WTA Tour Statistical Abstract 2005

Home , 2005 Estoril Open, 2005 Zurich Open, Ahsha Rolle, Aiko Nakamura, Ai Sugiyama, Akiko Morigami

Contents Introduction ...... 4 Percentage of Possible Points Earned...... 81 2005 In Review: The Top Players...... 5 Head to Head/Results against Top Players . .83 The Final Top Thirty ...... 5 The Top 20 Head to Head...... 83 The Beginning Top Twenty-Five ...... 6 Wins Over Top Players...... 84 Summary of Changes, Beginning to End of 2005...... 6 Matches Played/Won against the (Final) Top Twenty 84 Top Players Analysed...... 7 Won/Lost Versus the Top Players (Time of the Match) 85 All the Players in the WTA Top Ten in 2005...... 7 Won/Lost Versus the Top Players (Final Rankings)...86 Complete Top Ten under the 1996 Ranking System...... 7 Statistics/Rankings Based on Head-to-Head Numbers. . . 87 Ranking Fluctuation ...... 8 Total Wins over Top Ten Players...... 87 Highest Ranking of 2005 ...... 10 Winning Percentage against Top Ten Players...... 87 Top Players Sorted by Median Ranking...... 11 How They Earned Their Points ...... 88 Short Summary: The Top Eighty ...... 12 Fraction of Points Earned in Slams...... 89 The Top 200, in Numerical Order ...... 14 Quality Versus Round Points ...... 90 The Top 200, in Alphabetical Order ...... 15 Percentage of Points Earned on Each Surface...... 92 Tournament Results...... 16 Consistency ...... 94 Summary of Results for Top Players ...... 16 Standard Deviation of Scores by Tournament ...... 94 Tournament Winners ...... 39 Fraction of Points Earned in Biggest Win ...... 95 Tournament Winners by Date (High-Tier Events) ...... 39 Early-Round Losses ...... 96 Tournament Winners by Type (High-Tier Events) ...... 40 Number of Opening Round Losses...... 97 Winners at Smaller Tournaments (Tier III, IV, V) ...... 41 Rate of Opening Round Losses ...... 98 Winners and Finalists at $50K and Larger Challengers 42 Number of Early Round Losse ...... 99 Cheap Thrills and Tough Bills ...... 44 Rate of Early Round Losses ...... 100 Number of Tournament Wins for Highlight Players ...45 Worst Losse ...... 101 Fraction of Tournaments Won ...... 47 Best and Worst “Worst Losses”...... 108 Tiers of Tournaments Played and Average Tier ...... 48 Winning and Losing Streaks...... 109 Points Earned Week by Week...... 50 List of Longest Winning Streaks...... 109 Tournament Results (Points), from Most to Least...... 51 Individual Winning and Losing Streaks...... 110 Alternate Rankings ...... 52 Number of Significant Results ...... 113 Total Points Ranking (1997 Ranking System)...... 53 Points Per Quarter...... 115 Points Per Tournament, Minimum 14 (1996 Ranking First Quarter...... 115 System: “The Divisor”) ...... 54 Second Quarter ...... 115 Points Per Tournament, Minimum 17 (“Modernized Third Quarter...... 116 Divisor”)...... 55 Fourth Quarter...... 116 Best 14 ...... 57 Most Consistent over Four Quarters ...... 117 Slotted Best 18 (ATP Entry Rank) ...... 58 Slam Results ...... 118 Total Wins...... 59 Winning Percentage ...... 60 Surface Rankings ...... 120 Divisor Rankings, No Slam Bonus ...... 61 Hardcourts...... 120 The “Majors Ranking”...... 62 Summary of Hardcourt Result...... 120 Best 17 Round Points ...... 65 Winning Percentage on Hardcourts ...... 123 Total Round Points...... 66 Points Per Tournament on Hardcourts...... 124 Round Points Per Tournament ...... 67 Best and Worst Results on Hardcourts ...... 125 Quality Points Per Tournament (“Future Potential”) 68 Clay...... 126 Quality/Round Points Equalized: 2Q+R Per Tourn ...70 Summary of Clay Result...... 126 Consistency-Rewarded Rankings...... 71 Winning Percentage on Clay ...... 128 Logarithmic Points Award ...... 71 Points Per Tournament on Clay...... 129 Worst 14 ...... 72 Best and Worst Results on Clay ...... 130 Middle Half...... 73 Grass ...... 131 Idealized Ranking Systems ...... 74 Summary of Grass Results ...... 131 Proposal 1: Surface-Modified Divisor (Minimum 16) 74 Winning Percentage on Grass ...... 133 Proposal 2 — Adjusted Won/Lost ...... 76 Adjusted Points Per Tournament on Grass...... 135 Proposal 3 — Success against Strength of Field ...... 78 Idealized Rankings Summarized...... 80

Contents Indoors ...... 136 Alternate Doubles Rankings 223 Summary of Indoor Results ...... 136 Rankings under the 1996 Ranking System ...... 224 Winning Percentage Indoors...... 138 Doubles Points Per Tournament, No Min. Divisor...225 Points Per Tournament Indoors ...... 139 Quality Points Per Event (Best Eleven Events) ...... 226 Best and Worst Results Indoors...... 140 Majors Ranking...... 227 All-Surface Players ...... 141 Combined Singles and Doubles Rankings ...... 229 Tournament Wins by Surface...... 142 WTA Calendar for 2005 ¥ Events & Results 231 Assorted Statistics ...... 143 The Tennis Almanac 2005 ...... 246 The Busiest Players on the Tour ...... 143 WTA Tour History ...... 263 Total Tour Matches Played by Top Players...... 143 Who Won What Summary — Singles ...... 263 Total Tour Events Played by the Top 150 ...... 145 Who Won What Summary — Doubles...... 264 The Strongest Tournaments ...... 147 Who Won What — History of Tournaments ...... 266 Tournament Strength Based on the Four Top Players 147 Who Won What Part 1: 2001Ð2005 ...... 266 The Top Tournaments Based on Top Players 1 ...... 149 Who Won What Part 2: 1996Ð2002 ...... 267 The Top Tournaments Based on Top Players 2 ...... 150 Who Won What Part 3: 1990Ð1996 ...... 268 Strongest Tournaments Won ...... 152 Who Won What Part 4: 1986Ð1989 ...... 269 Strongest Tournament Performances ...... 153 Who Won What Part 5: 1983Ð1986 ...... 270 Title Defences ...... 154 Active Leaders in Titles (Singles/Doubles) ...... 272 Seeds and their Success Rates ...... 154 Recent Singles Winners, Finalists, Semifinalists ...... 273 Lucky Losers...... 159 Career Results for Leading Players ...... 285 Bagels...... 160 Career Results — Singles...... 285 The Road to Victory...... 165 Slam History ...... 307 Games Lost in Path to Title...... 165 Singles Slam Winners, Open Era ...... 307 Quality Points Earned ...... 166 Doubles Slam Winners, Open Era ...... 308 “Top Players” 2005 ...... 167 Singles and Doubles at the Same Slam (Open Era) 309 Statistics About the Tour as a Whole...... 169 Doubles Slams and Partners...... 310 The Year of the Injury ...... 170 Grand Slams and Career Slams...... 315 Doubles ...... 174 Total Slam Victories, Open Era ...... 317 The Final Top 30 in Doubles...... 174 Players and Titles ...... 318 The Initial Top 30 in Doubles...... 175 Players with Titles, Year by Year...... 318 Doubles Ranking Fluctuation...... 176 Most Titles, Year By Year ...... 321 The Final Top Fifty in Doubles ...... 178 Five Or More Titles in a Year...... 322 Individual Results: The Top Doubles Players/Results. . .179 Surface Sweeps — Singles (Since 1990) ...... 323 Head-to-Heads — Team Records and Losses ...... 197 Career Surface Sweeps/Singles...... 325 Teams with the Most Events ...... 206 Career Grand Surface Sweep ...... 326 Team Results, Sorted By Both Players ...... 207 Year-End Top Players...... 327 Team and Individual Doubles Statistics...... 212 Year-End Top Eight, Alphabetical, Since 1975 ...... 327 Doubles Win Percentages for the Top Teams ...... 212 Total Years Ended At Each Rank, Since 1975 ...... 329 Tournament Win Percentages for the Top Teams .....213 Strongest Career Rankings Showings...... 331 Doubles Win Percentages for the Top Players ...... 214 Total Years in the Top Eight ...... 332 Doubles Tournament Win Percentage/Top Players..215 Doubles Wins & Partners ...... 333 Individual Doubles Statistical Leaders ...... 216 Winningest Doubles Player, From 1983...... 333 Top Ten, Most Wins...... 216 Titles With Multiple Partners, Single Year, Open Era 335 Top Ten, Most Matches Played ...... 216 Slams With the Most Partners, Open Era...... 335 Top Ten, Matches Per Tournament...... 216 I Came, I Played ...... 336 Top Ten, Most Partners...... 216 WTA Main Draw Events Played ...... 337 Highest Partner Turnover Rate...... 216 Comings and Goings: On & Off Rankings 338 Doubles Tournament Winners by Date (Smaller Events) 217 Players ranked in 2004 but not in 2005...... 339 Team Doubles Titles, Sorted from Most to Least ...... 218 Players ranked in 2005 but not in 2004...... 341 Individual Doubles Titles, Sorted from Most to Least. . .220 Players ranked in both 2004 and 2005 ...... 343 Tournament Winners by Date (High-Tier Events)...... 222 Index ...... 349

Introduction Do you ever ask yourself what the WTA rankings are supposed to measure? Chances are, your answer would simply be “They measure which player is better.” If you think about it, though, that’s just pushing the question back a level. What does it mean to be “better”? Obvious answers include “the player who is more likely to win a particular match is better” or “the player who is more likely to win a tournament is better.” In fact the WTA rankings don’t measure this; they don’t measure anything, really, except the ability to achieve a high WTA ranking. In all their miscellaneous press releases, the WTA never really addresses the issue of what the WTA rankings are supposed to mean. Indeed, the bare fact that they are eliminating quality points — the best part of their ranking system in terms of predicting future results (see page 68, and indeed the whole section on alternate rankings starting on page 52) — in 2006 demonstrates that they have no idea what a ranking is supposed to be. But suppose someone went in and reformed the WTA and insisted that they came up with a relatively decent ranking system. Then what? Even if the rankings told us who is the best player overall, that doesn’t tell us who is best on clay, or on grass, or even on hardcourts. Nor does it tell us who is best at avoiding upsets. Nor who is most able to play a lot of matches in a year. Some of these should perhaps be taken into account in the rankings. Others assuredly should not. But all of these things — even the most oddball statistics — tell us something about the state of tennis. Some people view all statistics as lies. This is precisely backward: all properly calculated statistics tell us something. The lie, if there is one, is in pretending they tell us something they don’t. (This is why I find the WTA rankings so obnoxious, and the proposed changes even more obnoxious. It’s not that the new rankings won’t tell us something; it’s that they won’t tell us what the WTA implicitly claims they will tell us.) So this document is an attempt to tell a fuller story. Two statistics tell more than one; three statistics tell still more. So hundreds, obviously, are better still. The statistics here can’t tell us everything. They can certainly tell us a lot more than the WTA rankings do. Want to know which player won the highest fraction of her matches? It’s all there on page page 60. Who had the easiest path to a title? Try page 44. Care which tournament had the most top players? We try three different ways of measuring that, starting on page 147. I was quite sure, when I started grinding out alternate rankings, that they would show that the WTA rankings were wrong: That Kim Clijsters, not Lindsay Davenport, should have been the year-end #1. It’s not just that she won a Slam and Davenport didn’t. She had more wins, a better winning percentages, more titles, better titles, you name it. Surprisingly, it’s not that simple. You can make a case for Clijsters; she does win a lot of the alternate rankings, including most of those based on variations of won/lost. But Davenport has her own set of alternate rankings won, including two of the three “idealized” system (page 74 and following) I consider most likely to in fact measure the “best” player. In addition to the large section on singles, there is a section on doubles — inadequate, really, but larger than you will find almost anywhere else. Plus a lot of WTA history, some directly based on WTA records but some reinterpreted just as 2005’s results have been reinterpreted to try to present a fuller picture. It will be obvious that there are a lot of numbers here. I’ve tried to explain what most of them mean, but I also try to let you draw your own conclusions. If I just wanted to tell you who is best — well, I could do that, but why should you believe me? This is your chance to work out your own answer. I would urge you to treat the numbers not as a burden but as fun — where else are you going to find out, for instance, which Top 30 player had the most doubles partners (page 216). Or which player earned the most Lucky Loser slots (page 159). These statistics are supposed to be fun as well as informative. I hope you’ll take advantage. Please note that this information is offered free; the only restriction on its use is that I retain copyright of the work and of the individual calculations. In return, I ask you to understand that this is a lot of work, so I surely made some errors. There are no guarantees of anything in here; if for some reason your life depends on, say, some player’s clay won/lost percentage, be sure to check it yourself. Robert B. Waltz, December 20, 2005

2005 In Review: The Top Players The Final Top Thirty Because we can’t cover every tennis pro, we have to devote our attention to relatively few. For obvious reasons, the WTA’s Top 30 are the most important of those few. The list below summarizes those players. In addition to listing the players, this table shows a few things about them. “Best 17 score” and “Number of Tournaments” are from the WTA, used to calculate their rankings. “Point gap from the preceding” shows how many points a player would need to earn to overtake the player above her. So Hantuchova, a mere five points behind #18 Kuznetsova, is a very strong #19, but Serena Williams, more than 750 points behind #10 Venus Williams, is a very weak #11. “Began year at” is the player’s ranking twelve months earlier. The final column shows how much her ranking has changed in the interim. Note that a negative number in that column indicates an upward move; smaller numbers are better. So Ivanovic, e.g., had the biggest upward move of any player in the Top 30: 85 places! Final Player Best 17 Number of Point Gap from Began Net Rank Name Score Tournaments Preceding Year At Change 1Davenport, Lindsay 4910 16 1 0 2 Clijsters, Kim 4829 17 81 22 -20 3Mauresmo, Amélie 4030 19 799 2 1 4 Sharapova, Maria 3958 15 72 4 0 5 Pierce, Mary 3797 14 161 29 -24 6 Hénin-Hardenne, Justine 2936 9 861 8 -2 7 Schnyder, Patty 2774 26 162 14 -7 8 Dementieva, Elena 2748 20 26 6 2 9 Petrova, Nadia 2638 25 110 12 -3 10 Williams, Venus 2628 12 10 9 1 11 Williams, Serena 1851 10 777 7 4 12 Déchy, Nathalie 1773 26 78 21 -9 13 Schiavone, Francesca 1704 22 69 19 -6 14 Myskina, Anastasia 1616 19 88 3 11 15 Vaidisova, Nicole 1581 17 35 75 -60 16 Ivanovic, Ana 1551 16 30 101 -85 17 Likhovtseva, Elena 1519 22 32 24 -7 18 Kuznetsova, Svetlana 1491 17 28 5 13 19 Hantuchova, Daniela 1486 25 5 31 -12 20 Saﬁna, Dinara 1372 21 114 44 -24 21 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 1365.5 28 6.5 68 -47 22 Jankovic, Jelena 1320 29 45.5 28 -6 23 Pennetta, Flavia 1240 24 80 38 -15 24 Golovin, Tatiana 1195 22 45 27 -3 25 Kirilenko, Maria 1107 26 88 107 -82 26 Peschke, Kveta 1028.75 25 78.25 93 -67 27 Dulko, Gisela 1008 23 20.75 33 -6 28 Srebotnik, Katarina 997.75 21 10.25 87 -59 29 Molik, Alicia 996 15 1.75 13 16 30 Sugiyama, Ai 994.5 27 1.5 17 13

The Beginning Top Twenty-Five Rank Name 2005 Final Ranking Net Change 1Davenport, Lindsay 1 — 2Mauresmo, Amélie 3 1 3Myskina, Anastasia 14 11 4 Sharapova, Maria 4 — 5Kuznetsova, Svetlana 18 13 6 Dementieva, Elena 8 2 7Williams, Serena 11 4 8 Hénin-Hardenne, Justine 6 -2 9Williams, Venus 10 1 10 Capriati, Jennifer — off rankings 11 Zvonareva, Vera 42 31 12 Petrova, Nadia 9 -3 13 Molik, Alicia 29 16 14 Schnyder, Patty 7 -7 15 Bovina, Elena 62 47 16 Suárez, Paola 232 216 17 Sugiyama, Ai 30 13 18 Sprem, Karolina 66 48 19 Schiavone, Francesca 13 -6 20 Farina Elia, Silvia retired [would have been c. 33] off rankings 21 Déchy, Nathalie 12 -9 22 Clijsters, Kim 2 -20 23 Zuluaga, Fabiola 84 [and retired] 61 24 Likhovtseva, Elena 17 -7 25 Maleeva, Magdalena 52 [and retired] 27 Summary of Changes, Beginning to End of 2005 Ranking Gains: From outside the Top 20 into the Top 20: Clijsters, Déchy, Hantuchova, Ivanovic, Likhovtseva, Pierce, Safina, Vaidisova, (total of 8) From outside the Top 20 into the Top 10: Clijsters, Pierce (total of 2) From the Top 20 into the Top 10: Petrova, Schnyder (total of 2) Ranking Losses: Dropping out of the Top 20: Bovina, Capriati, Farina Elia, Molik, Sprem, Suárez, Sugiyama, Zvonareva (total of 8) Dropping out of the Top 10 but remaining Top 20: Kuznetsova, Myskina, S. Williams (total of 4) Dropping from the Top 10 to below the Top 20: Capriati (total of 1) Players who were in the Top 10 at beginning and end of the year: Davenport, Dementieva, Hénin- Hardenne, Mauresmo, Sharapova, V. Williams (total of 6) Players who were in the Top 20 at the beginning and end of the year: Davenport, Dementieva, Hénin- Hardenne, Kuznetsova, Mauresmo, Myskina, Petrova, Schiavone, Schnyder, Sharapova, S.Williams, V. Williams (total of 12)

Top Players Analysed All the Players in the Top Ten in 2005: The Complete Top Ten Based on WTA (Best 17) Statistics The lists below show all players who have ranked in the Top 10 in 2005, with the highest rank achieved. A total of sixteen players spent time in the Top Ten in 2005, the same as the sixteen we had in 2004 and only slightly up from the fifteen in 2003, far more than the twelve in 2002, but less than the seventeen in 2001; we had sixteen in 2000 also.

Capriati (9) Mauresmo (2) Schnyder (7) Clijsters (2) Molik (8) Sharapova (1) Davenport (1) Myskina (3) S. Williams (2) Dementieva (5) Petrova (8) V. Williams (6) Hénin-Hardenne (5) Pierce (5) Zvonareva (10) Kuznetsova (4)

The following list shows all the players who have occupied a given position in the Top 10: 1. Davenport, Sharapova 2. Clijsters, Davenport, Mauresmo, Sharapova, S. Williams 3. Clijsters, Davenport, Mauresmo, Myskina, Sharapova, S. Williams 4. Clijsters, Kuznetsova, Mauresmo, Sharapova, S. Williams 5. Dementieva, Hénin-Hardenne, Kuznetsova, Myskina, Pierce 6. Dementieva, Hénin-Hardenne, Kuznetsova, Myskina, Pierce, S. Williams, V. Williams 7. Dementieva, Hénin-Hardenne, Kuznetsova, Pierce, Schnyder, S. Williams, V. Williams 8. Clijsters, Dementieva, Hénin-Hardenne, Molik, Petrova, Schnyder, S. Williams, V. Williams 9. Capriati, Molik, Myskina, Petrova, Schnyder, S. Williams, V. Williams 10. Capriati, Clijsters, Dementieva, Molik, Myskina, Petrova, Schnyder, V. Williams, Zvonareva The Complete Top Ten under the 1996 Ranking System This list shows all players who would have been in the Top 10 under the 1996 ranking system (total points divided by tournaments, minimum fourteen), with the highest ranking achieved. (For the list of the final Top 10 under this system, see the section on Alternate Rankings.)

Capriati (7) Kuznetsova (6) Pierce (3) Clijsters (1) Mauresmo (2) Schnyder (10) Davenport (1) Molik (8) Sharapova (2) Dementieva (5) Myskina (4) S. Williams (1) Hénin-Hardenne (3) Petrova (10) V. Williams (6)

Note that there were sixteen Top Ten players in the WTA rankings, and fifteen under the divisor; Zvonareva never made it in the divisor standings. Other than that, it is the same sixteen players in both lists, though their peak rankings differ somewhat (e.g. Clijsters and Serena both made it to #1 under the divisor but not in the WTA rankings; Sharapova, who was #1 under the WTA rankings for about two months, never made it under the divisor). This is a relatively high rate of agreement; although last year we had the same sixteen players in both lists, historically the difference is typically about 15% of the total players in the two lists.

Ranking Fluctuation The charts on these pages shows how highlight players ranked in the course of the year. The graph below shows the data visually; this is followed by a table with the precise data. In each, the season is divided into half-month sections, with players’ rankings listed for the specified days. In the table, this is followed by the mean (average), median, and standard deviation, indicating how much a player’s ranking varied during the year. So Suárez, with a standard deviation of 70.1, showed the biggest fluctuation in 2005, followed distantly by Clijsters and even more distantly by Ivanovic and Sprem, while Davenport, with a deviation of only 0.4, showed the least fluctuation, followed by Mauresmo and Sharapova. One players listed — Capriati — did not play in the year, so her statistics trace only her decline as points came off. The graph shows the bi-monthly numbers for the sixteen players who spent time in the Top Ten (with all rankings above #35 are treated as “36+”) Players are listed by initials, except that Amélie Mauresmo is Ma, Alicia Molik Mo, and Anastasia Myskina My because they have the same initials. The players shown are (in order based on their initials) Elena Dementieva, Jennifer Capriati, Justine Hénin-Hardenne, Kim Clijsters, Lindsay Davenport, Amélie Mauresmo, Alicia Molik, Mary Pierce, Maria Sharapova, Anastasia Myskina, Nadia Petrova, Patty Schnyder, Svetalana Kuznetsova, Serena Williams, Venus Williams, and Vera Zvonareva.

KC KC 36+ KC KC KC KC JH JH JC JC JC VZ 35 34 33 MP 32 MP 31 MP 30 29 MP MP Mo 28 27 MP MP MP JC VZ 26 JC Mo 25 MP VZ 24 MP 23 MP 22 KC JH VZ 21 JH 20 KC VZ 19 18 VZ SK 17 KC KC KC KC KC VZ 16 JH VW VW VZ 15 JH JH JC VZ SK SK 14 PS PS PS PS PS VW MP KC MP My Mo Mo SK My 13 Mo NP PS PS PS PS PS VW MP KC MP Mo Mo My My Mo Mo 12 NP Mo NP NP NP NP NP NP NP JC JH VZ VZ PS My PS MP SK My My My 11 VZ VZ VZ VZ VZ VZ VZ JC JC JH VZ PS PS Mo PS MP PS PS SW SW SW SW 10 JC JC Mo Mo JC JC JC VZ VZ VZ PS My My My KC NP VW NP PS PS ED VW 9 VW VW JC JC VW VW VW Mo VW NP NP Mo Mo NP NP VW NP SW NP NP NP NP 8 JH JH VW VW Mo Mo Mo VW Mo Mo Mo NP NP VW VW KC SW ED ED ED PS ED 7 SW SW ED ED SK SK SK SK SK SK SK JH JH JH SW SW JH VW VW MP VW PS 6 ED ED SK My ED My My My My My My ED SK SW ED ED ED MP MP VW JH JH 5 SK SK My SK My ED ED ED ED ED ED SK ED ED JH JH SK JH JH JH MP MP 4 MS MS MS MS SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SK SK SK KC Ma Ma Ma Ma MS 3 My My Ma SW MS MS MS Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma KC KC KC MS Ma 2 Ma Ma SW Ma Ma Ma Ma MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS LD LD LD KC KC 1 LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD LD MS MS MS LD LD 115115115115115115115115 1 15 1 15 1 15 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Mean Std. 1151151151151151151151151151 15118 (avg) Median Dev. Asagoe 37 33 32 26 26 26 26 22 21 22 21 26 24 24 25 27 25 39 34 36 39 38 28.6 26.0 6.2 Bartoli 41 40 36 33 34 32 32 32 33 31 32 32 27 29 35 36 43 43 45 44 46 40 36.2 34.5 5.6 Bovina 15 15 16 16 15 15 15 14 14 15 14 14 15 17 18 16 20 21 20 28 63 62 20.8 15.5 13.9 Capriati 10 10 9 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 15 27 26 44 42 55 —————— 19.4 11.0 15.0 Chakvetadze 83 84 78 75 73 72 65 65 65 61 56 43 39 34 34 28 24 31 36 35 37 33 52.3 49.5 20.1 Clijsters 22 20 48 134 134 133 38 17 17 17 17 17 13 14 10 8433322 30.7 17.0 43.4 Davenport 1111111111111111122211 1.1 1.00.4 Déchy 21 24 13 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 18 18 18 15 15 15 15 15 14 13 12 15.5 15.0 2.8 Dementieva 66776555555655666888108 6.3 6.01.4 Dulko 33 34 30 30 32 34 36 38 39 37 32 37 29 30 30 35 29 27 33 34 28 27 32.5 32.5 3.6 Farina Elia 20 19 18 19 21 23 22 18 19 20 25 24 22 21 21 23 23 25 27 32 32 — 22.6 22.0 4.0 Frazier 26 26 25 23 27 27 27 31 32 30 37 31 30 43 68 64 73 77 79 77 70 55 44.5 31.5 21.0 Golovin 27 25 24 25 24 25 23 25 18 19 20 20 20 22 22 25 27 24 26 23 24 24 23.3 24.0 2.5 Grönefeld 68 69 58 44 40 41 44 45 45 51 44 40 42 36 29 29 31 30 23 21 21 21 39.6 40.5 13.8 Hantuchova 31 31 29 29 22 22 21 21 25 23 22 22 28 25 23 21 19 19 19 17 18 19 23.0 22.0 4.2 Hénin-Hardenne 8 8 15 15 16 21 40 43 22 11 1277755755566 12.5 7.5 10.7 Ivanovic 101 100 63 62 58 50 52 36 37 36 31 21 21 20 20 19 16 18 18 20 16 16 37.8 26.0 25.8 Jankovic 28 28 28 27 28 20 20 20 23 21 18 19 19 19 19 18 17 17 17 19 22 22 21.3 20.0 3.9 Kirilenko 107 105 94 73 67 66 48 52 55 45 50 53 55 49 50 51 44 45 28 26 25 25 55.1 50.5 23.1 Kuznetsova 5565777777756444 51214151518 7.8 7.0 4.1 Likhovtseva 24 23 22 18 18 17 17 16 16 18 19 15 17 16 17 20 21 16 16 16 17 17 18.0 17.0 2.5 Maleeva 25 27 23 28 30 30 28 28 30 27 39 38 43 37 36 56 55 57 58 61 54 52 39.2 36.5 12.9 Martinez 42 43 43 37 35 31 31 33 49 47 45 47 50 45 48 43 37 37 38 40 35 32 40.4 41.0 6.1 Mauresmo 2232222333333333344443 2.9 3.00.7 Medina Garrigu 39 38 40 43 43 42 43 41 42 42 34 34 38 33 32 34 30 26 30 30 38 34 36.6 38.0 5.2 Molik 13 12 10 10888988899111313141413132629 12.1 10.5 5.5 Myskina 335656666661010101214131312121214 8.6 8.0 3.7 Pennetta 38 35 35 36 25 29 29 30 31 29 36 29 34 28 24 30 32 29 29 27 23 23 30.0 29.0 4.3 Peschke 93 89 85 82 83 83 82 67 67 58 59 61 62 41 41 38 36 36 41 39 31 26 59.1 60.0 21.6 Petrova 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 12998899109109999 10.3 9.5 1.6 Pierce 29 29 27 32 31 33 25 27 27 24 23 13 14 13 14 11 1266755 18.8 18.5 10.0 Raymond 30 30 38 40 48 45 47 50 43 44 47 50 46 53 47 44 64 69 70 91 88 76 52.7 47.0 16.7 Saﬁna 45 44 47 38 38 37 35 37 38 34 30 33 32 26 26 24 22 22 25 24 20 20 31.7 32.5 8.3 Schiavone 19 18 19 21 17 16 16 19 20 26 24 23 23 23 28 22 26 28 21 22 14 13 20.8 21.0 4.2 Schnyder 14 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 10 11 11 12 11 12 11 11 10 10 8 7 11.8 12.0 2.0 Sharapova 4444333222222222211134 2.5 2.01.0 Shaughnessy 40 39 39 41 41 53 62 56 53 54 58 70 63 66 57 61 53 52 53 51 62 66 54.1 53.5 9.3 Smashnova 32 32 31 31 33 35 33 34 35 41 60 57 59 61 44 47 46 44 44 45 44 43 42.3 43.5 9.8 Sprem 18 17 17 17 19 18 18 23 26 28 28 28 31 62 64 78 86 85 67 63 65 65 42.0 28.0 25.4 Srebotnik 87 65 69 68 55 52 55 53 44 49 51 58 57 59 60 46 50 48 43 43 29 28 53.1 52.5 12.9 Suárez 16 16 20 20 20 19 19 26 28 32 27 56 58 86 93 108 121 153 155 158 230 232 77.0 44.0 70.1 Sugiyama 17 21 21 22 23 24 24 24 24 25 26 25 25 32 38 26 33 32 32 29 30 30 26.5 25.0 4.9 Vaidisova 75 75 57 60 57 63 53 49 34 39 35 30 33 27 27 32 28 23 24 18 19 15 39.7 33.5 18.3 S. Williams 7723444444444677 8 911111111 6.2 5.0 2.9 V. Williams 99889998914131616889107767109.5 9.02.8 Zuluaga 23 22 26 24 29 28 30 29 29 38 40 44 45 46 45 48 58 63 63 75 83 84 44.2 42.0 19.3 Zvonareva 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 10 11 12 12 15 16 17 18 20 22 25 27 42 15.6 11.5 7.8

Highest Ranking of 2005 For the players who spent at least a week of 2005 in the Top 30, the following shows the best ranking she reached in the year: Sorted by Name Sorted by Ranking Asagoe 21 Name Rank Bartoli 27 Davenport 1 Bovina 14 Sharapova 1 Capriati 9 Clijsters 2 Chakvetadze 24 Mauresmo 2 Clijsters 2 Williams, Serena 2 Davenport 1 Myskina 3 Déchy 12 Kuznetsova 4 Dementieva 5 Dementieva 5 Dulko 27 Hénin-Hardenne 5 Farina Elia 18 Pierce 5 Frazier 23 Williams, Venus 6 Golovin 18 Schnyder 7 Grönefeld 19 Molik 8 Hantuchova 17 Petrova 8 Hénin-Hardenne 5 Capriati 9 Ivanovic 16 Zvonareva 10 Jankovic 17 Déchy 12 Kirilenko 25 Schiavone 13 Kuznetsova 4 Bovina 14 Likhovtseva 15 Likhovtseva 15 Maleeva 23 Vaidisova 15 Martinez 31 Ivanovic 16 Mauresmo 2 Suárez, Paola 16 Medina Garrigues 26 Zuluaga 16 Molik 8 Hantuchova 17 Myskina 3 Jankovic 17 Pennetta 23 Sprem 17 Peschke 26 Farina Elia 18 Petrova 8 Golovin 18 Pierce 5 Grönefeld 19 Raymond 30 Saﬁna 20 Saﬁna 20 Asagoe 21 Schiavone 13 Sugiyama 21 Schnyder 7 Frazier 23 Sharapova 1 Maleeva 23 Sprem 17 Pennetta 23 Srebotnik 28 Chakvetadze 24 Suárez, Paola 16 Kirilenko 25 Sugiyama 21 Medina Garrigues 26 Vaidisova 15 Peschke 26 Williams, Serena 2 Bartoli 27 Williams, Venus 6 Dulko 27 Zuluaga 16 Srebotnik 28 Zvonareva 10 Raymond 30

Top Players Sorted by Median Ranking This table lists our highlight players in order of their median ranking — that is, the ranking they spent as much of the year above as below. This indicates their typical standing in the course of the year. It should be noted that this figure takes 2004 and 2005 results equally into account, since rankings at the beginning of the year were based entirely on 2004 results, while 2005 results were the sole influence by the end of the year. Median Rank Player 1.0 Davenport 2.0 Sharapova 3.0 Mauresmo 5.0 S. Williams 6.0 Dementieva 7.0 Kuznetsova 7.5 Hénin-Hardenne 8.0 Myskina 9.0 V. Williams 9.5 Petrova 10.5 Molik 11.0 Capriati 11.5 Zvonareva 12.0 Schnyder 15.0 Déchy 15.5 Bovina 17.0 Clijsters 17.0 Likhovtseva 18.5 Pierce 20.0 Jankovic 21.0 Schiavone 22.0 Farina Elia 22.0 Hantuchova 24.0 Golovin 25.0 Sugiyama 26.0 Asagoe 26.0 Ivanovic 28.0 Sprem 29.0 Pennetta 31.5 Frazier 32.5 Dulko 32.5 Saﬁna 33.5 Vaidisova 34.5 Bartoli 36.5 Maleeva 38.0 Medina Garrigues 40.5 Grönefeld 41.0 Martinez 42.0 Zuluaga 43.5 Smashnova 44.0 Suárez 47.0 Raymond 49.5 Chakvetadze 50.5 Kirilenko 52.5 Srebotnik 53.5 Shaughnessy 60.0 Peschke

Short Summary: The Top Eighty The following table shows the entire WTA Top Eighty, with brief summary of results. In the table, Final Rank is a player’s year-end ranking (based on the November 14, 2005 rankings), Player is of course the player, Score is her Best 17 point total, # of Trn is the number of tournaments she played (including Challengers), Best Rank is her highest ranking during the year 2005, Won/Lost is won/lost record (in the notes to this field, Wi=Withdrawal, WO=walkover. So Mauresmo, for instance, won 59 matches, lost eleven, received two walkovers, and withdrew once). Note that this figure includes only WTA main draws. Many players will have losses in wins and losses in qualifying and/or Challengers; the highest-ranked of these was Ivanovic (for qualifying) and Schiavone (for Challengers). Titles is the list of titles the player won, if any. We list the names (sometimes abbreviated), then the number of titles in parentheses. So #4 Maria Sharapova’s line, e.g., reads PanPaci, Doha, Birm (3). This means Sharapova won three titles — the Pan Pacific, Doha, and Birmingham. Challenger wins are not listed. Players marked * are “highlight” players studied extensively throughout this document. Final # of Best Rank Player Name Score Trn Rank Won/Lost Titles 1 Davenport, Lindsay* 4910 16 1 58Ð10(+1Wi) Dubai, Amelia Island, New Haven, Bali, Filderstadt, Zürich (6) 2 Clijsters, Kim* 4829 17 2 65Ð9(+1WO) Indian Wells, Miami, Eastbourne, Stanford, Los Angeles, Canadian Open, U.S. Open, Luxembourg, Hasselt (9) 3Mauresmo, Amélie* 4030 19 2 53Ð16 Antw,Rome,Phil,LAChmp(4) 4 Sharapova, Maria* 3958 15 1 53Ð12(+1Wi) PanPaci, Doha, Birm (3) 5 Pierce, Mary* 3797 14 5 41Ð12 San Diego, Moscow (2) 6 Hénin-Hardenne, Justine* 2936 9 5 34Ð5 Charl,Wars,Berl,RolandG(4) 7 Schnyder, Patty* 2774 26 7 58Ð25 Gold Coast, Cincinnati (2) 8 Dementieva, Elena* 2748 20 5 40Ð21(+1WO,1Wi) 9 Petrova, Nadia* 2638 25 8 56Ð22(+3Wi) Linz (1) 10 Williams, Venus* 2628 12 6 34Ð9(+1Wi) Istanbul, Wimbledon (2) 11 Williams, Serena* 1851 10 2 21Ð7(+2Wi) Australian Open (1) 12 Déchy, Nathalie* 1773 26 12 40Ð26 13 Schiavone, Francesca* 1704 22 13 39Ð21 14 Myskina, Anastasia* 1616 19 3 34Ð18(+1WO) Kolkata (1) 15 Vaidisova, Nicole* 1581 17 15 45Ð14 Seoul, JapanO, Bangkok (3) 16 Ivanovic, Ana* 1551 16 16 32Ð13(+1Wi) Canberra (1) 17 Likhovtseva, Elena* 1519 22 15 30Ð22 18 Kuznetsova, Svetlana* 1491 17 4 29Ð17 19 Hantuchova, Daniela* 1486 25 17 37Ð25(+1WO) 20 Safina, Dinara* 1372 21 20 36Ð19(+1WO) Paris, Prague (2) 21 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena* 1365.5 28 19 36Ð25(+1Wi) 22 Jankovic, Jelena* 1320 29 17 36Ð29 23 Pennetta, Flavia* 1240 24 23 36Ð21(+1WO) Bogota, Acapulco (2) 24 Golovin, Tatiana* 1195 22 18 33Ð22 25 Kirilenko, Maria* 1107 26 25 29Ð21 Beijing (1) 26 Peschke, Kveta* 1028.75 25 26 21Ð19 27 Dulko, Gisela* 1008 23 27 32Ð23 28 Srebotnik, Katarina* 997.75 21 28 28Ð17 Auckland, Stockholm (2) 29 Molik, Alicia* 996 15 8 17Ð14 Sydney (1) 30 Sugiyama, Ai* 994.5 27 17 28Ð27 31 Mirza, Sania 929.75 22 31 27Ð16 Hyderabad (1) 32 Martinez, Conchita* 925 20 31 28Ð19(+1WO) Pattaya City (1) 33 Chakvetadze, Anna* 918.25 23 24 24Ð21

34 Medina Garrigues, Anabel*902.75 26 26 28Ð23 Strasbourg, Palermo (2) 35 Karatantcheva, Sesil 902.25 16 35 17Ð14 36 Koukalova, Klara 883.75 23 33 32Ð19 ’s-Hertogenb, Portoroz (2) 37 Peng Shuai 883.5 16 31 20Ð16 38 Asagoe, Shinobu* 876 25 21 24Ð25(+1WO) 39 Dushevina, Vera 834.25 20 31 19Ð19 40 Bartoli, Marion* 796.75 25 27 26Ð25 41 Vinci, Roberta 764 22 41 15Ð17 42 Zvonareva, Vera* 759 22 10 21Ð21 Memphis (1) 43 Smashnova, Anna* 744 18 31 24Ð16 Modena, Budapest (2) 44 Zheng Jie 739.75 18 42 24Ð15 Hobart (1) 45 Peer, Shahar 733.75 23 45 22Ð20 46 Stosur, Samantha 695.25 24 44 16Ð22(+2WO) 47 Craybas, Jill 692 30 47 19Ð23 48 Morigami, Akiko 673.25 22 41 18Ð20 49 Llagostera Vives, Nuria 672.5 25 35 20Ð19 Rabat (1) 50 Safarova, Lucie 660.75 21 50 15Ð9 Estoril, Forest Hills (2) 51 Razzano, Virginie 660.5 24 35 16Ð22 52 Maleeva, Magdalena* 648 20 23 17Ð20 53 Linetskaya, Evgenia* 638 19 35 17Ð16 54 Benesova, Iveta 636.25 28 33 21Ð27 55 Frazier, Amy* 634.5 19 23 18Ð16 Quebec City (1) 56 Diaz-Oliva, Mariana 630.5 26 56 22Ð23 57 Li Na 623.5 14 33 23Ð14 58 Krajicek, Michaella 619.75 14 57 14Ð8 Tashkent (1) 59 Castaño, Catalina 615 23 59 22Ð18 60 Domachowska, Marta 572.25 26 47 18Ð23(+1WO) 61 Granville, Laura 567.25 23 57 12Ð15 62 Bovina, Elena* 558 8 14 12Ð8 63 Vento-Kabchi, Maria 546 24 48 13Ð23 64 Serra Zanetti, Antonella 536.5 29 64 18Ð24 65 Sprem, Karolina* 534.25 24 17 15Ð23 66 Shaughnessy, Meghann* 533.75 25 34 17Ð24(+1Wi) 67 Arvidsson, Sofia 528.75 21 62 13Ð8 68 Randriantefy, Dally 514.5 24 44 17Ð20 69 Bychkova, Ekaterina 507.25 28 67 9Ð10 70 Daniilidou, Eleni 505.25 22 34 14Ð20 71 Nakamura, Aiko 486.5 23 65 11Ð13 72 Cho, Yoon Jeong 486.25 21 67 9Ð10 73 Bondarenko, Alona 474.75 29 69 12Ð16(+1WO) 74 Washington, Mashona 470.75 22 51 13Ð22 75 Jackson, Jamea 467 24 73 10Ð14 76 Raymond, Lisa* 464.5 20 30 14Ð18(+1Wi) 77 Dominguez Lino, Lourdes 459 23 77 6Ð4 78 Ondraskova, Zuzana 440.75 23 74 8Ð10 79 Bammer, Sybille 434.75 27 77 5Ð7 80 Schruff, Julia 426.25 28 80 9Ð13

In addition, Yan Zi won GuangZhou; she was the only non-Top 80 player with a WTA title this year

The Top 200, in Numerical Order 1 Lindsay Davenport 56 Mariana Diaz-Oliva 111Elena Vesnina 166Anne Kremer 2 Kim Clijsters 57 Li Na 112Shenay Perry 167Anastassia Rodionova 3 Amélie Mauresmo 58 Michaella Krajicek 113Camille Pin 168Tatiana Poutchek 4Maria Sharapova 59 Catalina Castaño 114Conchita Martinez 169Angelika Bachmann 5Mary Pierce 60 Marta Domachowska Granados 170Selima Sfar 6 Justine Hénin-Hardenne 61 Laura Granville 115Ludmila Cervanova 171Bethanie Mattek 7Patty Schnyder 62 Elena Bovina 116Eva Birnerova 172Libuse Prusova 8 Elena Dementieva 63 Maria Vento-Kabchi 117Ashley Harkleroad 173Li Ting 9 Nadia Petrova 64 Antonella Serra Zanetti 118Galina Voskoboeva 174Cara Black 10 Venus Williams 65 Karolina Sprem 119Meilen Tu 175Ahsha Rolle 11 Serena Williams 66 Meghann Shaughnessy 120Kaia Kanepi 176Kathrin Woerle 12 Nathalie Déchy 67 Soﬁa Arvidsson 121Stephanie Dubois 177Lioudmila Skavronskaia 13 Francesca Schiavone 68 Dally Randriantefy 122Elena Baltacha 178Ryoko Fuda 14 Anastasia Myskina 69 Ekaterina Bychkova 123Alina Jidkova 179Suchanan Viratprasert 15 Nicole Vaidisova 70 Eleni Daniilidou 124Mariya Koryttseva 180Mervana Jugic-Salkic 16 Ana Ivanovic 71 Aiko Nakamura 125Kateryna Bondarenko 181Agnes Szavay 17 Elena Likhovtseva 72 Yoon Jeong Cho 126Ivana Lisjak 182Sandra Kleinova 18 Svetlana Kuznetsova 73 Alona Bondarenko 127Nicole Pratt 183Seiko Okamoto 19 Daniela Hantuchova 74 Mashona Washington 128Katerina Bohmova 184Frederica Piedade 20 Dinara Saﬁna 75 Jamea Jackson 129Edina Gallovits 185Julia Vakulenko 21 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 76 Lisa Raymond 130Denisa Chladkova 186Elise Tamaela 22 Jelena Jankovic 77 Lourdes Dominguez 131Varvara Lepchenko 187Olga Blahotova 23 Flavia Pennetta Lino 132Tamarine Tanasugarn 188Jessica Kirkland 24 Tatiana Golovin 78 Zuzana Ondraskova 133Marissa Irvin 189Aravane Rezai 25 Maria Kirilenko 79 Sybille Bammer 134Tzipora Obziler Bidakhavidi 26 Kveta Peschke 80 Julia Schruff 135Angela Haynes 190Aleksandra Wozniak 27 Gisela Dulko 81 Emilie Loit 136Lindsay Lee-Waters 191Sunitha Rao 28 Katarina Srebotnik 82 Laura Pous Tio 137Yuliana Fedak 192Akgul Amanmuradova 29 Alicia Molik 83 Maria Sanchez Lorenzo 138Michaela Pastikova 193Shiho Hisamatsu 30 Ai Sugiyama 84 Fabiola Zuluaga 139Nathalie Vierin 194Petra Cetkovska 31 Sania Mirza 85 Mara Santangelo 140Sabine Klaschka 195Hanna Nooni 32 Conchita Martinez 86 Tathiana Garbin 141Shikha Uberoi 196Maria Jose Argeri 33 Anna Chakvetadze 87 Kristina Brandi 142Barbora Strycova 197Olga Poutchkova 34 Anabel Medina 88 Tszvetana Pironkova 143Lilia Osterloh 198Olena Antypina Garrigues 89 Tatiana Panova 144Marie-Eve Pelletier 199Carly Gullickson 35 Sesil Karatantcheva 90 Martina Sucha 145Jarmila Gajdosova 200Silvija Talaja 36 Klara Koukalova 91 Sandra Kloesel 146Victoria Azarenka 37 Peng Shuai 92 Melinda Czink 147Vanessa Henke 38 Shinobu Asagoe 93 Emmanuelle Gagliardi 148Maria Emilia Salerni 39 Vera Dushevina 94 Stephanie Foretz 149Yvonne Meusburger 40 Marion Bartoli 95 Maret Ani 150Milagros Sequera 41 Roberta Vinci 96 Maria Elena Camerin 151Clarisa Fernandez 42 Vera Zvonareva 97 Rika Fujiwara 152Meng Yuan 43 Anna Smashnova 98 Hana Sromova 153Evie Dominikovic 44 Zheng Jie 99 Jelena Kostanic 154Su-Wei Hsieh 45 Shahar Peer 100Emma Laine 155Maria Fernanda Alves 46 Samantha Stosur 101Anastasiya Yakimova 156Abigail Spears 47 Jill Craybas 102Severine Bremond 157Vilmarie Castellvi 48 Akiko Morigami 103Yan Zi 158Sanda Mamic 49 Nuria Llagostera Vives 104Sun Tiantian 159Natalie Grandin 50 Lucie Safarova 105Stephanie Cohen-Aloro 160Yulia Beygelzimer 51 Virginie Razzano 106Virginia Ruano Pascual 161Kyra Nagy 52 Magdalena Maleeva 107Arantxa Parra Santonja 162Olga Savchuk 53 Evgenia Linetskaya 108Saori Obata 163Henrieta Nagyova 54 Iveta Benesova 109Martina Müller 164Mathilde Johansson 55 Amy Frazier 110Viktoriya Kutuzova 165Claudine Schaul

The Top 200, in Alphabetical Order 155Maria Fernanda Alves 93 Emmanuelle Gagliardi 34 Anabel Medina 80 Julia Schruff 192Akgul Amanmuradova 145Jarmila Gajdosova Garrigues 150Milagros Sequera 95 Maret Ani 129Edina Gallovits 149Yvonne Meusburger 64 Antonella Serra Zanetti 198Olena Antypina 86 Tathiana Garbin 31 Sania Mirza 170Selima Sfar 196Maria Jose Argeri 24 Tatiana Golovin 29 Alicia Molik 4Maria Sharapova 67 Soﬁa Arvidsson 159Natalie Grandin 48 Akiko Morigami 66 Meghann Shaughnessy 38 Shinobu Asagoe 61 Laura Granville 109Martina Müller 177Lioudmila Skavronskaia 146Victoria Azarenka 21 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 14 Anastasia Myskina 43 Anna Smashnova 169Angelika Bachmann 199Carly Gullickson 161Kyra Nagy 156Abigail Spears 122Elena Baltacha 19 Daniela Hantuchova 163Henrieta Nagyova 65 Karolina Sprem 79 Sybille Bammer 117Ashley Harkleroad 71 Aiko Nakamura 28 Katarina Srebotnik 40 Marion Bartoli 135Angela Haynes 195Hanna Nooni 98 Hana Sromova 54 Iveta Benesova 6 Justine Hénin-Hardenne 108Saori Obata 46 Samantha Stosur 160Yulia Beygelzimer 147Vanessa Henke 134Tzipora Obziler 142Barbora Strycova 116Eva Birnerova 193Shiho Hisamatsu 183Seiko Okamoto 90 Martina Sucha 174Cara Black 154Su-Wei Hsieh 78 Zuzana Ondraskova 30 Ai Sugiyama 187Olga Blahotova 133Marissa Irvin 143Lilia Osterloh 104Sun Tiantian 128Katerina Bohmova 16 Ana Ivanovic 89 Tatiana Panova 181Agnes Szavay 73 Alona Bondarenko 75 Jamea Jackson 107Arantxa Parra Santonja 200Silvija Talaja 125Kateryna Bondarenko 22 Jelena Jankovic 138Michaela Pastikova 186Elise Tamaela 62 Elena Bovina 123Alina Jidkova 45 Shahar Peer 132Tamarine Tanasugarn 87 Kristina Brandi 164Mathilde Johansson 144Marie-Eve Pelletier 119Meilen Tu 102Severine Bremond 180Mervana Jugic-Salkic 37 Peng Shuai 141Shikha Uberoi 69 Ekaterina Bychkova 120Kaia Kanepi 23 Flavia Pennetta 15 Nicole Vaidisova 96 Maria Elena Camerin 35 Sesil Karatantcheva 112Shenay Perry 185Julia Vakulenko 59 Catalina Castaño 25 Maria Kirilenko 26 Kveta Peschke 63 Maria Vento-Kabchi 157Vilmarie Castellvi 188Jessica Kirkland 9 Nadia Petrova 111Elena Vesnina 115Ludmila Cervanova 140Sabine Klaschka 184Frederica Piedade 139Nathalie Vierin 194Petra Cetkovska 182Sandra Kleinova 5Mary Pierce 41 Roberta Vinci 33 Anna Chakvetadze 91 Sandra Kloesel 113Camille Pin 179Suchanan Viratprasert 130Denisa Chladkova 124Mariya Koryttseva 88 Tszvetana Pironkova 118Galina Voskoboeva 72 Yoon Jeong Cho 99 Jelena Kostanic 82 Laura Pous Tio 74 Mashona Washington 2 Kim Clijsters 36 Klara Koukalova 168Tatiana Poutchek 11 Serena Williams 105Stephanie Cohen-Aloro 58 Michaella Krajicek 197Olga Poutchkova 10 Venus Williams 47 Jill Craybas 166Anne Kremer 127Nicole Pratt 176Kathrin Woerle 92 Melinda Czink 110Viktoriya Kutuzova 172Libuse Prusova 190Aleksandra Wozniak 70 Eleni Daniilidou 18 Svetlana Kuznetsova 68 Dally Randriantefy 101Anastasiya Yakimova 1 Lindsay Davenport 100Emma Laine 191Sunitha Rao 103Yan Zi 12 Nathalie Déchy 136Lindsay Lee-Waters 76 Lisa Raymond 152Meng Yuan 8 Elena Dementieva 131Varvara Lepchenko 51 Virginie Razzano 44 Zheng Jie 56 Mariana Diaz-Oliva 57 Li Na 189Aravane Rezai 84 Fabiola Zuluaga 60 Marta Domachowska 173Li Ting Bidakhavidi 42 Vera Zvonareva 77 Lourdes Dominguez 17 Elena Likhovtseva 167Anastassia Rodionova Lino 53 Evgenia Linetskaya 175Ahsha Rolle 153Evie Dominikovic 126Ivana Lisjak 106Virginia Ruano Pascual 121Stephanie Dubois 49 Nuria Llagostera Vives 50 Lucie Safarova 27 Gisela Dulko 81 Emilie Loit 20 Dinara Saﬁna 39 Vera Dushevina 52 Magdalena Maleeva 148Maria Emilia Salerni 137Yuliana Fedak 158Sanda Mamic 83 Maria Sanchez Lorenzo 151Clarisa Fernandez 114Conchita Martinez 85 Mara Santangelo 94 Stephanie Foretz Granados 162Olga Savchuk 55 Amy Frazier 32 Conchita Martinez 165Claudine Schaul 178Ryoko Fuda 171Bethanie Mattek 13 Francesca Schiavone 97 Rika Fujiwara 3 Amélie Mauresmo 7Patty Schnyder

Tournament Results Summary of Results for Top Players The list below shows all the tournaments the highlight players played in 2005. To explain the data in the table: The numbers in parentheses list, first, the Tier of the tournament, second, how far the player went, and third, the number of wins achieved. This is followed by a list of top players beaten en route, with the player’s rank at the time. For example, the first item in the entry for Shinobu Asagoe reads Auckland (IV, F/Srebotnik [87], 4) — Frazier (26) This means that Asagoe’s first tournament of 2005 was Auckland. The “IV” means that it was a Tier IV event; if a Roman numeral is used, it refers to the tier of the event; the other possibilities are “Slam” for the Grand Slams, “Champ” for the year-end Championships, and a dollar amount, e.g. $50K, for a Challenger. F/Srebotnik means that Asagoe reached the second round, where she was beaten by Katarina Srebotnik, then ranked #87. The 4 indicates that she won four matches prior to that defeat. Players she defeated included Amy Frazier, then ranked #26. (Note: only wins over Top 35 players are listed.) If a description is in bold, it means the player won the title. 38/Shinobu Asagoe Auckland (IV, F/Srebotnik [87], 4) — Frazier (26) Hobart (V, 2R/Zheng [82], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Li Na [64], 1) Pan Paciﬁc (I, SF/Sharapova [4], 3) — Dementieva (7) Doha (II, 1R/Bovina [16], 0) Dubai (II, 1R/Martinez [35], 0) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Clijsters [133], 0) Miami (I, R16/Sharapova [3], 2) — Schiavone (16) Amelia Island (II, QF/Petrova [12], 3) — Myskina (6) Charleston (I, R16/Vaidisova [49], 1+1 walkover) Rome (I, 1R/Pennetta [29], 0) Strasbourg (III, 1R/Douchevina [54], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Karatantcheva [98], 1) Birmingham (III, R16/Chakvetadze [44], 1) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Raymond [50], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Maleeva [43], 0) San Diego (I, 1R/Karatantcheva [49], 0) Los Angeles (II, 1R/Zheng [76], 0) Canadian Open (I, R16/Myskina [14], 2) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Schnyder [11], 2) Beijing (II, QF/Sharapova [1], 2) — Golovin (25) Japan Open (III, 2R/Arvidsson [94], 1) Bangkok (III, 1R/Ant. Serra Zanetti [74], 0) Zürich (I, 1R/Srebotnik [43], 0) Linz (II, 1R/Ivanovic [17], 0)

40/Marion Bartoli Auckland (V, SF/Srebotnik [87], 3) — Jankovic (28) Canberra (V, QF/Ivanovic [100], 2) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Kuznetsova [5], 1) Pattaya City (III, 2R/Serna [109], 1) Paris (II, QF/Petrova [12], 2) — Déchy (13) Doha (II, QF/Sharapova [4], 2) — Suárez (19) Dubai (II, 2R/Myskina [5], 1+3 in qualifying) — Dulko (32) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Kirkland [196], 0) Miami (I, 2R/Peer [135], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Peer [84], 0) Birmingham (III, 2R/Tanasugarn [64], 0) Eastbourne (II, QF/Douchevina [54], 2) — Likhovtseva (15) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Craybas[85], 1) Cincinnati (III, 1R/Mattek [177], 0) Stanford (II, 2R/Schnyder [12], 1) San Diego (I, 1R/Raymond [47], 0) Los Angeles (II, R16/Dementieva [6], 2) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Ivanovic [19], 1) New Haven (II, 1R/Likhovtseva [20], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Mirza [42], 2) Portoroz (IV, 1R/Ani [121], 0) Seoul (IV, QF/Vaidisova [24], 2) Japan Open (III, 1R/Peer [50], 0) Linz (II, 1R/Martinez [38], 0) Quebec City (III, SF/Arvidsson [75], 3) 62/Elena Bovina Doha (II, 2R/Hantuchova [28], 1) — Asagoe (25) Dubai (II, 2R/S. Williams [4], 1) — Schiavone (17) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Kirilenko [66], 0) Miami (I, 3R/Golovin [23], 1) Warsaw (II, QF/Clijsters [17], 1) — Hantuchova (25) Berlin (I, QF/Jankovic [24], 2) Rome (I, QF/Sharapova [2], 3) — Suárez (32) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Petrova [9], 3) — Golovin (20) —/Jennifer Capriati No matches played

33/Anna Chakvetadze Sydney Qualifying (II, Q2R/Cervanova [95], 0+1 in qualifying) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Dementieva [6], 1) Paris Qualifying (II, Q2R/Black [170], 0+1 in qualifying) Antwerp (II, 2R/Srebotnik [68], 1+3 in qualifying) — Sprem (17) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Clijsters [133], 2) — Jankovic (20) Miami (I, 1R/Kirilenko [48], 0) Warsaw (II, 1R/Vakulanko [260], 0+3 in qualifying) Berlin (I, 1R/Pierce [27], 0) Rome (I, 2R/Ivanovic [36], 1) Istanbul (III, QF/V. Williams [13], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Sharapova [2], 2) — Suárez (27) Birmingham (III, QF/Golovin [19], 3) — Asagoe (25) Eastbourne (II, 2R/Kuznetsova [5], 1+3 in qualifying) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Jankovic [19], 0) San Diego (I, QF/Morigami [61], 3) — Golovin (22), Likhovtseva (17) Los Angeles (II, R16/Sharapova [2], 2) New Haven (II, SF/Davenport [2], 3) — Jankovic (17) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Dementieva [6], 2) Luxembourg (II, 2R/Hantuchova [19], 1) Filderstadt (II, 1R/Schiavone [22], 0) Moscow (I, 1R/Schnyder [10], 0) Zürich (I, 1R/Maleeva [61], 0) Hasselt (III, 1R/Krajicek [68], 0) 2/Kim Clijsters Antwerp (II, QF/V. Williams [8], 2) — Kostanic (35), Petrova (12) Indian Wells (I, Win, 7) — Asagoe (26), Martinez (31), Dementieva (5), Davenport (1) Miami (I, Win, 7) — Frazier (27), Déchy (14), Myskina (6), Dementieva (5), Mauresmo (2), Sharapova (3) Warsaw (II, SF/Kuznetsova [7], 3) — Bovina (14) Berlin (I, R16/Schnyder [13], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Davenport [1], 3) — Hantuchova (22) Eastbourne (II, Win, 5) — Jankovic (19), Kuznetsova (5) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Davenport [1], 3) Stanford (II, Win, 4) — Sugiyama (33), Hantuchova (24), V. Williams (10) San Diego (I, QF/Peng [46], 2) — Jankovic (19) Los Angeles (II, Win, 5) — Saﬁna (24), Petrova (9), Schiavone (28), Hantuchova (22) Canadian Open (I, Win, 4+1 walkover) — Pennetta (30), Myskina (14), Hénin-Hardenne (5) U. S. Open (Slam, Win, 7) — Sugiyama (33), V. Williams (10), Sharapova (2), Pierce (12) Luxembourg (II, Win, 4) — Koukalova (35), Schiavone (21), Déchy (15), Grönefeld (23) Filderstad (II, QF/Dementieva [8], 1) Hasselt (III, Win, 5) — Saﬁna (21), Schiavone (15) Los Angeles Championships (Champ, 1-2 in RR/Pierce [5], Mauresmo [4]; did not make SF [1-2 record]) — Dementieva (7)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 18 1/Lindsay Davenport Sydney (II, withdrew from QF, 1) — Déchy (24) Australian Open (Slam, F/S. Williams [7], 6) — Sprem (18), Molik (12), Déchy (25) Pan Paciﬁc (I, F/Sharapova [4], 3) — Benesova (34), Kuznetsova (6) Dubai (II, Win, 4) — Martinez (35), Schnyder (14), Jankovic (28) Indian Wells (I, F/Clijsters [133], 5) — Déchy (14), Sharapova (3) Amelia Island (II, Win, 5) — V. Williams (8), Petrova (12), Farina Elia (24) Charleston (I, QF/Hénin-Hardenne [43], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, QF/Pierce [23], 4) — Clijsters (17) Wimbledon (Slam, F/V. Williams [16], 6) — Saﬁna (32), Clijsters (13), Kuznetsova (6), Mauresmo (3) Stanford (II, 2R/Grönefeld [39], 0) New Haven (II, Win, 4) — Hantuchova (21), Chakvetadze (30), Mauresmo (3) U. S. Open (Slam, QF/Dementieva [6], 4) — Medina Garrigues (30), Déchy (15) Bali (III, Win, 4) — Schiavone (28) Filderstadt (II, Win, 4) — Schiavone (22), Myskina (12), Hantuchova (20), Mauresmo (4) Zürich (I, Win, 4) — Hantuchova (19), Schiavone (18), Myskina (12), Schnyder (10) Los Angeles Championships (Champ, 2-1 in RR/Sharapova [3]; lost SF/Pierce [5]; [2-2 record]) — Petrova (10), Schnyder (8) 12/Nathalie Déchy Gold Coast (III, 1R/Pennetta [38], 0) Sydney (II, 2R/Davenport [1], 1) — Raymond (30) Australian Open (Slam, SF/Davenport [1], 5) — Schiavone (23), Myskina (3), Schnyder (14) Paris (II, 2R/Bartoli [37], 1) — Kostanic (34) Antwerp (II, 1R/Koukalova [39], 0) Dubai (II, 2R/Martinez [35], 1) Indian Wells (I, QF/Davenport [1], 3) Miami (I, 3R/Clijsters [38], 1) Warsaw (II, QF/Ivanovic [37], 2) — Maleeva (30) Berlin (I, 1R/Randriantefy [50], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Camerin [65], 0) Strasbourg (III, SF/Medina Garrigues [42], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Llagostera Vives [46], 2) Eastbourne (II, QF/Kuznetsova [5], 2) — Frazier (31) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Sharapova [2], 3) Stanford (II, QF/Grönefeld [39], 2) San Diego (I, R16/Pierce [14], 2) — Dulko (30) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Vaidisova [32], 1) New Haven (II, 1R/Shaughnessy [60], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Davenport [1], 3) — Golovin (27) Luxembourg (II, SF/Clijsters [3], 2) — Hantuchova (19) Filderstadt (II, 2R/Dementieva [8], 1) — Molik (13) Moscow (I, 1R/Pennetta [27], 0) Zürich (I, 2R/Dementieva [8], 1) — Kuznetsova (15) Hasselt (III, QF/Krajicek [68], 2) Quebec City (III, SF/Frazier [70], 3)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 19 8/Elena Dementieva Sydney (II, withdrew from SF, 2) — Schnyder (14) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Schnyder [14], 3) — Hantuchova (31) Pan Paciﬁc (I, QF/Asagoe [32], 1) Indian Wells (I, SF/Clijsters [133], 4) — Golovin (25), Kuznetsova (7) Miami (I, QF/Clijsters [38], 3) — Maleeva (28), Golovin (23) Charleston (I, F/Hénin-Hardenne [43], 4) — Schnyder (13) Rome (I, 2R/Dulko [37], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Likhovtseva [19], 3) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 2R/Chladkova [71], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Myskina [10], 3) San Diego (I, 2R/Peng [46], 0) Los Angeles (II, SF/Hantuchova [22], 3) New Haven (II, QF/Medina Garrigues [33], 1) — Dushevina (34) U. S. Open (Slam, SF/Pierce [12], 5) — Chakvetadze (24), Schnyder (11), Davenport (1) Filderstadt (II, SF/Mauresmo [4], 3) — Déchy (15), Clijsters (3) Moscow (I, SF/Schiavone [22], 2) — Myskina (12) Zürich (I, QF/Myskina [12], 1) — Déchy (14) Linz (II, 2R/Peschke [39], 0) Philadelphia (II, F/Mauresmo [4], 2+1 walkover) — Peschke (31) Los Angeles Championships (Champ, 0Ð3 in RR/Pierce [5], Mauresmo [4], Clijsters [2]; did not make SF [0-3 record]) 351/Jelena Dokic Pattaya City (III, 2R/A. Bondarenko [108], 1) Hyderabad (IV, 1R/Santangelo [177], 0) Indian Wells Qualifying (I, Q2R/Salerni [165], 0+1 in qualifying) Estoril (IV, 1R/A. Bondarenko [82], 0) Rabat (IV, 2R/Li Na [25], 1+3 in qualifying) Prague (IV, 1R/Ondraskova [98], 0) Fano $75K ($75K, 1R/Birnerova [111], 0) Cuneo $50K+H ($50K, 1R/Martinez Granados [169], 0) Petange $50K ($50K, Q3R/Vallverdu-Zaira [647], made main draw as Lucky Loser, 1R/Fislova [240], 0+2 in qualifying) Martina Franca $50K ($50K, 2R/Dominguez Lino [121], 1+3 in qualifying) 27/Gisela Dulko Hobart (V, F/Zheng [82], 4) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Diaz-Oliva [101], 1) Doha (II, 2R/Sharapova [4], 1) Dubai (II, 1R/Bartoli [34], 0) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Diaz-Oliva [93], 0) Miami (I, 3R/Molik [8], 1) Amelia Island (II, 2R/Likhovtseva [16], 1) Estoril (IV, SF/Safarova [155], 3) Berlin (I, 2R/Martinez [51], 1) — Hantuchova (23) Rome (I, R16/Linetskaya [50], 2) — Dementieva (5) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Irvin [85], 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, SF/Safarova [80], 3) — Petrova (8) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Pennetta [34], 1) San Diego (I, 2R/Déchy [15], 1) Los Angeles (II, 2R/Martinez [50], 1) Canadian Open (I, QF/Myskina [14], 3) — Golovin (25), Kuznetsova (4) New Haven (II, 2R/Medina Garrigues [33], 1) — Molik (14) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Cho [75], 1) Seoul (IV, 2R/Castaño [65], 1) Japan Open (III, 2R/Craybas [55], 1) Bangkok (III, SF/Vaidisova [18], 3) Zürich (I, 1R/Schnyder [10], 0) Linz (II, 2R/Sugiyama [32], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 20 —/ Silvia Farina Elia Gold Coast (III, SF/Stosur [65], 2+1 walkover) Canberra (IV, QF/Fedak [83], 2) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Sharapova [4], 3) Paris (II, QF/Golovin [23], 2) Doha (II, 1R/Schiavone [20], 0) Dubai (II, 2R/Jankovic [28], 1) — V. Williams (9) Amelia Island (II, F/Davenport [1], 5) — Schnyder (13), S. Williams (4) Charleston (I, 1R/Kostanic [40], 0) Warsaw (II, QF/Kuznetsova [7], 2) Rome (I, R16/Mauresmo [3], 2) Strasbourg (III, 1R/Douchevina [53], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Likhovtseva [19], 2) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Razzano [35], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Likhovtseva [17], 2) Palermo (IV, 1R/Pironkova [128], 0) New Haven (II, 1R/Kirilenko [49], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Granville [71], 0) Portoroz (IV, 1R/Henke [172], 0) Luxembourg (II, 1R/Smashnova [44], 0) Filderstadt (II, 1R/Likhovtseva [16], 0) Moscow (I, 1R/Saﬁna [24], 0) Zürich (I, 2R/Myskina [12], 1) — Likhovtseva (16) Hasselt (III, 1R/Flipkens [239], 0) RETIRED 55/Amy Frazier Auckland (IV, SF/Asagoe [37], 3) Hobart (V, 1R/Li Na [76], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Linetskaya [93], 2) Memphis (III, 1R/Jackson [149], 0) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Kutuzova [473], 1) Miami (I, 2R/Clijsters [38], 0) Amelia Island (II, 2R/Peschke [79], 1) Charleston (I, 1R/Golovin [25], 0) Strasbourg (III, 2R/Medina Garrigues [42], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Loit [92], 1) Eastbourne (II, 2R/Déchy [18], 1) — Sugiyama (25) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Washington [53], 0) Stanford (II, 2R/Jankovic [19], 1) San Diego (I, 1R/Jankovic [19], 0) Los Angeles (II, 2R/Koukalova [33], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Myskina [13], 1) Ashland $50K ($50K, SF/Tongsalee [302], 3) Houston $50K ($50K, Win, 5) Quebec City (III, Win, 5) — Déchy (13)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 21 24/Tatiana Golovin Gold Coast (III, SF/Schyder [14], 3) Sydney (II, 2R/Stosur [59], 1) — Sugiyama (21) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Spears [96], 1) Paris (II, SF/Saﬁna [48], 3) — Farina Elia (19) Antwerp (II, 2R/Myskina [6], 1) Indian Wells (I, R16/Dementieva [5], 2) Miami (I, R16/Dementeiva [5], 2) — Bovina (15) Charleston (I, SF/Hénin-Hardenne [43], 4) — Frazier (31), V. Williams (8), Petrova (12) Rome (I, 1R/Ivanovic [36], 0) Strasbourg (III, 2R/Peng [47], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Bovina [14], 2) Birmingham (III, SF/Sharapova [2], 3) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/A. Bondarenko [90], 0) San Diego (I, 1R/Chakvetadze [34], 0) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Dulko [35], 1) New Haven (II, 1R/Peschke [41], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Déchy [15], 2) Beijing (II, 1R/Asagoe [39], 0) Seoul (IV, SF/Jankovic [17], 3) — Sugiyama (32) Japan Open (III, F/Vaidisova [21], 4) — Sugiyama (31) Zürich (I, 1R/Ivanovic [22], 0) Linz (II, QF/Ivanovic [17], 1) 21/Anna-Lena Grönefeld Tucson $50K 2004 ($50K, 2R/Lepchenko [233], 1) Palm Beach Gardens $50K 2004 ($50K, Mirza [207], 3) Canberra (V, 2R/Farina Elia [19], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Douchevina [65], 2) — Zuluaga (16) Pattaya City (III, F/Martinez [43], 4) Hyderabad (IV, withdrew from SF, 3) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Beltrame [92], 0) Miami (I, 2R/V. Williams [9], 1) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Maleeva [28], 0) Charleston (I, 2R/Sugiyama [24], 1) Berlin (I, 2R/Sharapova [2], 1) Rome (I, 2R/Schnyder [13], 1) Istanbul (III, QF/Vaidisova [39], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Schiavone [24], 2) Birmingham (III, 1R/Foretz [127], 0) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 2R/Shaughnessy [70], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/O’Donoghue [232], 0) Cincinnati (III, 1R/Mirza [70], 0) Stanford (II, SF/Clijsters [14], 3) — Davenport (1), Déchy (18) San Diego (I, 2R/Pierce [14], 1) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Martinez [43], 0) New Haven (II, QF/Mauresmo [3], 2) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Mauresmo [3], 2) Bali (III, 2R/Nakamura [74], 1) Beijing (II, F/Kirilenko [45], 3) — Sugiyama (32) Luxembourg (II, F/Clijsters [3], 4) — Petrova (9), Saﬁna (25) Filderstadt (II, 1R/Petrova [9], 0) Moscow (I, 2R/Sharapova [1], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 22 19/Daniela Hantuchova Sydney (II, 2R/Petrova [13], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Dementieva [6], 2) Pan Paciﬁc (I, QF/Kuznetsova [6], 2) Doha (II, SF/Sharapova [4], 3) — Maleeva (29), Bovina (16) Dubai (II, QF/S. Williams [4], 2) — Molik (8), Likhovtseva (18) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Zuluaga [28], 1) Miami (I, 2R/Cohen-Aloro [96], 0) Warsaw (II, 2R/Bovina [14], 1) Berlin (I, 1R/Dulko [37], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Mamic [110], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Clijsters [17], 2) Birmingham (III, 2R/Parra Santonja [86], 0) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Vento-Kabchi [55], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/V. Williams [16], 2) Cincinnati (III, SF/Morigami [72], 3) Stanford (II, QF/Clijsters [14], 2) San Diego (I, 2R/Sugiyama [38], 1) Los Angeles (II, F/Clijsters [10], 3+1 walkover) — Dementieva (6) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Jidkova [83], 0) New Haven (II, QF/Davenport [2], 2) — Schnyder (11) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/V. Williams [10], 2) Luxembourg (II, QF/Déchy [15], 2) — Medina Garrigues (30) Filderstadt (II, SF/Davenport [2], 3) — Schnyder (10), Pennetta (30) Zürich (I, 2R/Davenport [3], 1) — Sugiyama (28) Linz (II, QF/Schnyder [9], 2) 6/Justine Hénin-Hardenne Miami (I, QF/Sharapova [3], 3) — Molik (8) Charleston (I, Win, 6) — Jankovic (20), Davenport (1), Golovin (25), Dementieva (5) Warsaw (II, Win, 5) — Schnyder (13), Kuznetsova (7) Berlin (I, Win, 6) — Sharapova (2), Schnyder (13), Petrova (12) Roland Garros (Slam, Win, 7) — Medina Garrigues (34), Kuznetsova (7), Sharapova (2), Petrova (9), Pierce (23) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Daniilidou [76], 0) Canadian Open (I, F/Clijsters [8], 4) — Vaidisova (32), Mauresmo (3) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Pierce [12], 3) Filderstadt (II, 2R/Pennetta [30], 0) —/Martina Hingis Pattaya City (III, 1R/Weingärtner [73], 0) [Re]-RETIRED 16/Ana Ivanovic Canberra (V, Win, 5+3 in qualifying) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Mauresmo [2], 2) — Benesova (34) Antwerp (II, 1R/Razzano [59], 0+3 in qualifying) Doha (II, 2R/Mauresmo [2], 1) Dubai Qualifying (II, Q3R/Dushevina [42], 0+2 in qualifying) Miami (I, QF/Mauresmo [2], 4) — Petrova (12), Kuznetsova (7) Warsaw (II, SF/Hénin-Hardenne [22], 3) — Zvonareva (10), Déchy (15) Berlin (I, 1R/Saﬁna [36], 0) Rome (I, R16/Schnyder [13], 2) — Golovin (19) Roland Garros (Slam, QF/Petrova [9], 4) — Mauresmo (3), Schiavone (24) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Pierce [14], 2) Canadian Open (I, withdrew from R16, 2) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Vento-Kabchi [72], 1) Filderstadt (II, 1R/Schnyder [10], 0) Zürich (I, SF/Schnyder [10], 3) — Golovin (24), Jankovic (21) Linz (II, SF/Schnyder [9], 3) — Golovin (25)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 23 22/Jelena Jankovic Auckland (IV, QF/Bartoli [41], 2) Sydney (II, 2R/Molik [12], 1) — Likhovtseva (23) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Panova [78], 1) Pan Pacific (I, 1R/Benesova [34], 0) Paris (II, 2R/Maleeva [31], 1) Dubai (II, F/Davenport [1], 4) — Suárez (20), Farina Elia (21), S. Williams (4) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Chakvetadze [72], 0) Miami (I, 2R/Vaidisova [53], 0) Amelia Island (II, R16/Petrova [12], 2) — Martinez (32) Charleston (I, 1R/Hénin-Hardenne [43], 0) Berlin (I, SF/Petrova [12], 4) — Pennetta (33), Bovina (14) Rome (I, 2R/Zvonareva [10], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Smashnova [60], 0) Birmingham (III, F/Sharapova [2], 4) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Clijsters [17], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Myskina [10], 2) Cincinnati (III, QF/Mattek [177], 2) Stanford (II, QF/V. Williams [10], 2) San Diego (I, R16/Clijsters [10], 2) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Li Na [45], 0) New Haven (II, 1R/Chakvetadze [30], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Pierce [12], 2) Beijing (II, 1R/Zheng [46], 0) Seoul (IV, F/Vaidisova [24], 4) — Golovin (26) Filderstadt (II, 2R/Mauresmo [4], 1) — Medina Garrigues (29) Moscow (I, 1R/Karatantcheva [41], 0) Zürich (I, 2R/Ivanovic [22], 1) — Molik (13) Linz (II, 1R/Dushevina [41], 0) Philadelphia (II, 1R/Panova [111], 0) 25/Maria Kirilenko Deauville $50K 2004 ($50K, 1R/A. Bondarenko [126], 0) Poitiers $75K 2004 ($75K, QF/Yakimova [178], 2) Sydney Qualifying (II, Q2R/Chladkova [49], 0+1 in qualifying) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Ivanovic [82], 1) Pan Pacific (I, 2R/Hantuchova [29], 1) Hyderabad (IV, SF/Mirza [134], 3) Doha (II, QF/Mauresmo [2], 2+3 in qualifying) — Schnyder (14) Dubai (II, Q2R/Ivanovic [58], 0+1 in qualifying) Indian Wells (I, R16/Martinez [31], 3+2 in qualifying) — Bovina (15) Miami (I, 2R/Mauresmo [2], 1) Warsaw (II, 2R/Clijsters [17], 1+3 in qualifying) Berlin (I, 2R/Hénin-Hardenne [15], 1) — Zuluaga (29) Rome (I, 1R/Farina Elia [20], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Birnerova [135], 0) Birmingham (III, 2R/Jackson [128], 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 2R/Safina [33], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Maleeva [43], 1) San Diego (I, 1R/Hanuchova [23], 0) Los Angeles (II, 2R/Sharapova [2], 1) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Bartoli [36], 0) New Haven (II, Q3R/Jackson [91], made main draw as Lucky Loser, 2R/Chakvetadze [30], 1) — Farina Elia (23) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/V. Williams [10], 1) Beijing (II, Win, 5) — Sharapova (1), Grönefeld (30) GuangZhou (III, QF/Zheng [47], 2) Japan Open (III, SF/Vaidisova [21], 3) Moscow (I, 1R/Zvonareva [25], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 24 18/Svetlana Kuznetsova Australian Open (Slam, QF/Sharapova [4], 4) Pan Paciﬁc (I, SF/Davenport [1], 2) — Hantuchova (29) Dubai (II, 2R/Mirza [97], 0) Indian Wells (I, QF/Dementieva [5], 3) Miami (I, R16/Ivanovic [52], 2) Warsaw (II, F/Hénin-Hardenne [22], 3) — Smashnova (35), Farina Elia (19), Clijsters (17) Berlin (I, QF/Schnyder [13], 2) — Maleeva (32) Rome (I, 2R/Suárez [32], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Hénin-Hardenne [12], 3) Eastbourne (II, SF/Clijsters [17], 2) — Déchy (18) Wimbledon (Slam, QF/Davenport [1], 4) — Vaidisova (33) San Diego (I, R16/Sugiyama [38], 1) — Koukalova (33) Los Angeles (II, 2R/Daniilidou [63], 0) Canadian Open (I, R16/Dulko [35], 1) — Medina Garrigues (34) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Bychkova [97], 0) Moscow (I, QF/Schiavone [22], 2) — Zvonareva (25) Zürich (I, 1R/Déchy [14], 0) 17/Elena Likhovtseva Gold Coast (III, 2R/Karatanchava [133], 1) Sydney (II, 1R/Jankovic [28], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Sprem [18], 2) Pan Paciﬁc (I, QF/Sharapva [4], 2) Dubai (II, 2R/Hantuchova [22], 1) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Craybas [79], 0) Miami (I, R16/SWilliams [4], 2) — Sugiyama (24) Amelia Island (II, R16/Zvonareva (10), 2) — Smashnova (35) Charleston (I, 1R/Koukalova [47], 0) Berlin (I, 2R/Pierce [27], 1) Rome (I, 1R/Smashnova [41], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, SF/Pierce [23], 5) — Farina Elia (25), Dementieva (5) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Bartoli [32], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Mauresmo [3], 3) — Farina Elia (22) San Diego (I, R16/Chakvetadze [34], 1) New Haven (II, 2R/Mauresmo [3], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Mauresmo [3], 3) — Myskina (13) Kolkata (III, SF/Sprem [81], 3) Filderstadt (II, 2R/Petrova [9], 1) — Farina Elia (28) Moscow (I, QF/Pierce [7], 2) — Schnyder (10) Zürich (I, 1R/Farina Elia [31], 0) Linz (II, 1R/Sugiyama [32], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 25 53/Evgenia Linetskaya Gold Coast Qualifying (III, Q1R/Karatantcheva [133], 0) Sydney Qualifying (II, Q2R/Mamic [104], 0+1 in qualifying) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Mauresmo [2], 3) — Frazier (28) Pattaya City (III, SF/Martinez [43], 3) — Zvonareva (11) Memphis (III, SF/Zvonareva [11], 3) Indian Wells (1, R16/Clijsters [133], 2) — Mauresmo (2) Miami (I, 2R/Dementieva [5], 1) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Medina Garrigues [41], 0) Berlin (I, 1R/Grönefeld [49], 0) Rome (I, QF/Schnyder [13], 3) — Pennetta (29) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Sharapova [2], 0) Birmingham (III, 2R/Chakvetadze [44], 1) Eastbourne (II, Q1R/Vinci [111], 0) San Diego (I, 1R/Koukalova [33], 0) Los Angeles (II, 1R/K. Bondarenko [186], 0) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Diaz-Oliva [67], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Asagoe [25], 1) Moscow (I, 1R/Peschke [39], 0) 52/Magdalena Maleeva Gold Coast (III, QF/Stosur [65], 2) Sydney (II, 2R/Schnyder [14], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Petrova [13], 2) Paris (II, QF/Mauresmo [4], 2) — Jankovic (28) Antwerp (II, 2R/Molik [10], 1) Doha (II, 1R/Hantuchova [28], 0) Dubai (II, 1R/Schnyder [14], 0) Miami (I, 3R?Dementieva [5], 1) Amelia Island (II, 2R/Petrova [12], 1) Warsaw (II, 1R/Déchy [15], 0) Berlin (I, 2R/Kuznetsova [7], 1) Rome (I, 1R/Sugiyama [25], 0) Rolan Garros (Slam, 2R/Medina Garrigues [34], 1) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Chakvetadze [43], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Kuznetsova [6], 3) — Asagoe (24) New Haven (II, 1R/Jackson [91], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Likhovtseva [21], 1) Luxembourg (II, 1R/Chakvetadze [36], 0) Moscow (I, 1R/Myskina [12], 0) Zürich (I, 2R/Schnyder [10], 1) — Chakvetadze (35) RETIRED

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 26 32/Conchita Martinez Sydney (II, 1R/Daniilidou [42], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Davenport [1], 0) Pattaya City (III, Win, 5) Doha (II, QF/Hantuchova [28], 2) — Myskina (5) Dubai (II, QF/Davenport [1], 2) — Asagoe (26), Déchy (13) Indian Wells (I, QF/Clijsters [133], 3) Amelia Island (II, 2R/Jankovic [20], 1) Charleston (I, 1R/Strycova [94], 0) Berlin (I, R16/Kuznetsova [7], 3) Rome (I, QF/Mauresmo [3], 2+1 walkover) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Hénin-Hardenne [12], 0) Eastbourne (II, 2R/Clijsters [17], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Peschke [62], 2) San Diego (I, 1R/Safina [26], 0) Los Angeles (II, QF/schiavone [28], 3) Canadian Open (I, R16/Mauresmo [3], 2) — Grönefeld (29), Safina (24) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Schnyder [11], 0) Bangkok (III, QF/Vaidisova [18], 2) Zürich (I, 1R/Petrova [9], 0) Linz (II, 2R/Hantuchova [20], 1) 3/Amélie Mauresmo Australian Open (Slam, QF/S. Williams [7], 4) Paris (II, F/Safina [48], 3) — Pierce (27), Maleeva (31), Petrova (12) Antwerp (II, Win, 4) — Pierce (32), Schnyder (14), Molik (10), V. Williams (8) Doha (II, SF/Molik [9], 2) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Linetskaya [44], 1) Miami (I, SF/Clijsters [38], 4) — Smashnova (33), Sprem (18) Berlin (I, QF/Petrova [12], 2) Rome (I, Win, 5) — Farina Elia (20), Zvonareva (10), Schnyder (13) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Ivanovic [31], 2) Eastbourne (II, 2R/Dushevina [54], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, SF/Davenport [1], 5) — Likhovtseva (17), Myskina (10) Canadian Open (I, SF/Hénin-Hardenne [5], 3) — Petrova (10) New Haven (II, F/Davenport [2], 3) — Likhovtseva (20), Grönefeld (32), Medina Garrigues (33) U. S. Open (Slam, QF/Pierce [12], 4) — Grönefeld (31), Likhovtseva (21) Filderstadt (II, F/Davenport [2], 3) — Jankovic (17), Petrova (9), Dementieva (8) Moscow (I, 2R/Schiavone [22], 0) Zürich (I, 2R/Srebotnik [43], 0) Philadelphia (II, Win, 4) — Sugiyama (30), Vaidisova (19), Dementieva (10) Los Angeles Championships (Champ, 2Ð1 in RR/Pierce [5], Won [4-1 record]) — Clijsters (2), Dementieva (7), Sharapova (3), Pierce (5)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 27 34/Anabel Medina Garrigues Hobart (V, 2R/Peschke [89], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Molik [12], 0) Paris (II, 1R/Pierce [27], 0) Antwerp (II,1R/Petrova [12], 0) Doha (II, 1R/Dulko [33], 0) Dubai (II, 1R/Zheng [65], 0) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Kirilenko [66], 1) Miami (I, 2R/Zuluaga [30], 1) Amelia Island (II, 2R/Farina Elia [24], 1) Charleston (I, 1R, Marrero [76], 0) Berlin (I, 2R/Schnyder [13], 1) Rome (I, 2R/Sharapova [2], 1) Strasbourg (III, Win, 5) — Frrazier (30), Déchy (16) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Hénin-Hardenne [12], 2) — Maleeva (29) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 2R/Krajicek [99], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Srebotnik [57], 0) Palermo (IV, Win, 5) Stockholm (IV, 2R/Parra Santonja [123], 1) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Kuznetsova [4], 1) New Haven (II, SF/Mauresmo [3], 3) — Dulko (28), Dementieva (6) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Davenport [1], 2) Portoroz (IV, QF/Srebotnik [49], 2) Luxembourg (II, 1R/Hantuchova [19], 0) Filderstadt (II, 1R/Jankovic [17], 0) Zürich Qualifying (I, Q2R/Szavay [190], 0+1 in qualifying) Hasselt (III, 1R/Schruff [83], 0) 29/Alicia Molik Sydney (II, Win, 5) — Schiavone (18), Jankovic (28), Zuluaga (22) Australian Open (Slam, QF/Davenport [1], 4) — V. Williams (9) Antwerp (II, SF/Mauresmo [2], 2) — Maleeva (28) Doha (II, F/Sharapova [4], 3)— Schiavone (20), Mauresmo (2) Dubai (II, 1R/Hantuchova [22], 0) Miami (I, R16/Hénin-Hardenne [40], 2) Amelia Island (II, 2R/Razzano [54], 0) Birmingham (III, 2R/Granville [100], 0) New Haven (II, 1R/Dulko [28], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Perry [118], 0) Bali (III, 2R/A. Bondarenko [82], 1) Beijing (II, 1R/Diaz-Oliva [61], 0) Filderstadt (II, 1R/Déchy [15], 0) Moscow (I, 1R/Stosur [64], 0) Zürich (I, 1R/Jankovic [21], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 28 14/Anastasia Myskina Sydney (II, 2R/Peng [80], 0) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Déchy [25], 2+1 walkover) Antwerp (II, SF/V. Williams [8], 2) — Golovin (25) Doha (II, 2R/Martinez [37], 0) Dubai (II, QF/Schnyder [14], 1) — Bartoli (34) Miami (I, R16/Clijsters [38], 2) — Pennetta (29) Amelia Island (II, R16/Asagoe [26], 1) Charleston (I, 2R/Vaidiosova [49], 0) Berlin (I, 2R/Schruff [107], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Sanchez Lorenzo [109], 0) Eastbourne (II, QF/Vinci [111], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, QF/Mauresmo [3], 4) — Jankovic (19), Dementieva (5) Stockholm (IV, F/Srebotnik [62], 4) Canadian Open (I, SF/Clijsters [8], 3) — Asagoe (27), Dulko (35) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Likhovtseva [21], 2) Kolkata (III, Win, 5) Filderstadt (II, QF/Davenport [2], 2) — Saﬁna (23) Moscow (I, QF/Dementieva [8], 2) Zürich (I, SF/Davenport [3], 3) — Zvonareva (26), Farina Elia (31), Dementieva (8) 23/Flavia Pennetta Gold Coast (III, QF/Golovin [27], 2) — Déchy (21) Sydney Qualifying (II, Q1R/McCain [132], 0+0 in qualifying) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Mandula [84], 0) Paris (II, 1R/Sfar [116], 0) Bogota (III, Win, 5) Acapulco (III, Win, 5) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Kutuzova [473], 0) Miami (I, 3R/Myskina [6], 1) Estoril (IV, 1R/Savchuk [220], 0) Berlin (I, 2R/Jankovic [24], 1) Rome (I, 2R/Linetskaya [50], 1) — Asagoe (22) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Schnyder [10], 2) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Pierce [14], 3) — Dulko (29) Modena (IV, SF/Smashnova [61], 3) Palermo (IV, SF/Koukalova [39], 3) San Diego (I, 2R/Morigami [61], 1) Los Angeles (II, 1R/Nakamura [87], 0) Canadian Open (I, QF/Clijsters [8], 2+1 walkover) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Schruff [87], 0) Bali (III, QF/Schiavone [28], 2) Beijing (II, 1R/Nakamura [75], 0) Filderstadt (II, QF/Hantuchova [20], 2) — Hénin-Hardenne (5) Moscow (I, 2R/Pierce [7], 1) — Déchy (14) Zürich (I, Q3R/Srebotnik [43], made main draw as Lucky Loser, QF/Schnyder [10], 2+2 in qualifying)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 29 26/Kveta (Hrdlickova) Peschke Deauville $50K 2004 ($50K, Win, 5) Poitiers $75K 2004 ($75K, SF/Mikaelian [145], 3) Hobart (V, QF/Dulko [34], 2) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Myskina [3], 0) Paris Qualifying (II, Q2R/Mamic [106], 0+1 in qualifying) Indian Wells (I, 1R/Bedanova [430], 0) Miami (I, 2R/Schnyder [13], 1) Amelia Island (II, R16/Davenport [1], 2+ 2 in qualifying) — Frazier (31) Cagnes sur Mer $75K ($75K, QF/Bychkova [134], 2) Berlin (I, R16/Hénin-Hardenne [15], 2+2 in qualifying) — Zvonareva (10) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Peer [84], 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 1R/Kirilenko [53], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Petrova [8], 3) — Zvonareva (12) Cincinnati (III, 1R/Panova [121], 0) San Diego (I, 2R/Schnyder [11], 1) New Haven (II, 2R/Davenport [2], 1+3 in qualifying) — Golovin (24) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Vaidisova [28], 0) Portoroz (IV, 2R/Bremond [125], 1) Luxembourg (II, 2R/Petrova [9], 1) Filderstadt Qualifying (II, Q3R/Daniilidou [67], 0+2 in qualifying) Moscow (I, 2R/Myskina [12], 1) Zürich (I, 1R/Pennetta [25], 0+3 in qualifying) Linz (II, SF/Petrova [10], 3) — Zvonareva (26), Dementieva (8), Sugiyama (32) Philadelphia (II, QF/Dementieva [10], 2) Pittsburg $75K ($75K, 1R/Dubois [146], 0) 9/Nadia Petrova Gold Coast (III, withdrew from QF, 2) Sydney (II, QF/Peng [80], 2) — Hantuchova (31) Australian Open (Slam, R16/S. Williams [7], 3) — Maleeva (26) Paris (II, SF/Mauresmo [4], 2) Antwerp (II, 2R/Clijsters [87], 1) Indian Wells (I, R16/Pierce [33], 2) Miami (I, 2R/Ivanovic [52], 0) Amelia Island (II, SF/Davenport [1], 3) — Maleeva (28), Jankovic (20), Asagoe (26) Charleston (I, QF/Golovin [25], 2) Berlin (I, F/Hénin-Hardenne [15], 4) — Pierce (27), Mauresmo (3), Jankovic (24) Rome (I, withdrew from R16, 1) Roland Garros (Slam, SF/Hénin-Hardenne [12, 5) — Bovina (14), Ivanovic (31) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, QF/Dulko [37], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, QF/Sharapova [2], 4) San Diego (I, 2R/Mirza [59], 0) Los Angeles (II, QF/Clijsters [10], 2) — Koukalova (33) Canadian Open (I, QF/Mauresmo [3], 2) U. S. Open (Slam, QF/Sharapova [2], 4) — Vaidisova (28) Luxembourg (II, QF/Grönefeld [23], 1) Filderstadt (II, QF/Mauresmo [4], 2) — Grönefeld (19), Likhovtseva (16) Bangkok (III, F/Vaidisova [18], 4) Zürich (I, 2R/Schiavone [18], 1) Linz (II, Win, 4) — Schnyder (9) Philadelphia (II, withrew from SF, 3) Los Angeles Championships (Champ, 1Ð2 in RR/Davenport [1], Schnyder [8]; did not make SF [1-2 record]) — Sharapova (3)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 30 5/Mary Pierce Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Cohen-Aloro [115], 0) Paris (II, 2R/Mauresmo [4], 1) Antwerp (II, 2R/Mauresmo [2], 1) — Benesova (34) Indian Wells (I, QF/Sharapova [3], 3) — Petrova (12) Amelia Island (II, R16/S. Williams [4], 2) Charleston (I, 2R/Llagostera Vives [63], 1) Berlin (I, R16/Petrova [12], 2) — Likhovtseva (18) Rome (I, R16/Sharapova (2), 2) Roland Garros (Slam, F/Hénin-Hardenne [12], 6) — Zvonareva (11), Schnyder (10), Davenport (1), Likhovtseva (19) Wimbledon (Slam, QF/V. Williams [16], 4) — Ivanovic (21), Pennetta (34) San Diego (I, Win, 5) — Grönefeld (29), Déchy (15), Schnyder (11) U. S. Open (Slam, F/Clijsters [4], 6) — Jankovic (17), Hénin-Hardenne (7), Mauresmo (3), Dementieva (6) Moscow (I, Win, 4) — Pennetta (27), Likhovtseva (16), Saﬁna (24), Schiavone (22) Los Angeles Championships (Champ, 3–0 in RR, lost F/Mauresmo [4] [4-1 record]) — Clijsters (2), Dementieva (7), Mauresmo (4), Davenport (1) 76/Lisa Raymond Sydney (II, 1R/Déchy [24], 0) Australian Open (Slam, withdrew from 3R, 2) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Petrova [12], 1) Miami (I, 2R/Déchy [14], 1) Amelia Island (II, 2R/Asagoe [26], 1) Charleston (I, 2R/Golovin [25], 1) — Razzano (35) Istanbul (III, 1R/Morigami [76], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Mamic [89], 0) Birmingham (III, 1R/Sequera [123], 0) Eastbourne (II, Q3R/Srebotnik [58], made main draw as Lucky Loser, 2R/Bartoli [32], 1+2 in qualifying) — Asagoe (26) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Panova [92], 0) Stanford (II, 2R/Déchy [18], 1) San Diego (I, 2R/Karatantcheva [49], 1) — Bartoli (35) Los Angeles (II, R16/Garbin [75], 2) New Haven (II, 1R/Schnyder [11], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Schruff [87], 1) Luxembourg (II, 1R/Schiavone [21], 0) Moscow Qualifying (I, Q3R/Karatantcheva [41], 0+2 in qualifying) Linz (II, 1R/Dulko [30], 0) Philadelphia (II, QF/Vaidisova [19], 2) 546/Chanda Rubin Strasbourg (III, 1R/Zheng [56], 0) Roland Garros Qualifying (Slam, Q1R/Mattek [171], 0) Cincinnati (III, 2R/Hantuchova [26], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 31 20/Dinara Saﬁna Gold Coast (III, 2R/Golovin [27], 1) — Sugiyama (17) Hobart (IV, 2R/Vaidisova [75], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Mauresmo [2], 1) Paris (II, Win, 4+1 walkover) — Sprem (17), Golovin (23), Mauresmo (4) Antwerp (II, 1R/Golovin [25], 0) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Sharapova [3], 1) Miami (I, 2R/Irvin [85], 0) Estoril (IV, SF/Li Na [40], 3) Berlin (I, 2R/Clijsters [17], 1) — Ivanovic (34) Prague (IV, Win, 5) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Razzano [39], 0) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, QF/Safarova [80], 2) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Davenport [1], 2) San Diego (I, R16/Peng [46], 2) Los Angeles (II, R16/Clijsters [10], 2) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Martinez [43], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Camerin [81], 0) Luxembourg (II, SF/Grönefeld [23], 3) Filderstadt (II, 2R/Myskina [12], 1) Moscow (I, SF/Pierce [7], 3) — Farina Elia (32), Sharapova (1) Hasselt (III, SF/Clijsters [2], 3) — Srebotnik (31) 13/Francesca Schiavone Bergamo $50K 2004 ($50K, 2R/Bychkova [187], 1) Sydney (II, 1R/Molik [12], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Déchy [25], 2) Doha (II, QF/Molik [9], 2) — Farina Elia (22), Sugiyama (21) Dubai (II, 1R/Bovina [15], 0) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Fujiwara [142], 0) Miami (I, 3R/Asagoe [26], 1) Warsaw (II, 1R/Vento-Kabchi [58], 0) Rome (I, QF/Zvonareva [10], 3) — S. Williams (4), Sugiyama (25) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Ivanovic [31], 3) — Vaidisova (35) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Brandi [70], 0) Modena (IV, QF/Szavay [301], 2) Stanford (II, 2R/Benesova [53], 1) San Diego (I, R16/Schnyder [11], 2) Los Angeles (II, SF/Clijsters [10], 4) — Peng (32) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/S. Williams [8], 2) Bali (III, F/Davenport [2], 4) — Pennetta (29), Schnyder (11) Luxembourg (II, QF/Clijsters [3], 2) Filderstadt (II, 2R/Davenport [2], 1) — Chakvetadze (33) Moscow (I, F/Pierce [7], 4) — Mauresmo (4), Kuznetsova (15), Dementieva (8) Zürich (I, QF/Davenport [3], 2) — Petrova (9) Hasselt (III, F/Clijsters [2], 4)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 32 7/Patty Schnyder Gold Coast (III, Win, 5) — Golovin (27) Sydney (II, QF/Dementieva [6], 2) — Sprem (17), Maleeva (27) Australian Open (Slam, QF/Déchy [25], 4) — Dementieva (6) Antwerp (II, QF/Mauresmo [2], 2) Doha (II, 2R/Kirilenko [86], 1) Dubai (II, SF/Davenport [1], 3) — Maleeva (30), Myskina (5) Miami (I, 3R/Castaño [111], 1) Amelia Island (II, R16/Farina Elia [24], 1) Charleston (I, SF/Dementieva [5], 3) Warsaw (II, QF/Hénin-Hardenne [22], 1) Berlin (I, SF/Hénin-Hardenne [15], 3) — Clijsters (17), Kuznetsova (7) Rome (I, F/Mauresmo [3], 4) — Sharapova (2) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Pierce [23], 3) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Ant. Serra-Zanetti [83], 0) Cincinnati (III, Win, 5) Stanford (II, SF/V. Williams [10], 2) — Bartoli (30) San Diego (I, QF/Pierce [14], 2) — Schiavone (28) New Haven (II, 2R/Hantuchova [21], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Dementieva [6], 3) — Asagoe (24) Bali (III, SF/Schiavone [28], 2) Luxembourg (II, 2R/Vinci [57], 0) Filderstadt (II, 2R/Hantuchova [19], 1) — Ivanovic (18) Moscow (I, 2R/Likhovtseva [16], 1) — Chakvetadze (35) Zürich (I, F/Davenport [3], 4) — Dulko (29), Pennetta (25), Ivanovic (22) Linz (II, F/Petrova [10], 3) — Hantuchova (20), Ivanovic (17) Los Angeles Championships (Champ, 1Ð2 in RR/Sharapova [3], Davenport [1]; did not make SF [1-2 record]) — Petrova (10) 4/Maria Sharapova Australian Open (Slam, SF/S. Williams [7], 5) — Farina Elia (19), Kuznetsova (5) Pan Paciﬁc (I, Win, 4) — Likhovtseva (22), Asagoe (32), Davenport (1) Doha (II, Win, 4) — Dulko (33), Bartoli (35), Hantuchova (28), Molik (9) Indian Wells (I, SF/Davenport [1], 4) — Zuluaga (28), Pierce (33) Miami (I, F/Clijsters [38], 5) — Asagoe (26), V. Williams (9) Berlin (I, QF/Hénin-Hardenne [15], 2) Rome (I, SF/Schnyder [13], 3) — Pierce (24), Bovina (15) Roland Garros (Slam, QF/Hénin-Hardenne [12], 4) Birmingham (III, Win, 5) — Golovin (19), Jankovic (20) Wimbledon (Slam, SF/V. Williams [16], 5) — Déchy (18), Petrova (8) Los Angeles (II, withdrew from QF, 2) — Chakvetadze (31) U. S. Open (Slam, SF/Clijsters [4], 5) — Petrova (9) Beijing (II, SF/Kirilenko [45], 2) Moscow (I, QF/Saﬁna [24], 1) — Grönefeld (21) Los Angeles Championships (Champ, 2Ð1 in RR/Petrova [10], lost SF/Mauresmo [4]; [2–2 record]) — Schnyder (8), Davenport (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 33 66/Meghann Shaughnessy Canberra (IV, 1R/Kapros [96], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Spears [96], 0) Memphis (III, F/Zvonareva [11], 4) Acapulco (III, 2R/Parra Santonja [79], 1) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Davenport [1], 1) Miami (I, 2R/Schiavone [16], 1) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Peng [49], 0) Charleston (I, withdrew from 2R, 1) Berlin (I, R16/Bovina [14], 2) Rome (I, 1R/Schiavone [26], 0) Istanbul (III, 1R/Pironkova [220], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Frazier [37], 0) Birmingham (III, 1R/Dominikovic [106], 0) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, SF/Koukalova [41], 3) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Likhovtseva [17], 1) Cincinnati (III, 1R/Zvonareva [15], 0) Stanford (II, 2R/Hantuchova [24], 1+3 in qualifying) — Zvonareva (15) San Diego (I, 1R/Sugiyama [38], 0) New Haven (II, 2R/Grönefeld [32], 1) — Déchy (15) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Karatantcheva [39], 0) Bali (III, 1R/Pous Tio [80], 0) Beijing (II, 1R/Domachowska [64], 0) Seoul (IV, 2R/Jankovic [17], 1) Filderstadt (II, 1R/Hantuchova [20], 0) Philadelphia (II, 1R/Washington [85], 0) 43/Anna Smashnova Canberra (IV, 2R/Czink [128], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/V. Williams [9], 2) Paris (II, 1R/Razzano [66], 0) Miami (I, 3R/Mauresmo [2], 1) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Likhovtsva [16], 0) Warsaw (II, 2R/Kuznetsova [7], 1) Berlin (I, 2R/Mauresmo [3], 1) Rome (I, 2R/Martinez [47], 1) — Likhovtseva (18) Istanbul (III, SF/Vaidisova [39], 3) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Grönefeld [44], 1) — Jankovic (18) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 1R/Shaughnessy [70], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Likhovtseva [17], 0) Modena (IV, Win, 5) — Pennetta (28) Palermo (IV, 2R/Pironkova [128], 1) Budapest (IV, Win, 5) Forest Hills (IV, 1R/Safarova [66], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Golovin [27], 1) Luxembourg (II, 2R/Grönefeld [23], 1) — Farina Elia (27)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 34 65/Karolina Sprem Gold Coast (III, 1R/Stosur [65], 0) Sydney (II, 1R/Schnyder [14], 0) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Davenport [1], 3) — Likhovtseva (22) Paris (II, 1R/Saﬁna [48], 0) Antwerp (II, 1R/Chakvetadze [75], 0) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Vaidisova [63], 0) Miami (I, R16/Mauresmo [2], 2) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Ruano Pascual [62], 0) Berlin (I,1R/Razzano [39], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Suárez [32], 0) Strasbourg (III, QF/Randriantefy [53], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Morigami [72], 1) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Vinci [111], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Tanasugarn [69], 0) Stanford (II, 1R/Déchy [18], 0) San Diego (I, 1R/Washington [55], 0) Los Angeles (II, 2R/Clijsters [10], 1) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Golovin [25], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Medina Garrigues [30], 0) Bali (III, 1R/Grönefeld [30], 0) Kolkata (III, F/Myskina [12], 4) — Likhovtseva (16) Filderstadt (II, 2R/Clijsters[3], 1+3 in qualifying) Zürich Qualifying (I, Q1R/Domachowska [60], 0) Hasselt (III, 2R/Clijsters [2], 1) 28/Katarina Srebotnik Auckland (V, Win, 5) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Baltacha [185], 0) Antwerp (II, QF/Myskina [6], 2+3 in qualifying) Indian Wells (I, 1R/A. Bondarenko [88], 0) Miami (I, 1R/Vaidisova [53], 0) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Dulko [40], 0) Charleston (I,QF/Dementieva [5], 3) — Sugiyama (24) Strasbourg (III, 1R/Vakulenko [226], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Davenport [1], 0) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Dushevina [54], 0+3 in qualifying) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Sharapova [2], 2) Palermo (IV, 1R/Diaz-Oliva [69], 0) Budapest (IV, QF/Pous Tio [84], 2) Stockholm (IV, Win, 5) — Dushevina (34), Myskina (14) New Haven Qualifying (II, Q1R/Zheng [64], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Pierce [12], 1) Portoroz (IV, F/Koukalova [41], 4) — Medina Garrigues (27) Luxembourg (II, 1R/Gajdosova [179], 0) Moscow Qualifying (I, Q2R/Birnerova [123], 0+1 in qualifying) Zürich (I, QF/Ivanovic [22], 2+3 in qualifying) — Pennetta (25), Asagoe (34), Mauresmo (4) Hasselt (III, QF/Saﬁna [21], 2) 232/Paola Suárez Doha (II, 1R/Bartoli [35], 0) Dubai (II, 1R/Jankovic [28], 0) Indian Wells (I, 2R/Jackson [125], 0) Miami (I, 2R/Castaño [111], 0) Rome (I, R16/Bovina [15], 2) — Sprem (28), Kuznetsova (7) Strasbourg (III, withdrew from 2R, 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Chakvetadze [56], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 35 30/Ai Sugiyama Gold Coast (III, 1R/Saﬁna [44], 0) Sydney (II, 1R/Golovin [25], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Sucha [57], 0) Pan Paciﬁc (I, 1R/Vinci [117], 0) Doha (II, 2R/Schiavone [20], 1) Dubai (II, 1R/Li Na [46], 0) Miami (I, 3R/Likhovtseva [17], 1) Amelia Island (II, R16/Razzano [54], 2) Charleston (I, R16/Srebotnik [53], 2) Berlin (I, 1R/Peng [52], 0) Rome (I, R16/Schiavone [26], 2) — Maleeva (27) Strasbourg (III, 2R/Domachowska [63], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Llagostera Vives [46], 0) Birmingham (III, R16/Daniilidou [87], 1) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Frazier [31], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Vinci [64], 0) Cincinnati (III, 2R/Peer [66], 1) Stanford (II, 2R/Clijsters [14], 1) San Diego (I, F/Pierce [14], 5) — Hantuchova (23), Kuznetsova (4) Canadian Open (I, Zheng [70], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Clijsters [4], 2) Beijing (II, 2R/Grönefeld [30], 1) Seoul (IV, QF/Golovin [26], 2) Japan Open (III, QF/Golovin [25], 2) Zürich (I, 1R/Hantuchova [19], 0+3 in qualfying) Linz (II, QF/Peschke [39], 2) — Likhovtseva (16), Dulko (30) Philadelphia (II, 2R/Mauresmo [4], 1) 15/Nicole Vaidisova Hobart (V, QF/Benesova [37], 2) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Davenport [1], 2) — Kostanic (35) Memphis (III, SF/Shaughnessy [41], 3) Indian Wells (I, 3R/Pierce [33], 2) — Sprem (18) Miami (I, 3R/Ivanovic [52], 2) — Jankovic (20) Charleston (I, QF/Schnyder [13], 3) — Myskina (6), Asagoe (22) Istanbul (III, F/V. Williams [13], 3) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Schiavone [24], 1) Birmingham (III, 2R/Daniilidou [87], 1) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Zvonareva [12], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Kuznetova [6], 2) Canadian Open (I, QF/Hénin-Hardenne [5], 3) — Déchy (15) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Petrova [9], 3) Seoul (IV, Win, 5)— Jankovic (17) Japan Open (III, Win, 5) — Kirilenko (26), Golovin (25) Bangkok (III, Win, 5) — Dulko (34), Petrova (9) Philadelphia (II, SF/Mauresmo [4], 3)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 36 11/Serena Williams Australian Open (Slam, Win, 7) — Petrova (13), Mauresmo (2), Sharapova (4), Davenport (1) Paris (II, withdrew from QF, 1) Dubai (II, SF/Jankovic [28], 2) — Bovina (15), Hantuchova (22) Miami (I, QF/V. Williams [9], 3) — Likhovtseva (17) Amelia Island (II, QF/Farina Elia [24], 2) — Pierce (27) Rome (I, 2R/Schiavone [26], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Craybas [85], 2) Canadian Open (I, withdrew from R16, 1) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/V. Williams [10], 3) — Schiavone (26) Beijing (II, 2R/Sun [127], 0) 10/Venus Williams Australian Open (Slam, R16/Molik [12], 3) — Smashnova (33) Antwerp (II, F/Mauresmo [2], 3) — Myskina (6) Dubai (II, 1R/Farina Elia [21], 0) Miami (I, SF/Sharapova [3], 4) — Zuluaga (30), S. Williams (4) Amelia Island (II, QF/Davenport [1], 2) Charleston (I, R16/Golovin [25], 1) Istanbul (III, Win, 4) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Karatantcheva [98], 2) Wimbledon (Slam, Win, 7) — Hantuchova (28), Pierce (14), Sharapova (2), Davenport (1) Stanford (II, F/Clijsters [14], 3) — Jankovic (19), Schnyder (12) U. S. Open (Slam, QF/Clijsters [4], 4) — Hantuchova (19), S. Williams (8) Beijing (II, withdrew from QF, 1) 84/Fabiola Zuluaga Sydney (II, QF/Molik [12], 2) — Zvonareva (11) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Grönefeld [71], 1) Bogota (III, SF/Dominguez Lino [196], 3) Indian Wells (I, R16/Sharapova [3], 2) — Hantuchova (22) Miami (I, 3R/V. Williams [9], 1) Charleston (I, 2R/Kutuzova [270], 1) Berlin (I, 1R/Kirilenko [48], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Santangelo [156], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Davenport [1], 1) San Diego (I, 1R/Benesova [54], 0) Los Angeles (II, 1R/Dulko [36], 0) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Déchy [15], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Clijsters [4], 1) RETIRED

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 37 42/Vera Zvonareva Sydney (II, 2R/Zuluaga [22], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Douchevina [65], 1) Pattaya City (III, QF/Linetskaya [68], 2) Memphis (III, Win, 5) Miami (I, 2R/Llagostera Vives [72], 0) Amelia Island (II, QF/Razzano [54], 2) — Likhovtseva (16) Charleston (I, 2R/Benesova [51], 0) Warsaw (II, 2R/Ivanovic [37], 0) Berlin (I, 2R/Peschke [67], 0) Rome (I, SF/Mauresmo [3], 3) — Jankovic (21), Schiavone (26) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Pierce [23], 2) Eastbourne (II, 2R/Vinci [111], 1) — Vaidisova (30) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Peschke [62], 1) Cincinnati (III, 2R/Morigami [72], 1) Stanford (II, 1R/Shaughnessy [69], 0) San Diego (I, 2R/Washington [55], 0) GuangZhou (III, 1R/Li Ting [157], 0) Japan Open (III, QF/Mirza [37], 2) Moscow (I, 2R/Kuznetsova [15], 1) — Kirilenko (26) Zürich (I, 1R/Myskina [12], 0) Linz (II, 1R/Peschke [39], 0) Philadelphia (II, 1R/Karatantcheva [36], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 38 Tournament Winners Tournament Winners by Date (High-Tier Events) The following list shows the winner of all important (Tier II or higher) tournaments, in the order the events occurred: Tournament Tier Winner Sydney II Molik Australian Open Slam S. Williams Tokyo (Pan Paciﬁc) I Sharapova Paris II Saﬁna Antwerp II Mauresmo Doha II Sharapova Dubai II Davenport Indian Wells I Clijsters Miami I Clijsters Amelia Island II Davenport Charleston I Hénin-Hardenne Warsaw II Hénin-Hardenne Berlin I Hénin-Hardenne Rome I Mauresmo Roland Garros Slam Hénin-Hardenne Eastbourne II Clijsters Wimbledon Slam V. Williams Stanford II Clijsters San Diego I Pierce Los Angeles II Clijsters Canadian Open (Toronto) I Clijsters New Haven II Davenport U.S. Open Slam Clijsters Beijing II Kirilenko Luxembourg II Clijsters Filderstadt II Davenport Moscow I Pierce Zürich I Davenport Linz II Petrova Philadelphia II Mauresmo Los Angeles Championships Champ Mauresmo

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 39 Tournament Winners by Tournament Type (High-Tier Events) The following list shows winners of the top-tier events by tier. Within the tiers, events are sorted by date. SLAMS Event Australian Open S. Williams Roland Garros Hénin-Hardenne Wimbledon V. Williams U.S. Open Clijsters YEAR-END CHAMPIONSHIP Event Los Angeles Championships Mauresmo TIER I Event Pan Paciﬁc (Tokyo) Sharapova Indian Wells Clijsters Miami Clijsters Charleston Hénin-Hardenne German Open (Berlin) Hénin-Hardenne Italian Open (Rome) Mauresmo San Diego Pierce Canadian Open Clijsters Moscow Pierce Zürich Davenport TIER II Event Sydney Molik Paris Saﬁna Antwerp Mauresmo Doha Sharapova Dubai Davenport Amelia Island Davenport Warsaw Hénin-Hardenne Eastbourne Clijsters Stanford Clijsters Los Angeles Clijsters New Haven Davenport Beijing Kirilenko Luxembourg Clijsters Filderstadt Davenport Linz Petrova Philadelphia Mauresmo

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 40 Winners at Smaller Tournaments (Tier III, IV, V) Tournament Winner Tier Same Week As Gold Coast Schnyder III Auckland (IV) Auckland Srebotnik IV Gold Coast (III) Canberra Ivanovic V Sydney (II), Hobart (V) Hobart Zheng V Sydney (II), Canberra (V) Pattaya City Martinez III Pan Paciﬁc (I) Hyderabad Mirza IV Paris (II) Memphis Zvonareva III Antwerp (II), Bogota (III) Bogota Pennetta III Antwerp (II), Memphis (III) Acapulco Pennetta III Doha (II) Estoril Safarova IV Warsaw (II) Rabat Llagostera Vives IV Berlin (I) Prague Saﬁna IV Rome (I) Strasbourg Medina Garrigues III Istanbul (III) Istanbul V. Williams III Strasbourg (III) Birmingham Sharapova III ’s-Hertogenbosch Koukalova III Eastbourne (II) Modena Smashnova IV Cincinnati Schnyder III Palermo (IV) Palermo Medina Garrigues IV Cincinnati (III) Budapest Smashnova IV Stanford (II) Stockholm Srebotnik IV Los Angeles (II) Forest Hills Safarova IV New Haven (II) Bali Davenport III+ [Fed Cup] Kolkata Myskina III Beijing (II), Portoroz (IV) Portoroz Koukalova IV Beijing (II), Kolkata (III) GuangZhou Yan III Luxembourg (II), Seoul (IV) Seoul Vaidisova IV Luxembourg (II), GuangZhou (III) Japan Open Vaidisova III Filderstadt (II), Tashkent (IV) Tashkent Krajicek IV Filderstadt (II), Japan Open (III) Bangkok Vaidisova III Moscow (I) Hasselt Clijsters III Linz (II) Quebec City Frazier III Philadelphia (II)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 41 Winners and Finalists at $50K and Larger Challengers Showing date (the last day of the event), tier, and final score (since November 15, 2004, when the 2004 Tour year ended) Nov. 21, 2004: Deauville, FRA $50K: Kveta Peschke def. Alona Bondarenko 6Ð0 6Ð3 Nov. 21, 2004: Tucson, AZ, USA $50K: Jamea Jackson (8) def. Stephanie Dubois 7Ð6(7Ð5) 7Ð5 Nov. 28, 2004: Poitiers, FRA $75K: Anastasiya Yakimova (LL) def. Marie-Gayanay Mikaelian 7Ð6 6Ð2 Dec. 5, 2004: Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA $50K: Sesil Karatantcheva (3) def. Sania Mirza 3Ð6 6Ð2 7Ð5 Dec. 19, 2004: Bergamo, ITA $50K: Michaella Krajicek (JE) def. Ekaterina Bychkova 6Ð4 6Ð3

Jan. 30, 2005: Waikoloa, HA, USA $50K: Marie-Eve Pelletier (1) def. Hana Sromova (7) 4Ð6 6Ð1 6Ð4 Feb. 6, 2005: Ortisei, ITA $75K: Michaella Krajicek def. Sandra Kloesel 6Ð3 6Ð3 Feb. 13, 2005: Midland, MI, USA $75K: Laura Granville (2) def. Yoon Jeong Cho (7) 6Ð3 3Ð6 7Ð6(8Ð6) Feb. 27, 2005: Saint Paul, MN, USA $50K: Laura Granville (2) def. Akiko Morigami (3) 6Ð2 6Ð7(6Ð8) 6Ð2 Feb.27, 2005: Bendigo, AUS $50K: Ye-Ra Lee (Q) def. Shayna McDowell 6Ð3 6Ð2 March 20, 2005: Orange, CA, USA $50K: Yoon Jeong Cho def. Julia Schruff 7Ð6(7Ð3) 6Ð1 April 10, 2005: Dinan, FRA $75K: Roberta Vinci (2) def. Zuzana Ondraskova (8) 7Ð5 7Ð5 April 24, 2005: Dothan, AL, USA $75K: Milagros Sequera (6) def. Varvara Lepchenko 2Ð6 6Ð2 6Ð4 May 1, 2005: Cagnes sur Mer, FRA $75K: Laura Pous Tio (8) def. Ekaterina Bychkova 7Ð6(7Ð4) 6Ð4 May 1, 2005: Lafayette, LA, USA $50K: Edina Gallovits (7) def. Olha Lazarchuk 6Ð2 7Ð6(8Ð6) May 8, 2005: Raleigh, NC, USA $75K: Olha Lazarchuk def. Mary Gambale 6Ð3 6Ð1 May 8, 2005: Gifu, JPN $50K: Saori Obata (4) def. Shiho Hisamatsu (6) 6Ð1 2Ð6 6Ð4 May 15, 2005: St. Gaudens, FRA $50K: Aravane Rezai def. Stephanie Gehrlein 6Ð4 2Ð6 6Ð2 May 15, 2005: Charlottesville, NC, USA $50K: Carly Gullickson def. Varvara Lepchenko (3) 6Ð4 6Ð4 May 15, 2005: Fukuoka, JPN $50K: Yung-Jan Chan def. Ayumi Morita 6Ð3 6Ð2 June 5, 2005: Prostejov, CZE $75K: Lucie Safarova (3) def. Tathiana Garbin (1) 7Ð6(7Ð0) 7Ð5 June 12, 2005: Zagreb, CRO $75K: Zuzana Ondraskova (1) def. Tszvetana Pironkova (Q) 4Ð6 6Ð4 6Ð3 June 12, 2005: Marseille, FRA $50K+H: Conchita Martinez Granados def. Marie-Eve Pelletier (5) 6Ð1 6Ð1 June 12, 2005: Beijing $50K I: Li Ting (4) def. Yan Zi (7) 6Ð1 6Ð3 July 3, 2005: Fano, ITA $75K: Kaia Kanepi def. Melinda Czink 3Ð6 6Ð1 7Ð5 July 3, 2005: Los Gatos, CA, USA $50K: Lindsay Lee-Waters (1) def. Carly Gullickson 6Ð4 6Ð0 July 10, 2005: Cuneo, ITA $50K+H: Laura Pous Tio (2) def. Conchita Martinez Granados 6Ð3 6Ð2 July 10, 2005: College Park, MD, USA $50K: Camille Pin (2) def. Ashley Harkleroad 2Ð6 6Ð2 6Ð3 July 17, 2005: Vittel, FRA $50K: Hanna Nooni def. Mathilde Johansson 6Ð2 6Ð2 July 17, 2005: Louisville, KY, USA $50K: Ashley Harkleroad def. Severine Beltrame (2) 4Ð6 7Ð5 6Ð0 July 24, 2005: Petange, LUX $50K: Victoria Azarenka def. Viktoriya Kutuzova (7) 6Ð4 6Ð2 July 31, 2005: Lexington, KY, USA $50K: Natalie Grandin def. Stephanie Dubois (8) 6-4 6-3 August 7, 2005: Washington, DC, USA $75K: Ashley Harkleroad (5) def. Olga Poutchkova 6Ð2 6Ð1 August 7, 2005: Martina Franca, ITA $50K: Nathalie Vierin def. Maret Ani (6) 6Ð3 6Ð4 August 14, 2005: Rimini, ITA $50K: Lourdes Dominguez Lino (1) def. Mariya Koryttseva 0Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð3 August 21, 2005: Bronx, NY, USA $50K: Sybille Bammer (6) def. Camille Pin (5) 3Ð6 6Ð4 6Ð4 Sept. 11, 2005: Denain, France $75K: Lioudmila Skavronskaia (Q) def. Arantxa Parra Santonja (1) 7Ð6(7Ð5) 6Ð0 Sept. 11, 2005 Beijing $50K II: Yuan Meng (3) def. Vilmarie Castellvi (2) 4Ð6 6Ð4 6Ð4 Sept. 18, 2005: Bordeaux, FRA $75K: Stephanie Foretz def. Lioudmila Skavronskaia (SE) 6Ð1 6Ð2 Sept. 25, 2005: Jounieh, LEB $75K+H: Mariya Koryttseva def. Lourdes Dominguez Lino (1) 7Ð5 7Ð5 Sept. 25, 2005: Albuquerque, NM, USA $75K: Anastastassia Rodionova def. Maureen Drake 6Ð2 6Ð3 Oct. 2, 2005: Biella, ITA $50K+H: Yulia Beygelzimer def. Giulia Gabba (Q) 6Ð2 6Ð4 Oct. 2, 2005: Ashland, KY, USA $50K: Napaporn Tongsalee def. Kristina Brandi (2) 6Ð4 2Ð6 6Ð4 Oct. 2, 2005: Batumi, GEO $50K: Anastasiya Yakimova (1) def. Ana Timotic 6Ð4 6Ð1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 42 Oct. 9, 2005: Barcelona, ESP $75K+H: Katerina Bohmova def. Maria Sanchez Lorenzo (2) 3Ð6 6Ð3 7Ð5 Oct. 9, 2005: Troy, ALA, USA $50K: Ahsha Rolle (6) def. Maria Kondratieva 6Ð1 7Ð5 Oct. 9, 2005: Juarez, MEX $50K; Olga Blahotova (3) def. Frederica Piedade (1) 7Ð6(7Ð2) 6Ð2 Oct. 16, 2005: San Francisco, CA, USA $50K: Kristina Brandi (1) def. Lilia Osterloh (7) 5Ð7 6Ð4 6Ð4 Oct. 16, 2005: Touraine, FRA $50K 2005: Emilie Loit (2) def. Jelena Kostanic (1) 6Ð2 6Ð1 Oct. 23, 2005: Saint-Raphael, FRA $50K 2005: Maret Ani def. Mara Santangelo (5) 6Ð3 7Ð5 Oct. 23, 2005: Houston, TX, USA $50K 2005: Amy Frazier (1) def. Anda Perianu 6Ð3 3Ð6 6Ð4 Nov. 6, 2005: Busan, KOR $50K 2005: So-Jung Kim def. Alla Kudryavtseva 3Ð6 6Ð1 6Ð2 Nov. 13, 2005: Pittsburg, PA, USA $75K: Lilia Osterloh (Q) def. Galina Voskoboeva 7Ð6(7Ð5) 6Ð4 Nov. 13, 2005: Shenzhen, CHN $50K: Tamarine Tanasugarn (3) def. Miho Saeki 6Ð2 6Ð4

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 43 Cheap Thrills and Tough Bills: Titles against Weak and Strong Opposition It’s one thing to win a title. It’s another to win a title against major opposition. The lists below classify tournament wins based on the level of opposition the winner faced (note: for brevity, titles are listed only once. So a player who won without facing a Top Fifteen player also obviously won without facing a Top Ten player, etc.): Won Title Beating at Least Two Top Ten Players (Total of 9): Australian Open: S. Williams Antwerp: Mauresmo Indian Wells: Clijsters Miami: Clijsters Charleston: Hénin-Hardenne Roland Garros: Hénin-Hardenne Wimbledon: V. Williams U. S. Open: Clijsters Los Angeles Champ.: Mauresmo Won Title Beating One Top Ten Player (Total of 18): Pan Pacific: Sharapova Paris: Safina Doha: Sharapova Amelia Island: Davenport Warsaw: Hénin-Hardenne Berlin: Hénin-Hardenne Rome: Mauresmo Eastbourne: Clijsters Stanford: Clijsters Los Angeles: Clijsters Canadian Open: Clijsters New Haven: Davenport Beijing: Kirilenko Filderstadt: Davenport Bangkok: Vaidisova Zürich: Davenport Linz: Petrova Philadelphia: Mauresmo Won Title Without Facing a Top Ten Player (Total of 6): Dubai: Davenport (Top Opponent: Schnyder/#14) San Diego: Pierce (Top Opponent: Schnyder/#11) Stockholm: Srebotnik (Top Opponent: Myskina/#14) Luxembourg: Clijsters (Top Opponent: Déchy/#15) Hasselt: Clijsters (Top Opponent: Schiavone/#15) Quebec City: Frazier (Top Opponent: Déchy/#13) Won Title Without Facing a Top Fifteen Player (Total of 5): Sydney: Molik (Top Opponent: Schiavone/#18) Strasbourg: Medina Garrigues (Top Opponent: Déchy/#16) Birmingham: Sharapova (Top Opponent: Golovin/#19) Seoul: Vaidisova (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#17) Moscow: Pierce (Top Opponent: Likhovtseva/#16) Won Title Without Facing a Top Twenty Player (Total of 4): Gold Coast: Schnyder (Top Opponent: Golovin/#27) Modena: Smashnova (Top Opponent: Pennetta/#28) Bali: Davenport (Top Opponent: Schiavone/#38) Japan Open: Vaidisova (Top Opponent: Golovin/#25) Won Title Without Facing a Top Thirty Player (Total of 11): Auckland: Srebotnik (Top Opponent: Asagoe/#37) Hobart: Zheng (Top Opponent: Asagoe/#33) Canberra: Ivanovic (Top Opponent: Bartoli/#40) Memphis: Zvonareva (Top Opponent: Shaughnessy/#41) Estoril: Safarova (Top Opponent: Dulko/#39) Istanbul: V. Williams (Top Opponent: Vaidisova/#39) ’s-Hertogenbosch: Koukalova (Top Opponent: Domachowska/#48) Palermo: Medina Garrigues (Top Opponent: Koukalova/#39) Forest Hills: Safarova (Top Opponent: Smashnova/#45) Portoroz: Koukalova (Top Opponent: Srebotnik/#49) GuangZhou: Yan (Top Opponent: Li Na/#42) Won Title Without Facing a Top Fifty Player (Total of 10): Pattaya City: Martinez (Top Opponent: Grönefeld/#58) Hyderabad: Mirza (Top Opponent: Zheng/#61) Bogota: Pennetta (Top Opponent: Strycova/#66) Acapulco: Pennetta (Top Opponent: Diaz-Oliva/#90) Rabat: Llagostera Vives (Top Opponent: Zheng/#65) Prague: Safina (Top Opponent: Benesova/#59) Cincinnati: Schnyder (Top Opponent: Peer/#66) Budapest: Smashnova (Top Opponent: Kostanic/#70) Kolkata: Myskina (Top Opponent: Sprem/#81) Tashkent: Krajicek (Top Opponent: Bychkova/#72

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 44 Number of Tournament Wins for Highlight Players The following table shows tournament wins by the highlight players. Tournaments are categorized as major (Tier II or higher) or minor (Tier III or lower). The tournaments are listed, with their tier, on the next line. Highlight players with no titles were (those marked * ended the year in the Top 25): Shinobu Asagoe, Marion Bartoli, Elena Bovina, (Jennifer Capriati), Anna Chakvetadze, Nathalie Déchy*, Elena Dementieva*, Jelena Dokic, Gisela Dulko, Silvia Farina Elia, Tatiana Golovin*, Anna-Lena Grönefeld*, Daniela Hantuchova*, Martina Hingis, Jelena Jankovic*, Svetlana Kuznetsova*, Elena Likhovtseva*, Evgenia Linetskaya, Magdalena Maleeva, (Kveta Peschke), Lisa Raymond, Chanda Rubin, Francesca Schiavone*, Meghann Shaughnessy, Karolina Sprem, Paola Suárez, Ai Sugiyama, and Fabiola Zuluaga. Kveta Peschke is a sort of special case; she did not win a title in 2005, but did win a Challenger (Deauville $50K 2004) in the course of this WTA year. Dementieva is the only Top Ten player without a title. Non-highlight players with titles were: Klara Koukalova (’s-Hertogenbosch, Portoroz), Michaella Krajicek (Tashkent; also Bergamo $50K 2004, Ortisei $75K), Nuria Llagostera Vives (Rabat), Sania Mirza (Hyderabad), Lucie Safarova (Estoril, Forest Hills; also Prostejov $75K), Yan Zi (GuangZhou), and Zheng Jie (Hobart). Koukalova and Safarova were the only players with multiple titles to end up outside the Top 25. Every player who won a Tier II or higher, except Alicia Molik who was sick for much of the year, ended the year in the Top 25.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 45 Rank Name Major Wins Minor Wins Total Wins Clijsters 8 1 9 Indian Wells (I), Miami (I), Eastbourne (II), Stanford (II), Los Angeles (II), Canadian Open (I), U. S. Open (Slam), Luxembourg (II), Hasselt (III) Davenport 5 1 6 Dubai (II), Amelia Island (II), New Haven (II), Bali (III), Filderstadt (II), Zürich (I) Frazier 1 (1 Challenger) 1 [Houston $50K], Quebec City (III) Hénin-Hardenne 4 0 4 Charleston (I), Warsaw (II), Berlin (I), Roland Garros (Slam) Ivanovic 0 1 1 Canberra (V) Kirilenko 1 0 1 Beijing (II) Martinez 0 1 1 Pattaya City (III) Mauresmo 4 0 4 Antwerp (II), Rome (I), Philadelphia (II), Los Angeles Championships (Champ) Medina Garrigues 0 2 2 Strasbourg (III), Palermo (IV) Molik 1 0 1 Sydney (II) Myskina 0 1 1 Kolkata (III) Pennetta 0 2 2 Bogota (III), Acapulco (III) Petrova 1 0 1 Linz (II) Pierce 2 0 2 San Diego (I), Moscow (I) Saﬁna 1 1 2 Paris (II), Prague (IV) Schnyder 0 2 2 Gold Coast (III), Cincinnati (III) Sharapova 2 1 3 Pan Paciﬁc (I), Doha (II), Birmingham (III) Smashnova 0 2 2 Modena (IV), Budapest (IV) Srebotnik 0 2 2 Auckland (V), Stockholm (IV) Vaidisova 0 3 0 Seoul (IV), Japan Open (III), Bangkok (III) Williams, Serena 1 0 1 Australian Open (Slam) Williams, Venus 1 1 2 Strasbourg (III), Wimbledon (Slam) Zvonareva 0 1 1 Memphis (III)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 46 Fraction of Tournaments Won Sorted in descending order of percent won. Includes all Top Thirty players, plus all players with WTA titles. Note that Challenger wins do not count as titles but do count as events (e.g. Peschke won Deauville but has 0 titles listed). WTA Rank Player Tournaments Played Tournaments Won Percent Won 2Kim Clijsters 17 9 53% 6 Justine Hénin-Hardenne 9 4 44% 1 Lindsay Davenport 16 6 38% 3 Amélie Mauresmo 19 4 21% 4Maria Sharapova 15 3 20% 15 Nicole Vaidisova 17 3 18% 10 Venus Williams 12 2 17% 5Mary Pierce 14 2 14% 43 Anna Smashnova 18 2 11% 11 Serena Williams 10 1 10% 50 Lucie Safarova 21 2 10% 20 Dinara Saﬁna 21 2 10% 28 Katarina Srebotnik 21 2 10% 36 Klara Koukalova 23 2 9% 23 Flavia Pennetta 24 2 8% 34 Anabel Medina Garrigues 26 2 8% 7Patty Schnyder 26 2 8% 58 Michaella Krajicek 14 1 7% 103 Yan Zi 14 1 7% 29 Alicia Molik 15 1 7% 16 Ana Ivanovic 16 1 6% 44 Zheng Jie 18 1 6% 55 Amy Frazier 19 1 5% 14 Anastasia Myskina 19 1 5% 32 Conchita Martinez 20 1 5% 31 Sania Mirza 22 1 5% 42 Vera Zvonareva 22 1 5% 49 Nuria Llagostera Vives 25 1 4% 9Nadia Petrova 25 1 4% 25 Maria Kirilenko 26 1 4% 18 Svetlana Kuznetsova 17 0 0% 8 Elena Dementieva 20 0 0% 24 Tatiana Golovin 22 0 0% 17 Elena Likhovtseva 22 0 0% 13 Francesca Schiavone 22 0 0% 27 Gisela Dulko 23 0 0% 19 Daniela Hantuchova 25 0 0% 26 Kveta (Hrdlickova) Peschke 25 0 0% 12 Nathalie Déchy 26 0 0% 30 Ai Sugiyama 27 0 0% 21 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 28 0 0% 22 Jelena Jankovic 29 0 0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 47 Tiers of Tournaments Played and Average Tier The goal of this statistic is to determine just how “rich” each player’s schedule was, expressed as a number correlating with the tier. The Slams and the Los Angeles Championships are treated mathematically as “Tier 0,” while Challengers are “Tier 8.” That is, in taking the mean (average), we assign 0 points for playing a Slam or the Championships, 1 point for a Tier I, 2 for a Tier II, etc. The lower the mean and median strength, the tougher one’s schedule.) In each category, we list the number of events the player played at that level, and then the percentage of her total she played at that level. So Asagoe, for instance, played four Slams, and twenty-five total events, so the four Slams are 16% of the events she played this year. The mean is, of course, the “average” Tier of tournament played, based on the above formula. Looking at the results on the next page, we see that the Top Five in terms of strongest (highest average tier) schedules were Mary Pierce and Justine Hénin-Hardenne, who managed the astonishing feat of playing more events above the Tier I level than below (which is really too strong a schedule for the health of the Tour; the author would consider an average tier of 1.3 to be about right), followed by Svetlana Kuznetsova, Maria Sharapova, and Fabiola Zuluaga of all people; Serena Williams, who has led the list in the two previous years, is #6. The weakest schedules were played by Peschke, Frazier, Grönefeld, Kirilenko, and Smashnova, who spent most of the year with relatively low rankings; the weakest schedules by players who were Top 30 for most of the year were Farina Elia and Schiavone. If we wish to look at the “typical” player, based on the listed players, we find that she played 18.6% of her events at Slams, 0.9% at the Championships, 30.1% at the Tier I events, 32.0% at the Tier II level, 11.7% at the Tier III level, 5.5% at the Tier IV level, and 124% at the Challenger level. The table below shows how many events would be “expected” of a player with 6, 8, 10, 12, events, etc. Note that, once we get to 26 events, players are “expected” to play five Slams, which is obviously impossible; players’ schedules inevitably get weaker as they play more events. Events Expected Expected Expected Expected Expected Expected Expected Played: Slams Champ Tier I Tier II Tier III Tier IV Challengers 6 1022100 8 1023100 10 2033110 12 2044110 14 3044210 16 3055210 18 3056210 20 4066210 22 4077310 24 4078310 26 5088310 28 5089320 30 60910420 We can, incidentally, determine who has the most and least deviant schedules on this basis. (The method used, for those who care, is RMS distance: Square root of the sum of the squares of the fraction of events played at each tier divided by the average fraction of events played at each tier.) By this standard, the most deviant schedule was turned in by Peschke (all those Challengers), followed by Frazier (Challengers again), Pierce (because she has so few low-tier events), Sharapova, and Davenport. The players with the most typical schedules were Myskina (who was most typical in 2003 also, and third on the list in 2004), Jankovic, Golovin, Asagoe, and Sugiyama (who was most typical in 2004). But enough of this. The actual data follows:

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 48 Slams Champ Tier I Tier II Tier III Tier IV Chall Total Mean Shinobu Asagoe 4 (16%) 8 (32%) 7 (28%) 4 (16%) 2 (8%) 25 1.68 Marion Bartoli 4 (16%) 4 (16%) 8 (32%) 5 (20%) 4 (16%) 25 2.04 Elena Bovina 1 (13%) 4 (50%) 3 (38%) 8 1.25 Anna Chakvetadze 4 (17%) 7 (30%) 9 (39%) 3 (13%) 23 1.48 Kim Clijsters 3 (18%) 1 (6%) 5 (29%) 7 (41%) 1 (6%) 17 1.29 Lindsay Davenport 4 (25%) 1 (6%) 4 (25%) 6 (38%) 1 (6%) 16 1.19 Nathalie Déchy 4 (15%) 8 (31%) 10 (38%) 4 (15%) 26 1.54 Elena Dementieva 4 (20%) 1 (5%) 8 (40%) 6 (30%) 1 (5%) 20 1.15 Gisela Dulko 4 (17%) 7 (30%) 6 (26%) 3 (13%) 3 (13%) 23 1.74 Silvia Farina Elia 4 (17%) 4 (17%) 9 (39%) 3 (13%) 3 (13%) 23 1.87 Amy Frazier 4 (21%) 4 (21%) 4 (21%) 3 (16%) 2 (11%) 2 (11%) 19 2.37 Tatiana Golovin 4 (18%) 7 (32%) 6 (27%) 4 (18%) 1 (5%) 22 1.59 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 4 (14%) 8 (29%) 6 (21%) 6 (21%) 2 (7%) 2 (7%) 28 2.21 Daniela Hantuchova 4 (16%) 8 (32%) 11 (44%) 2 (8%) 25 1.44 Justine Hénin-Hardenne 3 (33%) 4 (44%) 2 (22%) 9 0.89 Ana Ivanovic 4 (25%) 5 (31%) 6 (38%) 1 (6%) 16 1.31 Jelena Jankovic 4 (14%) 10 (34%) 11 (38%) 2 (7%) 2 (7%) 29 1.59 Maria Kirilenko 4 (15%) 8 (31%) 7 (27%) 4 (15%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 26 2.08 Svetlana Kuznetsova 4 (24%) 9 (53%) 4 (24%) 17 1.00 Elena Likhovtseva 4 (18%) 9 (41%) 7 (32%) 2 (9%) 22 1.32 Magdalena Maleeva 4 (20%) 5 (25%) 10 (50%) 1 (5%) 20 1.40 Conchita Martinez 4 (20%) 7 (35%) 7 (35%) 2 (10%) 20 1.35 Amélie Mauresmo 4 (21%) 1 (5%) 7 (37%) 7 (37%) 19 1.11 Anabel Medina Garrigues 4 (15%) 7 (27%) 8 (31%) 3 (12%) 4 (15%) 26 1.85 Alicia Molik 2 (13%) 3 (20%) 8 (53%) 2 (13%) 15 1.67 Anastasia Myskina 4 (21%) 6 (32%) 7 (37%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 19 1.42 Flavia Pennetta 4 (17%) 8 (33%) 5 (21%) 4 (17%) 3 (13%) 24 1.75 Kveta (Hrdlickova) Peschke 4 (16%) 6 (24%) 7 (28%) 2 (8%) 2 (8%) 4 (16%) 25 2.64 Nadia Petrova 4 (16%) 1 (4%) 8 (32%) 9 (36%) 3 (12%) 25 1.40 Mary Pierce 4 (29%) 1 (7%) 6 (43%) 3 (21%) 14 0.86 Lisa Raymond 4 (20%) 5 (25%) 9 (45%) 2 (10%) 20 1.45 Dinara Safina 4 (19%) 6 (29%) 5 (24%) 3 (14%) 3 (14%) 21 1.76 Francesca Schiavone 4 (18%) 6 (27%) 8 (36%) 2 (9%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 22 1.82 Patty Schnyder 4 (15%) 1 (4%) 7 (27%) 11 (42%) 3 (12%) 26 1.46 Maria Sharapova 4 (27%) 1 (7%) 6 (40%) 3 (20%) 1 (7%) 15 1.00 Anna Smashnova 4 (22%) 3 (17%) 4 (22%) 2 (11%) 5 (28%) 18 2.06 Karolina Sprem 4 (17%) 7 (29%) 8 (33%) 5 (21%) 24 1.58 Katarina Srebotnik 4 (19%) 5 (24%) 5 (24%) 2 (10%) 5 (24%) 21 1.95 Paola Suárez 1 (14%) 3 (43%) 2 (29%) 1 (14%) 7 1.43 Ai Sugiyama 4 (15%) 8 (30%) 9 (33%) 5 (19%) 1 (4%) 27 1.67 Nicole Vaidisova 4 (24%) 4 (24%) 2 (12%) 5 (29%) 2 (12%) 17 1.82 Serena Williams 3 (30%) 3 (30%) 4 (40%) 10 1.10 Venus Williams 4 (33%) 2 (17%) 5 (42%) 1 (8%) 12 1.25 Fabiola Zuluaga 3 (23%) 7 (54%) 2 (15%) 1 (8%) 13 1.08

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 49 Points Earned Week by Week The table shows the week-by-week point totals earned by the Top Twenty. Points for winning events in bold C D D D H H I K L M M P P S S S S V S V L A É E A É V U I A Y E I A C C H A W W I V C M N N A Z K U S T E F H H A I I I J E H E T I N N H R K R R I I N R D L L S N Y N U N O E O E I O C N A Y A I L L week T P T C - V T V S N V E A V D P S I I of E O I H H I S T M A A O E O O A A 12/20/04 7 1/8 1 26 38 39 155 1/15 72 40 133 29 108.5 1 168 18 1 87 34 1/30 662 564 136 72 94 210 72 218 106 138 2 48 84 268 470 106 1208 160 2/6 270 79 83 154 87 448 2/13 40 202 102 35 306 53 2/20 99 1 19.75 331 119 35 40 15969 192 2/27 148 33 100 1 95 33 283 3/6 268 35 115 15.75 129 64 1 163 146 1 3/20 527 342 101 220 32 95 1 36 59 128 32 1 190 59 4/3 611 38 129 1 136 171 57 76 202 70 1 13632308 59 116 230 4/10 304 50 29 141 30 33 74 65 4/17 78 269 514 1 19333 159 145 50 4/24 5/1 135 72 26 299 174 198 53 1 50 5/8 56 1 1 471 1 98 27 95 1 324 73 40 211 93 5/15 1117311419 44 56 115 161 313 203 1 5/22 67 107 144 6/5 148 264 80 122 72 1084 364 106 470 64 2 420 894 2 156 122 222 40 84 6/12 1 184 13 6/18 294 66 1 1 1211157 34 46 1 7/3 116 790 118 126 92 2 84 230 168 440 320 198 258 7222476 80 68 1120 7/10 7/17 28 7/24 65 142 7/31 286 165 57 29 111 203 8/7 106 65 1 35 57 50 1 405 56 47 100 8/14 303 114 186 1 81 72 37 123 72 8/22 410 35 1 307 60 57 196 173 95 35 114 46 8/28 309 1 64 92 35 190 35 9/11 1022 284 128 640 68 122 40 2 192 274 80 224 834 280172 442 130 138 322 9/18 182 161 78 9/25 63 132 108 1 57 10/02 291 119 74 59 100 67 1 150 10/9 63 356 64 204 165 1 1 44 263 80 113 33 44 52 176 10/16 1 180 102 128 1 93 107 396 258 351 57 98 194 10/23 424 77 110 57 191 111208 52 128 279 10/30 198 44 1 69 121 1 256 84 107 191 11/6 63 154 280 95 104 11/13 164 304 67 719 133 613 164 361

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 50 Tournament Results (Points Earned), Sorted from Most to Least The table below sorts the results for the Top Twenty from most points per tournament to least. Thus, the row labelled “1” lists each player’s best result, the row “2” lists the next-best, and so on. The seventeenth tournament (the last to count toward the WTA rankings) is highlighted. T C D D D H H I K L M M P P S S S S V S V o L A É E A É V U I A Y E I A C C H A W W u I V C M N N A Z K U S T E F H H A I I I r J E H E T I N N H R K R R I I N R D L L n S N Y N U N O E O E I O C N A Y A I L L T P T C - V T V S N V E A V D P S I I # E O I H H I S T M A A O E O O A A 1 1022 790 564 640 186 1084 364 230 470 719 320 420 894 306 351 313 476 194 1208 1120 2 611 662 128 269 165 514 191 210 192 440 208 324 834 258 161 279 470 176 146 322 3 527 424 119 220 148 471 174 198 168 419 173 256 613 115 161 268 448 150 138 230 4 410 356 118 204 115 307 171 154 128 331 132 224 405 100 156 211 442 145 116 203 5 303 342 101 180 92 299 121 121 87 280 119 198 396 84 128 191 361 130 74 192 6 294 309 80 154 92 136 108.5 106 76 274 106 141 258 72 123 172 308 114 68 160 7 291 304 77 136 87 122 94 102 72 263 93 138 128 56 107 164 283 107 53 144 8 286 304 72 133 74 2 84 98 63 218 81 133 73 53 95 163 222 106 46 84 9 198 284 67 129 72 1 73 95 50 202 80 113 56 48 84 159 203 104 1 65 10 164 270 66 126 72 60 57 50 202 80 107 40 46 80 155 190 80 1 57 11 148 268 65 122 69 40 57 44 196 70 102 35 40 67 142 184 69 50 12 135 264 65 114 68 33 57 35 190 64 95 33 39 47 122 108 59 1 13 116 182 64 110 65 19.75 229100 57 95 30 37 44 111 98 59 14 106 78 63 79 57 15.75 1279529 93 2 35 36 100 93 40 15 99 72 44 67 57 1 1 26 64 2 72 33 29 87 72 34 16 63 1406435 1 1136168 32 28 78 13 17 56 40 1 32 1 1 1 1 59 18 7 59 1 18 38 1 29 11159 2257 19 35 1 26 11152 2152 20 35 1 1 1 44 1 1 50 21 1 1 1 38 1135 22 1 1 1 35 133 23 1 1 34 33 24 1 1 1 32 25 1 1 1 2 26 1 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 51 Alternate Rankings 2006 will see the WTA make a dramatic change in its ranking system, eliminating the “quality points” players earned for beating high-ranked opponents. My ears are still spouting steam over this. It should be recalled that the purpose of the rankings is to grant admission to tournaments, and to seed the players who play them. This means that the goal of the system should be to most accurately predict who will win particular matches and events. This is simple mathematical truth. Obviously there is an upper bound on how complicated such a system can be; the players have to understand it. But it is noteworthy that a slight increase in complexity can produce a dramatic improvement in accuracy — and a slight decrease in complexity can dramatically reduce the predictive power of the system. The elimination of quality points decreases the complexity only slightly — the rankings before the change were not difficult to calculate — but past Statistical Abstracts have shown that quality points are the strongest predictive aspect of the rankings. Eliminating quality points, therefore, will reduce the ability of the rankings to predict future events. In other words, the WTA is deliberately making its rankings less capable of actually ranking the players. But while the author finds it hard to imagine anything more boneheaded than altering the ranking system to be deliberately less accurate (while conceding that the WTA is much, much more original than the author when it comes to being boneheaded), it does bring out a point: There is absolutely nothing magic about the WTA’s 2005 ranking system — indeed, about the only good thing one can say about it is that it was better than the 2006 ranking system. At best, the WTA’s best 17 system emphasizes a certain sort of results — in particular, the ability to play a lot. This is surely not the only thing we want to study. If we want to fully explore a player’s success, we need more. Even a more accurate ranking system, such as the ELO rankings used in chess, is only a single number. Players are multi-dimensional creatures; we can much better describe them by using several measures. (And then, perhaps, conflating them into a Grand Combined Ranking.) This section of alternate rankings does that: We slice the data other ways, emphasizing particular strenths and weaknesses. For example, the 2005 ranking system is “Best 17”: Players earn points at every event (“round points” based on the round they reach, plus the quality points for the players they beat). The WTA sorts their point totals and adds up their seventeen highest scores in the last year. Alternate rankings calculate points differently, or total them differently, or something. A typical way to create alternate rankings would be to use some of the WTA’s earlier ranking systems, such as “Best Infinity”: This system adds up the total points from all the tournaments a player played, whether the number of events be 9 (for Justine Hénin-Hardenne) or 29 (for Jelena Jankovic). It is essentially the system used by the WTA in 1997, except that the round point table has been repeatedly changed since then.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 52 Total Points Ranking (1997 Ranking System) Total Points Rank Player Total Tournaments WTA Rank 1Davenport 4910 16 1 2 Clijsters 4829 17 2 3Mauresmo 4032 19 3 4 Sharapova 3958 15 4 5 Pierce 3797 14 5 6 Schnyder 3069 26 7 7 Hénin-Hardenne 2936 9 6 8 Petrova 2902 25 9 9 Dementieva 2751 20 8 10 Williams, Venus 2628 12 10 11 Déchy 1887 26 12 12 Williams, Serena 1851 10 11 13 Schiavone 1710 22 13 14 Myskina 1618 19 14 15 Vaidisova 1581 17 15 16 Ivanovic 1551 16 16 17 Hantuchova 1547 25 19 18 Likhovtseva 1524 22 17 19 Kuznetsova 1491 17 18 20 Grönefeld 1437.5 27 21 21 Saﬁna 1378 21 20 22 Jankovic 1333 29 22 23 Pennetta 1248 24 23 24 Golovin 1200 22 24 25 Kirilenko 1137 26 25 Dulko 1065 23 27 Peschke 1050.75 25 26 Sugiyama 1024.5 27 30 Srebotnik 1001.75 21 28 Molik 996 15 29 Farina Elia 972 23 — Martinez 928 20 32 Chakvetadze 924.25 23 33 Medina Garrigues 912.75 26 34 Asagoe 884 25 38 Peng 883.5 16 37 Bartoli 804.75 25 40 Zvonareva 764 22 42 Smashnova 745 18 43 Maleeva 651 20 52 Best 17 usually not differ much from Total Points (note that the first player to move more than one spot is #17/#19 Hantuchova), but there are some noticeable differences this year, because we have a few players who played an incredible number of events and others who hardly played at all: We have a change at #6, where Patty Schnyder supplants Justine Hénin-Hardenne; at #8, where Nadia Petrova overtakes Elena Dementieva, and at #11, where Nathalie Déchy moves past Serena Williams. We also see Anna-Lena Grönefeld in the Top 20 rather than Dinara Safina.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 53 If Best 17 and Total Score rankings are almost identical (since both are additive rankings), the same is not true when either is compared with the WTA’s 1996 ranking system, Points per Tournament (minimum 14). Here the rankings are completely different. Scores are rounded to the nearest tenth of a point. Since this system is the best the WTA has used in recent memory, we’ll do the entire Top 50 plus all our highlight players: Points Per Tournament, Minimum 14 (1996 Ranking System: “The Divisor”) 1996 Ranking Name Total Points Tournaments Score WTA Rank 1Davenport 4910 16 306.9 1 2Clijsters 4829 17 284.1 2 3 Pierce 3797 14 271.2 5 4 Sharapova 3958 15 263.9 4 5Mauresmo 4032 19 212.2 3 6Hénin-Hardenne 2936 9 209.7 6 7Williams, Venus 2628 12 187.7 10 8Dementieva 2751 20 137.6 8 9Williams, Serena 1851 10 132.2 11 10 Schnyder 3069 26 118.0 7 11 Petrova 2902 25 116.1 9 12 Ivanovic 1551 16 96.9 16 13 Vaidisova 1581 17 93.0 15 14 Kuznetsova 1491 17 87.7 18 15 Myskina 1618 19 85.2 14 16 Schiavone 1710 22 77.7 13 17 Déchy 1887 26 72.6 12 18 Likhovtseva 1524 22 69.3 17 19 Molik 996 15 66.4 29 20 Safina 1378 21 65.6 20 21 Hantuchova 1547 25 61.9 19 22 Karatantcheva 902.25 16 56.4 36 23 Peng 883.5 16 55.2 37 24 Golovin 1200 22 54.5 24 25 Pennetta 1248 24 52.0 23 26 Grönefeld 1437.5 28 51.3 21 27 Srebotnik 1001.75 21 47.7 28 28 Martinez 928 20 46.4 32 29 Dulko 1065 23 46.3 27 30 Jankovic 1333 29 46.0 22 31 Kirilenko 1137 26 43.7 25 32 Mirza 935.75 22 42.5 31 33 Farina Elia 972 23 42.3 — 34 Peschke 1050.75 25 42.0 26 35 Dushevina 837.25 20 41.9 39 36 Smashnova 745 18 41.4 43 37 Zheng 740.75 18 41.2 44 38 Chakvetadze 924.25 23 40.2 33

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 54 39 Bovina 558 8 39.9 62 40 Koukalova 890.75 23 38.7 36 Sugiyama 1024.5 27 37.9 30 Asagoe 884 25 35.4 38 Medina Garrigues 912.75 26 35.1 34 Vinci 769 22 35.0 41 Zvonareva 764 22 34.7 42 Linetskaya 640 19 33.7 53 Frazier 636.5 19 33.5 55 Peer 761.75 23 33.1 45 Maleeva 651 20 32.6 52 Bartoli 804.75 25 32.2 40 Safarova 664.75 21 31.7 50 Morigami 678.25 22 30.8 48 Zuluaga 415 13 29.6 84 Stosur 702.25 24 29.3 46 Llagostera Vives 700.5 25 28.0 49 Craybas 717 30 23.9 47 Raymond 467.5 20 23.4 76 Sprem 541.25 24 22.6 65 Shaughnessy 541.75 25 21.7 66 Suárez 132 7 9.4 232 Dokic 69.25 10 4.9 351 Rubin 27 3 1.9 546 Most years, this ranking produces big changes; there have been years (e.g. 1998, 2001) when it changed the top ranking — and most people seem to think it was right in those years, or at least the latter. The divisor consistently changes the Top Ten. This time, the Top Two stay unchanged, but note that Mary Pierce moves all the way up to #3, with Amélie Mauresmo falling to #5. Venus Williams rises from #10 to #7, and Serena Williams moves from #11 to #9, knocking Nadia Petrova out of the Top Ten. The two fast-rising youngsters, Ana Ivanovic and Nicole Vaidisova, also gain, and the injured Alicia Molik does not suffer as much as she did under the WTA ranking system.. On the other hand, we see that Nathalie Déchy and Ai Sugiyama and Jill Craybas are significantly over-ranked. But the divisor has a problem: Players these days are expected to play at least 17 events (both by the ranking system and the Gold Exempt rules) — meaning they must play more weak events. The Williams Sisters, even when healthy, ignored this, but most players try to 17 events. We should perhaps adjust the divisor accordingly. So we offer the “modern divisor”: same as the above, but a minimum divisor of 17. Points Per Tournament, Minimum 17 (“Modernized Divisor”) ModDiv Rank Name Total Points Tournaments Score WTA Rank 1Davenport 4910 16 288.8 1 2 Clijsters 4829 17 284.1 2 3 Sharapova 3958 15 232.8 4 4 Pierce 3797 14 223.4 5 5Mauresmo 4032 19 212.2 3 6 Hénin-Hardenne 2936 9 172.7 6 7Williams, Venus 2628 12 154.6 10 8 Dementieva 2751 20 137.6 8

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 55 9 Schnyder 3069 26 118.0 7 10 Petrova 2902 25 116.1 9 11 Williams, Serena 1851 10 108.9 11 12 Vaidisova 1581 17 93.0 15 13 Ivanovic 1551 16 91.2 16 14 Kuznetsova 1491 17 87.7 18 15 Myskina 1618 19 85.2 14 16 Schiavone 1710 22 77.7 13 17 Déchy 1887 26 72.6 12 18 Likhovtseva 1524 22 69.3 17 19 Saﬁna 1378 21 65.6 20 20 Hantuchova 1547 25 61.9 19 21 Molik 996 15 58.6 29 22 Golovin 1200 22 54.5 24 23 Karatantcheva 902.25 16 53.1 36 24 Pennetta 1248 24 52.0 23 25 Peng 883.5 16 52.0 37 26 Grönefeld 1437.5 28 51.3 21 27 Srebotnik 1001.75 21 47.7 28 28 Martinez 928 20 46.4 32 29 Dulko 1065 23 46.3 27 30 Jankovic 1333 29 46.0 22 31 Kirilenko 1137 26 43.7 25 32 Mirza 935.75 22 42.5 31 33 Farina Elia 972 23 42.3 — 34 Peschke 1050.75 25 42.0 26 35 Dushevina 837.25 20 41.9 39 36 Smashnova 745 18 41.4 43 37 Zheng 740.75 18 41.2 44 38 Chakvetadze 924.25 23 40.2 33 39 Koukalova 890.75 23 38.7 36 40 Sugiyama 1024.5 27 37.9 30 Asagoe 884 25 35.4 38 Medina Garrigues 912.75 26 35.1 34 Vinci 769 22 35.0 41 Zvonareva 764 22 34.7 42 Linetskaya 640 19 33.7 53 Frazier 636.5 19 33.5 55 Peer 761.75 23 33.1 45 Bovina 558 8 32.8 62 Maleeva 651 20 32.6 52 Bartoli 804.75 25 32.2 40 Safarova 664.75 21 31.7 50 Raymond 467.5 20 23.4 76 Sprem 541.25 24 22.6 65 Shaughnessy 541.75 25 21.7 66 Suárez 132 7 7.8 232 This ranking typically resembles the preceding except that injured players lose ground. So it is here; note, e.g. that Serena Williams back out of the Top Ten and Alicia Molik out of the Top 20..

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 56 Best 14 The WTA uses the “Best 17” ranking system — totalling the points earned in the seventeen tournaments where one earned the most points. For most of the Nineties, the ATP uses the related “Best 14” system — the total points earned in one’s best fourteen events. If applied to the WTA, the result would be as follows: Best 14 Rank Name Best 14 Total WTA Rank 1Davenport 4837 1 2 Clijsters 4611 2 3Mauresmo 3929 3 4 Sharapova 3886 4 5 Pierce 3797 5 6 Hénin-Hardenne 2936 6 7Williams, Venus 2628 10 8 Dementieva 2616 8 9 Schnyder 2550 7 10 Petrova 2439 9 11 Williams, Serena 1851 11 12 Déchy 1649 12 13 Schiavone 1640 13 14 Myskina 1612 14 15 Ivanovic 1549 16 16 Vaidisova 1533 15 17 Likhovtseva 1491 17 18 Kuznetsova 1488 18 19 Hantuchova 1362 19 20 Grönefeld 1296 21 Saﬁna 1289 20 Jankovic 1218 22 Pennetta 1182 23 Golovin 1163 24 Kirilenko 1042.5 25 Molik 995 29 Srebotnik 994.75 28 Peschke 978 26 Farina Elia 963 — Dulko 928 27 Sugiyama 923.5 30 Martinez 920 32 Chakvetadze 898.25 33 Medina Garrigues 877 34 Asagoe 873 38 Bartoli 781.75 40 Zvonareva 756 42 Smashnova 741 43 Maleeva 645 52 Theoretically, this isn’t very different from Best 17, but the effects have differed over time. This year, the ﬁrst change is at #7. In 2004, we had a change as high as #4. In 2003, Best 14 and Best 17 produced the same Top Eight — but in 2001, the difference affected the #1 ranking; Jennifer Capriati rather than Lindsay Davenport would have been on top. This is the ultimate problem with best-however-many rankings: If the number of events is high, it rewards players who play a lot, whether they have consistently good results or not; if the number is low; it rewards a few big results over consistency.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 57 Slotted Best 18 (ATP Entry Rank) This is the men’s “ranking” system. I put “ranking” in quotes because of several complications — the most notable being the discontinuity (top players are expected to play Masters Series events, while lower-ranked players need not). It’s very hard to rank on this system if players aren’t playing to it. But anyway.... The ATP system counts a player’s results in Slams, Masters Series (equivalent to the WTA’s Tier I events), and five other events, plus the year-end Championships if qualified. In the table, “Slam Points, LA Champ Points, Tier I Points” refer to what the players earned at those “Required” events; “Optional Points” are what the players earned in their five best other events (Note: The WTA has ten, not nine, Tier I events. We’ll count all ten). The last column, “Required Events,” counts how many “required” events players played. If the players followed the ATP rules, the number should be 14. Note that only Jankovic played all 14. Slotted WTA Player Slam LA Champ Tier I Optional Total Required Rank Rank Name Points Points Points Points Slotted Pts Events 11Davenport 2000 304 1114 1419 4837 8+YEC 22Clijsters 1286 164 1710 1372 4532 8+YEC 34Sharapova 1610 361 1340 647 3958 10+YEC 43Mauresmo 996 719 950 1266 3931 11+YEC 55Pierce 1988 613 1091 105 3797 10+YEC 66Hénin-Hardenne 1208 1428 300 2936 7 78Dementieva 1024 67 989 669 2749 12+YEC 87Schnyder 564 164 1151 762 2641 11+YEC 910Williams, Venus 1686 280 661 2627 6 10 9 Petrova 980 133 669 719 2501 12+YEC 11 11 Williams, Serena 1414 163 274 1851 6 12 13 Schiavone 322 724 553 1599 10 13 12 Déchy 890 319 389 1598 12 14 16 Ivanovic 582 496 456.25 1534.25 9 15 14 Myskina 508 546 476 1530 10 16 17 Likhovtseva 902 372 221 1495 13 17 18 Kuznetsova 548 622 321 1491 13 18 15 Vaidisova 356 377 731 1464 8 19 21 Grönefeld 300 197 759 1256 12 20 19 Hantuchova 304 215 706 1225 12 20 Saﬁna 124 422 658 1204 10 23 Pennetta 220 412 503 1135 12 22 Jankovic 208 361 564 1133 14 24 Golovin 198 407 450 1055 11 29 Molik 282 61 648 991 5 25 Kirilenko 118 229 612.75 959.75 12 28 Srebotnik 124 307.25 508.75 940 9 —Farina Elia 280 135 512 927 8 27 Dulko 172 370 380 922 11 26 Peschke 256 245 396.5 897.5 10 30 Sugiyama 78 542.5 245 865.5 12 38 Asagoe 166 369 328 863 12 34 Medina Garrigues 160 163.75 524 847.75 11 32 Martinez 82 327 436 845 11 Because it is so very different, the effects of this ranking system vary from year to year. This year, the first change came at #3, but nobody moved in or out of the Top Ten. In 2004, we had a change at #5. In 2002 and 2003, its effects were minimal. In 2001, however, seven of the top ten positions would have changes hands, including the #1 ranking..

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 58 Total Wins The list below shows how the top players fared in terms of wins (I also show losses for balance). The reason this deviates so far from the rankings is that some of these players (e.g., obviously, Schnyder) played large numbers of low-tier (Tier III-IV) tournaments or, further down the rankings, qualifying rounds. Since they faced low-level opposition, their wins do not count as much toward the rankings. Others were unwilling or unable to play many tournaments. Though their winning percentage was high (witness Hénin-Hardenne), their total wins were relatively low. Where two players have the same number of wins, I list the player with fewer losses first. Note: As elsewhere, this list includes only official tour wins; non-point-bearing events (e.g. Fed Cup) are excluded. Walkovers are not calculated as wins or losses. The list is not comprehensive; it omits players who spent their time primarily in Challengers (e.g. Shahar Peer, who has over 40 total wins but only 22 WTA main draw victories). Only the Top 30 plus highlight players have been examined. Finally, the numbers here may not match those in the section on the Top Eighty. That section listed only main draw wins; this includes Challenger and Qualifying results as well. Rank Player Wins Losses WTA Rank Player Wins Losses WTA Rnk Rnk 1Clijsters 65 9 2 Golovin 33 22 24 2Davenport 58 10 1 Dulko 32 23 27 2 Schnyder 58 25 7 Sugiyama 31 27 30 4 Petrova 56 22 9 Likhovtseva 30 22 17 5 Sharapova 53 12 4 Kuznetsova 29 17 18 5Mauresmo 53 16 3 Medina Garrigues 29 24 34 7Vaidisova 45 14 15 Bartoli 29 25 40 8 Peschke 44 24 26 Martinez 28 19 32 9Kirilenko 43 26 25 Frazier 26 17 55 10 Pierce 41 12 5 Smashnova 24 16 43 11 Ivanovic 40 14 16 Farina Elia 24 23 — 11 Dementieva 40 21 8 Asagoe 24 25 38 11 Schiavone 40 22 13 Williams, Serena 21 7 11 11 Déchy 40 26 12 Zvonareva 21 21 42 11 Grönefeld 40 27 21 Shaughnessy 20 24 66 16 Srebotnik 38 19 28 Linetskaya 18 19 53 16 Pennetta 38 23 23 Raymond 18 20 76 18 Hantuchova 37 25 19 Sprem 18 24 65 19 Safina 36 19 20 Molik 17 14 29 19 Jankovic 36 29 22 Maleeva 17 20 52 Chakvetadze 35 23 33 Bovina 12 8 62 Hénin-Hardenne 34 5 6 Dokic 12 11 351 Williams, Venus 34 9 10 Zuluaga 12 13 84 Myskina 34 18 14 Suárez 3 6 232

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 59 Winning Percentage Based on the data on wins above, we can also calculate these players’ win percentages. It’s little surprise that Justine Hénin-Hardenne is first; she won a lot on her favorite surface (clay) and didn’t play much on anything else. The demotions are more surprising: Schnyder out of the Top Ten, Dementieva barely Top 15, Déchy below #20, Likhovtseva in the #30 range. But this almost always happens with this statistic. Rank Name Wins Losses Win% WTA Rank 1 Clijsters 65 9 87.8% 2 2 Hénin-Hardenne 34 5 87.2% 6 3Davenport 58 10 85.3% 1 4 Sharapova 53 12 81.5% 4 5Williams, Venus 34 9 79.1% 10 6 Pierce 41 12 77.4% 5 7Mauresmo 53 16 76.8% 3 8Vaidisova 45 14 76.3% 15 9Williams, Serena 21 7 75.0% 11 10 Ivanovic 40 14 74.1% 16 11 Petrova 56 22 71.8% 9 12 Schnyder 58 25 69.9% 7 13 Srebotnik 38 19 66.7% 28 14 Dementieva 40 21 65.6% 8 15 Saﬁna 36 19 65.5% 20 16 Myskina 34 18 65.4% 14 17 Peschke 44 24 64.7% 26 18 Schiavone 40 22 64.5% 13 19 Kuznetsova 29 17 63.0% 18 20 Kirilenko 43 26 62.3% 25 Pennetta 38 23 62.3% 23 Déchy 40 26 60.6% 12 Frazier 26 17 60.5% 55 Chakvetadze 35 23 60.3% 33 Golovin 33 22 60.0% 24 Smashnova 24 16 60.0% 43 Bovina 12 8 60.0% 62 Grönefeld 40 27 59.7% 21 Hantuchova 37 25 59.7% 19 Martinez 28 19 59.6% 32 Dulko 32 23 58.2% 27 Likhovtseva 30 22 57.7% 17 Jankovic 36 29 55.4% 22 Molik 17 14 54.8% 29 Medina Garrigues 29 24 54.7% 34 Bartoli 29 25 53.7% 40 Sugiyama 31 27 53.4% 30 Farina Elia 24 23 51.1% — Zvonareva 21 21 50.0% 42 Asagoe 24 25 49.0% 38 Raymond 18 20 47.4% 76 Maleeva 17 20 45.9% 52 Sprem 18 24 42.9% 65

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 60 Divisor Rankings, No Slam Bonus In terms of strength of field, the Slams are no stronger than the Year-End event or Miami — or even Filderstadt. But the Slams award double points — at Filderstadt, you earn 225 points for winning the tournament, and 100 points for beating the #1 player, while at a Slam, it’s 650 and 200 points, respectively. The following table calculates divisor rankings if this Slam Bonus is eliminated. Surfaces being what they are, I maintain that this is proper: Does winning Roland Garros really tell you three as much about who is going to win Zürich as does winning Filderstadt? Rank Player Points Tournaments Score WTA Rank 1 Clijsters 4186 17 246.2 2 2Davenport 3910 16 244.4 1 3 Sharapova 3153 15 210.2 4 4 Pierce 2803 14 200.2 5 5Mauresmo 3534 19 186.0 3 6 Hénin-Hardenne 2332 9 166.6 6 7Williams, Venus 1785 12 127.5 10 8 Dementieva 2239 20 112.0 8 9 Schnyder 2787 26 107.2 7 10 Petrova 2412 25 96.5 9 11 Vaidisova 1403 17 82.5 15 12 Williams, Serena 1144 10 81.7 11 13 Ivanovic 1260 16 78.8 16 14 Myskina 1364 19 71.8 14 15 Kuznetsova 1217 17 71.6 18 16 Schiavone 1549 22 70.4 13 17 Saﬁna 1316 21 62.7 20 18 Molik 855 15 57.0 29 19 Hantuchova 1395 25 55.8 19 20 Déchy 1442 26 55.5 12 21 Peng 839.5 16 52.5 37 22 Golovin 1101 22 50.0 24 23 Likhovtseva 1073 22 48.8 17 24 Pennetta 1138 24 47.4 23 25 Grönefeld 1287.5 28 46.0 21 Srebotnik 939.75 21 44.8 28 Martinez 887 20 44.4 32 Dulko 979 23 42.6 27 Jankovic 1229 29 42.4 22 Kirilenko 1078 26 41.5 25 Peschke 922.75 25 36.9 26 Sugiyama 985.5 27 36.5 30 Farina Elia 832 23 36.2 — Smashnova 641 18 35.6 43 Chakvetadze 812.25 23 35.3 33 Bovina 474 8 33.9 62 Asagoe 801 25 32.0 38 Medina Garrigues 832.75 26 32.0 34 Zvonareva 696 22 31.6 42 Bartoli 723.75 25 29.0 40 Frazier 549.5 19 28.9 55 Zuluaga 359 13 25.6 84

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 61 The “Majors Ranking” It is an unfortunate fact that tennis uses the word “major” as a synonym for “Slam.” It’s unfortunate because it leaves us with no good word for “the best events.” The Slams are, of course, among the strongest events on the tour — but there are usually at least half a dozen other events which are competitive in terms of field strength. And many of them aren’t even Tier I events; the Tier II tournaments at Sydney and Filderstadt have traditionally been stronger than the average Tier I; the Tier I events at Moscow and Tokyo, by contrast, have a history of being too weak for the points they award. Quality points make up for some of that — or they did in the days when the WTA had the brains to award them — but not all. Which gives us the basis for another ranking, the “Majors Ranking.” We take the ten best events, and count results only in those events. In 2005, our list is Sydney, Australian Open, Miami, Rome, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, San Diego, U. S. Open, Filderstadt, and the Los Angeles Championships. (The list does vary from year to year, as described below. I probably shouldn’t have used Sydney this year, since it was weaker than usual, but it’s not proper to change in mid-year; it would raise the possibility of picking an event to help a favorite player.) Since all these events are strong, we don’t need quality points for this ranking. And early losses are worthless. We’ll count only semifinals and better: 1 point for a semifinal, 3 for a final, 5 for a win. Note that this gives a title more relative value than the WTA ranking table. The WTA awards Win/Final/ Semifinal points in the ratio 20:14:9; this system awards 20:12:4, because winning is much more memorable than being a finalist, and hardly anyone remembers a player who doesn’t even make the semifinal. By definition, no more than forty players can earn majors points in a year, and in practice fifteen is about normal. Also by definition, only 100 points are awarded in a year. It will be evident that the “Majors Ranking” is not useful as an overall ranking system — it isn’t intended to be — but it is a good measure of the accomplishments we might count toward Player of the Year. We note that an unusually high total of 21 players with Majors points this year, though the 15 points scored by leader Amélie Mauresmo is rather low. (That’s inevitable, with only 100 points to award: If a lot of players have points, then nobody can have many.) More surprising is the fact that, with such a low total for the leader, we have only four players with ten or more points. To give some perspective on these numbers: In 2004, we had 17 players with Majors points, though with even lower totals for the leader: Lindsay Davenport and Mauresmo led with 13 points, Serena Williams had 12, and four others had 10 points, with the rest lower. 2003 was more typical though much more top-heavy: 14 players, led by Kim Clijsters (32 points), Justine Hénin-Hardenne (22), Serena Williams (15), and no one else with more than 8. In 2002, we had fifteen players: Serena Williams of course led with 29 points, then Venus Williams (16), Clijsters (13), Capriati (11), and all others below 10. In 2001, when Indian Wells replaced Rome, we had only thirteen Majors point-scorers, despite which the leaders had lower totals: Venus Williams (22), Capriati (15), Davenport (14), Hingis (14), Serena (13), and the rest lower. In 2000, we must add Philadelphia (substituting for Filderstadt, which in 2000 had its field depleted by the Olympics) and the Canadian Open for Indian Wells. We had sixteen players that year; The rankings were: Hingis (24), Davenport (22), Venus (15), and the rest below ten. In 1999, Filderstadt substitutes for the Canadian Open, and we again had sixteen players: Hingis (31), Davenport (23), Venus (11), Graf (10), and the rest below 10. Since I started compiling this statistic, the highest score has been the 32 points by Clijsters in 2003 (yes, the year she didn’t win any Slams — but won everything else). Prior to that, the biggest score I can guarantee is Martina Hingis’s 43 points in 1997. No doubt players like Graf in 1988 and 1989 scored higher, but I don’t have the tournament strength data to determine which events belong on the Majors list. The list of players with at least one Majors point in 2005 is as follows (I also show the Majors points earned at each event):

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 62 Major WTA Major Syd- AO Miam Rome RG Wim SD USO Fild LA Rank Rank Player Points ney Cham 13Mauresmo 15 15 1 35 25Pierce 14 3533 31Davenport 12 3351 42Clijsters 10 55 54Sharapova 8 131111 610V. Williams 6 15 7T 6 Hénin-Harde 5 5 7T 29 Molik 5 5 7T 11 S. Williams 5 5 10T 7 Schnyder 3 3 10T 46 Stosur 3 3 10T 30 Sugiyama 3 3 13T 8 Dementieva 2 11 13T 37 Peng 2 11 15T 12 Déchy 1 1 15T 19 Hantuchova 1 1 15T 17 Likhovtseva 1 1 15T 48 Morigami 1 1 15T 14 Myskina 1 1 15T 9 Petrova 1 1 15T 42 Zvonareva 1 1

The chart on the next page may give some perspective on this: It shows the points earned by the top eight players in the Majors Rankings over the years 2000Ð2005 (plus that 1997 Hingis data point for comparison) The actual data involved is as follows:

1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 #1 has 43 24 22 29 32 13 15 #2 has 22 15 16 22 13 14 #3 has 15 14 13 15 12 12 #4 has 7 14 11 8 10 10 #5 has 6 13 8 6 10 8 #6 has 5745106 #7 has 5735105 #8 has 433165

45 1997

40 2000

35 2001

2002 30 2003

25 2004

20 2005

0 12345678

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 64 Best 17 Round Points Consists of the total round points which a player has earned in tournaments in the last year. Calculated by taking a player’s Best 17 total, then subtracting her quality points. In general, a player who does better in this ranking than in the WTA rankings is one who is failing to beat top players, and is attaining ranking by proceeding through easy matches. A player who stands lower in this ranking than the WTA ranking is one who perhaps has bad losses but who also probably has beaten a number of higher-ranked players. We include this because it approximates the travesty the WTA will call a “ranking system” next year. Rank Name Total WTA Rank Name Total WTA Rnd Pts Rank Rnd Pts Rank 1Davenport 3267 1 41 Peng 519.5 37 2 Clijsters 3110 2 42 Zheng 502.75 44 3Mauresmo 2748 3 43 Dushevina 490.25 39 4 Sharapova 2667 4 44 Safarova 482.75 50 5 Pierce 2281 5 45 Peer 481.75 45 6 Schnyder 1945 7 46 Stosur 474.25 46 7 Petrova 1875 9 47 Morigami 468.25 48 8 Hénin-Hardenne 1829 6 48 Benesova 463.25 54 9 Dementieva 1813 8 49 Frazier 460.5 55 10 Williams, Venus 1639 10 50 Vinci 456 41 11 Myskina 1155 14 51 Maleeva 453 52 12 Déchy 1147 12 52 Diaz-oliva 449.5 56 13 Kuznetsova 1140 18 53 Krajicek 443.75 58 14 Williams, Serena 1107 11 54 Li Na 432.5 57 15 Schiavone 1089 13 55 Llagostera Vives 432.5 49 16 Vaidisova 1033 15 56 Domachowska 421.25 60 17 Hantuchova 1018 19 57 Castaño 421 59 18 Likhovtseva 967 17 58 Craybas 412 47 19 Saﬁna 929 20 59 Razzano 400.5 51 20 Ivanovic 912 16 60 Arvidsson 397.75 67 21 Grönefeld 895.5 21 Shaughnessy 381.75 66 22 Pennetta 891 23 Linetskaya 379 53 23 Jankovic 884 22 Granville 374.25 61 24 Golovin 822 24 Serra Zanetti 373.5 64 25 Kirilenko 725 25 Bovina 368 62 26 Sugiyama 681.5 30 Dominguez Lino 366 77 27 Molik 656 29 Sprem 365.25 65 28 Srebotnik 652.75 28 Randriantefy 359.5 68 29 Koukalova 648.75 36 Nakamura 356.5 71 30 Martinez 639 32 Vento-kabchi 353 63 31 Mirza 623.75 31 Cho 341.25 72 32 Dulko 621 27 Raymond 337.5 76 33 Medina Garrigues 617.75 34 Ondraskova 329.75 78 34 Peschke 605.75 26 Bammer 316.75 79 35 Asagoe 596 38 Washington 310.75 74 36 Karatantcheva 579.25 35 Bondarenko 309.75 73 37 Zvonareva 567 42 Jackson 305 75 38 Chakvetadze 565.25 33 Bychkova 295.25 69 39 Bartoli 535.75 40 Schruff 266.25 80 40 Smashnova 520 43 Daniilidou 261.25 70

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 65 Total Round Points This is almost the same as the preceding, except that every event counts. Few players are affected, save Schnyder, Petrova, and Déchy — and the first two of those made their big round-points move in the preceding ranking. Rank Name Total WTA Rank Name Total WTA Rnd Pts Rank Rnd Pts Rank 1Davenport 3267 1 33 Mirza 629.75 31 2Clijsters 3110 2 34 Medina Garrigues 627.75 34 3Mauresmo 2750 3 35 Peschke 624.75 26 4 Sharapova 2667 4 36 Asagoe 604 38 5 Pierce 2281 5 37 Karatantcheva 579.25 35 6 Schnyder 2171 7 38 Zvonareva 572 42 7 Petrova 2087 9 39 Chakvetadze 571.25 33 8Hénin-Hardenne 1829 6 40 Bartoli 543.75 40 9Dementieva 1816 8 Smashnova 521 43 10 Williams, Venus 1639 10 Peng 519.5 37 11 Déchy 1241 12 Zheng 503.75 44 12 Myskina 1157 14 Peer 501.75 45 13 Kuznetsova 1140 18 Dushevina 493.25 39 14 Williams, Serena 1107 11 Safarova 486.75 50 15 Schiavone 1095 13 Stosur 481.25 46 16 Hantuchova 1074 19 Morigami 473.25 48 17 Vaidisova 1033 15 Frazier 462.5 55 18 Likhovtseva 972 17 Vinci 461 41 19 Grönefeld 950.5 21 Maleeva 456 52 20 Safina 935 20 Krajicek 443.75 58 21 Ivanovic 912 16 Llagostera Vives 440.5 49 22 Pennetta 899 23 Craybas 433 47 23 Jankovic 897 22 Shaughnessy 389.75 66 24 Golovin 827 24 Linetskaya 381 53 25 Kirilenko 745 25 Sprem 372.25 65 26 Sugiyama 709.5 30 Bovina 368 62 27 Dulko 666 27 Raymond 340.5 76 28 Srebotnik 656.75 28 Zuluaga 303 84 29 Molik 656 29 Yan Zi 261 103 30 Koukalova 655.75 36 Suárez 64 232 31 Martinez 642 32 Dokic 50.25 351 32 Farina Elia 634 — Rubin 19 546

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 66 Round Points Per Tournament This ranking measures, in effect, how far a player typically advanced in a tournament, regardless of opposition. Rank Name Rnd Pts WTA Rank Name Rnd Pts WTA Per Trn Rank Per Trn Rank 1Davenport 204.2 1 33 Smashnova 28.9 43 2 Hénin-Hardenne 203.2 6 34 Kirilenko 28.7 25 3 Clijsters 182.9 2 35 Mirza 28.6 31 4 Sharapova 177.8 4 Koukalova 28.5 36 5 Pierce 162.9 5 Zheng Jie 28.0 44 6Mauresmo 144.7 3 Farina Elia 27.6 — 7Williams 136.6 10 Sugiyama 26.3 30 8Williams 110.7 11 Zvonareva 26.0 42 9 Dementieva 90.8 8 Peschke 25.0 26 10 Schnyder 83.5 7 Chakvetadze 24.8 33 11 Petrova 83.5 9 Dushevina 24.7 39 12 Kuznetsova 67.1 18 Frazier 24.3 55 13 Myskina 60.9 14 Asagoe 24.2 38 14 Vaidisova 60.8 15 Medina Garrigues 24.1 34 15 Ivanovic 57.0 16 Zuluaga 23.3 84 16 Schiavone 49.8 13 Safarova 23.2 50 17 Déchy 47.7 12 Maleeva 22.8 52 18 Bovina 46.0 62 Peer 21.8 45 19 Saﬁna 44.5 20 Bartoli 21.8 40 20 Likhovtseva 44.2 17 Morigami 21.5 48 21 Molik 43.7 29 Vinci 21.0 41 22 Hantuchova 43.0 19 Linetskaya 20.1 53 23 Golovin 37.6 24 Stosur 20.1 46 24 Pennetta 37.5 23 Yan Zi 18.6 103 25 Karatantcheva 36.2 35 Llagostera Vives 17.6 49 26 Grönefeld 33.9 21 Raymond 17.0 76 27 Peng Shuai 32.5 37 Shaughnessy 15.6 66 28 Martinez 32.1 32 Sprem 15.5 65 29 Krajicek 31.7 58 Craybas 14.4 47 30 Srebotnik 31.3 28 Suárez 9.1 232 31 Jankovic 30.9 22 Rubin 6.3 546 32 Dulko 29.0 27 Dokic 5.0 351 If, here as elsewhere, we require a minimum of 14 events, we get significant changes in the list: Rank Name Rnd Pts WTA Rank Name Rnd Pts WTA Per Trn Rank Per Trn Rank 1Davenport 204.2 1 9 Schnyder 83.5 7 2 Clijsters 182.9 2 10 Petrova 83.5 9 3 Sharapova 177.8 4 11 Williams 79.1 11 4 Pierce 162.9 5 12 Kuznetsova 67.1 18 5Mauresmo 144.7 3 13 Myskina 60.9 14 6 Hénin-Hardenne 130.6 6 14 Vaidisova 60.8 15 7Williams 117.1 10 15 Ivanovic 57 16 8 Dementieva 90.8 8 16 Schiavone 49.8 13

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 67 Quality Points Per Tournament (“Future Potential Ranking”) The reverse of the above, this ranking calculates the difficulty of the opposition a player has overcome. For players outside the Top Six, it is a good measure of how they stack up against other players, and how likely they are to produce upsets. For the Top Six, it is less meaningful, because the varying levels of quality point awards for the top players (that is, the fact that a win over #1 is worth more than a win over #4) obscures their results. Overall, the Quality Points per Tournament ranking serves best as an indicator of players with lots of “up side” — players who look as if they will move much higher in the coming year or two. For 2002, e.g., it “predicted” Daniela Hantuchova, though, to be fair, in 2003 it “predicted” Myriam Casanova. But it redeemed itself in 2003 by picking Maria Sharapova. And then, last year, it predicted that Sharapova would not improve as much in 2005; it also forecast falls for Anastasia Myskina, Svetlana Kuznetsova, and Ai Sugiyama. Plus it also forecast big moves by Sesil Karatantcheva (who was last year’s #127, but #35 in quality points per tournament — which just happens to be her 2005 year-end ranking!), Anna Chakvetadze, Nicole Vaidisova, and Ana Ivanovic. Of these, only Vaidisova was really obvious at the end of 2004 — except in the quality standings. With the ranking system changing in 2006 to eliminate quality points, it’s hard to know whether this ranking will retain its predictive value for future rankings, though it seems as if it would (if we could still predict it): Quality points per tournament mostly measures the ability to win big matches. So, if injuries don’t rear up, it would seem likely that both Justine Hénin-Hardenne and Mary Pierce will rise before they fall. Nathalie Déchy seems umlikely to retain her ranking. Evgenia Linetskaya ought to move up if she can get healthy. Viktoriya Kutuzova looks as if she might finally fulfill her promise, and Victoria Azarenka also seems due to rise. Vania King’s Challenger results appear not to be flukes. But the only player who really seems to be crying out, “Ready or not, here I come” is Michaella Krajicek.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 68 Rank Name Qual/ WTA Rank Name Qual/ WTA Trn Rank Trn Rank 1 Hénin-Hardenne 123.0 6 46 Asagoe 11.2 38 2 Pierce 108.3 5 47 Daniilidou 11.1 70 3Davenport 102.7 1 48 Medina Garrigues 11.0 34 4 Clijsters 101.1 2 49 Razzano 10.8 51 5 Sharapova 86.1 4 50 Bartoli 10.4 40 6Williams, Venus 82.4 10 51 Koukalova 10.2 36 7Williams, Serena 74.4 11 52 Maleeva 9.8 52 8Mauresmo 67.5 3 53 Suárez 9.7 232 9 Dementieva 46.8 8 54 Llagostera Vives 9.6 49 10 Ivanovic 39.9 16 55 Craybas 9.5 47 11 Schnyder 34.5 7 56 Morigami 9.3 48 12 Petrova 32.6 9 57 Stosur 9.2 46 13 Vaidisova 32.2 15 58 Frazier 9.2 55 14 Schiavone 28.0 13 59 Pironkova 8.8 88 15 Likhovtseva 25.1 17 60 Zvonareva 8.7 42 16 Déchy 24.8 12 61 Zuluaga 8.6 84 17 Myskina 24.3 14 62 Safarova 8.5 50 18 Bovina 23.8 62 63 Castaño 8.4 59 19 Peng 22.8 37 64 Granville 8.4 61 20 Molik 22.7 29 65 Vakulenko 8.1 185 21 Saﬁna 21.1 20 66 Kutuzova 8.1 110 22 Kuznetsova 20.6 18 67 Vento-Kabchi 8.0 63 23 Karatantcheva 20.2 35 68 Sun 7.9 104 24 Hantuchova 18.9 19 69 Bychkova 7.6 69 25 Grönefeld 17.4 21 70 Perry 7.4 112 26 Dulko 17.3 27 71 Azarenka 7.3 146 27 Dushevina 17.2 39 72 Washington 7.3 74 28 Peschke 17.0 26 73 Sprem 7.0 65 29 Golovin 17.0 24 74 Diaz-oliva 7.0 56 30 Srebotnik 16.4 28 75 Cho 6.9 72 31 Chakvetadze 15.3 33 76 Jackson 6.8 75 32 Kirilenko 15.1 25 77 Sanchez Lorenzo 6.7 83 33 Jankovic 15.0 22 78 Randriantefy 6.5 68 34 Farina Elia 14.7 — 79 Raymond 6.4 76 35 Pennetta 14.5 23 80 Yan Zi 6.3 103 36 Martinez 14.3 32 81 Yan 6.3 103 37 Vinci 14.0 41 82 Arvidsson 6.2 67 38 Mirza 13.9 31 83 Benesova 6.2 54 39 Li Na 13.6 57 84 Shaughnessy 6.1 66 40 Linetskaya 13.6 53 85 Szavay 6.0 181 41 Zheng Jie 13.2 44 86 Domachowska 5.8 60 42 Krajicek 12.6 58 87 Schruff 5.7 80 43 Smashnova 12.4 43 88 Bondarenko 5.7 73 44 Sugiyama 11.7 30 89 Nakamura 5.7 71 45 Peer 11.3 45 90 Fernandez 5.6 151

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 69 Quality/Round Points Equalized: 2Q+R Per Tournament Calculated by doubling total quality points, adding round points, and dividing the sum by tournaments. The effect of this is to make, very roughly, half of the typical player’s points come from quality and half from round points. This is, in the author’s opinion, about the best way to assess players’ actual performances based solely on WTA ranking data with no manipulation based on winning percentage or surface balance. Rank Name 2Q+R/ WTA Rank Name 2Q+R/ WTA Trn Rank Trn Rank 1Hénin-Hardenne 449.2 6 33 Dushevina 59.1 39 2Davenport 409.6 1 34 Kirilenko 58.8 25 3Clijsters 385.2 2 35 Farina Elia 57.0 — 4 Pierce 379.5 5 36 Krajicek 56.8 58 5 Sharapova 349.9 4 37 Mirza 56.4 31 6Williams, Venus 301.4 10 38 Chakvetadze 55.5 33 7Mauresmo 279.7 3 39 Zheng 54.3 44 8Williams, Serena 259.5 11 40 Smashnova 53.8 43 9Dementieva 184.3 8 Sugiyama 49.6 30 10 Schnyder 152.6 7 Vinci 49.0 41 11 Petrova 148.7 9 Koukalova 48.9 36 12 Ivanovic 136.9 16 Linetskaya 47.3 53 13 Vaidisova 125.2 15 Asagoe 46.6 38 14 Myskina 109.4 14 Medina Garrigues 46.1 34 15 Kuznetsova 108.4 18 Peer 44.4 45 16 Schiavone 105.7 13 Zvonareva 43.5 42 17 Déchy 97.4 12 Frazier 42.7 55 18 Likhovtseva 94.4 17 Bartoli 42.6 40 19 Bovina 93.5 62 Maleeva 42.3 52 20 Molik 89.1 29 Zuluaga 40.5 84 21 Safina 86.7 20 Morigami 40.1 48 22 Hantuchova 80.8 19 Safarova 40.1 50 23 Peng 78.0 37 Stosur 38.5 46 24 Karatantcheva 76.6 35 Llagostera Vives 36.8 49 25 Golovin 71.5 24 Craybas 33.4 47 26 Grönefeld 68.7 21 Yan 31.2 103 27 Pennetta 66.5 23 Raymond 29.7 76 28 Srebotnik 64.1 28 Sprem 29.6 65 29 Dulko 63.7 27 Suárez 28.6 232 30 Jankovic 61.0 22 Shaughnessy 27.8 66 31 Martinez 60.7 32 Rubin 11.7 546 32 Peschke 59.1 26 Dokic 8.8 351

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 70 Consistency-Rewarded Rankings Logarithmic Points Award The WTA’s Best 17 ranking cares nothing for consistency — your best results count, and nothing else. The old WTA divisor ranking took consistency more into account — but big results (e.g. from Slams) still biased the result. The Consistency-Rewarded Rankings give the greatest reward to consistent players. Under this system, it’s better to make two semifinals than to win one event and lose first round in another (the reverse is true under the WTA rankings, even though reaching two semifinals requires at least as many wins). If good results help, bad results hurt. The method is as follows: One takes the natural log — in mathematical terms, ln() — of each weekly score, takes the arithmetic mean (i.e. divide by the number of events), then take the antilog, ex or exp(x). Under this system, a player who is absolutely consistent, producing the same score at every event, will get the same score as under the divisor. A less-consistent player will get a lower score — the less consistent, the lower the score. A consistency-punishing ranking is, of course, also possible — but is functionally equivalent to just ranking players according to their single highest score.. Rank Name Consist. WTA Rank Name Consist. WTA Score Rank Score Rank 1 Sharapova 221.89 4 26 Likhovtseva 18.08 17 2Clijsters 209.08 2 27 Pennetta 17.65 23 3Davenport 194.73 1 28 Smashnova 16.91 43 4 Pierce 107.47 5 29 Martinez 16.21 32 5Williams, Venus 101.24 10 30 Peschke 14.51 26 6Hénin-Hardenne 97.54 6 31 Chakvetadze 14.29 33 7Mauresmo 86.54 3 32 Sugiyama 12.98 30 8 Schnyder 73.18 7 33 Frazier 12.64 55 9 Petrova 68.32 9 34 Jankovic 11.76 22 10 Vaidisova 63.48 15 35 Srebotnik 11.27 28 11 Dementieva 53.17 8 Zuluaga 10.73 84 12 Ivanovic 45.88 16 Bartoli 10.25 40 13 Williams, Serena 45.08 11 Medina Garrigues 9.96 34 14 Bovina 40.95 62 Maleeva 9.95 52 15 Myskina 30.26 14 Raymond 9.04 76 16 Safina 29.10 20 Farina Elia 8.20 — 17 Kuznetsova 28.85 36 Asagoe 7.75 38 18 Schiavone 28.29 13 Zvonareva 7.46 42 19 Dulko 26.70 27 Molik 7.14 29 20 Déchy 26.61 12 Linetskaya 6.95 53 21 Hantuchova 25.33 19 Shaughnessy 5.49 66 22 Peng 19.87 37 Sprem 3.92 65 23 Grönefeld 18.77 21 Rubin 3.63 546 24 Golovin 18.49 24 Suárez 3.40 232 25 Kirilenko 18.10 25 Dokic 3.35 351 It’s interesting to note that, though a lot of people have been saying that Davenport got to the top by consistency, she in fact comes in third in this ranking! We do see a nice upward move by Venus Williams; observe on the other hand the hits suffered by Nathalie Déchy and Elena Likhovtseva. And of course Alicia Molik had terrible consistency: She was very good before getting sick, and very bad after.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 71 Worst 14 A simpler, though less accurate, way of measuring consistency is to simply take a player’s worst fourteen results. Instead of paying off on good results at the top, this pays off on a lack of bad results. We look only at a subset of the Highlight Players. This is offered mostly for demonstration purposes, but I would ask the real question, why is Best 14/Best 17 any better than Worst 14/17? Neither one counts all results!. Rank Name Worst WTA Rank Name Worst WTA 14 Rank 14 Rank 1 Pierce 3797 5 26 Martinez 337 32 2 Sharapova 3482 4 27 Dulko 328 27 3Davenport 3458 1 28 Likhovtseva 268 17 4Hénin-Hardenne 2936 6 29 Pennetta 254 23 5Clijsters 2669 2 30 Frazier 227.5 55 6Williams, Venus 2628 10 Maleeva 202 52 7Williams, Serena 1851 11 Chakvetadze 182.75 33 8Mauresmo 1843 3 Peschke 173.25 26 9Dementieva 1084 8 Raymond 164.5 76 10 Vaidisova 1061 15 Grönefeld 164.5 21 11 Ivanovic 996 16 Kirilenko 154.5 25 12 Kuznetsova 853 18 Srebotnik 151.5 28 13 Petrova 746 9 Sugiyama 134 30 14 Schnyder 730 7 Suárez 132 232 15 Molik 716 29 Linetskaya 113 53 16 Myskina 666 14 Bartoli 110 40 17 Bovina 558 62 Farina Elia 105 — 18 Schiavone 428 13 Zvonareva 101 42 19 Peng 418.75 37 Jankovic 80 22 20 Zuluaga 415 84 Medina Garrigues 77.75 34 21 Safina 387 20 Dokic 69.25 351 22 Hantuchova 375 19 Asagoe 45 38 23 Déchy 365 12 Rubin 27 546 24 Smashnova 343 43 Shaughnessy 17 66 25 Golovin 340 24 Sprem 14 65 The real problem with this system, of course, is that it encourages underplaying; Pierce comes out ahead of, say, Clijsters because she gets to count all of her best events while Clijsters loses her best three. We could control for this — e.g. by taking events off the top, perhaps one event for every two events a player is short of 17 — but this is just a demonstration; you can make those adjustments if you want.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 72 Middle Half Another variation on the theme of consistency is to count half your results — but not the best half, the middle half. So if you play twelve events, we count the middle six, omitting the best three and the worst three. If your number of events is not divisible by four, we adjust appropriately. So, e.g., if you have seventeen events, half of that is 8.5. We take the seven middle events (i. e. #6-#12), and 75% of the two around that (i.e. #5 and #13). Applying this formula, we get the following: Mid Player Score # of % of pts WTA Mid Player Score # of % of pts WTA Half Trns in mid Rank Half Trns in mid Rank Rank half Rank half 1Davenport 2345 16 48% 1 26 Williams, Serena 403 10 22% 11 2 Sharapova 1888.5 15 48% 4 27 Kirilenko 380.3 26 33% 25 3 Clijsters 1830.3 17 38% 2 28 Peschke 377.5 25 36% 26 4Mauresmo 1826 19 45% 3 29 Chakvetadze 361.4 23 39% 33 5 Schnyder 1392 26 45% 7 30 Sugiyama 341.6 27 33% 30 6 Hénin-Hardenne 1186.8 9 40% 6 Farina Elia 307.3 23 32% — 7 Pierce 1171 14 31% 5 Bartoli 304.1 25 38% 40 8 Dementieva 1170 20 43% 8 Smashnova 303.5 18 41% 43 9 Petrova 1138.5 25 39% 9 Srebotnik 296.8 21 30% 28 10 Williams, Venus 848 12 32% 10 Peng 279.8 16 32% 37 11 Vaidisova 780.8 17 49% 15 Bovina 255 8 46% 62 12 Déchy 715 26 38% 12 Maleeva 237 20 36% 52 13 Hantuchova 714.8 25 46% 19 Frazier 234.8 19 37% 55 14 Myskina 690.3 19 43% 14 Medina Garrigues 226.8 26 25% 34 15 Schiavone 682 22 40% 13 Asagoe 224 25 25% 38 16 Kuznetsova 664.3 17 45% 18 Zvonareva 195.5 22 26% 42 17 Ivanovic 613.5 16 40% 16 Raymond 195.5 20 42% 76 18 Pennetta 525 24 42% 23 Zuluaga 170.8 13 41% 84 19 Golovin 515.5 22 43% 24 Linetskaya 124 19 19% 53 20 Saﬁna 465 21 34% 20 Molik 120.5 15 12% 29 21 Grönefeld 451.8 27 32% 21 Shaughnessy 115.3 25 21% 66 22 Dulko 446.5 23 42% 27 Sprem 48 24 9% 65 23 Likhovtseva 435.5 22 29% 17 Dokic 23 10 33% 351 24 Jankovic 431.5 29 32% 22 Suárez 10.8 7 8% 232 25 Martinez 411 20 44% 32 Rubin 8.3 3 31% 546

As a measure of consistency, the higher the percentage in the middle half, the more consistent. So this measure, improbably enough, makes Vaidisova the most consistent player, followed by Davenport, Sharapova, Hantuchova, and Bovina. Least consistent is Suárez; Sprem is next (who is thus the least- consistent healthy player, at least in our sample).

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 73 Idealized Ranking Systems Idealized Rankings/Proposal 1: Surface-Modified Divisor (Minimum 16) In examining the various ranking systems used (and not used) by the Tours, one notices that each has strengths and weaknesses. The current ATP Tour system has the advantage of enforcing surface balance, but it generally ignores smaller tournaments and has no reward for beating top players. The WTA Tour system has the advantage of encouraging players to play regularly (any good result is likely to increase a player’s ranking total) but encourages overplaying, has no surface balance, and renders losses meaningless. Based on consideration, it seems to me that the following are the key features of an ideal ranking system: 1. Both wins and losses should count. 2. There should be strong rewards for quality; winning a tournament with a weak field should have relatively little value 3. There should be a minimum required number of tournaments, and incentives for playing more than the minimum should be reduced (to prevent injury) but not eliminated 4. Surfaces should be balanced — players should not be allowed to “clean up” by playing more than half their events on a particular surface. 5. The Slam Bias should be reduced (slightly) relative to the stronger tournaments such as Miami. I’ll outline three proposals. The first is closest to the current WTA system: ¥ The system is point-and-divisor based: You earn a certain number of points, and divide them by a number of tournaments. This is probably not the best mathematical model, but it is (relatively) simple. ¥ The minimum divisor should be 16 (in doubles, perhaps 12). This is larger than the divisor of 14 the WTA used in 1996, but smaller than the Best 18 used from 1998 to 2000 or the Best 17 used since 2001. ¥ The Slam Bonus should be reduced from 2 to 1.5 ¥ Quality points should be multiplied by 1.5 (Note that this, combined with the preceding point, means that quality points at Slams will be multiplied by 2.5.) ¥ The current WTA Round Point table may be retained ¥ Players should play at least a certain percentage of their events on all four surfaces: 37% on hardcourts, 11% indoors, 16% on clay, 6% on grass. (This is based on a simple calculation: I took the Top 30, found the percent they played on each surface, sorted the list for each surface, and took the percentage for player #26, rounding to the nearest percent.) This is a total of 70% of one’s schedule accounted for; the other 30% may be played on any surface. If, however, you fail to play the minimum on any given surface, your divisor will be adjusted accordingly. Example: A player plays sixteen events, but only two on clay, or 12.5%. She was supposed to play 17% on clay, meaning she should have played at least three clay events. The difference, one, is added to her divisor; she is treated as if she had played seventeen events. Note: A player cannot be penalized more than two tournaments per surface (only one for grass). ¥ If a player plays beyond the minimum of sixteen, her divisor is reduced by one third of a tournament for each additional tournament played. So, e.g., if she play seventeen tournaments, her divisor is 16.67; if she plays 19, it is 18, etc. ¥ Injured players who miss at least four months are exempt from balance requirements; their ranking is based simply on their points and number of tournaments The result of this calculation are given below. The first column, “Rank,” is the rank under this system. “Player” is self-explanatory. “# of Tourn” is the number of events the player actually played. “Qual Pts,” “Round Pts,” and “Slam Pts” are actual quality points, round points, points in Slams. Surface is events played on each surface — marked * if below the minimum “Penalty Tourns” is the number of extra events assessed for surface imbalance. “Adjust. points” is the adjusted points total — round points plus 1.5xquality points minus one fourth of Slam Points. “Adjust. # Tourn” is the adjusted tournaments played — number of actual tournaments plus penalty tournaments minus bonus tournaments. Score is what you get when you divide Adjusted Points by Adjusted # of Tournaments — the basis of the ranking. WTA Rnk is the player’s WTA rank. Hence:

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 74 Surface-Modified Divisor (Minimum 16) Ranking Table Rank Player # of Qual Round Slam Surface Penalty Adjust. Adjust. # Score WTA Tourn Pts Pts Pts C/G/H/I Tourns Points Tourn Rnk 1Davenport 16 1643 3267 2000 3/1/8/4 5231.5 16 327.0 1 2 Clijsters 17 1719 3110 1286 3/2/7/5 5367 16.7 322.0 2 3 Sharapova 15 1291 2667 1610 3/2/7/3 4201 16 262.6 4 4 Pierce 14 1516 2281 1988 5/1/4/4 1 4058 17 238.7 5 5Mauresmo 19 1282 2750 996 3/2/7/7 2 4424 20 221.2 3 6 Hénin-Hardenne 9 1107 1829 1208 4/1/3/1 1 3187.5 17 187.5 6 7Williams, Venus 12 989 1639 1686 4/1/6/1 1 2701 17 158.9 10 8 Dementieva 20 935 1816 1024 3/2/8/7 1 2962.5 19.7 150.6 8 9 Schnyder 26 829 2171 564 6/1/12/7 1 3377 23.7 142.7 7 10 Petrova 25 763 2087 980 5/2/10/8 3064.5 22 139.3 9 11 Williams, Serena 10 744 1107 1414 2/1/6/1 1 1869.5 17 110.0 11 12 Ivanovic 16 639 912 582 4/1/7/4 1725 16 107.8 16 13 Vaidisova 17 548 1033 356 3/3/9/2 1766 16.7 106.0 15 14 Myskina 19 461 1157 508 4/2/9/4 1721.5 18 95.6 14 15 Schiavone 22 615 1095 322 4/1/11/6 1 1937 21 92.2 13 16 Kuznetsova 17 351 1140 548 4/2/8/3 1529.5 16.7 91.8 18 17 Déchy 26 626 1241 890 5/2/11/8 1987.5 22.7 87.7 12 18 Saﬁna 21 443 935 124 4/2/9/6 1568.5 19.3 81.1 20 19 Likhovtseva 22 552 972 902 5/2/10/5 1574.5 20 78.7 17 20 Hantuchova 25 468 1074 304 4/3/13/5 1 1707.5 23 74.2 19 21 Golovin 22 373 827 198 4/2/12/4 1337 20 66.8 24 22 Grönefeld 28 470 950.5 300 7/3/15/3 1 1606 25 64.2 21 23 Karatantcheva 16 323 579.25 0 2/1/7/6 1 1063.8 17 62.6 35 24 Peng 16 364 519.5 88 6/0/9/1 1 1043.5 17 61.4 37 25 Pennetta 24 349 899 220 8/1/11/4 1 1367.5 22.3 61.2 23 Molik 15 340 656 282 1/1/9/4 2 1095.5 18 60.9 29 Jankovic 29 436 897 208 5/3/14/7 1499 24.7 60.8 22 Srebotnik 21 345 656.75 124 6/2/8/5 1143.3 19.3 59.1 28 Kirilenko 26 382 745 118 5/3/15/3 1303.5 22.7 57.5 25 Dulko 23 387 666 172 5/2/14/2 1 1221.5 21.7 56.4 27 Martinez 20 286 642 82 5/2/11/2 1 1050.5 19.7 53.4 32 Peschke 25 423 624.75 256 5/2/9/9 1 1199.8 23 52.2 26 Sugiyama 27 313 709.5 78 6/3/14/4 1162.5 23.3 49.8 30 Farina Elia 23 338 634 280 7/2/8/6 1 1071 21.7 49.4 — Chakvetadze 23 353 571.25 224 5/3/8/7 1 1044.8 21.7 48.2 33 Medina Garrigues 26 285 627.75 160 7/2/11/6 1015.3 22.7 44.8 34 Asagoe 25 280 604 166 5/3/14/3 982.5 22 44.7 38 Smashnova 18 224 521 208 9/2/5/2 2 805 19.3 41.6 43 Zvonareva 22 192 572 136 6/2/9/5 826 20 41.3 42 Bovina 8 190 368 168 4/0/4/0 611 16 38.2 62 Bartoli 25 261 543.75 162 1/3/18/3 2 894.8 24 37.3 40 Maleeva 20 195 456 320 5/2/8/5 668.5 18.7 35.8 52 Frazier 19 174 462.5 174 4/2/11/2 1 680 19 35.8 55 Shaughnessy 25 152 389.75 46 7/3/12/3 606.3 22 27.6 66 Sprem 24 169 372.25 206 5/2/12/5 574.3 21.3 26.9 65 Raymond 20 127 340.5 120 4/3/9/4 501 18.7 26.8 76

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 75 Idealized Rankings/Proposal 2 — Adjusted Won/Lost The previous ranking system was based on the current WTA point table. Many of our other proposals have also been based on this. But there is nothing magic about the WTA points table — as witness the fact that it gets changed almost every year. We could also use a won/lost system. Except — a player who plays weak events may earn a much higher winning percentage than a better player who plays stronger events. Henrieta Nagyova has nine career titles because she plays a lot of Tier IV tournaments. Anna Kournikova had none, in part, because in her heyday she played mostly Tier II and up. Kournikova was the better player (even in 2003, with Kournikova in her final decline, she beat Nagyova 6Ð 1 6–2), but the Russian doesn’t have the titles, or the winning percentage, to prove it. So if we are to base our system on winning percentage, we must somehow adjust for tournament strength. And we also need to account for wins over top players. And we need to encourage players to play more, within reason. We can do all that. To accomplish the first, we simply diddle with the values of wins: If we define a win at a Tier I or Tier II as being “one standard win,” then a win at a Slam might be 1.1 SWs (for this purpose, we’ll count the year-end championship as a Slam), and a win at a Tier III only 0.8, and a win at a Tier IV a mere 0.6. To account for wins over top players, we assign bonus wins. In our system, a top four player gets you an extra .6 wins. Beating a player ranked #5-#10 is worth .4. Beating #11-#20 gets you .2. And a win over #21- #35 is worth .1. To encourage players to play more, we do two things: First, we require you to play sixteen events, and add losses until you do (except for injured players). And second — and this is the key part — we reduce losses exponentially. Instead of calculating raw wins and losses, we take losses to the .8 power. What this means is that if two players have the same winning percentage, but one has played more, the one who has played more will have a slightly higher adjusted winning percentage. Not much — losses still count! But enough to make it worth playing more if it doesn’t drag your results down. Note: Withdrawals and walkovers do not count as wins or losses. We calculate only a limited list of players, because this ranking is work and would require significant reprogramming by the WTA staff to use as “the” ranking system. In assessing the results, we ask that you remember: This system isn’t designed to look anything like the WTA rankings; it’s a completely different way of looking at the data. You should not look at the results but rather the method. If you approve of the method, then be open to the results. If you don’t accept the method — well, we are generally as surprised by the results as you are. The columns in the table are as follows: Rnk: Player’s rank under this system. Player Name: Just what it says. #Trn: The number of tournaments the player played. Slam W, L: Wins and losses in Slams. Tier I/II W, L: Wins and losses in Tier I and Tier II tournaments. Tier III W, L: Wins and losses in Tier III events. Tier IV+ W, L: Wins and losses in Tier IV and Challenger events. Adj. Wins: Adjusted winning total based on the formula above (i.e. a Slam win counts as 1.1, etc.) Bon Wins: Bonus wins as a result of victories over top players. Pen Loss: Penalty losses assessed for not playing the full 16 events. Tot Wins: Total wins as calculated, i.e. Adjusted wins plus Bonus Wins. Adj Los: Adjusted losses as calculated, i.e. total actual losses plus penalty losses raised to the .8 power. Adj Wi%: Adjusted winning percentage: Tot Wins divided by the quantity total wins plus adj. losses, expressed as a percent. Note, however, that this is not a true percentage; while the minimum is zero, the bonus wins man it’s not directly based on won/lost — though the maximum value does not exceed 100%. And so, without further ado, the actual numbers:

Rnk Player # Slam TierI/II Tier III TierIV+ Bonus Wins Adj Bon Tot Pen Adj Adj WTA Name Trn WL WL WL WL ≤4 ≤10 ≤20 ≤35 Wins Wins Wins Loss Loss Wi% Rank 1 Clijsters 17 14 4 46550 4 9 91665.4 9.4 74.8 0 5.8 92.8 2 2Davenport 16 22 6 32440 4 6131259.4 8.6 68.0 0 6.3 91.5 1 3 Sharapova 15 21 6 27650 2 6 51154.1 5.7 59.8 1 7.8 88.5 4 4Mauresmo 19 19 5 34 11 2 10 9 9 54.9 7.9 62.8 0 9.2 87.2 3 5 Pierce 14 20 5 21 7 548743.0 6.9 49.9 2 8.3 85.8 5 6 Hénin-Harde 9 10 2 24 3 454435.0 5.6 40.6 7 7.3 84.8 6 7Vaidisova 17 8 4 13 6 17371 2 4 539.6 2.1 41.7 0 8.3 83.5 15 8 Petrova 25 17 6 32 14 7 2 214956.3 3.3 59.6 0 11.9 83.4 9 9Williams, V 12 16 3 14640 324334.8 3.7 38.5 4 7.8 83.2 10 10 Ivanovic 169423 10 8 0123537.7 2.5 40.2 0 8.3 83.0 16 11 Schnyder 26 11 6 35 18 12 1 1 4 5 10 56.7 4.2 60.9 0 13.1 82.3 7 12 Dementieva 20 14 7 26 13 0 1 216741.4 3.5 44.9 0 11.4 79.7 8 13 Schiavone 22 7 4 22 148232222737.9 3.1 41.0 0 11.9 77.6 13 14 Karatanchev 16 9 4 13 106250 2 430.7 0.8 31.5 0 9.2 77.4 35 15 Myskina 19 8 4 17 135041 2 1 832.2 1.8 34.0 0 10.1 77.1 14 16 Kuznetsova 17 11 4 18 13 3 7 30.1 1.3 31.4 0 9.6 76.5 18 17 Williams, S 10 12295 3 3 322.2 2.7 24.9 6 7.8 76.2 11 18 Peschke 25 4 4 27 13 0 2 13 5 2 1 4 39.2 1.4 40.6 0 12.7 76.2 26 19 Saﬁna 21 3 4 18 106392 2 2 431.5 2.0 33.5 0 10.5 76.1 20 20 Srebotnik 21 3 4 17 10 2 2 16 3 1 1 4 31.5 1.2 32.7 0 10.5 75.6 28 21 Déchy 26 13 4 20 18 7 4 1 4 7 39.9 2.1 42.0 0 13.6 75.6 12 22 Kirilenko 26 3 4 28 157453 1 2 339.9 1.3 41.2 0 13.6 75.2 25 23 Hantuchova 25 8 4 26 19 3 2 3 3 4 37.2 2.2 39.4 0 13.1 75.0 19 24 Chakvetadze 23 5 4 25 16 5 3 4 3 34.5 1.1 35.6 0 12.3 74.3 33 25 Pennetta 24 5 4 13 14 14263 1 1 333.3 0.9 34.2 0 12.3 73.6 23 Likhovtseva 22 13 4 13 16 4 2 2 1 5 30.5 1.5 32.0 0 11.9 73.0 17 Grönefeld 28 6 4 18 148683112335.8 1.7 37.5 0 14.0 72.9 21 Golovin 22 5 4 15 13 10431 1 3 430.3 1.4 31.7 0 11.9 72.8 24 Martinez 20 2 4 19 14 7 1 1 1 3 26.8 0.9 27.7 0 10.5 72.4 32 Bovina 83197 2 312.3 0.7 13.0 0 5.3 71.1 62 Dulko 23 4 4 13 137383121227.8 1.8 29.6 0 12.3 70.7 27 Jankovic 29 5 4 19 216262 1 3 632.9 1.8 34.7 0 14.8 70.1 22 Frazier 19445862113 1 120.8 0.3 21.1 0 9.6 68.6 55 Sugiyama 27 2 4 22 175521 1 1 329.4 1.1 30.5 0 14.0 68.6 30 Molik 15 4 2 12 10 1 2 112317.2 1.7 18.9 1 8.7 68.4 29 Smashnova 18445732123 2 219.0 0.6 19.6 0 9.2 68.1 43 Farina Elia 23 7 4 13 132323112 23.5 1.4 24.9 0 12.3 67.0 — Bartoli 25 4 4 14 124574 3 225.8 0.8 26.6 0 13.1 66.9 40 Medina Garr 26 4 4 10 156293 1 1 324.6 0.9 25.5 0 12.7 66.7 34 Asagoe 25 4 4 13 152452 2 1 222.0 1.2 23.2 0 13.1 63.9 38 Zvonareva 2243714104 1 419.4 0.6 20.0 0 11.4 63.6 42 Raymond 20 3 3 15 15 0 2 3 18.3 0.3 18.6 0 11.0 62.9 76 Maleeva 207481521 317.3 0.3 17.6 0 11.0 61.6 52 Shaughnessy 25 1 4 10 118712 2 18.1 0.4 18.5 0 12.7 59.3 66 Sprem 244471575 1 117.0 0.3 17.3 0 12.7 57.6 65 Dokic 10 1111109 7.80 7.869.644.7 351

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 77 Idealized Rankings/Proposal 3 — Success against Strength of Field One of the big problems with the WTA rankings — one which will only get worse in 2006 — is the fact that the large majority of points awarded are round points, and round points don’t in any way reflect the strength of the field. Surely winning in a tough field should be worth more than winning in a weak field! The ideal approach to this is something like the ELO rankings used in chess, which takes into account the exact opponents you face. But this system is both complex and hard to explain. We can at least produce a bastardized version. We’ll just measure success, in a primitive way, against strength of field, based on the Modified TSI data on page 150. We will combine this with a variant on the WTA points table. In the WTA system, whatever the value of a tournament, you earn 70% of that number of points for reaching the final, 45% for reaching the semifinal, 25% for reaching the quarterfinal, etc. So at a Slam, where the winner earns 650 points, the finalist gets 650x.70=455 points (which the WTA managed to round to 456). A semifinalist earns 650x.45=292.5 points (rounded to 292). Etc. So what we will do is this. We will take the Modified TSI of each event, then multiply based on the round reached, using this table derived from the WTA’s: Win 1.00 Round of 16 .14 Qualifier (add to above) .04 Final .70 Round of 32 .09 Qualifying final .02 Semifinal .45 Round of 64 .05 Qualifying second round .01 Quarterfinal .25 Opening round loss, any level .0 We then add up the results, divide by the number of tournaments, and, well see what comes out. For example, Kim Clijsters played seventeen events this year: Antwerp QF, Indian Wells W, etc.. Antwerp had a strength of 54.5, and Clijsters made the quarterfinal. So she gets .545 times .25, or .14. Indian Wells had a MTSI of 79.8, and Clijsters won, so she gets .798 times 1.00, or .798. And so forth. We add all these up, then divide by the number of tournaments. In the case of Clijsters, that’s 164.1 divided by 6, or 27.4. As for where that puts her — well, see below. Note: Some tournaments have a MTSI below 10%; a number have a MTSI of 0. We are putting a “floor” of 10% on the MTSI values (.07 for Challengers), so that all tournaments are worth something. At the year- end Championships, we arbitrarily assign a value of .20 for each win. An Olympic bronze is worth .56. This is another tricky statistic, so we do the final Top 30 and only a handful of others..

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 78 Rank Player Score WTA Rank 1Davenport 47.7 1 2 Clijsters 39.8 2 3 Hénin-Hardenne 39.0 6 4 Sharapova 36.7 4 5Mauresmo 32.4 3 6 Pierce 31.4 5 7Williams, Venus 25.7 10 8Williams, Serena 21.8 11 9 Dementieva 19.5 8 10 Schnyder 18.7 7 11 Petrova 17.0 9 12 Kuznetsova 12.7 18 13 Myskina 12.6 14 14 Molik 10.9 29 15 Schiavone 10.8 13 16 Saﬁna 10.8 20 17 Bovina 10.8 62 18 Ivanovic 10.6 16 19 Hantuchova 10.3 19 20 Vaidisova 9.2 15 Déchy 9.0 12 Likhovtseva 8.4 17 Jankovic 7.3 22 Golovin 7.1 24 Grönefeld 6.7 21 Farina Elia 6.5 — Pennetta 6.2 23 Dulko 5.6 27 Kirilenko 5.4 25 Sugiyama 5.1 30 Peschke 4.9 26 Zvonareva 4.9 42 Maleeva 4.7 52 Srebotnik 4.6 28 Sprem 2.1 65

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 79 Idealized Rankings Summarized The previous three rankings are all based on different calculation methods, so it is arguable that their consensus is a still better ranking. It turns out that only 18 different players are Top 15 in any of the three rankings — Clijsters, Davenport, Dementieva, Hénin-Hardenne, Mauresmo, Myskina, Petrova, Pierce, Schaivone, Schnyder, Sharapova, and Venus Williams are Top 15 in all three systems; Ivanovic, Vaidisova, and Serena Williams in two; Karatantcheva, Kuznetsova, and Molik in one each. How to combine the rankings? One option is to take the median, with any ranking above #15 counted arbitrarily as #20. For the players with only one Top 15 ranking, I have taken the median of that ranking and 20. Standing Player Surf-Mod Div Adj Won-Lost Strength of Field Average Median 1Davenport 1 2 1 1.3 1 2 Clijsters 2 1 2 1.7 2 3 Sharapova 3 3 4 3.3 3 4T Mauresmo 5 4 5 4.7 5 4T Pierce 4 5 6 5.0 5 6 Hénin-Hardenne 6 6 3 5.0 6 7Williams, Venus 7 9 7 7.7 7 8 Dementieva 8 12 9 9.7 9 9T Petrova 10 8 11 9.7 10 9T Schnyder 9 11 10 10.0 10 11 Williams, Serena 11 8 13.0 11 12 Ivanovic 12 10 14.0 12 13 Vaidisova 13 7 13.3 13 14 Myskina 14 15 13 14.0 14 15 Schiavone 15 13 15 14.3 15 16 Kuznetsova 12 17.3 16 17T Molik 14 18.0 17 17T Karatantcheva 14 18.0 17 Alternately, we can sort by the average ranking: Standing Player Surf-Mod Div Adj Won-Lost Strength of Field Average Median 1Davenport 1 2 1 1.3 1 2 Clijsters 2 1 2 1.7 2 3 Sharapova 3 3 4 3.3 3 4Mauresmo 5 4 5 4.7 5 5T Pierce 4 5 6 5 5 5T Hénin-Hardenne 6 6 3 5 6 7Williams, Venus 7 9 7 7.7 7 8T Dementieva 8 12 9 9.7 9 8T Petrova 10 8 11 9.7 10 10 Schnyder 9 11 10 10 10 11 Williams, Serena 11 8 13 11 12 Vaidisova 13 7 13.3 13 13T Ivanovic 12 10 14 12 13T Myskina 14 15 13 14 14 15 Schiavone 15 13 15 14.3 15 16 Kuznetsova 12 17.3 16 17T Molik 14 18 17 17T Karatantcheva 14 18 17 We note with interest that Davenport comes out ahead of Clijsters. I, at least, was very surprised.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 80 Percentage of Possible Points Earned Tournaments differ in their “richness.” A win at a Slam, for instance, is worth twice as much as a win in an equivalent round of a Tier I. A player who plays mostly “rich” tournaments, such as Slams and Tier I events, will therefore earn more points than a player who has the same number of wins in lesser tournaments. We can control for this by comparing a player’s actual score with the expected results at given tournaments. For these purposes, we must find expected values for each type of tournaments. I estimate as follows: ¥ Slam: 1000 (650 round points + 350 quality points = 7 rounds * 25 pts/round *2 slam bonus) ¥ Los Angeles Championship: 760 (485 round points + 225 qual points = 5 rounds * 55 pts/round) ¥ 96 draw [Tier I] — Miami, Indian Wells: 505 (325 round points + 180 qual points = 6 rounds * 30 pts/round) ¥ 56-Draw Tier I (=Charleston, Berlin, Rome, Canadian Open): 450 (300 round points + 150 qual points = 5 rounds * 30 pts/round) ¥ 28-Draw Tier I (=Pan Pacific, Zürich, Moscow): 428 (300 round points + 128 qual points = 4 rounds * 32 pts/round) ¥ Tier II: 327 (195 round points + 132 qual points = 4 rounds * 33 pts/round) [includes Olympics] ¥ Tier III: 208 (120 round points + 88 qual points = 4 rounds * 22 pts/round) ¥ Tier IV: 155 (95 round points for Tier IV + 60 qual points = 5 rounds * 12 pts/round) ¥ Challenger: 60 points (very approximate, since Challengers vary, but it hardly matters) Note that the above point totals are approximations, based on the examination of several tournament fields, and is what one could typically expect to earn at such an event. Actual tournament winners will not earn this precise amount; the Tier II events in particular vary widely. It is, of course, possible to calculate the maximum number of points a player could earn for any given tournament — but this is actually an unfair gauge, because chances are that a particular player will not play all her highest-round opponents. And this is not under the player’s own control. Based on these numbers, we can calculate an approximate figure for the number of points a player could have earned based on her schedule. This is the “Possible Points” field. The “Actual Points” is what the player actually earned in these events (note that this does not match a player’s WTA ranking total, because all events count). The column after that, “Percent,” shows the percent of her possible points a player earned. The final column, “average richness,” is simply the possible points divided by the number of tournaments. This shows how strong a player’s schedule is. Justine Hénin-Hardenne for instance, played only nine tournaments — but they included three Slams, which are obviously “rich,” so she played the richest schedule of any player. Also having scheduled with “richness” figures in excess of 550 are Pierce, Sharapova, and Serena Williams (last year’s strength leader); such strong schedules probably should not be allowed. The key figure, though, is “percent” — this is the calculation which shows how well a player lived up to expectations. In this category, Davenport is the leader at 56.2%, barely edging Clijsters at 56.0%; this is effectively equal to 2004’s leader Hénin-Hardenne at 56.1% — but none of those figures is all that impressive; in 2003, Serena Williams was at 84% earned, and she had 86% in 2002; Hénin-Hardenne herself was at 72% in 2003. It shows you how bad a year Serena had that she was down all the way to 32%. It’s interesting to note how “democratic” this has all become; in 2004, we had two players (Henin- Hardenne, Davenport) over 50%, and four more (Mauresmo, Clijsters, Serena, Myskina) over 40%, with 11 total players at 25% or more. By contrast, in 2003, we had three players over 60% (Serena, 84%; Hénin- Hardenne, 72%; Clijsters, 68%), but only one other over 40% (Venus, 53%) and a total of 7 players over 25%. In 2002, we had two players over 60% (Serena, 86%, Venus, 62%), five over 40%, and nine over 25%; in 2001, we have two players over 60% (Venus, 65%; Davenport, 63%); six over 40%, and ten over 25%; in 2000, Venus had 80%, Hingis 68%, five players exceeded 40%, and seven were over 25%.

For additional alternate ranking schemes, see Statistics/Rankings Based on Head-to-Head Numbers.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 81 Rnk Player Slam YE Tr I Tr I 56 Tr I 28 Tier Tier Tier Chall Possibl Actual Percent Avg Chm 96 dr draw draw II III IV Points Points Richn 1Davenport 4 111261 8741 4910 56.2% 546.3 2 Clijsters 3 1 2 3 7 1 8617 4829 56.0% 506.9 3 Hénin-Hardenn 3 1 3 2 5711 2936 51.4% 634.6 4 Sharapova 4 122231 8715 3958 45.4% 581.0 5 Pierce 4 11413 8474 3797 44.8% 605.3 6Mauresmo 4 12327 10265 4032 39.3% 540.3 7Williams, Venu 4 1 1 5 1 6798 2628 38.7% 566.5 8Williams, Seren 3 1 2 4 5713 1851 32.4% 571.3 9 Dementieva 4 123361 10574 2751 26.0% 528.7 10 Schnyder 4 1142113 12142 3069 25.3% 467.0 11 Petrova 4 125193 12015 2902 24.2% 480.6 12 Vaidisova 4 2 2 2 5 2 7914 1581 20.0% 465.5 13 Ivanovic 4 1316 1 8400 1551 18.5% 525.0 14 Myskina 4 132711 9363 1618 17.3% 492.8 15 Schiavone 4 222821110013 1710 17.1% 455.1 16 Déchy 4 2 4 2 10 4 11768 1887 16.0% 452.6 17 Kuznetsova 4 2434 9402 1491 15.9% 553.1 18 Molik 2 1 2 8 2 6393 996 15.6% 426.2 19 Saﬁna 4 231533 9512 1378 14.5% 453.0 20 Likhovtseva 4 24372 10799 1524 14.1% 490.9 21 Bovina 1 2 2 3 4194 558 13.3% 524.3 22 Hantuchova 4 2 4 2 11 2 11679 1547 13.2% 467.2 23 Grönefeld 4 251662211328 1437.5 12.7% 404.6 24 Golovin 4 241641 10187 1200 11.8% 463.0 25 Pennetta 4 242543 10598 1248 11.8% 441.6 Srebotnik 4 212525 9142 1001.75 11.0% 435.3 Peschke 4 222722410021 1050.75 10.5% 400.8 Jankovic 4 2 5 3 11 2 2 12867 1333 10.4% 443.7 Dulko 4 241633 10289 1065 10.4% 447.3 Kirilenko 4 242741211062 1137 10.3% 425.5 Farina Elia 4 2 2 9 3 3 9788 972 9.9% 425.6 Martinez 4 15172 9888 928 9.4% 494.4 Sugiyama 4 152951 11749 1024.5 8.7% 435.1 Smashnova 4 12425 8811 745 8.5% 489.5 Medina Garrigu 4 241834 11098 912.75 8.2% 426.8 Zvonareva 3 14275 9490 764 8.1% 431.4 Asagoe 4 242742 11097 884 8.0% 443.9 Frazier 4 2 2 43228272 636.5 7.7% 435.4 Chakvetadze 4 23293 12768 924.25 7.2% 555.1 Bartoli 4 22854 11801 804.75 6.8% 472.0 Maleeva 4 1 2 2 10 1 9739 651 6.7% 487.0 Zuluaga 3 2 5 2 1 7122 415 5.8% 547.8 Shaughnessy 4 2 4 6 7 2 10538 541.75 5.1% 421.5 Sprem 4 24185 10894 541.25 5.0% 453.9 Raymond 4 22192 9697 467.5 4.8% 484.9 Dokic 1 1 4 4 1573 69.25 4.4% 157.3 Suárez 1 2 1 2 1 3322 132 4.0% 474.6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 82 Head to Head/Results against Top Players The Top 20 Head to Head The table below shows how the Top 20 fared against each other in 2005. For completeness, more players are shown on the vertical axis, although only the Top 20 can be listed across the top for space reasons. Reading the Table: For space reasons, the names of the Top 20 players have been abbreviated in the column headings. Scores are meant to be read across the rows. So, e.g., if you look down the column headed DAVENPO(rt) and the row labelled Clijsters, you will see the notation “1-2.” This means that Davenport and Clijsters played three times (1+2=3), with Clijsters winning one and Davenport two. C D D D H H I K L M M P P S S S S V S V L A É E A É V U I A Y E I A C C H A W W I V C M N N A Z K U S T E F H H A I I I J E H E T I N N H R K R R I I N R D L L S N Y N U N O E O E I O C N A Y A I L L T P T C - V T V S N V E A V D P S I I E O I H H I S T M A A O E O O A A Clijsters 1-2 2-0 3-1 3-0 1-0 0-0 1-1 0-0 1-1 2-0 2-0 1-1 3-0 3-0 0-1 2-0 0-0 0-0 2-1 Davenport 2-1 4-0 0-1 3-0 0-1 0-0 2-0 0-0 3-0 2-0 2-0 0-2 1-0 3-0 3-0 1-2 1-0 0-1 1-1 Déchy 0-2 0-4 0-2 1-0 0-0 0-1 1-1 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 1-0 1-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 Dementieva 1-3 1-0 2-0 1-1 0-1 0-0 1-0 0-1 0-3 1-2 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-1 3-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 Dulko 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 Farina Elia 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-3 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 1-0 0-1 0-0 1-0 1-0 Golovin 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-2 0-0 0-1 0-3 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 2-1 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-0 1-0 Grönefeld 0-2 1-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 1-1 0-1 1-0 0-1 0-1 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-1 Hantuchova 0-3 0-3 0-1 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 2-1 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-2 Hénin-Hardenne 0-1 1-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 1-0 2-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 2-0 1-1 0-0 0-0 2-0 2-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 Ivanovic 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 1-3 0-0 1-1 0-1 0-1 1-0 0-4 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 Jankovic 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 1-0 0-1 0-1 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-2 1-0 0-1 Kirilenko 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-1 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 1-0 1-1 0-1 0-0 0-2 Kuznetsova 1-1 0-2 1-1 0-1 1-0 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 Likhovtseva 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-3 1-0 0-1 0-3 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 Martinez 0-2 0-2 1-0 0-0 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-2 1-0 0-1 0-0 1-1 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 Mauresmo 1-1 0-3 0-0 3-0 0-0 0-1 3-1 0-0 3-0 1-0 3-1 3-2 1-1 0-1 2-0 1-0 0-1 0-1 1-0 Molik 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 2-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 1-0 Myskina 0-2 0-2 0-1 2-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 Pennetta 0-1 0-0 2-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-1 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 Peschke 0-0 0-2 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-3 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 Petrova 0-2 0-2 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-2 1-1 0-0 1-0 1-3 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-1 1-1 1-2 1-1 0-1 0-0 Pierce 1-1 2-0 1-0 2-0 0-0 1-1 1-0 0-0 3-0 2-3 0-0 1-1 1-0 1-0 2-0 0-2 1-0 0-1 0-1 Saﬁna 0-3 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 1-1 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 1-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 Schiavone 0-3 0-3 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 1-0 0-1 0-0 1-1 0-0 1-0 1-1 0-0 Schnyder 1-0 0-3 0-1 1-3 1-2 0-2 4-0 1-0 0-1 0-2 1-0 1-1 0-2 0-0 1-1 0-2 1-0 0-0 0-1 Sharapova 0-2 2-1 1-0 0-0 1-0 1-2 0-0 1-0 1-0 0-1 0-0 2-1 2-0 1-1 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-1 1-1 Srebotnik 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 1-0 1-1 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 Sugiyama 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-0 1-0 1-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 Vaidisova 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-1 1-0 1-1 0-1 1-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 Williams, Serena 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 1-0 0-0 1-0 1-0 0-0 1-1 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-2 Williams, Venus 1-2 1-1 0-0 0-0 2-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 1-1 1-0 2-0 Zvonareva 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 1-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 83 Wins Over Top Players Matches Played/Won against the (Final) Top Twenty This table summarizes how players did against the players who would constitute the final Top Twenty. (Note that, for the players ranked in the Top Twenty, the total number of opponents they could face is 19.) The final column,% of wins against Top 20, calculates the fraction of a player’s wins earned against the Top Twenty — a measure of the difficulty one faced to earn those wins.We note that the leader in this category Davenport at 48%, then Pierce, with Clijsters and Mauresmo nearly tied for third; Peschke and Kirilenko are last. Davenport and Schnyder played the most different Top 20 opponents (17); Clijsters beat the most different opponents (14). Schnyder managed the less promising feat of losing to the most different Top 20 players (12) and having the most Top 20 losses (21) Distinct Distinct Distinct Top 20 Top 20 Top 20 Total Total Total % of wins Player WTA Opponents Players Players Top 20 Top 20 Wins, all against Name Rank Played Beaten Lost To Victories Losses opponents Top 20 Clijsters 2 15 14 7 27 8 65 42% Davenport 1 17 13 7 28 9 58 48% Déchy 12 12585134013% Dementieva 8 12 7 9 10 15 40 25% Dulko 27 103737329% Farina Elia — 11484102417% Golovin 24 11394123312% Grönefeld 21 12494124010% Hantuchova 19 11 3 10 4 15 37 11% Hénin-Hardenne 6 11 10 3 14 3 34 41% Ivanovic 16 10666114015% Jankovic 22 13 2 11 2 14 36 6% Kirilenko 25 1029213435% Kuznetsova 18 11494112914% Likhovtseva 17 9363103010% Martinez 32 13 3 11 3 15 28 11% Mauresmo 3 16 11 10 22 13 53 42% Molik 29 836461724% Myskina 14 1029311349% Pennetta 23 82638388% Peschke 26 717112442% Petrova 9 13 8 11 8 17 56 14% Pierce 5 16 13 7 19 10 41 46% Safina 20 83739368% Schiavone 13 12777114018% Schnyder 7 17 9 12 12 21 58 21% Sharapova 4 14 11 9 14 11 53 26% Srebotnik 28 92828385% Sugiyama 30 837393110% Vaidisova 15 13 4 10 4 10 45 9% Williams, Serena 11 982832138% Williams,Venus 10 10 9 4 11 5 34 32% Zvonareva 42 835352114%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 84 Won/Lost Versus the Top Players (Based on Rankings at the Time of the Match) The following table shows each player’s won/lost record against the Top 10, against the Second 10 (#11-#20), and against the Top 20 as a whole, based on the rankings at the time. (The next previous table gives statistics based on the final Top 20.) The player with the best record in each category is shown in bold. WTA Player Overall Against Top 10 Against #11-#20 Against Top 20 Non-Top20 Rank Name WLWL%WL% WL % WL % 38 Asagoe 24 25 2 3 40.0% 1 5 16.7% 3 8 27.3% 21 17 55.3% 40 Bartoli 29 25 0 4 0% 3 4 42.9% 3 8 27.3% 26 17 60.5% 62 Bovina 12 8 0 3 0% 2 1 66.7% 2 4 33.3% 10 4 71.4% 33 Chakvetadze 35 23 0 7 0% 4 4 50.0% 4 11 26.7% 31 12 72.1% 2 Clijsters 65 9 13 5 72.2% 9 3 75.0% 22 8 73.3% 43 1 97.7% 1Davenport 58 10 10 5 66.7% 13 1 92.9% 23 6 79.3% 35 4 89.7% 12 Déchy 40 26 1 9 10.0% 4 1 80.0% 5 10 33.3% 35 16 68.6% 8 Dementieva 40 21 3 6 33.3% 6 4 60.0% 9 10 47.4% 31 11 73.8% 27 Dulko 32 23 3 3 50.0% 1 4 20.0% 4 7 36.4% 28 16 63.6% —Farina Elia 24 23 2 4 33.3% 2 5 28.6% 4 9 30.8% 20 14 58.8% 24 Golovin 33 22 1 4 20.0% 3 5 37.5% 4 9 30.8% 29 13 69.0% 21 Grönefeld 40 27 2 7 22.2% 2 4 33.3% 4 11 26.7% 36 16 69.2% 19 Hantuchova 37 25 3 10 23.1% 3 6 33.3% 6 16 27.3% 31 9 77.5% 6 Hénin-Hardenne 34 5 9 2 81.8% 4180.0% 13 3 81.3% 21 2 91.3% 16 Ivanovic 40 14 3 7 30.0% 3 2 60.0% 6 9 40.0% 34 5 87.2% 22 Jankovic 36 29 1712.5% 3 5 37.5% 4 12 25.0% 32 17 65.3% 35 Karatantcheva 33 16 0 6 0% 2 2 50.0% 2 8 20.0% 31 8 79.5% 25 Kirilenko 43 26 1 4 20.0% 2 3 40.0% 3 7 30.0% 40 19 67.8% 18 Kuznetsova 29 17 0 4 0% 3 4 42.9% 3 8 27.3% 26 9 74.3% 17 Likhovtseva 30 22 2 8 20.0% 1 1 50.0% 3 9 25.0% 27 13 67.5% 52 Maleeva 17 20 0 6 0% 0 6 0% 0 12 0% 17 8 68.0% 32 Martinez 28 19 1 6 14.3% 1 6 14.3% 2 12 14.3% 26 7 78.8% 3Mauresmo 53 16 12 7 63.2% 9 2 81.8% 21 9 70.0% 32 7 82.1% 34 Medina Garrigues 29 24 1 4 20.0% 1 6 14.3% 2 10 16.7% 27 14 65.9% 29 Molik 17 14 2 3 40.0% 2 1 66.7% 4 4 50.0% 13 10 56.5% 14 Myskina 34 18 2 6 25.0% 1 1 50.0% 3 7 30.0% 31 11 73.8% 23 Pennetta 38 23 1 5 16.7% 1 2 33.3% 2 7 22.2% 36 16 69.2% 26 Peschke 44 24 2 7 22.2% 1 4 20.0% 3 11 21.4% 41 13 75.9% 9 Petrova 56 22 3 10 23.1% 4 4 50.0% 7 14 33.3% 49 8 86.0% 5 Pierce 41 12 9 7 56.3% 8 3 72.7% 17 10 63.0% 24 2 92.3% 76 Raymond 18 20 0 0 — 0 5 0% 0 5 0% 18 15 54.5% 20 Saﬁna 36 19 2 6 25.0% 2 2 50.0% 4 8 33.3% 32 11 74.4% 13 Schiavone 40 22 4 10 28.6% 2 3 40.0% 6 13 31.6% 34 9 79.1% 7 Schnyder 58 25 5 11 31.3% 5 4 55.6% 10 15 40.0% 48 10 82.8% 4 Sharapova 53 12 8 5 61.5% 5 4 55.6% 13 9 59.1% 40 3 93.0% 43 Smashnova 24 16 0 4 0% 2 2 50.0% 2 6 25.0% 22 10 68.8% 65 Sprem 18 24 0 5 0% 1 3 25.0% 1 8 11.1% 17 16 51.5% 28 Srebotnik 38 19 1 4 20.0% 1 1 50.0% 2 5 28.6% 36 14 72.0% 30 Sugiyama 31 27 1 2 33.3% 1 5 16.7% 2 7 22.2% 29 20 59.2% 15 Vaidisova 45 14 2 5 28.6% 4 3 57.1% 6 8 42.9% 39 6 86.7% 11 Williams, Serena 21 7 3 2 60.0% 3 0 100.0% 6275.0% 15 5 75.0% 10 Williams, Venus 34 9 5 4 55.6% 4 2 66.7% 9 6 60.0% 25 3 89.3% 42 Zvonareva 21 21 0 1 0% 1 2 33.3% 1 3 25.0% 20 18 52.6%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 85 Won/Lost Versus the Top Players (Based on Final Rankings) The following table shows each player’s won/lost record against the Top 10, against the Second 10 (#11- #20), and against the Top 20 as a whole, based on final rankings. Note: This is not the same as the players’ wins over Top 10/Top 20 players, given in the previous table. What is shown here is the player’s record against the women who ended the year in the Top 10/Top 20. At the time of the matches, some of these women will not have been at their final ranks. On the other hand, it could be argued that this is a better measure of success against top players — a player who ends 2004 at #2 (e.g. Clijsters) had a better 2005 than a player who began the year at #5 but ended it outside the Top Fifteen (Kuznetsova), and a win against the player with the higher final rank should therefore mean more. The player with the best (worst) record in each category is shown in bold. WTA Player Overall W/L Against Top 10 Against #11-#20 Against Top 20 Non-Top20 Rank Name WLWL%WL% WL % WL % 2 Clijsters 65 913765% 14 1 93% 27 8 77% 38 1 97% 1Davenport 58 10 12 8 60% 16 1 94% 28 9 76% 30 1 97% 12 Déchy 40 26 1 10 9% 4 3 57% 5 13 28% 35 13 73% 8 Dementieva 40 21 5 10 33% 5 5 50% 10 15 40% 30 6 83% 27 Dulko 32 23 2 2 50% 1 5 17% 3 7 30% 29 16 64% —Farina Elia 24 23 2 3 40% 2 7 22% 4 10 29% 20 13 61% 24 Golovin 33 22 2 5 29% 2 7 22% 4 12 25% 29 10 74% 21 Grönefeld 40 27 2 10 17% 2 2 50% 4 12 25% 36 15 71% 19 Hantuchova 37 25 3 12 20% 1 3 25% 4 15 21% 33 10 77% 6 Hénin-Hardenne 34 5 10 3 77% 40100% 14 3 82% 20 2 91% 16 Ivanovic 40 14 2 10 17% 4 1 80% 6 11 35% 34 3 92% 22 Jankovic 36 29 0100%2 4 33%21413% 34 15 69% 25 Kirilenko 43 26 2 7 22% 0 6 0% 2 13 13% 41 13 76% 18 Kuznetsova 29 17 1 8 11% 3 3 50% 4 11 27% 25 6 81% 17 Likhovtseva 30 22 2 8 20% 1 2 33% 3 10 23% 27 12 69% 32 Martinez 28 19 0 9 0% 3 6 33% 3 15 17% 25 4 86% 3Mauresmo 53 16 14 8 64% 8 5 62% 22 13 63% 31 3 91% 29 Molik 17 14 4 4 50% 0 2 0% 4 6 40% 13 8 62% 14 Myskina 34 18 2 8 20% 1 3 25% 3 11 21% 31 7 82% 23 Pennetta 38 23 1 5 17% 2 3 40% 3 8 27% 35 15 70% 26 Peschke 44 24 1 9 10% 0 3 0% 1 12 8% 43 12 78% 9 Petrova 56 22 4 13 24% 4 4 50% 8 17 32% 48 5 91% 5 Pierce 41 12 11 9 55% 8 1 89% 19 10 66% 22 2 92% 20 Saﬁna 36 19 2 7 22% 1 2 33% 3 9 25% 33 10 77% 13 Schiavone 40 22 4 8 33% 3 3 50% 7 11 39% 33 11 75% 7 Schnyder 58 25 3 16 16% 9 5 64% 12 21 36% 46 4 92% 4 Sharapova 53 12 9 9 50% 5 2 71% 14 11 56% 39 1 98% 28 Srebotnik 38 19 1 4 20% 1 4 20% 2 8 20% 36 11 77% 30 Sugiyama 31 27 0 4 0% 3 5 38% 3 9 25% 28 18 61% 15 Vaidisova 45 14 1 7 13% 3 3 50% 4 10 29% 41 4 91% 11 Williams, Serena 21 7 5 2 71% 3 1 75% 8 3 73% 13 4 76% 10 Williams,Venus 34 9 5 5 50% 6 0 100% 11 5 69% 23 4 85% 42 Zvonareva 21 21 0 2 0% 3 3 50% 3 5 38% 18 16 53%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 86 Statistics/Rankings Based on Head-to-Head Numbers Based on these numbers, we can offer a number of statistics/rankings. For instance: Total Wins over Top Ten Players

Based on the Top Ten at the Time: Based on the Final Top Ten: 1. Clijsters (13) 1. Mauresmo (14) 2. Mauresmo (12) 2. Clijsters (13) 3. Davenport (10) 3. Davenport (12) 4T. Hénin-Hardenne (9) 4. Pierce (11) 4T. Pierce (9) 5. Hénin-Hardenne (10)

Winning Percentage against Top Ten Players (Minimum eight matches)

Based on the Top Ten at the Time: Based on the Final Top Ten: [1.] [Suárez, Sun: 1–0, 100%] 1. Hénin-Hardenne (77%) 1. Hénin-Hardenne (82%) 2. Serena Williams (71%) 2. Clijsters (72%) 3. Clijsters (65%) 3. Davenport (67%) 4. Mauresmo (64%) [3T.] [Vinci, 2Ð1, 67%] 5. Davenport (60%) 4. Mauresmo (63%) 5. Pierce (56%)

For additional information about winning percentages, see Winning Percentage against Non-Top-20 Players.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 87 How They Earned Their Points The following tables evaluate the manner in which players earn points, breaking them up, e.g., by points earned on each surface, points earned from quality versus round points, points earned in Slams.... In assessing the first table, Fraction of Points Earned in Slams, note that the Top 25 collectively earned 58305.5 points in 2005 (total actual points; the total of their Best 17 scores is of course somewhat lower), down from 58516.5 points in 2004 but still slightly more than the 58028.25 points in 2003; the figure was 58524.25 points in 2002 and 57459 points in 2001. (But, given the point inflation on the WTA, this actually means that they decreased their fraction of total points earned from 2001 to 2005.). Of the points earned in 2005, 20336, or 34.9%, were earned in Slams — the record for recent years;. In 2004, 19088, or 32.6%, were earned at Slams; in 2003, the figure was 33.5%; in 2002, it was 30.9% in 2002; in 2001, before the Great Slam Inflation, the figure was a mere 28.6%. The mean of the fraction of points earned in the Slams in 2005 is 32.8% (that is, this is the average of the players’ fractions); it was 32.0% in 2004. The median is Myskina’s 31.4%; last year, the median was 28.5%. The extremes are Safina’s minimum of 9% and Serena’s maximum of 76% — a much wider range than in 2004, when the extremes were 13% and 58%, but not far from the 2003 extremes of 10% and 74%. The next table is Quality Versus Round Points. Generally speaking, the higher the fraction of points one earns from quality, the better one is at pulling off “upsets.” This is especially true of lower-ranked players — top-ranked players have fewer opportunities to earn quality points. For Comparison: The Top 25, as noted above, earned an actual total of 58305.5 points in 2005. 19704 of these, or 33.8%, came from quality. This is slightly up from 2004, when the numbers were 58516.5, 19617, 33.5% from quality. It remains below the historical average, though: in 2003, 34.8% of the top players’ points came from quality; in 2002, it was 35.1%, and 35.4% in 2001. The median quality percentage for the Top 25 is slightly higher: the median player, Grönefeld, picked up 33.9% of her points from quality (though over 20% of those points came from one win over Davenport). The mean of the percentage from quality was lower, however, 33.5%. Of all the players I tested, only one had more than half her points from quality: Suárez earned 51.5% of her points based on the players she beat. Of the Top 25, the leader was Ivanovic, with 41.2%. Of the Top 50, six players were over 40%: Peng (41.2%), Ivanovic (41.2%), Dushevina (41.1%), Peschke (40.5%), Serena (40.2%), and Vinci (40.1%). I didn’t test many players below that, but Linetskaya was at 40.5%. The freakiest case of quality points, however, may belong to Craybas: 39.6% of her points were from quality, and over a third of those came from her win over Serena Williams at Wimbledon. 15% of her points come just from the quality points from that result. The lowest rate of anyone I tested, apart from the special case of Hingis, came from Kuznetsova, who earned only 23.5% of her points from quality. No other player tested was below 25%; Zvonareva was next at 25.1%. The final table, Percentage of Points Earned on Each Surface, assesses surface balance. The first four numbers in this table (% on hard, clay, grass, indoor) should be fairly self-explanatory: They represent the fraction of each player’s points that she earned on the particular surface. The last column, RMS, is perhaps less clear. This is an attempt to assess a player’s balance. RMS, for Root Mean Square, measures the player’s distance from the mean. The smaller the RMS value, the more “typical” a player is. Thus, Tatiana Golovin was the most balanced player in the Top 25; Amy Frazier was also very balanced; Maria Sharapova and Lindsay Davenport were next. The least balanced player in the list is Justine Hénin-Hardenne, with her heavy bias toward clay, followed by Bovina (who of course lost tournaments to injury), Smashnova (another clay fan), and Serena Williams (who is heavy on hardcourts). The median deviation for the Top 25 is .22; for the Top 30, it is .23. So a player with a deviation of less than .22 is relatively balanced; one with a deviation above this is relatively unbalanced. For Reference: For the Top 25 as a whole, 44.9% of all points were earned on hardcourts (compared to 45.8% in 2004 and 41.1% in 2003), 21.4% on clay (22.7% in 2004), 10.4% on grass (10.1% in 2004), and 23.2% indoors (21.4% in 2004).

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 88 Fraction of Points Earned in Slams WTA Rank Player Name Total Points Points from Slams % of Slam Pts Pts outside Slams % Not from Slams 1Davenport 4910 2000 40.7% 2910 59.3% 2 Clijsters 4829 1286 26.6% 3543 73.4% 3Mauresmo 4032 996 24.7% 3036 75.3% 4 Sharapova 3958 1610 40.7% 2348 59.3% 5 Pierce 3797 1988 52.4% 1809 47.6% 6 Hénin-Hardenne 2936 1208 41.1% 1728 58.9% 7 Schnyder 3069 564 18.4% 2505 81.6% 8 Dementieva 2751 1024 37.2% 1727 62.8% 9 Petrova 2902 980 33.8% 1922 66.2% 10 Williams, Venus 2628 1686 64.2% 942 35.8% 11 Williams, Serena 1851 1414 76.4% 437 23.6% 12 Déchy 1887 890 47.2% 997 52.8% 13 Schiavone 1710 322 18.8% 1388 81.2% 14 Myskina 1618 508 31.4% 1110 68.6% 15 Vaidisova 1581 356 22.5% 1225 77.5% 16 Ivanovic 1551 582 37.5% 969 62.5% 17 Likhovtseva 1524 902 59.2% 622 40.8% 18 Kuznetsova 1491 548 36.8% 943 63.2% 19 Hantuchova 1547 304 19.7% 1243 80.3% 20 Saﬁna 1378 124 9.0% 1254 91.0% 21 Grönefeld 1437.5 300 20.9% 1137.5 79.1% 22 Jankovic 1333 208 15.6% 1125 84.4% 23 Pennetta 1248 220 17.6% 1028 82.4% 24 Golovin 1200 198 16.5% 1002 83.5% 25 Kirilenko 1137 118 10.4% 1019 89.6% 26 Peschke 1050.75 256 24.4% 794.75 75.6% 27 Dulko 1065 172 16.2% 893 83.8% 28 Srebotnik 1001.75 124 12.4% 877.75 87.6% 29 Molik 996 282 28.3% 714 71.7% 30 Sugiyama 1024.5 78 7.6% 946.5 92.4% 31 Mirza 935.75 250 26.7% 685.75 73.3% 32 Martinez 928 82 8.8% 846 91.2% 33 Chakvetadze 924.25 224 24.2% 700.25 75.8% 34 Medina Garrigues 912.75 160 17.5% 752.75 82.5% 35 Karatantcheva 902.25 414 45.9% 488.25 54.1% 36 Koukalova 890.75 76 8.5% 814.75 91.5% 38 Asagoe 884 166 18.8% 718 81.2% 39 Dushevina 837.25 232 27.7% 605.25 72.3% 40 Bartoli 804.75 162 20.1% 642.75 79.9% 42 Zvonareva 764 136 17.8% 628 82.2% 43 Smashnova 745 208 27.9% 537 72.1% 52 Maleeva 651 320 49.2% 331 50.8% 55 Frazier 636.5 174 27.3% 462.5 72.7% 62 Bovina 558 168 30.1% 390 69.9% 65 Sprem 541.25 206 38.1% 335.25 61.9% —Farina Elia 972 280 28.8% 692 71.2%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 89 Quality Versus Round Points WTA Player Total Round Quality % of Points % of Points from Rank Name Points Points Points from Quality Round Pts 1Davenport 4910 1643 3267 33.5% 66.5% 2 Clijsters 4829 1719 3110 35.6% 64.4% 3Mauresmo 4032 1282 2750 31.8% 68.2% 4 Sharapova 3958 1291 2667 32.6% 67.4% 5 Pierce 3797 1516 2281 39.9% 60.1% 6 Hénin-Hardenne 2936 1107 1829 37.7% 62.3% 7 Schnyder 3069 898 2171 29.3% 70.7% 8 Dementieva 2751 935 1816 34.0% 66.0% 9 Petrova 2902 815 2087 28.1% 71.9% 10 Williams, Venus 2628 989 1639 37.6% 62.4% 11 Williams, Serena 1851 744 1107 40.2% 59.8% 12 Déchy 1887 646 1241 34.2% 65.8% 13 Schiavone 1710 615 1095 36.0% 64.0% 14 Myskina 1618 461 1157 28.5% 71.5% 15 Vaidisova 1581 548 1033 34.7% 65.3% 16 Ivanovic 1551 639 912 41.2% 58.8% 17 Likhovtseva 1524 552 972 36.2% 63.8% 18 Kuznetsova 1491 351 1140 23.5% 76.5% 19 Hantuchova 1547 473 1074 30.6% 69.4% 20 Saﬁna 1378 443 935 32.1% 67.9% 21 Grönefeld 1437.5 487 950.5 33.9% 66.1% 22 Jankovic 1333 436 897 32.7% 67.3% 23 Pennetta 1248 349 899 28.0% 72.0% 24 Golovin 1200 373 827 31.1% 68.9% 25 Kirilenko 1137 392 745 34.5% 65.5% 26 Peschke 1050.75 426 624.75 40.5% 59.5% 27 Dulko 1065 399 666 37.5% 62.5% 28 Srebotnik 1001.75 345 656.75 34.4% 65.6% 29 Molik 996 340 656 34.1% 65.9% 30 Sugiyama 1024.5 315 709.5 30.7% 69.3% 31 Mirza 935.75 306 629.75 32.7% 67.3% 32 Martinez 928 286 642 30.8% 69.2% 33 Chakvetadze 924.25 353 571.25 38.2% 61.8% 34 Medina Garrigues 912.75 285 627.75 31.2% 68.8% 38 Asagoe 884 280 604 31.7% 68.3% 40 Bartoli 804.75 261 543.75 32.4% 67.6% 42 Zvonareva 764 192 572 25.1% 74.9% 43 Smashnova 745 224 521 30.1% 69.9% 52 Maleeva 651 195 456 30.0% 70.0% 55 Frazier 636.5 174 462.5 27.3% 72.7% 62 Bovina 558 190 368 34.1% 65.9% 65 Sprem 541.25 169 372.25 31.2% 68.8% 66 Shaughnessy 541.75 152 389.75 28.1% 71.9% 76 Raymond 467.5 127 340.5 27.2% 72.8% 232 Suárez 132 68 64 51.5% 48.5% —Farina Elia 972 338 634 34.8% 65.2%

Asagoe 32% 68% Bartoli 32% 68% Bovina 34% 66% Chakvetadze 38% 62% Clijsters 36% 64% Davenport 33% 67% Déchy 34% 66% Dementieva 34% 66% Dulko 37% 63% Dushevina 41% 59% Farina Elia 35% 65% Frazier 27% 73% Golovin 31% 69% Grönefeld 34% 66% Hantuchova 31% 69% Hénin-Hardenne 38% 62% Ivanovic 41% 59% Jankovic 33% 67% Karatancheva 36% 64% Kirilenko 34% 66% Koukalova 26% 74% Krajicek 28% 72% Kuznetsova 24% 76% Likhovtseva 36% 64% Maleeva 30% 70% Martinez 31% 69% Mauresmo 32% 68% Medina Garrigues 31% 69% Mirza 33% 67% Molik 34% 66% Myskina 28% 72% Peng 41% 59% Pennetta 28% 72% Peschke 41% 59% Petrova 28% 72% Pierce 40% 60% Safina 32% 68% Schiavone 36% 64% Schnyder 29% 71% Sharapova 33% 67% Smashnova 30% 70% Sprem 31% 69% Srebotnik 34% 66% Suárez 52% 48% Sugiyama 31% 69% Vaidisova 35% 65% Williams, Serena 40% 60% Williams, Venus 38% 62% Zvonareva 25% 75%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 91 Percentage of Points Earned on Each Surface The first six columns in this table should be self-explanatory. The last column, RMS, attempts to assess a player’s balance. RMS, for Root Mean Square, measures the player’s distance from the mean. The smaller the RMS value, the more “typical” a player is. For addition information, see the introduction to this section. WTA Rank Player % Hard % Clay % Grass % Indr RMS 1Davenport 43% 13% 16% 28% 0.11 2 Clijsters 68% 7% 8% 17% 0.28 3Mauresmo 30% 14% 11% 45% 0.27 4 Sharapova 47% 13% 17% 23% 0.11 5 Pierce 36% 29% 7% 29% 0.13 6 Hénin-Hardenne 19% 81% 0% 0% 0.69 7 Schnyder 45% 29% 0% 26% 0.13 8 Dementieva 52% 14% 5% 29% 0.13 9 Petrova 28% 35% 8% 29% 0.23 10 Williams, Venus 37% 13% 43% 7% 0.38 11 Williams, Serena 89% 4% 4% 3% 0.52 12 Déchy 57% 12% 10% 22% 0.15 13 Schiavone 38% 20% 0% 41% 0.22 14 Myskina 44% 2% 23% 31% 0.25 15 Vaidisova 65% 18% 6% 11% 0.24 16 Ivanovic 34% 39% 5% 21% 0.22 17 Likhovtseva 36% 36% 11% 17% 0.18 18 Kuznetsova 32% 27% 24% 17% 0.20 19 Hantuchova 58% 6% 6% 29% 0.21 20 Saﬁna 19% 15% 9% 57% 0.43 21 Grönefeld 63% 16% 2% 19% 0.21 22 Jankovic 52% 21% 15% 12% 0.14 23 Pennetta 21% 44% 11% 24% 0.33 24 Golovin 50% 26% 6% 18% 0.10 25 Kirilenko 79% 8% 6% 7% 0.40 26 Peschke 17% 25% 19% 39% 0.33 27 Dulko 57% 26% 15% 3% 0.24 28 Srebotnik 42% 14% 11% 33% 0.12 29 Molik 88% 0% 0% 12% 0.51 30 Sugiyama 65% 17% 2% 16% 0.23 32 Martinez 67% 18% 11% 4% 0.30 33 Chakvetadze 53% 21% 15% 12% 0.15 34 Medina Garrigues 42% 54% 3% 1% 0.40 38 Asagoe 54% 22% 2% 21% 0.13 40 Bartoli 63% 0% 17% 20% 0.29 42 Zvonareva 19% 44% 10% 27% 0.35 43 Smashnova 25% 70% 0% 6% 0.56 52 Maleeva 35% 16% 25% 25% 0.18 55 Frazier 51% 14% 8% 27% 0.10 65 Sprem 67% 18% 1% 15% 0.26 66 Shaughnessy 40% 19% 22% 19% 0.13 76 Raymond 59% 13% 10% 18% 0.17 232 Suárez 3% 97% 0% 0% 0.90 —Farina Elia 30% 46% 8% 15% 0.30

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 92 The data above can again be graphed. The graph below shows percentages on hard, clay, grass, and indoor, in that order, for all of the above players and a few others we didn’t list in the table for reasons of space and injury. Hard Clay Grass Indoor

Asagoe 54% 22% 2% 21% Bartoli 63% 0%17% 20% Bovina 23% 77% 0% Chakvetadze 53% 21% 15% 12% Clijsters 68% 7% 8% 17% Davenport 43% 13% 16% 28% Déchy 57% 12% 10% 22% Dementieva 52% 14% 5% 29% Dokic 39% 61% 0% Dulko 57% 26% 15% 3% Farina Elia 30% 46% 8% 15% Frazier 51% 14% 8% 27% Golovin 50% 26% 6% 18% Grönefeld 63% 16% 2% 19% Hantuchova 58% 6% 6% 29% Hénin-Hardenne 19% 81% 0% Ivanovic 34% 39% 5% 21% Jankovic 52% 21% 15% 12% Kirilenko 79% 8% 6% 7% Kuznetsova 32% 27% 24% 17% Likhovtseva 36% 36% 11% 17% Maleeva 35% 16% 25% 25% Martinez 67% 18% 11% 4% Mauresmo 30% 14% 11% 45% Medina 42% 54% 3%1% Molik 88% 0%0%12% Myskina 44% 2% 23% 31% Pennetta 21% 44% 11% 24% Peschke 17% 25% 19% 39% Petrova 28% 35% 8% 29% Pierce 36% 29% 7% 29% Raymond 59% 13% 10% 18% Rubin 89% 11%0% Safina 19% 15% 9% 57% Schiavone 38% 20% 0% 41% Schnyder 45% 29% 0% 26% Sharapova 47% 13% 17% 23% Shaughnessy 40% 19% 22% 19% Smashnova 25% 70% 0%6% Sprem 67% 18% 1%15% Srebotnik 42% 14% 11% 33% Suárez 3% 97% 0% Sugiyama 65% 17% 2% 16% Vaidisova 65% 18% 6% 11% Williams, 89% 4%4%3% Williams, Venus 37% 13% 43% 7% Zuluaga 68% 32% 0% Zvonareva 19% 44% 10% 27%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 93 Consistency We often speak of a player’s “consistency,” but the term does not really have a clear definition. We can offer some models, however. Standard Deviation of Scores by Tournament One measure of a player’s consistency is the standard deviation of a player’s results over the tournaments she plays. The following list expresses a player’s consistency by dividing the standard deviation of her score by the mean score. In mathematical parlance, if the player’s scores are s1, s2, … sn, then the number given here is given by the formula (shown here in two forms):

STDDEV(s1, s2, … sn) s(s1, s2, … sn) ------MEAN(s1, s2, … sn) m(s1, s2, … sn)

Thus (for the mathematicians out there), this is not actually the standard deviation; it has been normalized by dividing by the mean. Note: This is not a ranking system, either; it is a measure of consistency. A player who loses in the second round of every tournament is more consistent (consistently bad) than a player who wins half of her tournaments and loses early in the other half — but the player who wins the tournaments will have, and probably deserve, a higher ranking. In the list below, the lower the score, the more consistent the player is. I have not “ranked” the players, lest this be confused with a ranking scheme. Still, we note that the most consistent players are Sharapova, Vaidisova, Davenport, and (improbably enough) Bovina; the least consistent are Serena Williams, Suárez, Sprem, and Molik. An obvious example of a player who is very bad but consistent is Dokic; she is the second-lowest-ranked player in the sample, and the worst in per-tournament results — but her 1.10 consistency score is slightly below (i.e. more consistent than) the median of 1.12. Asagoe 1.34 Jankovic 1.27 Rubin 1.44 Bartoli 1.02 Kirilenko 1.48 Saﬁna 1.20 Bovina 0.73 Kuznetsova 0.87 Schiavone 1.06 Chakvetadze 1.02 Likhovtseva 1.51 Schnyder 0.73 Clijsters 0.87 Linetskaya 1.42 Sharapova 0.55 Davenport 0.65 Maleeva 1.19 Shaughnessy 1.39 Déchy 1.48 Martinez 0.92 Smashnova 0.94 Dementieva 1.02 Mauresmo 0.85 Sprem 1.83 Dokic 1.10 MedinaGarrigues 1.45 Srebotnik 1.24 Dulko 0.84 Molik 1.60 Suárez 1.96 Farina Elia 1.40 Myskina 0.97 Sugiyama 1.60 Frazier 1.20 Peng 1.32 Vaidisova 0.6 Golovin 1.03 Pennetta 0.93 Williams, Serena 1.96 Grönefeld 1.20 Peschke 1.18 Williams, Venus 1.36 Hantuchova 0.84 Petrova 0.87 Zuluaga 0.97 Hénin-Hardenne 1.04 Pierce 1.15 Zvonareva 1.41 Ivanovic 0.97 Raymond 0.98

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 94 Fraction of Points Earned in Biggest Win In general, the lower this number, the more consistent a player has been, as she did not use one freak result to significantly change her result. The table shows the point value of the player’s biggest win, what percentage of her (total) points this represents, what her score would have been without this win, where she would have stood in the rankings without that win (some years, some players would keep their rankings even without the Big Win. Not this time), and what the win was. Note: A “big win” does not constitute the result that took a player deepest into a tournament, but the result worth the most points. Not too surprisingly, Serena Williams had the biggest Big Win Percent — more than half her points! Pennetta and Schnyder are lowest. WTA Player Best 17 Big Win Big Win Score W/O Resulting Big Win Rank Name Amount Percent Big Win Ranking 38 Asagoe 876 184 21% 693 47 Pan Pacific SF 40 Bartoli 796.75 94 12% 703.75 46 Paris QF/Eastbourne QF 62 Bovina 558 168 30% 390 88 Roland Garros R16 33 Chakvetadze 918.25 129 14% 790.25 41 New Haven SF 2 Clijsters 4829 1022 21% 3807 4 U. S. Open W 1Davenport 4910 790 16% 4120 2 Wimbledon F 12 Déchy 1773 564 32% 1247 23 Australian Open SF 8 Dementieva 2748 640 23% 2109 11 U. S. Open SF 27 Dulko 1008 161 16% 869 39 Canadian Open QF 55 Frazier 634.5 168 26% 467.5 75 Quebec City W 24 Golovin 1195 238 20% 958 31 Charleston SF 21 Grönefeld 1365.5 221 16% 1164.5 25 Luxembourg F 19 Hantuchova 1486 186 13% 1329 22 Los Angeles F 6 Hénin-Hardenne 2936 1084 37% 1852 11 Roland Garros W 16 Ivanovic 1551 364 23% 1187 25 Roland Garros QF 22 Jankovic 1320 242 18% 1080 26 Dubai F 25 Kirilenko 1107 324 29% 796 41 Beijing W 18 Kuznetsova 1491 230 15% 1261 23 Wimbledon QF 17 Likhovtseva 1519 470 31% 1050 26 Roland Garros SF 32 Martinez 925 119 13% 807 40 Pattaya City W 3Mauresmo 4030 719 18% 3312 6 Los Angeles Champ. W 34 Medina Garrigues 902.75 194 21% 710.75 46 Strasbourg W 29 Molik 996 280 28% 716 46 Australian Open QF 14 Myskina 1616 320 20% 1297 23 Wimbledon QF 23 Pennetta 1240 140 11% 1102 26 Acapulco W 26 Peschke 1028.75 200 19% 837.75 39 Wimbledon R16 9 Petrova 2638 420 16% 2277 11 Roland Garros SF 5 Pierce 3797 894 24% 2903 6 Roland Garros F 20 Safina 1372 306 22% 1068 26 Paris W 13 Schiavone 1704 351 21% 1355 22 Moscow F 7 Schnyder 2774 313 11% 2518 11 Rome F 4 Sharapova 3958 476 12% 3482 5 Wimbledon SF 43 Smashnova 744 124 17% 621 58 Modena Q 65 Sprem 534.25 154 29% 381.25 90 Australian Open R16 28 Srebotnik 997.75 189.5 19% 809.25 40 Zürich QF 30 Sugiyama 994.5 314 32% 698.5 46 San Diego F 15 Vaidisova 1581 194 12% 1387 20 Bangkok W 11 Williams, Serena 1851 1208 65% 643 53 Australian Open W 10 Williams, Venus 2628 1120 43% 1508 20 Wimbledon W 42 Zvonareva 759 177 23% 583 60 Memphis W

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 95 Early-Round Losses Another way of measuring consistency is how rarely one suffers early-round losses. The following table shows how many first- round (correctly, opening-round) losses each player had, followed by other early-round losses (defined, arbitrarily, as cases where she earned 50 or fewer points). Note: Players who go 0Ð3 at the Los Angeles Championships are only in the “other early losses” column; technically they don’t qualify even for that since a first round loss is worth 67 points, but still, they didn’t win. Name WTA Rank Tournaments 1R Losses Other Early Losses Asagoe 38 25 12 7 Bartoli 40 25 10 8 Bovina 62813 Chakvetadze 33 23 7 8 Clijsters 2 17 0 0 Davenport 1 16 1 0 Déchy 12 26 6 6 Dementieva 8 20 4 1 Dulko 27 23 3 13 Farina Elia — 23 12 1 Frazier 55 19 6 10 Golovin 24 22 7 4 Grönefeld 21 27 7 11 Hantuchova 19 25 6 4 Hénin-Hardenne 6920 Ivanovic 16 16 2 4 Jankovic 22 29 12 8 Kirilenko 25 26 6 12 Kuznetsova 18 17 5 0 Likhovtseva 17 22 7 7 Maleeva 52 20 8 8 Martinez 32 20 7 4 Mauresmo 3 19 3 1 Medina Garrigues 34 26 10 11 Molik 29 15 9 1 Myskina 14 19 5 1 Pennetta 23 24 8 4 Peschke 26 25 6 12 Petrova 9 25 2 4 Pierce 5 14 1 4 Safina 20 21 4 9 Schiavone 13 22 5 6 Schnyder 7 26 2 5 Sharapova 4 15 0 0 Shaughnessy 66 25 14 6 Smashnova 43 18 5 8 Sprem 65 24 16 4 Srebotnik 28 21 9 5 Sugiyama 30 27 9 13 Vaidisova 15 17 1 3 Williams, Serena 11 10 2 1 Williams, Venus 10 12 1 1 Zvonareva 42 22 11 6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 96 From the above we can compile a lists of first-round losses. Note that a lower number is better. Number of Opening Round Losses Player Name First Round Losses Player Name First Round Losses Clijsters 0 Frazier 6 Sharapova 0 Hantuchova 6 Bovina 1 Kirilenko 6 Davenport 1 Peschke 6 Pierce 1 Chakvetadze 7 Vaidisova 1 Golovin 7 Williams, Venus 1 Grönefeld 7 Hénin-Hardenne 2 Likhovtseva 7 Ivanovic 2 Martinez 7 Petrova 2 Maleeva 8 Schnyder 2 Pennetta 8 Williams, Serena 2 Raymond 8 Dulko 3 Molik 9 Mauresmo 3 Srebotnik 9 Dementieva 4 Sugiyama 9 Saﬁna 4 Bartoli 10 Dokic 5 Medina Garrigues 10 Kuznetsova 5 Zvonareva 11 Myskina 5 Asagoe 12 Schiavone 5 Farina Elia 12 Smashnova 5 Jankovic 12 Suárez 5 Shaughnessy 14 Zuluaga 5 Sprem 16 Déchy 6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 97 We can also calculate the rate of first round losses — the fraction of events in which each player lost her opener. It’s worth noting that, under the WTA ranking system, it’s not unusual for a player to lose her opener in roughly half her events and still end up in the Top 30! Rate of Opening Round Losses Name 1R Losses 1R Loss Rate Name 1R Losses 1R Loss Rate Clijsters 0 0% Kuznetsova 5 29.4% Sharapova 0 0% Chakvetadze 7 30.4% Vaidisova 1 5.9% Frazier 6 31.6% Davenport 1 6.3% Golovin 7 31.8% Pierce 1 7.1% Likhovtseva 7 31.8% Schnyder 2 7.7% Pennetta 8 33.3% Petrova 2 8.0% Sugiyama 9 33.3% Williams, Venus 1 8.3% Martinez 7 35.0% Bovina 1 12.5% Zuluaga 5 38.5% Ivanovic 2 12.5% Medina Garrigues 10 38.5% Dulko 3 13.0% Maleeva 8 40.0% Mauresmo 3 15.8% Raymond 8 40.0% Saﬁna 4 19.0% Bartoli 10 40.0% Williams, Serena 2 20.0% Jankovic 12 41.4% Dementieva 4 20.0% Srebotnik 9 42.9% Hénin-Hardenne 2 22.2% Asagoe 12 48.0% Schiavone 5 22.7% Dokic 5 50.0% Déchy 6 23.1% Zvonareva 11 50.0% Kirilenko 6 23.1% Farina Elia 12 52.2% Hantuchova 6 24.0% Shaughnessy 14 56.0% Peschke 6 24.0% Molik 9 60.0% Grönefeld 7 25.9% Sprem 16 66.7% Myskina 5 26.3% Suárez 5 71.4% Smashnova 5 27.8%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 98 We can calculate similar numbers for early round losses, adding up the “first round losses” and “early round losses” in the table above. Number of Early Round Losses Player Name Early Round Losses Player Name Early Round Losses Clijsters 0 Déchy 12 Sharapova 0 Pennetta 12 Davenport 1 Farina Elia 13 Hénin-Hardenne 2 Saﬁna 13 Williams, Venus 2 Smashnova 13 Williams, Serena 3 Likhovtseva 14 Bovina 4 Srebotnik 14 Mauresmo 4 Chakvetadze 15 Vaidisova 4 Dulko 16 Dementieva 5 Frazier 16 Kuznetsova 5 Maleeva 16 Pierce 5 Zvonareva 17 Ivanovic 6 Bartoli 18 Myskina 6 Grönefeld 18 Petrova 6 Kirilenko 18 Suárez 6 Peschke 18 Schnyder 7 Raymond 18 Dokic 10 Asagoe 19 Hantuchova 10 Jankovic 20 Molik 10 Shaughnessy 20 Zuluaga 10 Sprem 20 Golovin 11 Medina Garrigues 21 Martinez 11 Sugiyama 22 Schiavone 11

