DOCSLIB.ORG

Red Rock/Lima Watershed Environmental Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Red Rock/Lima Watershed Environmental Analysis RED ROCK/LIMA WATERSHED ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-MT-B050-2018-0009-EA 5/22/2018 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Dillon Field Office 1005 Selway Drive Dillon, Montana 59725 Phone: (406) 683-8000 Fax: (406) 683-8066 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action ................................................................... 1 Introduction & Background ........................................................................................................ 1 Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................................... 3 Decision to be Made ................................................................................................................... 7 Conformance with Land Use Plan .............................................................................................. 8 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, other Plans, or other NEPA Documents ........................ 8 Public Involvement ..................................................................................................................... 9 Resource Issues Identified for Analysis .................................................................................... 10 Resource Issue #1: Riparian, Wetland and Aquatic Habitat ..................................................... 10 Resource Issue #2: Upland -Sagebrush and Grassland Habitat ................................................ 11 Resource Issue #3: Forest and Woodland Habitat .................................................................... 12 Resource Concern #1: Special Status Species and Big Game Habitat ..................................... 12 Resource Concern #2: Socioeconomics .................................................................................... 13 Resource Concern #3: Noxious and Invasive Species .............................................................. 13 Resource Concern #4: Travel Management .............................................................................. 14 Resource Concern #5: Visual Resource Management .............................................................. 14 Resource Concern #6: Wilderness Study Areas ....................................................................... 15 Resource Concern #7: Cultural and Paleontological Resources ............................................... 16 Issues/Resources Considered but Eliminated from Further Analysis ....................................... 16 Chapter 2 Proposed Alternatives .................................................................................................. 18 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 18 Process Used to Formulate Alternatives ................................................................................... 18 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated ................................................................................... 18 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ............................................. 18 Features Common to All Alternatives ...................................................................................... 20 Alternative A (No Action) ........................................................................................................ 25 Features Common to All Action Alternatives .......................................................................... 34 Alternative B ............................................................................................................................. 52 Alternative C ............................................................................................................................. 68 Alternative D ............................................................................................................................. 71 Comparison of Alternatives ...................................................................................................... 72 Chapter 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................... 79 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 79 General Setting.......................................................................................................................... 79 Relevant Past and Ongoing Actions: ........................................................................................ 80 Resources Brought Forward for Analysis ................................................................................. 82 Chapter 4 Environmental Effects ................................................................................................ 108 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 108 Resource Issue #1: Riparian, Wetland and Aquatic Habitat Environmental Effects .............. 108 Resource Issue #2: Upland Sagebrush and Grassland Habitat Environmental Effects .......... 133 Resource Issue #3: Forest and Woodland Habitat Environmental Effects ............................. 144 Resource Concern #1: Special Status Species and Big Game Habitat Environmental Effects ................................................................................................................................................. 150 Resource Concern #2: Socioeconomics Environmental Effects ............................................. 168 Resource Concern #3: Noxious and Invasive Species Environmental Effects ....................... 174 Resource Concern #4: Travel Management Environmental Effects ....................................... 