Cohesin Mutations Are Synthetic Lethal with Stimulation of WNT Signaling 2 3 4 Chue Vin Chin1,2, Jisha Antony1,2, Sarada Ketharnathan1, Gregory Gimenez1, Kate M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cohesin Mutations Are Synthetic Lethal with Stimulation of WNT Signaling 2 3 4 Chue Vin Chin1,2, Jisha Antony1,2, Sarada Ketharnathan1, Gregory Gimenez1, Kate M bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218875; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Cohesin mutations are synthetic lethal with stimulation of WNT signaling 2 3 4 Chue Vin Chin1,2, Jisha Antony1,2, Sarada Ketharnathan1, Gregory Gimenez1, Kate M. 5 Parsons3, Jinshu He3, Amee J. George3, Antony Braithwaite1,2, Parry Guilford4, Ross D. 6 Hannan3 and Julia A. Horsfield1,2,5 7 8 1 Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New 9 Zealand. 10 2 Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Private Bag 92019, The University of 11 Auckland. 12 3 The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, 13 Australia. 14 4 Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. 15 5 Correspondence: Julia Horsfield, Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, 16 University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. Tel.: 64 3-479-7436; E-mail: 17 [email protected]. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218875; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 18 Abstract 19 Mutations in genes encoding subunits of the cohesin complex are common in several cancers, 20 but may also expose druggable vulnerabilities. We generated isogenic MCF10A cell lines 21 with deletion mutations of genes encoding cohesin subunits SMC3, RAD21 and STAG2 and 22 screened for synthetic lethality with 3,009 FDA-approved compounds. The screen identified 23 several compounds that interfere with transcription, DNA damage repair and the cell cycle. 24 Unexpectedly, one of the top ‘hits’ was a GSK3 inhibitor, an agonist of Wnt signaling. We 25 show that sensitivity to GSK3 inhibition is likely due to stabilization of b-catenin in cohesin 26 mutant cells, and that Wnt-responsive gene expression is highly sensitized in STAG2-mutant 27 CMK leukemia cells. Moreover, Wnt activity is enhanced in zebrafish mutant for cohesin 28 subunit rad21. Our results suggest that cohesin mutations could progress oncogenesis by 29 enhancing Wnt signaling, and that targeting the Wnt pathway may represent a novel 30 therapeutic strategy for cohesin mutant cancers. 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218875; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 31 Introduction 32 33 The cohesin complex is essential for sister chromatid cohesion, DNA replication, DNA 34 repair, and genome organization. Three subunits, SMC1A, SMC3 and RAD21, form the core 35 ring-shaped structure of human cohesin [1, 2]. A fourth subunit of either STAG1 or STAG2 36 binds to cohesin by contacting RAD21 and SMC subunits [3], and is required for the 37 association of cohesin with DNA [1-3]. The STAG subunits of cohesin are also capable of 38 binding RNA in the nucleus [4]. Cohesin associates with DNA by interaction with loading 39 factors NIPBL and MAU2 [5], its stability on DNA is regulated by the acetyltransferases 40 ESCO1 [6] and ESCO2 [7], and its removal is facilitated by PDS5 and WAPL [8, 9]. The 41 cohesin ring itself acts as a molecular motor to extrude DNA loops, and this activity is 42 thought to underlie its ability to organize the genome [10, 11]. Cohesin works together with 43 CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) to mediate three-dimensional genome structures, including 44 enhancer-promoter loops that instruct gene accessibility and expression [12, 13]. The 45 consequences of cohesin mutation therefore manifest as chromosome segregation errors, 46 DNA damage, and deficiencies in genome organization leading to gene expression changes. 47 48 All cohesin subunits are essential to life: homozygous mutations in genes encoding complex 49 members are embryonic lethal [14]. However, haploinsufficient germline mutations in 50 NIPBL, ESCO2, and in cohesin genes, cause human developmental syndromes known as the 51 “cohesinopathies” [14]. Somatic mutations in cohesin genes are prevalent in several different 52 types of cancer, including bladder cancer (15-40%), endometrial cancer (19%), glioblastoma 53 (7%), Ewing’s sarcoma (16-22%) and myeloid leukemias (5-53%) [15-17]. The prevalence of 54 cohesin gene mutations in myeloid malignancies [18-22] reflects cohesin’s role in 55 determining lineage identity and differentiation of hematopoietic cells [23-26]. Of the 56 cohesin genes, STAG2 is the most frequently mutated, with about half of cohesin mutations in 57 cancer involving STAG2 [17]. 