Revenue Recognition: It's Not Sexy but You Need To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Revenue Recognition: It’s Not Sexy but You Need to Know Andrew Reading, Dopkins & Company LLP Eric Lucas, KPMG LLP David Antoni, KPMG LLP National Society of Accountants for Cooperatives 2019 Tax, Finance & Accounting Conference for Cooperatives Denver, CO August 5, 2019 1 The information in this document is not intended to be “written advice concerning one or more Federal tax matters” subject to the requirements of section 10.37(a)(2) of Treasury Department Circular 230. You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both, of any transaction described in the associated materials provided to you, including, but not limited to, any tax opinions, memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in the materials. The information in this document is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser. 2 Agenda • ASC 606 Overview • Cooperative Implementation Considerations and Best Practices • Tax Revenue Overview • Tax Considerations 3 Key Concepts • Replaces substantially all prior guidance • Effective January 1, 2019 for calendar issuers • Scope – all contracts with customers except where other guidance is provided in ASC (ex. Leases etc.) • Principles based – need to document judgments • Revenue is recognized based on a 5 step model – Applied on a contract by contract basis – Portfolio approach as practical expedient 4 The Five-step Model An entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to Core customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects Principle to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services 1 Identify the contract(s) with a customer 2 Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3 Determine the transaction price 4 Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5 Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation 5 The Five-step Model An entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to Core customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects Principle to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services 1 Identify the contract(s) with a customer 2 Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3 Determine the transaction price 4 Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5 Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation 6 Step 1 - Identify the Contract • “An agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and obligations”. – The accounting reflects the legal rights and obligations • Considerations: – Written contracts/e-mails – Purchase orders – Standard terms/conditions – Verbal agreements – Past business practices – Combining contracts 7 Step 1 - Identify the Contract • Cannot apply 5 step model until a contract is deemed to exist as part of Step 1 • Existence criteria: – Approvals and commitment to perform by both parties – Rights of both parties and payment terms are identified – Commercial substance exists – Collection is probable (likely to occur) • Consider contract termination provisions • Contract modifications 8 The Five-step Model An entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to Core customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects Principle to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services 1 Identify the contract(s) with a customer 2 Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3 Determine the transaction price 4 Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5 Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation 9 Step 2 – Identify Performance Obligations • A performance obligation (PO) is a promise to deliver a good or service that is: – Capable of being distinct (customer can benefit from on own or combining it with other resources readily available to customer) – Distinct within the context of the contract (separately identifiable) 10 Step 2 – Identify Performance Obligations • Identify all promised goods and services in the contract (explicit vs. implicit) • Determine if they meet PO definition • Practical expedient – immaterial in context of the contract 11 Step 2 – Identify Performance Obligations • Key Considerations – Warranties (assurance type vs. service) – Customer options for additional goods/services including loyalty programs – Shipping and Handling 12 The Five-step Model An entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to Core customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects Principle to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services 1 Identify the contract(s) with a customer 2 Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3 Determine the transaction price 4 Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5 Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation 13 Step 3 – Determine the Transaction Price • Amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties (i.e. certain sales taxes). • Based on contract terms and customary business practices – Does not consider cancellation, renewal or modification terms 14 Step 3 – Determine the Transaction Price • Determined at contract inception – Fixed cash and any noncash consideration – Expected variable consideration • Refunds • Returns • Discounts • Performance bonuses • Rebates • Penalties • Royalties 15 Step 3 – Determine the Transaction Price • Other transaction price considerations – Significant financing component – Consideration payable to the customer (i.e. Slotting / Coupons ) – Sales and similar taxes – Nonrefundable upfront fees 16 The Five-step Model An entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to Core customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects Principle to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services 1 Identify the contract(s) with a customer 2 Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3 Determine the transaction price 4 Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5 Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation 17 Step 4 – Allocate Transaction Price to Performance Obligations • Key concept – allocate an amount to each PO representing the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled as a result of transferring control of the underlying goods or services to the customer. • Generally allocated using stand-alone selling prices 18 The Five-step Model An entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to Core customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects Principle to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services 1 Identify the contract(s) with a customer 2 Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3 Determine the transaction price 4 Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5 Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation 19 Step 5 – Recognize Revenue • Recognize revenue when control is transferred in connection with the satisfaction of a performance obligation a)over time or b)at a point in time • Transfer of control - customer has the ability to direct the use of the asset and receive substantially all of the related remaining benefits 20 Step 5 – Recognize Revenue • Indicators that control has transferred – Customer is obligated to pay Cooperative for the transferred asset – Customer has: • Legal title • Physical custody • Significant risks and rewards of owning asset • Accepted asset • Indicators are not solely determinative – often require significant judgment 21 Step 5 – Recognize Revenue • Over time vs. point in time - assessed at contract inception • Over time if any one are met, otherwise recognized at a point in time: – Customer simultaneously receives and consumes benefits as entity performs – Customer controls the asset as the entity creates or enhances the asset – No alternative use and an enforceable right to payment 22 Step 5 – Recognize Revenue • Over time – use output or input methods that reasonably measure progress toward completion of POs • Must be consistently applied to all similar transactions • Point in time – when customer obtains control of the asset underlying the performance obligation 23 Step 5 – Recognize Revenue • Key considerations: – Customer’s unexercised rights (i.e. breakage) – Repurchase agreements – Consignment arrangements – Sales to distributors – Bill-and-Hold arrangements – Customer acceptance – International sales (when has control transferred) 24 Other Overall Considerations • Licensing and rights to use (IP) • Principal vs. Agent (gross vs. net reporting) • Onerous (loss) contracts • Contract costs – to fulfill and obtain 25 Transition • Full Retrospective application to all periods presented. Certain practical expedients with disclosure • Modified Retrospective – Applied to either (a) all contracts at the date of initial application or (b) only contracts
Recommended publications
  • Technical Line: How the New Revenue Standard Affects Asset Managers