175 Resource Concern #5: Visual Resource Management Environmental Effects ....................... 179 Resource Concern #6: Wilderness Study Areas Environmental Effects ................................ 181 Resource Concern #7: Cultural and Paleontological Resources Environmental Effects ........ 183 Chapter 5 Consultation and Coordination................................................................................... 186 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 186 Persons, Groups, and Agencies Consulted ............................................................................. 186 List of Preparers ...................................................................................................................... 187 Glossary .................................................................................................................................. 188 References ............................................................................................................................... 190 Chapter 6 Appendices ................................................................................................................. 204 Chapter 1 Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action Introduction & Background The Red Rock/Lima Watershed (RRLW) is located in southern Beaverhead County, Montana. The watershed lies in Townships 8-16 South, Ranges 6-12 West, Montana Principal Meridian (M.P.M). The RRLW follows the I-15 corridor from the Barrett’s exit south of Dillon, Montana south to the Montana/Idaho border near Monida, Montana. This assessment covers only BLM administered public lands in this area. The RRLW is primarily in the central portion of the 4th level Hydrologic Unit (HU) known as the Red Rock (10020001) used by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The RRLW also overlaps a small portion of the Beaverhead HU (ID# 10020002). The current watershed boundary for the RRLW has been modified from the boundary area used during the 2007 watershed assessment process. Some areas have been removed, while other areas that were assessed as part of the Beaverhead West Watershed in 2007 were included into the RRLW. Additionally, during the Sage Creek Watershed planning process (2015-2016), a small portion of BLM land was administratively moved into the Red Rock Watershed from the Sage Creek Watershed, while some of the Red Rock Lima watershed was moved to the Sage Creek Watershed. The watershed boundary modification was an administrative remedy to improve efficiency of workloads and rangeland administration throughout the entire Dillon Field Office. Watershed Boundaries continue to follow grazing allotment boundaries, not the HU watershed boundaries. The RRLW assessment area within the Dillon Field Office boundary is shown on the vicinity map below as well as Map 1 in appendix A. 1 Within the RRLW there are approximately 338,027 acres. Of these acres, 69,730 acres are BLM managed public land. This represents approximately 21 percent of the watershed. This Environmental Assessment (EA) addresses only the public lands administered by the BLM. There are also 80,948 acres (24% of the watershed) administered by the United States Forest Service (USFS), 9,500 acres (3% of the watershed) administered by the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), 53,451 acres (16% of the watershed) administered by the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC), and 124,394 acres (37% of the watershed) of privately owned lands within the RRLW. Elevations on BLM administered public land within the RRLW
Load more

Recommended publications
  • East Bench Unit History
    East Bench Unit Three Forks Division Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program Jedediah S. Rogers Bureau of Reclamation 2008 Table of Contents East Bench Unit...............................................................2 Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program .........................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Investigations...........................................................7 Project Authorization....................................................10 Construction History ....................................................10 Post Construction History ................................................15 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................19 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water...................................20 Conclusion............................................................21 Bibliography ................................................................23 Archival Sources .......................................................23 Government Documents .................................................23 Books ................................................................24 Other Sources..........................................................24 1 East Bench Unit Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program Located in rural southwest Montana, the East Bench Unit of the Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program provides water to 21,800 acres along the Beaverhead River in
    [Show full text]
  • Montana State Parks Guide Reservations for Camping and Other Accommodations: Toll Free: 1-855-922-6768 Stateparks.Mt.Gov
