The Knowledge Triangle in the Netherlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Knowledge Triangle in the Netherlands TIP Working Party KNOWLEDGE TRIANGLE PROJECT (2015-16) CASE STUDY: the Netherlands “An Entrepreneurial eco-system approach to the Knowledge Triangle” Concept The Knowledge Triangle in the Netherlands AN ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM APPROACH Prof. Dr. E. Stam, Prof. Dr. A. G. L. Romme, M. Roso MSc, Dr. J. P. van den Toren & B. T. van der Starre MSc UTRECHT UNIVERSITY | EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY | BIRCH CONSULTANTS COMMISSIONED BY THE OECD, THE DUTCH MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, THE DUTCH MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, CULTURE & SCIENCE, AND THE DUTCH CENTRES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP 1 Concept Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2 Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Knowledge, talent and entrepreneurship ...................................................................................... 6 2.2 The interaction of research, education and entrepreneurship ...................................................... 7 2.3 Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional leadership .................................................................... 8 3 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Case delineation ........................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Primary rationale for ecosystem selection ............................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Regional delineation ................................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Comparative background data ..................................................................................................... 12 3.2.1 Comparison of ecosystems ....................................................................................................... 13 3.2.2 Labour force characteristics ..................................................................................................... 13 3.2.3 Business demographics ............................................................................................................ 14 3.2.4 R&D intensity ............................................................................................................................ 14 3.2.5 Productive entrepreneurship ................................................................................................... 14 3.2.6 Gross added value .................................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Network analysis .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.1 Data Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 15 3.3.2 Data Selection ........................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.3 Method of analysis ................................................................................................................... 16 3.4 Case studies .................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.1 Respondent selection ............................................................................................................... 16 3.4.2 Approaching respondents ........................................................................................................ 17 3.4.3 Structure of the interview ........................................................................................................ 17 4 Overview of the Dutch Knowledge Triangle .......................................................................................... 18 4.1 Higher education .......................................................................................................................... 18 4.1.1 Universities ............................................................................................................................... 18 4.1.2 Universities of Applied Sciences ............................................................................................... 19 4.1.3 Vocational Education and Training ........................................................................................... 20 4.2 Research ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Universities ............................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Universities of applied sciences ............................................................................................... 22 4.3 Innovation policy .......................................................................................................................... 22 4.3.1 Top Sector policy ...................................................................................................................... 22 4.3.2 Entrepreneurship and innovation stimuli................................................................................. 23 4.3.3 European programmes ............................................................................................................. 23 4.3.4 Place based policies .................................................................................................................. 23 2 Concept 4.4 Evaluation of the Knowledge Triangle .......................................................................................... 23 4.4.1 Strengths .................................................................................................................................. 23 4.4.2 Weaknesses .............................................................................................................................. 24 5 Knowledge Networks in Ecosystems ..................................................................................................... 25 5.1 Project intensity ............................................................................................................................ 25 5.2 Visualisations and key characteristics .......................................................................................... 