C 'FNSI1S «)F INI)I" 20UI

Series - 13

NAGALA,ND

Paper - I of 2001

PR()VISIC)NAI.I P()PlJL.ATION TOTALS

1\1FTONOl\lFRFN AO I )jll'Clm ofCenslis Operations, Nagalalld. CONTENTS PAGES

Map of showing the position of (ill)

Map of Nagaland showing administrative division - 2001 (iv)

Acknowledgement (v)

Census Hierarchy (vii)

Figures at a glance. Nagaland (viii)

Figures at a glance Indla/State/UT (ix)

IntroducUon and Analysis of Data 1

Table - 1 : Population distribution, decadal growth rate. sex ratio and population density 11

Table - 2: Decada' variation in population for State/District 1901 - 2001 12

Table - 3: Sex ratio for State/Dlstrlcts 1901 - 2001 13

Table - 4: Population In the age group 0 - 6, Number of literates and Literacy rates for State/District 2001 14

Statement - 1 : Ranking of districts by population and size. , 991 - 2001 15

Statement - 2: Ranking of districts by sex ratio. 1991 - 2001 16

Statement - 3 : Ranking of districts by population density 17

Statement - 4 : Literacy rate 1951 - 2001 18

Statement -- 5 : LIteracy rnte bV SP,X tor Slatn/DI<;trl<:ls. 1991 & 2001 19

MAPS AND CHARTS Map on decadal groWth rates 1991 - 2001 20

Map on density of population 2001 21

Map on female literacy 2001 22

Map on sex ratio 2001 23

Notional Map on enumeration block No. 20 ( circle) 24

Charts on sex ratio 1901 - 2001 25

DHcndol pOfJulatlon Urowttl 190 t ~OO 1 26

Population and Net decadal accretion In NagZllrl1ld 190 1 .- 2001 27

Comparative population size and afea in the district of Nagaland 2001 28

Comparative population size in the districts of Nagaland 2001 29

literacy rate of distr~cts vls-a- vis the State average 2001 30

Trends In sex ratio in !tIe districts of Nngafnnd 1901 - 2001 31

Famale literacy rate of districts vis- a vis the Stole average 2001 32

A copy of the Houselist Schedule 33

A copy of the Hous£'hotd Sche(lulp. 35

~L ...... 37 fOR OFFICIAL USE ONt Y ',I t 1':1 t·~ of II ~1I1J\ ?I)I!I WI" m" 'r"n '",II III" ." INDIA , I I . .- ____ ~"IIII".IV, ",.110/ III • . \ ~,IIIIMIIIII ~ -I 100 Go 0 100 200 3<10 400 eoo ,!, , I ! I ,

N

MYANMAR (BURMA)

I OADIIA 8 NAGAR HAVELI BA Y $, OF BENGAL ARABIAN SEA

• CrrD 'I (Burm,) 7' 'Nll'rXIf'Idlm t. ~tndl.' ;,~ .

~ ~ BI",nl. (India) 12' ~ ~ , . ' -:::- '0;:" ANOAMAN SE.A 1- 1- " " ~ 1;.("1 a 0",

SO _ '~o~ "1'_ s' ~~.Q Ifl"; P - PONOICHEilRY Indira point ~ til o C E A .N I .. ______L ______l---~ 1..._____ 71,;...1' E.1,1 or Gfeenwich Ill' 11'

11:1' ",1111'110 <:IIfH), lIf1n\lia mar with the ~rmi~~ion orlhe Survey'" ('rnrfJl "rlnllia CI Govtrnment of India Copyrip,hl, 2001. , I he "'" II"'J~I \\lIle" "i h"lt. ('llenc.l illlo Iho: sea to. c.li!tnncc of Iwd • .: naulll:ullllileJ IIIr~\llIrll hom Ihe nrrr"rmic "'ue lillO, I II!' '''If'''ull'IIIIIIIIIIII''<'~ "<,h\l'CII ~ruliudulll'radc)h. ~Halll ftll.Jl\h:j(I,alll)u ~h"\l1I ulIlllI~ 'i.", '"kl["lrlcd f,ll," Ihe North·I'M,lern "rellS (n«lrp,Dni~lillnl"~I, 1<171 hllliliu yelill I>c ,'crilie,! ill NA(1AlAND AOMINISTRATIVE OIVISIONS 2001 '.'.

:'1(\11 CfIf'lTlll I HtIlDQUAI~lERS 0151RICT j~ " CIRCLE • •

I'

. 1.,'"• 11,.11\\1

f. f "h.", ' ....

5 'I ,~ ,~ ,< "'.' ,j L "-. G-) • ) 1 ,; \,.P'l,~~'11• ! ~ ,/ , / 1 ,I ",'

\ .

p

\: I, BOUNDARY 1t,j)[Rr'JA11()NAL STATE ., ." / DI51Rlr;T j ClHCl~,

IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This paper contains the fruits of the collective endeavour of Census Officials who toiled with an extraordinary spirit of co-operation to accomplish the great national task within the stipulated time. The purpose of bringing out this publication on. "Provisional Population Totals" is to make available to the Government and the people the basic population figures immediately after the population enumeration.

We have always received unstinted support and encouragement from the hon 'ble Chief Minister of Nagaland, Sbri S.C. Jamir but for whose active interest the Census Operations could not hav~ been conducted so successfully.

I am particularly grateful to the Chief Secretary Shri R:S. Pandey lAS, Add!. Chief Secretary and Commissioner Shri P .Talitemjen Ao lAS , Home Commissioner Shri H.K.Khulu lAS, the Director of School Education and the Additional Director of Economics and Statistics for the help and co-operation extended by them. I express my gratitude to Shri Tsumongo Lotha, Jt. Secretary (home) who acted efficiently as nodal officer between Central and State Governments extending all his efforts for successful conduct of Census of India 2001.

We are grateful to the Deputy Commissioners, notified as the Principal Census Officers, who provided the required leadership in the districts. My thanks are due to thl~ Additional Deputy Commissioners, the Sub-Divisional Officers (c) and the Extra Assistant Commissioners who along with their machinery accomplished the task so successfully. I am personally indebted to Shri lK. Banthia, Registrar General and Census C()mmissioner, India under whose affectionate qui dance and inspiration it has been a rare privilege for me to strive for excellence and on whose personal request I accepted the challenge of Census taking in Nagaland & completed it successfully in spite of arduous ..circumstances & constraints. I am thankful to Shri S.P. Sharma, Consultant and Shri RG. Mitra, Dy. Registrar General (C & n for their valuable guidance from time to time. Shri A. Pyrtuh, Jt. Director and Srnti. E.Peseyie, Asstt Director, who joined hands with me in field supervision and administrative and financial matters respectively deserve special word of praise. I would also like to express my sincere thanks to S/Shri A. laban, H.K.Endow and M. Peseyie Investigators who along with the members of the census family mentioned in the list have spared no pains in timely release of this publication. It was due to their tireless efforts that the Provisional Population totals were collected and transmitted to the Registrar General of India in the quickest possible manner.

