Mbarara-Nkenda & Tororo-Lira Power Transmission Lines Project Country : Uganda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mbarara-Nkenda & Tororo-Lira Power Transmission Lines Project Country : Uganda Language : English Original : English PROJECT : MBARARA-NKENDA & TORORO-LIRA POWER TRANSMISSION LINES PROJECT COUNTRY : UGANDA PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Date : 2 December 2008 Team Leader V. ZONGO Principal Financial Analyst OINF.0 3352 Team Members B. RAM Chief Power Engineer OINF.3 2266 D. LEKOETJE Public Utilities Economist OINF.3 2651 P. MWESIGYE Environmentalist, Consultant OINF.3 ATR M.L. EPIE Financial Management Expert ORPU. 2346 Appraisal Team D. RUTABINGWA Infrastructure Specialist UGFO 3894 Division OINF.3 A.T. DIALLO 2125 Manager Sector Director G. MBESHERUBUSA OINF 2034 Regional OREA A. ORDU 2065 Director Mr. E. NZABANITA, Power Engineer OINF.3 3081 Mr. M. DIENNE Chief Infrastructure Specialist- ORQR3 3395 Mr. E. ROBLE, Procurement expert ORPF.1 2648 Peer Reviewers Mr. R. HEERO, Infrastructure Specialist, GHFO GHFO 3319 Mr. J.B. NGUEMA-OLLO, Power Engineer OINF.3 3072 Mr. A. ZAKOU, Power Engineer OINF.3 2211 Mrs L. MOOLA, Disbursement Officer FFCO 2603 Mr O. SOMALI, Consultant, Financial Analyst OINF.3 3905 Mr G. MOLLA Consultant , Financial Analyst OINF.3 ATR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 STRATEGIC THRUST & RATIONALE.....................................................................1 1.1 Project linkages with country strategy and objectives .............................................1 1.2 Rationale for Bank’s involvement ..............................................................................2 1.3 Donors Coordination ...................................................................................................2 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................2 2.1 Project Objective..........................................................................................................2 2.2 Project components......................................................................................................3 2.3 Technical solution retained and other alternatives explored...................................4 2.4 Project type...................................................................................................................4 2.5 Project cost and financing arrangements ..................................................................4 2.6 Project’s target area and population..........................................................................6 2.7 Participatory process for project identification, design and implementation........7 2.8 Bank Group experience, lessons reflected in project design....................................7 2.9 Key performance indicators……………………………………………………… 7 3 PROJECT FEASIBILITY ..............................................................................................9 3.1 Financial and Economic Performance.......................................................................9 3.2 Environmental and Social impacts...........................................................................11 4 IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................................................................13 4.1 Implementation arrangements .................................................................................13 4.2 Monitoring..................................................................................................................14 4.3 Governance.................................................................................................................15 4.4 Climate Change..........................................................................................................16 4.5 Sustainability..............................................................................................................16 4.6 Risk management and lessons learnt from Bujagali ..............................................17 4.7 Knowledge building ...................................................................................................18 5 Financing instrument and conditions ……………………………………………. 17 5.1 Financing instrument……………………………………………………………… 17 5.2 Conditions associated with Bank’intervention……………………………………18 5.3 Compliance with Bank Policies.................................................................................20 6. RECOMMENDATION.................................................................................................20 Appendix I: Comparative Socio-Economic Indicator ........................................................1 Appendix II: Project Map......................................................................................................2 Appendix III: ADB Portfolio in Uganda as at 31 July 2008 ................................................3 Appendix III Projects financed by the Bank and Other Development Partners...............4 Appendix IV: Energy Sector Development Partners Project Matrix 2008-2011...............5 Annex1: Country’s development agenda, sector brief and donor’s support ……………... 