cyclist Management

Details of pedestrian management along the site boundary shall be provided in accordance with relevant conditions of consent.

At this stage, fencing / hoarding along the site frontage on Mamre Road is not proposed as Mamre Road generally does not provide walking / cycling access.

4.3.6 Engineering Construction Specifications

Any Signage and/or line marking to be installed as a result of these construction works shall be installed as per Council’s Engineering Construction Specification for Civil Works document (October 2017). Details of signage and line-marking along Mamre Road is expected to be addressed by MU Group CTMP.

4.3.7 Traffic Control Plans

Any Traffic Control Plans (TCPs) shall be prepared by an accredited person, in accordance with:

▪ RMS Traffic Control at Worksites Manual, ▪ Austroads—Guide to Temporary Traffic Management, and ▪ AS1742.3. All TCPs involving signage or impacts to public roads shall be approved by the TfNSW Traffic Management Centre (TMC), prior to the works for which they relate. These TCPs shall be updated to respond to any changes to prevailing traffic conditions throughout the life of the works.

Having regard for the anticipated truck movements exceeding 20 movements per day, it is expected that signage (e.g., “Trucks Turning”) will be required at the site access points to advise other road users of changed traffic conditions. In this regard, it is expected that site-specific versions of the standard TCP 195 would be implemented by the Contractor. TCP’s shall be integrated to accommodate the spacing and clearances of each access.

In addition, site-specific versions of standard TCP 93 will be required for any works on the internal roads where the kerbside lane is obstructed or insufficient clearances to passing traffic cannot be maintained.

Supplementary site-specific TCPs shall be developed and submitted to TMC for approval, as required to reflect specific work activities and/or changes to road conditions.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 24

5 Transport Impact Assessment

5.1 Background

The traffic report (Ason Group Ref: 0584r04v4) supporting SSD 9952 outlined the following relevant traffic generation with regard to future operational traffic volumes associated with the full development of the Site during the peak periods (refer Section 1.6):

▪ AM Peak 1,042 movements per hour (movements, in & out combined) ▪ PM Peak 768 movements per hour (movements, in & out combined) For the purpose of this report, 1 truck is equal to 1 inbound movement plus 1 outbound movement which equals to 2 movements.

5.2 Construction Traffic Generation

5.2.1 Construction Traffic Estimates

Light Vehicle Traffic Generation:

Light vehicle traffic generation would generally be associated with staff movements to and from the Site. Staff would be comprised of project managers, various trades, and general construction employees. Light vehicle construction trips are expected to arrive in the morning and depart in the evening, and the number of trips is estimated based on the workforce numbers which is a maximum of 50 people. Therefore, the forecast light vehicle trip generation during peak hours is 50 trips per hour. Noting the work hours, this peak is likely to occur outside of traditional road network peak periods.

Heavy Vehicle Traffic Generation:

The anticipated heavy vehicle movements generated by the construction of the Site have been estimated having consideration of the likely requirements for construction plant, equipment, and haulage. It is noted that the contractor has provided the anticipated heavy vehicle movements (in & out combined) for the construction works which is as follows:

▪ Site Establishment (earlier stages of the construction work)

• Between 6am – 7am: 10 vehicle movements per hour

• From 7am – 7pm: 6 vehicle movements per hour

• Daily: 82 vehicle movements per day

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 25

▪ Subsequent to Site Establishment:

• Between 6am – 7am: 90 vehicle movements per hour

• From 7am – 7pm: 76 vehicle movements per hour

• Daily: ~1,000 vehicle movements per day

Combined Heavy and Light Vehicle Movements

Accordingly, the maximum construction peak hour traffic generation (combined light and heavy vehicles) are as follows:

▪ 60 veh/hr during Site Establishment (50 light plus10 heavy vehicle movements), and ▪ 140 veh/hr at subsequent stages (50 light plus 90 heavy vehicle movements).

These traffic volumes occur outside road network peak periods.

5.3 Heavy Vehicle Types

The majority of daily truck movements for the internal construction works will be truck and dogs, with intermittent arrival of dozers, excavator, and dump trucks, with the following plant expected to be delivered and remain on-site from the outset of construction:

▪ 8 x 627 Scrapers ▪ 6 x Compactors ▪ 3 x Water carts ▪ 2 x Graders ▪ 2 x Rollers

5.4 Traffic Generation Summary

5.4.1 During Site Establishment

Traffic volumes for the Site Establishment period are provided in below figure. It should be considered that staff movements are anticipated to occur generally outside of network peak hours as well as peak heavy vehicle movements.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 26

Figure 9: Site Establishment Light & Heavy Hourly Vehicle Trips

The table above demonstrates the 10 light vehicle trips associated with staff arrival and departure occurring during 6am-7am and 6pm-7pm, with heavy vehicle in and out movements occurring throughout the work period. This demonstrates that during the road network peak hours (8-9 am and 3-4 pm), the total construction traffic would equate to approximately 6 movements per hour.

Table 6: Construction Peak Hour Vehicle Movements

Period Light Vehicles Heavy Vehicles Total

50 vehicles IN & 5 vehicles IN & 6-7am 60 Vehicle movements 0 vehicles OUT 5 vehicles OUT

0 vehicles IN & 3 vehicles IN & 6-7pm 56 vehicle movements 50 vehicles OUT 3 vehicles OUT

The Site establishment period is expected to continue for a period of approximately 1 month and during this time the interim access (left in/left out) on Mamre Road will be utilised.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 27

5.4.2 Following Site Establishment

Traffic volumes for the subsequent stages of construction (following site establishment – likely to start from the second month of construction) are provided in Figure 10.

Figure 10: Following Site Establishment Light & Heavy Hourly Vehicle Trips

As can be seen the maximum truck movements of 90 veh/hr occurs between 6-7am with all staff arriving at that period (totalling 140veh/hr). Outside this period and up to 6.00 pm there would be an equally distributed truck entry and exit of 76veh/hr. Finally, between 6-7 pm a total of 126 (76 trucks+50 cars) vehicle movements is expected for the construction.

Construction traffic volumes generally represent a small proportion of the existing background traffic occurring on Mamre Road. Figure 9 below visualizes hourly count volumes of construction traffic in the subsequent construction periods against existing background traffic. This demonstrates that the addition of construction traffic is relatively small in comparison.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 28

Figure 11: Background Traffic vs Construction Traffic

In this regard, it is evident that the construction traffic volumes are significantly lower than the background traffic volumes (maximum of 140 veh/hr between 6-7am, 126 veh/hr between 6-7pm and 76 veh/hr outside these periods) on surrounding road network and as such will not have any material impact onto these roads. Furthermore, the above figure shows that the construction peak periods are OUTSIDE the road network peak hours.

5.5 Impacts on Surrounding Network

Having regard for the traffic generation summary (presented in Section 5.1) as part of the SSD submission the operational traffic generation for the entire masterplan are significantly higher than the anticipated construction traffic volumes (refer below table).

Table 7: SSD Traffic vs. Maximum Construction Traffic

Maximum CTMP Difference Period SSD Traffic Generation

Road Network AM Peak (veh/hr) 1,042 76 (6)1 - 966

Road Network PM Peak (veh/hr) 768 76 (6)1 - 692

Notes) 1) figures in bracket demonstrates the maximum traffic movements during site establishment.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 29

Noting the construction stage 1 is proposed to use this intersection as the construction access point, the estimated construction traffic has been distributed onto this intersection, as shown in Figure 11, and the impact of construction traffic has been assessed using SIDRA computer program which outputs a range of performance measures, in particular:

▪ Average Vehicle Delay (AVD) – The AVD (or average delay per vehicle in seconds) for intersections also provides a measure of the operational performance of an intersection and is used to determine an intersection’s Level of Service (see below). For signalised intersections, the AVD reported relates to the average of all vehicle movements through the intersection. For priority (Give Way, Stop & Roundabout controlled) intersections, the AVD reported is that for the movement with the highest AVD.

