DOCSLIB.ORG

Statewide Rail Planning Is Gaining Momentum Nationwide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statewide Rail Planning Is Gaining Momentum Nationwide Final March 2015 Contents Chapter S. Executive Summary ........................................................................................... S-1 S.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... S-1 S.2 Wyoming’s Rail System ...................................................................................................................... S-1 S.2.1 Freight-Rail System ................................................................................................................ S-1 S.2.2 Passenger-Rail Service ........................................................................................................... S-2 S.3 Rail Impacts ........................................................................................................................................ S-2 S.4 Rail Plan Development Process ......................................................................................................... S-2 S.5 Key Stakeholder Input on Rail Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities .............................................. S-3 S.6 Wyoming’s Rail Vision and Service Objectives .................................................................................. S-4 S.6.1 Freight-Rail Objectives ........................................................................................................... S-4 S.6.2 Passenger-Rail Objectives ...................................................................................................... S-4 S.7 Proposed Capital Investment Programs and Future Studies ............................................................. S-4 S.8 State Rail Plan Recommendations and Next Steps ............................................................................ S-5 S.9 Summary ............................................................................................................................................ S-5 Chapter 1. The Role of Rail in Wyoming’s Statewide Transportation System ...................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Wyoming’s Goals for the Statewide Multimodal Transportation System and the State Rail Plan .................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 Goals for the Multimodal Transportation System ................................................................. 1-2 1.2.2 State Rail Plan Purpose .......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.3 Federal Mandate for State Rail Plans .................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.4 Integration with the National Rail Plan ................................................................................. 1-4 1.2.5 State Rail Planning Background ............................................................................................. 1-4 1.2.6 Rail Planning Activity Best Practices ...................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.7 Wyoming State Rail Plan Content .......................................................................................... 1-7 1.2.8 Wyoming’s Involvement in Multi-state Rail Planning ........................................................... 1-7 1.3 Rail Transportation’s Role in the State Transportation System ........................................................ 1-7 1.4 Institutional Structure of Wyoming’s State Rail Program ................................................................. 1-8 1.4.1 Wyoming DOT’s Rail Organization and Roles ........................................................................ 1-9 1.4.2 Wyoming Legislative Rail Authority ....................................................................................... 1-9 1.4.3 Additional Public Sector Rail Planning in Wyoming ............................................................. 1-13 1.5 State Authority for Grant, Loan, and Other Financing .................................................................... 1-15 Wyoming Department of Transportation Final March 2015 i 1.6 Summary of Rail Services and Studies ............................................................................................. 1-16 1.6.1 Freight-Rail Services ............................................................................................................. 1-16 1.6.2 Passenger-Rail Services ........................................................................................................ 1-16 1.6.3 Wyoming Rail Studies Summary .......................................................................................... 1-16 Chapter 2. Wyoming’s Existing Rail System ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Summary of Existing Freight-Rail Systems in Wyoming .................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Existing Rail Line Network ...................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.2 Major Freight and Passenger Terminals .............................................................................. 2-50 2.1.3 Objectives for Passenger Service in Wyoming ..................................................................... 