58 59 While cancer-associated mutations in genes encoding RAD21, SMC3 and STAG1 are always 60 heterozygous [21, 27, 28], mutations in the X chromosome-located genes SMC1A and STAG2 61 can result in complete loss of function due to hemizygosity (males), or silencing of the wild 62 type during X-inactivation (females). STAG2 and STAG1 have redundant roles in cell 63 division, therefore complete loss of STAG2 is tolerated due to partial compensation by 64 STAG1. Loss of both STAG2 and STAG1 leads to lethality [29, 30]. STAG1 inhibition in 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218875; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 65 cancer cells with STAG2 mutation causes chromosome segregation defects and subsequent 66 lethality [31]. Therefore, although partial depletion of cohesin can confer a selective 67 advantage to cancer cells, a complete block of cohesin function will cause cell death. The 68 multiple roles of cohesin provides an opportunity to inhibit the growth of cohesin mutant 69 cancer cells via chemical interference with pathways that depend on normal cohesin function. 70 For example, poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors were previously shown to 71 exhibit synthetic lethality with cohesin mutations [17, 31-34]. PARP inhibitors prevent DNA 72 double-strand break repair [35], a process that also relies on cohesin function. 73 74 To date, only a limited number of compounds have been identified as inhibitors of cohesin- 75 mutant cells [17]. Here, we sought to identify additional compounds of interest by screening 76 libraries of FDA-approved molecules against isogenic MCF10A cells with deficiencies in 77 RAD21, SMC3 or STAG2. Unexpectedly, our screen identified a novel sensitivity of 78 cohesin-deficient cells to a GSK3 inhibitor that acts as an agonist of the Wnt signaling 79 pathway. We found that b-catenin stabilization upon cohesin deficiency likely contributes to 80 an acute sensitivity of Wnt target genes. The results raise the possibility that sensitization to 81 Wnt signaling in cohesin mutant cells may participate in oncogenesis, and suggest that Wnt 82 agonism could be therapeutically useful for cohesin mutant cancers. 83 84 Results 85 86 Cohesin gene deletion in MCF10A cells results in minor cell cycle defects 87 To avoid any complications with pre-existing oncogenic mutations, we chose the relatively 88 ‘normal’ MCF10A line for creation and screening of isogenic deletion clones of cohesin 89 genes SMC3, RAD21, and STAG2 (Supplementary Fig. 1a). MCF10A is a near-diploid, 90 immortalized, breast epithelial cell line that exhibits normal epithelial characteristics [36] and 91 has been successfully used for siRNA and small molecule screening [37]. We isolated several 92 RAD21 and SMC3 deletion clones, and selected single clones for further characterization that 93 grew normally and were essentially heterozygous. In the selected RAD21 deletion clone, one 94 of three RAD21 alleles (on chromosome 8, triploid in MCF10A) was confirmed deleted, with 95 one wild type and one undetermined allele (Supplementary Fig. 1c, e-g). In the selected 96 SMC3 deletion clone, one of two SMC3 alleles (on chromosome 10) was deleted 97 (Supplementary Fig. 1d, e-g). In the selected STAG2 deletion clone (Supplementary Fig. 1b), 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218875; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 98 homozygous loss of STAG2 was determined by the absence of STAG2 mRNA and protein 99 (Supplementary Fig. 1e-g). For convenience here, we named the three cohesin mutant clones 100 RAD21+/-, SMC3+/- and STAG2-/-. a b Hours after double thymidine release 0 6 12 36 48 100 WT WT ** RAD21+/- ce (%) RAD21+/- en 50 SMC3+/- **** STAG2-/- Conflu SMC3+/- 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 STAG2-/- Time (h) 100 c Chromosome spreads d Normal Partial loss Complete loss Normal ds (%) ds ea Partial loss 50 Complete loss ase spr aph Met Normal 0 PCS 1+/- 2-/- WT 2 G D A A R SMC3+/-ST e f g WT RAD21+/- SMC3+/- STAG2-/- 300 **** 0.25 **** 0.20 M) 2 (μ 250 * 0.15 DAPI r area 0.10 ea 200 Nucl 0.05 Micronuclei per cell (%) 150 0.00 1+/- 2-/- WT 1+/- 2-/- WT 2 G 2 G D A D A A A SMC3+/- R SMC3+/-ST R ST Figure 1.
