Gabrielle Herman, SPT November 3, 2015  Outline ◦ Patient demographics ◦ Patient Evaluation, Assessment, Goals, Treatment, Outcome ◦ Clinical Question ◦ 2 Studies ◦ Conclusion ◦ Clinical Application ◦ Future Research  To investigate whether the incontinence portion of the Normal Pressure triad relates to prognosis of fall risk  84-year-old Caucasian female living in an assisted living facility  3 falls within the past week in her bathroom  Patient referred for home health physical therapy  Past Medical History: ◦ Hypertension ◦ Incontinence ◦ Dementia ◦ TKA ◦ OA ◦ Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus  Cerebral shunt placement 1 month prior  Classic triad ◦ impairment ◦ Cognitive decline ◦ Urinary incontinence  Ventricular enlargement with MRI: Normal brain absence of elevated CSF pressure  Difficult to diagnose ◦ Mimics other neurodegenerative disorders ◦ Aging  Typical treatment: shunt placement ◦ Extremely variable improvement rates

MRI: INPH brain  Chief complaints: ◦ Frequent loss of ◦ Incontinence  “I have to go all the time”  Have to get up multiple times throughout the night ◦ Unable to safely ambulate to assisted living facility dining room as leaving home requires significant and taxing effort  Home situation: Lives alone  Prior level of function: completes all ADLS without assistance, but often completed unsafely and without necessary assistive device (rollator)  Alert and Oriented x2, showing signs of mild dementia  Balance: Poor  Transfers: Stand by assistance  Decreased coordination  Gait deviations: narrow BOS, short step length R and L, impulsive movements, forward leaning posture, and poor/inconsistent rhythm, clearance and placement of assistive device  Manual Muscle Test: Good overall strength  TUG: 20 seconds Fall risk  MAHC 10 Fall Risk: 10 Fall risk  Berg Balance Test: 31/56 Fall risk ◦ Frequent LOB during testing  Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ): 4 Mild cognitive impairment  Diagnosis: ◦ Lack of coordination ◦ Gait deviations ◦ Poor balance ◦ Fall risk  Prognosis: Poor ◦ Lack of insight on deficits ◦ Age ◦ Poor safety awareness  Transfers ◦ Sit to stand  STG: Modified independent in 3 weeks, LTG MOD I in 5 weeks  Get up safely to use the bathroom/perform ADLs around apartment  Balance ◦ TUG  STG: 18 seconds in 3 weeks, LTG: 15 seconds in 5 weeks  To decrease fall risk, to get dressed and use the bathroom safely  Gait ◦ STG: level surface distance 500 ft in 3 weeks with MOD I assist, LTG: 600 ft in 5 weeks with MOD I assist ◦ To ambulate to ALF dining room safely with rollator  Balance training   Patient education ◦ Safety awareness  To decrease fall risk  Slow down  Never take a step without assistive device  Do not reach out far past base-of-support  2 days following initial evaluation, received call from Pt. J  First responders on the scene  Patient J fell again, also reporting she had fallen the night before  Patient received on the floor having soiled herself  Patient reported she was trying to get to the bathroom  Patient admitted to the hospital later that day  Is urinary incontinence a prognostic indicator of increased fall risk in an 80-year-old female patient with the Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus triad?  Title: Urinary incontinence is associated with an increase risk of falls in elderly women: A Systematic Review

Chiarelli, Pauline E., Lynette A. Mackenzie, and Peter G. Osmotherly. "Urinary incontinence is associated with an increase in falls: a systematic review."Australian journal of physiotherapy 55.2 (2009): 89-95  Question: Is urinary incontinence associated with falls in community-dwelling older people?  Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies investigating falls and incontinence  Study identification: Database search of MEDLINE, EMBASe, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from 1985-2008  Total of 9 studies met all inclusion criteria ◦ 5 prospective ◦ 4 cross-sectional Design Participants Outcome Data Measures •Observational •Community- • Falls and •Estimated odds studies dwelling older urinary ratios related to people (>65 yr) incontinence incontinence and measured falls •Not related to any specific clinical • Falls measured •Sufficient data group by self report or to enable odds calendar ratio calculations

•Urinary incontinence defined broadly or more specifically  Two investigators independently extracted odds ratio data  Comprehensive meta-analysis software ◦ Generated pooled estimate of effect size ◦ Random effects model used  Q-test used to identify outliers  Influence of different types of UI on effect size estimate explored ◦ Overactive bladder Sx: urinary urgency, leak large sudden volumes, nocturia ◦ Stress incontinence Sx: lose small amounts of urine with coughing, sneezing without sense of urgency to rush to the toilet Association measured: Odds Confidence interval ratio

