Hedonic Impact, Reward Learning, Or Incentive Salience?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hedonic Impact, Reward Learning, Or Incentive Salience? Brain Research Reviews 28Ž. 1998 309±369 Full-length review What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Kent C. Berridge ), Terry E. Robinson 1 Department of Psychology, UniÕersity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109, USA Accepted 23 June 1998 Abstract What roles do mesolimbic and neostriatal dopamine systems play in reward? Do they mediate the hedonic impact of rewarding stimuli? Do they mediate hedonic reward learning and associatiÕe prediction? Our review of the literature, together with results of a new study of residual reward capacity after dopamine depletion, indicates the answer to both questions is `no'. Rather, dopamine systems may mediate the incentiÕe salience of rewards, modulating their motivational value in a manner separable from hedonia and reward learning. In a study of the consequences of dopamine loss, rats were depleted of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and neostriatum by up to 99% using 6-hydroxydopamine. In a series of experiments, we applied the `taste reactivity' measure of affective reactionsŽ gapes, etc...Ž.. to assess the capacity of dopamine-depleted rats for: 1 normal affect hedonic and aversive reactions , 2 modulation of hedonic affect by associative learningŽ.. taste aversion conditioning , and 3 hedonic enhancement of affect by non-dopaminergic pharmacological manipulation of palatabilityŽ. benzodiazepine administration . We found normal hedonic reaction patterns to sucrose vs. quinine, normal learning of new hedonic stimulus valuesŽ. a change in palatability based on predictive relations , and normal pharmacological hedonic enhancement of palatability. We discuss these results in the context of hypotheses and data concerning the role of dopamine in reward. We review neurochemical, electrophysiological, and other behavioral evidence. We conclude that dopamine systems are not needed either to mediate the hedonic pleasure of reinforcers or to mediate predictive associations involved in hedonic reward learning. We conclude instead that dopamine may be more important to incentiÕe salience attributions to the neural representations of reward-related stimuli. Incentive salience, we suggest, is a distinct component of motivation and reward. In other words, dopamine systems are necessary for `wanting' incentiÕes, but not for `liking' them or for learning new `likes' and `dislikes'. q 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Neostriatum; Nucleus accumbens; Substantia nigra; Tegmentum; Mesolimbic; Nigrostriatal; Mesotelencephalic mesostriatal; Dopamine; 6-hydroxydopamine; Lateral hypothalamus; Brain; Reinforcement; Motivation; Self-administration; Conditioning; Reward; Emotion; Palatability; Pleasure; Feeding; Food intake appetitive behavior; Consummatory behavior; Affect; Anhedonia; Hedonic; Diazepam; Conditioned taste aversion; Taste; Taste reactivity; Aphagia; Aversion; Appetite; Ingestion; Neurotransmitters; Substance-related disorders; Addiction Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................... 311 2. Evidence for a role of dopamine in reward ....................................................... 311 2.1. Nature of dopamine's role in reward: hedonia, incentive salience or reward learning? ............................. 312 3. Brain manipulations of behavior for revealing dopamine's function in reward .................................... 315 3.1. Traditional measures of reward: instrumental behavior and choiceŽ. `wanting' ................................. 316 ) Corresponding author. Fax: q1-734-763-7480; E-mail: berridge@umich.edu 1 E-mail: ter@umich.edu. 0165-0173r98r$ - see front matter q 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0165-0173Ž. 98 00019-8 310 K.C. Berridge, T.E. RobinsonrBrain Research ReÕiews 28() 1998 309±369 3.2. Measures of reward based on affective reactionsŽ. `liking' ............................................ 316 3.3. Dopamine manipulations dissociate `wanting' vs. `liking' ............................................ 317 4. Effects of mesolimbic and neostriatal dopamine depletion on subcomponents of reward ............................... 317 4.1. General experimental approach .......................................................... 318 5. Experiment 1: Unconditioned affective reactions to sucrose or quinine ........................................ 318 5.1. Methods ...................................................................... 318 5.2. Results ....................................................................... 320 5.3. Discussion of Experiment 1 ............................................................ 321 6. Experiment 2: Modulation of affective reactions by taste aversion conditioning ................................... 323 6.1. Methods ...................................................................... 