2-52 2.1.4 Wyoming Passenger-Rail Performance Evaluation ............................................................. 2-53 2.1.5 Public Financing for Rail Projects ......................................................................................... 2-53 2.1.6 Safety and Security Programs in Wyoming .......................................................................... 2-63 2.1.7 Rail Transportation Impacts in Wyoming ............................................................................ 2-69 2.2 Wyoming’s Existing Rail System: Trends and Forecasts .................................................................. 2-74 2.2.1 Demographic and Economic Growth Factors ...................................................................... 2-74 2.2.2 Freight Demand and Growth ............................................................................................... 2-85 2.2.3 Passenger Travel Demand and Growth ............................................................................. 2-104 2.2.4 Fuel Cost Trends ................................................................................................................. 2-105 2.2.5 Rail Congestion Trends ...................................................................................................... 2-105 2.2.6 Highway and Airport Congestion Trends ........................................................................... 2-106 2.2.7 Land-Use Trends ................................................................................................................ 2-108 2.3 Wyoming’s Existing Rail System: Rail Service Needs and Opportunities ...................................... 2-109 Chapter 3. Proposed Passenger-Rail Improvements and Investments ................................. 3-1 Chapter 4. Proposed Freight-Rail Improvements and Investments...................................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Wyoming Rail Carrier Needs .............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2.1 Class I Railroads ...................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Class III Railroads ................................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.3.1 Bighorn Divide & Wyoming Railroad ..................................................................................... 4-4 4.3.2 Swan Ranch Railroad .............................................................................................................. 4-4 4.4 Passenger Railroad Needs .................................................................................................................. 4-5 4.5 Wyoming Rail User and Community Needs ....................................................................................... 4-5 Wyoming Department of Transportation ii Final March 2015 Chapter 5. Wyoming’s Rail Service and Investment Program .............................................. 5-1 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 State Rail Vision ................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2.1 Freight-Rail Objectives ........................................................................................................... 5-2 5.2.2 Passenger-Rail Objectives ...................................................................................................... 5-2 5.3 Integration of the Rail Vision with Other Transportation Plans ........................................................ 5-2 5.4 Proposed Organizational or Policy Changes .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Powder River Basin Province, Wyoming and Montana Click Here to Return to Volume Title Page by Lawrence O
    Chapter 1 Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Powder River Basin Province, Wyoming and Montana Click here to return to Volume Title Page By Lawrence O. Anna Chapter 1 of Total Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas Resources in the Powder River Basin Province, Wyoming and Montana By U.S. Geological Survey Powder River Basin Assessment Team U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–U U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 Revised: April 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lawrence O. Anna, 2010, Geologic assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Powder River Basin Province Wyoming and Montana, in Total Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas Resources in the Powder River Basin Province, Wyoming and Montana: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak's Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads
    Amtrak’s Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads September 21, 2017 Jim Blair –Director Host Railroads Today’s Amtrak System 2| Amtrak Amtrak’s Services • Northeast Corridor (NEC) • 457 miles • Washington‐New York‐Boston Northeast Corridor • 11.9 million riders in FY16 • Long Distance (LD) services • 15 routes • Up to 2,438 miles in length Long • 4.65 million riders in FY16 Distance • State‐supported trains • 29 routes • 19 partner states • Up to 750 miles in length State- • 14.7 million riders in FY16 supported3| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads Amtrak Route System Track Ownership Excluding Terminal Railroads VANCOUVER SEATTLE Spokane ! MONTREAL PORTLAND ST. PAUL / MINNEAPOLIS Operated ! St. Albans by VIA Rail NECR MDOT TORONTO VTR Rutland ! Port Huron Niagara Falls ! Brunswick Grand Rapids ! ! ! Pan Am MILWAUKEE ! Pontiac Hoffmans Metra Albany ! BOSTON ! CHICAGO ! Springfield Conrail Metro- ! CLEVELAND MBTA SALT LAKE CITY North PITTSBURGH ! ! NEW YORK ! INDIANAPOLIS Harrisburg ! KANSAS CITY ! PHILADELPHIA DENVER ! ! BALTIMORE SACRAMENTO Charlottesville WASHINGTON ST. LOUIS ! Richmond OAKLAND ! Petersburg ! Buckingham ! Newport News Norfolk NMRX Branch ! Oklahoma City ! Bakersfield ! MEMPHIS SCRRA ALBUQUERQUE ! ! LOS ANGELES ATLANTA SCRRA / BNSF / SDN DALLAS ! FT. WORTH SAN DIEGO HOUSTON ! JACKSONVILLE ! NEW ORLEANS SAN ANTONIO Railroads TAMPA! Amtrak (incl. Leased) Norfolk Southern FDOT ! MIAMI Union Pacific Canadian Pacific BNSF Canadian National CSXT Other Railroads 4| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads ! MONTREAL Amtrak NEC Route System
    [Show full text]
  • RL Banks Uinta Basin Railway Pre Feasibility Analysis
    " SEVEN COUNTY rp. INFRASTRUCTURE ~COAlmON A REPORT TO: SEVEN COUNTY INFRASTRUCTURE COALITION Table of Contents Section Page ES.l Executive Summary v ES.2 Overview of Assignment v ES.3 Conclusions Regarding Volume of Commodities Originating and Terminating in the vi Uinta Basin ES.4 Conclusions Regarding the Viability of a New Railroad along the Three, Proposed vii Alignments in Light of the Forecasted Volumes Originating and Terminating in the Uinta Basin ES.S Conclusions Regarding teh Transportation Cost to Reach the National Rail Network x across the Various Transportation Options Potentially Available in the Uinta Basin (Rail, Pipe and Truck) ES.6 Conclusions Regarding the Total Transportation Cost to Ship to National Markets xi ES.7 Conclusions Regarding the Transportation Cost to Reach Salt Lake City Refineries xii across the Various Transportation Options Out of the Uinta Basin 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Description of Assignment 2 1.2 RLBA Approach to Scope of Work 3 1.3 Approach Part 1 - Determining Potential Rail Traffic Volumes, Destinations and Origins 3 1.4 Approach Part 2 - Determining Costs to Reach the National Rail Network 4 1.5 Approach Part 3 - Determining Costs to Ship across the National Rail Network to/from 4 Distant Markets 1.6 TIle Prospective Railroad 5 1.7 Western Terminus - Uinta Basin 5 1.8 Eastern Terminus - Connection with the National Rail Network 7 1.9 Potential Alignments 9 1.10 Shared Alignments 11 1.11 Deseret Power Railroad 11 2.0 Approach Part 1 - Determining Potential Rail Traffic Volumes, Destinations
    [Show full text]
  • Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ August 2017 Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D. Lisa Shofstall Kansas State University Transportation Center 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) August 2017 Railcar Operational Status in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D., Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D., Lisa Shofstall No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Transportation Center Department of Civil Engineering 11 Contract or Grant No. 2109 Fiedler Hall C2069 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren October 2015–December 2016 Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0691-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The rail industry’s recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III/short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition, they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • Arch Western Resources, LLC (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 Commission file number: 333-107569-03 Arch Western Resources, LLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 43-1811130 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification Number) One CityPlace Drive, Ste. 300, St. Louis, Missouri 63141 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (314) 994-2700 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ☑ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☑ No o Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No ☑ (Note: As a voluntary filer not subject to the filing requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has filed all reports pursuant to
    [Show full text]
  • 45 Bay Filly