    Technical Line: How the New Revenue Standard Affects Asset Managers

    No. 2017-20 Updated 10 July 2020 Technical Line FASB — final guidance How the new revenue standard affects asset managers In this issue: Overview ....................................... 1 What you need to know Background ................................... 2 Investment management • Asset managers need to make a number of judgments on when and how to recognize arrangements ............................. 3 performance-based fees for their investment management services. This may result Identifying the contract with a in entities recognizing revenue differently than they have in the past. customer ................................. 3 Combining contracts .................... 4 • Certain expenses incurred by the asset manager that are reimbursed by funds or Identifying the performance investors may be required to be presented gross on the income statement (i.e., in obligations ............................... 5 revenue and expense) based on the asset manager’s performance obligations and Determining the transaction price 7 principal versus agent evaluation. Allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations • Asset managers may be required to capitalize certain contract costs (e.g., placement in the contract .......................... 9 Recognizing revenue when fees, implementation costs), amortize these assets and analyze them for impairment. (or as) the entity satisfies a This is a change in practice for entities that have not previously capitalized these costs. performance obligation ............ 9 Carried interest ......................... 10 Contract costs ............................. 11 Overview Costs to obtain and fulfill a The new revenue recognition standard issued1 by the Financial Accounting Standards Board contract ................................. 11 Additional considerations for (FASB or Board) requires entities in the asset management industry to make additional mutual fund asset managers ..... 12 judgments and estimates, such as when and how to recognize performance-based fees for Distribution services .................
  • Cop 416 Cooperative Accounting