Recommended publications
  • Meiotic Cohesin and Variants Associated with Human Reproductive Aging and Disease
    fcell-09-710033 July 27, 2021 Time: 16:27 # 1 REVIEW published: 02 August 2021 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.710033 Meiotic Cohesin and Variants Associated With Human Reproductive Aging and Disease Rachel Beverley1, Meredith L. Snook1 and Miguel Angel Brieño-Enríquez2* 1 Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 2 Magee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States Successful human reproduction relies on the well-orchestrated development of competent gametes through the process of meiosis. The loading of cohesin, a multi- protein complex, is a key event in the initiation of mammalian meiosis. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion via cohesin rings is essential for ensuring homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair and future proper chromosome segregation. Cohesin proteins loaded during female fetal life are not replenished over time, and therefore are a potential etiology of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes resulting in Edited by: decreased fecundity and increased infertility and miscarriage rates with advancing Karen Schindler, Rutgers, The State University maternal age. Herein, we provide a brief overview of meiotic cohesin and summarize of New Jersey, United States the human genetic studies which have identified genetic variants of cohesin proteins and Reviewed by: the associated reproductive phenotypes
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into Hp1a-Chromatin Interactions
    cells Review Insights into HP1a-Chromatin Interactions Silvia Meyer-Nava , Victor E. Nieto-Caballero, Mario Zurita and Viviana Valadez-Graham * Instituto de Biotecnología, Departamento de Genética del Desarrollo y Fisiología Molecular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca Morelos 62210, Mexico; [email protected] (S.M.-N.); [email protected] (V.E.N.-C.); [email protected] (M.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +527773291631 Received: 26 June 2020; Accepted: 21 July 2020; Published: 9 August 2020 Abstract: Understanding the packaging of DNA into chromatin has become a crucial aspect in the study of gene regulatory mechanisms. Heterochromatin establishment and maintenance dynamics have emerged as some of the main features involved in genome stability, cellular development, and diseases. The most extensively studied heterochromatin protein is HP1a. This protein has two main domains, namely the chromoshadow and the chromodomain, separated by a hinge region. Over the years, several works have taken on the task of identifying HP1a partners using different strategies. In this review, we focus on describing these interactions and the possible complexes and subcomplexes associated with this critical protein. Characterization of these complexes will help us to clearly understand the implications of the interactions of HP1a in heterochromatin maintenance, heterochromatin dynamics, and heterochromatin’s direct relationship to gene regulation and chromatin organization. Keywords: heterochromatin; HP1a; genome stability 1. Introduction Chromatin is a complex of DNA and associated proteins in which the genetic material is packed in the interior of the nucleus of eukaryotic cells [1]. To organize this highly compact structure, two categories of proteins are needed: histones [2] and accessory proteins, such as chromatin regulators and histone-modifying proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppression of RAD21 Gene Expression Decreases Cell Growth and Enhances Cytotoxicity of Etoposide and Bleomycin in Human Breast Cancer Cells
    Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 361 Suppression of RAD21 gene expression decreases cell growth and enhances cytotoxicity of etoposide and bleomycin in human breast cancer cells Josephine M. Atienza,1 Richard B. Roth,1 Introduction 1 1 Caridad Rosette, Kevin J. Smylie, The RAD21 gene codes for a human homologue of Stefan Kammerer,1 Joachim Rehbock,2 1 1 Saccharomyces pombe Rad21 protein. The current knowledge Jonas Ekblom, and Mikhail F. Denissenko about this protein points to a role in modulation of cell 1Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, California and 2Frauena¨rzte growth and in cell defense against DNA damage, both Rosenstrasse, Munich, Germany processes being central to carcinogenesis. Several DNA repair genes including rad21 were initially identified in the fission yeast S. pombe as radiation-sensitive mutants (1, 2). Abstract Specifically, Rad21 has been implicated in homologous A genome-wide case-control association study done in our recombination–mediated double-strand break (DSB) re- laboratory has identified a single nucleotide polymorphism pair, and is unique among the radiation response genes in located in RAD21 as being significantly associated with that it also plays a role in cell cycle regulation (3, 4). Yeast breast cancer susceptibility. RAD21 is believed to function Rad21 and its mammalian homologue were subsequently in sister chromatid alignment as part of the cohesin complex identified as components of a conserved cohesin complex and also in double-strand break (DSB) repair. Following our (5, 6), which is believed to function in aligning sister initial finding, expression studies revealed a 1.25- to 2.5- chromatids during the early stages of cellular division.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutational Inactivation of STAG2 Causes Aneuploidy in Human Cancer
