Humanitarian Access Snapshot, Gedeo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Ethiopia Access Snapshot - Gedeo and West Guji As of 15 September 2020 The humanitarian situation in the sub-region has signifi- WOLAYITA i Partners have reported that security forces have attempted cantly improved in 2020, following the return of near i to command their vehicles and some incidents at security 300,000 IDPs to areas of origin - some 170,000 in Gedeo Daye checkpoints. These cases illustrate the tension and prevailing (94,500 from West Guji and 75,500 within Gedeo) and SIDAMA REGION suspicion in a region impacted by smuggling and other illegal Lake activities. In one incident during July, a traffic police officer in some 124,000 in West Guji by mid-2019. Nevertheless, thousands of Abaya people continue to be displaced and are yet to access durable Bule Hora demonstrated disregard to the fundamental Dilla solutions. Access continues to be limited to these IDPs due to the provision that relief partners cannot carry weapons on their Abaya Zuria ongoing security operations against unidentified armed groups vehicles nor be associated with any security actor. The police (UAGs). Wenago officer stopped an NGO vehicle and demanded from the driver Gelo Bule to transport armed security personnel. He also physically The conflict with UAGs in West Guji - and neighboring Guji - contin- Ledo Rape assaulted the driver. This kind of incident infringes on human- ues unabated. While the security situation has improved in the recent itarian principles. past, sporadic clashes continue. In August, partners reported eight Yirga Oda derba Dango GEDEO major incidents of clashes causing casualties and hindering opera- Ergensa Chefe Some 30,000 people remain displaced since mid-2018 in Churso tions in Dugda Dawa, Bule Hora, Gelana, Kercha, and Melka Soda Bore Chelbessa Melka Soda woreda due to security operations against Kochere woredas. The impact of this violence on humanitarian access is Gelana Hambela UAGs. The intensification of security operations in January intermittent, impacting the quality of assistance to vulnerable popula- Wamena impacted partners' access to the woreda; since July, partners tion groups. Armed groups are mobile and continue to carry out Shamole Oda Gedeb have managed to access the area only on an intermittent ambushes targeting local officials and security forces. While no aid Shamole Shida basis. Limited access initially affected the response to a partner has been directly targeted by such violence, there is a high risk Gedu Hera cholera outbreak in the woreda. UNDSS continues to warn Jabasere Lipitu Kercha Dari wamena of collateral damage. AMARO Kersa/MeteriChere about the high risk of suffering collateral damage during road Gololicha Gerachu Birbirsa movements or programme delivery. In September, a UN Jeldu In 2020, tensions between Guji and Gedeo communities in West Guji Galessa Kojowa Bedessa mission also documented lingering insecurity, significantly have remained low thanks to continued community-level security and BurkaKilenso Kibissa Chebicha Resa Funyankawa GUJI impacting boundary areas with Dugda Dawa, Bule Hora, and Ebala Galessa Galessa Araba peace and reconciliation efforts. This notwithstanding, some issues Sororo Burka Soke Kercha woredas and Guji zone. remain to impact equitable access to need-based aid. Authorities Melkajawe Bule Hora Dawabichu Surro Buda Dawadimtu Some 3,000 IDPs - ethnic Gedeo - have not returned to their have discouraged partners from supporting the claims of IDP return- Ropi Berguda Mageda ees to recover former land or property taken during the conflict. In Mageda Dayadawa place of origin in West Guji due to insecurity and lack of land Melkasoda addition, authorities have reportedly issued separate identification access. These IDPs primarily live with the host community in Hidakorma WEST GUJI documents (IDs) to IDP returnees. BURJI Melka Soda Gedeo and are engaged in causal labor and petty trade. Dugda Regional authorities have not recognized them as IDPs since In 2019, authorities and partners put a new system to assess and Dawa Bayagundi last year. They have been included as a "vulnerable group" in target people in need jointly. This came as a result of previous the Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP), which remains disagreements. on the numbers of people affected by the conflict and to be implemented. Currently, food aid assistance in the concerns over denials of assistance to the population groups. In Returnees (1) Chemekura Gedeo zone is given only to returnees, and remaining IDPs Kercha woreda, an estimated 100,000 people were arguably not West Guji 300,000 are out of coverage of protection related services. adequately or at all registered during the joint verification exercises. Gedeo 95,000 At the time of writing, authorities continue to dispute their eligibility for Accessible In terms of physical access constraints, rains have impacted partners' movements and operations through the sub-region, food assistance. Similarly, some 19,000 left-out IDPs in Suro Berguda Partially Accessible IDPs (1) BORENA and in particular, in West Guji' Gelana, Hambela Wamena, and woreda (affected by inter-communal conflict since 2019) remain out West Guji 79,000 Melka Soda woredas, also affecting the work of the Interna- of support schemes. Besides, partners are reporting instances where- Not Accessible Gedeo 3,000 tional Organization for Migration (IOM) in tracking displaced by IDPs' rights are not duly respected, for example, regarding partici- Partially accessible road (1) Zonal Disaster Risk Management pation in local decision‐making structures. Accessible Road Office and returned populations. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Creation date: 30 September 2020 Source: DSS, OCHA and Partners Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org/ethiopia www. reliefweb.int/country/eth.
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia

    Districts of Ethiopia

    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
  • Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ©UNHCR/Adelina Gomez

    Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ©UNHCR/Adelina Gomez

    ©UNHCR/Anna Helge Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ©UNHCR/Adelina Gomez TABLE OF CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 DAMAGE AND LOSS IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION SECTORS 4 DAMAGE ON LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEM 5 DAMAGE AND LOSS ASSESMENT ON SOCIAL AND INFRAESTRUCTURAL 6 SECTORS • Private houses 6 • Public Infrastructure 7 • Recommendations 8 LEGAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS 10 • Access to justice 10 • Access to Land holding certificate 11 • Customary/Traditional justice system 12 • Recommendations 12 CONFLICT, PEACE BUILDING AND SOCIAL COHESION 13 POSSIBLE APPROACHES FOR CONFLICT TRANSFORMATION AND PEACE- 14 BUILDING IN THE CONTEXT OF GUJI AND GEDEO ETHNIC GROUPS • Building Trust 14 • Developing social cohesion 15 • Supporting local buy-in 15 • Recommendations 16 APPENDIX 1 18 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Damage and Loss Assessment in West Guji Bule Hora University initiated a Damage and Loss Assessment (DaLA) in West Guji zone in collaboration with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the West Guji Zonal Disaster Risk Management Office to assess loss and damages incurred during the intercommunal conflict between the Gedeo and Guji people in 2018, which displaced hundreds of thousands. The assessment also analyzed legal assistance needs, as well as the potential for peace-building and social cohesion. A total of 78,257HHs (508,671 individuals) with an average family size of 6.5/HH were severely exposed to multiple socio-economic crises due to the conflict. Following the Government’s initiated return process based on the alleged improved safety and security situation (assessed by the Government) in May 2019, according to the Government, the majority of the IDPs were returned to their places of habitual residence 1.
  • Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M

    Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M

    35°0'0"E 40°0'0"E Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia A m Tigray A Afar m h u Amhara a uz N m Dera u N u u G " / m r B u l t Dire Dawa " r a e 0 g G n Hareri 0 ' r u u Addis Ababa ' n i H a 0 Gambela m s Somali 0 ° b a K Oromia Ü a I ° o A Hidabu 0 u Wara o r a n SNNPR 0 h a b s o a 1 u r Abote r z 1 d Jarte a Jarso a b s a b i m J i i L i b K Jardega e r L S u G i g n o G A a e m e r b r a u / K e t m uyu D b e n i u l u o Abay B M G i Ginde e a r n L e o e D l o Chomen e M K Beret a a Abe r s Chinaksen B H e t h Yaya Abichuna Gne'a r a c Nejo Dongoro t u Kombolcha a o Gulele R W Gudetu Kondole b Jimma Genete ru J u Adda a a Boji Dirmeji a d o Jida Goro Gutu i Jarso t Gu J o Kembibit b a g B d e Berga l Kersa Bila Seyo e i l t S d D e a i l u u r b Gursum G i e M Haro Maya B b u B o Boji Chekorsa a l d Lalo Asabi g Jimma Rare Mida M Aleltu a D G e e i o u e u Kurfa Chele t r i r Mieso m s Kegn r Gobu Seyo Ifata A f o F a S Ayira Guliso e Tulo b u S e G j a e i S n Gawo Kebe h i a r a Bako F o d G a l e i r y E l i Ambo i Chiro Zuria r Wayu e e e i l d Gaji Tibe d lm a a s Diga e Toke n Jimma Horo Zuria s e Dale Wabera n a w Tuka B Haru h e N Gimbichu t Kutaye e Yubdo W B Chwaka C a Goba Koricha a Leka a Gidami Boneya Boshe D M A Dale Sadi l Gemechis J I e Sayo Nole Dulecha lu k Nole Kaba i Tikur Alem o l D Lalo Kile Wama Hagalo o b r Yama Logi Welel Akaki a a a Enchini i Dawo ' b Meko n Gena e U Anchar a Midega Tola h a G Dabo a t t M Babile o Jimma Nunu c W e H l d m i K S i s a Kersana o f Hana Arjo D n Becho A o t
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)

    Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)

    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
  • Explanatory Notes

    Explanatory Notes

    GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY MAPS OF DILA NB 37-6 EXPLANATORY NOTES Habtamu Eshetu (Chief Compiler) Vladislav Rapprich (Editor) The Main Project Partners The Czech Development Agency (CzDA) cooperates with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the establishment of an institutional framework of Czech development cooperation and actively participates in the creation and financing of development cooperation programs between the Czech Republic and partner countries. www.czda.cz The Geological Survey of Ethiopia (GSE) is accountable to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, collects and assesses geology, geological engineering and hydrogeology data for publication. The project beneficiary. www.gse.gov.et The Czech Geological Survey collects data and information on geology and processes it for political, economical and environmental management. The main contractor. www.geology.cz AQUATEST a.s. is a Czech consulting and engineering company in water management and environmental protection. The main aquatest subcontractor. www.aquatest.cz Copyright © 2014 Czech Geological Survey, Klarov 3, 118 21 Prague 1, Czech Republic First edition AcknowledgmentAcknowledgment Fieldwork and primary compilation of the map and explanatory notes was done by a team from the Geological Survey of Ethiopia (GSE) consisting of staff from the Geo Hazard Investigation Directorate, Groundwater Resources Assessment Directorate and Czech experts from AQUATEST a.s. and the Czech Geological Survey in the framework of the Czech Development Cooperation Program. We would like to thank the SNNPR Regional Water Bureau, the Dila, Sidamo and Sodo- Woleita Zone Administrations, Water, Mines and Energy offices for their hospitality, guidance and relevant data delivery. The team is grateful to the management of the Geological Survey of Ethiopia, particularly to Director General (GSE) Mr.
  • ETHIOPIA IDP Situation Report May 2019

    ETHIOPIA IDP Situation Report May 2019

    ETHIOPIA IDP Situation Report May 2019 Highlights • Government return operations continue at full scale and sites are being dismantled. • Where security is assured and rehabilitation support provided, IDPs have opted to return to their areas of origin. IDPs who still feel insecure and have experienced trauma prefer to relocate elsewhere or integrate within the community. Management of IDP preferences differs in every IDP caseload. • There is minimal to no assistance in areas of return. Local authorities have requested international partner sup- port to address the gap. Meanwhile, public-private initiatives continue to fundraise for the rehabilitation of IDPs. • The living condition of the already vulnerable host communities has deteriorated having shared their limited resources with the IDPs for over a year. I. Displacement context Government IDP return operations have been implemented at full scale since early May 2019 following the 8 April 2019 announcement of the Federal Government’s Strategic Plan to Address Internal Displacement and a costed Re- covery/Rehabilitation Plan. By end May, most IDP sites/camps were dismantled, in particular in East/West Wollega and Gedeo/West Guji zones. Humanitarian partners have increased their engagement with Government at all levels aiming to improve the implementation of the Government return operation, in particular advocating for the returns to happen voluntarily, in safety, sustainably and with dignity. Overall, humanitarian needs remain high in both areas of displacement and of return. Most assistance in displace- ment areas is disrupted following the mass Government return operation and the dismantling of sites, while assis- tance in areas of return remain scant to non-existent, affecting the sustainability of the returns.
  • Woreda-Level Crop Production Rankings in Ethiopia: a Pooled Data Approach