    Cop 416 Cooperative Accounting

    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES COURSE CODE: COP 416 COURSE TITLE: COOPERATIVE ACCOUNTING COURSE MAIN TEXT Course Developer/ Mr. S. O. Israel-Cookey Unit Writer School of Management Sciences, National Open University of Nigeria, Lagos. Course Editor: Dr. O. J. Onwe NOUN, Lagos Programme Leader: Dr. C. I. Okeke School of Management Sciences, National Open University of Nigeria, Lagos. Course Coordinator:Pastor Timothy O. Ishola School of Management Sciences, National Open University of Nigeria, Lagos NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA 14/16 AMADU BELLO WAY, VICTORIA ISLAND, LAGOS SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES COP415 ASSESSMENT SHEET PROGRAMME: B.Sc. COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT COURSE CODE: COP 415 COURSE TITLE: SEMINAR IN COOPERATIVE 1 CREDIT: 02 PART A: SEMINAR PRESENTATION NAME OF CENTER: ……………………………………. NAME OF STUDENT: ………………………………...... MATRIC NO: ……………………………………………. S/N Seminar presentation Max Facilitator Head/Coordinator, Remark Score Score (%) Hq. Score(%) (%) i. Content mastery: 10 • Relevance and Comprehensiveness • Correctness ii. Comportment of the presenter 5 iii. • Confidence 10 • Demonstration of boldness to address the audience iv. • Response to questions 10 • Ease attending to audience’s questions and observation v. Communication- Correction of grammer 10 • Fluency and Simplicity vi. Dressing-Simplicity and neatness 5 Grand total 50% 50% Facilitator name and signature PART B: ASSESSMENT OF TERM PAPER S/N Term Paper Report Feature Max Score /Coordinator, Hq. Remark (%) Score(%) i. Literature review 15 • Relevancy of cited works • Comprehensiveness of the review • Extensive of the sources – textual, interact, journals, government report etc. ii. Summary, conclusion and recommendation: 10 iii. Referencing: 10 • Materials – correctly cited using the APA format, Comprehensive cited iv.
  • On the Balance Sheet-Based Model of Financial Reporting

    On the Balance Sheet-Based Model of Financial Reporting

    On the Balance Sheet-Based Model of Financial Reporting Occasional Paper Series Center for Excellence in Accounting & Security Analysis Columbia Business School established the Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis in 2003 under the direction of Trevor Harris and Professor Stephen Penman. The Center (“CEASA”) aims to be a leading voice for independent, practical solutions for financial reporting and security analysis, promoting financial reporting that reflects economic reality and encourages investment practices that communicate sound valuations. CEASA’s mission is to develop workable solutions to issues in financial reporting and accounting policy; produce a core set of principles for equity analysis; collect and synthesize best thinking and best practices; disseminate ideas to regulators, analysts, investors, accountants and management; and promote sound research on relevant issues. Drawing on the wisdom of leading experts in academia, industry and government, the Center produces sound research and identifies best practices on relevant issues. CEASA's guiding criterion is to serve the public interest by supporting the integrity of financial reporting and the efficiency of capital markets. Located in a leading university with a mandate for independent research, CEASA is positioned to lead a discussion of issues, with an emphasis on sound conceptual thinking and without obstacles of constituency positions. More information and access to current research is available on our website at http://www.gsb.columbia.edu/ceasa/ The Center is supported by our generous sponsors: General Electric, IBM and Morgan Stanley. We gratefully acknowledge the support of these organizations that recognize the need for this center. ON THE BALANCE SHEET-BASED MODEL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING Principal Consultant Ilia D.
  • What Board Members Need to Know About Not-For-Profit Finance and Accounting

    What Board Members Need to Know About Not-For-Profit Finance and Accounting

    What Board Members Need to Know About Not-for-Profit Finance and Accounting www.jjco.com 1-2014 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Role of Board Member in Financial Oversight 3 Understanding Financial Statements 4 Financial Statements: Review Checklist 12 Reviewing the IRS Form 990 13 Key Financial & Governance Policies 17 Evaluating Funding Sources 18 Roles and Responsibilities 20 Glossary of Terms 26 (words and terms found in glossary are italicized throughout) Other Resources 30 Our Services/Contact Us 34 © 2014 Jacobson Jarvis & Co PLLC. All rights reserved. 1 Introduction Thank you for agreeing to serve on the board of a not-for-profit organization. Without your dedication and commitment, we would not enjoy the thriving not-for-profit community we do. As a board member, you are probably very familiar with some aspects of not-for-profit management. You understand the basic need to raise money to support the activities of the organization for which you volunteer, and you probably have seen the fundamental challenge every not-for-profit management team faces – to make the dollars raised go as far as possible. However, in addition to addressing funding challenges, as a board member you now have a legal responsibility to protect the organization’s assets by overseeing its financial activities and implementing “best practices” to protect the organization. For board members without experience in not- for-profit accounting,and especially for those without any formal accounting training, it is easy to neglect this important responsibility and bear some liability for the outcome. This booklet is designed to help you perform your financial responsibilities more effectively.
  • Class #15 Accounting Trading Strategies Do Investors Understand Accounting?