    REPORTS mean difference for all rubric score elements was ing becomes a more commonly supported facet 18. C. L. Townsend, E. Heit, Mem. Cognit. 39, 204 (2011). rejected. Univariate statistical tests of the observed of STEM graduate education then students’ in- 19. D. F. Feldon, M. Maher, B. Timmerman, Science 329, 282 (2010). mean differences between the teaching-and- structional training and experiences would alle- 20. B. Timmerman et al., Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 36,509 research and research-only conditions indicated viate persistent concerns that current programs (2011). significant results for the rubric score elements underprepare future STEM faculty to perform 21. No outcome differences were detected as a function of “testability of hypotheses” [mean difference = their teaching responsibilities (28, 29). the type of teaching experience (TA or GK-12) within the P sample population participating in both research and 0.272, = 0.006; CI = (.106, 0.526)] with the null teaching. hypothesis rejected in 99.3% of generated data References and Notes 22. Materials and methods are available as supporting samples (Fig. 1) and “research/experimental de- 1. W. A. Anderson et al., Science 331, 152 (2011). material on Science Online. ” P 2. J. A. Bianchini, D. J. Whitney, T. D. Breton, B. A. Hilton-Brown, 23. R. L. Johnson, J. Penny, B. Gordon, Appl. Meas. Educ. 13, sign [mean difference = 0.317, = 0.002; CI = Sci. Educ. 86, 42 (2001). (.106, 0.522)] with the null hypothesis rejected in 121 (2000). 3. C. E. Brawner, R. M. Felder, R. Allen, R. Brent, 24. R. J. A. Little, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinct Functions of Human Cohesin-SA1 and Cohesin-SA2 in Double-Strand Break Repair
    Distinct Functions of Human Cohesin-SA1 and Cohesin-SA2 in Double-Strand Break Repair Xiangduo Kong,a Alexander R. Ball, Jr.,a Hoang Xuan Pham,a Weihua Zeng,a* Hsiao-Yuan Chen,a John A. Schmiesing,a Jong-Soo Kim,a* Michael Berns,b,c Kyoko Yokomoria Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, USAa; Beckman Laser Instituteb and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Samueli School of Engineering,c University of California, Irvine, California, USA Cohesin is an essential multiprotein complex that mediates sister chromatid cohesion critical for proper segregation of chromo- somes during cell division. Cohesin is also involved in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. In mammalian cells, cohesin is involved in both DSB repair and the damage checkpoint response, although the relationship between these two functions is un- clear. Two cohesins differing by one subunit (SA1 or SA2) are present in somatic cells, but their functional specificities with re- gard to DNA repair remain enigmatic. We found that cohesin-SA2 is the main complex corecruited with the cohesin-loading factor NIPBL to DNA damage sites in an S/G2-phase-specific manner. Replacing the diverged C-terminal region of SA1 with the corresponding region of SA2 confers this activity on SA1. Depletion of SA2 but not SA1 decreased sister chromatid homologous recombination repair and affected repair pathway choice, indicating that DNA repair activity is specifically associated with cohe- sin recruited to damage sites. In contrast, both cohesin complexes function in the intra-S checkpoint, indicating that cell cycle- specific damage site accumulation is not a prerequisite for cohesin’s intra-S checkpoint function.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mutational Landscape of Myeloid Leukaemia in Down Syndrome
    cancers Review The Mutational Landscape of Myeloid Leukaemia in Down Syndrome Carini Picardi Morais de Castro 1, Maria Cadefau 1,2 and Sergi Cuartero 1,2,* 1 Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Campus Can Ruti, 08916 Badalona, Spain; [email protected] (C.P.M.d.C); [email protected] (M.C.) 2 Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Campus Can Ruti, 08916 Badalona, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Leukaemia occurs when specific mutations promote aberrant transcriptional and proliferation programs, which drive uncontrolled cell division and inhibit the cell’s capacity to differentiate. In this review, we summarize the most frequent genetic lesions found in myeloid leukaemia of Down syndrome, a rare paediatric leukaemia specific to individuals