▪ Level of Service (LOS) – This is a comparative measure that provides an indication of the operating performance, based on AVD. The following table provides a recommended baseline for assessment as per the RMS Guide:

Table 8 : Level of Service Criteria for Intersections

Level of Average Delay per Traffic Signals, Roundabout Give Way and Stop Signs Service Vehicle (secs/veh)

A less than 14 Good operation Good operation

Good with acceptable delays & spare B 15 to 28 Acceptable delays & spare capacity capacity

C 29 to 42 Satisfactory Satisfactory, but accident study required

D 43 to 56 Operating near capacity Near capacity & accident study required

At capacity; at signals, incidents will E 57 to 70 cause excessive delays. At capacity, requires other control mode Roundabouts require other control mode

Unsatisfactory and requires additional Unsatisfactory and requires other control F More than 70 capacity. mode or major treatment.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 30

AM PM

Figure 12: Traffic Volume on Mamre Road and Bakers Lane Intersection – Construction Stage 1

A comparison of SIDRA results is provided in the table below.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 31

Table 9 : Intersection Performance Comparison – Mamre Road / Bakers Lane (Isolated)

Queue Length (m)

Average Delay Level of Intersection Period Mamre Road Mamre Road (sec) Service (North (South approach) approach)

AM 18.2 B 157 148 Baseline1

(2018 Existing) PM 47.2 D 477 166

AM 18.8 B 179 160 Baseline + Construction Traffic PM 56.2 D 601 181

The SIDRA results indicate that construction traffic will have moderate impact on the performance of the intersection of Mamre Road and Bakers Lane during the morning peak hour. The intersection is expected to keep operating at LoS B during the AM peak. During PM peak, the intersection is expected to operate at LoS D.

In this regard, consideration shall also be given to the average queue length which is expected to increase by approximately 73 metres and 14 metres at Mamre Road northern and southern approaches, separately.

Notwithstanding, this increase in traffic is temporary for the purpose of construction and shall be in place until the proposed signals are provided.

In particular it is important to note that the proposed construction access will only be limited to left in / left out and the SIDRA modelling suggests minimal increase in delay and queue during PM peak hour as a result of this movements on the western approaches as follows:

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 32

Table 10 : Construction Site Access Performance – PM Peak

Left-in movement Left-out movement Intersection Delay (sec) Queue (m) Delay (sec) Queue (m)

Baseline 18.4 166 23.4 0 (2018 Existing)

Baseline + Construction Traffic 18.8 181 28.9 0

In summary, based on the construction traffic numbers currently envisaged, the construction traffic impacts at the existing form of Mamre Road / Bakers Lane are considered acceptable during site establishment period.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 33

6 Plan Administration

6.1 Monitoring Program

This CTMP shall be subject to ongoing review and will be updated accordingly. Regular reviews will be undertaken by the on-site coordinator. As a minimum, a review of the CTMP shall be undertaken within three months of:

▪ the submission of a Compliance Report under condition C14;

▪ the submission of an incident report under condition C10;

▪ the approval of any modification of the conditions of this consent; or

▪ the issue of a direction of the Planning Secretary under condition A2(b) which requires a review of the strategies, plans and programs required.

All and any reviews undertaken should be documented, however key considerations regarding the review of the CTMP shall be:

▪ Tracking deliveries against the volumes outlined within report. Deliveries will be tracked against approved volumes and will keep a vehicle log - including rego & time of entry - for the purpose of assessing the effectiveness of these monitoring programs.

▪ To identify any shortfalls and develop an updated action plan to address issues that may arise during construction (Parking and access issues)

▪ To ensure TCP’s are updated (if necessary) by “Prepare a Work Zone Traffic Management Plan” card holders to ensure they remain consistent with the set-up on-site.

▪ Regular checks undertaken to ensure all loads are entering and leaving site covered as outlined within this CTMP.

The development of a program to monitor the effectiveness of this CTMP shall be established by the Contractor.

6.2 Contingency Plan

A contingency plan shall be established by the Contractor. Table 11 outlines an indicative plan to be undertaken by the builder in the event that the monitoring program identifies the management plan is not effective in managing the construction impacts.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 34

Table 11: Contingency Plan

Risk Condition Green Condition Amber Condition Red

Construction traffic volume is Construction traffic volumes Construction traffic volumes in accordance with exceeds programmed volume Trigger exceeds programmed volume permissible and programmed but is within permissible and time constraints volume and time constraints volume constraints

Review and investigate construction activities. Review and investigate Where appropriate, construction activities, and implement additional where appropriate, implement remediation measures such additional remediation as: measures such as: - Temporary halting - Temporary halting of activities and of activities and resuming when No response required resuming when Response conditions have Continue monitoring program conditions have improved. improved. - Stop all - Review CTMP and transportation into update where and out of the site. necessary Review CTMP and - Provide additional update where training. necessary. Provide additional training.

Construction traffic does not Construction traffic utilise site Construction traffic utilises the Construction utilise site accesses other Trigger accesses other than the proposed site assess but with Movements than the proposed (Left in / left proposed right in or right out movement. out)

Review and investigate construction activities. If it is concluded that construction activities were directly Review and investigate responsible for the construction activities, and exceedance, submit an where appropriate, implement incident report to government additional remediation agencies. Where appropriate, measures such as: implement additional - Review vehicles remediation measures such arriving to site and as: No response required remind them of the Response - Stop all Continue monitoring program strict access transportation into conditions. and out of the site.

- Provide additional - Review CTMP and training (including update where toolbox talks and necessary further notification of Driver Code of - Provide additional Conduct) training (including toolbox talks and further notification of Driver Code of Conduct).

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 35

Risk Condition Green Condition Amber Condition Red

Queuing identified on the Trigger No queuing identified Queuing identified within site public road

Review and investigate construction activities. Where appropriate, implement additional remediation measures such as: Review the delivery schedule - Temporary halting prepared by the builder. If of activities and Queuing drivers are not following the resuming when No response required correct schedule, then they Response conditions have Continue monitoring program should be provided with improved. additional training and an extra copy of the Driver Code - Stop all of Conduct transportation into and out of the site.

- Review CTMP and update where necessary.

Provide additional training

Noise levels do not exceed Noise levels in minor excess Noise levels greatly in excess Trigger imposed noise constraints of imposed noise constraints of imposed noise constraints

Undertake all feasible and reasonable mitigation and management measures to Undertake all feasible and ensure noise levels are below Noise reasonable mitigation and Highly Noise Affected criteria. No response required management measures to Response If noise levels cannot be kept Continue monitoring program. minimise noise impacts, and below applicable limits, then a to be consistent with the different construction method CNVMP or equipment must be utilised. Response to also be consistent with the CNVMP

Near miss or incident Minor inconsistencies with occurring regardless of / as a Trigger No observable issues TCP to onsite operations result of the TCP being implemented

Traffic Stop work until an Control investigation has been Plans undertake into the incident. Traffic Controller to amend No response required There are to be changes Response TCP on site and to keep a log Continue monitoring TCPs. made to the TCP to ensure of all changes that the safety of all workers, students and civilians are catered for.

Minor quantities of dust in the Large quantities of dust in the Trigger No observable dust air and tracking on to the road air and tracking on to the road Dust No response required Review the SWMP / ESCP Review and investigate Response Continue monitoring program and investigate construction construction activities and activities and respective respective control measures.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 36

Risk Condition Green Condition Amber Condition Red

control measures, where If it is concluded that appropriate. Implement construction activities were additional remedial measures, directly responsible for the such as: exceedance, submit an incident report to government - Deployment of agencies. additional water Implement relevant sprays responses and undertake - Relocation or immediate review to avoid modification of such occurrence in future. dust-generating

sources

- Check condition of vibrating grids to ensure they are functioning correctly.

- Temporary halting of activities and resuming when conditions have improved

It is therefore proposed to incorporate the above items within the communications strategy. The contingency plan outlines the most effective methods to ensure that each item identified within the Monitoring Program is adhered to, resulting in the impacts to the wider community being minimised. It also represents the efforts undertaken to continually improve CTMP and ensure that the process being utilised are indeed best practice.

6.3 Communications Strategy

A communications strategy shall be established by the Contractor. The contractor is to notify the community liaison representative when traffic is expected to exceed the parameters set within “Condition Green” of Table 5. Notwithstanding, Table 12 outlines an indicative communication strategy to ensure that adequate communication with key stakeholders have been met.