A word of praise is due to Director All India Radio, Director Door Darshan , the Director Govt. Printing Press and the officers and staff working under him, Director fuforrnation and Publicity and other publicity media who helped us to carry the message of Census to the people of NagaI and effectively.

It is hoped that this booklet will be useful to those interested in the subject till th~~ final figures are published.

Kohima METONGMEREN AO, lAS 30th March 2001. Director of Census Operations,Nagland,

(V) OFFICERS AND OFFICIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PUBLICATION

OVER ALL SUPERVISION

IijESIGNA noN!

1. Shri Metongmeren Ao Director 2. Shri A. Pyrtuh It. Director

COMPILATION OF DATA

1. Mrs. E. Peseyie Asstt. Director 2. Shri A. lahan Statistical Investigator gr. II 3. Shri H.K. Endow Statistical Investigator gr. II 4. Shri M. Peseyie Statistical Investigator gr. II S. Shri D. Sarma Statistical Investigator gr. III 6. Mrs. GopaDas Statistical. Investigator gr. III 7. Mrs. R. Pichano Statistical Investigator gr. III 8. Shri Muyalo Kath Compiler

MAPS AND CHARTS

1. Shri Rohit Kumar Geogr~pher 2. Mrs. Thepfusanuo Sr. Artist

TYPING

1. Miss Vikiehunuo Sr. Steno 2. Shri Ranjan Changkakoty Compiler 3. Shri Ashim Sengupta U.D.C. 4. Shri A Dikho L.D.C. S. Mrs. Shipra Chakravorty L.D.C. 6. Miss Ketholenuo L.D.C.

PROOF READING

1. Mrs. Lucy Tep Proof Reader 2. Miss Kilenkala L.D.C. til

VI ------.------~

MEMBERS OF STAFlf ASSOCIATED WITH 2001 CENSUS OPERAnONS NAGALAND

TRAINING AND FIELD SUPERVISION

IDESIGNA noN!

1. Shri Metongmeren Ao Director 2. Shri A. Pyrtuh Jt. Director 3. Mrs. E. Peseyie Asstt. Director 4. Shri A. Jahan Statistical Investigator gr.n 5. Shri RK Endow Statistical Investigator gf.1I 6. Shri Z. Nisa Statistical Investigator gr.n 7. Shri M.Peseyie Statistical Investigator gr.n 8.Shri D. Sarma Statistical Investigator gr. III 9. Mrs. Gopa Das Statistical Investigator gr. III 1O.Mrs.R. Pichano Lotha Statistical Investigator gr. III 11.Shri R.K. Gnosh Statistical Investigator gr. III 12.Shri Visasielie Statistical Investigator gr. ITI 13. Shri Tinuwati Statistical Investigator gr. III 14.Shri Lhovishe Chishi Statistical Investigator gr. ill 15.Shri N.K.Roy Chowdhury Compiler 16.Shri Viyovol Chaya Compiler 17. Shri Imkongnungsang Compiler 18.Shri Ranjan Changkakoty Compiler 19.5hri Muyalo Kath Compiler 20.Shri Senchulo Kath Compiler 21. Shri Mhabemo Lotha Asstt. Compiler

RECORD MANAGEMENT

l.Shri A. Jahan Statistical Investigator gr.II 2.Mrs. Lucy Tep ProofReader 3. Shri Muyalo Kath Compiler 4.Shri Priya Ranjan Jr. Hindi Translator

vn HIERARCHY F'OR CENSUS ENUMERATION, 2001, NAGALAND

REGISTRAR GENERAL & CENSUS COMMISSIONER OF INDIA

DIRECTOR OF CENSUS OPERATIONS NAGALAND J I DIRECTORATE STATE GOVERNMENT AGENCY OF FOR CENSUS OPERATIONS CENSUS WORK

JOINT DIRECTOR PRINCIPAL CENSUS OFFICERS

I I ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DISTRICT CENSUS OFFICERS .

STJ~TISTICAL INVESTIGATORS GRADE"" ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CENSUS OFFICERS

I

STATISTICAL INVESTIGATORS GRADE-III SUB-DIVISIONAL CENSUS OFFICERS

; 'COMPILERS &SUPPORTING STAFF CHARGE OFFICERS

SUPERVISORS

ENUMERATORS ...IlL

(VIII) FIGURES AT A GLANCE CENSUS OF INDIA 2001 NAGALAND

(Provisional Population Totals)

A NUMBER OF DISTRICTS 8

B. AREA IN SQUARE KILOMETERS 16,579 c TOTAL POPULATION PERSONS 19,88,636 MALES 10,41,686 FEMALES 9,46,950

D. DECADAL POPULATION GROWTH, 1991- 2001

1. Absolute 7, 79, 090 2. Percentage 64.41

E. POPULATION DENSITY 120 (per square kilometer)

F. SEX RATIO 909

G. POPULATION °- 6 PERSONS MALES FEMALES 1. Absolute 2,80, 172 1,41,852 1,38,320 2. Percentage to Total Population 14. 09 13. 62 14.61

H. LITERACY PERSONS MALES FEMALES

1.Absolute 11,46,523 6,45,807 5,00,716 2.Literacy Rate 67. 11 71. 77 61. 92

(IX) PROVISIONAL FIGURES AT Population distribution, percentage decadal growth, Percentage decadal S(''ltof!' . India/States/ Population 2001 growth UT Union territories· Code Persons Males Females 1981- 1991- 1991 2001 2 3 4 5 6 7

