DOCSLIB.ORG

The–Self-Enclosing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The–Self-Enclosing VU Research Portal The Self-Enclosing God Hunt, R.M. 2015 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Hunt, R. M. (2015). The Self-Enclosing God: John Chrysostom and Ephrem Syrus on divine self-limitation as gift of love in Genesis 1-3. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT The Self-Enclosing God John Chrysostom and Ephrem Syrus on divine self-limitation as gift of love in Genesis 1–3 ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr. V. Subramaniam, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van de promotiecommissie van de Faculteit der Godgeleerdheid op maandag 14 december 2015 om 9.45 uur in de aula van de universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105 door Rosa Maria Hunt geboren te Sliema, Malta G.C. 1 promotoren: prof.dr. W.Th. van Peursen prof.dr. I. Noble copromotor: dr. L. Kucova This dissertation research was completed in co-operation with the International Baptist Theological Study Centre, a collaborative partner of the Faculty of Theology at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 2 Acknowledgements To all the members and friends of Bethel Baptist Church, Penyrheol, who supported me in the first years of ordained ministry while I was also writing this thesis – thank you for your love and grace. A special thanks to Sally and Mike Ball for their unflagging interest and multi-faceted support! To all the members and friends of Capel Salem, Tonteg, for their love and generous support over the last two and a half years – diolch o galon i chi i gyd. To Ivana, Wido, Lydie and all the staff at IBTS for their wisdom and guidance. To my mother – lil ommi. Mingħajrek qatt ma kont nista’ nagħmel li għamilt. Inħobbok. To our sons Joshua, Christopher, Timothy and Daniel. Dw i’n eich caru chi cymaint, a dw i mor falch ohonoch chi i gyd. Diolch am eich cefnogaeth yn ystod yr holl flynyddoedd. Inħobbkom ħafna u ħafna. To my husband Francis, ħafnu lil-ftita li jien, qalb ta’ qalbi, cariad. Grazzi ta’ kollox, a dw i’n edrych ymlaen at yr antur noi nesaf, tuag at y bedd a wedyn tu hunt ... And to the One in whom I live and move and have my being, for mercy and love and grace upon grace. We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time. T.S. Eliot 3 . Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 2 Note on References to Primary Sources .................................................................................... 6 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 8 The Bible in Patristic Exegesis. .............................................................................................. 9 The Theological Landscape of the Fourth Century ............................................................. 15 Why Ephrem Syrus and John Chrysostom? ........................................................................ 20 Overview of Scholarly Literature ........................................................................................ 25 Overview of Scholarly Literature on Divine Self-limitation in Chrysostom ................. 26 Overview of Scholarly Literature on Divine Self-limitation in Ephrem ......................... 28 Methodology and Research Process .................................................................................... 30 Structure of the Argument .................................................................................................. 33 Part 1: EPHREM SYRUS ............................................................................................................ 36 Chapter 1: The Heritage of Ephrem Syrus ............................................................................... 36 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 37 1.1. Ephrem’s Social and Theological Heritage: the cultural, theological and political contexts of Nisibis and Edessa ............................................................................................. 37 1.1.1 The Church in Nisibis .............................................................................................. 38 1.1.2 The School in Nisibis ............................................................................................... 43 1.1.3 The Church in Edessa .............................................................................................. 45 1.1.4 The School in Edessa ............................................................................................... 48 1.1.5 The ‘Enemies’ in Edessa and the Teachings of Bardaisan ....................................... 49 1.2 Ephrem’s Literary Heritage: poetry and prose .............................................................. 53 1.2.1 Why Did Ephrem Write Poetry? .............................................................................. 