Signals and Receptors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Signals and Receptors Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Signals and Receptors Carl-Henrik Heldin1, Benson Lu2, Ron Evans2, and J. Silvio Gutkind3 1Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden 2The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Gene Expression Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037 3National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4340 Correspondence: [email protected] SUMMARY Communication between cells in a multicellular organism occurs by the production of ligands (proteins, peptides, fatty acids, steroids, gases, and other low-molecular-weight compounds) that are either secreted by cells or presented on their surface, and act on receptors on, or in, other target cells. Such signals control cell growth, migration, survival, and differentiation. Signaling receptors can be single-span plasma membrane receptors associated with tyrosine or serine/threonine kinase activities, proteins with seven transmembrane domains, or intra- cellular receptors. Ligand-activated receptors convey signals into the cell by activating signal- ing pathways that ultimately affect cytosolic machineries or nuclear transcriptional programs or by directly translocating to the nucleus to regulate transcription. Outline 1 Introduction 6 Functions of nuclear receptors 2 Cell-surface receptors 7 Gases 3 The TNF receptor family 8 Concluding remarks 4 Cell adhesion receptors and References mechanotransducers 5 Nuclear receptors Editors: Lewis Cantley, Tony Hunter, Richard Sever, and Jeremy Thorner Additional Perspectives on Signal Transduction available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2016 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005900 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8:a005900 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press C.-H. Heldin et al. 1 INTRODUCTION immune system and also promote cell differentiation. Cy- tokine receptors can be divided into two classes. The ex- Cells within multicellular organisms need to communicate tracellular domains of class I cytokine receptors contain with each other to coordinate their growth, migration, cytokine receptor homology domains (CHDs) consisting survival, and differentiation. They do so by direct cell– of two tandem fibronectin type III domains with a charac- cell contact and secretion or release of molecules that teristic WSXWS motif in the second (Liongue and Ward bind to and activate receptors on the surface of or inside 2007). Based on the number of CHDs and the presence of target cells. Such factors can stimulate the producer cell other types of domains, the class I cytokine receptors can be itself (autocrine stimulation), cells in the immediate vicin- divided into five groups (Fig. 2), the growth hormone ity (paracrine stimulation), or cells in distant organs (en- (GH) receptor being typical of the first group. Interferon docrine stimulation). The signaling induced within target receptors are typical of the 12-member class II cytokine cells is important during embryonic development, as well receptor family, which also have extracellular regions based as in the adult, where it controls cell proliferation, differ- on tandem fibronectin domains but differ from those of entiation, the response to infection, and numerous organ- class I receptors (Fig. 2) (Renauld 2003). Both classes of ismal homeostatic mechanisms. cytokine receptors have conserved box 1 and box 2 regions Many cell-surface receptors contain an extracellular li- in their intracellular regions, which bind to JAK family gand-binding region, a single transmembrane segment, and tyrosine kinases that are activated upon ligand binding. an intracellular effector region, which may or may not have The multisubunit antigen receptors on B cells and T cells an associated enzyme activity. Some receptors contain (Zikherman and Weiss 2009) and the Fc receptors present multiple subunits that together form the ligand-binding on macrophages, mast cells, basophils, and other immune site. Others, including those encoded by the largest gene cells (Nimmerjahn and Ravetch 2008) are also associated family in the human