INDIA 1.2.3 [,027,015.247 531,277,078 495,738,169 23.86 21.34 Jammu & Kashmir ~ 10.069.917 5,300,574 4,769.343 30.34 29.04 20.79 17.53 2: Ilimachull'rlldcsh !I. 7 (1,077 .248 3,085,256 2.991,992 3 Punjab 24.289,296 12,963,362 11,325,934 20.81 19.76 40.33 4 Chandigarh • q()O,914 508.224 392,690 42.16 5 Uttaranchal 8.479,562 4,316,401 4,163,161 24.23 19.20 6 Haryana 21.082.989 11,327,658 9,755,331 27.41 28.06 51.45 46.31 7 Delhi • 13.782.976 7,570,890 6,212,086 S Rajasthan 56,473.122 29,381,657 27,091,465 28.44 28.33 9 Uttar Pradesh 166.052.859 87,466,301 78,586,558 25.55 25.80 10 Bihar 82.878.796 43,153,9M 39,724,832 23.38 28.43. II Sikkim 540.493 288,217 252.276 28.47 32.98 12 Amnachal Pradesh I.OC)I.117 573,951 517,166 36.83 26.21 \} Naga\and 1.988.636 1.041,686 946,950 56.08 64,41 14 Vlanipur 2.388.634 1,207,338 1,181,296 29.29 30.02 15 Vlizoram 891.058 459,783 431,275 39.70 29.18 16 Tripura 3.191,168 1,636,_138 1,555,030 34.30 15.74 17 Meghalaya 2,J06.069 1,167,840 1.138,229 32.86 29.94 IX 26.6~8.407 13,787,799 12,850,608 24.24 18.85 I C) West [kngal XIt,121,171 41,487,694 38,733.477 24.73 17.84 20 Jharkhand 26.909,428 13,861,277 13,048,151 24.03 23.19 21 Orissa 36.706.920 18.612.340 18,094,580 20.06 15.94 22 Chhatisgarh 20.795.956 10,452,426 10,343,530 25.73 18.06 23 Madhya Pradesh 60,385,118 31,456.873 28,928,245 27.24 24.34 24 Gujarat 6.7 50.596.992 26,344.053 24,252,939 21.19 22.48 25 Daman & Diu .. I ~R.059 92,478 65.581 28.62 55.59 26 Dadra & Nagar Hllveli ... 220.451 121.731 98.720 33.57 59.20 27 Maharashtra 96,752.247 50,334,270 46.417,977 25.73 22.57 28 Andhra Pradesh 75.727.541 38,286,811 . 37,440,730 24.20 13.86 29 Kama taka 52.733,958 26,856,343 25,877.615 21.12 17.25 .30 Goa 1.343.998 685,617 658,381 16.08 14.89 31 I,akshadweep ... 60.595 31.118 29,477 28.47 17.19 ~~ Kcrala J I.R~,U'j 19 15,4611,664 16,369,955 14.32 9.42 .P Tamil Nadu 62.110.839 31.268,654 30,842,185 15.39 11.l9 J4 Pondicherry * 973,829 486,705 487,124 33.64 20.56 35 Andaman & Nicobar Islands • 356.265 192.985 163,280 48.70 26.94 Noles: I. The population of India includes the estimutcd population of entire Kachchh district, Morvi. Maliya- Miyana and Wankaner talukas of Rajkot district. Jodiya taluka of lamnagar district of Gujarat State and entire Kinnaur district of Himachal Pradesh where population enumeration of Census of India, 2001 could not be <:onducted due to natural calamities. 2. For working out the population density of India and Jammu and Kashmir the entire area and population of those areas of Jammu and Kashmir which are under illegal occupation of likistan and China have not been taken into account. J. TIlt! literacy rates tilf India have been worked out by excluding the population and number of literates of areas affected by natural calamities of Guianlt and Himachal Pradesh as per details given in Note 1 above .

.1, While working our tht: percentage uec:toal growth of population of Jammu and Kashmir the population tigures ror 11191 have been worked l)lIt hy intt'l1'olation as 1991 Census could not be held there owing to di<:tllrbed conditiuns. x POPULATION TOTALS 2001 A GLANCE ~cx ratio, popul~tion density and literacy ratc Statel Se:t ratio Population density Literacy rate 2001 India/States! UT ( females per (,000 males) (per sq. km.) Union territories· Code 1991 2001 1991 2001 Persons Males Females

III II 1'2 I! 14 J 8 __ 9_ .. _. ____ ._ -.. ~--~--~

1.1, .\ IN III" "n 1)11 ZI,7 Jl.1 h5.IN 75.H5 5·1.lfi H'II, 1)11() /I I"l \.1·111 1t'./~ 41."2 ~ 11111111111 .'It Kdsllllllr '171, '170 (1.1 lO'l nil l

II. FI!!ur~s shl)wn against Gujarat have been arrived at altcr inciliding the estimated figures of entire Kachchh district, Mocvi, i\faliya-Miyana ,1I1d Wankaner talukas of Rajkot district. Jodiya raluka of Jamnagar district of Gujarat State where the population t'1H1111l'f3tion ofCenslIs of India, 2001 could not bc conducted due to natural calamity, 7. Literacy rates shtlwn again~t Hilllllcnal Pradesh ami Gujnra! do not include areas affected by natural calamities, !he details of which are given in Note I above.

XI

INTRODUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA

STATE HIGHLIGHTS

Nagaland, the Sixteenth State of Indian Union attained its state hood in 1963. The State was formally inaugurated on December 1, 1963 at Kohima, the Capital of the State by the President ofIndia, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, with Mr. P.Shilu Ao as the first Chief Minister of NagaI and.

Physically the State of Nagaland is triangular in shape having an area of 16, 579 Square Kilometre. It is one of the North Eastern States of India, sharing an international border with the adjacent country of Myanmer on its extreme south east. The State lies between 25'6'N and 27'4 N latitudes and between 95'20 E and 95' 15' E longitudes. Nagaland is bounded by the states of Arunachal Pradesh on the North, Manipur on the South, on the East and Assam on the West.

Nagaland is a hilly mountainous State with its peaks, Saramati (3840 metres) in district, Japfu (3014 metres) in , Zaniibou (2750 metres) and Kiipamedzti. (2620 metres) both in district. The plain area of the State is limited to , Jalukie and adjoining areas with Assam. Kohima, the capital of Nagaland is situated at 1444 metres above the sea level. The State has a beautiful land 'scape and is divided into 8(eight) districts viz Mon, Tuensang, , Zunheboto, , Dimapur, Kohima and Phek.

The population of the State as per the 1991 census and other characteristics are as follows:

1. Population 12,09,546

2. Growth Rate + 56. 08

3. Sex Ratio 886

4. Percentage of Urban Population 17. 21

5. Literacy Rate 6l. 65

6. Density 73 i:VTRODlICTION

The Indian Census has a long tradition ()f releasirw: a very ~ ~- comprehensive population data and it has always been a matter of great prtde for the cl:nsus organisation to release the initial population totals in the shortest po~s:ible time.

However it is not an easy task. Though census is. a Central subjei:t the achievement of the Indian Census had always been the outcome of a very dose co-operation between the centre and the State. The works of census c.onsisting of two phases viz : Houselisting and Population Enumeration was organised and implemef\ted the State administrative machinery. The Deputy commissioners who were notified as the Principal Census Otlicers for their districts were th~ overall incharge of Census operations in the distlicts. They were assisted by an Additional Deputy Commissioners each who had been notified as the District Census Officer. The Sub-Divisional Oftlcers (Civil) notifi.ed as the Sub-Divisional Ct:l1SUS Omcers \-vert:: responsible tbl' organisation and supervision of the tidd works in their jUlri~,diction. The Extra Assistant Commissioners were notified as Charge Offi.cers and were directly responsible tor the conduct of census taking in their respective jurisdictions The District Statistical Officers of the Department of Economics & Statistics, Nagaland were notified as Additional District Census Ott:cers for assisting the Oistt;ct Census Officers in imparting training to the Enu:neratofs and Supervisors. One Enumerator for each Enumerator's Block and one Supt~rvisor for 5 Enumerators were appointed to conduct hnuselisting and Actual P','pulation Enumerations for Census ofIndia, 200 I.

The State of Nagaland under the adminIstrative division of eight (8) districts were placed under the over all control and charge of eight (8) Prir;,~ipal Census Otlicers (Deputy Commissioners) and under them there IN ere 102 Ch1l ·-ge oft1cers, 550 Supervisors and 3150 Enumerators.