323 6.2. Results ....................................................................... 324 6.3. Discussion of Experiment 2 ............................................................ 324 7. Experiment 3: enhancement of hedonic reaction patterns by diazepam ........................................ 324 7.1. Methods ...................................................................... 326 7.2. Results ....................................................................... 326 7.3. Discussion of Experiment 3 ............................................................ 327 8. General discussion.................................................................... 328 8.1. Unconditioned hedonic reactivity ......................................................... 328 8.2. Palatability modulation............................................................... 328 9. Dopamine and reward: choosing among competing explanations ........................................... 328 9.1. Not motor deficits ................................................................. 328 9.2. Not anhedonia ................................................................... 328 9.3. Not reward learning? ................................................................ 330 9.4. Loss of incentive salience?............................................................. 332 10. Conditioned dopamine activity: re-examination of implications for incentive salience and reward learning hypotheses ............... 335 10.1. Predictions of `reward learning' vs. `incentive salience' hypotheses of dopamine function .......................... 335 11. Effects of dopamine antagonists: a re-examination of anhedonia, incentive salience or anergia explanations .................... 338 11.1. Comparing dopamine antagonist effects on hedonic activation ......................................... 338 11.2. Affective taste reactivity and dopamine antagonists: sensorimotor anergia but not anhedonia ......................... 339 11.3. Subjective hedonic ratings by humans and dopamine antagonists: conscious pleasure persists ........................ 339 12. Phenomena that don't fit: problems for the incentive salience model?......................................... 340 12.1. Euphorigenic dopaminergic drugs ........................................................ 340 12.2. Paradoxical effects of dopamine antagonists ................................................... 341 12.3. The `Two Motivational Systems' hypothesisŽ. Bechara et al. .......................................... 345 13. Caveats to the `Incentive Salience' hypothesis ..................................................... 348 13.1. Beyond reward to aversion ............................................................ 348 13.2. Beyond the dopamine synapse .......................................................... 349 14. General conclusion ................................................................... 350 15. Addendum 1: Taste reactivity patterns as a measure of `liking' ............................................ 350 15.1. Insufficiency of alternative interpretations of affective taste reactivity ..................................... 351 15.2. Conclusion: Affective reaction patterns reflect hedonic impact of `liked' stimulus............................... 354 16. Addendum 2: Measuring cognitive expectations of reward in animalsŽ. studies of incentive learning by Dickinson and Balleine ......... 355 17. Note added in proof ................................................................... 356 Acknowledgements...................................................................... 356 References .......................................................................... 356 K.C. Berridge, T.E. RobinsonrBrain Research ReÕiews 28() 1998 309±369 311 Appearances to the mind are of four kinds. Things quantified by electrophysiological, microdialysis, or either are what they appear to be; or they neither are, voltammetric measures, is triggered in animals by encoun- nor appear to be; or they are, and do not appear to be; ters with food, sex, drugs of abuse, electrical stimulation at or they are not, and yet appear to be. Rightly to aim in brain sites that support self-stimulation, and by secondary all these cases is the wise man's task. reinforcers for these incentivesw 5,52,159,233,259,260,263, 283,300,301,344±346,359,401,403±405,425,478x . In hu- Epictetus Ž60 A.D. Translation: Elizabeth Carterwx 142 mans, presentation of rewards such as cocaine, drug-asso- Ð Thomas Higginsonwx 143 . ciated stimuli, and even a video gameŽ. `tank combat' , has similarly been reported in PET and fMRI imaging studies to modulate activity in
Recommended publications
  • Dopamine Neurons Mediate a Fast Excitatory Signal Via Their Glutamatergic Synapses