genome, consist of a polypeptide with intracellular tyrosine kinases; activation of these re- that spans the cell membrane seven times. Finally, there ceptors involves tyrosine phosphorylation by members of are receptors that are located intracellularly and are acti- the Src family, followed by docking and activation of SH2- vated by ligands that cross the cell membrane, such as ste- domain-containing Syk/Zap70 tyrosine kinases (see Sa- roid hormones. Below, we describe the major families of melson 2011; Cantrell 2014). Although receptors that ligands and receptors and the signal transduction mecha- have intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity and those associated nisms they activate. with tyrosine kinases are structurally different and bind ligands of different kinds, the principles underlying their 2 CELL-SURFACE RECEPTORS activation and the intracellular signals they initiate are sim- ilar (see below). 2.1 Receptors with Associated Protein Kinase There is also a family of receptors that have intrinsic Activity serine/threonine kinase domains, and these respond to Several types of cell-surface receptors contain or are asso- members of the transforming growth factor b (TGFb) fam- ciated with kinase activities that respond to the binding of a ily (see Moustakas and Heldin 2009; Wrana 2013). The ligand. Perhaps best understood are receptors with intrinsic human genome has only 12 genes encoding receptors of protein tyrosine kinase domains. This receptor tyrosine this type (Fig. 3). These receptors have rather small cys- kinase (RTK) family has more than 50 human members teine-rich extracellular domains; their intracellular do- (Lemmon and Schlessinger 2010). RTKs have important mains are most often also small and consist mainly of the roles in the regulation of embryonic development, as well as kinase domains. TGFb receptors mediate signaling events in the regulation of tissue homeostasis in the adult. Each during embryonic development. Because they often inhibit has an extracellular, ligand-binding region, which consists cell growth, they also exert a controlling function on the of different combinations of various domains, such as Ig- immune system and other tissues. like, fibronectin type III, and cysteine-rich domains. This is linked to a single transmembrane segment and an intracel- lular region that includes a tyrosine kinase domain. Based 2.2 Ligands on their structural features, RTKs can be divided into 20 Each of these different receptor types responds to a sub- subfamilies (Fig. 1), a well-studied example being the epi- family of structurally similar ligands. The ligands are nor- dermal growth factor (EGF) receptors (EGFRs). mally small monomeric, dimeric, or trimeric proteins, Members of the cytokine receptor family in contrast often derived by proteolytic processing from larger precur- lack intrinsic kinase activity but associate with intracellular sors, some of which are transmembrane proteins. There is kinases. They have important roles in the regulation of the not a strict specificity in ligand–receptor interactions with- 2 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8:a005900 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Signals and Receptors EGFR InsR PDGFRα VEGFR1/ FGFR1 PTK7/ TrkA Rot1 MuSk Met AxI Tie1 EphA1-8 Ret Ryk DDR1 Ros LMR1 ALK SuRTK106/ ErbB2 IGF1R PDGFRβ FIt1 FGFR2 CCK4 TrkB Ror2 Ron Mer Tie2 EphA10 DDR2 LMR2 LTK STYK1 ErbB3 InsRR CSF1R/ VEGFR2/ FGFR3 TrkC Tyro3 EphB1-4 LMR3 ErbB4 Fms KDR FGFR4 EphB6 Kit/SCFR VEGFR3/ FIt3/FIk2 FIt4 Tyrosine L Cysteine- Fibronectin Leucine- Cadherin Discoidin Ig EGF-like Kringle kinase rich type III rich SAM Psi WIF Ephrin Fz Ldla YMTD Acid Sema Mam binding propeller box Figure 1. Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) families. The 20 subfamilies of human RTKs and their characteristic structural domains are shown. The individual members of each family are listed below. (From Lemmon and Schlessinger 2010; adapted, with permission.) in the families; normally each ligand binds to more than 2.3 Activation by Dimerization one receptor, and each receptor binds more than one li- A common theme for activation of kinase-associated recep- gand. Although it is rare that ligands for completely differ- tors is ligand-induced receptor dimerization or oligomeri- ent types of receptors bind to kinase-associated receptors, zation (Heldin 1995). The juxtaposition of the intracellular examples do exist.4 kinase domains that occurs as a consequence allows auto- phosphorylation in trans within the complex. For RTKs, the autophosphorylation has two important consequences: 4The Ryk and Ror families of RTK, for example, bind members of the Wnt it changes the conformation of the kinase domains, leading family. Ryk has a Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF1) domain, and the two Ror to an increase in their kinase activities; and it produces receptors have cysteine-rich domains related to a domain in the Frizzled family of serpentine receptors to which ligands of the Wnt family bind docking sites (phosphorylated sequences) for intracellular (van Amerongen et al. 2008). signaling molecules containing
Recommended publications
  • Identi®Cation and Role of Adenylyl Cyclase in Auxin Signalling in Higher
    letters to nature + + + P.P. thank the Academy of Finland and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, respectively, for ®nancial CO , 53), 77 (C6H5 , 60), 73 (TMSi , 84); 6-methyl-4-hydroxy-2-pyrone: RRt 0.35, 198 (M+, 18), 183 ([M-Me]+, 16), 170 ([M-CO]+, 54), 155 ([M-CO-Me]+, support. + + Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.S. (e-mail: [email protected] 15), 139 ([M-Me-CO2] , 10), 127 ([M-Me-2CO] , 13), 99 (12), 84 (13), 73 + + freiburg.de). (TMSi , 100), 43 (CH3CO , 55). The numbers show m/z values, and the key fragments and their relative intensities are indicated in parentheses. Received 4 August; accepted 14 October 1998. erratum 1. Helariutta, Y. et al. Chalcone synthase-like genes active during corolla development are differentially expressed and encode enzymes with different catalytic properties in Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae). Plant Mol. Biol. 28, 47±60 (1995). 2. Helariutta, Y. et al. Duplication and functional divergence in the chalcone synthase gene family of 8 Asteraceae: evolution with substrate change and catalytic simpli®cation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, Crystal structure of the complex 9033±9038 (1996). 3. Thaisrivongs, S. et al. Structure-based design of HIV protease inhibitors: 5,6-dihydro-4-hydroxy-2- of the cyclin D-dependent pyrones as effective, nonpeptidic inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 39, 4630±4642 (1996). 4. Hagen, S. E. et al. Synthesis of 5,6-dihydro-4-hydroxy-2-pyrones as HIV-1 protease inhibitors: the kinase Cdk6 bound to the profound effect of polarity on antiviral activity. J. Med. Chem.
    [Show full text]
  • Redox-Mediated Regulation of the Tyrosine Kinase Zap70
    Redox-mediated regulation of the tyrosine kinase Zap70 DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigt durch die Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität von M.Sc. Christoph Thurm geb. am 27.06.1988 in Borna Gutachter: apl. Prof. Dr. Luca Simeoni PD Dr. rer. nat. Marcus Lettau eingereicht am: 02.02.2018 verteidigt am: 06.06.2018 Eigenständigkeitserklärung I. Eigenständigkeitserklärung Christoph Thurm Halberstädter Straße 29 39112 Magdeburg Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die von mir eingereichte Dissertation zu dem Thema Redox-mediated regulation of the tyrosine kinase Zap70 selbständig verfasst, nicht schon als Dissertation verwendet habe und die benutzten Hilfsmittel und Quellen vollständig angegeben wurden. Weiterhin erkläre ich, dass ich weder diese noch eine andere Arbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an anderen Einrichtungen eingereicht habe. Magdeburg, den 02.02.2018 ____________________________________ M.Sc. Christoph Thurm II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Luca Simeoni. His extraordinary support during my PhD thesis together with his motivation and knowledge enabled me to pursue my dream. I could not have imagined having a better mentor. Furthermore, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Burkhart Schraven for giving me the opportunity to work in his institute. His support, ideas, and the lively discussions promoted me to develop as a scientist. Special thanks go also to the whole AG Simeoni/Schraven - Ines, Camilla, Matthias, and Andreas - for the help with experiments, the discussions, and the fun we had. This helped to sustain also the longest days.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Redundant Dual Functions of the ZAP70 Catalytic and Scaffolding