The entire work and field Supervision during the population enumeration was done by the Teachers of Primary, Middle and High Schools who were appointed as Enumerators and Supervisors

The field operations for the census, 2001 were conducted in two phases viz: Houselisting Operations from 16tJ1 May to 151h June, 2000 and the th Population Enumeration 2001 from gth February to 28 February with a revisional r(lutld fmm 1'4. to Slh March 2001. Houseless population were enumerate,d on the m ic~night of 28 th February, 200 t. The houseless popufatlOn enuml'.ration was conducted under the direct supervi.sion of Director of Census Operations, Nagaland alollg with the Additional Deputy Commissioner and Sub-Divif-ional Officer (Civil) 0:' Uimapur District and technical staff of the Censlis Directorate 3

The Chief Secretary to the was the th flrst to be enumerated by the Director of Census Operations, Nagaland on 9 February 2001. Since the Governor of Nagaland and. Chief Minister were out of station they were enumerated only on 20th February, 2601 and 21 st February, 2001 respectively by the Investigators of this Directorate. I

The final phase of training of the staff of this Directorate was th th completed on 24th and 25 Oct. 2000 just after the State level conference on 16 September, 2000. The District Statistical Officers who were notified as Additional District C~nsus Officers attended the training cla.sses in this Directorate. Training for Enumerators and Supervisors could only be started on 15th January 2001 which was concluded on 3rd February 2001 due to late receipt of the instruction manuals and training schedules. The Actual Schedules for Population Enumeration 2001 was th delivered to all the District headquarters and sub-divisional headquarters from 30 January 2001 to 2nd February 2001.

SUPERVISION OF POPULATION ENUMERATION, 2001

Massive Supervision Programme was chalked out by the Directorate. The three groups of officers and staff covered every District, Sub­ Divisions and Charges in the State for effective supervision during actual work of Population Enumeration as follows: Group A District

1. Director 1. 2. Shri H.K. Endow, 2. Mokokchung " 3. Tuensang " 4. Zunheboto " 5.Mon " (Tobu Sub-Div.)

GroupB 1. Kohima " (Peren, Jalukie) 1. A. Pyrtuh, IDCO Pughoboto under Zunheboto 2. D. Sarma, SA district. 2. (Niuland, Medziphema) 3. Mon District (Tizit, , Aboi) Mon Sadar Groupe

1. A. Jahan, Investigator 1. 2. Ranjan Changkakoty, 2. Sub-Division Computor 4

PUBLICITY

The massive publicity programme launched to create awareness among the general masses of the State was very effective. The hon'ble Chief Minister of Nagaland Shri S.C. Jamir and the Director of Census Operations, Nagaland Shri Metongmeren Ao gave radio talks on the eve of Census of India, 2001. These talks were later on broadcast in different dialects through All India Radio, Kohima and the Doordarshan Kohima. All these measures proved to be very effective measure. The peculiar problem of communication in the different hilly terrain in Nagaland was finally overcome by timely assistance rendered by the State Government through police Radio network along with the improved and advanced FAX facility which made the immediate transmission and receipt of the provisional population figures from all the Deputy Commissioners from their districts possible and were received by 9th except Qne district which was received on 10th March, 2001. The same was compiled in this office and communicated to the Registrar General, India by FAX at 17:20 hrs on 10th March, 2001.1t has been a remarkable achievement that Nagaland State has been able to release the provisional Population totals on the very day stipulated by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India despite the various topographical and other administrative difficulties which are very peculiar to this State and different from other advance State of the country.

NEW FEATURES OF THE CENSUS OF INDIA 2001

In the 1991 Census both the individual slip and household schedule were canvassed. In the Census of India 2001, the individual slip was replaced by a household schedule as the data source at the population enumeration stage. In the Census of India 2001, a question on the physically/mentally disabled was introduced in the household schedule. In the 1991 Census question was asked from those seeking/available for job from non-worker only. In the census of India 2001, that question was extended to marginal workers also. Distance from the residence to place of work and the mode of travel to place of work were two new questions asked to the other workers. In the Census of India 2001, the questions on ex-serviceman incorporated in the individual slip of the 1991 Census was dropped. Instead a new question on the total net area of land under cultivation/plantation was asked from those engaged in cultivation/plantation. 5

ANALYSIS OF THE PROVISIONAL POPULATION RESlfL TS, 2001

STATE GRO'''TH RATE

The Provisional Population of Nagaland stands at 19, 88, b36 at 000 hour of March L 2001 out of which 10, 4,886 are males and 9, 46, 950 are temdies, all addition of 7, 79, 090 persons to the population as it stood at sunrise of March 1, 199]. thereby making an overall grovvth rate of 64. 41 per cent during the decade trom 1991 to 2001. It is the highest decadal growth rate ever in Nagaland. In fact the dccadal growth rate of the population in Naga[and has been growing progressively during the last seven decades. From a humble decadal grmvth rak of jw;! 0.04 per cent during tht decade 1931 - 41, it has pro6Tfessivdy grown to a mighty 5b 08 per cent during 1981 and 64 41 per cent during 1991 - 0 l In 1991 Nagaland earned the distinction of being the most fecund State in india with the highest decadal gftJwth rate of pl)pulation during the decade from 1981 to 1991 among all the Stdh~s/Uninn Territories in the country. That distinction is bt'ing retaint'd in 2001 alsu, while the all India average decadal groVvth rate has been declining tram 24.6b percent during 1971-81 to 23.50 percent during 1981-91 and to 21.34 percent during 1991- 200i.

INDIA/NAGALAND GROWTH RATE OF POPllLAT10N

198] 1991 2001

India 24.66 23.50 21.34

Nagaland 5005 56.08 64.41

DlfSTRICT GRO\VTH RATE

With the exception of Mokokchung and Kohima districts where th,~ decadal groWth rate of the population has declined tl-om 52.39 per cent during 1981 .- 91 tu 43.48 per cent dUling 1991-01 in the former and from 68.98 per cent during 1981-91 to 49.96 per cent during 1991-01 in the latter, there has been a rise in thl;; decadal growth rate of the population in all the remaining six districts, the highest being in Wokha district at 95.01 per cent against 42.80 per cent during 1981 - 91. There has been only marginal rise in the decadal growth rate in the population of Phek district which has risen from 44.66 per cent during 1981 - 91 to 45 12 per cent during t 991-0 1. The lowest decada! grO\vth rate ofthe population during 1991-01 is noticed 6 in ~!fokokchung, at 4348 per cent. [t is further noticed that while the decadal growth rate of the popUlation in Mon, Tuensang, Wokha and Dimapur is above the State average of 6441 per cent, the gro\Vth rate in Mokokchung, Zunheboto, Kohima and Phd~ is below the State average.