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 99 And, finally, we calculate the fraction of her events in which a player lost early. Rate of Early Round Losses Name Early L Early L Rate Name Early L Early L Rate Clijsters 0 0% Likhovtseva 14 63.6% Sharapova 0 0% Chakvetadze 15 65.2% Davenport 1 6.3% Grönefeld 18 66.7% Williams, Venus 2 16.7% Molik 10 66.7% Mauresmo 4 21.1% Srebotnik 14 66.7% Hénin-Hardenne 2 22.2% Jankovic 20 69.0% Vaidisova 4 23.5% Kirilenko 18 69.2% Petrova 6 24.0% Dulko 16 69.6% Dementieva 5 25.0% Bartoli 18 72.0% Schnyder 7 26.9% Peschke 18 72.0% Kuznetsova 5 29.4% Smashnova 13 72.2% Williams, Serena 3 30.0% Asagoe 19 76.0% Myskina 6 31.6% Zuluaga 10 76.9% Pierce 5 35.7% Zvonareva 17 77.3% Ivanovic 6 37.5% Maleeva 16 80.0% Hantuchova 10 40.0% Shaughnessy 20 80.0% Déchy 12 46.2% Medina Garrigues 21 80.8% Bovina 4 50.0% Sugiyama 22 81.5% Golovin 11 50.0% Sprem 20 83.3% Pennetta 12 50.0% Frazier 16 84.2% Schiavone 11 50.0% Suárez 6 85.7% Martinez 11 55.0% Raymond 18 90.0% Farina Elia 13 56.5% Dokic 10 100.0% Saﬁna 13 61.9%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 100 Worst Losses The tables below list the “worst” losses suffered by a player, based on the player’s rank at the time of the loss. Losses are listed in decreasing order of severity. Player Losses to players outside Top 50 Losses to players outside Top 20 Asagoe Clijsters (133) — Indian Wells Raymond (50) — Eastbourne Karatantcheva (98) — Roland Garros Vaidisova (49) — Charleston Arvidsson (94) — Japan Open Karatantcheva (49) — San Diego Srebotnik (87) — Auckland Chakvetadze (44) — Birmingham Zheng (82) — Hobart Maleeva (43) — Wimbledon Zheng (76) — Los Angeles Srebotnik (43) — Zürich Ant. Serra Zanetti (74) — Bangkok Martinez (35) — Dubai Li Na (64) — Australian Open Pennetta (29) — Rome Douchevina (54) — Strasbourg Bartoli Kirkland (196) — Indian Wells Peer (50) — Japan Open Mattek (177) — Cincinnati Raymond (47) — San Diego Peer (135) — Miami Mirza (42) — U. S. Open Ani (121) — Portoroz Martinez (38) — Linz Serna (109) — Pattaya City Vaidisova (24) — Seoul Ivanovic (100) — Canberra Srebotnik (87) — Auckland Craybas (85) — Wimbledon Peer (84) — Roland Garros Arvidsson (75) — Quebec City Tanasugarn (64) — Birmingham Bovina Kirilenko (66) — Indian Wells Hantuchova (28) — Doha Jankovic (24) — Berlin Golovin (23) — Miami Chakvetadze Vakulenko (260) — Warsaw Kirilenko (48) — Miami Black (174) — Paris Qualifying Ivanovic (36) — Rome Clijsters (133) — Indian Wells Pierce (27) — Berlin Cervanova (95) — Sydney Qualifying Schiavone (22) — Filderstadt Srebotnik (68) — Antwerp Krajicek (68) — Hasselt Morigami (61) — San Diego Maleeva (61) — Zürich Clijsters Peng (46) — San Diego Davenport Clijsters (133) — IndianWells Hénin-Hardenne (43) — Charleston Grönefeld (39) — Stanford Pierce (23) — Roland Garros Déchy Frazier (70) — Quebec City Randriantefy (50) — Berlin Krajicek (68) — Hasselt Llagostera Vives (46) — Roland Garros Camerin (65) — Rome Medina Garrigues (42) — Strasbourg Shaughnessy (60) — New Haven Koukalova (39) — Antwerp Grönefeld (39) — Stanford Pennetta (38) — Gold Coast Clijsters (38) — Miami Bartoli (37) — Paris Ivanovic (37) — Warsaw Martinez (35) — Dubai Vaidisova (32) — Canadian Open Pennetta (27) — Moscow

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 101 Dementieva Clijsters (133) — Indian Wells Peng (46) — San Diego Chladkova (71) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Hénin-Hardenne (43) — Charleston Peschke (39) — Linz Clijsters (38) — Miami Dulko (37) — Rome Medina Garrigues (33) — New Haven Asagoe (32) — Pan Pacific Hantuchova (22) — Los Angeles Schiavone (22) — Moscow Dokic Vallverdu-Zaira (647) — Petange $50K Qualifying Li Na (35) — Rabat Fislova (240) — Petange $50K Santangelo (177) — Hyderabad Martinez Granados (169) — Cuneo $50K+H Salerni (165) — Indian Wells Qualifying Dominguez Lino (121) — Martina Franca $50K Birnerova (111) — Fano $75K A. Bondarenko (108) — Pattaya City Ondraskova (98) — Prague A. Bondarenko (82) — Estoril Dulko Safarova (155) — Estoril Linetskaya (50) — Rome Diaz-Oliva (101) — Australian Open Martinez (50) — Los Angeles Diaz-Oliva (93) — Indian Wells Bartoli (34) — Dubai Irvin (85) — Roland Garros Pennetta (34) — Wimbledon Zheng (82) — Hobart Medina Garrigues (33) — New Haven Safarova (80) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Sugiyama (32) — Linz Cho (75) — U. S. Open Castaño (65) — Seoul Craybas (55) — Japan Open Martinez (51) — Berlin Farina Elia Flipkens (239) — Hasselt Kirilenko (49) — New Haven Henke (172) — Portoroz Smashnova (44) — Luxembourg Pironkova (128) — Palermo Kostanic (40) — Charleston Fedak (83) — Canberra Razzano (35) — Eastbourne Granville (71) — U. S. Open Jankovic (28) — Dubai Stosur (65) — Gold Coast Safina (24) — Moscow Randriantefy (53) — Strasbourg Golovin (23) — Paris Frazier Kutuzova (473) — Indian Wells Medina Garrigues (42) — Strasbourg Tongsalee (302) — Ashland $50K Clijsters (38) — Miami Jackson (149) — Memphis Asagoe (37) — Auckland Linetskaya (93) — Australian Open Koukalova (33) — Los Angeles Loit (92) — Roland Garros Golovin (25) — Charleston Peshke (79) — Amelia Island Li Na (76) — Hobart Washington (53) — Wimbledon Golovin Spears (96) — Australian Open Safina (48) — Paris A. Bondarenko (90) — Wimbledon Peng (47) — Strasbourg Stosur (59) — Sydney Hénin-Hardenne (43) — Charleston Peschke (41) — New Haven Asagoe (39) — Beijing Ivanovic (36) — Rome Dulko (35) — Canadian Open Chakvetadze (34) — San Diego Ivanovic (22) — Zürich Vaidisova (21) — Japan Open

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 102 Grönefeld Lepchenko (233) — Tucson $50K 2004 Kirilenko (45) — Beijing O’Donoghue (232) — Wimbledon Martinez (43) — Pattaya City Mirza (207) — Palm Beach Gardens $50K 2004 Martinez (43) — Canadian Open Foretz (127) — Birmingham Vaidisova (39) — Istanbul Beltrame (92) — Indian Wells Maleeva (28) — Amelia Island Nakamura (74) — Bali Sugiyama (24) — Charleston Shaughnessy (70) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Schiavone (24) — Roland Garros Mirza (70) — Cincinnati Douchevina (65) — Australian Open Hantuchova Mamic (110) — Rome Sugiyama (38) — San Diego Cohen-Aloro (96) — Miami Dulko (37) — Berlin Parra Santonja (86) — Birmingham Zuluaga (28) — Indian Wells Jidkova (83) — Canadian Open Morigami (72) — Cincinnati Vento-Kabchi (55) — Eastbourne Hénin-Harde Daniilidou (76) — Wimbledon Pennetta (30) — Filderstadt Hingis Weingärtner (73) — Pattaya City Ivanovic Vento-Kabchi (72) — U. S. Open Douchevina (42) — Dubai Qualifying Razzano (59) — Antwerp Safina (36) — Berlin Hénin-Hardenne (22) — Warssaw Jankovic Mattek (177) — Cincinnati Zheng (46) — Beijing Panova (111) — Philadelphia Li Na (45) — Canadian Open Panova (78) — Australian Open Hénin-Hardenne (43) — Charleston Chakvetadze (72) — Indian Wells Bartoli (41) — Auckland Smashnova (60) — Roland Garros Karatantcheva (41)— Moscow Vaidisova (53) — Miami Dushevina (41) — Linz Benesova (34) — Pan Pacific Maleeva (31) — Paris Chakvetadze (30) — New Haven Vaidisova (24) — Seoul Ivanovic (22) — Zürich Kirilenko Yakimova (178) — Poitiers $75K 2004 Chladkova (49) — Sydney Qualifying Birnerova (135) — Roland Garros Zheng (47) — GuangZhou Mirza (134) — Hyderabad Maleeva (43) — Wimbledon Jackson (128) — Birmingham Bartoli (36) — Canadian Open A.Bondarenko (126) — Deauville $50K 2004 Safina (33) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Ivanovic (82) — Australian Open Martinez (31) — Indian Wells Ivanovic (58) — Dubai Qualifying Chakvetadze (30) — New Haven Hantuchova (29) — Pan Pacific Zvonareva (25) — Moscow Hantuchova (23) — San Diego Vaidisova (21) — Japan Open Kuznetsova Mirza (97) — Dubai Sugiyama (38) — San Diego Bychkova (97) — U. S. Open Dulko (35) — Canadian Open Daniilidou (63) — Los Angeles Suárez (32) — Rome Ivanovic (52) — Miami Hénin-Hardenne (22) — Warsaw Schiavone (22) — Moscow

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 103 Likhovtseva Karatantcheva (133) — Gold Coast Koukalova (47) — Charleston Sprem (81) — Kolkata Smashnova (41) — Rome Craybas (79) — Indian Wells Chakvetadze (34) — San Diego Bartoli (32) — Eastbourne Sugiyama (32) — Linz Farina Elia (31) — Zürich Jankovic (28) — Sydney Pierce (27) — Berlin Pierce (23) — Roland Garros Hantuchova (22) — Dubai Linetskaya K. Bondarenko (186) — Los Angeles Grönefeld (49) — Berlin Karatantcheva (133) — Gold Coast Qualifying Chakvetadze (44) — Birmingham Clijsters (133) — Indian Wells Martinez (43) — Pattaya City Vinci (111) — Eastbourne Qualifying Medina Garrigues (41) — Amelia Island Mamic (104) — Sydney Qualifying Peschke (39) — Moscow Diaz-Oliva (67) — Canadian Open Koukalova (33) — San Diego Hantuchova (28) — Wimbledon Asagoe (25) — U. S. Open Maleeva Jackson (91) — New Haven Chakvetadze (43) — Eastbourne Stosur (65) — Gold Coast Chakvetadze (36) — Luxembourg Medina Garrigues (34) — Roland Garros Hantuchova (28) — Doha Sugiyama (25) — Rome Likhovtseva (21) — U. S. Open Martinez Clijsters (133) — Indian Wells Daniilidou (42) — Sydney Strycova (94) — Charleston Hantuchova (28) — Doha Peschke (62) — Wimbledon Schiavone (28) — Los Angeles Saﬁna (26) — San Diego Mauresmo Douchevina (54) — Eastbourne Saﬁna (48) — Paris Linetskaya (44) — Indian Wells Srebotnik (43) — Zürich Clijsters (38) — Miami Ivanovic (31) — Roland Garros Schiavone (22) — Moscow Medina Garr Szavay (190) — Zürich Qualifying Srebotnik (49) — Portoroz Parra Santonja (123) — Stockholm Dulko (33) — Doha Krajicek (99) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Zuluaga (30) — Miami Peschke (89) — Hobart Pierce (27) — Paris Schruff (83) — Hasselt Farina Elia (24) — Amelia Island Marrero (76) — Charleston Kirilenko (66) — Indian Wells Zheng (65) — Dubai Srebotnik (57) — Wimbledon Molik Perry (118) — U. S. Open Hénin-Hardenne (40) — Miami Granville (100) — Birmingham Dulko (28) — New Haven A. Bondarenko (82) — Bali Hantuchova (22) — Dubai Stosur (64) — Moscow Jankovic (21)— Zürich Diaz-Oliva (61) — Beijing Razzano (54) — Amelia Island Myskina Vinci (111) — Eastbourne Vaidisova (49) — Charleston Sanchez Lorenzo (109) — Roland Garros Clijsters (38) — Miami Schruff (107) — Berlin Martinez (37) — Doha Peng (80) — Sydney Asagoe (26) — Amelia Island Srebotnik (62) — Stockholm Déchy (25) — Australian Open Likhovtseva (21) — U. S. Open

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 104 Pennetta Kutuzova (473) — Indian Wells Linetskaya (50) — Rome Savchuk (220) — Estoril Srebotnik (43) — Zürich Qualifying McCain (132) — Sydney Qualifying Koukalova (39) — Palermo Sfar (116) — Paris Schiavone (28) — Bali Nakamura (87) — Los Angeles Golovin (27) — Gold Coast Schruff (87) — U. S. Open Jankovic (24) — Berlin Mandula (84) — Australian Open Nakamura (75) — Beijing Smashnova (61) — Modena Morigami (61) — San Diego Peshke Bedanova (430) — Indian Wells Dulko (34) — Hobart Dubois (146) — Pittsburg $75K Vaidisova (28) — U. S. Open Mikaelian (145) — Poitiers $75K 2004 Pennetta (25) — Zürich Bychkova (134) — Cagnes sur Mer $75K Bremond (125) — Portoroz Panova (121) — Cincinnati Mamic (106) — Paris Qualifying Peer (84) — Roland Garros Daniilidou (67) — Filderstadt Qualifying Kirilenko (53) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Petrova Clijsters (87) — Antwerp Dulko (37) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Peng (80) — Sydney Pierce (33) — Indian Wells Mirza (59) — San Diego Golovin (25) — Charleston Ivanovic (52) — Miami Grönefeld (23) — Luxembourg Pierce Cohen-Aloro (115) — Australian Open Llagostera Vives (63) — Charleston Raymond Sequera (123) — Birmingham Karatantcheva (49) — San Diego Panova (92) — Wimbledon Karatantcheva (41) — Moscow Qualifying Mamic (89) — Roland Garros Bartoli (32) — Eastbourne Schruff (87) — U. S. Open Dulko (30) — Linz Morigami (76) — Istanbul Asagoe (26) — Amelia Island Garbin (75) — Los Angeles Golovin (25) — Charleston Srebotnik (68) — Eastbourne Qualifying Déchy (24) — Sydney Schiavone (21) — Luxembourg Rubin Mattek (171) — Roland Garros Qualifying Hantuchova (26) — Cincinnati Zheng (56) — Strasbourg Saﬁna Irvin (85) — Miami Peng (46) — San Diego Camerin (81) — U. S. Open Martinez (43) — Canadian Open Safarova (80) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Li Na (40) — Estoril Vaidisova (75) — Hobart Razzano (39) — Roland Garros Golovin (27) — Gold Coast Golovin (25) — Antwerp Grönefeld (23) — Luxembourg Schiavone Szavay (301) — Modena Ivanovic (31) — Roland Garros Bychkova (187) — Bergamo $50K 2004 Asagoe (26) — Miami Fujiwara (142) — Indian Wells Déchy (25) — Australian Open Brandi (70) — Wimbledon Vento-Kabchi (58) — Warsaw Benesova (53) — Stanford Schnyder Castaño (111) — Miami Schiavone (28) — Bali Kirilenko (86) — Doha Déchy (25) — Australian Open Ant. Serra Zanetti (83) — Wimbledon Farina Elia (24) — Amelia Island Vinci (57) — Luxembourg Pierce (23) — Roland Garros Hénin-Hardenne (22) — Warsaw Hantuchova (21) — New Haven

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 105 Sharapova Kirilenko (45) — Beijing Safina (24) — Moscow Clijsters (38) — Miami Shaughnessy Pironkova (220) — Istanbul Peng (49) — Amelia Island Dominikovic (106) — Birmingham Koukalova (41) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Kapros (96) — Canberra Karatantcheva (39) — U. S. Open Spears (96) — Australian Open Sugiyama (38) — San Diego Washington (85) — Philadelphia Frazier (37) — Roland Garros Pous Tio (80) — Bali Grönefeld (32) — New Haven Parra Santonja (79) — Acapulco Schiavone (26) — Rome Domachowska (64) — Beijing Hantuchova (24) — Stanford Smashnova Czink (128) — Canberra Martinez (47) — Rome Pironkova (128) — Palermo Grönefeld (44) — Roland Garros Shaughnessy (70) — ’s-Hertogenbosch Vaidisova (39) — Istanbul Razzano (66) — Paris Golovin (27) — U. S. Open Safarova (66) — Forest Hills Grönefeld (23) — Luxembourg Sprem Vinci (111) — Eastbourne Safina (48) — Paris Chakvetadze (75) — Antwerp Razzano (39) — Berlin Morigami (72) — Roland Garros Suárez (32) — Rome Tanasugarn (69) — Wimbledon Medina Garrigues (30) — U. S. Open Stosur (65) — Gold Coast Grönefeld (30) — Bali Vaidisova (63) — Indian Wells Golovin (25) — Canadian Open Ruano Pascual (62) — Amelia Island Domachowska (60) — Zürich Qualifying Washington (55) — San Diego Randriantefy (53) — Strasbourg Srebotnik Vakulenko [226] — Strasbourg Koukalova (41) — Portoroz Baltacha (185) — Australian Open Dulko (40) — Amelia Island Gajdosova (179) — Luxembourg Ivanovic (22) — Zürich Birnerova (123) — Moscow Qualifying Safina (21) — Hasselt A. Bondarenko (88) — Indian Wells Pous Tio (84) — Budapest Diaz-Oliva (69) — Palermo Zheng (64) — New Haven Qualifying Dushevina (54) — Eastbourne Vaidisova (53) — Miami Suárez Jackson (125) — Indian Wells Bartoli (35) — Doha Castaño (111) — Miami Jankovic (28) — Dubai Chakvetadze (56) — Roland Garros Sugiyama Vinci (117) — Pan Pacific Li Na (46) — Dubai Daniilidou (87) — Birmingham Llagostera Vives (46) — Roland Garros Zheng (70) — Canadian Open Safina (44) — Gold Coast Peer (66) — Cincinnati Peschke (39) — Linz Vinci (64) — Wimbledon Frazier (31) — Eastbourne Domachowska (63) — Strasbourg Grönefeld (30) — Beijing Sucha (57) — Australian Open Schiavone (26) — Rome Razzano (54) — Amelia Island Golovin (26) — Seoul Srebotnik (53) — Charleston Golovin (25) — Sydney Peng (52) — Berlin Golovin (25) — Japan Open Vaidisova Daniilidou (87) — Birmingham Shaughnessy (41) — Memphis Ivanovic (52) — Miami Benesova (37) — Hobart Pierce (33) — Indian Wells Schiavone (24) — Roland Garros Williams, S. Sun (127) — Beijing Jankovic (28) — Dubai Craybas (85) — Wimbledon Schiavone (26) — Rome Farina Elia (24) — Amelia Island

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 106 Williams, V. Karatantcheva (98) — Roland Garros Golovin (25) — Charleston Farina Elia (21) — Dubai Zuluaga Kutuzova (270) — Charleston Kirilenko (48) — Berlin Dominguez Lino (196) — Bogota Dulko (36) — Los Angeles Santangelo (156) — Rome Grönefeld (71) — Australian Open Benesova (54) — San Diego Zvonareva Li Ting (157) — GuangZhou Peschke (39) — Linz Vinci (111) — Eastbourne Ivanovic (37) — Warsaw Llagostera Vives (72) — Miami Mirza (37) — Japan Open Morigami (72) — Cincinnati Karatantcheva (36) — Philadelphia Shaughnessy (69) — Stanford Pierce (23) — Roland Garros Linetskaya (68) — Pattaya City Zuluaga (22) — Sydney Peschke (67) — Berlin Douchevina (65) — Australian Open Peschke (62) — Wimbledon Washington (55) — San Diego Razzano (54) — Amelia Island Benesova (51) — Charleston

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 107 Best and Worst “Worst Losses” In the tables below, the list on the left shows, in order based on badness of loss, the worst single loss for our highlight players based on the ranking at the time (the same figure used in the previous table). Both the opponent’s ranking at the time and her final ranking are shown. The column on the right ranks losses based on the opponent’s final ranking. Worst Losses Based on Rankings at the Time Worst Losses Based on Year-End Rankings Pennetta: Kutuzova (then: 473/ended: 110) Pennetta: McCain (then: 132/ended: 433) Frazier: Kutuzova (then: 473/ended: 110) Bartoli: Serna (then: 109/ended: 378) Peschke: Bedanova (then: 430/ended: 289) Dokic: Fislova (then: 240/ended: 290) Schiavone: Szavay (then: 301/ended: 181) Peschke: Bedanova (then: 430/ended: 289) Zuluaga: Kutuzova (then: 270/ended: 110) Medina Garrigues: Marrero (then: 76/ended: 278) Chakvetadze: Vakulenko (then: 260/ended: 185) Frazier: Tongsalee (then: 302/ended: 252) Dokic: Fislova (then: 240/ended: 290) Grönefeld: O’Donoghue (then: 232/ended: 250) Farina Elia: Flipkens (then: 239/ended: 201) Shaughnessy: Kapros (then: 96/ended: 242) Grönefeld: Lepchenko (then: 233/ended: 131) Sprem: Suárez (then: 32/ended: 232) Srebotnik: Vakulenko (then: 226/ended: 185) Kuznetsova: Suárez (then: 32/ended: 232) Shaughnessy: Pironkova (then: 220/ended: 88) Farina Elia: Flipkens (then: 239/ended: 201) Bartoli: Kirkland (then: 196/ended: 188) Srebotnik: Vakulenko (then: 226/ended: 185) Medina Garrigues: Szavay (then: 190/ended: 181) Chakvetadze: Vakulenko (then: 260/ended: 185) Kirilenko: Yakimova (then: 178/ended: 101) Schiavone: Szavay (then: 301/ended: 181) Jankovic: Mattek (then: 177/ended: 171) Zvonareva: Li Ting (then: 157/ended: 173) Rubin: Mattek (then: 171/ended: 171) Rubin: Mattek (then: 171/ended: 171) Zvonareva: Li Ting (then: 157/ended: 173) Jankovic: Mattek (then: 177/ended: 171) Dulko: Safarova (then: 155/ended: 50) Raymond: Mamic (then: 89/ended: 158) Martinez: Clijsters (then: 133/ended: 2) Hantuchova: Mamic (then: 110/ended: 158) Likhovtseva: Karatantcheva (then: 133/ended: 35) Golovin: Spears (then: 96/ended: 156) Dementieva: Clijsters (then: 133/ended: 2) Martinez: Strycova (then: 94/ended: 142) Davenport: Clijsters (then: 133/ended: 2) Saﬁna: Irvin (then: 85/ended: 133) Asagoe: Clijsters (then: 133/ended: 2) Dulko: Irvin (then: 85/ended: 133) Smashnova: Czink (then: 128/ended: 92) Kirilenko: Chladkova (then: 49/ended: 130) Serena Williams: Sun (then: 127/ended: 104) Dementieva: Chladkova (then: 71/ended: 130) Suárez: Jackson (then: 125/ended: 75) Molik: Perry (then: 118/ended: 112) Raymond: Sequera (then: 123/ended: 150) Zuluaga: Kutuzova (then: 270/ended: 110) Molik: Perry (then: 118/ended: 112) Pierce: Cohen Aloro (then: 115/ended: 105) Sugiyama: Vinci (then: 117/ended: 41) Serena Williams: Sun (then: 127/ended: 104) Pierce: Cohen Aloro (then: 115/ended: 105) Déchy: Camerin (then: 65/ended: 96) Sprem: Vinci (then: 111/ended: 41) Smashnova: Czink (then: 128/ended: 92) Schnyder: Castaño (then: 111/ended: 59) Sugiyama: Sucha (then: 57/ended: 90) Myskina: Vinci (then: 111/ended: 41) Myskina: Sanchez Lorenzo (then: 109/ended: 83) Hantuchova: Mamic (then: 110/ended: 158) Asagoe: Raymond (then: 50/ended: 76) Venus Williams: Karatantcheva (then: 98/ended: 35) Suárez: Jackson (then: 125/ended: 75) Kuznetsova: Mirza (then: 97/ended: 31) Maleeva: Jackson (then: 91/ended: 75) Golovin: Spears (then: 96/ended: 156) Vaidisova: Daniilidou (then: 87/ended: 70) Maleeva: Jackson (then: 91/ended: 75) Hénin-Hardenne: Daniilidou (then: 76/ended: 70) Vaidisova: Daniilidou (then: 87/ended: 70) Likhovtseva: Sprem (then: 18/ended: 65) Petrova: Clijsters (then: 87/ended: 2) Schnyder: Ant. Serra Zanetti (then: 83/ended: 64) Saﬁna: Irvin (then: 85/ended: 133) Ivanovic: Vento-Kabchi (then: 72/ended: 63) Hénin-Hardenne: Daniilidou (then: 76/ended: 70) Mauresmo: Linetskaya (then: 44/ended: 53) Ivanovic: Vento-Kabchi (then: 72/ended: 63) Petrova: Peng (then: 80/ended: 37) Déchy: Frazier (then: 70/ended: 55) Clijsters: Peng (then: 46/ended: 37) Bovina: Kirilenko (then: 66/ended: 25) Venus Williams: Karatantcheva (then: 98/ended: 35) Mauresmo: Douchevina (then: 54/ended: 39) Sharapova: Kirilenko (then: 45/ended: 25) Clijsters: Peng (then: 46/ended: 37) Bovina: Kirilenko (then: 66/ended: 25) Sharapova: Kirilenko (then: 45/ended: 25) Davenport: Grönefeld (then: 39/ended: 21)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 108 Winning and Losing Streaks List of Longest Winning Streaks The following list shows all winning streaks of ten or more matches, in descending order, including the tournaments involved and the surfaces on which they were achieved. Number Player Tournaments and Results Surfaces of Wins 24 Hénin-Hardenne Charleston W (6), Warsaw W (5), Berlin W (6), Clay Roland Garros W (7), [Wimbledon 1R (0)] 211 Clijsters Los Angeles W (5), Canadian Open W (4), U. S. Open Hard, Indoor W (7), Luxembourg (4), Filderstadt QF (1) 18 Vaidisova Seoul W (5), Japan Open W (5), Bangkok W (5), Hard, Indoor Philadelphia SF (3) 17 Clijsters Indian Wells W (7), Miami W (7), Warsaw SF (3) Hard, Clay 14 Davenport Bali W (4), Filderstadt (4), Zürich (4), Los Angeles RR Hard, Indoor (2) 12 Sharapova Pan Paciﬁc W (4), Doha W (4), Indian Wells SF (4) Indoor, Hard 11 Pierce San Diego (5), U. S. Open F (6) Hard 10 Pennetta Bogota W (5), Acapulco W (5), [Indian Wells 2R (0)] Clay 10 Sharapova Birmingham W (5), Wimbledon SF (5) Grass 102 V. Williams Wimbledon W (7), Stanford F (3) Grass, Hard (10) (Frazier) [Houston $50K W (5)], Quebec City W (5) Hard, Indoor (10) Ivanovic Canberra W as qualiﬁer (8), Australian Open 3R (2) Hard 1. Clijsters also had a walkover in this series 2. Venus Williams won ten straight WTA matches at Wimbledon and Stanford, but she lost a Fed Cup match along the way, so this perhaps should not count

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 109 Individual Winning and Losing Streaks, Sorted by Player The following table records a player’s longest winning and losing streaks, as well as tabulating all winning streaks of ten or more matches and all losing streaks of three or more matches. Players with 10-match win streaks are shown in bold; those with 3+ match losing streaks in italics. Longest Longest Streaks Streaks Events in Longest Win Streak Events in Longest Loss Streak Player Win Loss of 10+ of 3+ Name Streak Streak Wins Losses Asagoe 4 5 0 4 Auckland F Birmingham R16, Eastbourne 1R, Wimbledon 1R, San Diego 1R, Los Angeles 1R Bartoli 4 5 0 2 Dubai 2R as qualifier Dubai 2R, Indian Wells 2R, Miami 2R, Roland Garros 1R, Birmingham 2R Bovina 3 2 0 0 Rome QF or Roland Garros Dubai 2R, Indian Wells 2R R16 Chakvetadze 4 5 0 1 Antwerp 2R as qualifier or Luxembourg 2R, Filderstadt 1R, Moscow 1R, Eastbourne 2R as qualifier Zürich 1R, Hasselt 1R Clijsters 21 2 2 0 Los Angeles W, Canadian Los Angeles Ch RR (0Ð2) Open W, U. S. Open W, Luxembourg W, Filderstsadt QF Davenport 14 2 1 0 Bali W, Filderstadt W, Wimbledon F, Stanford 2R Zürich W, Los Ang Ch RR Déchy 5 3 0 1 Australian Open SF Warsaw QF, Berlin 1R, Rome 1R Dementieva 5 4 0 1 U. S. Open SF Philadelphia F; Los Angeles RR (0-3) Dokic 4 4 0 1 Rabat 2R as qualifier or Rabat 2R, Prague 1R, Fano $75K 1R, Cuneo Martina Franca $50K as qual $50K 1R Dulko 4 3 0 1 Hobart F Doha 2R, Dubai 1R, Indian Wells 2R Farina Elia 5 8 0 1 Amelia Island F Wimbledon 3R, Palermo 1R, New Haven 1R, U. S. Open 1R, Portoroz 1R, Luxembourg 1R, Filderstadt 1R, Moscow 1R Frazier 10 2 1 0 Houston $50K W, Quebec Auckland SF, Hobart 1R or Australian Cit $50K W Open 3R, Memphis 1R or Indian Wells 3R, Miami 2R or Amelia Island 2R, Charleston 1R or Eastbourne 2R, Wimbledon 1R or Stanford 2R, San Diego 1R Golovin 4 3 0 2 Charleston SF or Japan Open Charleston F, Rome 1R, Strasbourg 2R or F Birmingham SF, Wimbledon 1R, San Diego 1R Grönefeld 4 3 0 1 Pattaya City F or Luxembourg ’s-Hertogenbosch 2R, Wimbledon 1R, F Cincinnati 1R Hantuchova 3 3 0 2 Doha SF or Cincinnati SF or Warsaw 2R, Berlin 1R, Rome 1R or Roland Los Angeles F or Filderstadt Garros 3R, Birmingham 2R, Eastbourne 1R SF Hénin- 24 2 1 0 Charleston W, Warsaw W, U. S. Open R16, Filderstadt 2R Hardenne Berlin W, Roland Garros W Hingis 0 1 0 0 — Pattaya City 1R Ivanovic 10 2 1 0 Canberra W as qualifier, Warsaw SF, Berlin 1R or U. S. Open 2R, Australian Open 3R Filderstadt 1R Jankovic 4 3 0 3 Dubai F or Berlin SF or Seoul Dubai F, Indian Wells 2R, Miami 2R or San F Diego R16, Canadian Open 1R, New Haven 1R or Zürich 2R, Linz 1R, Philadelphia 1R Kirilenko 7 3 0 1 Beijing W, GuangZhou QF Berlin 2R, Rome 1R, Roland Garros 1R

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 110 Kuznetsova 4 2 0 0 Australian Open QF or Pan Pacific SF, Dubai 2R or Berlin QF, Rome Wimbledon QF 1R or San Diego R16, Los Angeles 2R or Canadian Open R16, U. S. Open 1R or Moscow QF, Zürich 1R Likhovtseva 5 3 0 1 Roland Garros SF Moscow QF, Zürich 1R, Linz 1R Maleeva 3 3 0 2 Wimbledon R16 Antwerp 2R, Doha 1R, Dubai 1R or U. S. Open 2R, Luxembourg 1R, Moscow 1R Martinez 7 21 00Pattaya City Q, Doha QF [5 instances of back-to-back losses; see Note] Mauresmo 7 3 0 1 Rome W, Roland Garros 3R Filderstadt F, Moscow 2R, Zürich 2R Medina 7602Strasbourg W, Roland Garros Hobart 2R, Australian Open 1R, Paris 1R, Garr 3R Antwerp 1R, Doha 1R, Dubai 1R Molik 9 5 0 2 Sydney W, Australian Open Miami R16, Amelia Island 1R, Birmingham QF 1R, New Haven 1R, U. S. Open 1R or Bali 2R, Beijing 1R, Filderstadt 1R, Moscos 1R, Zürich 1R Myskina 7 4 0 1 Kolkata W, Filderstadt QF Amelia Island R16, Charleston 2R, Berlin 2R, Roland Garros 1R Pennetta 10 4 1 1 Bogota W, Acapulco W Gold Coast QF, Sydney Qual. 1R, Australian Open 1R, Paris 1R Peshke 42 2 00Amelia Island R16 as Q or Hobart QF, Australian Open 1R or Paris Q2R, Berlin R16 as Q or New Indian Wells 1R or Roland Garros 2R, ’s- Haven 2R as Q Hertogenbosch 2R or Wimbledon R16, Cincinnati 1R or New Haven 2R, U. S. Open 1R or Philadelphia QF, Pittsburg $75K 1R Petrova 7 2 0 0 Linz Q, Philadelphia SF Indian Wells R16, Miami 2R or Wimbledon QF, San Diego 2R or Los Angeles RR (0Ð2) Pierce 11 (1)3 10San Diego W, U. S. Open F [12 losses in 2005, none consecutive] Raymond 2 4 0 1 Australian Open 3R or Charleston 2R, Istanbul 1R, Roland Garros Eastbourne Q3R(+LL) or Los 1R, Birmingham 1R Angeles R16 or Moscow Q3R or Philadelphia QF Rubin 1 (2)4 0 (0) Cincinnati 2R Strasbourg 1R, Roland Garros Q1R Safina 5 2 0 0 Prague W Indian Wells 3R, Miami 2R or Canadian Open 2R, U. S. Open 1R Schiavone 4 3 0 1 Los Angeles SF or Bali F or Doha QF, Dubai 1R, Indian Wells 2R Moscow F Schnyder 7 3 0 1 Gold Coast W, Sydney QF or Linz F, Los Angeles RR (0Ð2) Cincinnati W, Stanford SF Sharapova 12 2 2 0 Pan Pacific Q, Doha W, Los Angeles RR (0Ð1), Los Angeles SF5 Indian Wells SF Shaughnessy 4 5 0 36 Memphis F Berlin R16, Rome 1R, Istanbul 1R, Roland Garros 1R, Birmingham 1R Smashnova 6 3 0 1 Modena W, Palermo 2R Roland Garros 2R, ’s-Hertogenbosch 1R, Wimbledon 1R Sprem 4 5 0 47 Kolkata F or Filderstadt 2R Roland Garros 2R, Eastbourne 1R, as Q Wimbledon 1R, Stanford 1R, San Diego 1R Srebotnik 5 4 0 2 Auckland W or Antwerp QF Antwerp QF, Indian Wells 1R, Miami 1R, as Q or Stockholm W orZürich Amelia Island 1R QF as Q Suárez 2 48 01Rome R16 Doha 1R, Dubai 1R, Indian Wells 1R, Miami 1R [See Note] Sugiyama 5 49 02San Diego F Gold Coast 1R, Sydney 1R, Australian Open 1R, Pan Pacific 1R [See Note]

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 111 Vaidisova 18 2 1 0 Seoul Q, Japan Open W, Birmingham 2R, Eastbourne 1R Bangkok W, Philadelphia SF Williams, S. 8 2 0 0 Australian Open W, Paris QF Amelia Island QF, Rome 2R or U. S. Open R16, Beijing 1R Williams, V. 10 2 1 0 Wimbledon W, Stanford F Antwerp F, Dubai 1R Zuluaga 3 4 0 2 Bogota SF Roland Garros 2R, San Diego 1R, Los Angeles 1R, Canadian Open 1R Zvonareva 5 4 0 310 Memphis W Amelia Island QF, Charleston 1R, Warsaw 2R, Berlin 2R or Cincinnati 2R, Stanford 1R, San Diego 2R, GuangZhou 1R or Moscow 2R, Zürich 1R, Linz 1R, Philadelphia 1R 1. Martinez’s longest losing streak of 2005 was the three match streak cited, but counting events in 2004, she started the year with a five match losing streak: San Diego 2004 R16, Olympics 1R, U. S. Open 1R, Sydney 2005 1R, Australian Open 1R. Ironic that she followed that with her longest winning streak since 2000. 2. Formally, Peschke had an 8-match winning streak in Tour Year 2005, but the wins were all in fact in 2004: Deuville $50K win, Poitiers SF. her longest streak at the WTA main draw level was 3, at the Linz SF and the Wimbledon R16 3. Pierce did in fact have a two-match losing streak in 2004-2005: Quebec City 2004 QF, Australian Open 2005 1R. This was Pierce’s only first round loss of 2005 4. Going back to 2004, Rubin had a four match losing streak starting 2005: U. S. Open 2004 3R, Bail 2R, Strasbourg 2005 1R, Roland Garros Q1R 5. As far as we can tell, Sharapova is the first player in WTA history to have back-to-back losses without suffering an opening round loss in the course of the year — indeed, she won at least two matches at every tournament she played except Moscow. Whatever that says. 6. Counting losses in 2004, Shaughnessy had four streaks of three or more losses; she started 2005 with two straight defeats 7. Counting losses in 2004, Sprem had four streaks of three or more losses; she started 2005 with two straight defeats 8. In addition to her four losses at the beginning of 2005, Suárez had two losses at the end of 2004, giving her six straight losses before she finally won. It is probably not coincidecne that her first win came in her first clay match. 9. In addition to her four losses at the beginning of 2005, Sugiyama had a loss at the end of 2004, giving her five straight losses before she finally won. 10. Counting losses in 2004, Zvonareva had four streaks of three or more losses, and the 2004Ð2005 streak involved five losses though only three events: She lost the Philadelphia final, lost all three of her matches at the Los Angeles Championships, and then lost first round at Sydney, her first event of 2005.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 112 Number of Signiﬁcant Results For our purposes, define a “significant result” as one which earns a player at least 100 points. The following table shows the number of significant results for top players. So, e.g., the figure in the “100+ Points” column is the number of the player’s events in which she earned 100+ points; similarly in the “200+ Points” column. We note that Schnyder, of all people, is tied with Clijsters for the lead in number of 100+ results, with 14; Davenport, Dementieva, and Mauresmo tied for third. Clijsters, however, leads in the percentage of 100+ results (14/17), followed by Davenport and Sharapova. Turning to 200+ point results, Davenport has the lead with 12, followed by Mauresmo (10), Sharapova (9), Clijsters (7), and Pierce (6); this goes far toward explaining why Davenport, and not Clijsters, is the WTA #1.Davenport’s 75% rate of 200+ results leads the Tour, followed by Sharapova, Hénin-Hardenne, Mauresmo, and Pierce; Clijsters is a mere #6 in this regard. There is a three-way tie for most 400+ point results, with Clijsters, Pierce, and Sharapova having four. Davenport, Hénin-Hardenne, and Mauresmo have three each, and no one else has more than two. Hénin- Hardenne has the highest rate of 400+ results, with 3/9 (33%); Pierce’s 4/14 (29%) is good for second, and Sharapova’s 4/15 (27%) is third. Every player in the Top 30 had at least one 100+ point result; indeed, every one exccept Sugiyama had at least three. Perhaps the most interesting result among lower-ranked players is Peng’s: she had two 200+ results, and no other 100+ point scores. On the evidence, she is a player with plenty of talent and a real need to learn how to harness it. Player Name WTA Events Events w/ Events w/ Events w/ % with % with Rank Played 100+ Pts 200+ Pts 400+ Pts 100+ points 200+ points Asagoe 38 252008%0% Bartoli 40 250000%0% Bovina 62820025%0% Chakvetadze 33 2330013%0% Clijsters 2 17 14 7 4 82% 41% Davenport 1 16 13 12 3 81% 75% Déchy 12 2651119%4% Dementieva 8 20 13 4 1 65% 20% Dokic 351 100000%0% Dulko 27 2330013%0% Farina Elia — 232109%4% Frazier 55 191005%0% Golovin 24 2231014%5% Grönefeld 21 2742015%7% Hantuchova 19 2540016%0% Hénin-Hardenne 6975378%56% Ivanovic 16 1661038%6% Jankovic 22 2941014%3% Kirilenko 25 2631012%4% Kuznetsova 18 1772041%12% Likhovtseva 17 2241118%5% Linetskaya 53 1930016%0% Maleeva 52 201005%0% Martinez 32 2030015%0% Mauresmo 3 19 13 10 3 68% 53%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 113 Medina Garrigues 34 2630012%0% Molik 29 1543027%20% Myskina 14 1962032%11% Peng 37 1622013%13% Pennetta 23 2450021%0% Peschke 26 2531012%4% Petrova 9 25 11 4 1 44% 16% Pierce 5 1476450%43% Raymond 76 200000%0% Rubin 54630000%0% Safina 20 2142019%10% Schiavone 13 2271032%5% Schnyder 7 26 14 4 0 54% 15% Sharapova 4 15 12 9 4 80% 60% Shaughnessy 66 251004%0% Smashnova 43 1820011%0% Sprem 65 242008%0% Srebotnik 28 2140019%0% Suárez 232710014%0% Sugiyama 30 271104%4% Vaidisova 15 1790053%0% Williams, Serena 11 1041140%10% Williams, Venus 10 1274158%33% Zuluaga 84 130000%0% Zvonareva 42 222009%0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 114 Points Per Quarter For those who want trends, we can also determine how well players did in each part of the year. In the lists which follow, quarters are reckoned based on when a tournament ends. So, e.g., Wimbledon began in June but ended in July; its points are counted toward the July total. Players are ranked in order of points per tournament. A player in italics is one with too few tournaments in the quarter for the result to be considered entirely meaningful. Experience shows that there is almost always a big gap, somewhere around #11 or #12, in points per tournament scores in each quarter (note, e.g., the gap between Déchy and Peng in the first quarter); I’ve generally listed enough players to show the gap. First Quarter (Constituting the period from the beginning of the year to Indian Wells) Rank Player Points Tournaments Per Tournament 1Williams, Serena 1407 3 469.0 2 Sharapova 1391 4 347.8 3Davenport 1614 5 322.8 4 Clijsters 626 2 313.0 5Molik 901 5 180.2 6Mauresmo 887 5 177.4 7 Dementieva 568 4 142.0 8 Schnyder 765 6 127.5 9Williams, Venus 353 3 117.7 10 Kuznetsova 460 4 115.0 11 Déchy 782 7 111.7 12 Peng 280 3 93.3 13 Hantuchova 479 6 79.8 Second Quarter (Constituting the period from Miami to Eastbourne) Rank Player Points Tournaments Per Tournament 1 Hénin-Hardenne 2504 5 500.8 2 Clijsters 1244 5 248.8 3 Pierce 1086 5 217.2 4Davenport 646 3 215.3 5 Sharapova 1010 5 202.0 6Ivanovic 783 5 156.6 7Mauresmo 781 5 156.2 8 Petrova 1057 7 151.0 9 Schnyder 920 7 131.4 10 Williams, Venus 573 5 114.6 11 Dementieva 522 5 104.4 12 Kuznetsova 581 6 96.8

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 115 Third Quarter (Constituting the period from Wimbledon to Beijing) Rank Player Points Tournaments Per Tournament 1 Pierce 1497 3 499.0 2Williams, Venus 1702 4 425.5 3 Clijsters 2243 6 373.8 4Davenport 1566 5 313.2 5Mauresmo 1100 4 275.0 6 Sharapova 1098 4 274.5 7 Dementieva 945 5 189.0 8Myskina 786 5 157.2 9 Hénin-Hardenne 431 3 143.7 10 Petrova 590 5 118.0 11 Vaidisova 324 3 108.0 12 Likhovtseva 508 5 101.6 13 Schnyder 640 7 91.4 14 Chakvetadze 379 5 75.8 15 Hantuchova 596 8 74.5 Fourth Quarter (Constituting the period from Luxembourg to the Los Angeles Championships.) Rank Player Points Tournaments Per Tournament 1 Pierce 1009 2 504.5 2Davenport 1084 3 361.3 3Mauresmo 1264 5 252.8 4 Sharapova 459 2 229.5 5 Clijsters 716 4 179.0 6Vaidisova 624 4 156.0 7 Schiavone 697 5 139.4 8Myskina 381 3 127.0 9 Schnyder 744 6 124.0 10 Dementieva 716 6 119.3 11 Saﬁna 475 4 118.8 12 Petrova 815 7 116.4 13 Ivanovic 313 3 104.3 14 Pennetta 297 3 99.0 15 Grönefeld 274 3 91.3 16 Hantuchova 365 4 91.3 17 Frazier 230.5 3 76.8

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 116 Most Consistent over Four Quarters The data in the previous section allows us to calculate another consistency ranking, based on who had the best results from quarter to quarter. All told, 20 different players ended in the Top Bunch in at least one quarter, though only four (Clijsters, Davenport, Mauresmo, and Sharapova) made it in all four quarters (a fairly typical number; there were four such in 2004 and 2002, though fully six in 2003; Davenport and Mauresmo are the only players to have managed it in both 2004 and 2005 — both, in fact, made it in 2003, 2004, and 2005, and they were the only two players to repeat in 2003Ð2004 as well as this year). In the list below, I have added up the player’s per-quarter score for each of the four quarters. Lowest is best, i.e. most consistent. Players not in the quarterly list in any given quarter are assigned an arbitrary value of 15 (meaning, obviously, that the maximum possible score is 60), but a player must make the list for at least one quarter to be listed. Injuries being what they are, this is a long way from perfect., but it is at least indicative. In 2003, this was nearly identical to the WTA rankings, but in 2004 the two lists were quite different; this year, we have the same Top Two, but increasing divergences below that — though, interestingly, this list includes the entire WTA Top 20 except for #19 Hantuchova, and the only non-Top 20 player to make it is Molik.. Consistency Rank Name Consistency Score WTA Rank 1Davenport 13 1 2 Clijsters 14 2 3 Sharapova 17 4 4 Pierce 20 5 5Mauresmo 21 3 6Williams, Venus 36 10 7 Dementieva 39 8 8 Hénin-Hardenne 40 6 9 Schnyder 41 7 10 Petrova 45 9 11T Myskina 46 14 11T Williams, Serena 46 11 13 Vaidisova 47 15 14 Molik 50 29 15 Ivanovic 51 16 16 Schiavone 52 13 17 Kuznetsova 55 18 18T Déchy 56 12 18T Saﬁna 56 20 19 Likhovtseva 57 17

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 117 Slam Results From the standpoint of difficulty, the Slams are overrated. Slam results, e.g., are worth twice as much as the results of Tier I events, even though Tier I events are played in a shorter time against a tougher field (to win Rome, a player must win five or six matches in seven days, with every opponent probably in the Top Fifty; to win Roland Garros requires seven matches in no less than twelve days, with probably at least two opponents outside the Top Fifty). Still, they are the events people remember, and so deserve some separate consideration. The following summarizes the top players’ slam results. The column, “Total Opponent Rank” adds up the rankings of one’s opponents. The next column divides this by the number of matches played. The lower this number, the tougher the average opponent was (note: Players ranked outside the Top 100 have been calculated as “100”). It is not properly a scheme for ranking; it simply calculated how tough, overall, the players’ draw was. Because there is so much data here, we obviously need some analysis. The player with the most Slam wins was Davenport, with 20; she led last year also, with 17 (Mauresmo also had 17 in 2004), but the American’s 2005 total is not particularly high; Justine Hénin-Hardenne had 24 Slam wins in 2003, Venus Williams had 22 in 2002, and Capriati had 24 in 2001; the last time someone other than Davenport led the Tour with a total as low as 20 was in 2000, when Hingis led the Tour with 20, Second place this year went to Sharapova, with 19; Venus Williams, Pierce, and Petrova were tied for third, with 16; Mauresmo had 15. Kim Clijsters ended up with only 13, tying her with Déchy and Likhovtseva for the #8 spot. The lowest win total for a Top 20 player was Safina’s three; Sugiyama’s two was the lowest for a Top 30 player. Slam winning percentave is a different matter: Clijsters leads at 87%, Serena Williams is at 86%, Venus Williams 84%; Hénin-Hardenne and Davenport are tied for fourth at 83%. We note that only two of the top five — Davenport and Venus — played all four Slams to completion. At the low end, we have the same “leaders” as in total wins: Safina has the worst record in the Top 20, Sugiyama the worst in the Top 30. In terms of points per Slam, ironically, the top two are players who didn’t win a Slam: Davenport is first with exactly 500 points per Slam; Pierce is a very close second with 497. Serena is third at 471, followed by Clijsters at 429 and Venus at 422; HeninÐHardenne and Sharapova are also just above 400, and then there is a huge gap to Dementieva at 256 and Mauresmo at 249. The continued levelling of the Tour shows also in the Top Ten wins: Pierce’s five led the Tour, and no one else had more than three. Last year, the leader (Dementieva) also had five, but the #2 player (Myskina) had four. In 2003, Hénin-Hardenne had seven and Serena six.. In terms of average opponents, we can’t see much that is revealing. Pierce’s schedule was amazingly tough. It’s easy to understand why Kveta Peschke wants to get seeded at the Slams in 2006; she was second despite not going very deep at the Slams (which is the usual cause of having a tough schedule: The deeper you go, the more top players you face). Elena Bovina played only one Slam, and ended up with a tough schedule as a result. Davenport was fourth, Chakvetadze fifth, Sharapova sixth. We note that both Clijsters and Mauresmo had things relatively easy. (In very round numbers, a player whose score is less than 50 had a tough schedule; 50-60 is in the middle; a number above 60 indicates relatively soft draws.) Holding up the low end are Raymond, Zvonareva, Dulko, Koukalova, Bartoli, and Kirilenko; the easiest schedules for Top 20 players went to Kuznetsova, Myskina, and Hantuchova.

Player WTA Rnk Slam W/L Winning% Slam Pts Slams Pts/Slam Vs. Top 10 Tot Opp. Rnk Per Opp. Asagoe 38 4Ð4 50.0% 166 4 41.5 0Ð1 527 65.9 Bartoli 40 4Ð4 50.0% 162 4 40.5 2Ð2 575 71.9 Bovina 62 3Ð1 75.0% 168 1 168.0 2Ð2 148 37.0 Chakvetadze 33 5Ð4 55.6% 224 4 56.0 1Ð2 340 37.8 Clijsters 2 13Ð2 86.7% 1286 3 428.7 3Ð2 764 50.9 Davenport 1 20Ð4 83.3% 2000 4 500.0 5Ð1 891 37.1 Déchy 12 13Ð4 76.5% 890 4 222.5 3Ð0 873 51.4 Dementieva 8 14Ð4 77.8% 1024 4 256.0 1Ð1 883 49.1 Dulko 27 4Ð4 50.0% 172 4 43.0 1Ð1 615 76.9

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 118 Dushevina 39 4Ð4 50.0% 232 4 58.0 0Ð3 353 44.1 Farina Elia — 7Ð4 63.6% 280 4 70.0 3Ð1 677 61.5 Frazier 55 4Ð4 50.0% 174 4 43.5 3Ð1 535 66.9 Golovin 24 5Ð4 55.6% 198 4 49.5 1Ð3 636 70.7 Grönefeld 21 6Ð4 60.0% 300 4 75.0 0Ð1 577 57.7 Hantuchova 19 8Ð4 66.7% 304 4 76.0 1Ð1 715 59.6 Hénin-Hardenne 6 10Ð2 83.3% 1208 3 402.7 0Ð3 528 44.0 Ivanovic 16 9Ð4 69.2% 582 4 145.5 1Ð2 650 50.0 Jankovic 22 5Ð4 55.6% 208 4 52.0 1Ð2 525 58.3 Karatantcheva 35 6Ð4 60.0% 414 4 103.5 0Ð2 505 50.5 Kirilenko 25 3Ð4 42.9% 118 4 29.5 0Ð2 502 71.7 Koukalova 36 2Ð4 33.3% 76 4 19.0 0Ð2 454 75.7 Kuznetsova 18 11Ð4 73.3% 548 4 137.0 0Ð1 954 63.6 Likhovtseva 17 13Ð4 76.5% 902 4 225.5 0Ð1 804 47.3 Maleeva 52 7Ð4 63.6% 320 4 80.0 0Ð1 590 53.6 Martinez 32 2Ð4 33.3% 82 4 20.5 0Ð0 256 42.7 Mauresmo 3 15Ð4 78.9% 996 4 249.0 0Ð1 990 52.1 Medina Garrigue 34 4Ð4 50.0% 160 4 40.0 0Ð2 397 49.6 Mirza 31 6Ð4 60.0% 250 4 62.5 0Ð0 491 49.1 Molik 29 4Ð2 66.7% 282 2 141.0 0Ð2 326 54.3 Myskina 14 8Ð4 66.7% 508 4 127.0 1Ð1 717 59.8 Peng 37 2Ð3 40.0% 88 3 29.3 0Ð1 253 50.6 Pennetta 23 5Ð4 55.6% 220 4 55.0 0Ð3 507 56.3 Peschke 26 4Ð4 50.0% 256 4 64.0 0Ð1 281 35.1 Petrova 9 16Ð4 80.0% 980 4 245.0 0Ð3 1134 56.7 Pierce 5 16Ð4 80.0% 1988 4 497.0 0Ð1 676 33.8 Raymond 76 3Ð3 50.0% 120 4 30.0 0Ð3 510 85.0 Saﬁna 20 3Ð4 42.9% 124 4 31.0 0Ð0 371 53.0 Schiavone 13 7Ð4 63.6% 322 4 80.5 0Ð2 581 52.8 Schnyder 7 10Ð4 71.4% 564 4 141.0 0Ð0 761 54.4 Sharapova 4 19Ð4 82.6% 1610 4 402.5 0Ð1 976 42.4 Shaughnessy 66 1Ð4 20.0% 46 4 11.5 0Ð1 280 56.0 Smashnova 43 4Ð4 50.0% 208 4 52.0 0Ð0 346 43.3 Sprem 65 4Ð4 50.0% 206 4 51.5 0Ð1 425 53.1 Srebotnik 28 3Ð4 42.9% 124 4 31.0 0Ð1 339 48.4 Suárez 232 0Ð1 0.0% 2 1 2.0 0Ð0 56 56.0 Sugiyama 30 2Ð4 33.3% 78 4 19.5 0Ð1 344 57.3 Vaidisova 15 8Ð4 66.7% 356 4 89.0 0Ð1 578 48.2 Williams, Serena 11 12Ð2 85.7% 1414 3 471.3 0Ð0 777 55.5 Williams, Venus 10 16Ð3 84.2% 1686 4 421.5 0Ð0 861 45.3 Zuluaga 84 3Ð3 50.0% 112 3 37.3 0Ð1 388 64.7 Zvonareva 42 4Ð3 57.1% 136 3 45.3 0Ð0 550 78.6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 119 Surface Rankings Most of our ratings to this point have been “overall” ratings, regardless of surface. However, players do most definitely have preferred surfaces. We may therefore compute “surface rankings.” The following tables show how the highlight players did on each surface. Some other players have been added when their results warrant it. Results are listed in order of points per tournament on each surface. It is effectively certain that some players outside the Top 25 have exceeded some of the lower Top 25 players on certain surfaces (especially grass). I have noted these players where I have been aware of them, but have not checked this for all players.

Hardcourts Summary of Hardcourt Results The following lists the top players, the tournaments they played on hardcourts, the points earned on the surface, their record and winning percentage. The list is in alphabetical order. Player Won/Lost Vs. Tournaments Played Total Pts/ Name (Percent) Top 10 # of Tourn Asagoe 15Ð14 0Ð2 Auckland (96), Hobart (14), Australian Open (40), Doha (1), Dubai (1), 479/14 (51.7%) Indian Wells (1), Miami (88), San Diego (1), Los Angeles (1), Canadian Open (47), U. S. Open (84), Beijing (80), Japan Open (24), Bangkok (1) Bartoli 18Ð18 0Ð4 Auckland (70), Canberra (26), Australian Open (48), Pattaya City (12), 505.75/18 (50.0%) Doha (82), Dubai (61.75), Indian Wells (1), Miami (1), Cincinnati (1), Stanford (33), San Diego (1), Los Angeles (31), Canadian Open (33), New Haven (1), U. S. Open (72), Portoroz (1), Seoul (30), Japan Open (1) Bovina 3Ð4 (42.9%) 0Ð1 Doha (48), Dubai (48), Indian Wells (1), Miami (32) 129/4 Chakvetadz 13Ð8 0Ð4 Sydney Qualifying (12), Australian Open (40), Indian Wells (59), 489/8 (61.9%) Miami (1), San Diego (129), Los Angeles (43), New Haven (129), U. S. Open (76) Clijsters 36Ð1 11Ð0 Indian Wells (527), Miami (611), Stanford (286), San Diego (106), Los 3265/7 (97.3%) Angeles (303), Canadian Open (410), U. S. Open (1022) Davenport 28Ð4 2Ð2 Sydney (72), Australian Open (662), Dubai (268), Indian Wells (342), 2120/8 (87.5%) Stanford (1), New Haven (309), U. S. Open (284), Bali (182) Déchy 19Ð11 1Ð4 Gold Coast (1), Sydney (40), Australian Open (564), Dubai (35), Indian 1073/11 (63.3%) Wells (101), Miami (38), Stanford (65), San Diego (65), Canadian Open (35), New Haven (1), U. S. Open (128) Dementieva 21Ð7 2Ð0 Sydney (133), Australian Open (136), Indian Wells (220), Miami (129), 1437/8 (75.0%) San Diego (1), Los Angeles (114), New Haven (64), U. S. Open (640) Dokic 2Ð3 (40.0%) 0Ð0 Pattaya City (16), Hyderabad (1), Indian Wells qualifying (10.25) 27.25/3 Dulko 19Ð14 1Ð2 Hobart (76), Australian Open (48), Doha (35), Dubai (1), Indian Wells 602/14 (57.6%) (1), Miami (32), San Diego (27), Los Angeles (24), Canadian Open (161), New Haven (60), U. S. Open (36), Seoul (14), Japan Open (18), Bangkok (69) Farina Elia 8Ð8 (50.0%) 1Ð1 Gold Coast (67), Canberra (36), Australian Open (118), Doha (1), 294/8 Dubai (68), New Haven (1), U. S. Open (2), Portoroz (1) Frazier 17Ð10 0Ð0 Auckland (57), Hobart (1), Australian Open (88), Indian Wells (29), 326.5/11 (63.0%) Miami (1), Stanford (33), San Diego (1), Los Angeles (18), U. S. Open (36), Ashland $50K (18.5), Houston $50K (44)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 120 Golovin 19Ð12 0-2 Gold Coast (76)Sydney (48), Australian Open (40), Indian Wells (53), 601/12 (61.3%) Miami (84), San Diego (1), Canadian Open (29), New Haven (1), U. S. Open (84), Beijing (1), Seoul (68), Japan Open (116) Grönefeld 24Ð14 1Ð3 Tucson $50K 2004 (6), Canberra (18), Australian Open (134), Pattaya 907/15 (63.2%) City (79), Hyderabad (48), Indian Wells (1), Miami (20), Cincinnati (1), Stanford (219), San Diego (33), Canadian Open (1), New Haven (65), U. S. Open (84), Bali (23), Beijing (175) Hantuchova 22Ð13 2Ð6 Sydney (29), Australian Open (72), Doha (148), Dubai (115), Indian 901/13 (62.9%) Wells (32), Miami (1), Cincinnati (65), Stanford (57), San Diego (35), Los Angeles (186), Canadian Open (1), New Haven (92), U. S. Open (68) Hénin-Hard 10Ð3 2Ð2 Miami (136), Canadian Open (307), U. S. Open (122) 565/3 (76.9%) Hingis 0Ð1 (0%) 0Ð0 Pattaya City (1) 1/1 Ivanovic 20Ð5 1Ð3 Canberra (108.5), Australian Open (94), Doha (33), Dubai Qualifying 522.25/7 (80.0%) (15.75), Miami (171), Canadian Open (60), U. S. Open (40) Jankovic 20Ð14 1Ð3 Auckland (36), Sydney (48), Australian Open (48), Dubai (242), Indian 696/14 (58.8%) Wells (1), Miami (1), Cincinnati (34), Stanford (61), San Diego (52), Canadian Open (1), New Haven (1), U. S. Open (66), Beijing (1), Seoul (104) Kirilenko 32Ð15 1Ð4 Sydney Qualifying (4), Australian Open (40), Hyderabad (55), Doha 893.75/15 (68.1%) (113.75), Dubai Qualifying (6), Indian Wells (109), Miami (24), San Diego (1), Los Angeles (18), Canadian Open (1), New Haven (54), U. S. Open (40), Beijing (324), GuangZhou (38), Japan Open (66) Kuznetsova 11Ð8 0Ð2 Australian Open (210), Dubai (1), Indian Wells (95), Miami (57), San 480/8 (57.9%) Diego (57), Los Angeles (1), Canadian Open (57), U. S. Open (2) Likhovtsev 14Ð10 0Ð3 Gold Coast (26), Sydney (1), Australian Open (72), Dubai (29), Indian 545/10 (58.3%) Wells (1), Miami (76), San Diego (50), New Haven (35), U. S. Open (192), Kolkata (63) Linetskaya 11Ð10 1Ð2 Gold Coast Qualifying (1), Sydney Qualifying (12), Australian Open 424/10 (52.4%) (144), Pattaya City (68), Indian Wells (124), Miami (24), San Diego (1), Los Angeles (1), Canadian Open (1), U. S. Open (48) Maleeva 7Ð8 (46.7%) 0Ð1 Gold Coast (44), Sydney (26), Australian Open (80), Doha (1), Dubai 229/8 (1), Miami (36), New Haven (1), U. S. Open (40) Martinez 19Ð10 1Ð3 Sydney (1), Australian Open (2), Pattaya City (119), Doha (103), Dubai 623/11 (65.5%) (99), Indian Wells (101), San Diego (1), Los Angeles (75), Canadian Open (80), U. S. Open (2), Bangkok (40) Mauresmo 21Ð7 1Ð4 Australian Open (218), Doha (100), Indian Wells (36), Miami (202), 1216/7 (75.0%) Canadian Open (196), New Haven (190), U. S. Open (274) Medina Gar 12Ð11 1Ð3 Hobart (18), Australian Open (2), Doha (1), Dubai (1), Indian Wells 384/11 (52.2%) (36), Miami (24), Los Angeles (16), Canadian Open (33), New Haven (156), U. S. Open (68), Portoroz (29) Molik 15Ð8 2Ð2 Sydney (268), Australian Open (280), Doha (239), Dubai (1), Miami 878/9 (65.2%) (59), New Haven (1), U. S. Open (2), Bali (27), Beijing (1) Myskina 19Ð8 0Ð1 Sydney (1), Australian Open (106), Doha (1), Dubai (64), Miami (70), 708/9 (70.4%) Stockholm (81), Canadian Open (173), U. S. Open (80), Kolkata (132) Pennetta 8Ð10 0Ð2 Gold Coast (57), Sydney Qualifying (1), Australian Open (2), Indian 264/11 (44.4%) Wells (1), Miami (32), San Diego (29), Los Angeles (1), Canadian Open (87), U. S. Open (2), Bali (51), Beijing (1) Peschke 9Ð9 (50.0%) 0Ð2 Hobart (38), Australian Open (2), Indian Wells (1), Miami (20), 182.75/9 Cincinnati (1), San Diego (33), New Haven (65.75), U. S. Open (2), Portoroz (20)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 121 Petrova 21Ð9 0Ð4 Gold Coast (38), Sydney (68), Australian Open (138), Indian Wells 803/10 (70.0%) (59), Miami (1), San Diego (1), Los Angeles (72), Canadian Open (95), U. S. Open (224), Bangkok (107) Pierce 14Ð3 3Ð2 Australian Open (2), Indian Wells (128), San Diego (405), U. S. Open 1369/4 (82.4%) (834) Raymond 9Ð8 (52.9%) 0Ð0 Sydney (1), Australian Open (80), Indian Wells (32), Miami (24), 274/9 Stanford (29), San Diego (40), Los Angeles (31), New Haven (1), U. S. Open (36) Rubin 1Ð1 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Cincinnati (24) 24/1 Saﬁna 9Ð9 (50.0%) 0Ð3 Gold Coast (39), Hobart (18), Australian Open (48), Indian Wells (32), 268/9 Miami (1), San Diego (56), Los Angeles (37), Canadian Open (35), U. S. Open (2) Schiavone 18Ð11 0Ð4 Sydney (1), Australian Open (84), Doha (95), Dubai (1), Indian Wells 658/11 (62.1%) (1), Miami (36), Stanford (29), San Diego (47), Los Angeles (123), U. S. Open (80), Bali (161) Schnyder 31Ð10 2Ð4 Gold Coast (155), Sydney (87), Australian Open (268), Doha (33), 1376/12 (75.6%) Dubai (163), Miami (32), Cincinnati (142), Stanford (111), San Diego (100), New Haven (35), U. S. Open (172), Bali (78) Sharapova 27Ð5 4Ð3 Australian Open (470), Doha (283), Indian Wells (190), Miami (308), 1873/7 (84.4%) Los Angeles (72), U. S. Open (442), Beijing (108) Shaughness 8Ð12 0Ð1 Canberra (1), Australian Open (2), Indian Wells (30), Miami (20), 215.75/12 (40.0%) Cincinnati (1), Stanford (80.75), San Diego (1), New Haven (60), U. S. Open (2), Bali (1), Beijing (1), Seoul (16) Smashnova 5Ð5 (50.0%) 0Ð2 Canberra (18), Australian Open (88), Miami (36), Forest Hills (1), U. S. 183/5 Open (40) Sprem 10Ð12 0Ð3 Gold Coast (1), Sydney (1), Australian Open (154), Indian Wells (1), 362/12 (45.5%) Miami (53), Stanford (1), San Diego (1), Los Angeles (18), Canadian Open (1), U. S. Open (2), Bali (1), Kolkata (128) Srebotnik 15Ð5 0Ð0 Gold Coast (127), Australian Open (2), Indian Wells (1), Miami (1), 423/8 (75.0%) Stockholm (161), New Haven Qualifying (1), U. S. Open (36), Portoroz (94) Suárez 0Ð4 (0%) 0Ð0 Doha (1), Dubai (1), Indian Wells (1), Miami (1) 4/4 Sugiyama 17Ð14 1Ð1 Gold Coast (1), Sydney (1), Australian Open (2), Doha (35), Dubai (1), 668/14 (54.8%) Miami (36), Cincinnati (29), Stanford (33), San Diego (314), Canadian Open (33), U. S. Open (72), Beijing (35), Seoul (34), Japan Open (42) Vaidisova 29Ð6 1Ð3 Hobart (34), Australian Open (106), Indian Wells (59), Miami (59), 1022/9 (82.9%) Canadian Open (114), U. S. Open (130), Seoul (150), Japan Open (176), Bangkok (194) S. Williams 16Ð4 3Ð2 Australian Open (1208), Dubai (146), Miami (116), Canadian Open 1655/6 (80.0%) (46), U. S. Open (138), Beijing (1) V. Williams 15Ð5 2Ð2 Australian Open (160), Dubai (1), Miami (230), Stanford (203), U. S. 973/6 (75.0%) Open (322), Beijing (57) Zuluaga 7Ð8 (46.7%) 0Ð3 Sydney (94), Australian Open (40), Indian Wells (72), Miami (38), San 283/8 Diego (1), Los Angeles (1), Canadian Open (1), U. S. Open (36) Zvonareva 6Ð9 (40.0%) 0Ð0 Sydney (1), Australian Open (36), Pattaya City (30), Miami (1), 143/9 Cincinnati (24), Stanford (1), San Diego (1), GuangZhou (1), Japan Open (48)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 122 Winning Percentage on Hardcourts Where two players have equal winning percentages, the player with the higher number of hardcourt wins is listed ﬁrst. Rank Player Won Lost Winning% 1 Clijsters 36 1 97.3% 2Davenport 28 4 87.5% 3 Sharapova 27 5 84.4% 4Vaidisova 29 6 82.9% 5 Pierce 14 3 82.4% 6T Ivanovic 20 5 80.0% 6T S. Williams 16 4 80.0% 8 Hénin-Hardenne 10 3 76.9% 9 Schnyder 31 10 75.6% 10T Mauresmo 21 7 75.0% 10T Dementieva 21 7 75.0% 10T V. Williams 15 5 75.0% 10T Srebotnik 15 5 75.0% 14 Myskina 19 8 70.4% 15 Petrova 21 9 70.0% 16 Kirilenko 32 15 68.1% 17 Martinez 19 10 65.5% 18 Molik 15 8 65.2% 19 Déchy 19 11 63.3% 20 Grönefeld 24 14 63.2% 21 Frazier 17 10 63.0% 22 Hantuchova 22 13 62.9% 23 Schiavone 18 11 62.1% 24 Chakvetadze 13 8 61.9% 25 Golovin 19 12 61.3% Jankovic 20 14 58.8% Likhovtseva 14 10 58.3% Kuznetsova 11 8 57.9% Dulko 19 14 57.6% Sugiyama 17 14 54.8% Raymond 9 8 52.9% Linetskaya 11 10 52.4% Medina Garrigues 12 11 52.2% Asagoe 15 14 51.7% Bartoli 18 18 50.0% Saﬁna 9 9 50.0% Peschke 9 9 50.0% Farina Elia 8 8 50.0% Smashnova 5 5 50.0% Zuluaga 7 8 46.7% Maleeva 7 8 46.7% Sprem 10 12 45.5% Pennetta 8 10 44.4% Bovina 3 4 42.9% Shaughnessy 8 12 40.0% Zvonareva 6 9 40.0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 123 Points Per Tournament on Hardcourts Hard Rank Player Name Hard Points Tourn on Hard Points/Tourn 1 Clijsters 3265 7 466.4 2 Pierce 1369 4 342.3 3 S. Williams 1655 6 275.8 4 Sharapova 1873 7 267.6 5Davenport 2120 8 265.0 6 Hénin-Hardenne 565 3 188.3 7 Dementieva 1437 8 179.6 8Mauresmo 1216 7 173.7 9V. Williams 973 6 162.2 10 Schnyder 1376 12 114.7 11 Vaidisova 1022 9 113.6 12 Molik 878 9 97.6 13 Déchy 1073 11 97.5 14 Petrova 803 10 80.3 15 Myskina 708 9 78.7 16 Ivanovic 522.25 7 74.6 17 Hantuchova 901 13 69.3 18 Chakvetadze 489 8 61.1 19 Grönefeld 907 15 60.5 20 Kuznetsova 480 8 60.0 21 Schiavone 658 11 59.8 22 Kirilenko 893.75 15 59.6 23 Martinez 623 11 56.6 24 Likhovtseva 545 10 54.5 25 Srebotnik 423 8 52.9 Golovin 601 12 50.1 Jankovic 696 14 49.7 Sugiyama 668 14 47.7 Dulko 602 14 43.0 Linetskaya 424 10 42.4 Farina Elia 294 8 36.8 Smashnova 183 5 36.6 Zuluaga 283 8 35.4 Medina Garrigues 384 11 34.9 Asagoe 479 14 34.2 Bovina 129 4 32.3 Raymond 274 9 30.4 Sprem 362 12 30.2 Saﬁna 268 9 29.8 Frazier 326.5 11 29.7 Maleeva 229 8 28.6 Bartoli 505.75 18 28.1 Pennetta 264 11 24.0 Rubin 24 1 24.0 Peschke 182.75 9 20.3 Shaughnessy 215.75 12 18.0 Zvonareva 143 9 15.9

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 124 Best and Worst Results on Hardcourts The following tables list a player’s best and worst results on this surface. Of these, the worst result may be the better measure of ability — a player who avoids bad losses is at least more consistent than one with a mixture of good and bad results. Best Result Worst Result 1 S. Williams (1208) 1Hénin-Hardenne (122) 2Clijsters (1022) 2 Clijsters (106) 3 Pierce (834) 3 Sharapova (72) 4Davenport (662) 4Mauresmo (36) 5Dementieva (640) 5Vaidisova (34) 6Déchy (564) 6 Schnyder (32) 7 Sharapova (470) 7 Rubin (24) 8Kirilenko (324) 8 Ivanovic (15.75) 9V. Williams (322) 10 Sugiyama (314) All other highlight players, including 11 Hénin-Hardenne (307) Asagoe, Bartoli, Bovina, Chakvetadze, 12 Molik (280) Davenport, Déchy, Dementieva, Dokic, 13 Mauresmo (274) Dulko, Farina Elia, Frazier, Golovin, 14 Schnyder (268) Grönefeld, Hantuchova, Hingis, Jankovic, 15 Jankovic (242) Kirilenko, Kuznetsova, Likhovtseva, 16 Petrova (224) Linetskaya, Maleeva, Martinez, Medina 17 Grönefeld (219) Garrigues, Molik, Myskina, Pennetta, 18 Kuznetsova (210) Peschke, Petrova, Pierce, Raymond, Safina, 19 Vaidisova (194) Schiavone, Shaughnessy, Smashnova, 20 Likhovtseva (192) Sprem, Srebotnik, Suárez, Sugiyama, S. Hantuchova (186) Williams, V. Williams, Zuluaga, and Myskina (173) Zvonareva, had at least one opening round Ivanovic (171) loss on hardcourts. Srebotnik (161) Schiavone (161) Dulko (161) Medina Garrigues (156) Sprem (154) Linetskaya (144) Chakvetadze (129) Martinez (119) Farina Elia (118) Golovin (116) Asagoe (96) Zuluaga (94) Smashnova (88) Frazier (88) Pennetta (87) Bartoli (82) Shaughness (80.75) Raymond (80) Maleeva (80) Peschke (65.75) Safina (56) Zvonareva (48) Bovina (48) Rubin (24)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 125 Clay Summary of Clay Results The following lists the top players, the tournaments they played on clay, the points earned on the surface, their record and winning percentage. The list is in alphabetical order. Player Won/Lost Vs. Tournaments Played Total Pts/ Name (Percent) Top 10 # of Tourn Asagoe 5Ð5 (50.0%) 1Ð0 Amelia Island (110), Charleston (46), Rome (1), Strasbourg (1), 198/5 Roland Garros (40) Bartoli 0Ð1 (0%) 0Ð0 Roland Garros (2) 2/1 Bovina 9Ð4 (69.2%) 0Ð2 Warsaw (72), Berlin (87), Rome (102), Roland Garros (168) 429/4 Chakvetadz 8Ð5 (61.5%) 0Ð1 Warsaw (18.75), Berlin (1), Rome (27), Istanbul (38), Roland Garros 190.75/5 (106) Clijsters 8Ð3 (72.7%) 0Ð2 Warsaw (135), Berlin (56), Roland Garros (148) 339/3 Davenport 11Ð2 (84.6%) 1Ð0 Amelia Island (304), Charleston (78), Roland Garros (264) 646/3 Déchy 6Ð5 (54.5%) 0Ð0 Warsaw (72), Berlin (1), Rome (1), , Strasbourg (67), Roland Garros 221/5 (80) Dementieva 7Ð3 (70%) 0Ð0 Charleston (269), Rome (1), Roland Garros (122) 392/3 Dokic 10Ð8 (55.6%) 0Ð0 Estoril (1), Rabat (21.5), Prague (1), Fano $75K (1), Cuneo $50K+H 42/7 (1), Petange $50K (4), Martina Franca $50K (12.5) Dulko 8Ð5 (61.5%) 1Ð0 Amelia Island (22), Estoril (59), Berlin (48), Rome (100), Roland 277/5 Garros (48) Farina Elia 11Ð7 (61.1%) 1Ð3 Amelia Island (253), Charleston (1), Warsaw (57), Rome (56), 449/7 Strasbourg (1), Roland Garros (80), Palermo (1) Frazier 3Ð4 (42.9%) 0Ð0 Amelia Island (22), Charleston (1), Strasbourg (20), Roland Garros 91/4 (48) Golovin 6Ð4 (40.0%) 1Ð0 Charleston (238), Rome (1), Strasbourg (1), Roland Garros (72) 312/4 Grönefeld 10Ð7 (58.5%) 0Ð1 Palm Beach Gardens $50K 2005 (20.5), Amelia Island (1), Charleston 233.5/7 (26), Berlin (35), Rome (29), Istanbul (42), Roland Garros (80) Hantuchova 3Ð4 (42.9%) 0Ð0 Warsaw (26), Berlin (1), Rome (1), Roland Garros (72) 100/4 Hénin-Hard 24Ð0 (100%) 7Ð0 Charleston (514), Warsaw (299), Berlin (471), Roland Garros (1084) 2368/4 Ivanovic 9Ð4 (69.2%) 2Ð1 Warsaw (174), Berlin (1), Rome (73), Roland Garros (364) 612/4 Jankovic 7Ð5 (58.3%) 0Ð1 Amelia Island (50), Charleston (1), Berlin (191), Rome (35), Roland 279/5 Garros (2) Kirilenko 5Ð5 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Deauville $50K 2004 (1), Warsaw (50.75), Berlin (40), Rome (1), 94.75/5 Roland Garros (2) Kuznetsova 8Ð4 (66.7%) 0Ð0 Warsaw (198), Berlin (98), Rome (1), Roland Garros (106) 403/4 Likhovtseva 8Ð5 (61.5%) 1Ð1 Amelia Island (50), Charleston (1), Berlin (27), Rome (1), Roland 549/5 Garros (470) Linetskaya 3Ð4 (42.9%) 0Ð1 Amelia Island (1), Berlin (1), Rome (108), Roland Garros (2) 112/4 Maleeva 3Ð5 (37.5%) 0Ð1 Amelia Island (24), Warsaw (1), Berlin (35), Rome (1), Roland Garros 101/5 (40) Martinez 5Ð5 (50.0%) 0Ð2 Amelia Island (18), Charleston (1), Berlin (54), Rome (89), Roland 164/5 Garros (2) Mauresmo 9Ð2 (81.8%) 1Ð0 Berlin (95), Rome (419), Roland Garros (64) 578/3 Medina Gar 15Ð5 (75%) 0Ð1 Amelia Island (24), Charleston (1), Berlin (29), Rome (33), 490/7 Strasbourg (194), Roland Garros (88), Palermo (121) Molik 0Ð1 (0%) 0Ð0 Amelia Island (1) 1/1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 126 Myskina 1Ð4 (20%) 0Ð0 Amelia Island (29), Charleston (1), Berlin (1), Roland Garros (2) 33/4 Pennetta 20Ð6 (76.9%) 0Ð1 Bogota (134), Acapulco (140), Estoril (1), Berlin (27), Rome (48), 550/8 Roland Garros (80), Modena (57), Palermo (63) Peschke 18Ð5 (78.3%) 1Ð1 Deauville $50K 2004 (46), Amelia Island (54.75), Cagnes sur Mer 262.25/5 $75K (9), Berlin (100.5), Roland Garros (52) Petrova 15Ð4 (78.9%) 1Ð1 Amelia Island (141), Charleston (93), Berlin (324), Rome (44), 1022/5 Roland Garros (420) Pierce 13Ð5 (72.2%) 2Ð2 Amelia Island (30), Charleston (33), Berlin (73), Rome (56), Roland 1086/5 Garros (894) Raymond 2Ð4 (33.3%) 0Ð0 Amelia Island (18), Charleston (40), Istanbul (1), Roland Garros (2) 61/4 Rubin 0Ð2 (0%) 0Ð0 Strasbourg (1), Roland Garros Qualifying (2) 3/2 Saﬁna 9Ð3 (75.0%) 0Ð0 Estoril (53), Berlin (40), Prague (115), Roland Garros (2) 210/4 Schiavone 8Ð4 (66.7%) 1Ð1 Warsaw (1), Rome (161), Roland Garros (156), Modena (28) 346/4 Schnyder 15Ð6 (71.4%) 2Ð2 Amelia Island (33), Charleston (159), Warsaw (50), Berlin (211), 888/6 Rome (313), Roland Garros (122) Sharapova 9Ð3 (75.0%) 0Ð0 Berlin (93), Rome (203), Roland Garros (222) 518/3 Shaughness 4Ð6 (40.0%) 0Ð0 Acapulco (17), Amelia Island (1), Charleston (29), Berlin (54), Rome 105/7 (1), Istanbul (1), Roland Garros (2) Smashnova 18Ð7 (72.0%) 0Ð2 Amelia Island (1), Warsaw (35), Berlin (35), Rome (48), Istanbul 518/9 (69), Roland Garros (78), Modena (124), Palermo (16), Budapest (112) Sprem 3Ð5 (37.5%) 0Ð0 Amelia Island (1), Berlin (1), Rome (1), Strasbourg (46), Roland 97/5 Garros (48) Srebotnik 5Ð6 (45.5%) 0Ð2 Amelia Island (1), Charleston (106), Strasbourg (1), Roland Garros 141/6 (2), Palermo (1), Budapest (30) Suárez 3Ð2 (60.0%) 1Ð0 Rome (100), Strasbourg (26), Roland Garros (2) 128/3 Sugiyama 7Ð6 (53.8%) 0Ð0 Amelia Island (33), Charleston (56), Berlin (1), Rome (65), 175/6 Strasbourg (18), Roland Garros (2) Vaidisova 7Ð3 (70.0%) 1Ð0 Charleston (145), Istanbul (107), Roland Garros (40) 292/3 S. Williams 2Ð2 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Amelia Island (74), Rome (1) 75/2 V. Williams 9Ð3 (75.0%) 0Ð1 Amelia Island (65), Charleston (50). Istanbul (144), Roland Garros 343/4 (84) Zuluaga 5Ð5 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Bogota (65), Charleston (29), Berlin (1), Rome (1), Roland Garros 132/5 (36) Zvonareva 7Ð6 (53.8%) 0Ð1 Amelia Island (94), Charleston (1), Warsaw (1), Berlin (1), Rome 338/6 (177), Roland Garros (64)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 127 Winning Percentage on Clay Rank Player Wins Losses Winning% 1 Hénin-Hardenne 24 0 100.0% 2Davenport 11 2 84.6% 3Mauresmo 9 2 81.8% 4 Petrova 15 4 78.9% 5 Peschke 18 5 78.3% 6 Pennetta 20 6 76.9% 7T Medina Garrigues 15 5 75.0% 7T Saﬁna 9 3 75.0% 7T Sharapova 9 3 75.0% 7T V. Williams 9 3 75.0% 11 Clijsters 8 3 72.7% 12 Pierce 13 5 72.2% 13 Smashnova 18 7 72.0% 14 Schnyder 15 6 71.4% 15T Dementieva 7 3 70.0% 15T Vaidisova 7 3 70.0% 17T Bovina 9 4 69.2% 17T Ivanovic 9 4 69.2% 19T Kuznetsova 8 4 66.7% 19T Schiavone 8 4 66.7% Chakvetadze 8 5 61.5% Dulko 8 5 61.5% Likhovtseva 8 5 61.5% Farina Elia 11 7 61.1% Golovin 6 4 60.0% Suárez 3 2 60.0% Grönefeld 10 7 58.8% Jankovic 7 5 58.3% Déchy 6 5 54.5% Sugiyama 7 6 53.8% Zvonareva 7 6 53.8% Asagoe 5 5 50.0% Kirilenko 5 5 50.0% Martinez 5 5 50.0% Zuluaga 5 5 50.0% S. Williams 2 2 50.0% Srebotnik 5 6 45.5% Frazier 3 4 42.9% Hantuchova 3 4 42.9% Linetskaya 3 4 42.9% Shaughnessy 4 6 40.0% Maleeva 3 5 37.5% Sprem 3 5 37.5% Raymond 2 4 33.3% Myskina 1 4 20.0% Bartoli 0 1 0% Molik 0 1 0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 128 Points Per Tournament on Clay Clay Rank Player Name Clay Points Tourn on Clay Points/Tourn 1 Hénin-Hardenne 2368 4 592.0 2 Pierce 1086 5 217.2 3Davenport 646 3 215.3 4 Petrova 1022 5 204.4 5Mauresmo 578 3 192.7 6 Sharapova 518 3 172.7 7Ivanovic 612 4 153.0 8 Schnyder 888 6 148.0 9 Dementieva 392 3 130.7 10 Clijsters 339 3 113.0 11 Likhovtseva 549 5 109.8 12 Bovina 429 4 107.3 13 Kuznetsova 403 4 100.8 14 Vaidisova 292 3 97.3 15 Schiavone 346 4 86.5 16 V. Williams 343 4 85.8 17 Golovin 312 4 78.0 18 Medina Garrigues 490 7 70.0 19 Pennetta 550 8 68.8 20 Farina Elia 449 7 64.1 Smashnova 518 9 57.6 Zvonareva 338 6 56.3 Jankovic 279 5 55.8 Dulko 277 5 55.4 Saﬁna 210 4 52.5 Peschke 262.25 5 52.5 Déchy 221 5 44.2 Suárez 128 3 42.7 Asagoe 198 5 39.6 Chakvetadze 190.75 5 38.2 S. Williams 75 2 37.5 Grönefeld 233.5 7 33.4 Martinez 164 5 32.8 Sugiyama 175 6 29.2 Linetskaya 112 4 28.0 Zuluaga 132 5 26.4 Hantuchova 100 4 25.0 Srebotnik 141 6 23.5 Frazier 91 4 22.8 Maleeva 101 5 20.2 Sprem 97 5 19.4 Kirilenko 94.75 5 19.0 Raymond 61 4 15.3 Shaughnessy 105 7 15.0 Myskina 33 4 8.3 Bartoli 2 1 2.0 Rubin 3 2 1.5

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 129 Best and Worst Results on Clay The following tables list a player’s best and worst results on this surface. Of these, the worst result may be the better measure of ability — a player who avoids bad losses is more consistent than one with a mixture of good and bad. Best Result Worst Result 1Hénin-Hardenne (1084) 1Hénin-Hardenne (299) 2 Pierce (894) 2 Sharapova (93) 3 Likhovtseva (470) 3Davenport (78) 4 Petrova (420) 4 Bovina (72) 5Mauresmo (419) 5Mauresmo (64) 6 Ivanovic (364) 6 Clijsters (56) 7 Schnyder (313) 7V. Williams (50) 8Davenport (304) 8 Petrova (44) 9Dementieva (269) 9Vaidisova (40) 10 Farina Elia (253) 10 Schnyder (33) 11 Golovin (238) 11 Pierce (30) 12 Sharapova (222) 12 Dulko (22) 13 Kuznetsova (198) 13 Peschke (9) 14 Medina Garrigues (194) 15 Jankovic (191) All other players examined, including Asagoe, 16 Zvonareva (177) Bartoli, Chakvetadze, Déchy, Dementieva, Dokic, 17 Bovina (168) Farina Elia, Frazier, Golovin, Grönefeld, 18 Schiavone (161) Hantuchova, Ivanovic, Jankovic, Kirilenko, 19 Clijsters (148) Kuznetsova, Likhovtseva, Linetskaya, Maleeva, 20 Vaidisova (145) Martinez, Medina Garrigues, Molik, Myskina, V. Williams (144) Pennetta, Raymond, Rubin, Safina, Schiavone, Pennetta (140) Shaughnessy, Smashnova, Sprem, Srebotnik, Smashnova (124) Suárez, Sugiyama, S. Williams, Zuluaga, Safina (115) Zvonareva, had at least one first-round loss on Asagoe (110) clay. Linetskaya (108) Srebotnik (106) Chakvetadze (106) Peschke (100.5) Suárez (100) Dulko (100) Martinez (89) Grönefeld (80) Déchy (80) S. Williams (74) Hantuchova (72) Zuluaga (65) Sugiyama (65) Shaughnessy (54) Kirilenko (50.75) Sprem (48) Frazier (48) Raymond (40) Maleeva (40) Myskina (29) Dokic (21.5) Bartoli (2) Molik (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 130 Grass Summary of Grass Results The following lists the top players, the tournaments they played on grass, the points earned on the surface, their record and winning percentage. Several players with success at grass Challengers (Ivanovic, Obata) are listed despite a lack of Tour success. The list is in alphabetical order. Player Won/Lost Vs. Tournaments Played Tot Pts/ Name (Percent) Top 10 # of Tourn Asagoe 1Ð3 (25.0%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (18), Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (2) 21/3 Bartoli 3Ð3 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (1), Eastbourne (94), Wimbledon (40) 135/3 Bovina — — — — Chakvetadze 7Ð3 (70.0%) 0Ð1 Birmingham (67), Eastbourne (66.75), Wimbledon (2) 135.75/3 Clijsters 8Ð1 (88.9%) 1Ð1 Eastbourne (294), Wimbledon (116) 410/2 Davenport 6Ð1 (85.7%) 2Ð0 Wimbledon (790) 790/1 Déchy 5Ð2 (71.4%) 0Ð2 Eastbourne (66), Wimbledon (118) 184/2 Dementieva 3Ð2 (60.0%) 0Ð1 ’s-Hertogenbosch (1), Wimbledon (126) 127/2 Dokic — — — — Dulko 4Ð2 (66.7%) 1Ð0 ’s-Hertogenbosch (116), Wimbledon (40) 156/2 Farina Elia 2Ð2 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (80) 81/2 Frazier 1Ð2 (33.3%) 0Ð0 Eastbourne (48), Wimbledon (2) 50/2 Golovin 3Ð2 (60.0%) 0Ð2 Birmingham (71), Wimbledon (2) 73/2 Grönefeld 1Ð3 (25.0%) 0Ð0 Birmingham(1), ’s-Hertogenbosch(20), Wimbledon(2) 23/3 Hantuchova 2Ð3 (40.0%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (1), Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (92) 94/3 Hénin-Hard 0Ð1 (0%) 0Ð0 Wimbledon (2) 2/1 Ivanovic 2Ð1 (66.7%) 0Ð0 Wimbledon (84) 84/1 Jankovic 6Ð3 (33.3%) 0Ð2 Birmingham (107), Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (92) 200/3 Kirilenko 3Ð3 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (13), ’s-Hertogenbosch (24), Wimbledon 73/3 (36) Kuznetsova 6Ð2 (75%) 0Ð1 Eastbourne (121), Wimbledon (230) 351/2 Likhovtseva 3Ð2 (60.0%) 0Ð1 Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (168) 169/2 Linetskaya 1Ð3 (25.0%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (17), Eastbourne Qualifying (1), 20/3 Wimbledon (2) Maleeva 3Ð2 (60.0%) 0Ð1 Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (160) 161/2 Martinez 3Ð2 (60.0%) 0Ð0 Eastbourne (29), Wimbledon (76) 105/2 Mauresmo 5Ð2 (71.4%) 1Ð1 Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (440) 441/2 Medina Garr 1Ð2 (33.3%) 0Ð0 ’s-Hertogenbosch (24), Wimbledon (2) 26/2 Molik 0Ð1 (0%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (1) 1/1 Myskina 5Ð2 (71.4%) 1Ð1 Eastbourne (57), Wimbledon (320) 377/2 Pennetta 3Ð1 (75.0%) 0Ð0 Wimbledon (136) 136/1 Peschke 3Ð2 (60.0%) 0Ð1 ’s-Hertogenbosch (1), Wimbledon (200) 201/2 Petrova 5Ð2 (71.4%) 0Ð1 ’s-Hertogenbosch (34), Wimbledon (198) 232/2 Pierce 4Ð1 (80.0%) 0Ð0 Wimbledon (258) 258/1 Raymond 3Ð4 (42.9%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (1), Eastbourne (46), Wimbledon (2) 49/3

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 131 Rubin Ð — — — Saﬁna 4Ð2 (66.7%) 0Ð1 ’s-Hertogenbosch (46), Wimbledon (72) 118/2 Schiavone 0Ð1 (0%) 0Ð0 Wimbledon (2) 2/1 Schnyder 0Ð1 (0%) 0Ð0 Wimbledon (2) 2/1 Sharapova 10Ð1 1Ð0 Birmingham (184), Wimbledon (476) 660/2 (90.9%) Shaughnessy 4Ð3 (57.1%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (1), ’s-Hertogenbosch (77), Wimbledon 118/3 (40) Smashnova 0Ð2 (0%) 0Ð0 ’s-Hertogenbosch (1), Wimbledon (2) 3/2 Sprem 0Ð2 (0%) 0Ð0 Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (2) 3/2 Srebotnik 5Ð2 (71.4%) 0Ð1 Eastbourne (26.75), Wimbledon (84) 110.75/2 Suárez — — — — Sugiyama 1Ð3 (25.0%) 0Ð0 Birmingham (18), Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (2) 21/3 Vaidisova 3Ð3 (50.0%) 0Ð1 Birmingham (13), Eastbourne (1), Wimbledon (80) 94/3 S. Williams 2Ð1 (66.7%) 0Ð0 Wimbledon (68) 68/1 V. Williams 7Ð0 (100%) 2Ð0 Wimbledon (1120) 1120/1 Zuluaga — — — — Zvonareva 2Ð2 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Eastbourne (40), Wimbledon (36) 76/2

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 132 Winning Percentage on Grass Rank Player Wins Losses Winning% 1V. Williams 7 0 100.0% 2 Sharapova 10 1 90.9% 3 Clijsters 8 1 88.9% 4Davenport 6 1 85.7% 5 Pierce 4 1 80.0% 6T Kuznetsova 6 2 75.0% 6T Pennetta 3 1 75.0% 8T Déchy 5 2 71.4% 8T Mauresmo 5 2 71.4% 8T Myskina 5 2 71.4% 8T Petrova 5 2 71.4% 8T Srebotnik 5 2 71.4% 13 Chakvetadze 7 3 70.0% 14T Jankovic 6 3 66.7% 14T Dulko 4 2 66.7% 14T Saﬁna 4 2 66.7% 14T Ivanovic 2 1 66.7% 14T S. Williams 2 1 66.7% 19T Dementieva 3 2 60.0% 19T Golovin 3 2 60.0% 19T Likhovtseva 3 2 60.0% 19T Maleeva 3 2 60.0% 19T Martinez 3 2 60.0% 19T Peschke 3 2 60.0% Shaughnessy 4 3 57.1% Bartoli 3 3 50.0% Kirilenko 3 3 50.0% Vaidisova 3 3 50.0% Farina Elia 2 2 50.0% Zvonareva 2 2 50.0% Raymond 3 4 42.9% Hantuchova 2 3 40.0% Frazier 1 2 33.3% Medina Garrigues 1 2 33.3% Asagoe 1 3 25.0% Grönefeld 1 3 25.0% Linetskaya 1 3 25.0% Sugiyama 1 3 25.0% Hénin-Hardenne 0 1 0.0% Molik 0 1 0.0% Schiavone 0 1 0.0% Schnyder 0 1 0.0% Smashnova 0 2 0.0% Sprem 0 2 0.0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 133 Points Per Tournament on Grass Grass Rank Player Name Grass Points Tourn on Grass Points/ Tourn 1V. Williams 1120 1 1120.0 2Davenport 790 1 790.0 3 Sharapova 660 2 330.0 4 Pierce 258 1 258.0 5Mauresmo 441 2 220.5 6 Clijsters 410 2 205.0 7Myskina 377 2 188.5 8Kuznetsova 351 2 175.5 9 Pennetta 136 1 136.0 10 Petrova 232 2 116.0 11 Peschke 201 2 100.5 12 Déchy 184 2 92.0 13 Likhovtseva 169 2 84.5 14 Ivanovic 84 1 84.0 15 Maleeva 161 2 80.5 16 Dulko 156 2 78.0 17 S. Williams 68 1 68.0 18 Jankovic 200 3 66.7 19 Dementieva 127 2 63.5 20 Saﬁna 118 2 59.0 Srebotnik 110.75 2 55.4 Martinez 105 2 52.5 Chakvetadze 135.75 3 45.3 Bartoli 135 3 45.0 Farina Elia 81 2 40.5 Shaughnessy 118 3 39.3 Zvonareva 76 2 38.0 Golovin 73 2 36.5 Hantuchova 94 3 31.3 Vaidisova 94 3 31.3 Frazier 50 2 25.0 Kirilenko 73 3 24.3 Raymond 49 3 16.3 Medina Garrigues 26 2 13.0 Grönefeld 23 3 7.7 Asagoe 21 3 7.0 Sugiyama 21 3 7.0 Linetskaya 20 3 6.7 Hénin-Hardenne 2 1 2.0 Schiavone 2 1 2.0 Schnyder 2 1 2.0 Smashnova 3 2 1.5 Sprem 3 2 1.5 Molik 1 1 1.0

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 134 Adjusted Points Per Tournament on Grass A blatant difficulty with grass is that so many players play only Wimbledon. This seriously biases their per-tournament results, because Slams are so point-heavy. A player who wins Eastbourne and reaches the Wimbledon semifinal will probably wind up with a lower divisor score than a player who plays only Wimbledon and reaches the semifinal. Yet surely the first player has at least as much right to be considered a top grass player! We didn’t have such a situation this year, but there was something similar in 2004. To attempt to compensate for this, we produce an adjusted grass ranking, setting a minimum divisor of 1.7. This reduces the bias for those who play only Wimbledon, while still making it more important than other grass results. Using this adjusted ranking gives us the following: Grass Rank Player Name Grass Pts Adj. Grass Trn Adj Points/Tourn 1V. Williams 1120 1 658.8 2Davenport 790 1 464.7 3 Sharapova 660 2 330.0 4Mauresmo 441 2 220.5 5 Clijsters 410 2 205.0 6Myskina 377 2 188.5 7Kuznetsova 351 2 175.5 8 Pierce 258 1 151.8 9 Petrova 232 2 116.0 10 Peschke 201 2 100.5 11 Déchy 184 2 92.0 12 Likhovtseva 169 2 84.5 13 Maleeva 161 2 80.5 14 Pennetta 136 1 80.0 15 Dulko 156 2 78.0 16 Jankovic 200 3 66.7 17 Dementieva 127 2 63.5 18 Safina 118 2 59.0 19 Srebotnik 110.75 2 55.4 20 Martinez 105 2 52.5 Ivanovic 84 1 49.4 Chakvetadze 135.75 3 45.3 Bartoli 135 3 45.0 Farina Elia 81 2 40.5 S. Williams 68 1 40.0 Shaughnessy 118 3 39.3 Zvonareva 76 2 38.0 Golovin 73 2 36.5 Hantuchova 94 3 31.3 Vaidisova 94 3 31.3 Frazier 50 2 25.0 Kirilenko 73 3 24.3 Raymond 49 3 16.3 Medina Garrigues 26 2 13.0 Grönefeld 23 3 7.7 Asagoe 21 3 7.0 Sugiyama 21 3 7.0 Linetskaya 20 3 6.7

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 135 Indoors Summary of Indoor Results The following lists the top players, the tournaments they played indoors, the points earned on the surface, their record and winning percentage. The list is in alphabetical order. Player Won/Lost Vs. Tournaments Played Total Pts/ Name (Percentage) Top 10 # of Tourn Asagoe 3Ð3 (50.0%) 1Ð1 Pan Pacific (184), Zürich (1), Linz (1) 186/3 Bartoli 5Ð3 (62.5%) 0Ð0 Paris (94), Linz (1), Quebec City (67) 162/3 Bovina — — — — Chakvetadz 6Ð7 (46.2%) 0Ð1 Paris Qualifuing (6), Antwerp (65.75), Luxembourg (33), 108.75/7 Filderstadt (1), Moscow (1), Zürich (1), Hasselt (1) Clijsters 13Ð4 (76.5%) 1Ð4 Antwerp (99), Luxembourg (291), Filderstadt (63), Hasselt (198), 815/5 Los Angeles Championships (164) Davenport 13Ð3 (81.3%) 5Ð3 Pan Pacific (270), Filderstadt (356), Zürich (424), Los Angeles 1354/4 Championships (304) Déchy 10Ð8 (55.6%) 0Ð3 Paris (40), Antwerp (1), Luxembourg (119), Filderstadt (64), 409/8 Moscow (1), Zürich (77), Hasselt (44), Quebec City (63) Dementieva 9Ð9 (50.0%) 1Ð5 Pan Pacific (79), Filderstadt (204), Moscow (180), Zürich (110), 795/7 Linz (1), Philadelphia (154), Los Angeles Championships (67) Dokic — — — — Dulko 1Ð2 (33.3%) 0Ð1 Zürich (1), Linz (29) 30/2 Farina Elia 3Ð6 (33.3%) 0Ð0 Paris (67), Luxembourg (1), Filderstadt (1), Moscow (1), Zürich 148/6 (77), Hasselt (1) Frazier 5Ð1 (83.3%) 0Ð0 Memphis (1), Quebec City (168) 169/2 Golovin 5Ð4 (55.6%) 0Ð1 Paris (119), Antwerp (35), Zürich (1), Linz (59) 214/4 Grönefeld 5Ð3 (62.5%) 1Ð3 Luxembourg (221), Filderstadt (1), Moscow (52) 274/3 Hantuchova 10Ð5 (66.7%) 1Ð4 Pan Pacific (87), Luxembourg (74), Filderstadt (165), Zürich (57), 452/5 Linz (69) Hénin-Hard 0Ð1 (0%) 0Ð0 Filderstadt (1) 1/1 Ivanovic 9Ð4 (69.2%) 0Ð3 Antwerp (19.75), Filderstadt (1), Zürich (191), Linz (121) 332.75/4 Jankovic 3Ð7 (30.0%) 0Ð1 Pan Pacific (1), Paris (33), Filderstadt (44), Moscow (1), Zürich 158/7 (77), Linz (1), Philadelphia (1) Kirilenko 3Ð4 (42.9%) 0Ð0 Poitiers $75K 2004 (22.5), Pan Pacific (52), Moscow (1) 75.5/3 Kuznetsova 4Ð3 (57.1%) 0Ð1 Pan Pacific (154), Moscow (102), Zürich (1) 257/3 Likhovtsev 5Ð5 (50.0%) 1Ð3 Pan Pacific (87), Filderstadt (44), Moscow (128), Zürich (1), Linz 261/5 (1) Linetskaya 3Ð2 (60.0%) 0Ð0 Memphis (63), Moscow (1) 64/2 Maleeva 4Ð5 (44.4%) 0Ð3 Paris (68), Antwerp (33), Luxembourg (1), Moscow (1), Zürich 160/5 (57) Martinez 1Ð2 (33.3%) 0Ð1 Zürich (1), Linz (35) 36/2 Mauresmo 18Ð5 (78.3%) 9Ð2 Paris (202), Antwerp (331), Filderstadt (263), Moscow (1), Zürich 1797/7 (1), Philadelphia (280), Los Angeles Championships (719) Medina Gar 1Ð6 (14.3%) 0Ð0 Paris (1), Antwerp (1), Luxembourg (1), Filderstadt (1), Zürich 12.75/6 Qualifying (7.75), Hasselt (1) Molik 2Ð4 (33.3%) 0Ð1 Antwerp (113), Filderstadt (1), Moscow (1), Zürich (1) 116/4 Myskina 9Ð4 (69.2%) 1Ð4 Antwerp (119), Filderstadt (80), Moscow (93), Zürich (208) 500/4 Pennetta 7Ð5 (58.3%) 1Ð1 Paris (1), Filderstadt (109), Moscow (77), Zürich (111( 298/4

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 136 Peschke 16Ð9 (64.0%) 1Ð3 Poitiers $75K 2004 (34.5), Paris Qualifying (5), Luxembourg (33), 404.75/9 Filderstadt Qualifying (10.75), Moscow (50), Zürich (40.5), Linz (161), Philadelphia (69), Pittsburg $75K (1) Petrova 15Ð7 (68.2%) 1Ð4 Paris (102), Antwerp (35), Luxembourg (59), Filderstadt (113), 845/8 Zürich (52), Linz (256), Philadelphia (95), Los Angeles Championships (133) Pierce 10Ð3 (76.9%) 4Ð3 Paris (35), Antwerp (40), Moscow (396), Los Angeles 1084/4 Championships (613) Raymond 4Ð4 (50.0%) 0Ð0 Luxembourg (1), Moscow Qualifying (20.5), Linz (1), 83.5/4 Philadelphia (61) Rubin — — — — Safina 14Ð5 (73.7%) 2Ð2 Paris (306), Antwerp (1), Luxembourg (100), Filderstadt (33), 782/6 Moscow (258), Hasselt (84) Schiavone 14Ð6 (70.0%) 3Ð5 Bergamo $50K 2004 (7), Luxembourg (67), Filderstadt (44), 704/6 Moscow (351), Zürich (128), Hasselt (107) Schnyder 12Ð8 (60.0%) 1Ð5 Antwerp (59), Luxembourg (1), Filderstadt (52), Moscow (57), 803/7 Zürich (279), Linz (191), Los Angeles Championships (164) Sharapova 7Ð3 (70.0%) 3Ð1 Pan Pacific (448), Moscow (98), Los Angeles Championships 907/3 (361) Shaughness 4Ð3 (57.1%) 0Ð0 Memphis (101), Filderstadt (1), Philadelphia (1) 103/3 Smashnova 1Ð2 (33.3%) 0Ð0 Paris (1), Luxembourg (40) 41/2 Sprem 5Ð5 (50.0%) 0Ð2 Paris (1), Antwerp (1), Filderstadt (58.25), Zürich Qualifying (1), 79.25/5 Hasselt (18) Srebotnik 13Ð5 (72.2%) 1Ð1 Antwerp (88.75), Luxembourg (1), Moscow Qualifying (9.75). 327/5 Zürich (189.5), Hasselt (38) Suárez — — — — Sugiyama 6Ð4 (60.0%) 0Ð1 Pan Pacific (1), Zürich (36.5), Linz (99), Philadelphia (33) 169.5/4 Vaidisova 6Ð2 (75.0%) 0Ð1 Memphis (69), Philadelphia (104) 173/2 S. Williams 1Ð0 (100%) 0Ð0 Paris (53) 53/1 V. Williams 3Ð1 (75.0%) 1Ð1 Antwerp (192) 192/1 Zuluaga — — — — Zvonareva 6Ð4 (60.0%) 0Ð0 Memphis (147), Moscow (57), Zürich (1), Linz (1), Philadelphia 207/5 (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 137 Winning Percentage Indoors Where two players have equal winning percentages, the player with the higher number of wins indoors is listed first. Rank Player Wins Losses Win% [1] S. Williams 1 0 100.0% 1 Frazier 5 1 83.3% 2Davenport 13 3 81.3% 3Mauresmo 18 5 78.3% 4 Pierce 10 3 76.9% 5 Clijsters 13 4 76.5% 6T Vaidisova 6 2 75.0% 6T V. Williams 3 1 75.0% 8 Saﬁna 14 5 73.7% 9 Srebotnik 13 5 72.2% 10T Schiavone 14 6 70.0% 10T Sharapova 7 3 70.0% 12T Ivanovic 9 4 69.2% 12T Myskina 9 4 69.2% 14 Petrova 15 7 68.2% 15 Hantuchova 10 5 66.7% 16 Peschke 16 9 64.0% 17T Bartoli 5 3 62.5% 17T Grönefeld 5 3 62.5% 19T Schnyder 12 8 60.0% 19T Sugiyama 6 4 60.0% 19T Zvonareva 6 4 60.0% 19T Linetskaya 3 2 60.0% Pennetta 7 5 58.3% Kuznetsova 4 3 57.1% Shaughnessy 4 3 57.1% Déchy 10 8 55.6% Golovin 5 4 55.6% Dementieva 9 9 50.0% Likhovtseva 5 5 50.0% Sprem 5 5 50.0% Raymond 4 4 50.0% Asagoe 3 3 50.0% Chakvetadze 6 7 46.2% Maleeva 4 5 44.4% Kirilenko 3 4 42.9% Farina Elia 3 6 33.3% Molik 2 4 33.3% Dulko 1 2 33.3% Martinez 1 2 33.3% Smashnova 1 2 33.3% Jankovic 3 7 30.0% Medina Garrigues 1 6 14.3% Hénin-Hardenne 0 1 0.0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 138 Points Per Tournament Indoors Indoor Rank Player Name Surface Pts Tourn indoor Points/Tourn 1Davenport 1354 4 338.5 2 Sharapova 907 3 302.3 3 Pierce 1084 4 271.0 4Mauresmo 1797 7 256.7 5V. Williams 192 1 192.0 6 Clijsters 815 5 163.0 7 Saﬁna 782 6 130.3 8Myskina 500 4 125.0 9 Schiavone 704 6 117.3 10 Schnyder 803 7 114.7 11 Dementieva 795 7 113.6 12 Petrova 845 8 105.6 13 Grönefeld 274 3 91.3 14 Hantuchova 452 5 90.4 15 Vaidisova 173 2 86.5 16 Kuznetsova 257 3 85.7 17 Frazier 169 2 84.5 18 Ivanovic 332.75 4 83.2 19 Pennetta 298 4 74.5 20 Srebotnik 327 5 65.4 Asagoe 186 3 62.0 Bartoli 162 3 54.0 Golovin 214 4 53.5 S. Williams 53 1 53.0 Likhovtseva 261 5 52.2 Déchy 409 8 51.1 Peschke 404.75 9 45.0 Sugiyama 169.5 4 42.4 Zvonareva 207 5 41.4 Shaughnessy 103 3 34.3 Maleeva 160 5 32.0 Linetskaya 64 2 32.0 Molik 116 4 29.0 Kirilenko 75.5 3 25.2 Farina Elia 148 6 24.7 Jankovic 158 7 22.6 Raymond 83.5 4 20.9 Smashnova 41 2 20.5 Martinez 36 2 18.0 Sprem 79.25 5 15.9 Chakvetadze 108.75 7 15.5 Dulko 30 2 15.0 Medina Garrigues 12.75 6 2.1 Hénin-Hardenne 1 1 1.0

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 139 Best and Worst Results Indoors The following tables list a player’s best and worst results on this surface. Of these, the worst result may be the better measure of ability — a player who avoids bad losses is at least more consistent than one with a mixture of good and bad results. Best Result Worst Result 1Mauresmo (719) 1Davenport (270) 2 Pierce (613) 2V. Williams (192) 3 Sharapova (448) 3 Sharapova (98) 4Davenport (424) 4Myskina (80) 5 Schiavone (351) 5Vaidisova (69) 6 Safina (306) 6 Clijsters (63) 7Clijsters (291) 7Hantuchova (57) 8 Schnyder (279) 8 S. Williams (53) 9 Petrova (256) 9 Petrova (35) 10 Grönefeld (221) 10 Pierce (35) 11 Myskina (208) 11 Schiavone (7) 12 Dementieva (204) 13 V. Williams (192) All other players examined, Asagoe, Bartoli, 14 Ivanovic (191) Chakvetadze, Déchy, Dementieva, Dulko, 15 Srebotnik (189.5) Farina Elia, Frazier, Golovin, Grönefeld, 16 Asagoe (184) Hénin-Hardenne, Ivanovic, Jankovic, 17 Frazier (168) Kirilenko, Kuznetsova, Likhovtseva, 18 Hantuchova (165) Linetskaya, Maleeva, Martinez, Mauresmo, 19 Peschke (161) Medina Garrigues, Molik, Pennetta, 20 Kuznetsova (154) Peschke, Raymond, Safina, Schnyder, Zvonareva (147) Shaughnessy, Smashnova, Sprem, Srebotnik, Likhovtseva (128) Sugiyama, and Zvonareva, had at least one Déchy (119) opening-round loss indoors. Not playing Golovin (119) indoors were Bovina, Dokic, Rubin, Suárez, Molik (113) and Zuluaga (retired) Pennetta (109) Vaidisova (104) Shaughnessy (101) Sugiyama (99) Bartoli (94) Farina Elia (77) Jankovic (77) Maleeva (68) Chakvetadze (65.75) Linetskaya (63) Raymond (61) Sprem (58.25) S. Williams (53) Kirilenko (52) Smashnova (40) Martinez (35) Dulko (29) Medina Garrigues (7.75) Hénin-Hardenne (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 140 All-Surface Players The above us to produce a sort of a pseudo-ranking for “best all-surface player.” For this we add up a player’s ranking on all four surfaces based on points per tournament, taking only the Top 20 on each surface. Players not in the Top 20 on a given surface are assigned an arbitrary score of 24. (Note: Because of the shortness of the grass season, grass scores have been divided in half, rounding down, and a maximum value of 12 has been used. Also, the adjusted grass scores have been used) Note that this is not a measure of who is better on all surfaces; it measures who has been an all-surface player this year. Players with the maximum score of 84 of have not been listed. It should be noted that any score in excess of about 65 is likely to indicate a single-surface specialist — or perhaps, these days, a player who is injured. All told, 35 players are in the Top 20 on at least one surface. Only nine — Clijsters, Davenport, Dementieva, Kuznetsova, Mauresmo, Petrova, Pierce, Sharapova, and Venus Williams — are Top 20 on all surfaces, and Kuznetsova just barely; she’s #20 on hardcourt. We observe the advantage of balance in this ranking: The Top Eight players in the list are all four-surface players, with Kuznetsova the only four-surface player to end up behind a non-four-surface player. Top 20 on three surfaces are Ivanovic (missing grass), Myskina (missing clay), Pennetta (missing hard), Schnyder (missing grass), and Srebotnik (who, incredibly, is missing clay, which is her best surface!) Rank Player Surface Score Rank Player Surface Score 1Davenport 10 18T Vaidisova 65 2 Pierce 11 20 Déchy 66 3 Sharapova 13 Hantuchova 67 4T Clijsters 19 Grönefeld 68 4T Mauresmo 19 Pennetta 69 6V. Williams 30 Bovina 72 7 Petrova 34 Molik 72 8 Dementieva 35 Frazier 77 9 Schnyder 40 Golovin 77 10 Hénin-Hardenne 43 Peschke 77 11 Myskina 50 Chakvetadze 78 12 Kuznetsova 52 Maleeva 78 13 Ivanovic 53 Medina Garrigues 78 14 Schiavone 60 Dulko 79 15 S. Williams 63 Farina Elia 80 16T Saﬁna 64 Jankovic 80 16T Srebotnik 64 Martinez 82 18T Likhovtseva 65

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 141 Tournament Wins by Surface Here are the number of tournaments each player won on the various surfaces. As elsewhere, tournaments are divided into Major (Tier II and up; note that this does not mean “Slam,” which is how some use the term) and Minor (Tier III and below). The final column lists the number of surfaces on which a player won tournaments. WTA Player Hard Clay Grass Indoor Won Rank Name Major Minor Major Minor Major Minor Major Minor On 2 Clijsters 6 1 1 1 3 1Davenport 2 1 1 2 3 55 Frazier* 1 1 6 Hénin-Hardenne 4 1 16 Ivanovic 1 1 25 Kirilenko 1 1 32 Martinez 1 1 3Mauresmo 1 3 2 34 Medina Garrigues 2 1 29 Molik 1 1 14 Myskina 1 1 23 Pennetta 2 1 9 Petrova 1 1 5 Pierce 1 1 2 20 Saﬁna 1 1 2 7 Schnyder 2 1 4 Sharapova 1 1 1 3 43 Smashnova 2 1 28 Srebotnik 2 1 15 Vaidisova 3 1 11 Williams, Serena 1 1 10 Williams, Venus 1 1 2 42 Zvonareva 1 1 * In addition to her WTA title, Amy Frazier also won a Challenger (on hardcourt). Highlight players with no titles: Asagoe, Bartoli, Bovina, Capriati, Chakvetadze, Déchy, Dementieva, Dokic, Dulko, Farina Elia, Golovin, Grönefeld, Hantuchova, Hingis, Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Likhovtseva, Maleeva, Peschke*, Raymond, Rubin, Schiavone, Shaughnessy, Sprem, Suárez, Sugiyama, and Zuluaga. Other players with titles are Koukalova (1 minor clay, 1 minor hard), Krajicek (1 minor hard), Llagostera Vives (1 minor clay), Mirza (1 minor hard), Safarova (1 minor clay, 1 minor hard), Yan (1 minor hard), Zheng (1 minor hard). Note that no player this year had a Surface Sweep (titles on all four surfaces); for more details on this, see the second on “Surface Sweeps — Singles (Since 1990)” on page 323.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 142 Assorted Statistics The Busiest Players on the Tour Total Tour Matches Played by Top Players The table on the next page shows how the Top 50, and certain other busy players, ranked in total matches played. Note that this does not correlate closely with ranking or with tournaments played; Clijsters is near the top of the list of matches played because she plays relatively little but wins a lot; Schnyder is #1 because she wins fairly often and plays a reasonably heavy schedule, and Craybas is fairly high because she wins relatively little but plays a ton. This seemingly-odd mix is in fact fairly typical. In 2002, the Top 25 player with the most matches was Jelena Dokic, with 79, followed by Anastasia Myskina, with 77 — two players who, at the time, had absurd schedules and moderate success. In 2003, that changed, with the biggest totals scored not by the insane overplayers (the top play- everything-in-sight player was Elena Dementieva, #3 in the matches list, who played 27 events in 2003). Rather, our top two in matches played that year were the top two players, Clijsters and Hénin-Hardenne. That was the first time since 2000 (when #1 Martina Hingis led the Tour with 87 matches) that the top player in matches was Top Two in the rankings. In 2004, though, we returned to having busy players top the list: Iveta Benesova had 84 matches, the most of any player we checked, and Vera Zvonareva led the Top 25 with 79, followed by Svetlana Kuznetsova with 77, and WTA #1 Davenport was third with 72. This year, the pattern is similar: Patty Schnyder and Nadia Petrova are at the low end of the Top Ten, but are first and second with 83 and 78 matches, followed by Kim Clijsters with 74. Historically, there appears to be no general pattern — except that, when there is no dominant player, as this year, the play-everything-that-moves types tend do dominate in matches played. Note: The “ordinal” in the list below represents where the player stands in the overall list of the 64 players checked. The number in [] represents where a Top 25 player stands among the Top 25 in matches played — e.g. Grönefeld is tied for #8 in the main list, but she is #7 among the Top 25 players, so her Ordinal reads 8 [7], meaning #8 overall, #7 among the Top 25. A simple test shows us that the correlation coefficient between ranking and matches played is -.13. Given that we have only 25 data points, that’s no correlation at all. (Correlation coefficients range from a minimum of -1 to a maximum of 1, with 1 — or -1 — representing a close relationship and 0 a complete lack or relatiionship.) We can also show this with a graph.

Ranking versus Matches 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Matches Played 20 10 0 051015 20 25 Ranking

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 143 Matches WTA Matches WTA Ordinal Player Played Rank Ordinal Player Played Rank 1 [1] Schnyder 83 7 31T Benesova 53 53 2 [2] Petrova 78 9 34T [20T] Myskina 52 14 3 [3] Clijsters 74 2 34T [20T] Likhovtseva 52 17 4T [4T] Mauresmo 69 3 34T Zheng Jie 52 44 4T [4T] Kirilenko 69 25 37 Vinci 51 41 6T [6] Davenport 68 1 38 Domachowska 50 60 6T Peschke 68 26 39T Karatantcheva 49 35 8 [7] Grönefeld 67 21 39T Asagoe 49 38 9 [8] Déchy 66 12 41T Dushevina 48 39 10T [9T] Sharapova 65 4 41T Stosur 48 46 10T [9T] Jankovic 65 22 43T Farina Elia 47 — 12 Peer 64 45 43T Martinez 47 32 13T Mirza 63 31 43T Morigami 47 48 13T Diaz-Oliva 63 56 43T Llagostera Vives 47 49 15T [11T] Schiavone 62 13 47 [22] Kuznetsova 46 18 15T [11T] Hantuchova 62 19 48 Shaughnessy 44 66 17T [13T] Dementieva 61 8 49T [23] Williams, Venus 43 10 17T [13T] Pennetta 61 23 49T Frazier 43 55 17T Safarova 61 50 51T Zvonareva 42 42 20 [15] Vaidisova 59 15 51T Sprem 42 65 21T Sugiyama 58 30 53 Smashnova 40 43 21T Chakvetadze 58 33 54 [24] Hénin-Hardenne 39 6 23 Srebotnik 57 28 55 Raymond 38 76 24 Craybas 56 47 56T Maleeva 37 52 25T [16T] Saﬁna 55 20 56T Linetskaya 37 53 25T [16T] Golovin 55 24 58 Molik 31 29 25T Dulko 55 27 59 [25] Williams, Serena 28 11 28T [18] Ivanovic 54 16 60 Zuluaga 25 84 28T Koukalova 54 36 61 Dokic 23 351 28T Bartoli 54 40 62 Bovina 20 62 31T [19] Pierce 53 5 63 Suárez 9 232 31T Medina Garrigues 53 34 64 Rubin 4 546

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 144 Total Tour Events Played by the Top 150 The table on the next page sorts the Top 150 (as of November 14, 2005) based on events played in the past year. All players who have played that many events are listed, along with their rankings (in parentheses). Top 25 players are shown in bold. The second column shows how many players played each number of events. All told, the Top 150 played 3403 events in 2005, slightly down from 3419 events in 2004. That’s not much change from last year, but sharply down from 2003, when the Top 150 played 3568 events. The total was 3540 events in 2002, 3434 events in 2001. Evidently the injury problem is starting to get to everyone; we’re down more than an event and a half per player from 2003. This even though the maximum events has gone up: Müller this year has 34, but the leader last year was 32 (played, it is true, by five different players; this year, Müller is the only player with more than 31, and Bohmova is the only other player with more than 30). In 2003, Grandin and Vakulenko led the Tour with 34 tournaments. In 2002, Ansley Cargill and Lubomira Kurhajcova had 34 events; in 2002, Alina Jidkova reached that figure. The busiest player in the Top 50 this year is Craybas, with 30 (though she will not be Top 50 in 2005). Marrero, with 31 events, led the Top 50 in 2004; in 2003, Dokic and Pisnik had 30. The median this year is 23 events; in 2004, the median was 24. The most typical result is also down — and sharply. In 2003, 14 players played 26 events. In 2004, that fell to 25, again played by 14 players. But this year, the most popular schedule is only 22 events, played by 17 players. The chart below shows the popularity of the various schedules

Tournaments per Year 18

Top 150 Players Playing 4

0 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334 Number of Tournaments

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 145 Events # to Players Play 34 1 Müller (109) 31 1 Bohmova (128) 30 7 Craybas (47), Fedak (137), Foretz (94), Lee-Waters (136), Osterloh (143), Sromova (98), Shikha Uberoi (141) 29 6 Alona Bondarenko (73), Antonella Serra Zanetti (64), Bremond (102), Henke (147), Jankovic (22), Pin (113) 28 8 Benesova (54), Brandi (87), Bychkova (69), Grönefeld (21), Pastikova (138), Pelletier (144), Schruff (80), Sucha (90) 27 10 Bammer (79), Camerin (96), Czink (92), Fujiwara (97), Klaschka (140), Laine (100), Meusburger (149), Parra Santonja (107), Sugiyama (30), Voskoboeva (118) 26 13 Ani (95), Baltacha (122), Déchy (12), Diaz-Oliva (56), Domachowska (60), Gagliardi (93), Jidkova (123), Kirilenko (25), Medina Garrigues (34), Panova (89), Pratt (127), Schnyder (7), Vierin (139) 25 14 Asagoe (38), Bartoli (40), Gallovits (129), Hantuchova (19), Haynes (135), Kloesel (91), Llagostera Vives (49), Loit (81), Peschke (26), Petrova (9), Sanchez Lorenzo (83), Shaughnessy (66), Vesnina (111), Yakimova (101) 24 12 Dubois (121), Jackson (75), Lepchenko (131), Pennetta (23), Pous Tio (82), Randriantefy (68), Razzano (51), Santangelo (85), Sprem (65), Stosur (46), Tu (119), Vento-Kabchi (63) 23 14 Castaño (59), Chakvetadze (33), Chladkova (130), Cohen-Aloro (105), Dominguez Lino (77), Dulko (27), Granville (61), Kostanic (99), Koukalova (36), Nakamura (71), Obata (108), Ondraskova (78), Peer (45), Salerni (148) 22 17 Kateryna Bondarenko (125), Cervanova (115), Daniilidou (70), Gajdosova (145), Garbin (86), Golovin (24), Koryttseva (124), Likhovtseva (17), Martinez Granados (114), Mirza (31), Morigami (48), Obziler (134), Ruano Pascual (106), Schiavone (13), Vinci (41), Washington (74), Zvonareva (42) 21 5 Arvidsson (67), Cho (72), Safarova (50), Saﬁna (20), Srebotnik (28) 20 9 Birnerova (116), Dementieva (8), Dushevina (39), Harkleroad (117), Maleeva (52), Martinez (32), Raymond (76), Sequera (150), Tanasugarn (132) 19 6 Frazier (55), Linetskaya (53), Lisjak (126), Mauresmo (3), Myskina (14), Strycova (142) 18 2 Smashnova (43), Zheng (44) 17 4 Clijsters (2), Kuznetsova (18), Perry (112), Vaidisova (15) 16 6 Davenport (1), Irvin (133), Ivanovic (16), Kanepi (120), Karatantcheva (35), Peng (37) 15 3 Molik (29), Sharapova (4), Sun (104) 14 4 Krajicek (58), Li Na (57), Pierce (5), Yan (103) 13 3 Kutuzova (110), Pironkova (88), Zuluaga (84) 12 1 Venus Williams (10) 10 2 Azarenka (146), Serena Williams (11) 91 Hénin-Hardenne (6) 81 Bovina (62)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 146 The Strongest Tournaments Theoretically, all tournaments of the same tier are of equal difficulty. In reality, it’s not even close. Tournaments like Filderstadt and San Diego (before it expanded to a 56-draw) are so strong that, in some years, Top Ten players can go unseeded, while Eastbourne 2002 didn’t feature a single Top Five player. In general, we can assume that all Slams and the year-end Championships are at maximum strength; with minor exceptions, everyone who can play will play. This is not true of Tier I and Tier II tournaments (other than Miami). Experience shows that, overall, certain tournaments are guaranteed to be strong: the Slams, the Championships, Miami, San Diego, Filderstadt. It’s much harder to decide which tournaments are next. There is no simple way of “rating” tournaments; it is not a statistic the WTA calculates (and never will, because it reveals the problem of a round points-based ranking system). The sections below offer three proposals, each with advantages and disadvantages (the latter derived both from the systems themselves and from the fact that they are based on WTA rankings). Tournament Strength Based on the Four Top Players Present Proposal #1: This is a two-part ranking, strength and depth. For the strength, take the total rankings of the top four players present. Add to this the scores of the top two present. (That is, count the top two twice and the #3 and #4 players once.) This gives an indication of just how tough things are when “the going gets tough”: it shows what you can expect to be up against in the semifinal and final rounds. For example, the top four players at Gold Coast in 2005 were Petrova, ranked #12; Schnyder, ranked #14; Sugiyama, #17; and Sprem, #18. So the total “value” of this tournament is 12+12+14+14+17+18=87. The lower this number (the minimum value is 13), the stronger the event. To calculate the depth, we look at the seeds #1-#3 and seeds #6Ð#8 (or, correctly, the top three players and the players whose rankings would entitle them to the last three seeds based on the current rankings; for events with more than 32 players, use seeds #14Ð#16). Sum the values for the bottom three, subtract the sum of the value for the top three, and divide by three (six if there are more than eight seeds). The smaller the result, the deeper the tournament, as the difference between top and bottom seeds is smallest. Again taking Gold Coast, the top seeds were ranked 12, 14, and 17; the bottom three seeds were ranked #21, #24, and #25. So the depth of Gold Coast is defined by [(21+24+25)-(12+14+17]/3 = (70-43)/3 = 27/3 = 9.0. Based on that, we rate the tournaments on the Tour as follows (sorted by strength). Note: Tournaments below Tier II shown in italics. The general coherence of the WTA’s Tier system is shown by the fact that the weakest Tier II (Warsaw) is as strong as the strongest Tier III (Birmingham). Rank Tier Tournament Strength Score Depth Score Winner 1T Slam Australian Open 13 2.7 S. Williams 1T Slam Wimbledon 13 7.5 V. Williams 1T Slam U. S. Open 13 6.5 Clijsters 1T Chmp Los Angeles Championships 13 6.3 Mauresmo 5T I Indian Wells 14 12.3 Clijsters 5T Slam Roland Garros 14 8.0 Hénin-Hardenne 7T I Miami 19 7.0 Clijsters 7T I Rome 19 10.2 Mauresmo 7T II Filderstadt 19 7.3 Davenport 10 II Dubai 22 8.7 Davenport 11T I Berlin 23 9.8 Hénin-Hardenne 11T I Pan Paciﬁc 23 22.7 Sharapova 13 II Amelia Island 24 11.7 Davenport 14T I Moscow 25 9.3 Pierce 14T II Sydney 25 11.3 Molik 16T I Canadian Open 26 11.0 Clijsters 16T I Charleston 26 12.5 Hénin-Hardenne 16T II Doha 26 14.7 Sharapova 19T II Los Angeles 27 17.0 Clijsters 19T II New Haven 27 25.7 Davenport

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 147 21 I Zürich 31 8.0 Davenport 22 II Antwerp 34 9.3 Mauresmo 23T II Eastbourne 37 12.3 Clijsters 23T II Paris 37 17.0 Saﬁna 25T I San Diego 39 10.0 Pierce 25T II Beijing 39 22.0 Kirilenko 27 II Stanford 48 12.7 Clijsters 28 II Luxembourg 49 15.7 Clijsters 29 II Philadelphia 55 21.7 Mauresmo 30 II Linz 60 12.3 Petrova 31T II Warsaw 61 8.7 Hénin-Hardenne 31T III Birmingham 61 20.3 Sharapova 33T III Bali 68 26.0 Davenport 33T III Hasselt 68 21.3 Clijsters 35 III Gold Coast 87 9.0 Schnyder 36 III ’s-Hertogenbosch 95 23.7 Koukalova 37 III Cincinnati 99 20.3 Schnyder 38 III Strasbourg 115 12.0 V. Williams 39 III Bangkok 119 28.0 Vaidisova 40 IV Seoul 140 21.0 Vaidisova 41 III Japan Open 141 12.3 Vaidisova 42 IV Palermo 162 27.3 Medina Garrigues 43 III Memphis 163 32.7 Zvonareva 44 III Kolkata 164 68.3 Myskina 45 III GuangZhou 173 32.0 Yan 46 IV Auckland 179 20.7 Srebotnik 47 V Canberra 181 26.3 Ivanovic 48 IV Portoroz 184 23.7 Koukalova 49 VHobart 189 12.3 Zheng 50 III Pattaya City 192 37.0 Martinez 51 III Stockholm 193 51.3 Srebotnik 52 III Istanbul 195 29.0 Medina Garrigues 53 IV Modena 214 37.0 Smashnova 54 IV Estoril 217 33.3 Safarova 55 III Acapulco 235 32.3 Pennetta 56 III Bogota 237 47.7 Pennetta 57 III Quebec City 244 38.7 Frazier 58 IV Prague 263 27.7 Saﬁna 59 IV Forest Hills 274 16.7 Safarova 60 IV Rabat 309 23.0 Llagostera Vives 61 IV Hyderabad 330 37.7 Mirza 62 IV Budapest 348 19.0 Smashnova 63 IV Tashkent 464 18.0 Krajicek

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 148 The Top Tournaments Based on Top Players Present — Method 1 Proposal #2: The following table assesses tournaments based on the top players who play. It starts with tournaments played by the #1 player, and lists the number of other Top Ten players present. Then it lists tournaments headlined by #2, etc. Only tournaments from Tier II up are listed. The difficulty with this system is that a tournament with (say) four Top Ten players headed by the #5 player might be considered stronger than a tournament with only one Top Ten player, but that one player being #2. Frankly, it’s a rather weak way of rating tournaments (is Stanford, with only two Top Ten players but that one being #1 in the world, really stronger than Miami, which had eight though it lacked #1?) but it makes it easy to look up who was at the top of the field. Trn Tournament Top Player # of Top Player Ranks of Missing Top 10 Winner Rank Present Top 10 Missing Players 1 U. S. Open #1/Davenport 10 #18/Zvonareva [top players missing #18, 20] Clijsters 2Wimbledon #1/Davenport 9 #9/Molik #9 V. Williams 3 Australian Op. #1/Davenport 8 #8/Hénin-Hard #8, #10 S. Williams 4 Los Angeles Ch #1/Davenport 8 #6/Hénin-Hard #6, #9 Mauresmo 5 Roland Garros #1/Davenport 8 #4/S. Williams #4, #8 Hénin-Hard 6 Indian Wells #1/Davenport 5 #4/SWilliams #4, #6, #8, #9, #10 Clijsters 7 Sydney #1/Davenport 4 #2/Mauresmo #2, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10 Molik 8 Dubai #1/Davenport 6 #2/Mauresmo #2, #3, #6, #10 Davenport 9Pan Paciﬁc #1/Davenport 4 #2/S. Williams #2, #3, #5, #8, #9, #10 Sharapova 10 Amelia Island #1/Davenport 6 #2/Mauresmo #2, #3, #5, #7 Davenport 11 Moscow #1/Sharapova 5 #2/Davenport #2, #3, #5, #6, #9 Pierce 12 Charleston #1/Davenport 5 #2/Sharapova #2, #3, #4, #7, #9 Hénin-Hard 13 Stanford #1/Davenport 2 #2/Sharapova #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 Clijsters 14 Beijing #1/Sharapova 3 #2/Davenport #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #10 Kirilenko 15 Miami #2/Mauresmo 8 #1/Davenport #1, #10 Clijsters 16 Rome #2/Sharapova 7 #1/Davenport #1, #6, #8 Mauresmo 17 Filderstadt #2/Davenport 7 #1/Sharapova #1, #6, #7 Davenport 18 New Haven #2/Davenport 3 #1/Sharapova #1, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10 Davenport 19 Berlin #2/Sharapova 5 #1/Davenport #1, #4, #5, #8, #9 Hénin-Hard 20 Doha #2/Mauresmo 4 #1/Davenport #1, #3, #6, #7, #8, #10 Sharapova 21 Los Angeles #2/Sharapova 5 #1/Davenport #1, #3, #5, #7, #8 Clijsters 22 Paris #2/SWilliams 2 #1/Davenport #1, #3, #5Ð#10 Saﬁna 23 Antwerp #2/Mauresmo 4 #1/Davenport #1, #3, #4, #5, #7, #9 Mauresmo 24 Zürich #3/Davenport 5 #1/Sharapova #1, #2, #5, #6, #7 Davenport 25 Canadian Open #3/Mauresmo 6 #1/Davenport #1, #2, #6, #9 Clijsters 26 Luxembourg #3/Clijsters 3 #1/Sharapova #1, #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 Clijsters 27 Eastbourne #3/Mauresmo 3 #1/Davenport #1, #2, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9 Clijsters 28 San Diego #4/Kuznetsov 4 #1/Davenport #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8 Pierce 29 Philadelphia #4/Mauresmo 3 #1/Davenport #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8 Mauresmo 30 Warsaw #7/Kuznetsov 2 #1/Davenport #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9 Hénin-Hard 31 Linz #8/Dementiev 3 #1/Davenport #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 Petrova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 149 The Top Tournaments Based on Top Players Present — Method 2 Proposal #3: This method combines the above with the “Tournament Strength Index” proposed by Geert Calliauw. The Tournament Strength Index calculates the total quality points available for the top eight seeds, and calculates this as a fraction of the possible quality points if all of the Top Eight played. My modified version uses the same calculation, but counts only Top 25 players. (This is a change from 2002, when only Top Ten players counted; the purpose is to allow us to assess the sorts of events with only a handful of top players.) Recall that the #1 player is worth 100 quality points, #2 is worth 75, #3 66, #4 55, #5 50, and players #6-#10 are worth 43. Players below #10 are counted at a discounted rate: 15 points for those ranked #11-#16, 10 for those ranked #17Ð#25. Thus the percentage listed below is the total quality points divided by the sum of the values for the Top Eight, 475. As with the “Strength and Depth” measure, tournaments below Tier II are shown in italics.. Tourn Rank Tournament Top 8 Adj. Qual Pts Percentage Score Winner 1T Australian Open 475 100% S. Williams 1T Wimbledon 475 100% V. Williams 1T U. S. Open 475 100% Clijsters 1T Los Angeles Cham 475 100% Mauresmo 5 Roland Garros 463 97.5% Hénin-Hardenne 6Miami 418 88.0% Clijsters 7 Rome 391 82.1% Mauresmo 8 Filderstadt 390 82.1% Davenport 9 Indian Wells 379 79.8% Clijsters 10 Dubai 364 76.6% Davenport 11 Amelia Island 357 75.2% Davenport 12 Canadian Open 330 69.5% Clijsters 13 Moscow 329 69.3% Pierce 14 Charleston 324 68.2% Hénin-Hardenne 15 Berlin 315 66.3% Hénin-Hardenne 16 Zürich 295 62.1% Davenport 17 Los Angeles 289 60.8% Clijsters 18 Sydney 279 58.7% Molik 19 Doha 273 57.5% Sharapova 20 Pan Paciﬁc 261 54.9% Sharapova 21 Antwerp 259 54.5% Mauresmo 22 Eastbourne 252 46.1% Clijsters 23T San Diego 244 51.4% Pierce 23T New Haven 244 51.4% Davenport 25 Beijing 221 46.5% Kirilenko 26 Stanford 218 45.9% Clijsters 27 Luxembourg 207 43.6% Clijsters 28 Paris 190 40.0% Saﬁna 29 Linz 184 38.7% Petrova 30T Warsaw 161 33.9% Hénin-Hardenne 30T Philadelphia 161 33.9% Mauresmo 32 Birmingham 158 33.3% Sharapova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 150 33 Hasselt 115 24.2% Clijsters 34 Bali 105 22.1% Davenport 35 Gold Coast 90 18.9% Schnyder 36 ’s-Hertogenbosch 86 18.1% Koukalova 37 Bangkok 58 12.2% Vaidisova 38 Strasbourg 45 9.5% Medina Garrigues 39 Cincinnati 40 8.4% Schnyder 40T Kolkata 30 6.3% Myskina 40T Japan Open 30 6.3% Vaidisova 42 Memphis 25 5.3% Zvonareva 43T Palermo 20 4.2% Medina Garrigues 43T Seoul 20 4.2% Vaidisova 45T Pattaya City 15 3.2% Martinez 45T Istanbul 15 3.2% V. Williams 45T Stockholm 15 3.2% Srebotnik 45T Quebec City 15 3.2% Frazier 49T Canberra 10 2.1% Ivanovic 49T Bogota 10 2.1% Pennetta 49T Modena 10 2.1% Smashnova 49T GuangZhou 10 2.1% Yan 53T Auckland 0 0% Srebotnik 53T Hobart 0 0% Zheng 53T Hyderabad 0 0% Mirza 53T Acapulco 0 0% Pennetta 53T Estoril 0 0% Safarova 53T Rabat 0 0% Llagostera Vives 53T Prague 0 0% Saﬁna 53T Budapest 0 0% Smashnova 53T Forest Hills 0 0% Safarova 53T Portoroz 0 0% Koukalova 53T Tashkent 0 0% Krajicek

Overall, these three systems agree fairly closely: If we look at the Top Ten events under each ranking, we find that no fewer than seven tournaments are Top Ten under all three: Australian Open, Dubai, Indian Wells, Los Angeles Championships, Roland Garros, U. S. Open, and Wimbledon. In addition, Filderstadt, Miami, and Rome are Top Ten in two lists each; Amelia Island, the Pan Pacific (!), and Sydney are Top Ten in one list each. Assessing the weakest tournaments is harder, but we note that Tashkent is dead last in the “Strength and Depth” ranking and is also one of the bottom tournaments in the Modified TSI. Of the 11 tournaments at the bottom of the TSI list, eight — Acapulco, Budapest, Estoril, Forest Hills, Hyderabad, Prague, Rabat, and Tashkent — are also in the bottom ten in the Strength and Depth list. It seems safe to say that these are pretty close to the bottom.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 151 Strongest Tournaments Won Based on the data in the previous table (modified TSI), we can also list the players in terms of strength of strongest tournament won: Ranking Player Tournament Score Tournament S. Williams 100 Australian Open V. Williams 100 Wimbledon Clijsters 100 U. S. Open Mauresmo 100 Los Angles Championships Hénin-Hardenne 97.5 Roland Garros Davenport 82.1 Filderstadt Pierce 69.3 Moscow Molik 58.7 Sydney Sharapova 57.5 Doha Kirilenko 46.5 Beijing Safina 40.0 Paris Petrova 38.7 Linz Schnyder 18.9 Gold Coast Koukalova 18.1 ’s-Hertogenbosch Vaidisova 12.2 Bangkok Medina Garrigues 9.5 Strasbourg Myskina 6.3 Kolkata Zvonareva 5.3 Memphis Martinez 3.2 Pattaya City Srebotnik 3.2 Stockholm Frazier 3.2 Quebec City Ivanovic 2.1 Canberra Pennetta 2.1 Bogota Smashnova 2.1 Modena Yan 2.1 GuangZhou Zheng 0 Hobart Mirza 0 Hyderabad Safarova 0 Estoril, Forest Hills Llagostera Vives 0 Rabat

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 152 Strongest Tournament Performances The list below shows the biggest performances (highest number of points earned) in 2005. Every result of more than 350 points is listed. Ordinal Score Player Event 1 1208 Serena Williams Australian Open W 2 1120 Venus Williams Wimbledon W 3 1084 Hénin-Hardenne Roland Garros W 4 1022 Clijsters U. S. Open W 5 894 Pierce Roland Garros F 6 834 Pierce U. S. Open F 7 790 Davenport Wimbledon F 8 719 Mauresmo Los Angeles Championships W 9 664 Davenport Australian Open F 10 640 Dementieva U. S. Open SF 11 613 Pierce Los Angeles Championships F 12 611 Clijsters Miami W 13 564 Déchy Australian Open SF 14 527 Clijsters Indian Wells W 15 514 Hénin-Hardenne Charleston W 16 471 Hénin-Hardenne Berlin W 17 476 Sharapova Wimbledon SF 18T 470 Sharapova Australian Open SF 18T 470 Likhovtseva Roland Garros SF 20 448 Sharapova Pan Pacific W 21 442 Sharapova U. S. Open SF 22 424 Davenport Zürich W 23 440 Mauresmo Wimbledon SF 24 420 Petrova Roland Garros SF 25 419 Mauresmo Rome W 26 410 Clijsters Canadian Open W 27 405 Pierce San Diego W 28 396 Pierce Moscow Q 29 364 Ivanovic Roland Garros QF 30 361 Sharapova Los Angeles Championships SF 31 356 Davenport Filderstadt W 32 351 Schiavone Moscow F All told, 14 different players — Clijsters, Davenport, Déchy, Dementieva, Hénin-Hardenne, Ivanovic, Likhovtseva, Mauresmo, Petrova, Pierce, Schiavone, Sharapova, Serena Williams, and Venus Williams — earned a big result, with 32 total big results, with the most beind scored by Pierce and Sharapova (five each); Clijsters and Davenport had four; Hénin-Hardenne and Mauresmo earned three. The total is dramatically down from last year, when 17 different players earned a 350 point result, with 38 total big results. On the other hand 2003, a mere 13 players combined to post 35 350+ point results, with fully half of them (18) being earned by Clijsters and Hénin-Hardenne.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 153 Title Defences The following list shows all instances of a defending a title in 2005. The total of six is at the low end of the normal range; there were nine in 2004, twelve (!) in 2003, six in 2002; seven in 2001. Title Defended By Memphis Zvonareva Amelia Island Davenport Rome Mauresmo Birmingham Sharapova Palermo Medina Garrigues Philadelphia Mauresmo

Seeds and their Success Rates The following tables summarize how successful seeded players are at holding their seeds. (It will be observed that seeding is much more accurate at the stronger tournaments.) In the tables which follow, the heading “reached seeded round” refers to the number of seeds who made it to the round in which seeds are expected to face seeds (e.g. the Round of 32 at the Slams, or the quarterfinals at a 28-draw tournament which has only eight seeds). The column “held seed” refers to players who not only reach the seeded round but reach the level expected for their seeding — so, e.g., seeds #5-#8 are expected to reach the quarterfinal; seeds #3 and #4 should reach the semifinal; #2 should reach the final, and #1 should win. If a player goes beyond her seeding, of course, she is regarded as having held her seed.