    Woreda-Level Crop Production Rankings in Ethiopia: a Pooled Data Approach

    Woreda-Level Crop Production Rankings in Ethiopia: A Pooled Data Approach 31 January 2015 James Warner Tim Stehulak Leulsegged Kasa International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) was established in 1975. IFPRI is one of 15 agricultural research centers that receive principal funding from governments, private foundations, and international and regional organizations, most of which are members of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). RESEARCH FOR ETHIOPIA’S AGRICULTURE POLICY (REAP): ANALYTICAL SUPPORT FOR THE AGRICULTURAL TRANSFORMATION AGENCY (ATA) IFPRI gratefully acknowledges the generous financial support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) for IFPRI REAP, a five-year project to support the Ethiopian ATA. The ATA is an innovative quasi-governmental agency with the mandate to test and evaluate various technological and institutional interventions to raise agricultural productivity, enhance market efficiency, and improve food security. REAP will support the ATA by providing research-based analysis, tracking progress, supporting strategic decision making, and documenting best practices as a global public good. DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared as an output for REAP and has not been reviewed by IFPRI’s Publication Review Committee. Any views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of IFPRI, the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. AUTHORS James Warner, International Food Policy Research Institute Research Coordinator, Markets, Trade and Institutions Division, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [email protected] Timothy Stehulak, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Research Analyst, P.O.
  • West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 1 9 May 2018

    West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 1 9 May 2018

    Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 1 9 May 2018 Highlights • At least 200,000i people are estimated to be displaced following inter-communal violence along the borders of Gedeo (SNNPR) and West Guji (Oromia region) zones. • The Ethiopian government and few partners provided limited first line assistance, including food, ES/NFI, WaSH and health/nutrition support. However, the needs significantly surpass resources available to date. • Humanitarian partners continue to receive ad-hoc requests for assistance from local authorities, mostly NFIs, WaSH and health assistance to IDPs in displacement and in return areas. Assistance to returnees has been mainly handled by the Government. A number of operational partners stand ready to scale up assistance to the displaced population in support of Government efforts, if additional resources can be made available. I. Displacement overview On 13 April 2018, inter-communal violence along the borders of Gedeo (SNNPR) and West Guji (Oromia region) zones has led to large scale displacements, damage of properties and loss of life. At least 200,000 people are estimated to be displaced in both zones (around 100,000 in each zone). All IDPs currently in Gedeo zone are believed to be ethnic Gedeos mostly displaced from border kebeles in Kercha woreda of West Guji zone. Around 67 per cent of the IDPs in West Guji zone are also believed to be ethnic Gedeos displaced within West Guji. Most areas of origin of Gedeo IDPs are within Oromia region, particularly in Kercha and Bule Hora woredas in West Guji zone. The remaining IDPs in West Guji zone are ethnic Gujis displaced from Gedeo zone and from border areas in Oromia.
  • Ethiopia Census 2007

    Ethiopia Census 2007

    Table 1 : POPULATION SIZE OF REGIONS BY SEX AND PLACE OF RESIDENCE: 2007 Urban + Rural Urban Rural Sex No. % No. % No. % COUNTRY TOTAL * Both Sexes 73,918,505 100.00 11,956,170 100.00 61,962,335 100.00 Male 37,296,657 50.46 5,942,170 49.70 31,354,487 50.60 Female 36,621,848 49.54 6,014,000 50.30 30,607,848 49.40 TIGRAY Region Both Sexes 4,314,456 100.00 842,723 100.00 3,471,733 100.00 Male 2,124,853 49.25 398,072 47.24 1,726,781 49.74 Female 2,189,603 50.75 444,651 52.76 1,744,952 50.26 AFFAR Region * Both Sexes 1,411,092 100.00 188,973 100.00 1,222,119 100.00 Male 786,338 55.73 100,915 53.40 685,423 56.08 Female 624,754 44.27 88,058 46.60 536,696 43.92 AMHARA Region Both Sexes 17,214,056 100.00 2,112,220 100.00 15,101,836 100.00 Male 8,636,875 50.17 1,024,136 48.49 7,612,739 50.41 Female 8,577,181 49.83 1,088,084 51.51 7,489,097 49.59 ORORMIYA Region Both Sexes 27,158,471 100.00 3,370,040 100.00 23,788,431 100.00 Male 13,676,159 50.36 1,705,316 50.60 11,970,843 50.32 Female 13,482,312 49.64 1,664,724 49.40 11,817,588 49.68 SOMALI Region * Both Sexes 4,439,147 100.00 621,210 100.00 3,817,937 100.00 Male 2,468,784 55.61 339,343 54.63 2,129,441 55.77 Female 1,970,363 44.39 281,867 45.37 1,688,496 44.23 BENISHANGUL-GUMUZ Region Both Sexes 670,847 100.00 97,965 100.00 572,882 100.00 Male 340,378 50.74 49,784 50.82 290,594 50.72 Female 330,469 49.26 48,181 49.18 282,288 49.28 SNNP Region Both Sexes 15,042,531 100.00 1,545,710 100.00 13,496,821 100.00 Male 7,482,051 49.74 797,796 51.61 6,684,255 49.52 Female 7,560,480 50.26 747,914 48.39 6,812,566
  • Resident/Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the Use of Cerf Funds