1 ANNEX2: Uganda development agenda and donor support ……………………………….4 ANNEX3: BACK UP OF KEY ARGUMENTS OF THE REPORT………………………………………….5 ANNEX4: PROJECT COSTS ESTIMATES………………………………………………………………6 ANNEX5: IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS……………………………………………………...7 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS As of 1 August 2008 UA = 1.59891 USD UA = 2638, 87 USh Fiscal Year January 1st – December 31st Weights and Measures • 1metric tonne = 2204 pounds (lbs) • 1 kilogramme (kg) = 2.200 lbs • 1 metre (m) = 3.28 feet (ft) • 1 millimetre (mm) = 0.03937 inch (“) • 1 kilometre (km) = 0.62 mile • 1 hectare (ha) = 2.471 acres • 1 kV = kilovolt = 103 volts (V) • 1 kVA = kilovolt ampere = 103 volt amperes (VA) • 1 MVA = Megavolt ampere = 103 kilovolt amperes (kVA) • 1 MVAr = Megavolt ampere reactive • 1 kW = kilowatt = l03 watts (W) • 1 MW = Megawatt = l03 kilowatts (kW) • 1 kWh = kilowatt hour = 103 watt hours • 1 MWh = Megawatt hour = 103 kilowatt hours (kWh) • 1 GWh = Gigawatt hour = 106 kilowatt hours • 1 barrel = 0.159 m3 = 158.987 litres • 1 km = kilometre = 103 meters (m) • 1 cm = centimetre = 10-2 meters (m) • 1 ha = hectare = 104 m2 • 1 ton = Metric ton = 1000 kg • 1 TOE = tons of oil equivalent = 11630 kWh ABBREVIATIONS • ACODE Action Coalition for Development and Environment • ADB African Development Bank • ADF African Development Fund • ADO Automotive Diesel Oil • AOI Area of influence • APA Advance Procurement Action • BIP Bujagali Interconnection Project • BOOT Build, Own, Operate and Transfer • DFID Department for International Development • EA Executing Agency • EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return • EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction • ERA Electricity Regulatory Authority • ERD Energy Resources Department • ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan • ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment • EU European Union • FC Foreign Cost • FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Return • GIEK Guarantee Institute for Export Credits of Norway • GOU Government of Uganda i ii • GPN General Procurement Notice • GTZ Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit • HFO Heavy Fuel Oil • IDA International Development Association • IPP Independent Power Producer • JBIC Japan Bank for International Cooperation • KML Kilembe Mines Ltd • LC Local cost • LDPG Local Development Partners Group • LV Low Voltage • MDG Millennium Development Goals • MEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development • MUIENR Makerere University Institute of Environment and Natural Resources • NDF Nordic Development Fund • NEMA National Environmental Management Authority • NFA National Forestry Authority • NGO Non-Governmental Organisation • NORAD The Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation • NPV net Present Value • MV Medium Voltage • O&M Operation and Maintenance • PAP Project Affected Persons • PCR Project Completion Report • PEAP Poverty Eradication Action Plan • PEPD Petroleum Exploration and Production Department • PIC Public Information Centre • PIU Project Implementation Unit • PSD Petroleum Supplies Department • PSR Poverty Status Report • QPR Quarterly Progress Report • RAP Resettlement Action Plan • REA Rural Electrification Agency • REB Rural Electrification Board • REF Rural Electrification Fund • SEA Social and Environmental Assessment • SEAP Social and Environmental Action Plan • SIDA Swedish International Development Agency • UA Unit of Account • UEB Uganda Electricity Board • UEDCL Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited • UEGCL Uganda Electricity Generation Company Limited • UETCL Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited • UJAS Uganda Joint Assistance Strategy • UTB Uganda Tourism Board • UWA Uganda Wildlife Authority • WACC Weighted Average Cost of Capital • WWF World Wide Fund for Nature ii LOAN INFORMATION Client’s information BORROWER: The Republic of Uganda EXECUTING AGENCY: The Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL). Financing Plan Sources of financing Amount (UA) Instrument ADF 52.51 million Loan GOU/UETCL 19.98 million Counterpart Funds Total cost 72.49 million ADF’s key financing information Loan disbursement currency Tbd Commitment Fees 0,50% Service Charge 0,75% p.a. Tenor 50 Years Grace period 10 Years FIRR, NPV (base case) 17,07%FNPV 90, 374 million EIRR (base case) 32.89% ENPV 177,542 million Timeframe - Main Milestones Concept Note approval August 2008 Project approval December 2008 Effectiveness June 2009 Last Disbursement December, 2014 Completion March, 2013 Last repayment 2059 i ii PROJECT SUMMARY 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW The Mbarara-Nkenda & Tororo-Lira Power Transmission Lines Project is located in west, north and eastern Uganda respectively. It will