Falls and incontinence 1.45 95% CI 1.36-1.54

Falls and urge 1.94 95% CI 1.33-2.84 incontinence Falls and Stress 1.11 95% CI 1.00-1.23 incontinence Falls and mixed 1.92 95% CI 1.69-2.18 incontinence  A clear association between falls and urinary incontinence  More predominately, falls relate to overactive bladder (urgency & nocturia) versus stress incontinence ◦ The need to rush to toilet/commode ◦ Distress and anxiety  Effective intervention to manage these symptoms should be included in falls prevention programs  Selection of English-language publications only  Possibility that association could also be a result of mobility status  Not directly related to Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus  Title: Urinary incontinence and behavioral symptoms are independent risk factors for recurrent and injurious falls, respectively, among residents in long-term care facilities

Hasegawa, Jun, Masafumi Kuzuya, and Akihisa Iguchi. "Urinary incontinence and behavioral symptoms are independent risk factors for recurrent and injurious falls, respectively, among residents in long-term care facilities." Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 50.1 (2010): 77-81.  Design: Cohort study  Participants: New residents to 13 randomly selected long-term care facilities ◦ N=1082, 327 male, 755 female ◦ Mean age of 82  Followed up for 6 months or up to D/C or death ◦ All had some physical or mental impairment  Fall outcomes collected from long-term care facility charts after 6 months ◦ Falls ◦ Fall related injury ◦ Day fall occurred  Participant background data from admission ◦ Physical status of patients ◦ Diagnosed chronic : , CVD, dementia, HTN, DM, CHF ◦ Prescribed medications ◦ Previous urinary incontinence ◦ Previous behavioral Sx: wandering, resistance to care, agitation  Patients assigned to groups: ◦ fall vs. non fall ◦ Injurious falls vs. non-injurious falls ◦ Recurrent falls vs. single falls  Chi-squared test to determine if there was a significant association between two variables  Cox proportional hazards regression model ◦ Risk of a variable expressed as a hazard ratio (HR)  Falls vs. Non-falls ◦ Those who fell had higher rates of  Moderate physical function  Experiences of incontinence (p<0.001, HR=2.38, 95% CI 1.83-3.09)  Behavioral symptoms  Higher average number of prescribed medications  Injurious falls and recurrent falls ◦ Presence of incontinence increased recurrent falls (p=0.036) ◦ Presence of behavioral Sx increased injurious falls (p<0.001)  Urinary incontinence was an independent predictor for recurrent falls, but not for injurious falls  In contrast, behavioral Sx were an independent predictor for injurious falls, but not for recurrent falls  Urinary incontinence relates to the number of falls among institutionalized older people  Treatment/management of these risk factors should be considered to prevent falls in long- term care facilities  Due to observational design, significance of incontinence could be due to unmeasured factors ◦ Physical restraints ◦ Visual/balance impairments ◦ Dizziness ◦ Orthostatic Hypotension  No information on the circumstances of the fall ◦ Activity being performed before and during fall  Changes in medication during the follow-up period were not measured  Also not specific to Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus  Study participants around same age  Mostly female subjects  Study 1: A strong association between urinary incontinence and fall risk, especially urge incontinence  Study 2: ◦ Patients had some sort of physical/mental impairment ◦ Patients in a long-term care facility ◦ Urinary incontinence strongly associated with recurrent, non-injurious falls  Yes ◦ Overactive bladder symptoms ◦ Recurrent falls ◦ Although results are not specific to the NPH diagnosis, they can still be applied to patient J  Interventions to decrease  Risk assessment is Sx of overactive bladder ◦ the primary Bladder training ◦ intervention Double voiding ◦ Pelvic floor exercises  Incontinence may be ◦ Scheduled toilet trips a risk factor not ◦ Fluid/diet management captured by the ◦ Electrical Stimulation current fall risk assessment tools 86% of occupational therapists acknowledged that they should have a  Should be part of role in management of incontinence, but routine investigation felt inadequately educated (Supk and Vickerman 2000)  Fall risk specifically in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus  Research on misplacement of shunt  Dementia, UI, and fall risk for this patient Questions?  Chiarelli, Pauline E., Lynette A. Mackenzie, and Peter G. Osmotherly. "Urinary incontinence is associated with an increase in falls: a systematic review."Australian journal of physiotherapy 55.2 (2009): 89-95  Hasegawa, Jun, Masafumi Kuzuya, and Akihisa Iguchi. "Urinary incontinence and behavioral symptoms are independent risk factors for recurrent and injurious falls, respectively, among residents in long-term care facilities." Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 50.1 (2010): 77-81.  Verrees, Meg, and WARREN R. Selman. "Management of normal pressure hydrocephalus." American Family 70 (2004): 1071-1090.  Vickerman, Supk J. “The hidden role of the occupational therapist in the management of continence.” International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 11 (2000):503-508.