    Class #15 Accounting Trading Strategies Do Investors Understand Accounting?

    Class #15 Accounting Trading Strategies Do Investors Understand Accounting? 15.535 - Class #15 1 Road Map: Where do things fit? • Risk Analysis: –CAPM – 3 Factor Model: Size and B/M Matter – Combine with Cash Flow Analysis • Where Now? – Recall discussion in first class about market efficiency edbate • Application of Fundamental Analysis … Can we use financial accounting numbers to identify mis-priced stocks? 15.535 - Class #15 2 Does the market set stock prices correctly all the time? • EMPHASIZE: Mkts are very competitive! • But .. Evidence that markets may not be perfectly efficient Æ Possible (risky) arbitrage opportunities. • Question: Can we use current (historical) financial accounting information and fundamental analysis to “pick” which stocks will do better/worse in the upcoming months/years? – Answer: There is growing evidence that this appears to be possible! 15.535 - Class #15 3 What is the correct benchmark for “Beating the Market”? • A high stock return (relative to other stocks) does not immediately imply you are getting a “free lunch” or an arbitrage opportunity exists! • Asset pricing models: There is a trade-off between risk and return. – Higher risk stocks should have higher returns. • What is the expected return on stock? … It depends on the stock’s systematic risk! • Simple case – CAPM: E( R ) = Rf + E*(Rm-Rf) – Expected return is increasing in systematic risk! 15.535 - Class #15 4 Abnormal Stock Returns: Getting the benchmark correct • Abnormal stock performance must be calculated relative to the stock return predicted by CAPM (or other model): • D = Abnormal return = Actual return – { Rf + E*(Rm-Rf) } – Abnormal return is known as the “alpha”.
  • Introduction to Management Accounting and Control

    Introduction to Management Accounting and Control

    ⬛⬛ CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Management Accounting and Control FEATURE STORY It’s Monday morning, 9 o’clock. Pekka Virtanen, Pekka: Restructuring means laying-off a larger general manager at FinnXL, one of the larg- percentage of the employees. Let me have est furniture companies in the world, calls a closer look at your scenarios, please. I’m for a meeting with his chief controller, Linn sure you’ll have included all the financials Petersson. in your model, but have you considered One of FinnXL’s production facilities in Estonia potential employee reaction to the restruc- is under discussion for a major restructur- turing plans? I remember some five years ing. The profitability of the production site ago, when I was the plant manager at our has dropped severely in the last six months. production site in Poland, that the financial Pekka is responsible for the Eastern European forecasts, which had been prepared by the operations, and FinnXL’s top management has central accounting department, were too instructed him to solve the problem. optimistic. They underestimated the nega- tive effects on employee motivation. Pekka: Good morning Linn. Great that you Linn: I have to admit, employee reaction is not could make it at such short notice. As I told explicitly considered in my model, as this is you last week, we need to find a solution for really difficult to quantify. But I have looked our Estonian production facility. up FinnXL’s experience with restructurings Linn: Absolutely. I’ve collected all the numbers in the Baltic states. In recent years, the actual from the last six months.
  • MASB 9 Revenue