    972 • The Journal of Neuroscience, January 28, 2004 • 24(4):972–981 Cellular/Molecular Dopamine Neurons Mediate a Fast Excitatory Signal via Their Glutamatergic Synapses Nao Chuhma,1,6 Hui Zhang,2 Justine Masson,1,6 Xiaoxi Zhuang,7 David Sulzer,1,2,6 Rene´ Hen,3,5 and Stephen Rayport1,4,5,6 Departments of 1Psychiatry, 2Neurology, 3Pharmacology, and 4Anatomy and Cell Biology, and 5Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, 6Department of Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York 10032, and 7Department of Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 Dopamine neurons are thought to convey a fast, incentive salience signal, faster than can be mediated by dopamine. A resolution of this paradox may be that midbrain dopamine neurons exert fast excitatory actions. Using transgenic mice with fluorescent dopamine neurons, in which the axonal projections of the neurons are visible, we made horizontal brain slices encompassing the mesoaccumbens dopamine projection. Focal extracellular stimulation of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area evoked dopamine release and early monosynaptic and late polysynaptic excitatory responses in postsynaptic nucleus accumbens neurons. Local superfusion of the ventral tegmental area with glutamate, which should activate dopamine neurons selectively, produced an increase in excitatory synaptic events. Local superfusion of the ventral tegmental area with the D2 agonist quinpirole, which should increase the threshold for dopamine neuron activation, inhibited the early response. So dopamine neurons make glutamatergic synaptic connections to accumbens neurons. We propose that dopamine neuron glutamatergic transmission may be the initial component of the incentive salience signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroplasticity in the Mesolimbic System Induced by Sexual Experience and Subsequent Reward Abstinence
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 6-21-2012 12:00 AM Neuroplasticity in the Mesolimbic System Induced by Sexual Experience and Subsequent Reward Abstinence Kyle Pitchers The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Lique M. Coolen The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Anatomy and Cell Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Kyle Pitchers 2012 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pitchers, Kyle, "Neuroplasticity in the Mesolimbic System Induced by Sexual Experience and Subsequent Reward Abstinence" (2012). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 592. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/592 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact wlswadmin@uwo.ca. NEUROPLASTICITY IN THE MESOLIMBIC SYSTEM INDUCED BY SEXUAL EXPERIENCE AND SUBSEQUENT REWARD ABSTINENCE (Spine Title: Sex, Drugs and Neuroplasticity) (Thesis Format: Integrated Article) By Kyle Kevin Pitchers Graduate Program in Anatomy and Cell Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Kyle K. Pitchers, 2012 THE UNIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • New Persistent Opioid Abuse and the Brain Reward Circuit
    Zhang L, Boysen PG. New Persistent Opioid Abuse and the Brain Reward Circuit. J Anesthesiol & Pain Therapy. 2020;1(1):11-13 Letter to the Editor Open Access New Persistent Opioid Abuse and the Brain Reward Circuit Ly Zhang*, Philip G. Boysen Department of Anesthesiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, The Mississippi Critical Care Organization, USA Article Info New persistent opioid abuse in peri-operative and peri- procedural patients is reported to be ~6% in two large population- Article Notes 1 Received: December 06, 2019 based studies . In addressing the opioid crisis the CDC has developed Accepted: April 08, 2020 2 *Correspondence: approved opioids are prescribed by licensed professionals . The *Dr. Ly Zhang, Department of Anesthesiology, University of three categories. The first is prescription drugs, when legal and Mississippi Medical Center, The Mississippi Critical Care and fentanyl . Over time CDC data indicates a sharp uptick in opioid Organization, USA; Email: lyzhang12@gmail.com. second and third3,4 categories involve illicit drugs, specifically heroin ©2020 Zhang L. This article is distributed under the terms of the prescription drugs5. Understanding the neurobiology of addiction Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. deaths for heroin and fentanyl, but a flat incidence of overdose with and public health issues are integral to the understanding of how adds insight to the problem and treatment. In addition, the social the brain reward circuit is activated in the first place. human primates 50 years ago. Rats taught to push a lever to self – The brain reward circuit was described in rodents, then in non- aspectsadminister of addictive addictive behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotine and Neurotransmitters
