Copolymerization of Carbon Dioxide with Propylene Oxide and Chain Transfer Agents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
catalysts Article Co-Ni Cyanide Bi-Metal Catalysts: Copolymerization of Carbon Dioxide with Propylene Oxide and Chain Transfer Agents Kirill Alferov 1, Shuanjin Wang 1 , Tianhao Li 1, Min Xiao 1,*, Shanyue Guan 2 and Yuezhong Meng 1,* 1 The Key Laboratory of Low-Carbon Chemistry & Energy Conservation of Guangdong Province/State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou 510275, China 2 Instrumental Analysis and Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou 510275, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.X.); [email protected] (Y.M.) Received: 1 July 2019; Accepted: 17 July 2019; Published: 25 July 2019 Abstract: Synthesis of copolymers from carbon dioxide (CO2) and epoxides is an important research direction as such processes utilize the abundant greenhouse gas and deliver useful products. Specifically, cooligomers of CO2 and propylene oxide (PO) with a non-alternating structure can be used for polyurethane preparation. They are synthesized by employing Zn-Co cyanide catalysts. The application of alternative metal cyanide complexes is interesting from scientific and practical points of view. The purpose of this work was to study the copolymerization of CO2 and PO in the presence of Co-Ni cyanide catalysts and chain transfer agents (CTAs) in order to obtain low molecular weight products. Three Co-Ni catalysts with different contents of complexing agents were synthesized, characterized by several analytical methods and applied for this reaction. The complex without complexing agents was chosen for detailed investigation. 1,6-Hexanediol proved to be a more preferred CTA than poly(propylene glycol) and adipic acid. An oligo(ethercarbonate) (Mn = 2560, PDI = 2.5, CO2 = 20 mol.%) capped with OH groups was synthesized with relatively high productivity (1320 gPO+CO2/gcat in 24 h) and characterized by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) MS and NMR methods. The main chain transfer routes during the cooligomerization were suggested on the basis of the research results. Keywords: metal cyanide catalyst; cobalt; nickel; carbon dioxide; propylene oxide; copolymerization; chain transfer agent; oligo(ethercarbonate); polyurethanes 1. Introduction CO2 utilization for the production of chemicals attracts a lot of attention because it can decrease the use of fossil-based starting materials [1]. One way of utilizing CO2 is incorporating it into copolymers with epoxides [2–11]. A lot of efforts were given to the synthesis of the alternating copolymers (structure 1 in Scheme1) of CO 2 with propylene oxide (PO) because PO is a cheap and industrially relevant epoxide. However, these materials have glass transition temperature around 40 ◦C which makes them inconvenient for usage. On the other hand, the inclusion of ether linkages resulting in poly(ethercarbonate)s (structure 2 in Scheme1) decreases the glass transition temperature. One of the options to use CO2/PO copolymerization products is the preparation of low molecular weight materials and their incorporation into polyurethanes (PU) [12–23]. The application of non-alternating CO2/PO cooligomers is especially attractive because, in some cases, they may substitute poly(propylene glycol)s (PPGs) thereby decreasing the consumption of fossil derived PO [1,22]. Oligo(ethercarbonate)s Catalysts 2019, 9, 632; doi:10.3390/catal9080632 www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts CatalystsCatalysts2019 2019, 9,, 6329, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of2 20 of 20 substitute poly(propylene glycol)s (PPGs) thereby decreasing the consumption of fossil derived PO (structure[1,22]. Oligo(ethercarbonate)s 4 in Scheme1) can be (structure e fficiently 4 producedin Scheme by 1) CO can2/ PObe cooligomerizationefficiently produced in by the CO presence2/PO ofcooligomerization Zn-Co metal cyanide in the catalystspresence of and Zn- chainCo metal transfer cyanide agents catalysts (CTAs) and chain [22–34 transfer]. Usually, agents polyols (CTAs) or polycarboxylic[22–34]. Usually, acids polyo (structurels or polycarboxylic 5 in Scheme1 acids) are employed(structure 5 to in control Scheme molecular 1) are employed weight to of control the final products.molecular The weight advantages of the final of theseproducts. catalysts The advantages are relatively of these high catalysts activity, are low relatively content high of unsaturated activity, chainlow ends,content the of absence unsaturated of product chain ends, coloration the absence and regioregularity of product coloration of PO unitsand regioregularity in the polymer of chains. PO However,units in the polymer catalytic chains. materials However, are prone the tocatalytic give considerable materials are amountsprone to give of propylene considerable carbonate amounts (PC) of propylene carbonate (PC) as a by-product (structure 3 in Scheme 1). Depending on particular as a by-product (structure 3 in Scheme1). Depending on particular Zn-Co