NAGALAND/DISTRICT GROWTH RATE OF POPULATION

1971 - 81 1981 - 9l 1991 - 01

NagaJand 50.05 56.08 6441

MOIl 22.52 58.98 73.41

Tuensang 42.60 69.87 78.10

Mokokchung 25.88 52.39 43.48

Zunheboto 2961 32.68 61.00

Wokha 49.92 42.80 ,95.01

Dimapur 176.44 55.16 7330

Kohima 54.56 68.98 49.96

Phek 5836 44.66 45.12

STATE DENSITY OF POPIJLATION

Density of population is taken as the number of persons living in an area of one square kilometre .with the growth of the population in Nagaland during 1991-0 I and her area remaining constant, it is natural for the density of the population to rise. This phenomenon is noticed at national level also. At national level, the density of the population has risen from 216 in 1981 to 267 in }991 and to 324 in 200 I. Similarly in Nagai and , it has gone up from 47 in 1981 to 73 in 1991 and to 120 in 2001. .. INDIA/NAGALAND DENSITY OF POPULATION

1981 1991 200t

India 216 267 324

Nagaland 47 73 120 7

DISTRICT DENSITY OF THE POPULATION

There has been a rise in the density of the population in all the districts. In both 1991 and 2001, the highest density of the population is noticed in Dimapur district and the lowest in Phek district. While Zunheboto, Dimapur, Kohima and Phek retain the same rank in density of population in both 1991 and 2001, Mon is up by one rank in 2001, from third to second and Tuensang and Mokokchung are down by one rank each from sixth to seventh and second to third respetively in 2001. Dimapur is the most densely populated district of NagaI and. It is noticed that Mon, Mokokchung, Zunheboto and Dimapur are the only districts with a density of the population above the state average of 120. The density of the population in the rest of the districts is be:low the State average.

NAGALANDIDISTRICT DENSITY OF POPULATION

1981 1991 2001

Nagaland 47 73 120

Mon 53 84 145

Tuensang 32 55 98

Mokokchung 64 99 141

Zunheboto 58 77 123

Wokha 36 51 99

Dimapur 84 192 333

Kohima 55 67 101

Phek 35 50 73

STATE SEX RATIO

The sex ratio is reckoned as the number of females per 1000 males. In bOoth 1981 and 1991 as well as in 2001, the sex ratio in Nagaland has been below the all -. India ratio average. But while the national sex ratio has declined from 934 in 1981 to 929 in 1991 which has marginal been gone up to 933 in 2001, the sex ratio of Nagaland shows a progressive rising trend from 863 in 1981, 890 in 1991 and 909 in 2001. 8

INDIAINAGALAND SEX RATIO

1981 1991 2001

India 934 929 933

Nagaland 863 890 909

DISTIUCT SEX RATIO

In the districts of Nagaland too, a rising trend in the sex ratio is noticed in all the districts, except in Zunheboto where the sex ratio has declined from 964 in 1991 to 945 in 2001. However despite the decline, Zunheboto still has the highest sex ratio among the districts ofNagaland closely followed by that of Kohima. The lowest sex ratio is recorded in Dimapur. It is further noticed that the sex ratio in Tuensang, Mokokchung, Zunheboto, Wokha, Kohima and Phek is above the State average of909, and that in Mon and Dimapur, below the State average.

NAGALANDIDISTRICT SEX RATIO

1981 1991 2001

Nagaland 863 890 909

Mon 874 872 881

Tuensang 892 889 913

Mokokchung 906 912 919

Zunheboto 959 964 945

Wokha 919 917 927

Dimapur 669 830 854

Kohima 906 879 944.

Phek 873 880 923 9

STATE LlTI:RACY RATE

Literacy is defined as an ability on the part of a person to read ilnd write with understanding in any language. If a person can only read but cannot wrire and vice versa. he is not treated as literate. FUliher like in the 1991 census, the ce:nsus of India 200 I considers a person to be literate if he is 7 years and above and can read and write \\lith understanding in any language Those below 7 years of age, that is, those aged 0 - 6 even if they can read and vl'Tite with understanding in any language, they are not treated as literate. So literacy rate is calculated by subtracting the population in the age-group 0 - 6 from the total population Like the population, a rising trend is also noticed in the literacy rate at both National and State levels" At National level, it has risen from 52.tl percent in 1991 to 65.38 percent in 2001. At Sf aft.' level, it has gone lip fi·om 61. 30 percent in 1991 to b 7.11 percent in 2001. As in 1991, in 2001 tOll, the literacy rak in NagaJand is higher than the all India average By sex too, the literacy rate has risen at both national and state level. But while In ]9S'!, the male literacy rate in Nagaland is higher than the aU-India average male li:.e:·acy rate, in 200 I, the all-Lndia average male literacy rate is higher than that in Nagatand. However, the female literacy rate in NagaJand is higher than the: all-India 3ver.Jge female literacy rate in both 1991 and 2001.

INDIA/NAGALAND LITERACY R-\ TE

1991 2001

lr:dia Persons 52.21 65.38

Mates 61.13 75.85 Females 39.2C.) 54.16

NagaJand Persons 61.65 67.11

Males b7.6:. 71.77

Females S4.7S 6t 92

DISTRICT LITERACY RATE

Like the State level literacy rate, the literacy rate in the districts too has risen during the decade from 1991 tu 2001 in all the districts. Like in 1991, the highest literacy rate is recorded in Mokokchung at 84.27 per cent and the lowest in r,,10Il, at 42.25 per cent. Like in 199L the literacy rate in six districts, l\lokokchung, ZWlheboto, Wokha, Dimapur, Kohima and Phek is above the Slate average of 67.11 per Gent and that in Mon and Tuensang is below the State average. 10