with trisomy 21. The evolution of this disease follows a well-defined sequence of events and represents a unique model to understand how the ordered acquisition of mutations drives malignancy. Abstract: Children with Down syndrome (DS) are particularly prone to haematopoietic disorders. Paediatric myeloid malignancies in DS occur at an unusually high frequency and generally follow a well-defined stepwise clinical evolution. First, the acquisition of mutations in the GATA1 transcription factor gives rise to a transient myeloproliferative disorder (TMD) in DS newborns. While this condition spontaneously resolves in most cases, some clones can acquire additional mutations, which trigger myeloid leukaemia of Down syndrome (ML-DS). These secondary mutations are predominantly found in chromatin and epigenetic regulators—such as cohesin, CTCF or EZH2—and Citation: de Castro, C.P.M.; Cadefau, in signalling mediators of the JAK/STAT and RAS pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Redundant and Specific Roles of Cohesin STAG Subunits in Chromatin Looping and Transcriptional Control
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 10, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Redundant and specific roles of cohesin STAG subunits in chromatin looping and transcriptional control Valentina Casa,1,6 Macarena Moronta Gines,1,6 Eduardo Gade Gusmao,2,3,6 Johan A. Slotman,4 Anne Zirkel,2 Natasa Josipovic,2,3 Edwin Oole,5 Wilfred F.J. van IJcken,1,5 Adriaan B. Houtsmuller,4 Argyris Papantonis,2,3 and Kerstin S. Wendt1 1Department of Cell Biology, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 2Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; 3Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; 4Optical Imaging Centre, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 5Center for Biomics, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands Cohesin is a ring-shaped multiprotein complex that is crucial for 3D genome organization and transcriptional regulation during differentiation and development. It also confers sister chromatid cohesion and facilitates DNA damage repair. Besides its core subunits SMC3, SMC1A, and RAD21, cohesin in somatic cells contains one of two orthologous STAG sub- units, STAG1 or STAG2. How these variable subunits affect the function of the cohesin complex is still unclear. STAG1- and STAG2-cohesin were initially proposed to organize cohesion at telomeres and centromeres, respectively. Here, we uncover redundant and specific roles of STAG1 and STAG2 in gene regulation and chromatin looping using HCT116 cells with an auxin-inducible degron (AID) tag fused to either STAG1 or STAG2. Following rapid depletion of either subunit, we perform high-resolution Hi-C, gene expression, and sequential ChIP studies to show that STAG1 and STAG2 do not co-occupy in- dividual binding sites and have distinct ways by which they affect looping and gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • RAD21 Gene RAD21 Cohesin Complex Component
    RAD21 gene RAD21 cohesin complex component Normal Function The RAD21 gene provides instructions for making a protein that is involved in regulating the structure and organization of chromosomes during cell division. Before cells divide, they must copy all of their chromosomes. The copied DNA from each chromosome is arranged into two identical structures, called sister chromatids, which are attached to one another during the early stages of cell division. The RAD21 protein is part of a protein group called the cohesin complex that holds the sister chromatids together. Researchers believe that the RAD21 protein, as a structural component of the cohesin complex, also plays important roles in stabilizing cells' genetic information, repairing damaged DNA, and regulating the activity of certain genes that are essential for normal development. Health Conditions Related to Genetic Changes Cornelia de Lange syndrome At least eight mutations in the RAD21 gene have been identified in people with Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a developmental disorder that affects many parts of the body. Mutations in this gene appear to be an uncommon cause of this condition. Some cases of Cornelia de Lange syndrome have resulted from a deletion that removes a segment of DNA on chromosome 8 including the RAD21 gene. In these cases, the entire gene is missing from one copy of the chromosome in each cell, so cells produce a reduced amount of RAD21 protein. In other cases, the condition is caused by mutations within the RAD21 gene that impair or eliminate the function of the RAD21 protein. A defective or missing RAD21 protein likely alters the activity of the cohesin complex, impairing its ability to regulate genes that are critical for normal development.