Table 12: Communication Strategy

Risk Impact Comms Channel

Wider Traffic Wider community and stakeholders informed through local and Disruption wider advertising and notification

Ensure construction crews use traffic routes identified in the Stakeholder Meetings Traffic Management Plan, Stakeholder email blast Construction related and traffic Ensure residents in area are notified in advance to any traffic changes that may affect them

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 37

6.4 Community Consultation

As per the strategy outlined above, the consultation process has begun with regards to the following stakeholders (as outlined below), and also provides a description to any response received.

Table 13: Stakeholder Communication

Stakeholder Consultation Response

Continued consultation with TfNSW has been undertake, with an outline of RFI’s by TfNSW TfNSW being addressed within Section 1.9

Discussions are ongoing with Penrith City Council, with initial consultation being Council undertaken through phone and email on 16 Nov 2020 (see attached correspondence within Appendix C). Further consultation will be undertaken.

A virtual consultation meeting was held with all three School Principals on the 4th of February 2021. The meetings included an overview of the proposed development and The Anglican Schools Corporation CTMP and comments and queries were responded to, either during the meeting or via follow up emails. Details of the meeting can be found at Appendix C

A virtual consultation meeting was held with all three School Principals on the 4th of February 2021. The meetings included an overview of the proposed development and Emmaus Catholic College CTMP and comments and queries were responded to, either during the meeting or via follow up emails. Details of the meeting can be found at Appendix C

A consultation meeting was held with the Manager – Emmaus Retirement Village and Manager – Emmaus Aged Care Home on the 3rd of February 2021. The meetings Emmaus Catholic Care Village included an overview of the proposed development and CTMP and comments and queries were responded to, either during the meeting or via follow up emails. Details of the meeting can be found at Appendix C

A virtual consultation meeting was held with all three School Principals on the 4th of February 2021. The meetings included an overview of the proposed development and Trinity Catholic Primary School CTMP and comments and queries were responded to, either during the meeting or via follow up emails. Details of the meeting can be found at Appendix C

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/20211 Kemps Creek West Estate; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan Page 38

Appendix A

Drivers Code of Conduct

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

Safe Driving Policy for MSP internal construction activities.

Objectives of the Drivers Code of conduct

▪ To minimise the impact of earthworks and construction on the local and regional road network; ▪ Minimise conflict with other road users; ▪ Minimise road traffic noise; ▪ Ensure truck drivers use project approved routes only, and ▪ All access and egress to/from Mamre Road will be limited to left in / left out only.

Code of Conduct

The code of conduct requires that while driving any vehicle for work-related purposes. Drivers are to be issues with a copy of the Drivers Code of Conduct, and must comply with all of the following:

▪ Demonstrate safe driving and road safety activities. ▪ Abide by traffic, road and environmental legislations. ▪ Follow site signage and instructions. ▪ Drivers must only enter and exit the site via the approved entry and exit points and travel routes.

The below activities in any vehicles will be considered as a breach of conduct and will result in removal from site:

▪ Reckless or dangerous driving causing injury or death. ▪ Driving whilst disqualified or not correctly licensed. ▪ Drinking or being under the influence of drugs while driving ▪ Failing to stop after an incident. ▪ Loss of demerit points leading to suspension of licence. ▪ Any actions that warrant the suspension of a licence ▪ Exceeding the speed limit in place on any permanent or temporary roads ▪ The use of roads other than internal roads, and Mamre Road to arrive and/depart from the site to access the wider road network.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

Driver Responsibilities

All Drivers on site must:

▪ Be responsible and accountable for their actions when operating a company vehicle or driving for the purposes of work. ▪ Display the highest level of professional conduct when driving a vehicle at all times. ▪ Ensure they have a current driver licence for the class of vehicle they are driving, and this licence is to be carried at all times. ▪ Immediately notify their supervisor or manager if their drivers’ licence has been suspended, cancelled, or has had limitations applied. ▪ Comply with all traffic and road legislation when driving. ▪ Assess hazards while driving. ▪ Undertake daily pre-start checks of oil, tyre pressures, radiator and battery levels of company vehicles they regularly used. ▪ Drive within the legal speed limits, including driving to the conditions. ▪ Not drive outside of the approved heavy vehicle routes. All drivers must obey weight, length and height restrictions imposed by the National Vehicle Regulator, and other Government agencies. Heavy Vehicles shall adhere to the routes outlined in below figures (during interim construction access stage):

Entry Movements

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

Entry Movements

▪ Access the Site via Mamre Road / Bakers Lane upgraded signal following completion of the upgrade works at this signalised intersection. ▪ Be cognisant of the noise and emissions requirements imposed within the EIS, and in a broader sense, the NSW/ Australian Road Rules. Works must be constructed with the aim of achieving the construction noise management levels detailed in the Interim Construction Noise Guideline. ▪ Do not queue on public roads unless a prior approval has been sought. ▪ Be aware that at no time may a tracked plant be permitted or required on a paved road. ▪ Never drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription and over the counter medication if they cause drowsiness – to do so will merit disciplinary measures. ▪ All drivers to report to their supervisor if they have been prescribed medication prior to the start of work. ▪ Wear a safety seat belt at all times when in the vehicle. ▪ Avoid distraction when driving – the driver will adjust car stereos/mirrors etc. before setting off or pull over safely to do so. ▪ Report ALL near-misses, crashes and scrapes to their manager, ▪ Report infringements to a manager at the earliest opportunity. ▪ Report vehicle defects to a manager prior to the next use of the vehicle. ▪ Follow the approved site access/egress routes only. ▪ Follow speed limits as imposed within the estate. ▪ Keep loads covered at all times.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

The Site Team Responsibilities

The Contractor is responsible to take all steps necessary to ensure company vehicles are as safe as possible and will not require staff to drive under conditions that are unsafe.

This will be achieved by undertaking the following:

▪ Ensuring all vehicles are well maintained and that the equipment enhances driver, operator and passenger safety by way of:

• Pre-commencement checks for all new plant arriving on-site and prior to undertaking any work.

• Daily prestart inspections for all plant, vehicles and equipment currently on-site.

• All construction plant must be fitted with a flashing light, fire extinguisher and reverse alarms (or squawkers).

• Ensure all operators onsite have a current verification of competency (VOC) for their current driver’s licence of the appropriate class.

• Ensure maintenance requirements are met and recorded. ▪ Identify driver training needs and arranging appropriate training or re-training. This may include providing the below:

• Operator VOC assessment as part of all inductions.

• Regular Toolbox discussions on safety features, managing fatigue, approved heavy routes, driver responsibility and drink-driving. ▪ Encouraging Safe Driving behaviour by:

• Ensuring the subcontractor is informed if their staff become unlicensed.

• Not covering or reimbursing staff speeding or other infringement notices

• Ensuring Legal use of mobile phones in vehicles while driving only and that illegal use is not undertaken. ▪ Encouraging better fuel efficiency by:

• Use of other transport modes or remote conferencing, whenever practical.

• Providing training on, and circulating information about, travel planning and efficient driving habits.

Crash or incident Procedure

▪ Stop your vehicle as close to it as possible to the scene, making sure you are not hindering traffic. Ensure your own safety first, then help any injured people and seek assistance immediately if required. ▪ Ensure the following information is noted:

• Details of the other vehicles and registration numbers

• Names and addresses of the other vehicle drivers.

• Names and addresses of witnesses.

• Insurers details

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

▪ Give the following information to the involved parties:

• Name, address and company details ▪ If the damaged vehicle is not occupied, provide a note with your contact details for the owner to contact the company. ▪ Ensure that the police are contacted should the following circumstances occur:

• If there is a disagreement over the cause of the crash.

• If there are injuries.

• If you damage property other than your own. ▪ As soon as reasonably practical, report all details gathered to your manager.

Environmental Procedures

A range of measures — including those detailed in the Environmental and Sedimentation Control Plan (ESCP); Appendix F of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan — shall be implemented to ensure the following;

▪ No dirt or debris from the construction vehicles is tracked on to the public road network; ▪ Reduce the impacts to sensitive receivers, including, where practicable, starting noisy equipment away from sensitive receivers and implementing respite periods; ▪ Watering of dusty activities will be undertaken, or activities temporarily halted and then resumed once weather conditions have improved; ▪ Containment measures for spillages will be provided at appropriate locations and in close proximity to staff car park areas, dangerous goods stores areas and main Project work areas; ▪ All vibratory compactors must not be used closer than 30 metres from residential buildings unless vibration monitoring confirms compliance with the vibration criteria, and ▪ Keep an accurate record which includes the range of measures undertaken to reduce environmental impacts.