25 5.2.1 Brainport network .................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.2 Amsterdam Metropolitan Area Network ................................................................................. 28 5.2.3 The Twente Network ................................................................................................................ 29 5.2.4 The Utrecht Network ................................................................................................................ 30 5.2.5 South Holland Network ............................................................................................................ 31 5.3 Network characteristics ................................................................................................................ 32 5.4 Involvement of knowledge institutes ........................................................................................... 33 5.4.1 Involvement of KIs in general ................................................................................................... 33 5.4.2 Involvement of HEIs.................................................................................................................. 34 6 Labour Markets in Ecosystems .............................................................................................................. 36 6.1 Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the labour market .................................................................... 36 6.2 Focus ............................................................................................................................................. 37 6.3 Sectors and occupations ............................................................................................................... 37 6.4 Dynamics ...................................................................................................................................... 42 6.5 Summary and conclusions ............................................................................................................ 44 7 The Brainport case study ....................................................................................................................... 47 7.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 47 7.2 The knowledge triangle in the ecosystem .................................................................................... 47 7.2.1 Eindhoven University of Technology ........................................................................................ 47 7.2.2 Fontys University of Applied Sciences ...................................................................................... 48 7.2.3 Vocational education ...............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Bestemmingsplan De Vecht
    bestemmingsplan De Vecht Gemeente Stichtse Vecht Planstatus: ontwerp Plan identificatie: NL.IMRO.1904.BPDeVechtLGB-ON01 Datum: 23-10-2019 Contactpersoon Buro SRO: dhr. J. van Nuland Kenmerk Buro SRO: SR160158 Opdrachtgever: Gemeente Stichtse Vecht Buro SRO 't Goylaan 11 3525 AA Utrecht 030-2679198 www.buro-sro.nl BTW nummer: NL8187.16.071.B01 KvK nummer: 30232281 Rabobank rekeningnummer: NL44.RABO.0142.1540.24 t.n.v. Buro SRO B.V. te Utrecht 2 Inhoudsopgave 1 Inleiding ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Aanleiding en doelstelling ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Ligging van het plangebied .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Vigerende bestemmingsplannen ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Leeswijzer ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 2 Het plangebied De Vecht ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Historische ontwikkeling ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 3, Case Study Randstad
    RISE Regional Integrated Strategies in Europe Targeted Analysis 2013/2/11 ANNEX 3 Randstad Case Study | 15/7/2012 ESPON 2013 This report presents the final results a Targeted Analysis conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Birmingham, 2012. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. ESPON 2013 ANNEX 3 Randstad Case Study: The making of Integrative Territorial Strategies in a multi-level and multi-actor policy environment ESPON 2013 List of authors Marjolein Spaans Delft University of Technology – OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment (The Netherlands) Bas Waterhout Delft University of Technology – OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment (The Netherlands) Wil Zonneveld Delft University of Technology – OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment (The Netherlands) 2 ESPON 2013 Table of contents 1.0 Setting the scene for RISE in the Randstad ............................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Governance in the Randstad ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Useful and the Agreeable Country Houses As Investment?
    THE USEFUL AND THE AGREEABLE COUNTRY HOUSES AS INVESTMENT? > by Fred Vogelzang K&B editor-in-chief and scientific researcher Dutch Castle Foundation, centre for study on castles and country houses Estates are often presented as luxurious country houses, built from the 17th century onwards by the elites as an escape from the filthy and overcrowded cities. However various other motives have been put forward for the construction of country houses: they are fashionable status symbols that could also function as economic assets. New studies by Brusse and Mijnhardt (Towards a new Template) and Piketty (Capitalism in the 21st Century) give reason to shine a new light on these economic motivations. > DE BUITENPLAATS MET AGRARISCH BEDRIJF MEERZICHT BIJ ZOETERMEER. ENJOYMENT OR INVESTMENT? FOTO ALBERT SPEELMAN R. van Luttervelt, who was among the first to study country houses scientifically, gives several reasons for the construction of After years of historical research into the Zeeland past they these luxurious retreats.1 Besides the love of nature he also arrived at the conclusion that the common division of Dutch clearly emphasises economic motives. The flourishing commerce history in the periods Revolt, Bataafse Period and Kingdom, and shipping industry of the 17th century brought in large determined by political make-up, should make way for a new amounts of wealth, triggering a diligent search for investment paradigm in which the (more social and economical) relationship opportunities for the profits. Farms and agricultural land became between city and countryside is the main reference point. This sought-after objects for investment, but castles and country paradigm should also hold true outside of Zeeland, allowing houses also served as investment opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for a Burch Seminar in Alaska and Iceland