Slams (+ Los Angeles Championships) Tournament Seeds Reached Held Seed % Reached % Held Seed Seeded Round Seeded Round Australian Open 32 211 15 66% 47% Roland Garros 32 212 12 66% 38% Wimbledon 32 203 16 63% 50% U. S. Open 32 244 18 75% 56% Los Angeles Champ (4) 3 1 75% 25% Total 132 895 62 67% 47% 1. If we take only the Top 16 Australian Open seeds, 13, or 81%, reached the Round of 16; 8 of 16, or 50%, held seed 2. If we take only the Top 16 Roland Garros seeds, 10, or 63%, reached the Round of 16; 5 of 16, or 31%, held seed 3. If we take only the Top 16 Wimbledon seeds, 12, or 75%, reach the Round of 16; 9 of 16, or 56%, held seed 4. If we take only the Top 16 U. S. Open seeds (actually 15, since #15 Elena Bovina withdrew), 12, or 80% reached the Round of 16; 7, or 47%, held seed. 5. If we take only the Top 16 seeds at the four Slams, then 50 of 67 seeds, or 75%, reached the seeded round (Round of Six- teen at the Slams, semiﬁnal at Los Angeles); 30 of 67, or 45%, held seed.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 154 Tier I Tournaments Tournament Seeds Reached Held Seed % Reached % Held Seed Seeded Round Seeded Round Pan Paciﬁc 8 6 4 74% 50% Indian Wells 32 21 17 66% 53% Miami 32 23 12 72% 38% Charleston 151 8653% 40% Berlin 16 9 6 56% 38% Rome 16 8 6 50% 38% San Diego 16 9 5 56% 31% Canadian Open 152 9760% 47% Moscow 8 5 4 63% 50% Zürich 73 4357% 43% Total 165 102 70 62% 42% 1. #5 seed Alicia Molik withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser 2. #7 seed Mary Pierce withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser 3. #3 seed Mary Pierce withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 155 Tier II Tournaments Tournament Seeds Reached Held Seed % Reached % Held Seed Seeded Round Seeded Round Sydney 8 5 4 37% 50% Paris 71 5471% 57% Antwerp 8 5 4 63% 50% Doha 8 3 2 37% 25% Dubai 8 4 2 50% 25% Amelia Island 16 13 10 81% 63% Warsaw 8 6 4 75% 50% Eastbourne 72 4257% 28% Stanford 8 5 5 63% 63% Los Angeles 143 10 8 71% 57% New Haven 74 3243% 29% Beijing 8 3 1 38% 13% Luxembourg 8 6 5 75% 63% Filderstadt 8 6 5 75% 63% Linz 8 5 5 63% 63% Philadelphia 65 4467% 67% Total 129 82 63 64% 49% 1. #3 seed Maria Sharapova withdrew after the draw was made and was replaced by a Lucky Loser 2. #3 seed Alicia Molik withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser 3. #6 seed Mary Pierce and #8 seed Elena Likhovtseva withdrew after play began and were replaced by Lucky Losers 4. #5 seed Nadia Petrova withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser 5. #1 seed Lindsay Davenport and #2 Maria Sharapova withdrew after play began and were replaced by Lucky Losers

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 156 Tier III Tournaments Tournament Seeds Reached Held Seed % Reached % Held Seed Seeded Round Seeded Round Gold Coast 8 4 3 50% 38% Pattaya City 8 4 3 50% 38% Memphis 8 4 4 50% 50% Bogota 8 3 2 38% 50% Acapulco 8 3 2 37% 25% Strasbourg 8 2 1 25% 13% Istanbul 8 6 6 75% 75% Birmingham 16 6 4 38% 25% ’s-Hertogenbosch 8 4 2 50% 25% Cincinnati 8 3 2 38% 25% Bali 8 5 4 63% 50% Kolkata 8 3 2 38% 25% GuangZhou 8 5 2 63% 25% Japan Open 8 6 5 75% 63% Bangkok 71 5471% 57% Hasselt 8 5 4 63% 50% Quebec City 8 4 2 50% 25% Total 143 72 52 50% 36% 1. #7 seed Marion Bartoli withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser.

Tier IV Tournaments Tournament Seeds Reached Held Seed % Reached % Held Seed Seeded Round Seeded Round Auckland 8 4 2 50% 25% Hyderabad 8 4 2 50% 50% Estoril 8 5 4 63% 50% Rabat 8 5 3 63% 38% Prague 8 3 2 38% 25% Modena 71 3243% 28% Palermo 8 4 3 50% 38% Budapest 8 4 3 50% 38% Stockholm 8 5 5 63% 63% Forest Hills 4 1 1 25% 25% Portoroz 8 4 3 50% 38% Seoul 8 6 5 75% 63% Tashkent 8 4 2 50% 25% Total 99 52 37 53% 37% 1. #3 seed Klara Koukalova with drew, and seeds were promoted, but the replacement seed, Maria Elena Camerin, also withdrew

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 157 Tier V Tournaments Tournament Seeds Reached Held Seed % Reached % Held Seed Seeded Round Seeded Round Canberra 8 2 0 25% 0% Hobart 8 3 3 38% 38% Total 16 5 3 31% 19%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 158 Lucky Losers All told, there were 74 instances of Lucky Losers making WTA main draws in 2005 (an average of a bit less than 1.2 per tournament), up from 62 in 2003 and 67 in 2004. Highlight players who were Lucky Losers were: Kirilenko (New Haven; lost 2R of main draw) Pennetta (Zürich; lost QF of main draw) Raymond (Los Angeles, lost 2R of main draw) In addition, Jelena Dokic was a Challenger Lucky Loser; she lost first round at the Petange $50K.

There is some tendency for Lucky Losers to come in bunches — that is, if a player managed to be a Lucky Loser once, she might well manage it more than once. Though somewhat less than last year; in 2004, four players were three-time Lucky Losers. This year, only Stephanie Cohen-Aloro managed three Lucky Loser entries. Getting into two main draws after losing in qualifying were K. Bondarenko, Chladkova, Czink, Haynes, Meusburger, Müller, Perebiynis, Perry, Ruano Pascual, and Schaul. One-time Lucky Losers were Alves, Beltrame, Birnerova, A. Bondarenko, Bychkova, Castaño, Czink , Drake, Flipkens, Foretz, Gagliardi, Gallovits, Gehrlein, Hisamatsu, Irvin, Jidkova, Karatantcheva, Kirilenko, Klaschka, Kurhajcova, Kutuzova, Laine, Lepchenko, Lisjak, Mamic, Mattek, Mihalache, Mirza, Obata, Ospina, Pastikova, Pennetta, Piedade, Poutchek, Raymond, Razzano, Rodionova, Safarova, Sanchez Lorenzo, Ant. Serra Zanetti, Ad. Serra Zanetti, Sromova, Stosur, Talaja, Tu, Vakulenko, Vento-Kabchi, Voskoboeva, Washington, Yakimova, and Zheng.

These 74 Lucky Losers compiled an overall record of 30-74 in main draw matches. The best result by a Lucky Loser was posted by Melinda Czink at Canberra; she went on to the the final (four wins)! (We might add as a footnote the odd case of Anastasiya Yakimova, who made the main draw of the Poitiers $75K Challenger as a Lucky Loser and won the event.) Only four other Lucky Losers managed to win more than one match at an event: Cohen-Aloro at Miami, Müller at Palermo, Lepchenko at Los Angeles, and Pennetta at Zürich; for Müller and Pennetta, that got them to the quarterfinals. Only four Lucky Losers earned Top 30 wins, though: Raymond beat #26 Asagoe at Eastbourne, Vento-Kabchi beat #22 Hantuchova at Eastbourne, Cohen-Aloro beat #21 Hantuchova at Miami, and Kirilenko beat #23 Farina Elia at New Haven.

If we look at tournaments with the most Lucky Losers, the numbers were as follows: 6 — Los Angeles 5 — Canadian Open 3 — Eastbourne, Estoril, Philadelphia, Warsaw, Wimbledon 2 — Bangkok, Hyderabad, Modena, New Haven, Palermo, Quebec City, Rabat, U. S. Open, Zürich 1 — Antwerp, Auckland, Beijing, Berlin, Birmingham, Bogota, Budapest, Canberra, Charleston, Doha, Gold Coast, GuangZhou, Indian Wells, Istanbul, Linz, Memphis, Miami, Moscow, Paris, Portoroz, Prague, Roland Garros, Rome, San Diego, Seoul, Stanford, Stockholm, Strasbourg, Sydney, Tashkent

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 159 Bagels The following chart lists the bagels (6-0 sets) experienced or inflicted by top players (WTA matches only; no Fed Cup. Some qualifying matches are listed, but I didn’t check every qualiyfing match). The “bagel” set is shown in bold. Double bagels are shown in bold for the entire line. Player Bagels inflicted Bagels experienced Asagoe Pan Pacific: def. Vinci 6Ð0 6Ð2 Amelia Island: lost to Petrova 0Ð6 6Ð0 2Ð6 Miami: def. Schiavone 6Ð0 6Ð3 Los Angeles: lost to Zheng 6Ð7 6Ð3 6Ð0 Amelia Island: lost to Petrova 0Ð6 6Ð0 2Ð6 Charleston: def. Lee-Waters 6Ð7 6Ð0 6Ð2 San Diego: lost to Karatantcheva 1Ð6 6Ð0 5Ð7 Bartoli Auckland: def. Spears 6Ð0 6Ð1 Australian Open: lost to Kuznetsova 2Ð6 0Ð6 Auckland: def. Craybas 2Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð1 San Diego: lost to Raymond 6Ð1 0Ð6 3Ð6 Canberra: def. Foretz 6Ð2 6Ð0 Indian Wells: lost to Kirkland 0Ð6 1Ð6 U. S. Open: def. Strycova 6Ð3 6Ð0 Birmingham: lost to Tanasugarn 3Ð6 0Ð6 U. S. Open: def. Perry 4Ð6 6Ð1 6Ð0 Seoul: def. Tanasugarn 6Ð0 6Ð1 Quebec City: def. Perry 6Ð0 6Ð4 Bovina Roland Garros: def. Vento-Kabchi 6Ð0 6Ð3 Doha: lost to Hantuchova 0Ð6 6Ð3 3Ð6 Capriati Chakvetadze Indian Wells: def. Sucha 6Ð0 7Ð5 ??? Roland Garros: def. Suárez 7–5 1–6 6Ð0 U. S. Open: def. Craybas 6Ð0 6Ð2 Clijsters Miami: def. Kloesel 6Ð0 6Ð1 Miami: def. Déchy 6Ð0 6Ð2 Miami: def. Mauresmo 6Ð1 6Ð0 Berlin: def. Fedak 6Ð1 6Ð0 Roland Garros: def. Tu 6Ð1 6Ð0 Eastbourne: def. Dushevina 7Ð5 6Ð0 Stanford: def. Grönefeld 6–4 6Ð0 Los Angeles: def. Safina 6Ð0 7Ð5 Canadian Open: def. Razzano 6Ð3 6Ð0 Canadian Open: def. Pennetta 6Ð0 6Ð1 U. S. Open: def. Zuluaga 7Ð5 6Ð0 U. S. Open: def. Vento-Kabchi 6Ð1 6Ð0 Luxembourg: def. Koukalova 6Ð3 6Ð0 Hasselt: def. Sprem 6Ð2 6Ð0 Hasselt: def. Safina 6Ð0 6Ð2 Davenport Australian Open: def. Martinez 6Ð1 6Ð0 Australian Open: lost to S. Williams 6Ð2 3Ð6 0Ð6 Indian Wells: def. Déchy 7Ð6 6Ð0 Indian Wells: def. Sharapova: 6Ð0 6Ð0 Amelia Island: def. Petrova 6Ð0 6Ð3 Roland Garros: def. Peng 3Ð6 7Ð6 6Ð0 Wimbledon: def. Jidkova 6Ð0 6Ð2 Wimbledon: def. Jackson 6Ð0 6Ð3 U. S. Open: def. Déchy 6Ð0 6Ð3 Zürich: def. Myskina 6Ð0 6Ð4 Déchy Linz: def. Vinci 6Ð0 3Ð2, retired Indian Wells: lost to Davenport 6Ð7 0Ð6 Quebec City: def. Dubois 2Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð0 Miami: lost to Clijsters 0Ð6 2Ð6 U. S. Open: lost to Davenport 0Ð6 3Ð6 Dementieva Charleston: def. Llagostera Vives 6Ð0 6Ð3 Charleston: def. Schnyder 3Ð6 6Ð4 6Ð0 Moscow: def. Karatantcheva 6Ð0 6Ð1 Philadelphia: def. Peschke 2Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð3

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 160 Dokic Petange $50K Qualifying: def. Geznenge 6Ð0 6Ð1 Indian Wells Qualifying: lost to Salerni 6Ð7 0Ð6 Rabat: lost to Li Na 6Ð0 3Ð6 6Ð2 Cuneo$50K+H:lost to MartinezGranados 4-6 7-5 0-6 Dulko Miami: def. Brandi 4Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð3 Hobart: lost to Zheng 2Ð6 0Ð6 ’s-Hertogenbosch: def. Camerin 6Ð3 6Ð0 Estoril: lost to Safarova 6Ð7 0Ð6 Canadian Open: def. Golovin 2Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð1 New Haven: lost to Medina Garrigues 0Ð6 7Ð6 4Ð6 Seoul: lost to Castaño 3–6 0Ð6 Bangkok: lost to Vaidisova 6Ð3 0Ð6 6Ð7 Farina Elia Australian Open: def. Baltacha 6Ð1 6Ð0 Paris: lost to Golovin 0Ð6, retired Paris: def. Koukalova 6Ð0 6Ð0 Luxembourg: lost to Smashnova 2Ð6 0Ð6 Warsaw: def. Pastikova 6Ð2 6Ð0 Frazier Memphis: lost to Jackson 6Ð7 6Ð0 3Ð6 Stanford: lost to Jankovic 0Ð6 3Ð6 Stanford: def. Vento-Kabchi 6Ð3 6Ð0 San Diego: lost to Jankovic 5Ð7 0Ð6 Los Angeles: def. Spears 7Ð6 6Ð0 Quebec City: def. Fedossova 6Ð3 6Ð0 Golovin Paris: def. Farina Elia, 6Ð0, retired Canadian Open: lost to Dulko 6Ð2 0Ð6 1Ð6 Miami: def. Haynes 6Ð0 6Ð7 6Ð3 Roland Garros: def. Osterloh 6Ð0 6Ð2 Roland Garros: def. Ant. Serra Zanetti 6Ð0 6Ð1 Grönefeld Roland Garros: def. Smashnova 6Ð1 6Ð0 Miami: lost to V. Williams 2Ð6 0Ð6 Stanford: lost to Clijsters 4Ð6 0Ð6 Hantuchova Australian Open: def. Schett 6Ð4 6Ð0 Sydney: lost to Petrova 0Ð6 2Ð6 Pan Pacific: def. Kirilenko 4Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð2 Doha: def. Bovina 6Ð0 3Ð6 6Ð3 U. S. Open: def. Salerni 6Ð1 6Ð0 Luxembourg: def. Medina Garrigues 6Ð7 7Ð6 6Ð0 Filderstadt: def. Shaughnessy 6Ð4 6Ð0 Linz: def. Martinez 2Ð6 6Ð0 3Ð1, retired Hénin-Hard Berlin: def. Schnyder 6Ð0 6Ð1 Roland Garros: def. Martinez 6Ð0 4Ð6 6Ð4 U. S. Open: def. Ondraskova 6Ð3 6Ð0 U. S. Open: def. Cho 6Ð0 7Ð6 Ivanovic Antwerp Qualifying: def. Bachmann 6Ð1 6Ð0 Doha: def. Vento-Kabchi 6Ð1 6Ð0 Warsaw: def. Sucha 6Ð0 6Ð0 Jankovic Auckland: def. Llagostera Vives 6Ð1 6Ð0 Paris: lost to Maleeva 4Ð6 0Ð6 Dubai: def. S. Williams 6Ð0 4Ð3, retired Roland Garros: lost to Smashnova 0Ð6 3Ð6 Amelia Island: def. Martinez 6Ð0 6Ð3 Wimbledon: lost to Myskina 0Ð6 7Ð5 8Ð10 Cincinnati: def. Salerni 4Ð6 6Ð3 6Ð0 Filderstadt: lost to Mauresmo 0Ð6, retired Cincinnati: lost to Mattek 1Ð6 6Ð0 2Ð6 Linz: lost to Dushevina 6Ð7 6Ð3 0Ð6 Stanford: def. Frazier 6Ð0 6Ð3 San Diego: def. Frazier 7Ð5 6Ð0 U. S. Open: def. Glatch 6Ð2 6Ð0 Kirilenko Doha: def. Schnyder 6Ð0 1Ð6 6Ð2 Pan Pacific: lost to Hantuchova 6Ð4 0Ð6 2Ð6 Indian Wells: def. Perebiynis 6Ð0 6Ð1 Kuznetsova Australian Open: def. Bartoli 6Ð2 6Ð0 Warsaw: def. Smashnova 6Ð2 4Ð6 6Ð0 Roland Garros: def. Irvin 6Ð1 2Ð6 6Ð0 Wimbledon: def. Llewellyn 6Ð0 6Ð1 Moscow: def. Gagliardi 6Ð0 6Ð4 Likhovtseva Gold Coast: lost to Karatantcheva 2Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð7 Wimbledon: lost to Mauresmo 4Ð6 0Ð6 Pan Pacific: def. Parra Santonja 6Ð0 6Ð0 San Diego: def Peer 0Ð6 6Ð2 6Ð4 U. S. Open: def. Myskina 0Ð6 6Ð3 7Ð6 Linetskaya Australian Open: def. Sucha 6Ð0 6Ð2 Rome: lost to Schnyder 1Ð6 0Ð6 Los Angeles: lost to K. Bondarenko 0Ð6 3Ð6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 161 Maleeva Paris: def. Jankovic 6Ð4 6Ð0 Amelia Island: lost to Petrova 0Ð6 3Ð6 New Haven: lost to Jackson 4Ð6 6Ð0 2Ð6 Martinez Doha: def. Vinci 5Ð7 6Ð0 6Ð2 Australian Open: lost to Davenport 1Ð6 0Ð6 Indian Wells: def. Jackson 6Ð0 7Ð5 Amelia Island: lost to Jankovic 0Ð6 3Ð6 Berlin: def. Müller 6Ð0 7Ð6 Roland Garros: lost to Hénin-Hardenne 0Ð6 6Ð4 4Ð6 Rome: def. Haynes 6Ð0 6Ð1 Canadian Open: lost to Mauresmo 0Ð6 2Ð6 Bangkok: def. Castaño 6–2 6Ð0 Bangkok: lost to Vaidisova 3Ð6 0Ð6 Linz: lost to Hantuchova 6Ð2 0Ð6 1Ð3, retired Mauresmo Australian Open: def. Saﬁna 2–6 6–1 6Ð0 Miami: lost to Clijsters 1Ð6 0Ð6 Rome: def. Stosur 6Ð2 6Ð0 Zürich: lost to Srebotnik 2–6 0Ð6 Roland Garros: def. Cornet 6Ð0 6Ð2 Wimbledon: def. Perry 6Ð0 6Ð2 Wimbledon: def. Likhovtseva 6Ð4 6Ð0 Canadian Open: def. Martinez 6Ð0 6Ð2 U. S. Open: def. Karatantcheva 6Ð0 6Ð1 Filderstadt: def. Jankovic 6Ð0, retired Medina Garr Roland Garros: def. Mandula 6Ð0 6Ð1 Hobart: lost to Peschke 0Ð6 2Ð6 Palermo: def. Koukalova 6Ð4 6Ð0 Charleston: lost to Marrero 6Ð7 0Ð6 New Haven: def. Dulko 6Ð0 6Ð7 6Ð4 Luxembourg: lost to Hantuchova 7Ð6 6Ð7 0Ð6 Zürich Qualifying: def. Klaschka 6–4 6Ð0 Molik Myskina Miami: def. Pennetta 6Ð4 6Ð0 Roland Garros: lost to Sanchez Lorenzo 4Ð6 6Ð4 0Ð6 Eastbourne: def. Vento-Kabchi 6Ð4 5Ð7 6Ð0 Zürich: lost to Davenport 0Ð6 4Ð6 Wimbledon: def. Jankovic 6Ð0 5Ð7 10Ð8 Stockholm: def. Kutuzova 4Ð6 6Ð4 6Ð0 U. S. Open: lost to Likhovtseva 6Ð0 3Ð6 6Ð7 Kolkata: def. Gallovits 6Ð1 6Ð0 Kolkata: def. Voskoboeva 6Ð0 6Ð1 Moscow: def. Peschke 6Ð0 4Ð6 6Ð3 Pennetta Acapulco: def. Osterloh 3Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð1 Miami: lost to Myskina 4Ð6 0Ð6 Modena: def. Diaz-Oliva 6Ð0 6Ð2 Roland Garros: lost to Schnyder 6Ð4 0Ð6 1Ð6 Palermo: lost to Koukalova 4Ð6 0Ð6 Canadian Open: lost to Clijsters 0Ð6 1Ð6 Peschke Hobart: def. Medina Garrigues 6Ð0 6Ð2 San Diego: def. Craybas 0Ð6 6Ð1 7Ð6 Amelia Island Qualifying: def. Osterloh 6Ð3 6Ð0 Portoroz: lost to Bremond 0Ð6 4Ð6 Berlin Qualifying: def. Petkovic 6Ð0 6Ð1 Moscow: lost to Myskina 0Ð6 6Ð4 3Ð6 Berlin Qualifying: def. Kandarr 6Ð3 6Ð0 Philadelphia: lost to Dementieva 6Ð4 0Ð6 3Ð6 Berlin: def. Zvonareva 6Ð2 6Ð0 Roland Garros: def. Randriantefy 6Ð1 6Ð0 New Haven Qualifying: def. Grande 6Ð3 6Ð0 Portoroz: def. Sucha 7Ð5 6Ð0 Philadelphia: def. Karatantcheva 6Ð1 6Ð0 Petrova Sydney: def. Hantuchova 6Ð0 6Ð2 Amelia Island: def. Asagoe 6Ð0 0Ð6 6Ð2 Australian Open: def. Ferguson 4Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð1 Amelia Island: lost to Davenport 0Ð6 3Ð6 Indian Wells: def. Ant. Serra Zanetti 6Ð0 6Ð1 Los Angeles Champ.: lost to Schyder 0Ð6 7Ð5 4Ð6 Amelia Island: def. Maleeva 6Ð3 6Ð0 Amelia Island: def. Asagoe 6Ð0 0Ð6 6Ð2 Charleston: def. Morigami 6Ð4 6Ð0 U. S. Open: def. Nakamura 6Ð2 6Ð0 Bangkok: def. Foretz 6Ð4 6Ð0 Pierce Amelia Island: def. Bedanova 6Ð3 6Ð0 Wimbledon: lost to V. Williams 0Ð6 6Ð7 Amelia Island: def. Daniilidou 6Ð0 6Ð2 Roland Garros: def. Kostanic 6Ð1 6Ð0 San Diego: def. Sugiyama 6Ð0 6-3

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 162 Raymond Australian Open: def. Yakimova 6Ð0 6Ð1 Birmingham: lost to Sequera 1Ð6 0Ð6 Australian Open: def. Koukalova 6Ð0 6Ð1 Eastbourne Qualifying: lost to Srebotnik 4Ð6 0Ð6 Amelia Island: def. Obziler 6-2 6Ð0 Charleston: def. Razzano 6Ð3 6Ð0 San Diego: def. Bartoli 1Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð3 Los Angeles: def. Osterloh 6Ð0 6Ð2 Rubin Saﬁna Miami: lost to Irvin 6Ð7 6Ð0 4Ð6 Australian Open: lost to Mauresmo 6Ð2 1Ð6 0Ð6 San Diego: def. Jidkova 0Ð6 6Ð1 6Ð0 San Diego: def. Jidkova 0Ð6 6Ð1 6Ð0 San Diego: lost to Peng 6Ð7 0Ð6 Los Angeles: lost to Clijsters 0Ð6 5Ð7 Hasselt: lost to Clijsters 0Ð6 1Ð6 Schiavone Australian Open: def. Perebiynis 2Ð6 6Ð3 6Ð0 Miami: lost to Asagoe 0Ð6 3Ð6 Rome: def. Shaughnessy 7Ð5 6Ð0 Modena: def. Marrero 6Ð0 6Ð0 Schnyder Amelia Island: def. Chladkova 6Ð3 6Ð0 Doha: lost to Kirilenko 0Ð6 6Ð1 2Ð6 Charleston: def. Koukalova 6Ð4 6Ð0 Charleston: lost to Dementieva 6Ð3 4Ð6 0Ð6 Rome: def. Linetskaya 6Ð1 6Ð0 Berlin: lost to Hénin-Hardenne 0Ð6 1Ð6 Roland Garros: def. Pennetta 4Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð1 Cincinnati: def. Wozniaki 6Ð3 6Ð0 Cincinnati: def. Morigami 6Ð4 6Ð0 Los Angeles Champ: def. Petrova 6Ð0 5Ð7 6Ð4 Seles Sharapova Australian Open: def. Lee-Waters 4Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð3 Indian Wells: lost to Davenport 0Ð6 0Ð6 Australian Open: def. Li Na 6Ð0 6Ð2 Pan Paciﬁc: def. Vento-Kabchi 7Ð6 6Ð0 Miami: def. Daniilidou 6Ð0 6Ð4 Miami: def. Irvin 6Ð2 6Ð0 Birmingham: def. Kremer 6Ð3 6Ð0 Wimbledon: def. Karatantcheva 6Ð0 6Ð1 U. S. Open: def. Randriantefy 6Ð1 6Ð0 Beijing: def. Peer 6Ð0 5Ð7 6Ð2 Shaughnessy Miami: def. Fedak 6Ð3 6Ð0 Rome: lost to Schiavone 5Ð7 0Ð6 Charleston: def. Daniilidou 6Ð4 6Ð0 Filderstadt: lost to Hantuchova 4Ð6 0Ð6 Smashnova Canberra: def. Parra Santonja 6Ð0 6Ð0 Australian Open: lost to V. Williams 3Ð6 0Ð6 Australian Open: def. Sanchez Lorenzo 4Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð0 Warsaw: lost to Kuznetsova 6Ð2 4Ð6 0Ð6 Istanbul: def. Hopkins 6Ð1 6Ð0 Istanbul: lost to Vaidisova 6Ð4 1Ð6 0Ð6 Roland Garros: def. Jankovic 6Ð0 6Ð3 Roland Garros: lost to Grönefeld 1–6 0Ð6 Modena: def. Parra Santonja 6Ð4 6Ð0 Budapest: def. Savchuk 6Ð0 6Ð1 Budapest: def. Kapros 6Ð2 6Ð0 Budapest: def. Kostanic 6Ð2 6Ð0 Luxembourg: def. Farina Elia 6Ð2 6Ð0 Sprem Rome: lost to Suárez 3–6 0Ð6 Linz: lost to Clijsters 2Ð6 0Ð6 Srebotnik Eastbourne Qual.: def. Ant. Serra Zanetti 7Ð6 6Ð0 Eastbourne Qualifying: def. Raymond 6Ð4 6Ð0 Stockholm: def. Bychkova 6Ð0 6Ð1 Stockholm: def. Dushevina 6Ð0 7Ð5 U. S. Open: def. Hsieh 6Ð0 6Ð2 Zürich: def. Mauresmo 6–2 6Ð0 Hasselt: def. Santangelo 6Ð3 6Ð0 Suárez Rome: def. Sprem 6Ð3 6Ð0 Roland Garros: lost to Chakvetadze 5Ð7 6Ð1 0Ð6 Sugiyama Rome: def. Vento-Kabchi 6Ð3 6Ð0 San Diego: lost to Pierce 0Ð6 3Ð6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 163 Vaidisova Australian Open: def. Kostanic 6Ð0 7Ð5 Istanbul: def. Smashnova 4Ð6 6Ð1 6Ð0 Roland Garros: def. Safarova 4Ð6 6Ð0 6Ð4 U. S. Open: def. Zheng 6Ð3 6Ð0 Seoul: def. Laine 6Ð4 6Ð0 Bangkok: def. Martinez 6Ð3 6Ð0 Bangkok: def. Dulko 3Ð6 6Ð0 7Ð6 S. Williams Australian Open: def. Randriantefy 6Ð3 6Ð0 Dubai: lost to Jankovic 0Ð6 3Ð4, retired Australian Open: def. Davenport 2Ð6 6Ð3 6Ð0 Miami: def. Dushevina 6Ð3 6Ð0 V. Williams Australian Open: def. Smashnova 6Ð3 6Ð0 Antwerp: def. Razzano 6Ð3 6Ð0 Miami: def. Grönefeld 6–2 6Ð0 Miami: def. Zuluaga 6Ð2 6Ð0 Amelia Island: def. Sucha 6Ð0 6Ð1 Istanbul: def. Marrero 6Ð0 6Ð0 Wimbledon: def. Craybas 6Ð0 6Ð2 Wimbledon: def. Pierce 6Ð0 7Ð6 Zuluaga Roland Garros: def. Prusova 6Ð1 6Ð0 Miami: lost to V. Williams 2Ð6 0Ð6 U. S. Open: def. Harkleroad 6Ð0 3Ð0, retired U. S. Open: lost to Clijsters 5Ð7 0Ð6 Zvonareva Memphis: def. K. Bondarenko 7Ð5 6Ð0 Berlin: lost to Peschke 2Ð6 0Ð6 Roland Garros: def. Birnerova 4Ð6 6Ð3 6Ð0 Wimbledon: def. Weingärtner 2–6 6–4 6Ð0

Other Singles Double Bagels: Rabat 1R: Li Na def. Pratt

Qualifying/Challenger Double Bagels (Partial) Eastbourne Q2R: Douchevina def. Panova San Diego Q1R: Irvin def. Kaufman Moscow Q1R: Kleybanova def. Stevenson Houston $50K 1R: Harkleroad def. Heinser

Doubles Double Bagels: Sydney: Martinez/Ruano Pascual def. Dhenin/Washington Antwerp: Benesova/Peschke def. Drake/Henke Budapest: Loit/Srebotnik def. Klemenschits/Klemenschits

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 164 The Road to Victory Sometimes earning a title is easy; sometimes it’s a long struggle. The following statistics offer perspectives on what a player had to do to earn a title (Tier II or higher). Games Lost in Path to Title The following table assesses the winner’s path to victory by calculating the number of games lost on the way to the title. Since, however, some tournaments have more rounds than others, this is divided by the number of matches played to get games per match. (Note: for these purposes, a tiebreak counts as a game). The lower the number of games per match, the better the player performed. Thus the toughest title, in terms of games lost, was Pierce’s victory at Moscow, followed by Mauresmo’s at Los Angeles and Mauresmo’s at Anterwep; Clijsters had by far the easiest wins, at the Canadian Open, Miami, and Stanford; ironically, Pierce’s sin at San Diego was the next-easiest. Event Tier Winner Games Lost Matches Played Games/Match Sydney II Molik 40 5 8.0 Australian Open Slam S. Williams 50 7 7.1 Tokyo (Pan Pacific) I Sharapova 35 4 8.8 Paris II Safina 38 4 9.5 Antwerp II Mauresmo 42 4 10.5 Doha II Sharapova 24 4 6.0 Dubai II Davenport 38 4 9.5 Indian Wells I Clijsters 46 7 6.6 Miami I Clijsters 27 7 3.9 Amelia Island II Davenport 37 5 7.4 Charleston I Hénin-Hardenne 60 6 10.0 Warsaw II Hénin-Hardenne 37 5 7.4 Berlin I Hénin-Hardenne 53 6 8.8 Rome I Mauresmo 31 5 6.2 Roland Garros Slam Hénin-Hardenne 56 7 5.0 Eastbourne II Clijsters 34 5 6.8 Wimbledon Slam V. Williams 56 7 8.0 Stanford II Clijsters 18 4 4.5 San Diego I Pierce 24 5 4.8 Los Angeles II Clijsters 25 5 5.0 Canadian Open I Clijsters 15 4 3.8 New Haven II Davenport 27 4 6.8 U.S. Open Slam Clijsters 42 7 6.0 Beijing II Kirilenko 33 51 6.6 Luxembourg II Clijsters 22 4 5.5 Filderstadt II Davenport 26 4 6.5 Moscow I Pierce 44 4 11.0 Zürich I Davenport 40 4 10.0 Linz II Petrova 34 4 8.5 Philadelphia II Mauresmo 40 4 10.0 Los Angeles Cham Champ Mauresmo 54 5 10.8 1. In her semifinal, Kirilenko faced Maria Sharapova, who retired shortly after the end of the first set, so the total might perhaps be listed as four and a half matches.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 165 Quality Points Earned The following table assesses the winner’s path to victory by calculating the strength of her opponents, as measured by quality points. Since some tournaments have more rounds than others, this is divided by the number of matches played. (Note: It should be kept in mind that there are more quality points available to lower-ranked players than to higher-ranked players.) Quality Matches Points Event Tier Winner Points Played per Match Sydney II Molik 73 5 14.6 Australian Open Slam S. Williams 558 7 79.71 Tokyo (Pan Pacific) I Sharapova 148 4 37.0 Paris II Safina 111 4 27.8 Antwerp II Mauresmo 136 4 34.0 Doha II Sharapova 88 2 22.0 Dubai II Davenport 73 4 24.3 Indian Wells I Clijsters 202 7 28.9 Miami I Clijsters 286 7 40.9 Amelia Island II Davenport 109 5 21.8 Charleston I Hénin-Hardenne 214 6 35.7 Warsaw II Hénin-Hardenne 104 5 20.8 Berlin I Hénin-Hardenne 171 6 28.5 Rome I Mauresmo 119 5 23.8 Roland Garros Slam Hénin-Hardenne 434 7 62.01 Eastbourne II Clijsters 99 5 19.8 Wimbledon Slam V. Williams 470 7 67.11 Stanford II Clijsters 91 4 22.8 San Diego I Pierce 105 5 21.0 Los Angeles II Clijsters 108 5 21.6 Canadian Open I Clijsters 110 4 27.5 New Haven II Davenport 114 4 28.5 U.S. Open Slam Clijsters 372 7 53.11 Beijing II Kirilenko 129 5 25.8 Luxembourg II Clijsters 99 4 24.8 Filderstadt II Filderstadt 136 4 34.0 Moscow I Pierce 96 4 24.0 Zürich I Davenport 124 4 31.0 Linz II Petrova 61 4 15.3 Philadelphia II Mauresmo 85 4 21.3 Los Angeles Cham Champ Mauresmo 234 52 46.8 1 Note that Slam quality points are doubled, giving artificially high values — except in Melbourne, where Hénin-Hardenne faced absurdly low-ranked players 2Mauresmo played five matches, but won only four

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 166 “Top Players” 2005 Early in 2000, the challenge was issued to define what constitutes a “Top Player.” After some discussion, those involved decided that a “Top Player” was one who met two of the following three criteria: 1. Has reached at least one Grand Slam semifinal in the last three years. 2. Has, during one of the last three years, defeated at least five Top Ten players during a single year. 3. Has, during the last three years, won at least one tournament of Tier II or higher. The following table shows how well current players have done against these goals. The column labelled “Total Ach[ieved]” lists the total number of accomplishments met — i.e. it totals Slam semifinals, Tier II or higher titles, and increments of five Top Ten players defeated (i.e. if you beat five Top Ten players in a year, it adds one to your total; beat ten and you add two, etc. Remainders do not carry; if you beat eight in one year and seven in another, that counts as two, not three.) Note that the table below includes only players with at least one Accomplishment over the past three years. The very shortness of the list shows how hard it is to come up with two accomplishments! Player 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2005 2005 2005 2005 2003Ð Slam Top 10 Tier II+ Slam Top 10 Tier II+ Slam Top 10 Tier II+ Total 2005 SF Wins Titles SF Wins Titles SF Wins Titles Ach. Ach. Bovina 03002100001 Capriati 15123000005 Clijsters 4 21 711211381129 Davenport 15121062105922 Déchy 00002011011 Dementieva 09228013017 Hénin-Hard 4 16 8185194628 Kirilenko 00000001111 Kuznetsova 00016200004 Likhovtseva 01003012011 Mauresmo 0821951124717 Molik 00003102112 Myskina 032110302008 Petrova 14003013123 Pierce 02001029255 Rubin 04100000001 Saﬁna 00000002111 Schnyder 02012005012 Sharapova 000172382610 Suárez 01012001001 Sugiyama 04200001002 S. Williams 3 10 4162131215 V. Williams 26100215139 Zuluaga 00011000001

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 167 From the above table, we can list players in order of “accomplishments.” Remember that this list is compiled over three years. Jennifer Capriati didn’t even play this year, but she has residual accomplishments. Justine Hénin-Hardenne was a mere co-#4 in accomplishments this year, but her three- year history makes her #2. We note that, of the 2005 year-end Top 25, eight (Golovin, Grönefeld, Hantuchova, Ivanovic, Jankovic, Pennetta, Schiavone, Vaidisova) had no accomplishments at all; another four (Déchy, Kirilenko, Likhovtseva, Safina) had only one accomplishment. In other words, nearly a third had no accomplishments, and nearly half had no more than one. (This is a tough criterion.) For comparison, of the 2004 year-end Top 25, six, had no accomplishments at that time. An interesting curiosity is that, most years, we have had retired players with accomplishments still on the books. Not this year; all players with accomplishments were active in this year, though Zuluaga retired in the course of the year and Rubin and Suárez may well be at the end also; they hardly played in 2005. But it’s interesting to note that we haven’t had any retirements by top players still at the height of their powers in hte last three years.

Top Players: Player Accomplishments Clijsters 29 Hénin-Hardenne 28 Davenport 22 Mauresmo 17 S. Williams 15 Sharapova 10 V. Williams 9 Myskina 8 Dementieva 7 Capriati 5 Pierce 5 Kuznetsova 4 Petrova 3 Molik 2 Schnyder 2 Sugiyama 2 Bovina 1 Déchy 1 Kirilenko 1 Likhovtseva 1 Rubin 1 Safina 1 Suárez 1 Zuluaga 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 168 Statistics About the Tour as a Whole Total number of ranked players, as of November 14, 2005: 1378 (1214 in 2001, 1253 in 2002, 1113 in 2003, 1256 in 2004) Most singles events played by a Top 100 player: 30 by Craybas, Foretz, Sromova (32/Jidkova in 2002, 34/Vakulenko in 2003, 32/ Benesova, Jidkova in 2004) Fewest events played by a Top 100 player: 8/Bovina (9/Davenport, M. Casanova in 2002, 6/V. Williams in 2003, 6/ Kim Clijsters in 2004) Median number of events played by a Top 100 player: 23 (23 in 2001, 24.5 in 2002, 24 in 2003, 23.5 in 2004) Number of Top 100 players playing 25 or more events: 37 (41 in 2001, 50 in 2002, 39 in 2003, 41 in 2004) Number of Top 100 players playing 30 or more events: 3 (6 in 2001, 8 in 2002, 9 in 2003, 7 in 2004) Most events played by any player: 36/Breadmore (39/ Tameishi in 2002, 37/ Krivencheva in 2003, 34/ Vierin in 2004). Median number of events played by all players: 9 (11 in 2001 and 2002, 10 in 2003, 9 in 2004) Number of players playing 25 or more events: 126 (117 in 2001, 153 in 2002, 121 in 2003, 124 in 2004) Number of players playing 30 or more events: 22 (14 in 2001, 26 in 2002, 25 in 2003, 24 in 2004) Most points earned in any event: 1208/S. Williams, Australian Open (1056 in 2002, 1156 in 2003, 1086 in 2004) Most titles for any player: 9/Clijsters (8/S. Williams in 2002, 9/Clijsters in 2003, 7/Davenport in 2004) Most Tour victories: 65/Clijsters (62/V. Williams in 2002, 86/Clijsters in 2003, 63/Davenport in 2004) Total Tournaments played in 2005: 63 (59 in 2003, 64 in 2002, 63 in 2001, 60 including Olympics in 2004) Total players with Tour singles titles in 2005: 30 (30 in 2001, 37 in 2002, 30 in 2003, 31 in 2004) Total players with multiple singles titles in 2005: 15 (14 in 2001, 12 in 2002, 11 in 2003, 12 in 2004) Total players with Tier II or higher titles in 2005: 10 (8 in 2001, 13 in 2002, 11 in 2003, 11 in 2004) Most WTA singles matches played: 83/Schnyder (79/Dokic in 2002, 98/Clijsters in 2003, 79/Zvonareva in 2004) Most doubles matches played: 78/Black (84/Suárez in 2002, 77/Navratilova in 2003, 78/Likhovtseva in 2004) Most combined singles and doubles matches played: 128/Peschke (136/Suárez in 2002, 149/Clijsters in 2003, 136/ Kuznetsova in 2004) Total Main Draw Matches Played, All Players (omits walkovers, withdrawals, byes): 2535 (2554 in 2002, 2384 in 2003, 2445 in 2004) Total players with at least 2000 points: 10 (11 in 2001, 10 in 2002, 11 in 2003, 12 in 2004) Total players with at least 1000 points: 27 (24 in 2001, 32 in 2002, 31 in 2003, 30 in 2004) Total players with at least 500 points: 70 (72 in 2001, 65 in 2002, 72 in 2003, 73 in 2004) Total players with at least 200 points: 172 (153 in 2001, 158 in 2002, 159 in 2003, 167 in 2004) Total players with at least 100 points: 282 (241 in 2001, 253 in 2002, 241 in 2003, 263 in 2004) Total players with at least 50 points: 407 (340 in 2001, 351 in 2002, 361 in 2003, 388 in 2004) Total players with at least 20 points: 629 (552 in 2001, 567 in 2002, 558 in 20013, 582 in 2004) Total players with at least 10 points: 863 (753 in 2001, 769 in 2002, 726 in 2003, 799 in 2004) Total ranked players with 1.0 or fewer points: 8 (8 in 2001, 11 in 2002, 6 in 2003, 10 in 2004) Total players with .75 points: 6 (3 in 2001, 5 in 2002; 2 in 2003, 4 in 2004) Highest (year-end) score in an 18th Tournament: 59/Petrova (69/Hénin in 2002, 170/Clijsters in 2003, 68/ Kuznetsova in 2004; record to this point: 215/Hingis, week of February 26, 2001) Total points “in the system” (sum of the Best 17 scores of all ranked players): 158920.25 (152702.61 in 2002, 150539.45 in 2003, 155255.06 in 2004). The Top 25 have 57419.5 of these, or 36%.

1. How can there be a .45 and a .6, prior to 2004 when the WTA started awarding eighths of points? The WTA made a mistake, that’s how. In 2003, #164 Evgenia Kulikovskaya had 190.45 points; in 2002, Alexandra Srndovic, #498, was shown with 25.1 points.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 169 The Year of the Injury When the WTA went to the additive (“Best N”) ranking system, it did so against the wishes of the top players. They didn’t want to have to play the extra tournaments needed to succeed under Best N. They were right. It took a while, but injuries to top players have become routine. 2000 was the first “year of the injury.” The WTA responded by lowering the minimum from Best 18 to Best 17. This, predictably, didn’t help — it didn’t reduce the incentive to overplay, just the reward. Every year since then has seen increased injuries by the top players. The following list attempts to tabulate top players’ injuries in 2005. I used to list the effects — the number of ranking places the players lost as a result of the injury. This year, I gave up when the list hit two pages. I didn’t think we’d ever see a worse year than 2004. I was, flatly, wrong. The list is necessarily somewhat imprecise. The WTA lists withdrawals, on a rather sporadic basis, and the reasons — but some of these are highly questionable (the ultimate example is probably Fabiola Zuluaga’s withrawal from Luxembourg. It was listed as a shoulder injury — but in fact she didn’t play because she was retired!). Note: Illness is listed as an injury (since a lot of these players get sick hanging around the locker room with other sick players, and overtraining can suppress the immune system). It’s just an informal impression, but the number of illnesses seemed to be dramatically up this year, even if you discount Alicia Molik’s chronic problem. Heat illness is not included in the injury list, since there is an element of conditioning (and of efficiency in winning) involved.

Player Injury Events Missed Entirely Retired or played w/injury Asagoe shoulder Quebec City Bartoli ? Canberra Bartoli kmee Dubai Bartoli thigh Charleston, Amelia Island, Warsaw, Berlin, Rome Dubai, Indian Wells, Miami Bartoli foot Eastbourne Bartoli wrist Bangkok Bartoli dizziness Quebec City Bovina foot Gold Coast, Sydney, Australian Open Bovina shoulder ’s-Hertogenbosch, Wimbledon, Stanford, San Diego, Canadian Open, New Haven, U. S. Open, Luxembourg, Filderstadt, Moscow, Hasselt Capriati shoulder entire year, including Sydney, Australian Open, Indian Wells, Miami, Rome, Berlin, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, San Diego, Canadian Open, New Haven, U. S. Open, Filderstadt, Zürich Chakvetadz wrist Linz Clijsters wrist (events in 2004 plus) Sydney, Australian Open Clijsters knee Rome Berlin Davenport illness Sydney Davenport hamstring Pan Pacific Davenport hip flexor Charleston Davenport back San Diego, Los Angeles Wimbledon, Stanford Davenport back Beijing Davenport illness Philadelphia Déchy quadriceps Pan Pacific Déchy illness Doha Antwerp? Dementieva finger Paris Pan Pacific Dementieva hip Amelia Island, Berlin Dementieva shoulder ’s-Hertogenbosch

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 170 Dokic groin Pattaya City Dulko hamstring Beijing Farina Elia shoulder Antwerp Paris, Doha Farina Elia knee Berlin Farina Elia shoulder Budapest, San Diego, Stockholm, Canadian Open Palermo Golovin abdomen Sydney Golovin ankle Los Angeles Birmingham, Wimbledon, San Diego Golovin tendonitis Japan Open Grönefeld knee Memphis, Acapulco, Warsaw Hyderabad Grönefeld groin ’s-Hertogenbosch Grönefeld hand Los Angeles Grönefeld knee New Haven Grönefeld ankle Linz, Philadelphia Moscow Hantuchova shoulder Quebec City Hénin- knee (events in 2004 plus) Sydney, Australian Open, Doha, Indian Hardenne Wells Hénin-Harde hamstring Eastbourne Hénin-Harde hamstring Luxembourg, Zürich, Linz, Los Angeles Championships Filderstadt Ivanovic back Eastbourne Ivanovic pectoral Canadian Open Ivanovic shoulder Luxembourg Ivanovic wrist Moscow Jankovic shoulder Antwerp, Doha Jankovic back Bali U. S. Open Jankovic illness Seoul, Filderstadt, Zürich, Linz, Philadelphia Kirilenko knee Sydney Kirilenko knee Canadian Open Kuznetsova shoulder Rome Kuznetsova back New Haven, Bali, Luzembourg Canadian Open, U. S. Open Likhovtseva illness Doha Likhovtseva wrist Warsaw Likhovtseva thigh Birmingham Likhovtseva illness Los Angeles, Canadian Open Likhovtseva illness Filderstadt Likhovtseva hamstring Zürich Maleeva shoulder Pan Paciﬁc Maleeva back Birmingham Maleeva elbow Los Angeles, Canadian Open Maleeva elbow Japan Open Martinez heel Miami Martinez wrist Linz Mauresmo thigh Australian Open Mauresmo abdomen Warsaw Mauresmo adductor Linz Zürich Medina Garr knee Estoril Medina Garr knee Linz Molik illness Paris

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 171 Molik illness Berlin, Rome, Roland Garros, Eastbourne, Wimbledon, San Birmingham Stanford, Diego, Canadian Open Molik illness Linz, Philadelphia Zürich Myskina shoulder Rome Berlin Myskina ankle New Haven Canadian Open Myskina illness Filderstadt Muskina shoulder Quebec City Pennetta foot Charleston Pennetta ankle Eastbourne Pennetta shoulder Linz Zürich Peschke back Canadian Open Petrova back Gold Coast Petrova thigh Istanbul Rome Petrova groin ’s-Hertogenbosch Petrova pectoral New Haven Canadian Open Petrova heel Philadelphia, Los Angeles Championships? Pierce shoulder Sydney Australian Open Pierce adductor ’s-Hertogenbosch Pierce leg Los Angeles Pierce leg Zürich, Linz Raymond back Pan Pacific, Memphis Australian Open Rubin knee Sydney, Australian Open, Paris, Memphis, Doha, Indian Wells, Miami, Amelia Island, Charleston Rubin ankle, knee Stanford, Los Angeles, U. S. Open, Filderstadt, Zürich, Linz, Cincinnati? Quebec City Safina wrist Zürich Schiavone thigh Warsaw Schiavone knee Canadian Open, New Haven Schnyder finger Pan Pacific Schnyder illness Bali Schnyder hand Philadelphia Linz Sharapova illness Paris Sharapova back San Diego Sharapova pectoral Canadian Open Los Angeles Sharapova pectoral Filderstadt Beijing Sharapova thumb Philadelphia Shaughnessy tendon Australian Open Shaughnessy leg Hyderabad Shaughnessy back Warsaw Amelia Island Shaughnessy back Los Angeles Smashnova illness Indian Wells Sprem back Doha, Dubai Sprem illness Charleston Sprem wrist Quebec City Srebotnik adductor Canberra Suárez leg Sydney, Australian Open Suárez neck Charleston, Warsaw, Berlin Suárez adductor Strasbourg

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 172 Suárez hip ’s-Hertogenbosch, Wimbledon, San Diego, Los Angeles, Canadian Open, U. S. Open, Japan Open, Los Angeles Championships Sugiyama knee Indian Wells Sugiyama foot Warsaw Sugiyama leg Los Angeles S. Williams illness Paris S. Williams shoulder Dubai S. Williams ankle Berlin, Roland Garros, Stanford, Los Angeles Amelia Island, Rome,Wimbledon S. Williams knee Filderstadt, Philadelphia Canadian Open, U. S. Open V. Williams blister Dubai V. Williams ﬂu Stockholm, Canadian Open V. Williams knee GuangZhou, Filderstadt, Moscow, Zürich, Philadelphia Beijing Zuluaga illness Amelia Island Zuluaga hip Cincinnati Zvonareva ankle Los Angeles, Canadian Open, U. S. Open, Beijing San Diego Zvonareva shoulder Zürich

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 173 Doubles Analysing doubles is more complex than singles, because of the existence of temporary teams and because some players play doubles much more often than others — though the women are approaching the men’s state of having singles and doubles specialists. There are no players who are Top Ten in both singles and doubles (though Alicia Molik was looking as if she would be before she got hurt), although Elena Likhovtseva and Daniela Hantuchova and Elena Dementieva amd Svetlana Kuznetsova are Top 20 in both. Still, doubles is so complex that the following section only sketches the state of the game. The Final Top 30 in Doubles Doubles Player 2004 Year-End 2005 Year-End Ranking Doubles Ranking Singles Ranking 1 Cara Black 3 174 2 Samantha Stosur 53 46 3 Lisa Raymond 10 76 4Virginia Ruano Pascual 1 106 5 Rennae Stubbs 4 — 6 Liezel Huber 11 — 7 Elena Likhovtseva 5 17 8Svetlana Kuznetsova 8 18 9 Conchita Martinez 14 32 10 Vera Zvonareva 15 42 11 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 47 21 12 Alicia Molik 17 29 13 Daniela Hantuchova 62 19 14 Ai Sugiyama 9 30 15 Corina Morariu 24 — 16 Kveta Peschke 142 26 17 Paola Suárez 2 232 18 Elena Dementieva 27 8 19 Meghann Shaughnessy 6 66 20 Anabel Medina Garrigues 79 34 21 Martina Navratilova 12 — 22 Flavia Pennetta 100 23 23 Shinobu Asagoe 26 38 24 Bryanne Stewart 54 908 25 Katarina Srebotnik 49 28 26 Gisela Dulko 34 27 27 Maria Kirilenko 148 25 28 Dinara Saﬁna 30 20 29 Emilie Loit 31 81 30 Zheng Jie 38 44

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 174 The Initial Top 30 in Doubles Doubles Player 2005 Singles Final Doubles Rank Rank Rank 1Virginia Ruano Pascual 106 4 2Paola Suárez 232 17 3 Cara Black 174 1 4 Rennae Stubbs — 5 5 Elena Likhovtseva 17 7 6Meghann Shaughnessy 66 19 7 Nadia Petrova 9 33 8Svetlana Kuznetsova 18 8 9 Ai Sugiyama 30 14 10 Lisa Raymond 76 3 11 Liezel Huber — 6 12 Martina Navratilova — 21 13 Janette Husarova 334 51 14 Conchita Martinez 32 9 15 Vera Zvonareva 42 10 16 Anastasia Myskina 14 39 17 Alicia Molik 29 12 18 Patty Schnyder 7 32 19 Barbara Schett — — 20 Tamarine Tanasugarn 132 127 21 Maria Vento-Kabchi 63 35 22 Emmanuelle Gagliardi 93 54 23 Nicole Pratt 127 40 24 Corina Morariu — 15 25 Roberta Vinci 41 74 26 Shinobu Asagoe 38 23 27 Elena Dementieva 8 18 28 Sun Tiantian 104 36 29 Li Ting 173 36 30 Dinara Saﬁna 20 28

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 175 Doubles Ranking Fluctuation The table below is similar to the Ranking Fluctuation Table for singles, except that rankings are recorded monthly rather than twice monthly. All players who were in the Top 25 at any time during the year, and those who ended the year in the Top 30, are listed, along with a handful of other players (e.g. Sanchez- Vicario) who had had solid past results or who came close to the Top 25. This includes every player to win a Tier I or higher; the only Tier II winners not included are Francesca Schiavone, who won Doha with Alicia Molik but peaked at #27 and ended the year at #34; Tatiana Perebiynis and Barbora Strycova, who won Warsaw but ended the year at #57 and #43, respectively; and Nuria Llagostera Vives, who won Beijing with Vento-Kabchi but ended the year at #55. As with the equivalent table for singles, the month-by-month ranking numbers are followed by statistics about the players’ rankings: mean (average) and standard deviation (indicating how much a player’s ranking varied during the year. So Tanasugarn, with a standard deviation of 42.8, showed the biggest fluctuation in the course of the year, while Ruano Pascual, with a standard deviation of 0.9, showed the least variation). For purposes of these calculations, players who were unranked for part of the year (Sanchez-Vicario, Schett) are omitted. Recall that the mean is the “average” ranking and the standard deviation is the measure of volatility: The higher the standard deviation, the more volatile a player’s ranking.. The top ten based on average ranking were 1. Ruano Pascual (1.3), 2. Black (2.8), 3. Suárez (4.9), 4. Stubbs (5.0), 5. Kuznetsova (5.9), 6. Likhovtseva (7.5), 7. Huber (8.5), 8. Raymond (9.4), 9. Molik (9.6), 10. Shaughnessy (9.7).

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 176 Player Jan 1 Feb 1 Mar 1 Apr 1 May1 Jun 1 Jul 1 Aug1 Sep 1 Oct 1 Nov 1 Nov20 Mean StDev Asagoe 26 24 21 22 19 20 19 20 29 27 24 23 22.8 3.3 Bartoli 37 29 28 30 34 35 36 45 43 44 50 47 38.2 7.4 Benesova 64 69 48 48 32 30 26 29 33 38 39 38 41.2 13.7 Black 3 3555322221 1 2.81.5 Callens 45 54 47 47 50 56 60 63 76 75 68 78 59.9 12.0 Davenport 44 27 25 39 37 39 41 35 39 40 49 49 38.7 7.3 Dementieva 27 21 18 17 18 18 21 23 18 18 20 18 19.8 2.9 Dulko 34 36 40 37 35 34 37 43 37 47 27 26 36.1 5.9 Gagliardi 22 28 26 26 31 32 35 33 46 69 54 54 38.0 14.5 Grönefeld 47 32 29 27 28 28 25 16 14 11 11 11 23.3 11.0 Hantuchova 62 57 55 40 38 31 31 25 19 19 13 13 33.6 17.1 L. Huber 11 13 14 13 12954546 6 8.53.9 Husarova 13 14 13 14 13 15 16 18 20 23 52 51 21.8 14.2 Kirilenko 149 109 101 76 63 36 47 40 30 29 28 27 61.3 39.7 Kuznetsova 8 4374575497 8 5.92.0 Li 30 31 32 32 53 63 43 42 35 36 38 36 39.3 9.9 Likhovtseva 5 87896666109 7 7.31.5 Loit 31 45 41 50 51 33 30 32 31 34 30 29 36.4 8.1 Martinez, C. 14 17 17 18 16 16 18 28 15 16 12 9 16.3 4.5 Medina Garrigue 79 51 39 31 26 19 17 19 22 21 21 20 30.4 18.3 Molik 17 12 1097798888129.62.9 Morariu 24 20 19 20 23 24 14 14 16 15 16 15 18.3 3.8 Myskina 16 16 15 16 15 17 20 24 26 26 36 39 22.2 8.3 Navratilova 12 11 12 12 14 14 22 30 23 20 22 21 17.8 6.0 Pennetta 101 87 83 79 81 76 64 82 58 24 23 22 65.0 27.5 Peschke 119 120 66 66 29 37 33 26 27 28 18 16 48.8 36.7 Petrova 7 643610101012141933 11.2 8.2 Pratt 23 22 20 19 20 23 23 31 32 41 40 40 27.8 8.5 Raymond 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 13 13 5 3 3 9.4 3.6 Ruano Pascual 1 1111111112 4 1.30.9 Saﬁna 29 43 23 21 25 27 24 21 24 32 29 28 27.2 6.0 Sanchez-Vicario 113 118 115 113 114 166 159 236 239 — — — — — Schett 19 19 ————————— — — — Schnyder 18 18 22 23 24 21 15 22 25 33 33 32 23.8 6.0 Shaughnessy 6 764812119111310199.74.0 Srebotnik 49 50 53 53 36 43 34 27 28 25 26 25 37.4 11.5 Stewart 54 40 37 35 22 26 29 17 21 22 25 24 29.3 10.4 Stosur 53 41 36 36 21 25 27 15 17 7 4 2 23.7 15.8 Stubbs 4 5863447735 5 5.11.6 Suárez 2 22222333615174.95.3 Sugiyama 9 9 9 10 10 8 8 12 10 17 17 14 11.1 3.2 Sun 28 26 27 29 52 62 42 41 34 35 37 36 37.4 10.7 Tanasugarn 20 23 24 24 27 29 32 37 70 114 124 127 54.3 42.8 Vento-Kabchi 21 25 30 28 30 22 28 36 38 37 35 35 30.4 5.8 Vinci 25 42 38 42 42 53 105 137 142 85 77 74 71.8 39.1 V./S. Williams — —————————— — — — Zheng 38 47 43 33 39 45 44 51 49 30 31 30 40.0 7.6 Zvonareva 15 15 16 15 17 13 13 11 9 12 14 10 13.3 2.5

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 177 The Final Top Fifty in Doubles as of November 14, 2005 Final Best 11 # of Best Worst Jan. 1 Rank Player Name Score Trn Rank Rank Rank Titles (name, number of titles, # of finals) 1Cara Black 3533 24 1 6 3 Antw, Rome, Wim, Stanf, Zür, Phil (6+6 F) 2 Samantha Stosur 3483 25 4 54 53Syd, AmI, NwH, USO, Lux, Mos, LACh (6+1F) 3 Lisa Raymond 3390 21 3 13 10 Eastb, NwH, USO, Lux, Mos, LACh (5+2F) 4Virginia Ruano Pascual 3333 19 1 4 1 Dub, IndW, Charl, RolG, SanD (5+3F) 5Rennae Stubbs 2579 21 3 8 4 Eastb, Stanford, Zürich, Phila (4+4F) 6 Liezel Huber 2430 15 4 14 11 Rome, Wimbledon (2+3 F) 7 Elena Likhovtseva 2100 23 4 12 5 Gold Cst, Pan Pacific, Berlin, Kolkata (4+2F) 8 Svetlana Kuznetsova 2079 11 3 9 8 Australian Open, Miami (2+2F) 9Conchita Martinez 2068 20 9 28 14 Charleston, San Diego (2+3 F) 10 Vera Zvonareva 2048 16 9 17 15 Berlin (1+2F) 11 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 1993 21 10 47 47 Pattaya City, Canadian Open, Bali (3+0F) 12 Alicia Molik 1927 12 6 17 17 Australian Open, Doha, Miami (3+1F) 13 Daniela Hantuchova 1923 19 13 74 63 Birmingham, Filderstadt (2+2F) 14 Ai Sugiyama 1785 23 8 19 9 Birmingham (1 title+3 finals) 15 Corina Morariu 1769 17 14 28 24 [2 finals: Australian Open, Pan Pacific] 16 Kveta Peschke 1690 26 16 124 119 Paris, Linz (2 titles+4 finals) 17 Paola Suárez 1650 5 2 17 2 Dubai, Indian Wells, Roland G (3 titles+0F) 18 Elena Dementieva 1605 13 16 27 27 Los Angeles (1 title+2 finals) 19 Meghann Shaughnessy 1516 14 4 19 6 Bali (1 title+1 final) 20 Anabel Medina Garrigues1483 20 19 79 79 ’s-Hertogenbosch, Portoroz (2 titles+4 finals) 21 Martina Navratilova 1477 15 11 30 12 Canadian Open (1 title+0 finals) 22 Flavia Pennetta 1378 18 22 101 101 Los Angeles (1 title+1 final: U. S. Open) 23 Shinobu Asagoe 1354 20 18 30 26 Auckland, Bangkok (2 titles+1 final) 24 Bryanne Stewart 1343 24 16 54 54 Sydney, Amelia Island (2 titles+0 final) 25 Katarina Srebotnik 1311 18 25 54 49 Aucklnd, Budapst, Stockhlm, Hasselt (4+1F) 26 Gisela Dulko 1286 21 26 48 34 Japan Open, Bangkok, Linz (3 titles+1 final) 27 Maria Kirilenko 1243 21 25 149 149 Japan Open (1 title+2 finals) 28 Dinara Safina 1232 20 21 43 29 ’s-Hertogenbosch (1 title+3 finals) 29 Emilie Loit 1164 17 28 53 31 Rabat, Prag, Buda, Stock, Tashk, Hasse (6+0F) 30 Zheng Jie 1106 19 29 51 38 Hobart, Hyder, [Beij $50K] (2 titles+2 finals) 31 Yan Zi 1095 22 29 50 39 Hobart, Hyder, [Beij, Shenz $50K] (2+2 F) 32 Patty Schnyder 1074 13 15 33 18 (1 final: Amelia Island) 33 Nadia Petrova 1068 9 3 33 7 (1 final: Indian Wells) 34 Francesca Schiavone 1061 17 25 81 40 Doha (1 title+1 final) 35 Maria Vento-Kabchi 1043 24 21 41 21 Beijing (1 title+1 final) 36 Li Ting 972 16 27 63 30 Estoril, [Bronx $50K] (1 title+1 final) 36 Sun Tiantian 972 16 23 62 28 Estoril, [Bronx $50K] (1 title+1 final) 38 Iveta Benesova 950 26 28 69 64 Paris (1 title+2 finals) 39 Anastasia Myskina 912 14 15 39 16 Kolkata, Filderstadt (2 titles+0 finals) 40 Nicole Pratt 908 20 19 42 23 Prague (1 title+0 finals) 41 Jennifer Russell 873.75 28 41 75 74 (1 final: Birmingham) 42 Tathiana Garbin 862 22 39 89 81 Canberra (1 title+0 finals) 43 Barbora Strycova 858 15 39 >150 >150 Warsaw, Rabat, [Ortisei $50K] (2+2 finals) 44 Gabriela Navratilova 857 18 32 62 62 [Fano $75K] (0 titles+2 finals: Canb, Modena) 45 Andreea Vanc 834.5 27 44 123 118 Strasbourg (1 title+0 finals) 46 Michaela Pastikova 833.5 23 35 91 88 [Fano $75K] (0 titles+ 1 final: Canberra) 47 Marion Bartoli 832 15 26 50 37 Pattaya City (1 title+0 finals) 48 Maria Elena Camerin 787 20 48 99 99 GuangZhou, Tashkent (2 titles+1 final) 49 Lindsay Davenport 786 5 44 24 52 [ 2 finals: Australian Open, Pan Pacific] 50 Eleni Daniilidou 770.75 21 33 76 46 [1 final: Birmingham]

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 178 Individual Results: The Top Doubles Players/Results This table is generally equivalent to the table of results in the section on singles, save that the format is somewhat simplified. (Also note that the number of events is what the WTA counted — it does not include the Olympics.) The list shows each tournament the player played and the partner with whom she played. This is followed, in parenthesis, by the tier of the tournament, a notation showing how far the player advanced, and the number of wins her team had to reach that point. For the players each team lost to, see the after this, “Head-to-Heads — Team Records and Losses.” Rank # of Player Results Events 23 20 Asagoe Auckland w/Srebotnik (IV, Win, 4) Australian Open w/Srebotnik (Slam, R16, 2) Pan Paciﬁc w/Jankovic (I, 1R, 0) Doha w/Camerin (II, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Srebotnik (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Srebotnik (I, 2R, 1) Amelia Island w/Srebotnik (II, SF, 2) Charleston w/Srebotnik (I, QF, 2) Rome w/Marrero (I, 2R, 1) Roland Garros w/Srebotnik (Slam, QF, 3) Birmingham w/Camerin (III, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Srebotnik (Slam, R16, 2) San Diego w/Peer (I, 1R, 0) Los Angeles w/Garbin (II, QF, 1) Canadian Open w/Garbin (I, SF, 2+1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Srebotnik (Slam, R16, 2) Beijing w/Lee (II, 1R, 0) Japan Open w/Vento-Kabchi (III, F, 3) Bangkok w/Dulko (III, Win, 3+1 walkover) Zürich w/Srebotnik (I, SF, 2) 47 15 Bartoli Canberra w/Grönefeld (IV, Bartoli withdrew from SF, 2) Australian Open w/Grönefeld (Slam, R16, 2) Pattaya City w/Grönefeld (III, Win, 4) Doha w/Farina Elia (II, 1R, 0) Indian Wells w/Grönefeld (I, QF, 2) Miami w/Grönefeld (I, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Grönefeld (Slam, R16, 2) Birmingham w/Tanasugarn (III, QF, 1) Eastbourne w/Washington (II, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Sequera (Slam, R16, 2) San Diego w/Pierce (I, QF, 2) Canadian Open w/Pratt (I, 2R, 1) U. S. Open w/Sequera (Slam, 1R, 0) Seoul w/Tanasugarn (IV, 1R, 0) Quebec City w/Salerni (III, Bartoli withdrew from SF, 2)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 179 38 26 Benesova Gold Coast w/Ant. Serra Zanetti (III, 1R, 0) Hobart w/Peschke (V, QF, 1) Australian Open w/Peschke (Slam, 1R, 0) Paris w/Peschke (II, Win, 4) Antwerp w/Peschke (II, SF, 2) Indian Wells w/Peschke (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Peschke (I, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Peschke (I, F, 4) Warsaw w/Talaja (II, 1R, 0) Berlin w/Krizan (I, 1R, 0) Prague w/Saﬁna (IV, SF, 2) Strasbourg w/Peschke (III, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Peschke (Slam, R16, 2) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Llagostera Vives (III, F, 2+1 walkover) Wimbledon w/Voskoboeva (Slam, 1R, 0) Cincinnati w/Tu (III, SF, 2) Stanford w/Jidkova (II, 1R, 0) San Diego w/Stewart (I, 1R, 0) Los Angeles w/Stewart (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Beygelzimer (Slam, 1R, 0) Portoroz w/Nagyova (IV, QF, 1) Luxembourg w/Kostanic (II, QF, 1) Moscow w/Tu (I, 1R, 0) Zürich w/Pastikova (I, 1R, 0) Linz w/Strycova (II, 1R, 0) Philadelphia w/Kachlikova (II, 1R, 0) 124Black Australian Open w/Huber (Slam, 2R, 1) Pan Paciﬁc w/Huber (I, QF, 1) Antwerp w/Callens (II, Win, 4) Doha w/Huber (II, lost F, 3) Dubai w/Huber (II, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Huber (I, 2R, 1) Warsaw w/Huber (II, 1R, 0) Berlin w/Huber (I, F, 3) Rome w/Huber (I, Win, 4) Roland Garros w/Huber (Slam, F, 5) Birmingham w/Huber (III, SF, 2) Eastbourne w/Huber (II, SF, 2) Wimbledon w/Huber (Slam, Win, 6) Stanford w/Stubbs (II, Win, 4) San Diego w/Stubbs (I, SF, 3) Canadian Open w/Stubbs (I, QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Stubbs (Slam, QF, 3) Luxembourg w/Stubbs (II, F, 3) Filderstadt w/Stubbs (II, 1R, 0) Moscow w/Stubbs (I, F, 3) Zürich w/Stubbs (I, Win, 4) Linz w/Stubbs (II, QF, 1) Philadelphia w/Stubbs (II, Win, 4) Los Angeles Championships w/Stubbs (Champ, F, 1) 142 4 Bovina Indian Wells w/Dementieva (I, 2R, 1) Miami w/Dementieva (I, QF, 2) Berlin w/Déchy (I, 2R, 1) Roland Garros w/Dementieva (Slam, 2R, 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 180 78 15 Callens Gold Coast w/McShea (III, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/McShea (Slam, 1R, 0) Pan Pacific w/McShea (I, QF, 1) Antwerp w/Black (II,Win, 4) Dubai w/Stewart (II, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Tu (I, 2R, 1) Berlin w/Tu (I, 1R, 0) Rome w/Krizan (I, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Daniilidou (Slam, 1R, 0) Birmingham w/Tu (III, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Gagliardi (Slam, R16, 2) Los Angeles w/Ant. Serra Zanetti (II, 1R, 0+2 in qualifying) Canadian Open w/Krizan (I, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Santangelo (Slam, 1R, 0) Hasselt w/Clijsters (III, SF, 1+1 walkover) Retired —1Clijsters, Kim Hasselt w/Callens (III, SF, 1+1 walkover) 49 5 Davenport Sydney w/Morariu (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Morariu (Slam, F, 5) Pan Pacific w/Morariu (I, F, 2+1 walkover) Dubai w/Morariu (II, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Morariu (Slam, 2R, 1) 18 13 Dementieva Sydney w/Sugiyama (II, Dementieva withdrew from F, 3) Australian Open w/Sugiyama (Slam, R16, 2) Pan Pacific w/Sugiyama (I, Dementieva withdrew from SF, 2) Indian Wells w/Bovina (I, 2R, 1) Miami w/Bovina (I, QF, 2) Roland Garros w/Bovina (Slam, 2R, 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Krajicek (III, QF, 1) San Diego w/Golovin (I, 2R, 1) Los Angeles w/Pennetta (II, Win, 3+1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Pennetta (Slam, F, 5) Filderstadt w/Pennetta (II, Dementieva withdrew from QF, 2) Moscow w/Krajicek (I, 1R, 0) Zürich w/Pennetta (I, QF, 1) 26 21 Dulko Hobart w/Spears (V, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Vento-Kabchi (Slam, 2R, 1) Doha w/Vento-Kabchi (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Vento-Kabchi (II, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Vento-Kabchi (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Vento-Kabchi (I, 2R, 1) Estoril w/Diaz-Oliva (IV, QF, 1) Berlin w/Vento-Kabchi (I, SF, 3) Rome w/Vento-Kabchi (I, QF, 2) Roland Garros w/Vento-Kabchi (Slam, 2R, 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Kirilenko (III, QF, 1) Wimbledon w/Vento-Kabchi (Slam, 1R, 0) San Diego w/Safina (I, 1R, 0) Los Angeles w/Safina (II, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Kirilenko (I, 2R, 1) New Haven w/Kirilenko (II, F, 2+1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Kirilenko (Slam, R16, 2) Seoul w/Vento-Kabchi (IV, 1R, 0) Japan Open w/Kirilenko (III, Win, 4) Bangkok w/Asagoe (III, Win, 3+1 walkover) Linz w/Peschke (II, Win, 4)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 181 54 19 Gagliardi Sydney w/Kostanic (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Bondarenko (Slam, 2R, 1) Bogota w/Pisnik (III, Win, 4) Acapulco w/Loit (III, SF, 2) Indian Wells w/Jankovic (I, 2R, 1) Miami w/Serna (I, 1R, 0) Rome w/Chladkova (I, 2R, 1) Istanbul w/Senoglu (III, QF, 1) Roland Garros w/Jankovic (Slam, 1R, 0) Eastbourne w/Vinci (II, Vinci withdrew from QF, 1) Wimbledon w/Callens (Slam, R16, 2) Modena w/Marrero (IV, SF, 2) Palermo w/Ani (IV, QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Weingärtner (Slam, 1R, 0) Kolkata w/Salerni (III, 1R, 0) GuangZhou w/Camerin (III, Win, 3+1 walkover) Tashkent w/Salerni (IV, 1R, 0) Moscow w/Salerni (I, QF, 0+1 walkover) Linz w/Jankovic (II, 1R, 0) 11 21 Grönefeld Canberra w/Bartoli (IV, Bartoli withdrew from SF, 2) Australian Open w/Bartoli (Slam, R16, 2) Pattaya City w/Bartoli (III, Win, 4) Hyderabad w/Navratilova (IV, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Bartoli (I, QF, 2) Miami w/Bartoli (I, 1R, 0) Amelia Island w/Medina Garrigues (II, QF, 1) Charleston w/Navratilova (I, 2R, 0) Berlin w/Schruff (I, 1R, 0) Rome w/Shaughnessy (I, SF, 2) Istanbul w/Liggan (III, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Bartoli (Slam, R16, 2) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Navratilova (III, SF, 2) Wimbledon w/Navratilova (Slam, SF, 4) Stanford w/Shaughnessy (II, SF, 2) San Diego w/Navratilova (I, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Navratilova (I, Win, 5) New Haven w/Shaughnessy (II, Grönefeld withdrew from QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Navratilova (Slam, SF, 4) Bali w/Shaughnessy (III, Win, 4) Filderstadt w/Shaughnessy (II, 1R, 0) [Moscow w/Maleeva (I) — Did not play/Grönefeld withdrew]

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 182 13 19 Hantuchova Sydney w/Navratilova (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Navratilova (Slam, QF, 3) Doha w/Maleeva (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Schiavone (II, SF, 2) Indian Wells w/Schiavone (I, 2R, 1) Miami w/Schnyder (I, 1R, 0) Berlin w/Sugiyama (I, SF, 3) Rome w/Sugiyama (I, QF, 2) Roland Garros w/Sugiyama (Slam, 2R, 1) Birmingham w/Sugiyama (III, Win, 4) Eastbourne w/Sugiyama (II, QF, 1) Wimbledon w/Sugiyama (Slam, QF, 3) Stanford w/Sugiyama (II, 1R, 0) San Diego w/Sugiyama (I, F, 4) Canadian Open w/Sugiyama (I, SF, 2) U. S. Open w/Sugiyama (Slam, R16, 2) Filderstadt w/Myskina (II, Win, 4) Zürich w/Sugiyama (I, F, 3) Linz w/Sugiyama (II, SF, 2) 615Huber, Liezel Sydney w/McShea (II, QF, 1) Australian Open w/Black (Slam, 2R, 1) Pan Paciﬁc w/Black (I, QF, 1) Doha w/Black (II,F, 3) Dubai w/Black (II, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Black (I, 2R, 1) Miami w/Maleeva (I, SF, 3) Amelia Island w/Washington (II, 1R, 0) Warsaw w/Black (II, 1R, 0) Berlin w/Black (I, F, 3) Rome w/Black (I, Win, 4) Roland Garros w/Black (Slam, F, 5) Birmingham w/Black (III, SF, 2) Eastbourne w/Black (II, SF, 2) Wimbledon w/Black (Slam, Win, 6) 51 11 Husarova Auckland w/Krasnoroutskaya (IV, Husarova withdrew from SF, 2) Australian Open w/Likhovtseva (Slam, 2R, 1) Pan Paciﬁc w/Likhovtseva (I, Win, 4) Berlin w/Martinez (I, QF, 1) Roland Garros w/Martinez (Slam, R16, 2) Wimbledon w/Martinez (Slam, R16, 2) New Haven w/Cohen-Aloro (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Schiavone (Slam, 1R, 0) Bordeaux $75K w/Jugic-Salkic ($75K, 1R, 0) Portoroz w/Beygelzimer (IV, SF, 2) Filderstadt w/Déchy (II, 1R, 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 183 27 21 Kirilenko Deauville $50K w/Tatarkova ($50K, QF, 1) Sydney w/Yakimova (II, Kirilenko withdrew from SF, 2+2 in qualifying) Australian Open w/Krasnoroutskaya (Slam, 1R, 0) Hyderabad w/Tanasugarn (IV, SF, 2) Doha w/Talaja (II, 1R, 0+2 in qualifying) Indian Wells w/Salerni (I, SF, 3+3 in qualifying) Miami w/Salerni (I, QF, 2) Warsaw w/Domachowska (II, QF, 2) Berlin w/McShea (I, 1R, 0) Rome w/Medina Garrigues (I, F, 3+1 walkover) Roland Garros w/Salerni (Slam, 2R, 1) Birmingham w/Sharapova (III, 1R, 0) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Dulko (III, QF, 1) San Diego w/Domachowska (I, 2R, 1) Los Angeles w/Domachowska (II, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Dulko (I, 2R, 1) New Haven w/Dulko (II, F, 2+1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Dulko (Slam, R16, 2) Beijing w/Domachowska (II, 1R, 0) GuangZhou w/Gullickson (III, Kirilenko withdrew from QF, 1) Japan Open w/Dulko (III, Win, 4) —2Krasnoroutskaya Auckland w/Husarova (IV, Husarova withdrew from SF, 2) Australian Open w/Kirilenko (Slam, 1R, 0) 811Kuznetsova Australian Open w/Molik (Slam, Win, 6) Dubai w/Molik (II, F, 3) Indian Wells w/Navratilova (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Molik (I, Win, 5) Roland Garros w/Pierce (Slam, 2R, 1) Wimbledon w/Mauresmo (Slam, F, 5) Los Angeles w/Daniilidou (II, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Petrova (I, Kuznetsova withdrew from QF [and Petrova would have if she hadn’t], 0+1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Molik (Slam, QF, 3) Moscow w/Molik (I, 1R, 0) Zürich w/Molik (I, 1R, 0) 36 16 Li Ting Gold Coast w/Sun (III, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Sun (Slam, R16, 2) Hyderabad w/Sun (IV, F, 3) Doha w/Sun (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Sun (II, QF, 1) Estoril w/Sun (IV, Win, 3+1 walkover) Rabat w/Sun (IV, SF, 2) Rome w/Sun (I, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Sun (Slam, QF, 3) Beijing $50K I w/Sun ($50K, F, 3) Los Angeles w/Sun (II, SF, 2) Bronx $50K w/Sun ($50K, Win, 4) U. S. Open w/Sun (Slam, R16, 2) Bali w/Sun (III, QF, 1) Beijing w/Sun (II, SF, 2) GuangZhou w/N. Li (III, Li Na withdrew from QF, 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 184 723Likhovtseva Gold Coast w/Maleeva (III, Win, 4) Australian Open w/Husarova (Slam, 2R, 1) Pan Paciﬁc w/Husarova (I, Win, 4) Dubai w/Martinez (II, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Martinez (I, QF, 2) Miami w/Sugiyama (I, 1R, 0) Amelia Island w/Sugiyama (II, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Sugiyama (I, 1R, 0) Berlin w/Zvonareva (I, Win, 4)) Rome w/Zvonareva (I, SF, 2) Roland Garros w/Zvonareva (Slam, R16, 2) Eastbourne w/Zvonareva (II, F, 3) Wimbledon w/Zvonareva (Slam, QF, 3) Stanford w/Zvonareva (II, F, 3) San Diego w/Zvonareva (I, SF, 3) New Haven w/Maleeva (II, QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Maleeva (Slam, 2R, 1) Kolkata w/Myskina (III, Win, 4) Filderstadt w/Molik (II, QF, 1) Moscow w/Zvonareva (I, SF, 2) Linz w/Zvonareva (II, SF, 2) Philadelphia w/Zvonareva (II, SF, 2) Los Angeles Championships w/Zvonareva (Champ, 1R, 0) 29 17 Loit Gold Coast w/Beygelzimer (III, QF, 1) Australian Open w/Déchy (Slam, 1R, 0) Bogota w/Woehr (III, SF, 2) Acapulco w/Gagliardi (III, SF, 2) Indian Wells w/Garbin (I, QF, 2) Miami w/Tanasugarn (I, 2R, 1) Rabat w/Strycova (IV, Win, 4) Prague w/Pratt (IV, Win, 4) Roland Garros w/Pratt (Slam, QF, 3) Wimbledon w/Strycova (Slam, R16, 2) Modena w/Yan (IV, 1R, 0) Budapest w/Srebotnik (IV, Win, 4) Stockholm w/Srebotnik (IV, Win, 4) New Haven w/Pratt (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Pratt (Slam, R16, 2) Tashkent w/Camerin (IV, Win, 4) Hasselt w/Srebotnik (III, Win, 4)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 185 920Martinez, C. Sydney w/Ruano Pascual (II, SF, 2) Australian Open w/Ruano Pascual (Slam, 1R, 0) Doha w/Pratt (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Likhovtseva (II, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Likhovtseva (I, QF, 2) Amelia Island w/Ruano Pascual (II, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Ruano Pascual (I, Win, 4) Berlin w/Husarova (I, QF, 1) Rome w/Déchy (I, QF, 2) Roland Garros w/Husarova (Slam, R16, 2) Eastbourne w/Sfar (II, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Husarova (Slam, R16, 2) San Diego w/Ruano Pascual (I, Win, 4) Los Angeles w/Ruano Pascual (II, SF, 2) Canadian Open w/Ruano Pascual (I, F, 3) U. S. Open w/Ruano Pascual (Slam, SF, 4) Bangkok w/Ruano Pascual (III, F, 3) Zürich w/Ruano Pascual (I, QF, 1) Linz w/Ruano Pascual (II, F, 3) Los Angeles Championships w/Ruano Pascual (Champ, 1R, 0) 20 20 Medina Hobart w/Safina (IV, F, 3) Garrigues Australian Open w/Safina (Slam, QF, 3) Paris w/Safina (II, F, 3) Antwerp w/Safina (II, F, 3) Indian Wells w/Safina (I, 2R, 1) Miami w/Safina (I, 2R, 1) Amelia Island w/Grönefeld (II, QF, 1) Charleston w/Dominguez Lino (I, SF, 3) Berlin w/Safina (I, 2R, 1) Rome w/Kirilenko (I, F, 3+1 walkover) Roland Garros w/Safina (Slam, 2R, 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Safina (III, Win, 4) Wimbledon w/Safina (Slam, R16, 2) Canadian Open w/Safina (I, QF, 2) New Haven w/Safina (II, QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Safina (Slam, 1R, 0) Portoroz w/Vinci (IV, Win, 4) Luxembourg w/Safina (II, SF, 2) Filderstadt w/Safina (II, SF, 1+1 walkover) Zürich w/Vinci (I, 1R, 0) 12 12 Molik Australian Open w/Kuznetsova (Slam, Win, 6) Doha w/Schiavone (II, Win, 4) Dubai w/Kuznetsova (II, F, 3) Miami w/Kuznetsova (I, Win, 5) Amelia Island w/Navratilova (II, SF, 2) Eastbourne w/Stewart (II, 1R, 0) New Haven w/Morariu (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Kuznetsova (Slam, QF, 3) Beijing w/Shaughnessy (II, 1R, 0) Filderstadt w/Likhovtseva (II, QF, 1) Moscow w/Kuznetsova (I, 1R, 0) Zürich w/Kuznetsova (I, 1R, 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 186 15 17 Morariu Auckland w/Craybas (IV, 1R, 0) Sydney w/Davenport (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Davenport (Slam, F, 5) Pan Paciﬁc w/Davenport (I, F, 2+1 walkover) Dubai w/Davenport (II, 1R, 0) Amelia Island w/Pierce (II, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Pierce (I, QF, 2) Roland Garros w/Schnyder (Slam, SF, 4) Wimbledon w/Davenport (Slam, 2R, 1) Stanford w/Schnyder (II, QF, 1) New Haven w/Molik (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Schnyder (Slam, QF, 3) Beijing w/Pennetta (II, SF, 2) Filderstadt w/Schnyder (II, QF, 1) Moscow w/Schnyder (I, 1R, 0) Zürich w/Schnyder (I, QF, 1) Philadelphia w/Peschke (II, QF, 1) 39 14 Myskina Australian Open w/Zvonareva (Slam, SF, 4) Doha w/Sugiyama (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Sugiyama (II, 1R, 0) Miami w/Zvonareva (I, QF, 2) Amelia Island w/Zvonareva (II, 1R, 0) Berlin w/Ivanovic (I, 2R, 1) Roland Garros w/Golovin (Slam, 1R, 0) Eastbourne w/Maleeva (II, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Miyagi (Slam, 2R, 1) Stockholm w/Wozniacki (IV, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Miyagi (Slam, 1R, 0) Kolkata w/Likhovtseva (III, Win, 4) Filderstadt w/Hantuchova (II, Win, 4) Moscow w/Pennetta (I, 1R, 0) 21 15 Navratilova Gold Coast w/Déchy (III, QF, 1) Sydney w/Hantuchova (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Hantuchova (Slam, QF, 3) Hyderabad w/Grönefeld (IV, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Kuznetsova (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Schiavone (I, 1R, 0) Amelia Island w/Molik (II, SF, 2) Charleston w/Grönefeld (I, 2R, 0) Rome w/Schiavone (I, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Sanchez-Vicario (Slam, 1R, 0) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Grönefeld (III, SF, 2) Wimbledon w/Grönefeld (Slam, SF, 4) San Diego w/Grönefeld (I, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Grönefeld (I, Win, 5) U. S. Open w/Grönefeld (Slam, SF, 4)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 187 16 26 Peschke Deauville $50K w/Henke ($50K, F, 3) Poitiers $75K w/Henke ($75K, SF, 2) Hobart w/Benesova (V, QF, 1) Australian Open w/Benesova (Slam, 1R, 0) Paris w/Benesova (II, Win, 4) Antwerp w/Benesova (II, SF, 2) Indian Wells w/Benesova (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Benesova (I, 1R, 0) Amelia Island w/Schnyder (II, F, 3) Charleston w/Benesova (I, F, 4) Berlin w/Rittner (I, 1R, 0) Strasbourg w/Benesova (III, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Benesova (Slam, R16, 2) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Schruff (III, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Schruff (Slam, 1R, 0) Cincinnati w/Salerni (III, F, 3) Stanford w/Schiavone (II, SF, 2) New Haven w/Strycova (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Strycova (Slam, 1R, 0) Portoroz w/Tu (IV, Peschke withdrew from QF, 1) Luxembourg w/Schiavone (II, Schiavone withdrew from SF, 2) Filderstadt w/Schiavone (II, F, 3) Moscow w/Schiavone (I, QF, 1) Zürich w/Schiavone (I, 1R, 0) Linz w/Dulko (II, Win, 4) Philadelphia w/Morariu (II, QF, 1) 33 9 Petrova [Australian Open w/Shaughnessy (Slam) — Did not play/Shaughnessy withdrew] Indian Wells w/Shaughnessy (I, F, 4) Miami w/Shaughnessy (I, QF, 2) Berlin w/Shaughnessy (I, QF, 1) Roland Garros w/Shaughnessy (Slam, SF, 4) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Shaughnessy (III, Petrova withdrew from SF, 2) Wimbledon w/Shaughnessy (Slam, QF, 3) Los Angeles w/Jidkova (II, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Kuznetsova (I, Kuznetsova withdrew from QF [and Petrova would have if she hadn’t], 0+1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Shaughnessy (Slam, R16, 2) 119 7 Pierce Antwerp w/Mikaelian (II, 1R, 0) Indian Wells w/Pennetta (I, 2R, 1) Amelia Island w/Morariu (II, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Morariu (I, QF, 2) Berlin w/Pennetta (I, 2R, 1) Roland Garros w/Kuznetsova (Slam, 2R, 1) San Diego w/Bartoli (I, QF, 2)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 188 40 20 Pratt Australian Open w/Daniilidou (Slam, QF, 3) Pan Paciﬁc w/Vento-Kabchi (I, SF, 2) Doha w/Martinez (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Stosur (II, 1R, 0) Indian Wells w/Daniilidou (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Daniilidou (I, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Daniilidou (I, 1R, 0) Estoril w/Cohen-Aloro (IV, QF, 0+1 walkover) Rabat w/Li Na (IV, SF, 2) Prague w/Loit (IV, Win, 4) Roland Garros w/Loit (Slam, QF, 3) Birmingham w/Vento-Kabchi (III, QF, 1) Eastbourne w/Daniilidou (II, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Daniilidou (Slam, 2R, 1) Canadian Open w/Bartoli (I, 2R, 1) New Haven w/Loit (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Loit (Slam, R16, 2) Kolkata w/Tanasugarn (III, 1R, 0) Japan Open w/Garbin (III, QF, 1) Philadelphia w/Shaughnessy (II, 1R, 0) 321Raymond Sydney w/Stubbs (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Stubbs (Slam, 2R, 1) Indian Wells w/Stubbs (I, SF, 3) Miami w/Stubbs (I, F, 3) Amelia Island w/Stubbs (II, QF, 1) Charleston w/Stubbs (I, SF, 2) Istanbul w/Stubbs (III, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Stubbs (Slam, QF, 2+1 walkover) Eastbourne w/Stubbs (II, Win, 4) Wimbledon w/Stubbs (Slam, 1R, 0) Stanford w/Stosur (II, 1R, 0) San Diego w/Stosur (I, 2R, 0) Los Angeles w/Stosur (II, QF, 1) New Haven w/Stosur (II, Win, 4) U. S. Open w/Stosur (Slam, Win, 6) Luxembourg w/Stosur (II, Win, 4) Filderstadt w/Stosur (II, 1R, 0) Moscow w/Stosur (I, Win, 4) Zürich w/Stosur (I, SF, 2) Philadelphia w/Stosur (II, F, 3) Los Angeles Championships w/Stosur (Champ, Win, 2)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 189 419Ruano Pascual Sydney w/Martinez (II, SF, 2) Australian Open w/Martinez (Slam, 1R, 0) Doha w/Suárez (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Suárez (II, Win, 4) Indian Wells w/Suárez (I, Win, 5) Miami w/Suárez (I, SF, 3) Amelia Island w/Martinez (II, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Martinez (I, Win, 4) Rome w/Suárez (I)— Did not play/Ruano Pascual withdrew] Roland Garros w/Suárez (Slam, Win, 6)) San Diego w/Martinez (I, Win, 4) Los Angeles w/Martinez (II, SF, 2) Canadian Open w/Martinez (I, F, 3) U. S. Open w/Martinez (Slam, SF, 4) Bali w/Pennetta (III, SF, 2) Kolkata w/Mirza (III, SF, 2) Bangkok w/Martinez (III, F, 3) Zürich w/Martinez (I, QF, 1) Linz w/Martinez (II, F, 3) Los Angeles Championships w/Martinez (Champ, 1R, 0) 28 20 Saﬁna Gold Coast w/Golovin (III, 1R, 0) Hobart w/Medina Garrigues (IV, F, 3) Australian Open w/Medina Garrigues (Slam, QF, 3) Paris w/Medina Garrigues (II, F, 3) Antwerp w/Medina Garrigues (II, F, 3) Indian Wells w/Medina Garrigues (I, 2R, 1) Miami w/Medina Garrigues (I, 2R, 1) Berlin w/Medina Garrigues (I, 2R, 1) Prague w/Benesova (IV, SF, 2) Roland Garros w/Medina Garrigues (Slam, 2R, 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Medina Garrigues (III, Win, 4) Wimbledon w/Medina Garrigues (Slam, QF, 3) San Diego w/Dulko (I, 1R, 0) Los Angeles w/Dulko (II, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Medina Garrigues (I, QF, 2) New Haven w/Medina Garrigues (II, QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Medina Garrigues (Slam, 1R, 0) Luxembourg w/Medina Garrigues (II, SF, 2) Filderstadt w/Medina Garrigues (II, SF, 1+1 walkover) Moscow w/Douchevina (I, SF, 2) —1Sanchez-Vicario Roland Garros w/Navratilova (Slam, 1R, 0) [Re]-retired —3Schett Gold Coast w/Schnyder (III, QF, 1) Sydney w/Schnyder (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Schnyder (Slam, 1R, 0) Retired

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 190 32 13 Schnyder Gold Coast w/Schett (III, QF, 1) Sydney w/Schett (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Schett (Slam, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Déchy (II, 1R, 0) Miami w/Hantuchova (I, 1R, 0) Amelia Island w/Peschke (II, F, 3) Berlin w/Dragomir Ilie (II, QF, 2) Roland Garros w/Morariu (Slam, SF, 4) Stanford w/Morariu (II, QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Morariu (Slam, QF, 3) Filderstadt w/Morariu (II, QF, 1) Moscow w/Morariu (I, 1R, 0) Zürich w/Morariu (I, QF, 1) 19 14 Shaughnessy [Australian Open w/Petrova (Slam) — Did not play/Shaughnessy withdrew] Indian Wells w/Petrova (I, F, 4) Miami w/Petrova (I, QF, 2) Berlin w/Petrova (I, QF, 1) Rome w/Grönefeld (I, SF, 2) Roland Garros w/Petrova (Slam, SF, 4) ’s-Hertogenbosch w/Petrova (III, Petrova withdrew from SF, 2) Wimbledon w/Petrova (Slam, QF, 3) Stanford w/Grönefeld (II, SF, 2) New Haven w/Grönefeld (II, Grönefeld withdrew from QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Petrova (Slam, R16, 2) Bali w/Grönefeld (III, Win, 4) Beijing w/Molik (II, 1R, 0) Filderstadt w/Grönefeld (II,R, 0) Philadelphia w/Pratt (II, 1R, 0) 25 18 Srebotnik Auckland w/Asagoe (IV, Win, 4) Australian Open w/Asagoe (Slam, R16, 2) Indian Wells w/Asagoe (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Asagoe (I, 2R, 1) Amelia Island w/Asagoe (II, SF, 2) Charleston w/Asagoe (I, QF, 2) Strasbourg w/Schaul (III, QF, 1) Roland Garros w/Asagoe (Slam, QF, 3) Eastbourne w/Tanasugarn (II, QF, 1) Wimbledon w/Asagoe (Slam, R16, 2) Budapest w/Loit (IV, Win, 4) Stockholm w/Loit (IV, Win, 4) New Haven w/Stewart (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Asagoe (Slam, R16, 2) Portoroz w/Kostanic (IV, F, 3) Luxembourg w/Vinci (II, QF, 1) Zürich w/Asagoe (I, SF, 2) Hasselt w/Loit (III, Win, 4)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 191 24 24 Stewart Gold Coast w/Stosur (III, QF, 1) Sydney w/Stosur (II, Win, 2+2 walkovers) Australian Open w/Stosur (Slam, 2R, 1) Doha w/Stosur (II, QF, 1) Dubai w/Callens (II, 1R, 0) Indian Wells w/Stosur (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Stosur (I, 2R, 1) Amelia Island w/Stosur (II, Win, 4) Charleston w/Stosur (I, QF, 2) Rome w/Stosur (I, 1R, 0) Strasbourg w/Stosur (III, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Stosur (Slam, R16, 2) Birmingham w/Stosur (III, SF, 2) Eastbourne w/Molik (II, 1R, 0) Wimbledon w/Stosur (II, SF, 4) San Diego w/Benesova (I, 1R, 0) Los Angeles w/Benesova (II, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Grande (I, 1R, 0) New Haven w/Srebotnik (II, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Mirza (Slam, 1R, 0) Beijing w/McShea (II, 1R, 0) Seoul w/McShea (IV, 1R, 0) Japan Open w/McShea (III, QF, 1) Bangkok w/McShea (III, SF, 2) 225Stosur Gold Coast w/Stewart (III, QF, 1) Sydney w/Stewart (II, Win, 2+2 walkovers) Australian Open w/Stewart (Slam, 2R, 1) Doha w/Stewart (II, QF, 1) Dubai w/Pratt (II, 1R, 0) Indian Wells w/Stewart (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Stewart (I, 2R, 1) Amelia Island w/Stewart (II, Win, 4) Charleston w/Stewart (I, QF, 2) Rome w/Stewart (I, 1R, 0) Strasbourg w/Stewart (III, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Stewart (Slam, R16, 2) Birmingham w/Stewart (III, SF, 2) Wimbledon w/Stewart (II, SF, 4) Stanford w/Raymond (II, 1R, 0) San Diego w/Raymond (I, 2R, 0) Los Angeles w/Raymond (II, QF, 1) New Haven w/Raymond (II, Win, 4) U. S. Open w/Raymond (Slam, Win, 6) Luxembourg w/Raymond (II, Win, 4) Filderstadt w/Raymond (II, 1R, 0) Moscow w/Raymond (I, Win, 4) Zürich w/Raymond (I, SF, 2) Philadelphia w/Raymond (II, F, 3) Los Angeles Championships w/Raymond (Champ, Win, 2)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 192 521Stubbs Sydney w/Raymond (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Raymond (Slam, 2R, 1) Indian Wells w/Raymond (I, SF, 3) Miami w/Raymond (I, F, 3) Amelia Island w/Raymond (II, QF, 1) Charleston w/Raymond (I, SF, 2) Istanbul w/Raymond (III, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Raymond (Slam, QF, 2+1 walkover) Eastbourne w/Raymond (II, Win, 4) Wimbledon w/Raymond (Slam, 1R, 0) Stanford w/Black (II,Win, 4) San Diego w/Black (I, SF, 2) Canadian Open w/Black (I, QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Black (Slam, QF, 3) Luxembourg w/Black (II, F, 3) Filderstadt w/Black (II, 1R, 0) Moscow w/Black (I, F, 3) Zürich w/Black (I, Win, 4) Linz w/Black (II, QF, 1) Philadelphia w/Black (II, Win, 4) Los Angeles Championships w/Black (Champ, F, 1) 17 5 Suárez Doha w/Ruano Pascual (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Ruano Pascual (II, Win, 4) Indian Wells w/Ruano Pascual (I, Win, 5) Miami w/Ruano Pascual (I, SF, 3) Rome w/Ruano Pascual (I)— Did not play/Ruano Pascual withdrew] Roland Garros w/Ruano Pascual (Slam, Win, 6) 14 23 Sugiyama Sydney w/Dementieva (II, Dementieva withdrew from F, 3) Australian Open w/Dementieva (Slam, R16, 2) Pan Paciﬁc w/Dementieva (I, Dementieva withdrew from SF, 2)) Doha w/Myskina (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Myskina (II, 1R, 0) Miami w/Likhovtseva (I, 1R, 0) Amelia Island w/Likhovtseva (II, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Likhovtseva (I, 1R, 0) Berlin w/Hantuchova (I, SF, 3) Rome w/Hantuchova (I, QF, 2) Roland Garros w/Hantuchova (Slam, 2R, 1) Birmingham w/Hantuchova (III, Win, 4) Eastbourne w/Hantuchova (II, QF, 1) Wimbledon w/Hantuchova (Slam, QF, 3) Stanford w/Hantuchova (II, 1R, 0) San Diego w/Hantuchova (I, F, 4) Canadian Open w/Hantuchova (I, SF, 2) U. S. Open w/Hantuchova (Slam, R16, 2) Beijing w/Jankovic (II, 1R, 0) Seoul w/S. Kim (IV, QF, 1) Japan Open w/Morita (III, 1R, 0) Zürich w/Hantuchova (I, F, 3) Linz w/Hantuchova (II, SF, 2)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 193 36 16 Sun Gold Coast w/Li (III, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Li (Slam, R16, 2) Hyderabad w/Li (IV, F, 3) Doha w/Li (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Li (II, QF, 1) Estoril w/Li (IV, Win, 3+1 walkover) Rabat w/Li (IV, SF, 2) Rome w/Li (I, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Li (Slam, QF, 3) Beijing $50K I w/Li ($50K, F, 3) Los Angeles w/Li (II, SF, 2) Bronx $50K w/Li ($50K, Win, 4) U. S. Open w/Li (Slam, R16, 2) Bali w/Li (III, QF, 1) Beijing w/Li (II, SF, 2) GuangZhou w/Hao (III, 1R, 0) 127 15 Tanasugarn Pattaya City w/Serna (III, QF, 1) Hyderabad w/Kirilenko (IV, SF, 2) Indian Wells w/Dragomir Ilie (I, 2R, 1) Miami w/Loit (I, 2R, 1) Rabat w/Kurhajcova (IV, 1R, 0) Prague w/Daniilidou (IV, 1R, 0) Strasbourg w/Woehr (III, QF, 1) Roland Garros w/Fujiwara (Slam, 1R, 0) Birmingham w/Bartoli (III, QF, 1) Eastbourne w/Srebotnik (II, QF, 1) Wimbledon w/Karatantcheva (Slam, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Grande (Slam, 1R, 0) Kolkata w/Pratt (III, 1R, 0) Seoul w/Bartoli (IV, 1R, 0) Bangkok w/Luangnam (III, 1R, 0) —5Testud Doha w/Vinci (II, SF, 2) Rome (Parioli) $10K w/Vaideanu ($10K, QF, 1) Rome w/Vinci (I, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Vinci (Slam, 1R, 0) Palermo w/Vinci (IV, 1R, 0) [Re-]retired

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 194 35 24 Vento-Kabchi Australian Open w/Dulko (Slam, 2R, 1) Pan Paciﬁc w/Pratt (I, SF, 2) Doha w/Dulko (II, 1R, 0) Dubai w/Dulko (II, QF, 1) Indian Wells w/Dulko (I, 1R, 0) Miami w/Dulko (I, 2R, 1) Amelia Island w/McShea (II, 1R, 0) Warsaw w/McShea (II, 1R, 0) Berlin w/Dulko (I, SF, 3) Rome w/Dulko (I, QF, 2) Roland Garros w/Dulko (Slam, 2R, 1) Birmingham w/Pratt (III, QF, 1) Eastbourne w/Perebiyns (II, QF, 1) Wimbledon w/Dulko (Slam, 1R, 0) Stanford w/Salerni (II, QF, 1) San Diego w/Salerni (I, 1R, 0) Los Angeles w/Salerni (II, QF, 1) Canadian Open w/Salerni (I, 2R, 1) U. S. Open w/Salerni (Slam, 1R, 0) Bali w/Camerin (III, QF, 1) Beijing w/Llagostera Vives (II, Win, 4) Seoul w/Dulko (IV, 1R, 0) Japan Open w/Asagoe (III, F, 3) Bangkok w/Llagostera Vives (III, QF, 1) 74 16 Vinci Sydney w/Talaja (II, 1R, 0) Australian Open w/Schiavone (Slam, 1R, 0) Pan Paciﬁc w/Krizan (I, QF, 1) Doha w/Testud (II, SF, 2) Rome (Parioli) $10K w/Zanchetta ($10K, SF, 2) Rome w/Testud (I, 1R, 0) Roland Garros w/Testud (Slam, 1R, 0) Eastbourne w/Gagliardi (II, Vinci withdrew from QF, 1) Wimbledon w/Farina Elia (Slam, 1R, 0) Palermo w/Testud (IV, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Voskoboeva (I, 1R, 0) U. S. Open w/Farina Elia (Slam, 3R, 2) Portoroz w/Medina Garrigues (IV, Win, 4) Luxembourg w/Srebotnik (II, QF, 1) Zürich w/Medina Garrigues (I, 1R, 0) Hasselt w/Santangelo (III, Vinci withdrew from QF, 1) —0Williams, S. — —0Williams, V. —

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 195 30 19 Zheng Gold Coast w/Yan (III, SF, 2) Hobart w/Yan (V, Win, 4) Australian Open w/Yan (Slam, 1R, 0) Hyderabad w/Yan (IV, Win, 4) Doha w/Yan (II, QF, 1) Dubai w/Yan (II, SF, 2) Estoril w/Yan (IV, QF, 0+1 walkover) Rabat w/Yan (IV, QF, 1) Rome w/Yan (I, 1R, 0) Strasbourg w/Yan (III, QF, 1) Roland Garros w/Yan (Slam, R16, 2) Beijing $50K I w/Yan ($50K, Win, 4) Los Angeles w/Yan (II, 1R, 0) Canadian Open w/Sromova (I, 2R, 1) New Haven w/Krizan (II, QF, 1) U. S. Open w/Yan (Slam, QF, 3) Bali w/Yan (III, F, 3) Beijing w/Yan (II, F, 3) GuangZhou w/Yan (III, Yan withdrew from SF, 2) 10 16 Zvonareva Australian Open w/Myskina (Slam, SF, 4) Miami w/Myskina (I, QF, 2) Amelia Island w/Myskina (II, 1R, 0) Charleston w/Golovin (I, 1R, 0) Warsaw w/Farina Elia (II, QF, 1) Berlin w/Likhovtseva (I, Win, 4) Rome w/Likhovtseva (I, SF, 2) Roland Garros w/Likhovtseva (Slam, R16, 2) Eastbourne w/Likhovtseva (II, F, 3) Wimbledon w/Likhovtseva (Slam, QF, 3) Stanford w/Likhovtseva (II, F, 3) San Diego w/Likhovtseva (I, SF, 2) Moscow w/Likhovtseva (I, SF, 2) Linz w/Likhovtseva (II, SF, 2) Philadelphia w/Likhovtseva (II, SF, 2) Los Angeles Championships w/Likhovtseva (Champ, 1R, 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 196 Head-to-Heads — Team Records and Losses Head-to-head records in doubles don’t mean much. It’s a much bigger achievement to beat Shinobu Asagoe when she plays with Ai Sugiyama than when she plays with Saori Obata. As a result, no attempt is made to compile individual head-to-heads for doubles. Rather, the following lists show the opponents to whom the top doubles teams have lost this year. The first line of each section shows, in bold, the names the doubles team. This is followed by a summary of their results: Events played together, titles won, won/lost record, perhaps comments about withdrawals or Challenger results. The opponents who beat them, and the event at which this occurred, follow.

Ani/Gagliardi [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Bartoli/Pierce [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Domachowska/Kostanic (Palermo QF) Hantuchova/Sugiyama (San Diego QF) Asagoe/Camerin [2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record] Bartoli/Pratt [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Garbin/Kostanic (Doha QF) Granville/Gullickson (Canadian Open 2R) Black/Huber (Birmingham 1R) Bartoli/Salerni [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð0 record+1 withdrawal] Asagoe/Dulko [1 event, 1 title, 3Ð0 record+1 walkover] WITHDREW from Quebec City SF WON Bangkok Bartoli/Sequera [2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record] Asagoe/Garbin [2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record+1 walkover] Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Wimbledon R16) Haynes/Mattek (Los Angeles QF) Douchevina/Peer (U. S. Open 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Canadian Open SF) Bartoli/Tanasugarn [2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record] Asagoe/Jankovic [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Stewart/Stosur (Birmingham QF) Dementieva/Sugiyama (Pan Paciﬁc 1R) Chang/M.Kim (Seoul 1R) Asagoe/Lee [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Bartoli/Washington [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Dekmeijere/Müller (Beijing 1R) Raymond/Stubbs (Eastbourne 1R) Asagoe/Marrero [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Benesova/Beygelzimer [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Grönefeld/Shaughnessy (Rome 2R) Dulko/Kirilenko (U. S. Open 1R) Asagoe/Peer [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Benesova/Jidkova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Domachowska/Kirilenko (San Diego 1R) Grönefeld/Shaughnesy (Stanford 1R) Asagoe/Srebotnik [10 events, 1 title, 20Ð9 record] Benesova/Kachlikova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] WON Auckland Morariu/Peschke (Philadelphia 1R) Hantuchova/Navratilova (Australian Open R16) Benesova/Kostanic [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Raymond/Stubbs (Indian Wells 1R) Raymond/Stosur (Luxembourg QF) Petrova/Shaughnessy (Miami 2R) Stewart/Stosur (Amelia Island SF) Benesova/Krizan [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Raymond/Stubbs (Charleston QF) Craybas/Russell (Berlin 1R) Petrova/Shaughnessy (Roland Garros QF) Benesova/Llagostera Vives Grönefeld/Navratilova (Wimbledon R16) [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record+1 walkover] Raymond/Stosur (U. S. Open R16) Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna (’s-Hertogenbosch F) Black/Stubbs (Zürich SF) Benesova/Nagyova [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Asagoe/Vento-Kabchi [1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record] Medina Garrigues/Vinci (Portoroz QF) Dulko/Kirilenko (Japan Open F) Benesova/Pastikova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Bartoli/Farina Elia [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Dementieva/Pennetta (Zürich 1R) Black/Huber (Doha 1R) Bartoli/Grönefeld [6 events, 1 title, 12Ð4 record+1 withdrawal] WITHDREW fom Canberra SF Daniilidou/Pratt (Australian Open R16) WON Pattaya City Raymond/Stubbs (Indian Wells QF) Kirilenko/Salerni (Miami 1R) Raymond/Stubbs (Roland Garros R16)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 197 Benesova/Peschke [9 events, 1 title, 13Ð8 record] Black/Stubbs [11 events, 3 titles, 27Ð8 record] Jidkova/Perebiynis (Hobart QF) WON Stanford Birnerova/Vanc (Australian Open 1R) Hantuchova/Sugiyama (San Diego SF) WON Paris Grönefeld/Navratilova (Canadian Open QF) Medina Garrigues/Safina (Antwerp SF) Raymond/Stosur (U. S. Open QF) Likhovtseva/Martinez (Indian Wells 1R) Raymond/Stosur (Luxembourg F) Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Miami 1R) Dementieva/Pennetta (Filderstadt 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Charleston F) Raymond/Stosur (Moscow F) Andres/Vanc (Strasbourg 1R) WON Zürich Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Roland Garros R16) Dulko/Peschke (Linz QF) Benesova/Safina [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] WON Philadelphia Kostanic/Strycova (Prague SF) Raymond/Stosur (Los Angeles Champ. F) Benesova/Ant. Serra Zanetti [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] A. Bondarenko/Gagliardi [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Camerin/Farina Elia (Gold Coast 1R) Davenport/Morariu (Australian Open 2R) Benesova/Stewart [2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record] Bovina/Déchy [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Lee/Peng (San Diego 1R) Petrova/Shaughnessy (Berlin 2R) Lee/Peng (Los Angeles 1R) Bovina/Dementieva [3 events, 0 titles, 4Ð3 record] Benesova/Strycova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Bartoli/Grönefeld (Indian Wells 2R) Krizan/Sfar (Linz 1R) Huber/Maleeva (Miami QF) Benesova/Peschke (Roland Garros 2R) Benesova/Talaja [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Perebiynis/Strycova (Warsaw 1R) Callens/Clijsters [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record+1 walkover] Krajicek/Szavay (Hasselt SF) Benesova/Tu [2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record] Granville/Spears (Cincinnati SF) Callens/Daniilidou [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Black/Stubbs (Moscow 1R) Petrova/Shaughnessy (Roland Garros 1R) Benesova/Voskoboeva [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Callens/Gagliardi[1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Hopkins/Washington (Wimbledon 1R) Douchevina/Peer (Wimbledon R16) Beygelzimer/Husarova [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Callens/Krizan [2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record] Medina Garrigues/Vinci (Portoroz SF) Russell/Santangelo (Rome 1R) Déchy/Golovin (Canadian Open 1R) Beygelzimer/Loit [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Cohen Aloro-Sfar (Gold Coast QF) Callens/McShea [3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record] Likhovtseva/Maleeva (Gold Coast 1R) Black/Callens [1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record] Dulko/Vento-Kabchi (Australian Open 1R) WON Antwerp Husarova/Likhovtseva (Pan Pacific QF) Black/Huber [12 events, 2 titles, 29Ð10 record] Callens/Santangelo [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Birnerova/Vanc (Australian Open 2R) A. Rolle/N. Uberoi (U. S. Open 1R) Davenport/Morariu (Pan Pacific QF) Molik/Schiavone (Doha F) Callens/Ant. Serra Zanetti [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record+2 Yan/Zheng (Dubai QF) qualifying wins] Kirilenko/Salerni (Indian Wells 2R) Asagoe/Garbin (Los Angeles 1R) Hradeckova/Sromova (Warsaw 1R) Callens/Stewart [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Berlin F) Kuznetsova/Molik (Dubai 1R) WON Rome Callens/Tu [3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record] Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Roland Garros F) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Charleston 2R) Daniilidou/Russell (Birmingham SF) Medina Garrigues/Safina (Berlin 1R) Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Eastbourne SF) Stewart/Stosur (Birmingham 1R) WON Wimbledon Camerin/Gagliardi [1 event, 1 title, 3Ð0 record+1 walkover] WON GuangZhou Camerin/Loit [1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record] WON Tashkent Camerin/Vento-Kabchi [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Pennetta/Ruano Pascual (Bali QF)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 198 Chladkova/Gagliardi [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Dementieva/Sugiyama [3 events, 0 titles, 7Ð1 record+2 Russell/Santangelo (Rome 2R) withdrawals] WITHDREW from Sydney F Cohen-Aloro/Husarova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Russell/Santangelo (Australian Open R16) Dulko/Kirilenko (New Haven 1R) WITHDREW from Pan Pacific SF Cohen-Aloro/Pratt Diaz-Oliva/Dulko [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record+1 walkover] Li/Sun (Estoril QF) Müller/Osterloh (Estoril QF) Domachowska/Kirilenko [4 events, 0 titles, 3Ð4 record] Craybas/Morariu [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Perebiynis/Strycova (Warsaw SF) Baker/Lubiani (Auckland 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (San Diego 2R) Daniilidou/Kuznetsova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Raymond/Stosur (Los Angeles 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Los Angeles 1R) Li/Sun (Beijing 1R) Daniilidou/Pratt [6 events, 0 titles, 4Ð6 record] Dominguez Lino/Medina Garrigues [1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 Myskina/Zvonareva (Australian Open QF) record] Medina Garrigues/Safina (IndianWells 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Charleston SF) Kuznetsova/Molik (Miami 1R) Dushevina/Safina [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Hopkins/Washington (Charleston1R) Raymond/Stosur (Moscow SF) Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Eastbourne 1R) Ivanovic/Krizan (Wimbledon 2R) Dragomir Ilie/Schnyder [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Black/Huber (Berlin QF) Daniilidou/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Blahotova/Hradecka (Prague 1R) Dragomir Ilie/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Indian Wells 2R) Davenport/Morariu [5 events, 0 titles, 8Ð5 record+1 walkover] Dulko/Kirilenko [5 events, 1 title, 10Ð4 record+1 walkover] Dementieva/Sugiyama (Sydney 1R) Benesova/Llagostera Vives (’s-Hertogenbosch QF) Kuznetsova/Molik (Australian Open F) Kuznetsova/Petrova (Canadian Open R16) Husarova/Likhovtseva (Pan Pacific F) Raymond/Stosur (New Haven F) Likhovtseva/Martinez (Dubai 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (U. S. Open R16) Bartoli/Sequera (Wimbledon 2R) WON Japan Open Déchy/Husarova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Dulko/Peschke [1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record] Schruff/Woehr (Filderstadt 1R) WON Linz Déchy/Loit [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Dulko/Safina [2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record] Kuznetsova/Molik (Australian Open 1R) Hantuchova/Sugiyama (San Diego 1R) Li/Sun (Los Angeles 1R) Déchy/Martinez [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Grönefeld/Shaughnessy (Rome QF) Dulko/Spears [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Jidkova/Perebiynis (Hobart 1R) Déchy/Navratilova [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Likhovtseva/Maleeva (Gold Coast QF) Dulko/Vento-Kabchi [10 events, 0 titles, 9Ð10 record] Medina Garrigues/Safina (Australian Open 2R) Déchy/Schnyder [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Testud/Vinci (Doha 1R) Yan/Zheng (Dubai 1R) Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Dubai QF) Dementieva/Golovin [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Hantuchova/Schiavone (Indian Wells 1R) Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (San Diego 2R) Kuznetsova/Molik (Miami 2R) Dementieva/Krajicek [2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record] Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Berlin SF) Grönefeld/Navratilova (’s-Hertogenbosch QF) Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Rome QF) Douchevina/Safina (Moscow 1R) Dominguez Lino/Llagostera Vives (Roland Garros 2R) Granville/Lee (Wimbledon 1R) Dementieva/Pennetta [4 events, 1 title, Douchevina/Peer (Seoul 1R) 11Ð2 record+1 withdrawal, 1 walkover] WON Los Angeles Farina Elia/Vinci [2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record] Raymond/Stosur (U. S. Open F) Callens/Gagliardi (Wimbledon 1R) WITHDREW from Filderstad QF Kuznetsova/Molik (U. S. Open 3R) Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Zürich QF) Farina Elia/Zvonareva [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Perebiynis/Strycova (Warsaw QF)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 199 Fujiwara/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Grönefeld/Navratilova [7 events, 1 title, 16Ð6 record] Kirilenko/Salerni (Roland Garros 1R) Amanmuradova/Panova (Hyderabad QF) Gagliardi/Jankovic [3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record] Benesova/Peschke (Charleston 2R) Granville/Lee (Indian Wells 2R) Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna (’s-Hertogenbosch SF) Marrero/Parra Santonja (Roland Garros 1R) Kuznetsova/Mauresmo (Wimbledon SF) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Linz 1R) K. Bondarenko/Rodionova (San Diego 1R) WON Canadian Open Gagliardi/Kostanic [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Dementieva/Pennetta (U. S. Open SF) J. Lee/Peng (Sydney 1R) Grönefeld/Schruff [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Gagliardi/Loit [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Pennetta/Pierce (Berlin 1R) Jidkova/Perebiynis (Acapulco SF) Grönefeld/Shaughnessy [5 events, 1 title, 9Ð3 record+1 Gagliardi/Marrero [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] withdrawal] G. Navratilova/Pastikova (Modena SF) Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues (Rome SF) Gagliardi/Pisnik [1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record] Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Stanford SF) WON Bogota WITHDREW from New Haven QF WON Bali Gagliardi/Salerni Morariu/Schnyder (Filderstadt 1R) [3 events, 0 titles, 0Ð3 record+1 walkover] Camerin/Sprem (Kolkata 1R) Gullickson/Kirilenko Rodionova/Voskoboeva (Tashkent 1R) 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record+1 withdrawal] Raymond/Stosur (Moscow QF) WITHDREW from GuangZhou QF Gagliardi/Senoglu [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Hantuchova/Maleeva [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Klemenschits/Klemenschits (Istanbul QF) Cohen-Aloro/Sfar (Doha 1R) Gagliardi/Serna [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Hantuchova/Myskina [1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record] Lee/Talaja (Miami 1R) WON Filderstadt Gagliardi/Vinci [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record+1 withdrawal] Hantuchova/Navratilova [2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record] WITHDREW from Eastbourne QF Huber/McShea (Sydney 1R) Kuznetosva/Molik (Australian Open QF) Gagliardi/Weingärtner [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Li/Sun (U. S. Open 1R) Hantuchova/Schiavone [2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record] Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Dubai SF) Garbin/Loit [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Raymond/Stubbs (Indian Wells 2R) Petrova/Shaughnessy (Indian Wells QF) Hantuchova/Schnyder [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Garbin/Pratt [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Loit/Tanasugarn (Miami 1R) Mirza/Peer (Japan Open QF) Hantuchova/Sugiyama [12 events, 1 title, 27Ð11 record] Golovin/Myskina [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Black/Huber (Berlin SF) Dulko/Vento-Kabchi (Roland Garros 1R) Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues (Rome QF) Golovin/Saﬁna [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Birnerova/Vanc (Roland Garros 2R) Yan/Zheng (Gold Coast 1R) WON Birmingham An. Serra Zanetti/Spears (Eastbourne QF) Golovin/Zvonareva [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Black/Huber (Wimbledon QF) Asagoe/Srebotnik (Charleston 1R) Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Stanford 1R) Grande/Stewart [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Martinez/Ruano Pascual (San Diego F) Bartoli/Pratt (Canadian Open 1R) Grönefeld/Navratilova (Canadian Open SF) Grande/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Yan/Zheng (U. S. Open R16) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (U. S. Open 1R) Black/Stubbs (Zürich F) Dulko/Peschke (Linz SF) Grönefeld/Liggan [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Bratchikova/Vesnina (Istanbul 1R) Hao/Sun [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Vorobieva/Yuan (GuangZhou 1R) Grönefeld/Medina Garrigues [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Henke/Peschke [2 Challengers, 0 titles, 5Ð2 Challenger Asagoe/Srebotnik (Amelia Island QF) record] Nemeth/Obziler (Deauville $50K F) G. Navratilova/Pastikova (Poitiers $75K SF)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 200 Huber/Maleeva [1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record] Kirilenko/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Raymond/Stubbs (Miami SF) Li/Sun (Hyderanad SF) Huber/McShea [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Kirilenko/Tatarkova Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Sydney QF) [1 Challenger, 0 titles, 1Ð1 Challenger record] Henke/Peschke (Deauville $50K QF) Huber/Washington [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Lee/Peng (Amelia Island 1R) Kirilenko/Yakimova [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð0 record+1 withdrawal+2 qualifying wins] Husarova/Jugic-Salkic WITHDREW from Sydney SF [1 Challenger, 0 titles, 0Ð1 Challenger record] Krauth/Nooni (Bordeaux $75K 1R) Kostanic/Srebotnik [1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record] Medina Garrigues/Vinci (Portoroz F) Husarova/Krasnoroutskaya [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð0 record+1 withdrawal] Krizan/Vinci [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] WITHDREW from Gold Coast SF Dementieva/Sugiyama (Pan Pacific QF) Husarova/Likhovtseva [2 events, 1 title, 5Ð1 record] Krizan/Zheng [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Chuang/Fukiwara (Australian Open 2R) Déchy/Mauresmo (New Haven QF) WON Pan Pacific Kurhajcova/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Husarova/Martinez [3 events, 0 titles, 5Ð3 record] Klemenschits/Klemenschits (Rabat) Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Berlin QF) Kuznetsova/Mauresmo [1 event, 0 titles, 5Ð1 record] Li/Sun (Roland Garros R16) Black/Huber (Wimbledon F) Stewart/Stosur (Wimbledon R16) Kuznetsova/Molik [6 events, 2 titles, 17Ð4 record] Husarova/Schiavone [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] WON Australian Open Fujiwara/N. Li (U. S. Open 1R) Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Dubai F) Ivanovic/Myskina [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] WON Miami Husarova/Martinez (Berlin 2R) Grönefeld/Navratilova (U. S. Open QF) Koryttseva/Voskoboeva (Moscow 1R) Jankovic/Sugiyama [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Zürich 1R) Yan/Zheng (Beijing 1R) Kuznetsova/Navratilova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Jidkova/Petrova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Gagliardi/Jankovic (IndianWells1R) Dementieva/Pennetta (Los Angeles 1R) Kuznetsova/Petrova [1 event, 0 titles, Karatantcheva/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] 0Ð0 record+1 withdrawal, 1 walkover] Medina Garrigues/Safina (Wimbledon 1R) WITHDREW from Canadian Open QF S-J. Kim/Sugiyama [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Kuznetsova/Pierce [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Granville/Spears (Seoul QF) Husarova/Martinez (Roland Garros 2R) Kirilenko/Krasnoroutskaya [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Li Na/Li Ting [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record+1 withdrawal] Bartoli/Grönefeld (Australian Open 1R) WITHDREW from GuangZhou QF Kirilenko/McShea [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Li Na/Pratt [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Kostanic/Peng (Berlin 1R) Dominguez Lino/Llagostera Vives (Rabat SF) Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues [1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record+1 walkover] Black/Huber (Rome F) Kirilenko/Salerni [3 events, 0 titles, 6Ð3 record+3 qualifying wins] Petrova/Shaughnessy (Indian Wells SF) Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Miami QF) Bartoli/Grönefeld (Roland Garros 2R) Kirilenko/Sharapova [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Bartoli/Tanasugarn (Birmingham 1R) Kirilenko/Talaja [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record+2 qualifying wins] Yan/Zheng (Doha 1R)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 201 Li Ting/Sun [13 events+2 Challengers, Loit/Pratt [4 events, 1 title, 9Ð3 record] 1 WTA+ 1 Challenger title, WON Prague 21Ð12 WTA record+1 walkover, 7Ð1 Challenger record] Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Roland Garros QF) Beygelzimer/Loit (Gold Coast 1R) Raymond/Stosur (New Haven 1R) Myskina/Zvonareva (Australian Open R16) Morariu/Schnyder (U. S. Open R16) Yan/Zheng (Hyderabad F) Loit/Srebotnik [3 events, 3 titles, 12Ð0 record] Asagoe/Camerin (Doha 1R) WON Budapest Kuznetsova/Molik (Dubai QF) WON Stockholm WON Estoril WON Hasselt Loit/Strycova (Rabat SF) Lee/Peng (Rome 1R) Loit/Strycova [2 events, 1 title, 6Ð1 record] Black/Huber (Roland Garros QF) WON Rabat Yan/Zheng (Beijing $50K I F) Black/Huber (Wimbledon R16) Haynes/Mattek (Los Angeles SF) Loit/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] WON Bronx $50K Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Miami 2R) Grönefeld/Navratilova (U. S. Open R16) Schiavone/Sprem (Bali QF) Loit/Woehr [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi (Beijing SF) Kurhajcova/Strycova (Bogota SF) Likhovtseva/Maleeva [3 events, 1 title, 6Ð2 record] Loit/Yan [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] WON Gold Coast Beygelzimer/Jugic-Salkic (Modena 1R) Raymond/Stosur (New Haven QF) Luangnam/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Asagoe/Srebotnik (U. S. Open 2R) Hopkins/Washington (Bangkok 1R) Likhovtseva/Martinez [2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record] \Maleeva/Myskina [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Hantuchova/Schiavone (Dubai QF) Srebotnik/Tanasugarn (Eastbourne 1R) Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Indian Wells SF) Martinez/Pratt [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Likhovtseva/Molik [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Stewart/Stosur (Doha 1R) Hantuchova/Myskina (Filderstadt QF) Martinez/Ruano Pascual [12 events, 2 titles, 26Ð10 record] Likhovtseva/Myskina [1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record] Dementieva/Sugiyama (Sydney SF) WON Kolkata Hopkins/Washington (Australian Open 1R) Likhovtseva/Sugiyama [3 events, 0 titles, 0Ð3 record] Asagoe/Srebotnik (Amelia Island 1R) Huber/Maleeva (Miami 1R) WON Charleston Peschke/Schnyder (Amelia Island 1R) WON San Diego Dominguez Lino/Medina Garrigues (Charleston 2R) Dementieva/Pennetta (Los Angeles SF) Grönefeld/Navratilova (Canadian Open F) Likhovtseva/Zvonareva [11 events, 1 title, 26Ð10 record] Raymond/Stosur (U. S. Open SF) WON Berlin Asagoe/Dulko (Bangkok F) Black/Huber (Rome SF) Asagoe/Srebotnik (Zürich QF) Asagoe/Srebotnik (Roland Garros R16) Dulko/Peschke (Linz F) Raymond/Stubbs (Eastbourne F) Raymond/Stosur (Los Angeles Championships 1R) Kuznetsova/Mauresmo (Wimbledon QF) Black/Stubbs (Stanford F) Martinez/Sfar [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Martinez/Ruano Pascual (San Diego SF) Gagliardi/Vinci (Eastbourne 1R) Black/Stubbs (Moscow SF) McShea/Stewart [4 events, 0 titles, 3Ð4 record] Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Linz SF) W. Liu/S. Sun (Beijing 1R) Raymond/Stosur (Philadelphia SF) Chan/Chuang (Seoul 1R) Black/Stubbs (Los Angeles Championships 1R) Foretz/Naguova (Japan Open QF) Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi Asagoe/Dulko (Bangkok SF) [2 events, 1 title, 5Ð1 record] McShea/Vento-Kabchi [2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record] WON Beijing Stewart/Stosur (Amelia Island 1R) Prakusya/Ant. Serra Zanetti (Bangkok QF) Ivanovic/Krizan (Warsaw 1R)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 202 Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna Morariu/Schnyder [6 events, 0 titles, 10Ð6 record] [15 events, 1 title, 28Ð14 record+1 walkover] Black/Huber (Roland Garros SF) Yan/Zheng (Hobart F) Grönefeld/Shaughnessy (Stanford QF) Davenport/Morariu (Australian Open QF) Dementieva/Pennetta (U. S. Open QF) Benesova/Pechke (Paris F) Schruff/Woehr (Filderstadt QF) Black/Callens (Antwerp F) Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Moscow 1R) Garbin/Loit (Indian Wells 2R) Black/Stubbs (Zürich QF) Bovina/Dementieva (Miami 2R) Morita/Sugiyama [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Kostanic/Peng (Berlin 2R) Hopkins/Washington (Japan Open 1R) Li/Sun (Roland Garros 2R) WON ’s-Hertogenbosch Myskina/Pennetta [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Wimbledon R16) Peschke/Schiavone (Moscow 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Canadian Open QF) Myskina/Sugiyama [2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record] Dulko/Kirilenko (New Haven QF) Garbin/Kostanic (Doha 1R) Yan/Zheng (U. S. Open 1R) Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Dubai 1R) Raymond/Stosur (Luxembourg SF) Hantuchova/Myskina (Filderstadt SF) Myskina/Wozniacki [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Bychkova/Foretz (Stockholm 1R) Medina Garrigues/Vinci [2 events, 1 title, 4Ð1 record] WON Portoroz Myskina/Zvonareva [3 events, 0 titles, 6Ð3 record] Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Zürich 1R) Kuznetsova/Molik (Australian Open SF) Kuznetsova/Molik (Miami QF) Mikaelian/Pierce [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Daniilidou/Gullickson (Amelia Island 1R) Dhenin/G. Navratilova (Antwerp 1R) Navratilova/Sanchez-Vicario [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Mirza/Ruano Pascual [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Dominguez Lino/Llagostera Vives (Roland Garros 1R) Likhovtseva/Myskina (Kolkata SF) Navratilova/Schiavone [2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record] Mirza/Stewart [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna (Miami 1R) Loit/Pratt (U. S. Open 1R) Camerin/Garbin (Rome 1R) Miyagi/Myskina [2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record] Pennetta/Pierce [2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record] Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Wimbledon 2R) Likhovtseva/Martinez (Indian Wells 2R) Farina Elia/Vinci (U. S. Open 1R) Black/Huber (Berlin 2R) Molik/Morariu [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Pennetta/Ruano Pascual [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Déchy/Mauresmo (New Haven 1R) Yan/Zheng (Bali SF) Molik/Navratilova [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Perebiynis/Vento-Kabchi [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Peschke/Schnyder (Amelia Island SF) Raymond/Stubbs (Eastbourne QF) Molik/Schiavone [1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record] Peschke/Rittner [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] WON Doha Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Berlin 1R) Molik/Shaughnessy [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Peschke/Salerni [1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record] Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi (Beijing 1R) Granville/Spears (Cincinnati F) Molik/Stewart [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Peschke/Schiavone Ant. Serra Zanetti/Spears (Eastbourne 1R) [5 events, 0 titles, 8Ð4 record+1 withdrawal] Morariu/Pennetta [1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record] Black/Stubbs (Stanford SF) Yan/Zheng (Beijing SF) WITHDREW from Luxembourg SF Hantuchova/Myskina (Filderstadt F) Morariu/Peschke [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (Moscow QF) Drake/Vaidisova (Philadelphia QF) Raymond/Stosur (Zürich 1R) Morariu/Pierce [2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record] Raymond/Stubbs (Amelia Island 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Charleston QF)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 203 Peschke/Schnyder [1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record] Raymond/Stubbs Stewart/Stosur (Amelia Island F) [10 events, 1 title, 16Ð9 record+1 walkover] Peschke/Schruff [2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record] Stewart/Stosur (Sydney 1R) Sekulovski/Watson (’s-Hertogenbosch 1R) Bartoli/Grönefeld (Australian Open 2R) Daniilidou/Pratt (Wimbledon 1R) Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Indian Wells SF) Kuznetsova/Molik (Miami F) Peschke/Strycova [2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record] Stewart/Stosur (Amelia Island QF) Medina Garrigues/Safina (New Haven 1R) Benesova/Peschke (Charleston SF) Camerin/Garbin (U. S. Open 1R) Stanciute/Szavay (Istanbul 1R) Peschke/Tu [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record+1 withdrawal] Morariu/Schnyder (Roland Garros QF) WITHDREW from Portoroz QF WON Eastbourne Cohen-Aloro/Sfar (Wimbledon 1R) Petrova/Shaughnessy [7 events, 0 titles, 18Ð6 record+1 withdrawal] Ruano Pascual/Suárez [5 events, 3 titles, 18Ð2 record] Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Indian Wells F) Molik/Schiavone (Doha 1R) Raymond/Stubbs (Miami QF) WON Dubai Dulko/Vento-Kabchi (Berlin QF) WON Indian Wells Ruano Pascual/Suárez (Roland Garros SF) Kuznetsova/Molik (Miami SF) WITHDREW from ’s-Hertogenbosch SF WON Roland Garros Stewart/Stosur (Wimbledon QF) Salerni/Vento-Kabchi [5 events, 0 titles, 3Ð5 record] Dementieva/Pennetta (U. S. Open R16) Black/Stubbs (Stanford QF) Pratt/Shaughnessy [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Bartoli/Pierce (San Diego 1R) Black/Stubbs (Philadelphia 1R) Martinez/Ruano Pascual (Los Angeles QF) Martinesz/Ruano Pascual (Canadian Open 2R) Pratt/Stosur [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Petrova/Shaughnessy (U. S. Open 1R) Li/Sun (Dubai 1R) Santangelo/Vinci Pratt/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record+1 withdrawal] Chuang/Fujiwara (Kolkata 1R) WITHDREW from Linz QF Pratt/Vento-Kabchi [2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record] Schaul/Srebotnik [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Husarova/Likhovtseva (Pan Pacific SF) McShea/Spears (Strasbourg QF) Daniilidou/Russell (Birmingham QF) Schett/Schnyder [3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record] Raymond/Stosur [11 events, 5 titles, 26Ð6 record] Camerin/Farina Elia (Gold Coast QF) Peschke/Schiavone (Stanford 1R) Kirilenko/Yakimova (Sydney 1R) Bartoli/Pierce (San Diego 2R) Sequera/Tu (Australian Open 1R) Li/Sun (Los Angeles QF) WON New Haven Schiavone/Vinci [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] WON U. S. Open J. Lee/Peng (Australian Open 1R) WON Luxembourg Serna/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Peschke/Schiavone (Filderstadt 1R) Domachowska/Talaja (Pattaya City QF) WON Moscow Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Zürich SF) Srebotnik/Stewart [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Black/Stubbs (Philadelphia F) Likhovtseva/Maleeva (New Haven 1R) WON Los Angeles Championships Srebotnik/Tanasugarn [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Black/Huber (Eastbourne QF) Srebotnik/Vinci [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Medina Garrigues/Safina (Luxembourg QF) Sromova/Zheng [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Grönefeld/M. Navratilova (Canadian Open 2R)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 204 Stewart/Stosur [13 events, 2 titles, 20Ð11 record+2 Vinci/Voskoboeva [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] walkovers] Grönefeld/Navratilova (Canadian Open 1R) Yan/Zheng (Gold Coast QF) Vinci/Zanchetta [1 Challenger, 0 titles, 2Ð1 Challenger WON Sydney record] Myskina/Zvonareva (Australian Open 2R) Abramovic/Haidner (Rome/Parioli $10K SF) Testud Vinci (Doha QF) Garbin/Loit (Indian Wells 1R) Yan/Zheng Huber/Maleeva (Miami 2R) [17 events, 2 WTA+1Challenger title, 28Ð13 record+1 WON Amelia Island withdrawal+1 walkover, 4-0 Challenger record] Domingues Lino/Medina Garrigues (Charleston QF) Likhovtseva/Maleeva (Gold Coast SF) Dhenin/Vanc (Rome 1R) WON Hobart Kachlikova/Mirza (Strasbourg 1R) Beygelzimer/Senoglu (Australian Open 1R) Morariu/Schnyder (Roland Garros R16) WON Hyderabad Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Birmingham SF) Black/Huber (Doha QF) Black/Huber (Wimbledon SF) Kuznetsova/Molik (Dubai SF) A. Bondarenko/K. Bondarenko (Estoril QF) Talaja/Vinci [1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record] Li Na/Pratt (Rabat QF) Sekulovski/Watson (Sydney 1R) Jidkova/Perebiynis (Rome 1R) Tanasugarn/Woehr [1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record] Dhenin/G. Navratilova (Strasbourg QF) Andres/Vanc (Strasbourg QF) Black/Huber (Roland Garros R16) WON Beijing $50K I Testud/Vaideanu [1 Challenger, 0 titles, 1Ð1 Challenger Salerni/Vento-Kabchi (Los Angeles 1R) record] Martinez/Ruano Pascual (U. S. Open QF) Borgarello/Rustignoli (Rome/Parioli $10K QF) Grönefeld/Shaughnessy (Bali F) Testud/Vinci [4 events, 0 titles, 2Ð4 record] Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi (Beijing F) Molik/Schiavone (Doha SF) WITHDREW from GuangZhou SF Hantuchova/Sugiyama (Rome 1R) Domachowska/Talaja (Roland Garros 1R) Domachowska/Kostanic (Palermo 1R)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 205 Teams with the Most Events The following list shows all teams containing at least one of our highlight doubles players to play at least four events together. Team Tournaments Yan/Zheng 17 Li/Sun 15 Medina Garrigues/Safina 15 Stewart/Stosur 13 Black/Huber 12 Hantuchova/Sugiyama 12 Martinez/Ruano Pascual 12 Black/Stubbs 11 Likhovtseva/Zvonareva 11 Raymond/Stosur 11 Asagoe/Srebotnik 10 Dulko/Vento-Kabchi 10 Raymond/Stubbs 10 Benesova/Peschke 9 Grönefeld/Navratilova 7 Petrova/Shaughnessy 7 Bartoli/Grönefeld 6 Daniilidou/Pratt 6 Kuznetsova/Molik 6 Morariu/Schnyder 6 Davenport/Morariu 5 Dulko/Kirilenko 5 Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 5 Peschke/Schiavone 5 Ruano Pascual/Suárez 5 Salerni/Vento-Kabchi 5 Dementieva/Pennetta 4 Domachowska/Kirilenko 4 Loit/Pratt 4 McShea/Stewart 4 Testud/Vinci 4