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

Appendix B

Lot 8 Access Swept Paths

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

PROVIDE TEMPORARY RMS SIGN " NO LEFT TURN (R2-6n_L) + ‘CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES ACEPTED' (R9-203-1)"

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

CONSULT AUSTRALIA

Appendix C

Community Consultation

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

James Laidler

From: Alison Veron Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2020 3:34 PM To: Naiem Teghlobi Cc: Peter Wood Subject: Letter from Penrith City Council regarding Construction Environmental Management Plan for SSD 9522 at Kemps Creek Attachments: ECM 9399396 Letter to Frasers regarding SSD9522 Kemps Creek CEMP Consultation.pdf

Importance: High

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.

Good Afternoon,

I refer to your email dated 2 December 2020 regarding the above State Significant development and request for Penrith City Council to provide comments on this matter.

Please find attached response from Penrith City Council regarding this matter.

Alison Veron Secretary - Environment & City Development

E [email protected] T +612 4732 7776 | F +612 4732 7958 PO Box 60, PENRITH NSW 2751 www.visitpenrith.com.au www.penrithcity.nsw.gov.au

#ECMBODY #RESPOND 9399396

1 Our reference: ECM: 9399396 Contact: Peter Wood Telephone: (02) 4732 7577

8 December 2020

Naiem Teghlobi, Senior Project Manager Frasers Property Industrial

Sent by email: [email protected]

Dear Mr Teghlobi,

Construction Environmental Management Plan for SSD 9522 at Kemps Creek

I refer to your email dated 2 December 2020 regarding the above State Significant development and request for Penrith City Council to provide comments on this matter.

The CTMP is acceptable for the proposed development subject to dilapidation reports on existing Council assets within Bakers Lane and James Erskine Drive (construction traffic routes on Council owned roads).

Any pavement failures on Bakers Lane during construction needs to be rectified by the developers and the pavements need to be rehabilitated at the end of the development.

Should you have any further questions, please contact me on (02) 4732 7577.

Yours sincerely

Peter Wood Development Services Manager James Laidler

From: Robert Nastasi Sent: Friday, 4 December 2020 11:43 AM To: James Laidler Subject: Re: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Dear James

Many thanks for this detail and I understand that the impact on Baker's lane and the safety of our community will be minimum to nil during this development.

Wishing you well and a happy christmas

Regards

Rob N

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:53, Emmaus Kemps Creek wrote:

God Bless, Emmaus Catholic College PH: 02 9670 8300 FAX: 02 9670 8399

------Forwarded message ------From: James Laidler Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:52 Subject: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek To: [email protected] Cc: Tim Lewis , Ali Rasouli , Naiem Teghlobi , Michaela Leerdam

Dear Robert,

On behalf of the Altis and Frasers JV (as developer), Ason Group is commencing consultation with schools located within a close proximity to the construction of the proposed warehouse, logistics and industrial facilities hub at 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. This consultation is aimed to provide you with an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed traffic management measures to be adopted during the period of construction.

1 during the construction phase of the project; it provides a summary of planned truck movements, associated impacts and other mitigating measures. Importantly, it is noted that this Plan relates to the on-site works only and a separate construction traffic management plan is expected to be prepared for works associated with the upgrade of Mamre Road itself.

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the construction site is located at the western side of Mamre Road and the haulage routes confirms that truck movements are not expected to impact Bakers Lane near your school. Accordingly, the construction traffic is unlikely to have any material impact on this section of Bakers Lane.

We understand that you are the relevant point of contact at Emmaus Catholic College. If not, can you please forward this email to the relevant contacts within your organisation and advise us of that alternative contact?

We are asking you to provide any comments, via return email to [email protected] or [email protected] by COB 11 Dec 2020, and note that if we do not receive a response within that time, we will assume you have no comments or objections to the proposed works.

If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contact me on the details provided below.

Thanks and regards,

James Laidler

Traffic Engineer | Ason Group

T: +61 2 9083 6601 | M: +61 421 209 996 | E: [email protected]

A: Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000

2 --

Principal

Robert Nastasi

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 9670 8300

Fax: 98343403

To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented auto matic download of this picture from the In ternet.

The Emmaus Pillars-Faith; Mercy; Respect; Service; Hospitality

'Curiosity to Clarity: Celebrating 200 years'

2020 ECC focus: ; Learning; Transforming learning; Attendance; Positive Behaviour focus; Respect; Growth; Wellbeing

3 James Laidler

From: James Laidler Sent: Tuesday, 15 December 2020 9:42 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Tim Lewis; Ali Rasouli; Naiem Teghlobi; Michaela Leerdam Subject: RE: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek Attachments: P1281r01v4 SSD CTMP_657-769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek.pdf

Dear Cathy,

Following on from the below request for consultation, we note that we have not received a response from Trinity Catholic Primary School.

In the spirit of providing all with an opportunity to respond, we are extending the opportunity to respond to COB Wednesday 16 Dec 2020. Again, if we do not receive a response within this updated timeframe, we will assume you have no comments or objections to the proposed works.

We are asking you to provide these comments via return email to [email protected] or [email protected].

Regards,

James Laidler Traffic Engineer | Ason Group

T: +61 2 9083 6601 | M: +61 421 209 996 | E: [email protected] A: Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000

From: James Laidler Sent: Friday, 4 December 2020 10:59 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Tim Lewis ; Ali Rasouli ; Naiem Teghlobi ; Michaela Leerdam Subject: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek

Dear Cathy,

1 On behalf of the Altis and Frasers JV (as developer), Ason Group is commencing consultation with schools located within a close proximity to the construction of the proposed warehouse, logistics and industrial facilities hub at 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. This consultation is aimed to provide you with an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed traffic management measures to be adopted during the period of construction.

In this regard, please find attached a copy of the draft Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) for your review and feedback. The attached documentation has been prepared to inform traffic management protocols during the construction phase of the project; it provides a summary of planned truck movements, associated impacts and other mitigating measures. Importantly, it is noted that this Plan relates to the on-site works only and a separate construction traffic management plan is expected to be prepared for works associated with the upgrade of Mamre Road itself.

We understand that you are the relevant point of contact at Trinity Catholic Primary School. If not, can you please forward this email to the relevant contacts within your organisation and advise us of that alternative contact?

If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contact me on the details provided below.

Thanks and regards,

James Laidler Traffic Engineer | Ason Group

T: +61 2 9083 6601 | M: +61 421 209 996 | E: [email protected] A: Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000

2 James Laidler

From: James Laidler Sent: Tuesday, 15 December 2020 9:40 AM To: '[email protected]' Cc: 'Naiem Teghlobi'; 'Michaela Leerdam'; Ali Rasouli; Tim Lewis Subject: RE: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek Attachments: P1281r01v4 SSD CTMP_657-769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek.pdf

Dear Charlotte,

Following on from the below request for consultation, we note that we have not received a response from The Anglicans Schools Corporation.

We are asking you to provide these comments via return email to [email protected] or [email protected].

Regards,

James Laidler Traffic Engineer | Ason Group

T: +61 2 9083 6601 | M: +61 421 209 996 | E: [email protected] A: Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000

From: James Laidler Sent: Friday, 4 December 2020 10:40 AM To: '[email protected]' Cc: Naiem Teghlobi ; Michaela Leerdam ; Ali Rasouli ; Tim Lewis Subject: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek

Dear Charlotte,

We understand that you are the relevant point of contact at The Anglican Schools Corporation. If not, can you please forward this email to the relevant contacts within your organisation and advise us of that alternative contact?

If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contact me on the details provided below.