    Resident/Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the Use of Cerf Funds

    RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS YEAR: 2018 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS ETHIOPIA RAPID RESPONSE DISPLACEMENT 2018 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Aeneas Chuma PART I Strategic Statement by the Resident/Humanitarian Coordinator The humanitarian situation in Ethiopia in the year 2018 was characterized by drought, disease outbreaks and conflict-induced displacements. Inter-communal violence along the border areas of Gedeo (SNNP) and West Guji (Oromia) zones since April 2018 has led to the displacement of over 800,000 people. The Government has taken the lead in the response efforts and has provided life-saving assistance to the displaced population. This CERF funding was received at a critical time and was instrumental in provision of supplementary food, access to clean water, measles vaccination, shelter and NFIs and basic sanitation and hygiene support. The current allocation has enabled the Government and humanitarian partners to reach approximately 1.7 million people displaced along the SNNP – Oromia borders. While recognizing the need to implement immediate life-saving interventions, it is important to strengthen efforts for long-term solutions to reintegrate the displaced into society and also address the causes of conflict and mass displacement. 1. OVERVIEW 18-RR-ETH-31283 TABLE 1: EMERGENCY ALLOCATION OVERVIEW (US$) a. TOTAL AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR THE HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE US$1.65B FUNDING RECEIVED BY SOURCE CERF 15,014,257 COUNTRY-BASED POOLED FUND (if applicable) 22,500,000 OTHER (bilateral/multilateral) 70,300,000 b. TOTAL FUNDING RECEIVED FOR THE HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE *107,814,257 *The total funding received indicated in Table 1 is funding mobilised for Gedeo/Guji response from various funding sources and not to the entire humanitarian response identified in the HRP.
  • Urban Water Supply Universal Access Plan.Pdf

    Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Water and Energy PART III Urban Water Supply Universal Access Plan (UWSPUAP) 2011-2015 December 2011 Addis Ababa 1 URBAN WATER SUPPLY UAP Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. The Urban UAP model and Assumptions ..................................................................................................... 4 4. Sector policy and Strategy ............................................................................................................................. 7 5. Cross cutting Issues ..................................................................................................................................... 10 6. Physical Plan ............................................................................................................................................... 10 7. Financial Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 12 7.1. Financial plan for Project Implementation .........................................................................................
  • Prevalence of and Risk Factors For

    Prevalence of and Risk Factors For

    Ophthalmic Epidemiology ISSN: 0928-6586 (Print) 1744-5086 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iope20 Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Trachoma in Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia: Results of 79 Population-Based Prevalence Surveys Conducted with the Global Trachoma Mapping Project Berhanu Bero, Colin Macleod, Wondu Alemayehu, Solomon Gadisa, Ahmed Abajobir, Yilikal Adamu, Menbere Alemu, Liknaw Adamu, Michael Dejene, Addis Mekasha, Zelalem Habtamu Jemal, Damtew Yadeta, Oumer Shafi, Genet Kiflu, Rebecca Willis, Rebecca M. Flueckiger, Brian K. Chu, Alexandre L. Pavluck, Anthony W. Solomon & for the Global Trachoma Mapping Project To cite this article: Berhanu Bero, Colin Macleod, Wondu Alemayehu, Solomon Gadisa, Ahmed Abajobir, Yilikal Adamu, Menbere Alemu, Liknaw Adamu, Michael Dejene, Addis Mekasha, Zelalem Habtamu Jemal, Damtew Yadeta, Oumer Shafi, Genet Kiflu, Rebecca Willis, Rebecca M. Flueckiger, Brian K. Chu, Alexandre L. Pavluck, Anthony W. Solomon & for the Global Trachoma Mapping Project (2016) Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Trachoma in Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia: Results of 79 Population-Based Prevalence Surveys Conducted with the Global Trachoma Mapping Project, Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 23:6, 392-405, DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1243717 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2016.1243717 © 2016 The Authors. Published with license Published online: 07 Nov 2016. by Taylor & Francis Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2068 View Crossmark data Citing articles: 19