What is fascinating about this list is how few strong teams lasted the whole year. Yan/Zheng have a combined ranking of #60. Li/Sun are #72. Medina Garrigues/Safina are the strongest team to last all year, and even they are only a combined #48 (and they came within a hair of qualifying for the year-end Championships with those rankings). In 2004, seven significant teams managed 14 or more events together, and included most of the top teams: Black/Stubbs had 19 events, Ruano Pascual/Suárez 17, Kuzetsova/Likhovtseva 15, Navratilova/ Raymond 15, Petrova/Shaughnessy 14.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 206 Team Results, Sorted By Both Players To facilitate finding the results for any particular team, the following list shows results for every team containing a highlight player, sorted by both highlight players (e.g. results for Petrova and Shaughnessy are listed under both Petrova [P] and Shaughnessy [S]). Please note that results have been simplified — withdrawals and walkovers omitted, Challengers and WTA events combined, etc.; for full details on a player’s activity, consult her entries above. This list exists primarily as a back reference: You can look up all the partners of any player, in alphabetical order. A Black/Callens: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Ani/Gagliardi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) C Asagoe/Camerin: 2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record (33%) Callens/Clijsters: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Asagoe/Dulko: 1 event, 1 title, 3Ð0 record (100%) Callens/Daniilidou: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Asagoe/Garbin: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record (60%) Callens/Gagliardi: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Asagoe/Jankovic: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Callens/Krizan: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Asagoe/Lee: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Callens/McShea: 3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record (25%) Asagoe/Marrero: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Callens/Santangelo: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Asagoe/Peer: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Callens/Serra Zanetti, Ant.: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record Asagoe/Srebotnik: 10 events, 1 title, 20Ð9 record (69%) (67%) Asagoe/Vento-Kabchi: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Callens/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) B Callens/Tu: 3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record (25%) Asagoe/Camerin: 2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record (33%) Bartoli/Farina Elia: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Camerin/Gagliardi: 1 event, 1 title, 3Ð0 record (100%) Bartoli/Grönefeld: 6 events, 1 title, 12Ð4 record (75%) Camerin/Loit: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Bartoli/Pierce: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Camerin/Vento-Kabchi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Bartoli/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Chladkova/Gagliardi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Bartoli/Salerni: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð0 record (100%) Callens/Clijsters: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Bartoli/Sequera: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Cohen-Aloro/Husarova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Bartoli/Tanasugarn: 2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record (33%) Cohen-Aloro/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Bartoli/Washington: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Craybas/Morariu: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Beygelzimer: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Callens/Daniilidou: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Jidkova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Kachlikova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) D Benesova/Kostanic: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Daniilidou/Kuznetsova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Krizan: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Daniilidou/Pratt: 6 events, 0 titles, 4Ð6 record (40%) Benesova/Llagostera Vives: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record Daniilidou/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (67%) Davenport/Morariu: 5 events, 0 titles, 8Ð5 record (62%) Benesova/Nagyova: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Bovina/Déchy: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Benesova/Pastikova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Déchy/Husarova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Peschke: 9 events, 1 title, 13Ð8 record (62%) Déchy/Loit: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Saﬁna: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Déchy/Martinez: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Benesova/Serra Zanetti, Ant.: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record Déchy/Navratilova: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) (0%) Déchy/Schnyder: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Stewart: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Bovina/Dementieva: 3 events, 0 titles, 4Ð3 record (57%) Benesova/Strycova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dementieva/Golovin: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Benesova/Talaja: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dementieva/Krajicek: 2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record (33%) Benesova/Tu: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Dementieva/Pennetta: 4 events, 1 title, 11Ð2 record (85%) Benesova/Voskoboeva: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dementieva/Sugiyama: 3 events, 0 titles, 7Ð1 record (88%) Benesova/Beygelzimer: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Diaz-Oliva/Dulko: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Beygelzimer/Husarova: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Domachowska/Kirilenko: 4 events, 0 titles, 3Ð4 record Beygelzimer/Loit: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) (43%) Black/Callens: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Dominguez Lino/Medina Garrigues: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 Black/Huber: 12 events, 2 titles, 29Ð10 record (74%) record (75%) Black/Stubbs: 11 events, 3 titles, 27Ð8 record (77%) Douchevina/Saﬁna: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Bondarenko/Gagliardi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Dragomir Ilie/Schnyder: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Bovina/Déchy: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Bovina/Dementieva: 3 events, 0 titles, 4Ð3 record (57%)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 207 Dragomir Ilie/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record Hantuchova/Schnyder: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (50%) Hantuchova/Sugiyama: 12 events, 1 title, 27Ð11 record Asagoe/Dulko: 1 event, 1 title, 3Ð0 record (100%) (71%) Diaz-Oliva/Dulko: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Hao/Sun: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dulko/Kirilenko: 5 events, 1 title, 10Ð4 record (71%) Henke/Peschke: 2 Challengers, 0 titles, 5Ð2 record (71%) Dulko/Peschke: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Black/Huber: 12 events, 2 titles, 29Ð10 record (74%) Dulko/Saﬁna: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Huber/Maleeva: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Dulko/Spears: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Huber/McShea: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Dulko/Vento-Kabchi: 10 events, 0 titles, 9Ð10 record (47%) Huber/Washington: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Beygelzimer/Husarova: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) F Cohen-Aloro/Husarova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Bartoli/Farina Elia: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Déchy/Husarova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Farina Elia/Vinci: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Husarova/Jugic-Salkic: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Farina Elia/Zvonareva: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Husarova/Krasnoroutskaya: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð0 record Fujiwara/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (100%) Husarova/Likhovtseva: 2 events, 1 title, 5Ð1 record (83%) G Husarova/Martinez: 3 events, 0 titles, 5Ð3 record (63%) Ani/Gagliardi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Husarova/Schiavone: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Bondarenko/Gagliardi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Callens/Gagliardi: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) I Camerin/Gagliardi: 1 event, 1 title, 3Ð0 record (100%) Ivanovic/Myskina: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Chladkova/Gagliardi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Gagliardi/Jankovic: 3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record (25%) J Gagliardi/Kostanic: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Asagoe/Jankovic: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Gagliardi/Loit: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Gagliardi/Jankovic: 3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record (25%) Gagliardi/Marrero: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Jankovic/Sugiyama: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Gagliardi/Pisnik: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Benesova/Jidkova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Gagliardi/Salerni: 3 events, 0 titles, 0Ð3 record (0%) Jidkova/Petrova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Gagliardi/Senoglu: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Husarova/Jugic-Salkic: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Gagliardi/Serna: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Gagliardi/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) K Gagliardi/Weingärtner: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Kachlikova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Asagoe/Garbin: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record (60%) Karatantcheva/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record Garbin/Loit: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) (0%) Garbin/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Kim/Sugiyama: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Dementieva/Golovin: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Domachowska/Kirilenko: 4 events, 0 titles, 3Ð4 record Golovin/Myskina: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (43%) Golovin/Saﬁna: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dulko/Kirilenko: 5 events, 1 title, 10Ð4 record (71%) Golovin/Zvonareva: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Gullickson/Kirilenko: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) Grande/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kirilenko/Krasnoroutskaya: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record Grande/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (0%) Bartoli/Grönefeld: 6 events, 1 title, 12Ð4 record (75%) Kirilenko/McShea: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Grönefeld/Liggan: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record Grönefeld/Medina Garrigues: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (75%) (50%) Kirilenko/Salerni: 3 events, 0 titles, 9Ð3 record (75%) Grönefeld/Navratilova: 7 events, 1 title, 16Ð6 record (73%) Kirilenko/Sharapova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Grönefeld/Schruff: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kirilenko/Talaja: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Grönefeld/Shaughnessy: 5 events, 1 title, 9Ð3 record (75%) Kirilenko/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Gullickson/Kirilenko: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) Kirilenko/Tatarkova: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Kirilenko/Yakimova: 1 event, 0 titles, 4Ð0 record (100%) H Benesova/Kostanic: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Hantuchova/Maleeva: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Gagliardi/Kostanic: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Hantuchova/Myskina: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Kostanic/Srebotnik: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Hantuchova/Navratilova: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record Dementieva/Krajicek: 2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record (33%) (60%) Husarova/Krasnoroutskaya: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð0 record Hantuchova/Schiavone: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record (60%) (100%)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 208 Kirilenko/Krasnoroutskaya: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record Martinez/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (0%) Martinez/Ruano Pascual: 12 events, 2 titles, 26Ð10 record Benesova/Krizan: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (72%) Callens/Krizan: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Martinez/Sfar: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Krizan/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Kuznetsova/Mauresmo: 1 event, 0 titles, 5Ð1 record (83%) Krizan/Zheng: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Callens/McShea: 3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record (25%) Kurhajcova/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Huber/McShea: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Daniilidou/Kuznetsova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kirilenko/McShea: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kuznetsova/Mauresmo: 1 event, 0 titles, 5Ð1 record (83%) McShea/Stewart: 4 events, 0 titles, 3Ð4 record (43%) Kuznetsova/Molik: 6 events, 2 titles, 17Ð4 record (81%) McShea/Vento-Kabchi: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Kuznetsova/Navratilova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dominguez Lino/Medina Garrigues: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 Kuznetsova/Petrova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0–0 record (—) record (75%) Kuznetsova/Pierce: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Grönefeld/Medina Garrigues: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) L Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record Asagoe/Lee: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (75%) Li Na/Li Ting: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna: 15 events, 1 title, 28Ð14 record Li Na/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) (67%) Li Na/Sun: 15 events, 2 titles, 28Ð13 record (68%) Medina Garrigues/Vinci: 2 events, 1 title, 4Ð1 record (80%) Li Na/Li Ting: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) Mikaelian/Pierce: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Grönefeld/Liggan: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Mirza/Ruano Pascual: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Husarova/Likhovtseva: 2 events, 1 title, 5Ð1 record (83%) Mirza/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Likhovtseva/Maleeva: 3 events, 1 title, 6Ð2 record (75%) Miyagi/Myskina: 2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record (33%) Likhovtseva/Martinez: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record (60%) Kuznetsova/Molik: 6 events, 2 titles, 17Ð4 record (81%) Likhovtseva/Molik: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Likhovtseva/Molik: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Likhovtseva/Myskina: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Molik/Morariu: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Likhovtseva/Sugiyama: 3 events, 0 titles, 0Ð3 record (0%) Molik/Navratilova: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Likhovtseva/Zvonareva: 11 events, 1 title, 26Ð10 record Molik/Schiavone: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) (72%) Molik/Shaughnessy: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Llagostera Vives: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record Molik/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (67%) Craybas/Morariu: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi: 2 events, 1 title, 5Ð1 Davenport/Morariu: 5 events, 0 titles, 8Ð5 record (62%) record (83%) Molik/Morariu: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Beygelzimer/Loit: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Morariu/Pennetta: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Camerin/Loit: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Morariu/Peschke: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Déchy/Loit: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Morariu/Pierce: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Gagliardi/Loit: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Morariu/Schnyder: 6 events, 0 titles, 10Ð6 record (63%) Garbin/Loit: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Morita/Sugiyama: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Loit/Pratt: 4 events, 1 title, 9Ð3 record (75%) Golovin/Myskina: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Loit/Srebotnik: 3 events, 3 titles, 12Ð0 record (100%) Hantuchova/Myskina: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Loit/Strycova: 2 events, 1 title, 6Ð1 record (86%) Ivanovic/Myskina: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Loit/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Likhovtseva/Myskina: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Loit/Woehr: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Maleeva/Myskina: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Loit/Yan: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Miyagi/Myskina: 2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record (33%) Luangnam/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Myskina/Pennetta: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Myskina/Sugiyama: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) M Myskina/Wozniacki: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Hantuchova/Maleeva: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Myskina/Zvonareva: 3 events, 0 titles, 6Ð3 record (67%) Huber/Maleeva: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Likhovtseva/Maleeva: 3 events, 1 title, 6Ð2 record (75%) N Maleeva/Myskina: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Nagyova: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Asagoe/Marrero: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Déchy/Navratilova: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Gagliardi/Marrero: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Grönefeld/Navratilova: 7 events, 1 title, 16Ð6 record (73%) Déchy/Martinez: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Hantuchova/Navratilova: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record Husarova/Martinez: 3 events, 0 titles, 5Ð3 record (63%) (60%) Likhovtseva/Martinez: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record (60%) Kuznetsova/Navratilova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Molik/Navratilova: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 209 Navratilova/Sanchez-Vicario: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record S (0%) Benesova/Safina: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Navratilova/Schiavone: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Douchevina/Safina: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) P Dulko/Safina: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Golovin/Safina: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Benesova/Pastikova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Medina Garrigues/Safina: 15 events, 1 title, 28Ð14 record Asagoe/Peer: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) (67%) Dementieva/Pennetta: 4 events, 1 title, 11Ð2 record (85%) Bartoli/Salerni: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð0 record (100%) Morariu/Pennetta: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Gagliardi/Salerni: 3 events, 0 titles, 0Ð3 record (0%) Myskina/Pennetta: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kirilenko/Salerni: 3 events, 0 titles, 9Ð3 record (75%) Pennetta/Pierce: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Peschke/Salerni: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Pennetta/Ruano Pascual: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Salerni/Vento-Kabchi: 5 events, 0 titles, 3Ð5 record (38%) Perebiyns/Vento-Kabchi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record Navratilova/Sanchez-Vicario: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (50%) (0%) Benesova/Peschke: 9 events, 1 title, 13Ð8 record (62%) Callens/Santangelo: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dulko/Peschke: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Santangelo/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) Henke/Peschke: 2 Challengers, 0 titles, 5Ð2 record (71%) Schaul/Srebotnik: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Morariu/Peschke: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Schett/Schnyder: 3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record (25%) Peschke/Rittner: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Hantuchova/Schiavone: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record (60%) Peschke/Salerni: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Husarova/Schiavone: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Peschke/Schiavone: 5 events, 0 titles, 8Ð4 record (67%) Molik/Schiavone: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Peschke/Schnyder: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Navratilova/Schiavone: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Peschke/Schruff: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Peschke/Schiavone: 5 events, 0 titles, 8Ð4 record (67%) Peschke/Strycova: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Schiavone/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Peschke/Tu: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) Déchy/Schnyder: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Jidkova/Petrova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dragomir Ilie/Schnyder: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Kuznetsova/Petrova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0–0 record (—) Hantuchova/Schnyder: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Petrova/Shaughnessy: 7 events, 0 titles, 18Ð6 record (75%) Morariu/Schnyder: 6 events, 0 titles, 10Ð6 record (63%) Bartoli/Pierce: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Peschke/Schnyder: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Kuznetsova/Pierce: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Schett/Schnyder: 3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record (25%) Mikaelian/Pierce: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Grönefeld/Schruff: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Morariu/Pierce: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Peschke/Schruff: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Pennetta/Pierce: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Gagliardi/Senoglu: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Gagliardi/Pisnik: 1 event, 1 title, 4Ð0 record (100%) Bartoli/Sequera: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Bartoli/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Gagliardi/Serna: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Cohen-Aloro/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Serna/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Daniilidou/Pratt: 6 events, 0 titles, 4Ð6 record (40%) Benesova/Serra Zanetti, Ant.: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record Garbin/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) (0%) Li Na/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Callens/Serra Zanetti, Ant.: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record Loit/Pratt: 4 events, 1 title, 9Ð3 record (75%) (67%) Martinez/Pratt: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Martinez/Sfar: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Pratt/Shaughnessy: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kirilenko/Sharapova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Pratt/Stosur: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Grönefeld/Shaughnessy: 5 events, 1 title, 9Ð3 record (75%) Pratt/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Molik/Shaughnessy: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Pratt/Vento-Kabchi: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record (60%) Petrova/Shaughnessy: 7 events, 0 titles, 18Ð6 record (75%) R Pratt/Shaughnessy: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dulko/Spears: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Raymond/Stosur: 11 events, 5 titles, 26Ð6 record (81%) Asagoe/Srebotnik: 10 events, 1 title, 20Ð9 record (69%) Raymond/Stubbs: 10 events, 1 title, 16Ð9 record (64%) Kostanic/Srebotnik: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Peschke/Rittner: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Loit/Srebotnik: 3 events, 3 titles, 12Ð0 record (100%) Martinez/Ruano Pascual: 12 events, 2 titles, 26Ð10 record Schaul/Srebotnik: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) (72%) Srebotnik/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Mirza/Ruano Pascual: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Srebotnik/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Pennetta/Ruano Pascual: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Srebotnik/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Ruano Pascual/Suárez: 5 events, 3 titles, 18Ð2 record Sromova/Zheng: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) (90%) Benesova/Stewart: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 210 Callens/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Callens/Tu: 3 events, 0 titles, 1Ð3 record (25%) Grande/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Peschke/Tu: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) McShea/Stewart: 4 events, 0 titles, 3Ð4 record (43%) Testud/Vaideanu: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Mirza/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Molik/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) V Srebotnik/Stewart: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Asagoe/Vento-Kabchi: 1 event, 0 titles, 3Ð1 record (75%) Stewart/Stosur: 13 events, 2 titles, 20Ð11 record (65%) Camerin/Vento-Kabchi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Pratt/Stosur: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Dulko/Vento-Kabchi: 10 events, 0 titles, 9Ð10 record (47%) Raymond/Stosur: 11 events, 5 titles, 26Ð6 record (81%) Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi: 2 events, 1 title, 5Ð1 Stewart/Stosur: 13 events, 2 titles, 20Ð11 record (65%) record (83%) Benesova/Strycova: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) McShea/Vento-Kabchi: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Loit/Strycova: 2 events, 1 title, 6Ð1 record (86%) Perebiyns/Vento-Kabchi: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record Peschke/Strycova: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) (50%) Black/Stubbs: 11 events, 3 titles, 27Ð8 record (77%) Pratt/Vento-Kabchi: 2 events, 0 titles, 3Ð2 record (60%) Raymond/Stubbs: 10 events, 1 title, 16Ð9 record (64%) Salerni/Vento-Kabchi: 5 events, 0 titles, 3Ð5 record (38%) Ruano Pascual/Suárez: 5 events, 3 titles, 18Ð2 record Farina Elia/Vinci: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) (90%) Gagliardi/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) Dementieva/Sugiyama: 3 events, 0 titles, 7Ð1 record (88%) Krizan/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Hantuchova/Sugiyama: 12 events, 1 title, 27Ð11 record Medina Garrigues/Vinci: 2 events, 1 title, 4Ð1 record (80%) (71%) Santangelo/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð0 record (100%) Jankovic/Sugiyama: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Schiavone/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kim/Sugiyama: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Srebotnik/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Likhovtseva/Sugiyama: 3 events, 0 titles, 0Ð3 record (0%) Talaja/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Morita/Sugiyama: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Testud/Vinci: 4 events, 0 titles, 2Ð4 record (33%) Myskina/Sugiyama: 2 events, 0 titles, 0Ð2 record (0%) Vinci/Voskoboeva: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Hao/Sun: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Vinci/Zanchetta: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Li Na/Sun: 15 events, 2 titles, 28Ð13 record (68%) Benesova/Voskoboeva: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Vinci/Voskoboeva: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) T Benesova/Talaja: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) W Kirilenko/Talaja: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Bartoli/Washington: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Talaja/Vinci: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Huber/Washington: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Bartoli/Tanasugarn: 2 events, 0 titles, 1Ð2 record (33%) Gagliardi/Weingärtner: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Daniilidou/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Loit/Woehr: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Dragomir Ilie/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record Tanasugarn/Woehr: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) (50%) Myskina/Wozniacki: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Fujiwara/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Grande/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Y Karatantcheva/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record Kirilenko/Yakimova: 1 event, 0 titles, 4Ð0 record (100%) (0%) Loit/Yan: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Kirilenko/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Yan/Zheng: 17 events, 3 titles, 32Ð13 record (71%) Kurhajcova/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Loit/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Z Luangnam/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Vinci/Zanchetta: 1 event, 0 titles, 2Ð1 record (67%) Pratt/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Krizan/Zheng: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Serna/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Sromova/Zheng: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Srebotnik/Tanasugarn: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Yan/Zheng: 17 events, 3 titles, 32Ð13 record (71%) Tanasugarn/Woehr: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Farina Elia/Zvonareva: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Kirilenko/Tatarkova: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Golovin/Zvonareva: 1 event, 0 titles, 0Ð1 record (0%) Testud/Vaideanu: 1 event, 0 titles, 1Ð1 record (50%) Likhovtseva/Zvonareva: 11 events, 1 title, 26Ð10 record Testud/Vinci: 4 events, 0 titles, 2Ð4 record (33%) (72%) Benesova/Tu: 2 events, 0 titles, 2Ð2 record (50%) Myskina/Zvonareva: 3 events, 0 titles, 6Ð3 record (67%)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 211 Team and Individual Doubles Statistics Doubles Winning Percentages for the Top Teams (All teams include at least one Highlight player. Minimum three events; sorted by winning percentage) Team Won Lost Win% Events Played Events Won Event Win% Loit/Srebotnik 12 0 100.0% 3 3 100.0% Ruano Pascual/Suárez 18 2 90.0% 5 3 60.0% Dementieva/Sugiyama 7 1 87.5% 3 0 0.0% Dementieva/Pennetta 11 2 84.6% 4 1 25.0% Raymond/Stosur 26 6 81.3% 11 5 45.5% Kuznetsova/Molik 17 4 81.0% 6 2 33.3% Black/Stubbs 27 8 77.1% 11 3 27.3% Petrova/Shaughnessy 18 6 75.0% 7 0 0.0% Bartoli/Grönefeld 12 4 75.0% 6 1 16.7% Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 9 3 75.0% 5 1 20.0% Kirilenko/Salerni 9 3 75.0% 3 0 0.0% Loit/Pratt 9 3 75.0% 4 1 25.0% Likhovtseva/Maleeva 6 2 75.0% 3 1 33.3% Black/Huber 29 10 74.4% 12 2 16.7% Grönefeld/Navratilova 16 6 72.7% 7 1 14.3% Likhovtseva/Zvonareva 26 10 72.2% 11 1 9.1% Martinez/Ruano Pascual 26 10 72.2% 12 2 16.7% Dulko/Kirilenko 10 4 71.4% 5 1 20.0% Yan/Zheng 32 13 71.1% 17 3 17.6% Hantuchova/Sugiyama 27 11 71.1% 12 1 8.3% Asagoe/Srebotnik 20 9 69.0% 10 1 10.0% Li Ting/Sun 28 13 68.3% 15 2 13.3% Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna 28 14 66.7% 15 1 6.7% Peschke/Schiavone 8 4 66.7% 5 0 0.0% Myskina/Zvonareva 6 3 66.7% 3 0 0.0% Stewart/Stosur 20 11 64.5% 13 2 15.4% Raymond/Stubbs 16 9 64.0% 10 1 10.0% Morariu/Schnyder 10 6 62.5% 6 0 0.0% Husarova/Martinez 5 3 62.5% 3 0 0.0% Benesova/Peschke 13 8 61.9% 9 1 11.1% Davenport/Morariu 8 5 61.5% 5 0 0.0% Bovina/Dementieva 4 3 57.1% 3 0 0.0% Dulko/Vento-Kabchi 9 10 47.4% 10 0 0.0% Domachowska/Kirilenko 3 4 42.9% 4 0 0.0% McShea/Stewart 3 4 42.9% 4 0 0.0% Daniilidou/Pratt 4 6 40.0% 6 0 0.0% Salerni/Vento-Kabchi 3 5 37.5% 5 0 0.0% Testud/Vinci 2 4 33.3% 4 0 0.0% Callens/McShea 1 3 25.0% 3 0 0.0% Callens/Tu 1 3 25.0% 3 0 0.0% Gagliardi/Jankovic 1 3 25.0% 3 0 0.0% Schett/Schnyder 1 3 25.0% 3 0 0.0% Gagliardi/Salerni 0 3 0.0% 3 0 0.0% Likhovtseva/Sugiyama 0 3 0.0% 3 0 0.0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 212 Tournament Winning Percentages for the Top Teams As above, each team must include a highlight player, and each team must have at least three events. Team Events Wins Winning% Loit/Srebotnik 3 3 100.0% Ruano Pascual/Suárez 5 3 60.0% Raymond/Stosur 11 5 45.5% Kuznetsova/Molik 6 2 33.3% Likhovtseva/Maleeva 3 1 33.3% Black/Stubbs 11 3 27.3% Dementieva/Pennetta 4 1 25.0% Loit/Pratt 4 1 25.0% Dulko/Kirilenko 5 1 20.0% Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 5 1 20.0% Yan/Zheng 17 3 17.6% Black/Huber 12 2 16.7% Martinez/Ruano Pascual 12 2 16.7% Bartoli/Grönefeld 6 1 16.7% Stewart/Stosur 13 2 15.4% Grönefeld/Navratilova 7 1 14.3% Li Ting/Sun 15 2 13.3% Benesova/Peschke 9 1 11.1% Asagoe/Srebotnik 10 1 10.0% Raymond/Stubbs 10 1 10.0% Likhovtseva/Zvonareva 11 1 9.1% Hantuchova/Sugiyama 12 1 8.3% Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna 15 1 6.7% Dulko/Vento-Kabchi 10 0 0.0% Petrova/Shaughnessy 7 0 0.0% Daniilidou/Pratt 6 0 0.0% Morariu/Schnyder 6 0 0.0% Davenport/Morariu 5 0 0.0% Peschke/Schiavone 5 0 0.0% Salerni/Vento-Kabchi 5 0 0.0% Domachowska/Kirilenko 4 0 0.0% McShea/Stewart 4 0 0.0% Testud/Vinci 4 0 0.0% Bovina/Dementieva 3 0 0.0% Callens/McShea 3 0 0.0% Callens/Tu 3 0 0.0% Dementieva/Sugiyama 3 0 0.0% Gagliardi/Jankovic 3 0 0.0% Gagliardi/Salerni 3 0 0.0% Husarova/Martinez 3 0 0.0% Kirilenko/Salerni 3 0 0.0% Likhovtseva/Sugiyama 3 0 0.0% Myskina/Zvonareva 3 0 0.0% Schett/Schnyder 3 0 0.0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 213 Doubles Winning Percentages for the Top Players Player WTA Rank # of Partners Events Won Lost Winning% Suárez 17 1 5 18 2 90.0% Loit 29 11 17 39 11 78.0% Ruano Pascual 4 4 19 48 14 77.4% Black 1 3 24 60 18 76.9% Kuznetsova 8 6 11 23 8 74.2% Raymond 3 2 21 42 15 73.7% Srebotnik 25 7 18 38 14 73.1% Dementieva 18 5 13 24 9 72.7% Molik 12 7 12 24 9 72.7% Petrova 33 3 9 18 7 72.0% Stosur 2 3 25 46 18 71.9% Huber 6 4 15 33 13 71.7% Stubbs 5 2 21 43 17 71.7% Shaughnessy 19 4 14 27 11 71.1% Pennetta 22 5 9 17 7 70.8% Grönefeld 11 6 21 38 16 70.4% Likhovtseva 7 7 23 45 19 70.3% Hantuchova 13 5 18 37 16 69.8% Zheng 30 3 19 34 15 69.4% Li Ting 36 3 17 31 14 68.9% Zvonareva 10 4 16 33 15 68.8% Medina Garrigues 20 5 20 39 18 68.4% Sun 36 2 16 28 14 66.7% Martinez 9 6 20 36 18 66.7% Kirilenko 27 12 21 35 18 66.0% Sugiyama 14 7 23 35 20 63.6% Peschke 16 11 26 38 22 63.3% Asagoe 23 9 20 31 18 63.3% Saﬁna 28 5 20 32 19 62.7% Bartoli 47 8 15 20 12 62.5% Davenport 49 158561.5% Navratilova 21 7 15 22 14 61.1% Husarova 51 8 11 14 9 60.9% Dulko 26 7 21 27 18 60.0% Morariu 15 7 17 23 17 57.5% Myskina 39 10 14 16 12 57.1% Bovina 142 245455.6% Schnyder 32 6 13 16 13 55.2% Gagliardi 54 15 19 19 16 54.3% Vento-Kabchi 35 8 24 25 23 52.1% Vinci 74 11 16 14 13 51.9% Pratt 40 11 20 20 19 51.3% Stewart 24 8 24 23 22 51.1% Pierce 119 577750.0% Benesova 38 16 26 21 25 45.7% Callens 78 10 15 11 14 44.0% Tanasugarn 127 14 15 8 15 34.8%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 214 Doubles Tournament Winning Percentage for the Top Players Player Rank # of Partners Events Titles Title Win% Suárez 17 15360.0% Loit 29 11 17 6 35.3% Raymond 3 2 21 6 28.6% Stosur 2 3 25 7 28.0% Ruano Pascual 4 4 19 5 26.3% Black 1 3 24 6 25.0% Molik 12 7 12 3 25.0% Srebotnik 25 7 18 4 22.2% Stubbs 5 2 21 4 19.0% Kuznetsova 8 6 11 2 18.2% Likhovtseva 7 7 23 4 17.4% Zheng 30 3 19 3 15.8% Dulko 26 7 21 3 14.3% Grönefeld 11 6 21 3 14.3% Myskina 39 10 14 2 14.3% Huber 6 4 15 2 13.3% Sun 36 2 16 2 12.5% Li Ting 36 3 17 2 11.8% Hantuchova 13 5 18 2 11.1% Pennetta 22 59111.1% Gagliardi 54 15 19 2 10.5% Asagoe 23 9 20 2 10.0% Martinez 9 6 20 2 10.0% Medina Garrigues 20 5 20 2 10.0% Husarova 51 8 11 1 9.1% Stewart 24 8 24 2 8.3% Peschke 16 11 26 2 7.7% Dementieva 18 5 13 1 7.7% Shaughnessy 19 4 14 1 7.1% Bartoli 47 8 15 1 6.7% Callens 78 10 15 1 6.7% Navratilova 21 7 15 1 6.7% Vinci 74 11 16 1 6.3% Zvonareva 10 4 16 1 6.3% Pratt 40 11 20 1 5.0% Saﬁna 28 5 20 1 5.0% Kirilenko 27 12 21 1 4.8% Sugiyama 14 7 23 1 4.3% Vento-Kabchi 35 8 24 1 4.2% Benesova 38 16 26 1 3.8% Davenport 49 1500.0% Morariu 15 7 17 0 0.0% Petrova 33 3900.0% Pierce 119 5700.0% Schnyder 32 6 13 0 0.0% Tanasugarn 127 14 15 0 0.0%

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 215 Individual Doubles Statistical Leaders Top Ten, Most Wins: Top Ten, Most Partners 1 Black (60) (of the highlight players): 2 Ruano Pascual (48) 1 Benesova (16) 3 Stosur (46) 2 Gagliardi (15) 4 Likhovtseva (45) 3 Tanasugarn (14) 5 Stubbs (43) 4 Kirilenko (12) 6 Raymond (42) 5T Loit (11) 7T Loit (39) 5T Peschke (11) 7T Medina Garrigues (39) 5T Pratt (11) 9T Grönefeld (38) 5T Vinci (11) 9T Peschke (38) 9T Callens (10) 9T Srebotnik (38) 9T Myskina (10)

Top Ten, Most Matches Played: Highlight players with only one partner: 1 Black (78) Clijsters (1 event, with Els Callens) 2T Likhovtseva (64) Davenport (5 events, with Corina Morariu) 2T Stosur (64) Sanchez-Vicario (1 event, with M. Navratilova) 4 Ruano Pascual (62) Schett (3 events, with Patty Schnyder) 5T Peschke (60) Suárez (5 events, with Virginia Ruano Pascual) 5T Stubbs (60) 7T Medina Garrigues (57) Highest Partner Turnover Rate 7T Raymond (57) (# of Partners divided by # of Events — 9 Sugiyama (55) minimum 3 events) 10T Grönefeld (54) 1 Tanasugarn (0.93) 10T Martinez (54) 2 Gagliardi (0.79) 3 Husarova (0.73) Top Ten, Matches Per Tournament: 4T Myskina (0.71) 1 Suárez (4.00) 4T Pierce (0.71) 2 Ruano Pascual (3.26) 6 Vinci (0.69) 3 Black (3.25) 7 Callens (0.67) 4 Huber (3.07) 8 Loit (0.65) 5 Zvonareva (3.00) 9 Benesova (0.62) 6 Hantuchova (2.94) 10 Molik (0.58) 7 Loit (2.94) 8 Srebotnik (2.89) 9 Stubbs (2.86) 10 Medina Garrigues (2.85)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 216 Doubles Tournament Winners by Date (Smaller Events) List includes all Tier III, IV, and V events, plus Challengers of the $50K or higher level. Players shown in bold won both singles and doubles at the event listed. 2004 7/10 Cuneo $50K+H Koryttseva/Voskoboeva Date Event Tier Winners 7/10 College Park $50K Argeri/Sobral 11/21 Deauville $50K Nemeth/Obziler 7/17 Modena IV Beygelzimer/Jugic-Salkic 11/21 Tucson $50K Dekmiejere/Uhlirova 7/17 Vittel $50K Sromova/Voracova 11/28 Poitiers $75K Cohen-Aloro/Sfar 7/17 Louisville $50K Dziamidzenka/Perianu 12/5 Palm Beach Gd$50K Dekmeijere/Miyagi 7/24 Cincinnati III Granville/Spears 12/19 Bergamo $50K Casoni/Lubiani 7/24 Palermo IV Casoni/Koryttseva 7/24 Petange $50K Beygelzmer/Kloesel 2005 7/31 Budapest IV Loit/Srebotnik 7/31 Lexington $50K Castellvi/Reeves Date Event Tier Winners 8/7 Washington $75K Antypina/Poutchek 1/8 Gold Coast III Likhovtseva/Maleeva 8/7 Martina Franca$50K Gubacsi/Koryttseva 1/8 Auckland IV Asagoe/Srebotnik 8/14 Stockholm IV Loit/Srebotnik 1/15 Canberra IV Garbin/Krizan 8/14 Rimini $50K Casoni/Koryttseva 1/15 Hobart IV Yan/Zheng 8/21 Bronx $50K Li/Sun 1/30 Waikoloa $50K Grandin/Smashey 8/27 Forest Hills IV NO DOUBLES 2/6 Pattaya City III Bartoli/Grönefeld 9/11 Denain $75K Hradecka/Uhlirova 2/6 Ortisei $75K Jugic-Salkic/Jurak 9/11 Beijing II $50K Arai/Kim 2/12 Hyderabad IV Yan/Zheng 9/18 Bali III Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 2/13 Midland $75K Beygelzimer/McCain 9/18 Bordeaux $75K M. J. Martinez/ 2/20 Memphis III Saeki/Yoshida Martinez Granados 2/20 Bogota III Gagliardi/Pisnik 9/25 Kolkata III Likhovtseva/Myskina 2/27 Acapulco III Jidkova/Perebiynis 9/25 Portoroz IV Medina Garrigues/Vinci 2/27 Saint Paul $50K Beygelzimer/Kloesel 9/25 Jounieh $75K+H Ditty/Sequera 2/27 Bendigo $50K Dell’Acqua/Musgrave 9/25 Albuquerque $75K Koryttseva/Yakimova 3/20 Orange $50K Gullickson/Hopkins 10/2 GuangZhou III Camerin/Gagliardi 4/10 Dinan $75K Krajicek/Szavay 10/2 Seoul IV Chan/Chuang 4/24 Dothan $75K Gullickson/Voskoboeva 10/2 Biella $50K+H Hradecka/Voracova 5/1 Estoril IV Li/Sun 10/2 Ashland $50K Ashley/Frazier 5/1 Cagnes sur Mer$75K Beygelzimer/Kloesel 10/2 Batumi $50K Ostrovskaya/Yakimova 5/1 Lafayette $50K Sekulovski/Watson 10/9 Japan Open III Dulko/Kirilenko 5/8 Rabat IV Loit/Strycova 10/9 Tashkent III Camerin/Loit 5/8 Raleigh $75K Harkleroad/Lee-Waters 10/9 Barcelona $75K+H Dominguez Lino/ 5/8 Gifu $50K Fujiwara/Obata Sanchez Lorenzo 5/15 Prague IV Loit/Pratt 10/9 Troy $50K Ditty/Sequera 5/15 St. Gaudens $50K Curran/Grandin 10/9 Juarez $50K Argeri/Sobral 5/15 Charlottesville$50K Harkleroad/Lee-Waters 10/16 Bangkok III Asagoe/Dulko 5/15 Fukuoka $50K Chan/Chuang 10/16 Touraine $50K Kostanic/Mezak 5/22 Strasbourg III Andres/Vanc 10/16 San Francisco $50K Cargill/Snyder 5/22 Istanbul III Marrero/Ant. Serra Zanetti 10/23 Saint-Raphael $50K Hradecka/Zahlavova 6/5 Prostejov $75K Beygelzimer/Santangelo 10/23 Houston $50K Fusano/Kops-Jones 6/12 Birmingham III Hantuchova/Sugiyama 10/30 Hasselt III Loit/Srebotnik 6/12 Zagreb $75K Hradecka/Uhlirova 11/7 Quebec City III Rodionova/Vesnina 6/12 Marseille $50K+H Dekmeijere/Dhenin 11/7 Busan $50K Prakusya/Voroboeva 6/12 Beijing I $50K Yan/Zheng 11/13 Pittsburg $75K Ashley/Gullickson 6/18 ’s-HertogenboschIII Medina Garrigues/Safina 11/13 Shenzhen $50K Hsieh/Yan 7/3 Fano $75K G. Navratilova/Pastikova 7/3 Los Gatos $50K Ashley/Gullickson

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 217 Team Doubles Titles, Sorted from Most to Least Although the only teams listed are those with WTA titles, their titles at $50K and larger Challengers are also shown. Team Titles Won (Tier) # of Titles Raymond/Stosur New Haven (II), U. S. Open (Slam), Luxembourg (II), 5 Moscow (I), Los Angeles Championships (Championships) Black/Stubbs Stanford (II), Zürich (I), Philadelphia (II) 3 Loit/Srebotnik Budapest (IV), Stockholm (IV), Hasselt (III) 3 Ruano Pascual/Suárez Dubai (II), Indian Wells (I), Roland Garros (Slam) 3 Black/Huber Rome (I), Wimbledon (Slam) 2 Kuznetsova/Molik Australian Open (Slam), Miami (I) 2 Martinez/Ruano Pascual Charleston (I), San Diego (I) 2 Stewart/Stosur Sydney (II), Amelia Island (II) 2 Yan/Zheng Hobart (IV), Hyderabad (IV), Beijing $50K I 2 Andres/Vanc Strasbourg (III) 1 Asagoe/Dulko Bangkok (III) 1 Asagoe/Srebotnik Auckland (IV) 1 Bartoli/Grönefeld Pattaya City (III) 1 Benesova/Peschke Paris (II) 1 Beygelzimer/Jugic-Salkic Modena (IV) 1 Black/Callens Antwerp (II) 1 Camerin/Gagliardi GuangZhou (III) 1 Camerin/Loit Tashkent (IV) 1 Casoni/Koryttseva Palermo (IV), Rimini $50K+H 1 Chan/Chuang Seoul (IV) 1 Dementieva/Pennetta Los Angeles (II) 1 Dulko/Kirilenko Japan Open (III) 1 Dulko/Peschke Linz (II) 1 Gagliardi/Pisnik Bogota (III) 1 Garbin/Krizan Canberra (IV) 1 Granville/Spears Cincinnati (III) 1 Grönefeld/Navratilova Canadian Open (I) 1 Grönefeld/Shaughnessy Bali (III) 1 Hantuchova/Myskina Filderstadt (II) 1 Hantuchova/Sugiyama Birmingham (III) 1 Husarova/Likhovtseva Pan Paciﬁc (I) 1 Jidkova/Perebiynis Acapulco (III) 1 Li/Sun Estoril (IV), Bronx $50K 1 Likhovtseva/Maleeva Gold Coast (III) 1 Likhovtseva/Myskina Kolkata (III) 1 Likhovtseva/Zvonareva Berlin (I) 1 Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi Beijing (II) 1 Loit/Pratt Prague (IV) 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 218 Loit/Strycova Rabat (IV) 1 Marrero/Ant. Serra Zanetti Istanbul (III) 1 Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna ’s-Hertogenbosch (III) 1 Medina Garrigues/Vinci Portotoz (IV) 1 Molik/Schiavone Doha (II) 1 Perebiynis/Strycova Warsaw (II) 1 Raymond/Stubbs Eastbourne (II) 1 Rodionova/Vesnina Quebec City (III) 1 Saeki/Yoshida Memphis (III) 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 219 Individual Doubles Titles, Sorted from Most to Least Note: Only players with WTA doubles titles are listed, but their titles at $50K and larger Challengers are included in the list. Player Titles Won (Tier) # of Titles Stosur Sydney (II), Amelia Island (II), New Haven (II), U. S. Open (Slam), 7 Luxembourg (II), Moscow (I), Los Angeles Championships (Champ) Black Antwerp (II), Rome (I), Wimbledon (I), Stanford (II), Zürich (I), 6 Philadelphia (II) Loit Rabat (IV), Prague (IV), Budapest (IV), Stockholm (IV), Tashkent 6 (IV), Hasselt (III) Raymond Eastbourne (II), New Haven (II), U. S. Open (Slam), Luxembourg (II), 6 Moscow (I), Los Angeles Championships (Champ) Ruano Pascual Dubai (II), Indian Wells (I), Charleston (I), Roland Garros (Slam), San 5 Diego (I) Likhovtseva Gold Coast (III), Pan Pacific (I), Berlin (I), Kolkata (III) 4 Srebotnik Auckland (IV), Budapest (IV), Stockholm (IV), Hasselt (III) 4 Stubbs Eastbourne (II), Stanford (II), Zürich (I), Philadelphia (II) 4 Dulko Japan Open (III), Bangkok (III), Linz (II) 3 Grönefeld Pattaya City (III), Canadian Open (I), Bali (III) 3 Molik Australian Open (Slam), Doha (II), Miami (I) 3 Suárez Dubai (II), Indian Wells (I), Roland Garros (Slam) 3 Asagoe Auckland (IV), Bangkok (III) 2 Camerin GuangZhou (III), Tashkent (IV) 2 Gagliardi Bogota (III), GuangZhou (III) 2 Hantuchova Birmingham (III), Filderstadt (II) 2 Huber Rome (I), Wimbledon (I) 2 Kuznetsova Australian Open (Slam), Miami (I) 2 Martinez Charleston (I), San Diego (I) 2 Medina Garrigues ’s-Hertogenbosch (III), Portoroz (IV) 2 Myskina Kolkata (III), Filderstadt (II) 2 Perebiynis Acapulco (III), Warsaw (II) 2 Peschke Paris (II), Linz (II) 2 Stewart Sydney (II), Amelia Island (II) 2 Strycova Ortisei $75K, Warsaw (II), Rabat (IV) 2 Yan Hobart (IV), Hyderabad (IV), Beijing $50K I, Shenzhen $50K 2 Zheng Hobart (IV), Hyderabad (IV), Beijing $50K I 2 Andres Strasbourg (III) 1 Bartoli Pattaya City (III) 1 Benesova Paris (II) 1 Beygelzimer Midland $75K, Saint Paul $50K, Cagnes Sur Mer $75K, Prostejov 1 $75K, Modena (IV), Petange $50K Callens Antwerp (II) 1 Casoni Bergamo $50K, Palermo (IV), Rimini $50K+H 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 220 Chan Seoul (IV) 1 Chuang Seoul (IV) 1 Dementieva Los Angeles (II) 1 Garbin Canberra (IV) 1 Granville Cincinnati (III) 1 Husarova Pan Pacific (I) 1 Jidkova Acapulco (III) 1 Jugic-Salkic Modena (IV), 1 Kirilenko Japan Open (III) 1 Koryttseva Cuneo $50K+H, Palermo (IV), Martina Franca $50K, Rimini 1 $50K+H, Jounieh $75K+H Krizan Canberra (IV) 1 Li Ting Estoril (IV), Bronx $50K ($50K) 1 Llagostera Vives Beijing (II) 1 Maleeva Gold Coast (III) 1 Marrero Istanbul (III) 1 Navratilova Canadian Open (I) 1 Pennetta Los Angeles (II) 1 Pisnik Ortisei $75K, Bogota (III) 1 Pratt Prague (IV) 1 Rodionova Quebec City (III) 1 Saeki Memphis (III) 1 Safina ’s-Hertogenbosch (III) 1 Schiavone Doha (II) 1 Serra Zanetti, Antonell Istanbul (III) 1 Shaughnessy Bali (III) 1 Spears Cincinnai (III) 1 Sugiyama Birmingham (III) 1 Sun Estoril (IV), Bronx $50K 1 Vanc Saint-Gaudens $50K, Fano $50K, Strasbourg (III) 1 Vento-Kabchi Beijing (II) 1 Vesnina Quebec City (III) 1 Vinci Portoroz (IV) 1 Yoshida Memphis (III) 1 Zvonareva Berlin (I) 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 221 Doubles Tournament Winners by Date (High-Tier Events) Players shown in bold also won the singles at these tournaments. Only Tier II and higher events are shown. Tournament Tier Winner Sydney II Stewart/Stosur Australian Open Slam Kuznetsova/Molik Tokyo (Pan Paciﬁc) I Husarova/Likhovtseva Paris II Benesova/Peschke Antwerp II Black/Callens Doha II Molik/Schiavone Dubai II Ruano Pascual/Suárez Indian Wells I Ruano Pascual/Suárez Miami I Kuznetsova/Molik Amelia Island II Stewart/Stosur Charleston I Martinez/Ruano Pascual Warsaw II Perebiynis/Strycova Berlin I Likhovtseva/Zvonareva Rome I Black/Huber Roland Garros Slam Ruano Pasucal/Suárez Eastbourne II Raymond/Stubbs Wimbledon Slam Black/Huber Stanford II Black/Stubbs San Diego I Martinez/Ruano Pascual Los Angeles II Dementieva/Pennetta Canadian Open I Grönefeld/Navratilova New Haven II Raymond/Stosur U.S. Open Slam Raymond/Stosur Beijing II Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi Luxembourg II Raymond/Stosur Filderstadt II Hantuchova/Myskina Moscow I Raymond/Stosur Zürich I Black/Stubbs Linz II Dulko/Peschke Philadelphia II Black/Stubbs Los Angeles Champ Champ Raymond/Stosur

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 222 Alternate Doubles Rankings For explanations of the first two rankings, see the equivalent section in singles, which include similar alternate rankings. There are several reasons why we compute fewer alternate rankings for doubles. The most notable reason is that quality points are far less important in doubles, constituting roughly 20% of a typical player’s total, rather than nearly 40% as in singles (observe the astonishing fact, e.g., that in 2004 Virginia Ruano Pascual and Paola Suárez earned exactly the same scores for winning the Australian Open, Roland Garros, and the U. S. Open — 786 points each time. This is at least 200 points less than a singles winner would earn, and the difference is all quality points; the fact that the numbers are the same at each event is a testament to the fact that the highest possible ranking for a doubles team is #3, and most end up ranked in the #121-#250 or #251-#500 brackets). We calculate the divisor ranking because it’s the simplest per-tournament ranking available; we calculate the divisor with no minimum because, in recent years, the best doubles players — Hingis, Davenport, Kournikova, the Williams Sisters; this year, we can even add Suárez — didn’t play full schedules. Though the other side of this coin is, a lot of players now play only or mostly Slams, or on their favorite surfaces, which helps them unduly; that is why Suárez, e.g., and also Mauresmo, come out so strong. There is probably some balance point, but with the changes coming to the system next year, it didn’t seem worthwhile to pursue it this year. Note: The WTA has a tradition of getting the doubles rankings wrong — that is, of having the year-end rankings disagree with the total points awarded week by week; they presumably are making corrections after the fact, and they never, ever announce this unless confronted by someone who knows exactly where the change occurred (in which case one hardly needs to ask). Last year, the error was fully 75 points for Tamarine Tanasugarn. This year, I didn’t spot any errors of more than one point. But that means there could be an error somewhere beyond the decimal point in some of these numbers. It’s unlikely to affect anything — but I can’t bring myself to like it.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 223 Rankings under the 1996 Ranking System (Divisor, Minimum 14) 1996 Rank Player Points Tournaments Score WTA Rank 1 Ruano Pascual, Virginia 3732 19 196.4 4 2 Black, Cara 4493 24 187.2 1 3 Raymond, Lisa 3706 21 176.5 3 4 Huber, Liezel 2534 15 168.9 6 5 Stosur, Samantha 3881 25 155.2 2 6Kuznetsova, Svetlana 2079 11 148.5 8 7 Stubbs, Rennae 3102 21 147.7 5 8Zvonareva, Vera 2277 16 142.3 10 9Molik, Alicia 1928 12 137.7 12 10 Martinez, Conchita 2453 20 122.7 9 11 Likhovtseva, Elena 2770 23 120.4 7 12 Suárez, Paola 1650 5 117.9 17 13 Dementieva, Elena 1638 13 117.0 18 14 Hantuchova, Daniela 2182 19 114.8 13 15 Shaughnessy, Meghann 1519 14 108.5 19 16 Morariu, Corina 1775 17 104.4 15 17 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 2168 21 103.2 11 18 Navratilova, Martina 1481 15 98.7 21 19 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 1863 20 93.2 20 20 Sugiyama, Ai 2020 23 87.8 14 21 Srebotnik, Katarina 1573 18 87.4 25 22 Pennetta, Flavia 1428 18 79.3 22 23 Asagoe, Shinobu 1560 20 78.0 23 24 Loit, Emilie 1315 17 77.4 29 25 Schnyder, Patty 1076 13 76.9 32 Petrova, Nadia 1068 9 76.3 33 Saﬁna, Dinara 1491 20 74.6 28 Peschke, Kveta 1856 26 71.4 16 Dulko, Gisela 1393 21 66.3 26 Zheng Jie 1250 19 65.8 30 Myskina, Anastasia 915 14 65.4 39 Kirilenko, Maria 1372.25 21 65.3 27 Li Ting 1035.5 16 64.7 36 Sun Tiantian 1002.5 16 62.7 36 Stewart, Bryanne 1386 24 57.8 24 Yan Zi 1249.5 22 56.8 31 Davenport, Lindsay 786 5 56.1 49 Bartoli, Marion 836 15 55.7 47 Husarova, Janette 752 11 53.7 51 Vento-Kabchi, Maria 1247 24 52.0 35 Mauresmo, Amélie 650 3 46.4 64 Pratt, Nicole 917 20 45.9 40 Gagliardi, Emmanuelle 750 19 39.5 54 Benesova, Iveta 967 26 37.2 38 Callens, Els 504.75 15 33.7 78 Vinci, Roberta 536 16 33.5 74 Tanasugarn, Tamarine 301 15 20.1 127

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 224 Doubles Points Per Tournament, No Minimum Divisor Divisor Rank Player Points Tournaments Score WTA Rank 1 Suárez, Paola 1650 5 330.0 17 2Mauresmo, Amélie 650 3 216.7 64 3 Ruano Pascual, Virginia 3732 19 196.4 4 4Kuznetsova, Svetlana 2079 11 189.0 8 5 Black, Cara 4493 24 187.2 1 6 Raymond, Lisa 3706 21 176.5 3 7 Huber, Liezel 2534 15 168.9 6 8Molik, Alicia 1928 12 160.7 12 9Davenport, Lindsay 786 5 157.2 49 10 Stosur, Samantha 3881 25 155.2 2 11 Stubbs, Rennae 3102 21 147.7 5 12 Zvonareva, Vera 2277 16 142.3 10 13 Dementieva, Elena 1638 13 126.0 18 14 Martinez, Conchita 2453 20 122.7 9 15 Likhovtseva, Elena 2770 23 120.4 7 16 Petrova, Nadia 1068 9 118.7 33 17 Hantuchova, Daniela 2182 19 114.8 13 18 Shaughnessy, Meghann 1519 14 108.5 19 19 Morariu, Corina 1775 17 104.4 15 20 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 2168 21 103.2 11 21 Navratilova, Martina 1481 15 98.7 21 22 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 1863 20 93.2 20 23 Sugiyama, Ai 2020 23 87.8 14 24 Srebotnik, Katarina 1573 18 87.4 25 25 Schnyder, Patty 1076 13 82.8 32 Pennetta, Flavia 1428 18 79.3 22 Asagoe, Shinobu 1560 20 78.0 23 Loit, Emilie 1315 17 77.4 29 Saﬁna, Dinara 1491 20 74.6 28 Peschke, Kveta 1856 26 71.4 16 Husarova, Janette 752 11 68.4 51 Dulko, Gisela 1393 21 66.3 26 Zheng Jie 1250 19 65.8 30 Myskina, Anastasia 915 14 65.4 39 Kirilenko, Maria 1372.25 21 65.3 27 Li Ting 1035.5 16 64.7 36 Sun Tiantian 1002.5 16 62.7 36 Bovina, Elena 241 4 60.3 142 Stewart, Bryanne 1386 24 57.8 24 Yan Zi 1249.5 22 56.8 31 Bartoli, Marion 836 15 55.7 47 Vento-Kabchi, Maria 1247 24 52.0 35 Pierce, Mary 321 7 45.9 119 Pratt, Nicole 917 20 45.9 40 Gagliardi, Emmanuelle 750 19 39.5 54 Benesova, Iveta 967 26 37.2 38 Callens, Els 504.75 15 33.7 78

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 225 Quality Points Per Event (Best Eleven Events) We said above that quality points don’t mean much in doubles, and they don’t. And it’s very hard to calculate quality numbers. But we’ll give it a try. What we will do is take the quality points from the player’s best eleven (as supplied by the WTA), and then divide by an adjusted number of tournaments. If the player in fact has 11 or fewer events, we’ll just divide by 11. If the player has more than eleven, we’ll subtract half an event for each event over 11, and divide by that. Doing that gives this somewhat surprising list — note Black falling out of the Top Ten!: Qual Rank Player Best 11 Q Pts Events Score WTA Rank 1 Suárez, Paola 333 5 66.6 17 2 Raymond, Lisa 562 21 35.1 3 3Mauresmo, Amélie 105 3 35.0 64 4 Stosur, Samantha 614 25 34.1 2 5 Ruano Pascual, Virginia 472 19 31.5 4 6Molik, Alicia 311 12 27.0 12 7Kuznetsova, Svetlana 288 11 26.2 8 8 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 330 21 20.6 11 9 Hantuchova, Daniela 303 19 20.2 13 10 Dementieva, Elena 238 13 19.8 18 11 Stubbs, Rennae 309 21 19.3 5 12 Black, Cara 320 24 18.3 1 13 Navratilova, Martina 230 15 17.7 21 14 Schnyder, Patty 195 13 16.3 32 15 Zvonareva, Vera 219 16 16.2 10 16 Sugiyama, Ai 273 23 16.1 14 17 Huber, Liezel 208 15 16.0 6 18 Peschke, Kveta 285 26 15.4 16 19 Morariu, Corina 202 17 14.4 15 20 Pennetta, Flavia 189 18 13.0 22 Dulko, Gisela 208 21 13.0 26 Davenport, Lindsay 62 5 12.4 49 Asagoe, Shinobu 189 20 12.2 23 Srebotnik, Katarina 176 18 12.1 25 Likhovtseva, Elena 201 23 11.8 7 Stewart, Bryanne 206 24 11.8 24 Bartoli, Marion 146 15 11.2 47 Martinez, Conchita 170 20 11.0 9 Zheng Jie 143 19 9.5 30 Sun Tiantian 128 16 9.5 36 Li Ting 128 16 9.5 36 Shaughnessy, Meghann 116 14 9.3 19 Petrova, Nadia 83 9 9.2 33 Yan Zi 146 22 8.8 31 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 135 20 8.7 20 Kirilenko, Maria 122 21 7.6 27 Myskina, Anastasia 94 14 7.5 39 Vento-Kabchi, Maria 114 24 6.5 35 Loit, Emilie 91 17 6.5 29 Saﬁna, Dinara 84 20 5.4 28 Benesova, Iveta 89 26 4.8 38 Husarova, Janette 50 11 4.5 51

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 226 Majors Ranking In the singles section (page 62), we defined the ten WTA “Majors” (tournaments effectively all the top players play): Sydney, Australian Open, Ericsson, Rome, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, San Diego, U. S. Open, Filderstadt, and the year-end Championships. We can apply the same “majors ranking” in doubles: Five points for a title at these events, three for a final, one for a semifinal. If we do this, we can rank both teams and individuals. To put this in perspective, Martina Hingis’s Grand Slam year of 1998 earned her 36 points — 26 with Novotna, 5 with Lucic, 5 with Sukova. In 2004, we had two teams each with 23 points: Black/Stubbs and Ruano Pascual/Suárez. In 2003, the co-leaders were Kim Clijsters and Ai Sugiyama, with 23 points earned together; in 2002, it was Suárez alone, with 25 points (21 with Ruano Pascual and four with others). The 2001 leader was Lisa Raymond, with 28 points (22 with Stubbs and six with others). We start with the team rankings: Doubles Team Majors Rankings 22 teams managed at least one Major showing. The following table shows both the team ranking and the results in the various events. Tournament Rank Team Total Syd AO Mia Ro RG Wim SD USO Fild Chm 1 Black/Huber 13 5 3 5 2T Kuznetsova/Molik 10 5 5 2T Raymond/Stosur 10 5 5 4Martinez/Ruano Pascual 8 1 5 1 1 5T Ruano Pascual/Suárez 6 1 5 5T Stewart/Stosur 6 5 1 6 Hantuchova/Myskina 5 5 7 Black/Stubbs 4 1 3 8T Davenport/Morariu 3 3 8T Dementieva/Pennetta 3 3 8T Dementieva/Sugiyama 3 3 8T Hantuchova/Sugiyama 3 3 8T Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues 3 3 8T Kuznetsova/Mauresmo 3 3 8T Likhovtseva/Zvonareva 3 1 1 1 8T Peschke/Schiavone 3 3 8T Raymond/Stubbs 3 3 18 Grönefeld/Navratilova 2 1 1 19T Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 1 1 19T Huber/Maleeva 1 1 19T Kirilenko/Yakimova 1 1 19T Medina Garrigues/Saﬁna 1 1 19T Morariu/Schnyder 1 1 19T Myskina/Zvonareva 1 1 19T G. Navratilova/Pastikova 1 1 19T Petrova/Shaughnessy 1 1 19T Schruff/Woehr 1 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 227 The weakness of the top teams is striking but not hard to explain: None of the top teams managed to stay together all year. The numbers are a little — though only a little — better if we take individual standings. All told, 37 players had at least one Majors point. Individual Majors Rankings. Tournament Rank Player Total Syd AO Eric Ro RG Wim SD USO Fild Chm 1 Black 17 5351 3 2 Stosur 16 5 1 5 5 3T Huber 14 1535 3T Ruano Pascual 14 115511 5T Kuznetsova 13 5 5 3 5T Raymond 13 3 5 5 7Molik 10 5 5 8T Hantuchova 8 3 5 8T Martinez 8 1 5 1 1 10 Stubbs 7 3 1 3 11T Dementieva 6 3 3 11T Myskina 6 1 5 11T Stewart 6 5 1 11T Suárez 6 1 5 11T Sugiyama 6 3 3 16T Kirilenko 4 1 3 16T Medina Garrigues 4 3 1 16T Morariu 4 3 1 16T Zvonareva 4 1 1 1 1 20T Davenport 3 3 20T Grönefeld 3 1 1 1 20T Likhovtseva 3 1 1 1 20T Mauresmo 3 3 20T Pennetta 3 3 20T Peschke 3 3 20T Schiavone 3 3 27T Navratilova, Martina 2 1 1 27T Shaughnessy 2 1 1 29T Maleeva 1 1 29T Navratilova, Gabriela 1 1 29T Pastikova 1 1 29T Petrova 1 1 29T Saﬁna 1 1 29T Schnyder 1 1 29T Schruff 1 1 29T Woehr 1 1 29T Yakimova 1 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 228 Combined Singles and Doubles Rankings This was the year the singles and doubles split became (almost) complete. There are no players who are Top Ten in both; the only player who looked as if she might manage both was Alicia Molik, and she got sick. Only four players — Likhovtseva, Dementieva, Kuznetsova, and Hantuchova — manage to be Top 20 in both. As of 2005, only 49 players are Top 100 in both singles and doubles. This is down from 53 in 2004; there were 60 such players in 2003, 55 in 2002, fully 67 in 2001. The following list ranks our 49 Top-100-in-Both players according to their combined singles and doubles rankings; in the case of ties, the player with the higher singles ranking is listed first. Combined Player Singles Doubles Combined ordinal Rank Rank Total 1 Likhovtseva, Elena 17 7 24 2 Dementieva, Elena 8 18 26 3Kuznetsova, Svetlana 18 8 26 4 Hantuchova, Daniela 19 13 32 5 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 21 11 32 6 Schnyder, Patty 7 32 39 7Molik, Alicia 29 12 41 8Martinez, Conchita 32 9 41 9 Petrova, Nadia 9 33 42 10 Peschke, Kveta 26 16 42 11 Sugiyama, Ai 30 14 44 12 Pennetta, Flavia 23 22 45 13 Schiavone, Francesca 13 34 47 14 Saﬁna, Dinara 20 28 48 15 Stosur, Samantha 46 2 48 16 Davenport, Lindsay 1 49 50 17 Kirilenko, Maria 25 27 52 18 Zvonareva, Vera 42 10 52 19 Myskina, Anastasia 14 39 53 20 Dulko, Gisela 27 26 53 21 Srebotnik, Katarina 28 25 53 22 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 34 20 54 23 Asagoe, Shinobu 38 23 61 24 Mauresmo, Amelie 3 64 67 25 Zheng Jie 44 30 74 26 Raymond, Lisa 76 3 79 27 Shaughnessy, Meghann 66 19 85 28 Bartoli, Marion 40 47 87 29 Benesova, Iveta 54 38 92 30 Peng Shuai 37 61 98 Vento-Kabchi, Maria 63 35 98 Llagostera Vives, Nuria 49 55 104

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 229 Dushevina, Vera 39 67 106 Loit, Emilie 81 29 110 Vinci, Roberta 41 74 115 Daniilidou, Eleni 70 50 120 Granville, Laura 61 66 127 Garbin, Tathiana 86 42 128 Peer, Shahar 45 86 131 Serra Zanetti, Antonella 64 69 133 Dominguez Lino, Lourdes 77 63 140 Domachowska, Marta 60 81 141 Maleeva, Magdalena 52 92 144 Camerin, Maria Elena 96 48 144 Gagliardi, Emmanuelle 93 54 147 Santangelo, Mara 85 71 156 Washington, Mashona 74 84 158 Kostanic, Jelena 99 60 159 Fujiwara, Rika 97 80 177

The following Top 30 singles players are not in the Top 100 in doubles: #2 Kim Clijsters (unranked in doubles; 1 doubles event); #4 Maria Sharapova (unranked; 1 event); #5 Mary Pierce (doubles #119), #6 Justine Hénin-Hardenne (unranked; no events), #10 Venus Williams (unranked; no events); #11 Serena Williams (unranked), #12 Nathalie Déchy (#103), #15 Nicole Vaidisova (#192), #16 Ana Ivanovic #133), #22 Jelena Jankovic (#139), and #24 Tatiana Golovin (#278). That’s a total of eleven Top 30 singles players below #100 in doubles — the same number as in 2004, but up from only three in 2001; there were nine in 2002 and seven in 2003.

The following Top 30 doubles players are not in the Top 100 in singles: #1 Cara Black (#174, in 17 events), #4 Virginia Ruano Pascual (#106, in 22 events), #5 Rennae Stubbs (unranked), #6 Liezel Huber (unranked), #15 Corina Morariu (unranked), #17 Paola Suárez (#232), #21 Martina Navratilova (unranked), and #24 Bryanne Stewart (#908), This total of eight is slightly down from 2004, when fully ten of the doubles Top 30 were not Top 100 in singles; there were four such doubles near-specialists in 2003, nine in 2002, eight in 2001.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 230 WTA Calendar for 2005 ¥ Events and Results The list below summarized the results of all Tour events in 2005. Tournaments are arranged by dates. The first item for each tournament lists the location, the surface, and the Tier. The next line gives the score of the singles final. The names of the two semifinalists follow, then a list of high seeds, with rankings and results. For tournaments below Tier II, only the top two seeds are mentioned. For tournaments of Tier II and higher, four seeds are listed if the event has a 28-draw; otherwise, the top eight seeds are mentioned. This is followed by a list of noteworthy upsets, and then by significant historical facts about the event. January 2Ð10 Gold Coast ¥ Hard ¥ Tier III Auckland, New Zealand ¥ Hard ¥ Tier IV Patty Schnyder (2) def. Samantha Stosur 1Ð6 6Ð3 7Ð5 Katarina Srebotnik def. Shinobu Asagoe (4) 5Ð7 7Ð5 6Ð4 Semifinalists: Silvia Farina Elia, Tatiana Golovin Semifinalists: Amy Frazier, Marion Bartoli #1 seed: Nadia Petrova (#12; withdrew from QF) #1 seed: Amy Frazier (#26) #2 seed: Patty Schnyder (#14; Won) #2 seed: Jelena Jankovic (#28; lost QF) Doubles champions: Likhovtseva/Maleeva Doubles champions: Asagoe/Srebotnik Major Upsets: Pennetta (#38) def. Déchy (#21); Major Upsets: Santangelo (#86) def. Daniilidou (#34); Beygelzimer/Loit def. Li/Sun; Stosur (#65) def. Sprem Husarova (#205) def. Brandi (#46); Srebotnik (#87) (#18); Safina (#44) def. Sugiyama (#17); Karatantcheva def. Bartoli (#41); Srebotnik (#87) def. Asagoe (#37) (#133) def. Likhovtseva (#24); Stosur (#65) def. Historical Significance: Asagoe loses her third career Maleeva (#25); Stosur (#65) def. Farina Elia (#29) final, but still hits a career high; Asagoe/Srebotnik Historical Significance: Schnyder picks up yet another dispute the singles final and win the doubles; cheap title; first final for Stosur Srebotnik’s third career title — and finally one away from clay January 11Ð16 Sydney, Australia ¥ Hard ¥ Tier II Canberra, Aust. ¥ Hard ¥ Tier V Hobart, Aust. ¥ Hard ¥ Tier V Alicia Molik (6) def. Samantha Stosur (WC) Ana Ivanovic (Q) def. Melinda Zheng Jie def. Gisela Dulko (2) 6Ð7(5Ð7) 6Ð4 7Ð5 Czink (LL) 7Ð5 6Ð1 6Ð2 6Ð0 Semifinalists: Elena Dementieva, Peng Shuai Semifinalists: Yuliana Fedak, Semifinalists: Li Na, Iveta #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; withdrew Lindsay Lee-Waters Benesova from QF) #1 seed: Silvia Farina Elia (#19; #1 seed: Amy Frazier (#26; lost #2 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#3; lost 2R) lost QF) 1R) #3 seed: Elena Dementieva (#6; withdrew #2 seed: Anna Smashnova (#32; #2 seed: Gisela Dulko (#34) from SF) lost 2R) Doubles champions: Yan/Zheng #4 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#11; lost 2R) Doubles champions: Garbin/ Major Upsets: Li Na (#76) def. Doubles champions: Stewart/Stosur Krizan Frazier (#26); Zheng (#82) def. Major Upsets: McCain (#145) def. Pennetta Major Upsets: Kapros (#96) def. Asagoe (#33); Peschke (#89) (#35); Stewart/Stosur def. Raymond/Stubbs; Shaughnessy (#39); Czink def. Medina Garrigues (#38); Kirilenko/Yakimova def. Schett/Schnyder; (#128) def. Smashnova (#32); Domachowska (#72) def. Stosur (#59) def. Kostanic (#36); Peng (#80) Fedak (#83) def. Farina Elia Camerin (#41); Vaidisova def. Myskina (#3); Zuluaga (#22) def. (#19); Ivanovic (#100) def. (#75) def. Safina (#45); Zheng Zvonareva (#11); Stosur (#59) def. Golovin Bartoli (#40) (#82) def. Koukalova (#44) (#25); Peng (#80) def. Petrova (#13) Historical Significance: Ivanovic Historical Significance: First title Historical Significance: Two singles wins her first title in only her in singles for Zheng, first final withdrawals put Stosur in first Tier II final; fifth WTA event; Czink makes for Dulko; first title for Yan/ another yields the doubles title to Stewart/ her first final Zheng Stosur ; Molik’s title gives her one Tier V, one Tier IV, one Tier III, one Tier II, and one Tier I

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 231 January 17Ð30 Australian Open ¥ Hard1 ¥ Slam Serena Williams (7) def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 2Ð6 6Ð3 6Ð0 Semifinalists: Nathalie Déchy, Maria Sharapova #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; lost F) #5 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#5; lost QF) #2 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#2; lost QF) #6 seed: Elena Dementieva (#6; lost R16) #3 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#3; lost R16) #7 seed: Serena Williams (#7; WON) #4 seed: Maria Sharapova (#4; lost SF) #8 seed: Venus Williams (#9; lost R16) Doubles champions: Kuznetsova/Molik Major Upsets: Sucha (#57) def. Sugiyama (#21); Cohen-Aloro (#115) def. Pierce (#29); Ivanovic (#82) def. Benesova (#34); Mandula (#84) def. Pennetta (#37); Spears (96) def. Shaughnessy (#40); Obziler (#114) def. Loit (#47); Douchevina (#65) def. Zvonareva (#11); Grönefeld (#71) def. Zuluaga (#16); Li Na (#64) def. Asagoe (#36); Diaz- Oliva (#101) def. Dulko (#32); Hopkins/Washington def. Martinez/Ruano Pascual; Spears (#96) def. Golovin (#24); Panova (#78) def. Jankovic (#27); Linetskaya (#93) def. Frazier (#28); Bartoli/Grönefeld def. Raymond/ Stubbs, Chuang/Fujiwara def. Husarova/Likhovtseva; Birnerova/Vanc def. Black/Huber; Russell/Santangelo def. Dementieva/Sugiyama; Déchy (#25) def. Myskina (#3); Schnyder (#14) def. Dementieva (#6); S. Williams (7) def. Mauresmo (2); Déchy (#25) def. Schnyder (#14); S. Williams (#7) def. Sharapova (#4) Historical Significance: In doubles, after many failures in finals, Kuznetsova at last wins a Slam; Molik wins her first. The singles was ugly: Lindsay Davenport, looking for her first Slam in five years, came apart at the end, and gave Serena Williams her first in a year and a half. 1. Although most matches were played in outdoor conditions, the Melbourne ﬁnal was played indoors due to rain. January 31-February 6 Pan Paciﬁc Open, Tokyo ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier I Pattaya City, THA ¥ Hard ¥ Tier III Maria Sharapova (2) def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 6Ð1 3Ð6 7Ð6(7Ð5) Conchita Martinez (3) def. Anna-Lena Semifinalists: Shinobu Asagoe, Svetlana Kuznetsova Grönefeld 6–3 3–6 6–3 #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; lost F) Semifinalists: Evgenia Linetskaya, Virginia #2 seed: Maria Sharapova (#4; WON) Ruano Pascual #3 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#6; lost SF) #1 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#11; lost QF) #4 seed: Elena Dementieva (#7; lost QF) #2 seed: Marion Bartoli (#36; lost 2R) Doubles champions: Husarova/Likhovtseva Doubles champions: Bartoli/Grönefeld Major Upsets: Vinci (#117) def. Sugiyama (#21); Kirilenko (#94) Major Upsets: Serna (#109) def. Bartoli (#36); def. Peng (#41); Asagoe (#32 def. Dementieva (#7) Linetskaya (#68) def. Zvonareva (#11) Historical Significance: Davenport, for the second straight week, Historical Significance: Martinez wins her first loses both the singles and doubles finals as Sharapova reaches a title since Berlin 2000 as Grönefeld loses her career-high #3 and closes in on #2. Likhovtseva wins her second first singles final — but wins her first doubles doubles title of the year. Asagoe closes in on Top 25 title after four lost finals February 7Ð13 Paris, France ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier II Hyderabad, IND ¥ Hard ¥ Tier IV Dinara Safina def. Amélie Mauresmo (2) 6–4 2–6 6–3 Sania Mirza def. Alona Bondarenko (9) 6Ð4 5Ð Semifinalists: Tatiana Golovin, Nadia Petrova 7 6Ð3 #1 seed: Serena Williams (#2; WITHDREW from QF) Semifinalists: Anna-Lena Grönefeld, Maria #2 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#4; lost F) Kirilenko #3 seed: NONE1 #1 seed: Li Na (#57; lost QF) #4 seed: Nadia Petrova (#12; lost SF) #2 seed: Anna-Lena Grönefeld (#48; withdrew Doubles champions: Benesova/Peschke from SF) Major Upsets: Safina (#48) def. Sprem (#17); Razzano (#66) def. Doubles champions: Yan/Zheng Smashnova (#66); Bartoli (#37) def. Déchy (#13); Safina (#48) Major Upsets: — def. Golovin (#23); Safina (#48) def. Mauresmo (#4) Historical Significance: First singles title for Historical Significance: First Tier II title for Safina Mirza brings her close to Top 100 1. #3 seed Maria Sharapova withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 232 February 14Ð20 Antwerp, BEL ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier II Memphis, USA ¥ Bogota, COL ¥ Clay ¥ Tier III Amélie Mauresmo (1) d. Venus Williams (3) Indoor ¥ Tier III Flavia Pennetta (2) d. Lourdes 6Ð3 3Ð6 6Ð3 Vera Zvonareva (1) d. Meghann Dominguez Lino (Q) 7Ð6(7Ð4) Semifinalists: Alicia Molik, Anastasia Shaughnessy (3) 7Ð6(7Ð3) 6Ð2 6Ð4 Myskina Semifinalists: Evgenia Linetskaya, Semifinalists: Fabioloa Zuluaga, #1 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#2; WON) Nicole Vaidisova Clarisa Fernandez #2 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#6; lost SF) #1 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#11; #1 seed: Fabiola Zuluaga (#24; #3 seed: Venus Williams (#8; lost F) WON) lost SF) #4 seed: Alicia Molik (#10; lost SF) #2 seed: Amy Frazier (#23; lost #2 seed: Flavia Pennetta (#36) Doubles champions: Black/Callens 1R) Doubles champions: Gagliardi/ Major Upsets: Koukalova (#39) def. Déchy Doubles champions: Saeki/ Pisnik (#13); Chakvetadze (#75) def. Sprem Yoshida Major Upsets:Dominguez Lino (#17); Clijsters (#87) def. Petrova (#12) Major Upsets: Jackson (#149) def. (#196) def. Zuluaga (#24) Historical Significance: First title of 2005 Frazier (#23) Historical Significance: Zuluaga’s for Mauresmo inches her back toward #1; Historical Significance: First title three-year winning streak ends; Molik hits career-high #9 defence for Zvonareva Pennetta wins second career title February 21Ð27 Doha, Qatar ¥ Hard ¥ Tier II Acapulco, Mexico ¥ Clay ¥ Tier III Maria Sharapova (2) def. Alicia Molik (4) 4Ð6 6Ð4 6Ð4 Flavia Pennetta (1) def. Ludmila Cervanova 3Ð Semifinalists: Amélie Mauresmo, Daniela Hantuchova 6 7Ð5 6Ð3 #1 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#2; lost SF) Semifinalists: Antonella Serra Zanetti, Dally #2 seed: Maria Sharapova (#4; Won) Randriantefy #3 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#5; lost 2R) #1 seed: Flavia Pennetta (#30; WON) #4 seed: Alicia Molik (#9; lost F) #2 seed: Meghann Shaughnessy (#34; lost 2R) Doubles champions: Molik/Schiavone Doubles champions: Jidkova/Perebiynis Major Upsets: Bartoli (#33) def. Suárez (#19); Molik/Schiavone Major Upsets: Parra Santonja (#79) def. def. Ruano Pascual/Suárez; Garbin/Kostanic def. Myskina/ Shaughnessy (#34) Sugiyama; Martinez (#37) def. Myskina (#5); Kirilenko (#86) Historical Significance: Second straight title for def. Schnyder (#14); Hantuchova (#28) def. Bovina (#16) Pennetta makes her Top25 Historical Significance: Sharapova first player with two titles this year; Molik still undefeated in doubles February 28ÐMarch 6 Dubai, UAR ¥ Hard ¥ Tier II Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Jelena Jankovic 6Ð4 3Ð6 6Ð4 Semifinalists: Patty Schnyder, Serena Williams #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; WON) #3 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#5; lost QF) #2 seed: Serena Williams (#4; lost SF) #4 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#7; lost 2R) Doubles champions: Ruano Pascual/Suárez Major Upsets: Farina Elia (#21) def. V. Williams (#9); Mirza (#97) def. Kostanic (#36); Hantuchova (#22) def. Molik (#8); Li Na (#46) def. Sugiyama (#23); Mirza (#97) def. Kuznetsova (#7); Schnyder (#14) def. Myskina (#5); Hantuchova/Schiavone def. Likhovtseva/Martinez; Yan/Zheng def. Black/Huber; Jankovic (#28) def. S. Williams (#4) Historical Significance: First title of the year for both Davenport and Ruano Pascual/Suárez; first Tier II final and Top Five win for Jankovic

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 233 March 9Ð20 Indian Wells, California, USA ¥ Hard ¥ Tier I Kim Clijsters def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 6Ð4 4Ð6 6Ð2 Semifinalists: Elena Dementieva, Maria Sharapova #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1); lost F #5 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#7; lost QF) #2 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#2); lost 3R #6 seed: Nadia Petrova (#12; lost R16) #3 seed: Maria Sharapova (#3); lost SF #7 seed: Nathalie Déchy (#14; lost QF) #4 seed: Elena Dementieva (#5); lost SF #8 seed: Elena Bovina (#15; lost 2R) Doubles champions: Ruano Pascual/Suárez Major Upsets: Kirilenko (#66) def. Bovina (#15); Fujiwara (#142) def. Schiavone (#16); Jackson (#125) def. Suárez (#19); Clijsters (#133) def. Asagoe (#26); Chakvetadze (#72) def. Jankovic (#20); Diaz-Oliva (#93) def. Dulko (#34); Beltrame (#92) def. Grönefeld (#41); Craybas (#79) def. Likhovtseva (#17); Vaidisova (#63) def. Sprem (#18); Kutuzova (#473) def. Pennetta (#29); Kirkland (#196) def. Bartoli (#32); Gagliardi/Jankovic def. Kuznetsova/Navratilova; Linetskaya (#44) def. Mauresmo (2); Fujiwara (#142) def. Benesova (#46); Kirilenko (#66) def. Medina Garrigues (#42); Kutuzova (#473) def. Frazier (#27); Pierce (#33) def. Petrova (#12); Clijsters (#133) def. Linetskaya (#44); Clijsters (#133) def. Martinez (#31); Clijsters (#133) def. Dementieva (#5); Clijsters (#133) def. Davenport (#1) Historical Significance: Clijsters, playing her second event back, wins her first title in over a year, putting her back in the Top 40 March 23ÐApril 3 Miami ¥ Hard ¥ Tier I Kim Clijsters def. Maria Sharapova (2) 6Ð3 7Ð5 Semifinalists: Amélie Mauresmo, Venus Williams #1 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#2); lost SF #5 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#6; lost R16) #2 seed: Maria Sharapova (#3; lost F) #6 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#7; lost R16) #3 seed: Serena Williams (#4); lost QF #7 seed: Alicia Molik (#8; lost R16) #4 seed: Elena Dementieva (#5); lost QF #8 seed: Venus Williams (#9; lost SF) Doubles champions: Kuznetsova/Molik Major Upsets: Llagostera Vives (#72) def. Zvonareva (#11); Castaño (#111) def. Suárez (#19); Peer (#135) def. Bartoli (#32); Irvin (#85) def. Safina (#35); Ivanovic (#52) def. Petrova (#12); Vaidisova (#53) def. Jankovic (#20); Cohen-Aloro (#96) def. Hantuchova (#21); Castaño (#111) def. Schnyder (#13); Clijsters (#38) def. Déchy (#14);Golovin (#23) def. Bovina (#15); Asagoe (#26) def. Schiavone (#16); Clijsters (#38) def.Myskina (#6); Ivanovic (#52) def. Kuznetsova (#7); Hénin-Hardenne (#40) def. Molik (#8); Ivanovic/Vaidisova def. Garbin/ Krizan; V. Williams (#9) def. S. Williams (#4); Clijsters (#38) def. Dementieva (#5); Clijsters (#38) def. Mauresmo (#2); Raymond/Stubbs def. Petrova/Shaughnessy; Kuznetsova/Molik def. Ruano Pascual/Suárez; Clijsters (#38) def. Sharapova (#3) Historical Significance: Clijsters wins her fourteenth straight match and second straight event; she’s back in the Top 20

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 234 April 4Ð10 Amelia Island, USA ¥ (Green) Clay ¥ Tier II Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Silvia Farina Elia (12) 7Ð5 7Ð5 Semifinalists: Nadia Petrova, Virginie Razzano #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; WON) #5 seed: Venus Williams (#8; lost QF) #2 seed: Serena Williams (#4; lost QF) #6 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#10; lost QF) #3 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#6; lost 3R) #7 seed: Nadia Petrova (#12; lost SF) #4 seed: Alicia Molik (#9; lost 2R) #8 seed: Patty Schnyder (#13; lost 3R) Doubles champions: Stewart/Stosur Major Upsets: Ruano Pascual (#62) def. Sprem (#19); Asagoe/Srebotnik def. Martinez/Ruano Pascual; Daniilidou/ Gullickson def. Myskina/Zvonareva; Lee/Peng def. Huber/Washington; Razzano (#54) def. Molik (#9); Peschke (#79)def. Frazier (#31); Peschke/Schnyder def. Likhovtseva/Sugiyama; Razzano (#54) def. Sugiyama (#23); Asagoe (#26) def. Myskina (#6); Farina Elia (#24) def. Schnyder (#13); Razzano (#54) def. Zvonareva (#10); Farina Elia (#13) def. S. Williams (#4); Stewart/Stosur def. Raymond/Stubbs Historical Significance: Davenport wins her third Amelia Island title and cements her #1 ranking April 11Ð17 Charleston, USA ¥ (Green) Clay ¥ Tier II Justine Hénin-Hardenne def. Elena Dementieva (2) 7–5 6–2 Semifinalists: Tatiana Golovin, Patty Schnyder #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; lost QF) #5 seed: NONE1 #2 seed: Elena Dementieva (#5; lost F) #6 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#10; lost 2R) #3 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#6; lost 2R) #7 seed: Nadia Petrova (#12; lost QF) #4 seed: Venus Williams (#8); lost 3R #8 seed: Patty Schnyder (#13; lsot SF) Doubles champions: Martinez/Ruano Pascual Major Upsets: Koukalova (#47) def. Likhovtseva (#16); Hénin-Hardenne (#43) def. Jankovic (#20); Kostanic (#40) def. Farina Elia (#18); Strycova (#94) def. Martinez (#33); Marrero (#76) def. Medina Garrigues (#41); Benesova (#51) def. Zvonareva (#10); Vaidisova (#49) def. Myskina (#6); Llagostera Vives (#63) def. Pierce (#27); Kutuzova (#270) def. Zuluaga (#29); Dominguez Lino/Medina Garrigues def. Likhovtseva/Sugiyama; Golovin (#25) def. V. Williams (#8); Srebotnik (#53) def. Sugiyama (#24); Vaidisova (#49) def. Asagoe (#22); Hénin-Hardenne (#43) def. Davenport (#1); Golovin (#25) def. Petrova (#12); Hénin-Hardenne (#43) def. Golovin (#25); Benesova/ Peschke def. Raymond/Stubbs; Hénin-Hardenne (#43) def. Dementieva (#5) Historical Significance: In only her second event back, Hénin-Hardenne wins her first title since the Olympics 1. #5 seed Alicia Molik withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser. April 25ÐMay 1 Warsaw, Poland ¥ Clay ¥ Tier II Estoril, Portugal ¥ Clay ¥ Tier IV Justine Hénin-Hardenne def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (2) 3–6 6–2 7–5 Lucie Safarova (Q) def. Li Na (4) 6Ð7(4Ð7) Semifinalists: Kim Clijsters, Ana Ivanovic 6Ð4 6Ð3 #2 seed:1 Svetlana Kuznetsova (#7; lost F) Semifinalists: Gisela Dulko, Dinara Safina #3 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#10; lost 2R) #1 seed: Flavia Pennetta (#31; lost 1R) #4 seed: Patty Schnyder (#13; lost QF) #2 seed: Dinara Safina (#38; lost SF) #5 seed: Elena Bovina (#14; lost QF) Doubles champions: Li/Sun Doubles champions: Perebiynis/Strycova Major Upsets: Savchuk (#220) def. Pennetta Major Upsets: Vento-Kabchi (#58) def. Schiavone; Ondraskova (#116) (#31); Safarova (#155) def. Dulko (#39); def. Douchevina (#46); Domachowska (#63) def. Razzano (#36); Safarova (#155) def. Li Na (#35) Hradecka/Sromova def. Black/Huber; Ivanovic (#37) def. Zvonareva Historical Significance: First career title for (#10); Ivanovic (#37) def. Déchy (#15); Hénin-Hardenne (#22) def. Safarova, in only her third WTA event. Li Schnyder (#13); Hénin-Hardenne (#22) def. Kuznetsova (#7) still reaches a career-high #35 (best ever Historical Significance: Hénin-Hardenne wins her second straight title fora Chinese player) and returns to the Top 15; biggest doubles title for Perebiynis and first title of any sort for Strycova 1. #1 seed Amélie Mauresmo withdrew after the draw was made and seeds were promoted

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 235 May 1Ð8 Berlin, Germany ¥ Clay ¥ Tier I Rabat, MOR ¥ Clay ¥ Tier IV Justine Hénin-Hardenne (12) def. Nadia Petrova (6) 6–3 4–6 6–3 Nuria Llagostera Vives (2) def. Zheng Semifinalists: Patty Schnyder, Jelena Jankovic Jie (6) 6Ð4 6Ð2 #1 seed: Maria Sharapova (#2; lost QF) Semifinalists: Li Na, Emilie Loit #2 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#3; lost QF) #1 seed: Li Na (#35; lost SF) #3 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#6; lost 2R) #2 seed: Nuria Llagostera Vives (#57) #4 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#7; lost QF) Doubles champions: Loit/Strycova #5 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#10; lost 2R) Major Upsets: Loit/Strycova def. Li/ #6 seed: Nadia Petrova (#12; lost F) Sun; Zheng (#65) def. Li Na (#25) #7 seed: Patty Schnyder (#13; lost SF) Historical Significance: First career #8 seed: Elena Bovina (#14; lost QF) title for Llagostera Vives Doubles champions: Likhovtseva/Zvonareva Major Upsets: Peng (#52) def. Sugiyama (#22); Razzano (#39) def. Sprem (#25); Randriantefy (#50) def. Déchy (#16); Dulko (#37) def. Hantuchova (#23); Kirilenko (#48) def. Zuluaga (#29); Peschke (#67) def. Zvonareva (#10); Schruff (#107) def. Myskina (#6); Pierce (#27) def. Likhovtseva (#18); Kostanic/Peng def. Medina Garrigues/Safina; Hénin-Hardenne (#15) def Sharapova (#2); Petrova (#12) def. Mauresmo (#3); Schnyder (#13) def. Kuznetsova (#7); Dulko/Vento-Kabchi def. Petrova/ Shaughnessy; Jankovic (#24) def. Bovina (#14) Historical Significance: Three straight titles, and 17 straight wins, for Hénin- Hardenne May 9Ð15 Rome, Italy ¥ Clay ¥ Tier I Prague, CZE ¥ Clay ¥ Tier IV Amélie Mauresmo (2) def. Patty Schnyder (8) 2–6 6–3 6–4 Dinara Safina (1) def. Zuzana Semifinalists: Maria Sharapova, Vera Zvonareva Ondraskova 7Ð6(7Ð2) 6Ð3 #1 seed: Maria Sharapova (#2; lost SF) Semifinalists: Laura Pous Tio, Klara #2 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#3; WON) Koukalova #3 seed: Serena Williams (#4; lost 2R) #1 seed: Dinara Safina (#34) #4 seed: Elena Dementieva (#5; lost 2R) #2 seed: Klara Koukalova (#40; lost #5 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#7; lost 2R) SF) #6 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#10; lost SF) Doubles champions: Loit/Pratt #7 seed: Nadia Petrova (#9; withdrew from 3R) Major Upsets: Ondraskova (#98) def. #8 seed: Patty Schnyder (#13; lost F) Koukalova (#40) Doubles champions: Black/Huber Historical Significance: Second title Major Upsets: Camerin (#65) def. Déchy (#16); Smashnova (#41) def. of the year for Safina puts her at a Likhovtseva (#18); Ivanovic (#36) def. Golovin (#19); Mamic (#110) def. career high #28; second straight Hantuchova (#23); Santangelo (#156) def. Zuluaga (#38); Dhenin/Vanc doubles title for Loit (she beat last def. Stewart/Stosur; Camerin/Garbin def. Navratilova/Schiavone; week’s partner Strycova in the final) Schiavone (#26) def. S. Williams (#4); Dulko (#37) def. Dementieva (#5); Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues def. Hantuchova/Sugiyama; Schnyder (#13) def. Sharapova (#2); Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues def. Grönefeld/ Shaughnessy Historical Significance: Mauresmo defends Rome title (first defence at a Tier I this year); Black./Huber finally win a title

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 236 May 16Ð22 Strasbourg, France ¥ Clay ¥ Tier III Istanbul, TUR ¥ Clay ¥ Tier III Anabel Medina Garrigues def. Marta Domachowska 6Ð4 6Ð3 Venus Williams (1) def. Nicole Vaidisova (2) Semifinalists: Nathalie Déchy, Dally Randriantefy 6Ð3 6Ð2 #1 seed: Nathalie Déchy (#16; lost SF) Semifinalists: Anna Smashnova, Tszvetana #2 seed: Tatiana Golovin (#20; lost 2R) Pironkova Doubles champions: Andres/Vanc #1 seed: Venus Williams (#13; Won) Major Upsets: Randriantefy (#53) def. Farina Elia (#21); #2 seed: Nicole Vaidisova (#39; lost F) Douchevina (#54) def. Asagoe (#22); Peng (#47) def. Golovin Doubles champions: Marrero/Ant. Serra Zanetti (#20); Domachowska (#63) def. Sugiyama (#26); Kachlikova/ Major Upsets: Morigami (#76) def. Raymond Mirza def. Stewart/Stosur; Randriantefy (#53) def. Sprem (#34); (#45); Stanciute/Szavay def. Raymond/Stubbs Medina Garrigues (#42) def. Déchy (#16) Historical Significance: Venus wins her first title Historical Significance: Medina Garrigues wins her first Tier III in over a year; Pironkova makes a big debut May 23ÐJune 5 French Open/Roland Garros ¥ Clay ¥ Slam Justine Hénin-Hardenne (10) def. Mary Pierce (21) 6–1 6–1 Semifinalists: Elena Likhovtseva, Nadia Petrova #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; lost QF) #5 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#6; lost 1R) #2 seed: Maria Sharapova (#2; lost QF) #6 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#7; lost R16) #3 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#3); lost 3R #7 seed: Nadia Petrova (#9; lost SF) #4 seed: Elena Dementieva (#5); lost R16 #8 seed: Patty Schnyder (#10; lost R16) Doubles champions: Ruano Pascual/Suárez Major Upsets: Sanchez Lorenzo (#109) def. Myskina (#6);Birnerova (#135) def. Kirilenko (#50); Mamic (#89) def. Raymond (#47); Smashnova (#60) def. Jankovic (#18); Llagostera Vives (#46) def. Sugiyama (#26); Chakvetadze (#56) def. Suárez (#27); Peer (#84) def. Bartoli (#33); Karatantcheva (#98) def. Asagoe (#21); Loit (#92) def. Frazier (#37); Morigami (#72) def. Sprem (#28); Irvin (#85) def. Dulko (#32); Pierce (#23) def. Zvonareva (#11); Karatantcheva (#98) def. V. Williams (#13); Li/Sun def. Medina Garrigues/Safina; Dominguez Lino/Llagostera Vives def. Dulko/Vento-Kabchi; Ivanovic (#31) def. Mauresmo; Llagostera Vives (#46) def. Déchy (#16); Birnerova/Vanc def. Hantuchova/Sugiyama; Likhovtseva (#19) def. Dementieva (#5); Pierce (#23) def. Schnyder (#10); Hénin-Hardenne (#12) def. Kuznetsova (#7); Asagoe/Srebotnik def. Likhovtseva/Zvonareva; Li/Sun def. Husarova/Martinez; Pierce (#23) def. Davenport (#1); Hénin-Hardenne (#12) def. Sharapova (#2); Morariu/ Schnyder def. Raymond/Stubbs Historical Significance: Justine Hénin-Hardenne is back in the Top Ten — and wins her first Slam since her sickness. She also finishes the year undefeated on clay. June 6Ð12 Birmingham, England ¥ Grass ¥ Tier III Maria Sharapova (1) def. Jelena Jankovic (3) 6Ð2 4Ð6 6Ð1 Semifinalists: Tatiana Golovin, Laura Granville #1 seed: Maria Sharapova (#2); WON #2 seed: Alicia Molik (#9; lost 2R) #3 seed: Jelena Jankovic (#20; lost F) #5 seed:1 Tatiana Golovin (#19; lost SF) Doubles champions: Hantuchova/Sugiyama Major Upsets: Sequera (#123) def. Raymond (#50); Granville (#100) def. Molik (#9); Parra Santonja (#86) def. Hantuchova (#22); Tanasugarn (#64) def. Bartoli (#33); Daniilidou (#87) def. Vaidisova (#31); Washington (#62) def. Razzano (#36); Chakvetadze (#44) def. Asagoe (#25); Daniilidou (#87) def. Sugiyama (#26); Daniilidou/ Russell def. Pratt/Vento-Kabchi; Daniilidou/Russell def. Black/Huber Historical Significance: Sharapova’s first title defence of 2005; Hantuchova wins first doubles title since 2002

1. #4 seed Elena Likhovtseva withdrew after the draw was made and seeds were promoted

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 237 June 13Ð19 Eastbourne, England ¥ Grass ¥ Tier II ’s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands ¥ Kim Clijsters (7) def. Vera Douchevina (Q) 7Ð5 6Ð0 Grass ¥ Tier III Semifinalists: Svetlana Kuznetsova, Roberta Vinci Klara Koukalova (8) def. Lucie Safarova 3Ð6 6Ð2 #1 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#3; lost 2R) 6Ð2 #2 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#5; lost SF) Semifinalists: Gisela Dulko, Meghann #3 seed: Alicia Molik (#9; withdrew) Shaughnessy #4 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#10; lost QF) #1 seed: Elena Dementieva (#6; lost 2R) Doubles champions: Raymond/Stubbs #2 seed: Nadia Petrova (#8; lost QF) Major Upsets: Vinci (#111) def. Linetskaya (#39); Bartoli (#32) Doubles champions: Medina Garrigues/Safina def. Likhovtseva (#15); Raymond (#50) def Asagoe (#26); Major Upsets: Chladkova (#71) def. Dementieva Vinci (#111) def. Sprem (#28); Vento-Kabchi (#55) def. (#6); Safarova (#80) def. Llagostera Vives (#36); Hantuchova (#22); An. Serra Zanetti/Spears def. Molik/ Krajicek (#99) def.Medina Garrigues (#34); Stewart; Douchevina (#54) def. Mauresmo (#3); Vinci (#111) Shaughnessy (#70) def. Grönefeld (#40); Dulko def. Zvonareva (#12); Washington (#59) def. Razzano (#35); (#37) def. Petrova (#8); Safarova (#80) def. Douchevina (#54) def. Bartoli (#32); Vinci (#111) def. Safina (#33); Safarova (#80) def. Dulko (#37) Myskina (#10); Clijsters (#17) def. Kuznetsova (#5) Historical Significance: After losing five finals, Historical Significance: Clijsters wins her best grass title yet. Koukalova finally wins one. June 20-July 3 Wimbledon ¥ Grass ¥ Slam Venus Williams (14) def Lindsay Davenport (1) 4Ð6 7Ð6(7Ð4) 9Ð7 Semifinalists: Maria Sharapova, Amélie Mauresmo #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; lost F) #5 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#6; lost QF) #2 seed: Maria Sharapova (#2); lost SF #6 seed: Elena Dementieva (#5; lost 4R) #3 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#3); lost SF #7 seed: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (#7; lost 1R) #4 seed: Serena Williams (#4; lost 3R) #8 seed: Nadia Petrova (#8; lost QF) Doubles champions: Black/Huber Major Upsets: Ant. Serra Zanetti (#83) def. Schnyder (#11); Vinci (#64) def. Sugiyama (#25); Maleeva (#43) def. Asagoe (#24); Tanasugarn (#69) def. Sprem (#31); Washington (#53) def. Frazier (#30); Daniilidou (#76) def. Hénin-Hardenne (#7); A. Bondarenko (#90) def. Golovin (#20); Brandi (#70) def. Schiavone (#23); Srebotnik (#57) def. Medina Garrigues (#38); Panova (#92) def. Raymond (#46); Peschke (#62) def. Zvonareva (#12); Craybas (#85) def. Bartoli (#27); Black (#182) def. Razzano (#35); Cohen-Aloro/Sfar def. Raymond/Stubbs; Bartoli/ Sequera def. Davenport/Morariu; Craybas (#85) def. S. Williams (#4); Stewart/Stosur def. Husarova/Martinez; Stewart/Stosur def. Petrova/Shaughnessy; V. Williams (#16) def. Sharapova (#2); V. Williams (#16) def. Davenport (#1); Kuznetsova/Mauresmo def. Likhovtseva/Zvonareva; Kuznetsova/Mauresmo def. Grönefeld/ Navratilova Historical Significance: Venus wins her first significant title in two years, and first Slam in four. Black wins Wimbledon for the second straight year, giving Liezel Huber her first Slam (though, sadly, she will hurt herself in Team Tennis and not play again in 2005) July 11Ð17 Modena, Italy ¥ Clay ¥ Tier IV Anna Smashnova (5) def. Tathiana Garbin 6Ð6(3Ð0), retired Semifinalists: Flavia Pennetta, Agnes Szavay #1 seed: Francesca Schiavone (#23; lost QF) #2 seed: Flavia Pennetta (#28; lost SF) Doubles champions: Beygelzimer/Jugic-Salkic Major Upsets: Szavay (#301) def. Schiavone (#23); Smashnova (#61) def. Pennetta (#28) Historical Significance: Smashnova wins her first title in over a year; she’s 10–0 in finals

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 238 July 18Ð24 Cincinnati, USA ¥ Hard ¥ Tier III Palermo, Italy ¥ Clay ¥ Tier IV Patty Schnyder (1) def. Akiko Morigami 6Ð4 6Ð0 Anabel Medina Garrigues (3) def. Klara Koukalova Semifinalists: Bethanie Mattek, Daniela Hantuchova 6Ð4 6Ð0 #1 seed: Patty Schnyder (#12; WON) Semifinalists: Flavia Pennetta, Tszvetana Pironkova #2 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#15; losdt 2R) #1 seed: Silvia Farina Elia (#21; lost 1R) Doubles champions: Granville/Spears #2 seed: Flavia Pennetta (#24; lost SF) Major Upsets: Panova (#121) def. Peschke (#40); Mattek Doubles champions: Casoni/Koryttseva (#177) def. Bartoli (#30); Mirza (#70) def. Grönefeld Major Upsets: Pironkova (#128) def. Farina Elia (#21); (#35); Peer (#66) def. Sugiyama (#32); Morigami (#72) Pironkova (#128) def. Smashnova (#53); Vierin (#180) def. Zvonareva (#15); Mattek (#177) def. Jankovic def. Domachowska (#50); Müller (#157) def. (#19); Morigami (#72) def. Hantuchova (#26) Llagostera Vives (#45); Koukalova (#39) def. Pennetta Historical Significance: Schnyder’s second title of 2005; (#24) Morigami’s first final; first doubles title for Granville Historical Significance: Third Palermo title for Medina Garrigues, and first title defence July 25Ð31 Stanford, CA, USA ¥ Hard ¥ Tier II Budapest, HUN ¥ Clay ¥ Tier IV Kim Clijsters (4) def. Venus Williams (3) 7Ð5 6Ð2 Anna Smashnova (1) def. Catalina Castaño 6–2 Semifinalists: Anna-Lena Grönefeld, Patty Schnyder 6Ð2 #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; lost 2R) Semifinalists: Jelena Kostanic, Laura Pous Tio #2 seed: Venus Williams (#10; lost F) #1 seed: Anna Smashnova (#54) #3 seed: Patty Schnyder (#12; lost SF) #2 seed: Katarina Srebotnik (#63; lost QF) #4 seed: Kim Clijsters (#14; WON) Doubles champions: Loit/Srebotnik Doubles champions: Black/Stubbs Major Upsets: — Major Upsets: Shaughnessy (#69) def. Zvonareva (#15); Peschke/ Historical Significance: Her second title of the Schiavone def. Raymond/Stosur; Grönefeld (#39) def. year meansSmashnova is now 11Ð0 in finals, Davenport; Benesova (#53) def. Schiavone (#28); Grönefeld and the win puts her back in the Top 50 (#39) def. Déchy (#18) Historical Significance: Clijsters puts herself back in the Top Ten August 1Ð7 San Diego, CA, USA ¥ Hard ¥ Tier I Mary Pierce (6) def. Ai Sugiyama 6Ð0 6Ð3 Semifinalists: Peng Shuai, Akiko Morigami #2 seed: 1 Svetlana Kuznetsova (#4); lost R16 #6 seed: Mary Pierce (#14; WON) #3 seed: Elena Dementieva (#6; lost 2R) #7 seed: Kim Clijsters (#10; lost QF) #4 seed: Nadia Petrova (#9); lost 2R #8 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#16; lost 2R) #5 seed: Patty Schnyder (#11; lost QF) #9 seed: Elena Likhovtseva (#17; lost R16) Doubles champions: Martinez/Ruano Pascual Major Upsets: Chakvetadze (#34) def. Golovin (#22); Karatantcheva (#49) def. Asagoe (#25); Peng (#46) def. Dementieva (#6); Morigami (#61) def. Pennetta (#24); Mirza (#59) def. Petrova (#9); Washington (#55) def. Zvonareva (#16); Sugiyama (#38) def. Hantuchova (#23); Bartoli/Pierce def. Raymond/Stosur; Sugiyama (#38) def. Kuznetsova (#4); Chakvetadze (#34) def. Likhovtseva (#17); Peng (#46) def. Safina (#26); Peng (#46) def. Clijsters (#10); Morigami (#61) def. Chakvetadze (#34); Hantuchova/Sugiyama def. Black/Stubbs Historical Significance: Pierce wins her first title above the Tier III level since Roland Garros 2000; Sugiyama seems finally to have broken out of her 2004 slump

1. #1 seed Lindsay Daveport withdrew after the draw was made and seeds were promoted

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 239 August 8Ð14 Los Angeles ¥ Hard ¥ Tier II Stockholm, Sweden ¥ Hard ¥ Tier IV Kim Clijsters (5) def. Daniela Hantuchova (9) 6Ð4 6Ð1 Katarina Srebotnik (5) def. Anastasia Semifinalists: Elena Dementieva, Francesca Schiavone Myskina (2) 7Ð5 6Ð2 #1 seed: Maria Sharapova (#2; withdrew from QF) Semifinalists: Emilie Loit, Vera #2 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#4; lost 2R) Douchevina #3 seed: Elena Dementieva (#6; lost SF) #2 seed:2 Anastasia Myskina (#14; lost #4 seed: Nadia Petrova (#9; lost QF) F) #5 seed: Kim Clijsters (#10; WON) #3 seed: Vera Dushevina (#34; lost SF) #6 seed:1 NONE Doubles champions: Loit/Srebotnik #8 seed: NONE Major Upsets: Parra Santonja (#123) #9 seed: Daniela Hantuchova (#22; lost F) def. Medina Garrigues (#35) Doubles champions: Dementieva/Pennetta Historical Significance: Myskina Major Upsets: Nakamura (#87) def. Pennetta (#23); Zheng (#76) def. blows a wide-open draw as Srebotnik Asagoe (#29); K. Bondarenko (#186) def. Linetskaya (#41); Daniilidou wins her second title of 2005; Loit/ (#63) def. Kuznetsova (#4); Garbin (#75) def. Raymond (#45); Li/Sun Srebotnik have won eight straight; def. Raymond/Stosur; Hantuchova (#22) def. Dementieva (#6); Srebotnik has won both singles and Dementieva/Pennetta def. Martinez/Ruano Pascual; Haynes/Mattek def. doubles twice this year (she did it at Li/Sun Auckland also) Historical Significance: Clijsters wins title #5 of 2005, moving her up to #8; first doubles title for Pennetta 1. #7 seed Vera Zvonareva withdrew after the draw was made and seeds were promoted; #6 seed Mary Pierce and #8 seed Elena Likhovtseva withdrew after play began and were replaced by Lucky Losers 2. #1 seed Venus Williams withdrew after the draw was made and seeds were promoted August 15Ð21 Canadian Open/Toronto ¥ Hard ¥ Tier I Kim Clijsters (7) def. Justine Hénin-Hardenne (4) 7–5 6–1 Semifinalists: Amélie Mauresmo, Anastasia Myskina #2 seed:1 Amélie Mauresmo (#3; lost SF) #6 seed: Kim Clijsters (#8; WON) #3 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#4; lost R16) #7 seed: Nadia Petrova (#10; lost QF) #4 seed: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (#5; lost F) #8 seed: NONE2 #5 seed: Serena Williams (#7; withdrew from R16) #9 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#14; lost SF) Doubles champions: Grönefeld/Navratilova Major Upsets: Li Na (#45) def. Jankovic (#18); Jidkova (#83) def. Hantuchova (#21); Diaz-Oliva (#67) def. Linetskaya; Martinez (#43) def. Safina (#24); Zheng (#70) def. Sugiyama (#26); Vaidisova (#32) def. Déchy (#15); Dulko (#35) def. Kuznetsova (#4); Grönefeld/Navratilova def. Black/Stubbs Historical Significance: Clijsters wins title #6 of the year and returns to the Top Five; first title of 2005 for Navratilova

1. #1 seed Maria Sharapova withdrew after the draw was made and seeds were promoted 2. #8 seed Mary Pierce withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 240 August 22Ð28 New Haven, Connecticut ¥ Hard ¥ Tier II Forest Hills ¥ Hard ¥ Tier IV Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Amélie Mauresmo (2) 6–4 6–4 Lucie Safarova def. Sania Mirza (3) Semifinalists: Anabel Medina Garrigues, Anna Chakvetadze 3Ð6 7Ð5 6Ð4 #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#2; WON) Semifinalists: Alexa Glatch, Iveta Benesova #2 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#3; lost F) #1 seed: Akiko Morigami (#43; lost 1R) #4 seed:1 Elena Dementieva (#6; lost QF) #2 seed: Anna Smashnova (#45; lost 1R) #5 seed:2 NONE Doubles champions: No Doubles Doubles champions: Raymond/Stosur Major Upsets: Ondraskova (#86) def. Major Upsets: Shaughnessy (#60) def. Déchy (#15); Chakvetadze Randriantefy (#48); Glatch (#460) def. (#30) def. Jankovic (#17); Kirilenko (#49) def. Farina Elia (#23); Morigami (#43) Peshke (#41) def. Golovin; Jackson (#91) def. Maleeva (#55); Historical Significance: Safarova earns her Déchy/Mauresmo def. Molik/Morariu; Hantuchova (#21) def. second career title and falls just short of Schnyder (#11); Medina Garrigues (#33) def. Dementieva (#6); the Top 50 Dulko/Kirilenko def. Medina Garrigues/Safina Historical Significance: Davenport breaks her New Haven jinx and regains the #1 ranking 1. #3 seed Svetlana Kuznetsova withdrew after the draw was made and seeds were promoted 2. #5 seed Nadia Petrova, who was promoted into Kuznetsova’s spot, withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser August 29- September 11 U. S. Open ¥ Hard ¥ Slam Kim Clijsters (4) def. Mary Pierce (12) 6Ð3 6Ð1 Semifinalists: Elena Dementieva, Maria Sharapova #1 seed: Maria Sharapova (#2; lost SF) #5 seed: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#5; lost 1R) #2 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1); lost QF #6 seed: Elena Dementieva (#6; lost SF) #3 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#3; lost QF) #7 seed: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (#7; lost R16) #4 seed: Kim Clijsters (#4; WON) #8 seed: Serena Williams (#8; lost R16) Doubles champions: Raymond/Stosur Major Upsets: Bychkova (#97) def. Kuznetsova (#5); Perry (#118) def. Molik (#14); Schruff (#87) def. Pennetta (#32); Camerin (#81) def. Safina (#22); Pratt (#134) def. Morigami (#47); Granville (#71) def. Farina Elia (#23); Laine (#116) def. Peng (#35); King (#721) def. Koukalova (#41); Sun (#180) def. Stosur (#49); Vento-Kabchi (#72) def. Ivanovic (#16); Peer (#60) def. Douchevina (#34); Cho (#75) def. Dulko (#29); Pierce (#12) def. Hénin- Hardenne (#7); Dementieva/Pennetta def. Petrova/Shaughnessy; Yan/Zheng def Hantuchova/Sugiyama; Dementieva/Pennetta def. Morariu/Schnyder; Pierce (#12) def. Mauresmo (#3); Dementieva (#6) def. Davenport (#1); Raymond/Stosur def. Black/Stubbs; Grönefeld/Navratilova def. Kuznetsova/Molik; Dementieva/Pennetta def. Grönefeld/Navratilova; Raymond/Stosur def. Martinez/Ruano Pascual; Pierce (#12) def. Dementieva (#6); Clijster (#4) def. Sharapova (#2) Historical Significance: Finally, Clijsters gets the monkey off her back and earns her first singles Slam. Winning her first doubles Slam title is Samantha Stosur. September 12Ð18 Bali, INA ¥ Hard ¥ Tier III [Week of Fed Cup Final] Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Francesca Schiavone (4) 6Ð2 6Ð4 Semifinalists: Patty Schnyder, Li Na #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#2; WON) #2 seed: Patty Schnyder (#11; lost SF) Doubles champions: Grönefeld/Shaughnessy Major Upsets: Bychkova (#75) def. Mirza (#34); A. Bondarenko (#82) def. Molik (#14); Nakamura (#74) def. Grönefeld (#30); Schiavone/Sprem def. Li/Sun; Schiavone (#28) def. Schnyder (#11) Historical Significance: Shaughnessy wins her first doubles title of 2005; Davenport wins her fourth title of the year.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 241 September 19Ð27 Beijing, CHI ¥ Hard ¥ Tier II Kolkata, IND ¥ Indr ¥ Tier III Portoroz, SLO ¥ Hard ¥ Tier IV Maria Kirilenko def. Anna-Lena Grönefeld Anastasia Myskina (1) def. Klara Koukalova (4) def. Katarina (9) 6Ð3 6Ð4 Karolina Sprem (7) 6Ð2 6Ð2 Srebotnik (6) 6Ð4 5Ð7 6Ð2 Semifinalists: Maria Sharapova, Marta Semifinalists: Kaia Kanepi, Elena Semifinalists: Vanessa Henke, Domachowska Likhovtseva Eleni Daniilidou #1 seed: Maria Sharapova (#1; lost SF) #1 seed: Anastasia Myskina (#12; #1 seed: Silvia Farina Elia (#26; #9 seed:1 Anna-Lena Grönefeld (#30) WON) lost 1R) #3 seed: Venus Williams (#7; withdrew #2 seed: Elena Likhovtseva (#16; #2 seed: Anabel Medina Garrigues from QF) lost SF) (#27; lost QF) #4 seed: Serena Williams (#9; lost 2R) Doubles champions: Likhovtseva/ Doubles champions: Medina Doubles champions: Llagostera Vives/ Myskina Garrigues/Vinci Vento-Kabchi Major Upsets: Czink (#122) def. Major Upsets: Henke (#172) def. Major Upsets: Diaz-Oliva (#61) def. Molik Mirza (#34); Sprem (#81) def. Farina Elia (#26); Ani (#121) (#14); Nakamura (#75) def. Pennetta Likhovtseva (#16) def. Bartoli (#44); Bremond (#28); Craybas (#57) def. Li Na (#35); Historical Significance: Sprem, (#125) def. Peschke (#37); Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi def. who had only one quarterfinal Srebotnik (#49) def. Medina Molik/Shaughnessy; Zheng (#46) def. this year, makes her first final in Garrigues (#27) Jankovic (#17); Asagoe (#39) def. more than two years; Myskina Historical Significance: Golovin (#25); Sun (#127) def. S. wins her first title of the year — Koukalova wins her second title Williams; Kirilenko (#45) def. Sharapova and also takes the doubles of the year (#1); Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi def. Li/Sun Historical Significance: First career title for Kirilenko puts her in the Top 30 1. #2 seed Lindsay Davenport withdrew at the last moment; Grönefeld was promoted into her spot but there were no other draw changes. September 28ÐOctober 2 Luxembourg ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier II GuangZhou, China ¥ Hard ¥ Tier III Seoul, Korea ¥ Hard ¥ Tier IV Kim Clijsters (1) def. Anna-Lena Yan Zi def. Nuria Llagostera Vives (6) Nicole Vaidisova (2) def. Jelena Grönefeld 6–2 6–4 6Ð4 4Ð0, retired Jankovic (1) 7Ð5 6Ð3 Semifinalists: Nathalie Déchy, Dinara Semifinalists: Victoria Azarenka, Zheng Semifinalists: Tatiana Golovin, Safina Jie Catalina Castaño #1 seed: Kim Clijsters (#3) #1 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#22; lost 1R) #1 seed: Jelena Jankovic (#17) #2 seed: Nadia Petrova (#9; lost 2R) #2 seed: Peng Shuai (#31; lost QF) #2 seed: Nicole Vaidisova (#24) #3 seed: Patty Schnyder (#10; lost 2R) Doubles champions: Camerin/Gagliardi Doubles champions: Chan/ #4 seed: Nathalie Déchy (#15) Major Upsets: Li Ting (#157) def. Chuang Doubles champions: Raymond/Stosur Zvonareva (#22); Azarenka (#202) Major Upsets: Chan/Chuang def. Major Upsets: Smashnova (#44) def. def. Peng (#31); Zheng (#47) def. McShea/Stewart; Castaño Farina Elia (#27); Vinci (#57) def. Kirilenko (#28); Yan (#163) def. Li Na (#65) def. Dulko (#33) Schnyder (#10); Grönefeld (#23) def. (#42) Historical Significance: Petrova (#9) Historical Significance: First career title Vaidisova wins her first title of Historical Significance: Raymond/ for Yan, who until now has been 2005 Stosur win their third straight mostly a doubles specialist tournament; Clijsters wins her fourth straight, and eighth of the year

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 242 October 3Ð10 Filderstadt, Germany ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier II Japan Open/Tokyo ¥ Hard ¥ Tier Tashkent ¥ Hard ¥ Tier IV Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Amélie Mauresmo III Michaella Krajicek (5) def. (3) 6Ð2 6Ð4 Nicole Vaidisova (2) def. Tatiana Akgul Amanmuradova (WC) Semifinalists: Daniela Hantuchova, Elena Golovin (3) 7Ð6(7Ð4) 3Ð2, retired 6Ð0 4Ð6 6Ð3 Dementieva Semifinalists: Maria Kirilenko, Semifinalists: Ekaterina #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#2; Won) Sania Mirza Bychkova, Maria Elena #2 seed: Kim Clijsters (#3; lost QF) #1 seed: Vera Zvonareva (#24; lost Camerin #3 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#4; lost F) QF) #1 seed: Ekaterina Bychkova #4 seed: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (#5; lost 2R) #2 seed: Nicole Vaidisova (#21; (#72; lost SF) Doubles champions: Hantuchova/Myskina Won) #2 seed: Alona Bondarenko Major Upsets: Daniilidou (#67) def. Peschke Doubles champions: Dulko/ (#74; lost 2R) (#40)l Dementieva/Pennetta def. Black/ Kirilenko Doubles champions: Camerin/ Stubbs; Morariu/Schnyder def. Grönefeld/ Major Upsets: Arvidsson (#94) def. Loit Shaughnessy; Pennetta (#30) def. Hénin- Asagoe (#36); Craybas (#55) def. Major Upsets: — Hardenne (#5); Hantuchova (#20) def. Dulko (#34); Mirza (#37) def. Historical Significance: First Schnyder (#10); Peschke/Schiavone def. Zvonareva (#24) title for Krajicek, first final Raymond/Stosur; Hantuchova/Myskina def. Historical Significance: Vaidisova for Amanmuradova, first Likhovtseva/Molik; Schruff/Woehr def. wins her second title in a row semifinal for Bychkova Morariu/Schnyder; Dementieva (#8) def. Clijsters (#3) Historical Significance: Dementieva ends the Clijsters winning streak and costs her her chance at #1; Davenport wins career title #50 October 11Ð16 Moscow, Russia ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier I Bangkok, THA ¥ Hard ¥ Tier III Mary Pierce (3) def. Francesca Schiavone 6Ð4 6Ð3 Nicole Vaidisova (2) def. Nadia Petrova (1) Semifinalists: Elena Dementieva, Dinara Safina 6Ð1 6Ð7(5Ð7) 7Ð5 #1 seed: Maria Sharapova (#1; lost QF) Semifinalists: Antonella Serra Zanetti, Gisela #2 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#4; lost 2R) Dulko #3 seed: Mary Pierce (#7; Won) #1 seed: Nadia Petrova (#9) #4 seed: Elena Dementieva (#8; lost SF) #2 seed: Nicole Vaidisova (#18) Doubles champions: Raymond/Stosur Doubles champions: Asagoe/Dulko Major Upsets: Pironkova (#99) def. Koukalova (#38); Gagliardi Major Upsets: Ant. Serra Zanetti (#74) def. (#107) def. Razzano (#46); Birnerova (#123) def. Srebotnik Asagoe (#36); Yuan (#186) def. Mirza (#31); (#43); Stosur (#65) def. Molik (#13); Pennetta (#27) def. Déchy Ant. Serra Zanetti (#74) def. Peer (#48) (#14); Karatantcheva (#41) def. Jankovic (#19); Likhovtseva Historical Significance: Mirza retires with a bad (#16) def. Schnyder (#10); Koryttseva/Voskoboeva def. back one match away from hitting the Top 30; Kuznetsova/Molik; Schiavone (#22) def. Mauresmo (#4); Safina Vaidisova wins her third straight title as (#24) def. Sharapova (#1); Schiavone (#22) def. Dementieva (#8) Petrova melts down again. Historical Significance: Black finally earns the #1 doubles ranking; Schiavone reaches her first Tier I final; Pierce wins second title of 2005

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 243 October 17Ð23 Zürich, Switzerland ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier I Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Patty Schnyder (6) 7Ð7(7Ð5) 6Ð3 Semifinalists: Ana Ivanovic, Anastasia Myskina #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#3; WON) #3 seed: NONE1 #2 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#4; lost 2R) #4 seed: Elena Dementieva (#8; lost QF) Doubles champions: Black/Stubbs Major Upsets: Srebotnik (#43) def. Pennetta (#25); Maleeva (#61) def. Chakvetadze (#35); Hantuchova/Sugiyama def. Kuznetsova/Molik; Jankovic (#21) def.Molik (#13); Asagoe/Srebotnik def. Martinez/Ruano Pascual; Srebotnik (#43) def. Mauresmo (#4); Schiavone (#18) def. Petrova (#9); Myskina (#12) def. Dementieva (#8); Hantuchova/Sugiyama def. Dementieva/Pennetta Historical Significance: After losing to Patty Schnyder in the second round, Magdalena Maleeva calls it a career; Davenport regains the #1 ranking and wins her third straight tournament 1. #3 seed Mary Pierce withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser October 24Ð31 Linz, Austria ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier II Hasselt, Belgium ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier III Nadia Petrova (3) def. Patty Schnyder (4) 4Ð6 6Ð3 6Ð1 Kim Clijsters (1) def. Francesca Schiavone (3) Semifinalists: Ana Ivanovic, Kveta Peschke 6Ð2 6Ð3 #9 seed: Tatiana Golovin (lost QF)1 Semifinalists: Dinara Safina; Michaella #2 seed: Elena Dementieva (#8; lost 2R) Krajicek #3 seed: Nadia Petrova (#10; WON) #1 seed: Kim Clijsters (#2; WON) #4 seed: Patty Schnyder (#9; lost F) #2 seed: Nathalie Déchy (#13; lost QF) Doubles champions: Dulko/Peschke Doubles champions: Loit/Srebotnik Major Upsets: Dushevina (#41) def. Jankovic (#19); Peschke (#39) Major Upsets: Schruff (#83) def. Medina def. Zvonareva (#26); Sugiyama (#32) def. Likhovtseva (#16); Garrigues (#29); Flipkens (#239) def. Farina Peschke (#39) def. Dementieva (#8); Bammer (#93) def. Elia (#28); Krajicek (#68) def. Chakvetadze Dushevina (#41); Dulko/Peschke def. Black/Stubbs (#35); Krajicek (#68) def. Déchy (#13) Historical Significance: Helped by a self-inflicted Schnyder wrist Historical Significance: Nine titles for Clijsters injury, Petrova finally wins her first career title this year. Can she ride that to the #1 ranking? (Later answer: No, though she easily leads the Tour in titles) 1. #1 seed Amélie Mauresmo withdrew after the draw was made and there was partial seed promotion November 1Ð6 Philadelphia, USA ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier II Quebec City, Canada ¥ Indoor ¥ Tier III Amélie Mauresmo (3) def. Elena Dementieva (4) 7–5 2–6 7–5 Amy Frazier (6) def. Sofia Arvidsson (8) 6Ð1 7Ð5 Semifinalists: Nadia Petrova, Nicole Vaidisova Semifinalists: Nathalie Dechy, Marion Bartoli #1 seed: NONE1 #1 seed: Nathalie Déchy (#13; lost SF) #2 seed: NONE2 #3 seed:3 Marion Bartoli (#46; lost SF) #3 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#4; WON) Doubles champions: Rodionova/Vesnina #4 seed: Elena Dementieva (#10; lost F) Major Upsets: Frazier (#70) def. Déchy (#13); Doubles champions: Black/Stubbs Arvidsson (#75) def. Bartoli (#46) Major Upsets: Panova (#111) def. Jankovic (#22) Historical Significance: First title since Hobart Historical Significance: Mauresmo has won every instance of 2004 for Frazier; first final for Arvidsson; first the revived Philadelphia; Black/Stubbs earn the last spot at the title of any kind for the doubles winners Los Angeles Championships, giving Black the chance to earn the year-end #1. 1. #1 seed Lindsay Davenport withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser 2. #2 seed Maria Sharapova withdrew after play began and was replaced by a Lucky Loser 3. #2 seed Daniela Hantuchova withdrew after the draw was made and seeds were promoted

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 244 November 7Ð14 Los Angeles Championships ¥ Indoor ¥ Championship Amélie Mauresmo (4) def. Mary Pierce 5–7 7–6(7–3) 6–4 Semifinalists: Lindsay Davenport, Maria Sharapova #1 seed: Lindsay Davenport (#1; lost SF; record 2-2) #5 player: Mary Pierce (#5; lost F; record 4-1) #2 seed: Kim Clijsters (#2; record 1Ð2) #6 player: Patty Schnyder (#8; record 1Ð2) #3 seed: Maria Sharapova (#3; lost SF; record 2-2) #7 player: Nadia Petrova (#10; record 1Ð2) #4 seed: Amélie Mauresmo (#4; WON; record 4-1) #8 player: Elena Dementieva (#7; record 0Ð3) Doubles champions: Raymond/Stosur Major Upsets: Pierce (#5) def. Clijsters (#2); Mauresmo (#4) def. Clijsters (#2); Sharapova (#3) def. Davenport (#1); Petrova (#10) def. Sharapova (#3); Pierce (#5) def. Davenport (#1) Historical Significance: Last event played before the WTA puts yet another nail in the coffin of the ranking system. Davenport, Black earn year-end #1; Mauresmo finally picks up a really big title

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 245 The Tennis Almanac 2005 A day-by-day account of what are, in the editor’s opinion, the most significant match(es) of each day of the year. Note that the comments, apart from later proofreading, are what I said at the time. January 2 — Gold Coast 1R: Flavia Pennetta def. Nathalie Déchy (7) 7–6(9–7) 6–1 This raises a faint possibility that Déchy will lose her Top 24 Australian Open seed. January 3 — Gold Coast 1R: Samantha Stosur def. Karolina Sprem (4) 6–4 6–2 Stosur beat Sprem at Gold Coast last year also. This year, it looks even more impressive. January 4 — Gold Coast 1R: Dinara Safina def. Ai Sugiyama (3) 6–3 6–2 Auckland 1R: Mara Santangelo def. Eleni Daniilidou (3) 6Ð2 1Ð6 6Ð1 Two events, two defending champions, two #3 seeds, two upsets. Sugiyama will fall out of the Top 20, Daniilidou out of the Top 40 January 5 — Gold Coast 2R: Sesil Karatantcheva (Q) def. Elena Likhovtseva (7) 6–2 0–6 7–6(7–3) Karatantcheva earns her second Top 30 win and moves closer to the Top 100 (without quite making it) January 6 — Gold Coast QF: Samantha Stosur def. Magdalena Maleeva (8) 2–6 6–3 6–4 What is it about Stosur and Gold Coast? This is her fourth Top 25 win at this event, and she has none at any other event. Whatever the reason, she’s knocked Maleeva out of the Top 25. January 7 — Gold Coast SF: Samantha Stosur def. Silvia Farina Elia (5) 6–4 2–6 6–1 This is rapidly moving from amazing to simply unreal. Why can’t Stosur do this anywhere else? The next day, she even took Patty Schnyder to three sets in the final Jaunary 8 — Auckland SF: Shinobu Asagoe (4) def. Amy Frazier (1) 7–6(7–4) 6–4 Auckland SF: Katarina Srebotnik def. (5) Marion Bartoli (5) 7Ð5 2Ð6 7Ð5 Auckland F: Katarina Srebotnik def. (4) Shinobu Asagoe (4) 5Ð7 7Ð5 6Ð4 Auckland F DOUBLES: Asagoe/Srebotnik (1) def. Baker/Lubiani (WC) 6Ð3 6Ð3 It was a long, long day for Asagoe and Srebotnik (who spent about five hours each on the court), but the rewards weren’t bad by Tier IV standards.... January 9 — Sydney 1R: Nathalie Déchy def. Lisa Raymond 7–5 6–3 It’s only a first round win, but it will probably keep Déchy Top 25. January 10 — Sydney 1R DOUBLES: Stewart/Stosur def. Raymond/Stubbs (1) 1–6 7–6(7–5) 6–4 More Stosur magic — or just Raymond/Stubbs up to their old problems? January 11 — Sydney 2R: Peng Shuai (Q) def. Anastasia Myskina (2) 6–1 6–3 A cranky loss by Myskina just about kills her chances of hitting #1 in the near future. January 12 — Sydney 2R: Fabiola Zuluaga def. Vera Zvonareva (4) 7–6(9–7) 6–3 Zvonareva’s Top Ten jinx (the one that says she can’t get there) operates again as Zuluaga hits a career high of #16. January 13 — Sydney QF: Peng Shuai (Q) def. Nadia Petrova (5) 6–3 4–2, retired (head exhaustion) Sydney QF: Samantha Stosur def. Lindsay Davenport (1) walkover (bronchitis) One day, two first-time Top 50 players. Amazingly, Stosur would benefit from another walkover (over Dementieva) in the next round to make her first Tier II final, and Dementieva/Sugiyama would withdraw from the doubles, giving Stosur and Bryanne Stewart a very nice doubles title.... January 14 — Hobart F: Zheng Jie def. Gisela Dulko (2) 6–2 6–0 A steady game gives Zheng her first-ever singles title January 15 — Sydney F: Alicia Molik (6) def. Samantha Stosur (WC) 6–7(5–7) 6–4 7–5 Canberra F: Ana Ivanovic (Q) def. Melinda Czink (LL) 7Ð5 6Ð1 Molik’s fifth career title gives her one Tier V, one Tier IV, one Tier III, one Tier II, and a Tier I; Ivanovic wins title #1 (and when is the last time you saw a qualifier face a lucky loser in a final?). January 17 — Australian Open 1R: Martina Sucha def. Ai Sugiyama (16) 7–5 6–4 Sugiyama remains winless in 2005; this is the worst of her three losses so far. What is wrong with her? January 18 — Australian Open 1R: Barbara Schett def. Tiffany Welford (WC) 6–3 1–6 6–2 This may well be the last singles win for the former Top Ten player....