    Module 2 —Legal Doesn’t Mean Harmless Overview Overview Summary This module focuses on how two drugs, nicotine and alcohol, change the functioning of the brain and body. Both drugs are widely used in the community, and for adults, using them is legal. Nonetheless, both alcohol and nicotine can have a strong impact on the functioning of the brain. Each can cause a number of negative effects on the body and brain, ranging from mild symptoms to addiction. The goal of this module is to help students understand that, although nicotine and alcohol are legal for adults, they are not harmless substances. Students will learn about how nicotine and alcohol change or disrupt the process of neurotransmission. Students will explore information on the short- and long- term effects of these two drugs, and also learn why these drugs are illegal for children and teens. Through the media, students are exposed to a great deal of information about alcohol and tobacco, much of which is misleading or scientifically inaccurate. This module will provide information on what researchers have learned about how nicotine and alcohol change the brain, and the resulting implications for safety and health. Learning Objectives At the end of this module: • Students can explain how nicotine disrupts neurotransmission. • Students can explain how alcohol use may harm the brain and the body. • Students understand how alcohol can intensify the effect of other drugs. • Students can define addiction and understand its basis in the brain. • Students draw conclusions about why our society regulates the use of nicotine and alcohol for young people.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortico-Striatal-Thalamic Loop Circuits of the Salience Network: a Central Pathway in Psychiatric Disease and Treatment
    REVIEW published: 27 December 2016 doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00104 Cortico-Striatal-Thalamic Loop Circuits of the Salience Network: A Central Pathway in Psychiatric Disease and Treatment Sarah K. Peters 1, Katharine Dunlop 1 and Jonathan Downar 1,2,3,4* 1Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4MRI-Guided rTMS Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada The salience network (SN) plays a central role in cognitive control by integrating sensory input to guide attention, attend to motivationally salient stimuli and recruit appropriate functional brain-behavior networks to modulate behavior. Mounting evidence suggests that disturbances in SN function underlie abnormalities in cognitive control and may be a common etiology underlying many psychiatric disorders. Such functional and anatomical abnormalities have been recently apparent in studies and meta-analyses of psychiatric illness using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and voxel- based morphometry (VBM). Of particular importance, abnormal structure and function in major cortical nodes of the SN, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and anterior insula (AI), have been observed as a common neurobiological substrate across a broad spectrum of psychiatric disorders. In addition to cortical nodes of the SN, the network’s associated subcortical structures, including the dorsal striatum, mediodorsal thalamus and dopaminergic brainstem nuclei, comprise a discrete regulatory loop circuit. Edited by: The SN’s cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loop increasingly appears to be central to Avishek Adhikari, mechanisms of cognitive control, as well as to a broad spectrum of psychiatric illnesses Stanford University, USA and their available treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Responses to Different Types of Salience in Antipsychotic Naïve First Episode Psychosis: an Fmri Study
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/263020; this version posted September 3, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Brain responses to different types of salience in antipsychotic naïve first episode psychosis: An fMRI study Franziska Knolle1,3*, Anna O Ermakova2*, Azucena Justicia2,4, Paul C Fletcher2,5,6, Nico Bunzeck7, Emrah Düzel8,9, Graham K Murray2,3,5 Running title: Salience signals in antipsychotic naïve first episode psychosis *joint first author with equal contribution to the work Affiliations 1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 2 Unit for Social & Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, East London NHS Foundation Trust 3 Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge 4 IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute). Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain. 5 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK 6 Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge 7 Institute of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany 8 Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Magdeburg, Germany 9 German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/263020; this version posted September 3, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Abnormal salience processing has been suggested to contribute to the formation of positive psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia and related conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Nicotine Administration on Behavior and Markers of Brain Plasticity in a Rodent Model of Psychosis" (2012)