54 1.2.2 Why Did Ephrem Write a Commentary? ................................................................ 60 1.3 Ephrem’s Philosophical Heritage: space and limit ........................................................ 63 1.3.1 Tracing Ephrem’s Ideas Back .................................................................................. 63 1.3.2 Space and Limit in Ephrem’s Writings .................................................................... 70 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 77 Chapter 2: The Rôle of ‘Limit’ in Ephrem’s Exegesis of Genesis 1–3 ....................................... 78 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 78 2.1 Fifteen Hymns and a Commentary ................................................................................ 79 4 2.1.1 The Hymns on Paradise ........................................................................................... 80 2.1.2 Ephrem’s Commentary on Genesis ......................................................................... 82 2.2 Divine Self-Giving as an Act of Divine Self-Limitation: the concept of limit in the Hymns on Paradise and the Commentary on Genesis ............................................................... 85 2.2.1 Limit as Boundary ................................................................................................... 85 2.2.2 Limit as Proportion ................................................................................................. 90 2.2.3 The Limits of Human Language .............................................................................. 97 2.2.4 Limitation as Gift: its purpose being to overcome human limitation .................. 101 2.3 Ephrem’s Own Reading of Genesis 1–3 ........................................................................ 102 2.3.1 Limitations of Human Language and the Necessity of the Reader’s Journey ...... 103 2.3.2 The Importance of Doctrine as a Limitation on the Reading of Scripture ........... 106 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 111 Summary of Part 1 ................................................................................................................. 114 Part 2: JOHN CHRYSOSTOM .................................................................................................. 116 Chapter 3: The Heritage of John Chrysostom....................................................................... 116 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 116 3.1 Chrysostom’s Social and Theological Heritage: the cultural, theological and political contexts of Antioch ........................................................................................................... 117 3.2 Chrysostom’s Literary Heritage – Sermons and Homilies .......................................... 126 3.3 Chrysostom’s Philosophical and Theological Heritage ............................................... 129 Summary ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GLIMPSES INTO the KNOWLEDGE, ROLE, and USE of CHURCH FATHERS in RUS' and RUSSIAN MONASTICISM, LATE 11T H to EARLY 16 T H CENTURIES
    ROUND UP THE USUALS AND A FEW OTHERS: GLIMPSES INTO THE KNOWLEDGE, ROLE, AND USE OF CHURCH FATHERS IN RUS' AND RUSSIAN MONASTICISM, LATE 11t h TO EARLY 16 t h CENTURIES David M. Goldfrank This essay originated at the time that ASEC was in its early stages and in response to a requestthat I write something aboutthe church Fathers in medieval Rus'. I already knew finding the patrology concerning just the original Greek and Syriac texts is nothing short of a researcher’s black hole. Given all the complexities in­ volved in the manuscript traditions associated with such superstar names as Basil of Caesarea, Ephrem the Syrian, John Chrysostom, and Macarius of wherever (no kidding), to name a few1 and all of The author would like to thank the staffs of the Hilandar Research Library at The Ohio State University and, of course, the monks of Hilandar Monastery for encouraging the microfilming of the Hilandar Slavic manuscripts by Ohio State. I thank the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection; and Georgetown University’s Woodstock Theological Library as well as its Lauinger Library Reference Room for their kind help. Georgetown University’s Office of the Provost and Center for Eurasian, East European and Russian Studies provided summer research support. Thanks also to Jennifer Spock and Donald Ostrowski for their wise suggestions. 1 An excellent example of this is Plested, Macarian Legacy. For the spe­ cific problem of Pseudo-Macarius/Pseudo-Pseudo-Macarius as it relates to this essay, see NSAW, 78-79. Tapestry of Russian Christianity: Studies in History and Culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews the Hymnal of the Armenian Church