    Burch Renewable Energy and Sustainability in Germany and the Netherlands Summary Burch Programs and Honors Study Abroad Title of Program: Burch Field Research Seminar: A glimpse into our future? Sustainability in Germany and the Netherlands Faculty Director: Dr. Gregory Gangi, Institute for the Environment and the Curriculum in Environment and Ecology Program Location(s): Freiburg, Germany The Hague and surrounding area, The Netherlands Ruhrgebeit, Germany Berlin, Germany Affiliation(s): Innovation Academy, Freiburg, Germany Program Duration: 6 weeks Total Credit Hours: 6 credits Proposed Courses: HNRS 352 The Future of Energy; Instructor: Dr. Gregory Gangi HNRS 352 Smart Cities; Instructor: Drs. Ing. Cor Rademaker Contact Hours: Future of Energy: 74 Smart Cities: 118 1 Burch Seminar in Germany and the Netherlands A glimpse into our future? Sustainability in Germany and the Netherlands Summer 2017 Six weeks (First summer session) Dr. Gregory Gangi Institute for the Environment and the Curriculum in Environment and Ecology And Drs. Ing. Cor Rademaker Curriculum in Environment and Ecology I. Introduction The world is undergoing the largest wave of urban growth in history. More than half of the world’s population now lives in towns and cities, and by 2030 this number will swell to about 5 billion. Much of this urbanization will unfold in Africa and Asia, bringing huge social, economic, and environmental transformations. Intensifying urbanization is not only a phenomenon of developing countries but also of developed countries. For example, many of the larger cities in the Benelux region (like Brussels, Antwerp, Rotterdam, and Amsterdam) are experiencing growth rates at or above 2% on annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1•The Randstad: the Creation of a Metropolitan Economy Pietertordoir
    A. The Economic, Infrastructural and Environmental Dilemmas of Spatial Development 3.1•The Randstad: The Creation of a Metropolitan Economy PieterTordoir Introduction In this chapter, I will discuss the future scenarios for the spatial and economic devel- opment of the Randstad (the highly urbanized western part of the Netherlands). Dur- ing the past 50 years, this region of six million inhabitants, four major urban centers and 20 medium-sized cities within an area the size of the Ile de France evolved into an increasingly undifferentiated patchwork of daily urban systems, structured by the sprawl of business and new towns along highway axes. There is increasing pressure from high economic and population growth and congestion, particularly in the northern wing of the Randstad, which includes the two overlapping commuter fields of Amsterdam and Utrecht. Because of land scarcity and a rising awareness of environ- mental issues, the Dutch planning tradition of low-density urban development has be- come increasingly irrelevant. The new challenge is for sustainable urban development, where the accommoda- tion of at least a million new inhabitants and jobs in the next 25 years must be com- bined with higher land-use intensities, a significant modal shift to public transporta- tion, and a substantial increase in the quality and diversity of the natural environment and the quality of life in the region.1 Some of these goals may be reached simultane- ously by concentrating development in high-density nodes that provide a critical mass for improved mass transit systems, rendering an alternative for car-dependent com- muters. Furthermore, a gradual integration of the various daily urban systems may benefit the quality and diversity of economic, social, natural, and cultural local envi- ronments within the polynuclear urban field.
    [Show full text]
  • Wastewater As a Resource
    Wastewater as a Resource Strategies to Recover Resources from Amsterdam’s Wastewater MSc thesis in Civil Engineering and Management — Heleen de Fooij 2 Wastewater as a Resource: Strategies to Recover Resources from Amsterdam’s Wastewater MSc thesis in Civil Engineering and Management Faculty of Engineering Technology University of Twente Student: Heleen de Fooij, BSc Location and date: Amsterdam, January 8, 2015 Thesis defence date: January 15, 2015 Graduation supervisor: Prof. Dr. ir. A.Y. Hoekstra Daily supervisor: Dr. ir. D.C.M. Augustijn External supervisors: ir. A.H.M. Struker (Waternet) Prof. Dr. ir. J.P. van der Hoek (Waternet / TU Delft) 3 4 Preface In this report I present my thesis concerning resource recovery from Amsterdam’s wastewater chain. I conducted the research in cooperation with the University of Twente and Waternet, which performs all water related tasks for the City of Amsterdam and the Regional Water Authority Amstel, Gooi and Vecht. My time at Waternet introduced me to the world of drinking-water and wastewater treatment; a relatively new topic to me. The graduation process opened my eyes to see a great sector where sustainability is high on the agenda. The fact that wastewater quality and the provision of essential resources, like phosphorus, are in the public interest was a great attraction to me. The whole time I kept wondering how things could be better or more sustainable. At one point I even found myself wondering whether it was more sustainable to use a pencil or a pen, which I thought was overdoing it! I would like to thank my supervisors at Waternet: André Struker and Jan Peter van der Hoek.