    For more information about Montana State Parks: 406-444-3750 TDD: 406-444-1200 website: stateparks.mt.gov P.O. Box 200701 • Helena, MT 59620-0701 Montana State Parks Guide Reservations for camping and other accommodations: Toll Free: 1-855-922-6768 stateparks.mt.gov For general travel information: 1-800-VISIT-MT (1-800-847-4868) www.visitmt.com Join us on Twitter, Facebook & Instagram If you need emergency assistance, call 911. To report vandalism or other park violations, call 1-800-TIP-MONT (1-800-847-6668). Your call can be anonymous. You may be eligible for a reward. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks strives to ensure its programs, sites and facilities are accessible to all people, including those with disabilities. To learn more, or to request accommodations, call 406-444-3750. Cover photo by Jason Savage Photography Lewis and Clark portrait reproductions courtesy of Independence National Historic Park Library, Philadelphia, PA. This document was produced by Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks and was printed at state expense. Information on the cost of this publication can be obtained by contacting Montana State Parks. Printed on Recycled Paper © 2018 Montana State Parks MSP Brochure Cover 15.indd 1 7/13/2018 9:40:43 AM 1 Whitefish Lake 6 15 24 33 First Peoples Buffalo Jump* 42 Tongue River Reservoir Logan BeTableaverta ilof Hill Contents Lewis & Clark Caverns Les Mason* 7 16 25 34 43 Thompson Falls Fort3-9 Owen*Historical Sites 28. VisitorMadison Centers, Buff Camping,alo Ju mp* Giant Springs* Medicine Rocks Whitefish Lake 8 Fish Creek 17 Granite11-15 *Nature Parks 26DisabledMissouri Access Headw ibility aters 35 Ackley Lake 44 Pirogue Island* WATERTON-GLACIER INTERNATIONAL 2 Lone Pine* PEACE PARK9 Council Grove* 18 Lost Creek 27 Elkhorn* 36 Greycliff Prairie Dog Town* 45 Makoshika Y a WHITEFISH < 16-23 Water-based Recreation 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest MONTANA Visitvisit Southwest MONTANA
    visit SouthWest MONTANA visitvisit SouthWest MONTANA 2016 OFFICIAL REGIONAL TRAVEL GUIDE SOUTHWESTMT.COM • 800-879-1159 Powwow (Lisa Wareham) Sawtooth Lake (Chuck Haney) Pronghorn Antelope (Donnie Sexton) Bannack State Park (Donnie Sexton) SouthWest MONTANABetween Yellowstone National Park and Glacier National Park lies a landscape that encapsulates the best of what Montana’s about. Here, breathtaking crags pierce the bluest sky you’ve ever seen. Vast flocks of trumpeter swans splash down on the emerald waters of high mountain lakes. Quiet ghost towns beckon you back into history. Lively communities buzz with the welcoming vibe and creative energy of today’s frontier. Whether your passion is snowboarding or golfing, microbrews or monster trout, you’ll find endless riches in Southwest Montana. You’ll also find gems of places to enjoy a hearty meal or rest your head — from friendly roadside diners to lavish Western resorts. We look forward to sharing this Rexford Yaak Eureka Westby GLACIER Whitetail Babb Sweetgrass Four Flaxville NATIONAL Opheim Buttes Fortine Polebridge Sunburst Turner remarkable place with you. Trego St. Mary PARK Loring Whitewater Peerless Scobey Plentywood Lake Cut Bank Troy Apgar McDonald Browning Chinook Medicine Lake Libby West Glacier Columbia Shelby Falls Coram Rudyard Martin City Chester Froid Whitefish East Glacier Galata Havre Fort Hinsdale Saint Hungry Saco Lustre Horse Park Valier Box Belknap Marie Elder Dodson Vandalia Kalispell Essex Agency Heart Butte Malta Culbertson Kila Dupuyer Wolf Marion Bigfork Flathead River Glasgow Nashua Poplar Heron Big Sandy Point Somers Conrad Bainville Noxon Lakeside Rollins Bynum Brady Proctor Swan Lake Fort Fairview Trout Dayton Virgelle Peck Creek Elmo Fort Benton Loma Thompson Big Arm Choteau Landusky Zortman Sidney Falls Hot Springs Polson Lambert Crane CONTENTS Condon Fairfield Great Haugan Ronan Vaughn Plains Falls Savage De Borgia Charlo Augusta Winifred Bloomfield St.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Burbot in Montana
    1 STATUS OF BURBOT IN MONTANA Melissa R. Jones-Wuellner and Christopher S. Guy U.S. Geological Survey Montana Cooperative Fishery Research Unit Montana State University Department of Ecology Bozeman, Montana 59717 December 2004 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .......................................................................................................................3 List of Figures......................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary.............................................................................................................7 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................8 Introduction..........................................................................................................................9 Review of Burbot Life History ..........................................................................................10 Description.............................................................................................................10 Habitat....................................................................................................................10 Spawning, Rearing, Growth...................................................................................10 Feeding and Food Habits .......................................................................................11 Economic and Conservation Importance...............................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Energy Solutions for Ranches Sustainable Alternatives That Benefit the Bottom Line By: Leo Crane | Vp of Energy 1