    Hip No. Consigned by Kings Equine, Agent 45 Bay Filly A.P. Indy . Seattle Slew Bernardini . {Weekend Surprise {Cara Rafaela . Quiet American Bay Filly . {Oil Fable April 3, 2017 Dansili . Danehill {Elbe (GB) . {Hasili (IRE) (2009) {Imroz . Nureyev {All At Sea By BERNARDINI (2003), [G1] $3,060,480, champion. Sire of 10 crops, 69 black type wnrs, $81,627,926, including Ruud Awakening [G1] ($636,168, champion), Boban [G1] ($2,434,628), Cavorting [G1] ($2,063,000), Stay Thirsty [G1] ($1,936,000), Alpha [G1] ($1,815,667), To Honor and Serve [G1] ($1,798,840), Dame Dorothy [G1] ($749,740), Rachel’s Valentina. 1st dam ELBE (GB), by Dansili. Winner at 2, 3,477 pounds in England. Total: $5,599. Dam of 3 other foals of racing age-- Limari (f. by Medaglia d’Oro). 3 4 wins in 5 6 starts at 3 and 4, 2019, $88,745 $139,745. Estrella Del Norte (f. by Sea The Stars). 2 wins at 3 in Chile. Eternal Power (g. by Giant’s Causeway). Placed at 2 and 3, 2019, $5,100 $13,069. 2nd dam Imroz, by Nureyev. 3 wins at 2 and 3, 25,263 pounds in England, 3rd City of York S. [L]; placed at 4, $29,438 in N.A./U.S., 3rd Las Cienegas H. [G3], etc. Total: $69,964. Dam of 10 foals to race, 9 winners, including-- POSTERITAS (f. by Lear Fan). 2 wins at 3, 26,040 pounds in England, Virginia Rated S. [L]. Total: $46,993. Dam of 6 winners, including-- MUTUAL TRUST (GB) (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Arch Coal, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): March 23, 2009 (March 23, 2009) Arch Coal, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1-13105 43-0921172 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation) CityPlace One One CityPlace Drive, Suite 300 St. Louis, Missouri 63141 (Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (314) 994-2700 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure. On March 23, 2009, John Eaves, President and Chief Operating Officer of Arch Coal, Inc., will deliver a presentation at the Howard Weil 37th Annual Energy Conference that will include written communication comprised of slides. The slides from the presentation are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and are hereby incorporated by reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerr-Mcgee Coal V. Sol (Msha) (91121889)
    CCASE: KERR-MCGEE COAL V. SOL (MSHA) DDATE: 19911209 TTEXT: ~1889 Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges KERR-MCGEE COAL CORPORATION, CONTEST PROCEEDINGS CONTESTANT Docket No. WEST 91-84-R v. Citation No. 3242337; 10/25/90 SECRETARY OF LABOR, Docket No. WEST 91-85-R MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH Order No. 3242340; 10/25/90 REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, RESPONDENT Jacobs Ranch SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW ADMINISTRATION, Docket No. WEST 91-220 PETITIONER A.C. No. 48-00997-03513 v. Jacobs Ranch KERR-MCGEE COAL CORPORATION, RESPONDENT DECISION Appearances: Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Respondent/Petitioner; Charles W. Newcom, Esq., SHERMAN & HOWARD, Denver, Colorado, for Contestant/Respondent. Before: Judge Lasher These three consolidated contest/civil penalty proceedings came on for hearing in Denver, Colorado, on July 23, 1991. Kerr-McGee Corporation (herein "K-M") in two contests challenges Citation No. 3242337 issued on October 25, 1990, by MSHA Inspector Jimmie Giles1 charging a violation of 30 C.F.R. 40.4 and ~1890 104(b) "failure to abate" Withdrawal Order No. 3242340 issued approximately 10 to 20 minutes after the Citation was issued. The Secretary of Labor (herein "MSHA") in the related penalty proceeding captioned seeks assessment of a penalty for the violation alleged in the citation. Contentions of the Parties The general issues are whether K-M violated 30 C.F.R. Part 40.4 and 103(f) of the Act by failing to post the designation of representative of miners (in the record three times as Exhibits K-1, M-1, and A-1 to the stipulation) and, if so, the appropriate amount of penalty for such violation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Champ Readies for Belmont Breeders= Cup
    TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2015 732-747-8060 $ TDN Home Page Click Here THE CHAMP READIES FOR BELMONT GLENEAGLES, FOUND TO BYPASS EPSOM GI Kentucky Derby and GI Preakness S. winner The Coolmore partners= dual Guineas winner American Pharoah (Pioneerof the Nile) registered his last Gleneagles (Ire) (Galileo {Ire}) and Group 1-winning filly serious work before Saturday=s GI Belmont S. under Found (Ire) (Galileo {Ire}) are no longer under cloudy skies Monday at consideration for Saturday=s Churchill Downs. The bay G1 Epsom Derby, and both covered five panels in will target mile races at 1:00.20 (video) with Royal Ascot. Martin Garcia in the irons Gleneagles was removed shortly after the from the Classic at renovation break. Monday=s scratching stage Churchill clocker John and will head to the G1 St. Nichols recorded 1/8-mile James=s Palace S. on the opening day of the Royal fractions in :13, :25 meeting June 16. Found, (:12), :36.60 (11.60) and who has been second in :48.60 (:12). He galloped Gleneagles winning the Irish both starts this year out six furlongs in 1:13, 2000 Guineas including the G1 Irish 1000 seven-eighths in 1:26 and Racing Post Photo Guineas May 24, will a mile in 1:39.60. contest the G1 Coronation Baffert noted how S. June 19. Found would have had to be supplemented pleased he was with the to the Derby at a cost of ,75,000. Coolmore and American Pharoah work later in the morning. trainer Aidan O=Brien are expected to be represented in Horsephotos AEverything went really the Derby by G3 Chester Vase scorer Hans Holbein well today,@ Hall of Fame (GB) (Montjeu {Ire}), owned in partnership with Teo Ah trainer Bob Baffert said outside Barn 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Depot Tower Interlocking Plant
