• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Casimir effect in conformally flat spacetimes Bartosz Markowicz,1, ∗ Kacper Dębski,1, † Maciej Kolanowski,1, ‡ Wojciech Kamiński,1, § and Andrzej Dragan1, 2, ¶ 1 Institute of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland 2 Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, 117543 Singapore, Singapore (Dated: June 15, 2020) We discuss several approaches to determine the Casimir force in inertial frames of reference in different dimensions. On an example of a simple model involving mirrors in Rindler spacetime we show that Casimir’s and Lifschitz’s methods are inequivalent and only latter can be generalized to other spacetime geometries. For conformally coupled fields we derive the Casimir force in conformally flat spacetimes utilizing an anomaly and provide explicit examples in the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (k = 0) models. I. INTRODUCTION Many years after the original work by Casimir [1], his effect is still considered bizarre. The force between two plates in a vacuum that was first derived using a formula originating from classical mechanics relates the pressure experienced by a plate to the gradient of the system’s energy. An alternative approach to this problem was introduced by Lifshitz [2], who expressed the Casimir force in terms of the stress energy tensor of the field. The force was written as a surface integral arXiv:2006.06884v1 [quant-ph] 12 Jun 2020 as for the static field in the classical field theory. Both approaches are known to be equivalent in inertial scenarios [3, 4]. Introducing non-inertial motion adds a new layer of complexity to the problem. Although Rindler metric that describes ∗ [email protected] † [email protected] ‡ [email protected] § [email protected] ¶ [email protected] 2 uniform acceleration is still stationary, the situation is more similar to a curved spacetime in many respects. New phenomena arise when objects undergoing sudden acceleration emit ra- diation by the so-called dynamical Casimir effect [5–7]. However, cavity moving in an appropriate manner is still stationary system and thus we can ask what is a generalization of the Casimir force to this setting. This problem attracted much attention, with many authors using Casimir original approach. However, we will point out on a simple example, that in non-inertial frames the two definitions are not equivalent. We will also argue, that only Lifshitz approach is correct in this setting, pointing out that the source of the problem lies in the definition of the force as the derivative of the energy with respect to the position of the mirror. Using a simple model of an accelerating cavity, we revise general methods of finding the Casimir force presented before. We compare results obtained in both approaches finding discrepancies. Surprisingly, energetic derivation leads to un- physical conclusions. At the same time, it is a special case of the Casimir force evaluated in a conformally flat space-time. We also point out several misconcep- tions present in the literature and propose a possible generalization of our result beyond Rindler spacetime. Using conformal anomaly methods first formulated in [8], we are able to derive the Casimir force in more general context. In partic- ular, we calculated it in de Sitter background and presented all formulas needed in the general Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (k = 0) universe. Our final results of Casimir forces in the Rindler and de Sitter spacetime have the potential of being used in some kind of an analog experiment testing quantum field theory in curved spacetime. We also comment on possible ambiguities that may arise in such setting. The work is structured as follows. In sec. II B we present derivation of Casimir force in uniformly accelerating 1+1 dimensional cavity via Casimir Energy. This is the most popular approach to derivation of the Casimir effect [1, 9]. However, the Casimir Energy method in non-inertial reference frame leads to incorrect re- sults, as we show in Section II D. Sec. II C provides correct derivation of Casimir 3 force for a uniformly accelerating 1+1 dimensional cavity. The derivation pre- sented in this chapter can be easily generalized for cavities moving along any trajectory in flat or conformally flat spacetimes. In sec. II D we compare the two described above methods of deriving Casimir force. We also propose how to fix a erroneous solution obtained via Casimir energy in case of mirrors with very simple geometry (ie. in the case that the passage of time at each