Thanks and regards,

James Laidler Traffic Engineer | Ason Group

T: +61 2 9083 6601 | M: +61 421 209 996 | E: [email protected] A: Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000

2 James Laidler

From: James Laidler Sent: Tuesday, 15 December 2020 9:41 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Tim Lewis; Ali Rasouli; Naiem Teghlobi; Michaela Leerdam Subject: RE: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek Attachments: P1281r01v4 SSD CTMP_657-769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek.pdf

To Whom it May Concern,

Following on from the below request for consultation, we note that we have not received a response from Emmaus Catholic Care Village.

We are asking you to provide these comments via return email to [email protected] or [email protected].

Regards,

James Laidler Traffic Engineer | Ason Group

T: +61 2 9083 6601 | M: +61 421 209 996 | E: [email protected] A: Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000

From: James Laidler Sent: Friday, 4 December 2020 10:58 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Tim Lewis ; Ali Rasouli ; Naiem Teghlobi ; Michaela Leerdam Subject: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek

To Whom It May Concern,

1 On behalf of the Altis and Frasers JV (as developer), Ason Group is commencing consultation with healthcare facilities located within a close proximity to the construction of the proposed warehouse, logistics and industrial facilities hub at 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. This consultation is aimed to provide you with an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed traffic management measures to be adopted during the period of construction.

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the construction site is located at the western side of Mamre Road and the haulage routes confirms that truck movements are not expected to impact Bakers Lane near your healthcare facility. Accordingly, the construction traffic is unlikely to have any material impact on this section of Bakers Lane.

We understand that this is the relevant point of contact for Emmaus Catholic Care Village. If not, can you please forward this email to the relevant contacts within your organisation and advise us of that alternative contact?

If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contact me on the details provided below.

Thanks and regards,

James Laidler Traffic Engineer | Ason Group

T: +61 2 9083 6601 | M: +61 421 209 996 | E: [email protected] A: Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000

2 James Laidler

From: James Laidler Sent: Friday, 4 December 2020 10:58 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Tim Lewis; Ali Rasouli; Naiem Teghlobi; Michaela Leerdam Subject: Community Consultation: 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek Attachments: P1281r01v4 SSD CTMP_657-769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek.pdf

To Whom It May Concern,

On behalf of the Altis and Frasers JV (as developer), Ason Group is commencing consultation with healthcare facilities located within a close proximity to the construction of the proposed warehouse, logistics and industrial facilities hub at 657 – 769 Mamre Road, Kemps Creek. This consultation is aimed to provide you with an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed traffic management measures to be adopted during the period of construction.

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the construction site is located at the western side of Mamre Road and the haulage routes confirms that truck movements are not expected to impact Bakers Lane near your healthcare facility. Accordingly, the construction traffic is unlikely to have any material impact on this section of Bakers Lane.

If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to contact me on the details provided below.

Thanks and regards,

James Laidler Traffic Engineer | Ason Group

T: +61 2 9083 6601 | M: +61 421 209 996 | E: [email protected] A: Suite 5.02, Level 5, 1 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000

Memorandum

To: Naiem Teghlobi – Frasers Property Australia Pty Ltd James Laidler – Ason Group From: Kate McKinnon Date: 11 February 2021 Subject: Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Hub Consultation Summary Construction Traffic Management Plan

CONFIDENTIALITY This document is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not a named or authorised recipient you must not read, copy, distribute or act in reliance on it. If you have received this document in error, please telephone our operator immediately and return the document by mail.

SLR Consulting have been engaged to undertake consultation with relevant stakeholders regarding the Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) prepared for the Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub including construction and operation of eight warehouses comprising 162,355 m2 of floor space, 744 parking spaces and 21-lot Torrens Title Subdivision (over two stages). The development has been approved under SSD 9522 with consultation on the CTMP forming condition B1(b) of the consent.

Condition B1(b) of SSD 9522 states:

Prior to the commencement of construction, the Applicant must prepare a Construction Traffic Management Plan for the development to the satisfaction of the Planning Secretary. The plan must form part of the CEMP required by condition C2 and must: … (b) be prepared in consultation with Council, TfNSW, The Anglican Schools Corporation, Emmaus Catholic College, Catholic Healthcare Emmaus Retirement Village, Catholic Healthcare Emmaus Residential Aged Care Home and Trinity Catholic Primary School

Meetings were arranged with each of the stakeholders listed within condition B1(b) to consult on the draft CTMP and address any questions or comments raised by these parties in relation to construction traffic and the approved development. Meetings times, location and attendees are listed in Table 1 below.

Table 1 Meeting attendees and details Attendees Time, date and location Rosemary Chapman (Manager - Emmaus Retirement Village) 10:00AM 3rd February 2021 Leo Sibal (Manager - Emmaus Aged Care Home) Kemps Creek Sports and Bowling Club James Laidler (Ason) Dan Thompson (SLR Consulting) Kate McKinnon (SLR Consulting)

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, The Central Building, UoW Innovation Campus North Wollongong NSW 2500 Australia T: +61 2 4249 1000 E: [email protected] www.slrconsulting.com ABN 29 001 584 612 Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Hub SLR Ref: 660.30061.00000-M01-v0.1- Consultation Summary 20210211Consultation Summary FINAL.docx Construction Traffic Management Plan Date: 11 February 2021

Attendees Time, date and location Cathy Hey (Principal - Trinity Primary School) 12:30PM 4th February 2021 Cathie Graydon (Principal - Mamre Anglican School) Virtual (Microsoft Teams) Robert Nastasi (Principal – Emmaus Catholic College) James Laidler (Ason) Kate McKinnon (SLR Consulting)

The minutes of the meetings are enclosed at Attachment 1.

Key queries and comments raised regarding the CTMP during consultation and a response to each item are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Comments and responses raised during consultation Comment or Question Response What is to stop construction traffic using Bakers It is the intent of the CTMP to prohibit the use of Bakers Lane East as a short cut to loop around and head Lane East by any construction traffic related to the south when leaving the site? project, with this requirement included explicitly within the CTMP to ensure compliance. Are traffic control measures proposed on Mamre Traffic control measures for Mamre Road are included in Road? the CTMP. Are Penrith City Council (PCC) aware of the The draft CTMP has been referred to PCC with project and the use of Mamre Road and Bakers responding comments received. PCC comments have Lane intersection and have they been consulted been addressed within the current draft CTMP. with regarding the CTMP? Can construction traffic access and egress to the As this new development will not utilise Bakers Lane upgraded Mamre Road/Bakers Lane intersection (East), peak hour restrictions of heavy vehicle within be prohibited during school pick up and drop off Mamre Road would not be considered a feasible option, times? given that this will be the only access point for the site once the intersection has been upgraded there is no direct impact to the Schools along Bakers Lane (East). The proposed intersection upgrade is designed to increase capacity and efficiency within Mamre Rd and Bakers Lane, while also providing better opportunities for traffic flow through the intersection – including access to and from Bakers Lane (East). When is the project is expected to commence Construction is expected to utilise the temporary left-in- construction and what are the timeframes for left-out access until the intersection of Mamre Road / use of the interim and ultimate construction Bakers Lane is constructed. accesses? Timeframes indicated outline that the temporary access shall be in operation for a period of 18 – 20 months, whereby after that all access is to utilise the upgraded intersection. In terms of timeframes, it is proposed that construction shall commence March/April 2021 and therefore the upgraded intersection of Mamre Road/ Bakers Lane is expected to be completed in approximately September to December of 2022.

Page 2

Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Hub SLR Ref: 660.30061.00000-M01-v0.1- Consultation Summary 20210211Consultation Summary FINAL.docx Construction Traffic Management Plan Date: 11 February 2021

The above responses were provided to attendees during the meetings where possible. Where further information or clarification beyond the meeting was required, responses were sent to all attendees via email as well as a copy of the meetings minutes. Copies of the email correspondence are enclosed at Attachment 2. The final CTMP will be distributed to all stakeholders for reference once approved.

The consultation required under B1(b) of SSD 9522 is concluded. Should you have any questions please contact the undersigned.