    Union Depot Tower Union Depot Tower (U.D. Tower) was completed in 1914 as part of a municipal project to improve rail transportation through Joliet, which included track elevation of all four railroad lines that went through downtown Joliet and the construction of a new passenger station to consolidate the four existing passenger stations into one. A result of this overall project was the above-grade intersection of 4 north-south lines with 4 east-west lines. The crossing of these rail lines required sixteen track diamonds. A diamond is a fixed intersection between two tracks. The purpose of UD Tower was to ensure and coordinate the safe and timely movement of trains through this critical intersection of east-west and north-south rail travel. UD Tower housed the mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection, also known as an interlocking plant. Interlocking Plant Interlocking plants consisted of the signaling appliances and tracks at the intersections of major rail lines that required a method of control to prevent collisions and provide for the efficient movement of trains. Most interlocking plants had elevated structures that housed mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection. Union Depot Tower is such an elevated structure. Source: Museum of the American Railroad Frisco Texas CSX Train 1513 moves east through the interlocking. July 25, 1997. Photo courtesy of Tim Frey Ownership of Union Depot Tower Upon the completion of Union Depot Tower in 1914, U.D. Tower was owned and operated by the four rail companies with lines that came through downtown Joliet.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Business in the Great Northwest
    The newsletter for Watco Companies February 2017, Volume 18, Issue 2 Growing business in the SKOL wins Business of the Year Award Great Northwest The South Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad (SKOL) was recently awarded the Cherryvale The team on The Great Northwest Railroad facility is that it will allow CHS Primeland to Chamber of Commerce Business of the Year (GRNW) recently completed work on helping one purchase and store fertilizer outside of the normal Award at their annual banquet. Shirley Ann of its valued and long-term Customers further spring and fall fertilizer seasons. CHS Primeland Hogben, Chamber Board Member, thanked grow their business in eastern Washington and will move both dry and liquid fertilizers, includ- the SKOL and Watco for their participation in northcentral Idaho. ing urea, phosphates, potash, the community and mentioned how the town On January 3, a GRNW train thyosol, and liquid phosphates. loves to see the Cherryvale Charger locomotive crew placed the first dozen cars Moreover, they will have the pulling trains through the area. at the new CHS Primeland fer- ability to blend and produce Attendees also thanked Watco Founder Dick tilizer storage and production products at the plant. Webb and the Heart of the Heartlands group facility at the Port of Wilma, “It’s important for the for restoring the depot in Cherryvale and Washington. The project’s growth of our company,” keeping the town from losing that meaningful completion is the culmination of several years Mingo said, adding that CHS Primeland will piece of history. of work for CHS Primeland and GRNW Team move several hundred carloads annually on the "Watco has always understood the impor- Members, which included extensive site selection GRNW to the facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 – Community Profile
    Chapter 3: COMMUNITY PROFILE The Physical Environment, Socio-Economics and History of Fremont County Natural and technological hazards impact citizens, property, the environment and the economy of Fremont County. These hazards expose Fremont County residents, businesses and industries to financial and emotional costs. The risk associated with hazards increases as more people move into areas. This creates a need to develop strategies to reduce risk and loss of lives and property. Identifying risks posed by these hazards, and developing strategies to reduce the impact of a hazard event can assist in protecting life and property of citizens and communities. Physical / Environment Geology Much of Fremont County is made up of the 8,500 square mile Wind River Basin. This basin is typical of other large sedimentary and structural basins in the Rocky Mountain West. These basins were formed during the Laramide Orogeny from 135 to 38 million years ago. Broad belts of folded and faulted mountain ranges surround the basin. These ranges include the Wind River Range on the west, the Washakie Range and Owl Creeks and southern Big Horn Mountains on the north, the Casper Arch on the east, and the Granite Mountains on the south. The center of the basin is occupied by relatively un-deformed rocks of more recent age. Formations of every geologic age exist in Fremont County. These create an environment of enormous geologic complexity and diversity. The geology of Fremont County gives us our topography, mineral resources, many natural hazards and contributes enormously to our cultural heritage. Topography Fremont County is characterized by dramatic elevation changes.
    [Show full text]