Recommended publications
  • Mining in Uganda A) Examine the Problems Affecting the Mining Industry in Uganda B) What Are the Solutions , Steps and Measures to the Problems Approach
    Mining in Uganda a) Examine the problems affecting the mining industry in Uganda b) What are the solutions , steps and measures to the problems Approach . Define mining . Status/situation . Types/ areas . Sketch map with types and areas . Problems (b) Suggesting solutions, steps and measures Mining is the extraction of organic and inorganic substances found in rocks naturally like metallic, none metallic and mineral, fuels. Status/ solutions; I. Contributes from 1.2%-6.3% to GDP II. Negative trend in production since 1999 III. None active mining areas copper in kilembe, tin in kitagate, phosphates,asbestos in Tororo. IV. Small scale mining gold in karamoja, busia V. Large scale mining , limestone in Tororo and Hima VI. Oil still under exploration in Bundibujo VII. Positive trend with sand, clay and quarrying VIII. Cobalt is being recycled at kasese IX. Mining is small scale and contributes less to GDP Types/ areas . Gold Busia, Karamoja, Bushenyi . Tin Ruhama, Kitagate . Oil Semuliki basin around L Albert . Sand,clay at Kajjansi . Copper and cobalt at Kilembe . Salt lake Katwe . Iron ore wolfram, tungstain, Kabala, berrythum, Kisoro plains. A sketch map of Uganda showing mining areas KEY; Co copper w wolfram s salt a apatite Cb cobalt o oil cl clay b berryllium G gold m manganese sa sand l limestone I iron ore m mica u uranium Problems facing mining are physical and human Exhaustion of minerals like wolfram in kabala, tin in kitagate. High cost of mineral exploration like oil around L Albert and gold in karamoja Minerals in small qualities and scattered like iron ore and tin in kabala, gold in Busia, Karamoja Poor quality minerals which are unecommercial like copper in kilembe,iron ore in kabala Poor science and technology affecting exploitation like oil in semuliki valley, gold in karamoja.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Opeta Wetland System Ramsar Information Sheet
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. LAKE OPETA WETLAND SYSTEM RAMSAR INFORMATION SHEET 1. Name and address of the RIS Compiler: Achilles Byaruhanga and Stephen Kigoolo NatureUganda Plot 83, Tufnel Drive, Kamwokya P. O Box 27034, Kampala - Uganda. Tel: 256 41 540719 Fax no: 256 41 533 528 E-mail: [email protected] 2. Date: 17 September 2005. 3. Country: The Republic of Uganda 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Lake Opeta Wetland System 5. Map of the Ramsar site: Hard copy: attached Digital (electronic) format: yes 6. Geographical coordinates: 34004" - 34024" E and 01033" - 01051" N,. 7. General Location: Lake Opeta and its surrounding swamps is located in north eastern Uganda, in four districts of Nakapiripirit (Namalu sub-county and Lorachat sub-county), Sironko (Bunambutye sub- county), Katakwi (Usuku county, Magoro sub-county) and Kumi (Kolir sub-county, Malera sub-county and Ongino sub-county). It is located 25 kms from Kumi town and the northern part borders a Wildlife Reserve, Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve and Teso Community Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Consortium to Revive Uganda's Copper Mines
    CHINESE CONSORTIUM TO REVIVE UGANDA’S COPPER MINES By Fredrick Mugira First published on People’s Daily Online on 17 March 2014 FREDRICK MUGIRA is a multiple award-winning Ugandan journal i s­­t and development communicator who now works with Uganda’s leading multimedia house – Vision Group – as a radio editor. He has reported from various countries in Africa, Europe and most recently in Asia, where he observed African migrants struggling to make a living in Hong Kong as part of a Wits China-Africa Reporting Project tour. Fredrick has a Master’s Degree in Communication for Development from Malmo University in Sweden and has won various continental and national journalism awards including the prestigious CNN/Multichoice African Journali st award in 2009 and the UN Development Journalism Award in 2013. When a Chinese consortium won a concession to revive production at the Kilembe mines in south western Uganda, which had stopped operating in 1982, he applied for a Wits China-Africa Reporting Project grant to find out what the investment would mean for the locals and for Uganda. The knocked-knee driver of the Boda Boda motorcycle revive the mine, however, and clearly the locals are hopeful whistled as he rode. I was sure he heard my question that this could once again mean prosperity for the area. because he changed to a low tone and answered over his shoulder. “Of course we have already started benefiting Kilembe mines today from the resumption of Kilembe copper mines. We The abandoned and ghost-city-like Kilembe copper mines transport people from Kasese town to the mines.