DOCSLIB.ORG

Luther and Erasmus: the Controversy Concerning the Bondage of the Will Protestant Reformed Theological Journal ^ | April 1999 | Garrett J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Luther and Erasmus: the Controversy Concerning the Bondage of the Will Protestant Reformed Theological Journal ^ | April 1999 | Garrett J Free Republic Religion Browse · Search Topics · Post Article Skip to comments. Luther and Erasmus: The Controversy Concerning the Bondage of the Will Protestant Reformed Theological Journal ^ | April 1999 | Garrett J. Eriks Posted on January 1, 2006 at 5:48:03 PM MST by HarleyD Introduction At the time of the Reformation, many hoped Martin Luther and Erasmus could unite against the errors of the Roman Catholic Church. Luther himself was tempted to unite with Erasmus because Erasmus was a great Renaissance scholar who studied the classics and the Greek New Testament. Examining the Roman Catholic Church, Erasmus was infuriated with the abuses in the Roman Catholic Church, especially those of the clergy. These abuses are vividly described in the satire of his book, The Praise of Folly. Erasmus called for reform in the Roman Catholic Church. Erasmus could have been a great help to the Reformation, so it seemed, by using the Renaissance in the service of the Reformation. But a great chasm separated these two men. Luther loved the truth of God's Word as that was revealed to him through his own struggles with the assurance of salvation. Therefore Luther wanted true reformation in the church, which would be a reformation in doctrine and practice. Erasmus cared little about a right knowledge of truth. He simply wanted moral reform in the Roman Catholic Church. He did not want to leave the church, but remained supportive of the Pope. This fundamental difference points out another difference between the two men. Martin Luther was bound by the Word of God. Therefore the content of the Scripture was of utmost importance to him. But Erasmus did not hold to this same high view of Scripture. Erasmus was a Renaissance rationalist who placed reason above Scripture. Therefore the truth of Scripture was not that important to him. The two men could not have fellowship with each other, for the two movements which they represented were antithetical to each other. The fundamental differences came out especially in the debate over the freedom of the will. From 1517 on, the chasm between Luther and Erasmus grew. The more Luther learned about Erasmus, the less he wanted anything to do with him. Melanchthon tried to play the mediator between Luther and Erasmus with no success. But many hated Erasmus because he was so outspoken against the church. These haters of Erasmus tried to discredit him by associating him with Luther, who was outside the church by this time. Erasmus continued to deny this unity, saying he did not know much about the writings of Luther. But as Luther took a stronger stand against the doctrinal abuses of Rome, Erasmus was forced either to agree with Luther or to dissociate himself from Luther. Erasmus chose the latter. Many factors came together which finally caused Erasmus to wield his pen against Luther. Erasmus was under constant pressure from the Pope and later the king of England to refute the views of Luther. When Luther became more outspoken against Erasmus, Erasmus finally decided to write against him. On September 1, 1524, Erasmus published his treatise On the Freedom of the Will. In December of 1525, Luther responded with The Bondage of the Will. Packer and Johnston call The Bondage of the Will "the greatest piece of theological writing that ever came from Luther's pen."1 Although Erasmus writes with eloquence, his writing cannot compare with that of Luther the theologian. Erasmus writes as one who cares little about the subject, while Luther writes with passion and conviction, giving glory to God. In his work, Luther defends the heart of the gospel over against the Pelagian error as defended by Erasmus. This controversy is of utmost importance. In this paper, I will summarize both sides of the controversy, looking at what each taught and defended. Secondly, I will examine the biblical approach of each man. Finally, the main issues will be pointed out and the implications of the controversy will be drawn out for the church today. Erasmus On the Freedom of the Will Erasmus defines free-will or free choice as "a power of the human will by which a man can apply himself to the things which lead to eternal salvation or turn away from them." By this, Erasmus means that man has voluntary or free power of himself to choose the way which leads to salvation apart from the grace of God. Erasmus attempts to answer the question how man is saved: Is it the work of God or the work of man according to his free will? Erasmus answers that it is not one or the other. Salvation does not have to be one or the other, for God and man cooperate. On the one hand, Erasmus defines free-will, saying man can choose freely by himself, but on the other hand, he wants to retain the necessity of grace for salvation. Those who do good works by free-will do not attain the end they desire unless aided by God's grace. Therefore, in regard to salvation, man cooperates with God. Both must play their part in order for a man to be saved. Erasmus expresses it this way: "Those who support free choice nonetheless admit that a soul which is obstinate in evil cannot be softened into true repentance without the help of heavenly grace." Also, attributing all things to divine grace, Erasmus states, And the upshot of it is that we should not arrogate anything to ourselves but attribute all things we have received to divine grace … that our will might be synergos (fellow-worker) with grace although grace is itself sufficient for all things and has no need of the assistance of any human will." In his work On the Freedom of the Will, Erasmus defends this synergistic view of salvation. According to Erasmus, God and man, nature and grace, cooperate together in the salvation of a man. With this view of salvation, Erasmus tries to steer clear of outright Pelagianism and denies the necessity of human action which Martin Luther defends. On the basis of an apocryphal passage (Ecclesiasticas 15:14-17), Erasmus begins his defense with the origin of free-will. Erasmus says that Adam, as he was created, had a free-will to choose good or to turn to evil. In Paradise, man's will was free and upright to choose. Adam did not depend upon the grace of God, but chose to do all things voluntarily. The question which follows is, "What happened to the will when Adam sinned; does man still retain this free-will?" Erasmus would answer, "Yes." Erasmus says that the will is born out of a man's reason. In the fall, man's reason was obscured but was not extinguished. Therefore the will, by which we choose, is depraved so that it cannot change its ways. The will serves sin. But this is qualified. Man's ability to choose freely or voluntarily is not hindered. By this depravity of the will, Erasmus does not mean that man can do no good. Because of the fall, the will is "inclined" to evil, but can still do good. Notice, he says the will is only "inclined" to evil. Therefore the will can freely or voluntarily choose between good and evil. This is what he says in his definition: free-will is "a power of the human will by which a man can apply himself to the things which lead to eternal salvation." Not only does the human will have power, although a little power, but the will has power by which a man merits salvation. This free choice of man is necessary according to Erasmus in order for there to be sin. In order for a man to be guilty of sin, he must be able to know the difference between good and evil, and he must be able to choose between doing good and doing evil. A man is responsible only if he has the ability to choose good or evil. If the free-will of man is taken away, Erasmus says that man ceases to be a man. For this freedom of the will, Erasmus claims to find much support in Scripture. According to Erasmus, when Scripture speaks of "choosing," it implies that man can freely choose. Also, whenever the Scripture uses commands, threats, exhortations, blessings, and cursings, it follows that man is capable of choosing whether or not he will obey. Erasmus defines the work of man's will by which he can freely choose after the fall. Here he makes distinctions in his idea of a "threefold kind of law" which is made up of the "law of nature, law of works, and law of faith." First, this law of nature is in all men. By this law of nature, men do good by doing to others what they would want others to do to them. Having this law of nature, all men have a knowledge of God. By this law of nature, the will can choose good, but the will in this condition is useless for salvation. Therefore more is needed. The law of works is man's choice when he hears the threats of punishment which God gives. When a man hears these threats, he either continues to forsake God, or he desires God's grace. When a man desires God's grace, he then receives the law of faith which cures the sinful inclinations of his reason. A man has this law of faith only by divine grace. In connection with this threefold kind of law, Erasmus distinguishes between three graces of God.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • People of Color Who Inspire: Additional Stories from the Communion of Saints the Center for the Theology of Childhood
    People of Color Who Inspire: Additional Stories from the Communion of Saints The Center for the Theology of Childhood Cheryl V. Minor, Director Jerome W. Berryman, Senior Fellow An imaginative method for nurturing the spiritual lives of children Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Extension Lesson ISBN: 978-1-954184-00-8 Introduction People of Color Who Inspire is a collection of stories written to supplement the collection of stories about the saints in The Complete Guide to Godly Play, Volume 7. In the collection of lessons on the saints found in Volume 7, there is a lesson called, “The Child’s Own Saint.” The lesson invites the children and Godly Play mentors in a Godly Play room to add to the lessons on the saints by writing the story of one of their own heroes. This story, and the others in this collection, serves as an example of this—a Christian person who inspires us all to strive for justice and respect the dignity of every human being. These stories are for children, so they try to minimize the distance between the child and the adult we are talking about. Some of the ways this is done is to keep the relationship informal, such as calling the person by their first name and emphasizing things about the person’s childhood. This means that the stories are somewhat open and very personal to engage the child’s intimacy and wonder with these amazing people who inspire. We are intentionally spare with the details of these stories so as not to obscure the core reality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtue of Penance in the United States, 1955-1975
    THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Maria Christina Morrow UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2013 THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Committee Chair _______________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member Mary Ann Spearin Chair in Catholic Theology _______________________________________ Kelly S. Johnson, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ Jana M. Bennett, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ William C. Mattison, III, Ph.D. Committee Member iii ABSTRACT THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation examines the conception of sin and the practice of penance among Catholics in the United States from 1955 to 1975. It begins with a brief historical account of sin and penance in Christian history, indicating the long tradition of performing penitential acts in response to the identification of one’s self as a sinner. The dissertation then considers the Thomistic account of sin and the response of penance, which is understood both as a sacrament (which destroys the sin) and as a virtue (the acts of which constitute the matter of the sacrament but also extend to include non-sacramental acts). This serves to provide a framework for understanding the way Catholics in the United States identified sin and sought to amend for it by use of the sacrament of penance as well as non-sacramental penitential acts of the virtue of penance.
    [Show full text]
  • Luther Leads the Reformation
    3 Luther Leads the Reformation MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES REVOLUTION Martin Luther’s Nearly one-fifth of the Christians •indulgence •Peace of protest over abuses in the in today’s world are Protestants. • Reformation Augsburg Catholic Church led to the • Lutheran • annul founding of Protestant churches. •Protestant • Anglican SETTING THE STAGE By the tenth century, the Roman Catholic Church had come to dominate religious life in Northern and Western Europe. However, the Church had not won universal approval. Over the centuries, many people criti- cized its practices. They felt that Church leaders were too interested in worldly pursuits, such as gaining wealth and political power. Even though the Church made some reforms during the Middle Ages, people continued to criticize it. Prompted by the actions of one man, that criticism would lead to rebellion. TAKING NOTES Causes of the Reformation Recognizing Effects Use a chart to By 1500, additional forces weakened the Church. The Renaissance emphasis on identify the effects the secular and the individual challenged Church authority. The printing press of Martin Luther's protests. spread these secular ideas. In addition, some rulers began to challenge the Church’s political power. In Germany, which was divided into many competing states, it was difficult for the pope or the emperor to impose central authority. effect 1 cause: Finally, northern merchants resented paying church taxes to Rome. Spurred by Luther effect 2 these social, political, and economic forces, a new movement for religious protests abuses reform began in Germany. It then swept much of Europe. effect 3 Criticisms of the Catholic Church Critics of the Church claimed that its lead- ers were corrupt.
    [Show full text]
  • HAVE GERMAN WILL TRAVEL Martin Luther
    HAVE GERMAN WILL TRAVEL Martin Luther Martin Luther (der 10. November 1483-der 2. Februar 1546) Martin Luther came this way. Yet it is Wittenberg, a feisty university in effect, the metaphorical last straw. Wittenberg, Eisleben is now Lutherstadt town since the days of Frederick the The pulpit formerly stood in the Eislebeo and Mansfeld is Mansfeld­ Wise, that has never stopped proudly Parish Church of St. Mary where he was Lutherstadt. All are UNESCO World statinrr its claim as "Cradle of the Refor- married and where the four-paneled Heritage Sites today, and Saxony-Anhalt mation.""' Its name is officially Luther- Reformation altar in the Choir Room is has adopted the subtitle "Luther's Coun­ stadt Wittenberg, and here he received attributed to Lucas Cranach the Elder t1y" for its tourist promotions. his doctor's degree; lived and taught for (1472 to 1553) , onetime mayor of the His commitment meant nearly con­ nearly forty years. Luther's House town. stant traveling throughout central Ger­ (Lutherhaus, Collegianstrasse 54), t~e Under the Communists, noxious fac­ many. It was not an easy life, but he Augustinian Monastery where he resid­ tories lined the Elbe, and Wittenberg never hesitated to go where he was ed with his family after its religious dis­ was called "Chemical-town," but, to no needed or to speak the doctrine to his solution, contains Lutherhalle, the one's surprise, the name never caught people. world's largest museum of Reformation on. Even as the Wall was coming down in In the cold winter of 1546, Luther's history.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanchthon Versus Luther: the Contemporary Struggle
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 44, Numbers 2-3 --- - - - JULY 1980 Can the Lutheran Confessions Have Any Meaning 450 Years Later?.................... Robert D. Preus 104 Augustana VII and the Eclipse of Ecumenism ....................................... Sieg bert W. Becker 108 Melancht hon versus Luther: The Contemporary Struggle ......................... Bengt Hagglund 123 In-. Response to Bengt Hagglund: The importance of Epistemology for Luther's and Melanchthon's Theology .............. Wilbert H. Rosin 134 Did Luther and Melanchthon Agree on the Real Presence?.. ....................................... David P. Scaer 14 1 Luther and Melanchthon in America ................................................ C. George Fry 148 Luther's Contribution to the Augsburg Confession .............................................. Eugene F. Klug 155 Fanaticism as a Theological Category in the Lutheran Confessions ............................... Paul L. Maier 173 Homiletical Studies 182 Melanchthon versus Luther: the Contemporary Struggle Bengt Hagglund Luther and Melanchthon in Modern Research In many churches in Scandinavia or in Germany one will find two oil paintings of the same size and datingfrom the same time, representing Martin Luther and Philip Melanchthon, the two prime reformers of the Church. From the point of view of modern research it may seem strange that Melanchthon is placed on the same level as Luther, side by side with him, equal in importance and equally worth remembering as he. Their common achieve- ment was, above all, the renewal of the preaching of the Gospel, and therefore it is deserving t hat their portraits often are placed in the neighborhood of the pulpit. Such pairs of pictures were typical of the nineteenth-century view of Melanchthon and Luther as harmonious co-workers in the Reformation. These pic- tures were widely displayed not only in the churches, but also in many private homes in areas where the Reformation tradition was strong.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cradle of the Reformation Lutherstadt Wittenberg
    Dear Travel Writer, Imagine seeing them with your own two eyes, touching them with your own two hands: The great bronze doors of Lutherstadt Wittenberg’s Castle Church, marking the very spot where Martin Luther posted the ninety-five theses that changed the world. Picture exploring the church in which the Great Reformer was baptized or stepping inside the tiny room where Luther translated the New Testament in just 10 weeks. Luckily, these unforgettable experiences don’t have to remain the stuff of dreams! Come and explore LutherCountry, the beautiful region in the heart of Germany that invites you to walk in Luther’s footsteps! Find out more on our website; then come visit! LutherCountry: The Cradle of the Reformation Although Martin Luther lived 500 years ago, his presence is still tangible today. Here in LutherCountry, visitors of all ages get the chance to discover myriad original locations that still boast the Great Reformer’s indelible mark – and all within easy reach of each other. Come discover the places where Luther once lived, taught and, preached! In addition to authentic locations that played a major role in Luther’s life, LutherCountry is also home to hundreds of other cultural and historical treasures, with many famous personalities in art and music having left their mark on the region’s cultural landscape. Great composers such as Johann Sebastian Bach and Georg Frederic Handel, two of the world’s most famous baroque composers, were both born in LutherCountry. And thanks to the great German painter Lucas Cranach the Elder, we now know what Martin Luther actually looked like.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Footsteps of Martin Luther in Germany: 500 Years of Reformation
    Wartburg College Alumni Tour In the Footsteps of Martin Luther in Germany: 500 Years of Reformation June 7-21, 2017 15 Days with optional extension to Bavaria June 21-24 Led by the Rev. Dr. Kit Kleinhans Group Travel Directors Enriching Lives Through Travel Since 1982 DAY-BY-DAY ITINERARY On October 31, 1517, Martin Luther Dr. Kit Kleinhans is Day 1, Wed, June 7 Your Journey Begins posted 95 theses against indul- the Mike and Marge Depart US for overnight flight to Berlin. (Meals in- McCoy Family Dis- flight) gences on the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany – an tinguished Chair of Day 2, Thur, June 8 Herzlich Willkommen! event ranked as one of the most Lutheran Heritage and Arrive in Berlin and travel to Wittenberg by pri- important events of the millennium! Mission at Wartburg vate motor coach. Check into Colleg Wittenberg, College, where she our home for the next 6 days. After an orientation Celebrate the 500th anniversary of walk through the town, a welcome dinner will has taught since 1993. get us off to an excellent start. Colleg Wittenberg Luther’s bold action by following in Her passion is the (Meals in-flight, D) his footsteps. Visit Eisleben, where history and theology Day 3, Fri, June 9 Wittenberg Luther was born; Wittenberg, where of Lutheranism and its relevance for us City tour through Wittenberg, where Martin Lu- he taught; Worms, where he stood today. Her article “Lutheranism 101,” pub- ther lived and taught for 36 years. Visit the Luther up for beliefs against the leaders of lished in The Lutheran in 2006, remains House - a former monastery – where Luther lived before his marriage and which the Luther family the church and the empire; the Wart- the most frequently requested reprint received as a wedding gift from their prince.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manifesto of the Reformation — Luther Vs. Erasmus on Free Will
    203 The Manifesto of the Reformation — Luther vs. Erasmus on Free Will Lee Gatiss The clash between Martin Luther and Desiderius Erasmus over the issue of free will is ‘one of the most famous exchanges in western intellectual history’. 1 In this article, we will examine the background to the quarrel between these two professors, and two of the central themes of Luther’s response to Erasmus—the clarity of Scripture and the bondage of the will. In doing so it is critical to be aware that studying these things ‘operates as a kind of litmus test for what one is going to become theologically’. 2 Ignoring the contemporary relevance and implications of these crucially important topics will not be possible; whether thinking about our approach to the modern reformation of the church, our evangelism, pastoral care, or interpretation of the Bible there is so much of value and vital importance that it would be a travesty to discuss them without at least a nod in the direction of the twenty-first century church. From Luther’s perspective, as Gerhard Forde rightly says, this was not just one more theological debate but ‘a desperate call to get the gospel preached’. 3 This is a fundamentally significant dispute historically since it involved key players in the two major movements of the sixteenth century: Erasmus the great renaissance humanist and Luther the Reformation Hercules. 4 The debate between these two titans reveals not only the reasons behind ‘humanism’s programmatic repudiation of the Reformation’ 5 but also a clear view of the heartbeat of the Reformation itself since, as B.
    [Show full text]
  • Luther on Education 2017
    LUTHER ON EDUCATION 2017 Schooling for Life MARTIN LUTHER EDUCATOR Rarely has the picture of Martin Luther in his dual role as educator at home and at school, as parent and professor, been treated extensively in English.1 Yet home and academic robe were daily fare for most of his life. From October 22, 1512, when the Wittenberg faculty formally received the twenty-eight year old monk as Lecturer on the Bible, through his marriage to Catherine von Bora in June, 1525, at age forty-two, until his death twenty-one years later, Luther's daily routine normally shuttled between duties at home and at school. If we want to know the man as he is, we have knocked at the right door. Those who expect to come away from the visit with a notebook full of abstract parental and educational principles will be sadly disappointed. We would be unfaithful to the Great Reformer's own mode and manner, were we to regale you with high-sounding theories of education abstracted and distilled from Luther's experience at home and in the classroom. To get to know Luther's views on education, we must become acquainted with him personally, as a father and as a teacher. Our approach, therefore, will happily be descriptive rather than prescriptive; hopefully, it will be edifying as well as instructive. In its own way it is strange that the English-speaking world has not readily acknowledged Luther's place in the history of education. Columbia University, a leading teacher-training institution in our land, inscribed in stone a list of modern educators on one of its buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Grace, Actual and Habitual by Joseph Pohle
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of Grace, Actual and Habitual by Joseph Pohle This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: Grace, Actual and Habitual Author: Joseph Pohle Release Date: July 29, 2009 [Ebook 29540] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK GRACE, ACTUAL AND HABITUAL*** Grace Actual and Habitual A Dogmatic Treatise By The Rt. Rev. Msgr. Joseph Pohle, Ph.D., D.D. Formerly Professor of Dogmatic Theology at St. Joseph's Seminary, Leeds (England), Later Professor of Fundamental Theology at The Catholic University of America Adapted and Edited by Arthur Preuss Third, Revised Edition W. E. Blake & Son, Limited Catholic Church Supplies 123 Church St. Toronto, Canada 1919 Contents Imprimatur . .2 Introduction . .3 Part I. Actual Grace . .4 Chapter I. The Nature Of Actual Grace . .6 Section 1. Definition Of Actual Grace . .6 Section 2. Division Of Actual Grace . 18 Chapter II. The Properties Of Actual Grace . 43 Section 1. The Necessity Of Actual Grace . 44 Section 2. The Gratuity Of Actual Grace . 115 Section 3. The Universality Of Actual Grace . 132 Chapter III. Grace In Its Relation To Free-Will . 191 Section 1. The Heresy of The Protestant Reform- ers And The Jansenists . 192 Section 2. Theological Systems Devised To Harmonize The Dogmas Of Grace And Free-Will . 199 Part II. Sanctifying Grace . 233 Chapter I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformative Power of Grace and Condign Merit at the Council of Trent
    The Thomist 79 (2015): 173-212 THE TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF GRACE AND CONDIGN MERIT AT THE COUNCIL OF TRENT CHRISTIAN D. WASHBURN Saint Paul Seminary School of Divinity St. Paul, Minnesota CLEAR UNDERSTANDING of merit, as defined by the Council of Trent in canon 32 of the Decretum de Aiustificatione , will determine the nature and extent to which an ecumenical rapprochement can be made on the issue of justification. In the debate over justification at the Council of Trent, the council fathers addressed two questions concerning merit. First, “Is the unjustified able to merit condignly initial justification?” 1 I will not discuss this question, since there was no serious theologian at any point during the Tridentine proceedings who maintained that it was possible to merit condignly initial justification. A second question, however, did agitate the minds of the fathers, which may be stated as, “Once one is transformed by inhering righteousness in the process of justification, is this justified Christian able to merit condignly?” Prior to the Second Vatican Council, most theologians seem to have held that Trent had actually defined the claim that the justified Christian is able to merit condignly, while in 1 This article prescinds from any discussion of the more complicated question concerning the role of congruous merit prior to initial justification. This topic has been treated by Heiko Augustinus Oberman, “The Tridentine Decree on Justification in the Light of Late Medieval Theology,” Journal for Theology and the Church 3 (1967): 28- 54; “Duns Scotus, Nominalism, and the Council of Trent,” in H. A. Oberman, The Dawn of the Reformation: Essays in Late Medieval and Early Reformation Thought (Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Justification, Presented to the Seventy-Third General Assembly
    Report on Justification Presented to the Seventy-third General Assembly of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church Committee on Christian Education Orthodox Presbyterian Church Box P Willow Grove, PA 19090-0920 Prefatory Statement In response to an overture from the Presbytery of the Midwest, the Seventy-first General Assembly of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church adopted the following Declaration on Justification: The Seventy-first (2004) General Assembly of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church (i) declares its continued commitment to the teaching of the Word of God, the Westminster Confession of Faith, and the Larger and Shorter Catechisms with regard to the doctrine of justification by faith alone; (ii) reaffirms that faith, which is a gift of God, is the sole instrument of justification; and (iii) reaffirms the following beliefs: a. “Justification is an act of God’s free grace, wherein he pardoneth all our sins, and accepteth us as righteous in his sight, only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us, and received by faith alone” (WSC 33). b. “Those whom God effectually calls, he also freely justifieth; not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for any thing wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ’s sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them, they receiving and resting on him and his righteousness by faith; which faith they have not of themselves, it is the gift of God” (WCF 11.1).
    [Show full text]