    ical C lin as C e Isakov, J Clinic Case Reports 2012, 2:6 f R o l e DOI: 10.4172/2165-7920.1000e113 a p n o r r t u s o J Journal of Clinical Case Reports ISSN: 2165-7920 Editorial Open Access ZAP70-Related SCID: Non-Redundant Dual Functions of the ZAP70 Catalytic and Scaffolding Regions Noah Isakov* The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences and the Cancer Research Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.B. 653, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel Primary Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) is a form rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. These transient intracellular of heritable immunodeficiency, characterized by impaired adaptive signals permit the activation of selected transcription factors that immune responses [1]. It includes a group of genetic disorders promote the proliferation and differentiation of T cells. originated by defects in one of several different genes that are critical Analysis of the phosphorylation sites of ZAP-70 and their impact for T lymphocyte production and/or function and involve defects in B on the function of the molecule demonstrated that phosphorylation lymphocytes as a primary or secondary cause [2]. of Tyr319, Tyr492 and Tyr493 serves to regulate the ZAP70 catalytic The most common type of SCID is linked to the X chromosome activity [23-25]. However, in vivo activation of T cells results in ZAP70 (X-SCID), and therefore affects only males [3,4]. The X-SCID males phosphorylation on additional tyrosine residues [26,27] which may possess mutations in the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor gamma chain also function as putative docking sites for SH2-containing proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • C-MET) Prolongs the Survival of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemic Cells Through STAT3 Phosphorylation: a Potential Role of Mesenchymal Cells in the Disease
    SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX An interaction between hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor (c-MET) prolongs the survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemic cells through STAT3 phosphorylation: a potential role of mesenchymal cells in the disease Paolo Giannoni,1 Silvia Scaglione,2 Rodolfo Quarto,1,3 Roberto Narcisi,3 Manuela Parodi,1 Enrico Balleari,4 Federica Barbieri,5 Alessandra Pattarozzi,5 Tullio Florio,5 Silvano Ferrini,6 †Giorgio Corte,7 and Daniela de Totero7 1Stem Cell Laboratory, Advanced Biotechnology Center, 16132, Genova; 2Dept. of Communication, Computer and System Sciences (D.I.S.T.), University of Genova, 16132, Genova; 3Dept. of Experimental Medicine (Di.Me.S.), University of Genova, Genova; 4Hematological Dept., San Martino Hospital, 16132, Genova; 5Pharmacology Laboratory, Dept. of Oncology, Biology and Genetics (D.O.Bi.G.), University of Genova, 16132, Genova; 6Immunological Therapies Laboratory and 7Gene Transfer Laboratory, National Institute for Cancer Research, 16132, Genova, Italy Citation: Giannoni P, Scaglione S, Quarto R, Narcisi R, Parodi M, Balleari E, Barbieri F, Pattarozzi A, Florio T, Ferrini S, Corte G, and de Totero D. An interaction between hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor (c-MET) prolongs the survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemic cells through STAT3 phosphorylation: a potential role of mesenchymal cells in the disease. Haematologica 2011;96(7):1015- 1023. doi:10.3324/haematol.2010.029736 Online Supplementary Design and Methods ac.uk/microarray-as/ae/) and analyzed in silico with Bioconductor (open source Version 1.2.0; http://www.bioconductor.org/docs/faq/) Immunofluorescence analysis of cell surface antigen for background subtraction and normalization (series acces- expression on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells sion numbers detailed in Online Supplementary Table S2).