    28=; REVIEWS THE HYMNAL OF THE ARMENIAN CHURCH. Das armenischeHymnarium: Studien zu seiner geschichtlichenEntwicklung. Von NERSES TER-MIKAELIAN, Archimandrit von Edschmiatsin. (Leipzig, J. C. Hinrichs'sche Buchhandlung, 1905. in-8.) Downloaded from THIS little book of no pages is the first critical study of the Hymnal of the Armenian Church, of which the editio princeps was printed at Amsterdam by Oscan in the year 1664. Germans might perhaps find fault with the author's style, but no Englishman will do so. It must be remembered that it is to him an acquired tongue, and he is at least clear http://jts.oxfordjournals.org/ and concise. He shews that the Hymnal was finally fixed in its present form in the second half of the fourteenth century, when the hymns written by the great Cilician prelates—Nerses the Graceful, Nerses of Lambron in the twelfth century, Gregory of Skevrha and Vardan Var- dapet in the thirteenth—were included. These additions constitute about a fourth of the existing book, and were accepted by the churches of Eastern Armenia in that age; but with the proviso that no more additions were allowable, especially those which the latinizing clergy at UB Giessen on May 14, 2015 of the decadent kingdom of Cilicia were eager to make. Not only were some forty new canons added in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, but existing hymns were greatly expanded. The collection, closed about 1350, includes 1,166 hymns, enumerated by Ter-Mikaelian under 162 heads, as canons, suites, and detached hymns. A canon is defined as the whole of the hymns to be sung on any one dominical feast or saint's day : a suite as a collection of hymns divided according to the eight tones or fundamental melodies; not appropriated as a whole to any special feast, but sung section by section on successive days of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 M a R O N I T E L I T U R G I C a L
    MARONITELITURGICAL CALENDAR 2018 The Liturgical Cycle of the Antiochene Syriac Maronite Church 2018 Imprimatur: ✙ Gregory John Mansour Imprimatur: ✙ Bishop of Saint Maron of Brooklyn Holy Days of obligation are printed in red. The LEFT COLUMN indicates the principle celebration of the day. The RIGHT COLUMN indicates optional memorials and celebrations. Abbreviations: An = Angel Ap = Apostle M = Martyr C = Confessor MARONITE LITURGICAL CYCLE January 2018 The Circumcision of Jesus (Holy Day of Obligation) Monday Sts. Basil and Gregory, Doctors of the Church, C 01/01/18 Eph 2:11-22 Lk 2:21 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Tuesday 01/02/18 Heb 7:1-10 Lk 2:22-24 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Wednesday 01/03/18 Heb 7:20-28 Lk 2:25-35 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Thursday St. Elizabeth Ann Seton (USA), C 01/04/18 Heb 6:9-12 Lk 2:36-40 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Vigil of the Glorious Epiphany Friday St. Paul, the First Hermit, C 01/05/18 Rom 5:1-11 Phil 3:7-12 Lk 3:1-6 Mt 11:25-30 St. John Neumann (USA), C _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Season of the Glorious Epiphany Feast of the Glorious Epiphany (Holy Day of Obligation) Saturday 01/06/18 Tit 2:11 - 3:7 Lk 3:15-22 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • St. Ephraim the Syrian's Thought and Imagery As an Inspiration to Byzantine Artists
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 1.2, 227–251 © 1998 [2010] by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press ST. EPHRAIM THE SYRIAN’S THOUGHT AND IMAGERY AS AN INSPIRATION † TO BYZANTINE ARTISTS ZAGA GAVRILOVIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH IN THE HUMANITIES THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM UNITED KINGDOM [1] For students of Byzantine art, St. Ephraim the Syrian is linked with the iconography of the Last Judgment. This paper gives an account of the previous research concerning his part in the development of that theme, although it is usually accepted that all previous conclusions were in fact based on pseudo-Ephraimic writings. However, in this article, a genuine text by St. Ephraim, which confirms that link, is introduced into the discussion. It is pointed out that, thanks to a great number of modern studies and the wider availability of St. Ephraim’s works, it is becoming possible to establish a more general connection between his thought and imagery and the art of the Byzantine world. This article includes a brief survey of the representations of St. Ephraim in Byzantine portraiture and of the iconography of his death and funeral. [2] One of the earliest preserved representations of St. Ephraim the Syrian in Byzantine art is on a small 10th century icon at St. Catherine’s Monastery, Mount Sinaï.1 The icon is divided into two † The General Editor acknowledges the assistance received from Eileen Wilson in scanning the images from slides. 1 K. Weitzmann, “The Mandylion and Constantine Porphyro- genetos,” CahArch XI (1960): 163–184. A photograph in colour, in id., The 227 228 Zaga Gavrilovic registers.