    SALES | AUCTIONS | FINANCE | MANAGEMENT | APPRAISALS FROM OUR CORNER | FALL 2013 Susie Q Ranch | Sun Valley, Idaho Smart Energy Solutions for Ranches SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVES THAT BENEFIT THE BOTTOM LINE BY: LEO CRANE | VP OF ENERGY 1 Bottom Line Benefits of Renewable Energy Systems Geothermal Heating and Cooling Technology Ranches throughout the west are regularly integrating renewable Geothermal heating and cooling systems function by using a ground- energy systems into existing structures. It is a trend that’s poised to source heat pump. These work in the same fundamental manner become even more prevalent as homeowners recognize the benefits as all heat pumps, including refrigerators, air conditioners and of renewable energy technology. These include both sustainability freezers. They move heat from one area to another. The advantage of and a return on investment. Energy efficiency has taken on an ground-source heat pumps is that they use the stable and moderate increased importance because of rising energy costs and a growing temperature of the earth or groundwater to transfer heat. The process environmental consciousness. Now, more than ever, it is crucial to begins with a heat transfer fluid being pumped through buried pipes, get the most out of every energy dollar. allowing for the collection of heat. The fluid continues on to the heat pump, located inside the building, where it is used to warm a The Flying D Ranch: A Model for Energy Sustainability refrigerant fluid. As the liquid warms it begins to boil and evaporate. The Flying D Ranch, located outside of Bozeman, Montana, is an The vapor is then compressed, which causes the temperature of the example of a property that has successfully integrated renewable refrigerant to increase dramatically.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by C.J. Harksen and Karen S. Midtlyng Helena, Montana June
    WATER-RESOURCES ACTIVITIES OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IN MONTANA, OCTOBER 1989 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1991 Compiled by C.J. Harksen and Karen S. Midtlyng U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 91-191 Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF MONTANA AND OTHER AGENCIES Helena, Montana June 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Jooks and Open-File Reports Section 428 Federal Building federal Center, Building 810 301 South Park, Drawer 10076 iox 25425 Helena, MT 59626-0076 Denver, CO 80225-0425 CONTENTS Page Message from the District Chief. ....................... 1 Abstract ................................... 3 Basic mission and programs .......................... 3 U.S. Geological Survey ........................... 3 Water Resources Division .......................... 4 District operations. ............................. 4 Operating sections ............................. 5 Support units. ............................... 5 Office addresses .............................. 5 Types of funding .............................. 8 Cooperating agencies ............................ 10 Hydrologic conditions ............................ 10 Data-collection programs ........................... 13 Surface-water stations (MT001) ....................... 16 Ground-water stations (MT002)........................ 17 Water-quality stations (MT003) ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Valley Arctic Grayling Adaptive Management Project Annual Report, 2019
    Centennial Valley Arctic Grayling Adaptive Management Project Annual Report, 2019 25 March, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) are a freshwater holarctic salmonid that were once widespread throughout the Upper Missouri River (UMR) drainage as a glacial relict population. One of the last endemic grayling populations remaining in the UMR drainage resides in the Centennial Valley (CV) of southwestern Montana. Spawning is largely limited to Red Rock, Corral, Elk Springs, and Odell creeks, with Red Rock Creek likely supporting 80-90% of annual spawning in the CV. It is presumed that most of the grayling population in the CV spends non-breeding portions of the year in Upper Red Rock Lake (Upper Lake). Red Rock Lakes National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) encompasses Upper Lake, and nearly all of the currently occupied grayling spawning habitat within Red Rock, Elk Springs, and Odell creeks. The estimated number of grayling in the 2019 Red Rock Creek spawning population was 154 1 (95% CI = 84–344), nearly unchanged from the previous year (Nˆ = 387, 95% CI = 168–682; Figure 1). Suitable habitat the prior winter within Upper Lake (i.e., water depth below the ice ¥ 1 m and dissolved oxygen ¥ 4 ppm) reached a minimum during February sampling at an estimated 0 ha. This is the same area of suitable winter habitat experienced during the winter of 2015–2016 that led to the documented decline of spawning grayling from 1131 (95% CI = 1069–1210) in 2015 to 214 (95% CI = 161–321) in 2016. Area of winter habitat for the current year (2020) was 3 ha in January and February.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Backcountry Hunters and Anglers
    MONTANA BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS Recommendations for Montana’s Rivers and Streams Prepared for Montana Backcountry Hunters and Anglers March 2016 1 MONTANA BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS Table of Contents I. Introduction to the Quiet Waters Initiative ........................................................................................ 4 II. Overview of Current Restrictions and Recommendations .............................................................. 4 III. Recommendations for Off-Highway Vehicle Regulation ............................................................... 5 IV. Recommendations by Watershed Area ............................................................................................. 7 Clark Fork River watershed .................................................................................................................. 7 Upper Flathead River watershed: ........................................................................................................ 8 Upper Missouri River – Three Forks to Pelican Point FAS ............................................................ 14 Missouri River – Pelican Point FAS to Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument ..... 17 Upper Yellowstone River watershed.................................................................................................. 22 IV. Further Considerations ..................................................................................................................... 25 A Note on Horsepower Restrictions .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No