    [Show full text]
  • Delft Survival Guide
    Delta Delta is the independent newspaper of TU Delft. www.delta.tudelft.nl COLOPHON Editor-in-chief, Delta: Frank Nuijens Editor: Molly Quell Writers: Damini Purkayastha, Caroline Vermeulen and Daniela Stow Layout design: Damini Purkayastha Cover Design: Stephan Timmers All articles printed in this book were first published in TU Delta from 2012 to 2015. Some text has been updated to reflect changes. To read the articles online log on to: www.delta.tudelft.nl/internationalstu- dents/survivalguide The Survival Guide is an on-going series and will be updated with new and relevant topics. For queries or topics you would like covered write to [email protected] Delta TU Delft 3 Table of Contents Life on campus 6 Survive: Campus 8 Survive: Bars on campus 11 Survive: TU Delft’s online forums 14 Survive: Mental health on campus 16 Getting around 18 Survive: The bike 19 Survive: The cycling rules 21 Survive: The public transport 24 Survive: The new train tickets 28 Survive: The news 31 Survive: Networking 34 Survive: The libraries 36 Survive: After-hour emergencies 39 Survive: Free wifi 41 Survive: The rain 43 Survive: The tourism 45 Survive: The snow 47 Survive: The trash 49 Survive: Visas 52 Survive: The medical system 54 4 Delta TU Delft Things to do 57 Survive: The beaches 59 Survive: The museums 61 Survive: Trivia nights 63 Survive: Sports clubs 65 Survive: The theatre 67 Survive: The events 69 Survive: Delft’s music events 72 Survive: The tastings 75 Survive: Winter activities in Delft 77 Survive: Watching sports 80 Survive:
    [Show full text]
  • List of Addresses of the Participants
    List of Addresses of the Participants Prof. R. J. Adrian Prof. Gido Buresti Dept. of Theor. & Appl. Mech. Dipt. di Jngegneria Aerospaziale University of lllinois at Urbana Universita di Pisa 216 Talbot Laboratory Via Diotisalvi 2 104 South Wright St. 1-56126 Pisa, Italia Urbana II. 61801-2983, USA [email protected] [email protected] Prof.S.Y. Alekseenko, Director Dr. Rene Delfos Inst. of Thermophysics Delft University of Technology Siberian Branch ofRAS Lab. for Aero- and Hydrodynamics Lavrentyev Ave, 1 Rotterdamseweg 145 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia NL- 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] Prof. S.P. Bardakhanov Prof. H. Eckelmann Inst. Theor. & Appl. Mech. Max-Planck Inst. f. Stromungsforschung Siberian Branch of Russian A.S. Bunsebnstrasse 10 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia D-37073 Gottingen, Germany [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Werner Benger Dr. Walter Egli Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum f. Informa- ABB Corporate Research Ltd. tionstechnik (Zm Berlin) LHS AG Zurich Takustrasse 7 CH-5405 Baden Dlittwil D-14195 Berlin-Dahlem, Germany Switzerland [email protected] [email protected] Pavel Y.Bulychev Prof. Dr. Marie Farge Depart. General Physics CNRS Lab. de Meteo. Dyn. Perm State University Ecole Normale Superieur 15, Bukirev St. 24, rue Lhomond 614600 Perm, Russia F-76231 Paris Cedex 05, France [email protected] [email protected] Prof. Tony Burden Dept. of Mechanics KTH S- 10044 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] 285 286 Prof. Adam Finchman Dr. Wolfram Hage LEGI-UJF-CNRS DLR (German Aerospace Center) Coriolis Inst.