NAGALANDfDISTRICT LITERACY RATE

1991 2001

Nagaland 61.30 67.11

Mon 36.02 42.25

Tuensang 48.39 51.30

Mokokchung 77.85 84.27

Zunheboto 64.36 69.73

Wokha 73.92 81.28

Dimapur .£S·{) 78.15

Kohima ,~:}. ')q 74.28

Phek 62.59 71.35 ~ to co --.J O'l U1 +>- W I\:) .... __. Z ~

'1J Q ~ N ~ -i ~ Z I 0 C C l> ~ 0 Z 0 0 m "I /\ m Z G> "1J /\ » I Z 0 ~ '1J I 0 (f) l> 9.(f) c » m A" en ...... "0 » tll (') » ~ I\:) ..,...... III C JJ 0 Z -. CD ii) :r z o -~ -I Q 0 ~. =: 0 C 0 Z :::J G) Q. (ii' _.. __. __. .... '1J :!. w w I\:) I\:) CD CD -C" __. +>-__. +>- 0 O'l__. C11 I\) C11 CD W (h c (l) +>- OJ +>- --.J +>- CO 0 I\) w w a to N en ~ (1l ::J o· m en <0 a (.0) C>_. a w en -:::J ~ m I\:) CD <0 0 +>- (1l '1J 0 "1J CD __. __. .... c:: ...... I\:) ~ " (')... --.J 0') 0) co -..,j ...... w g PJ CD --.J _. 0) W lD (X) 0) CD .... +>- ri. -..,j 0) 0) (X) CD 0 :::J 0 w +>- a (1l en ::J (X) 0 w I\:) I\:) I\:) CD 0 CD I» I\) ..... C11 0 -..,j CD co C11 (1l I\:) IQ- a CD 0__. Q...... __. __. CD CD ...... " (') ~ --.J C11 ."., -..,j -..,j 0 lD I\) tg 3 m ..... I\) I\:) -..,j _. (1l C11 I» _... U1 CD --.J III Q. r 0') 0 +>- I\:) CD lD C11 co Cil m 0) 0') +>- -...j CD 0 ..... lD U1 en ~ ."., (J1 --.J OJ I\) I\:) W lD 0 IQ ..... __. '1J ... CD 0 ...... lD ...... + + + + + t .. + + CD__. 0 ! ."., 0) C11 +>- W (Jl m (Jl U1 m CD :r I 10 ::J ."., (X) ~ I\:) N I\) lD en en c.o .., ...... i.» (0 _... OJ i.» W Co (0 0 _.. o jl) OJ 0) (X) O'l 0 (X) c.o -...j (X) co !IO CD :TCD - _...... 0. III CD C/) lD -0 CD + + + + + + + + + to__. (I) jl) )( +>- ."., -..J lD 0)__. .J>. -..J -..J -..J 0. I C11 <0 W C11 W w ~ ... ~ 6 ~ OJ __. (0 0 0 ~ ..... +>- j:...... I\:) 0) w ..... (X) I\) 0 0 0 .... -o· OJ :::J ..... Q. to "..,(I) Z(f) co (I) - "1J to ..... c:: (I) 0 <0 - 3 >< co co co to to co co co 0 3 co -..J W ..... en ..... co -..J co -- 0 I» CY I I\) (1l -(I) .., c 0 <0 0 --.J +>- <0 I\:) 0 "m 3 m... e I» a o· 0= fI.) :::J 0 CD co 0 2!.. Q. to lD co <0 co <0_. co co CD ..... CD I\:) ."., C11 I\:) ."., .... co__. 0 :::J w ."., ~ -..J C11 co w co til ~ ..... il ..... co 0 0 to ...... c:: 0) C11 " C11 to C11__. -..J c.o OJ -..J (I) 0 -..J I\:) -..J. <0 C11 +>- W "... e- en o· .fl :::J fI.) 0. _. 0 ;0;- (I) .... 0 ::J .... c.u .... __. __...... ? en --.J 0 c.u co fI.) ."., CO ~ 1'1.) ~ w .... W to W .... co C11 0 ..... N a co 0 0 co .,...CN 'Of; '¢ ~ " + + ~ + + + + + 'i fI'J ...- "- (J LI') ('oJ 1:0 ~ N " U) '<:I' ~ LO as t';- cci oi ..- I.() c:i 0 ..... N ~ en 0> CO) C\I C\I ' + + 0 «I"'" en > ..... 0 « « 0> 0 N en ,.._0 (') ,... Cii tD Z Z ~ t') I"- W I'-. -c II( cO co t.ri cci tI) .... ]'. + ,- .,... .- ~ (,) rJ v + + + ~ .~ III 0> N c: .- .~ -0 OJ ,.... ,... co « co{ ..-,.._ en lQ (J,) Ol CVl .- I'-. Z Z I'-- ~ 0 q a tU , <.0 C') I- fa .g Z c.? I ..... Z 0 0 a: c: Vi C\I « en co{ ~ (fJ z ill « ::> (I) 0._ I 0.. ~ (,) (]I +>0- W I\.) ...... z 9 -u A Q ~ N s: -I s: Z (J) ::r a s: 0 c: 0 c: 0 m m :r "I, ;,>, 7. A m A ~? z iii I ::I: () - "Tl III (/J t J ); L e .v ill I\.) Iii' JJ () » §; .-+ 0 :r:'" Z z ::l. -I c: G> 0 ..(') 0 Z Q

..... , , (A ..... <0 0 OJ co co co co ...... j>. ...., ...., ...., ~ w (]I (]I (A w w Cj ....

...... , , +>0- ..... <0 co OJ a 0 0 <0 f\.) C'l 0 co (]l <0 :8 ... (l) co .j>. I\J (]l I\J Co) ...... , , (]I ..... <0 <0 CJ:) 0 0 0 <0 (/) -..j ... C'l m f\.) ~ m f\.) ...., i; -..j ... CD ~ >f- (J) ...... , , ...... m ~ co 0 CJ:) 0 0 0 en <0 0 m 0 w +>0- f\.) ~ IS w f\.) +>0- (J1 W -..j W ..., .... ~ Ie. a ::s o· (') . III ...... , , ...... , .... i! V) co 0 0 0 0 z ... CD (,] (n t· (T! 2 '£ c: ~ .f. 01 (0) (JI ..... 8 - ,.=.a ~ . 3 .... ~ r- r-r- 0- (II ...... 0 w ...... , ex> .. <0 <0 ex> Cl 0 0 0 co 9. (/) 01 <0 I\.] W f\.) U) W 01 ..... 01 ..., <0 -J (1l ..., ex> m ..... (II III 3 It- III ..... m -III <0 ex> ..., co <0 co m (0 CD <0 CII ::s .... <0 +>0- 0 ex> ...., (]l c;..l ~ Q. 01 (]l W .j>. .t:> .... co ex> CD ~ ~... Q ..... II) ...... 0 .. co ex> (l) co co CD <0 co CID 0 co 0 -,i" ...., ...... , ...., 0 0...., N...., J>. ex> c.> 0 II) .... a ex> +>0- ...... c;..l ...... 3 - e!- m ...... ~ ex> co en co co ex> ex> CID .... co ...., 0 m ..... (]l ~ <0 ...., ex> w ·m co co co (l) f\.) +>0- ~ ...... ex> ex> ex> co co co ex> ex> N <0 (XI -..j w .... en ... ex> ...., I co 0 <0 0 ...., +>0- I\.) co I\.) Gl ....

... N co co ex> to co <0 ex> c;..l 0 I\.) (]l I\.] +>0- ~ .... ex> w t .I>- -..j U1 to c;..l .... S ~ ..,..C\I C\I N r..:

f/) c:o ~(I') Q) Q.

a CJ aI­ £Xl ~ W Z I ~ z w Z w a :> :> I :E I- N Q. o Z ,.... ,... C\I (1) ...." U1 ...... ~ ...... 0...... :x- :5"

-0 A Q :E N ~ -l ~ ::r: 0 3: 0 c 0 c 0 m J: A Z A m Z A » I I 0 Z 0 3: -0 m en iii· » c » CD z » I\) ..., :0 0 Z 0 I -o· (j) -i C ... 0 Z G> -0 0 ...... _. _.. 1\)"0 c:.>_. c:.> I\) ~_.. I\) ~ 0 (1)_. U1 I\) (J1 c:.> 01:: (X) ~ (X) ~ ...." ~ co o iii I\) c:.> w 0 co I\) (X) (1) ...... ~ O'l (X) co 0 w 0 0 o· (1) O'l I\) 00 co 0 ..... ~ ::;, "0 0 -0 I:: -0 iii (1).... d: (") ...... i'-) .. ~ 0 (1) ...." (1] ....., I\) (1l (1l - 0 W 0 :J :J :,:.. (.n ..... ~ -:,:.. ~ 0 ... (J1 i:xl CD 0 g_ ...... 0 co c.u O'l c..n ...... 0 ::r... --... (1) 0 C/I ![ III -.-+ (1) -0 0 ...... I\) ...... I\) ...... -0 0 0 ...." ~ c..n COl:: ~ co ...." I\) (1) (X) I\) CO CO- ...... (1) <0 en I\) w to m .... ~. (1l (JJ (1l ...... " 0 <0 0 (1) 0 ..... I\) ()) ~ (1) (0 ::;, "0 0 "0 I:: -0 .....CD ~ (") ...... 0 CD (X) ...... , (1) ...... , ..... ::;, ~ c.u CO I\) co :J :,:.. 00 (0 (:) i\) m co ... (1l C:.> ~ (1l w -. 9- ... (.\) ...... c.u co (1)

a(l)