    <PRORULE> DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2009-0065] [MO 92210-0-0008-B2] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised 12-Month Finding to List the Upper Missouri River Distinct Population Segment of Arctic Grayling as Endangered or Threatened AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of revised 12month finding. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service/USFWS), announce a revised 12month finding on a petition to list the upper Missouri River Distinct Population Segment (Missouri River DPS) of Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. After review of all available scientific and commercial information, we find that listing the upper Missouri River DPS of Arctic grayling as endangered or threatened is warranted. However, listing the upper Missouri River DPS of Arctic grayling is currently precluded by higher priority actions to amend the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Upon publication of this 12month finding, we will add the upper Missouri River DPS of Arctic grayling to our candidate species list. We will develop a proposed rule to list this DPS as our priorities allow. We will make any determination on critical habitat during development of the proposed listing rule. In the interim, we will address the status of this DPS through our annual Candidate Notice of Review (CNOR). DATES: The finding announced in this document was made on [insert date of Federal Register publication]. ADDRESSES: This finding is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov at Docket Number FWS-R6-ES-2009-0065.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by Karen S. Midtlyng and C.J. Harksen Helena, Montana July
    WATER-RESOURCES ACTIVITIES OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IN MONTANA, OCTOBER 1991 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1993 Compiled by Karen S. Midtlyng and C.J. Harksen U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 93-151 Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF MONTANA AND OTHER AGENCIES Helena, Montana July 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey DALLAS L. PECK, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 428 Federal Building Federal Center 301 South Park, Drawer 10076 Box 25425 Helena, MT 59626-0076 Denver, CO 80225-0425 CONTENTS Page Message from the District Chief. ....................... 1 Abstract ................................... 3 Basic mission and programs of the U.S. Geological Survey ........... 3 Mission of the Water Resources Division. ................... 4 District operations. ............................. 4 Operating sections ............................. 5 Support units................................ 5 Office addresses .............................. 5 Types of funding .............................. 8 Cooperating agencies ............................ 10 Hydrologic conditions ............................ 10 Data-collection programs ........................... 14 Surface-water stations (MT001) ....................... 16 Ground-water stations (MT002)........................ 17 Water-quality stations (MT003) ....................... 18 Sediment stations (MT004).........................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program
    An Overview of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program U.S. Department of the Interior Great Plains Region Bureau of Reclamation Roger S. Otstot Economist Great Plains Region Bureau of Reclamation (406) 247-7706 [email protected] Table of Contents Page A Brief History of the Bureau of Reclamation .............................. 1 The Missouri River Basin ............................................................... 3 The Missouri River Basin History (Pre Pick-Sloan) ....................... 4 The Pick-Sloan Plan ....................................................................... 6 Authorized Purposes ................................................................... 10 Flood Control ........................................................................................ 10 Navigation ............................................................................................. 10 Irrigation ................................................................................................ 11 Power .................................................................................................... 14 Water Supply ........................................................................................ 14 Recreation ............................................................................................. 14 Fish and Wildlife ................................................................................... 14 Water Quality ........................................................................................ 15 Interagency Relationships
    [Show full text]