point of the considered plate is the same). Sec. II E contains a discussion about the impact of the state outside the cavity on the observed Casimir effect. In Sec. III A we describe methods to derive Casimir force in any conformally flat space-time with the use of conformal anomaly we apply this approach to the case of uniformly ac- celerating plates in 1+1 dimensional space-time in Sec. IV A. Finally, in Sec. IV B we derive Casimir force for plates in 3+1 dimenional de Sitter spacetime. A. Conventions and notational remarks We follow sign conventions of [6] and thus the metric signature is either (+−) or (+ − −−) in two and four dimensions, respectively. Greek letters denote spacetime and Latin letters denote space indices. Riemann tensor is α α R βγδ = ∂δΓ βγ − ... (1) while Ricci tensor is α Rµν = R µαν. (2) α Weyl tensor C βγδ is a trace-less part of the Riemann tensor. We are going to work both within a cavity with Dirichlet boundary conditions and in the whole spacetime. To distinguish between those cases, we will denote vacuum in the former case by |0i and in the latter by |Θi. 4 II. CASIMIR FORCE IN AN ACCELERATED FRAME A. Setting We consider a 1 + 1 dimensional cavity limited by uniformly accelerating plates (due to low dimensionality of our system, they are spatially point-like). They impose Dirichlet boundary conditions upon a scalar field in question. The plates move in such a way that at any time in the cavity’s rest frame the length of the cavity is constant and equal to L. To operate in the mentioned frame, we introduce Rindler coordinates (τ, χ) associated with Minkowski coordinates (t, x) through the following transformation p 1 t χ = x2 − t2 τ = tanh−1 , (3) a x where a ∈ R+ is a transformation parameter [10]. A physical interpretation of these coordinates is as follows. A body moving on a trajectory χ = const. has 1 a constant acceleration Aχ = χ and from (3) it is easy to see that it follows a hyperbolic trajectory from the point of view of an inertial observer [10] s 1 2 x(t) = 2 + t (4) Aχ with velocity A t v(t) = χ . (5) q 2 2 1 + Aχt Metric tensor in the Rindler coordinates takes the form ds2 = (aχ)2dτ 2 − dχ2. (6) The plates are located at χ = A and χ = B = A + L, as shown in the Fig. 1. The normalized solutions to the wave equation in the Rindler coordinates take the form 1 i k log aχ−i|k|τ ψ(k) = e a , (7) p4π|k| where k ∈ R. With such a mode decomposition, we can associate a field operator Z ∞ ˆ ψ = dkψ(k)ˆak + h.c., (8) −∞ 5 Accelerating cavity seen in Rindler frame Minkowski frame τ t Rindler Horizon χ x A L A L B B FIG. 1. The graphs show the space-time trajectories of uniformly accelerating plates in the Rindler frame (τ, χ) and in the inertial Minkowski frame (t, x). In the inertial frame at t = 0 both plates are in rest. † Operators aˆk and aˆk in (8) are bosonic annihilation and creation operators, h †i respectively and they satisfy the canonical commutation relation aˆk, aˆl = 2πδ(k − l). We define vacuum state as |Θi such that ∀k aˆk |Θi = 0. Solutions considered so far were obtained in an empty spacetime. However, we are mainly interested in the field theory within a cavity. Thus, we need to find modes which satisfy Dirichlet boundary conditions. They are of the form χ ! −i anπ τ 1 log A log B ψ (t, x) = √ sin nπ e A , (9) n nπ B log A where n is a positive integer. With such a mode decomposition of the field we can associate a field operator ∞ X ψˆ = ψnˆbn + h.c., (10) n=1 hˆ ˆ†i where bk, bl = δkl. And now, (cavity) vacuum state is denoted as |0i such that ˆ ∀k bk |0i = 0. Casimir force can be defined in two different ways. First as the 6 work needed to move one of the plates by an unit distance. Intuitively, it will increase the energy of the field between the plates. The second definition is the pressure that the field exerts on the plates limiting the cavity. In this chapter, we examine both approaches and analyze the results they lead to. B. Casimir force as a work derivative In 1948 Casimir in his original work [1] derived force acting on the infinite parallel plates resting in Minkowski spacetime. Since that time, many meth- ods of determining Casimir’s force have been proposed, however the original approach, thanks to its simplicity, remained the most popular. Here we present an analogous derivation for accelerating plates. In this approach we want to calculate the Casimir force in the accelerating frame we must first determine the difference between energy of the field located in the cavity and energy of the free field located in the area χ ∈ [A, B].

Load more

  21

Copy Link