    [Show full text]
  • Mtorc1-Independent Autophagy Regulates Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Phosphorylation in Colorectal Cancer Cells Via an Mtorc2-Mediated Mechanism
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2017) 24, 1045–1062 & 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved 1350-9047/17 www.nature.com/cdd mTORC1-independent autophagy regulates receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylation in colorectal cancer cells via an mTORC2-mediated mechanism Aikaterini Lampada1,2, James O’Prey3, Gyorgy Szabadkai4, Kevin M Ryan3, Daniel Hochhauser*,2,5 and Paolo Salomoni*,1,5 The intracellular autophagic degradative pathway can have a tumour suppressive or tumour-promoting role depending on the stage of tumour development. Upon starvation or targeting of oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), autophagy is activated owing to the inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 signalling pathway and promotes survival, suggesting that autophagy is a relevant therapeutic target in these settings. However, the role of autophagy in cancer cells where the PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 pathway is constitutively active remains partially understood. Here we report a role for mTORC1-independent basal autophagy in regulation of RTK activation and cell migration in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. PI3K and RAS-mutant CRC cells display basal autophagy levels despite constitutive mTORC1 signalling, but fail to increase autophagic flux upon RTK inhibition. Inhibition of basal autophagy via knockdown of ATG7 or ATG5 leads to decreased phosphorylation of several RTKs, in particular c-MET. Internalised c-MET colocalised with LAMP1-negative, LC3-positive vesicles. Finally, autophagy regulates c-MET phosphorylation via an mTORC2- dependent
    [Show full text]
  • K-RAS Gtpase- and B-RAF Kinase–Mediated T-Cell PNAS PLUS Tolerance Defects in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    K-RAS GTPase- and B-RAF kinase–mediated T-cell PNAS PLUS tolerance defects in rheumatoid arthritis Karnail Singha,1, Pratima Deshpandeb,1, Guangjin Lib, Mingcan Yub, Sergey Pryshchepa, Mary Cavanaghb, Cornelia M. Weyandb, and Jörg J. Goronzyb,2 aLowance Center for Human Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322; and bDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine and Palo Alto Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304 Edited by Dennis A. Carson, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved April 18, 2012 (received for review November 3, 2011) Autoantibodies to common autoantigens and neoantigens, such the signaling cascade after T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation. as IgG Fc and citrullinated peptides, are immunological hallmarks Based on the substitution conferring increased phosphatase ac- of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined whether a failure in tivity, it was originally considered a gain of function (12). Recent maintaining tolerance is mediated by defects in T-cell receptor findings, however, have shown that the variant is rapidly de- activation threshold settings. RA T cells responded to stimulation graded, causing T-cell hyperresponsiveness (13). The findings with significantly higher ERK phosphorylation (P < 0.001). Gene of disease-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles and PTPN22 poly- expression arrays of ERK pathway members suggested a higher morphisms indicate that T-cell recognition events and TCR expression of KRAS and BRAF, which was confirmed by quantita- threshold calibration are central to RA pathogenesis (13, 14). tive PCR (P = 0.003), Western blot, and flow cytometry (P < 0.01).
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORS Overview:- The completion of the Human Genome Project allowed the identification of a large family of proteins with a common motif of seven groups of 20-24 hydrophobic amino acids arranged as α-helices. Approximately 800 of these seven transmembrane (7TM) receptors have been identified of which over 300 are non-olfactory receptors (see Frederikson et al., 2003; Lagerstrom and Schioth, 2008). Subdivision on the basis of sequence homology allows the definition of rhodopsin, secretin, adhesion, glutamate and Frizzled receptor families. NC-IUPHAR recognizes Classes A, B, and C, which equate to the rhodopsin, secretin, and glutamate receptor families. The nomenclature of 7TM receptors is commonly used interchangeably with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), although the former nomenclature recognises signalling of 7TM receptors through pathways not involving G proteins. For example, adiponectin and membrane progestin receptors have some sequence homology to 7TM receptors but signal independently of G-proteins and appear to reside in membranes in an inverted fashion compared to conventional GPCR. Additionally, the NPR-C natriuretic peptide receptor has a single transmembrane domain structure, but appears to couple to G proteins to generate cellular responses. The 300+ non-olfactory GPCR are the targets for the majority of drugs in clinical usage (Overington et al., 2006), although only a minority of these receptors are exploited therapeutically. Signalling through GPCR is enacted by the activation of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins), made up of α, β and γ subunits, where the α and βγ subunits are responsible for signalling. The α subunit (tabulated below) allows definition of one series of signalling cascades and allows grouping of GPCRs to suggest common cellular, tissue and behavioural responses.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/0082511 A1 Brown Et Al
