Heterodox Economics Newsletter Issue 254 — November 04, 2019 — Web1 — Pdf2 — Heterodox Economics Directory3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heterodox Economics Newsletter Issue 254 — November 04, 2019 — Web1 — Pdf2 — Heterodox Economics Directory3 Heterodox Economics Newsletter Issue 254 | November 04, 2019 | web1 | pdf2 | Heterodox Economics Directory3 During public talks or in teaching contexts I am sometimes asked, whether there exists a clear-cut heterodox alternative to standard theories of individual economic decision- making. While there are some obvious responses to this question pointing to classic concepts - like social emulation of consumer preferences, consumption-learning, rent- seeking behavior, mark-up pricing the marginal propensity to consume - many of these concepts operate on a systemic, rather than individual level, and are, hence, sometimes difficult to apply directly to individual decisions without invoking further assumptions. Similar issues can come up, when discussing the role of the ascent of behavioral economics and its impact on the development economics in general (see also here4 or here5 for recent evaluations, which posit that behavioral econ is firmly embedded in mainstream economics). In such contexts it is, in my view, helpful to point out that a fuller heterodox theory of purposeful behavior does indeed exist. It has its roots in the early works of Herbert Simon, builds on "smart heuristics" and is sometimes dubbed 'ecological rationality' (for an introduction see here6 ). It has been developed mainly in psychology and a key idea underlying this approach is that purposeful human action often employs mental shortcuts to approach complex phenomena, that are successful in application and, hence, evolutionary stable. A simple example is the physician's principle "do no harm" that shortly explicates some kind of MaxiMin decision rule. Another example, is Simon's idea of satisficing, which can be understood as a shortcut to circumvent costly/impossible procedures of optimization. In my view, three major arguments can be made for embracing such a view. First, the concept of smart heuristics allows for deriving some of the more systemic heterodox arguments on behavioral patterns (e.g. marginal propensities to consume, cooperative attitudes or herd behavior). Second, smart heuristics often allow for explaining many of the 'biases' found in conven- tional behavioral economics instead of simply 'recording' them as anomalies - indeed it makes the latter look like epicycles in the Ptolemaic theory of celestial motion. For in- stance, in this vein the famous 'status quo bias' can be rationalized as a form of intuitive 1http://www.heterodoxnews.com/n/htn254.html 2http://www.heterodoxnews.com/n/htn254.pdf 3http://heterodoxnews.com/hed 4https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/mic.20170007 5https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625210 6http://www.fulviofrisone.com/attachments/article/412/simple%20heuristics%20that% 20make%20us%20smart.pdf 1 defense against fundamental uncertainty (as future incomes or belongings are discounted relative to those already owned). Finally, a smart heuristics perspective provides conceptual alternatives, which has a twofold impact. For one, these alternative concepts help to illustrate how the tendency to frame findings in behavioral economics in terms of standard models contributes to an "assimilation"7 of behavioral ideas. For another, smart heuristics may also emerge from dealing critically with the inherent practical implications of the standard approach - e.g., when assuming fundamental uncertainty (e.g. here8 ) or complex, multi-dimensional choice-options (e.g. here9 ). Hence, in sum I would argue that the smart heuristics approach can be seen as a highly useful complement to more established heterodox modes of analyzing behavioral pat- terns. All the best, Jakob Contents Call for Papers4 11th Annual Conference in Political Economy (Ferrara, Sept. 2020).......4 15th Forum of the World Association for Political Economy (Athens, August 2020).......................................5 1st International ASCOPE Symposium (Paris, June 2020)............7 3rd Macroeconomics in Perspective Workshop (Paris, April 2020)........8 4th International Conference on Cultural Political Economy (Staffordshire, Jan 2020)....................................... 10 56th ITH Conference "Capital, Migration and the Left" (Linz, Sept 2020)... 10 5th Nordic Post-Keynesian Conference (Aalborg, April 2020).......... 12 5th Nordic Post-Keynesian Conference (Aalborg, April 2020).......... 13 AFFE @ Midwest Economics Association Annual Meeting (US, March 2020). 13 Annual ESPAnet Conference (Leuven, Sept. 2020)................ 14 Call for Book Chapter Proposals: "(De)automating the Future"......... 16 Cambridge Journal of Economics: Special Issue on \Financialisation in devel- oping and emerging economies: Manifestations, Drivers and Implications" 18 7https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268101002414 8https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&uact=8& ved=2ahUKEwizqeHx2s3lAhVr5KYKHXspAkUQFjAEegQIAxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.uvm.edu% 2F{extasciitilde}jfarley%2FEEseminar%2Freadings%2FWhat%2520is%2520ecological% 2520economics.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0AIP6DHYrnNIbTfBjOSYae 9https://jakob-kapeller.org/images/pubs/2013-KapSchuetzStein-JEE.pdf 2 Capitalism & Contention Conference (New York, March 2020)......... 20 Conference on Achieving Sustainable Development in LDCs (Helsinki, Oct. 2020) 21 Conference on Strategies for Degrowth in Europe (Vienna, June 2020)..... 22 Cuadernos de Econom´ıaCr´ıtica:Special Issue on "The Science of Sustainability under structural crisis and the unsustainability of life"........... 24 History of Economic Society Conference (Utrecht, June 2020).......... 25 Workshop on "Patents as Capital" (Stockholm, Sept 2020)........... 25 YSI at International Conference Minsky at 100 (Milan, Dec. 2019)....... 26 Call for Participants 27 13th AHE postgraduate workshop on advanced research methods (Leeds, Jan. 2020)....................................... 27 15th Annual AFIT-AFEE Student Scholars Award Competition........ 28 2nd Workshop on "Teaching History of Economic Thought and Pluralism in Economics" (London, Nov. 2019)....................... 29 Conference "European industrial policy - a tool for a Green New Deal" (Brus- sels, Dec. 2020)................................. 29 GLOBE 2019 Winter School in International Relations (Leysin, Feb. 2020).. 30 International Master's Course "Economic Policies in the Age of Globalisation" (EPOG 2.0)................................... 31 Pluralistic Teaching Workshops at ICAPE Conference 2020 (San Diego, Jan- uary 2020).................................... 32 Job Postings 33 California State University San Bernardino, US.................. 33 Colorado State University, US............................ 34 Progressive Economy Forum, UK.......................... 35 St. John's University, US.............................. 36 Trinity College, US.................................. 37 University of Amsterdam, Netherlands....................... 38 University of Manitoba, US............................. 39 University of Texas, US............................... 40 Awards 41 Call for Nominations: Joseph J. Spengler Book Prize............... 42 Calls for Nominations: Awards of ESHET Conference.............. 42 Winner Announcement: EAEPE Research Prizes................. 44 Journals 45 Economy and Society, 48 (3)............................ 45 European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies 16 (2).......... 47 Feminist Economics 25 (4).............................. 47 Historical Materialism, 27 (3)............................ 50 International Critical Thought 9 (3)........................ 51 3 Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 41 (4)............... 54 Rethinking Marxism 31 (4)............................. 55 Review of Keynesian Economics 7 (4)....................... 57 Review of Radical Political Economics 51 (4)................... 58 Books and Book Series 60 A Modern Guide to State Intervention Economic Policies for Growth and Sus- tainability.................................... 61 Class History and Class Practices in the Periphery of Capitalism........ 61 Finance, Growth and Inequality Post-Keynesian Perspectives.......... 62 John Maynard Keynes: The Art of Choosing the Right Model.......... 62 Macroeconomics................................... 63 Nationalism on the Internet: Critical Theory and Ideology in the Age of Social Media and Fake News............................. 63 None so Fit to Break the Chains: Marx's Ethics of Self-Emancipation..... 64 Progressive Post-Keynesian Economics Dealing with Reality........... 64 Revolutionizing World Trade: How Disruptive Technologies Open Opportuni- ties for All.................................... 65 Towards a Political Economy of Degrowth..................... 65 Understanding Marxism............................... 66 Veblen's America: The Conspicuous Case of Donald J. Trump......... 66 For Your Information 67 World Economics Association Commentaries is looking for a co-editor..... 67 Call for Papers 11th Annual Conference in Political Economy (Ferrara, Sept. 2020) 09-11 September 2020 | Ferrara, Italy Beyond Neoliberalism and Populism: On the Political Economy of our Soci- eties and Economies IIPPE calls for submissions to the 2020 annual Conference. We particularly welcome pa- pers directly related to the core themes of \moving beyond neoliberalism and populism", and \building progressive policies and alliances for our societies and economies". As always, presentations on all aspects of political economy are also welcome. New partic- ipants committed to political economy, interdisciplinarity, history of economic
Recommended publications
  • Schumpeter's Theory of Economic Development
    Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 4, Issue 3 (2021) 65-81 Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development: A Study of the Creative Destruction and Entrepreneurship Effects on the Economic Growth Farrokh Emami Langroodi a,* a Goethe University Frankfurt, Graduate School of Economics, Finance, & Management (GSEFM), Department of Finance, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History This paper provides a multifaceted review and Submitted 11 Aug 2021 analysis of Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Accepted 12 Aug 2021 Development and specifically the creative Available online 13 Aug 2021 destruction effect intertwined with the business JEL Classification cycles, and their effectiveness in explaining the A12 long-run economic growth by first, looking into the B13 main features of this theory; second, comparing the B31 fundamental similarities and differences of B52 Schumpeter theory with respect to Marxism and Keynesianism, third; a comparison of “Schumpeter” Keywords effect vs. the “refugee” effect in recently published Schumpeter Creative Destruction researches, and finally, the relationship of Capitalism Schumpeterian and Kirznerian opportunities in Kirznerian modern entrepreneurship. Marxism Keynesianism Journal of Insurance and Financial Management Economic Growth Business Cycle Entrepreneurship *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Author(s) retain copyright of the submitted paper (Please view the Copyright Notice of JIFM). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management (ISSN-Canada: 2371-2112) Emami Langroodi F. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 4, Issue 3 (2021) 65-81 66 1. INTRODUCTION It is well known that Joseph Alois Schumpeter always explained that “analyzing business cycles means neither more nor less than analyzing the economic process of the capitalist era” (Schumpeter, 1939).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Alternatives
    EDITORIAL COLLECTIVE Social Alternatives Bronwyn Stevens University of the Sunshine Coast Social Alternatives is an independent, quarterly refereed Clare Archer-Lean University of the Sunshine Coast journal which aims to promote public debate, commentary and Ella Jeffrey Queensland University of Technology dialogue about contemporary social, political, economic and Jennifer Mays Queensland University of Technology environmental issues. Julie Matthews University of Adelaide Ginna Brock University of the Sunshine Coast Social Alternatives analyses, critiques and reviews contemporary social issues and problems. The journal seeks Debra Livingston University of the Sunshine Coast to generate insight, knowledge and understanding of our Graham Maddox University of New England contemporary circumstances in order to determine local, Cassandra Star Flinders University national and global implications. We are committed to the George Morgan University of Western Sydney principles of social justice and to creating spaces of dialogue Hayley Baxter University of Queensland intended to stimulate social alternatives to current conditions. Helen McLaren Flinders University Social Alternatives values the capacity of intellectual and artistic endeavour to prompt imaginative solutions and Lee-Anne Bye University of the Sunshine Coast alternatives and publishes refereed articles, review essays, Christine Morley Queensland University of Technology commentaries and book reviews as well as short stories, Elizabeth Eddy poems, images and cartoons. ADVISORY BOARD The journal has grappled with matters of contemporary concern for four decades, publishing articles and themed Roland Bleiker University of Queensland issues on topics such as peace and conflict, racism, Verity Burgmann Monash University Indigenous rights, social justice, human rights, inequality and Parlo Singh Griffith University the environment. Please show your support by subscribing to Don Alexander University of Queensland the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism Versus Democracy? Also by Boris Frankel
    CAPITALISM VERSUS DEMOCRACY? ALSO BY BORIS FRANKEL Democracy Versus Sustainability Fictions of Sustainability: The Politics of Growth and Post-Capitalist Futures Zombies, Li"iputians and Sadists: The Power of the Living Dead and the Future of Australia When the Boat Comes In: Transforming Australia in the Age of Globalisation From the Prophets Deserts Come: The Stru#le to Reshape Australian Political Culture The Post Industrial Utopians Beyond the State? Dominant Theories and Socialist Strategies Marxian Theories of The State: A Critique of Orthodoxy CAPITALISM VERSUS DEMOCRACY? RETHINKING POLITICS IN THE AGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS BORIS FRANKEL GREENMEADOWS Copyright © Boris Frankel 2020 First published in 2020 by Greenmeadows P.O. Box 128 Elsternwick, Melbourne 3185 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher. A catalogue record for this book is available from the National Library of Australia. Name: Frankel, Boris, author. Title: Capitalism Versus Democracy? Rethinking Politics in the Age of Environmental Crises/ Boris Frankel. Includes Notes and References and Index. Subjects: 1. Politics of environmental sustainability. 2. Fascism, socialism and democracy. 3. Post-capitalism – post-growth societies. 4. Social reform – alternative policies ISBN: (pbk) 978-0-6483633-4-7 ISBN: (epub) 978-0-6483633-5-4 Typeset in Hoefler Text. Cover Design by Emile Frankel. The publisher has endeavoured to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book were accurate and active at the time of going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • New Structural Economics Meets European Transition Erik Berglofa a Institute of Global Affairs, LSE, London, UK Published Online: 17 Jun 2015
    This article was downloaded by: [Professor Judith Clifton] On: 18 June 2015, At: 08:38 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Economic Policy Reform Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gpre20 New structural economics meets European transition Erik Berglofa a Institute of Global Affairs, LSE, London, UK Published online: 17 Jun 2015. Click for updates To cite this article: Erik Berglof (2015) New structural economics meets European transition, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18:2, 114-130, DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2015.1013543 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.1013543 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 the Fourth World War: the EZLN Analysis of Neoliberalism
    We Are from Before, Yes, but We Are New: Autonomy, Territory, and the Production of New Subjects of Self-government in Zapatismo by Mara Catherine Kaufman Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Charles Piot, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Anne Allison ___________________________ Kathi Weeks ___________________________ Michael Hardt Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 ABSTRACT We Are from Before, Yes, but We Are New: Autonomy, Territory, and the Production of New Subjects of Self-government in Zapatismo by Mara Catherine Kaufman Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Charles Piot, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Anne Allison ___________________________ Kathi Weeks ___________________________ Michael Hardt An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2010 Copyright by Mara Catherine Kaufman 2010 Abstract The 1994 Zapatista uprising in Chiapas, Mexico, created a rupture with a series of neoliberal policies implemented in Mexico and on a global scale over the last few decades of the 20th century. In a moment when alternatives to neoliberal global capitalism appeared to have disappeared from the world stage, the Zapatista Army for National Liberation (EZLN) initiated a movement and process that would have significance not only in Chiapas and for Mexico, but for many struggles and movements around the world that would come to identify with a kind of “alter-globalization” project.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Economic: Perspectives on Risk and Rationality
    Social Contexts and Responses to Risk Network (SCARR) Working Paper 2007/18 Being Economic: Perspectives on Risk and Rationality Judith Mehta 1 Being Economic: Perspectives on Risk and Rationality Mehta Contact: Author: Judith Mehta Address: School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ EMail: [email protected] ESRC priority network ‘Social Contexts and Responses to Risk’ (SCARR) School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research (SSPSSR) Cornwallis Building NE University of Kent at Canterbury Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, UK http://www.kent.ac.uk/scarr/ 2 Being Economic: Perspectives on Risk and Rationality Mehta 1. Introduction Austrian economics, behavioural/experimental economics, black political economy, critical realism, ecological economics, ersatz economics, evolutionary economics, feminist economics, historical economics, institutional and new institutional economics, Keynesianism/s, Marxism/s, monetarism, neoclassical economics and neo-neoclassical economics, new classical economics, postcolonial economics, postmodern economics, rhetorical economics, social economics, social constructivism, structuralist economics, transaction cost economics, … The list isn’t exhaustive; but it suffices to demonstrate that economics is characterised by a multitude of schools of thought, or methodological approaches to economic phenomena. Some schools of thought overlap and cross-fertilise one another, while some are openly in antagonistic relation; some schools of thought operate across a broad terrain of subject matter, while
    [Show full text]
  • Latin American Structuralism
    175 CEPAL REVIEW 98 • AUGUST 2009 KEYWORDS Economic policy Economic systems Structural adjustment Value Latin American structuralism Markets Prices and economic theory Inflation Political aspects Economic aspects Economic dependence Armando Di Filippo Neoliberalism Economic development Latin America T his essay suggests that there is a body of Latin American structuralist economic theory which possesses distinctive characteristics while having a family resemblance to other institutionalist schools of thought, and which is based on an original approach to economic value. The founders of structuralism conceived a systemic, multidimensional and dynamic approach. They applied it to the study of improvements in, and the social distribution of, labour productivity generated in the central economies and the effects of these on the societies of the periphery. This outlook challenges the notion of markets as self-regulating systems that return to stable equilibrium positions, presenting them rather as a quantitative expression of the national or international power status of contracting parties. Different development styles and processes progressively alter the Armando Di Filippo Argentinean economist power structure of social systems and these changes are reflected in the Professor at the Institute of dynamic of relative market prices. International Studies, University of Chile, and at the Universidad Alberto Hurtado Adviser to the Executive Secretariat of ECLAC ✒ [email protected] 176 CEPAL REVIEW 98 • AUGUST 2009 I Latin American structuralism: economic theory and political economy At the heart of any economic theory about the support the legislator and statesman (Smith, 2007, p. capitalist system is the study of economic values, the 275), while economic theory includes, first, a value- market and prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Unified Theory Analysing Workplace Ideologies: Marxism And
    Marxism and Racial Oppression: Towards a Unified Theory Charles Post (City University of New York) Half a century ago, the revival of the womens movementsecond wave feminismforced the revolutionary left and Marxist theory to revisit the Womens Question. As historical materialists in the 1960s and 1970s grappled with the relationship between capitalism, class and gender, two fundamental positions emerged. The dominant response was dual systems theory. Beginning with the historically correct observation that male domination predates the emergence of the capitalist mode of production, these theorists argued that contemporary gender oppression could only be comprehended as the result of the interaction of two separate systemsa patriarchal system of gender domination and the capitalist mode of production. The alternative approach emerged from the debates on domestic labor and the predominantly privatized character of the social reproduction of labor-power under capitalism. In 1979, Lise Vogel synthesized an alternative unitary approach that rooted gender oppression in the tensions between the increasingly socialized character of (most) commodity production and the essentially privatized character of the social reproduction of labor-power. Today, dual-systems theory has morphed into intersectionality where distinct systems of class, gender, sexuality and race interact to shape oppression, exploitation and identity. This paper attempts to begin the construction of an outline of a unified theory of race and capitalism. The paper begins by critically examining two Marxian approaches. On one side are those like Ellen Meiksins Wood who argued that capitalism is essentially color-blind and can reproduce itself without racial or gender oppression. On the other are those like David Roediger and Elizabeth Esch who argue that only an intersectional analysis can allow historical materialists to grasp the relationship of capitalism and racial oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • An Essay on Late Structuralism
    An Essay on Late Structuralism Bill Gibson¤ March 2002 Abstract This paper traces the evolution of structuralist thought from the early European and Latin American structuralists through the late structuralism of Taylor and his followers. The genesis of the structuralist method is located in the writings of the early structuralists and necessarily leads to what neoclassicals call ad hoc theory. It is argued that simulation models are the logical outgrowth of the structuralist methodological trajectory and the validity of structuralist method is established by it scope as well as its realism. 1. Introduction In this essay I examine the scope and method of the structuralist school in an attempt to identify precisely how it di¤ers from the neoclassical system, in both its mode of analysis and its criteria for validity. There are four conclusions reached: …rst, the work of Taylor and his followers can be seen as a coherent outgrowth of not only Latin American Structuralism, as is often observed [25], but also the European or Early Structuralism of Levi-Strauss, Godlier and Piaget [27], [22] Piaget [37]. The early work, both Latin American and European, focused on rigidities and frictions in local economies [5] while in the late structuralism of Taylor and his followers, theory not only must account for the “macrofoundations” of behavior, but also global foundations, that is the constraints the evolution of the global system itself imposes on the players. Third, late structuralism is often criticized as ad hoc theorybecauseisnotgroundedinoptimizationmodels ¤Department of Economics, University of Vermont, Old Mill Burlington, VT 05405 USA 413-548-9448 e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of Endoegenous Crises: Heterodox Explanations and Empirical Analysis
    THE CAUSES OF ENDOEGENOUS CRISES: HETERODOX EXPLANATIONS AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS AUTHOR: Jordi Schröder Bosch UNDERGRADUATE: Economics TUTOR: Anna Solé del Barrio DATE: 25.05.2020 ABSTRACT The possibility of endogenous economic crises is an issue that divides economists. Many orthodox approaches reject the existence of this kind of crises (economic recessions are the result of exogenous shocks), while various heterodox schools of thought have conceptualised crisis as an endogenous phenomenon of the cycle. However, these schools differ on what are the causes and the origin of such crisis. The main explanations offered about the main driving of the cycle and its ultimate effect producing crisis are underconsumption, the evolution of profits, and investment. The most relevant schools that have contributed to the debate on endogenous crisis are the classical political economists, the Marxist, and the Keynesian schools of thought. However, so far, this is still a topic of intense debate among many scholars and no agreement on the factors leading to crisis has been reached. A distributed lag model is applied to a time series of profits and investment in the UK economy in order to explore for the relationship between variables. The empirical analysis does not provide robust conclusions and more discussion and debate is needed on that issue. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Motivation ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH in POLITICAL ECONOMY Series Editor: Paul Zarembka State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
    CLASS HISTORY AND CLASS PRACTICES IN THE PERIPHERY OF CAPITALISM RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY Series Editor: Paul Zarembka State University of New York at Buffalo, USA Recent Volumes: Volume 24: Transitions in Latin America and in Poland and Syria À Edited by P. Zarembka Volume 25: Why Capitalism Survives Crises: The Shock Absorbers À Edited by P. Zarembka Volume 26: The National Question and the Question of Crisis À Edited by P. Zarembka Volume 27: Revitalizing Marxist Theory for Today’s Capitalism À Edited by P. Zarembka and R. Desai Volume 28: Contradictions: Finance, Greed, and Labor Unequally Paid À Edited by P. Zarembka Volume 29: Sraffa and Althusser Reconsidered; Neoliberalism Advancing in South Africa, England, and Greece À Edited by P. Zarembka Volume 30A: Theoretical Engagements In Geopolitical Economy À Edited by Radhika Desai Volume 30B: Analytical Gains of Geopolitical Economy À Edited by R. Desai Volume 31: Risking Capitalism À Edited by Susanne Soederberg Volume 32 Return of Marxian Macro-Dynamics in East Asia À Edited by M. Ishikura, S. Jeong, and M. Li Volume 33 Environmental Impacts of Transnational Corporations in the Global South À Edited by Paul Cooney and William Sacher Freslon EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD GENERAL EDITOR Paul Zarembka State University of New York at Buffalo, USA EDITORIAL BOARD Paul Cooney Jie Meng Universidad Nacional de General Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Sarmiento, Argentina Republic of China Radhika Desai Isabel Monal University of Manitoba, Canada University of Havana, Cuba Thomas Ferguson
    [Show full text]
  • For a Modest and Heterodox Mainstream Economics
    FOR A MODEST AND HETERODOX MAINSTREAM ECONOMICS Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira Paper presented to the Coimbra Conference 2010 “The Revival of Political Economy – Prospects for a Sustainable Provision”, sponsored by the Faculty of Economics of Coimbra University, October 21-23 2010. Suddenly, in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis, the king turned naked. Or we all realized that he was naked. Neoclassical economics was dominant since the late 1970s, but proved unable to explain and predict the behavior of economic systems. Mainstream economics, based on the homo economicus and on the rational expectations assumptions, concluded from them that markets were efficient and self-regulated. They were not. It also concluded that the existing market failures were eventually minor and did not questioned the logic of that revealed truth. It would be enough to guarantee markets, to protect property rights and contracts, to defend competition, and to keep public finances balanced, that the rest – financial and price stability, fast growth, and fair income distribution would in place. But this was also false. Although hypothetical- deductive economic models may show that income is distributed according to the marginal productivity of factors, non-regulated markets were never just or even fair; although market competition was supposed to automatically cause fast growth, historical experiences of catching up were always combined with active state action; although inflation was supposed to be under control provided that budget deficit and the supply of money were under control, these two implicit correlations were not confirmed by regression analyses; although deregulated financial markets were supposed to guarantee financial stability, the enormous increase of asset bubbles and financial crises, or, in Kindleberg’s wording, the recurrence of euphoria, manias and panics after the collapse of the Bretton Woods agreement, proved that this was just not true.
    [Show full text]