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 82713-UG PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A Public Disclosure Authorized PROPOSED SERIES OF IDA PARTIAL RISK GUARANTEES IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 160 MILLION EQUIVALENT IN SUPPORT OF PROJECTS UNDER THE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA February 20, 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Africa Energy (AFTG1) Africa Region: Tanzania, Uganda and Burundi Country Unit (AFCE1) Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 31, 2014) Currency Unit = Uganda Shilling (UGX) 2,475 UGX = US$ 1 FISCAL YEAR July 1 – June 30 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BP Bank Procedure BST Bulk Supply Tariff CAS Country Assistance Strategy COD Commercial Operation Date DEG Entrepreneurial Development Cooperation – German DFI Development Finance Institution EAPP Eastern Africa Power Pool DRC Democratic Republic of Congo EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction ERA Electricity Regulatory Authority ESAP Environment and Social Action Plan ESDP Electricity Sector Development Project ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan ESMS Environmental and Social Management System ESRS Environmental and Social Review Summary EU European Union EUR Euro FM Financial Management FMO Entrepreneurial
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Bushenyi-Ishaka, Uganda
    Water governance in small towns at the rural-urban intersection: the case of Bushenyi-Ishaka, Uganda Ramkrishna Paul MSc Thesis WM-WQM.18-14 March 2018 Sketch Credits: Ramkrishna Paul Water governance in small towns at the rural-urban intersection: the case of Bushenyi-Ishaka, Uganda Master of Science Thesis by Ramkrishna Paul Supervisor Dr. Margreet Zwarteveen Mentor Dr. Jeltsje Kemerink - Seyoum Examination committee Dr. Margreet Zwarteveen, Dr. Jeltsje Kemerink – Seyoum, Dr. Janwillem Liebrand This research is done for the partial fulfilment of requirements for the Master of Science degree at the UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands Delft March 2018 Although the author and UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education have made every effort to ensure that the information in this thesis was correct at press time, the author and UNESCO- IHE do not assume and hereby disclaim any liability to any party for any loss, damage, or disruption caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident, or any other cause. © Ramkrishna Paul 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Abstract Water as it flows through a town is continuously affected and changed by social relations of power and vice-versa. In the course of its flow, it always benefits some, while depriving, or even in some cases harming others. The issues concerning distribution of water are closely intertwined with the distribution of risks, at the crux of which are questions related to how decisions related to water allocation and distribution are made.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Health
    UGANDA PROTECTORATE Annual Report of the MINISTRY OF HEALTH For the Year from 1st July, 1960 to 30th June, 1961 Published by Command of His Excellency the Governor CONTENTS Page I. ... ... General ... Review ... 1 Staff ... ... ... ... ... 3 ... ... Visitors ... ... ... 4 ... ... Finance ... ... ... 4 II. Vital ... ... Statistics ... ... 5 III. Public Health— A. General ... ... ... ... 7 B. Food and nutrition ... ... ... 7 C. Communicable diseases ... ... ... 8 (1) Arthropod-borne diseases ... ... 8 (2) Helminthic diseases ... ... ... 10 (3) Direct infections ... ... ... 11 D. Health education ... ... ... 16 E. ... Maternal and child welfare ... 17 F. School hygiene ... ... ... ... 18 G. Environmental hygiene ... ... ... 18 H. Health and welfare of employed persons ... 21 I. International and port hygiene ... ... 21 J. Health of prisoners ... ... ... 22 K. African local governments and municipalities 23 L. Relations with the Buganda Government ... 23 M. Statutory boards and committees ... ... 23 N. Registration of professional persons ... 24 IV. Curative Services— A. Hospitals ... ... ... ... 24 B. Rural medical and health services ... ... 31 C. Ambulances and transport ... ... 33 á UGANDA PROTECTORATE MINISTRY OF HEALTH Annual Report For the year from 1st July, 1960 to 30th June, 1961 I.—GENERAL REVIEW The last report for the Ministry of Health was for an 18-month period. This report, for the first time, coincides with the Government financial year. 2. From the financial point of view the year has again been one of considerable difficulty since, as a result of the Economy Commission Report, it was necessary to restrict the money available for recurrent expenditure to the same level as the previous year. Although an additional sum was available to cover normal increases in salaries, the general effect was that many economies had to in all be made grades of staff; some important vacancies could not be filled, and expansion was out of the question.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Uganda: an Assessment and Review
    Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2014, 6, 1297-1315 Published Online October 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jwarp http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.614120 Water Resources of Uganda: An Assessment and Review Francis N. W. Nsubuga1,2*, Edith N. Namutebi3, Masoud Nsubuga-Ssenfuma2 1Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa 2National Environmental Consult Ltd., Kampala, Uganda 3Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kampala, Uganda Email: *[email protected] Received 1 August 2014; revised 26 August 2014; accepted 18 September 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Water resources of a country constitute one of its vital assets that significantly contribute to the socio-economic development and poverty eradication. However, this resource is unevenly distri- buted in both time and space. The major source of water for these resources is direct rainfall, which is recently experiencing variability that threatens the distribution of resources and water availability in Uganda. The annual rainfall received in Uganda varies from 500 mm to 2800 mm, with an average of 1180 mm received in two main seasons. The spatial distribution of rainfall has resulted into a network of great rivers and lakes that possess big potential for development. These resources are being developed and depleted at a fast rate, a situation that requires assessment to establish present status of water resources in the country. The paper reviews the characteristics, availability, demand and importance of present day water resources in Uganda as well as describ- ing the various issues, challenges and management of water resources of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Kasese District Profile.Indd
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA Kasese District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi le 2016 Kasese District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi le a b Kasese District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile Contents List of Tables.........................................................................................................................ii List of Figures......................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgment .................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. iv Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ vi Definition of Terms .............................................................................................................. vii Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 1 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 1 District Overview .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mitooma District Community Knowledge and Practices LQAS Survey Report
    Mitooma District Community Knowledge and Practices LQAS Survey Report Management Sciences for Health (STAR-E) April 2011 This report was made possible through support provided by the US Agency for International Development, under the terms of Cooperative Agreement Number 617‐A‐00‐09‐00006‐00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Agency for International Development. Strengthening TB and HIV & AIDS Responses in Eastern Uganda (STAR-E) Management Sciences for Health 784 Memorial Drive Cambridge, MA 02139 Telephone: (617) 250-9500 www.msh.org MITOOMA DISTRICT COMMUNITY KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES SURVEY REPORT APRIL 2011 MITOOMA MITOOMA DISTRICT COMMUNITY KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES SURVEY REPORT APRIL 2011 Prepared by STAR- E LQAS __________________________________________________________________________________ Mitooma Mitooma District Knowledge and Practices Survey Report, 2010 This document may be cited as: Author: Management Sciences in Health (STAR-E) and Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (STAR-SW) Title: Community knowledge and practices LQAS survey, 2010. Mitooma district report, May 2011. Contacts: Stephen K. Lwanga ([email protected]) and Edward Bitarakwate ([email protected]) Mitooma District Knowledge and Practices Survey Report, 2010 Page i Acknowledgements STAR-E acknowledges with appreciation the cooperation it has received from the partners contributing to the 2010 LQAS survey in Mitooma district: the communities that participated, the district authorities for oversight and supervision, the district officials for carrying out the survey under the management and guidance of the STAR-SW and STAR-E projects. STAR-E thanks STAR-SW for providing the electronic survey raw data sets as soon as they were ready.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Kyoga.Pdf