    MASB 9 Revenue

    MASB 9 Revenue MASB 9 Revenue prescribes the accounting treatment of revenue arising from certain types of transactions and events. MASB 9 supersedes MASB Approved Accounting Standard IAS 18, Revenue Recognition adopted previously by the MASB. Highlights: 1. MASB 9 should be applied in accounting for revenue arising from the sale of goods, rendering of services and the use by others of enterprise assets yielding interest, royalties and dividends. It also specifically excludes revenue arising from certain transactions. 2. Exempt enterprises need not comply with certain provisions of this Standard i.e. the recognition of revenue by reference to the stage of completion in rendering services. 3. MASB 9 requires that revenue should be measured at the fair value of consideration received or receivable. In most cases, the consideration is in the form of cash or cash equivalents. Discounting is needed in those circumstances where the inflow of cash is significantly deferred without interest. If dissimilar goods or services are exchanged (as in barter transactions), revenue is the fair value of the goods or services received adjusted by the any cash or cash equivalent transferred or, if this is not reliably measurable, the fair value of the goods or services given up adjusted by the any cash or cash equivalent transferred. 4. Revenue should be recognised when all the following have been satisfied: (a) the significant risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the buyer; (b) managerial involvement and control have passed to the buyer; (c) the amount of revenue can be measured reliably; (d) it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the enterprise; and (e) the costs incurred or to be incurred can be measured reliably.
  • Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants Contents

    Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants Contents

    June 2005 Revised July 2006 CODE OF ETHICS FOR ♦ PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS CONTENTS Page PREFACE ...................................................................................................... 1102 PART A: GENERAL APPLICATION OF THE CODE ............................... 1103 100 Introduction and Fundamental Principles ........................................ 1104 110 Integrity ........................................................................................... 1110 120 Objectivity ....................................................................................... 1111 130 Professional Competence and Due Care .......................................... 1112 140 Confidentiality ................................................................................. 1113 150 Professional Behavior ...................................................................... 1115 PART B: PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE ... 1116 200 Introduction ..................................................................................... 1117 210 Professional Appointment ............................................................... 1123 220 Conflicts of Interest ......................................................................... 1127 230 Second Opinions .............................................................................. 1129 240 Fees and Other Types of Remuneration .......................................... 1130 250 Marketing Professional Services ..................................................... 1133 260 Gifts and
  • Ten Years of XBRL: Financial-Reporting Experts Reflect on Benefits, Successes, and Remaining Challenges (Part 1)

    Ten Years of XBRL: Financial-Reporting Experts Reflect on Benefits, Successes, and Remaining Challenges (Part 1)

    JUNE & JULY 2019 IN THIS ISSUE Ten years of XBRL: Financial- SEC staff comments are RECENT DEVELOPMENTS reporting experts reflect on revealing, a year after The SEC’s FAST Act rules benefits, successes, and ASC 606 broaden XBRL requirements remaining challenges PAGE 2 PAGE 8 PAGE 10 Ten years of XBRL: Financial-reporting experts reflect on benefits, successes, and remaining challenges (Part 1) Believe it or not, a decade has elapsed since June 2009, when the SEC implemented its XBRL-tagging requirement for financial disclosure filings. Three years later, the XBRL mandate was fully phased in for all SEC filers, and it continues to expand. All regulatory compliance teams at SEC reporting companies are now involved in XBRL tagging. SEC rules that took effect in May 2019 now require Inline XBRL for information on the cover of Forms 8-K, 10-Q, 10-K, 20-F, and 40-F. [See The SEC’s FAST Act rules broaden XBRL requirements in this issue.] To mark the anniversary, DIMENSIONS asked six XBRL experts in the securities regulation, financial reporting, or capital markets sectors to comment on the structured-data revolution in SEC reporting: its benefits to investors and companies; the success stories thus far; and the challenges that remain for structured data and the general modernization of disclosure. • Mike Willis, Assistant Director, SEC Office of Structured Disclosure • J. Louis Matherne, Chief of Taxonomy Development, FASB • Campbell Pryde, President and CEO, XBRL US • Christine Tan, Co-Founder and Chief Research Officer, idaciti • Pranav Ghai, CEO, Calcbench • Lou Rohman, Vice President of XBRL Services, Toppan Merrill NOTE: The views expressed here are solely those of the individual respondents, and they do not necessarily reflect the views of their respective organizations.
  • E-Procurement in Accounting