:D .... III ...... , co ::;, I\) cu (X) ...." ~ ...... (1l (0 m ...... :x- ::r ...... en 0) .,.. U') ,.... v (f) ...... C\I CO CO II) .¥ c:as a:

ell -j! as E , 0 .... CD C\I en C\I v ...... ,... 0 CD,.... 0 0 m "It ..... CO .... CO C') CO 0 ...- CO CO CD en m CO IX) CO .... 0 --(l) :::: 0. m ell .... CD >< as I» E N en CD .a>- - 0 c U) - -I» .... Q) \0 E Co) ..0 I» "i:- E .... CIS U) ::J ...... (f) CD It) ..... "It '¢ (f) - 0 C') CD .,...... V N U") V (\j - 0 (f)- Q Z CO en CD en CD CD CD CD - C\I -0 I 0 ;;:; -en ...ro c: I :i2 X c: enCD a:CIS zC!> :l 0 ....o CJ t- .;:: Z :r 0 () !Xl a:: -ell ~ ~ W ~ :I: a.. ~ B '" 0 ::x: ~ z ~ x:: < z w z ::E :I: UJ 0 ~ 0 :::> 0 0 :r: ~ I- ~ N s: 0 !:s:: a...... 0 0 C\I c: .- ,.... CO L{) T"'" (f) CD '¢ ..x '" c:ro cr 17

Statement· 3

Ranking of Districts by Population densJty

Rank in 2001 District Population density Rank 1991 2001 1991 1 2 3 4 5

2 MON 145 84 3

7 TUENSANG 98 55 6

3 MOKOKCHUNG 141 99 2

4 ZUNHE80TO 123 77 4

6 WOKHA 99 51 7

1 DIMAPUA 333 191 ,

5 KOHIMA 101 67 5

B PHEK 73 50 9 18

Statement ~ 4

Uteracy Rate 1951-2001

Year -- Persons Males Females 1 2 3 4

1951 10.52 15.18 5.75

1961 21.95 29.22 14.02

1971 33.78 42.57 23.38

1981 50.28 58.58 40.39

1991 61.65 67.62 54.75

2001 67.11 71.77 61.92

Note: Literacy rates for 1951, 1961 and 1971 relate to population aged five years and above. The rates for the years 1981 to 2001· relate to the population aged seven years and above. 19

Statement· 5

Uteracy rates by sex for State and Districts

," 51. Statel Literacy rate No. District Persons Males Females 1991 2001 1991 2001 1991 2001 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 NAGALAND 61:65 67.11 67.62 71.77 54.75 61.92

2 MON 36.02 42.25 41.90 46.70· 29.10 37.12

3 TUENSANG 48.39 51.30 53.98 55.97 41.98 46.12

4 MOKOKCHUNG 77.85 84.27 80.52 86.14 74.88 82.20

5 ZUNHEBOTO 64.36 69.73 70.76 73.43 57.63 65.80

6 WOKHA 73.92 81.28 81.0S 85.69 65.99 76.46

7DlMAPUR C~!;:r,{,6 78.15 "Z!;tr't 82.16 , Z_'il2- 73.34

8 KOHIMA J~l] til 74.28 77,~ 81.44 ~,66 66.64

9 PHEK 62.59 71.35 72.28 78.97 51.34 63.08 20 .., ...... _ _. ._ . i '

I , NAGALANO .. . llFLALJAL,' LI liO WIII I?!\ I LS - 1991-2 001 (f1i(OI.'ISIONAl)

GROWTH R'ArES 111 S1 AND ABOVE 71- 89 ~. ( . [fUllUJ 51 ··69 L~-~J 50 BE lOW

I i, I i,I: \ i I

~ '­ ~ ; .' - -

"

1[)I)I . lJl''l1l 'IlIr\ C) . Cun 11)),1. ~ I rh~::d - ., of Indil mJp with. the ~ m ission ~ i the SI.'fYej or ' •.~ =I oililtrlc . 'J ( ',0 vernrLt. nl of InJ la . 21

. ' _,. __ ._. .

.. ,'( . ~ I ';

1 " ~" " " ~ ' ~ " ,j~ ...... ,

NA(;ALANIJ t DENSITY OF POPULATION 2001 (PReiVISIONAl)

\.

L PERSON S PER Km

151 ,:\DOVE

(~ t · • ~ I 101 - 150 a:: . ~~ , .. , . Q 50 - 100

._'

ft II

U(JIJNLV\I/y IIJII 11I11, II( II/ ' 1f " '~ 11\ If "

11 ~'t-:" 1!I"'n . .._, .------.- -. -- or Gern:fJI of India. .. • .1 Su~ I"V 01lnlll3 OIlf" Wllh Ih._e..;_rt__ rml5510n olthe Survey ----...___, I Ii) (Jovunmen I 0 f India.. Cop),Iil!hl. 200 I - - , ~,~~ ,, --,--- 22 .. NJ~GALAND FEMALES LITEnACY UATE 2001 ( l'IIUVISIONAl)

FEMALES

35-55 !:=:3 55 -75 ~ SlATE AVERAGE "" • 75 - 95 ( ,

~ '

"

~~ ~ --- ~ --~ . -~--- Kohillltl -==::::!JO:=:=='-_-_-___ = =::::::::t~' , 1 -.... _··--- .... _. - .. ...__~ . - - _ ... _____ .t . t.::,?:: { ,. t: . ~ \~ ( / . I I ... =7\., ~! fI I ",' B(IIJN(.JI\'IY lUll I Ulf.I II 'I:,. 1 " ' :, ' 1\ 11 " " 'H r" 'I !' ,

._-----_ - . ._"

------._ - .-.--.... - - - - - ~--,

I© Government of Indi3 Copyright, 100 I. 23

SEX RATIO 2001 ,' -. . ~ .

I r. ." : tbl ., -l . i \ .. , :J Mon [~ . \~ )I" ,

FEMALES PER lOOO.MALtS .J J 931 A.NO .AI30VE -'-.:-- c ::-._ : ,1 901 - 930 ; I j. MokokChung .2 : .. -; ~ Tuensang 900 8ELOW.

{ :-:1 , ."