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2012 The ffecE ts of Nicotine Administration on Behavior and Markers of Brain Plasticity in a Rodent Model of Psychosis Marla K. Perna East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Chemical Actions and Uses Commons Recommended Citation Perna, Marla K., "The Effects of Nicotine Administration on Behavior and Markers of Brain Plasticity in a Rodent Model of Psychosis" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1432. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1432 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact digilib@etsu.edu. The Effects of Nicotine Administration on Behavior and Markers of Brain Plasticity in a Rodent Model of Psychosis ________________________ A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Sciences ________________________ by Marla Perna May 2012 ________________________ Russell W. Brown, Chair Ronald H. Baisden Theresa A. Harrison Gregory A. Ordway Brooks B. Pond David S. Roane Keywords: psychosis, adolescence, nicotine, dopamine, synaptic plasticity ABSTRACT The Effects of Nicotine Administration on Behavior and Markers of Brain Plasticity in a Rodent Model of Psychosis by Marla Perna Schizophrenia affects about 1% of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabidiol Attenuates Insular Dysfunction During Motivational Salience Processing in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Robin Wilson1, Matthijs G
    Wilson et al. Translational Psychiatry (2019) 9:203 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0534-2 Translational Psychiatry ARTICLE Open Access Cannabidiol attenuates insular dysfunction during motivational salience processing in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis Robin Wilson1, Matthijs G. Bossong1,2, Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi1, Natalia Petros 1, Michael Brammer1,3,JesusPerez4, Paul Allen1,5, Philip McGuire1 and Sagnik Bhattacharyya 1 Abstract Accumulating evidence points towards the antipsychotic potential of cannabidiol. However, the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the antipsychotic effect of cannabidiol remain unclear. We investigated this in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm study. We investigated 33 antipsychotic-naïve subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) randomised to 600 mg oral cannabidiol or placebo and compared them with 19 healthy controls. We used the monetary incentive delay task while participants underwent fMRI to study reward processing, known to be abnormal in psychosis. Reward and loss anticipation phases were combined to examine a motivational salience condition and compared with neutral condition. We observed abnormal activation in the left insula/parietal operculum in CHR participants given placebo compared to healthy controls associated with premature action initiation. Insular activation correlated with both positive psychotic symptoms and salience perception, as indexed by difference in reaction time between salient and neutral stimuli conditions. CBD attenuated the increased
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Neurobiological Alterations in Alcohol Addiction: a Review
    Adicciones ISSN: 0214-4840 secretaria@adicciones.es Sociedad Científica Española de Estudios sobre el Alcohol, el Alcoholismo y las otras Toxicomanías España Erdozain, Amaia M.; Callado, Luis F. Neurobiological alterations in alcohol addiction: a review Adicciones, vol. 26, núm. 4, octubre-diciembre, 2014, pp. 360-370 Sociedad Científica Española de Estudios sobre el Alcohol, el Alcoholismo y las otras Toxicomanías Palma de Mallorca, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=289132934009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative revisión adicciones vol. 26, nº 3 · 2014 Neurobiological alterations in alcohol addiction: a review Alteraciones neurobiológicas en el alcoholismo: revisión Amaia M. Erdozain*,*** and Luis F. Callado*,** *Department of Pharmacology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Spain. **Biocruces Health Research Institute, Bizkaia, Spain. ***Neuroscience Paris Seine, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France Resumen Abstract Todavía se desconoce el mecanismo exacto mediante el cual el etanol The exact mechanism by which ethanol exerts its effects on the brain produce sus efectos en el cerebro. Sin embargo, hoy en día se sabe is still unknown. However, nowadays it is well known that ethanol que el etanol interactúa con proteínas específicas de la membrana interacts with specific neuronal membrane proteins involved in neuronal, implicadas en la transmisión de señales, produciendo así signal transmission, resulting in changes in neural activity.