Kind Regards,

Kate McKinnon Associate SLR Consulting

Checked/ Authorised by: DT

Attachment 1: Minutes of Consultation Meetings

Attachment 2: Email Correspondence with Stakeholders

Page 3

Attachment 1

CTMP Consultation - Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities

Minutes 03/02/2021 10:00AM Kemps Creek Sporting and Bowling Club

Rosemary Chapman (Emmaus Retirement Village), Leo Sibal (Emmaus Aged Care Home), James ATTENDEES Laidler (Ason), Dan Thompson (SLR Consulting), Kate McKinnon (SLR Consulting) APOLOGIES Nil

MINUTES TAKER Kate McKinnon

ITEM DISCUSSION ACTIONS General discussion and summary of approved development including: • Construction and operation of a Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub, comprising nine (9) buildings in Stage 1 only. This incorporates ancillary office space, amenities, hardstand parking and loading areas and landscaping. The facilities will operate on a 24-hour, 7-day basis, consistent General with the adjacent Erskine Park Industrial Areas. overview of • Upgrade of the existing Bakers Lane intersection and construction of new development signalised intersection along Mamre Road providing a connection to the proposed Southern Link Road • Subdivision of the overall Site into 33 Torrens Title allotments over three (3) stages. • Bulk earthworks (in two stages) and estate works across the whole site including internal estate roads (to be dedicated to Council) and civil works CTMP Discussed a condition of SSD9522 requiring consultation with Bakers Lane purpose and Stakeholders regarding the proposed Construction Traffic Management Plan. summary Outlined the general inclusions of a CTMP Discussed measures outlined within the CTMP of direct influence or importance to the attending stakeholders including: Interim and Ultimate construction access locations from Mamre Road Key CTMP inclusions Construction traffic direction for entry and egress from the site (northbound only) Discussed intersection upgrade (Mamre Road/Bakers Lane) for ultimate construction traffic access to site. Both stakeholders expressed general concerns with congestions currently Discussion: experienced on Mamre Road along its full extent. JL advised that consideration of broad issues Mamre Road and surrounding road network was made within the original Traffic congestion Impact Assessment for SSD9522, with State Government considering the impacts Mamre Road acceptable. Discussed generally the future proposed road to traverse the subject site identified as the Southern Link Road (SLR). Advised that whilst the approved Discussion: development has been designed to incorporate future access to the SLR, the SLR construction and timing of roll out of the SLR is dependant on external government parties.

Filename: Meeting Minutes-2021203.docx

Page 1

Minutes of Meeting Filename: Meeting CTMP Consultation - Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Minutes-2021203.docx

ITEM DISCUSSION ACTIONS

KM Minutes to be provided, final Final Actions Stakeholders were advised that they would be provided a copy of these minutes CTMP to be and Close and the final CTMP. Meeting Closed provided once produced

Page 2

CTMP Consultation - Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities

Minutes 04/02/2021 12:30PM Virtual (Microsoft Teams)

Cathy Hey (Trinity Primary School), Cathie Graydon (Mamre Anglican School), Robert Nastasi ATTENDEES (Emmaus Catholic College), James Laidler (Ason), Kate McKinnon (SLR Consulting) APOLOGIES Nil

MINUTES TAKER Kate McKinnon

ACTIONS ITEM DISCUSSION General discussion and summary of approved development including: • Construction and operation of a Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub, comprising nine (9) buildings in Stage 1 only. This incorporates ancillary office space, amenities, hardstand parking and loading areas and landscaping. The facilities will operate on a 24-hour, 7- General day basis, consistent with the adjacent Erskine Park Industrial Areas. overview of • Upgrade of the existing Bakers Lane intersection and construction of new development signalised intersection along Mamre Road providing a connection to the proposed Southern Link Road • Subdivision of the overall Site into 33 Torrens Title allotments over three (3) stages. • Bulk earthworks (in two stages) and estate works across the whole site including internal estate roads (to be dedicated to Council) and civil works Discussed condition of SSD9522 requiring consultation with Bakers Lane CTMP purpose Stakeholders regarding the proposed Construction Traffic Management Plan and summary (CTMP). Outlined the general inclusions of a CTMP Discussed measures outlined within the CTMP of direct influence or importance to the attending stakeholders including: Interim and Ultimate construction access locations from Mamre Road Key CTMP Construction traffic direction for entry and egress from the site (northbound inclusions only) Discussed intersection upgrade (Mamre Road/Bakers Lane) for ultimate construction traffic access to site. CH asked what was to stop construction traffic utilising Bakers Lane East and JL include explicit Aldington Road to loop back to head southbound on Mamre. exclusion of use of Discussion: JL advised it was the intent of the CTMP to prohibit the use of Bakers Lane East Bakers Lane East Bakers Lane East by any construction traffic related to the project and this could be included to construction explicitly within the CTMP to ensure compliance with this intention. traffic within the Confirmation that this has occurred to be provided. CTMP Discussion: CG asked whether traffic control measures were proposed along Mamre Road Traffic Control to ensure safety of other road users – particularly school related road users. on Mamre Road

Filename: Meeting Minutes-20210214.docx

Page 1

Minutes of Meeting Filename: Meeting CTMP Consultation - Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Minutes-20210214.docx

ACTIONS ITEM DISCUSSION JL advised that traffic control measures for Mamre Road are included in the CTMP. CG asked if Penrith City Council (PCC) were aware of the project and the use of Discussion: PCC Mamre Road and Bakers Lane intersection and whether they had been awareness of consulted with regarding the CTMP project and JL advised that the draft CTMP has been referred to PCC with responding CTMP comments received. PCC comments have been addressed within the current draft CTMP. JL to ascertain Discussion: CG asked if construction traffic access and egress to the upgraded Mamre whether Construction Road/Bakers Lane intersection could be prohibited during school pick up and construction access during drop off times. traffic can be school peak JL response to this request will need to be considered outside of this meeting, prohibited during drop off/pick up response to be provided once decision determined. school pick up/ times drop off times CH asked when the project is expected to commence construction and the KM to obtain timeframes for use of the interim and ultimate construction accesses. projected start KM the developers expected commencement is unknown, to be followed up date from Discussion: and response to be provided after meeting developer Timeframes JL following commencement, the interim access is expected to be utilised for approximately 1.5 – 2 years, with access switching to the ultimate access once upgrade of the Mamre Road/Bakers Lane intersection is complete. Discussed generally the future proposed road to traverse the subject site identified as the Southern Link Road. All stakeholders were concerned JL to seek out regarding the proposed linkage to Bakers Lane from the Mamre Road further intersection as illustrated as part of the broader SLR package. information on Discussion: SLR JL advised that whilst the approved development has been designed to Mamre Road incorporate future access to the SLR, the layout, construction and timing of roll upgrade and SLR out of the road is dependent on external government parties. Notwithstanding, tie in at further information will be sought regarding the proposed intention for this intersection intersection and distributed to the schools for their reference. KM Minutes to be provided, final Final Actions Stakeholders were advised that they would be provided a copy of these CTMP to be and Close minutes, a response to the actions noted and the final CTMP. Meeting Closed provided once produced

Page 2 Attachment 2

Kate McKinnon

From: Kate McKinnon Sent: Sunday, 14 February 2021 6:24 PM To: 'Rosemary Chapman'; Leo Sibal Cc: Dan Thompson; James Laidler Subject: CTMP Consultation Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub - Minutes and Response to Queries Attachments: Meeting Minutes-2021203.pdf

Hi Leo and Rosemary,

Please find attached the minutes of our meeting last week to discuss the CTMP for the Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub.

In the course of consultation with you and the other Bakers Lane stakeholders, we recorded a number of questions and queries. These are listed, along with a response below:

Can we request that trucks do not utilise intersection of Bakers and Mamre during School peak drop off and pick up times? As this new development will not utilise Bakers Lane (East), peak hour restrictions of heavy vehicle within Mamre Road would not be considered a feasible option, given that this will be the only access point for the site once the intersection has been upgraded there is no direct impact to the Schools along Bakers Lane (East). The proposed intersection upgrade is designed to increase capacity and efficiency within Mamre Rd and Bakers Lane, while also providing better opportunities for traffic flow through the intersection – including access to and from Bakers Lane (East).