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 246 January 19 — Australian Open 1R DOUBLES: Hopkins/Washington def. Martinez/Ruano Pascual (4) 7Ð5 6Ð4 Anna-Lena Grönefeld def. Fabiola Zuluaga (17) 6–2 7–6(7–2) Zuluaga, last year’s semifinalist, crashes out of the Top 25 — but the big news is in doubles: Last year’s champion is out, and with it we have a possibility — slight, but a possibility — that Ruano Pascual will lose the #1 doubles ranking to Cara Black January 20 — Australian Open 2R: Daniela Hantuchova (26) def. Barbara Schett 6–4 6–0 Schett was stoic until the final game, but then burst into tears before she played the last point of her career — and was aced. January 21 — Australian Open 2R DOUBLES: Bartoli/Grönefeld def. Raymond/Stubbs (3) 1Ð0 Retired (Raymond Lower Back Strain) Australian Open 2R DOUBLES: Chuang/Fujiwara def. Husarova/Likhovtseva (5) 6Ð7(1Ð7) 6Ð1 7Ð5 Likhovtseva, last year’s doubles finalist, will fall from #4 to probably #7. Stubbs’s faint hopes of reaching #1 are dead. But it’s Raymond who may be in the most trouble; while she may well stay Top Ten in doubles, how is she going to do in singles after this? (Next day’s answer: She withdrew) January 22 — Australian Open 2R DOUBLES: Birnerova/Vanc def. Black/Huber (2) 6Ð7(6Ð8) 7Ð5 6Ð3 A black day for Black: She loses her chance to become doubles #1. Ruano Pascual keeps the top spot. Jaunary 23 — Australian Open 3R DOUBLES: Russell/Santangelo def. Dementieva/Sugiyama (8) 6Ð4 6Ð4 And so six of the top eight seeded teams are out, including all of the top five. Only three seeded teams — #6 Kuznetsova/Molik, #7 Myskina/Zvonareva, and #15 Davenport/Morariu — are left, and Davenport/Morariu are the only seeds in the bottom half. The only past Slam winners are Davenport and Morariu in the bottom half and Martina Navratilova in the top half. What a doubles event.... January 24 — Australian Open 4R: Nathalie Déchy (19) def. Anastasia Myskina (3) 6–4 6–2 Australian Open 4R: (12) Patty Schnyder (12) def. (6) Elena Dementieva 6Ð7(6Ð8) 7Ð6(7Ð4) 6Ð2 Australian Open 4R: Alicia Molik (10) def. Venus Williams (8) 7Ð5 7Ð6(7Ð3) Schnyder, who had seemed likely to lose her #14 ranking, instead moves up a spot; Venus loses another Slam as Molik reaches the Top Ten for the first time, and Myskina will lose the #3 spot to either Kuznetsova or Sharapova (or maybe Serena Williams) as Déchy moves firmly into the Top 20. January 25 — Australian Open QF: Serena Williams (7) def. Amélie Mauresmo 6–2 6–2 Australian Open QF: Maria Sharapova (4) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (5) 4Ð6 6Ð2 6Ð2 Sharapova becomes the #1 Russian; she and Serena will play for the #3 ranking after the American kills the injured Mauresmo’s chance to become #1 Jaunary 26— Australian Open QF: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Alicia Molik (10) 6–4 4–6 9–7 Australian Open QF: Nathalie Déchy (18) def. Patty Schnyder (12) 5–7 6–1 7–5 Two matches, both two hours 33 minutes long (though the Davenport/Molik match would have been longer had it not been for a blown call that cost Molik an ace). For Déchy, it spells a new high of #13; Molik has to settle for #10. Davenport looks good to win her first Slam in five years, though it’s likely to be called cheap. January 27 — Australian Open SF: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Nathalie Déchy (19) 2–6 7–6(7–5) 6–4 Australian Open SF: Serena Williams (7) def. Maria Sharapova (4) 2Ð6 7Ð5 8Ð6 Serena saves three match points to take the #3 ranking. Davenport looks very bad, but she’s in her first Slam final since the 2000 U. S. Open — and she’s in the doubles final too.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 247 January 28 — Australian Open F DOUBLES: Kuznetsova/Molik (6) def. Davenport/Morariu (15) 6Ð3 6Ð4 After a long string of failures in finals, Kuznetsova at last wins one; Molik also has her first Slam. Davenport/Morariu, after waiting four years for another Slam final, once again lose — but Morariu was thrilled just to get this far after leukemia and countless injuries. January 29 — Australian Open F: Serena Williams (7) def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 2–6 6–3 6–0 Serena won the last nine games to win her first Slam in a year and a half. Davenport, who has gone five years without a Slam, thus loses both finals. And while the American stays #1, Serena is close enough to threaten in the next few months. January 31 — Pattaya City 1R: Jelena Dokic def. Melinda Czink 7–5 7–5 Dokic snaps a nine match losing streak going back all the way to Charleston. February 1 — Pattaya City 1R: Marlene Weingärtner def. Martina Hingis (WC) 1–6 6–2 6–2 Pan Pacific 1R: Roberta Vinci def. Ai Sugiyama (5) 2Ð6 6Ð3 6Ð2 Hingis made her long-awaited comeback, but lost strength and concentration in the end. Sugiyama lost concentration, too, suffering her fifth straight loss; she has yet to win a match this year and falls to #22. February 2 — Pan Pacific 1R: Jill Craybas def. Tatiana Panova 6–4 4–6 7–5 Pattaya City 2R: Alona Bondarenko def. Jelena Dokic 7Ð6(7Ð1) 1Ð0, retired (groin) One day, two players who had their best results of 2004 at the Pan Pacific both losing. Panova will fall from #60 to about #80; #125 Dokic drops to around #210. February 3 — Pan Pacific 2R: Shinobu Asagoe def. Roberta Vinci 6–0 6–2 Unless Iveta Benesova beats Lindsay Davenport, Asagoe will hit the Top 30 for the first time February 4 — Pan Pacific QF: Shinobu Asagoe def. Elena Dementieva (4) 6–3 6–4 Pattaya City QF: Evgenia Linetskaya def. Vera Zvonareva (1) 6Ð4 6Ð2 Asagoe clinches her Top 30 ranking (she will likely hit Top 25 in the next few weeks); Zvonareva once again falls short of the Top Ten as Linetskaya earns her first Top 20 win and reaches a career high. February 5 — Pan Pacific SF: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (3) 6–1 7–6(7–2) Davenport gains revenge for the U. S. Open and also strengthens her grip on the #1 ranking February 6 — Pan Pacific F: Maria Sharapova (2) def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 6–1 3–6 7–6(7–5) Sharapova wins her first title of 2005, takes the #3 ranking, and ends Davenport’s two year run in Tokyo. February 7 — Paris 1R: Dinara Safina def. Karolina Sprem (6) 6–4 6–2 Safina, who has over 180 points to defend, starts off with a win over the event’s leading indoor-hater. February 8 — Paris 1R: Vera Dushevina (Q) def. Iveta Benesova 6–4 2–6 6–3 Dushevina is one win away from the Top 40; Benesova’s hopes of making the Top 30 are nearly dead. February 9 — Hyderabad 2R: Li Na (1) def. Maria Emilia Salerni 6–2 7–5 On a very dull day otherwise, Li’s routine win puts her in the Top 50 for the first time. February 10 — Paris 2R: Amélie Mauresmo (2) def. Mary Pierce 6–4 6–3 Mauresmo moves back up to #3 in the world and knocks last year’s finalist out of the top 30. February 11 — Paris QF: Amélie Mauresmo (2) def. Magdalena Maleeva (8) 6–2 7–6(7–2) This win, combined with a withdrawal by Serena Williams (stomach flu) puts Mauresmo back at #2. February 12 — Paris SF: Dinara Safina def. Tatiana Golovin 6–1 4–6 7–6(7–2) Safina, who seemed bound out of the Top 50 when this began, instead reaches her first Tier II final. February 13 — Paris F: Dinara Safina def. Amélie Mauresmo (2) 6–4 2–6 6–3 Safina wins her first Tier II title (though she would lose the doubles final) as Mauresmo badly damages her hopes of returning to #1. February 14 — Antwerp 1R: Silvia Farina Elia, withdrawn (shoulder)/replaced by Schaul (LL) Farina Elia was last year’s finalist; her inability to play will drop her out of the Top 30. February 15 — Antwerp 1R: Kim Clijsters def. Jelena Kostanic 6–2 6–3 For a first match back, it was a very good effort indeed.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 248 February 16 — Antwerp 2R: Kim Clijsters def. Nadia Petrova (5) 7–5 6–7(3–7) 6–1 An even more impressive second match for Clijsters. February 17 — Antwerp 2R: Alicia Molik (4) def. Magdalena Maleeva 4–6 6–2 7–6(9–7) Another careerhigh for Molik: She’ll be at least #9. February 18 — Antwerp QF: Venus Williams (3) def. Kim Clijsters 6–2 6–3 Clijsters, the defending champion, will fall out of the Top 100 — but she’s playing, and she says her wrist is fine, and she had two good matches before losing. February 19 — Bogota SF: Lourdes Dominguez Lino (Q) def. Fabiola Zuluaga (1) 7–6(9–7) 7–6(7–3) A player going for her first career final ends Zuluaga’s almost-four-year, 17-match winning streak in Bogota. When the points come off in another week, it will probably cost Zuluaga her Top 25 spot. February 20 — Antwerp F: Amélie Mauresmo (1) def. Venus Williams (3) 4–6 7–5 6–4 Mauresmo is perhaps one final away from a return to #1. February 21 — Doha 1R: Elena Bovina (6) def. Shinobu Asagoe 7–5 7–6(8–6) Bovina comes back strong in her first event of the year, and stops Asagoe from passing Ai Sugiyama to become Japan’s #1. February 22 — Doha 1R DOUBLES: Molik/Schiavone def. Ruano Pascual/Suárez (1) 7–5 5–7 6–3 Having already lost in singles, it’s been a tough comeback for Paola Suárez. February 23 — Doha 2R: Conchita Martinez def. Anastasia Myskina (3) 6–4 7–5 Martinez wins her seventh straight match, and knocks out the defending champion. February 24 — Doha QF DOUBLES: Testud/Vinci def. Stewart/Stosur 1–6 7–6(7–4) 6–4 A pretty good comeback for Testud, considering that she hasn’t played since the Olympics! February 25 — Doha SF: Alicia Molik (4) def. Amélie Mauresmo (1) 7–6(13–11) 6–1 Ah, Mauresmo and the #1 ranking. This will likely be her last chance, and she blew it. Molik hits a career-high #8. February 26 — Doha F: Maria Sharapova (2) def. Alicia Molik (4) 4–6 6–1 6–4 Sharapova wins her second title of the year, hits #3, and takes the #2 spot in the Race. February 27 — Acapulco F: Flavia Pennetta (1) def. Ludmila Cervanova 3–6 7–5 6–3 Pennetta wins her second straight title and shoots up to #25 February 28 — Dubai 1R: Silvia Farina Elia def. Venus Williams (5) 7–5 7–6(8–6) Venus blamed a blister. Whatever the reason, Farina Elia has her first Top Ten win in a long time. March 1 — Dubai 2R: Sania Mirza (WC) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova 6–4 6–2 Mirza scores her first Top Ten win and leaves Kuznetsova #7 — and #4 among Russians March 2 — Dubai QF DOUBLES: Hantuchova/Schiavone (WC) def. Likhovtseva/Martinez (4) 6Ð3 6Ð3 Hantuchova suddenly is coming to life in both singles and doubles: She beat Molik in the singles first round, and she beat Likhovtseva in both singles and doubles on this Wednesday March 3 — Dubai QF: Patty Schnyder (8) def. Anastasia Myskina (3) 6–7(0–7) 7–6(7–2) 6–2 Myskina had a match point. She proceeded to Russianize it — and the whole match. March 4 — Dubai SF: Jelena Jankovic def. Serena Williams (2) 6–0 4–3, retired Serena blamed the balls. Whatever the explanation, Jankovic has her best-ever win, her first Tier II final, and a career high. March 5 — Dubai F: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Jelena Jankovic 6–4 3–6 6–4 Davenport probably didn’t deserve it, but she earns her first title of 2005. March 9 — Indian Wells 1R: Kim Clijsters def. Nicole Pratt 6–2 6–1 One more win, and Clijsters defends her points. Then she gets to start trying to rebuild. March 10 — Indian Wells 1R: Daja Bedanova (WC) def. Kveta Peschke 6–3 3–6 6–3 Bedanova earns her first WTA win since Wimbledon 2003. March 11 — Indian Wells 2R: Mariana Diaz-Oliva (Q) def. Gisela Dulko (21) 6–4 1–6 6–4 Dulko watches 152 points come off and probably sees her days of hovering around #30 end.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 249 March 12 — Indian Wells 2R: Lisa Raymond(31) def. Alona Bondarenko (LL) 4–6 6–3 6–3 It’s not a pretty scoreline, but at least Raymond is playing again. March 13 — Indian Wells 3R: Evgenia Linetskaya (30) def. Amélie Mauresmo (2) 2–6 6–2 7–5 Mauresmo could have earned the #1 ranking at this event. Need I say more? March 14 — Indian Wells 3R: Viktoriya Kutuzova (WC) def. Amy Frazier (17) 6–3 6–3 Kutuzova is having the event of her life — two Top 30 wins, and three straight victories; she’ll move from #473 to around #250. March 15 — Indian Wells 4R: Kim Clijsters def. Evgenia Linetskaya (30) 6–2 6–1 One more win (which she will earn over Conchita Martinez the next day) and Clijsters is Top 100 again. As for Linetskaya, she’s Top 40 and climbing fast. [Later: Too bad her father abuses her. In a few more weeks, she will “hurt” her wrist, and what was looking like a Top 30 run fizzles out.] March 16 — Indian Wells QF: Elena Dementieva (4) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (5) 3–6 6–3 7–5 Not only does Dementieva get revenge for the U. S. Open, she also keeps Kuznetsova at #7. March 17 — Indian Wells QF: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Nathalie Déchy (7) 7–6(7–2) 6–0 Indian Wells QF: Maria Sharapova (3) def. Mary Pierce (20) 6Ð4 6Ð3 And so Davenport and Sharapova will meet in the semifinal — with Sharapova needing to win if she is to have any chance at the #1 ranking at Miami. March 18 — Indian Wells SF: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Maria Sharapova (3) 6–0 6–0 The Shriekinator will not be making #1 at Miami; Davenport is safe at least until Amelia Island. March 19 — Indian Wells F: Kim Clijsters def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 6–4 4–6 6–2 Clijsters wins herfirst title in over a year, and returns to the Top 40 as Davenport shows little of the form she had the day before. March 20 — Indian Wells F DOUBLES: Ruano Pascual/Suárez (1) def. Petrova/Shaughnessy (2) 7Ð6(7Ð3) 6Ð1 Ruano Pascual and Suárez finally break their jinx against Petrova and Shaughnessy [It will turn out that the magic is over for Petrova and Shaughnessy, who will not win a title all year.] March 21 — Miami Qualifying 1R: Stephanie Cohen-Aloro (6) def. Daja Bedanova (WC) 6–3 6–4 Bedanova put in only 45% of her first serves, with predictable results. March 23 — Miami 1R: Marissa Irvin def. Magui Serna (Q) 6–3 7–5 So much for Serna’s seeming return to form. March 24 — Miami 1R: Kim Clijsters def. Sandra Kloesel (Q) 6–0 6–1 Not only does Clijsters post her eighth straight win, but it’s the first bagel of her comeback. March 25 — Miami 2R: Ai Sugiyama (21) def. Jill Craybas 7–5 6–4 Miami 2R: Maria Sharapova (2) def. Eleni Daniilidou 6Ð0 6Ð4 Within a few hours, we lose last year’s quarterfinalist and semifinalist. Daniilidou will fall from #58 to the #90 range; Craybas goes from #73 to below #100. March 26 — Miami 2R: Ana Ivanovic def. Nadia Petrova (10) 6–4 7–5 In a strange match, Ivanovic hits theTop 50 while blocking Petrova’s Top Ten chances (incidentally allowing Vera Zvonareva to return to the Top Ten). March 27 — Miami 3R: Catalina Castaño (Q) def. Patty Schnyder (11) 6–3 2–6 6–1 Even Castaño has to be surprised; after beating Paola Suárez in the second round, she knocks off another seed and, from #111, moves up to the #80 range. March 28 — Miami 4R: Ana Ivanovic def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (6) 6–3 3-6 7–5 Ivanovic scores herfirst Top Ten win and puts herself in the Top 40 March 29 — Miami QF: Venus Williams (8) def. Serena Williams (3) 6–1 7–6(10–8) A typically ugly match,but it breaks Venus’s six match losing streak to Serena and moves her to #8. March 30 — Miami QF: Kim Clijsters def. Elena Dementieva (4) 6–2 6–1 Consecutive win #12 puts Clijsters back in the Top 30 — and she faces Amélie Mauresmo next, with Mauresmo needing a win to get back to #1.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 250 March 31 — Miami SF: Kim Clijsters def. Amélie Mauresmo (1) 6–1 6–0 Miami SF: Maria Sharapova (2) def. Venus Williams (8) 6Ð4 6Ð3 Mauresmo, if she won the final, would be #1. Any surprise that she lost? And, by losing, she opened the door for Sharapova to be #2 if she could beat Clijsters. April 1 — Miami SF DOUBLES: Kuznetsova/Molik (3) def. Ruano Pascual/Suárez (1) 6–4 6–3 Kuznetsova and Molik reach their third final in three tries while breaking the top seeds’ 12-win streak. April 2 — Miami F: Kim Clijsters def. Maria Sharapova (2) 6–3 7–5 Clijsters wins her fourtheenth straight, and her second straight tournament; she is the first person ever to win the Indian Wells/Miami duo since Indian Wells became a 96-draw Tier I. She is back in the Top 20; Sharapova loses the chance to become #2 April 3 — Miami F DOUBLES: Kuznetsova/Molik (3) def. Raymond/Stubbs (5) 7–5 6–7(5–7) 6–2 Raymond and Stubbs make their first final of the year — but it’s Kuznetsova/Molik who are 14–1 this year and have won the two biggest titles so far (Australian Open and Miami). Molik is 18Ð1! April 4 — Amelia Island 1R: Viriginie Razzano def. Emilie Loit 7–5, retired (left wrist) Loit, last year’s Casablanca champion, will fall out of the Top 60 — and she still has Estoril to defend. April 5 — Amelia Island 1R: Virginia Ruano Pascual def. Karolina Sprem (10) 4–6 6–3 6–4 Not even clay can halt Sprem’s slide; she falls out of the Top 20 April 6 — Amelia Island 2R: Virginie Razzano def. Alicia Molik (4) 6–4 6–4 Razzano puts herself in the Top 50 as Molik loses a chance to regain the #8 ranking April 7 — Amelia Island 3R: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Kveta Peschke (Q) 6–2 6–2 It wasn’t much of a match — but rain halted all but two contests. This at least helps Davenport a tiny bit in her quest to stay #1. April 8 — Amelia Island 3R: Shinobu Asagoe (15) def. Anastasia Myskina (3) 7–6(7–5) 7–6(9–7) Amelia Island 3R: Virginie Razzano def. Ai Sugiyama (13) 6Ð4 6Ð7(3Ð7) 7Ð5 Amelia Island QF: Virginie Razzano def. Vera Zvonareva (6) 6Ð4 6Ð4 Amelia Island QF: Silvia Farina Elia (12) def. Serena Williams (2) 5Ð7 7Ð6(9Ð7), retired On a day when almost everyone except Davenport and Zvonareva had to play two matches, upsets reigned. Razzano puts herself in the Top 40, Farina Elia in the Top 20, and Asagoe hitss a career high and is Japan’s #1 player. Our crazy list of semifinalists: Davenport, Petrova, Farina Elia, Razzano. April 9 — Amelia Island QF DOUBLES: Stewart/Stosur def. Raymond/Stubbs (2) 2Ð6 7Ð6(8Ð6) 7Ð6(7Ð2) Down a set and a break when power failed Friday night, the Australian pair took maximum advantage of the respite, winning the quarterfinal and going on to the final — the second time they’ve beaten Raymond/Stubbs and then made the final of a Tier II event this year. (And they would once again take home the title, too.) Goofy. Or maybe it was just a lousy day to be an Australian seed playing with a non-Australian; in addition to Stubbs, Alicia Molik (seeded #5 with Martina Navratilova) suffered only her second loss of the year in doubles — her first before a final. April 10 — Amelia Island F: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Silvia Farina Elia (12) 7–5 7–5 Farina Elia really should have won the second set at least, but instead Davenport takes the Race lead and strengthens her grip on the #1 ranking; this probably blocks Maria Sharapova this clay season. April 11 — Charleston 1R: Justine Hénin-Hardenne def. Jelena Jankovic (10) 5–7 6–4 6–3 Hénin-Hardenne again plays well in her comeback, and returns to the Top 40 April 12 — Charleston 1R: Barbora Strycova def. Conchita Martinez 6–3 6–4 Strycova, #94 coming in and slumping, beats last year’s finalist; that could drop Martinez below #50. April 13 — Charleston 2R: Nicole Vaidisova def. Anastasia Myskina (3) 6–3 5–7 6–4 Vaidisova scores her first Top Ten win as Myskina continues to struggle badly April 14 — Charleston 3R: Tatiana Golovin (13) def. Venus Williams (4) 7–5 6–4 Golovin hits the Top 20 for the first time and drops Venus to #9 — and Venus has reportedly decided not to play any more clay before Roland Garros.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 251 April 15 — Charleston QF: Justine Hénin-Hardenne def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 3–6 6–3 1–0, retired Lindsay’s Law (stating that Davenport gets hurt when she plays three or more weeks in a row) strikes again; it was her hip flexor this time, and it puts Hénin-Hardenne back in the Top 30. April 16 — Charleston SF: Justine Hénin-Hardenne def. Tatiana Golovin (13) 7–6(7–4) 7–5 Just like countrywoman Clijsters, Hénin-Hardenne is in the final in only her second event back. April 17 — Charleston F: Justine Hénin-Hardenne def. Elena Dementieva (2) 7–5 6–2 Look who is back — back in the Top 25 and back in the winner’s circle. April 25 — Estoril 1R: Alona Bondarenko def. Jelena Dokic 6–2 3–6 6–2 So what else is new? But nothing really happened on this day to give us a real Match of the Day. April 26 — Warsaw 1R: Maria Vento-Kabchi def. Francesca Schiavone (9) 5–1, retired (thigh) Schiavone, with over 180 points to defend, will fall from #20 to no better than #26. April 27 — Warsaw 2R: Elena Bovina (5) def. Daniela Hantuchova 6–4 4–6 6–3 It doesn’t affect either of these players much, but it assures that Justine Hénin-Hardenne will return to the Top 20. April 28 — Warsaw 2R: Ana Ivanovic def. Vera Zvonareva (3) 6–2 6–4 Ivanovic is closing in on a Roland Garros seed, while Zvonareva continues her long slump April 29 — Warsaw QF: Ana Ivanovic def. Nathalie Déchy (6) 7–6(7–2) 6–4 And the progress goes on.... April 30 — Warsaw SF: Svetlana Kuznetsova (2) def. Kim Clijsters 2–6 6–2 6–3 And so the Clijsters streak ends at 17… May 1 — Warsaw F: Justine Hénin-Hardenne def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (2) 3–6 6–2 7–5 …but we still have a Belgian streak as Hénin-Hardenne wins #12 straight and returns to the Top 15. May 2 — Berlin 1R: Virginie Razzano def.Karolina Sprem (16) 4–6 6–1 6–2 Sprem’s season-long struggle finally drops her out of the Top 25 May 3 — Berlin 1R: Maria Kirilenko def. Fabiola Zuluaga 6–3 6–1 Zuluaga falls out of the Top 30 as Kirilenko continues to rise quickly this year. May 4 — Berlin 2R: Julia Schruff (WC) def. Anastasia Myskina (3) 6–2 1–6 6–4 The Myskina Meltdown continues; Schruff hits the Top 100 for the first time May 5 — Berlin 3R: Patty Schnyder (7) def. Kim Clijsters (11) 6–7(4–7) 6–5, retired (knee strain) At least it isn’t the wrist. But Clijsters is making noises as if she won’t play any more clay this year. May 6 — Berlin QF: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (12) def. Maria Sharapova (1) 6–2 6–4 Hénin-Hardenne earns consecutive win #15, meaning that Sharapova won’t make #1 this week. May 7 — Berlin SF: Nadia Petrova (6) def. Jelena Jankovic (13) 6–4 6–7(5–7) 6–3 Jankovic had to finish off a win over Elena Bovina before playing the semifinal, and it may have cost her; she still returns to the Top 20, but it’s Petrova going for an actual title. Gulp! May 8 — Berlin F: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (12) def. Nadia Petrova (6) 6–3 4–6 6–3 Petrova does it to herself again — and so Hénin-Hardenne moves up to #11, wins consecutive match #17, and takes home her third title in four events this year; she’s undefeated on clay. May 9 — Rome 1R: Paola Suárez def. Karolina Sprem 6–3 6–0 Suárez wins her first match of the year as Sprem loses again — and, perhaps, falls out of the Top 50. May 10 — Rome 1R: Anna Smashnova def. Elena Likhovtseva (11) 6–1 6–3 Looks like no Top 16 Roland Garros ranking for Likhovtseva May 11 — Rome 2R: Francesca Schiavone def. Serena Williams (3) 7–6(7–2) 6–2 Rome 2R: Gisela Dulko def. Elena Dementieva (4) 7Ð5 6Ð4 And so we know the top Roland Garros seeding tiers: Davenport-Sharapova #1/#2 (in some order), Mauresmo #3, Serena #4, and Dementieva #5. May 12 — Rome 3R: Francesca Schiavone def. Ai Sugiyama (15) 6–3 7–5 One more win, and Schiavone is Italy’s #1 player again. Sugiyama remains Japan’s #2.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 252 May 13 — Rome QF: Maria Sharapova (1) def. Elena Bovina (9) 6–2 6–2 One win away from earning the #1 ranking two weeks from now; two wins from earning it next week May 14 — Rome SF: Patty Schnyder (8) def. Maria Sharapova (1) 3–6 6–3 6–1 Phht! Power doesn’t win everything on clay — and Sharapova won’t be taking the #1 ranking yet. But Schnyder is back in the Top Ten. May 15 — Rome F: Amélie Mauresmo (2) def. Patty Schnyder (8) 2–6 6–3 6–4 Mauresmo lost more points than she won in this match, but she defends her title and keeps alive her faint chances of regaining #1 at Roland Garros. May 16 — Istanbul 1R: Akiko Morigami def. Lisa Raymond (4) 6–1 6–2 So much for Raymond’s Roland Garros preparation. May 17 —Strasbourg 1R: Amy Frazier (7) def. Claudine Schaul (WC) 6–3 6–3 Strasbourg 1R: Zheng Jie def. Chanda Rubin 6Ð4 6Ð2 Istanbul 1R DOUBLES: Stanciute/Szavay (Q) def. Raymond/Stubbs (1) 6Ð4 6Ð4 Say goodnight, Claudine. This loss drops Schaul, last year’s Strasbourg winner, below #150. Rubin’s news is better: She lost, but at least she’s back. As for Raymond — don’t ask me what’s wrong. May 18 — Strasbourg 2R: Peng Shuai def. Tatiana Golovin (2) 6–4 3–6 7–5 Only two seeds made the quarterfinal at Strasbourg, but this was probably the biggest upset — and Golovin would have been #18 had she won it. May 19 — Strasbourg QF: Dally Randriantefy def. Karolina Sprem (6) 6–4 4–6 6–4 The good news is, Sprem won a couple of matches. The bad is, she really should have won more. May 20 — Strasbourg SF: Anabel Medina Garrigues def. Nathalie Déchy (1) 6–4 6–1 Medina Garrigues is Top 40, and Déchy continues to struggle since her Australian Open semifinal. May 21 — Istanbul F: Venus Williams (1) def. Nicole Vaidisova (2) 6–3 6–2 Venus wins her first title since Warsaw 2004, though it doesn’t help her ranking at all. May 23 — Roland Garros 1R: Maria Sanchez Lorenzo def. Anastasia Myskina (5) 6–4 4–6 6–0 Myskina becomes the first Roland Garros defending champion in the Open Era to lose her first round match; it’s likely that she will drop out of the Top Eight. May 24 — Roland Garros 1R: Anna Chakvetadze def. Paola Suárez (26) 7–5 1–6 6–0 Last year’s semifinalist Suárez, who just hasn’t been able to get healthy this year, falls out of the Top 50. May 25 — Roland Garros 1R DOUBLES: Dominguez Lino/Llagostera Vives def Navratilova/Sanchez-Vicario 6Ð4 3Ð6 6Ð3 Sanchez-Vicario, playing her first match of the year, once again fails to win the Roland Garros doubles — the one doubles Slam she has never won. May 26 — Roland Garros 2R: Anabel Medina Garrigues def. Magdalena Maleeva (24) 6–3 6–4 Medina Garrigues may reach the Top 30; she definitely drops Maleeva out May 27 — Roland Garros 3R: Sesil Karatantcheva def. Venus Williams (11) 6–3 1–6 6–1 Venus’s errors take her out of another Slam — and, just possibly, out of the Top 15. May 28 — Roland Garros 3R: Ana Ivanovic(29) def. Amélie Mauresmo (3) 6–4 3–6 6–4 Ivanovic puts herself in the Top 25 as Mauresmo clutches up another French Open May 29 — Roland Garros 4R: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Kim Clijsters (14) 1–6 7–5 6–3 Roland Garros 4R: Elena Likhovtseva (16) def. Elena Dementieva (4) 7Ð6(7Ð3) 5Ð7 7Ð5 Davenport surprises almost everyone with one of the best clay wins of her career, while Likhovtseva knocks last year’s finalist out of the Top Five May 30 — Roland Garros 4R: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (12) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (6) 7Ð6(8Ð6) 4Ð6 7Ð5 It took over three hours, and Kuznetsova blew a 5–3 lead in the third, but Hénin-Hardenne is back in the Top Ten.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 253 May 31 — Roland Garros QF: Mary Pierce (23) def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 6–3 6–2 Roland Garros QF: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (10) def. Maria Sharapova (2) 6–4 6–2 Davenport once again fails to win a major red clay event — but it won’t cost her the #1 ranking, because Sharapova still hasn’t won any clay events at the Tour level June 1 — Roland Garros QF DOUBLES: Morariu/Schnyder (8) def. Raymond/Stubbs (3) 6–4 6–3 Stubbs loses her chance to regain the #1 ranking as Morariu returns to the Top 15 and reaches her second straight Slam semifinal June 2 — Roland Garros SF: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (10) def. Nadia Petrova (7) 6–2 6–3 It was as ugly as you would expect of Petrova in this context. Hénin-Hardenne reaches #7 and wins #23 straight. June 3 — Roland Garros SF DOUBLES: Ruano Pascual/Suárez (1) def. Petrova/Shaughnessy (5) 6Ð2 6Ð4 Roland Garros SF DOUBLES: Black/Huber (2) def. Morariu/Schnyder (8) 6Ð4 6Ð2 And so the final will have the #1 ranking on the line: If Black wins, she’s #1; otherwise, Ruano Pascual will keep the top spot. Huber reaches a career-high #5; Suárez falls to #3; Black is assured at least #2. June 4 — Roland Garros F: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (10) def. Mary Pierce (21) 6–1 6–1 Not much of a final, but it again clearly shows Hénin-Hardenne is back. June 5 — Roland Garros F DOUBLES: Ruano Pascual/Suárez (1) def. Black/Huber (2) 4–6 6–3 6–3 Ruano Pascual stays #1, and the top seeds win Roland Garros #4 and Slam #8. June 6 — Birmingham 1R DOUBLES: Bartoli/Tanasugarn def. (WC) Kirilenko/Sharapova 6–4 6–0 Last year’s champions fall in their opener. Sharapova now has no doubles wins in the last year. June 7 — Birmingham 2R: Anna Chakvetadze def. Evgenia Linetskaya (12) 4–6 6–4 6–4 Let’s hope Linetskaya isn’t developing a case of Russian Disease; she will not be earning a Wimbledon seed. [As noted previously, she doesn’t have Russian Disease; she has her father, which is worse.] June 8 — Birmingham 2R: Laura Granville def. def. Alicia Molik (2) 6–4 6–2 Molik, who is still a unsteady due to her ear infection, loses any chance to be seeded #8 at Wimbledon. June 9 — Birmingham 3R: Anna Chakvetadze def. Shinobu Asagoe (6) 6–4 6–4 Chakvetadze is closing in on the Top 40 after dropping Asagoe out of the Top 25. June 10 — Birmingham QF: Tatiana Golovin (5) def. Anna Chakvetadze 6–4 7–6(7–3) Golovin keeps herself in the Top 20, and blocks Chakvetadze’s run toward the Top 40. June 11 — Birmingham SF DOUBLES: Daniilidou/Russell def. Black/Huber (1) 6–4 7–6(7–3) Daniilidou, who beat Vaidisova and Sugiyama here and scared Sharapova, gives more evidence of finally recovering her form. June 12 — Birmingham F: Maria Sharapova (1) def. Jelena Jankovic (3) 6–2 4–6 6–1 Sharapova wins her first title since Doha, and keeps her vague hopes of reaching #1 vaguely alive. June 13 — Eastbourne 1R: Nathalie Déchy (8) def. Nicole Vaidisova 6–3 6–2 Vaidisova looks like she ought to be a grass player, but she’s only 1–3 in her career on the stuff. June 14 — Eastbourne 1R: Maria Vento-Kabchi (LL) def. Daniela Hantuchova 6–2 4–6 6–4 Vento-Kabchi knocks Hantuchova, last year’s finalist, out of the Top 25 June 15 — Eastbourne 2R: Vera Dushevina (Q) def. Amélie Mauresmo (1) 6–4 6–4 Mauresmo had almost no chance of reaching #1 at Wimbledon, but the chances just went from worse to much worse. June 16 — ’s-Hertogenbosch QF: Gisela Dulko (6) def. Nadia Petrova (2) 6–4 4–6 6–3 Dulko hits a career high of probably #29 as Petrova again fails to win a title. June 17 — Eastbourne SF: Kim Clijsters (7) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (2) 6–4 3–6 6–4 Since she faces Vera Dushevina in the final, it looks like Clijsters will be winning her first Eastbourne title. June 18 — Eastbourne F: Kim Clijsters (7) def. Vera Dushevina (Q) 7–5 6–0 Clijsters may have hurt her back, but she wins her best-ever grass title.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 254 June 20 — Wimbledon 1R: Tamarine Tanasugarn def. Karolina Sprem (25) 6–2 6–2 Sprem’s continued slump costs her her Top 50 ranking. June 21 — Wimbledon 1R: Eleni Daniilidou def. Justine Hénin-Hardenne (7) 7–6(10–8) 2–6 7–5 So much for Hénin-Hardenne’s winning streak — and her hopes of moving above #7. June 22 — Wimbledon 2R: Shenay Perry def. Tamarine Tanasugarn 7–6(7–1) 6–2 Perry wins her first match since Auckland, and drops Tanasugarn to about #80. June 23 — Wimbledon 1R DOUBLES: Cohen-Aloro/Sfar def. Raymond/Stubbs (3) 6–4 3–6 6–2 A pair of nobodies defeat one of the defending champions; Stubbs may lose her Top Five spot June 24 — Wimbledon 3R: Anastasia Myskina (9) def. Jelena Jankovic (17) 6–0 5–7 10–8 A crazy back-and-forth match, but maybe it will help Myskina’s head. At the very least, she moves ahead of Alicia Molik in the rankings, which should keep her Top Ten. June 25 — Wimbledon 3R: Jill Craybas def. Serena Williams (4) 6–3 7–6(7–4) A stiff and sick Serena loses to a healthy Craybas — and falls out of the Top Five. June 27 — Wimbledon 4R: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Kim Clijsters (15) 6–3 6–7(4–7) 6–3 Davenport clinches the #1 ranking, no matter what Maria Sharapova does. June 28 — Wimbledon QF: Venus Williams (14) def. Mary Pierce (12) 6–0 7–6(12–10) Venus reaches her first Slam semifinal since Wimbledon 2003. June 29 — Wimbledon QF DOUBLES: Black/Huber (2) def. Hantuchova/Sugiyama (7) 6–3 6–2 In a match between last year’s finalists, Huber knocks her ex-partner Sugiyama out of the Top Ten. June 30 — Wimbledon SF: Venus Williams (14) def. Maria Sharapova (2) 7–6(7–2) 6–1 Venus puts herself back in the Top Ten and pretty well kills Sharapova’s #1 hopes. July 1 — Wimbledon SF: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Amélie Mauresmo 6–7(5–7) 7–6(7–4) 6–4 Mauresmo held a lead in every set. But this was a Slam semifinal; what did you expect? July 2 — Wimbledon F: Venus Williams (14) def Lindsay Davenport (1) 4–6 7–6(7–4) 9–7 Davenport blows another Slam as Venus earns her first Slam title since the 2001 U. S. Open July 3 — Wimbledon F DOUBLES: Black/Huber (2) def. Kuznetsova/Mauresmo 6–2 6–2 Black defends the only Slam she’s ever won, and Huber wins her first and reaches a career-high #4. July 11 — Modena 1R: Yan Zi def. Marta Domachowska (4) 2–6 7–6(7–5) 6–1 There were only three players ranked above #60 in the Modena draw, and this is one down. It may be a very dull week.... July 12 — Modena 1R: Flavia Pennetta (2) def. Virginia Ruano Pascual 6–2 6–7(7–9) 7–6(7–2) It could hardly get closer, but it puts Pennetta back in the Top 25. July 13 — Modena 2R: Agnes Szavay (Q) def. Zuzana Ondraskova 6–3 6–3 Szavay reaches herfirst WTA quarterfinal and moves above #250. July 14 — Modena 2R: Tathiana Garbin def. Jelena Kostanic (6) 6–2 6–3 Kostanic has fallen from #35 to #63 this year. Whatever is plaguing her doesn’t seem to be going away. July 15 — Modena QF: Anges Szavay (Q) def. Francesca Schiavone (1) 6–1 6–4 Another week, another lack of a title for Schiavone; she hasn’t reached a semifinal since Warsaw 2004. July 16 — Modena SF: Anna Smashnova (5) def. Flavia Pennetta (2) 7–5 6–3 Pennetta won’t becomne Italy’s #2, but Smashnova has her first final since winning Vienna 2004. July 17 — Modena F: Anna Smashnova (5) def. Tathiana Garbin 6–6(3–0), retired (Heat Exhaustion) And Smashnova rises to 10–0 in finals in her career — though she still is below the Top 50. July 18 — Cincinnati 1R: Chanda Rubin def. Laura Granville 6–3 6–4 Rubin plays only her third event of the year, and wins her first match. [But she won’t be able to play again this year.] July 19 — Palermo 1R: Tszvetana Pironkova def. Silvia Farina Elia (1) 7–6(7–3) 2–0, retired It may not mean much, given Farina’s shoulder problems [and her upcoming decision to retire], but Pironkova, who is playing only her second WTA event, now has a Top 25 win.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 255 July 20 — Cincinnati 2R: Shahar Peer def. Ai Sugiyama (6) 5–7 7–6(8–6) 6–4 With Anna Smashnova’s loss to Pironkova at Palermo (ending her six match losing streak), there is a faint chance that Peer could become Israel’s #1 this week. July 21 — Cincinnati 2R: Akiko Morigami def. Vera Zvonareva (2) 6–3 6–2 Whatever it is that has Zvonareva so messed up obviously isn’t getting better. July 22 — Cincinnati QF: Bethanie Mattek (Q) def. Jelena Jankovic (3) 6–1 0–6 6–2 Huh? It’s not just the scoreline; it’s that Bethanie Mattek had never made a WTA quarterfinal until now, and here she is in a semifinal with a Top 20 win. July 23 — Cincinnati SF: Akiko Morigami def. Daniela Hantuchova (4) 6–4 6–4 Morigami makes her first career final and puts a real crimp in Hantuchova’s Top 20 hopes. July 24 — Cincinnati F: Patty Schnyder (1) def. Akiko Morigami 6–4 6–0 Second title of the year for Schnyder, though it doesn’t help her ranking July 25 — Stanford 1R: Amy Frazier def. Maria Vento-Kabchi 6–3 6–0 Amy Frazier. California hardcourts. Clearly the woman and the hour have met. July 26 — Stanford 1R: Meghann Shaughnessy (Q) def. Vera Zvonareva (5) 6–3 1–6 7–6(8–6) It just keeps getting uglier for Zvonareva.... July 27 — Stanford 2R: Patty Schnyder (3) def. Marion Bartoli 6–4 7–5 Schnyder knocks Bartoli out of the Top 30 — and Anastasia Myskina out of the Top Ten. Either Schnyder or Kim Clijsters will replace Myskina. July 28 — Stanford 2R: Anna-Lena Grönefeld def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 5–0, retired Davenport’s back acted up again — and that means her #1 ranking, which had seemed safe for the next several months, will be under severe threat in two weeks. July 29 — Stanford QF: Anna-Lena Grönefeld def. Nathalie Déchy (6) 2–6 6–2 6–3 Grönefeld evidently wants to prove that her result here wasn’t pure fluke.... July 30 — Stanford SF: Venus Williams (2) def. Patty Schnyder (3) 2–6 7–6(7–4) 6–2 Patty Schnyder had five match points to beat Venus and clinch a Top Ten spot. She obviously blew them all. July 31 — Stanford F: Kim Clijsters (4) def. Venus Williams (2) 7–5 6–2 Clijsters wins her fourth title of the year and puts herself back in the Top Ten. August 1 — San Diego 1R: Anna Chakvetadze def. Tatiana Golovin (12) 6–4 6–4 San Diego 1R: Sesil Karatantcheva def. Shinobu Asagoe (13) 6Ð1 0Ð6 7Ð5 Asagoe will, and Golovin might, drop out of the Top 25, while Chakvetadze closes in on the Top Thirty. August 2 — San Diego 1R: Mashona Washington def. Karolina Sprem 2–6 7–6(7–1) 6–1 San Diego 2R: Peng Shuai def. Elena Dementieva 7Ð5 6Ð4 San Diego 1R DOUBLES: Domachowska/Kirilenko def. Asagoe/Peer 4Ð6 7Ð6(20Ð18) 7Ð6(7Ð5) After (I think) the longest tiebreak of the year, Asagoe falls out of the Top 25 in doubles as well as singles; Sprem will fall to around #80; Dementieva loses her chance to return to the Top Five. August 3 — San Diego 2R: Sania Mirza def. Nadia Petrova (4) 6–2 6-1 Mirza puts herself in the Top 50 as the bottom half of the San Diego draw is nearly emptied of seeds August 4 — San Diego R16: Anna Chakvetadze def. Elena Likhovtseva (9) 6–3 6–1 Chakvetadze has almost clinched her Top 30 spot, and Likhovtseva falls to #20. August 5 — San Diego QF: Peng Shuai def. Kim Clijsters 6–4 6–4 San Diego QF: Akiko Morigami def. Anna Chakvetadze 6Ð3 6Ð4 San Diego QF: Ai Sugiyama def. Sesil Karatantcheva 6Ð1 6Ð2 On a day when two of our surprise youngsters fell (meaning that neither will hit the Top 30), Peng Shuai wins thematch of her life and hits a career high. As does Morigami. And Sugiyama finally has a semifinal this year. This will prove to be the only hardcourt loss of the year for Clijsters.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 256 August 6 — San Diego SF DOUBLES: Hantuchova/Sugiyama (5) def. Black/Stubbs (1) 6Ð7(10Ð12) 6Ð4 6Ð3 San Diego SF DOUBLES: Martinez/Ruano Pascual (3) def. Likhovtseva/Zvonareva 1Ð3, retired (Zvonareva/ankle) San Diego SF: Ai Sugiyama def. Akiko Morigami 6Ð4 4Ð3, retired (knee tendonitis) Sugiyama is Top 30 and Japan’s #1 again — and Cara Black suffers her first loss of 2005 with Rennae Stubbs, meaning that she will not become the doubles #1, at least this week. August 7 — San Diego F: Mary Pierce (6) def. Ai Sugiyama 6–0 6–3 Pierce wins her first better-than-Tier-III title since Roland Garros 2000, and is closing in on the Top Ten. Sugiyama at least returns to the Top 30, but she had a really tough day, losing the doubles also. August 8 — Los Angeles 1R: Aiko Nakamura (Q) def. Flavia Pennetta (10) 6–3 6–4 Pennetta, last year’s Sopot champion, will probably fall out of the Top 30. August 9 — Los Angeles 1R: Karolina Sprem def. Yuliana Fedak (Q) 6–4 7–6(13–11) Finally, a win for Sprem! August 10 — Los Angeles 2R: Eleni Daniilidou def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (2) 6–4 6–4 What is wrong with Kuznetsova? August 11 — Stockholm 2R: Anastasia Myskina (2) def. Camille Pin 6–7(3–7) 6–4 6–1 Why can’t Myskina have an easy match even against the easy players? August 12 — Los Angeles QF: Daniela Hantuchova def. Maria Sharapova walkover (pectoral strain) No #1 for Sharapova this week. Aren’t players supposed to at least reach #1 before they lose the ranking to injury? [Sharapova in fact would make #1 for one week, then lose the top spot again.] August 13 — Los Angeles SF DOUBLES: Dementieva/Pennetta def. Martinez/Ruano Pascual (2) 6Ð4 6Ð7)6Ð8) 6Ð1 Dementieva lost an ugly shocker in singles (6Ð3 6Ð4 to Hantuchova), but she turned around to end Ruano Pascual’s 16-match doubles winning streak. August 14 — Los Angeles F: Kim Clijsters (5) def. Daniela Hantuchova (9) 6–4 6–1 Her tour-leading fifth title of the year puts Clijsters back up at #8. August 15 — Canadian Open 1R: Shinobu Asagoe def. Aleksandra Wozniak (WC) 6–2 6–2 On a day when absolutely nothing else happened, Asagoe at least broke her five match losing streak. August 16 — Canadian Open 1R: Li Na def. Jelena Jankovic (11) 6–4 5–7 6–2 No career high or Top 16 U. S. Open seed for Jankovic.... August 17 — Canadian Open 2R: Gisela Dulko def. Tatiana Golovin (16) 1–6 6–0 6–1 Looks like Golovin hurt something again. August 18 — Canadian Open 3R: Gisela Dulko def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (3) 7–6(7–3) 7–6(10–8) Kuznetsova’s back spasms clinch a Top 30 ranking for Dulko August 19 — Canadian Open QF: Amélie Mauresmo (2) def. Nadia Petrova (6) 4–6 7–5 2–0, retired Here we go again. Not only is Petrova hurt, but she won’t get a Top Eight U. S. Open seed. August 20 — Canadian Open SF: Justine Hénin-Hardenne (4) def. Amélie Mauresmo (2) 7–5 3–6 6–1 That pretty well kills Mauresmo’s faint hopes of regaining the #1 ranking any time soon. August 21 — Canadian Open F: Kim Clijsters (7) def. Justine Hénin-Hardenne (4) 7–5 6–1 Title #6 of 2005 for Clijsters puts her in the Top Five, and drops Olympic champion Hénin-Hardenne out. August 22 — New Haven 1R: Meghann Shaughnessy def. Nathalie Déchy (9) 7–6(7–3) 2–6 6–4 Shaughnessy shows signs of life as she knocks out last year’s finalist. August 23 — New Haven 2R: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Kveta Peschke (Q) 6–4 6–1 Not much of a match, but Davenport is playing and has chances to regain the #1 ranking she just lost. August 24 — New Haven 2R: Daniela Hantuchova def. Patty Schnyder (11) 5–7 6–2 6–4 New Haven 2R: Amélie Mauresmo (2) def. Elena Likhovtseva 6–1 6–3 With these results, Likhovtseva is back out of the Top 20 and Hantuchova is back in.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 257 August 25 — New Haven QF: Anabel Medina Garrigues def. Elena Dementieva (4) 6–4 6–3 Medina Garrigues hits the Top 30; Dementieva loses her last chance to earn points before her USO final comes off. August 26 — New Haven SF: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Anna Chakvetadze 6–3 6–3 It was a lot tougher than the score — Chakvetadze made a lot of nervous errors on big points — but it lets Davenport reclaim the #1 ranking for the next fortnight at least. Chakvetadze still has her first WTA semifinal and a Top 25 ranking. [Sadly, it seems to use up all she had; the rest of 2005 is all downhill.] August 27 — New Haven F: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Amélie Mauresmo (2) 6–4 6–4 Davenport picks up her first title since Amelia Island and improves her chances of staying #1 after the U. S. Open. August 29 — U. S. Open 1R: Ekaterina Bychkova def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (5) 6–3 6–2 Bychkova, playing in her first event above the Tier III level, defeats the defending USO champion. The injured Kuznetsova will probably fall out of the Top Ten. August 30 — U. S. Open 1R: Elena Dementieva (6) def. Lucie Safarova 7–5 6–3 It was an upset-less day; 16 of 16 seeds ina ction advanced. Here, last year’s finalist ends Safarova’s four-match winning streak. August 31 — U. S. Open 2R: Maria Vento-Kabchi def. (18) Ana Ivanovic 3–6 7–5 6–1 What is probably Ivanovic’s worst loss of the year costs her her chance to reach the Top 15. September 1 — U. S. Open 2R: Yoon Jeong Cho def. Gisela Dulko (27) 6–4 6–3 Fifteen of sixteen bottom half seeds reached the third round; Dulko is the only exception. September 2 — U. S. Open 2R DOUBLES: Asagoe/Srebotnik (10) def. Likhovtseva/Maleeva 6–2 6–4 She didn’t say anything at the time, but odds are that this will be Maleeva’s last Slam match. [It was.] September 3 — U. S. Open 3R: Elena Dementieva (6) def. Anna Chakvetadze (29) 6–1 4–6 7–6(7–5) U. S. Open 3R: Patty Schnyder (11) def. Shinobu Asagoe (24) 6Ð1 6Ð3 Chakvetadze had this won as Dementieva produced 19 double-faults — but still lost, and is out of the Top 30 as a result. Asagoe, too, falls out of the Top 30. September 4 — U. S. Open 4R: Venus Williams (10) def. Serena Williams (8) 7–6(7–5) 6–2 It was typically bad, but it makes Venus once again the #1 Williams September 5 — U. S. Open 4R: Mary Pierce (12) def. Justine Hénin-Hardenne (7) 76–3 6–3 Hénin-Hardenne hasn’t won an event away from clay this year — and that puts Pierce on the brink of a return to the Top Ten for the first time in four and a half years. September 6 — U. S. Open QF: Kim Clijsters (4) def. Venus Williams (10) 4–6 7–5 6–1 Clijsters really ought to have lost this — she was down 6–4 4–2 — but Venus fell apart (tired? sick?) after that, meaning that she won’t be returning to the Top Five. September 7 — U. S. Open QF: Elena Dementieva (6) def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 6–2 3–6 7–6(8–6) U. S. Open QF DOUBLES: Raymond/Stosur (6) def. Black/Stubbs 5Ð7 6Ð4 6Ð4 U. S. Open QF DOUBLES: Martinez/Ruano Pascual (3) def. Yan/Zheng 6Ð3 6Ð4 The singles result means that Lindsay Davenport loses the #1 ranking; Maria Sharapova regains the top spot in singles. The two doubles results combine to mean that Virginia Ruano Pascual remains #1; Cara Black will fall at least four points short. September 8 — U. S. Open SF DOUBLES: Raymond/Stosur (6) def. Martinez/Ruano Pascual (3) 7Ð5 4Ð6 7Ð6(7Ð2) Raymond/Stosur extend their winning streak to nine and assure that no one will win two Slams this year. Stosur is now Top Ten, giving Australia three Top Ten doubles players (Molik, Stosur, Stubbs) September 9 — U. S. Open SF: Kim Clijsters (4) def. Maria Sharapova (1) 6–2 6–7(4–7) 6–3 U. S. Open SF: (12) Mary Pierce def. (6) Elena Dementieva 3Ð6 6Ð2 6Ð2 Clijsters is up to #3, Pierce is #6 and in her second Slam final of the year; Dementieva falls to #8. September 10 — U. S. Open F: Kim Clijsters (4) def. Mary Pierce (12) 6–3 6–1 At last, Kim Clijsters earns the Slam she so long ago proved herself good enough to win.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 258 September 11 — U. S. Open F DOUBLES: Raymond/Stosur (6) def. Dementieva/Pennetta (14) 6Ð2 5Ð7 6Ð3 It was a match nobody really wanted to win, but Stosur picks up her first women’s doubles Slam, and Raymond her fourth (and first without Rennae Stubbs); Stosur, as noted above, is now Top Ten. September 12 — Bali 1R: Francesca Schiavone (4) def. Jamea Jackson 6–4 3–6 6–4 It’s only one win, but it will probably put Schiavone in the Top 25. September 13 — Bali 1R: Alicia Molik (3) def. Mariana Diaz-Oliva 7–6(8–6) 6–3 Molik at last scores her first win since Miami. September 14 — Bali 2R: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Rika Fujiwara 6–3 6–2 A meaningless match (they were all meaningless on this day; there were no surprises and no close singles matches), but Davenport is apparently over her U. S. Open problems. September 15 — Bali 2R: Alona Bondarenko def. Alicia Molik (3) 6–4 6–2 Maybe Molik isn’t as recovered as we hoped. September 16 — Bali QF: Francesca Schiavone (4) def. Flavia Pennetta (6) 5–7 6–3 7–5 On a day when all higher-seeded players/teams won, Schiavone assures that she will be Italy’s #1. September 17 — Bali SF: Francesca Schiavone (4) def. Patty Schnyder (2) 1–6 6–4, retired (heat) Schiavone reaches only her third career final, and her best. Problem is, Lindsay Davenport is waiting. September 18 — Bali F: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Francesca Schiavone (4) 6–2 6–4 You aren’t actually surprised, are you? September 19 — Beijing 1R: Mariana Diaz-Oliva def. Alicia Molik (5) 7–6(7–1) 6–7(4–7) 6–4 Here we go again. September 20 — Portoroz 1R: Vanessa Henke def. Silvia Farina Elia (1) 6–1 6–7(3–7) 6–4 Farina Elia loses her fifth straight and loses her chance for a return to the Top 25 as Henke wins her first WTA match of the year. September 21 — Beijing 2R: Sun Tiantian (WC) def. Serena Williams (4) 6–2 7–6(9–7) OK, Serena, how much longer will it take you to figure it out: Either you’re a tennis player or you’re a psuedo-celebrity. Lose the life — or lose the tennis. September 22 — Beijing 2R: Shinobu Asagoe def. Jill Craybas 6–2 6–4 In her first event since falling out of the Top 30, Asagoe seems to be trying to get back in; this moves her back above #35. September 23 — Beijing QF: Marta Domachowska def. Venus Williams (3) Walkover (Knee) Another day, another Williams out. September 24 — Beijing SF: Maria Kirilenko def. Maria Sharapova 6–4 2–1, retired (pectoral) Kolkata SF: Karolina Sprem (7) def. Elena Likhovtseva (2) 4Ð6 6Ð4 6Ð1 Kolkata SF DOUBLES: Myskina/Likhovtseva (1) def. Mirza/Ruano Pascual (4) 4Ð6 6Ð3 7Ð5 Ruano Pascual just can’t seem to secure her grip on the #1 doubles ranking; Sharapova doesn’t do much for her hold on #1 (she’ll keep the ranking, but her Race standing is fragile), and Sprem, who hadn’t been past a quarterfinal this year, reaches her first final in over two years — though she will lose it to Myskina, who has been struggling herself. September 25 — Beijing F: Maria Kirilenko def. Anna-Lena Grönefeld (9) 6–3 6–4 Kirilenko becomes the lowest-ranked Tier II winner in ages — and hits the Top 30 September 26 — Luxembourg 1R: Anna Chakvetadze def. Magdalena Maleeva (WC) 7–5 2–6 6–4 At least people got a long almost-last look at Maleeva. Sadly, this will drop her out of the Top 60. September 27 — GuangZhou 1R: Li Ting def. Vera Zvonareva (1) 6–3 7–6 Zvonareva plays her first event since San Diego, but without much success. September 28 — GuangZhou 2R: Victoria Azarenka (Q) def. Martina Sucha (8) 6–3 6–2 Azarenka makes her first quarterfinal and costs last year’s finalist about a dozen ranking spots. September 29 — Luxembourg 2R: Roberta Vinci def. Patty Schnyder (3) 7–6(7–2) 5–7 6–4 Vinci hits the Top 50 and keeps Schnyder at #10.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 259 September 30 — GuangZhou QF: Yan Zi def. Li Na (3) 6–7(5–7) 7–5 7–6(7–4) Yan drops last year’s winner out of the Top 50. Li said earlier she felt confused by Chinese behavior toward their players. Evidently so. October 1 — Luxembourg SF: Anne-Lena Grönefeld def. Dinara Safina (7) 6–4 5–7 6–4 Grönefeld blew a Top 20 chance last week, but this clinches it. October 2 — Luxembourg F DOUBLES: Raymond/Stosur (2) def. Black/Stubbs (1) 7–5 6–1 Not only do Raymond/Stosur win consecutive match #14, but they again block Black’s quest for #1. October 3 — Filderstadt Qualifying F: Eleni Daniilidou (5) def. Kveta Peschke (2) 4Ð6 7Ð6(8Ð6) 7Ð6(7Ð2) More progress for Daniilidou: She makes it through a pretty tough qualifying draw. October 4 — Filderstadt 1R DOUBLES: Dementieva/Pennetta def. Black/Stubbs (1) 7–5 6–4 There go Black’s chances to take the #1 spot, probably for a long time; she was defending champion. October 5 — Filderstadt 2R: Flavia Pennetta def. Justine Hénin-Hardenne (4) 6–4 6–3 So much for Hénin-Hardenne getting to #4 in the next few weeks.... October 6 — Japan Open 2R: Vera Zvonareva def. Shahar Peer 6–3 7–5 Zvonareva reaches her first quarterfinal since Rome, and against a pretty good opponent. Progress? October 7 —Filderstadt QF: Elena Dementieva (5) def. Kim Clijsters (2) 6–3 3–6 6–2 No #1 ranking for Clijsters this week. She may not even move up to #2; it depends on Lindsay Davenport. October 8 —Filderstadt SF: Amélie Mauresmo (2) def. Elena Dementieva (5) 6–3 6–4 How could Dementieva be so good on Friday (she said, quite possibly correctly, that it was the best match she ever played) and this bad on Saturday? October 9 — Filderstadt F: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Amélie Mauresmo (3) 6–2 6–4 Davenport defends her title, holds the #2 ranking — and earns her fiftieth career title. October 10 — Moscow 1R: Elena Likhovtseva def. Vera Dushevina 3–6 6–2 7–5 Likhovtseva drops her young countrywoman out of the Top 40. October 11 — Moscow 1R: Flavia Pennetta def. Nathalie Déchy 6–3 7–5 What is with Pennetta all of a sudden? Until Filderstadt, she had only one indoor WTA win in her life, and that as a Lucky Loser, and now she has three in ten days, two of them over Top 15 players. October 12 — Moscow 2R: Maria Sharapova (1) def. Anna-Lena Grönefeld 1–6 2–4, retired Grönefeld was six points from the match when she twisted her ankle and had to retire. October 13 — Moscow 2R: Francesca Schiavone def. Amélie Mauresmo (2) 6–1 6–1 Mauresmo, who said she had trouble adjusting to the surface and played very badly, loses the chance to reach #3 in the Race. October 14 — Moscow QF: Dinara Safina def. Maria Sharapova (1) 1–6 6–4 7–5 Safina wins the match Grönefeld couldn’t win, and hits the Top 20 along the way. October 15 — Moscow SF DOUBLES: Black/Stubbs (1) def. Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (4) 3–6 6–3 6–3 Cara Black, after sundry bad failures, finally attains the #1 doubles ranking. October 16 — Moscow F: Mary Pierce (3) def. Francesca Schiavone 6–46–3 Pierce didn’t face a Top 15 opponent, but she still wins her second Tier I of the year and is up to #5. October 17 — Zürich 1R: Magdalena Maleeva (WC) def. Anna Chakvetadze 6–1 6–1 Maleeva starts her last WTA event with a win October 18 — Zürich 1R: Jelena Jankovic def. Alicia Molik (8) 6–3 4–2, retired (ear infection) The Endless Illness deals Molik its worst blow yet; Molik will be falling out of the Top 20. [She will later announce that she is quitting the Tour until and unless she can shake this thing.] October 19 — Zürich 2R: Patty Schnyder (6) def. Magdalena Maleeva 6–3 6–2 And that’s it. The last match of Magdalena Maleeva’s career, at the event where she won her first Tier I title. Thanks for sixteen impressive years.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 260 October 20 — Zürich 2R: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Daniela Hantuchova 3–6 7–5 6–2 Hantuchova served for the match, was broken, and was never the same as Davenport regains #1. October 21 — Zürich QF: Ana Ivanovic def. Katarina Srebotnik (Q) 6–3 6–1 Ivanovic keeps Srebotnik out of the Top 30 and all but clinches a year-end Top 20 ranking. October 22 — Zürich SF DOUBLES: Black/Stubbs (2) def. Asagoe/Srebotnik 6–7(5–7) 7–5 6–2 It wasn’t easy, but Black keeps the #1 doubles ranking for at least another week. October 23 — Zürich F: Lindsay Davenport (1) def. Patty Schnyder (6) 7–6(7–5) 6–3 Davenport wins her third straight title and regains the lead in the Race October 24 — Hasselt 1R: Kirsten Flipkens def. Silvia Farina Elia (6) 6–3 6–2 This will be Farina Elia’s last match. A sad way to end a quietly excellent career. October 25 — Linz 1R: Kveta Peschke def. Vera Zvonareva 7–5 7–5 Zvonareva has about 300 more points to defend by year-end. If she doesn’t wake up soon, she’ll end 2005 around #40. October 26— Linz 2R: Kveta Peschke def. Elena Dementieva (2) 6–3 7–5 Hasselt 2R: Julia Schruff def. Els Callens (WC) 6Ð3 6Ð1 Callens ends her career (except for the doubles here with Kim Clijsters); Dementieva does almost as good a job on her year-end Championships chances. October 27 — Linz QF DOUBLES: Dulko/Peschke def. Black/Stubbs (1) 7–6(7–2) 6–4 It’s not quite certain, but this probably means that doubles #1 Black won’t make the year-end Championships. [That statement, obviously, was wrong, but it took some strange circumstances to get her in.] October 28 — Hasselt QF: Michaella Krajicek def. Nathalie Déchy (2) 6–4 6–3 Krajicek closes in on theTop50 as Déchy suffers her worst loss of the year. October29 — Linz SF: Nadia Petrova (3) def. Kveta Peschke 6–3 6–4 Peschke falls just short of the Top30 — but Petrova is in another final, and she’ll face Patty Schnyder, who hurt her wrist in the semifinal. October 30 — Linz F: Nadia Petrova (3) def. Patty Schnyder (4) 4–6 6–3 6–1 A (self-inflicted) bad wrist proves more of a problem than a bad head as Petrova wins her first title. October 31 — Philadelphia 1R: Tatiana Panova def. Jelena Jankovic (8) 6–4 3–6 7–5 A still-sick Jankovic, gasping and leaning on her racquet between points, loses her chance to end the year in the Top 20. It’s starting to look as if Jankovic might be yet another Mysterious Career- Threatening Illness victim. November 1 — Philadelphia 1R: Sesil Karatantcheva def. Vera Zvonareva (9) 7–5 6–3 Zvonareva, last year’s finalist, will end the year outside the Top 40 November 2 — Philadelphia 2R: Elena Dementieva (4) def. Angelika Bachmann 6–3 6–4 Dementieva is one win away from qualifying for the year-end Championships. November 3 — Philadelphia QF DOUBLES: Likhovtseva/Zvonareva (3) def. Alves/Rolle (Q) 6–2 6–4 Despite playing for only half a year, and Zvonareva’s summer injury break, the Russians make the year-end Championships November 4 — Philadelphia QF: Elena Dementieva (4) def. Kveta Peschke 4–6 6–0 6–3 Dementieva earns revenge for the previous week and, with Justine Hénin-Hardenne not playing, qualifies for the WTA Championships. November 5 — Quebec City SF: Amy Frazier (6) def. Nathalie Déchy (1) 6–4 7–5 Frazier reaches her first final since the start of the year, and she will go on to win the title. November 6 — Philadelphia F: Amélie Mauresmo (3) def. Elena Dementieva (4) 7–5 2–6 7–5 Mauresmo completes her third title at Philadelphia; she has won the tournament every time it has been played in its revival. November 8 — Los Angeles Championships RR: Mary Pierce def.Kim Clijsters (2) 6–1 4–6 7–6(7–2) This doesn’t quite kill the chances for Clijsters to end the year at #1 — but it really, really doesn’t help.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 261 November 9 — Los Angeles RR: Amélie Mauresmo (4) def. Kim Clijsters (2) 6–3 7–6(7–4) And that really is that: Clijsters is 0Ð2 and unlikely to make the semifinal; Davenport is 2Ð0 and nearly sure to do so; Davenport will end the year at #1. November 10 — Los Angeles RR: Amélie Mauresmo (4) def. Elena Dementieva 6–2 6–3 And with that, Kim Clijsters is formally out of the Los Angeles semifinal, and Lindsay Davenport (even though she lost on this day to Maria Sharapova) is in — which makes it official: Davenport is the year- end #1, and the last year-end under a ranking system with quality points in it to give it some semblance of reality. November 11 — Los Angeles RR: Mary Pierce def. Amélie Mauresmo (4) 2–6 6–4 6–2 Pierce is the only player to go 3Ð0 in the Championships. Mauresmo is also in the semifinal, so the #4 ranking is still in play — but this can only help Pierce. November 12 — Los Angeles SF: Mary Pierce def. Lindsay Davenport (1) 7–6(7–5) 7–6(8–6) Los Angeles SF DOUBLES: Black/Stubbs (1) def. Likhovtseva/Zvonareva 6Ð4 7Ð6(7Ð4) Black clinches the year-end doubles #1; Pierce sends Davenport home without any title bigger than a Tier I this year. November 13 — Los Angeles F: Amélie Mauresmo (4) def. Mary Pierce 5–7 7–6(7–3) 6–4 Mauresmo, helped by a rash of Pierce errors in the last two games, finally wins a Big One, and moves up to the year-end #3.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 262 WTA Tour History Who Won What Summary — Singles The following table shows all active Tier II or higher titles and lists which of the top players have won them. The figures in the boxes show how many times the player has won each event and the year of her earliest win (e.g. by the Australian Open, in the column for Capriati, we see 2/01 — Capriati has won the Australian Open two times, starting in 2001). Looking at this list can give a measure both of a player’s success (Davenport, e.g., has a lot of titles) and her weaknesses (but Davenport has big holes in the clay season) The players listed are the Top Ten, plus the major players of recent years. Several of these players have also won Tier II events that are no longer played. The list: Clijsters — Hamburg (1/02), Leipzig (2/00); Davenport — Atlanta (1/97), Chicago (1/97), Princess Cup (1/99), Scottsdale (1/01); Dementieva — Shanghai (1/03); Hingis — Hamburg (2/98); Martinez — Barcelona (1/ 91), Hamburg (1/95), Houston (1/93), Stratton Mountain (2/93), Tampa (1/89); Mauresmo — Nice (1/01); Pierce — Princess Cup (1/95); Schnyder — Hannover (1/98); Seles — Bahia (1/01), Barcelona (1/92), Chicago (1/93), Essen (1/92), Houston (3/89), Milan (1/91), Princess Cup (5/91), San Antonio (1/90), Tampa (1/90); S. Williams — Hannover (1/00), Princess Cup (2/00), Scottsdale (1/02), Leipzig (1/02); V. Williams — Hamburg (2/99). In addition, some of our players won some of these events before they reached Tier II status: Clijsters won Luxembourg 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003; Martinez won Paris 1990.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 263 Event Capri Clijst Daven Deme Hénin Hingi Marti Maure Petrov Pierce Schny Seles Shara SWill VWill Sydney 1/93 1/03 1/99 1/04 3/97 1/00 1/96 Australian 2/01 1/00 1/04 3/97 1/95 4/91 2/03 Pan Paciﬁc 4/98 4/97 1/05 Paris 1/04 1/97 1/01 1/98 2/99 1/02 Antwerp 1/04 1/05 2/02 Doha 1/05 Dubai 1/05 2/03 1/01 1/02 1/02 Indian Wel 2/03 2/97 1/04 1/98 1/92 2/99 Miami 1/05 2/97 2/90 3/02 3/98 Amelia Isl 3/97 1/03 1/95 1/01 1/98 2/99 1/02 Charleston 1/01 2/03 2/97 2/94 1/00 1/04 Warsaw 1/05 1/03 1/04 Berlin 3/02 1/99 2/98 2/01 1/90 Rome 1/03 1/98 4/93 2/04 1/97 2/90 1/02 1/99 Roland G 1/01 2/03 1/00 3/90 1/02 Eastbourne 1/05 1/01 1/96 Wimbledon 1/99 1/97 1/94 1/04 2/02 3/00 Stanford 3/01 3/98 2/96 2/90 2/00 San Diego 2/91 2/98 1/03 2/97 1/95 1/05 3/00 Los Angeles 2/03 4/96 1/95 3/90 2/99 Canadian O 1/91 1/05 1/03 2/99 2/02 4/95 1/01 New Haven 1/03 1/05 4/99 U.S. Open 1/05 1/98 1/03 1/97 2/91 2/99 2/00 Beijing 1/04 Luxembourg 1/05 Filderstadt 2/02 3/01 4/96 1/93 Moscow 1/00 2/98 Zürich 4/97 1/03 1/00 1/02 1/99 Linz 2/00 1/02 1/04 1/05 1/99 Philadelphia 2/99 1/97 1/93 3/03 1/91 Champions 2/02 1/99 2/98 1/05 3/90 1/04 1/01 Different 714181132091211011541213 events won Total Tier 9/9 20/23 37/41 1/2 18/18 36/38 14/20 17/18 1/1 11/12 1/2 32/47 4/4 20/24 25/27 II+ wins (active/total) Who Won What Summary — Doubles The equivalent of the preceding, but for doubles. It’s harder to pick these players, as there are more doubles winners out there. I finally chose to list the Top Ten, meaning Black, Stosur, Raymond, Ruano Pascual, Stubbs, Huber, Likhovtseva, Kuznetsova, Martinez, and Zvonareva — plus Serena Williams as the other active player with the Career Slam (Venus has an identical record except that she didn’t win Leipzig 2002), Suárez and Sugiyama as the other top active players, plus Hingis and Sanchez-Vicario as the other most successful players of recent years. The final lines of the table differ slightly from the singles table. The line “Events won” lists the distinct active Tier II titles each player has won. Serena, for instance, has won seven titles at these 30 events — but she has two Wimbledons and two Australian Opens, so she has only five distinct titles. The next line, “To 2000,” lists each player’s titles at all Tier II+ events in the years leading up to 2000 (inclusive). We then show her total for the 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and the grand total. Note

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 264 that the total may be higher than the total titles listed, since some players will have titles at no-longer-extant tournaments (e.g. Hingis has 36 total doubles titles, but only 33 show up in the list; she also won Hamburg 1995, 2002, and Leipzig 1997, which are no longer played). Tournament Black Hingi LHub Kuzne Likho Marti Raym Ruano Sanch Stosur Stubb Suáre Sugiy SWill Zvona Sydney 1/04 1/98 1/99 1/02 3/91 1/05 2/02 3/99 Australian O 4/97 1/05 1/00 1/04 3/92 1/00 1/04 2/01 Pan Paciﬁc 1/04 2/98 1/05 2/01 1/92 4/01 Paris 1/98 Antwerp 2/04 1/03 Doha 1/04 1/04 Dubai 1/03 1/04 1/05 1/05 Indian Wells 1/99 4/94 2/04 2/93 2/04 1/01 Miami 2/98 1/03 1/05 1/02 5/92 1/02 1/00 Amelia Islan 1/01 1/99 1/03 6/90 1/05 Charleston 1/97 1/99 2/98 2/01 4/00 4/90 2/01 3/00 Warsaw 1/03 Berlin 1/05 1/00 1/03 1/00 1/03 1/05 Rome 2/01 1/99 1/05 1/03 1/01 1/00 2/98 2/93 1/00 2/98 Roland Gar 2/98 4/01 4/01 1/03 1/99 Eastbourne 1/99 4/01 2/95 3/01 1/00 Wimbledon 2/04 2/96 1/05 1/01 1/95 2/01 1/03 2/00 Stanford 2/03 1/97 2/02 1/94 2/02 San Diego 2/01 1/97 1/01 2/96 1/00 1/05 2/94 2/00 1/03 Los Angeles 1/98 2/92 1/03 Canadian O 2/98 1/03 1/02 2/94 1/92 1/02 1/04 New Haven 1/01 1/01 2/99 1/03 1/02 1/05 1/99 1/03 1/00 U.S. Open 1/98 2/01 3/02 2/93 1/05 1/01 3/02 1/00 1/99 Beijing Luxembourg 1/05 1/05 Filderstadt 1/04 2/97 3/01 2/92 2/03 Moscow 1/01 2/99 1/97 1/05 1/99 1/00 1/04 Zürich 2/04 3/96 2/99 1/97 3/99 1/03 1/98 Linz 1/03 1/04 1/03 Philadelphia 1/05 1/00 1/98 5/96 4/96 1/98 Championsh 2/990 2/01 1/03 2/92 1/05 1/01 1/03 Events won 11 21 5 6 11 5 20 12 20 7 20 11 15 5 2 To 2000 0 33 00471625601521150 2001 511051911071110 2002 020100953085020 2003 1 — 340065—035810 2004 7 — 0121150065101 2005 6 — 2222650743001 Totals 19 36 6 6 13 11 47 23 60 7 43 21 21 9 2 I can’t help but observe that Hingis, having played only half a career, still has the broadest diversity of both singles and doubles titles, though there are players (all far older than she) with more titles. Serena Williams has the distinction of being the only player in recent times to win all four Slams in both singles and doubles; Navratilova of course did it to, and others before her, but that was pre-Rebound Ace.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 265 Who Won What — History of Tournaments The following tables list players who won the equivalent of Tier II and higher events. Some tournaments (e.g. Warsaw and Shanghai before 2003, Doha before 2004, Luxembourg before 2005) were not Tier II events for this entire period; these winners are shown in italics Who Won What Part 1: 2001Ð2005 Tournament 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Sydney Molik Hénin-Hardenne Clijsters Hingis Hingis Australian Open S. Williams Hénin-Hardenne S. Williams Capriati Capriati Pan Pacific Sharapova Davenport Davenport Hingis Davenport Paris Safina Clijsters S. Williams V. Williams Mauresmo Antwerp Mauresmo Clijsters V. Williams V. Williams Nice Mauresmo Doha Sharapova Myskina Myskina Seles Hingis Dubai Davenport Hénin-Hardenne Hénin-Hardenne Mauresmo Hingis Scottsdale Sugiyama S. Williams Davenport Indian Wells Clijsters Hénin-Hardenne Clijsters Hantuchova S. Williams Miami Clijsters S. Williams S. Williams S. Williams V. Williams Amelia Island Davenport Davenport Dementieva V. Williams Mauresmo Charleston Hénin-Hardenne V. Williams Hénin-Hardenne Majoli Capriati Warsaw Hénin-Hardenne V. Williams Mauresmo Bovina Hamburg Clijsters V. Williams Berlin Hénin-Hardenne Mauresmo Hénin-Hardenne Hénin Mauresmo Rome Mauresmo Mauresmo Clijsters S. Williams Dokic Roland Garros Hénin-Hardenne Myskina Hénin-Hardenne S. Williams Capriati Eastbourne Clijsters Kuznetsova Rubin Rubin Davenport Wimbledon V. Williams Sharapova S. Williams S. Williams V. Williams Stanford Clijsters Davenport Clijsters V. Williams Clijsters San Diego Pierce Davenport Hénin-Hardenne V. Williams V. Williams Los Angeles Clijsters Davenport Clijsters Rubin Davenport Canadian Open Clijsters Mauresmo Hénin-Hardenne Mauresmo S. Williams Olympics1 Hénin-Hardenne New Haven Davenport Bovina Capriati V. Williams V. Williams U.S. Open Clijsters Kuznetsova Hénin-Hardenne S. Williams V. Williams Bahia Myskina Seles Beijing2 Kirilenko S. Williams Dementieva Smashnova Seles Princess Cup S. Williams Dokic Leipzig Myskina S. Williams Clijsters Luxembourg Clijsters Molik Clijsters Clijsters Clijsters Filderstadt Davenport Davenport Clijsters Clijsters Davenport Moscow Pierce Myskina Myskina Maleeva Dokic Zürich Davenport Molik Hénin-Hardenne Schnyder Davenport Linz Petrova Mauresmo Sugiyama Hénin Davenport Philadelphia Mauresmo Mauresmo Mauresmo Championships Mauresmo Sharapova Clijsters Clijsters S. Williams 1. Olympic tennis events were held in past years, but 2004 was the first year they bore points and became a non-exhibition 2. Shanghai until 2004

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 266 Who Won What Part 2: 1996Ð2002 Tournament 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 Sydney Hingis Hingis Mauresmo Davenport Sanchez-V Hingis Seles Australian Open Capriati Capriati Davenport Hingis Hingis Hingis Seles Pan Paciﬁc Hingis Davenport Hingis Hingis Davenport Hingis Majoli Paris V. Williams Mauresmo Tauziat S. Williams Pierce Hingis Halard-D Antwerp V. Williams Nice Mauresmo Hannover (Essen) S. Williams Novotna Schnyder Majoli Majoli Dubai Mauresmo Hingis Scottsdale S. Williams Davenport rained out Indian Wells Hantuchova S. Williams Davenport S. Williams Hingis Davenport Graf Miami/Key Biscay S. Williams V. Williams Hingis V. Williams V. Williams Hingis Graf Amelia Island V. Williams Mauresmo Seles Seles Pierce Davenport Spirlea Charleston1 Majoli Capriati Pierce Hingis Coetzer Hingis Sanchez-V Hamburg Clijsters V. Williams Hingis V. Williams Hingis Majoli Sanchez-V Berlin Hénin Mauresmo Martinez Hingis Martinez M. Fernandez Graf Rome S. Williams Dokic Seles V. Williams Hingis Pierce Martinez Roland Garros S. Williams Capriati Pierce Graf Sanchez-V Majoli Graf Eastbourne Rubin Davenport Halard-D Zvereva Novotna rained out Seles Wimbledon S. Williams V. Williams V. Williams Davenport Novotna Hingis Graf Stanford V. Williams Clijsters V. Williams Davenport Davenport Hingis Hingis San Diego V. Williams V. Williams V. Williams Hingis Davenport Hingis Date Los Angeles Rubin Davenport S. Williams S. Williams Davenport Seles Davenport Canadian Open Mauresmo S. Williams Hingis Hingis Seles Seles Seles New Haven2 V. Williams V. Williams V. Williams V. Williams Graf Davenport U.S. Open S. Williams V. Williams V. Williams S. Williams Davenport Hingis Graf Bahia Myskina Seles Princess Cup S. Williams Dokic S. Williams Davenport Seles Seles Seles Surabaya3 Wang Leipzig S. Williams Clijsters Clijsters Tauziat Graf Novotna Huber Moscow Maleeva Dokic Hingis Tauziat Pierce Novotna Martinez Filderstadt Clijsters Davenport Hingis Hingis Testud Hingis Hingis Zürich Schnyder Davenport Hingis V. Williams Davenport Davenport Novotna Linz Hénin Davenport Davenport Pierce Novotna Rubin Appelmans Chicago Davenport Novotna Philadelphia Davenport Davenport Graf Hingis Novotna Championships Clijsters S. Williams Hingis Davenport Hingis Novotna Graf 1. Hilton Head until 2001 2. Tournament held in Atlanta in 1997 3. The WTA lists Surabaya as a Tier II in 1996. The ﬁeld does not back this up

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 267 Who Won What Part 3: 1990Ð1996 Order of events is (approximately) as in 1995. Tournament Winner In 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Sydney Seles Sabatini Date Capriati Sabatini Novotna Zvereva Australian Open Seles Pierce Graf Seles Seles Seles Graf Pan Paciﬁc Majoli Date Graf Navratilova Sabatini Sabatini Graf Paris1 Halard-D Graf Navratilova Navratilova Essen Majoli Novotna Medvedeva Seles Indian Wells2 Graf M. Fernandez Graf M. Fernandez Seles Navratilova Navratilova Delray Beach3 Graf Graf Graf Graf Sabatini Sabatini Lipton Graf Graf Graf Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Seles Seles San Antonio Navratilova Graf Seles Houston Graf Hack Martinez Seles Seles KMaleeva Hilton Head Sanchez-V Martinez Martinez Graf Sabatini Sabatini Navratilova Amelia Island Spirlea Martinez Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Sabatini Sabatini Graf Tampa Seles Barcelona Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Seles Martinez Sanchez-V Hamburg Sanchez-V Martinez Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Graf Graf Graf Rome Martinez Martinez Martinez Martinez Sabatini Sabatini Seles Berlin Graf Sanchez-V Graf Graf Graf Graf Seles Roland Garros Graf Graf Sanchez-V Graf Seles Seles Seles Eastbourne Seles Tauziat McGrath Navratilova McNeil Navratilova Navratilova Wimbledon Graf Graf Martinez Graf Graf Graf Navratilova Stratton Mtn Martinez Martinez Newport Sanchez-V Canadian Open Seles Seles Sanchez-V Graf Sanchez-V Capriati Graf Los Angeles4 Davenport Martinez Frazier Navratilova Navratilova Seles Seles San Diego Date Martinez Graf Graf Capriati Capriati Graf Washington, DC Sanchez-V Navratilova U.S. Open Graf Graf Sanchez-V Graf Seles Seles Sabatini Princess/Nicherei Seles Pierce Sanchez-V Coetzer Seles Seles MFernandez Leipzig Huber Huber Novotna Graf Graf Graf Graf Milan Seles Filderstadt Hingis Majoli Huber Pierce Navratilova Huber MFernandez Surabaya5 Wang Zürich Novotna Majoli Maleeva ManMaleeva Graf Graf Graf Brighton M. Fernandez Novotna Novotna Graf Graf Graf Chicago Novotna Maleeva Zvereva Seles Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Oakland Hingis Maleeva Sanchez-V Navratilova Seles Navratilova Seles New England Graf Philadelphia Novotna Graf Huber Martinez Graf Seles Championships Graf Graf Sabatini Graf Seles Seles Seles 1. There was a tournament in Paris prior to 1993, but it was smaller and at a different time; winners are not recorded here 2. Indian Wells: Palm Springs until 1991 3. Delray Beach: Boca Raton until 1992 4. Sometimes designated “Manhattan Beach” 5. The WTA lists Surabaya as a Tier II in 1996. The ﬁeld does not back this up

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 268 Who Won What Part 4: 1986Ð1989 Order of events is (approximately) as in 1990. A major change in Tier schedule occurred between 1987 and 1988, with very many $150,000 events upgrading in the interim. In 1987, $150,000 was the equivalent of Tier II; in 1988, it was not. I have listed as Tier II events only those $150,000 events which upgraded in 1988 — but marked them in italics for 1987 (not previously). TThe Tour shifted to a Calendar Year system in 1986. Note that this resulted in many events not being played in 1986. Tournament 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 Brisbane Zvereva Sukova Shriver Mandlikova Sydney Zvereva Navratilova Shriver Garrison Australian Open Graf Graf Graf Mandlikova Pan Paciﬁc Graf Navratilova Shriver Sabatini Graf1 Chicago Navratilova Garrison-Jackson Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Washington, DC Navratilova Graf Navratilova Mandlikova Indian Wells2 Navratilova Maleeva-Fragniere Boca Raton Sabatini Graf Sabatini Graf Lipton Seles Sabatini Graf Graf Houston KMaleeva Seles Evert Evert Evert San Antonio Seles Graf Graf Hilton Head Navratilova Graf Navratilova Graf Graf Amelia Island Graf Sabatini Navratilova Graf Graf Tampa Seles Martinez Evert Evert Hamburg Graf Graf Graf Graf Rome Seles Sabatini Sabatini Graf Berlin Seles Graf Graf Graf Graf Roland Garros Seles Sanchez-Vicario Graf Graf Evert Eastbourne Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Sukova Navratilova Wimbledon Navratilova Graf Graf Navratilova Navratilova Newport Sanchez-Vicario Garrison McNeil Shriver Shriver Canadian Open Graf Navratilova Sabatini Shriver Sukova San Diego Graf Graf Rehe Reggi Cincinnati Potter Los Angeles3 Seles Navratilova Evert Graf Navratilova Mahwah Graf Graf Man. Maleeva Graf U.S. Open Sabatini Graf Graf Navratilova Navratilova Dallas Navratilova Navratilova Evert Leipzig Graf Princess/Nicherei M. Fernandez New Orleans Evert Evert Navratilova Zürich Graf Graf Shriver Graf Filderstadt M. Fernandez Sabatini Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Brighton Graf Graf Graf Sabatini Graf Oakland4 Seles Garrison Navratilova Garrison New England Graf Navratilova Navratilova Shriver Navratilova Indianapolis Martinez Graf Championships Seles Graf Sabatini Graf Navratilova 1. Listed by the WTA as a Tier I event but with $50,000 in prize money. Presumably the former is correct 2. Palm Springs in 1989 3. Sometimes designated Manhattan Beach 4. Sometimes designated San Francisco, e.g. in 1987

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 269 Who Won What Part 5: 1983Ð1986 Order of events is (approximately) as in 1985. See footnotes (on the following page), as the tour order was complex at this time; many events moved and the schedule was repeatedly adjusted. Tournament 19861 1985(-1986)2 1984(-1985)3 1983(Ð1984) Palm Beach Gard4 Horvath Evert Boston Mandlikova Hilton Head Graf Evert Evert Navratilova Amelia Island Graf Garrison Navratilova Evert Orlando5 Evert Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Houston Evert Navratilova Mandlikova Atlanta Shriver Italian Open6 Reggi ManMaleeva Temesvari Johannesburg Evert Sydney Indoors Shriver Berlin Graf Evert Kohde-Kilsch Evert French Open Evert Evert Navratilova Evert Eastbourne Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Wimbledon Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Newport Shriver Evert Navratilova Moulton Indianapolis7 Graf Temesvari ManMaleeva Temesvari Los Angeles Navratilova Kohde-Kilsch Evert Navratilova Canadian Open Sukova Evert Evert Navratilova Mahwah Graf Rinaldi Navratilova Durie U.S. Open Navratilova Mandlikova Navratilova Navratilova Queens Grand Prix8 Bonder Richmond Fairbank Hartford Schaefer Detroit Ruzici Chicago Navratilova Gadusek Shriver New Orleans Navratilova Evert Navratilova Fort Lauderdale9 Navratilova Navratilova Evert Filderstadt10 Navratilova Shriver Lindqvist Navratilova Brighton Graf Evert Hanika Evert Zürich Garrison Garrison Tampa Rehe Torres Navratilova Lions Cup11 Evert ManMaleeva Navratilova Brisbane Navratilova Sukova Shriver Sydney Navratilova Navratilova Durie Australian Open Navratilova Evert Navratilova Pan Paciﬁc Graf12 ManMaleeva Washington, DC Navratilova Navratilova Mandlikova New England Navratilova Navratilova Key Biscayne13 Evert Evert Lipton Evert Navratilova Oakland Evert Mandlikova Mandlikova Princeton14 Navratilova Mandlikova Navratilova Dallas Navratilova Mandlik/Navrat15 Championships Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 270 1. Partial year; see note on 1985Ð1986. 2. Until 1986, the Tour used a “tournament year” stretching from roughly March to March. In 1986, it switched to a calendar year form, explaining why many events are omitted (but not shown as unplayed) in 1986 3. The 1984/1985 season was 13 months long, including March 1985 and March 1986. One tournament — Dallas — was therefore played twice in that year, and not at all in the 1983/1984 season. 4. Reduced to a $50,000 tournament in 1985, coupled with a “4-woman special” won by Evert 5. Marco Island in 1986, with reduced prize money and an earlier date 6. The Italian Open was “in exile” 1980-1985, held in Taranto (with a $50,000 prize) in 1985, and in Perugia in 1984 and before (with a more normal $150,000 prize). It was not held in 1986 (not unusual given the realignment) 7. In some years (e.g. 1985), there were two Indianapolis events, perhaps on different surfaces. This is the larger 8. Held in Tokyo. Singles only; no doubles. Featured a third and fourth place playoff as well as winner and runner-up 9. Bonaventure in 1984; Deer Creek in 1983, with reduced prize money 10. Stuttgart until 1985 11. Held in Tokyo. Singles only; no doubles. Featured a third and fourth place playoff as well as winner and runner-up 12. Listed by the WTA as a Tier I event but with $50,000 in prize money. Presumably the former is correct 13. Key Biscayne: Later Boca Raton 14. Held in Livingston in the 1983/1984 season 15. Dallas 1984/1985: Won by Mandlikova in March 1984 and by Navratilova in March 1985

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 271 Active Leaders in Titles (Singles/Doubles) Minimum ten titles required to be listed, except all 2005 Slam winners are listed. Players in bold won at least one title in 2005 Singles Doubles Player Titles Player Titles Seles* ...... 53 Navratilova* ...... 175 Davenport*...... 50† Sanchez-Vicario‡ ...... 68 Hingis*¤ ...... 40 Stubbs* ...... 52 Martinez* ...... 33 Raymond* ...... 50 V. Williams* ...... 31† Suárez* ...... 39 Clijsters* ...... 30 Hingis*¤ ...... 36 S. Williams* ...... 25† Davenport* ...... 35 Mauresmo ...... 19 Ruano Pascual* ...... 34 Hénin-Hardenne* ...... 23 Sugiyama*...... 31 Pierce* ...... 18 Black* ...... 25 Capriati* ...... 13† Likhovtseva ...... 24 Myskina* ...... 10 Husarova ...... 19 Sharapova* ...... 10 Loit...... 14 Maleeva‡ ...... 10 Huber*...... 12 Schnyder...... 10 Kuznetsova* ...... 12 Martinez ...... 12 Shaughnessy ...... 12 Clijsters*...... 11 Morariu*...... 11 Petrova ...... 11 Srebotnik ...... 11 Pierce* ...... 10 Rubin* ...... 10 Callens‡ ...... 10 Schett‡ ...... 10 S. Williams* ...... 10 [Stosur* ...... 7] [Molik*...... 6] * Titles include at least one Slam † Excludes Olympics before 2004, Grand Slam Cup ¤ Retired, but making a comeback ‡ Has announced plans to retire or retired this year

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 272 Recent Singles Winners, Finalists, Semiﬁnalists The following list shows every player to have reached a WTA semifinal, with listed result, since the beginning of 1999. Titles shown in Highlight. As a good general rule, the longer a player’s entry, the better she is; the higher the fraction of her entry in Highlight, the better she handles pressure (not even close to the same thing). Amanmuradova, Akgul — Tashkent 2005 F Appelmans, Sabine — Luxembourg 1999 SF Arvidsson, Sofia — Quebec City 2005 F Asagoe, Shinobu — Oklahoma City 2001 SF, Acapulco 2003 SF, Birmingham 2003 F, Hobart 2004 F, Auckland 2005 F, Pan Pacific 2005 SF Azarenka, Victoria — GuangZhou SF Bacheva, Lubomira — Estoril 1999 SF Bachmann, Angelika — Tashkent 1999 SF Barna, Anca — Estoril 2002 F, Vienna 2003 SF, Pattaya City 2003 SF, Tashkent 2004 SF Bartoli, Marion — Canberra 2003 SF, Auckland 2004 SF, Hyderabad 2004 SF, Cincinnati 2004 SF, Auckland 2005 SF, Quebec City 2005 SF Bedanova, Daja — Princess Cup 2000 SF, Bratislava 2000 W, Gold Coast 2002 SF, Eastbourne 2002 SF Beigbeder, Celine — Strasbourg 2001 SF Benesova, Iveta — Bratislava 2002 F, Hobart 2003 SF, Acapulco 2004 W, Estoril 2004 F, Budapest 2004 SF, Forest Hills 2004 F, Hobart 2005 SF, Forest Hills 2005 SF Bes, Eva — Antwerp 2001 SF Black, Cara — Birmingham 1999 SF, Auckland 2000 F, Birmingham 2000 SF, Hobart 2001 SF, Big Island 2002 W Bondarenko, Alona — Hyderabad 2005 F Boogert, Kristie — Antwerp 1999 SF, Budapest 2000 F Bovina, Elena — Estoril 2001 F, Estoril 2002 SF, Warsaw 2002 W, Quebec City 2002 W, Gold Coast 2003 SF, Filderstadt 2003 SF, New Haven 2004 W, Hasselt 2004 F, Moscow 2004 SF, Linz 2004 F Brandi, Kristina — ’s-Hertogenbosch 1999 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2000 SF, Hobart 2004 SF Bychkova, Ekaterina — Tashkent 2005 SF Callens, Els — Antwerp 1999 SF, Big Island 2002 SF Camerin, Maria Elena — Casablanca 2001 F, Bali 2004 SF, Hasselt 2004 SF, Tashkent 2005 SF Capriati, Jennifer — Strasbourg 1999 W, Quebec City 1999 W, Australian Open 2000 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2000 SF, Luxembourg 2000 W, Zürich 2000 SF, Quebec City 2000 F, Australian Open 2001 W, Oklahoma City 2001 F, Scottsdale 2001 SF, Ericsson 2001 F, Charleston 2001 W, Berlin 2001 W, Roland Garros 2001 W, Wimbledon 2001 SF, Canadian Open 2001 F, New Haven 2001 SF, U. S. Open 2001 SF, Zürich 2001 SF, Australian Open 2002 W, Scottsdale 2002 F, Miami 2002 F, Charleston 2002 SF, Berlin 2002 SF, Rome 2002 SF, Roland Garros 2002 SF, Canadian Open 2002 F, Los Angeles Championships 2002 SF, Dubai 2003 SF, Indian Wells 2003 SF, Miami 2003 F, Amelia Island 2003 SF, Berlin 2003 SF, Eastbourne 2003 SF, Stanford 2003 F, New Haven 2003 W, U. S. Open 2003 SF, WTA Championships 2003 SF, Doha 2004 SF, Berlin 2004 SF, Rome 2004 F, Roland Garros 2004 SF, U. S. Open 2004 SF Casanova, Myriam — Budapest 2002 F, Brussels 2002 W, Antwerp 2004 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 273 Castaño, Catalina — Bogota 2002 SF, Budapest 2005 F, Seoul 2005 SF Cervanova, Ludmila — Bratislava 2001 SF, Casablanca 2003 SF, Budapest 2003 SF, Palermo 2003 SF, Casablanca 2004 F, Acapulco 2005 F Chladkova, Denisa — Budapest 1999 SF, Strasbourg 1999 SF, Knokke-Heist 1999 F, Pattaya City 1999 SF, Hannover 2000 F, Bratislava 2000 SF, Helsinki 2002 F, Warsaw 2003 SF, Palermo 2004 SF Chakvetadze, Anna — New Haven 2005 SF Clijsters, Kim — Luxembourg 1999 W, Bratislava 1999 F, Hobart 2000 W, Filderstadt 2000 F, Leipzig 2000 W, Indian Wells 2001 F, Bol 2001 SF, Roland Garros 2001 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2001 F, Knokke- Heist 2001 SF, Stanford 2001 W, New Haven 2001 SF, Princess Cup 2001 SF, Leipzig 2001 W, Luxembourg 2001 W, Munich Championships 2001 SF, Sydney 2002 SF, Australian Open 2002 SF, Hamburg 2002 W, Rome 2002 SF, Stanford 2002 F, Princess Cup 2002 F, Leipzig 2002 SF, Filderstadt 2002 W, Luxembourg 2002 W, Los Angeles Championships 2002 W, Sydney 2003 W, Australian Open 2003 SF, Antwerp 2003 F, Scottsdale 2003 F, Indian Wells 2003 W, Miami 2003 SF, Berlin 2003 F, Rome 2003 W, Roland Garros 2003 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2003 W, Wimbledon 2003 SF, Stanford 2003 W, San Diego 2003 F, Los Angeles 2003 W, U. S. Open 2003 F, Leipzig 2003 SF, Filderstadt 2003 W, Zürich 2003 SF, Luxembourg 2003 W, WTA Championships 2003 W, Australian Open 2004 F, Paris 2004 W, Antwerp 2004 W, Hasselt 2004 SF, Indian Wells 2005 W, Miami 2005 W, Warsaw 2005 SF, Eastbourne 2005 W, Stanford 2005 W, Los Angeles 2005 W, Canadian Open 2005 W, U. S. Open W, Luxembourg 2005 W, Hasselt 2005 W Chi, Jane — Japan Open 1999 SF Cho, Yoon Jeong — Pattaya City 2002 F, Auckland 2003 F, Memphis 2003 SF Coetzer, Amanda — Oklahoma City 1999 F, Pan Pacific 1999 F, Eastbourne 1999 SF, Stanford 1999 SF, San Diego 1999 SF, Oklahoma City 2000 SF, Hamburg 2000 SF, Berlin 2000 F, Antwerp 2000 W, New Haven 2000 SF, Acapulco 2001 W, Amelia Island 2001 F, Hamburg 2001 SF, Luxembourg 2001 SF, Moscow 2002 SF, Memphis 2003 F, Acapulco 2003 W Cohen-Aloro, Stephanie — Estoril 2004 SF Courtois, Laurence — Tashkent 1999 F, Antwerp 2000 SF Craybas, Jill — Japan Open 2002 W Czink, Melinda — Canberra 2005 F Daniilidou, Eleni — Budapest 2002 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2002 W, Bahia 2002 F, Auckland 2003 W, Paris 2003 SF, Birmingham 2003 F, Auckland 2004 W, Miami 2004 F, Portoroz 2005 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 274 Davenport, Lindsay — Sydney 1999 W, Australian Open 1999 SF, Wimbledon 1999 W, Stanford 1999 W, San Diego 1999 SF, Los Angeles 1999 SF, New Haven 1999 F, U. S. Open 1999 SF, Princess Cup 1999 W, Philadelphia 1999 W, Chase Championships 1999 W, Sydney 2000 F, Madrid 1999 W, Australian Open 2000 W, Scottsdale 2000 F (rainout) Indian Wells 2000 W, Ericsson 2000 F, Wimbledon 2000 F, Stanford 2000 F, Los Angeles 2000 F, U. S. Open 2000 F, Zürich 2000 F, Linz 2000 W, Philadelphia 2000 W, Sydney 2001 F, Australian Open 2001 SF, Pan Pacific 2001 W, Scottsdale 2001 W, Eastbourne 2001 W, Wimbledon 2001 SF, Stanford 2001 F, San Diego 2001 SF, Los Angeles 2001 W, New Haven 2001 F, Filderstadt 2001 W, Zürich 2001 W, Linz 2001 W, Munich Championships 2001 F, Stanford 2002 SF, San Diego 2002 SF, Los Angeles 2002 F, New Haven 2002 F, U. S. Open 2002 SF, Moscow 2002 F, Zürich 2002 F, Sydney 2003 F, Pan Pacific 2003 W, Indian Wells 2003 F, Charleston 2003 SF, Amelia Island 2003 F, San Diego 2003 SF, Los Angeles 2003 F, New Haven 2003 F, U. S. Open 2003 SF, Sydney 2004 SF, Pan Pacific 2004 W, Indian Wells 2004 F, Amelia Island 2004 W, Strasbourg 2004 F, Wimbledon 2004 SF, Stanford 2004 W, Los Angeles 2004 W, San Diego 2004 W, Cincinnati 2004 W, U. S. Open 2004 SF, Filderstadt 2004 W, Moscow 2004 SF, Australian Open 2005 F, Pan Pacific 2005 F; Dubai 2005 W, Indian Wells 2005 F, Amelia Island 2005 W, Wimbledon 2005 F, New Haven 2005 W, Bali 2005 W, Filderstadt 2005 W, Zürich 2005 W, Los Angeles Championships 2005 SF Dechaume-Balleret, Alexia — Prostejov 1999 SF Déchy, Nathalie — Paris 1999 SF, Bratislava 1999 SF, Gold Coast 2000 SF, Oklahoma City 2000 F, Estoril 2000 F, Strasbourg 2000 SF, Canberra 2001 SF, Scottsdale 2002 SF, Bratislava 2002 SF, Gold Coast 2003 W, Sarasota 2003 SF, Gold Coast 2004 SF, Indian Wells 2004 SF, New Haven 2004 F, Australian Open 2005 SF, Strasbourg 2005 SF, Luxembourg 2005 SF, Quebec City 2005 SF de Lone, Erica — Kuala Lumpur 1999 F de los Rios, Rossana — Bahia 2001 SF, Pattaya City 2001 SF Dementieva, Elena — Palermo 1999 SF, Indian Wells 2000 SF, Los Angeles 2000 SF, U. S. Open 2000 SF, [Olympics 2000 Silver], Chase Championships 2000 SF, Acapulco 2001 F, Ericsson 2001 SF, Leipzig 2001 SF, Moscow 2001 F, Acapulco 2002 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2002 F, Filderstadt 2002 SF, Antwerp 2003 SF, Amelia Island 2003 W, Canadian Open 2003 SF, New Haven 2003 SF, Bali 2003 W, Shanghai 2003 W, Moscow 2003 SF, Miami 2004 F, Roland Garros 2004 F, Los Angeles 2004 SF, San Diego 2004 SF, New Haven 2004 SF, U. S. Open 2004 F, Hasselt 2004 W, Moscow 2004 F, Zürich 2004 SF, Sydney 2005 SF, Indian Wells 2005 SF, Charleston 2005 F, Los Angeles 2005 SF, U. S. Open SF, Filderstadt 2005 SF, Moscow 2005 SF, Philadelphia 2005 F Diaz-Oliva, Mariana — Estoril 1999 SF, Bogota 2001 SF, Bol 2001 F, Palermo 2002 W, Acapulco 2003 F Dokic, Jelena — Wimbledon 2000 SF, [Olympics 2000 SF], Hamburg 2001 SF, Rome 2001 W, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2001 SF, Sopot 2001 SF, Bahia 2001 F, Princess Cup 2001 W, Moscow 2001 W, Zürich 2001 F, Linz 2001 F, Paris 2002 F, Sarasota 2002 W, Amelia Island 2002 SF, Hamburg 2002 SF, Strasbourg 2002 F, Birmingham 2002 W, San Diego 2002 F, Los Angeles 2002 SF, Canadian Open 2002 SF, Bahia 2002 SF, Princess Cup 2002 SF, Warsaw 2003 SF, Zürich 2003 F, Pan Pacific 2004 SF Domachowska, Marta — Sopot 2004 SF, Seoul 2004 F, Strasbourg 2005 F, Beijing 2005 SF Dominguez Lino, Lourdes — Bogota 2005 F Douchevina, Vera — Helsinki 2003 SF, Eastbourne 2005 F, Stockholm 2005 SF Dragomir Ilie, Ruxandra — Amelia Island 1999 F, Berlin 1999 SF, New Haven 1999 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2000 F, Hobart 2001 SF Drake, Maureen — Cairo 1999 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 275 Dulko, Gisela — Casablanca 2002 SF, Hobart 2005 F, Estoril 2005 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2005 SF, Bangkok 2005 SF Farina Elia, Silvia — Auckland 1999 SF, Prostejov 1999 F, Estoril 2000 SF, Palermo 2000 SF, Gold Coast 2001 F, Porto 2001 SF, Strasbourg 2001 W, Sopot 2001 SF, Moscow 2001 SF, Pan Pacific 2002 SF, Strasbourg 2002 W, Quebec City 2002 SF, Strasbourg 2003 W, Eastbourne 2003 SF, Canberra 2004 F, Antwerp 2004 F, Strasbourg 2004 SF, Stockholm 2004 SF, Luxembourg 2004 SF, Gold Coast 2005 SF, Amelia Island 2005 F Fedak, Yuliana — Canberra 2005 SF Fernandez, Clarisa — Roland Garros 2002 SF, Bogota 2005 SF Fernandez, Mary Joe — Strasbourg 1999 SF Flipkens, Kirsten — Forest Hills 2004 SF Frazier, Amy — Hobart 1999 SF, Japan Open 1999 W, Madrid 1999 W, Stanford 1999 SF, Princess Cup 1999 SF, Quebec City 1999 SF, Hobart 2000 SF, San Diego 2000 SF, Japan Open 2000 F, Quebec City 2000 SF, Hobart 2002 SF, Princess Cup 2002 SF, Hobart 2003 F, Hobart 2004 W, Vienna 2004 SF, Stanford 2004 SF, Cincinnati 2004 SF, Auckland 2005 SF, Quebec City 2005 W Gagliardi, Emmanuelle — Cairo 1999 SF, São Paulo 2000 SF, Indian Wells 2002 SF, Auckland 2003 SF, Estoril 2003 SF, Tashkent 2003 SF Garbin, Tathiana — Bogota 2000 F, Estoril 2000 SF, Budapest 2000 W, Bol 2002 SF, Tashkent 2002 SF, Sopot 2002 SF, Modena 2005 F Gersi, Adriana — Portschach 1999 SF, Portschach 2000 SF, Doha 2001 SF, Basel 2001 W Glatch, Alexa — Forest Hills 2005 SF Golovin, Tatiana — Paris 2004 SF, Birmingham 2004 F, Gold Coast 2005 SF, Paris 2005 SF, Charleston 2005 SF, Birmingham 2005 SF, Seoul 2005 SF, Japan Open 2005 F Gorrochategui, Ines — Warsaw 1999 F Graf, Steffi — Sydney 1999 SF, Hannover 1999 SF, Indian Wells 1999 F, Lipton 1999 SF, Roland Garros 1999 W, Wimbledon 1999 F Grahame, Amanda — Canberra 2002 SF Grande, Rita — Hobart 1999 F, Kuala Lumpur 1999 SF, Oklahoma City 2000 SF, Hobart 2001 W, Shanghai 2001 SF, Bratislava 2001 W, Bratislava 2002 SF, Casablanca 2003 W, Casablanca 2004 SF Granville, Laura — Memphis 2003 SF, Quebec City 2003 SF, Memphis 2004 SF, Vancouver 2004 F, Birmingham 2005 SF Grönefeld, Anna-Lena — Pattaya City 2005 F, Hyderabad 2005 SF, Stanford 2005 SF, Beijing 2005 F, Luxembourg 2005 F Gubacsi, Zsofia — Casablanca 2001 W, Porto 2002 SF Habsudova, Karina — Portschach 1999 W, Sopot 1999 F, Bratislava 2000 SF Halard-Decugis, Julie — Auckland 1999 W, Hobart 1999 SF, Bol 1999 F, Berlin 1999 F, Birmingham 1999 W, Los Angeles 1999 F, Paris 2000 SF, Eastbourne 2000 W, Princess Cup 2000 F, Japan Open 2000 W Hantuchova, Daniela — Oklahoma City 2001 SF, Birmingham 2001 SF, Indian Wells 2002 W, Eastbourne 2002 SF, Canadian Open 2002 SF, New Haven 2002 SF, Filderstadt 2002 F, Linz 2002 SF, Antwerp 2003 SF, Eastbourne 2004 F, Doha 2005 SF, Cincinnati 2005 SF, Los Angeles 2005 F, Filderstadt 2005 SF Harkleroad, Ashley — Charleston 2003 SF, Strasbourg 2003 SF, Auckland 2004 F

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 276 Hénin-Hardenne, Justine — Antwerp 1999 W, Gold Coast 2001 W, Canberra 2001 W, Estoril 2001 SF, Berlin 2001 SF, Roland Garros 2001 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2001 W, Wimbledon 2001 F, Big Island 2001 F, Filderstadt 2001 F, Gold Coast 2002 F, Antwerp 2002 SF, Amelia Island 2002 F, Berlin 2002 W, Rome 2002 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2002 SF, Wimbledon 2002 SF, Leipzig 2002 SF, Zürich 2002 SF, Linz 2002 W, Sydney 2003 SF, Australian Open 2003 SF, Antwerp 2003 SF, Dubai 2003 W, Charleston 2003 W, Amelia Island 2003 SF, Berlin 2003 W, Roland Garros 2003 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2003 F, Wimbledon 2003 SF, San Diego 2003 W, Canadian Open 2003 W, U. S. Open 2003 W, Leipzig 2003 F, Filderstadt 2003 F, Zürich 2003 W, WTA Championships 2003 SF, Sydney 2004 W, Australian Open 2004 W, Dubai 2004 W, Doha 2004 SF, Indian Wells 2004 W, Amelia Island 2004 SF, Olympics 2004 W, Charleston 2005 W, Warsaw 2005 W, Berlin 2005 W, Roland Garros 2005 W, Canadian Open 2005 F Henke, Vanessa — Portoroz 2005 SF Hingis, Martina — Sydney 1999 F, Australian Open 1999 W, Pan Pacific 1999 W, Lipton 1999 SF, Hilton Head 1999 W, Rome 1999 SF, Berlin 1999 W, Roland Garros 1999 F, San Diego 1999 W, Los Angeles 1999 SF, Canadian Open 1999 W, U. S. Open 1999 F, Filderstadt 1999 W, Zürich 1999 F, Philadelphia 1999 F, Chase Championships 1999 F, Sydney 2000 SF, Australian Open 2000 F, Pan Pacific 2000 W, Scottsdale 2000 F (rainout), Indian Wells 2000 F, Ericsson 2000 W, Hamburg 2000 W, Berlin 2000 SF, Roland Garros 2000 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2000 W, Los Angeles 2000 SF, Canadian Open 2000 W, U. S. Open 2000 SF, Filderstadt 2000 W, Zürich 2000 W, Moscow 2000 W, Philadelphia 2000 F, Chase Championships 2000 W, Sydney 2001 W, Australian Open 2001 F, Pan Pacific 2001 F, Doha 2001 W, Dubai 2001 W, Indian Wells 2001 SF, Ericsson 2001 SF, Charleston 2001 F, Berlin 2001 SF, Rome 2001 SF, Roland Garros 2001 SF, San Diego 2001 SF, Los Angeles 2001 SF, U. S. Open 2001 SF, Filderstadt 2001 SF, Sydney 2002 W, Australian Open 2002 F, Pan Pacific 2002 W, Scottsdale 2002 SF, Indian Wells 2002 F, Hamburg 2002 SF Hopkins, Jennifer — Warsaw 2000 SF, Hobart 2001 F Hopmans, Amanda — Prostejov 1999 SF, Auckland 2000 SF, Warsaw 2000 F Hrdlickova, Kveta: See Kveta (Hrdlickova) Peschke Hsieh, Su-Wei — Bali 2001 SF Huber, Anke — Filderstadt 1999 SF, Leipzig 1999 SF, Estoril 2000 W, Hamburg 2000 SF, Sopot 2000 W, Paris 2001 F, Nice 2001 SF, Strasbourg 2001 SF, Canadian Open 2001 SF Husarova, Janette — Doha 2002 SF Irvin, Marissa — Big Island 2001 SF Ivanovic, Ana — Canberra 2005 W, Warsaw 2005 SF, Zürich 2005 SF, Linz 2005 SF Jankovic, Jelena — Budapest 2004 W, Linz 2004 SF, Dubai 2005 F, Berlin 2005 SF, Birmingham 2005 F, Seoul 2005 F Jidkova, Alina — Memphis 2002 SF, Vancouver 2004 SF, Quebec City 2004 SF Kandarr, Jana — Estoril 2001 SF Kanepi, Kaia — Kolkata 2005 SF Kapros, Aniko — Budapest 2001 SF, Casablanca 2001 SF, Japan Open 2003 F Kirilenko, Maria — Hyderabad 2004 F, Hyderabad 2005 SF, Beijing 2005 W, Japan Open 2005 SF Kleinova, Sandra — Stockholm 2004 SF Kostanic, Jelena — Antwerp 2000 SF, Vienna 2001 SF, Helsinki 2003 F, Charleston 2004 SF, Vienna 2004 SF, Budapest 2005 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 277 Koukalova, Klara — Antwerp 2001 F, Casablanca 2002 F, Sopot 2003 F, Casablanca 2004 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2004 F, Sopot 2004 F, Japan Open 2004 SF, Prague 2005 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2005 W, Palermo 2005 F, Portoroz 2005 W Kournikova, Anna — Oklahoma City 1999 SF, Hilton Head 1999 F, Amelia Island 1999 SF, Eastbourne 1999 SF, Sydney 2000 SF, Paris 2000 SF, Scottsdale 2000 SF, Stanford 2000 SF, San Diego 2000 SF, Luxembourg 2000 SF, Moscow 2000 F, Leipzig 2000 SF, Chase Championships 2000 SF, Pan Pacific 2001 SF, Auckland 2002 SF, Pan Pacific 2002 SF, Acapulco 2002 SF, San Diego 2002 SF, Shanghai 2002 F Krajicek, Michaella — Tashkent 2005 W, Hasselt 2005 SF Krasnoroutskaya, Lina — Luxembourg 1999 SF, Pattaya City 2002 SF, Doha 2003 SF, Canadian Open 2003 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2004 SF Kremer, Anne — Pattaya City 1999 F, Auckland 2000 W, Eastbourne 2000 SF, Pattaya 2000 W, Budapest 2991 F, Quebec City 2001 SF, Amelia Island 2002 SF, Seoul 2004 SF Kruger, Joanette — Kuala Lumpur 1999 SF, São Paulo 2000 SF, Berlin 2000 SF, Japan Open 2000 SF, Bali 2001 F, Japan Open 2001 SF Kurhajcova, Lubomira — Pattaya City 2003 F, Bogota 2004 SF Kuti Kis, Rita — Estoril 1999 F, Budapest 1999 SF, Bogota 2000 SF, São Paulo 2000 W, Strasbourg 2000 F, Bogota 2001 F Kuznetsova, Svetlana — Casablanca 2002 SF, Helsinki 2002 W, Bali 2002 W, San Diego 2003 SF, Dubai 2004 F, Doha 2004 F, Warsaw 2004 F, Eastbourne 2004 W, U. S. Open 2004 W, Bali 2004 W, Beijing 2004 F, Filderstadt 2004 SF, Pan Pacific 2005 SF, Warsaw 2005 F, Eastbourne 2005 SF Lamade, Bianka — Tashkent 2001 W Lee-Waters, Lindsay — Canberra 2005 SF Leon Garcia, Gala — São Paulo 1999 SF, Bol 2000 SF, Madrid 2000 W, Sopot 2000 F, Palermo 2001 SF, Knokke-Heist 2001 F, Sopot 2001 F, Princess Cup 2001 SF, Big Island 2002 SF Li Na — GuangZhou 2004 W, Hobart 2005 SF, Estoril 2005 F, Rabat 2005 SF, Bali 2005 SF Li Ting — GuangZhou 2004 SF Likhovtseva, Elena — Hannover 1999 SF, Strasbourg 1999 F, Amelia Island 2000 SF, Leipzig 2000 F, Eastbourne 2001 SF, Hobart 2003 SF, Doha 2003 F, Canadian Open 2004 F, Forest Hills 2004 W, Roland Garros 2005 SF, Kolkata 2005 SF Linetskaya, Evgenia — Pattaya City 2005 SF, Memphis 2005 SF Llagostera Vives, Nuria — Acapulco 2001 SF, Rabat 2005 W, GuangZhou 2005 F Loit, Emilie — Casablanca 2001 SF, Brussels 2002 SF, Canberra 2003 SF, Acapulco 2003 SF, Bogota 2004 SF, Casablanca 2004 W, Estoril 2004 W, Strasbourg 2004 SF, Birmingham 2004 SF, Rabat 2005 SF, Stockholm 2005 SF Lucic, Mirjana — Wimbledon 1999 SF Majoli, Iva — Madrid 2000 SF, Kuala Lumpur 2000 F, Quebec City 2001 F, Charleston 2002 W, Bol 2002 F, Sarasota 2003 SF Maleeva, Magdalena — ’s-Hertogenbosch 1999 SF, Pattaya City 1999 W, Luxembourg 2000 F, Pan Pacific 2001 SF, Paris 2001 SF, Nice 2001 F, Budapest 2001 W, Leipzig 2001 F, Linz 2001 SF, Strasbourg 2002 SF, Moscow 2002 W, Luxembourg 2002 F, Birmingham 2003 W, Pan Pacific 2004 F Mandula, Petra — Vienna 2002 SF, Sopot 2003 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 278 Marrero, Marta — Knokke-Heist 2000 SF, Knokke-Heist 2001 SF, Casablanca 2003 SF, Acapulco 2004 SF, Estoril 2004 SF Martinez, Conchita — Amelia Island 1999 SF, Sopot 1999 W, Gold Coast 2000 F, Australian Open 2000 SF, Amelia Island 2000 F, Hilton Head 2000 SF, Berlin 2000 W, Roland Garros 2000 F, Canadian Open 2000 SF, Philadelphia 2000 SF, Sydney 2001 SF, Charleston 2001 SF, Rome 2001 SF, Bali 2002 F, Zürich 2002 SF, Indian Wells 2003 SF, Eastbourne 2003 F, Charleston 2004 F, Pattaya City 2005 W Martinez, Maria Jose — Madrid 2001 SF Martinez Granados, Conchita — Bol 1999 SF, Bol 2003 F Matevzic, Maja — Porto 2002 SF, Bratislava 2002 W Mattek, Bethanie — Cincinnati 2005 SF Mauresmo, Amélie — Australian Open 1999 F, Paris 1999 F, Rome 1999 SF, Bratislava 1999 W, Linz 1999 SF, Sydney 2000 W, Hannover 2000 SF, Bol 2000 F, Rome 2000 F, Moscow 2000 SF, Sydney 2001 SF, Paris 2001 W, Nice 2001 W, Amelia Island 2001 W, Berlin 2001 W, Rome 2001 F, Paris 2002 SF, Antwerp 2002 SF, Dubai 2002 W, Wimbledon 2002 SF, Canadian Open 2002 W, U. S. Open 2002 SF, Moscow 2002 SF, Filderstadt 2002 SF, Antwerp 2003 F, Dubai 2003 SF, Warsaw 2003 W, Berlin 2003 SF, Rome 2003 F, New Haven 2003 SF, Moscow 2003 F, Philadelphia 2003 W, WTA Championships 2003 F, Sydney 2004 F, Amelia Island 2004 F, Berlin 2004 W, Rome 2004 W, Eastbourne 2004 SF, Wimbledon 2004 SF, Canadian Open 2004 W, Olympics 2004 F, Filderstadt 2004 F, Linz 2004 W, Philadelphia 2004 W, Los Angeles Champ 2004 SF, Paris 2005 F, Antwerp 2005 W, Doha 2005 SF, Miami 2005 SF, Rome 2005 W, Wimbledon 2005 SF, Canadian Open 2005 SF, New Haven 2005 F, Filderstadt 2005 F, Philadelphia 2005 W, Los Angeles Championships 2005 McQuillan, Rachel — Dubai 2001 SF Medina Garrigues, Anabel — Antwerp 2001 SF, Madrid 2001 SF, Palermo 2001 W, Hobart 2002 F, Bogota 2003 F, Palermo 2003 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2004 SF, Palermo 2004 W, Forest Hills 2004 SF, Luxembourg 2004 SF, Strasbourg 2005 W, Palermo 2005 W, New Haven 2005 SF Mikaelian, Marie-Gayanay — Tashkent 2001 SF, Basel 2001 F, Tashkent 2002 W, Quebec City 2002 F, Gold Coast 2003 F Mirza, Sania — Hyderabad 2005 W, Forest Hills 2005 F, Japan Open 2005 SF Molik, Alicia — Shanghai 2001 SF, Doha 2002 SF, Hobart 2003 W, Sarasota 2003 F, Budapest 2003 F, Vienna 2004 F, Stockholm 2004 W, Olympics 2004 Bronze, Zürich 2004 W, Luxembourg 2004 W, Sydney 2005 W, Antwerp 2005 SF, Doha 2005 F Montolio, Angeles — Palermo 1999 F, Budapest 2000 SF, Portschach 2000 SF, Estoril 2001 W, Bol 2001 W, Madrid 2001 F, Porto 2002 W Morariu, Corina — Japan Open 1999 SF, Bol 1999 W, Rome 2000 SF Morigami, Akiko — Hyderabad 2003 SF, Shanghai 2003 SF, Cincinnati 2005 F, San Diego 2005 SF Müller, Martina — Budapest 2002 W Myskina, Anastasia — Palermo 1999 W, Sopot 2000 SF, Moscow 2001 SF, Birmingham 2002 F. Eastbourne 2002 F, New Haven 2002 SF, Bahia 2002 W, Leipzig 2002 F, Doha 2003 W, Sarasota 2003 W, Leipzig 2003 W, Moscow 2003 W, Philadelphia 2003 F, Doha 2004 W, Indian Wells 2004 SF, Roland Garros 2004 W, San Diego 2004 F, Canadian Open 2004 SF, Sopot 2004 SF, Olympics 2004 SF, Filderstadt 2004 SF, Moscow 2004 W, Los Angeles Champ 2004 SF, Antwerp 2005 SF, Stockholm 2005 F, Canadian Open 2005 SF, Kolkata 2005 W, Zürich 2005 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 279 Nagyova, Henrieta — Prostejov 1999 W, Portschach 1999 SF, Warsaw 2000 W, Palermo 2000 W, Kuala Lumpur 2000 W, Pattaya 2000 SF, Bahia 2001 SF, Pattaya City 2001 F, Warsaw 2002 F, Palermo 2002 SF, Sopot 2002 F, Pattaya City 2003 W Nola, Pavlina (Stoyanova) — Palermo 2000 F, Shanghai 2000 SF Noorlander, Seda — Tashkent 2001 F Novotna, Jana — Pan Pacific 1999 SF, Hannover 1999 W, Hilton Head 1999 SF Obata, Saori — Bali 2003 SF, Tashkent 2003 F Ondraskova, Zuzana — Pattaya 2000 SF, Prague 2005 F Oremans, Miriam — ’s-Hertogenbosch 1999 SF, Warsaw 2000 SF, Bratislava 2000 F, Birmingham 2001 F Osterloh, Lilia — Oklahoma City 1999 SF, Canberra 2002 SF Panova, Tatiana — Kuala Lumpur 2000 SF, Pattaya 2000 F, Auckland 2002 F, Sarasota 2002 F, Pattaya City 2002 SF, Sydney 2003 SF Papadaki, Christina — Bogota 1999 F Parra Santonja, Arantxa — Japan Open 2003 SF, Tashkent 2003 SF Peng Shuai — Sydney 2005 SF, San Diego 2005 SF Pennetta, Flavia — Hyderabad 2003 SF, Acapulco 2004 F, Budapest 2004 SF, Palermo 2004 F, Sopot 2004 W, Bogota 2005 W, Acapulco 2005 W, Modena 2005 SF, Palermo 2005 SF Perebiynis, Tatiana — Stockholm 2004 F Peschke, Kveta Hrdlickova — Bratislava 1999 SF, Leipzig 1999 F, Linz 2000 SF, Linz 2005 SF Petrova, Nadia — Amelia Island 2001 SF, Gold Coast 2002 SF, Roland Garros 2003 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2003 SF, Zürich 2003 SF, Linz 2003 F, Philadelphia 2003 SF, Gold Coast 2004 F, Miami 2004 SF, Amelia Island 2004 SF, Bali 2004 SF, Linz 2004 SF, Philadelphia 2004 SF, Paris 2005 SF, Amelia Island 2005 SF, Berlin 2005 F, Roland Garros 2005 SF, Bangkok 2005 F, Linz 2005 W, Philadelphia 2005 SF Pierce, Mary — Gold Coast 1999 F, Hamburg 1999 F, Rome 1999 F, Canadian Open 1999 SF, Filderstadt 1999 F, Zürich 1999 SF, Linz 1999 W, Leipzig 1999 SF, Scottsdale 2000 SF, Indian Wells 2000 SF, Hilton Head 2000 W, Roland Garros 2000 W, Canberra 2001 SF, Filderstadt 2003 SF, Quebec City 2003 SF, Paris 2004 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2004 W, Roland Garros 2005 F, San Diego 2005 W, U. S. Open 2005 F, Moscow 2005 W, Los Angeles Championships 2005 F Pin, Camille — Vancouver 2004 SF Pironkova, Tszvetana — Istanbul 2005 SF, Palermo 2005 SF Pisnik, Tina — Warsaw 1999 SF, Tashkent 1999 SF, Bol 2000 W, Luxembourg 2001 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2002 SF, Rome 2003 SF Pitkowski, Sarah — Budapest 1999 W, Bol 1999 SF, Antwerp 1999 F, Linz 1999 SF, Budapest 2000 SF, Tashkent 2000 SF Plischke, Sylvia — Bogota 2000 SF Pous Tio, Laura — Prague 2005 SF,Budapest 2005 SF Poutchek, Tatiana — Pattaya City 2001 SF, Budapest 2002 SF, Tashkent 2002 F Pratt, Nicole — Shanghai 2001 F, Hobart 2002 SF, Birmingham 2002 SF, Hyderabad 2004 W Prusova, Libuse — Bol 2002 SF Randriantefy, Dally — Acapulco 2005 SF, Strasbourg 2005 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 280 Raymond, Lisa — Moscow 1999 SF, Birmingham 2000 W, Birmingham 2001 SF, Big Island 2001 SF, Luxembourg 2001 F, Memphis 2002 W, Birmingham 2002 SF, Stanford 2002 SF, Big Island 2002 F, Pan Pacific 2003 SF, Memphis 2003 W, Memphis 2004 F, New Haven 2004 SF Razzano, Virginie — Sarasota 2002 SF, Luxembourg 2002 SF, Estoril 2003 SF, Tashkent 2004 F, Amelia Island 2005 SF Reeves, Samantha — Bol 2003 SF Rittner, Barbara — Knokke-Heist 1999 SF, Luxembourg 2000 SF, Antwerp 2001 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2003 SF Rodionova, Anastassia — Quebec City 2002 SF Ruano Pascual, Virginia — Madrid 2000 SF, Brussels 2002 SF, Tashkent 2003 W, Pattaya City 2005 SF Rubin, Chanda — Hobart 1999 W, Indian Wells 1999 SF, Madrid 1999 SF, Quebec City 1999 SF, Hobart 2000 F, Pan Pacific 2000 SF, Eastbourne 2000 SF, Linz 2000 SF, Quebec City 2000 W, Eastbourne 2001 SF, Madrid 2002 F, Eastbourne 2002 W, Los Angeles 2002 W, Linz 2002 SF, Pan Pacific 2003 SF, Miami 2003 SF, Madrid 2003 W, Eastbourne 2003 W, Bali 2003 F, Shanghai 2003 F, Luxembourg 2003 F, Pan Pacific 2004 SF Safarova, Lucie — Estoril 2005 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2005 F, Forest Hills 2005 W Safina, Dinara — Estoril 2002 SF, Sopot 2002 W, Palermo 2003 W, Paris 2004 SF, Luxembourg 2004 F, Paris 2005 W, Estoril 2005 SF, Prague 2005 W, Luxembourg 2005 SF, Moscow 2005 SF, Hasselt 2005 SF Salerni, Maria Emilia — Hobart 2004 SF, Quebec City 2004 SF Sanchez Lorenzo, Maria — Knokke-Heist 1999 W, Bol 2000 SF, Budapest 2003 SF, Bol 2003 SF, Madrid 2003 F, Bogota 2004 F, Acapulco 2004 SF Sanchez-Vicario, Arantxa — Cairo 1999 W, Hamburg 1999 SF, Berlin 1999 SF, Roland Garros 1999 SF, Gold Coast 2000 SF, Hilton Head 2000 F, Hamburg 2000 F, Roland Garros 2000 SF, Canadian Open 2000 SF, Filderstadt 2000 SF, Porto 2001 W, Amelia Island 2001 SF, Madrid 2001 W, Princess Cup 2001 F, Bali 2001 SF, Brussels 2002 F, Bali 2002 SF Schaul, Claudine — Strasbourg 2004 W Schett, Barbara — Sydney 1999 SF, Auckland 1999 SF, Hamburg 1999 SF, Moscow 1999 F, Portschach 2000 W, Zürich 2000 SF, Doha 2001 SF, Madrid 2003 SF Schiavone, Francesca — Tashkent 2000 F, Auckland 2001 SF, Canberra 2003 F, Stanford 2003 SF, Los Angeles 2003 SF, Sydney 2004 SF, Warsaw 2004 SF, Los Angeles 2005 SF, Bali 2005 F, Moscow 2005 F, Hasselt 2005 F Schnyder, Patty — Gold Coast 1999 W, Hilton Head 1999 SF, Portschach 2000 F, Gold Coast 2001 SF, Vienna 2001 F, Pattaya City 2001 W, Antwerp 2002 SF, Charleston 2002 F, Zürich 2002 W, Gold Cost 2003 SF, Sopot 2003 SF, Linz 2003 SF, Australian Open 2004 SF, Charleston 2004 SF, Birmingham 2004 SF, Zürich 2004 SF, Gold Coast 2005 W, Dubai 2005 SF, Charleston 2005 SF, Berlin 2005 SF, Rome 2005 F, Cincinnati 2005 W, Stanford 2005 SF, Bali 2005 SF, Zürich 2005 F, Linz 2005 F Schruff, Julia — Estoril 2003 F

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 281 Seles, Monica — Australian Open 1999 SF, Pan Pacific 1999 SF, Amelia Island 1999, Roland Garros 1999 SF, Canadian Open 1999 F, New Haven 1999 SF, Princess Cup 1999 F, Oklahoma City 2000 W, Ericsson 2000 SF, Amelia Island 2000 W, Hilton Head 2000 SF, Rome 2000 W, Stanford 2000 SF, San Diego 2000 F, New Haven 2000 F, [Olympics 2000 Bronze], Princess Cup 2000 SF, Chase Championships 2000 F, Oklahoma City 2001 W, Scottsdale 2001 SF, Stanford 2001 SF, San Diego 2001 F, Los Angeles 2001 F, Canadian Open 2001 SF, Bahia 2001 W, Japan Open 2001 W, Shanghai 2001 W, Australian Open 2002 SF, Pan Pacific 2002 F, Paris 2002 SF, Doha 2002 W, Dubai 2002 SF, Indian Wells 2002 SF, Miami 2002 SF, Madrid 2002 W, Bahia 2002 SF, Pan Pacific 2003 F, Dubai 2003 F Serra Zanetti, Adriana — Bratislava 2001 SF Serra Zanetti, Antonella — Casablanca 2003 F, Acapulco 2005 SF, Bangkok 2005 SF Sequera, Milagros — Quebec City 2003 F Serna, Magui — Birmingham 1999 SF, Knokke-Heist 2000 SF, Porto 2001 F, Eastbourne 2001 F, Porto 2002 F, Estoril 2002 W, Estoril 2003 W, Budapest 2003 W Sharapova, Maria — Birmingham 2003 SF, Japan Open 2003 W, Luxembourg 2003 SF, Quebec City 2003 W, Memphis 2004 SF, Birmingham 2004 W, Wimbledon 2004 W, Beijing 2004 SF, Seoul 2004 W, Japan Open 2004 W, Zürich 2004 F, Philadelphia 2004 SF, Los Angeles Champ 2004 W, Australian Open 2005 SF, Pan Pacific 2005 W, Doha 2005 W, Indian Wells 2005 SF, Miami 2005 F, Rome 2005 SF, Birmingham 2005 W, Wimbledon 2005 SF, U. S. Open 2005 SF, Beijing 2005, Los Angeles Championships 2005 SF Shaughnessy, Meghann — Bogota 1999 SF, Auckland 2000 SF, Shanghai 2000 W, Gold Coast 2001 SF, Scottsdale 2001 F, Hamburg 2001 F, Stanford 2001 SF, Quebec City 2001 W, Sydney 2002 F, Sarasota 2002 SF, Strasbourg 2002 SF, Canberra 2003 W, Scottsdale 2003 SF, Dubai 2004 SF, Tashkent 2004 SF, Memphis 2005 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2005 SF Sidot, Anne-Gaëlle — Canadian Open 1999 SF, Hannover 2000 SF Smashnova, Anna — Tashkent 1999 W, Strasbourg 2000 SF, Palermo 2000 SF, Knokke-Heist 2000 W, Basel 2001 SF, Auckland 2002 W, Canberra 2002 W, Berlin 2002 SF, Vienna 2002 W, Shanghai 2002 W, Auckland 2003 SF, Sopot 2003 W, Helsinki 2003 W, Moscow 2003 SF, Vienna 2004 W, Istanbul 2005 SF, Modena 2005 W, Budapest 2005 W Snyder, Tara — Quebec City 1999 SF Spears, Abigail — Seoul 2004 SF, Quebec City 2004 F Spirlea, Irina — Gold Coast 1999 SF, Cairo 1999 F Sprem, Karolina — Strasbourg 2003 F, Vienna 2003 F, Helsinki 2003 SF, Canberra 2004 SF, Antwerp 2004 SF, Berlin 2004 SF, Kolkata 2005 F Srebotnik, Katarina — Estoril 1999 W, Palermo 1999 SF, Pan Pacific 2000 SF, Bogota 2002 F, Acapulco 2002 W, Luxembourg 2002 SF, Bogota 2003 SF, Palermo 2003 F, Palermo 2004 SF, Auckland 2005 W, Stockholm 2005 W, Portoroz 2005 F Stevenson, Alexandra — Wimbledon 1999 SF, Memphis 2002 F, Linz 2002 F, Scottsdale 2003 SF Stosur, Samantha — Gold Coast 2004 SF, Gold Coast 2005 F, Sydney 2005 F Strycova, Barbora — GuangZhou 2004 SF Suárez, Paola — Bogota 1999 SF, Madrid 1999 F, São Paulo 2000 F, Amelia Island 2000 SF, Sopot 2000 SF, Auckland 2001 F, Bogota 2001 W, Acapulco 2001 SF, Vienna 2001 SF, Acapulco 2002 F, Madrid 2002 SF, Palermo 2002 SF, Bogota 2003 SF, Vienna 2003 W, Canadian Open 2003 SF, Auckland 2004 SF, Canberra 2004 W, Roland Garros 2004 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 282 Sucha, Martina — Quebec City 2001 SF, Bratislava 2002 F, Hobart 2002 W, Helsinki 2002 SF, Budapest 2004 F, GuangZhou 2004 F, Quebec City 2004 W Sugiyama, Ai — Gold Coast 1999 SF, Japan Open 1999 F, Princess Cup 1999 SF, Japan Open 2001 SF, Memphis 2002 SF, Los Angeles 2002 SF, Shanghai 2002 SF, Scottsdale 2003 W, Los Angeles 2003 SF, Shanghai 2003 SF, Linz 2003 W, Philadelphia 2003 SF, Gold Coast 2004 W, Dubai 2004 SF, San Diego 2005 F Svensson, Åsa (Carlsson) — Kuala Lumpur 1999 W, Palermo 2001 SF, Bol 2002 W Szavay, Agnes — Modena 2005 SF Talaja, Silvija — Warsaw 1999 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 1999 F, Portschach 1999 F, Sopot 1999 SF, Knokke-Heist 1999 SF, Pattaya City 1999 SF, Gold Coast 2000 W, Strasbourg 2000 W, Porto 2001 SF, Auckland 2002 SF, Warsaw 2002 SF, Japan Open 2002 F Tanasugarn, Tamarine — Birmingham 2000 F, Japan Open 2000 SF, Shanghai 2000 SF, Kuala Lumpur 2000 SF, Dubai 2001 SF, Japan Open 2001 F, Canberra 2002 F, Doha 2002 F, Japan Open 2002 SF, Hyderabad 2003 W, Pattaya City 2003 SF, Hyderabad 2004 SF, Japan Open 2004 SF Tauziat, Nathalie — Birmingham 1999 F, Eastbourne 1999 F, Zürich 1999 SF, Moscow 1999 W, Leipzig 1999 W, Philadelphia 1999 SF, Chase Championships 1999 SF, Paris 2000 W, Birmingham 2000 SF, New Haven 2000 SF, Filderstadt 2000 SF, Moscow 2000 SF, Leipzig 2000 SF, Philadelphia 2000 SF, Paris 2001 SF, Dubai 2001 F, Strasbourg 2001 SF, Birmingham 2001 W, Los Angeles 2001 SF, Leipzig 2001 SF, Zürich 2001 SF Taylor, Sarah — Bali 2002 SF, Japan Open 2002 SF Testud, Sandrine — Indian Wells 1999 SF, Sopot 1999 SF, Filderstadt 1999 SF, Linz 1999 SF, Pan Pacific 2000 F, Ericsson 2000 SF, Canberra 2001 F, Doha 2001 F, Bol 2001 SF, Big Island 2001 W, Filderstadt 2001 SF, Munich Championships 2001 SF, Dubai 2002 F, Charleston 2002 SF Torrens Valero, Cristina — Budapest 1999 F, Warsaw 1999 W, São Paulo 1999 SF, Antwerp 2000 F, Bogota 2001 SF, Budapest 2001 SF, Tashkent 2001 SF, Palermo 2001 F, Sopot 2001 W, Basel 2001 SF, Bogota 2002 SF Tu, Meilen — Quebec City 2000 SF, Auckland 2001 W Tulyaganova, Iroda — Tashkent 2000 W, Shanghai 2000 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2001 SF, Vienna 2001 W, Knokke-Heist 2001 W, Linz 2001 SF, Vienna 2002 F, Hyderabad 2003 F, Madrid 2003 SF Vaidisova, Nicole — Vancouver 2004 W, Tashkent 2004 W, Memphis 2005 SF, Istanbul 2005 F, Seoul 2005 W, Japan Open 2005 W, Bangkok 2005 W, Philadelphia 2005 SF Vakulenko, Julia — Canberra 2004 SF Van Roost, Dominique (Monami) — Auckland 1999 F, Paris 1999 SF, Luxembourg 1999 F, Moscow 1999 SF, Eastbourne 2000 F, Knokke-Heist 2000 F Vento-Kabchi, Maria — Hobart 2000 SF, Stanford 2003 SF, Bali 2003 SF, Leipzig 2003 SF, Stanford 2004 SF Vinci, Roberta — Tashkent 2002 SF, Eastbourne 2005 SF Wartusch, Patricia — São Paulo 1999 F, Bogota 2000 W, Vienna 2002 SF, Casablanca 2002 W, Helsinki 2002 SF, Doha 2003 SF Washington, Mashona — Japan Open 2004 F Weingärtner, Marlene — Auckland 2001 SF, Charleston 2001 SF, Luxembourg 2003 SF, Bali 2004 F Widjaja, Angelique — Bali 2001 W, Shanghai 2002 SF, Pattaya City 2002 W