    [Show full text]
  • De Franschen in De Vechtstreek in 1672 (Pdf)
    De Franschen in de Vechtstreek in 1672 d:\hist_top\schoemaker(hss)\hss-1672\Vechtstreek Medegedeeld door I.M. VAN WIJHE. J.M. van Wijhe, die waarschijnlijk in Den Haag woonde, maar waarover verder niets werd gevonden, schreef in de twintiger jaren van de vorige eeuw artikelen in verschillende periodieken. Vaak waren dat uittreksels uit oude handschriften, waaronder die van Andries Schoemaker. Zo vinden we in het Jaarboekje van het Oudheidkundig Genootschap 'Niftarlake' van 1923, pag. 6 - 17 een gedeelte uit Schoemakers Beschryving van Utrecht (&) Overijssel), dat we hier onverkort weergeven. Een stukje transcriptie uit: Beschryving van Utrecht (&) Overijssel) door Schoemaker Op de Kon. Bibliotheek te 's-Hage bevinden zich een aantal manuscripten, waarin plaatsbeschrijvingen van Andries Schoemaker, die deze ook met uit de hand gekleurde afbeeldingen heeft voorzien. Een daarvan bevat min of meer uitgebreide aanteekeningen hoe de Franschen anno 1672 in de stad en de provincie Utrecht en in andere deelen van ons land hebben huisgehouden. Op het titelblad staat: UTRECHT. ,,De stadt en het geheele Sticht werd in den jare 1672 bemagtigt van de Francen, alwaar dat se slegt huusgehouden hebben en het jaar daaraan sijn se sonder slag of stoot weder weghgetrocken, doch niet sonder groote knevelarij en brantschatting, die seer swaar was te moeten betalen". Op verzoek van den heer J. W. Verburgt wil ik ten behoeve van ,,Niftarlake" eenige mededeelingen betreffende plaatsen en kasteelen in de Vechtstreek uit dit manuscript geven. NIWENRODE. Een oud adelijk huijs gelegen aan de Vecht, welke een uijtmuntent swaar gebouw en de muragie wel drie voeten dik sijn, gelijk men ten huijdige daage aan dat gebouw noch kan zien.
    [Show full text]
  • Halfjaarrapportage HOV in 'T Gooi
    Halfjaarrapportage HOV in ’t Gooi augustus 2019 t/m januari 2020 148676/1366079 Projectnaam: HOV in ’t Gooi Programma: Openbaar Vervoer Bestuurlijk Opdrachtgever(s): Z. Pels Datum: 18 februari 2020 Het project De provincie Noord-Holland investeert in R-net, een betrouwbaar OV-netwerk. Onderdeel van dit netwerk is de hoogwaardige openbaarvervoer verbinding (HOV) tussen Huizen en Hilversum. De regio krijgt hierdoor een frequente, snelle en betrouwbare OV-verbinding met Amsterdam, Schiphol en Almere. Daarnaast wordt Huizen, een van de grootste gemeenten in Nederland zonder treinstation, veel beter ontsloten. Ook Blaricum, Eemnes en Laren krijgen een sterk verbeterde aansluiting op R-net. Belangrijk onderdeel hiervan is de aanleg of uitbreiding van P+R-terreinen met HOV-haltes. Automobilisten krijgen hierdoor een gemakkelijke overstap op de bus. In de omgeving van Schiphol, Haarlem en Amsterdam is R-net al enkele jaren een succes. Ook in Zuid-Holland, Flevoland en Utrecht wordt R-net uitgerold. Het project HOV in 't Gooi gaat echter over meer dan een HOV-verbinding. Een deel van het projectbudget wordt besteed aan het verbeteren van het leefklimaat, het verhogen van de verkeersveiligheid en het versterken van de natuur. Door een nieuwe natuurbrug (ecoduct) bij Anna’s Hoeve hebben flora en fauna de ruimte om zich tussen het Laarder Wasmeer en Monnikenberg te verplaatsen en te ontwikkelen. Met de ondertunneling van de bus- en spoorbaan bij de Oosterengweg in Hilversum wordt het laatste knelpunt van de Hilversumse ring opgelost; voor automobilisten, fietsers en voetgangers wordt het hier veel veiliger. Figuur 1: Het tracé Het tracé is met de verschillende raadsbesluiten in de gemeenten en het besluit van Provinciale Staten van Noord-Holland op 9 juli 2012 vastgesteld (zie bovenstaande figuur).