Can we explicitly express within the CTMP that construction traffic is never to utilise Bakers Lane East? Yes, this will be expressly included in the final CTMP – making this requirement binding

What are the expected start dates for construction? What are the timeframes for the interim and ultimate construction access? As outlined within the community consultation, construction is expected to utilise the temporary left-in-left-out access until the intersection of Mamre Road / Bakers Lane is constructed. Timeframes indicated outline that the temporary access shall be in operation for a period of 18 – 20 months, whereby after that all access is to utilise the upgraded intersection. In terms of timeframes, it is proposed that construction shall commence March/April 2021 and therefore the upgraded intersection of Mamre Road / Bakers Lane is expected to be completed in approximately September to December of 2022.

Are there plans available of the proposed upgraded intersection of Mamre and Bakers? (Interim upgrade exclusive of SLR construction) Currently the Mamre Road upgrade is in the planning stage, with the final design yet to be determined, therefore there are no detailed plans available of the proposed intersection upgrades. The State Government / TfNSW is continuing to work on the Mamre Road upgrade project, and periodically releases community updates. Notwithstanding, the concept plans shown within our consultation meeting can be found on the projects website which can be found here. Additionally, reference can be made to the draft Mamre Road Precinct DCP in relation to (currently envisaged) road network(s), which can be found here and illustrated below.

1 Thankyou both again for your time, questions and input. Please advise if you have any further questions on this matter, we will forward a copy of the Final CTMP once it’s been drafted for your reference.

Kind Regards,

Kate

Kate McKinnon Associate - Environmental Assessment & Management

2 +61 2 4249 1010 +61 2 4249 1000 +61 402 626 049 [email protected]

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, The Central Building, Innovation Campus, Squires Way, North Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2500

3 Kate McKinnon

From: Kate McKinnon Sent: Sunday, 14 February 2021 6:24 PM To: Catherine Hey; Cathie Graydon; Robert Nastasi Cc: Dan Thompson; James Laidler Subject: CTMP Consultation Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub - Minutes and Response to Queries Attachments: Meeting Minutes-20210214.pdf

Hi Cathie, Cathy and Rob,

Please find attached the minutes of our meeting last week to discuss the CTMP for the Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub.

In the course of consultation with you and the other Bakers Lane stakeholders, we recorded a number of questions and queries. These are listed, along with a response below:

Can we explicitly express within the CTMP that construction traffic is never to utilise Bakers Lane East? Yes, this will be expressly included in the final CTMP – making this requirement binding

1 Thankyou all again for your time, questions and input. Please advise if you have any further questions on this matter, we will forward a copy of the Final CTMP once it’s been drafted for your reference.

Kind Regards,

Kate

Kate McKinnon Associate - Environmental Assessment & Management 2 +61 2 4249 1010 +61 2 4249 1000 +61 402 626 049 [email protected]

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, The Central Building, Innovation Campus, Squires Way, North Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2500

Appendix D

Traffic Control Plan

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

www.invarion.com Installed as per TCP and in accordance with any Key: changes, as shown on TCP. Construction Team leader (on site): Zone

Signature: Site Fencing

Date: Access Gate

Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle appropriate ticket):

Ticket No:

Reason for modification:

80.0 m 80.0 m

Mamre Road m 160 ON LEFT

W8207 (L) W522 W522

NOTES Closure: Project: Date: Trucks Turning Job No: 0696 1281 22/01/2021 Address: Reserve Road, St Leonards Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek Scale @ A3: Client: Drawing Title: Frasers 1281SP01Mamre Rd_Kemps Creek Drawing Number: DESIGNER: JAMES LAIDLER AG.01 CERT: 0052158569

Appendix E

Correspondence from DPIE

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

James Laidler

From: Travis Lythall Sent: Monday, 15 March 2021 10:53 AM To: David Schwebel Cc: Stephen O'Connor; Paul Solomon; William Hodgkinson; Naiem Teghlobi; Mark Linfoot Subject: RE: SSD-9522 CEMP

David,

Thanks for providing clarification with respect to the below. Much appreciated.

Regards, Travis.

Travis Lythall Associate

A National Town Planning Consultancy SYDNEY | NEWCASTLE | GOLD COAST | BRISBANE

T 02 9929 6974 | M 0447 493 097 | L

E [email protected] | W www.willowtreeplanning.com.au

P Suite 4, Level 7, 100 Walker Street, North Sydney

ISO 9001:2015 Certificate number: 54 146 035 707 – Q

This e-mail and attachments (if any) is intended only for the addressee(s) and is subject to copyright. This email contains information which may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically stated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender

From: David Schwebel Sent: Monday, 15 March 2021 10:51 AM To: Travis Lythall Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; William Hodgkinson Subject: SSD-9522 CEMP

Hi Travis

I refer to the CEMP submitted for the Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub (SSD-9522) and the RFI letter issued by the Department on Friday (12/3/21).

We have received confirmation from TfNSW that they have reviewed and accepted the latest version of the CTMP that forms part of the CEMP. As such, the first point under the CTMP heading in Attachment A of the RFI letter is considered to be satisfied and no further information is required in relation to consultation with TfNSW.

Please contact me if you wish to discuss any other matters in the RFI letter.

1 Regards

David Schwebel Planning Officer, Industry Assessments Planning & Assessment | Department of Planning, Industry and Environment T 02 9274 6400 | 4 Parramatta Square, 12 Darcy Street, Parramatta NSW 2150 www.dpie.nsw.gov.au

The Department of Planning, Industry and Environment acknowledges that it stands on Aboriginal land. We acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land and we show our respect for elders past, present and emerging through thoughtful and collaborative approaches to our work, seeking to demonstrate our ongoing commitment to providing places in which Aboriginal people are included socially, culturally and economically.

Appendix F

Evidence of Dilapidation Reports

P1281r01v9.1 | 30/03/2021 Kemps Creek West Estate ; 657 – 769 Mamre Rd, Kemps Creek | Construction Traffic Management Plan

James Laidler

From: Bill Stavropoulos Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2021 1:19 PM To: George Elhage Cc: Ruhul Chowdhury; Joekarl Diaz; Naiem Teghlobi; Michaela Leerdam; Paul Solomon; Stephen O'Connor Subject: RE: TfNSW Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) Comments - SSDA 9522

Hi George,

TfNSW accepts the submitted CTMP for the operation of the temporary access off Mamre Road in Kemps Creek.

Regards,

Bill

Bill Stavropoulos Project/Contract Manager Greater Sydney Transport for NSW

M 0400 478 924 129a-139 Orchardleigh Street, Yennora, NSW 2161

From: George Elhage [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, 1 March 2021 2:44 PM To: Bill Stavropoulos Cc: Ruhul Chowdhury ; Joekarl Diaz ; 'Naiem Teghlobi' ; Michaela Leerdam ; Paul Solomon ; Stephen O'Connor Subject: RE: TfNSW Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) Comments - SSDA 9522

Hi Bill,

As promised please see attached for your records final CTMP incorporating TfNSW feedback.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

George Elhage Project Manager

1 P 02 9016 7272 | M 0426 145 265 E [email protected] A Level 4, 23-33 Mary Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 www.mugroup.com.au

From: George Elhage Sent: Monday, 1 March 2021 9:21 AM To: Bill Stavropoulos Cc: Ruhul Chowdhury ; Joekarl Diaz ; 'Naiem Teghlobi' ; Michaela Leerdam ; Paul Solomon ; Stephen O'Connor Subject: RE: TfNSW Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) Comments - SSDA 9522

Hi Bill,

Thanks. Confirming that the final version of the CTMP will be issued shortly.

With reference to the items relating to the WAD for the temporary works, please see comments below:

 Please see attached Developer Details form. Can you please provide details of the WAD fees/bond to be paid so we can organise payment concurrently with the review of the detailed design and CTMP. Can you also please issue a copy of the WAD once available so we can organise for the WAD to be signed concurrently with other tasks; and  The detailed design and CTMP are still being prepared and will be issued as soon as possible.

Thanks,

George Elhage Project Manager

P 02 9016 7272 | M 0426 145 265 E [email protected] A Level 4, 23-33 Mary Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 www.mugroup.com.au

From: Bill Stavropoulos Sent: Friday, 26 February 2021 4:12 PM To: George Elhage Cc: Ruhul Chowdhury ; Joekarl Diaz ; 'Naiem Teghlobi' ; Michaela Leerdam ; Paul Solomon ; Stephen

2 O'Connor Subject: RE: TfNSW Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) Comments - SSDA 9522

Hi George,

Thank you for your email.