. t, . ;. ( . i . 7 (. " . I y::~ t: ~ u

eQUNOt\RYINTERNATlONAl ., _._._ " STATE ...... _._. _ ," OtSlnlCT ... ' .. _ . _._

,-" .,. ".1 "I'"'' SOl" q ' olll1Ji3 m~p wilh the perm~;ion of Ihe Surveynr (icllcrn.' of Illdia . () (JoverlllllclIl of 1ndj~ COf1Yril!hl. lUO I. 24

, ' "/ I 1\ ~, /. I r { hi v [ P, % "

i

J " f f ~ ! , J I

______j I

-----;------' " I "'I ['I 1,1 I It] II . ! I " " [I ~ II" .,- " . " i I ' I " "(" -" 1 /' .l. -) ~, .:: ,h , J... .~ ) ~ ;

..._ 0' U ... 25

NA( ~t\ LAN U SI.::,< - nATIO le)o 1- 2()() I (Provisional)

.. . _- . ._ - -- __. 10S() -_------,_. . _------~ . - . - -. __ .. _- - ._ (/) CD (Q 1· ·······_ ··.. _····· .. 100() I E I I 0 I 0 I 0 950 ~... Q) c. (/) gOO (1) -cu e 85() u.CD 'to- 0. aoo z0 750 ~ ...... ~ ~ 't- ~ 't- .... 't- .... 0 .... N C"") ~ I() CD ..... co Ch 0 CD en en CD en en 0') en en 0) 0 ~ .... ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ...... ('II 26

Nagaland NAGALAND IU<:CAI)AI. POPtlLATION GROWTII !g>'I> 200 , ------1901-2001 I", I.e: lGO t------;,.;.-- 10 ( Provjsj~nal) :1> 120 ~ Ie ------.--~---~ --:";-- ;~ BOI'~~'~--S--~ "'!--~~--:t--a--:s--~-- 40 - '" M ..... r: ti . ,.~·1.~-: f 1 1 I" I

Mon Wokha

OJ 0> g, 200 c: 200 ------._.-- o 7: 160 .r:'" 160 --. - - - - . ------. -N ------;,;- (~ 120 0 I> 120 ~ - .... -.. .,- N --:;t-- :I - ~ -- «! --1'1- :J' 60 0> 80 ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ i ~ <.:,. 40 ~ ,...... I> 40 !:' ~ (I. 0 0 ~ .- ...... " <~ ...... , q ... " ... ~f'# '7...... "t ..."T III "t...... , N 1ft ,.. 10 g W. eft :a II "l1li :g en- eft g: ~ I ...... , ...... -...... - ...... 1_------I Tuen!iang I Dimapur ! g 201) _~ 160 tt .... ~, 120 1ft en"'; '"0' eo " 40 I ::::::::~ t o·L Q_ ...... :;; .... ~.... :f... ~... Of...... o It) ..en en :;; I ~ ...... =...... ------Mokokchung Kohima ., g' 200 .l" 160 ; ... en .. 170 ... N ~ 80 ... ~ 40 f! ~ 0 .... ' ...... "\', '1 ~ :f .... ' ...... It) N .. In 1ft.. 1ft '".... ~....' ......

Zunheboto Phek

., II) g> 20(1 Cl c 200 I'll ~ 160 .e: 160 ~ 120 () 120 CD II) g' 80 .., Ol ...: .l! 80 ~ 4Ct! ... c ~ OJ 40 r~' 0 ~ 0 • Q) ;: Q_ ... (J)... 27

POI'III,ATION AND NET DF-C.AIlA .. ACCIU\TION IN NAGALAND 1901 - 2001 . (Provisional)

2500000 .-,' .. '------... __ .. _- --, ..-.-.,-- ,- ..... , .. -.. -.. -----.. _,------, CD M CD co co en 2000000-~------~-~----~

1500000 .t------·------~I!---I@ll---~

1000000

'If"" ..... o .... ~ ~ en CD CD o 'I"'" en o .... 'I"'" N

IfH Population ~ Net Oecadal Accretion I 28

COMPARATIVE POPlJLATION SIZE ANI) AREA IN THE DISTRICTS OF NAGALAND 2001 (Provisional)

30 1%

t,-·t . _' t .. • Area 200/" t] Population

15 1%

04yo C CIl IX) ....Q C'4 1000 e': 0 c: =: Q .c i ~ .:t =C. ....e ~ {IJ = .c CIS -= ~ 0 ~ ~ =: ~ Q QJ -= ~ ~ .c ....e :s Q =: Q ~ ~ .¥ :I Q N ~

Note: Areas of the State and districts are provisional 29

COI\H'ARATIVE POI'lJLATION SIZE IN TilE DISTRICTS OF NAGALANU 2001 (Provisional)

._----_._------, Phek Mon 7.45% 13.05%

Tuensang .,." . . . . . ' .... 20.86% ....""".... _",',. """""" Nngn'and 1988636

IIhIIW,,. .. 15.~1%

Mokokchung 11.43% WoJ<..h:1 Zunheboto 8. 1OJ. '7,'19%

- -'-- -... ---.- .. ------.-."----.---.---.. -~------_i ITJPhek EaKohima ElDimapur mWokha DZunheboto nIl Mokokchung o Tuensang CtMon 30

NAGALAND LITERACY RATE OF DISTRICTS VIS-A-VIS THE STATE AVERAGE, ZOOI (Provisional)

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 .20 10 o ~ /J §Ot ,g ~ $ t ~ .'1Ji 6- I I ~ ~.

TRENDS IN SEX-RATIO IN THE DISTRICTS OF NAGALAND 1901-2001 (PROVISIONAL)

1120~----~------~

1080

1040

1000

960

r/) Q) co 920 :2 o o 880 ,....o L- a> a. 840 r/) Q) co E 800 Q) LL 760

720 ------

~o ------

600+---~----T---~----~--~----~--~----~--~----T---~ ...... - or- ...- ..- ...... 'l""' ..- 'l""' ..- ..- 0 ...- N (t) V &t) ,.... co C) 0 C) C) C) en C) C) 8 0) en (J) 0 ...... 'l""' ..- ..- 'l""' ..- ...- ..- ..- 'l""' N Mon Tuensang Mokokchung Zunheboto -Wokha Dimapur - -Kohima Phek 32

NAGALAND FEMALE LITERACY RATE OF DISTRICTS VIS-A",VlS THE STATE AVl:RAG~, ~oo.l

1'00 '90 BO 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 O+J~~~~~~~~~~_~WL~~Y-.~~~~~--~- ~,; .~'" w w UJ UJ

I .. ;

i I I. ~ f • a. , f ~. .I ! I I I

\ ;

. ;, - • • • . 0. . ..Co lJ Stria! number = I I Di rector of Census Operations,Nagaland addressing the enumer3tors ju 1 before enumeration of the Houseless population, Ce s of Ind ia "'00 I

The I- on' ble Chief Minister fNagaland is enumerated by the officials of t e Directorate of C'ensu Op rations, Nagaland, Kohima_" 37

SDO (C) Dimapur enumerating Hou eless population on the night of28111 February 2001.

Enu I 1eration of Houseless population in Di rnapur on the night of 28\h February 200 I.

Printed at the Nagaland Government Press