    [Show full text]
  • New Directions in Behavioral Activation
    Clinical Psychology Review 79 (2020) 101860 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Clinical Psychology Review journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/clinpsychrev Review New directions in behavioral activation: Using findings from basic science T and translational neuroscience to inform the exploration of potential mechanisms of change Courtney N. Forbes Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Mail Stop 948, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606, USA HIGHLIGHTS • Understanding mechanisms of change can facilitate improvements in BA treatments. • BA treatments may work by targeting (low) reward responsiveness directly. • Basic science findings can inform hypotheses about potential mechanisms of change. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Interest in behavioral activation treatments for depression has increased over the past two decades. Behavioral Behavioral activation activation treatments have been shown to be effective in treating depression across a variety of populations and Reward responsiveness settings. However, little is known about the mechanisms of change that may bring about symptom improvement Depression in behavioral activation treatments. Recent developments in the theoretical and empirical literature on beha- Mechanisms of change vioral activation treatments have coincided with advances in basic science and translational neuroscience re- Translational neuroscience garding the mechanisms underlying individual differences in responsiveness to reward. Attenuated reward re- sponsiveness has been associated with depression and related clinical outcomes at the self-report, behavioral, and neural levels of analysis. Given that behavioral activation treatments are focused on increasing individuals' contact and engagement with sustainable sources of reward in their environment, it is plausible that behavioral activation treatments bring about improvements in depression symptoms by targeting (low) reward respon- siveness directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Attention Or Salience?
    Attention and inference Attention or salience? Thomas Parr1, Karl J Friston1 1 Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, UK. thomas.parr.12@ucl.ac.uk, k.friston@ucl.ac.uk Correspondence: Thomas Parr The Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging Institute of Neurology 12 Queen Square, London, UK WC1N 3BG thomas.parr.12@ucl.ac.uk Abstract While attention is widely recognised as central to perception, the term is often used to mean very different things. Prominent theories of attention – notably the premotor theory – relate it to planned or executed eye movements. This contrasts with the notion of attention as a gain control process that weights the information carried by different sensory channels. We draw upon recent advances in theoretical neurobiology to argue for a distinction between attentional gain mechanisms and salience attribution. The former depends upon estimating the precision of sensory data, while the latter is a consequence of the need to actively engage with the sensorium. Having established this distinction, we consider the intimate relationship between attention and salience. Keywords: Attention; Salience; Bayesian; Active inference; Precision; Active vision Introduction Optimal interaction with the world around us requires that we attend to those sources of information that help us form accurate beliefs about states of affairs in the world (and our body). This statement may be interpreted in two very different ways. The first interpretation is that we (covertly) select from multiple sensory channels (either within or between modalities) and ascribe greater weight to those sensory streams that convey the most reliable information about states of the world [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Mesolimbic Reward Neurocircuitry in Prevention and Rescue of the Activity-Based Anorexia (ABA) Phenotype in Rats
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2017) 42, 2292–2300 © 2017 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved 0893-133X/17 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org The Role of Mesolimbic Reward Neurocircuitry in Prevention and Rescue of the Activity-Based Anorexia (ABA) Phenotype in Rats 1 1 ,1 Claire J Foldi , Laura K Milton and Brian J Oldfield* 1 Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia Patients suffering from anorexia nervosa (AN) become anhedonic; unable or unwilling to derive normal pleasures and avoid rewarding outcomes, most profoundly in food intake. The activity-based anorexia (ABA) model recapitulates many of the characteristics of the human condition, including anhedonia, and allows investigation of the underlying neurobiology of AN. The potential for increased neuronal activity in reward/hedonic circuits to prevent and rescue weight loss is investigated in this model. The mesolimbic pathway extending from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) was activated using a dual viral strategy, involving retrograde transport of Cre (CAV-2-Cre) to the VTA and coincident injection of DREADD receptors (AAV-hSyn-DIO-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry). Systemic clozapine-n-oxide (CNO; 0.3 mg/kg) successfully recruited a large proportion of the VTA-NAc dopaminergic projections, with activity evidenced by colocalization with elevated levels of Fos protein. The effects of reward circuit activation on energy balance and predicted survival was investigated in female Sprague-Dawley rats, where free access to running wheels was paired with time-limited (90 min) access to food, a paradigm (ABA) which will cause anorexia and death if unchecked. Excitation of the reward pathway substantially increased food intake and food anticipatory activity (FAA) to prevent ABA-associated weight loss, while overall locomotor activity was unchanged.
    [Show full text]