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 283 Williams, Serena — Paris 1999 W, Indian Wells 1999 W, Lipton 1999 F, Los Angeles 1999 W, U. S. Open 1999 W, Paris 2000 F, Hannover 2000 W, Wimbledon 2000 SF, Los Angeles 2000 W, Canadian Open 2000 F, Princess Cup 2000 W, Indian Wells 2001 W, Canadian Open 2001 W, U. S. Open 2001 F, Munich Championships 2001 W, Sydney 2002 SF, Scottsdale 2002 W, Miami 2002 W, Berlin 2002 F, Rome 2002 W, Roland Garros 2002 W, Wimbledon 2002 W, U. S. Open 2002 W, Princess Cup 2002 W, Leipzig 2002 W, Los Angeles Championships 2002 F, Australian Open 2003 W, Paris 2003 W, Miami 2003 W, Charleston 2003 F, Rome 2003 SF, Roland Garros 2003 SF, Wimbledon 2003 W, Miami 2004 W, Rome 2004 SF, Wimbledon 2004 F, Los Angeles 2004 F, Beijing 2004 W, Los Angeles Champ 2004 F, Australian Open 2005 W, Dubai 2005 SF Williams, Venus — Hannover 1999 F, Oklahoma City 1999 W, Lipton 1999 W, Hamburg 1999 W, Rome 1999 W, Stanford 1999 F, San Diego 1999 F, New Haven 1999 W, U. S. Open 1999 SF, Zürich 1999 W, Philadelphia 1999 SF, Chase Championships 1999 SF, Wimbledon 2000 W, Stanford 2000 W, San Diego 2000 W, New Haven 2000 W, U. S. Open 2000 W, [Olympics 2000 Gold], Linz 2000 F, Australian Open 2001 SF, Nice 2001 SF, Indian Wells 2001 SF, Ericsson 2001 W, Hamburg 2001 W, Wimbledon 2001 W, San Diego 2001 W, New Haven 2001 W, U. S. Open 2001 W, Gold Coast 2002 W, Paris 2002 W, Antwerp 2002 W, Dubai 2002 SF, Miami 2002 SF, Amelia Island 2002 W, Hamburg 2002 F, Roland Garros 2002 F, Wimbledon 2002 F, Stanford 2002 W, San Diego 2002 W, New Haven 2002 W, U. S. Open 2002 F, Los Angeles Championships 2002 SF, Australian Open 2003 F, Antwerp 2003 W, Warsaw 2003 F, Wimbledon 2003 F, Charleston 2004 W, Warsaw 2004 W, Berlin 2004 F, Stanford 2004 F, Los Angeles 2004 SF, Antwerp 2005 F, Miami 2005 SF, Istanbul 2005 W. Wimbledon 2005 W, Stanford 2005 F Yan Zi — GuangZhou 2005 W Yi Jing-Qian — Tashkent 2000 SF Zheng Jie — Japan Open 2003 SF, Hobart 2005 W, Rabat 2005 F, GuangZhou 2005 SF Zuluaga, Fabiola — Bogota 1999 W, São Paulo 1999 W, Rome 2000 SF, Madrid 2000 F, Bogota 2002 W, Madrid 2002 SF, Bogota 2003 W, Australian Open 2004 SF, Bogota 2004 W, Bogota 2005 SF Zvereva, Natasha — Eastbourne 1999 W Zvonareva, Vera — Warsaw 2002 SF, Palermo 2002 F, Sopot 2002 SF, Bol 2003 W, Strasbourg 2003 SF, Vienna 2003 SF, Linz 2003 SF, Memphis 2004 W, Warsaw 2004 SF, Rome 2004 SF, Eastbourne 2004 SF, San Diego 2004 SF, Canadian Open 2004 SF, Cincinnati 2004 F, Beijing 2004 SF, Philadelphia 2004 F, Memphis 2005 W, Rome 2005 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 284 Career Results for Leading Players Career Results — Singles The following tables summarize the performances of certain top singles players, both current and recently retired. The criterion used is that a player must have retired since 1996, and must have, or be projected to have, at least 20 career singles titles. The table then attempts (probably with some inaccuracy) to break out a player’s titles by year, surface, and tier. Tiers have been translated, to the extent possible, to the current Slam-Champ-I-II-III-IV-V system, even though the system has changed dramatically over the years (e.g. events now titled Tier II might have had prizes of $225,000 or $350,000 in the early Nineties; similarly, in the late Eighties the money gap between Tier I and Tier II was only 3:2, compared to the 2:1 ratio of today. The list below does not represent the nomenclature at the time but what appears to me to be the best approximation to the nomenclature of today). Tournaments of Tier II or higher are shown in bold; lesser results in plain text. Slams are in bold coloured type. The year-end championships is also in bold colour as the closest thing to an indoor Slam. Note: Here as elsewhere, events which do not follow WTA admission rules (Olympics prior to 2004, Fed Cup, Hopman Cup, Grand Slam Cup) are not listed. Since some (not all) WTA lists include the Olympics, their totals for Capriati, Davenport, Graf, Venus Williams, etc. may be one or more tournaments higher. Jennifer Capriati Career Titles: Hardcourt: 8; Clay: 3; Grass: 0; Indoor: 2. Total: 13 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 4; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1990 Puerto Rico (III) 1991 San Diego (II), Canadian Open (II) 1992 San Diego (II) 1993 Sydney (II) 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Strasbourg (III) Quebec City (III) 2000 Luxembourg (III) 2001 Australian Open (Slam) Charleston (I), Roland Garros (Slam) 2002 Australian Open (Slam) 2003 New Haven (II) 2004

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 285 Kim Clijsters Career Titles: Hardcourt: 13; Clay: 2; Grass: 2; Indoor: 13. Total: 30 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 2; Tier I: 5; Tier II: 15; Tier III: 6; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Luxembourg (III) 2000 Hobart (V) Leipzig (II) 2001 Stanford (II) Leipzig (II), Luxembourg (III) 2002 Hamburg (II) Filderstadt (II), Luxembourg (III), Los Angeles (Champ) 2003 Sydney (II), Indian Wells (I), Stanford Rome (I) ’s-Hertogenbosch Filderstadt (II), Luxembourg (III), (II), Los Angeles (II) (III) Los Angeles (Champ) 2004 Paris (II), Antwerp (II) 2005 Indian Wells (I), Miami (I). Stanford (II), Eastbourne (II) Hasselt (III) Los Angeles (II), Canadian Open (I), U. S. Open (Slam), Luxembourg (II) Lindsay Davenport Career Titles: Hardcourt: 23; Clay: 8; Grass: 2; Indoor: 17. Total: 50 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 1; Tier I: 11; Tier II: 26; Tier III: 9; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1993 Lucerne (III) 1994 Brisbane (III) Lucerne (III) 1995 Strasbourg (III) 1996 Los Angeles (II) Strasbourg (III) 1997 Indian Wells (I), Atlanta (II) Amelia Island (II) Oklahoma City (III), Zürich (I), Chicago (II) 1998 Stanford (II), San Diego (II), Pan Pacific (I), Zürich (I) Los Angeles (II), US Open (Slam) 1999 Sydney (II), Stanford (II), Madrid (III) Wimbledon (Slam) Philadelphia (II), Chase Princess Cup (II) (Champ) 2000 Australian Open (Slam), Indian Linz (II), Philadelphia (II) Wells (I) 2001 Scottsdale (II), Los Angeles (II) Eastbourne (II) Pan Pacific (I), Filderstadt (II), Zürich (I), Linz (II) 2002 2003 Pan Pacific (I) 2004 Stanford (II), Los Angeles (II), Amelia Island (II) Pan Pacific (I), Filderstadt (II) San Diego (I), Cincinnati (III) 2005 Dubai 2005 (II), New Haven Amelia Island (II) Filderstadt (II), Zürich (I) 2004 (II), Bali (III) Jelena Dokic Career Titles: Hardcourt: 1; Clay: 2; Grass: 1; Indoor: 1. Total: 5 By Tier: Slams: 0; Championships: 0; Tier I: 2; Tier II: 1; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2001 Princess Cup (II) Rome (I) Moscow (I) 2002 Sarasota (IV) Birmingham (III) 2003 2004

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 286 Steffi Graf Career Titles: Hardcourt: 36; Clay: 32; Grass: 7; Indoor: 31. Total: 106 By Tier: Slams: 22; Championships: 5; Tier I: 30; Tier II: 48; Tier III: 1 GRAND SLAM 1988 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1986 Mahwah (II) Hilton Head (I), Amelia Pan Pacific (I), Brighton (I), Island (I), Indianapolis (I), Zürich (II) Berlin (II) 1987 Boca Raton (I), Lipton (I), Los Hilton Head (I), Amelia Zürich (II), Virginia Slims Angeles (I) Island (I), Rome (II), Berlin (Champ) (II), Roland Garros (Slam), Hamburg (II) 1988 Australian Open (Slam), San Berlin (I), Roland Garros Wimbledon Brighton (II) Antonio (II), Lipton (I), Mahwah (Slam), Hamburg (II) (Slam) (II), US Open (Slam) 1989 Australian Open (Slam), San Hilton Head (I), Hamburg Wimbledon Washington (I), Zürich (II), Antonio (II), Boca Raton (I), San (II), Berlin (I) (Slam) Brighton (II), Virginia Slims Diego (II), Mahwah (II), U. S. (Champ) Open (Slam) 1990 Australian Open (Slam), Amelia Island (II), Pan Pacific (II), Leipzig (II), Canadian Open (I), San Diego Hamburg (II) Zürich (II), Brighton (II), New (II) England (II) 1991 San Antonio (II) Hamburg (II), Berlin (I) Wimbledon Leipzig (II), Zürich (II), (Slam) Brighton (II) 1992 Boca Raton (I) Hamburg (II), Berlin (I) Wimbledon Leipzig (II), Zürich (II), (Slam) Brighton (II), Philadelphia (II) 1993 Delray Beach (II), San Diego (II), Hilton Head (I), Berlin (I), Wimbledon Leipzig (II), Virginia Slims Canadian Open (I), US Open Roland Garros (Slam) (Slam) (Champ) (Slam) 1994 Australian Open (Slam), Indian Berlin (I) Pan Pacific (I) Wells (II), Delray Beach (II), Lipton (I), San Diego (II) 1995 Delray Beach (II), Lipton (I), US Houston (II), Roland Wimbledon Paris (II), Philadelphia (I), Open (Slam) Garros (Slam) (Slam) New York (Champ) 1996 Indian Wells (II), Lipton (I), US Berlin (I), Roland Garros Wimbledon Chase (Champ) Open (Slam) (Slam) (Slam) 1997 Strasbourg (III) 1998 New Haven (II) Leipzig (II), Philadelphia (II) 1999 Roland Garros (Slam)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 287 Justine Hénin-Hardenne Career Titles: Hardcourt: 11; Clay: 9; Grass: 1; Indoor: 2. Total: 23 By Tier: Slams: 4; Championships: 0; Tier I: 8; Tier II: 7; Tier III: 3; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Antwerp (IV) 2000 2001 Gold Coast (III), Canberra (III) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III) 2002 Berlin (I) Linz (II) 2003 Dubai (II), San Diego (II), Canadian Open Charleston (I), Berlin (I), Zürich (I) (I), U. S. Open (Slam) Roland Garros (Slam) 2004 Sydney (II), Australian Open (Slam), Dubai (II), Indian Wells (I), Olympics (II) 2005 Charleston (I), Warsaw (II), Berlin (I), Roland Garros (Slam) Martina Hingis Career Titles: Hardcourt: 17; Clay: 6; Grass: 2; Indoor: 15. Total: 40 By Tier: Slams: 5; Championships: 2; Tier I: 15; Tier II: 16; Tier III: 2; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1996 Filderstadt (II), Oakland (II) 1997 Sydney (II), Australian Open Hilton Head (I) Wimbledon (Slam) Pan Pacific (I), Paris (II), (Slam), Lipton (I), Stanford (II), Filderstadt (II), Philadelphia San Diego (II), US Open (Slam) (II) 1998 Australian Open (Slam), Indian Hamburg (II), Rome Chase (Champ) Wells (I) (I) 1999 Australian Open (Slam), San Hilton Head (I), Pan Pacific (I), Filderstadt Diego (II), Canadian Open (I) Berlin (I) (II) 2000 Ericsson (I), Canadian Open (I) Hamburg (II) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III) Pan Pacific (I), Filderstadt (II), Zürich (I), Moscow (I), Chase (Champ) 2001 Sydney (II), Doha (III), Dubai (II) 2002 Sydney (II) Pan Pacific (I) 2003 RETIRED 2004 RETIRED 2005

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 288 Conchita Martinez Career Titles: Hardcourt: 9; Clay: 20; Grass: 1; Indoor: 3. Total: 33 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 0; Tier I: 9; Tier II: 9; Tier III: 13; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1988 Soﬁa (III) 1989 Wellington (V), Phoenix (III) Tampa (II) 1990 Scottsdale (III) Paris (III) Indianapolis (III) 1991 Barcelona (II), Kitzbühel (III), Paris (III) 1992 Kitzbühel (III) 1993 Brisbane (III), Stratton Houston (II), Rome (I) Philadelphia (I) Mountain (II) 1994 Stratton Mountain (II) Hilton Head (I), Rome (I) Wimbledon (Slam) 1995 San Diego (II), Los Angeles Hilton Head (I), Amelia Island (II) (II), Hamburg (II), Rome (I) 1996 Rome (I) Moscow (III) 1997 1998 Berlin (I), Warsaw (III) 1999 Sopot (III) 2000 Berlin (I) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Pattaya City (III)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 289 Amélie Mauresmo Career Titles: Hardcourt: 5; Clay: 6; Grass: 0; Indoor: 8. Total: 19 By Tier: Slams: 0; Championships: 1; Tier I: 6; Tier II: 11; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Bratislava (V) 2000 Sydney (II) 2001 Amelia Island (II), Berlin (I) Paris (II), Nice (II) 2002 Dubai (II), Canadian Open (I) 2003 Warsaw (II) Philadelphia (II) 2004 Canadian Open (I) Berlin (I), Rome (I) Linz (II), Philadelphia (II) 2005 Rome (I) Antwerp (II). Philadelphia (II), Los Angeles (Champ) Anastasia Myskina Career Titles: Hardcourt: 4; Clay: 3; Grass: 0; Indoor: 3. Total:10 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 0; Tier I: 2; Tier II: 3; Tier III: 2; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Palermo (V) 2000 2001 2002 Bahia (II) 2003 Doha (III) Sarasota (IV) Leipzig (II), Moscow (I) 2004 Doha (II) Roland Garros (Slam) Moscow (I) 2005 Kolkata (III) Jana Novotna Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 4; Grass: 2; Indoor: 15. Total: 24 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 1; Tier I: 2; Tier II: 11; Tier III: 9; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1988 Adelaide (III) 1989 Strasbourg (III) 1990 Albuquerque (III) 1991 Sydney (II) Oklahoma City (III) 1992 1993 Osaka (III), Brighton (II) 1994 Leipzig (II), Brighton (II), Essen (II) 1995 Linz (III) 1996 Madrid (III) Zürich (I), Chicago (II), Philadelphia (II) 1997 Madrid (III) Leipzig (II), Moscow (I), Chase (Champ) 1998 Prague (III) Eastbourne (II), Linz (II) Wimbledon (Slam) 1999 Hannover (II)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 290 Mary Pierce Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 7; Grass: 1; Indoor: 7. Total: 18 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 5; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 3; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 3 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1991 Palermo (V) 1992 Cesena (V), Palermo (V) Puerto Rico (III) 1993 Filderstadt (II) 1994 1995 Australian Open (Slam), Tokyo/Nicherei (II) 1996 1997 Rome (I) 1998 Amelia Island (II) Paris (II), Moscow (I), Luxembourg (III) 1999 Linz (II) 2000 Hilton Head (I), Roland Garros (Slam) 2001 2002 2003 2004 ’s-Hertogenbosch (III) 2005 San Diego (I) Moscow (I) Gabriela Sabatini Career Titles: Hardcourt: 9; Clay: 11; Grass: 0; Indoor: 7. Total: 27 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 2; Tier I: 11; Tier II: 10; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 3 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1985 Japan Open (V) 1986 1987 Pan Pacific (I) Buenos Aires (V) Brighton (II) 1988 Boca Raton (I), Canadian Open (I) Buenos Aires (V), Rome (II) Virginia Slims (Champ) 1989 Lipton (I) Amelia Island (II), Rome (I) Filderstadt (II) 1990 Boca Raton (II), US Open (Slam) 1991 Boca Raton (I) Hilton Head (I), Amelia Island (II), Pan Pacific (II) Rome (I) 1992 Sydney (II) Hilton Head (I), Amelia Island (I), Pan Pacific (II) Rome (I) 1993 1994 Virginia Slims (Champ) 1995 Sydney (II)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 291 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Career Titles: Hardcourt: 8; Clay: 19; Grass: 1; Indoor: 1. Total: 29 By Tier: Slams: 4; Championships: 0; Tier I: 6; Tier II: 13; Tier III: 3; Tier IV: 3; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1988 Brussels (IV) 1989 Barcelona (IV), Roland Garros (Slam) 1990 Barcelona (III) Newport (II) 1991 Washington, DC (II) 1992 Lipton (I), Canadian Open (I) 1993 Lipton (I) Amelia Island (II), Barcelona (II), Hamburg (II) 1994 Canadian Open (I), US Open Amelia Island (II), Barcelona (II), Oakland (II) (Slam), Tokyo/Nicherei (II) Hamburg (II), Roland Garros (Slam) 1995 Barcelona (II), Berlin (I) 1996 Hilton Head (I), Hamburg (II) 1997 1998 Sydney (II) Roland Garros (Slam) 1999 Cairo (III) 2000 2001 Porto (IV), Madrid (III) 2002 Monica Seles Career Titles: Hardcourt: 27; Clay: 14; Grass: 1; Indoor: 11. Total: 53 By Tier: Slams: 9; Championships: 3; Tier I: 9; Tier II: 26; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1989 Houston (II) 1990 Lipton (I), San Antonio (II), Los Angeles Tampa (II), Rome (I), Berlin Oakland (II), Virginia (II) (I), Roland Garros (Slam) Slims (Champ) 1991 Australian Open (Slam), Lipton (I), Los Houston (II), Roland Garros Milan (II), Philadelphia Angeles (II), US Open (Slam), Tokyo/ (Slam) (II), Virginia Slims Nicherei (II) (Champ) 1992 Australian Open (Slam), Indian Wells Houston (II), Barcelona (II), Essen (II), Oakland (II), (II), US Open (Slam), Tokyo/Nicherei (II) Roland Garros (Slam) Virginia Slims (Champ) 1993 Australian Open (Slam) Chicago (II) 1994 1995 Canadian Open (I) 1996 Sydney (II), Australian Open (Slam), Eastbourne Canadian Open (I), Tokyo/Nicherei (II) (II) 1997 Los Angeles (II), Canadian Open (I), Princess Cup (II) 1998 Canadian Open (I), Princess Cup (II) 1999 Amelia Island (II) 2000 Amelia Island (II), Rome (I) Oklahoma City (III) 2001 Bahia (II), Japan Open (III), Shanghai (IV) Oklahoma City (III) 2002 Doha (III) Madrid (III) 2003

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 292 Serena Williams Career Titles: Hardcourt: 16; Clay: 2; Grass: 2; Indoor: 5. Total: 25 By Tier: Slams: 7; Championships: 1; Tier I: 7; Tier II: 10; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Indian Wells (I), Los Angeles (II), US Paris (II) Open (Slam) 2000 Los Angeles (II), Princess Cup (II) Hannover (II) 2001 Indian Wells (I), Canadian Open (I) Munich (Champ) 2002 Scottsdale (II). Miami (I). U. S. Open Rome (I), Roland Wimbledon (Slam) Leipzig (II) (Slam), Princess Cup (II) Garros (Slam) 2003 Australian Open (Slam), Miami (I) Wimbledon (Slam) Paris (II) 2004 Miami (I), Beijing (II) 2005 Australian Open (Slam) Venus Williams Career Titles: Hardcourt: 16; Clay: 7; Grass: 2; Indoor: 6. Total: 31 By Tier: Slams: 5; Championships: 0; Tier I: 6; Tier II: 16; Tier III: 4; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Lipton (I) Oklahoma City (III) 1999 Lipton (I), New Haven (II) Hamburg (II), Rome (I) Oklahoma City (III), Zürich (I) 2000 Stanford (II), San Diego (II), New Wimbledon (Slam) Haven (II), US Open (Slam) 2001 Ericsson (I), San Diego (II), New Hamburg (II) Wimbledon (Slam) Haven (II), U. S. Open (Slam) 2002 Gold Coast (III), Stanford (II), Amelia Island (II) Paris (II), Antwerp (II) San Diego (II), New Haven (II) 2003 Antwerp (II) 2004 Charleston (I), Warsaw (II) 2005 Istanbul (III) Wimbledon (Slam)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 293 Career Results — Doubles For inclusion in this list, players must have at least two Slams, and must have, or project to have, at least 25 doubles titles. Other criteria are similar to those for singles. For brevity, partners are listed only by initial in the following tables — e.g. the first item for Serena Williams is Oklahoma City (III/VW). This means Serena won Oklahoma City 1998, a Tier III, with VW=Venus Williams. The list of partners follows the list of results for each player. Players with whom the player won a Slam shown in bold. Note: Martina Navratilova is excluded because I just don’t trust the early WTA data. The surface data for some of the older players may also be inaccurate. Cara Black Career Titles: Hardcourt: 11; Clay: 4; Grass: 3; Indoor: 7. Total: 25 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 6; Tier II: 11; Tier III: 2; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 3 Partners with whom has won titles: 8 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 2 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2000 Auckland (V/AF) 2001 Hobart (V/EL), San Diego (II/EL), New Hamburg (II/ Birmingham (III/EL) Haven (II/EL), Princess Cup (II/LH) EL), Rome (I/EL) 2002 Bali (III/VRP) Porto (IV/IS) 2003 Hobart (V/EL), Stanford (II/LR) 2004 Sydney (II/RS), San Diego (I/RS) Wimbledon (Slam/RS) Antwerp (II/EC), Pan Paciﬁc (I/RS), Filderstadt (II/RS), Zürich (I/RS) 2005 Stanford (II/RS) Rome (I/LH) Wimbledon (Slam/LH) Antwerp (II/EC), Zürich (I/ RS), Philadelphia (II/RS) Partners: AF=Alexandra Fusai, EC=Els Callens, EL=Elena Likhovtseva, IS=Irina Selyutina, LH=Liezel Huber, LR=Lisa Raymond, RS=Rennae Stubbs, VRP=Virginia Ruano Pascual Kim Clijsters Career Titles: Hardcourt: 4; Clay: 2; Grass: 1; Indoor: 4. Total: 11 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 2 Partners with whom has won titles: 5 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Bratislava (V/LC) 2000 Antwerp (V/SA) 2001 2002 Los Angeles (II/JD) Luxembourg (III/JH) 2003 Sydney (II/AS), Scottsdale (II/AS). Roland G (Slam/AS) Wimbledon (Slam/AS) Antwerp (II/AS), San Diego (II/AS) Zürich (I/AS) 2004 2005 Partners: AS=Ai Sugiyama, JD=Jelena Dokic, JH=Janette Husarova, LC= Laurence Courtois, SA=Sabine Appelmans

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 294 Lindsay Davenport Career Titles: Hardcourt: 16; Clay: 6; Grass: 2; Indoor: 11. Total: 35 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 3; Tier I: 9; Tier II: 19; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 7 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 3 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1994 Indian Wells (II/LR) Oakland (II/ASV) 1995 Sydney (II/JN), Indian Wells (II/LR), Strasbourg (III/ Nicherei (II/MJF) MJF) 1996 Sydney (II/MJF), Los Angeles (II/NZ) Roland Garros Oakland (II/MJF), Chase (Slam/MJF) (Champ/MJF) 1997 Indian Wells (I/NZ), Stanford (II/MH), Amelia Island (II/ Pan Paciﬁc (I/NZ) Chase U. S. Open (Slam/JN) JN), Berlin (I/JN) (Champ/JN) 1998 Indian Wells (I/NZ), Stanford (II/NZ), Berlin (I/NZ) Filderstadt (II/NZ), Chase San Diego (II/NZ) (Champ/NZ) 1999 Stanford (II/CM), San Diego (II/CM) Wimbledon (Slam/ Pan Paciﬁc (I/NZ) CM) 2000 Indian Wells (I/CM) 2001 Filderstadt (II/LR), Zürich (I/LR) 2002 Filderstadt (II/LR) 2003 Indian Wells (I/LR) Amelia Island (II/ Eastbourne (II/ LR) LR) 2004 2005 Partners: ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, CM=Corina Morariu, JN=Jana Novotna, LR=Lisa Raymond, MH=Martina Hingis, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, NZ=Natasha Zvereva

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 295 Gigi Fernandez Career Titles: Hardcourt: 25; Clay: 14; Grass: 8; Indoor: 21. Total: 68 By Tier: Slams: 17; Championships: 2; Tier I: 13; Tier II: 26; Tier III: 7; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 1 Partners with whom has won titles: 11 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 4 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1985 Delray Beach (V/MN), Canadian Washington (III/MN) Open (II/MN), Fort Lauderdale (III/ RW) 1986 1987 Mahwah (III/LM) Newport (III/LM) Piscataway (III/LM) 1988 U. S. Open (Slam/RW) Suntory/Tokyo (IV/RW) 1989 Canadian Open (I/RW), VS Newport (II/LM) Filderstadt (II/RW) Doubles (I/RW), Puerto Rico (IV/ RW) 1990 Los Angeles (II/JN), U. S. Open Hamburg (II/MN) Pan Pacific (II/ES), (Slam/MN) Worcester (II/HS) 1991 Brisbane (III/JN), Light ’n Lively (I/ Roland G (Slam/JN) Chicago (II/JN), Oakland (II/ HS) PF), Indianapolis (III/PF) 1992 U. S. Open (Slam/NZ) Houston (II/PF), Wimbledon (Slam/ Oakland (II/NZ), Roland G (Slam/NZ) NZ) Philadelphia (II/NZ) 1993 Australian Open (Slam/NZ), Hilton Head (I/NZ), Eastbourne (II/ Leipzig (II/NZ), Filderstadt Delray Beach (II/NZ), Light ’n Berlin (I/NZ), Roland NZ), Wimbledon (II/NZ), VSlims (Champ/NZ) Lively (I/NZ), San Diego (II/HS) G (Slam/NZ) (Slam/NZ) 1994 Australian Open (Slam/NZ), Rome (I/NZ), Berlin Eastbourne (II/ Chicago (II/NZ), Filderstadt Miami (I/NZ) (I/NZ), Roland G NZ), Wimbledon (II/NZ), Philadelphia (I/NZ), (Slam/NZ) (Slam/NZ) VSlims (Champ/NZ) 1995 San Diego (II/NZ), Los Angeles (II/ Hamburg (II/MH), Pan Pacific (I/NZ), NZ), U. S. Open (Slam/NZ) Rome (I/NZ), Roland Filderstadt (II/NZ) G (Slam/NZ) 1996 San Diego (II/CM), U. S. Open Pan Pacific (I/NZ) (Slam/NZ) 1997 Sydney (II/ASV) Roland G (Slam/NZ) Wimbledon (Slam/ NZ) Partners: ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, CM=Conchita Martinez, ES=Elizabeth Smylie, HS=Helena Sukova, JN=Jana Novotna, LM=Lori McNeil, MH=Martina Hingis, MN=Martina Navratilova, NZ=Natasha Zvereva, PF=Patty Fendick, RW=Robin White

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 296 Martina Hingis Career Titles: Hardcourt: 14; Clay: 6; Grass: 3; Indoor: 13. Total: 36 By Tier: Slams: 9; Championships: 2; Tier I: 13; Tier II: 12; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 12 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 6 GRAND SLAM 1998 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1995 Hamburg (II/GF) 1996 Wimbledon (Slam/ Zürich (I/HS) HS) 1997 Australian Open (Slam/NZ), Hilton Head (I/ Paris (II/JN), Leipzig (II/JN), Stanford (II/LD), San Diego (II/ MJF) Filderstadt (II/ASV), Zürich (I/ ASV) ASV) 1998 Sydney (II/HS), Australian Open Roland G (Slam/ Wimbledon (Slam/ Pan Paciﬁc (I/ML) (Slam/ML), Miami (I/JN), Los JN) JN) Angeles (II/NZ), Canadian Open (I/ JN), U. S. Open (Slam/JN) 1999 Australian Open (Slam/AK), Rome (I/AK) Eastbourne (II/ Chase (Champ/AK) Indian Wells (I/AK), Miami (I/JN) AK) 2000 Canadian Open (I/NT) Roland G (Slam/ Pan Paciﬁc (I/MP), Filderstadt MP) (II/AK), Zürich (I/AK), Philadelphia (II/AK), Chase (Champ/AK) 2001 Moscow (I/AK) 2002 Australian Open (Slam/AK) Hamburg (II/BS) Partners: AK=Anna Kournikova, ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, BS=Barbara Schett, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HS=Helena Sukova, MP=Mary Pierce, JN=Jana Novotna, LD=Lindsay Davenport, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, ML=Mirjana Lucic, NT=Nathalie Tauziat, NZ=Natasha Zvereva Anna Kournikova Career Titles: Hardcourt: 7; Clay: 2; Grass: 1; Indoor: 6. Total: 16 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 2; Tier I: 4; Tier II: 6; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 6 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Princess Cup (II/MS) 1999 Australian Open (Slam/ Rome (I/MH) Eastbourne (II/ Chase (Champ/MH) MH), Indian Wells (I/MH) MH) 2000 Gold Coast (III/JHD) Hamburg (II/NZ) Filderstadt (II/MH), Zürich (I/MH), Philadelphia (II/MH), Chase (Champ/MH) 2001 Sydney (II/BS) Moscow (I/MH) 2002 Australian Open (Slam/ MH), Shanghai (IV/JL) 2003 Partners: BS=Barbara Schett, JHD=Julie Halard-Decugis, JL=Janet Lee, MH=Martina Hingis, MS=Monica Seles, NZ=Natasha Zvereva

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 297 Svetlana Kuznetsova Career Titles: Hardcourt: 8; Clay: 3; Grass: 0; Indoor: 1. Total: 12 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 0; Tier I: 3; Tier II: 3; Tier III: 4; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 4 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2002 Japan Open (III/ASV) Sopot (III/ASV), Helsinki (IV/ ASV) 2003 Gold Coast (III/MN), Dubai (II/ Rome (I/MN) Leipzig (II/MN) MN), Canadian Open (I/MN) 2004 Gold Coast (III/EL), Doha (II/EL) 2005 Australian Open (Slam/AM), Miami (I/AM) Partners: AM=Alicia Molik, ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, EL=Elena Likhovtseva, MN=Martina Navratilova Larisa (Savchenko) Neiland Career Titles: Hardcourt: 21; Clay: 12; Grass: 12; Indoor: 21. Total: 66 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 10; Tier II: 28; Tier III: 19; Tier IV: 7; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles:16 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 16 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1985 Salt Lake City (IV/SP) Seabrook (IV/SP) 1986 New Orleans (III/SP) Little Rock (IV/SP) 1987 Boca Raton (II/SP) Eastbourne (II/SP) Wichita (IV/SP), Oklahoma City (IV/SP) 1988 Birmingham (III/NZ) Indianapolis (IV/NZ) 1989 Amelia Island (II/NZ), Birmingham (III/NZ) Moscow (III/NZ), Roland G (Slam/NZ) Chicago (II/NZ) 1990 Light n Lively (II/NZ) Birmingham (III/NZ), Nashville (III/KJ) Eastbourne (II/NZ) 1991 Auckland (IV/PF), Boca Raton (I/ Hamburg (II/JN), Eastbourne (II/NZ), Philadelphia (II/JN) NZ), Canadian Open (I/NZ), Los Berlin (I/NZ) Wimbledon (Slam/ Angeles (II/NZ), Washington (II/JN) NZ) 1992 Brisbane (III/JN), Boca Raron (I/ Berlin (I/JN) Eastbourne (II/JN) Leipzig (II/JN), NZ), Miami (I/ASV), Light n’ Lively Brighton (II/JN) (II/JN), San Diego (II/JN) 1993 Brisbane (III/CMa), Miami (I/JN), Osaka (III/JN) Canadian Open (I/JN) 1994 Schenectady (III/MM) Amelia Island (II/ASV), Birmingham (III/ZG) Osaka (III/RS), Brighton Barcelona (II/ASV) (II/MB) 1995 Barcelona (II/ASV), Paris (II/MM), Moscow Edinburgh (II/M) (III/MM), Leipzig (II/ MM), Brighton (II/MM) 1996 Canadian Open (I/ASV) Berlin (I/MM) Rosmalen (III/BSM) Essen (II/MM), Moscow (III/NM) 1997 Birmingham (III/KA) Luxembourg (III/HS) 1998 1999 Gold Coast (III/CMo), Los Angeles Hamburg (II/ASV) Birmingham (III/ Leipzig (II/MP) (II/ASV) CMo) Partners: ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, BSM=Brenda Schultz-McCarthy, CMa=Conchita Martinez, CMo=Corina Morariu, JN=Jana Novotna, KA=Katrina Adams, KJ=Kathy Jordan, MB=Manon Bollegraf, MM=Meredith McGrath, MP=Mary Pierce, NM=Natalia Medvedeva, NZ=Natasha Zvereva, PF=Patty Fendick, RS=Rennae Stubbs, SP=Svetlana Parkhomenko, ZG=Zina Garrison Jackson

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 298 Jana Novotna Career Titles: Hardcourt: 35; Clay: 17; Grass: 8; Indoor: 16. Total: 76 By Tier: Slams: 12; Championships: 2; Tier I: 16; Tier II: 36; Tier III: 10; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 17 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 5 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1987 San Diego (III/CS) Strasbourg (III/CS), Hamburg (II/CKK) 1988 Canadian Open (I/HS), Mahwah (II/ Rome (II/CS), Oklahoma City (III/CS) HS) Hamburg (II/TSL) 1989 Brisbane (III/HS), Boca Raton (II/HS), Barcelona (III/TSL) Wimbledon (Slam/ Zürich (II/HS) Miami (I/HS) HS) 1990 Brisbane (III/HS), Sydney (II/HS), Roland G (Slam/HS) Wimbledon (Slam/ Australian Open (Slam/HS), Indian HS) Wells (II/HS), Miami (I/HS), Boca Raton (II/HS), Los Angeles (II/GF) 1991 Brisbane (III/GF), Washington (II/LN) Hamburg (II/LN), Chicago (II/GF), Zürich Roland G (Slam/GF) (II/AS), Filderstadt (II/ MN), Philadelphia (II/LN) 1992 Brisbane (III/LN), Light n Lively (II/ Berlin (I/LN) Eastbourne (II/ Leipzig (II/LN), Brighton LN), San Diego (II/LN) LN) (II/LN) 1993 Miami (I/LN), Canadian Open (I/LN) Rome (I/ASV) Osaka (III/LN), Paris (II/ AS) 1994 Delray Beach (II/ASV), Light & Lively Hamburg (II/ASV) (II/ASV), U. S. Open (Slam/ASV), San Diego (II/ASV) 1995 Sydney (II/LD), Australian Open Eastbourne (II/ WTA (Champ/ASV) (Slam/ASV), Miami (I/ASV), Delray ASV), Wimbledon Beach (II/MJF) (Slam/ASV) 1996 Miami (I/ASV) Hilton Head (I/ASV), Eastbourne (II/ Paris (II/KB), Filderstadt Madrid (III/ASV) ASV) (II/NA) 1997 U. S, Open (Slam/LD) Amelia Island (II/ Paris (II/MH), Leipzig (II/ LD), Berlin (I/LD) MH), Chase (Champ/LD) 1998 Miami (I/MH), Canadian Open (I/ Roland G (Slam/MH) Eastbourne (II/ MH), U. S. Open (Slam/MH) MdS), Wimbledon (Slam/MH) 1999 Miami (I/MH), Canadian Open (I/MP) Hilton Head (I/EL) Partners: AS=Andrea Strnadova, ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, CKK=Claudia Kohde-Kilsch, CS=Catherine Suire, EL=Elena Likhovtseva, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HS=Helena Sukova, KB=Kristie Boogert, LD=Lindsay Davenport, LN=Larisa Neiland, MdS=Mariaan de Swardt, MH=Martina Hingis, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, MN=Martina Navratilova, MP=Mary Pierce, NA=Nicole Arendt, TSL=Tine Scheuer-Larsen

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 299 Lisa Raymond Career Titles: Hardcourt: 18; Clay: 6; Grass: 5; Indoor: 21. Total: 50 By Tier: Slams: 4; Championships: 2; Tier I: 12; Tier II: 27; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 6 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 2 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1993 Nicherei (II/CR) 1994 Indian Wells (II/LD) 1995 Indian Wells (II/LD) 1996 Chicago (II/RS), Philadelphis (II/RS) 1997 Quebec City (III/RS), Philadelphia (II/RS) 1998 Boston (III/RS) Hannover (II/RS) 1999 New Haven (II/RS) Oklahoma City (III/RS), Zürich (I/RS), Moscow (I/RS), Philadelphia (II/RS) 2000 Australian Open (Slam/RS), San Rome (I/RS), Madrid Diego (II/RS) (III/RS) 2001 Scottsdale (II/RS), U. S. Open Charleston (I/RS) Eastbourne (II/RS), Pan Paciﬁc (I/RS), Filderstadt (Slam/RS) Wimbledon (Slam/ (II/LD), Zürich (I/LD), Munich RS) (Champ/RS) 2002 Sydney (II/RS), Scottsdale (II/ Charleston (I/RS) Eastbourne (II/RS) Pan Paciﬁc (I/RS), Filderstadt RS), Indian Wells (I/RS), Miami (II/LD) (I/RS), Stanford (II/RS) 2003 Indian Wells (I/LD), Stanford Amelia Island (II/LD) Eastbourne (II/LD) Filderstadt (II/RS), (II/CB) Philadelphia (II/MN) 2004 Vienna (III/MN) Philadelphia (II/AM) 2005 New Haven (II/SS), U. S. Open Eastbourne (II/RS) Luxembourg (II/SS), Moscow (Slam/SS) (I/SS), Los Angeles (Champ/SS) Partners: AM=Alicia Molik, CB=Cara Black, CR=Chanda Rubin, LD=Lindsay Davenport, MN=Martina Navratilova, RS=Rennae Stubbbs, SS=Samantha Stosur Virginia Ruano Pascual Career Titles: Hardcourt: 13; Clay: 19; Grass: 0; Indoor: 2. Total: 34 By Tier: Slams: 8; Championships: 1; Tier 3: 11; Tier II: 3; Tier III: 7; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 3 Partners with whom has won titles: 5 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Hobart (V/PS) Budapest (V/PS), Rome (I/PS) 1999 Madrid (III/PS) 2000 Hilton Head (I/PS), Sopot (III/PS) 2001 Antwerp (V/EC), Madrid (III/PS), Roland Garros (Slam/PS), Knokke-Heist (IV/MS) 2002 Canadian Open (I/PS), U. S. Open Bogota (III/PS), Acapulco (III/PS), Rome (I/ (Slam/PS), Bahia (II/PS), Bali (III/CB) PS), Roland Garros (Slam/PS) 2003 New Haven (II/PS), U. S. Open (Slam/ Charleston (I/PS), Berlin (I/PS) Los Angeles PS) (Champ/PS) 2004 Australian Open (Slam/PS), Indian Charleston (I/PS), Roland Garros (Slam/PS) Luxembourg Wells (I/PS), U. S. Open (Slam/PS) (III/PS) 2005 Dubai (II/PS), Indian Wells (I/PS), Charleston (I/CM), Roland Garros (Slam/PS) San Diego (I/CM) Partners: CB=Cara Black, CM=Conchita Martinez, EC=Els Callens, MS=Magui Serna, PS=Paola Suárez

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 300 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Career Titles: Hardcourt: 25; Clay: 31; Grass: 3; Indoor: 10. Total: 69 (WTA says 68 but lists 69 events) By Tier: Slams: 6; Championships: 2; Tier I: 16; Tier II: 35; Tier III: 6; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 2 Partners with whom has won titles: 24 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 3 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1986 Athens (IV/IC) 1987 1988 1989 1990 Hilton Head (I/MN), Amelia Island (II/MP), Tampa (II/MP), Barcelona (III/MP) 1991 Sydney (II/HS) Amelia Island (II/HS), Barcelona (II/MN) 1992 Sydney (II/HS), Australian Open Hilton Head (I/NZ), Amelia Pan Paciﬁc (II/HS), (Slam/HS), Miami (I/LN), Los Island (II/NZ), Barcelona (II/ Filderstadt (II/HS) Angeles (II/HS) CM) VSlims (Champ/HS) 1993 U. S. Open (Slam/HS) Barcelona (II/CM), Rome (I/JN) Essen (II/HS) 1994 Delray Beach (II/JN), Light n Hilton Head (I/LM), Amelia Oakland (II/LD) Lively (II/JN), San Diego (II/JN), Island (II/LN), Barcelona (II/ Canadian Open (I/MM), U. S. Open LN), Hamburg (II/JN) (Slam/JN), Nicherei (II/JHD) 1995 Australian Open (Slam/JN), Miami Barcelona (II/LN) Eastbourne (II/ WTA (Champ/JN) (I/JN) JN), Wimbledon (Slam/JN) 1996 Australian Open (Slam/CR), Miami Hilton Head (I/JN), Amelia Eastbourne (II/ (I/JN), Canadian Open (I/LN) Island (II/CR), Hamburg (II/BS), JN) Rome (I/IS), Madrid (III/JN) 1997 Sydney (II/GF), Miami (I/NZ), San Madrid (III/MJF) Filderstadt (II/MH), Diego (II/MH) Zürich (I/MH), Moscow (I/NZ) 1998 1999 Los Angeles (II/LN) Cairo (III/LC), Hamburg (II/LN) 2000 Berlin (I/CM) Leipzig (II/AGS) 2001 Miami (I/NT) 2002 Doha (III/JH), New Haven (II/DH), Amelia Island (II/DH), Sopot (III/ Princess Cup (II/SK) SK), Helsinki (IV/SK) 2003 RETIRED 2004 Palermo (V/AMG) 2005 Partners: AGS=Anne-Gaëlle Sidot, AMG=Anabel Medina Garrigues, BS=Brenda Schultz, CM=Conchita Martinez, CR=Chanda Rubin, DH=Daniela Hantuchova, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HS=Helena Sukova, IC=Isabel Cueto, IS=Irina Spirlea, JH=Janette Husarova, JHD=Julie Halard (later Julie Halard-Decugis), JN=Jana Novotna, LC=Laurence Courtois, LM=Lori McNeil, MH=Martina Hingis, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, MM=Meredith McGrath, MN=Martina Navratilova, MP=Mercedes Paz, LN=Larisa Nieland, NT=Nathalie Tauziat, NZ=Natasha Zvereva, SK=Svetlana Kuznetsova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 301 Samantha Stosur Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 1; Grass: 0; Indoor: 3. Total: 7 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 1; Tier I: 0; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 2 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2005 Sydney (II/BS), New Haven (II/ Amelia Island (II/BS) Luxembourg (II/LR), Moscow LR), U. S. Open (Slam/LR) (ILR), Los Angeles (Champ/LR) Partners: BS=Bryanne Stewart, LR=Lisa Raymond, Rennae Stubbs Career Titles: Hardcourt: 17; Clay: 7; Grass: 7; Indoor: 21. Total: 52 By Tier: Slams: 4; Championships: 1; Tier I: 15; Tier II: 23; Tier III: 9; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 9 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1992 Canadian Open (I/LM) Hamburg (II/SG) Birmingham (III/LM) Osaka (III/HS) 1993 Indian Wells (II/HS) Hamburg (II/SG) 1994 Strasbourg (III/LM) Osaka (III/LN) 1995 Birmingham (III/MB) 1996 Chicago (II/LR), Philadelphis (II/LR) 1997 Quebec City (III/LR), Philadelphia (II/LR) 1998 Boston (III/LR) Hannover (II/LR) 1999 New Haven (II/LR) Oklahoma City (III/LR), Zürich (I/LR), Moscow (I/LR), Philadelphia (II/LR) 2000 Australian Open (Slam/LR), Rome (I/LR), San Diego (II/LR) Madrid (III/LR) 2001 Scottsdale (II/LR), U. S. Open Charleston (I/LR) Eastbourne (II/LR), Pan Pacific (I/LR), Munich (Slam/LR) Wimbledon (Slam/LR) (Champ/LR) 2002 Sydney (II/LR), Scottsdale (II/ Charleston (I/LR) Eastbourne (II/LR) Pan Pacific (I/LR) LR), Indian Wells (I/LR), Miami (I/LR), Stanford (II/LR) 2003 Los Angeles (II/MP) Pan Pacific (I/EB), Filderstadt (II/LR) 2004 Sydney (II/CB), San Diego (I/ Wimbledon (Slam/CB) Pan Pacific (I/CB), Filderstadt CB) (II/CB), Zürich (I/CB) 2005 Stanford (II/CB) Eastbourne (II/LR) Zürich (I/CB), Philadelphia (II/ CB) Partners: CB=Cara Black, EB=Elena Bovina, HS=Helena Sukova, LM=Lori McNeil, LN=Larisa Neiland, LR=Lisa Raymond, MB=Manon Bollegraf, MP=Mary Pierce, SG=Steffi Graf

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 302 Paola Suárez Career Titles: Hardcourt: 11; Clay: 26; Grass: 0; Indoor: 2. Total: 39 By Tier: Slams: 8; Championships: 1; Tier I: 9; Tier II: 3; Tier III: 10; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 6 Partners with whom has won titles: 4 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1996 Bol (V/LM) 1997 1998 Hobart (V/VRP) Bogota (V/JH), Budapest (V/VRP), Bol (V/ LM), Rome (I/VRP), Maria Lankowitz (V/LM) 1999 Madrid (III/VRP), Sopot (III/LM), Sao Paulo (III/LM) 2000 Bogota (IV/LM), Sao Paulo (IV/LM), Hilton Head (I/VRP), Klagenfurt (III/LM), Sopot (III/ VRP) 2001 Madrid (III/VRP), Roland Garros (Slam/ VRP), Vienna (III/PT) 2002 Canadian Open (I/VRP), U. S. Open Bogota (III/VRP), Acapulco (III/VRP), Rome (Slam/VRP), Bahia (II/VRP) (I/VRP), Roland Garros (Slam/VRP) 2003 New Haven (II/VRP), U. S. Open Charleston (I/VRP), Berlin (I/VRP) Los Angeles (Slam/VRP) (Champ/VRP) 2004 Australian Open (Slam/VRP), Indian Charleston (I/VRP), Roland Garros (Slam/ Luxembourg Wells (I/VRP), U. S. Open (Slam/VRP) VRP) (III/VRP) 2005 Dubai (II/VRP), Indian Wells (I/VRP) Roland Garros (Slam/VRP) Partners: JH=Janette Husarova, LM=Laura Montalvo, PT=Patricia Tarabini, VRP=Virginia Ruano Pascual Ai Sugiyama Career Titles: Hardcourt: 18; Clay: 2; Grass: 3; Indoor: 8. Total: 31 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 0; Tier I: 5; Tier II: 13; Tier III: 9; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 1 Partners with whom has won titles: 14 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 2 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1994 Japan Open (III/MD) 1995 Hobart (V/KN) 1996 Japan Open (III/KD) 1997 Princess Cup (II/MS) 1998 Gold Coast (III/EL) Luxembourg (III/EL), Leipzig (II/EL), Philadelphia (II/EL) 1999 Sydney (II/EL) Strasbourg (III/EL) 2000 Sydney (II/JHD), Miami (I/JHD), New Eastbourne (II/NT) Moscow (I/JHD) Haven (II/JHD), U. S. Open (Slam/ JHD), Princess Cup (II/JHD) 2001 Canberra (III/NA), Indian Wells (I/NA) 2002 Memphis (III/ET) 2003 Sydney (II/KC), Scottsdale (II/KC), Roland G (Slam/ Wimbledon (Slam/ Antwerp (II/KC), Zürich San Diego (II/KC) KC) KC) (I/KC), Linz (II/LH) 2004 Canadian Open (I/SA), Bali (III/AM) 2005 Birmingham (III/DH) Partners: AM=Anastasia Myskina, DH=Daniela Hantuchova, EL= Elena Likhovtseva, ET=Elena Tatarkova, JHD=Julie Halard-Decugis, KC=Kim Clijsters, KD=Kimiko Date, KN=Kyoko Nagatsuka, LH=Liezel Huber, MD = Mami Donoshiro, MS=Monica Seles, NA=Nicole Arendt, NT=Nathalie Tauziat, SA=Shinobu Asagoe

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 303 Helena Sukova Career Titles: Hardcourt: 26; Clay: 12; Grass: 5; Indoor: 25. Total: 68 By Tier: Slams: 9; Championships: 1; Tier I: 12; Tier II: 36; Tier III: 10; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 21 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 4 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1984 Perugia (II/IB) Sydney (II/CKK) Marco Island (III/HM), Stuttgart (II/CKK) 1985 Los Angeles (I/CKK), U. S. Berlin (II/CKK), Pan Pacific (I/CKK) Open (Slam/CKK) Lugano (III/BG) 1986 Miami (I/PS) Amelia Island (I/CKK), Chicago (II/CKK), Dallas Berlin (II/SG) (II/CKK), Brighton (II/ SG), Hilversum (III/KJ) 1987 Berlin (II/CKK) Wimbledon (Slam/ Bridgestone (I/CKK), CKK) Chicago (II/CKK), Brighton (II/KJ) 1988 San Antonio (II/LM), Pan Pacific (II/PS) Canadian Open (I/JN), Mahwah (II/JN) 1989 Brisbane (III/JN), Boca Raton Wimbledon (Slam/JN) Zürich (II/Novotna) (II/JN), Miami (I/JN) 1990 Brisbane (III/JN), Sydney (II/ Roland G (Slam/JN) Wimbledon (Slam/JN) Brighton (II/NT), JN), Australian Open (Slam/ Worcester (II/GF) JN), Indian Wells (II/JN), Boca Raton (II/JN), Miami (I/JN) 1991 Sydney (II/ASV), Light & Amelia Island (II/ASV) Lively (I/GF) 1992 Sydney (II/ASV), Australian Rome (I/MS) Pan Pacific (II/ASV), Osaka Open (Slam/ASV), Los Angeles (III/RS), Zürich (II/ASV), (II/ASV) Filderstadt (II/ASV), VirginiaS (Champ/ASV) 1993 Indian Wells (II/RS), Stratton Lucerne (III/MJF) Pan Pacific (I/MN), Essen Mountain (II/ES), San Diego (II/ASV) (II/GF), Los Angeles (II/ASV), U. S. Open (Slam/ASV) 1994 1995 Oakland (II/LM), Philadelphia (II/LM) 1996 Karlovy Vary (III/KH) Wimbledon (Slam/MH) Zürich (I/MH) 1997 Strasbourg (III/NZ) Luxembourg (III/LN) 1998 Sydney (II/MH) Partners: ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, BG=Bonnie Gadusek, CKK=Claudia Kohde-Kilsch, ES=Elizabeth Smylie, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HM=Hana Mandlikova, IB=Iva Budarova, JN=Jana Novotna, KH=Karina Habsudova, KJ=Kathy Jordan, LM=Lori McNeil, LN=Larisa Neiland, MH=Martina Hingis, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, MN=Martina Navratilova, MS=Monica Seles, NT=Nathalie Tauziat, NZ=Natasha Zvereva, PS=Pam Shriver, RS=Rennae Stubbs, SG=Steffi Graf

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 304 Serena Williams Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 1; Grass: 2; Indoor: 4. Total: 10 By Tier: Slams: 6; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 2; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 2 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Oklahoma City (III/VW), Zürich (I/VW) 1999 U. S. Open (Slam/VW) Roland G (Slam/VW) Hannover (II/VW) 2000 Wimbledon (Slam/VW) 2001 Australian Open (Slam/VW) 2002 Wimbledon (Slam/VW) Leipzig (II/AS) 2003 Australian Open (Slam/VW) 2004 2005 Partners: AS=Alexandra Stevenson, VW=Venus Williams Venus Williams Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 1; Grass: 2; Indoor: 3. Total: 9 By Tier: Slams: 6; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 1; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 1 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Oklahoma City (III/SW), Zürich (I/SW) 1999 U. S. Open (Slam/SW) Roland G (Slam/SW) Hannover (II/SW) 2000 Wimbledon (Slam/SW) 2001 Australian Open (Slam/SW) 2002 Wimbledon (Slam/SW) 2003 Australian Open (Slam/SW) 2004 2005 Partners: SW=Serena Williams

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 305 Natasha Zvereva Career Titles: Hardcourt: 24; Clay: 20; Grass: 12; Indoor: 24. Total: 80 By Tier: Slams: 18; Championships: 3; Tier I: 23; Tier II: 29; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 12 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 4 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1988 Birmingham (III/LS) Indianapolis (IV/LS) 1989 Amelia Island (II/LN), Birmingham (III/LN) Chicago (II/LN), Roland Garros (Slam/ Moscow (IV/LN) LN) 1990 Light & Lively (II/LN) Birmingham (III/LN), Eastbourne (II/LN) 1991 Boca Raton (I/LN), Canadian Open Hilton Head (I/CKK), Eastbourne (II/LN), Brighton (II/PS) (I/LN), Los Angeles (II/LN), U. S. Berlin (I/LN) Wimbledon (Slam/LN) Open (Slam/PS) 1992 Boca Raton (I/LN), U. S. Open Hilton Head (I/ASV), Wimbledon (Slam/GF) Zürich (II/HS), (Slam/GF) Amelia Island (II/ Oakland (II/GF), ASV), Roland G Philadelphia (II/GF) (Slam/GF) 1993 Australian Open (Slam/GF), Delray Hilton Head (I/GF), Eastboune (II/GF), Leipzig (II/GF), Beach (II/GF), Light ’n Lively (II/ Berlin (I/GF), Roland Wimbledon (Slam/GF) Filderstadt (II/GF), GF) G (Slam/GF) VSlims (Champ/GF) 1994 Australian Open (Slam/GF), Miami Rome (I/GF), Berlin Eastbourne (II/GF), Chicago (II/GF), (I/GF) (I/GF), Roland G Wimbledon (Slam/GF) Filderstadt (II/GF), (Slam/GF) Philadelphia (I/GF), VSlims (Champ/GF) 1995 San Diego (II/GF), Los Angeles (II/ Rome (I/GF) Pan Pacific (I/GF), GF), U. S. Open (Slam/GF) Roland G (Slam/GF) Filderstadt (II/GF) 1996 Los Angeles (II/LD), U. S. Open Pan Pacific (I/GF) (Slam/GF) 1997 Australian Open (Slam/MH), Indian Strasbourg (III/HS), Wimbledon (Slam/GF) Pan Pacific (I/LD), Wells (I/LD), Miami (I/ASV) Roland G (Slam/GF) Moscow (I/ASV) 1998 Indian Wells (I/LD), Stanford (II/ Berlin (I/LD) Filderstadt (II/LD), LD), San Diego (II/LD), Los Angeles Moscow (I/MP), Chase (II/MH) (Champ/LD) 1999 Pan Pacific (I/LD) 2000 Hamburg (II/AK) Hannover (II/ÅC) 2001 2002 Madrid (III/MN) Partners: ÅC=Åsa Carlsson (now Svensson), AK=Anna Kournikova, ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, CKK=Claudia Kohde- Kilsch, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HS=Helena Sukova, LD=Lindsay Davenport, LN=LS=Larisa (Savchenko) Neiland, MH=Martina Hingis, MN=Martina Navratilova, MP=Mary Pierce, PS=Pam Shriver

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 306 Slam History Singles Slam Winners, Open Era The following list shows, year by year, who won which Slams, and also shows the Open Era Slam Count for each player. (Note that some players, e.g. Court and King, have earlier Slams; these do not appear in the totals. Also, the Australian Open is always counted as the first Slam of the year even when it was actually the last, i.e. 1978-1985.) Multiple Slam winners shown in Bold Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon U. S. Open 1968 Richey King (1) Wade (1) 1969 Court (1) Court (2) A. Jones Court (3) 1970 Court (4) Court (5) Court (6) Court (7) 1971 Court (8) Goolagong (1) Goolagong (2) King (2) 1972 Wade (2) King (3) King (4) King (5) 1973 Court (9) Court (10) King (6) Court (11) 1974 Goolagong (3) Evert (1) Evert (2) King (7) 1975 Goolagong (4) Evert (3) King (8) Evert (4) 1976 Goolagong Cawley (5) Barker Evert (5) Evert (6) 1977 Reid Jausovec Wade (3) Evert (7) Goolagong Cawley (6) 1978 O’Neil Ruzici Navratilova (1) Evert (8) 1979 B. Jordan Evert Lloyd (9) Navratilova (2) Austin (1) 1980 Mandlikova (1) Evert Lloyd (10) Goolagong Cawley (7) Evert Lloyd (11) 1981 Navratilova (3) Mandlikova (2) Evert Lloyd (12) Austin (2) 1982 Evert Lloyd (13) Navratilova (4) Navratilova (5) Evert Lloyd (14) 1983 Navratilova (6) Evert Lloyd (15) Navratilova (7) Navratilova (8) 1984 Evert Lloyd (16) Navratilova (9) Navratilova (10) Navratilova (11) 1985 Navratilova (12) Evert Lloyd (17) Navratilova (13) Mandlikova (3) 1986 Evert Lloyd (18) Navratilova (14) Navratilova (15) 1987 Mandlikova (4) Graf (1) Navratilova (16) Navratilova (17) 1988 Graf (2) Graf (3) Graf (4) Graf (5) 1989 Graf (6) Sanchez-Vicario (1) Graf (7) Graf (8) 1990 Graf (9) Seles (1) Navratilova (18) Sabatini 1991 Seles (2) Seles (3) Graf (10) Seles (4) 1992 Seles (5) Seles (6) Graf (11) Seles (7) 1993 Seles (8) Graf (12) Graf (13) Graf (14) 1994 Graf (15) Sanchez-Vicario (2) Martinez Sanchez-Vicario (3) 1995 Pierce (1) Graf (16) Graf (17) Graf (18) 1996 Seles (9) Graf (19) Graf (20) Graf (21) 1997 Hingis (1) Majoli Hingis (2) Hingis (3) 1998 Hingis (4) Sanchez-Vicario (4) Novotna Davenport (1) 1999 Hingis (5) Graf (22) Davenport (2) S. Williams (1) 2000 Davenport (3) Pierce (2) V. Williams (1) V. Williams (2) 2001 Capriati (1) Capriati (2) V. Williams (3) V. Williams (4) 2002 Capriati (3) S. Williams (2) S. Williams (3) S. Williams (4) 2003 S. Williams (5) Hénin-Hardenne (1) S. Williams (6) Hénin-Hardenne (2) 2004 Hénin-Hardenne (3) Myskina Sharapova Kuznetsova 2005 S. Williams (7) Hénin-Hardenne (4) V. Williams (5) Clijsters

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 307 Doubles Slam Winners, Open Era Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open 1968 Durr/A Jones Casals/King Bueno/Court 1969 Court/Tegart Dalton Durr/A Jones Court/Tegart Dalton Durr/Hard 1970 Court/Tegart Dalton Chanfreau/Durr Casals/King Court/Tegart Dalton 1971 Court/Goolagong Cawley Chanfreau/Durr Casals/King Casals/Tegart Dalton 1972 Gourlay/Harris King/Stove King/Stove Durr/Stove 1973 Court/Wade Court/Wade Casals/King Court/Wade 1974 Goolagong Cawley/Michel Evert/Morozova Goolagong/Michel Casals/King 1975 Goolagong Cawley/Michel Evert/Navratilova Kiyomura/Sawamatsu Court/Wade 1976 Goolagong Cawley/Gourlay Bonicelli/Chanfreau Lovera Evert/Navratilova Boshoff/Kloss 1977 Balestrat/Gourlay* Mariskova/Teeguarden Gourlay Cawley/Russell Navratilova/Stove 1978 Nagelsen/Tomanova Jausovec/Ruzici Reid/Turnbull King/Navratilova 1979 Chaloner/Evers Stove/Turnbull King/Navratilova Stove/Turnbull 1980 Navratilova/Nagelsen K Jordan/A Smith K Jordan/A Smith King/Navratilova 1981 K Jordan/A Smith Fairbank/Harford Navratilova/Shriver K Jordan/A Smith 1982 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/A Smith Navratilova/Shriver Casals/Turnbull 1983 Navratilova/Shriver Fairbank/Reynolds Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver 1984 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver 1985 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver K. Jordan/Smylie Kohde-Kilsch/Sukova 1986 Navratilova/Temesvari Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver 1987 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver Kohde-Kilsch/Sukova Navratilova/Shriver 1988 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver Graf/Sabatini G Fernandez/White 1989 Navratilova/Shriver Savchenko/Zvereva Novotna/Sukova Mandlikova/Navratilova 1990 Novotna/Sukova Novotna/Sukova Novotna/Sukova G Fernandez/Navratilova 1991 Fendick/MJ Fernandez G Fernandez/Novotna Savchenko Neiland/Zvereva Shriver/Zvereva 1992 Sanchez-Vicario/Sukova G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva 1993 G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva Sanchez-Vicario/Sukova 1994 G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario 1995 Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario G Fernandez/Zvereva Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario G Fernandez/Zvereva 1996 Rubin/Sanchez-Vicario Davenport/ MJ Fernandez Hingis/Sukova G Fernandez/Zvereva 1997 Hingis/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva Davenport/Novotna 1998 Hingis/Lucic Hingis/Novotna Hingis/Novotna Hingis/Novotna 1999 Hingis/Kournikova Williams/Williams Davenport/Morariu Williams/Williams 2000 Raymond/Stubbs Hingis/Pierce Williams/Williams Halard-Decugis/Sugiyama 2001 Williams/Williams Ruano Pascual/Suárez Raymond/Stubbs Raymond/Stubbs 2002 Hingis/Kournikova Ruano Pascual/Suárez Williams/Williams Ruano Pascual/Suárez 2003 Williams/Williams Clijsters/Sugiyama Clijsters/Sugiyama Ruano Pascual/Suárez 2004 Ruano Pascual/Suárez Ruano Pascual/Suárez Black/Stubbs Ruano Pascual/Suárez 2005 Kuznetsova/Molik Ruano Pascual/Suárez Black/Huber Raymond/Stosur

* This is the January winner; the “other” Australian Open, in December, had the doubles final rained out

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 308 Singles and Doubles at the Same Slam (Open Era) It’s tough enough to win one part of a Slam. Winning singles and doubles is that much harder. The following list shows, year by year, the players who have won both. The first name in each column is, of course, the player who won both; the second name is her doubles partner. Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open 1968 King w/Casals 1969 Court w/Tegart Dalton 1970 Court w/Tegart Dalton Court w/Tegart Dalton 1971 Court w/Goolagong 1972 King w/Stove King w/Stove 1973 Court w/Wade Court w/Wade King w/Casals Court w/Wade 1974 Goolagong w/Michel Evert w/Morozova King w/Casals 1975 Goolagong w/Michel Evert w/Navratilova 1976 Goolagong w/Gourlay Evert w/Navratilova 1977 1978 Ruzici w/Jausovec 1979 Navratilova w/King 1980 1981 1982 Navratilova w/A. Smith Navratilova w/Shriver 1983 Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver 1984 Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver 1985 Navratilova w/Shriver 1986 Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver 1987 Navratilova w/Shriver 1988 Graf w/Sabatini 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Sanchez-Vicario w/Novot 1995 1996 1997 Hingis w/Zvereva 1998 Hingis w/Lucic Novotna w/Hingis 1999 Hingis w/Kournikova Davenport w/Morariu S. Williams w/Williams 2000 Pierce w/Hingis V. Williams w/Williams 2001 2002 S. Williams w/Williams 2003 S. Williams w/Williams 2004 2005

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 309 Doubles Slams and Partners The following tables show, for most of the major doubles players of the Open Era, the Slams they won and the partners with whom they won them. The emphasis has been placed on “career Slammers” — players who won all four Slams in their doubles careers. Grand Slams are shown in Bold Rosie Casals Australian French Wimbledon USO 1968 King 1969 1970 King 1971 King Tegart Dalton 1972 1973 King 1974 King 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Turnbull

Margaret Court Australian French Wimbledon USO 1968 Bueno 1969 Tegart Dalton Tegart Dalton 1970 Tegart Dalton Tegart Dalton 1971 Goolagong Cawley 1972 1973 Wade Wade Wade 1974 1975 Wade

Judy Tegart Dalton Australian French Wimbledon USO 1969 Court Court 1970 Court Court 1971 Casals

Francoise Durr Australian French Wimbledon USO 1968 AJones 1969 AJones Hard 1970 Chanfreau 1971 Chanfreau 1972 Stove

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 310 Gigi Fernandez Australian French Wimbledon USO 1988 White 1989 1990 Navratilova 1991 Novotna 1992 Zvereva Zvereva Zvereva 1993 Zvereva Zvereva Zvereva 1994 Zvereva Zvereva Zvereva 1995 Zvereva Zvereva 1996 Zvereva 1997 Zvereva Zvereva

Evonne Goolagong (Cawley) Australian French Wimbledon USO 1971 Court 1972 1973 1974 Michel Michel 1975 Michel 1976 Gourlay

Martina Hingis Australian French Wimbledon USO 1996 Sukova 1997 Zvereva 1998 Lucic Novotna Novotna Novotna 1999 Kournikova 2000 Pierce 2001 2002 Kournikova

Kathy Jordan Australian French Wimbledon USO 1980 A. Smith A. Smith 1981 A. Smith A. Smith 1982 1983 1984 1985 Smylie

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 311 Billie Jean King Australian French Wimbledon USO 1968 Casals 1969 1970 Casals 1971 Casals 1972 Stove Stove 1972 1973 Casals 1974 Casals 1975 1976 1977 1978 Navratilova 1979 Navratilova 1980 Navratilova

Martina Navratilova Australian French Wimbledon USO 1975 Evert 1976 Evert 1977 Stove 1978 King 1979 King 1980 Nagelson King 1981 Shriver 1982 Shriver ASmith Shriver 1983 Shriver Shriver Shriver 1984 Shriver Shriver Shriver Shriver 1985 Shriver Shriver 1986 Temesvari Shriver Shriver 1987 Shriver Shriver Shriver 1988 Shriver Shriver 1989 Shriver Mandlikova 1990 GFernandez

Jana Novotna Australian French Wimbledon USO 1989 Sukova 1990 Sukova Sukova Sukova 1991 1992 GFernandez 1993 1994 Sanchez-Vicario 1995 Sanchez-Vicario Sanchez-Vicario 1996 1997 Davenport 1998 Hingis Hingis Hingis

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Australian French Wimbledon USO 1992 Sukova 1993 Sukova 1994 Novotna 1995 Novotna Novotna 1996 Rubin

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 312 Pam Shriver Australian French Wimbledon USO 1981 Navratilova 1982 Navratilova Navratilova 1983 Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova 1984 Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova 1985 Navratilova Navratilova 1986 Navratilova Navratilova 1987 Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova 1988 Navratilova Navratilova 1989 Navratilova 1990 1991 Zvereva

Anne Smith Australian French Wimbledon USO 1980 Jordan Jordan 1981 Jordan Jordan 1982 Navratilova

Helena Sukova Australian French Wimbledon USO 1985 Kohde-Kilsch 1986 1987 Kohde-Kilsch 1988 1989 Novotna 1990 Novotna Novotna Novotna 1991 1992 ASV 1993 ASV 1994 1995 1996 Hingis

Wendy Turnbull Australian French Wimbledon USO 1978 Reid 1979 Stove Stove 1980 1981 1982 Casals

Venus or Serena Williams Australian French Wimbledon USO 1999 Williams Williams 2000 Williams 2001 Williams 2002 Williams 2003 Williams

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 313 Natasha Zvereva Australian French Wimbledon USO 1989 Savchenko 1990 1991 Savchenko Neiland Shriver 1992 GFernandez GFernandez GFernandez 1993 GFernandez GFernandez GFernandez 1994 GFernandez GFernandez GFernandez 1995 GFernandez GFernandez 1996 GFernandez 1997 Hingis GFernandez GFernandez

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 314 Grand Slams and Career Slams A “Grand Slam” consists of winning all four Slams in a single year — a rare accomplishment indeed. A “Career Slam” consists of winning all four Slams at some time in one’s career, though not all in one year. The following lists summarize the Career Slams for Women in the Open Era. Grand Slams, Singles, Open Era1 Margaret Court, 1970 Steffi Graf, 19882

Career Slams, Singles, Open Era3 Margaret Court (Grand Slam, 1970) Steffi Graf (Grand Slam, 1988) Chris Evert — Australian Open 1982, 1984 Roland Garros 1974, 1975, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1985, 1986 Wimbledon 1974, 1976, 1981 U. S. Open 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1980, 1982 Martina Navratilova4 — Australian Open 1981, 1983, 1985 Roland Garros 1982, 1984 Wimbledon 1978, 1979, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1990 U. S. Open 1983, 1984, 1986, 1987 Serena Williams5 — Australian Open 2003, 2005 Roland Garros 2002 Wimbledon 2002, 2003 U. S. Open 1999, 2002

Grand Slams, Doubles, Open Era, team Martina Navratilova/Pam Shriver, 1984

Grand Slams, Doubles, Open Era, individual6 Martina Navratilova, 1984 (with Pam Shriver) Pam Shriver, 1984 (with Martina Navratilova)7 Martina Hingis, 1998 (with Mirjana Lucic, Australian Open, and Jana Novotna, other 3 Slams)8

Career Slams, Doubles, Open Era, team9 Martina Navratilova/Pam Shriver (20 Slams as a team) Gigi Fernandez/Natasha Zvereva (14 Slams as a team) Kathy Jordan/Anne Smith (4 Slams as a team) Venus Williams/Serena Williams (6 Slams as a team)

1. Maureen Connolly also won a Grand Slam before the Open Era 2. Stefﬁ Graf is the only player, man or woman, to win the singles Grand Slam in the four-surfaces era 3. Maureen Connolly, Doris Hart, and Shirley Fry had Career Slams before the Open Era. Billie Jean King won a Career Slam partly in the Open Era, but her only Australian Open title was pre-Open Era. 4. Martina Navratilova has a non-calendar Grand Slam in 1983Ð1984: Wim 83, USO 83, AO 83, RG 84, Wim 84, USO 84 5. Serena Williams had a non-calendar Grand Slam in 2002Ð2003: RG 02, Wi 02, USO 02, AO 03 6. Maria Bueno also won a Grand Slam in doubles before the Open Era 7. Navratilova and Shriver are the only team to win a Grand Slam together in the Open Era 8. Hingis is the only player to win a multi-partner Grand Slam in the Open Era (Bueno did it before the Open Era) Hingis also has the only doubles Grand Slam in the four-surface era. 9. Margaret Court and Judy Tegart Dalton won a Career Slam as a team, but their only Roland Garros title was before the Open Era

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 315 Career Slams, Doubles, Open Era, with partners, individual1 Martina Navratilova (Grand Slam, 1984) Pam Shriver (Grand Slam, 1984) Martina Hingis (Grand Slam, 1998) Margaret Court — Australian Open 1969, 1970 (Tegart Dalton), 1971 (Goolagong Cawley), 1973 (Wade) Roland Garros 1973 (Wade) Wimbledon 1969 (Tegart Dalton) U.S. Open 1970 (Tegart Dalton) Gigi Fernandez — Australian Open 1993, 1994 (Zvereva) Roland Garros 1991 (Novotna), 1992-1995, 1997 (Zvereva) Wimbledon 1992-1994, 1997 (Zvereva) U.S. Open 1988 (White), 1990 (Navratilova), 1992, 1995, 1996 (Zvereva) Kathy Jordan — Australian Open 1981 (A. Smith) Roland Garros 1980 (A. Smith) Wimbledon 1980 (A. Smith), 1985 (Smylie) U. S. Open 1981 (A. Smith) Jana Novotna — Australian Open 1990 (Sukova), 1995 (Sanchez-Vicario) Roland Garros 1990 (Sukova), 1991 (G. Fernandez), 1998 (Hingis) Wimbledon 1989, 1990 (Sukova), 1995 (Sanchez-Vicario), 1998 (Hingis) U. S. Open 1994 (Sanchez-Vicario), 1997 (Davenport), 1998 (Hingis) Anne Smith — Australian Open 1981 (Jordan) Roland Garros 1980 (Jordan), 1982 (Navratilova) Wimbledon 1980 (Jordan) U. S. Open 1981 (Jordan) Helena Sukova — Australian Open 1990 (Novotna), 1992 (Sanchez-Vicario) Roland Garros 1990 (Novotna) Wimbledon 1987 (Kohde-Kilsch), 1989, 1990 (Novotna), 1996 (Hingis) U. S. Open 1985 (Kohde-Kilsch), 1993 (Sanchez-Vicario) Venus/Serena Williams —Australian Open 2001 (Williams), 2003 (Williams) Roland Garros 1999 (Williams) Wimbledon 2000 (Williams), 2002 (Williams) U. S. Open 1999 (Williams) Natasha Zvereva — Australian Open 1993, 1994 (G. Fernandez), 1997 (Hingis) Roland Garros 1989 (Savchenko), 1992-1995, 1997 (G. Fernandez) Wimbledon 1991 (Savchenko Nieland), 1992-1994, 1997 (G. Fernandez) U.S. Open 1991 (Shriver), 1992, 1995, 1996 (G. Fernandez)

1. Louise Brough, Maria Bueno, Shirley Fry, Doris Hart, and Lesley Turner Bowrey also had Career Slams before the Open Era. Judy Tegart Dalton won a career Slam partly in the Open Era, but her only Roland Garros title was before the Open Era

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 316 Total Slam Victories, Open Era Note that many of these players (e.g. Court, King) also won Slams before the Open Era. These Slams are not counted (e.g. Court had 24 total singles Slams, but 13 were before the Open Era, so she is listed as having 11 Open Era Slam titles) Singles Doubles — Multiple Winners Doubles — One-Time Winners 22 Steffi Graf 31 Martina Navratilova 1 Dianne Balestrat 18 Chris Evert 21 Pam Shriver Fiorella Bonicelli Martina Navratilova 18 Natasha Zvereva Delina Boshoff* 11 Margaret Court 17 Gigi Fernandez Maria Bueno 9Monica Seles 12 Jana Novotna Judy Chaloner* 8 Billie Jean King 10 Margaret Court Dianne Evers* 7 Evonne Goolagong Cawley Billie Jean King Patty Fendick Serena Williams 9Martina Hingis Steffi Graf* 5Martina Hingis Helena Sukova Julie Halard-Decugis Venus Williams 8 Virginia Ruano Pascual Darlene Hard 4 Justine Hénin-Hardenne Paola Suárez Liezel Huber Hana Mandlikova 7 Rosie Casals Tanya Harford Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario 6 Francoise Durr Kerry Harris 3 Jennifer Capriati Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Mima Jausovic* Lindsay Davenport Betty Stove Anne Kiyomura* Virginia Wade Serena Williams Ilana Kloss* 2 Tracy Austin Venus Williams Svetlana Kuznetsova* Mary Pierce 5 Judy Tegart Dalton Mirjana Lucic 1 Sue Barker Evonne Goolagong Cawley Hana Mandlikova Kim Clijsters Kathy Jordan Regina Mariskova* Mima Jausovec Anne Smith Alicia Molik* Anne Jones 4 Helen Gourlay Cawley Corina Morariu Barbara Jordan Lisa Raymond Olga Morozova Svetlana Kuznetsova Rennae Stubbs Mary Pierce Iva Majoli Wendy Turnbull Kerry Melville Reid Conchita Martinez Virginia Wade Candy Reynolds Anastasia Myskina 3 Lindsay Davenport Chanda Rubin Jana Novotna Chris Evert JoAnne Russell Chris O’Neil Gail Chanfreau Lovera Virginia Ruzici* Nancy Richey Peggy Michel Gabriela Sabatini* Kerry Melville Reid Ai Sugiyama Kazuko Sawamatsu* Virginia Ruzici 2 Cara Black Elizabeth Smylie Gabriela Sabatini Kim Clijsters Pam Teeguarden* Maria Sharapova Rosalyn Fairbank Andrea Temesvari Mary Joe Fernandez Renata Tomanova Ann Haydon Jones Robin White Claudia Kohde-Kilsch Anna Kournikova * Part of a “One Slam Wonder” Betsy Nagelson team, i.e. one where each won Larisa Savchenko Neiland only one doubles Slam

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 317 Players and Titles Players with Titles, Year by Year The following list shows, year by year, all the players with titles in a given year, and the number of titles for each player. (Note: Prior to 1993, the season was considered to start before the beginning of the calendar year, and prior to 1986, multiple years are listed, e.g. 1985/1986. The following lists are based on “Tour Years,” not calendar years, with 1985/1986 listed as “1985,” etc.) 2005 (total of 30 winners, 63 events) — Clijsters (9), Davenport (6), Hénin-Hardenne (4), Mauresmo (4), Sharapova (3), Vaidisova (3), Koukalova (2), Medina Garrigues (2), Pennetta (2), Pierce (2), Safarova (2), Safina (2), Schnyder (2), Smashnova (2), Srebotnik (2), V. Williams (2), Frazier (1), Ivanovic (1), Kirilenko (1), Krajicek (1), Llagostera Vives (1), Martinez (1), Mirza (1), Molik (1), Myskina (1), Petrova (1), S. Williams (1), Yan (1), Zheng (1), Zvonareva (1) 2004 (total of 31 winners, 60 events) — Davenport (7), Hénin-Hardenne (5), Mauresmo (5), Sharapova (5), Kuznetsova (3), Molik (3), Myskina (3), Clijsters (2), Loit (2), Vaidisova (2), S. Williams (2), V. Williams (2), Benesova (1), Bovina (1), Daniilidou (1), Dementieva (1), Frazier (1), Jankovic (1), Li Na (1), Likhovtseva (1), Medina Garrigues (1), Pennetta (1), Pierce (1), Pratt (1), Schaul (1), Smashnova (1), Suárez (1), Sucha (1), Sugiyama (1), Zuluaga (1), Zvonareva (1) 2003 (total of 30 winners, 59 events) — Clijsters (9), Hénin-Hardenne (8), Myskina (4), Serena Williams (4), Dementieva (3), Mauresmo (2), Pistolesi (2), Rubin (2), Serna (2), Sharapova (2), Sugiyama (2), Capriati (1), Coetzer (1), Daniilidou (1), Davenport (1), Déchy (1), Farina Elia (1), Grande (1), Maleeva (1), Molik (1), Nagyova (1), Raymond (1), Ruano Pascual (1), Safina (1), Shaughnessy (1), Suárez (1), Tanasugarn (1), Venus Williams (1), Zuluaga (1), Zvonareva (1) 2002 (total of 37 winners, 64 events) — S. Williams (8), V. Williams (7), Clijsters (4), Smashnova (4), Bovina (2), Dokic (2), Hénin (2), Hingis (2), Kuznetsova (2), Mauresmo (2), Rubin (2), Seles (2), Black (1), Capriati (1), M. Casanova (1), Craybas (1), Daniilidou (1), Diaz-Oliva (1), Farina Elia (1), Hantuchova (1), Majoli (1), Maleeva (1), Matevzic (1), Mikaelian (1), Montolio (1), Müller (1), Myskina (1), Raymond (1), Safina (1), Schnyder (1), Serna (1), Srebotnik (1), Sucha (1), Svensson (1), Wartusch (1), Widjaja (1), Zuluaga (1) 2001 (total of 30 winners, 63 events) — Davenport (7), V. Williams (6), Mauresmo (4), Seles (4), Capriati (3), Clijsters (3), Dokic (3), Hénin (3), Hingis (3), S. Williams (3), Grande (2), Montolio (2), Sanchez- Vicario (2), Tulyaganova (2), Coetzer (1), Farina Elia (1), Gersi (1), Gubacsi (1), Lamade (1), Maleeva (1), Medina Garrigues (1), Rittner (1), Schnyder (1), Shaughnessy (1), Suárez (1), Tauziat (1), Testud (1), Torrens Valero (1), Tu (1), Widjaja (1) 2000 (total of 29 winners, 56 events excluding rain-out at Scottsdale) — Hingis (9), V. Williams (5), Davenport (4), Nagyova (3), Seles (3), S. Williams (3), Clijsters (2), Halard-Decugis (2), Huber (2), Kremer (2), Pierce (2), Talaja (2), Bedanova (1), Capriati (1), Coetzer (1), Garbin (1), Kuti Kis (1), Leon Garcia (1), Martinez (1), Mauresmo (1), Pisnik (1), Raymond (1), Rubin (1), Schett (1), Shaughnessy (1), Smashnova (1), Tauziat (1), Tulyaganova (1), Wartusch (1) 1999 (total of 33 winners, 57 events) — Davenport (7), Hingis (7), V. Williams (6), S. Williams (4), Capriati (2), Halard-Decugis (2), Tauziat (2), Zuluaga (2), Brandi (1), Carlsson (1), Clijsters (1), Frazier (1), Graf (1), Habsudova (1), Hénin (1), Mag. Maleeva (1), Martinez (1), Mauresmo (1), Morariu (1), Myskina (1), Nagyova (1), Novotna (1), Pierce (1), Pitkowski (1), Rubin (1), Sanchez Lorenzo (1), Sanchez-Vicario (1), Schnyder (1), Seles (1), Smashnova (1), Srebotnik (1), Torrens Valero (1), Zvereva (1) 1998 (total of 23 winners, 51 events excluding rain-out at Birmingham) — Davenport (6), Hingis (5), Schnyder (5), Novotna (4), Pierce (4), Graf (3), Halard-Decugis (2), Martinez (2), Nagyova (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Seles (2), Sugiyama (2), V. Williams (2), Coetzer (1), de Swardt (1), Hrdlickova (1), Lucic (1), Ruano-Pascual (1), Snyder (1), Spirlea (1), Suárez (1), Testud (1), Van Roost (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 318 1997 (total of 25 winners, 50 events excluding rain-out at Eastbourne) — Hingis (12), Davenport (6), Novotna (4), Majoli (3), Seles (3), Coetzer (2), van Roost (2), Dragomir (1), Graf (1), Kruger (1), Likhovtseva (1), Lucic (1), Maruska (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Nagyova (1), Paulus (1), Pierce (1), Ruano-Pascual (1), Rubin (1), Sawamatsu (1), Schett (1), Schultz-McCarthy (1), Sugiyama (1), Tauziat (1), Testud (1) 1996 (total of 25 winners, 50 events) — Graf (7), Seles (5), Novotna (4), Dragomir (3), Huber (3), Date (2), Davenport (2), Halard-Decugis (2), Hingis (2), Majoli (2), Martinez (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Wang (2), Appelmans (1), Cacic (1), McGrath (1), Nagyova (1), Paulus (1), Pizzichini (1), Raymond (1), Schett (1), Schultz-M (1), Spirlea (1), Van Roost (1), Wild (1) 1995 (total of 27 winners, 49 events) — Graf (9), Martinez (6), Mag. Maleeva (3), Majoli (2), M. J. Fernandez (2), Paulus (2), Pierce (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Schultz (2), Wild (2), Bradtke (1), Date (1), Frazier (1), Garrison Jackson (1), Hack (1), Halard (1), Huber (1), Kruger (1), Meshki (1), Novotna (1), Richterova (1), Sabatini (1), Seles (1), Spirlea (1), Tauziat (1), Wang (1), Wiesner (1) 1994 (total of 29 winners, 55 events) — Sanchez-Vicario (8), Graf (7), Martinez (4), Huber (3), Novotna (3), Appelmans (2), Basuki (2), Date (2), Davenport (2), Mag. Maleeva (2), McGrath (2), Coetzer (1), Endo (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Frazier (1), Hack (1), Halard (1), Helgeson (1), Kat. Maleeva (1), Maleeva-Fragniere (1), McNeil (1), Navratilova (1), Sabatini (1), Sawamatsu (1), Spirlea (1), Wagner (1), Wang (1), Wiesner (1), Zvereva (1) 1993 (total of 30 winners, 60 events) — Graf (10), Martinez (5), Navratilova (5), Sanchez-Vicario (4), Basuki (2), Bobkova (2), Coetzer (2), Garrison Jackson (2), Maleeva-Fragniere (2), Medvedeva (2), Novotna (2), Seles (2), Wang (2), Wild (2), Capriati (1), Date (1), Davenport (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Grossi (1), Hack (1), Huber (1), Likhovtseva (1), McNeil (1), Neiland (1), Pierce (1), Provis (1), Reinach (1), Sawamatsu (1), Schultz (1), Tauziat (1) 1992 (total of 30 winners, 57 events) — Seles (10), Graf (8), Sabatini (5), Navratilova (4), Pierce (3), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Sukova (2), Appelmans (1), Basuki (1), Capriati (1), Cecchini (1), Date (1), Frazier (1), Garrison-Jackson (1), Hack (1), Halard (1), Mag. Maleeva (1), Maleeva-Fragniere (1), Martinez (1), McNeil (1), Medvedeva (1), Probst (1), Provis (1), Rittner (1), Schultz (1), Stafford (1), van Lottum (1), White (1), Wiesner (1), Zrubakova (1) 1991 (total of 29 winners, 60 events) — Seles (10), Graf (7), Navratilova (5), Sabatini (5), Maleeva- Fragniere (3), Martinez (3), Appelmans (2), Capriati (2), McNeil (2), Novotna (2), Basuki (1), Cecchini (1), Demongeot (1), G. Fernandez (1), Halard (1), Huber (1), Lindqvist (1), Kat. Maleeva (1), Martinek (1), Meshki (1), Neiland (1), Piccolini (1), Pierce (1), Sanchez-Vicario (1), Schultz (1), Sukova (1), Sviglerova (1), Zardo (1), Zrubakova (1) 1990 (total of 30 winners, 59 events) — Graf (10), Seles (9), Navratilova (6), Martinez (3), M. J. Fernandez (2), Meshki (2), Sabatini (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Zvereva (2), Bonsignori (1), Capriati (1), Cecchini (1), Cueto (1), Dahlman (1), Frazier (1), Garrison-Jackson (1), Haumuller (1), Huber (1), Kohde-Kilsch (1), Lindquist (1), K. Maleeva (1), Medvedeva (1), Novotna (1), Paulus (1), Paz (1), Probst (1), Reggi (1), Sawamatsu (1), Tauziat (1), Van Rensburg (1) 1989 (total of 27 winners, 61 events) — Graf (14), Navratilova (8), Sabatini (4), Garrison[-Jackson] (3), Kat. Maleeva (3), Martinez (3), Cueto (1 listed as “Cuerto”) (2), Gildemeister (2), Maleeva-Fragniere (2), Novotna (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Bollegraf (1), Cecchini (1), Cordwell (1), Dahlman (1), Fendick (1), Frazier (1), Magers (1), McNeil (1), Meshki (1), Minter (1), Okamoto (1), Quentrec (1), Seles (1), Sukova (1), Wiesner (1), Zrubakova (1) 1988 (total of 28 winners, 62 events) — Graf (10), Navratilova (9), Sabatini (5), Evert (4), Shriver (4), Cecchini (2), Cueto (2), Dias (2), Fendick (2), Maleeva-Fragniere (2), McNeil (2), Rehe (2), Gomer (1), Hetherington (1), Javer (1), Kelesi (1), Kohde-Kilsch (1), Langrova (1), Magers (1), Kat. Maleeva (1), Martinez (1), Minter (1), Paulus (1), Paz (1), Potter (1), Sanchez-Vicario (1), Sloane (1), Wiesner (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 319 1987 (total of 24 winners, 54 events) — Graf (11), Evert (5), Navratilova (4), Shriver (4), Mandlilova (3), Sabatini (3), Cecchini (2), Garrison (2), Kat. Maleeva (2), Man. Maleeva[-Fragniere] (2), Minter (2), Sukova (2), Bassett Seguso (1), Cioffi (1), Goles (1), Hakami (1), Horvath (1), Magers (1), Nelson- Dunbar (1), Potter (1), Reggi (1), Rehe (1), Smylie (1), White (1) 1986 (total of 19 winners, 40 events) — Navratilova (9), Graf (7), Evert (3), Gurney (2), McNeil (2), Reggi (2), Shriver (2), Sukova (2), Burgin (1), Cacchini (1), G. Fernandez (1), Garrison (1), Hanika (1), Herr (1), Herreman (1), Huber (1), Hy (1), Kelesi (1), Rinaldi (1) 1985 (total of 23 winners, 53 events) — Navratilova (13), Evert (11), Shriver (4), Gadusek (3), Garrison (2), Kat. Maleeva (2), Rehe (2), Cecchini (1), Croft (1), Hobbs (1), Horvath (1), Kohde-Kilsch (1), Man. Maleeva (1), Mandlikova (1), Mesker (1), Potter (1), Reggi (1), Rinaldi (1), Ruzici (1), Sabatini (1), Temesvari (1), Thompson (1), White (1) 1984 (total of 22 winners, 51 events) — Navratilova (15), Evert (7), Man. Maleeva (4), Mandlikova (4), Cecchini (2), Lindqvist (2), Louie Harper (2), Drescher (1), Gadusek (1), Garrison (1), Gildemeister (1), Hamika (1), Horvath (1), Inoue (1), Kohde-Kilsch (1), Paz (1), Russell (1), Shriver (1), Sukova (1), Torres (1), Vermaak (1), White (1) 1983 (total of 25 winners, 49 events excluding rain-out at Lugano) — Navratilova (13), Evert (5), Mandlikova (3), Shriver (3), Temesvari (3), Bonder (2), Durie (2), Daniels (1), Fairbank (1), Gadusek (1), Horvath (1), Inoue (1), King (1), Klitch (1), Leand (1), Lindqvist (1), Moulton (1), Mundel- Reinbold (1), Paradis (1), Russell (1), Ruzici (1), Shaefer (1), Smylie (1), Tanvier (1), Vermaak (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 320 Most Titles, Year By Year The following list shows the three players with the most titles, year by year, and the number of titles. Year Player with Most Titles #2 in titles #3 in titles 2005 Clijsters (9) Davenport (6) Hénin-Hardenne (4), Mauresmo (4) 2004 Davenport (7) Hénin-Hardenne (5), Kuznetsova (3), Molik (3), Mauresmo (5), Sharapova (5)1 Myskina (3) 2003 Clijsters (9) Hénin-Hardenne (8) Myskina (4),2 Serena Williams (4) 2002 S. Williams (8) V. Williams (7) Clijsters (4), Smashnova (4)3 2001 Davenport (7) V. Williams (6) Mauresmo (4), Seles (4) 2000 Hingis (9) V. Williams (5) Davenport (4) 1999 Davenport (7), Hingis (7) V. Williams (6) S. Williams (4) 1998 Davenport (6) Hingis (5), Schnyder (5)4 Novotna (4), Pierce (4) 1997 Hingis (12) Davenport (6) Novotna (4) 1996 Graf (7) Seles (5) Novotna (4) 1995 Graf (9) Martinez (6) Mag. Maleeva (3) 1994 Sanchez-Vicario (8) Graf (7) Martinez (4) 1993 Graf (10) Martinez (5), Navratilova (5) Sanchez-Vicario (4) 1992 Seles (10) Graf (8) Sabatini (5) 1991 Seles (10) Graf (7) Navratilova (5), Sabatini (5) 1990 Graf (10) Seles (9) Navratilova (6) 1989 Graf (14) Navratilova (8) Sabatini (4) 1988 Graf (10) Navratilova (9) Sabatini (5) 1987 Graf (11) Evert (5) Navratilova (4), Shriver (4) 1986 Navratilova (14) Graf (7) Evert (3) 1985 Navratilova (13) Evert (11) Shriver (4) 1984 Navratilova (15) Evert (7) Man. Maleeva (4), Mandlikova (4) 1983 Navratilova (13) Evert (5) Mandlikova (3), Shriver (3), Temesvari (3) 1. Of Sharapova’s ﬁve titles, three were below the Tier II level; the other two were above the Tier I level. Sharapova, through the end of 2004, had never won a Tier I or Tier II title — which is even stranger than all the footnotes below, though she changed that in 2005 2. Of Myskina’s four titles, two were below the Tier II level — a rather unusual outcome for someone near the top of the titles list; most top players win most of their titles at large events — e.g. Clijsters won seven of her nine titles at Tier II or better events; Hénin-Hardenne won all eight of hers titles at Tier II or better events 3. As noted above, most players on this list, particularly in recent years, won the majority of their titles at Tier II or higher events. Smashnova 2002 is an exception; all four of her titles were small events. 4. Like Smashnova 2002, Schnyder had mostly small titles: four of her ﬁve were Tier III or lower.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 321 Five Or More Titles in a Year The following table shows all players who have earned five or more WTA Tour titles in a year (from the founding of the Tour in 1971), with the total years with five or more titles Total Years Player Years with 5+ titles with 5+ titles 15 Chris Evert 1973, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 15 Martina Navratilova 1977, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90, 91, 93 11 Stefﬁ Graf 1986, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96 7 Billie Jean King 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1977 6Evonne Goolagong Cawley 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1976, 1978 6 Lindsay Davenport 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2004, 2005 4Martina Hingis 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 4Monica Seles 1990, 1991, 1992, 1996 4Virginia Wade 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975 4Venus Williams 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 3Tracy Austin 1979, 1980, 1981 3Margaret Court 1971, 1972, 1973 2 Kim Clijsters 2003, 2005 2 Justine Hénin-Hardenne 2003, 2004 2 Hana Mandlikova 1980, 1984 2 Conchita Martinez 1993, 1995 2 Gabriela Sabatini 1991, 1992 1 Francoise Durr 1971 1Manuela Maleeva-Fragniere 1984 1 Amélie Mauresmo 2004 1 Nancy Richey 1972 1Patty Schnyder 1998 1Maria Sharapova 2004 1 Serena Williams1 2002 1. The WTA lists Serena as having ﬁve titles in 1999, but one of these was the Grand Slam Cup, which is an exhibition.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 322 Surface Sweeps — Singles (Since 1990) A “surface sweep” consists of winning titles on all four major surfaces (clay, grass, hard, indoor) in a single year. The following list shows all recent instances, with the total titles on each surface and the name of the best title on each surface. Year Player Titles and Surfaces 1990 Martina Navratilova Clay: 1 (Hilton Head), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon), Hard: 2 (Palm Springs), Indoor: 1 (Chicago) 1991 Steffi Graf Clay: 2 (Berlin), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 1 (San Antonio), Indoor: 1 (Zürich) 1992 Steffi Graf Clay: 2 (Berlin), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 1 (Boca Raton), Indoor: 4 (Philadelphia) 1993 Steffi Graf Clay: 3 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 4 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 2 (Tour Championships) 1995 Steffi Graf Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 3 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 3 (Chase Championships) 1996 Steffi Graf Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 3 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 1 (Chase Championships) 1997 Martina Hingis Clay: 1 (Hilton Head), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 6 (Australian Open, U. S. Open), Indoor: 4 (Pan Pacific) 1999 Lindsay Davenport Clay: 1 (Madrid), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 2 (Sydney), Indoor: 3 (Chase Championships) 2000 Martina Hingis Clay: 1 (Hamburg), Grass: 1 (’s-Hertogenbosch), Hard: 2 (Miami), Indoor: 5 (Chase Championships) 2002 Serena Williams Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 4 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 1 (Leipzig) 2003 Kim Clijsters Clay: 1 (Rome), Grass: 1 (’s-Hertogenbosch), Hard: 2 (Indian Wells), Indoor: 3 (Los Angeles Championships)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 323 Surface Sweeps — Doubles (Since 1990) Note: Where teams are shown with a surface sweep, titles are listed only for the team — e.g. Raymond in 2001 had seven titles with Stubbs, as shown in the entry, and two more with Davenport, not shown. Year Player/Team Titles and Surfaces 1990 Helena Sukova Clay: 1 (Roland Garros w/Novotna), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon w/Novotna), Hard: 6 (Australian Open w/Novotna), Indoor: 2 (Brighton w/Tauziat) 1991 Larisa Neiland Clay: 2 (Berlin w/Zvereva), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon w/Zvereva), Hard: 5 (Canadian Open w/Zvereva), Indoor: 1 (Philadelphia w/Novotna) 1991 Natasha Zvereva Clay: 2 (Hilton Head w/Kohde-Kilsch), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon w/ Neiland), Hard: 4 (U. S. Open w/Shriver), Indoor: 1 (Brighton w/ Shriver) 1992 G. Fernandez/Zvereva Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 1 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 2 (Philadelphia) 1992 Neiland/Novotna Clay: 1 (Berlin), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Hard: 3 (San Diego), Indoor: 2 (Brighton) 1992 Rennae Stubbs Clay: 1 (Hamburg w/Graf), Grass: 1 (Birmingham w/McNeil), Hard: 1 (Canadian Open w/McNeil), Indoor: 1 (Osaka w/Sukova) 1993 G. Fernandez/Zvereva Clay: 3 (Roland Garros), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon), Hard: 3 (Australian Open), Indoor: 3 (Tour Championships) 1994 Larisa Neiland Clay: 2 (Amelia Island w/Sanchez-Vicario), Grass: 1 (Birmingham w/ Garrison Jackson), Hard: 1 (Schenectady w/McGrath), Indoor: 2 (Brighton w/Bollegraf) 1994 G. Fernandez/Zvereva Clay: 3 (Roland Garros), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon), Hard: 2 (Australian Open), Indoor: 4 (Tour Championships) 1995 A. Sanchez-Vicario Clay: 1 (Barcelona w/Neiland), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon w/Novotna), Hard: 2 (Australian Open w/Novotna), Indoor: 1 (Chase Championships w/Novotna) 1996 Larisa Neiland Clay: 1 (Berlin w/McGrath), Grass: 1 (Rosmalen w/Schultz- McCarthy), Hard: 1 (Canadian Open w/Sanchez-Vicario), Indoor: 2 (Essen w/McGrath) 1996 Jana Novotna Clay: 2 (Hilton Head w/Sanchez-Vicario), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne w/ Sanchez-Vicario), Hard: 1 (Lipton w/Sanchez-Vicario), Indoor: 2 (Filderstadt w/Arendt) 1996 B. Schultz-McCarthy Clay: 1 (Hamburg w/Sanchez-Vicario), Grass: 1 (Rosmalen w/ Neiland), Hard: 1 (Indian Wells w/Rubin), Indoor: 2 (Oklahoma City w/ Rubin) 1997 Natasha Zvereva Clay: 2 (Roland Garros w/G. Fernandez), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon w/G. Fernandez), Hard: 3 (Australian Open w/Hingis), Indoor: 2 (Pan Pacific w/Davenport) 1998 Martina Hingis Clay: 1 (Roland Garros w/Novotna), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon w/Novotna), Hard: 6 (Australian Open w/Lucic, U.S Open w/Novotna), Indoor: 1 (Pan Pacific w/Lucic) 1999 Hingis/Kournikova Clay: 1 (Rome), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Hard: 2 (Australian Open), Indoor: 1 (Chase Championships) 1999 Larisa Neiland Clay: 1 (Hamburg w/Sanchez-V), Grass: 1 (Birmingham w/Morariu), Hard: 2 (Los Angeles/w/ Sanchez-V), Indoor: 1 (Leipzig/ w/Pierce) 2001 Raymond/Stubbs Clay: 1 (Charleston), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon), Hardcourt: 2 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 2 (Munich)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 324 2001 Elena Likhovtseva Clay: 2 (Rome w/Black), Grass: 1 (Birmingham w/Black), Hard: 3 (San Diego w/Black), Indoor: 1 (Leipzig w/Tauziat) 2002 Raymond/Stubbs Clay: 1 (Charleston), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Hard: 5 (Miami), Indoor: 1 (Pan Pacific) 2003 Clijsters/Sugiyama Clay: 1 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 3 (San Diego), Indoor: 2 (Zürich) 2003 Lisa Raymond Clay: 1 (Amelia Island w/Davenport), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne w/ Davenport), Hard: 2 (Indian Wells w/Davenport), Indoor: 2 (Filderstadt w/Stubbs, Philadelphia w/Navratilova) 2005 Cara Black Clay: 1 (Rome w/Huber), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon w/Huber), Hard: 1 (Stanford w/Stubbs), Indoor: 3 (Zürich w/Stubbs)

Career Surface Sweeps/Singles The list below shows all players active in 2002 or after to have won titles on all four surfaces, showing the strongest title on each surface and the year in which she achieved the sweep (i.e. earned her first title on her “last” surface) If a title is marked “etc.” (e.g. Seles is marked “Roland Garros 1990, etc.), this means that she won it several times starting with that year.) The “best” tournament is based on tournament tier. Slam titles are abbreviated. Player Year Best Clay Best Grass Best Hard Best Indoors Clijsters 2003 Rome 2003 Eastbourne 2005 U. S. Open 2005 WTA Champ 2002, etc. Davenport 1999 Amelia Island 1997, Wim 1999 USO 1998, AO 2000 WTA Champ. 1999 etc. Dokic 2002 Rome 2001 Birmingham 2002 Princess Cup 2001 Moscow 2001 Hénin- 2002 Roland Garros 2003 ’s-Hertogenbosch U. S. Open 2003 Linz 2002 Hardenne 2001 Hingis 1997 Hilton Head 1997, Wim 1997 AO 1997, etc. USO WTA Champ 1998, etc.; Rome 1998; 1997 etc. Berlin 1999 Maleeva 2003 Budapest 2001 Birmingham 2003 Pattaya 1999 Zürich 1994, Moscow 2002 Martinez 1994 Rome 1993, etc.; Wim 1994 San Diego 1995 Philadelphia 1993 Hilton Head 1994, etc.; Berlin 1998, etc. Pierce 2004 Roland Garros 2000 ’s-Hertogenbosch Australian Open Moscow 1998 2004 1995 Rubin 2003 Madrid 2003 Eastbourne 2002 Los Angeles 2002 Linz 1997, etc. Seles 1996 RG 1990, etc. Eastbourne 1996 AO 1991, etc.; USO WTA Champ 1990, 1991, etc. etc. S. Williams 2002 RG 2002 Wim 2002, etc. USO 1999, etc. WTA Champ. 2001 V. Williams 2000 Rome 1999 Wim 2000, etc. USO 2000, etc. Zürich 1999

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 325 Career Grand Surface Sweep The Grand Surface Sweep is a higher-order version of the Surface Sweep: It entails a title, Tier I or higher, on all seven major WTA surfaces: Rebound Ace, DecoTurf, Red Clay, Green Clay, Grass, Carpet (including Greenset and Supreme) and Indoor Hardcourts. The WTA established the Tier I event in 1990 (though there were approximate equivalents for about a decade before that). In that period, the events of each type, by surface, were as follows: Rebound Ace: Australian Open DecoTurf: U. S. Open, Miami, Canadian Open, Boca Raton 1991Ð1992, Indian Wells 1997-present, San Diego 2004-present Red Clay: Roland Garros, Rome, Berlin Green Clay: Hilton Head/Charleston Grass: Wimbledon Carpet: WTA Championships 1990-2000, Chicago 1990, Pan Pacific 1993-present, Philadelphia 1993- 1995, Moscow 1997-present Indoor Hard: WTA Championships 2001-present, Zürich 1993-present

From this data, we can compile the (very short) list of Grand Surface Sweepers (this is all-time, since the Australian Open shifted to Rebound Ace; note that the list includes some events from the Slams and “Super Series” before 1990, though those “excess events” include only events which are still active):

1. Steffi Graf Rebound Ace: Australian Open [1988], [1989], 1990, 1994 DecoTurf: U. S. Open [1988], [1989], 1993, 1995, 1996; Miami [1987], [1988], 1994, 1995, 1996; Canadian Open 1990, 1993; Boca Raton 1992 Red Clay: Roland Garros [1987], [1988], 1993, 1995, 1996, 1999; Rome, Berlin [1988], [1989], 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996 Green Clay: Hilton Head [1986], [1987], [1989], 1993; [Amelia Island 1986, 1987] Grass: Wimbledon [1988], [1989], 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996 Carpet: WTA Championships [1987], [1989], 1993, 1995, 1996; Pan Paciﬁc [1986], 1994; Philadelphia 1995; Moscow 1997- present Indoor Hard: [Washington 1989]

2. Martina Hingis Rebound Ace: Australian Open 1997, 1998, 1999 DecoTurf: U. S. Open 1997; Miami 1997, 2000; Canadian Open 1999, 2000; Indian Wells 1998 Red Clay: Rome 1998, Berlin 1999 Green Clay: Hilton Head 1997, 1999 Grass: Wimbledon 1997 Carpet: WTA Championships 1998, 2000; Pan Paciﬁc 1997, 1999, 2000, 2002; Moscow 2000 Indoor Hard: Zürich 2000

Lacking Rebound Ace and, apparently, Indoor Hard was Martina Navratilova. (This is largely lack of opportunity.)

Of the top active players, Serena Williams lacks green clay and carpet; Venus Williams lacks Rebound Ace and carpet; Lindsay Davenport lacks green and red clay; Monica Seles lacks grass and indoor hardcourt, Justine Hénin-Hardenne lacks grass and carpet; Kim Clijsters lacks Rebound Ace, green clay, grass, and carpet; Anastasia Myskina lacks Rebound Ace, DecoTurf, green clay, grass, and indoor hardcourt; and Amélie Mauresmo lacks Rebound Ace, green clay, grass, indoor hardcourt, and carpet.

Note that Graf was the only player ever to complete the calendar year Grand Surface Sweep (1989).

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 326 Year-End Top Players Year-End Top Eight, Alphabetical, with Years, Since 1975 The following tables list every player to end a Tour year in the Top Eight since computer rankings began in 1975. The first table, in alphabetical order, lists each year in which the player ended at #1, #2, #3, etc. Player Years was #1 Yrs was #2 Years was #3 Years was #4 Years #5-#8 Austin 1980, 1981 1979 1982 #6-1978 Balestrat #6-1979; #7-1976; #8-1978 Barker #5-1976, 1977 Bunge #7-1983 Capriati 2001 2002 #6-1991, 2003; #7-1992; #8-1990 Casals #6 -1977 Clijsters 2003, 2005 2002 #5-2001 Coetzer 1997 Court #6-1975 Date 1995 #8-1996 Davenport 1998, 2001, 2004, 1999, 2000 1997 #5-2003; #6-1994 2005 Dementieva #6-2004, #8-2003, 2005 Dokic #8-2001 Durie #6-1983 Evert 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1982, 1987, 1988 1980, 1981 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986 Fernandez, M 1990 #6-1992; #7-1993; #8-1991, 1995 Garrison[-J] 1989 #8-1985 Goolagong 1976 1975, 1978 1979 #5-1980 Graf 1987, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992 1986 #6-1985 1990, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 Hanika #5-1983; #6-1981 Hantuchova #8-2002 Hénin-Harden 2003 #5-2002; #6-2005, #7-2001, #8- 2004 Hingis 1997, 1999, 2000 1998 1996, 2001 Huber, Anke #6-1996 Jaeger 1982, 1983 1981 #7-1980 Jausovec #8-1976 King 1975, 1977 #5-1978, 1979; #6-1980 Kohde-Kilsch #5-1985; #7-1986; #8-1984 Kournikova #8-2000 Kuznetsova #5-2004 Majoli #6-1997; #7-1996 Maleeva, K #6-1990 Maleeva, Mag #6-1995 Maleeva, Man #6-1984, 1988; #7-1985; #8-1986, 1987 Mandlikova 1984, 1985 1980, 1986 #5-1981, 1987; #7-1982

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 327 Martinez 1995 1994 1993 #5-1996, 2000; #7-1989; #8-1992, 1998 Mauresmo 2004 2005 2003 #6-2002 Morozova #7-1975 Myskina 2004 #7-2003 Navratilova 1978, 1979, 1982, 1987, 1988, 1989 1977, 1980, 1981, 1975, 1976, 1991 #5-1992; #8-1994 1983, 1984, 1985, 1990, 1993 1986 Novotna 1997 1996, 1998 1994 #6-1993; #7-1991 Pierce #5-1994, 1995, 1999, 2005; #7- 1997, 1998, 2000 Potter #8-1982 Reid #8-1978 Richey Gunter #8-1975 Sabatini 1989, 1991, 1992 1988 #5-1990, 1993; #6-1987; #7-1994, 1995 Sanchez-Vicari 1993, 1994, 1996 1995 1992, 1998 #5-1989, 1991; #7-1990 Schett #8-1999 Schnyder #7-2005 Seles 1991, 1992 1990, [1996] 2000 #5-1997; #6-1989, 1998, 1999; #7-2002; #8-1993 Sharapova 2004, 2005 Shriver 1983, 1984, 1985, #5-1988; #6-1982, 1986; #7-1981 1987 Spirlea #8-1997 Stove #6-1976; #7-1977 Sukova #5-1986; #7-1984, 1987; #8-1988, 1989 Tauziat #7-1999 Turnbull #5-1982, 1984; #7-1978, 1979; #8-1980, 1981, 1983 Wade 1976 1977, 1978 #5-1975; #8-1979 Williams, S 2002 2003 1999 #6-2000, 2001, #7-2004 Williams, V. 2002 1999, 2000, 2001 #5-1998 Zvereva #7-1988

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 328 Total Years Ended At Each Rank, Alphabetical, Since 1975 Player Years #1 Years #2 Years #3 Years #4 Years #5 Years #6 Years #7 Years #8 Total Austin 2 1 1 1 5 Balestrat 1113 Barker 2 2 Bunge 11 Capriati 1 1 2117 Casals 1 1 Clijsters 2 1 1 4 Coetzer 1 1 Court 1 1 Date 1 1 2 Davenport 4 2 1 1 1 9 Dementieva 1 2 3 Dokic 11 Durie 1 1 Evert 5 7 2 14 Fernandez, M 1 1125 Garrison[-J] 1 1 2 Goolagong 1211 5 Graf 8 2 1 1 12 Hanika 1 1 2 Hantuchova 11 Hénin-Hardenne 1 11115 Hingis 3 1 2 6 Huber, Anke 1 1 Jaeger 2 1 1 4 Jausovec 11 King 2 2 1 5 Kohde-Kilsch 1 1 1 3 Kournikova 11 Kuznetsova 1 Majoli 1 1 2 Maleeva, K 1 1 Maleeva, Mag 1 1 Maleeva, Man 2125 Mandlikova 2 2 2 1 7 Martinez 1112 128 Mauresmo 1 1 1 1 4 Morozova 11 Myskina 1 1 2 Navratilova 73531 120 Novotna 1 2 1 1 1 6 Pierce 4 3 7 Potter 11 Reid 11 Richey Gunter 11 Sabatini 31212 9

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 329 Sanchez-Vicari 3122 1 9 Schett 11 Schnyder 11 Seles 2 1(2) 1131110(11) Sharapova 2 2 Shriver 4121 8 Spirlea 11 Stove 1 1 2 Sukova 1 2 2 5 Tauziat 11 Turnbull 2 2 3 7 Wade 1 2 1 15 Williams, S 1 1 1 2 1 6 Williams, V. 1 3 1 5 Zvereva 11

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 330 Strongest Career Rankings Showings Based on the above statistics, we can produce a career “ranking of rankings.” In the system below, one point is awarded for a year in which a player ends at #8. Two are awarded for #7, 3 for #6, 4 for #5, 6 for #4, 8 for #3, 12 for #2, and 16 for #1. It is interesting to note that 2005 made almost no difference in the standings. We have the same Top Ten, though Davenport of course moved up the standings a bit. The first change in the standings, in fact, is at #18; Clijsters takes that spot from Capriati. The only other player to move into the Top 20 was Hénin- Hardenne.

Note: for purposes of reckoning, Monica Seles is omitted from the rankings for 1995, but is treated as #2 for 1996, with all players below her demoted one position. Ranking Player Score Ranking Player Score 1Navratilova 211 32T Garrison[-Jackson] 7 2Evert 180 32T Hanika 7 3 Graf 163 32T Kohde-Kilsch 7 4Davenport 95 35T Balestrat 6 5 Seles 78 35T Coetzer 6 6 Hingis 70 35T Date 6 7 Sanchez-Vicario 62 38T Dementieva 5 8 Sabatini 45 38T Stove 5 9 Austin 41 40T Kuznetsova 4 10 Williams, V. 40 40T Majoli 4 11T Goolagong 38 42T Casals 3 11T Mandlikova 38 42T Court 3 11T Williams, S 38 42T Durie 3 14T Martinez, C. 37 42T Maleeva, K 3 14T Novotna 37 42T Maleeva, Magdalena 3 16 Shriver 36 47T Bunge 2 17 King 35 47T Huber 2 18 Clijsters 34 47T Morozova 2 19 Capriati 29 47T Schnyder 2 20 Hénin-Hardenne 26 47T Tauziat 2 21 Wade 25 47T Zvereva 2 22T Jaeger 24 53T Dokic 1 22T Mauresmo 24 53T Hantuchova 1 24 Pierce 22 53T Jausovec 1 25 Turnbull 15 53T Kournikova 1 26 Fernandez, M 13 53T Potter 1 27 Sharapova 11 53T Reid 1 28T Maleeva[-Fragniere] 10 53T Richey Gunter 1 28T Sukova 10 53T Schett 1 30T Barker 8 53T Spirlea 1 30T Myskina 8

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 331 Total Years in the Top Eight The following table shows the all-time leaders in most years spent in the Top Eight. Player Years Spent in Top Eight Navratilova 20 Evert 14 Graf 12 Seles 11 Davenport 9 Sabatini 9 Sanchez-Vicario 9 Martinez, Conchita 8 Shriver 8 Capriati 7 Mandlikova 7 Pierce 7 Turnbull 7 Hingis 6 Novotna 6 Williams, Serena 6 Austin 5 Fernandez, Mary Joe 5 Goolagong 5 King 5 Hénin-Hardenne 5 Maleeva[-Fragniere], Manuela 5 Sukova 5 Wade 5 Williams, Venus 5

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 332 Doubles Wins & Partners Winningest Doubles Player, Year By Year, From 1983 The following list shows the player with the most doubles titles each year, and lists the partners with whom she played and the number of tournaments they won together. Year Player # of titles Partners 1983 Martina Navratilova 11 Shriver (9), Reynolds (2) Pam Shriver 11 Navratilova (9), Evert (1), Potter (1) 1984 Martina Navratilova 13 Shriver (10), G. Fernandez (1), Smylie (1) 1985 Pam Shriver 12 Navratilova (7), Smylie (2), Fairbank (1), Mandlikova (1), Sukova (1) 1986 Martina Navratilova 9 Shriver (7), Temesvari (2) 1987 Martina Navratilova 9 Shriver (7), K. Jordan (1), Sabatini (1) 1988 Martina Navratilova 8 Shriver (5), Casals (1), Kucyzynska (1), McNeil (1) Pam Shriver 8 Navratilova (5), K. Adams (1), Nagelson (1), Sukova (1) 1989 Katrina Adams 8 Garrison (4), McNeil (3), Shriver (1) Pam Shriver 8 Navratilova (4), K. Adams (1), Graf (1), Mandlikova (1), Nagelson (1) 1990 Helena Sukova 10 Novotna (8), G. Fernandez (1), Tauziat (1) 1991 Larisa Neiland 10 Zvereva (6), Novotna (3), Fendick (1) 1992 Arantxa 10 Sukova (6), Zvereva (2), Martinez (1), Neiland (1) Sanchez-Vicario 1993 Gigi Fernandez 12 Zvereva (11), Sukova (1) 1994 Gigi Fernandez 11 Zvereva (11) Arantxa 11 Novotna (5), Neiland (2), Davenport (1), Halard (1), Sanchez-Vicario McGrath (1), McNeil (1), Natasha Zvereva 11 G. Fernandez (11) 1995 Gigi Fernandez 8 Zvereva (7), Hingis (1) 1996 Arantxa 9Novotna (4), Rubin (2), Neiland (1), Schultz-McCarthy (1), Spirlea (1) Sanchez-Vicario 1997 Martina Hingis 8 Sanchez-Vicario (3), Novotna (2), Davenport (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Zvereva (1) Natasha Zvereva 8 Davenport (2), G. Fernandez (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Hingis (1), Sukova (1) 1998 Martina Hingis 9 Novotna (5), Lucic (2), Sukova (1), Zvereva (1) 1999 Martina Hingis 6 Kournikova (5), Novotna (1) Corina Morariu 6 Davenport (3), Neiland (2), Po (1) 2000 Julie 10 Sugiyama (6), Morariu (2), Kournikova (1), Testud (1) Halard-Decugis 2001 Lisa Raymond 9 Stubbs (7), Davenport (2) 2002 Lisa Raymond 9 Stubbs (8), Davenport (1) 2003 Ai Sugiyama 8 Clijsters (7), Liezel Huber (1) 2004 Cara Black 7 Callens (1), Stubbs (6) Nadia Petrova 7 Shaughnessy (7) Meghann 7 Petrova (7) Shaughnessy 2005 Samantha Stosur 7 Raymond (5), Stewart (2)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 333 The data above can be graphed, showing how the number of titles won by the winningest player has tended to decline over the years. The graph below shows the number of titles won by both the winningest singles player and the winningest doubles player since 1983.

Most Titles, Year by Year

8 Titles

0 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year

Singles Doubles

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 334 Titles With Multiple Partners, Single Year, Open Era According to the WTA, only 7 players have won doubles titles with five or more partners in a year in the WTA Era.* The following lists these players, their partners, and the number of titles with each partner.* # of Player Year Partners & Title Count Partners 6 Helena Sukova 1993 Sanchez-Vicario (3), G. Fernandez (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Navratilova (1), Stubbs (1), Smylie (1) 6 A. Sanchez-Vicario 1994 Novotna (5), Neiland (2), Davenport (1), Halard (1), McGrath (1), McNeil (1), 5Pam Shriver 1989 Navratilova (4), K. Adams (1), Graf (1), Mandlikova (1), Nagelson (1) 5Mercedes Paz 1989 Bollegraf (1), Goles (1), Scheuer-Larsen (1), Tarabini (1), Wiesner (1) 5 Larisa Neiland 1994 Bollegraf (1), Garrison-Jackson (1), McGrath (1), Sanchez-Vicario (1), Stubbs (1) 5 A. Sanchez-Vicario 1996 Novotna (4), Rubin (2), Neiland (1), Schultz-McCarthy (1), Spirlea (1) 5Martina Hingis 1997 Sanchez-Vicario (3), Novotna (2), Davenport (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Zvereva (1) 5 Natasha Zvereva 1997 Davenport (2), G. Fernandez (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Hingis (1), Sukova (1) * The WTA list for this statistic is extremely inaccurate — it omits Neiland, gets Sanchez-Vicario’s record wrong, and shows Paz with only four titles in 1989; I discovered her result with Tarabini by accident. This is a corrected list, but may be incomplete. Slams With the Most Partners, Open Era The following list shows all women who have won Slams with four or more partners in the Open Era, listing the partners and the number of Slams with each*. Total Partners Player Partners & Slams 9Martina Navratilova Shriver (20), King (3), Evert (2), A. Smith (1), G. Fernandez (1) Mandlikova (1), Nagelson (1), Stove (1), Temesvari (1) 6Martina Hingis Novotna (3), Kournikova (2), Lucic (1), Pierce (1), Sukova (1), Zvereva (1) 5 Jana Novotna Sukova (4), Hingis (3), Sanchez-Vicario (3), Davenport (1), G. Fernandez (1) 4 Natasha Zvereva G. Fernandez (14), Savchenko Neiland (2), Hingis (1), Shriver (1) 4 Gigi Fernandez Zvereva (14), Navratilova (1), Novotna (1), White (1) 4Margaret Court Tegart Dalton (4), Wade (4), Bueno (1), Goolagong (1) 4 Helena Sukova Novotna (4), Kohde-Kilsch (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Hingis (1) 4 Francoise Durr Chanfreau (2), A. Jones (2), Hard (1), Stove (1) 4 Betty Stove King (2), Turnbull (2), Durr (1), Navratilova (1) 4 H. Gourlay Cawley Balestrat (1), Goolagong (1), Harris (1), Russell (1) * Note: Billie Jean King won titles with 5 players, but only three in the Open Era: Casals (5), Navratilova (4), Stove (1). Counting wins before the Open Era, Court won with 7 players: The above plus Ebbern, Reitano, and Turner.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 335 I Came, I Played.... The following is a complete list of every player to play a WTA main draw match in 2005. All told, 310 players had at least one main draw match in 2005 (compared to 296 last year, 287 in 2003, and 301 in 2002). The list shows the players and the number of WTA main draws they played (many of these players had additional Challengers or qualifying). Abramovic (1), Adamczak (2), Alves (2), Amanmuradova (3), Andres Rodriguez (1), Andrieux (1), Ani (2), Antypina (1), Arvidsson (8), Asagoe (25), Avants (1), Azarenka (2), Bachmann (3), Baltacha (4), Bammer (7), Barna (6), Bartoli (25), Bedanova (2), Beltrame (18), Benesova (27), Bhambri (2), Birnerova (7), Black (2), Bohmova (4), Alona Bondarenko (16), Kateryna Bondarenko (7), Borwell (2), Bovina (8), Brandi (19), Breadmore (1), Buyukakcay (1), Bychkova (10), Callens (3), Camerin (22), Cargill (1), Castaño (18), Castellvi (5), Cervanova (15), Chakravarthi (1), Chakvetadze (21), Chan (1), Chang (1), Chen (1), Chladkova (17), Chladkova (1), Cho (10), Chuang (1), Clijsters (17), Cohen-Aloro (13), Cornet (1), Craybas (23), Czink (11), Czink (1), Dabek (1), Damayanti (1), Daniilidou (21), Davenport (16), Déchy (26), Dellacqua (2), Dementieva (20), Diaz-Oliva (23), Ditty (1), Dokic (5), Domachowska (23), Dominguez Lino (4), Daniela Dominikovic (1), Evie Dominikovic (9), Douchevina (19), Drake (1), Dubois (2), Dulko (23), Erakovic (1), Farina Elia (23), Fedak (18), Fedossova (2), Ferguson (3), Clarisa Fernandez (2), Flipkens (2), Foretz (14), Frazier (17), Fuda (2), Fujiwara (12), Gagliardi (15), Gajdosova (2), Gallovits (4), Gambale (1), Garbin (19), Garcia (1), Garcia Sokol (1), Gehrlein (3), Glatch (3), Gloria (1), Golovin (22), Grande (1), Grandin (2), Granville (15), Grönefeld (26), Gubacsi (2), Gullickson (4), Gussoni (1), Hantuchova (25), Harkleroad (4), Haynes (14), Henin (9), Henke (2), Hewitt (1), Hingis (1), Hisamatsu (2), Andrea Hlavackova (1), Hopkins (4), Hrdinova (1), Hrdlickova (19), Hsieh (3), Husarova (1), Ifrakh (1), Irvin (14), Ivanovic (15), Jackson (14), Janes (3), Jankovic (29), Jidkova (25), Mathilde Johansson (1), Jugic-Salkic (1), Kachlikova (2), Kanepi (2), Kapros (5), Karatantcheva (14), Keothavong (3), So-Jung Kim (1), King (1), Kirilenko (22), Kirkland (5), Klaschka (2), Kleinova (1), Klepac (1), Kleybanova (1), Kloesel (8), Koryttseva (1), Kosinska (1), Kostanic (21), Koukalova (21), Krajicek (9), Krasnoroutskaya (1), Erica Krauth (1), Kremer (13), Kudryavtseva (1), Kurhajcova (10), Kutuzova (6), Kuznetsova (17), Laine (6), Janet Lee (1), Lee-Waters (10), Lepchenko (1), Li Na (14), Li Ting (3), Likhovtseva (22), Linetskaya (16), Lisjak (3), Liu Nan Nan (2), Llagostera (19), Llagostera (1), Llewellyn (1), Loit (20), Lopez Herrera (1), Maleeva (20), Mamic (11), Mandula (3), Marrero (13), Martinez (20), Martinez Granados (3), Matevzic (5), Mattek (3), Mauresmo (19), McCain (1), Medina Garrigues (25), Meusburger (3), Mihalache (1), Mikaelian (2), Minella (2), Mirza (17), Molik (15), Morigami (20), Morita (1), Mouhtassine (2), Müller (8), Myskina (19), Nagyova (6), Nakamura (13), Namigata (1), Navratilova (1), Nemeckova (2), Nooni (1), Noorlander (1), O’Brien (1), O’Donoghue (1), Obata (9), Obziler (7), Ondraskova (10), Oprandi (1), Ospina (1), Osterloh (9), Ozgen (1), Panova (15), Parmentier (2), Parra (21), Pastikova (16), Paszek (1), Peer (20), Pelletier (6), Peng (16), Pennetta (23), Perebiynis (14), Perry (7), Peterson (1), Petrova (25), Piedade (1), Pierce (14), Pin (13), Pironkova (3), Pisnik (2), Pous Tio (7), Poutchek (4), Prakusya (2), Pratt (17), Prusova (4), Randriantefy (20), Rao (2), Raymond (19), Razzano (22), Rezai (2), Rodina (1), Rodionova (3), Ahsha Rolle (1), Rousseau (1), Ruano Pascual (18), Rubin (2), Saeki (1), Safarova (11), Safina (21), Salerni (14), Sanchez Lorenzo (20), Santangelo (13), Savchuk (6), Schaul (15), Schett (1), Schiavone (21), Schnyder (26), Schruff (13), Sequera (2), Serna (3), Adriana Serra Zanetti (2), Antonella Serra Zanetti (24), Sescioreanu (1), Sfar (10), Sharapova (15), Shaughnessy (25), Shvedova (1), Silva (1), Skavronskaia (2), Smashnova (18), Spears (17), Sprem (23), Srebotnik (19), Sromova (6), Stanciute (1), Stevenson (1), Stosur (22), Strycova (15), Suárez (7), Sucha (25), Sugiyama (27), Sun Shengnan (1), Sun Tiantian (6), Szavay (5), Talaja (6), Tanasugarn (16), Tatishvili (1), Timotic (1), Torres (2), Tu (9), Tulyaganova (1), Neha Uberoi (2), Shikha Uberoi (8), Vaidisova (17), Vakulenko (3), Vento (23), Vesnina (6), Vierin (2), Vinci (17), Viratprasert (1), Voskoboeva (9), Vrljic (1), Washington (22), Watson (1), Weingärtner (11), Welford (2), Serena Williams (10), Venus Williams (12), Wozniacki (2), Wozniak (3), Xie (1), Yakimova (8), Yan (5), Yonemura (1), Yoshida (3), Yuan (2), Masa Zec Peskiric (1), Zheng (16), Zuluaga (13), Zvonareva (22)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 336 WTA Main Draw Events Played If we wish, we can sort the above list based on events played. The following list shows the players who had the most WTA main draws played: Jankovic (29), Benesova (27), Sugiyama (27), Déchy (26), Grönefeld (26), Schnyder (26), Asagoe (25), Bartoli (25), Hantuchova (25), Jidkova (25), Medina Garrigues (25), Petrova (25), Shaughnessy (25), Sucha (25), Antonella Serra Zanetti (24), Craybas (23), Diaz-Oliva (23), Domachowska (23), Dulko (23), Farina Elia (23), Pennetta (23), Sprem (23), Vento (23), Camerin (22), Golovin (22), Kirilenko (22), Likhovtseva (22), Razzano (22), Stosur (22), Washington (22), Zvonareva (22), Chakvetadze (21), Daniilidou (21), Kostanic (21), Koukalova (21), Parra (21), Safina (21), Schiavone (21), Dementieva (20), Loit (20), Maleeva (20), Martinez (20), Morigami (20), Peer (20), Randriantefy (20), Sanchez Lorenzo (20), Brandi (19), Douchevina (19), Garbin (19), Hrdlickova (19), Llagostera (19), Mauresmo (19), Myskina (19), Raymond (19), Srebotnik (19), Beltrame (18), Castaño (18), Fedak (18), Ruano Pascual (18), Smashnova (18), Chladkova (17), Clijsters (17), Frazier (17), Kuznetsova (17), Mirza (17), Pratt (17), Spears (17), Vaidisova (17), Vinci (17), Alona Bondarenko (16), Davenport (16), Linetskaya (16), Pastikova (16), Peng (16), Tanasugarn (16), Zheng (16), Cervanova (15), Gagliardi (15), Granville (15), Ivanovic (15), Molik (15), Panova (15), Schaul (15), Sharapova (15), Strycova (15), Foretz (14), Haynes (14), Irvin (14), Jackson (14), Karatantcheva (14), Li Na (14), Perebiynis (14), Pierce (14), Salerni (14), Cohen-Aloro (13), Kremer (13), Marrero (13), Nakamura (13), Pin (13), Santangelo (13), Schruff (13), Zuluaga (13), Fujiwara (12), Venus Williams (12), Czink (11), Mamic (11), Safarova (11), Weingärtner (11), Bychkova (10), Cho (10), Kurhajcova (10), Lee-Waters (10), Ondraskova (10), Sfar (10), Serena Williams (10), Evie Dominikovic (9), Henin (9), Krajicek (9), Obata (9), Osterloh (9), Tu (9), Voskoboeva (9), Arvidsson (8), Bovina (8), Kloesel (8), Müller (8), Shikha Uberoi (8), Yakimova (8), Bammer (7), Birnerova (7), Kateryna Bondarenko (7), Obziler (7), Perry (7), Pous Tio (7), Suárez (7), Barna (6), Kutuzova (6), Laine (6), Nagyova (6), Pelletier (6), Savchuk (6), Sromova (6), Sun Tiantian (6), Talaja (6), Vesnina (6), Castellvi (5), Dokic (5), Kapros (5), Kirkland (5), Matevzic (5), Szavay (5), Yan (5), Baltacha (4), Bohmova (4), Dominguez Lino (4), Gallovits (4), Gullickson (4), Harkleroad (4), Hopkins (4), Poutchek (4), Prusova (4), Amanmuradova (3), Bachmann (3), Callens (3), Ferguson (3), Gehrlein (3), Glatch (3), Hsieh (3), Janes (3), Keothavong (3), Li Ting (3), Lisjak (3), Mandula (3), Martinez Granados (3), Mattek (3), Meusburger (3), Pironkova (3), Rodionova (3), Serna (3), Vakulenko (3), Wozniak (3), Yoshida (3), Adamczak (2), Alves (2), Ani (2), Azarenka (2), Bedanova (2), Bhambri (2), Black (2), Borwell (2), Dellacqua (2), Dubois (2), Fedossova (2), Clarisa Fernandez (2), Flipkens (2), Fuda (2), Gajdosova (2), Grandin (2), Gubacsi (2), Henke (2), Hisamatsu (2), Kachlikova (2), Kanepi (2), Klaschka (2), Liu Nan Nan (2), Mikaelian (2), Minella (2), Mouhtassine (2), Nemeckova (2), Parmentier (2), Pisnik (2), Prakusya (2), Rao (2), Rezai (2), Rubin (2), Sequera (2), Adriana Serra Zanetti (2), Skavronskaia (2), Torres (2), Neha Uberoi (2), Vierin (2), Welford (2), Wozniacki (2), Yuan (2), Abramovic (1), Andres Rodriguez (1), Andrieux (1), Antypina (1), Avants (1), Breadmore (1), Buyukakcay (1), Cargill (1), Chakravarthi (1), Chan (1), Chang (1), Chen (1), Chladkova (1), Chuang (1), Cornet (1), Czink (1), Dabek (1), Damayanti (1), Ditty (1), Daniela Dominikovic (1), Drake (1), Erakovic (1), Gambale (1), Garcia (1), Garcia Sokol (1), Gloria (1), Grande (1), Gussoni (1), Hewitt (1), Hingis (1), Andrea Hlavackova (1), Hrdinova (1), Husarova (1), Ifrakh (1), Mathilde Johansson (1), Jugic-Salkic (1), So-Jung Kim (1), King (1), Kleinova (1), Klepac (1), Kleybanova (1), Koryttseva (1), Kosinska (1), Krasnoroutskaya (1), Erica Krauth (1), Kudryavtseva (1), Janet Lee (1), Lepchenko (1), Llagostera (1), Llewellyn (1), Lopez Herrera (1), McCain (1), Mihalache (1), Morita (1), Namigata (1), Navratilova (1), Nooni (1), Noorlander (1), O’Brien (1), O’Donoghue (1), Oprandi (1), Ospina (1), Ozgen (1), Paszek (1), Peterson (1), Piedade (1), Rodina (1), Ahsha Rolle (1), Rousseau (1), Saeki (1), Schett (1), Sescioreanu (1), Shvedova (1), Silva (1), Stanciute (1), Stevenson (1), Sun Shengnan (1), Tatishvili (1), Timotic (1), Tulyaganova (1), Viratprasert (1), Vrljic (1), Watson (1), Xie (1), Yonemura (1), Masa Zec Peskiric (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 337 Comings and Goings: On and Off the Rankings The following lists compare the ranking tables for 2004 and 2005, noting how many players have been added and subtracted. Note that this is not the same as the number of players who have turned pro or retired. Some players may go off the rankings because of injuries, others may reappear because they have recovered from injuries. And some have changed their names, and so will disappear from one list to reappear on the other (I have corrected some of these, e.g. Severine Beltrame became Severine Bremond. But there are bound to be some low-ranked players I’ve missed). In other cases, the WTA simply changes players’s names, presumably because they were misspelled or badly anglicized when first entered in the database (e.g. Vera Douchevina is now spelling her name Dushevina) — but the WTA does not issue lists of these changes. So chances are that at least some players slipped past me. But this gives a general overview of how the numbers of ranked players has changed. This year showed an amazing increase in the number of players. We saw a final total of 1378 ranked players (we had 1256 in 2004, a mere 1113 in 2003, 1252 in 2002, 1214 in 2001, 1242 in 2000, 1079 in 1999) — but it’s harder to earn a ranking now than in 2002; first round losses at the lowest events no longer carry points, though on the other hand, there are more Challengers to give new players openings. So even as prize money has stayed stagnant, even with the Tour having fewer events than four or so years ago, the number of players is up. Note that the old WTA rankings lists clipped players’ names at 22 letters, and I have had to maintain this convention (for the most part) to allow comparison of old and new lists. Clipping, if it occurs, takes place in the first names, not the surnames. In a few instances I’ve spotted it and filled out the name, but this is not guaranteed. The first list, of players ranked only in 2004, shows the players in alphabetical order with their 2004 year- end rankings shown in parenthesis. The second list, of players ranked only in 2005, is similar: An alphabetical list, with 2005 final rankings in parenthesis. The final list, of players ranked in both years, is more complicated, as it allows ranking comparison. The list shows each player’s name, her 2005 final ranking, the net change in her ranking from 2004 to 2005, and the percent change. As an example of what we mean, take the first player on the list. That’s Fatima Abinu, and her entry reads

Fatima Abinu (#1162, -24, -2%) This means that Abinu’s year-end 2005 ranking was #1162. The fact that the number is negative means that she had fallen down the rankings by 24 places (she ended 2004 at #1138). A positive number means the player moved up the rankings; a negative number means she moved down. The third number in the parentheses is her percentage movement — the real indicator of how the player did in the course of the year. Abinu saw her ranking increase by 2%. Had the number been positive, it would mean that she had improved.