    [Show full text]
  • An Index to of Saint Mark's Monastery, Jerusalem (
    An Index to of Saint Mark’s Monastery, Jerusalem () Adam Carter McCollum Hill Museum & Manuscript Library [email protected] e manuscript was first catalogued by Georg Graf in OC n.s. (): - and subsequently by William Macomber in his Final Inventory of the Microfilmed Manuscripts of the Mark’s Convent, Jerusalem (Provo: BYU, ) e stories are alphabetized by the names of the saints (or the miraculous events) themselves. e parenthetical reference to Graf is to vol. of his Geschichte der christlichen arabischen Literatur (Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ) A Aaron, a-b (Graf ) ʿAbd Al-Maṣīḥ, b-a (Graf ) Abel, see below under Martyrs Abḥai, a-a (Graf ) Abraham, a-a (Graf ) Abraham of Qidun, b-a (Graf ) Abraham of Kashkar, a-b (Graf ) Addai, b-a (Graf ) Agrippas, see under Lawrence & Agrippas Andronicus & Athanasia his wife, b-a (Graf ) Antonius, b-b (Graf ) Arcadius, son of Xenophon, see under Xenophon Archelides, a-b (Graf ) Athanasia, see under Andronicus Athanasius, b-a (Graf ) Awgen, a-a (Graf ) Awtil, b-a (Graf ) B Bacchus, see under Sergius & Bacchus Barbara & Juliana, b-a (Graf ff.) http://tinyurl.com/ps6pzyj. Available at http://tinyurl.com/lfuwakq. e work is not paginated, but the information on this manuscript is available on pp. - of the . Barsawma, a-b (Graf ) Miracles of Basil, a-b (Graf ) Basilia, see under Eugenia Bayt Al-Šuhadāʾ, a-a (Graf ) Bishoi, a-a (Graf ) C Children of the rulers of Rome & Antioch, b-b Christopher the Barbarian, a-b (Graf ) Clement of Rome, b-a (Graf ) e Invention of the Cross, a-b (Graf
    [Show full text]
  • The Pneumatology of Ephrem the Syrian
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (2009 -) Projects Fire in the Bread, Life in the Body: The Pneumatology of Ephrem the Syrian David Kiger Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Kiger, David, "Fire in the Bread, Life in the Body: The Pneumatology of Ephrem the Syrian" (2020). Dissertations (2009 -). 913. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/913 FIRE IN THE BREAD, LIFE IN THE BODY: THE PNEUMATOLOGY OF EPHREM THE SYRIAN by David Wesley Kiger, B.C.M, B.Th., M.Div. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2020 ABSTRACT FIRE IN THE BREAD, LIFE IN THE BODY: THE PNEUMATOLOGY OF EPHREM THE SYRIAN David Wesley Kiger, B.C.M., B.Th., M.Div. Marquette University, 2020 The fourth century debates about the status and personhood of the Son later expanded to reflections on the status and person of the Holy Spirit. In this dissertation I examine the pneumatology of Ephrem the Syrian, who is often over-looked in discussions about fourth century pneumatology. I argue that Ephrem displays a high pneumatology that fits within the broad contours of the pro-Nicene movement. I begin with a discussion of Ephrem’s Syriac heritage and focus on the themes and language surrounding the Holy Spirit in pre-Nicene Syriac texts. Pre-Nicene Syriac authors speak about the Spirit’s role in liturgical practices, often using feminine or maternal language to describe the Spirit’s work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spiritual Father for the Whole Church: the Universal Appeal of St
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 1.2, 197–220 © 1998 [2010] by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press A SPIRITUAL FATHER FOR THE WHOLE CHURCH: THE UNIVERSAL APPEAL OF ST. EPHRAEM THE SYRIAN SIDNEY H. GRIFFITH INSTITUTE OF CHRISTIAN ORIENTAL RESEARCH THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA I [1] In an encyclical letter issued on 5 October 1920, Pope Benedict XV proclaimed St. Ephraem the Syrian a Doctor of the Universal Church.1 This accolade may be seen as in some ways the culmination in Rome of a new fame in the twentieth century for Syria’s ‘Harp of the Holy Spirit,’ already widely acclaimed in east and west in medieval times. It was due to efforts exerted already for some two centuries by a number of scholars in the west to bring out modern editions of Ephraem’s works. One thinks initially of the publication in the eighteenth century of the six-volume Roman edition of the works attributed to Ephraem in Greek, Syriac, and Latin.2 While the Greek and Latin texts had long been known in the west, the publication of Ephraem’s works in Syriac, 1 See Benedict XV, “Principi Apostolorum Petro,” Acta Apostolicae Sedis 12 (1920), pp. 457–453. 2 See J.S. Assemani (ed.), Sancti Patris Nostri Ephraem Syri Opera Omnia quae exstant Graece, Syriace, Latine, 6 vols. (Rome, 1732–46). 197 198 Sidney H. Griffith the only language in which he is known to have written, brought the first glimpse of the poet’s true genius to western Christians. The Syriac works, with Latin translations, were included in volumes IV to VI of the Editio Romana.