    Report of frame survey of the Kyoga basin lakes 2002 Item Type monograph Publisher National Fisheries Resources Research Institute (NaFIRRI) Download date 30/09/2021 01:58:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/34464 . ; ~ ..... '. ....: , NATIONAL FISHERIES RESOURCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE (NAFIRRI) .' ,,':",.... _. .: .:-: .' .:" THEME 3: l::; ••••:· ENHANCING INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOIURCES ,' ...' .:. ~ .• ': ~ . ". .. ~ -PROJECT: GENERATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGIES THAT ENSURE SUSTAINABLE USTILISATION OF FISH STOCKS I (CAPTURE FISHERIES) ON LAKES KYOGA,KWANIA, BISINA, 0' _ . ALBERT AND ALBERT NILE ARTP II .. , .: :.','I' .. ..:.' "... REPORT OF FRAME SURVEY OF THE KYOGA BASIN . LAKES 2002 (".11I "'. ~. "'" ~ '., - :", ,'. •• r .',.:\ ' ....' ' · " '" .., -, . .. ~ . ,. " .. , -- .... ... 11 I" THEME 3: Enhancing Integrated Management of Natural Resources PROJECT: Generation of Knowledge and Technologies that Ensure Sustainable Utilization of Fish Stocks (Capture Fisheries) on II Lakes Kyoga, Kwania, Bisina, Albert And Albert Nile. PROJECT LEADER: J.R. Kamanyi Principal Research Officer, NAFIRRI. Back ground I The project objective is to generate, package, and disseminate information/technologies/methods and policy advice for increasing and sustaining 'II Fisheries resources and development of options for optimizing socio-economic ,. benefits from the aquatic systems. The activities were to be conducted on Lakes Kyoga, Kwania, Bisina, Albert and Albert Nile. However due to limited funds, I: work was not extended to Lake Albert, Albert Nile. There are six studies/experiments/activities in the project namely: ~ II 1. Population characteristics of fish stocks (composition, distribution, I abundance and population structure). 2. Estimation of fish biomass II 3. Fish catch assessment (catch rates) and estimation of annual commercial catch 4. age estimation of the major commercial fish species Ii 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Efficiency Roadmap for Uganda Making Energy Efficiency Count
    Energy Efficiency Roadmap for Uganda Making Energy Efficiency Count ENERGY EFFICIENCY ROADMAP FOR UGANDA Making Energy Efficiency Count Authors: Stephane de la Rue du Can,1 David Pudleiner,2 David Jones,3 and Aleisha Khan4 This work was supported by Power Africa under Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Published May 2017 1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2 ICF International 3 Tetra Tech 4 ICF International i ENERGY EFFICIENCY ROADMAP FOR UGANDA DISCLAIMERS This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. The views of the authors do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is an equal opportunity
    [Show full text]
  • UGANDA for Those with Disabilities in Rural Communities
    DESIGN WITH DesigningUGANDA for those with disabilities in rural communities LUIS A. GARCIA Acknowledgements: Special thanks to: Jim Dewar Nelson Mukiika Kio Bjarki Hallgrimsson Jennifer Vandermeer Walter Zanneti Ramathan Kavuma Navin Parekh Zoe Krug Jennifer Tataryn Kisembo Salim Amanda Cox Charles Williams Andrew Dewar Moses Lena Sitnikova Joseph Nate Williams Bja My amazing classmates. i 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Research 3 Ideation 13 Preliminary Design Development 19 Definitive Design Development 27 Final Design Development 37 Appendix A 45 Appendix B 47 Appendix C Executive Summary This project started through a collaboration Having done much research the ideation between the READ Initiative at Carleton phase was started first by the development of University and CanUgan, a non-for-profit a mindmap. This mindmap helped understand organization found in Ottawa, Canada by the many complex problems and, how they Navin Parekh. CanUgan works closely with are related, surrounding the focus of the KADUPEDI, The Kasese District Union of research. This mindmap also helped attain a Persons with Disabilities, in Uganda. Both deeper understanding of each problem and CanUgan and KADUPEDI focus on providing the root source of them. Ideation followed by support through assistive devices to people the development of concepts dealing with in need. CanUgan’s proposal to the School of water management, either water collection Industrial Design at Carleton University was or water distribution. This process proved to design innovative devices for people with helpful but the best solution evetually found disabilities in Uganda. was a very complex system of creating a water source and a pump.
    [Show full text]