NYC Tries 'Rapid' Buses in Bid to Cut Transit Costs ­ Nytimes.Com

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NYC Tries 'Rapid' Buses in Bid to Cut Transit Costs ­ Nytimes.Com 1/22/2015 NYC Tries 'Rapid' Buses in Bid to Cut Transit Costs ­ NYTimes.com January 3, 2011 NYC Tries 'Rapid' Buses in Bid to Cut Transit Costs By NATHANIAL GRONEWOLD of G r e n w i Tenth story in an occasional series on the greening of New York City. Click here to view the series. NEW YORK ­­ The city's much­maligned bus system is getting a face­lift. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) surprised commuters on Manhattan's East Side last fall by launching shiny stretch coaches to replace old grimy buses on the route that links the island's southern tip to East Harlem. The new buses cruise 90 percent of the route in a new "bus only" lane marked by signs warning motorists that they face $115 fines for parking or driving in the path. The M15 Select Bus Service (SBS) is New York City's version of "bus rapid transit," a Latin American innovation that's being copied around the world. The Manhattan route runs along 1st and 2nd avenues and was first seen as a stopgap measure until a new subway line could be completed, but the city's Department of Transportation says the service is likely here to stay. As with bus rapid transit in Curitiba, Brazil, and Bogota, Colombia, New York's Select Bus requires passengers to pay prior to boarding to speed up the trip. With ticket in hand, riders can board through any door, instead of all lining up single file at the front to pay their fare one by one. The buses themselves resemble light­rail trains, and they move in their own lanes. Federal grants are helping to pay for the improvements, even after MTA budget woes forced the agency to cut dozens of regular bus routes early last year. Despite fits and starts, New Yorkers seem to be quickly taking to the new concept. Though no MORE IN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT studies have been undertaken yet to see how things have improved on the M15 route, ARTICLES) anecdotally, riders estimate the trip to be at least 50 percent faster than before. Russia Presses Ahead With Plan for Gas Pipeline to "It's a lot faster," said Daniel Hernandez, a Brooklyn resident who rides the bus to workT duarilky einy Midtown Manhattan. "The best part is you can board through the back door. That speeRdesad More » http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/01/03/03greenwire­nyc­tries­rapid­buses­in­bid­to­cut­transit­co­71909.html?pagewanted=print 1/5 1/22/2015 NYC Tries 'Rapid' Buses in Bid to Cut Transit Costs ­ NYTimes.com things up a lot." Indeed, northbound traveling from the South Street Seaport to 42nd Street took a reporter less than 20 minutes to travel more than 50 blocks, a time comparable to a trip on a subway train that stops at every station. Southbound from Harlem, the trip gets disrupted by the 2nd Avenue subway construction but can still cover 125th Street to the Chrysler Building in about the same amount of time. The system isn't perfect. There are no big stations, the bus lanes aren't physically separated from other streets, and the buses can get stuck at red lights. Bus­transit proponents envision systems that work much like above­ground subway networks, but SBS buses occasionally intermingle with traffic, and passenger vehicles are allowed to use the lanes for right turns. But activists who pressure the city's DOT to improve transit say the system is ahead of what bus riders must endure on other routes. They're eager to expand SBS throughout the city. "I don't think you'll ever see something like what exists in Bogota just because of the physical infrastructure constraints in New York City," said Elena Conte, an official at the nonprofit Pratt Center for Community Development. "But the thing is, that's perfectly fine, because right now, bus service in New York City is so atrociously slow that if you even see improvements on a fraction of the level of what's possible with full­fledged bus rapid transit, you're talking major improvements in people's lives." Bronx experiment New York's testing of bus rapid transit began in 2008 in the Bronx, where DOT and MTA jointly implemented a system for the Bx12 bus along Fordham Road and Pelham Parkway. The east­west route has since become one of New York's most heavily used. The Straphangers Campaign, a division of the nonprofit New York Public Interest Research Group that advocates for public transit riders, surveyed the route this summer and found that it now runs 25 percent faster than the old express service. "It has really, really done a great job for east­west commutes in the Bronx," said Cate Contino, a campaign coordinator. "Ridership on that has skyrocketed. It's now in like the top five or 10 for the city." Contino said her organization plans to conduct a similar survey of the newest M15 Select Bus Service this month. She expects similar results. http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/01/03/03greenwire­nyc­tries­rapid­buses­in­bid­to­cut­transit­co­71909.html?pagewanted=print 2/5 1/22/2015 NYC Tries 'Rapid' Buses in Bid to Cut Transit Costs ­ NYTimes.com The M15 on the east side of Manhattan is the second extension to the system and now the longest, stretching about 9 miles. Before SBS was implemented there, the Straphangers Campaign estimated that both the local and express M15 buses serviced about 50,000 people per day. The rollout wasn't smooth. Confusion over how to pay quickly set in, and the local press railed against reports of drivers doling out $100 fines to passengers who failed to pay before boarding. Rush hour traffic also overwhelmed some parts of the line ­­ complaints poured in that the 14th Street stop didn't have enough pay kiosks and sometimes ran out of the paper needed to print proofs of purchase. The bus lanes themselves weren't respected when first introduced. Drivers and even the New York Police Department routinely flouted the rules and parked their vehicles in the lanes. And the systems still sometimes have to share space with street traffic, a further limitation. The bus­only rule is only enforced during rush hour on some stretches, and the buses still occasionally find themselves vying with trucks making deliveries for the space. "It's kind of like 'bus rapid transit light,'" Contino admitted. "It has a variety of beneficial features, but it's not what a planner would think of when you say bus rapid transit, with a physically separated right of way, iconic stations, prescribed waiting areas." But growing pains seem to be easing. Regular passengers have become familiar with the pay­ before­you­board system, and even praise it, recalling how long it often took the bus to get moving when passengers had to pay their fares at boarding. The city also recently installed a camera system on the Bronx and Manhattan SBS routes to stiffen enforcement. DOT officials declined multiple requests for interviews, but their press office said in an e­mail that, although they don't have figures to gauge compliance, they nevertheless feel that the cameras will have the intended effect. Bargain price But it's the cost advantage that really hits home. Officials estimate that modern metropolitan areas spend on average $1 billion per mile to build a new subway line. A full­blown, Bogota­style bus rapid transit system is estimated to be roughly a thousand times cheaper ­­ just $1 million per mile. Expansion of "bus rapid transit light" throughout New York City is now under way. http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/01/03/03greenwire­nyc­tries­rapid­buses­in­bid­to­cut­transit­co­71909.html?pagewanted=print 3/5 1/22/2015 NYC Tries 'Rapid' Buses in Bid to Cut Transit Costs ­ NYTimes.com DOT plans to roll out a new line in Brooklyn, along the B44 route from Sheepshead Bay to Williamsburg. Up next is likely a line along 34th Street in Manhattan that would cross the island east to west along that notoriously difficult thoroughfare. The city has considered plans to cut the middle portion off to passenger vehicles entirely to speed up the route for buses. Now Contino says there's talk that the entire route could become the first full­blown bus rapid transit route, with all curbside parking eliminated in favor of buses and stations. Even Staten Island will likely be included. In that borough, DOT is already experimenting with technology that allows regular bus drivers to order a red light to turn green as it approaches, speeding up travel times to the Staten Island Ferry port. Officials are considering expanding this "signal prioritization technology" to the SBS routes in Manhattan and the Bronx and to any new routes added later. Officials are also eying Queens for opportunities there. A recent DOT study of the feasibility of spreading bus rapid transit throughout the city concluded that the five boroughs could all benefit from such systems in at least eight to 10 heavily congested traffic corridors in each borough. That suggests up to 50 new lines could be added to the nascent system in the years to come. Both the Pratt Center and Straphangers Campaign say their experience with the two lines put in so far tells them this is a good way for the city to go. DOT reports suggest the city is already moving forward on 16 of the most promising routes.
Recommended publications
  • Based on the Existing • Bx41 Bus Route 5.3 Miles Long
    WEBSTER AVENUE SBS Study Corridor • Based on the existing Bx41 bus route • 5.3 miles long • Within a quarter-mile of the corridor: • 125,000 residents • 74% of households do not own a car • 63% of residents commute by public transit Project Goals 1. Speed buses and improve reliability 2. Improve safety for all corridor users 3. Support community needs +selectbusservice Webster Avenue BUS DELAY • Bx41 LTD buses are Other 1% stopped more than 50% of Bus Stops the time 24% In Motion • One-way travel time can 49% vary by up to 20 minutes Red Lights (typical times are between 26% 37 and 57 minutes) • Travel times are worst in the PM peak Average Bx41 LTD trip = 46 minutes Bus stops The Hub Fordham Road Red lights Fordham Road Claremont Avenue Congestion E Gun Hill Road Cross Bronx Expressway +selectbusservice Webster Avenue D T R E 221 S S E 220 ST N I E 219 ST E 219 ST A V L A ST E 218 S E V P A N T R 7 S E E 21 A L L B E I V N T T I E 216 S L I O 16 ST E 2 T 15 S H 2 T E E 216 S 5 ST D E 21 W N V 4 ST L E 21 B W A X Y N T L ST E 213 S D Y O E 214 R R L B O P E 212 ST O ST E E T E 213 L S I T W ST S 3 L V 21 ME E ST EN R A D T ST 1 L 211 S V E 212 A 21 TI E R E A C E E 212 ST C E T T T S E B L E L L RD I ILL V P W H T A UN W ST G S 11 E E 2 E N V 1 G E V Y 1 A E 2 A A D E L L E D W L G V T O N S V O A D N A C I I A T A C N N E L H R G A F L T S L O B C M F V V I S P O G Y U N A A L I H T L R N P S C E I E A I M L T D V V A L L D K B N A O A E A L C H A D I T Y N R V L A R V B W V A B T V A L L E M N A U I W U B R N P O L R H U X C O E ST
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons Improving Bus Service in New York A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning By Charles Romanow May 2018 Abstract New York City’s transportation system is in a state of disarray. City street are clogged with taxi’s and for-hire vehicles, subway platforms are packed with straphangers waiting for delayed trains and buses barely travel faster than pedestrians. The bureaucracy of City and State government in the region causes piecemeal improvements which do not keep up with the state of disrepair. Bus service is particularly poor, moving at rates incomparable with the rest of the country. New York has recently made successful efforts at improving bus speeds, but only so much can be done amidst a city of gridlock. Bus systems around the world faced similar challenges and successfully implemented improvements. A toolbox of near-immediate and long- term options are at New York’s disposal dealing directly with bus service as well indirect causes of poor bus service. The failing subway system has prompted public discussion concerning bus service. A significant cause of poor service in New York is congestion. A number of measures are capable of improving congestion and consequently, bus service. Due to the city’s limited capacity at implementing short-term solutions, the most highly problematic routes should receive priority. Routes with slow speeds, high rates of bunching and high ridership are concentrated in Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn which also cater to the most subway riders.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 23: Response to Comments on the SDEIS1
    Chapter 23: Response to Comments on the SDEIS1 A. INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes and responds to all substantive comments on the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) published in March 2003 for the Second Avenue Subway. Public review for the SDEIS began on March 2003, with publication and distribution of the document. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) held two public hearings to receive comments on the document: on May 12, 2003 in the auditorium of the Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House at One Bowling Green (Lower Manhattan); and on May 13, 2003, in the Hecksher Auditorium at El Museo del Barrio, 1230 Fifth Avenue (at 104th Street in East Harlem). The public comment period remained open until June 10, 2003. The SDEIS was circulated to involved and interested agencies and other parties and posted on the MTA’s website, and notice of its availability and the public hearing were published in the Federal Register on April 11, 2003. To advertise the public hearing, MTA published notices in the New York Post, Hoy, Amsterdam News, Chinese World Journal, and New York Daily News. In addition, information on the public hearing was posted on the MTA’s website, a notice of public hearing was mailed to all public officials and interested parties in the MTA service area; and a press release announcing the hearing was sent to all media outlets in the area. Bilingual signs announcing the hearing were posted in all MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) subway stations and on some buses. Brochures were handed out in major Manhattan East Side NYCT subway stations.
    [Show full text]
  • At Capacity: the Need for More Rail Access to the Manhattan CBD
    At Capacity: The Need for More Rail Access to the Manhattan CBD Rosemary Scanlon and Edward S. Seeley Jr. Elliot G. Sander, Director Allison L. C. de Cerreño, Co-Director November 2004 Rudin Center for Transportation Policy & Management NYU Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service 295 Lafayette Street, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10012 www.nyu.edu/wagner/rudincenter This report was made possible with support from the New York State Laborers and the General Contractors Association of New York, Inc. Their generosity is greatly appreciated. ABOUT THE RUDIN CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION POLICY & MANAGEMENT Established in 1996 at New York University’s Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, and named in September 2000 in recognition of a generous gift to NYU in support of the Center, the Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management is currently led by Elliot (Lee) G. Sander, Director, and Allison L. C. de Cerreño, Ph.D., Co-Director. The mission of the Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management is to encourage innovative thinking and action in transportation management and policy. With a team of Visiting Scholars drawn from both the transportation and academic communities, the Rudin Center conducts research and conferences, provides education and training, and promotes and supports key policy networks in the field of transportation policy and management. A number of publications are produced each year, based on the research, conferences, and training carried out by the Rudin Center. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report focuses on the need for new rail access to Manhattan to ensure that the economy of the Manhattan Central Business District (CBD) will retain its critical central function in the national and New York regional economy, and can expand the level of economic activity and jobs in this new century.
    [Show full text]
  • 8-25-20 MTA Transcript
    NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES & COMMISSIONS ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES & COMMISSIONS IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY August 25, 2020 10:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Page 2 Joint Hearing Impact of COVID-19 on MTA, 8-25-20 SENATORS PRESENT: SENATOR LEROY COMRIE, Chair, Senate Standing Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions SENATOR TIM KENNEDY, Chair, Senate Standing Committee on Transportation SENATOR TODD KAMINSKY SENATOR GUSTAVO RIVERA SENATOR ANNA KAPLAN SENATOR JESSICA RAMOS SENATOR ANDREW GOUNARDES SENATOR LUIS SEPULVEDA SENATOR THOMAS O’MARA SENATOR JOHN LIU SENATOR BRAD HOYLMAN SENATOR SHELLEY MAYER SENATOR MICHAEL RANZENHOFER SENATOR SUE SERINO Geneva Worldwide, Inc. 256 West 38t h Street, 10t h Floor, New York, NY 10018 Page 3 Joint Hearing Impact of COVID-19 on MTA, 8-25-20 ASSEMBLY MEMBERS PRESENT: ASSEMBLY MEMBER AMY PAULIN, Chair, Assembly Standing Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions ASSEMBLY MEMBER KENNETH BLANKENBUSH ASSEMBLY MEMBER CHARLES FALL ASSEMBLY MEMBER NILY ROZIC ASSEMBLY MEMBER SANDRA GALEF ASSEMBLY MEMBER STEVEN OTIS ASSEMBLY MEMBER RON KIM ASSEMBLY MEMBER STACEY PHEFFER AMATO ASSEMBLY MEMBER VIVIAN COOK ASSEMBLY MEMBER DAVID BUCHWALD ASSEMBLY MEMBER PHILLIP PALMESANO ASSEMBLY MEMBER ROBERT CARROLL ASSEMBLY MEMBER REBECCA SEAWRIGHT ASSEMBLY MEMBER CARMEN DE LA ROSA ASSEMBLY MEMBER YUH-LINE NIOU Geneva Worldwide,
    [Show full text]
  • IRUM's Additional Comments on Revised Supplemental
    INSTITUTE FOR RATIONAL URBAN MOBILITY, INC. George Haikalis One Washington Square Village, Suite 5D President New York, NY 10012 212-475-3394 [email protected] www.irum.org June 5, 2006 Joseph Petrocelli Chief, Finance & Administration MTA Capital Construction 469 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 Re: Additional Comments on Revised Supplemental Environmental Assessment of Proposed 50th Street Vent Facility for MTA LIRR East Side Access Project Dear Mr. Petrocelli: Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and others from MTA and also with Irwin Kessman of FTA on Thursday, June 1, 2006. My associates at the Regional Rail Working Group (RRWG) were especially grateful to be able to share some of their expertise and knowledge at the meeting. The RRWG is an informal coalition of transit advocates from New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. The RRWG and its advisors represent a broad cross-section of transit experts and advocates with many years of experience in planning, design and public participation. We were especially fortunate to have with us Phil Strong, former LIRR transportation engineer, Herb Landow, a retired railroad and transportation consulting executive, Albert L. Papp, Jr., a Director of the New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers and Secretary of the Board of the National Association of Railroad Passengers, and William K. Guild, a lawyer with a longstanding interest in rail transit matters. The RRWG is hosted by the Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, Inc. (IRUM), a New York City-based not-for-profit corporation concerned with advancing cost-effective measures to reduce motor vehicle congestion in dense urban places.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitcenter Build Trust
    The MTA Can Deliver a Capital Program That Puts Riders First B After a long run of rising usage, unreliable subway service has led to shrinking ridership despite growing population and jobs. Unless New York’s leaders reverse this decline, the continued health and prosperity of the region will be at risk. Cratering subway reliability and a surge in high- profile breakdowns during 2017 and 2018 drew attention to longstanding deficiencies that had previously skirted intense public scrutiny. The signal system is ancient and failure-prone. Hundreds of stations lack access for people with disabilities. Subway cars that should have been retired long ago are still pressed into service. The consequences of unreliable, inaccessible subways are felt most acutely by New Yorkers who do not have the means to live close to the Manhattan core. Riders with low incomes tend to lose more time to delays than more affluent riders,1 and accessible subway stations are scarcer in neighborhoods with more affordable rents.2 The decrepit condition of the subway system became the main rallying point for congestion pricing in 2019. Until that legislative session, congestion pricing and similar traffic reduction policies had failed to clear the necessary political hurdles in Albany, despite impressive policy merits. The dire transit situation helped ensure that this time would be different. Funds generated from tolls on driving in the Manhattan core will now supply at least $15 billion for a new wave of 1 Federal Reserve Bank of New transit investment. York. “Why New York City Leading up to the landmark congestion pricing vote, Subway Delays Don’t Affect opponents attacked the Metropolitan Transportation All Riders Equally,” June 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit for New York City
    Bus Rapid Transit For New York City Prepared for Transportation Alternatives NYPIRG Straphangers Campaign June 2002 Schaller Consulting 94 Windsor Place, Brooklyn, NY (718) 768-3487 [email protected] www.schallerconsult.com Summary New York City has the slowest bus service in America. NYC Transit buses travel at an average speed of 7.5 mph. On bus routes such as the M96, M23, M15, Q32, BX35 and B63, the average speed is 6 mph or less. That buses are traveling in slow motion is obvious to everyone, especially riders, who rank it the most serious problem with bus service. Slow bus service discourages people from taking buses, especially for work trips where travel time is critical. Slow bus service contributes to very long travel times to work in New York City, as shown by the latest census. Bus service is slow for many reasons. Traffic congestion is clearly a major factor. But other problems are just as important: • Buses spend as much as 30% of their time waiting for passengers to board and exit. • Increased crowding on buses due to ridership growth has lengthened delays from boarding and exiting. • Traffic signals are not synchronized with bus speeds, so buses are delayed by red lights between bus stops. • Drivers often have to slow down to stay on schedule even when traffic is light. • Bus field supervisors lack the tools to prevent bus bunching. SCHALLER CONSULTING 1 Summary (cont.) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is a promising strategy for improving bus service. By applying features used in rail service to bus service, BRT can make buses faster, more reliable and more attractive.
    [Show full text]
  • Webster Avenue SBS
    WEBSTER AVENUE SBS Study Corridor Gun Hill Rd • Based on the existing " " Intermodal Terminal E Gun Hill Rd " Bx41 bus route that " carries 20,000 daily riders " Fordham " Manhattan Plaza Bx12 SBS • 5.3 miles from The Hub A 1 5 " 5 2 4 to Williamsbridge B The Bronx D " • Within a 10-minute walk Webster Ave of the corridor: 6 • 200,000 residents " " Legend • 71% of households do Proposed Webster Ave 3 SBS Corridor (Bx 41 route) The 5 2 Major activity node not own a car Melrose Ave Hub Subway line 3 E 149 St 5 2 6 Bx12 SBS Corridor • 61% of residents NYCT Bus route 4 Metro-North Railroad (MNR) " 5 " commute by public transit 6 MNR Station 0 0.25 0.5 1 I Miles ! ! Project Goals 1. Speed buses and improve reliability 2. Improve safety for all corridor users 3. Support community needs +selectbusservice Webster Avenue BUS DELAY • Bx41 LTD buses are Other 1% stopped more than 50% of Bus Stops the time 24% In Motion • One-way travel time can 49% vary by up to 20 minutes Red Lights (typical times are between 26% 37 and 57 minutes) • Travel times are worst in the PM peak Average Bx41 LTD trip = 46 minutes Bus stops The Hub Fordham Road Red lights Fordham Road Claremont Avenue Congestion E Gun Hill Road Cross Bronx Expressway +selectbusservice Webster Avenue SELECT BUS SERVICE IN NYC Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) A cost-effective approach to transit service that cities around the world have used to make riding the bus more like a subway.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Outreach Process 4.0 INTRODUCTION 4.1
    Chapter 4: Public Outreach Process 4.0 INTRODUCTION Consistent with Federal Transit Authority (FTA) guidance for the Alternatives Analysis process, public outreach was conducted at key milestones to solicit comments on work completed and to fully vet the alternatives with stakeholders. This chapter describes the public outreach efforts that have been undertaken for the 34th Street Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis. 4.1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS The public involvement process for the 34th Street Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis was outlined in Attachment A of the Project Initiation Package, which was provided to the FTA in October 2009. As described in the Project Initiation Package, the NYCDOT Project Team held its first Open House in November 2009 to present the proposed alternatives for the 34th Street Corridor. The purpose of the Open House was to provide information about the project, and to allow stakeholders to voice to their concerns, call attention to sensitivities, and explore potential solutions. In addition to the Open House, NYCDOT met with several key stakeholders to present the Alternatives Analysis and receive feedback. Information about the project was also posted on the NYCDOT website, where written feedback was possible through an online submission form. NYCDOT will present the results to the Alternatives Analysis at a second public meeting in January 2010. 4.1.1 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #1—NOVEMBER 19, 2009 The first public Open House was held on November 19, 2009, upon completion of the Project Initiation Package, which included the Statement of Purpose and Need. The meeting reviewed the Project Initiation Package with stakeholders, presented the alternatives, and then solicited input on the alternatives under consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement: MTA, Bus Turnaround Coalition Agree: Key Fixes Can Improve Bus Service
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 22, 2017 CONTACT: Tabitha Decker, TransitCenter | 646-706-7545 | [email protected] Nick Sifuentes, Riders Alliance | 646-600-8329 | [email protected] Jaqi Cohen, Straphangers Campaign | 914-393-0755 | [email protected] Statement: MTA, Bus Turnaround Coalition Agree: Key Fixes Can Improve Bus Service NYCT Has Selected the Right Tools, But Needs an Ambitious Plan and Timeline to Turn Around Bus Decline On Monday, March 20th, the MTA New York City Transit Chief of Operations Planning, Peter Cafiero, outlined the agency’s approach to improving bus service in New York City in a presentation to the board. In response, the Bus Turnaround coalition released the following statement: The Bus Turnaround coalition applauds the MTA New York City Transit for its new analysis of New York City’s bus ridership and performance decline and commitment to applying proven tools like bus only lanes, transit signal priority, route and network redesign, and speeding up the boarding process to improve local buses. These are the strategies required to reverse declines in service and attract riders back to the bus with faster, more reliable trips, and they are strategies we call for in our report, “Turnaround: FiXing New York City’s Buses.” As a neXt step, the agency should detail a specific plan and timeline for an ambitious rollout for these urgently needed reforms. Transit signal priority, which can reduce bus trip times by 10-30%, is a tactic that we should eXpedite implementation of systemwide. We look forward to seeing it initiated this summer on the M60 and Q44, and call on the MTA NYCT and NYC DOT to bring this solution to at least 10 routes in 2017 and to complete system-wide implementation by the first quarter of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Nor News Template
    Serving Norwood, Bedford Park, Fordham and University Heights NORWOOD NEWS Vol. 25, No. 15 ■ PUBLISHED BY MOSHOLU PRESERVATION CORPORATION ■ July 26 –August 22, 2012 SUMMER SPLASHING Rangel Emerges Victorious, Part of Bronx Family By ALEX KRATZ Initially, Charlie Rangel wanted nothing to do with the Bronx. The 82-year-old legislative icon, a symbol of black political power and one-time student at DeWitt Clinton High School on Mosholu Parkway, was comfortable with upper Manhattan as his district and Harlem as his base. The Bronx seemed like for - eign territory, not, as it has become, an extension of the dis - trict he had loved and fostered as a Congressman for the last 42 years. “I had a fierce identification with Harlem,” he said in a recent interview, just weeks after edging out a primary victo - ry in the 13th Congressional District, which now includes the northwest Bronx. “As a kid, I always thought if anybody did - Photo by Adi Talwar n’t live in Manhattan, they didn’t live in the City.” BRONXITES HAVE endured record temperatures this summer, but many have found a way to stay cool. He fought the idea that the Bronx would become part of his The Norwood News won’t be publishing again until Aug. 23, but visit our website, norwoodnews.org, for district. But after a judge drew new Congressional lines earli - more photos and news updates. er this year (after the state legislature failed to agree on lines) based on the 2010 Census, it didn’t matter. The Bronx would come to him.
    [Show full text]