As per my earlier email, the temporary/interim access arrangement has now been accepted with a small note to adjust some signage; you have advised this will be updated and submitted to me as the final version.

Prior to the issuing of a Construction Certificate for the temporary access, the following main items will need to be completed:

 Execute a Works Authorisation Deed (WAD) for these temporary works only; Please complete the attached Developer Details form to assist with this;  WAD fees and bond to be paid;  Detailed design review of the temporary access arrangement – note the first detailed design review timeframe is 20 working days with each additional review having a timeframe of 10 working days;  A specific CTMP addressing construction and final operation of the temporary access, including all TCP’s etc – TfNSW reviews in conjunction with TMC – TMC’s timeframe is 20 working days for each review;

I will endeavour to keep the timeframes to the minimum possible, however much depends on the extent of detail in both the submitted detailed design and CTMP.

Feel free to contact me if you require any further clarifications.

Bill

Bill Stavropoulos Project/Contract Manager Greater Sydney Transport for NSW

M 0400 478 924 129a-139 Orchardleigh Street, Yennora, NSW 2161

From: George Elhage [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 24 February 2021 7:58 AM To: Bill Stavropoulos Cc: Ruhul Chowdhury ; Joekarl Diaz ; 'Naiem Teghlobi' ; Michaela Leerdam ; Paul Solomon ; Stephen O'Connor Subject: RE: TfNSW Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) Comments - SSDA 9522

Hi Bill,

Thanks for your discussion on Monday afternoon and subsequent email. 3 Please note that the first submission of the CTMP was issued to TfNSW on 03 July 2020. There has since been several revisions to the CTMP to incorporate TfNSW CTMP review comments. Based on previous advice from TfNSW, we were of the understanding that the temporary access was supported as per 6 previous revisions of the CTMP. Please see reference email attached. In our view the CTMP Rev 06 is also a detailed CTMP which covers the construction and operation of the temporary access. A detailed TCP for the operation of the left-in-left-out has been provided within Appendix D of the CTMP. TCP's associated with the construction of the LI/LO will be provided as requested as soon as possible.

The latest CTMP (Rev 06) was issued to TfNSW on 27 January 2021. At the time we advised TfNSW of Frasers-Altis commitment to start Construction (earthworks associated with the Development) on 15 March 2021 and TfNSW committed to promptly responding and finalising the CTMP including Road Act Approval to construct the temporary access off Mamre Road. Other than the design related comments below, we had not received any other feedback on the temporary access design provided to TfNSW on 27 January 2021. Frasers-Altis are in the process of updating the design in line with the new requested information which we aim to submit by the end of this week as supplementary information to Rev 6 CTMP along with consolidated responses to your comments below.

Can you please confirm if TfNSW can assist in meeting the 15 March 2021 start date on site? The CTMP approval would be required by the 11 March to facilitate release of the construction certificate for subdivision works to enable works to proceed on the 15 March 2021.

Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss.

Thanks,

George Elhage Project Manager

P 02 9016 7272 | M 0426 145 265 E [email protected] A Level 4, 23-33 Mary Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 www.mugroup.com.au

From: Bill Stavropoulos Sent: Monday, 22 February 2021 5:27 PM To: George Elhage Cc: Ruhul Chowdhury ; Joekarl Diaz ; 'Naiem Teghlobi' ; Michaela Leerdam Subject: RE: TfNSW Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) Comments - SSDA 9522

Hi George,

Thank you for taking my call earlier.

TfNSW in conjunction with TMC is reviewing the submitted CTMP for the temporary access.

4 As discussed, a detailed CTMP including TCP’s for the construction and operation of the temporary access will be required once the temporary access has been agreed to. I am endeavouring to have a response on this within the next couple weeks.

In terms of the design it was discussed that a detailed design submission should be submitted to commence any formal review of the temporary access. The detailed design will need to clearly show:  the interface between the existing road and new temporary pavement;  interface between pavement and proposed infill raised island;  infill raised island treatment;  Signage and linemarking;  Hydrology/swale design/culvert design;  Proposed temporary pavement life expectancy; include calculations.  Details of wheel wash  Expected duration of temporary access.

Once a detailed design has been submitted for this temporary access, TfNSW will be able to commence the detailed design review.

Regards,

Bill

Bill Stavropoulos Project/Contract Manager Greater Sydney Transport for NSW

M 0400 478 924 129a-139 Orchardleigh Street, Yennora, NSW 2161

From: George Elhage [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 18 February 2021 1:16 PM To: Bill Stavropoulos Cc: Ruhul Chowdhury ; Joekarl Diaz ; 'Naiem Teghlobi' ; Michaela Leerdam Subject: TfNSW Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) Comments - SSDA 9522

Hi Bill,

Further to our conversation earlier this week, was just following up to see if you had any feedback on the CTMP including temporary LI/LO construction access design off Mamre Road.

Please let me know if you have ay questions or would like to discuss.

Thanks,

5 George Elhage Project Manager

Ph: +61 2 9016 7272 | M: +61 426 145 265 E: [email protected] A: Level 4, 23-33 Mary Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 W: www.mugroup.com.au

The information contained in this email is confidential and is the subject of professional privilege. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. MU Group Consulting is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this email or attachment to it.

This email is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you receive this email in error please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender immediately by reply email. Transport for NSW takes all care to ensure that attachments are free from viruses or other defects. Transport for NSW assume no liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using an attachment.

Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless really necessary.

6 James Laidler

From: Naiem Teghlobi Sent: Monday, 8 February 2021 5:01 PM To: Daniel Restuccia Cc: Garry Ryan; Michaela Leerdam Subject: FW: Kemps Creek - SSD-9522 Consent Condition A17c [Dilap Report]

Daniel See below copy of email sent to council re 17c. Note the requirement is submission only. Regards NT

From: Naiem Teghlobi Sent: Monday, 8 February 2021 4:59 PM To: Peter Wood ; Alison Veron Cc: Michaela Leerdam Subject: Kemps Creek - SSD-9522 Consent Condition A17c [Dilap Report]

Hi Peter and Alison

Please see attached via download link dilap report issued to you in accordance with condition A17c.

Citrix Attachments Expires March 10, 2021

Dilapidation Reports_A17.pdf 45.8 MB

Download Attachments

Naiem Teghlobi uses Citrix Files to share documents securely.

Regards

Naiem Teghlobi Senior Project Manager Frasers Property Industrial

T +61 2 9767 2110 M +61 417 665 167 E [email protected] Level 2, 1C Homebush Bay Drive, Rhodes NSW 2138 Australia www.FrasersPropertyIndustrial.com LinkedIn

We’ve changed the way we work to accommodate COVID-19. For details visit our website.

1 James Laidler

From: Naiem Teghlobi Sent: Wednesday, 17 February 2021 4:35 PM To: 'Daniel Restuccia' Cc: 'Garry Ryan' Subject: FW: Kemps Creek - SSD-9522 Consent Condition A17c [Dilap Report] Attachments: ..datacontentImagerteImagesNew_DPIE_Logo1561956956365.png

Hi Daniel See below FYI. I’m this one is definitely done. Regards NT

From: Paul Solomon Sent: Wednesday, 17 February 2021 4:28 PM To: Naiem Teghlobi Cc: Stephen O'Connor Subject: FW: Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub - Dilapidation report fyi

Paul Solomon Planning and Infrastructure Manager Frasers Property Industrial

T +61 2 9767 2951 M +61 417 480 730 E [email protected] Level 2, 1C Homebush Bay Drive, Rhodes NSW 2138 Australia www.FrasersPropertyIndustrial.com LinkedIn

From: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, 17 February 2021 4:26 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Paul Solomon Subject: Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub - Dilapidation report

This email is to acknowledge receipt of the Dilapidation report for the Kemps Creek Warehouse, Logistics and Industrial Facilities Hub .

The Department has no comments on the document at this time.

If you have any enquiries, please contact Julia Pope on 0448229658 at [email protected].

To sign in to your account click here or visit the Major Projects Website.

Please do not reply to this email.

Kind regards

1 The Department of Planning, Industry and Environment

Subscribe to our newsletter

------This email is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain confidential and/or privileged information.

If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and then delete it immediately.

PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL