DOCSLIB.ORG

020601 Low Carbon Spaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
020601 Low Carbon Spaces View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository Low carbon spaces: area-based carbon emission reduction - a scoping study 02.06.02 Low Carbon Spaces Area-Based Carbon Emission Reduction: A Scoping Study Prepared for the Sustainable Development Commission by the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research March 2002 Simon Shackley1, Paul Fleming2 and Harriet Bulkeley3 With: Sarah Mander1, Ken Green1, John Turnpenny4, Abigail Bristow5 Darryn McEvoy6, Dorian Speakman1 and Sebastian Carney1 1) Tyndall Centre at UMIST 2) Institute of Energy & Sustainable Development, De Montfort University 3) St.Catherine's College, University of Cambridge 4) Tyndall Centre at UEA 5) Tyndall Centre & Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds 6) Centre for Urban and Regional Ecology, University of Manchester 1 Contents: Glossary of Acronyms Summary 1. Introduction 2. Overview 3. Local Government Experiences 4. Exemplars of Low-Carbon Sustainable Energy 5. Experience in Other Countries 6. Consultees 7. References Appendix One: The Players Appendix Two: Recommendations Appendix Three: A Note on the Transport Sector Appendix Three: The Data Base 2 Glossary of Acronyms BRE Building Research Establishment CAT Centre for Alternative Technology CHP Combined Heat and Power CCL Climate change levy CCP Councils for Climate Protection CO2 Carbon dioxide CT Carbon Trust DEFRA Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DTI Department of Trade & Industry DTLR Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions EEC Energy Efficiency Commitment EESoP Energy Efficiency Standards of Performance Programme EEACs Energy Efficiency Advisory Centres ESCO Energy Services Company EST Energy Saving Trust GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse gas HECA Home Energy Conservation Act IDeA Improvement and Development Agency IPPC Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control Directive LA Local Authority MRETT Midlands Renewable Energy TechnologyTransfer NETA New Electricity Trading Arrangements NGOs Non-governmental Organisations OFGEM Office of Gas and Electricity Markets RCEP Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution Formatted: French (France) RDA Regional Development Agencies SDC Sustainable Development Commission SEV Sherwood Energy Village TNEI The Northern Energy Initiative URCs Urban Regeneration Companies 3 Summary of Report Background to this report The Sustainable Development Commission has been examining the prospects for an area-based approach to reducing carbon emissions in which different spatial and administrative scales are examined in relation to each other. In this way areas, organisations and initiatives which have achieved significant reduction in carbon emissions, but which are often isolated, can be joined-up and good ideas and experiences more widely shared. The Commission appointed a team led by the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research in January 2002 to review existing experiences on 'carbon reduction' at the sub-UK scale and to draw out lessons and recommendations for a workshop and subsequent project(s). In this report 'Scale' refers to a range of units of different spatial dimensions. We also use it to refer to a range of administrative units operating at different spatial scales (e.g. local, regional and national governments). Key Points • Actions at the local to regional scale are needed to deliver extensive carbon emission reductions, but to date most strategic thinking has focused on national policy levers and mechanisms. • There is great untapped potential for 'bottom-up' led carbon reduction at the local to regional scale to tackle social, economic and environmental objectives. • There is a welter of different agencies, programmes and policies which influence local carbon reduction and a lack of co-ordination, information-sharing and integration between efforts as a consequence. This, and limited funding, increase the transaction costs in undertaking carbon reduction work. • The representative bodies, executives and regional institutions (Assemblies, Development Agencies, etc.) will increasingly function as bridges between the 468 local authorities in the UK and central government and EU. • All local authorities have undertaken standard energy efficiency measures as part of estates and housing management. • Local authorities have limited ability to use the planning system to reduce the carbon intensity of development because the statutory framework and guidance does not permit rejection of applications on the basis of their carbon emissions. • Reducing carbon intensity (carbon per unit of energy) can occur independently of a reduction in energy intensity (energy per unit of economic activity), e.g. through use of renewable energy. Sustainable energy requires a reduction in both carbon and energy intensity. Carbon intensity can be reduced at national (or international) scales, contra most energy intensity reduction, which takes place locally. What are the sustainability implications of local or regional versus national reductions in carbon intensity? • A dozen or so local authorities have led the way on low-carbon sustainable energy over the past two decades, building up considerable experience, knowledge and skills. 4 • The conditions for successful local authority engagement are: enduring commitment from leading members of the council and from senior officers; in- house energy specialists driving the work forward; partnerships with private, public and NGO sectors; and ability to attract top-up funding. • Local learning-loops emerge around successful authorities, which spin-out to motivate other local authorities, the private sector and community groups. • Momentum and capacity are sustained by local learning-loops, bringing in new organisations, resources and enhancing the reputation and status of the partners. • The private sector is a major actor in reducing carbon emissions, often acting corporately rather than initiating partnerships, though there are excellent examples of joint approaches with local authorities and communities. • In part on account of restrictions imposed by clients, construction, design, architecture and development firms can, but rarely do, have a major influence over the embedded carbon in new development. • In the Netherlands the private and NGO sectors frequently initiate partnerships with local authorities and their customers or members: this may be a consequence of more widespread district heating systems, as well as the wider- uptake of green electricity tariffs than in the UK. • It is currently virtually impossible to measure carbon emissions at the sub-UK scale, hence to monitor the effectiveness of policy measures; this has contributed to a lack of evidence-based policymaking in the field. The Sustainable Development Commission Area-Based Work • There are, as yet, no carbon reduction programmes working across a wide range of spatial or organisational scales, though there are strong growth points, e.g. the Energy Saving Trust, the Councils for Climate Protection (Local Government Association) and regional efforts (e.g. RDAs). This absence may, to some extent, reflect the difficulty of organising such an activity. • The Sustainable Development Commission should select one region or devolved administration for the area-based work, though there are arguments for, and against, selecting a region containing more leading, average or less proactive local authorities and organisations. • Each scale in the region selected should identify a partner from another region or devolved administration with which to make a comparison, extend experience and expertise (we call this the 'low carbon pathfinder'). • The project(s) should be set against the long term carbon reduction target of 60% by 2050 as proposed by the Royal Commission for Environmental Protection. This should then be telescoped down to more immediate shorter-term milestones (e.g. 10% in next 5 years). • The extent to which a regional target can be met by activity outside of the region (determined largely through national policy) should be decided upon in advance. • Some work is already underway on local to regional climate change impacts and adaptation. At the present time it is better for the carbon reduction project to proceed as a separate activity, though there should be close exchange of information. The challenges and potential obstacles in achieving earlier, and/or larger, emission reductions need to be identified at an early stage. 5 What the Report is about As noted above, the Sustainable Development Commission appointed a team led by the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research in January 2002 to review existing experiences on 'carbon reduction' at the sub-UK scale and to draw out lessons and recommendations for a workshop and subsequent project(s). The process A large number of relevant individuals and organisations were informed of the project(s) via email lists. Information has been collected by submissions of project proformas (accessible via the web) and other data. Approximately 70 telephone interviews have been conducted across the UK. We would like to thank the cooperation and assistance of all those involved in providing information and their perspectives. A new strategic focus on local to regional carbon reduction is needed A large reduction of carbon dioxide emissions requires a combination of 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' policy measures. To date, the top-down options (taxation, national regulation, policies, programmes and guidance)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lewis Wave Power Limited
    Lewis Wave Power Limited 40MW Oyster Wave Array North West Coast, Isle of Lewis Environmental Statement Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary March 2012 40MW Lewis Wave Array Environmental Statement 1. NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction This document provides a Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the Environmental Statement (ES) produced in support of the consent application process for the North West Lewis Wave Array, hereafter known as the development. The ES is the formal report of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken by Lewis Wave Power Limited (hereafter known as Lewis Wave Power) into the potential impacts of the construction, operation and eventual decommissioning of the development. 1.2 Lewis Wave Power Limited Lewis Wave Power is a wholly owned subsidiary of Edinburgh based Aquamarine Power Limited, the technology developer of the Oyster wave power technology, which captures energy from near shore waves and converts it into clean sustainable electricity. Aquamarine Power installed the first full scale Oyster wave energy convertor (WEC) at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney, which began producing power to the National Grid for the first time in November 2009. That device has withstood two winters in the harsh Atlantic waters off the coast of Orkney in northern Scotland. Aquamarine Power recently installed the first of three next-generation devices also at EMEC which will form the first wave array of its type anywhere in the world. 1.3 Project details The wave array development will have the capacity to provide 40 Megawatts (MW), enough energy to power up to 38,000 homes and will contribute to meeting the Scottish Government’s targets of providing the equivalent of 100% of Scotland’s electricity generation from renewable sources by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex A: Progress on Actions
    UK Renewable Energy Roadmap Update 2012 Annex of Actions Annex A: Progress on Actions = Actions that are in progress = Actions that have been completed CROSS CUTTING Actions Result Comments Facilitating Access to the Grid: In February 2012 the Electricity Networks Strategy Group published an updated assessment by Reform the onshore grid to ensure cost-effective the network companies of the network investment potentially required to accommodate new grid investment and connection. generation to 2020. It concluded that around £8.8bn of strategic investment may be required and that, provided the identified reinforcements were taken forward on time and the planning consents secured in a timely manner, the reinforcements can be delivered to required timescales. In April 2012 Ofgem approved Price Controls for 2013-21 with the Scottish Transmission Owners allowing up to £6bn of investment. In July 2012 Ofgem announced its Initial Proposals, worth up to £11.6bn of investment for National Grid’s Business Plan for the same period. Ofgem plans to publish its Final Proposals for National Grid in December 2012. This should help ensure that new generation can be accommodated on the transmission network in a timely and cost-effective manner. In addition, Ofgem announced in January 2012 a further £72m of funding for strategic transmission network investment and in July approved funding for a 2.25GW sub-sea transmission link between Scotland and England valued at around £1.1bn. Facilitating Access to the Grid: Ofgem concluded its review of the transmission charging regime through Project TransmiT in May Work with Ofgem through Project TransmiT to 2012 with an instruction to National Grid and the Connection and Use of System Code (CUSC) help plan grid investments and the regime for industry group to develop changes to the charging methodology based on the Improved charging for new connections to the Investment Cost Related Pricing (ICRP) approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy
    Renewable Energy Abstract This paper provides background briefing on renewable energy, the different types of technologies used to generate renewable energy and their potential application in Wales. It also briefly outlines energy policy, the planning process, possible problems associated with connecting renewable technologies to the electricity grid and energy efficiency. September 2005 Members’ Research Service / Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau Members’ Research Service: Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil Renewable Energy Kath Winnard September 2005 Paper number: 05/032/kw © Crown copyright 2005 Enquiry no: 05/032/kw Date: September 2005 This document has been prepared by the Members’ Research Service to provide Assembly Members and their staff with information and for no other purpose. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information is accurate, however, we cannot be held responsible for any inaccuracies found later in the original source material, provided that the original source is not the Members’ Research Service itself. This document does not constitute an expression of opinion by the National Assembly, the Welsh Assembly Government or any other of the Assembly’s constituent parts or connected bodies. Members’ Research Service: Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 2 Background .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tyndall Centre Briefing Note 40
    Review of the Fourth Carbon Budget - Call for Evidence www.theccc.org.uk/call-for-evidence Question and Response form When responding please provide answers that are as specific and evidence-based as possible, providing data and references to the extent possible. Please limit your response to a maximum of 400 words per question. Questions for consideration: A. Climate Science and International Circumstances The Committee’s advice assumes a climate objective to limit central estimates of temperature rise to as close to 2C as possible, with a very low chance of exceeding 4C by 2100 (henceforth referred to as “the climate objective”). This is broadly similar to the UNFCCC climate objective, and that of the EU. In order to achieve this objective, global emissions would have to peak in the next few years, before decreasing to roughly half of recent levels by 2050 and falling further thereafter. The UNFCCC is working toward a global deal consistent with such reductions, to be agreed by 2015. Earlier attempts (e.g. at Copenhagen in 2009, before the fourth budget was recommended or legislated) have failed to achieve a comprehensive global deal to limit emissions. It is difficult to imagine a global deal which allows developed countries to have emissions per capita in 2050 which are significantly above a sustainable global average, implying the need for emissions reductions in the UK of at least 80% from 1990 levels by 2050. The EU has not yet agreed a package beyond 2020, but the European Commission is consulting on a range of issues relating to development of climate and energy targets for 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifestyle-You-And-Your-Energy-V2.Pdf
    ECO CHURCH LIFESTYLE RESOURCES ECO CHURCH LIFESTYLE RESOURCES You and Your Energy www.ecochurch.arocha.org.uk ECOthink CHURCH LIFESTYLE You and Your Energy RESOURCES think do Energy is always in the news. And it costs us more Carbon dioxide is a major cause of climate change than just our fuel bills. and ocean acidification which also impacts on biodiversity. By choosing a green energy provider Coal, oil and natural gas produce carbon dioxide and reducing domestic energy consumption, we when burned.do In 2013 the world produced a can save both planet and pounds. do more recordthink 36 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide from human sources – with China, USA and the EU being the major contributors. do more do weblink Use a home energy check HOME ENERGY CHECK Find out how you can achieve lower energy bills and a more comfortable home. Take away a report with hec.est.org.uk details of cost-effective improvement measures recommended for your home, based on the information youdoweblink provide. more weblink www.ecochurch.arocha.org.uk think think do do do more ECO CHURCH LIFESTYLE RESOURCES do more weblink Keep oil in the soil and coal in the hole THE GUARDIAN CLIMATE CHANGE CAMPAIGN That’s the message from the Keep It In The Ground movement. The idea is that while there might www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2015/mar/16/ be plenty of oil, gas and coal reserves, that doesn’t mean we should harvest the earth endlessly keep-it-in-the-ground-guardian-climate-change-campaign of theseweblink buried treasures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Scenario Analysis in Disclosure of Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities
    Technical Supplement The Use of Scenario Analysis in Disclosure of Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities June 2017 Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure i Contents A Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 B Scenario Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Why is Scenario Analysis Useful? ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. What Is a Scenario? ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. How are Organizations Using Climate-Related Scenario Analysis? ........................................................................ 3 C Developing and Applying Scenario Analysis ............................................................................................... 4 1. Considerations for Building Climate Change into Scenario Analysis ..................................................................... 5 2. Analytical Choices in Scenario Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 8 3. Tools and Data ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies
    The UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies Final Report A report to the DTI Renewable Energy Development & Deployment Team June 2003 Imperial College London Centre for Energy Policy and Technology & E4tech Consulting ii Executive summary Background and approach This report considers how innovation systems in the UK work for a range of new and renewable energy technologies. It uses a broad definition of 'innovation' - to include all the stages and activities required to exploit new ideas, develop new and improved products, and deliver them to end users. The study assesses the diversity of influences that affect innovation, and the extent to which they support or inhibit the development and commercialisation of innovative new technologies in the UK. The innovation process for six new and renewable energy sectors is analysed: • Wind (onshore and offshore) • Marine (wave and tidal stream) • Solar PV • Biomass • Hydrogen from renewables • District and micro-CHP In order to understand innovation better, the report takes a systems approach, and a generic model of the innovation system is developed and used to explore each case. The systems approach has its origins in the international literature on innovation. The organising principles are twofold: • The stages of innovation. Innovation proceeds through a series of stages, from basic R&D to commercialisation – but these are interlinked, and there is no necessity for all innovations to go through each and every stage. The stages are defined as follows: Basic and applied R&D includes both ‘blue skies’ science and engineering/application focused research respectively; Demonstration from prototypes to the point where full scale working devices are installed in small numbers; Pre-commercial captures the move from the first few multiples of units to much larger scale installation for the first time; Supported commercial is the stage where technologies are rolled out in large numbers, given generic support measures; Commercial technologies can compete unsupported within the broad regulatory framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a National Citizen Engagement Process for Energy Policy
    Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy Nick Pidgeona,1, Christina Demskia, Catherine Butlerb, Karen Parkhillc, and Alexa Spenced aUnderstanding Risk Research Group, Tyndall Centre and Climate Change Consortium of Wales, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales CF10 3AT, United Kingdom; bGeography Department, The University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RJ, United Kingdom; cSchool of Environment, Natural Resources, and Geography, Bangor University, Wales LL57 2UW, United Kingdom; and dHorizon Digital Economy Research and School of Psychology, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, United Kingdom Edited by Baruch Fischhoff, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, and accepted by the Editorial Board June 12, 2014 (received for review December 11, 2013) This paper examines some of the science communication chal- involved and on the promise and perils of scientific progress. In lenges involved when designing and conducting public delibera- this respect people often focus less on the technology or science tion processes on issues of national importance. We take as our per se, than on the social context within which it is to be illustrative case study a recent research project investigating deployed, including complex arguments about the regulatory or public values and attitudes toward future energy system change governance conditions surrounding the application of science. for the United Kingdom. National-level issues such as this are However, designing successful deliberative fora is not a simple often particularly difficult to engage the public with because of matter, and in this paper we outline a series of interlinked sci- their inherent complexity, derived from multiple interconnected ence communication challenges associated with conducting elements and policy frames, extended scales of analysis, and public deliberation on national-level topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Research
    energysavingtrust.org.uk Energy Saving Trust The UK Pulse: UK:Pulse consumers’ thoughts and action on energy in the home. Introduction Our homes are evolving. The number of F and G rated homes (extremely energy inefficient) has gone from 29% in 1996 to 6% in 20121. The average energy performance rating has gone from an E in 2001 to a D in 20122. We’re still not where we want to be but there has been progress. Unsurprisingly, householders and landlords have installed The UK Pulse findings show that there needs to be a radical the technologies that offer the quickest wins and biggest shift in how we market and communicate the benefits of energy saving paybacks: millions of cavity walls have been energy efficiency in the home. People’s motivations for insulated in recent years and almost no totally uninsulated changing behaviour, or choosing how and where to invest lofts remain. money in energy efficiency, are diverse across genders, age groups and UK regions, as well as being heavily influenced That’s good news. But as our homes improve the by the type of property people own or rent. We need opportunities change. In the next stage of the evolution to move away from big messages for broad audiences of our homes we need householders to engage with their to information that is tailored to people’s individual energy use in a new, deeper way. This means persuading motivations, their lifestyle and their home. more householders to consider upfront financial investment in technologies. It means persuading more householders We recognise that taking action on energy is more difficult to take an interest in the way they use energy in the home.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro, Tidal and Wave Energy in Japan Business, Research and Technological Opportunities for European Companies
    Hydro, Tidal and Wave Energy in Japan Business, Research and Technological Opportunities for European Companies by Guillaume Hennequin Tokyo, September 2016 DISCLAIMER The information contained in this publication reflects the views of the author and not necessarily the views of the EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation, the views of the Commission of the European Union or Japanese authorities. While utmost care was taken to check and confirm all information used in this study, the author and the EU-Japan Centre may not be held responsible for any errors that might appear. © EU-Japan Centre for industrial Cooperation 2016 Page 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first and foremost thank Mr. Silviu Jora, General Manager (EU Side) as well as Mr. Fabrizio Mura of the EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation to have given me the opportunity to be part of the MINERVA Fellowship Programme. I also would like to thank my fellow research fellows Ines, Manuel, Ryuichi to join me in this six-month long experience, the Centre's Sam, Kadoya-san, Stijn, Tachibana-san, Fukura-san, Luca, Sekiguchi-san and the remaining staff for their kind assistance, support and general good atmosphere that made these six months pass so quickly. Of course, I would also like to thank the other people I have met during my research fellow and who have been kind enough to answer my questions and helped guide me throughout the writing of my report. Without these people I would not have been able to finish this report. Guillaume Hennequin Tokyo, September 30, 2016 Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the long history of the Japanese electricity market, Japan has often reverted to concentrating on the use of one specific electricity power resource to fulfil its energy needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenant Empowerment Training 7 November 2012
    Energy Saving Trust and Housing Corporation Tenant empowerment training Energy Saving Trust, 21 Dartmouth Street, London SW1H 9BP Tel 020 7227 0305, www.est.org.uk CP158 © Energy Saving Trust March 2006. E&OE Printed on Revive Silk which cont ains 75% de-inked post consumer waste and a maximum of 25% mill broke Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7BN Tel 0845 230 7000, www.housingcorp.gov.uk Energy Saving Trust and Housing Corporation Tenant empowerment training CONTENTS Tenant empowerment training Toolkit contents Session 1 Fundamentals of energy and climate Session 2 Energy and housing Session 3 Are you spending too much on your energy? Session 4 Action you can take in your home Session 5 Action you can take with your provider Session 6 Taking things forward Training activities Tenant energy tools Prepared for the Energy Saving Trust and the Housing Corporation by the Centre for Sustainable Energy, the Tenant Participation Advisory Service and Energy Inform. Programme for the day Session 1: Fundamentals of energy and climate 10:00 – 10:20 Session 2: Energy and housing 10:20 – 11:00 Coffee Break: 11:00 – 11:15 Session 3: Are you spending too much on energy? 11:15 – 12:00 Session 4: Action you can take in your home 12:00 – 12:45 Lunch: 12:45 – 1:30 Session 5: Keeping your house warm 1:30 – 2:15 Session 6: Taking things forward 2:15 – 3:00 Session 7: Feedback and looking at the tools 3:00 – 3:15 Trainer brief Tenant empowerment training The main aims of the training are to: • To encourage people to make changes to their life styles in order to save and energy • To inspire individuals to press for action by working with other individuals and organisations The following training brief provides some hints and tips that should help you deliver the training.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Adaptation and Development: Exploring the Linkages �
    Climate Change Adaptation and Development: Exploring the Linkages � E. Lisa F. Schipper July 2007 Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper 107 Climate Change Adaptation and Development: Exploring the Linkages E. Lisa F. Schipper Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ UK and South East Asia START Regional Centre Bangkok, Thailand Email: [email protected] Tyndall Centre Working Paper No.107 July 2007 Please note that Tyndall working papers are "work in progress". Whilst they are commented on by Tyndall researchers, they have not been subject to a full peer review. The accuracy of this work and the conclusions reached are the responsibility of the author(s) alone and not the Tyndall Centre. Manuscript has also been submitted to a peer-reviewed journal 1 Summary Successful human societies are characterised by their adaptability, evidenced throughout human existence. However, climate change introduces a new challenge, not only because of the expected rise in temperature and sea-levels, but also due to the current context of failure to address the causes of poverty adequately. As a result, policy supporting adaptation has been cast as a necessary strategy for responding to both climate change and supporting development, making adaptation the focus of much recent scholarly and policy research. This paper addresses this new adaptation discourse, arguing that work on adaptation so far has focused on responding to the impacts of climate change, rather than sufficiently addressing the underlying factors that cause vulnerability. While there is a significant push all around for adaptation to be better placed in development planning, the paper finds this to be putting the cart before the horse.
    [Show full text]