    US 20030082511A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/0082511 A1 Brown et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 1, 2003 (54) IDENTIFICATION OF MODULATORY Publication Classification MOLECULES USING INDUCIBLE PROMOTERS (51) Int. Cl." ............................... C12O 1/00; C12O 1/68 (52) U.S. Cl. ..................................................... 435/4; 435/6 (76) Inventors: Steven J. Brown, San Diego, CA (US); Damien J. Dunnington, San Diego, CA (US); Imran Clark, San Diego, CA (57) ABSTRACT (US) Correspondence Address: Methods for identifying an ion channel modulator, a target David B. Waller & Associates membrane receptor modulator molecule, and other modula 5677 Oberlin Drive tory molecules are disclosed, as well as cells and vectors for Suit 214 use in those methods. A polynucleotide encoding target is San Diego, CA 92121 (US) provided in a cell under control of an inducible promoter, and candidate modulatory molecules are contacted with the (21) Appl. No.: 09/965,201 cell after induction of the promoter to ascertain whether a change in a measurable physiological parameter occurs as a (22) Filed: Sep. 25, 2001 result of the candidate modulatory molecule. Patent Application Publication May 1, 2003 Sheet 1 of 8 US 2003/0082511 A1 KCNC1 cDNA F.G. 1 Patent Application Publication May 1, 2003 Sheet 2 of 8 US 2003/0082511 A1 49 - -9 G C EH H EH N t R M h so as se W M M MP N FIG.2 Patent Application Publication May 1, 2003 Sheet 3 of 8 US 2003/0082511 A1 FG. 3 Patent Application Publication May 1, 2003 Sheet 4 of 8 US 2003/0082511 A1 KCNC1 ITREXCHO KC 150 mM KC 2000000 so 100 mM induced Uninduced Steady state O 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Time (seconds) FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Validation of a Protein-Based Risk Score for Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients with Stable Coronary Heart Disease
    Supplementary Online Content Ganz P, Heidecker B, Hveem K, et al. Development and validation of a protein-based risk score for cardiovascular outcomes among patients with stable coronary heart disease. JAMA. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5951 eTable 1. List of 1130 Proteins Measured by Somalogic’s Modified Aptamer-Based Proteomic Assay eTable 2. Coefficients for Weibull Recalibration Model Applied to 9-Protein Model eFigure 1. Median Protein Levels in Derivation and Validation Cohort eTable 3. Coefficients for the Recalibration Model Applied to Refit Framingham eFigure 2. Calibration Plots for the Refit Framingham Model eTable 4. List of 200 Proteins Associated With the Risk of MI, Stroke, Heart Failure, and Death eFigure 3. Hazard Ratios of Lasso Selected Proteins for Primary End Point of MI, Stroke, Heart Failure, and Death eFigure 4. 9-Protein Prognostic Model Hazard Ratios Adjusted for Framingham Variables eFigure 5. 9-Protein Risk Scores by Event Type This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/02/2021 Supplemental Material Table of Contents 1 Study Design and Data Processing ......................................................................................................... 3 2 Table of 1130 Proteins Measured .......................................................................................................... 4 3 Variable Selection and Statistical Modeling ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Tyrosine Kinases: Their Roles and Their Targeting in Leukemia
    cancers Review Protein Tyrosine Kinases: Their Roles and Their Targeting in Leukemia Kalpana K. Bhanumathy 1,*, Amrutha Balagopal 1, Frederick S. Vizeacoumar 2 , Franco J. Vizeacoumar 1,3, Andrew Freywald 2 and Vincenzo Giambra 4,* 1 Division of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (F.J.V.) 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada; [email protected] (F.S.V.); [email protected] (A.F.) 3 Cancer Research Department, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada 4 Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapies (ISBReMIT), Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (K.K.B.); [email protected] (V.G.); Tel.: +1-(306)-716-7456 (K.K.B.); +39-0882-416574 (V.G.) Simple Summary: Protein phosphorylation is a key regulatory mechanism that controls a wide variety of cellular responses. This process is catalysed by the members of the protein kinase su- perfamily that are classified into two main families based on their ability to phosphorylate either tyrosine or serine and threonine residues in their substrates. Massive research efforts have been invested in dissecting the functions of tyrosine kinases, revealing their importance in the initiation and progression of human malignancies. Based on these investigations, numerous tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been included in clinical protocols and proved to be effective in targeted therapies for various haematological malignancies.