complex and reaction Zn-Co complex and reaction conditions used, its amount can vary from several percent to dozens of conditions used, its amount can vary from several percent to dozens of percent. As these catalysts are percent. As these catalysts are used for industrial production of PPGs and oligo(ethercarbonate)s used for industrial production of PPGs and oligo(ethercarbonate)s and have been thoroughly studied and have been thoroughly studied for PO polymerization and CO2/PO co(poly)oligomerization, the for PO polymerization and CO /PO co(poly)oligomerization, the issues related to intellectual property issues related to intellectual2 property may also arise when the application of the catalysts is maynecessary. also arise when the application of the catalysts is necessary. Scheme 1. Different products of PO/CO2 copolymerization. Scheme 1. Different products of PO/CO2 copolymerization. OtherOther metal metal cyanide cyanide complexes complexes werewere alsoalso applied to copolymerize copolymerize PO PO and and CO CO2: 2Zn: Zn-Cr-Cr [35,36], [35,36 ], Zn-FeZn-Fe [36 [36–41–41],], Zn-Ni-Fe, Zn-Ni-Fe, Zn-Ni-Co Zn-Ni-Co [[42],42], Zn-Mo,Zn-Mo, Zn Zn-Mn,-Mn, Zn Zn-Cd-Cd [36], [36], Zn Zn-Ni-Ni [36,43,44], [36,43,44 Co], Co-Ni-Ni [43,45]. [43,45 ]. Co-NiCo-Ni catalyst catalyst obtained obtained by by dehydration dehydration of of Co(H Co(H2O)2O)2[M(CN)2[M(CN)44]] 4H4H22O seemed to to us us to to be be attractive attractive as as it 2 copolymerizedit copolymerized CO2 andCO POand with PO relatively with relatively high productivity high productivit and producedy and produced no PC [45 ].no Additionally, PC [45]. it wasAdditionally, shown that it was performance shown that of aperformance Co-Ni complex of a preparedCo-Ni complex in the presenceprepared ofin complexing the presence agents of competedcomplexing with agents that of competed a Zn-Co catalyst with that when of thesea Zn- materialsCo catalyst were when used these to catalyze materials PO were oligomerization used to catalyze PO oligomerization in the presence of PPG [46]. As there is no data on target preparation of in the presence of PPG [46]. As there is no data on target preparation of CO2/PO cooligomers in the CO2/PO cooligomers in the presence Co-Ni cyanide complexes and CTAs, we explored this process presence Co-Ni cyanide complexes and CTAs, we explored this process to estimate their reactivity to estimate their reactivity and the composition of the final products. It was found that a Co-Ni and the composition of the final products. It was found that a Co-Ni complex without complexing complex without complexing agents can efficiently catalyze CO2/PO cooligomerization in agents can efficiently catalyze CO /PO cooligomerization in combination with 1,6-hexanediol (HD) to combination with 1,6-hexanediol2 (HD) to give an oligo(ethercarbonate) capped mainly with give an oligo(ethercarbonate) capped mainly with secondary OH groups. Most of OH ends of HD secondary OH groups. Most of OH ends of HD participated in the chain transfer processes. participated in the chain transfer processes. 2. Results and Discussion 2. Results and Discussion 2.1. Catalyst Characterization 2.1. Catalyst Characterization Three Co-Ni complexes were prepared during this work: Co-Ni(0), Co-Ni(t), Co-Ni(P). The first Three Co-Ni complexes were prepared during this work: Co-Ni(0), Co-Ni(t), Co-Ni(P). The first complex was synthesized following the procedure described in [45]. The difference is that the complex was synthesized following the procedure described in [45]. The difference is that the precipitated solid was washed two times with deionized (DI) water. Co-Ni(t) and Co-Ni(P) were precipitatedprepared in solid general was accordance washed two with times the method with deionized published (DI) in [46]. water. However, Co-Ni(t) when and the Co-Ni(P) latter was were preparedfollowed in exactly general as accordance it was described, with the the method product published was heterogeneous in [46]. However, in color. when This the happened latter was followedbecause exactlyit seems as to ithave was heterogeneous described, the distribution product wasof poly(tetrahydrofuran) heterogeneous in color.(poly(THF)) This over happened the because it seems to have heterogeneous distribution of poly(tetrahydrofuran) (poly(THF)) over the material. For this reason, the published method was modified; that is washings with H2O/tBuOH, Catalysts 2019, 9, 632 3 of 20 Catalysts 2019, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 20 poly(THF)material. For/tBuOH this andreason, with the pure published tBuOH as method well as additionalwas modified centrifugations; that is washings were done with (see H Section2O/tBuOH, 3.2). Datapoly(THF)/tBuOH on catalyst characterizations and with pure are tBuOH presented as well in Table as 1ad. ditional centrifugations were done (see Section 3.2). Data on catalyst characterizations are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Results of catalyst characterizations obtained by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) andTable nitrogen 1.