If it matters, the biggest percentage improvements in ranking in 2005 were: Kim Clijsters (91%), Michaella Krajicek (86%), Sania Mirza (85%), Ana Ivanovic (84%), Mary Pierce (83%), and Nicole Vaidisova (81%); no one else improved as much as 80%. A total of 82 players improved by at least 50% (i.e. cut their rankings in half). The biggest percentage hits were suffered by Paola Suárez (1350%), Rita Grande (950%), Chanda Rubin (930%), Marta Marrero (491%), and Marlene Weingärtner (434%); no one else went up more than 400%. 64 players saw their rankings increase by at least 100% (i.e. their rankings doubled). Most of these declines, of course, were induced by injury; a few (Anastasia Myskina, Vera Zvonareva, Karolina Sprem, Svetlana Kuznetsova, Lisa Raymond) just plain slumped; one or two (notably Fabiola Zuluaga’s) were the result of retirement.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 338 Players ranked in 2004 but not in 2005, with their 2005 final rankings (Total of 284) Olakunbi Abass (1240), Nadia Abdala (1090), Sara Abutovic (1183), Julia Acs (818), Susanne Aigner (773), Ronke Akianbade (1223), Joanne Akl (799), Orobosa Amadin (1231), Osaro Amadin (1138), Verena Amesbauer (975), Anca Anastasiu (898), Liza Andriyani (599), Kaori Aoyama (388), Melisa Arevalo (909), Emily Arnott (1228), Lata Assudani (1172), Zsuzsanna Babos (707), Lubomira Bacheva (219), Alesa Bagola (1096), Elisabeth Bahn (731), Ally Baker (637), Gabrielle Baker (1009), Olga Barabanschikova (435), Masha Bayser (1180), Verena Beller (1183), Alba Berdala Grive (1050), Janet Bergman (703), Anna Bielen-Zarska (377), Bea Bielik (647), Michelle Blattler (1055), Branka Bojovic (784), Allison Bradshaw (740), Alanna Broderick (725), Jenny Broughall (1228), Yakaterina Burduli (1154), Irina Buryachok (953), Patrizia Cacciaguerra (919), Tyra Calderwood (1231), Sandra Canrom (1183), Jennifer Capriati (10), Chloe Carlotti (1204), Myriam Casanova (121), Zuzana Cerna (736), Daria Chemarda (960), Chen Yan-Chong (442), Elke Clijsters (648), Brenda Coassolo (810), Amanda Coetzer (280), Isabel Collischonn (749), Laurence Combes (490), Mariana Conde (1090), Irina Cybina (1026), Eunice David (1183), Talitha De Groot (933), Stefanie De Laet (805), Rita Degliesposti (729), Irina Delitz (889), Laura Dell’angelo (786), Caroline Dhenin (802), Du Rui (582), Ana-Clara Duarte (1038), Nina Duebbers (390), Amandine Dulon (1138), Anastasia Dvornikova (1110), Sabrina Eisenberg (722), Minami Endo (1253), Sophie Erre (1111), Carolina Escamilla (1183), Pilar Escandell (748), Mariana Esperon (294), Audra Falk (1096), Yomna Farid (961), Silvia Farina Elia (20), Jessica Fernandez (535), Diane Filip (1223), Christina Fitz (971), Zsuzsanna Fodor (1101), Anna Foldenyi (562), Francesca Frappi (518), Maria Paulina Gamboa (1240), Elena Gancheva (883), Ioana Gaspar (869), Gala Gasset (1115), Debora Gbadamosi (1223), Sarah Gbadamosi (1240), Natia Gegia (1172), Ilke Gers (646), Lara Giltinan (671), Yael Glitzenshtein (761), Rochelle Goldthreate (1247), Oana-Elen Golimbioschi (654), Raissa Gourevitch (1000), Olga Govortsova (600), Amanda Grahame (1080), Katie Granson (706), Stephanie Greau (526), Maria Gugel (844), Laura Harkness (1240), Nadine Hassinger (986), Stephanie Hazlett (502), Nina Henkel (1045), Audrey Hernandez (792), Jana Hlavackova (386), Lejla Hodzic (1022), Kika Hogendoorn (1204), Da Jung Hong (650), Marielle Hoogland (513), Christiane Hoppmann (728), Hu Di (1238), Iris Ichim (737), Tara Iyer (797), Claire Jalade (915), Adriana Jerabek (1128), Ana Jerman (1072), Jia Ping (1253), Lindsey Jones (1151), Diana Julianto (837), Yoshimi Kakuta (1253), Oksana Kalashnikova (1204), Bianca Kamper (886), Asimina Kaplani (1038), Claudia Kardys (1131), Tinatin Kavlashvili (570), Jodi Kenoyer (682), Chin Bee Khoo (1050), Ji-Young Kim (953), Akiko Kinebuchi (779), Satomi Kinjo (511), Nikoleta Kipritidou (726), Ekaterina Kirianova (579), Urska Klemenc (1101), Pooja Kommireddi (1223), Agata Komorowska (1138), Galyna Kossyk (1228), Alexandra Kostikova (1151), Lina Krasnoroutskaya (138), Daniela Krejsova (1038), Nicole Kriz (515), Evgenia Kulikovskaya (814), Rati Kumar (1131), Bianka Lamade (1050), Orawan Lamangthong (947), Martina Lautenschlager (819), Jessica Lehnhoff (193), Karin-Marlies Lems (1204), Gala Leon Garcia (214), He Wen Fei Li (1138), Nancy Loeffler-Caro (1231), Elizabeth Lumpkin (1115), Mi Lyoo (558), Sabita Maharaj (1172), Nelly Maillard (1060), Iva Majoli (315), Borka Majstorovic (796), Eden Marama (383), Ana Martin Ramirez (1024), Monica Mastan (1026), Lisa McShea (1072), Nicole Melch (624), Jolanda Mens (850), Giulia Meruzzi (660), Anastasia Michail (1069), Tatia Mikadze (663), Anna-Maria Miller (863), Aurelija Miseviciute (1007), Desislava Mladenova (915), Laura Moares (1183), Eszter Molnar (701), Sylvia Montero (950), Svetlana Mossiakova (890), Megan Moulton-Levy (1122), Na Wei (1037), Chie Nagano (995), Ljiljana Nanusevic (859), Martina Navratilova (376), Martina Nejedly (1101), Yana Nemerowski (1154), Natalie Neri (1178), Helena Norfeldt (759), Eri Nozawa (978), Yanet Nunez (1080), Viky Nunez Fuentes (897), Ellah Nze (1183), Teresa Oberti (975), Alison Ojeda (987), Alina Orcholska (1204), Ana Gloria Osorio (1000), Liza Pereira (898), Nandini Perumal (1047), Natalia Pervitskaya (915), Klara Petersson (1131), Marina Petrovic (843), Elena Petrucciano (1066), Nicole Pitts (603), Vendula Plechata (1101), Barbara Polidoro (1085), Tea Popaja (1231), Karla Porter (1199), Anna Powaska (913), Yulja Pugach (1072), Iciri Rai (765), Jelena Rajic (996), Anupama Rajur (1128), Natalia Rakhmanina (1080), Natacha Randriantefy (775), Madhura Ranganathan (924), Preeti Rao (1067), Arancha Recio (1084), Nicole Rencken (668), Rebekah Rhodes (993), Tania Rice (718), Barbara Rittner (233), Deanna Roberts (929), Jessi Robinson (1093), Maya Rosa (1055), Maria-Sol Rotondo (1204), Natalia Rudnouskaya (1060), Carolina Salge (1087), Florencia Salvadores (659), Nuria Sanchez Garcia (982), Sonia Sandano (1231), Raluca Sandu (561), Ana Paula Saviole (1204), Stephanie Schaer (996), Barbara Schett (88), Nadine Schlotterer (618), Tina Schmassmann (800), Barbara Schwartz (310), Samrita Sekar (1115), Dina Senkina (1223), Ipek Senoglu (307), Nicole Sewell (681), Shi Yuan-Yuan (1249), Amandine Singla (632), Lenka Snajdrova (692), Diana Srebrovic (826), Ildiko Stadler (936), Danielle Steinberg (721), Shelley Stephens (337), Sarah Stone (1168), Madita Suer (598), Eun

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 339 Hee Sung (1047), Åsa Svensson (191), Anna Sydorska (790), Nino Szownadze (1204), Kokoro Takehara (855), Ryoko Takemura (384), Natalie Tanevska (902), Marina Tavares (1131), Sandrine Testud (311), Margot Torre (636), Cristin Torrens Valero (410), Ana Cecilia Trevino (1168), Alienor Tricerri (764), Judit Trunkos (1238), Katrina Tsang (1031), Andrea Van Den Hurk (1172), Kristen Van Elden (972), Anousjka Van Exel (265), Lyutfiya Velieva (1044), Courtney Vernon (1165), Alexia Virgili (589), Ivana Visic (793), Stefanie Vogele (711), Antonela Voina (439), Martine Vosseberg (1183), I-Ting Wang (828), Patricia Wartusch (222), Ryoko Watanabe (1164), Vivien Weber (1138), Julie Ann Welford (1249), Angelique Widjaja (135), Bronwyn Williams (1180), Wu Shuang (1183), Alena Yaryshka (1055), Yue Qing (1249), Christina Zachariadou (965), Maria Paola Zavagli (1204), Zuzana Zemenova (427), Anzela Zguna (522), Zhang Shuai (901), Zhang Yan (1094), Gabriela Ziliotto (1168), Natasa Zoric (1138)

Based on year-end 2004 rankings, six players who were Top 150 last year are now off the rankings: 10. Jennifer Capriati 20. Silvia Farina Elia 88. Barbara Schett 121. Myriam Casanova 135. Angelique Widjaja 138. Lina Krasnoroutskaya Farina Elia and Schett retired (and would have been ranked had they not asked to have their names removed from the list. The others were all injured.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 340 Players ranked in 2005 but not in 2004, with their 2005 final rankings (Total of 406) Alicia Aguilar (1182), Lauren Albanese (1050), Lara Alexander (1337), Sabrina Allaut (1086), Maria Fernanda Alvarez (1058), Michal Amir (1182), Marie Jose Andres (1196), Kristina Antoniychuk (703), Blessing Anuna (1280), Czarina Mae Arevalo (1072), Anna-Marie Atelj (1350), Sarah Aulombard (995), Alison Bai (982), Cristina Bala Abella (965), Giulia Baldoni (1127), Lisanne Balk (588), Kristina Barrois (211), Page Bartelt (952), Anna Bartenstein (587), Marie-Perrine Baudouin (647), Alena Bayarchyk (1108), Inga Beermann (1241), Josipa Bek (638), Alice Bellicha (1074), Ana Beltran Trigueros (1264), Segolene Berger (772), Tarakaa Bertrand (1135), Mareike Biglmaier (750), Bernadett Birkas (798), Bojana Bobuscic (933), Julia Bone (1365), Marrit Boonstra (838), Bojana Borovnica (1151), Barbora Bozkova (1060), Megan Bradley (450), Madison Brengle (777), Lenka Broosova (760), Prim Buaklee (1203), Lutfiana Ari Budiharto (1070), Irina Buryachok (465), Hye-Mi Byun (1176), Martina Caciotti (864), Alexandra Cadantu (1297), Giada Calabretta (1373), Maria Isabel Camberos (1352), Holly Cao (828), Amandine Cazeaux (944), Lu-Ling Chen (1058), Chen Hui (1211), Chen Yanchong (738), Fani Chifchieva (1034), Eun-Hye Cho (1340), Mi-Hee Chung (1297), Dominika Cibulkova (555), Julie Coin (367), Kimberly Couts (1120), Kelly Couturier (1297), Samantha Cowan (1324), Lindsay Cox (787), Maria-Luiza Craciun (1282), Joanna Craven (1264), Bruna Cunha (1070), Jade Curtis (1021), Delia Damaschin (1264), Federica D‘ambrosio (1277), Rebecca Dandeniya (784), Kelly De Beer (542), Annali De Bruyn (1050), Sandra Del Rey (910), Corinna Dentoni (761), Gaelle Desperrier (1090), Alessandra Di Batte (813), Sara Di Paolo (1318), Federica Di Sarra (989), Anne Dickhardt (1297), Rachael Dillon (763), Ding Ding (731), Ding Li-Li (1264), Andrada Dinu (758), Paola Doldan Gonzalez (1220), Louise Doutrelant (661), Alexandra Dulgheru (631), Mariana Duque Marino (803), Hannah Eke (1203), Tiffany Eklov (346), Hila Elster (1216), Diana Enache (756), Yasmin Enrich (1151), Marina Erakovic (213), Diana Eriksson (1098), Soledad Esperon (260), Manuela Esposito (1135), Chayenne Ewijk (726), Stamatia Fafaliou (978), Nadine Fahoum (1264), Catherine Fall (1233), Laurene Fayol (603), Alessandra Ferrazzi (1241), Teresa Ferrer (865), Karolina Filipiak (710), Amanda Fink (926), Anna Fitzpatrick (1102), Antonia Fohse (1169), Martina Fratini (1275), Hitomi Fujii (1277), Maite Gabarrus-Alonso (936), Angelina Gabueva (553), Sevvy Gallios (1193), Albertina Gandara (1124), Elena Gantcheva (1039), Gao Chen-Chen (1188), Manon Garcia (1220), Beatri Garcia Vidagany (723), Maria Gatalskaya (1196), Anna Geissler (1297), Carla Genovese (1362), Sheryl Gershon (1191), Nicola Geuer (1127), Melissa Gibb (1139), Claudia Giovine (1241), Julia Goerges (1118), Franziska Goetz (1060), Shannon Golds (854), Mireia Gonzalez-Bosch (1220), Federica Grazioso (1241), Evgenia Grebenyuk (1151), Estelle Guisard (960), Guo Xuan-Yu (1337), Ina Hadziselimovic (1068), Han Xin-Yun (627), Elina Hasanova (1241), Jennifer-Lee Heinser (1151), Dorota Hibental (982), Mutsuko Hirose (1176), Kanae Hisami (673), Lenka Hojckova (1032), Radana Holusova (732), Mateja Horvat (830), Sonia Iacovacci (1257), Eleonora Iannozzi (893), Sabath Ibrahim (1241), Akari Inoue (846), Haruka Inoue (885), Paola Iovino (1151), Maria Irigoyen (759), Reina Ishihara (1297), Kazusa Ito (931), Aurelia Janeczek (914), Stephanie Jeanes (1264), Hanne Skak Jensen (1199), Sacha Jones (808), Thamara Jonkman (1352), Claudi Jorda-Fernandez (900), Jana Juricova (595), Eva Kadlecova (942), Madlen Kadur (1324), Jana Kandarr (409), Natasha Karolyi (982), Maren Kassens (739), Yuri Kasuya (1337), Akiko Kato (1143), Mika Kawamura (1277), Mitsumi Kawasaki (1362), Emma Kidd (1182), Alexandra Kiesl (1098), Katharina Killi (853), Ji Young Kim (889), Ji-Sun Kim (1297), Ju-Hyeong Kim (1324), Jung-Eun Kim (1108), Dora Kiss (1220), Melanie Klaffner (1095), Franziska Klotz (972), Monika Kochanova (1102), Norie Kojima (1216), Veronika Kolarova (1365), Maria Komissarova (1371), Anastasia Kontratevidi (1076), Ekaterina Kosminskaya (570), Galyna Kosyk (640), Tatiana Kotelnikova (916), Neda Kozic (881), Katerina Kramperova (1257), Hannah Kuervers (806), Nika Kukharchuk (1162), Alexandra Kulikova (528), Jelena Kulikova (871), Regina Kulikova (712), Yuka Kuroda (781), Nadja Kusterer (946), Sofia Kvatsabaia (1102), Renee Lampret (1193), Anna Lapushchenkova (527), Ji-Yeon Lee (1025), Nadia Lee (1318), Se-Na Lee (1151), Shona Lee (746), Vera Leontieva (905), Agustina Lepore (774), Liang Chen (783), Sae-Mi Lim (995), Anna-Viktoria Lind (1078), Liene Linina (1233), Salome Llaguno (1050), Letizia Lo Re (1211), Davinia Lobbinger (720), Thaddea Lock (1151), Patricia Lopez-Illan (1275), Ting Ting Lu (1280), Lu Dan (1282), Lu Jing (1199), Camilla Lundberg (1294), Paulina Luquin (1182), Monique Lynch (1324), Ayaka Maekawa (529), Nina Maglatyuk (1176), Fabiana Mak (1211), Irina Malashok (1135), Klaudia Malenovska (993), Carolina Malheiros (933), Anastasia Malhotra (1023), Aleksandra Malyarchikova (904), Roberta Martellini (1352), Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez (397), Maja Matevzic (651), Joanna Matuszczyk (1220), Fadzai Mawisire (1182), Patricia Mayr (643), Shayna McDowell (522), Marlot Meddens (949), Apollonia Melzani (1282), Giulia Meruzzi (591), Jessica Mezo (1143), Vanja Mikovic (1282), Elitsa Mileva (1340), Kristi Miller (749), Danielle Mills (1297),

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 341 Edita Milos (1216), Miki Miyamura (860), Yuumi Miyazaki (912), Berveine Mohammed (1340), Taja Mohorcic (1119), Saskia Monien (947), Nicola Mooney (1340), Ayumi Morita (314), Micaela Moroni (1340), Ana Maria Moura (1162), Ines Moura (1093), Anna Movsisyan (1324), Sarina Mueller (1087), Stanca Muresan (1173), Samantha Murray (1233), Monika Musilova (1373), Anna Mydlowska (1365), Diana Nakic (794), Asha Nanda Kumar (1324), Olesya Nazarova (1220), Daria Neretina (1032), Viet-Ha Ngo (1282), Caroline Nothnagel (1257), Karolina Nowak (1127), Tracey O’Connor (701), Beauty Oghenekevwe (1365), Chiaki Okadaue (868), Fatima Olaso (1087), Abigail Olivier (1220), Martina Ondrackova (1030), Jillian O’Neill (1241), Jesica Orselli (820), Jenna May Osborne (1297), Justine Ozga (434), Julia Paetow (1015), Ksenia Palkina (863), Joana Pangaio (1241), Nina Pantic (989), Alizee Paradis (1162), Yulia Parasyuk (957), Tamira Paszek (365), Denisa Pavlikova (991), Irena Pavlovic (569), Melissa Percy (1297), Eleanor Peters (1203), Laura Peterzan (646), Maja Petrovic (1078), Lynn Philippe (1241), Sabrina Piccolo (1373), Vanessa Pinto (847), Elena Pioppo (1140), Nathalie Piquion (1220), Anastasia Pivovarova (728), Alexandra Podkolzina (1090), Anastasia Poltoratskaya (1050), Elze Potgieter (1050), Samantha Powers (1220), Cynthia Prieto-Garcia (1321), Abbie Probert (1297), Valeria Pulido Velasco (811), Ekaterina Pushkareva (1352), Qiu Si-Si (1352), Urszula Radwanska (1025), Oormila Ram (1257), Daria Razarenova (1350), Polona Rebersak (982), Dominice Ripoll (1151), Shadisha Robinson (1264), Maria Eug Roca Recarey (922), Arina Rodionova (779), Katia Rodrigues (1352), Maca Rodriguez Capilla (1255), Jessica Roland (1045), Georgia Rose (882), Nicole Rottmann (1324), Elodie Rouzier (1365), Katherine Ruckert (768), Ana Ruiz-Fernandez (1373), Larikah Russell (1072), Kimberley Ruxton (1373), Jenny Saarnilinna (1294), Lisa Sabino (696), Emi Sakurai (1220), Blessing Samuel (1297), Olivia Sanchez (639), Gangothri Sandri (1340), Luciana Sarmenti (1013), Veronica Saucedo (1317), Branka Savic (1324), Anna Savitskaya (1352), Olivia Scarfi (1373), Anne Schaefer (Jr) (825), Noemie Scharle (948), Yasmin Schnack (1019), Katarina Scholtisek (1000), Bibiane Schoofs (875), Martina Sebastiani (1316), Shao Shitong (1297), Sakiko Shimizu (1193), Mi-Ran Shin (1372), Keren Shlomo (1050), Ekaterina Shulaeva (737), Irina Smirnova (1015), Svetlana Smirnova (1318), Anna Smith (660), Anne Smith (953), Bianca Smith (1121), Sandra Soler-Sola (1102), Christine Sperling (577), Paola Sprovieri (1108), Oana Stanica (1188), Alina Stanila (1236), Jelena Stanivuk (821), Jovana Stankovic (1340), Sladjana Stankovic (802), Agni Stefanou (1127), Miriam Steinhilber (1010), Robin Stephenson (1176), Jennifer Stevens (1203), Georgie Stoop (903), Christy Striplin (950), Yevgeniya Stupak (1140), Liina Suurvarik (897), Jenny Swift (1340), Ayano Takeuchi (1191), Lavinia Tananta (1220), Anna Tatishvili (1151), Romana Tedjakusuma (355), Berengere Teix (752), Laura Thorpe (930), Nicole Thyssen (688), Elizavet Tochilovskaya (1365), Magdalena Tokarczyk (1127), Moe Tsubuku (1340), Iroda Tulyaganova (363), Sayaka Umeda (953), Nazari Urbina (1297), Julia Ustyuzhanina (610), Roxana Vaideanu (1013), Alise Vaidere (729), Klaartje Van Baarle (1297), Josanne Van Bennekom (757), Sann Van Den Biggelaar (861), Suza Van Hartingsveldt (719), Katerina Vankova (961), Bo Verhulsdonk (1211), Ragini Vimal (1149), Patricia Vollmeier (1203), Stephanie Vongsouthi (1045), Nungnadda Wannasuk (1135), Kana Watanabe (1297), Annabella Weigert (1168), Jessica Weyreuter (1220), Lenka Wienerova (843), Monica Wiesener (1340), Jessica Williams (1257), Karolina Wlodarczak (974), Pauline Wong (849), Xia Huan (1236), Xu Yi-Fan (850), Ai Yamamoto (1162), Mari Yamauchi (1075), Mi Yoo (376), Yana Zavialova (1196), Elizaveta Zaytseva (1324), Laura Zelder (422), Zhang Shuai (648), Efrat Zlotikamin (1095), Agnese Zucchini (755)

The five highest-ranked players to come on the rankings in 2005 were not very noteworthy (unlike 2004, when Nicole Vaidisova, Li Na, and Kveta Peschke arrived on the rankings): 211. Kristina Barrois 213. Marina Erakovic 260. Soledad Esperon 314. Ayumi Morita 346. Tiffany Eklov

We did see the return of Iroda Tulyaganova, but she is still only #363.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 342 Players ranked in both 2004 and 2005 (total of 972) Fatima Abinu (#1162, -24, -2%), Ivana Abramovic (#229, -13, -6%), Marija Abramovic (#533, -21, -4%), Bianca Acquistapace (#752, 8, 1%), Monique Adamczak (#382, -46, -14%), Miljana Adanko (#613, -56, -10%), Ekaterina Afinogenova (#513, -59, -13%), Kasumi Aiko (#902, 252, 22%), Ilge Alpay (#812, 388, 32%), Maria Fernanda Alves (#155, 19, 11%), Akgul Amanmuradova (#192, 167, 47%), Sanja Ancic (#342, 189, 36%), Mari Andersson (#428, 466, 52%), Kristina Andlovic (#473, 710, 60%), Rosa Maria Andres Rodriguez (#547, -269, -97%), Mailyne Andrieux (#370, 136, 27%), Maret Ani (#95, 109, 53%), Olena Antypina (#198, 154, 44%), Maki Arai (#489, 27, 5%), Maria Jose Argeri (#196, 100, 34%), Lorena Arias Rodriguez (#709, 406, 36%), Maria Arkhipova (#679, -139, -26%), Greta Arn (#476, -125, -36%), Diana Aroutiounova (#1043, 161, 13%), Marcela Arroyo Vergara (#839, -186, -28%), Sofia Arvidsson (#67, 109, 62%), Shinobu Asagoe (#38, -1, -3%), Teryn Ashley (#273, -123, -82%), Sofia Avakova (#1123, -378, -51%), Cory Ann Avants (#274, -10, -4%), Kateryna Avdiyenko (#497, 53, 10%), Virginie Ayassamy (#743, -190, -34%), Victoria Azarenka (#146, 360, 71%), Martina Babakova (#1005, -130, -15%), Maria Babich (#1254, -331, -36%), Julia Babilon (#512, -89, -21%), Angelika Bachmann (#169, 27, 14%), Emilie Bacquet (#474, 221, 32%), Timea Bacsinszky (#392, -145, -59%), Hae-Youm Bae (#1102, -47, -4%), Holly Bagshaw (#786, -113, -17%), Cecile Baijot (#959, 75, 7%), Caroline Bailly (#927, 54, 6%), Katharine Baker (#866, 8, 1%), Leanne Baker (#401, 126, 24%), Marilyn Baker (#1210, -116, -11%), Liana Balaci (#584, -270, -86%), Estefania Balda (#764, -102, -15%), Alice Balducci (#809, 54, 6%), Elisa Balsamo (#394, 20, 5%), Elena Baltacha (#122, 80, 40%), Sybille Bammer (#79, 72, 48%), Vasilisa Bardina (#248, 198, 44%), Cheli Bargil (#907, -125, -16%), Adriana Barna (#270, -26, -11%), Anca Barna (#333, -248, -292%), Lauren Barnikow (#421, 639, 60%), Cassandra Barr (#539, 166, 24%), Marion Bartoli (#40, 1, 2%), Martina Bartosova (#921, 71, 7%), Anna Bastrikova (#386, -69, -22%), Daja Bedanova (#289, 111, 28%), Celine Beermann (#975, -181, -23%), Janette Bejlkova (#447, 208, 32%), Sarah Benad (#1172, 77, 6%), Iveta Benesova (#54, -18, -50%), Andrea Benitez (#293, 110, 27%), Melissa Berry (#692, 144, 17%), Astrid Besser (#941, 68, 7%), Yulia Beygelzimer (#160, 2, 1%), Ankita Bhambri (#398, 42, 10%), Sanaa Bhambri (#466, 139, 23%), Raffaella Bindi (#563, -91, -19%), Eva Birnerova (#116, 23, 17%), Erica Biro (#597, - 188, -46%), Cara Black (#174, -40, -30%), Olga Blahotova (#187, 65, 26%), Stefania Boffa (#717, -97, -16%), Natalia Bogdanova (#678, -69, -11%), Katerina Bohmova (#128, 35, 21%), Annalisa Bona (#467, 424, 48%), Alona Bondarenko (#73, 53, 42%), Kateryna Bondarenko (#125, 208, 62%), Valeria Bondarenko (#888, -84, -10%), Bianca Bonifate (#623, 262, 30%), Krizia Borgarello (#1090, -441, -68%), Karoline Borgersen (#431, 440, 51%), Sarah Borwell (#331, 86, 21%), Rebeca Bou Nogueiro (#816, 256, 24%), Elena Bovina (#62, -47, -313%), Daniela Bracaglia (#823, 290, 26%), Kristina Brandi (#87, -39, -81%), Nina Bratchikova (#259, -30, -13%), Lauren Breadmore (#265, 61, 19%), Severine (Beltrame) Bremond (#102, -7, -7%), Alberta Brianti (#295, 36, 11%), Liset Brito (#771, 383, 33%), Danielle Brown (#801, 246, 23%), Olga Brozda (#445, 63, 12%), Diana Brunel (#543, 189, 26%), Laura Bsoul (#1236, -98, -9%), Nicole Buitoni (#980, 35, 3%), Irina Bulykina (#396, -125, -46%), Tamara Bunic (#683, 282, 29%), Leslie Butkiewicz (#606, -261, -76%), Mihaela Buzarnescu (#427, 194, 31%), Ekaterina Bychkova (#69, 118, 63%), Estrella Cabeza Candela (#567, -37, -7%), Marina Caiazzo (#1036, -549, -113%), Els Callens (#221, -99, -81%), Maria Elena Camerin (#96, -53, -123%), Alice Canepa (#226, -45, -25%), Fernanda Caputi (#1108, -393, -55%), Cecilia Cardenas (#1108, -136, -14%), Ansley Cargill (#299, -59, -25%), Kit Carson (#1022, 104, 9%), Larissa Carvalho (#344, 35, 9%), Giulia Casoni (#329, -44, -15%), Catalina Castaño (#59, 51, 46%), Vilmarie Castellvi (#157, -21, -15%), Karen Emilia Castiblanco Duarte (#1027, 127, 11%), Valentina Castro (#707, -198, -39%), Celine Cattaneo (#538, 388, 42%), Cristina Celani (#594, 287, 33%), Ludmila Cervanova (#115, -15, -15%), Petra Cetkovska (#194, 238, 55%), Kyung Yee Chae (#604, 301, 33%), Margalit Chakhnashvili (#255, 371, 59%), Rushmi Chakravarthi (#366, -20, -6%), Anna Chakvetadze (#33, 51, 61%), Chin-Wei Chan (#256, 32, 11%), Yung-Jan Chan (#219, 270, 55%), Kyung-Mi Chang (#441, 60, 12%), Yi Chen (#890, -194, -28%), Lauren Cheung (#762, 200, 21%), Kildine Chevalier (#440, -100, -29%), Krushmi Chheda (#1065, -107, -11%), Stefania Chieppa (#390, 157, 29%), Denisa Chladkova (#130, -76, -141%), Jeong A Cho (#942, -191, -25%), Yoon Jeong Cho (#72, 135, 65%), Jin-Young Choi (#1264, -730, -137%), Wilawan Choptang (#568, 98, 15%), Chia-Jung Chuang (#307, -107, -54%), Veronika Chvojkova (#425, 34, 7%), Sorana Cirstea (#711, 182, 20%), Raluca Ciulei (#1024, 141, 12%), Shana Claes (#920, 48, 5%), Erika Clarke (#634, -102, -19%), Nicole Clerico (#576, -34, -6%), Kim Clijsters (#2, 20, 91%), Tanner Cochran (#891, -410, -85%), Julia Cohen (#470, 199, 30%), Melanie Cohen (#626, - 18, -3%), Stephanie Cohen-Aloro (#105, 7, 6%), Sarah Coles (#837, 223, 21%), Hannah Collin (#695, -167, -32%), Bruna Colosio (#1094, -618, -130%), Eloisa Compostizo De Andres (#671, 73, 10%), Chantal Coombs (#861, 94,

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 343 10%), Belen Corbalan (#589, 108, 15%), Corina Corduneanu (#457, 263, 37%), Alize Cornet (#308, 553, 64%), Vanja Corovic (#582, 246, 30%), Mariana Correa (#656, 183, 22%), Joana Cortez (#423, 170, 29%), Marina Cossou (#734, 449, 38%), Estefania Craciun (#469, 174, 27%), Jorgelina Cravero (#389, 72, 16%), Jill Craybas (#47, 12, 20%), Dubravka Cupac (#875, -455, -108%), Kristina Czafikova (#271, 167, 38%), Melinda Czink (#92, 39, 30%), Tiffany Dabek (#218, 45, 17%), Stephanie Dalmacio (#1282, -270, -27%), Ayu Fani Damayanti (#492, 526, 52%), Lisa D’amelio (#574, -9, -2%), Eleni Daniilidou (#70, -36, -106%), Lindsay Davenport (#1, 0, 0%), Vasilisa Davydova (#706, 77, 10%), Surina De Beer (#300, 528, 64%), Claire De Gubernatis (#452, 446, 50%), Magali De Lattre (#548, 439, 44%), Rossana De Los Rios (#383, -188, -96%), Jessie De Vries (#980, -25, -3%), Nathalie Déchy (#12, 9, 43%), Liga Dekmeijere (#372, 73, 16%), Sara Del Barrio Aragon (#704, -77, -12%), Casey Dellacqua (#223, 78, 26%), Servane Delobelle (#617, -124, -25%), Elena Dementieva (#8, -2, -33%), Emilia Desiderio (#967, 1, 0%), Salome Devidze (#404, -101, -33%), Shruti Dhawan (#500, 241, 33%), Mariana Diaz-Oliva (#56, 52, 48%), Amy Dillingham (#911, 32, 3%), Silvia Disderi (#649, 122, 16%), Mireille Dittmann (#420, -5, -1%), Julie Ditty (#253, 13, 5%), Lenka Dlhopolcova (#482, 374, 44%), Simona Dobra (#810, 286, 26%), Ria Doernemann (#793, 156, 16%), Tomoko Dokei (#419, -59, -16%), Jelena Dokic (#351, -226, -181%), Marta Domachowska (#60, 14, 19%), Lourdes Dominguez Lino (#77, 132, 63%), Daniella Dominikovic (#362, 138, 28%), Evie Dominikovic (#153, 0, 0%), Dong Nan (#1236, -5, 0%), Dong Yan-Hua (#1199, -333, -38%), Suzana Dos Anjos (#1060, 144, 12%), Gianna Doz (#488, 247, 34%), Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie (#702, -443, -171%), Maureen Drake (#283, -99, -54%), Ekaterina Dranets (#1124, -74, -7%), Dorian Driessen (#1149, -18, -2%), Lizaan Du Plessis (#552, 44, 7%), Stephanie Dubois (#121, 132, 52%), Gisela Dulko (#27, 6, 18%), Vera Dushevina (#39, 24, 38%), Ekaterina Dzehalevich (#251, 42, 14%), Natallia Dziamidzenka (#785, -430, -121%), Julia Dziedzic (#917, 14, 2%), Emmanuelle Edon (#1108, -804, -264%), Heidi El Tabakh (#388, 270, 41%), Jennifer Elie (#562, 69, 11%), Tamara Encina (#804, -126, -19%), Jessica Engels (#1216, -197, -19%), Sara Errani (#359, 162, 31%), Allessandra Esposito (#1336, -392, -42%), Naoko Eto (#1257, - 17, -1%), Franziska Etzel (#393, 175, 31%), Anne-Valerie Evain (#1121, 132, 11%), Marcela Evangelista (#924, - 215, -30%), Dia Evtimova (#575, 37, 6%), Lara Fakhoury (#897, 36, 4%), Megan Falcon (#622, -252, -68%), Sarah Fansler (#611, -123, -25%), Gulnara Fattakhetdinova (#997, -740, -288%), Evelyn Fauth (#301, 71, 19%), Yuliana Fedak (#137, -54, -65%), Youlia Fedossova (#328, -15, -5%), Sophie Ferguson (#264, 4, 1%), Clarisa Fernandez (#151, 205, 58%), Eva Fernandez-Brugues (#560, 110, 16%), Catarina Ferreira (#1068, -110, -11%), Claire Feuerstein (#415, 439, 51%), Debbrich Feys (#674, -218, -48%), Lauren Fisher (#963, 138, 13%), Eva Fislova (#290, -78, -37%), Lucy Fletcher (#1085, -217, -25%), Kirsten Flipkens (#201, -32, -19%), Anna Floris (#294, 386, 57%), Galina Fokina (#699, -383, -121%), Paula Fondevila Castro (#735, -97, -15%), Rebecca Fong (#700, 70, 9%), Stacia Fonseca (#541, 23, 4%), Anna Font (#670, -95, -17%), Stephanie Foretz (#94, -1, -1%), Yamile Fors (#998, -16, - 2%), Marta Fraga (#521, -246, -89%), Nikola Frankova (#416, 610, 59%), Amy Frazier (#55, -29, -112%), Elizabet Freeman-Young (#1089, -68, -7%), Helen Fritche (#1143, -363, -47%), Ryoko Fuda (#178, 143, 45%), Haruka Fujishiro (#894, -16, -2%), Rika Fujiwara (#97, 61, 39%), Vanesa Furlanetto (#1045, 56, 5%), Christina Fusano (#554, -121, -28%), Giulia Gabba (#224, 245, 52%), Diana Gae (#730, 153, 17%), Emmanuelle Gagliardi (#93, 11, 11%), Jarmila Gajdosova (#145, 72, 33%), Varvara Galanina (#886, 59, 6%), Mariona Gallifa Puigdesens (#1127, - 349, -45%), Edina Gallovits (#129, 57, 31%), Mary Gambale (#238, 203, 46%), Gao Quan (#991, -448, -83%), Natalia Garbellotto (#559, -239, -75%), Tathiana Garbin (#86, -28, -48%), Paula Garcia (#269, -113, -72%), Maria Van Garcia Sokol (#305, -94, -45%), Julianna Gates (#1143, -308, -37%), Giulia Gatto Monticone (#797, -131, - 20%), Stephanie Gehrlein (#203, -6, -3%), Michelle Gerards (#322, -85, -36%), Anna Gerassimou (#792, -181, - 30%), Iveta Gerlova (#616, 17, 3%), Maria Geznenge (#369, -40, -12%), Celia Gil (#857, -49, -6%), Anna Gil Mares (#951, -18, -2%), Marinne Giraud (#618, 199, 24%), Alexa Glatch (#225, 137, 38%), Melanie Gloria (#495, -154, - 45%), Pavlina Glosova (#1010, 112, 10%), Madalina Gojnea (#291, 506, 63%), Tatiana Golovin (#24, 3, 11%), Maria Goloviznina (#986, -716, -265%), Lucia Gonzales (#987, 167, 14%), Carola Gonzalez King (#1108, -36, -3%), Adriana Gonzalez Penas (#487, 96, 16%), Parul Goswami (#832, 26, 3%), Julija Gotovskyte (#927, 256, 22%), Sheethal Goutham (#1045, -82, -9%), Hannah Grady (#1040, -454, -77%), Rita Grande (#1081, -978, -950%), Natalie Grandin (#159, 21, 12%), Laura Granville (#61, 15, 20%), Kristina Grigorian (#880, -3, 0%), Anna-Lena Grönefeld (#21, 54, 72%), Zsofia Gubacsi (#212, -11, -5%), Sheila Guerberg (#687, 136, 17%), Carly Gullickson (#199, 199, 50%), Sandy Gumulya (#668, -194, -41%), Natalia Gussoni (#215, -10, -5%), Ji Sun Ha (#1034, -40, -4%), Laura Haberkorn (#843, 288, 25%), Lisa Haegele (#895, 285, 24%), Melanie Hafner (#1241, -533, -75%), Stefanie Haidner (#479, -108, -29%), Natsumi Hamamura (#523, -126, -32%), Florentina Hanisch (#1081, 15, 1%), Daniela Hantuchova (#19, 12, 39%), Hao Jie (#556, -33, -6%), Florence Haring (#235, 113, 32%), Ashley Harkleroad (#117, 7, 6%), Danielle Harmsen (#1008, -28, -3%), Anna Hawkins (#883, -164, -23%), Angela Haynes (#135, -2, -2%),

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 344 Anne-Laure Heitz (#471, -35, -8%), Zuzana Hejdova (#493, -97, -24%), Justine Hénin-Hardenne (#6, 2, 25%), Vanessa Henke (#147, 45, 23%), Fernanda Hermenegildo (#839, -194, -30%), Jaslyn Hewitt (#463, -106, -30%), Emily Hewson (#412, 7, 2%), Shiho Hisamatsu (#193, 31, 14%), Andrea Hlavackova (#341, 102, 23%), Eva-Maria Hoch (#713, -153, -27%), Julia Hodes (#1151, -173, -18%), Andrea Hofinger (#817, 423, 34%), Patricia Holzman (#676, 48, 7%), Jennifer Hopkins (#209, -77, -58%), Zita Horanyi (#932, -10, -1%), Christina Horiatopoulos (#483, 71, 13%), Naoko Horikawa (#918, 3, 0%), Lucie Hradecka (#204, 54, 21%), Eva Hrdinova (#230, 15, 6%), Stanislava Hrozenska (#327, -129, -65%), Su-Wei Hsieh (#154, 272, 64%), Wen-Hsin Hsu (#318, 370, 54%), Huang Lei (#716, -114, -19%), Violette Huck (#481, 99, 17%), Janette Husarova (#334, -121, -57%), Laura-Ramona Husaru (#1127, - 370, -49%), I-Hsuan Hwang (#510, 662, 56%), Kelley Hyndman (#1324, -445, -51%), Yvette Hyndman (#1081, -94, -10%), Alexandra Iacob (#922, 133, 13%), Kumiko Iijima (#373, 200, 35%), Lauren Imre (#1282, -78, -6%), Mami Inoue (#748, 103, 12%), Mari Inoue (#741, 154, 17%), Marissa Irvin (#133, -61, -85%), Mitsuko Ise (#1038, -296, - 40%), Ivanna Israilova (#672, -47, -8%), Ekaterina Ivanova (#480, 162, 25%), Ana Ivanovic (#16, 81, 84%), Claudia Ivone (#618, 84, 12%), Alice Izomor (#1282, -210, -20%), Jamea Jackson (#75, 104, 58%), Karina Jacobsgaard (#724, -127, -21%), Suhaila Jad Gomez (#1060, -321, -43%), Klara Jagosova (#1297, -265, -26%), Dragana Jakovljevic (#1209, 38, 3%), Amanda Janes (#311, -72, -30%), Jelena Jankovic (#22, 6, 21%), Klaudia Jans (#867, - 417, -93%), Sai Jayalakshmy Jayaram (#620, -42, -7%), Mi-Ra Jeon (#459, -292, -175%), Ji Chun-Mei (#847, -56, - 7%), Alina Jidkova (#123, -68, -124%), Ia Jikia (#691, 67, 9%), Lucia Jimenez (#380, 27, 7%), Mathilde Johansson (#164, 235, 59%), Michaela Johansson (#635, 9, 1%), Amanda Johnson (#999, -12, -1%), Sabrina Jolk (#472, -83, - 21%), Beau Jones (#572, 140, 20%), Whitney Jones (#918, -22, -2%), Shilpa Joshi (#705, 499, 41%), Ana Jovanovic (#524, -10, -2%), Karolina Jovanovic (#969, -149, -18%), Betina Jozami (#511, 106, 17%), Mervana Jugic-Salkic (#180, -23, -15%), Yoo-Mi Jung (#586, 246, 30%), Darija Jurak (#296, 28, 9%), Anet Kaasik (#787, 176, 18%), Katarina Kachlikova (#249, 42, 14%), Kaia Kanepi (#120, 106, 47%), Aniko Kapros (#242, -156, -181%), Tatsiana Kapshai (#970, 72, 7%), Veronika Kapshay (#478, 183, 28%), Sesil Karatantcheva (#35, 92, 72%), Alexandra Karavaeva (#831, 400, 32%), Oksana Karyshkova (#356, 114, 24%), Maya Kato (#765, 42, 5%), Shizu Katsumi (#805, -239, -42%), Biffy Kaufman (#686, 193, 22%), Moe Kawatoko (#1324, -487, -58%), Anne Keothavong (#239, -64, -37%), Angelique Kerber (#261, 114, 30%), Natasha Kersten (#655, 233, 26%), Natasha Khan (#869, 310, 26%), Olga Khrapkova (#1352, -237, -21%), Hae-Sung Kim (#776, 378, 33%), Hea-Mi Kim (#536, 313, 37%), Jin-Hee Kim (#280, 17, 6%), Mi-Ok Kim (#653, -186, -40%), So Jung Kim (#320, 7, 2%), Vania King (#202, 623, 76%), Maria Kirilenko (#25, 86, 77%), Jessica Kirkland (#188, 53, 22%), Magdalena Kiszczynska (#490, -6, -1%), Etsuko Kitazaki (#683, 150, 18%), Daniela Kix (#272, 86, 24%), Carmen Klaschka (#580, 85, 13%), Sabine Klaschka (#140, 115, 45%), Sandra Kleinova (#182, -42, -30%), Daniela Klemenschits (#1108, -345, -45%), Sandra Klemenschits (#707, -228, -48%), Andreja Klepac (#298, 114, 28%), Alisa Kleybanova (#244, 120, 33%), Sandra Kloesel (#91, 98, 52%), Karin Knapp (#306, 288, 48%), Beier Ko (#496, -143, -41%), Elizabeth Kobak (#913, 87, 9%), Andrea Koch (#564, 112, 17%), Arpi Kojian (#601, 103, 15%), Natalia Kolat (#733, -20, -3%), Annette Kolb (#402, 213, 35%), Hiroko Komori (#958, -191, -25%), Maria Kondratieva (#275, -37, -16%), Raquel Kops-Jones (#413, 146, 26%), Mariya Koryttseva (#124, 168, 58%), Anna Korzeniak (#530, 515, 49%), Karolina Kosinska (#297, 11, 4%), Jelena Kostanic (#99, -64, -183%), Irina Kotkina (#417, 107, 20%), Klara Koukalova (#36, 10, 22%), Anna Koumantou (#1002, -60, -6%), Ekaterina Kozhokina (#448, 46, 9%), Michaella Krajicek (#58, 371, 86%), Dimana Krastevitch (#343, -15, -5%), Erica Krauth (#357, -73, -26%), Oleksandra Kravets (#1015, -584, -135%), Anne Kremer (#166, - 72, -77%), Lucie Kriegsmannova (#933, 157, 14%), Kavitha Krishnamurthy (#799, -106, -15%), Svetlana Krivencheva (#326, 82, 20%), Danica Krstajic (#292, 160, 35%), Lucija Krzelj (#537, -215, -67%), Renata Kucerkova (#534, -39, -8%), Zuzana Kucova (#285, -58, -26%), Alla Kudryavtseva (#216, 593, 73%), Claudia Kuleszka (#1005, -252, -33%), Yuko Kurata (#1003, 123, 11%), Lubomira Kurhajcova (#245, -156, -175%), Iryna Kuryanovich (#571, -169, -42%), Imke Kusgen (#770, -130, -20%), Darya Kustava (#506, 42, 8%), Rita Kuti-Kis (#231, 5, 2%), Viktoriya Kutuzova (#110, 361, 77%), Irina Kuzmina (#417, 66, 14%), Svetlana Kuznetsova (#18, - 13, -260%), Danielle Kypreos (#1010, 211, 17%), Claire Lablans (#1151, -20, -2%), Emma Laine (#100, 65, 39%), Essi Laine (#1324, -84, -7%), Isha Lakhani (#519, 120, 19%), Po-Kuen Lam (#658, 249, 27%), Johanna Larsson (#491, 692, 58%), Anais Laurendon (#426, 137, 24%), Olga Lazarchuk (#228, -20, -10%), Lenore Lazaroiu (#1220, -354, -41%), Eun-Jeong Lee (#721, -386, -115%), Janet Lee (#685, -380, -125%), Jin-A Lee (#747, -196, -36%), Ye- Ra Lee (#332, 384, 54%), Lindsay Lee-Waters (#136, -54, -66%), Sophie Lefevre (#535, -142, -36%), Nicole Leimbach (#680, -194, -40%), Varvara Lepchenko (#131, 99, 43%), Pascale Leroy (#444, -62, -16%), Marta Lesniak (#681, -182, -36%), Yana Levchenko (#852, 62, 7%), Li Na (#57, 23, 29%), Li Shanshan (#955, 79, 8%), Li Ting (#173, -5, -3%), Kelly Liggan (#287, -20, -7%), Elena Likhovtseva (#17, 7, 29%), Evgenia Linetskaya (#53, 43,

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 345 45%), Andrea Lipovska (#1176, -109, -10%), Sabine Lisicki (#437, 514, 54%), Ivana Lisjak (#126, 237, 65%), Veronika Litvinskaya (#766, -132, -21%), Amber Liu (#1241, -651, -110%), Liu Nannan (#262, -92, -54%), Liu Wanting (#464, 259, 36%), Liu Wei-Juan (#1173, -570, -95%), Nuria Llagostera Vives (#49, 30, 38%), Rebecca Llewellyn (#384, 238, 38%), Emilie Loit (#81, -36, -80%), Marie Jo Lopez Herrera (#961, -469, -95%), Mariana Lopez Terribile (#1031, -5, 0%), Lu Cheng-Jie (#1127, 11, 1%), Nudnida Luangnam (#531, 275, 34%), Francesca Lubiani (#514, -37, -8%), Olivia Lukaszewicz (#558, 282, 34%), Aleksandra Lukic (#944, 128, 12%), Vojislava Lukic (#579, 73, 11%), Tetiana Luzhanska (#435, 160, 27%), Hee Sun Lyoo-Suh (#742, 70, 9%), Oxana Lyubtsova (#276, 308, 53%), Alice Mackenzie (#800, 127, 14%), Caroline Maes (#374, 151, 29%), Ekaterina Makarova (#258, 123, 32%), Magdalena Maleeva (#52, -27, -108%), Tatjana Malek (#284, 268, 49%), Anne Mall (#581, -207, -55%), Sanda Mamic (#158, -57, -56%), Petra Mandula (#277, -196, -242%), Melissa Mang (#1352, -214, -19%), Geeta Manohar (#976, -293, -43%), Paula Marama (#1028, -487, -90%), Krysty Marcio (#391, 138, 26%), Melanie Marois (#1018, -657, -182%), Katalin Marosi (#592, -293, -98%), Marta Marrero (#278, -231, -491%), Conchita Martinez (#32, 10, 24%), Conc Martinez Granados (#114, 38, 25%), Sandra Martinovic (#551, -85, -18%), Sousan Massi (#819, 303, 27%), Simona Matei (#336, -11, -3%), Antonia Matic (#403, -160, -66%), Bethanie Mattek (#171, -5, - 3%), Amélie Mauresmo (#3, -1, -50%), Alexandra Mayrat (#938, 216, 19%), Kelly McCain (#433, -305, -238%), Anabel Medina Garrigues (#34, 5, 13%), Samia Medjahdi (#443, 397, 47%), Leonie Mekel (#669, -68, -11%), Sofia Melikishvili (#339, 164, 33%), Septi Mende (#842, -163, -24%), Sabri Mendez-Dominguez (#815, -46, -6%), Stella Menna (#927, 241, 21%), Marlena Metzinger (#1173, 10, 1%), Yvonne Meusburger (#149, 23, 13%), Matea Mezak (#222, 116, 34%), Michaela Michalkova (#970, -340, -54%), Ana Lucia Migliarini De Leon (#1282, -746, -139%), Flavia Mignola (#429, -35, -9%), Magda Mihalache (#210, 46, 18%), Ani Mijacika (#698, 398, 36%), Marie-Gayana Mikaelian (#233, -89, -62%), Katie Miles (#965, 235, 20%), Mandy Minella (#254, 90, 26%), Melisa Miranda Otarola (#906, 248, 21%), Teodora Mircic (#557, 219, 28%), Sania Mirza (#31, 175, 85%), Katarina Misic (#1203, -517, -75%), Eriko Mizuno (#609, 477, 44%), Alicia Molik (#29, -16, -123%), Florencia Molinero (#625, 262, 30%), Milangela Morales (#754, -369, -96%), Micaela Moran (#599, 127, 17%), Berta Morata-Flaquer (#790, 297, 27%), Akiko Morigami (#48, 20, 29%), Giorgia Mortello (#629, -223, -55%), Bahia Mouhtassine (#453, -280, -162%), Karla Mraz (#525, 600, 53%), Mariana Muci Torres (#826, 149, 15%), Alexandra Mueller (#573, -151, -36%), Martina Müller (#109, 73, 40%), Nina Munch-Soegaard (#824, 291, 26%), Daniela Munoz Gallegos (#414, 90, 18%), Matild Munoz Gonzalves (#354, 103, 23%), Trudi Musgrave (#520, -102, -24%), Susanna Mussi (#740, 242, 25%), Anastasia Myskina (#14, -11, -367%), Sandhya Nagaraj (#901, 56, 6%), Kyra Nagy (#161, 33, 17%), Henrieta Nagyova (#163, -9, -6%), Aiko Nakamura (#71, 52, 42%), Junri Namigata (#246, 273, 53%), Gabriela Navratilova (#751, -317, -73%), Lenka Nemeckova (#217, -69, -47%), Virag Nemeth (#349, -208, -148%), Jessica Nguyen (#550, -126, -30%), Kim Anh Nguyen (#650, 118, 15%), Gabriela Niculescu (#395, 149, 27%), Monica Niculescu (#268, 162, 38%), Sylwia Niedbalo (#1187, -235, -25%), Liudmila Nikoyan (#1321, -316, -31%), Dominika Nociarova (#241, -13, -6%), Ana Nogueira (#778, -331, -74%), Hanna Nooni (#195, -17, -10%), Seda Noorlander (#313, -4, - 1%), Irena Nossenko (#856, -123, -17%), Petra Novotnikova (#657, -197, -43%), Karen Nugent (#1352, -807, - 148%), Saori Obata (#108, -1, -1%), Tina Obrez (#540, 336, 38%), Katie O’Brien (#263, 138, 34%), Tzipora Obziler (#134, -25, -23%), Jane O’Donoghue (#250, -19, -8%), Ayumi Oka (#697, 323, 32%), Seiko Okamoto (#183, 93, 34%), Hiromi Okazaki (#1190, -260, -28%), Raluca Olaru (#509, 257, 34%), Zuzana Ondraskova (#78, 65, 45%), Kaori Onishi (#899, -99, -12%), Romina Oprandi (#240, 238, 50%), Alexandra Orasanu (#602, 242, 29%), Natalia Orlova (#972, -36, -4%), Diana Ospina (#321, 21, 6%), Lilia Osterloh (#143, -23, -19%), Tanja Ostertag (#641, 121, 16%), Nadejda Ostrovskaya (#350, -61, -21%), Maika Ozaki (#833, -328, -65%), Nika Ozegovic (#206, 63, 23%), Pemra Ozgen (#566, 349, 38%), Alexandra Panova (#693, 279, 29%), Olga Panova (#405, 176, 30%), Tatiana Panova (#89, -11, -14%), Nathalia Papadopoulou (#1255, -55, -5%), Pauline Parmentier (#207, 54, 21%), Arantxa Parra Santonja (#107, -37, -53%), Lourdes Pascual Rodriguez (#1045, -490, -88%), Michaela Pastikova (#138, -32, -30%), Karishma Patel (#1029, -89, -9%), Karen Paterson (#408, 40, 9%), Martina Pavelec (#633, 64, 9%), Nadja Pavic (#345, 9, 3%), Biljana Pavlova (#682, 250, 27%), Shahar Peer (#45, 138, 75%), Marie-Eve Pelletier (#144, 3, 2%), Peng Shuai (#37, 36, 49%), Maria Penkova (#486, -23, -5%), Flavia Pennetta (#23, 15, 39%), Eva Pera (#665, 395, 37%), Tatiana Perebiynis (#214, -124, -138%), Teliana Pereira (#884, 52, 6%), Anda Perianu (#220, 415, 65%), Korina Perkovic (#507, 287, 36%), Shenay Perry (#112, -43, -62%), Vittoria Perugini (#1060, -22, -2%), Stefania Pesce (#1117, -329, -42%), Kveta Peschke (#26, 90, 78%), Jewel Peterson (#368, -134, -57%), Claire Peterzan (#462, 76, 14%), Andrea Petkovic (#338, 78, 19%), Nadia Petrova (#9, 3, 25%), Sonal Phadke (#955, -256, -37%), Virginie Pichet (#236, -91, -63%), Lara Picone (#725, 123, 15%), Frederica Piedade (#184, 36, 16%), Mary Pierce (#5, 24, 83%), Alicia Pillay (#621, 232, 27%), Camille Pin (#113, -15, -15%), Kate Pinchbeck (#1294, -720, -125%), Erika

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 346 Pineider (#892, 73, 8%), Carmen Pinto (#1362, -197, -17%), Tszvetana Pironkova (#88, 207, 70%), Tina Pisnik (#498, -368, -283%), Gloria Pizzichini (#630, -24, -4%), Barbara Pocza (#667, -223, -50%), Kateryna Polunina (#873, 72, 8%), Alexandra Popa (#1321, -374, -39%), Lana Popadic (#612, -413, -208%), Andrea Popovic (#583, 151, 21%), Laura Pous Tio (#82, 73, 47%), Tatiana Poutchek (#168, 64, 28%), Olga Poutchkova (#197, 76, 28%), Wynne Prakusya (#279, 60, 18%), Nicole Pratt (#127, -76, -149%), Tatjana Priachin (#360, 160, 31%), Libuse Prusova (#172, 16, 9%), Eleonora Punzo (#654, 415, 39%), Federica Quercia (#689, 122, 15%), Sarah Raab (#438, 351, 44%), Agnieszka Radwanska (#381, 560, 60%), Veronika Raimrova (#565, 211, 27%), Chirashanthi Rajur (#1297, -196, -18%), Petra Rampre (#518, -150, -41%), Dally Randriantefy (#68, -6, -10%), Sunitha Rao (#191, -1, -1%), Lisa Raymond (#76, -46, -153%), Virginie Razzano (#51, 9, 15%), Alexandra Recio (#1041, -269, -35%), Punam Reddy (#608, -36, -6%), Samantha Reeves (#652, -449, -221%), Irene Rehberger-Bescos (#690, 213, 24%), Nicole Remis (#794, -444, -127%), Andrea Remynse (#787, -210, -36%), Ren Jing (#736, 264, 26%), Anastasia Revzina (#1257, -386, -44%), Arav Rezai Bidakhavidi (#189, 308, 62%), Holly Richards (#1171, 12, 1%), Claire Ricketts (#879, -94, -12%), Sarah Riske (#424, -19, -5%), Laura Ritchey (#714, -5, -1%), Birgit Ritschka (#1264, - 336, -36%), Veronica Rizhik (#835, -2, 0%), Stephanie Rizzi (#807, -343, -74%), Shannon Robinson (#1291, -87, - 7%), Laura Rocchi (#915, -328, -56%), Evgeniya Rodina (#323, 815, 72%), Anastassia Rodionova (#167, 48, 22%), Angelika Roesch (#352, -117, -50%), Nuria Roig (#460, -160, -53%), Ahsha Rolle (#175, 194, 53%), Tiya Rolle (#642, 266, 29%), Geraldine Roma (#872, -13, -2%), Nadja Roma (#967, 105, 10%), Alicja Rosolska (#769, 140, 15%), Capucine Rousseau (#485, -366, -308%), Virginia Ruano Pascual (#106, -42, -66%), Chanda Rubin (#546, - 493, -930%), Petra Russegger (#508, -80, -19%), Nancy Rustignoli (#818, 197, 19%), Margit Ruutel (#340, -21, - 7%), Magdalena Rybarikova (#302, 622, 67%), Katia Sabate (#1037, -213, -26%), Miho Saeki (#208, 38, 15%), Lucie Safarova (#50, 135, 73%), Dinara Safina (#20, 24, 55%), Misae Sakai (#1291, -180, -16%), Joanna Sakowicz (#282, -8, -3%), Ana Salas Lozano (#561, 192, 25%), Ma. Emilia Salerni (#148, -34, -30%), Nadezda Samoylo (#1143, -111, -11%), Maria Sanchez Lorenzo (#83, -31, -60%), Mara Santangelo (#85, 6, 7%), Valentina Sassi (#288, -5, -2%), Olga Savchuk (#162, 117, 42%), Yevgenia Savransky (#227, 139, 38%), Andra Savu (#767, 334, 30%), Wukirasih Sawondari (#1241, -199, -19%), Claudine Schaul (#165, -104, -170%), Chanelle Scheepers (#234, -24, - 11%), Francesca Schiavone (#13, 6, 32%), Tina Schiechtl (#267, 198, 43%), Karin Schlapbach (#1050, -228, -28%), Kristen Schlukebir (#446, -197, -79%), Kelly Schmandt (#1005, -35, -4%), Jennifer Schmidt (#829, -404, -95%), Caroline Schneider (#796, 46, 5%), Monika Schneider (#1076, -469, -77%), Patty Schnyder (#7, 7, 50%), Julia Schruff (#80, 25, 24%), Darina Sedenkova (#430, 600, 58%), Vivian Segnini (#827, 377, 31%), Nicole Seitenbecher (#549, 66, 11%), Beti Sekulovski (#364, 321, 47%), Erika Sema (#666, 239, 26%), Yurika Sema (#304, 281, 48%), Soon-Mi Seo (#988, -297, -43%), Milagros Sequera (#150, -8, -6%), Anamaria Sere (#637, 234, 27%), Chrissie Seredni (#675, 137, 17%), Magui Serna (#378, -276, -271%), Adriana Serra Zanetti (#257, -3, -1%), Antonella Serra Zanetti (#64, 35, 35%), Delia Sescioreanu (#400, -254, -174%), Meta Sevsek (#940, -49, -5%), Selima Sfar (#170, - 53, -45%), Marina Shamayko (#632, -65, -11%), Manana Shapakidze (#851, 353, 29%), Sophia Shapatava (#1019, 82, 7%), Maria Sharapova (#4, 0, 0%), Meghann Shaughnessy (#66, -26, -65%), Jung-Yoon Shin (#993, 87, 8%), Lauren Shumate (#964, 58, 6%), Yaroslava Shvedova (#315, 441, 58%), Laura Siegemund (#353, 494, 58%), Andrea Sieveke (#501, 171, 25%), Malgorzata Silka (#1297, -159, -14%), Neuza Silva (#468, -47, -11%), Marta Simic (#1176, -164, -16%), Katarzyna Siwosz (#775, 223, 22%), Lioudmila Skavronskaia (#177, -28, -19%), Kaysie Smashey (#615, -153, -33%), Anna Smashnova (#43, -11, -34%), Linda Smolenakova (#745, -196, -36%), Tara Snyder (#316, -93, -42%), Michelle Snyman (#1050, -386, -58%), Leticia Sobral (#317, 94, 23%), Ivana Sokac (#1102, -91, -9%), Silvia Soler-Espinos (#484, 205, 30%), Sheila Solsona Carcasona (#1293, -93, -8%), Song Shan- Shan (#515, 337, 40%), Aneta Soukup (#896, -222, -33%), Melanie South (#449, 4, 1%), Danielle Spacek (#977, 88, 8%), Abigail Spears (#156, -64, -70%), Veronica Spiegel (#451, 66, 13%), Karolina Sprem (#65, -47, -261%), Katarina Srebotnik (#28, 59, 68%), Aleksandra Srndovic (#432, 191, 31%), Hana Sromova (#98, 127, 56%), Lina Stanciute (#237, 40, 14%), Emily Stellato (#410, -45, -12%), Alexandra Stevenson (#645, -363, -129%), Bryanne Stewart (#908, -423, -87%), Elena Stoianova (#1044, -216, -26%), Dijana Stojic (#780, -166, -27%), Samantha Stosur (#46, 19, 29%), Barbora Strycova (#142, -86, -154%), Paola Suárez (#232, -216, -1350%), Carla Suárez Navarro (#358, 255, 42%), Martina Sucha (#90, -33, -58%), Tomoko Sugano (#590, 631, 52%), Ai Sugiyama (#30, -13, -76%), Valentina Sulpizio (#347, 163, 32%), Sun Shengnan (#330, 258, 44%), Sun Tiantian (#104, 14, 12%), Piia Suomalainen (#1008, -72, -8%), Agnes Szatmari (#545, 198, 27%), Agnes Szavay (#181, 197, 52%), Adriana Szili (#635, -89, -16%), Keiko Taguchi (#494, 196, 28%), Tomoko Taira (#978, -162, -20%), Tomoyo Takagishi (#475, -38, -9%), Erika Takao (#319, 357, 53%), Ayami Takase (#348, -86, -33%), Minori Takemoto (#1274, -354, -38%), Silvija Talaja (#200, -87, -77%), Elise Tamaela (#186, -26, -16%), Sarah Tami Masi (#1241, -236, -23%),

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 347 Mari Tanaka (#407, 591, 59%), Shiho Tanaka (#1097, -294, -37%), Tamarine Tanasugarn (#132, -66, -100%), Montinee Tangphong (#335, 12, 3%), Elena Tatarkova (#532, -272, -105%), Sarah Taylor (#456, 100, 18%), Elena Tchalova (#411, 435, 51%), Oksana Teplyakova (#455, 41, 8%), Valerie Tetreault (#936, 202, 18%), Remi Tezuka (#442, -29, -7%), Elizabeth Thomas (#925, 60, 6%), Pichittra Thongdach (#715, 194, 21%), Carmen Raluca Tibuleac (#909, -195, -27%), Timna Ticic (#782, 80, 9%), Carla Tiene (#544, -214, -65%), Ana Timotic (#247, 59, 19%), Lisa Tognetti (#663, -195, -42%), Napaporn Tongsalee (#252, 46, 15%), Dessislava Topalova (#614, -372, -154%), Melissa Torres Sandoval (#436, -32, -8%), Antonia Xenia Tout (#516, 667, 56%), Emilie Trouche (#722, -65, -10%), Aleke Tsoubanos (#526, 247, 32%), Meilen Tu (#119, 42, 26%), Jennifer Tuchband (#477, 142, 23%), Lenka Tvaroskova (#439, -188, -75%), Story Tweedie-Yates (#517, 213, 29%), Neha Uberoi (#303, 9, 3%), Shikha Uberoi (#141, 30, 18%), Yuko Uchida (#1142, -29, -3%), Vladimira Uhlirova (#791, -163, -26%), Nana Urotadze (#839, 176, 17%), Tatsiana Uvarova (#243, 91, 27%), Nicole Vaidisova (#15, 62, 81%), Roxane Vaisemberg (#773, 48, 6%), Megha Vakharia (#585, -46, -9%), Julia Vakulenko (#185, -56, -43%), Zuzana Valicekova (#1236, -212, -21%), Eva Valkova (#1065, -15, -1%), Victoria Valls-Comamala (#1211, -39, -3%), Laura Vallverdu-Zaira (#578, 509, 47%), Dominique Van Boekel (#662, -70, -12%), Tessy Van De Ven (#502, -179, -55%), Alana Van Dervort (#628, 229, 27%), Andreea Vanc (#644, -162, -34%), Eveline Vanhyfte (#600, -227, -61%), Charlene Vanneste (#596, 150, 20%), Cora Vasilescu (#1084, -50, -5%), Alena Vaskova (#454, 283, 38%), Nadejda Vassileva (#870, -7, -1%), Aurelie Vedy (#361, -12, -3%), Gabriel Velasco Andreu (#461, -69, -18%), Archana Venkataraman (#834, -205, - 33%), Maria Vento-Kabchi (#63, -14, -29%), Verdiana Verardi (#387, 428, 53%), Nadege Vergos (#605, 222, 27%), Ana Veselinovic (#875, 279, 24%), Elena Vesnina (#111, 175, 61%), Tereza Veverkova (#845, -478, -130%), Elena Vianello (#1264, -577, -84%), Nathalie Vierin (#139, 25, 15%), Varanya Vijuksanaboon (#1080, 124, 10%), Elisa Villa (#458, -3, -1%), Lorena Villalobos (#677, 392, 37%), Roberta Vinci (#41, 74, 64%), Suchanan Viratprasert (#179, 42, 19%), Thassha Vitayaviroj (#499, 34, 6%), Michaela Vogel (#1199, -330, -38%), Sandra Volk (#607, 3, 0%), Renata Voracova (#281, 288, 51%), Julia Vorobeva (#285, 252, 47%), Galina Voskoboeva (#118, 19, 14%), Dalia-Diana Vranceanu (#505, 194, 28%), Ana Vrljic (#309, 23, 7%), Rita Vukov (#938, -263, -39%), Astrid Waernes (#503, -52, -12%), Mashona Washington (#74, -24, -48%), Cindy Watson (#371, -84, -29%), Emily Webley-Smith (#385, -113, -42%), Svenja Weidemann (#873, 139, 14%), Marielle Weihs (#1001, -220, -28%), Marlene Weingärtner (#379, -308, -434%), Stefanie Weis (#1170, -712, -155%), Tiffany Welford (#399, -4, -1%), Vanessa Wellauer (#598, 53, 8%), Christina Wheeler (#324, -22, -7%), Jenifer Widjaja (#310, 81, 21%), Gaelle Widmer (#406, -116, -40%), Tara Wigan (#1004, -217, -28%), Serena Williams (#11, -4, -57%), Venus Williams (#10, -1, -11%), Sabrina Wist (#1098, -189, -21%), Jasmin Woehr (#727, -247, -51%), Kathrin Woerle (#176, 42, 19%), Maria Wolfbrandt (#1124, -843, -300%), Kirsty Woolley (#822, 186, 18%), Aleksandra Wozniak (#190, 301, 61%), Georgette Wright (#887, -6, -1%), Wu Wen-Hao (#624, 60, 9%), Xie Yanze (#325, -75, -30%), Yukiko Yabe (#1143, -567, -98%), Anastasiya Yakimova (#101, 76, 43%), Mayumi Yamamoto (#375, -57, -18%), Yan Zi (#103, 145, 58%), Yang Shu-Jing (#744, -269, -57%), Anne Yelsey (#1041, -289, -38%), Akiko Yonemura (#377, 72, 16%), Tomoko Yonemura (#337, 6, 2%), Soo Mi Yoo (#855, -285, -50%), Yuka Yoshida (#266, -107, -67%), Yu Dan (#718, -24, -3%), Yu Ying (#878, -287, -49%), Yuan Meng (#152, 235, 61%), Paula Zabala (#504, 213, 30%), Sandra Zahlavova (#205, 175, 46%), Zuzana Zalabska (#659, -18, -3%), Riza Zalameda (#858, 257, 23%), Erika Zanchetta (#836, 292, 26%), Dragana Zaric (#593, -120, -25%), Masa Zec Peskiric (#312, 186, 37%), Jie Zeng (#1098, -111, - 11%), Zhang Yan (#1065, -315, -42%), Zhao Jia (#858, 142, 14%), Zhao Yijing (#694, -38, -6%), Zheng Jie (#44, 23, 34%), Zhou Jing (#1108, 43, 4%), Katarina Zoricic (#1162, -415, -56%), Ana-Maria Zubori (#813, 91, 10%), Hilda Zuleta Cabrera (#664, 91, 12%), Fabiola Zuluaga (#84, -61, -265%), Vera Zvonareva (#42, -31, -282%)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Page 348 Index A Bachmann, Angelika 261, 273 Benesova/Stewart 198 Bahia 266, 267 Benesova/Strycova 198 Acapulco 29, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, Baker/Lubiani 246 Benesova/Talaja 198 217, 233, 249 Balestrat, Dianne 327, 329 Benesova/Tu 198 Adams, Katrina 333 Balestrat/Gourlay 308 Benesova/Voskoboeva 198 Albuquerque $75K 42, 217 Bali 19, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 182, Bergamo $50K 42, 217 Alves/Rolle 261 191, 217, 241, 259 Berlin 23, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, 155, Amanmuradova, Akgul 243, 273 Bammer, Sybille 13, 42, 244 165, 166, 185, 196, 222, 236, 252, Amelia Island 19, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, Bangkok 36, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 154, 156, 165, 166, 222, 235, 251, 179, 181, 217, 243 Bes, Eva 273 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 Barcelona 268 Beygelzimer, Yulia 42, 220 Andres, Rosa Maria 220 Barcelona $75K+H 43, 217 see also Benesova/Beygelzimer Andres/Vanc 217, 218, 237 Barker, Sue 307, 327, 329 Beygelzimer/Husarova 198 Ani, Maret 42, 43, 242 Barna, Anca 273 Beygelzimer/Jugic-Salkic 217, 218, Ani/Gagliardi 197 Bartoli, Marion 9, 11, 13, 17, 44, 101, 238 Antwerp 27, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 156, 108, 110, 120, 126, 131, 136, 160, Beygelzimer/Kloesel 217 165, 166, 180, 181, 222, 233, 248, 170, 177, 178, 179, 220, 231, 232, Beygelzimer/Loit 198, 231 264, 265, 266, 267 233, 234, 237, 238, 239, 242, 244, Beygelzimer/McCain 217 Antypina/Poutchek 217 246, 256, 273 Beygelzimer/Santangelo 217 Appelmans, Sabine 267, 273 Bartoli/Farina Elia 197 Beygelzmer/Kloesel 217 Arai/Kim 217 Bartoli/Grönefeld 197, 217, 218, 232, Biella $50K+H 42, 217 Argeri/Sobral 217 247 Birmingham 33, 41, 44, 148, 150, 154, Arvidsson, Sofia 13, 243, 244, 273 Bartoli/Pierce 197, 239 157, 183, 217, 237, 254 Asagoe, Shinobu 9, 11, 13, 16, 44, 48, Bartoli/Pratt 197 Birnerova, Eva 237, 243 101, 110, 120, 126, 131, 136, 160, Bartoli/Salerni 197 Birnerova/Vanc 232, 237, 247 174, 175, 177, 178, 179, 220, 231, Bartoli/Sequera 197, 238 Black, Cara 169, 174, 175, 177, 178, 232, 234, 235, 237, 238, 239, 240, Bartoli/Tanasugarn 197, 254 180, 214, 216, 220, 224, 225, 228, 242, 243, 246, 248, 249, 251, 254, Bartoli/Washington 197 238, 245, 247, 265, 272, 273, 325, 256, 257, 258, 259, 273 Batumi $50K 42, 217 333 Asagoe/Camerin 197 Bedanova 249, 250, 273 Black/Callens 198, 218, 222, 233 Asagoe/Dulko 197, 217, 218, 243 Beigbeder, Celine 273 Black/Huber 198, 218, 222, 227, 232, Asagoe/Garbin 197 Beijing 24, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 156, 233, 235, 236, 237, 238, 247, 254, Asagoe/Jankovic 197 165, 166, 195, 222, 242, 259, 264, 255, 308 Asagoe/Lee 197 265, 266 Black/Stubbs 198, 212, 213, 218, 222, Asagoe/Marrero 197 Beijing $50K I 42, 196, 217 227, 239, 240, 241, 243, 244, 257, Asagoe/Peer 197, 256 Beijing $50K II 42, 217 258, 260, 261, 262, 308 Asagoe/Srebotnik 197, 217, 218, 231, Beltrame, Severine 42, 234 Blahotova, Olga 43 235, 237, 244, 246, 258, 261 Beltrame, Severine — See Severine Boca Raton 269 Asagoe/Vento-Kabchi 197 (Beltrame) Bremond see also Delray Beach Ashland $50K 42, 217 Bendigo $50K 42, 217 Bogota 29, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 182, Ashley/Frazier 217 Benesova, Iveta 13, 44, 169, 177, 178, 217, 233, 249 Ashley/Gullickson 217 180, 216, 220, 231, 232, 234, 235, Bohmova, Katerina 43 Atlanta 270 239, 241, 248, 273 Bonaventure — see Fort Lauderdale Auckland 35, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, Benesova/Beygelzimer 197 Bondarenko, Alona 13, 42, 232, 238, 179, 191, 217, 231, 246 Benesova/Jidkova 197 241, 243, 248, 250, 252, 259, 273 Austin, Tracy 307, 317, 322, 327, 329, Benesova/Kachlikova 197 Bondarenko, Kateriyna 240 331, 332 Benesova/Kostanic 197 Bondarenko/Gagliardi 198 Australian Open 37, 39, 40, 44, 147, Benesova/Krizan 197 Bonicelli/Chanfreau Lovera 308 150, 154, 165, 166, 184, 186, 222, Benesova/Llagostera Vives 197 Boogert, Kristie 273 232, 246, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, Benesova/Nagyova 197 Bordeaux $75K 42, 217 269, 270 Benesova/Pastikova 197 Boshoff/Kloss 308 Azarenka, Victoria 42, 68, 242, 259, Benesova/Peschke 164, 198, 218, 222, Boston 270 273 232, 235 Bovina, Elena 6, 9, 11, 13, 17, 73, 101, B Benesova/Safina 198 110, 120, 126, 130, 131, 136, 160, Benesova/Serra Zanetti, Antonella 167, 170, 180, 233, 234, 235, 236, 273 Bacheva, Lubomira 198 249, 252, 253, 266, 273

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Bovina/Déchy 198 Castellvi, Vilmarie 42 Court/Goolagong Cawley 308 Bovina/Dementieva 198 Castellvi/Reeves 217 Court/Tegart Dalton 308 Brandi, Kristina 43, 231, 238, 273 Cervanova, Ludmila 233, 249, 274 Court/Wade 308 Breadmore, Lauren 169 Chakvetadze, Anna 9, 11, 12, 18, 101, Courtois, Laurence 274 Bremond, Severine (Beltrame) 242 110, 120, 126, 131, 136, 160, 170, Craybas, Jill 13, 55, 234, 238, 242, Brighton 268, 269, 270 233, 234, 237, 239, 241, 244, 253, 243, 248, 250, 255, 259, 274 Brisbane 269, 270 254, 256, 258, 259, 260, 274 Craybas/Morariu 199 Bronx $50K 42, 184, 194, 217 Chaloner/Evers 308 Cuneo $50K+H 42, 217 Budapest 34, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, Chan, Yung-Jan 42, 221 Curran/Grandin 217 185, 191, 217, 239 Chan/Chuang 217, 218, 242 Czink, Melinda 42, 159, 231, 242, Bueno/Court 308 Chanfreau Lovera, Gail (Sheriff) 246, 248, 274 Bunge, Bettina 327, 329 see Bonicelli/Chanfreau Lovera Busan $50K 43, 217 Chanfreau/Durr 308 D Bychkova, Ekaterina 13, 42, 44, 241, Charleston 23, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, Dallas 269, 270 243, 258, 273 155, 165, 166, 186, 190, 222, 235, Daniilidou, Eleni 13, 178, 231, 237, 251, 264, 265, 266, 267 238, 240, 242, 243, 246, 250, 255, C Charlottesville $50K 42, 217 257, 260, 274 Cagnes sur Mer $75K 42, 217 Chase Championships 264, 265, 266, see also Callens/Daniilidou Callens, Els 177, 181, 220, 261, 273 267, 268 Daniilidou/Gullickson 235 see also Black/Callens Chi, Jane 274 Daniilidou/Kuznetsova 199 Callens/Ant. Serra Zanetti 198 Chicago 267, 268, 269, 270 Daniilidou/Pratt 199 Callens/Clijsters 198 Chladkova, Denisa 238, 274 Daniilidou/Russell 237, 254 Callens/Daniilidou 198 Chladkova/Gagliardi 199 Daniilidou/Tanasugarn 199 Callens/Gagliardi 198 Cho, Yoon Jeong 13, 42, 241, 258, Date, Kimiko 267, 268, 327, 329 Callens/Krizan 198 274 Davenport, Lindsay 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, Callens/McShea 198 Chuang, Chia-Jung 221 12, 19, 39, 40, 41, 44, 47, 48, 50, 51, Callens/Santangelo 198 see also Chan/Chuang 53, 54, 55, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, Callens/Stewart 198 Chuang/Fujiwara 232, 247 66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 77, 79, Callens/Tu 198 Cincinnati 33, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 98, Camerin, Maria Elena 157, 178, 220, 217, 239, 255, 269 101, 109, 110, 113, 115, 116, 117, 231, 236, 241, 243, 273 Clijsters, Kim 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 18, 118, 120, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, see also Asagoe/Camerin 39, 40, 41, 44, 47, 50, 51, 53, 54, 55, 129, 130, 131, 133, 135, 136, 138, Camerin/Gagliardi 198, 217, 218, 242 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 69, 139, 140, 141, 147, 150, 152, 153, Camerin/Garbin 236 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 154, 156, 160, 165, 166, 167, 169, Camerin/Loit 198, 217, 218, 243 83, 84, 85, 87, 98, 101, 109, 110, 170, 177, 178, 181, 228, 231, 232, Camerin/Vento-Kabchi 198 113, 115, 116, 117, 118, 120, 123, 233, 234, 235, 237, 238, 239, 241, Canadian Open 18, 39, 40, 44, 147, 124, 125, 126, 131, 133, 135, 136, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 150, 155, 159, 165, 166, 182, 187, 138, 141, 144, 147, 150, 152, 153, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 222, 240, 257, 264, 265, 266, 267, 160, 165, 167, 169, 170, 181, 233, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 268, 269, 270 234, 235, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 264, 266, 267, 268, 272, 275, 286, Canberra 23, 41, 44, 148, 151, 158, 243, 244, 245, 248, 249, 250, 251, 295, 307, 317, 321, 322, 323, 325, 217, 231, 246 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 327, 329, 331, 332 Capriati, Jennifer 6, 7, 9, 11, 17, 160, 260, 261, 262, 264, 266, 267, 272, Davenport/M. J. Fernandez 308 167, 170, 264, 266, 267, 268, 272, 274, 286, 294, 307, 321, 322, 323, Davenport/Morariu 199, 227, 238, 273, 285, 307, 317, 327, 329, 332, 325, 327, 329, 338 247, 248, 308 340 see also Callens/Clijsters Davenport/Novotna 308 Cargill/Snyder 217 Clijsters/Sugiyama 308, 325 de Lone, Erica 275 Casals, Rosie 310, 317, 327, 329 Coetzer 267, 268, 274, 327, 329 de los Rios, Rossana 275 Casals/King 308 Cohen-Aloro, Stephanie 159, 232, Deauville $50K 30, 42, 217 Casals/Tegart Dalton 308 234, 250, 274 Dechaume-Balleret, Alexia 275 Casals/Turnbull 308 Cohen-Aloro/Husarova 199 Casanova, Myriam 169, 273, 340 Cohen-Aloro/Pratt 199 Casoni, Guilia 220 Cohen-Aloro/Sfar 217, 238, 255 Casoni/Koryttseva 217, 218, 239 College Park $50K 42, 217 Casoni/Lubiani 217 Court, Margaret 307, 310, 315, 316, Castaño, Catalina 13, 234, 239, 242, 317, 322, 327, 329, 335 250, 274 see also Bueno/Court

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Déchy, Nathalie 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 19, 44, Dominguez Lino, Lourdes 13, 42, Evers, Dianne 50, 51, 55, 63, 68, 71, 83, 101, 110, 233, 249, 275 see also Chaloner/Evers 120, 126, 131, 136, 153, 160, 170, Dominguez Lino/Llagostera Vives Evert, Chris 269, 270, 307, 315, 317, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 237, 253 322, 327, 329, 331, 332 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 246, Dominguez Lino/Medina Garrigues Evert/Morozova 308 247, 250, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, 199, 235 Evert/Navratilova 308 260, 261, 275 Dominguez Lino/Sanchez Lorenzo see also Bovina/Déchy 217 F Déchy/Husarova 199 Dothan $75K 42, 217 Fairbank/Harford 308 Déchy/Loit 199 Douchevina, Vera Fairbank/Reynolds 308 Déchy/Martinez 199 See Vera Dushevina Fano $75K 42, 217 Déchy/Mauresmo 241 Dragomir Ilie, Ruxandra 275 Farina Elia, Silvia 6, 9, 11, 21, 83, Déchy/Navratilova 199 Dragomir Ilie/Schnyder 199 102, 110, 120, 126, 131, 136, 161, Déchy/Schnyder 199 Dragomir Ilie/Tanasugarn 199 171, 231, 233, 235, 237, 239, 241, Dekmeijere/Dhenin 217 Drake, Maureen 42, 275 242, 244, 246, 248, 249, 251, 255, Dekmeijere/Miyagi 217 Drake/Henke 164 259, 261, 276, 340 Dekmiejere/Uhlirova 217 Dubai 19, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, 156, see also Bartoli/Farina Elia Dell’Acqua/Musgrave 217 165, 166, 190, 193, 222, 233, 249, Farina Elia/Vinci 199 Delray Beach 268 264, 265, 266, 267 Farina Elia/Zvonareva 199 Dementieva, Elena 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, Dubois, Stephanie 42 Fedak, Yuliana 231, 257, 276 20, 50, 51, 63, 70, 83, 102, 110, 113, Dulko, Gisela 5, 9, 11, 12, 20, 44, 83, Fendick/M. J. Fernandez 308 120, 125, 126, 131, 136, 153, 160, 102, 110, 120, 126, 131, 136, 161, Fernandez, Clarisa 233, 276 167, 170, 174, 175, 177, 178, 181, 171, 174, 177, 178, 181, 220, 231, Fernandez, Gigi 296, 311, 315, 316, 221, 228, 229, 231, 232, 234, 235, 232, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 240, 317, 324, 333, 335 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 243, 241, 242, 243, 246, 249, 252, 254, Fernandez/Navratilova 308 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 250, 252, 257, 258, 276 Fernandez/White 308 253, 256, 257, 258, 260, 261, 262, see also Asagoe/Dulko Fernandez/Zvereva 308, 315, 324 264, 266, 275, 327, 329 see also Diaz-Oliva/Dulko Fernandez, Mary Joe 267, 268, 269, see also Bovina/Dementieva Dulko/Kirilenko 199, 217, 218, 241, 276, 327, 329, 332 Dementieva/Golovin 199 243 see also Davenport/Fernandez Dementieva/Krajicek 199 Dulko/Peschke 199, 218, 222, 244, see also Fendick/Fernandez Dementieva/Pennetta 199, 212, 218, 261 Filderstadt 19, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, 222, 227, 240, 241, 243, 244, 257, Dulko/Safina 199 156, 165, 166, 183, 187, 222, 243, 259, 260 Dulko/Spears 199 260, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, Dementieva/Sugiyama 199, 212, 227, Dulko/Vento-Kabchi 199, 236, 237 270 232, 246, 247 Durie, Jo 270, 327, 329 Flipkens, Kirsten 244, 261, 276 Denain $75K 42, 217 Durr, Françoise 310, 317, 322, 335 Forest Hills 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 241 Detroit 270 see also Chanfreau/Durr 308 Foretz, Stephanie 42 Dhenin, Caroline Durr/Hard 308 Fort Lauderdale 270 see also Dekmeijere/Dhenin Durr/A. Jones 308 Frazier, Amy 9, 11, 13, 21, 41, 43, 44, Dhenin/Vanc 236 Durr/Stove 308 48, 102, 108, 109, 110, 120, 126, Dhenin/Washington 164 Dushevina, Vera 13, 164, 232, 235, 131, 136, 138, 148, 152, 161, 231, Diaz-Oliva, Mariana 13, 44, 232, 234, 237, 238, 240, 241, 244, 248, 254, 232, 233, 234, 235, 237, 238, 244, 240, 242, 249, 259, 275 260, 275 246, 250, 253, 256, 261, 268, 276 Diaz-Oliva/Dulko 199 Dushevina/Safina 199 see also Ashley/Frazier Dinan $75K 42, 217 Dziamidzenka/Perianu 217 French Open Ditty/Sequera 217 see Roland Garros Doha 33, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, 156, E Fujiwara, Rika 234, 259 165, 166, 186, 222, 233, 249, 264, Eastbourne 18, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, Fujiwara/Obata 217 265, 266 156, 165, 166, 189, 193, 222, 238, Fujiwara/Tanasugarn 200 Dokic, Jelena 20, 102, 108, 110, 120, 254, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, Fukuoka $50K 42, 217 126, 131, 136, 159, 161, 169, 171, 270 Fusano/Kops-Jones 217 248, 252, 266, 267, 275, 286, 325, Ericsson 268, 269 327, 329 see also Miami G Domachowska, Marta 13, 44, 231, Essen 267, 268 Gabba, Giulia 42 235, 237, 239, 255, 259, 275 Estoril 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 184, Gadusek, Bonnie 270 Domachowska/Kirilenko 199, 256 194, 217, 235, 252

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Gagliardi, Emmanuelle 175, 177, 182, Graf, Steffi 62, 267, 268, 269, 270, Hantuchova/Schiavone 200, 233, 249 216, 220, 243, 276 276, 287, 307, 315, 317, 321, 322, Hantuchova/Schnyder 200 see also Ani/Gagliardi 323, 327, 329, 331, 332 Hantuchova/Sugiyama 200, 217, 218, see also Bondarenko/Gagliardi Graf/Sabatini 308 227, 236, 237, 239, 241, 244, 255, see also Callens/Gagliardi Grahame, Amanda 276 257 see also Camerin/Gagliardi Grande, Rita 276, 338 Hao/Sun 200 see also Chladkova/Gagliardi Grande/Stewart 200 Harford, Tanya Gagliardi/Jankovic 200, 234 Grande/Tanasugarn 200 see also Fairbank/Harford Gagliardi/Kostanic 200 Grandin, Natalie 42 Harkleroad, Ashley 42, 164, 276 Gagliardi/Loit 200 see also Curran/Grandin Harkleroad/Lee-Waters 217 Gagliardi/Marrero 200 Grandin/Smashey 217 Harris, Kerry Gagliardi/Pisnik 200, 217, 218, 233 Granville, Laura 13, 42, 221, 237, see also Gourlay/Harris Gagliardi/Salerni 200 241, 254, 255, 276 Hartford 270 Gagliardi/Senoglu 200 Granville/Spears 217, 218, 239 Hasselt 18, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 185, Gagliardi/Serna 200 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 5, 9, 11, 12, 22, 191, 217, 244, 261 Gagliardi/Vinci 200 44, 48, 83, 103, 110, 121, 126, 131, Haynes/Mattek 240 Gagliardi/Weingärtner 200 136, 161, 171, 174, 177, 178, 182, Heinser, Jennifer-Lee 164 Gallovits, Edina 42 220, 228, 229, 232, 234, 238, 239, Hénin-Hardenne, Justine 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, Gambale, Mary 42 241, 242, 247, 256, 259, 260, 276 12, 23, 39, 40, 44, 47, 48, 50, 51, 60, Garbin, Tathiana 42, 178, 221, 238, see also Bartoli/Grönefeld 62, 63, 67, 68, 69, 70, 72, 79, 80, 82, 240, 255, 276 Grönefeld/Liggan 200 83, 85, 86, 87, 103, 109, 110, 113, see also Asagoe/Garbin Grönefeld/Medina Garrigues 200 115, 118, 121, 125, 126, 128, 129, Garbin/Kostanic 233 Grönefeld/Navratilova 200, 218, 222, 130, 131, 136, 147, 150, 152, 153, Garbin/Krizan 217, 218, 231, 234 227, 238, 240, 241 161, 165, 166, 167, 169, 171, 234, Garbin/Loit 200 Grönefeld/Schruff 200 235, 236, 237, 238, 240, 241, 243, Garbin/Pratt 200 Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 200, 217, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 257, 258, Garrison(-Jackson), Zina 269, 270, 218, 227, 236, 241, 243 260, 264, 266, 267, 272, 277, 288, 327, 329 GuangZhou 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 307, 317, 321, 322, 325, 327, 329, Gehrlein, Stephanie 42 182, 217, 242, 259 332 Gersi, Adriana 276 Gubacsi, Zsofia 276 Henke, Vanessa 242, 259, 277 Gifu $50K 42, 217 Gubacsi/Koryttseva 217 Henke/Peschke 200 Glatch, Alexa 241, 276 Gullickson, Carly 42 Hilton Head 268, 269, 270 Gold Coast 33, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, see also Ashley/Gullickson Hingis, Martina 23, 62, 103, 110, 121, 185, 217, 231, 246 Gullickson/Hopkins 217 169, 248, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, Golovin, Tatiana 5, 9, 11, 12, 22, 44, Gullickson/Kirilenko 200 272, 277, 288, 297, 307, 311, 315, 48, 83, 102, 110, 121, 126, 131, 136, Gullickson/Voskoboeva 217 316, 317, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 161, 171, 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, 327, 329, 331, 332, 333, 335 237, 238, 239, 241, 242, 243, 244, H Hingis/Kournikova 308, 324 248, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 257, Habsudova, Karina 276 Hingis/Lucic 308, 315 276 Hack, Sabine 268 Hingis/Novotna 308, 315 see also Dementieva/Golovin Halard-Decugis, Julie 267, 268, 276, Hingis/Pierce 308 Golovin/Myskina 200 333 Hingis/Sukova 308 Golovin/Safina 200 Halard-Decugis/Sugiyama 308 Hingis/Zvereva 308 Golovin/Zvonareva 200 Hamburg 266, 267, 268, 269 Hisamatsu, Shiho 42 Goolagong (Cawley), Evonne 307, Hanika, Sylvia 270, 327, 329 Hobart 41, 44, 148, 151, 158, 196, 311, 317, 322, 327, 329, 332 Hannover 267 217, 231, 246 see also Court/Goolagong Cawley Hantuchova, Daniela 5, 9, 11, 12, 23, Hopkins, Jennifer 277 Goolagong Cawley/Gourlay 308 50, 51, 63, 73, 83, 85, 103, 110, 121, see also Gullickson/Hopkins Gorrochategui, Ines 276 126, 131, 136, 161, 171, 174, 177, Hopkins/Washington 232, 247 Gourlay Cawley, Helen 335 178, 183, 220, 228, 229, 233, 234, Hopmans, Amanda 277 see also Balestrat/Gourlay 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 243, Houston 268, 269, 270 see also Goolagong Cawley/ 244, 247, 252, 254, 256, 257, 261, Houston $50K 21, 43, 217 Gourlay 266, 267, 276, 327, 329 Hradecka/Sromova 235 Gourlay Cawley/Russell 308 Hantuchova/Maleeva 200 Hradecka/Uhlirova 217 Gourlay/Harris 308 Hantuchova/Myskina 200, 218, 222, Hradecka/Voracova 217 227, 243 Hradecka/Zahlavova 217 Hantuchova/Navratilova 200

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Hrdlickova, Kveta Japan Open 36, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, Kirilenko/McShea 201 see Kveta (Hrdlickova) Peschke 181, 184, 217, 243, 260 Kirilenko/Medina Garrigues 201, 227, Hsieh, Su-Wei 277 Jausovec, Mima 307, 327, 329 236 Hsieh/Yan 217 Jausovec/Ruzici 308 Kirilenko/Salerni 201 Huber, Anke 267, 268, 277, 327, 329 Jidkova, Alina 169, 221, 240, 277 Kirilenko/Sharapova 201, 254 Huber, Liezel (Horn) 174, 175, 177, see also Benesova/Jidkova Kirilenko/Talaja 201 178, 183, 216, 220, 224, 228, 265, Jidkova/Perebiynis 217, 218, 233 Kirilenko/Tanasugarn 201 272 Jidkova/Petrova 201 Kirilenko/Tatarkova 201 see also Black/Huber Johannesburg 270 Kirilenko/Yakimova 201, 227, 231 Huber/Maleeva 201, 227 Johansson, Mathilde 42 Kirkland, Jessica 234 Huber/McShea 201 Jones, Ann 307 Kiyomura/Sawamatsu 308 Huber/Washington 201, 235 see also Durr/A. Jones Kleinova, Sandra 277 Husarova, Janette 175, 177, 183, 221, Jordan, Barbara 307 Klemenschits/Klemenschits 164 231, 272, 277 Jordan, Kathy 311, 315, 316, 317 Kleybanova, Alisa 164 see also Benesova/Husarova Jordan/Anne Smith 308, 315 Kloesel, Sandra 42, 250 see also Cohen-Aloro/Husarova Jordan/Smylie 308 see also Beygelzimer/Kloesel see also Déchy/Husarova Jounieh $75K+H 42, 217 Kloss, Ilana Husarova/Jugic-Salkic 201 Juarez $50K 43, 217 see Boshoff/Kloss Husarova/Krasnoroutskaya 201 Jugic-Salkic, Mervana 221 Kohde-Kilsch, Claudia 270, 327, 329 Husarova/Likhovtseva 201, 218, 222, see also Beygelzimer/Jugic-Salkic Kohde-Kilsch/Sukova 308 232, 247 see also Husarova/Jugic-Salkic Kolkata 29, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, Husarova/Martinez 201, 237, 238 Jugic-Salkic/Jurak 217 185, 187, 217, 242 Husarova/Schiavone 201 Jurak, Darija Kondratieva, Maria 43 Hyderabad 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 196, see Jugic-Salkic/Jurak Kops-Jones, Racquel 217, 232, 248 see also Fusano/Kops-Jones K Koryttseva, Mariya 42, 221 I Kachlikova, Katarina see also Casoni/Koryttseva Indian Wells 18, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, see also Benesova/Kachlikova see also Gubacsi/Koryttseva 155, 165, 166, 190, 193, 222, 234, Kachlikova/Mirza 237 Koryttseva/Voskoboeva 217, 243 249, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269 Kandarr, Jana 277 Koryttseva/Yakimova 217 Indianapolis 269, 270 Kanepi, Kaia 42, 242, 277 Kostanic, Jelena 43, 44, 231, 233, 235, Irvin, Marissa 164, 234, 237, 250, 277 Kapros, Aniko 231, 277 239, 248, 255, 277 Istanbul 37, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, Karatantcheva, Sesil 13, 42, 231, 237, see also Benesova/Kostanic 217, 237, 253 239, 243, 246, 253, 256, 261 see also Gagliardi/Kostanic Italian Open — see Rome Karatantcheva/Tanasugarn 201 Kostanic/Mezak 217 Ivanovic, Ana 5, 9, 11, 12, 23, 41, 44, Kaufman, Biffy 164 Kostanic/Peng 236 50, 51, 55, 83, 103, 109, 110, 121, Key Biscayne 270 Kostanic/Srebotnik 201 126, 131, 136, 148, 151, 152, 153, see also Lipton, Ericsson, Miami Koukalova, Klara 13, 41, 44, 45, 148, 161, 171, 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, Kim, So-Jung 43 151, 152, 157, 231, 233, 235, 236, 237, 241, 244, 246, 250, 252, 253, Kim/Sugiyama 201 238, 239, 241, 242, 243, 278 258, 261, 277, 338 King, Billie Jean 307, 312, 317, 322, Kournikova, Anna 272, 278, 297, 324, Ivanovic/Myskina 201 327, 329, 332 327, 329 Ivanovic/Vaidisova 234 see also Casals/King see also Hingis/Kournikova King, Vania 68, 241 Krajicek, Michaella 13, 41, 42, 44, 45, J King/Navratilova 308 68, 148, 151, 238, 243, 244, 261, Jackson, Jamea 13, 42, 234, 241, 259 King/Stove 308 278, 338 Jaeger, Andrea 327, 329 Kirilenko, Maria 5, 9, 11, 12, 24, 39, see also Dementieva/Krajicek Jankovic, Jelena 5, 9, 11, 12, 24, 44, 40, 44, 48, 83, 103, 110, 121, 126, Krajicek/Szavay 217 48, 83, 103, 110, 121, 126, 131, 136, 131, 136, 148, 150, 152, 159, 161, Krasnoroutskaya, Lina 184, 278, 340 161, 171, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 165, 166, 167, 171, 174, 177, 178, see also Husarova/ 236, 237, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 184, 216, 221, 228, 232, 233, 234, Krasnoroutskaya 244, 249, 251, 252, 254, 255, 256, 236, 237, 241, 242, 243, 252, 259, see also Kirilenko/Krasnoroutskaya 257, 260, 261, 277 266, 277 Kremer, Anne 278 see also Asagoe/Jankovic see also Domachowska/Kirilenko Krivencheva, Svetlana 169 see also Gagliardi/Jankovic see also Dulko/Kirilenko Jankovic/Sugiyama 201 see also Gullickson/Kirilenko Kirilenko/Krasnoroutskaya 201

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Krizan, Tina 221 Li/Sun 202, 206, 217, 218, 231, 235, Los Angeles 18, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, see also Benesova/Krizan 236, 237, 240, 241, 242 156, 159, 165, 166, 181, 222, 240, see also Callens/Krizan Liggan, Kelly 257, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, see also Garbin/Krizan see Grönefeld/Liggan 270 Krizan/Vinci 201 Likhovtseva, Elena 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 25, Los Angeles Championships 27, 39, Krizan/Zheng 201 44, 50, 51, 63, 71, 83, 104, 111, 121, 40, 44, 147, 150, 165, 166, 189, 192, Kruger, Joanette 278 126, 130, 131, 136, 153, 156, 161, 222, 245, 261 Kudryavtseva, Alla 43 169, 171, 174, 175, 177, 178, 185, Los Gatos $50K 42, 217 Kulikovskaya, Evgenia 169 216, 220, 228, 229, 231, 234, 235, Louisville $50K 42, 217 Kurhajcova, Lubomira 278 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 242, 243, Luangnam/Tanasugarn 202 Kurhajcova/Tanasugarn 201 244, 246, 252, 253, 256, 257, 259, Lubiani, Francesca Kuti Kis, Rita 278 260, 265, 272, 278, 325 see also Baker/Lubiani Kutuzova, Viktoriya 42, 68, 234, 235, see also Husarova/Likhovtseva see also Casoni/Lubiani 250 Likhovtseva/Maleeva 202, 213, 217, Lucic, Mirjana 278 Kuznetsova, Svetlana 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 218, 231, 258 see also Hingis/Lucic 12, 25, 48, 50, 51, 83, 103, 111, 121, Likhovtseva/Martinez 202, 233, 249 Luxembourg 18, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 126, 131, 136, 161, 167, 169, 171, Likhovtseva/Molik 202, 243 156, 165, 166, 189, 192, 222, 242, 174, 175, 177, 178, 184, 214, 220, Likhovtseva/Myskina 202, 217, 218, 259, 264, 265, 266 225, 228, 229, 232, 233, 234, 235, 242 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 247, Likhovtseva/Sugiyama 202, 235 M 248, 249, 250, 252, 253, 254, 257, Likhovtseva/Zvonareva 202, 218, Mahwah 269, 270 265, 266, 272, 278, 298, 307, 321, 222, 227, 236, 237, 238, 257, 261, Majoli 266, 267, 268, 278, 307, 327, 327, 329 262 329 Kuznetsova, Svetlana Linetskaya, Evgenia 13, 26, 104, 121, Maleeva, Katerina 268, 269, 327, 329 see also Daniilidou/Kuznetsova 126, 131, 136, 161, 232, 233, 234, Maleeva,Magdalena 6, 9, 11, 13, 26, Kuznetsova/Mauresmo 201, 227, 238, 238, 240, 248, 250, 254, 278 104, 111, 121, 126, 131, 136, 162, 255 Linz 30, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 156, 171, 221, 228, 238, 241, 244, 246, Kuznetsova/Molik 201, 212, 213, 218, 165, 166, 181, 188, 222, 244, 261, 248, 249, 253, 259, 260, 266, 267, 222, 227, 232, 234, 241, 243, 244, 264, 265, 266, 267 268, 272, 278, 325, 327, 329 247, 248, 251, 308 Lions Cup (Tokyo) 270 see also Hantuchova/Maleeva Kuznetsova/Navratilova 201, 234 Lipton 270 see also Huber/Maleeva Kuznetsova/Petrova 201 See also Miami see also Likhovtseva/Maleeva Kuznetsova/Pierce 201 Livingston — See Princeton Maleeva/Myskina 202 Llagostera Vives, Nuria 13, 41, 44, Maleeva-Fragniere, Manuela 268, L 45, 148, 151, 152, 221, 234, 235, 269, 270, 322, 327, 329, 332 Lafayette $50K 42, 217 236, 237, 238, 239, 242, 278 Mamic, Sanda 236, 237 Laine, Emma 241 see also Benesova/Llagostera Vives Mandlikova, Hana 269, 270, 307, 317, Lamade, Bianka 278 Llagostera Vives/Vento-Kabchi 202, 322, 327, 329, 332 Lazarchuk, Olha 42 218, 222, 242 Mandlikova/Navratilova 308 Lee, Janet Loit, Emilie 43, 174, 177, 178, 185, Mandula, Petra 232, 278 see also Asagoe/Lee 214, 215, 220, 232, 236, 237, 240, Mariskova/Teeguarden 308 Lee/Peng 235 251, 278 Marrero, Marta 221, 235, 279, 338 Lee, Ye-Ra 42 see also Beygelzimer/Loit see also Asagoe/Marrero Lee-Waters, Lindsay 42, 231, 278 see also Camerin/Loit see also Gagliardi/Marrero see also Harkleroad/Lee-Waters see also Déchy/Loit Marrero/Serra Zanetti 217, 219, 237 Leipzig 266, 267, 268, 269 see also Gagliardi/Loit Marseille $50K+H 42, 217 Leon Garcia, Gala 278 see also Garbin/Loit Martina Franca $50K 42, 217 Lepchenko, Varvara 42 Loit/Pratt 202, 217, 218, 236 Martinez, Conchita 9, 11, 12, 27, 41, Lexington $50K 42, 217 Loit/Schaul 202 44, 83, 104, 111, 121, 126, 131, 136, Li Na 13, 44, 164, 231, 232, 233, 235, Loit/Srebotnik 164, 202, 212, 213, 148, 151, 152, 162, 171, 174, 175, 236, 240, 241, 242, 248, 257, 260, 217, 218, 239, 240, 244 177, 178, 186, 220, 228, 232, 233, 278 Loit/Strycova 202, 217, 219, 236 234, 235, 240, 249, 251, 264, 265, Li/Li 201 Loit/Tanasugarn 202 267, 268, 269, 272, 279, 289, 307, Li/Pratt 201 Loit/Woehr 202 322, 325, 328, 329, 332 Li Ting 42, 175, 177, 178, 184, 221, Loit/Yan 202 see also Déchy/Martinez 242, 259, 278 see also Husarova/Martinez see also Li/Li see also Likhovtseva/Martinez

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Martinez/Pratt 202 Memphis 38, 41, 44, 148, 151, 154, Moscow 31, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, 155, Martinez/Ruano Pascual 164, 202, 157, 217, 233 165, 166, 189, 192, 222, 243, 260, 218, 222, 227, 232, 235, 239, 240, Mezak, Matea 264, 265, 266, 267 241, 244, 247, 257, 258 see also Kostanic/Mezak Müller, Martina 239, 279 Martinez/Sfar 202 Miami 18, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, 155, Munich 264, 265, 266, 267 Martinez, Maria Jose 279 165, 166, 184, 186, 222, 234, 250, Musgrave, Trudi Martinez, M. J./Martinez Granados 264, 265, 266, 267 see Dell’acqua/Musgrave 217 Michel, Margaret Myskina, Anastasia 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, Martinez Granados, Conchita 42, 279 see also Goolagong Cawley/Michel 29, 41, 44, 48, 50, 51, 63, 83, 104, see also Martinez/Martinez Midland $75K 42, 217 111, 121, 127, 131, 136, 140, 148, Granados Mikaelian, Marie-Gayanay 42, 279 152, 162, 167, 172, 175, 177, 178, Matevzic, Maja 279 Mikaelian/Pierce 203 187, 220, 228, 231, 232, 233, 234, Mattek, Bethanie 239, 256, 279 Milan 268 235, 236, 237, 238, 240, 242, 244, Mauresmo, Amélie 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, Mirza, Sania 12, 41, 42, 44, 45, 148, 246, 247, 249, 251, 252, 253, 255, 27, 39, 40, 44, 47, 50, 51, 53, 54, 57, 151, 152, 233, 239, 241, 242, 243, 256, 257, 266, 267, 290, 307, 321, 59, 62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 73, 75, 77, 249, 256, 279, 338 328, 329 79, 80, 83, 84, 86, 87, 104, 111, 113, Mirza/Ruano Pascual 203, 259 see also Golovin/Myskina 116, 117, 121, 125, 126, 128, 129, Mirza/Stewart 203 see also Hantuchova/Myskina 130, 131, 135, 136, 138, 139, 140, Miyagi, Nana see also Ivanovic/Myskina 141, 144, 147, 148, 150, 152, 153, see also Dekmiejere/Miyagi see also Likhovtseva/Myskina 154, 162, 165, 166, 167, 171, 225, Miyagi/Myskina 203 see also Maleeva/Myskina 226, 228, 232, 233, 234, 236, 237, Modena 34, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, see also Miyagi/Myskina 238, 240, 241, 243, 244, 245, 247, 217, 238, 255 Myskina/Likhovtseva 259 248, 249, 250, 251, 253, 254, 255, Molik, Alicia 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 28, 39, Myskina/Pennetta 203 257, 258, 260, 261, 262, 264, 266, 40, 44, 55, 63, 71, 83, 104, 111, 115, Myskina/Sugiyama 203, 233 267, 272, 279, 290, 321, 322, 328, 121, 126, 131, 136, 147, 150, 152, Myskina/Wozniacki 203 329 155, 156, 162, 165, 166, 167, 172, Myskina/Zvonareva 203, 227, 235, see also Kuznetsova/Mauresmo 174, 175, 177, 178, 186, 220, 228, 247 McCain, Kelly 231 233, 234, 235, 237, 238, 241, 242, see also Beygelzimer/McCain 243, 244, 246, 247, 249, 251, 254, N McDowell, Shayna 42 259, 260, 266, 279, 321 Nagelsen, Betsy McGrath, Meredith 268 see also Kuznetsova/Molik see also Navratilova/Nagelson McNeil, Lori 268, 269 see also Likhovtseva/Molik Nagelsen/Tomanova 308 McQuillan, Rachel 279 Molik//Schiavone 203 Nagyova, Henrieta 280 McShea, Lisa Molik/Morariu 203, 241 see also Benesova/Nagyova see also Callens/McShea Molik/Navratilova 203, 251 Nakamura, Aiko 13, 240, 241, 242, see also Huber/McShea Molik/Schiavone 219, 222, 233, 249 257 see also Kirilenko/McShea Molik/Shaughnessy 203, 242 Navratilova, Martina 174, 175, 177, McShea/Stewart 202, 242 Molik/Stewart 203, 238 178, 187, 221, 228, 240, 247, 268, McShea/Vento-Kabchi 202 Montolio, Angeles 279 269, 270, 272, 307, 312, 315, 316, Medina Garrigues, Anabel 9, 11, 13, Morariu, Corina 174, 175, 177, 178, 317, 321, 322, 323, 328, 329, 331, 28, 41, 44, 104, 108, 111, 121, 126, 187, 228, 272, 279, 333 332, 333, 335 131, 136, 148, 151, 152, 154, 162, see also Craybas/Morariu see also Evert/Navratilova 171, 174, 177, 178, 186, 220, 228, see also Davenport/Morariu see also Fernandez/Navratilova 231, 234, 235, 237, 238, 239, 240, see also Molik/Morariu see also King/Navratilova 241, 242, 244, 253, 258, 279 Morariu/Pennetta 203 see also Mandlikova/Navratilova see also Dominguez Lino/Medina Morariu/Peschke 203 see also Déchy/Navratilova Garrigues Morariu/Pierce 203 see also Grönefeld/Navratilova see also Grönefeld/Medina Morariu/Schnyder 203, 227, 237, 241, see also Hantuchova/Navratilova Garrigues 243, 254 see also Kuznetsova/Navratilova see also Kirilenko/Medina Morigami, Akiko 13, 42, 63, 237, 239, see also Molik/Navratilova Garrigues 241, 253, 256, 257, 279 Navratilova/Nagelsen 308 Medina Garrigues/Safina 203, 206, Morita, Ayumi 42 Navratilova/Sanchez-Vicario 203, 217, 219, 227, 236, 237, 238, 241 Morita/Sugiyama 203 253 Medina Garrigues/Vinci 203, 217, Morozova, Olga 328, 329 Navratilova/Schiavone 203, 236 219, 242 see also Evert/Morozova Navratilova/Shriver 308, 315 Medvedeva, Natalia 268 Navratilova/Smith 308

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Navratilova/Stove 308 Pan Pacific 33, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, Peschke/Schiavone 203, 227, 239, Navratilova/Temesvari 308 155, 165, 166, 183, 185, 222, 232, 243 Navratilova, Gabriela 178, 228 248, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, Peschke/Schnyder 204, 235 Navratilova/Pastikova 217, 227 270 Peschke/Schruff 204 Neffa-de los Rios, Rossana Panova 164, 232, 238, 239, 248, 261, Peschke/Strycova 204 see Rossana de los Rios 280 Peschke/Tu 204 Neiland, Larisa 298, 324, 333, 335 Papadaki, Christina 280 Petange $50K 42, 217 see also under Savchenko Paris 32, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 156, Petrova, Nadia 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 30, Neiland/Novotna 324 165, 166, 180, 222, 232, 248, 264, 39, 40, 44, 50, 51, 55, 59, 63, 83, 85, Neiland/Zvereva 308 265, 266, 267, 268 86, 105, 111, 118, 122, 127, 128, Nemeth/Obziler 217 Parra Santonja, Arantxa 42, 233, 237, 129, 130, 131, 137, 144, 148, 152, New England 268, 269, 270 240, 280 153, 156, 162, 165, 167, 172, 175, New Haven 19, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, Pastikova, Michaela 178, 228 177, 178, 188, 228, 231, 232, 233, 156, 165, 166, 189, 192, 222, 241, see also Benesova/Pastikova 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 257, 264, 265, 266, 267 see also G. Navratilova/Pastikova 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 249, New Orleans 269, 270 Pattaya City 27, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 250, 252, 254, 256, 257, 261, 264, Newport 268, 269, 270 179, 182, 217, 232, 248 266, 272, 280, 333 Nice 266, 267 Paz, Mercedes 335 see also Jidkova/Petrova Nola, Pavlina (Stoyanova) 280 Peer, Shahar 13, 44, 234, 237, 239, see also Kuznetsova/Petrova Nooni, Hannah 42 241, 256, 260 Petrova/Shaughnessy 204, 227, 234, Noorlander, Seda 280 see also Asagoe/Peer 236, 238, 241, 250, 254 Novotna, Jana 267, 268, 280, 299, Pelletier, Marie-Eve 42 Philadelphia 27, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 307, 312, 316, 317, 324, 328, 329, Peng Shuai 13, 63, 113, 231, 232, 236, 154, 156, 165, 166, 180, 193, 222, 332, 335 237, 239, 241, 242, 246, 253, 256, 244, 261, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268 see also Davenport/Novotna 280 Piedade, Frederica 43 see also Hingis/Novotna Pennetta, Flavia 5, 9, 11, 12, 29, 41, Pierce, Mary 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 31, 39, 40, Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario 308 44, 83, 95, 105, 108, 109, 111, 121, 44, 48, 50, 51, 53, 54, 55, 57, 61, 63, Novotna/Sukova 308 127, 131, 136, 148, 151, 152, 159, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 75, 77, 162, 172, 174, 177, 178, 221, 228, 80, 82, 83, 84, 87, 98, 105, 109, 111, O 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 238, 239, 113, 115, 116, 117, 118, 122, 123, O’Neil, Chris 307 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 246, 249, 124, 125, 127, 129, 130, 131, 133, Oakland 270 255, 257, 259, 260, 280 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 148, 150, see also Stanford see also Dementieva/Pennetta 152, 153, 155, 156, 162, 165, 166, Obata, Saori 42, 280 see also Morariu/Pennetta 167, 172, 188, 232, 234, 235, 236, see also Fujiwara/Obata see also Myskina/Pennetta 237, 239, 241, 243, 245, 248, 250, Obziler, Tzipora 232 Pennetta/Pierce 203 254, 255, 257, 258, 260, 261, 262, see also Nemeth/Obziler Pennetta/Ruano Pascual 203 264, 266, 267, 268, 272, 280, 291, Olympics 266 Perebiynis, Tatiana 220, 280 307, 317, 325, 328, 329, 332, 338 Ondraskova, Zuzana 13, 42, 235, 236, see also Jidkova/Perebiynis see also Bartoli/Pierce 241, 255, 280 Perebiynis/Strycova 219, 222, 235 see also Hingis/Pierce Orange $50K 42, 217 Perebiynis/Vento-Kabchi 203 see also Kuznetsova/Pierce Oremans, Miriam 280 Perianu, Anda 43 see also Mikaelian/Pierce Orlando 270 see also Dziamidzenka/Perianu see also Morariu/Pierce Ortisei $75K 42, 217 Perry, Shenay 241, 255 see also Pennetta/Pierce Osterloh, Lilia 43, 280 Peschke, Kveta (Hrdlickova) 5, 9, 11, Pin, Camille 42, 257, 280 Ostrovskaya/Yakimova 217 12, 30, 42, 48, 83, 105, 108, 111, Pironkova, Tszvetana 42, 237, 239, 118, 121, 127, 128, 131, 137, 162, 243, 255, 280 P 169, 172, 174, 177, 178, 188, 216, Pisnik, Tina 221, 280 Palermo 28, 41, 44, 148, 151, 154, 220, 228, 231, 235, 236, 239, 241, see also Gagliardi/Pisnik 157, 217, 239, 241, 255 242, 243, 244, 249, 251, 257, 260, Pitkowski, Sarah 280 Palm Beach Gardens 270 261, 280 Pittsburg $75K 43, 217 Palm Beach Gardens $50K 42, 217 see also Benesova/Peschke Plischke, Sylvia 280 Palm Springs 269 see also Henke/Peschke Poitiers $75K 42, 217 see also Indian Wells see also Morariu/Peschke Portoroz 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 186, Peschke/Rittner 203 195, 217, 242, 259 Peschke/Salerni 203 Potter, Barbara 269, 328, 329 Pous Tio, Laura 42, 236, 239, 280

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Poutchek, Tatiana 280 Richey, Nancy 307, 322, 328, 329 Safina, Dinara 5, 9, 11, 12, 32, 39, 40, see also Antypina/Poutchek Richmond 270 41, 44, 50, 51, 83, 105, 111, 122, Poutchkova, Olga 42 Rimini $50K 42, 217 127, 132, 137, 148, 150, 151, 152, Prague 32, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 185, Rinaldi, Kathy 270 163, 165, 166, 167, 174, 175, 177, 189, 217, 236 Rittner, Barbara 281 178, 190, 221, 228, 231, 232, 234, Prakusya/Voroboeva 217 see also Peschke/Rittner 235, 236, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, Pratt, Nicole 164, 175, 177, 178, 189, Rodionova, Anastassia 42, 221, 281 243, 244, 246, 248, 260, 266, 281 221, 241, 249, 280 Rodionova/Vesnina 217, 219, 244 see also Benesova/Safina see also Bartoli/Pratt Roland Garros 23, 39, 40, 44, 147, see also Dulko/Safina see also Cohen-Aloro/Pratt 150, 154, 165, 166, 190, 193, 222, see also Dushevina/Safina see also Daniilidou/Pratt 237, 253, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, see also Golovin/Safina see also Garbin/Pratt 269, 270 see also Medina Garrigues/Safina see also Li/Pratt Rolle, Ahsha 43 Saint Paul $50K 42, 217 see also Loit/Pratt see also Alves/Rolle Saint-Raphael $50K 43, 217 see also Martinez/Pratt Rome 27, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, 154, Salerni, Maria Emilia 248, 281 Pratt/Shaughnessy 204 155, 165, 166, 180, 183, 222, 236, see also Bartoli/Salerni Pratt/Stosur 204 252, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, see also Gagliardi/Salerni Pratt/Tanasugarn 204 270 see also Kirilenko/Salerni Pratt/Vento-Kabchi 204, 237 Ruano Pascual, Virginia 174, 175, see also Peschke/Salerni Princess Cup 266, 267, 268, 269 176, 177, 178, 190, 214, 215, 216, Salerni/Vento-Kabchi 204 Princeton 270 220, 224, 225, 226, 228, 232, 235, San Antonio 268, 269 Prostejov $75K 42, 217 247, 251, 255, 265, 272, 281, 300, San Diego 31, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, Prusova, Libuse 280 317 155, 165, 166, 186, 190, 222, 239, see also Martinez/Ruano Pascual 256, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269 Q see also Mirza/Ruano Pascual San Francisco $50K 43, 217 Quebec City 21, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, see also Pennetta/Ruano Pascual Sanchez Lorenzo, Maria 43, 237, 253, 217, 244 Ruano Pascual/Suárez 204, 212, 213, 281 Queens Grand Prix (Tokyo) 270 218, 222, 227, 233, 234, 237, 249, see also Dominguez Lino/Sanchez 250, 251, 254, 308 Lorenzo R Rubin, Chanda 31, 105, 111, 122, 127, Sanchez-Vicario, Arantxa 177, 190, Rabat 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 185, 217, 132, 137, 163, 167, 172, 253, 255, 265, 267, 268, 269, 272, 281, 292, 236 266, 267, 272, 281, 325, 338 301, 307, 312, 317, 321, 324, 328, Raleigh $75K 42, 217 Rubin/Sanchez-Vicario 308 330, 331, 332, 333, 335 Randriantefy, Dally 13, 233, 236, 237, Russell, Jennifer 178 see also Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario 241, 253, 280 Russell, JoAnne see also Rubin/Sanchez-Vicario Raymond, Lisa 9, 11, 13, 31, 105, 111, see Gourlay Cawley/Russell see also Navratilova/Sanchez- 122, 127, 131, 137, 159, 163, 172, Russell/Santangelo 232, 247 Vicario 174, 175, 177, 178, 189, 215, 220, Ruzici, Virginia 270, 307 Sanchez-Vicario/Sukova 308 224, 226, 228, 237, 238, 240, 246, see also Jausovec/Ruzici Santangelo, Mara 43, 231, 236, 246 250, 253, 265, 272, 281, 300, 333 see also Beygelzimer/Santangelo Raymond/Stosur 204, 212, 213, 218, S see also Callens/Santangelo 222, 227, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, Sabatini, Gabriela 268, 269, 291, 307, Santangelo/Vinci 204 245, 258, 259, 260, 308 322, 328, 329, 331, 332 Savchenko, Larisa Raymond/Stubbs 204, 219, 222, 227, see also Graf/Sabatini see also Neiland, Larisa 231, 232, 234, 235, 237, 238, 246, Saeki, Miho 43, 221 Savchenko/Zvereva 308 247, 251, 253, 254, 255, 308, 325 Saeki/Yoshida 217, 219, 233 Savchuk, Olga 235 Razzano, Virginie 13, 232, 235, 236, Safarova, Lucie 13, 41, 42, 44, 45, Sawamatsu, Kazuko 237, 238, 243, 251, 252, 281 148, 151, 152, 235, 238, 241, 258, see Kiyomura/Sawamatsu Reeves, Samantha 281 281 Schaul, Claudine 253, 281 see also Castellvi/Reeves Schaul/Srebotnik 204 Reggi, Raffaella 269, 270 Schett 175, 177, 190, 246, 247, 272, Rehe, Stephanie 269, 270 281, 328, 330, 340 Reid, Kerry Melville 307, 328, 329 Schett/Schnyder 204, 231 Reid/Turnbull 308 Reynolds, Candy see also Fairbank/Reynolds Rezai, Aravane 42

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Schiavone, Francesca 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, Sfar, Selima Sprem, Karolina 6, 9, 11, 13, 35, 44, 32, 44, 50, 51, 83, 105, 108, 111, see also Cohen-Aloro/Sfar 73, 106, 111, 122, 127, 132, 137, 122, 127, 132, 137, 140, 153, 163, see also Martinez/Sfar 163, 172, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 172, 178, 221, 228, 234, 235, 236, Sharapova, Maria 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 33, 236, 237, 238, 242, 246, 248, 251, 238, 239, 240, 241, 243, 244, 252, 39, 40, 41, 44, 47, 48, 50, 51, 53, 54, 252, 253, 255, 256, 257, 259, 282 255, 259, 260, 281 55, 57, 59, 60, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 69, Srebotnik, Katarina 5, 9, 11, 12, 35, see also Hantuchova/Schiavone 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 77, 79, 80, 82, 83, 41, 44, 83, 106, 111, 122, 127, 132, see also Husarova/Schiavone 86, 94, 98, 106, 109, 111, 113, 115, 137, 148, 151, 152, 163, 172, 174, see also Molik/Schiavone 116, 117, 118, 122, 123, 124, 125, 177, 178, 191, 220, 231, 235, 238, see also Navratilova/Schiavone 127, 130, 132, 133, 135, 137, 139, 239, 242, 243, 244, 246, 261, 282 see also Peschke/Schiavone 140, 141, 147, 150, 152, 153, 154, see also Asagoe/Srebotnik Schiavone/Sprem 241 156, 163, 165, 166, 167, 172, 232, see also Kostanic/Srebotnik Schiavone/Vinci 204 233, 234, 236, 237, 238, 240, 241, see also Loit/Srebotnik Schnyder, Patty 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 33, 242, 243, 244, 245, 247, 248, 249, see also Schaul/Srebotnik 41, 44, 50, 51, 59, 63, 70, 73, 83, 84, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 257, Srebotnik/Stewart 204 86, 95, 105, 111, 113, 122, 127, 132, 258, 259, 260, 264, 266, 282, 307, Srebotnik/Tanasugarn 204 137, 144, 148, 151, 152, 163, 167, 321, 322, 328, 330 Srebotnik/Vinci 204 172, 175, 177, 178, 191, 228, 231, see also Kirilenko/Sharapova Srndovic, Aleksandra 169 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, Shaughnessy, Meghann 9, 11, 13, 34, Sromova, Hana 42 239, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 247, 44, 106, 111, 122, 127, 132, 137, Sromova/Voracova 217 249, 250, 252, 253, 256, 257, 258, 163, 172, 174, 175, 177, 178, 191, Sromova/Zheng 204 259, 260, 261, 264, 266, 267, 281, 221, 228, 231, 232, 233, 238, 239, St. Gaudens $50K 42, 217 322, 328, 330 241, 256, 257, 272, 282, 333 Stanciute/Szavay 237, 253 see also Déchy/Schnyder see also Grönefeld/Shaughnessy Stanford 18, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 156, see also Dragomir Ilie/Schnyder see also Molik/Shaughnessy 165, 166, 180, 193, 222, 239, 256, see also Hantuchova/Schnyder see also Petrova/Shaughnessy 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269 see also Morariu/Schnyder see also Pratt/Shaughnessy Stevenson, Alexandra 164, 282 see also Peschke/Schnyder Shenzhen $50K 43, 217 Stewart, Bryanne 174, 177, 178, 192, see also Schett/Schnyder ’s-Hertogenbosch 41, 44, 148, 151, 220, 228 Schruff, Julia 13, 42, 228, 236, 241, 157, 186, 190, 217, 238, 254 see also Benesova/Stewart 244, 252, 261, 281 Shriver, Pam 269, 270, 313, 315, 316, see also Callens/Stewart see also Grönefeld/Schruff 317, 328, 330, 332, 333, 335 see also Grande/Stewart see also Peschke/Schruff see also Navratilova/Shriver see also McShea/Stewart Schruff/Woehr 227, 243 Shriver/Zvereva 308 see also Mirza/Stewart Schultz-McCarthy, Brenda 324 Sidot, Anne-Gaëlle 282 see also Molik/Stewart Scottsdale 266, 267 Skavronskaia, Lioudmila 42 see also Srebotnik/Stewart Sekulovski/Watson 217 Smashey, Kaysie Stewart/Stosur 205, 218, 222, 227, Seles, Monica 163, 264, 266, 267, see also Grandin/Smashey 231, 235, 236, 237, 238, 246, 249, 268, 269, 272, 282, 292, 307, 317, Smashnova, Anna 9, 11, 13, 34, 41, 251 321, 322, 325, 328, 330, 331, 332 44, 48, 106, 111, 122, 127, 132, 137, Stockholm 35, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, Senoglu, Ipek 148, 152, 163, 172, 231, 232, 236, 185, 191, 217, 240, 257 see Gagliardi/Senoglu 237, 238, 239, 241, 242, 252, 255, Stosur, Samantha 13, 63, 174, 177, Seoul 36, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 217, 266, 282 178, 192, 215, 216, 220, 224, 226, 242 Smith, Anne 313, 315, 316, 317 228, 231, 241, 243, 246, 265, 282, Sequera, Milagros 42, 237, 282 see also Kathy Jordan/Anne Smith 302, 333 see also Bartoli/Sequera see also Navratilova/Smith see also Pratt/Stosur see also Ditty/Sequera Smylie, Elizabeth see also Raymond/Stosur Serna, Magui 232, 250, 282 see also Jordan/Smylie see also Stewart/Stosur see also Gagliardi/Serna Snyder, Tara 282 Stove, Betty 317, 328, 330, 335 Serna/Tanasugarn 204 see also Cargill/Snyder see also Durr/Stove Serra Zanetti, Adriana 282 Sobral, Leticia see also King/Stove Serra Zanetti, Antonella 13, 221, 233, see also Argeri/Sobral see also Navratilova/Stove 238, 243, 282 Spears, Abigail 221, 232, 282 Stove/Turnbull 308 see also Benesova/Serra Zanetti see also Dulko/Spears Strasbourg 28, 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, see also Callens/Serra Zanetti see also Granville/Spears 217, 237, 253 see also Marrero/Serra Zanetti Spirlea, Irina 267, 268, 282, 328, 330 Stratton Mountain 268 Serra Zanetti/Spears 238

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Strycova, Barbora 44, 178, 220, 235, Talaja/Vinci 205 U 251, 282 Tameishi, Keiko 169 U. S. Open 18, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, see alos Loit/Strycova Tampa 268, 269, 270 154, 165, 166, 189, 192, 222, 241, see also Benesova/Strycova Tanasugarn, Tamarine 43, 175, 176, 258, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, see also Peschke/Strycova 177, 194, 216, 237, 238, 255, 283 270 Stubbs, Rennae 174, 175, 177, 178, see also Bartoli/Tanasugarn Uhlirova, Vladimira 193, 216, 220, 228, 265, 272, 302, see also Daniilidou/Tanasugarn see also Dekmiejere/Ulihrova 324 see also Dragomir Ilie/Tanasugarn see also Hradecka/Uhlirova see also Black/Stubbs see also Fujiwara/Tanasugarn see also Raymond/Stubbs see also Grande/Tanasugarn V Suárez, Paola 6, 8, 9, 11, 35, 73, 87, see also Karatantcheva/ Vaideanu, Rozana 106, 111, 122, 127, 132, 137, 163, Tanasugarn see Testud/Vaideanu 167, 169, 172, 174, 175, 177, 178, see also Kirilenko/Tanasugarn Vaidisova, Nicole 5, 9, 11, 12, 36, 41, 193, 214, 215, 216, 220, 225, 226, see also Kurhajcova/Tanasugarn 44, 50, 51, 55, 73, 83, 98, 106, 109, 228, 233, 234, 237, 252, 253, 265, see also Loit/Tanasugarn 112, 122, 123, 125, 127, 132, 137, 272, 282, 303, 317, 338 see also Luangnam/Tanasugarn 140, 148, 151, 152, 164, 237, 231, see also Ruano Pascual/Suárez see also Pratt/Tanasugarn 233, 234, 235, 237, 240, 242, 243, Sucha, Martina 232, 246, 259, 283 see also Serna/Tanasugarn 244, 251, 253, 254, 283 338 Sugiyama, Ai 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 36, 48, see also Srebotnik/Tanasugarn Vakulenko, Julia 169, 283 55, 63, 83, 106, 111, 113, 122, 127, Tanasugarn/Woehr 205 Van Roost, Dominique (Monami) 283 132, 137, 163, 167, 173, 174, 175, Tashkent 41, 44, 148, 151, 157, 185, 178, 221 177, 178, 193, 221, 228, 231, 232, 217, 243 Vanc, Andreea see also Andres/Vanc 233, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, Tatarkova, Elena Vento-Kabchi,Maria 13, 175, 177, 244, 246, 248, 250, 251, 252, 256, see also Kirilenko/Tatarkova 178, 195, 221, 235, 238, 241, 252, 257, 265, 266, 272, 283, 303, 333 Tauziat, Nathalie 267, 268, 272, 283, 254, 256, 258, 283 see also Dementieva/Sugiyama 328, 330 see also Asagoe/Vento-Kabchi see also Halard-Decugis/Sugiyama Taylor, Sarah 283 see also Camerin/Vento-Kabchi see also Hantuchova/Sugiyama Teeguarden, Pam see also Dulko/Vento-Kabchi see also Jankovic/Sugiyama see also Mariskova/Teeguarden see also Llagostera Vives/Vento- see also Kim/Sugiyama Tegart Dalton, Judy 310, 317 Kabchi see also Likhovtseva/Sugiyama see also Casals/Tegart Dalton see also McShea/Vento-Kabchi see also Morita/Sugiyama see also Court/Tegart Dalton see also Perebiynis/Vento-Kabchi see also Myskina/Sugiyama Temesvari, Andrea 270 see also Pratt/Vento-Kabchi Sukova, Helena 269, 270, 304, 313, see also Navratilova/Temesvari see also Salerni/Vento-Kabchi 316, 317, 324, 328, 330, 332, 333, Testud 194, 267, 283 Vesnina, Elena 221 335 Testud/Vaideanu 205 see also Rodionova/Vesnina see also Hingis/Sukova Testud/Vinci 205, 249 Vierin, Nathalie 42, 169, 239 see also Kohde-Kilsch/Sukova Timotic, Ana 42 Vinci, Roberta 13, 42, 87, 175, 177, see also Novotna/Sukova Tomanova, Renata 195, 221, 232, 238, 242, 248, 259, see also Sanchez-Vicario/Sukova see also Nagelson/Tomanova 283 Sun Tiantian 87, 175, 177, 178, 194, Torrens Valero, Cristina 283 see also Farina Elia/Vinci 221, 241, 242, 259 Touraine $50K 43, 217 see also Gagliardi/Vinci see also Hao/Sun Troy $50K 43, 217 see also Krizan/Vinci see also Li/Sun Tu, Meilen 283 see also Medina Garrigues/Vinci Surabaya 267 see also Benesova/Tu see also Santangelo/Vinci Svensson, Åsa (Carlsson) 283 see also Callens/Tu see also Schiavone/Vinci Sydney 28, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, 156, see also Peschke/Tu see also Srebotnik/Vinci 165, 166, 192, 222, 231, 246, 264, Tucson $50K 42, 217 see also Talaja/Vinci 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 Tulyaganova 283 see also Testud/Vinci Sydney Indoors 270 Turnbull, Wendy 313, 328, 330, 332 Vinci/Voskoboeva 205 Szavay, Agnes 238, 255, 283 see also Casals/Turnbull Vinci/Zanchetta 205 see also Krajicek/Szavay see also Reid/Turnbull Virginia Slims Championships 269, see also Stove/Turnbull T 270 Vittel $50K 42, 217 Talaja, Silvija 283 Voracova, Renata see also Benesova/Talaja see also Hradecka/Voracova see also Kirilenko/Talaja see also Sromova/Voracova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2005 Robert Waltz Index Voroboeva, Julia Williams, Venus 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 37, Zanchetta, Erika see Prakusya/Voroboeva 39, 40, 41, 44, 50, 51, 55, 60, 63, 70, see Vinci/Zanchetta Voskoboeva, Galina 43 71, 72, 83, 107, 109, 112, 116, 118, Zheng Jie 13, 41, 44, 45, 148, 151, see also Benesova/Voskoboeva 122, 127, 132, 133, 135, 137, 139, 152, 174, 177, 178, 196, 220, 231, see also Gullickson/Voskoboeva 140, 147, 148, 151, 152, 153, 164, 236, 240, 242, 246, 253, 284 see also Koryttseva/Voskoboeva 165, 166, 167, 169, 195, 232, 233, see also Krizan/Zheng see also Vinci/Voskoboeva 234, 235, 237, 238, 239, 242, 247, see also Sromova/Zheng 249, 250, 251, 253, 255, 256, 258, see also Yan/Zheng W 259, 264, 266, 267, 272, 284, 293, Zuluaga, Fabiola 6, 9, 11, 37, 48, 107, Wade, Virginia 307, 317, 322, 328, 305, 307, 313, 315, 316, 317, 321, 108, 112, 122, 127, 132, 137, 164, 330, 332 322, 325, 328, 330, 331, 332 167, 173, 231, 232, 233, 235, 236, see also Court/Wade Williams/Williams 308, 315 246, 247, 249, 252, 284 Waikoloa $50K 42, 217 Wimbledon 37, 39, 40, 44, 147, 150, Zürich 19, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 155, Wang, Shi-Ting 267, 268 154, 165, 166, 180, 183, 222, 238, 165, 166, 180, 193, 222, 244, 264, Warsaw 23, 39, 40, 44, 148, 150, 156, 255, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 165, 166, 222, 235, 252, 264, 265, 270 Zvereva, Natasha 267, 268, 269, 284, 266 Woehr, Jasmin 228 306, 314, 315, 316, 317, 324, 328, Wartusch, Patricia 283 see also Loit/Woehr 330, 333, 335 Washington 268, 269, 270 see also Tanasugarn/Woehr see also Fernandez/Zvereva Washington $75K 42, 217 Wozniacki, Caroline see also Hingis/Zvereva Washington, Mashona 13, 237, 238, see Myskina/Wozniacki see also Neiland/Zvereva 239, 256, 283 Wozniak, Aleksandra 257 see also Savchenko/Zvereva see also Bartoli/Washington WTA Championships (Los Angeles) see also Shriver/Zvereva see also Huber/Washington 154 Zvonareva, Vera 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 38, Watson, Cindy 41, 44, 63, 107, 112, 122, 127, 132, see also Sekulovski/Watson Y 137, 148, 151, 152, 154, 164, 169, Weingärtner, Marlene 248, 283, 338 Yakimova, Anastasiya 42, 159, 228 173, 174, 175, 177, 178, 196, 216, see also Gagliardi/Weingärtner see also Kirilenko/Yakimova 221, 228, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, Welford, Tiffany 246 see also Koryttseva/Yakimova 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 242, 243, White, Robin see also Ostrovskaya/Yakimova 244, 246, 248, 251, 252, 256, 259, see also Fernandez/White Yan Zi 13, 41, 42, 44, 45, 148, 151, 260, 261, 265, 284 Widjaja, Angelique 283, 340 152, 178, 220, 242, 255, 260, 284 see also Farina Elia/Zvonareva Williams, Serena 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 37, see also Loit/Yan see also Golovin/Zvonareva 39, 40, 44, 48, 50, 51, 55, 62, 63, 70, Yan/Zheng 205, 206, 217, 218, 231, see also Likhovtseva/Zvonareva 81, 83, 85, 87, 94, 95, 106, 112, 115, 233, 241, 258 see also Myskina/Zvonareva 118, 122, 124, 125, 127, 132, 137, Yi Jing-Qian 284 138, 147, 150, 152, 153, 164, 165, Yoshida, Yuka 221 166, 167, 169, 173, 177, 195, 232, see also Saeki/Yoshida 233, 234, 235, 236, 238, 240, 241, Yuan Meng 42, 243 242, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 255, 258, 259, 264, 265, 266, 267, Z 272, 284, 293, 305, 307, 313, 315, Zagreb $75K 42, 217 316, 317, 321, 322, 323, 325, 328, Zahlavova, Sandra 330, 332 see also Hradecka/Zahlavova