    [Show full text]
  • AMP-Activated Protein Kinase: the Current Landscape for Drug Development
    REVIEWS AMP-activated protein kinase: the current landscape for drug development Gregory R. Steinberg 1* and David Carling2 Abstract | Since the discovery of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as a central regulator of energy homeostasis, many exciting insights into its structure, regulation and physiological roles have been revealed. While exercise, caloric restriction, metformin and many natural products increase AMPK activity and exert a multitude of health benefits, developing direct activators of AMPK to elicit beneficial effects has been challenging. However, in recent years, direct AMPK activators have been identified and tested in preclinical models, and a small number have entered clinical trials. Despite these advances, which disease(s) represent the best indications for therapeutic AMPK activation and the long-term safety of such approaches remain to be established. Cardiovascular disease Dramatic improvements in health care coupled with identifying a unifying mechanism that could link these (CVD). A term encompassing an increased standard of living, including better nutri- changes to multiple branches of metabolism followed diseases affecting the heart tion and education, have led to a remarkable increase in the discovery that the AMP-activated protein kinase or circulatory system. human lifespan1. Importantly, the number of years spent (AMPK) provided a common regulatory mechanism in good health is also increasing2. Despite these positive for inhibiting both cholesterol (through phosphoryla- Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease developments, there are substantial risks that challenge tion of HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR)) and fatty acid (NAFLD). A very common continued improvements in human health. Perhaps the (through phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase disease in humans in which greatest threat to future health is a chronic energy imbal- (ACC)) synthesis8 (BOx 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Formulas of Integration of Permissivity and of Directed Molecular Targeting in Oncogenesis
    Cancer Therapy & Oncology International Journal ISSN: 2473-554X Review Article Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J Volume 8 Issue 5 - January 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Lawrence M Agius DOI: 10.19080/CTOIJ.2018.08.555749 Formulas of Integration of Permissivity and of Directed Molecular Targeting In Oncogenesis Lawrence M Agius* Department of pathology, University Of Malta Medical School, Malta, Submission: December 15, 2017; Published: January 05, 2018 *Correspondence Address: Lawrence M Agius, Department of pathology, University of Malta Medical School, Mater Dei Hospital Msida, TAL- QROQQ, Malta, Europe, Tel: ; Email: Abstract Dimensions of non-resolution or paradoxically of resolved integrative action allow for a dualized context of constitutive receptor activity and of permissiveness in the creation of the malignant phenotype of cancer cells. The proposition for such permissiveness is compounded by resolved end-result in oncogenesis that is projected in terms of aberrant over-activity of tyrosine kinases that include dimensions of over-activity in the face of non-resolved dynamics of spread and metastasis. It is within such dimensional context that the oncogenesis is portrayed as established pathways within a permissive context for further change progression. Growth factors and transcription factors allow for such permissiveness to integrate with the directed targeting of molecules in terms of protein-protein interactivity and tyrosine kinase formulations. Introduction formulation. Protein phosphorylation is strictly regulated by Intracellular and receptor tyrosine kinases constitute attractive targets for interfering with progression of in provision of activated/de-activated motif formulation is carcinogenesis. Strong evidence highlights the association protein kinases and protein phosphatases [4]. The significance further compounded by tyrosine kinase binding in the presence of autophagy with tyrosine kinase receptor signaling [1].
    [Show full text]