    [Show full text]
  • The Randstad : Face and Form
    IFoU 2006 Beijing International Conference Modernization and Regionalism – Re-inventing the Urban Identity THE RANDSTAD : FACE AND FORM E. Brandes Faculty of Urbanism TU Delft, P.O. Box 5043, Delft, The Netherlands, *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Dutch poly-nuclear metropolis the product of urban design and policies of spatial planning over many years. The underlying landscape and the history of urban planning are the base of its current form and face. Now the different urban areas get absorbed in the new unity the Randstad. Like before a masterplan should be made at the higher scale, and on local scale guidelines and flexible realization plans. A plan which respects the existing cities and landscape, combined with an authority and a policy to realize it. The Netherlands have to continue its valuable tradition in urbanization. KEYWORDS: Randstad, a poly-nuclear structure by landscape and history, differentiation, policy of concentration, at the urban scale and the regional scale 1 INTRODUCTION The Netherlands are currently in the process of forming a metropolis. Nowadays about six million inhabitants are living in the relatively small area Holland (the western part of the Netherlands). [1] The urban area is made up of a number of ‘big’ cities, middle large towns and the open or partly urbanized landscape in between. This poly-nuclear constellation differs from that of Paris and Beijing, examples of cities, which mono-centrally spread them selves out over a whole region. This urban network is there for considered by Dutch planners as a metropolis, although quantatively it falls short of the real large cities of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotterdam's Transformation Potential
    ROTTERDAM’S TRANSFORMATION POTENTIAL TRANSFORMING VACANT OFFICE SPACE INTO HOUSING Graduation Research Proposal P2 R.A. de Ridder November 2017 COLOPHON P2 RESEARCH PROPOSAL Title Rotterdam’s transformation potential Transforming vacant office space into housing Lab Adaptive Re-use Date Report 21-12-2017 Date Presentation 10-01-2017 STUDENT Name R.A. de Ridder Studentnumber 4433394 Address Koninginnetuin 4 2665TV, Bleiswijk Phone +31 6 5722 3090 E-Mail [email protected] UNIVERSITY Institute Delft University of Technology Master Track Management of the Built Environment Address Julianalaan 132 – 134 2628BL, Delft Phone +31 1 5278 5159 Website www.tudelft.nl/bk/over-faculteit/afdelingen/management-in-the-built- environment/ GRADUATION MENTORS First Mentor Hilde Remøy Second Mentor Ilir Nase External Examiner Wido Quist 2 Preface This report presents the research proposal of my graduation thesis towards the transformation potential of Rotterdam’s vacant office space into housing. This master thesis is the final assignment for the master-track Management in the Built Environment at the Delft University of Technology. The choosing of the topic of this thesis can be traced back to an episode of “De slag om Nederland” (VPRO 2012). This documentary showed the problematic situation of the Dutch office market. However, solutions for this problem where hardly proposed. With this thesis I will go into more detail on the origin of the current Dutch office vacancy and how adaptive reuse can serve as a possible solution. By doing so, I want to expand my knowledge on adaptive reuse and its value in a social and economic way.
    [Show full text]