    E-Procurement in Accounting

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Clute Institute: Journals The Review Of Business Information Systems Volume 7, Number 1 E-Procurement In Accounting: A Macro Perspective Of Selection Techniques Saravanan Muthaiyah (E-Mail: saravanan.muthaiyah @ mmu.edu.my), Multimedia University, Malaysia Murali Raman (E-mail: murali.raman @ mmu.edu.my), Multimedia University, Malaysia Larry Lombard, Ph.D. (E-mail: [email protected]), Metropolitan State College of Denver Abstract Selecting an E-procurement accounting package is a complex process because of rapidly chang- ing technology and the variety of options proposed by software providers. There are many e- procurement packages available in the market, but most of these packages simply automate the ordering process. Using an integrated system to place orders over the Internet can save time, re- duce postage and paper cost. But without integrating e-procurement packages within a compa- ny’s finance and accounting systems, one of the largest opportunities for savings is missed out. To achieve full advantage of e-procurement, the procurement system must be integrated not only within the financial system but also with vendors and customers. There are two main categories of e-procurement solutions: 1) buy-side and 2) marketplace. While the full range of benefits might be better secured with buy-side procurement solutions, application costs make marketplace solutions more affordable. For smaller companies, costs of development of buy-side solutions will most often outweigh benefits and therefore marketplace solutions will be more suitable. For large businesses that choose buy-side solutions, careful evaluation is required in selecting the best software that can best suit the company requirements.
  • Effects of Corporate Governance on Accounting Education And

    Effects of Corporate Governance on Accounting Education And

    EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education ISSN: 1305-8223 (online) 1305-8215 (print) OPEN ACCESS 2018 14(3):915-922 DOI: 10.12973/ejmste/81142 Effects of Corporate Governance on Accounting Education and Enterprise Value in High-Tech Industry Wei Jiang 1*, Xiaoming Zhang 1 1 School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi’an, CHINA Received 12 September 2017 ▪ Revised 26 November 2017 ▪ Accepted 27 November 2017 ABSTRACT Corporate governance, an important study on enterprise operation and management, aims to have an enterprise effectively supervise organizational activity and operation through favorable management and supervision systems or mechanisms. When a company presents sound corporate governance, the managers would maximize corporate value and shareholders’ equity to enhance the business performance and corporate value. Listed high-tech industries in Shanghai are sampled for this study. The data are acquired from China Economic and Financial Research Database. The research results conclude 1.significantly positive correlations between corporate governance and Accounting Education, 2.remarkably positive correlations between Accounting Education and enterprise value, 3.notably positive correlations between corporate governance and enterprise value, and 4.mediation effects of Accounting Education between corporate governance and enterprise value. The results could provide reference for managers in domestic high-tech industries making investment decisions and governmental authorities formulating relevant regulations. Good match with corporate governance allows a company thoroughly developing the benefit of capital expenditure to further create higher corporate value. Keywords: high-tech industries, corporate governance, accounting education, enterprise value INTRODUCTION In the past decade, the so-called “corporate governance” has become an important study on enterprise operation and management.
  • Table of Contents: Chapter 5 – Procurement

    Table of Contents: Chapter 5 – Procurement

    STATE OF DELAWARE BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING POLICY Office of Management and Budget Procurement Table of Contents: Chapter 5 – Procurement Chapter 5 – Procurement ................................................................................................................ 2 5.1 General Procurement............................................................................................................. 2 5.1.1 Authority......................................................................................................................... 2 5.1.2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 3 5.2 Contracts and Contract Purchasing ....................................................................................... 3 5.2.1 State Contracts ................................................................................................................ 3 5.2.2 Organization Contracts ................................................................................................... 4 5.2.3 Fiscal Year ...................................................................................................................... 4 5.2.4 Non-Discrimination ........................................................................................................ 5 5.2.5 Purchase Orders Required .............................................................................................. 5 5.2.6 Contract Documentation................................................................................................