    [Show full text]
  • 129 Sebastian P. Brock, an Introduction to Syriac
    BOOK REVIEWS Sebastian P. Brock, An Introduction to Syriac Studies (revised second edition). (Gorgias Handbooks 4; Gorgias Press: Piscataway, NJ, 2006) Pp. ix + 78. Paperback, $29.00. REVIEWED BY ROBERT A. KITCHEN, KNOX-METROPOLITAN UNITED CHURCH [1] It has seldom been an easy task to venture into the study of things Syriac. There are few places, even many theological institutions, where mention of the Syriac language and its churches elicits a response of recognition. Sources and reference materials, therefore, are not readily located, so where to begin is a matter of first importance. Sebastian Brock’s second small volume recently republished in an updated edition remedies the situation. An Introduction to Syriac Studies was written originally in 1980 for a publication in Birmingham targeted towards undergraduates, but over time became inaccessible to most students. Kristian Heal of the Center for the Preservation of Ancient Religious Texts (CPART) at Brigham Young University first rescued the publication from no-longer-in-print status and published it electronically on the CPART website. Now Gorgias Press has reissued the book with a number of additions and updates which Brock happily notes is the good sign of significant growth and interest in the field of Syriac studies. [2] This may be called an introduction, but it is worth the time reading through for any student or experienced scholar. Particularly helpful are the initial sections on “what is Syriac” and “why one should study it,” matters typically raised by all sorts of people, but seldom answered in an articulate way. The section on the scope of Syriac literature is all too brief, but after all this is intended only to be an introduction, so Brock continually points the reader towards other more in-depth resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Realism in St. Ephrem the Syrian and T. F. Torrance1
    THEOLOGICAL REALISM IN ST. EPHREM THE SYRIAN AND T. F. TORRANCE1 Mark Mourachian, PhD Assistant Professor of Greek and Latin Chair, Department of Humanities and Science St. Charles Borromeo Seminary, Wynnewood, PA [email protected] Abstract: This article examines continuities between St. Ephrem the Syrian (ca. 306-373) and T. F. Torrance with respect to the latter’s bedrock concept of theological realism. otwithstaning the ast ierences etween the two theologians’ historical and ecclesial contexts and the idioms of their theological discourse, there are several points of deep connection between them in terms of their understanding of divine revelation, theological knowing, a proper method of theological inquiry, and the centrality of the Nicene confession of faith in Christ for all right theological thinking. There can be no doubt about who the chief patristic fgures were that shaped T. F. Torrance’s theology. That Torrance’s theological contributions lean heavily on the Athanasius-Cyril axis is, of course, well known;2 to theirs one would quickly add the names of Hilary of Poitiers and Irenaeus of Lyons.3 This article, however, brings Torrance into conversation with a fgure less known to many of his readers: Ephrem the Syrian, the masterful poet-theologian of fourth- century Mesopotamia. What Torrance has written about theological method and epistemology bears striking resemblance in several respects to the methodological and epistemological framework of the Syrian Father’s conception of symbolic knowing and divine revelation. With respect to Torrance, the aim of this article 1 This article is adapted from a chapter from the author’s PhD dissertation, Human Freedom in the Context of the Theological Anthropology of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian the African: Fact Sheet / Time Line (Michael Wood)
    HADRIAN THE AFRICAN – fact sheet Michael Wood, 2020 There is no separate in-depth account of Hadrian and his legacy. The key study of his life is by M Lapidge and B Bischoff Biblical Commentaries from the Canterbury School of Theodore and Hadrian Cambridge 1994 pp82-132. To draw up this fact sheet/time line I have used this along with older studies starting with AS Cook in 1923, and added new finds made over the last few years, the latest by Franck Cinato in 2017. It mainly concentrates on what we might be able to deduce about his life and career in Africa and Naples before he came to England. For all his importance, Hadrian was till recently a poorly studied figure – not least because of the difficulty of finding evidence; but the one certainty is that more is to be discovered. My article on him comes out in the October issue of the BBC History magazine. Any comments or suggestions gratefully received! 1) Hadrian was born in North Africa (in the 620s?) and died in Canterbury on January 9 709 or 710. 2) He was of ‘African race” vir natione Afir (so Bede- Hadrian was alive till Bede was in his thirties.) NB the use of this term by the likes of Virgil, Martial and Statius: it is often specifically used by Latin poets to refer to a native of Libya. Maybe then he was a Berber/Amazigh? Probably as a fluent Greek speaker he was from the Greek-speaking part of North Africa – i.e. Cyrenaica; but where exactly we don’t know.
    [Show full text]
  • Nisibis As the Background to the Life of Ephrem the Syrian
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 8, 179-235 © 2005 [2009] by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press NISIBIS AS THE BACKGROUND TO THE LIFE OF EPHREM THE SYRIAN PAUL S. RUSSELL ST. JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA ANGLICAN THEOLOGICAL COLLEGE ABSTRACT1 This paper is an attempt to collect together what is known about Nisibis before and during the life of Ephrem the Syrian (306-373). It is important to see him against the backdrop of the place that formed him rather than the place in which he spent the final years of his life, so it is to Nisibis that we should turn for insight into Ephrem’s basic thoughts and concerns. I hope that this information may stir readers to reflect on Ephrem as a child of his birthplace and to see him in a slightly different light than before. Even of Nisibis, which was clearly the central place in the eastern part of the Mesopotamian shelf, we have 1 I would like to thank the anonymous readers from Hugoye as well as Dr. Daniel Stoekl Ben Ezra of Hebrew University, Dr. David G. K. Taylor of Oxford University, Dr. James Russell of Harvard University, Adam Becker of New York University, Dr. Mark Dickens of Cambridge University, Dr. Edwin Yamauchi of Miami University of Ohio and Dr. Glen Bowersock of Princeton University for supplying me with information and suggestions that were helpful in filling in gaps and giving a clearer shape to this paper that had been electronically damaged as well as being incomplete. Please accept my apologies if this list is incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See PRINCIPI APOSTOLORUM PETRO ENCYCLICAL OF POPE BENEDICT XV ON ST. EPHREM THE SYRIAN TO THE PATRIARCHS, PRIMATES, ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS, AND OTHER ORDINARIES IN PEACE AND COMMUNION WITH THE APOSTOLIC SEE. Venerable Brothers, Greetings and The Apostolic Benediction. 1. To Peter the Prince of the Apostles, the divine Founder of the Church allotted the gifts of inerrancy [1] in matters of faith and of union with God. This relationship is similar to that of a "Choir Director of the Choir of the Apostles."[2] He is the common teacher and rector [3] of all, so that he might feed the flock of Him who established His Church [4] on the authority of Peter himself and his successors. And on this mystical rock the foundation [6] of the entire ecclesiastical structure stands firm as on a hinge. From it rises the unity of Christian charity as well as our Christian faith. 2. Indeed the unique gift of Peter's primacy is that he might spread everywhere and preserve the riches of charity and faith, as Ignatius Theophorus, a man of Apostolic times, beautifully declared. For in those noble letters he wrote to the Roman Church on his journey, announcing his arrival in Rome to be martyred for Christ, he gave testimony to the primacy of that Church over all others by calling it 'presiding officer over the universal community of charity."[7] This was to signify not only that the Universal Church was the visible image of divine charity, but also that Blessed Peter, together with his primacy and his love for Christ (affirmed by his triple confession), remains heir of the Roman See.
    [Show full text]