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohesin Architecture and Clustering in Vivo Siheng Xiang, Douglas Koshland*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Cohesin architecture and clustering in vivo Siheng Xiang, Douglas Koshland* Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States Abstract Cohesin helps mediate sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA repair, and transcription regulation. We exploited proximity-dependent labeling to define the in vivo interactions of cohesin domains with DNA or with other cohesin domains that lie within the same or in different cohesin complexes. Our results suggest that both cohesin’s head and hinge domains are proximal to DNA, and cohesin structure is dynamic with differential folding of its coiled coil regions to generate butterfly confirmations. This method also reveals that cohesins form ordered clusters on and off DNA. The levels of cohesin clusters and their distribution on chromosomes are cell cycle-regulated. Cohesin clustering is likely necessary for cohesion maintenance because clustering and maintenance uniquely require the same subset of cohesin domains and the auxiliary cohesin factor Pds5p. These conclusions provide important new mechanistic and biological insights into the architecture of the cohesin complex, cohesin–cohesin interactions, and cohesin’s tethering and loop-extruding activities. Introduction Chromosome segregation, DNA damage repair, and the regulation of gene expression require the tethering or folding of chromosomes (Uhlmann, 2016; Onn et al., 2008). Remarkably, these differ- ent types of chromosome organizations are all mediated by a conserved family of protein complexes *For correspondence: [email protected] called structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) (Onn et al., 2008; Nolivos and Sherratt, 2014; Hirano, 2016; Hassler et al., 2018). SMC complexes tether and fold chromosomes by two Competing interests: The activities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Requirement for STAG2 in Replication Fork Progression Creates a Targetable Synthetic Lethality in Cohesin-Mutant Cancers
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09659-z OPEN A requirement for STAG2 in replication fork progression creates a targetable synthetic lethality in cohesin-mutant cancers Gourish Mondal1, Meredith Stevers1, Benjamin Goode 1, Alan Ashworth2,3 & David A. Solomon 1,2 Cohesin is a multiprotein ring that is responsible for cohesion of sister chromatids and formation of DNA loops to regulate gene expression. Genomic analyses have identified that 1234567890():,; the cohesin subunit STAG2 is frequently inactivated by mutations in cancer. However, the reason STAG2 mutations are selected during tumorigenesis and strategies for therapeutically targeting mutant cancer cells are largely unknown. Here we show that STAG2 is essential for DNA replication fork progression, whereby STAG2 inactivation in non-transformed cells leads to replication fork stalling and collapse with disruption of interaction between the cohesin ring and the replication machinery as well as failure to establish SMC3 acetylation. As a con- sequence, STAG2 mutation confers synthetic lethality with DNA double-strand break repair genes and increased sensitivity to select cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and PARP or ATR inhibitors. These studies identify a critical role for STAG2 in replication fork procession and elucidate a potential therapeutic strategy for cohesin-mutant cancers. 1 Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. 2 UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. 3 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.A.S. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2019) 10:1686 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09659-z | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09659-z ohesin is a multi-protein complex composed of four core transcriptional dysregulation22,23.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Cohesin Complex Components STAG2 Or STAG3 Confers Resistance to BRAF Inhibition in Melanoma
    Loss of cohesin complex components STAG2 or STAG3 confers resistance to BRAF inhibition in melanoma The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Shen, C., S. H. Kim, S. Trousil, D. T. Frederick, A. Piris, P. Yuan, L. Cai, et al. 2016. “Loss of cohesin complex components STAG2 or STAG3 confers resistance to BRAF inhibition in melanoma.” Nature medicine 22 (9): 1056-1061. doi:10.1038/nm.4155. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.4155. Published Version doi:10.1038/nm.4155 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:31731818 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Nat Med Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2017 March 01. Published in final edited form as: Nat Med. 2016 September ; 22(9): 1056–1061. doi:10.1038/nm.4155. Loss of cohesin complex components STAG2 or STAG3 confers resistance to BRAF inhibition in melanoma Che-Hung Shen1, Sun Hye Kim1, Sebastian Trousil1, Dennie T. Frederick2, Adriano Piris3, Ping Yuan1, Li Cai1, Lei Gu4, Man Li1, Jung Hyun Lee1, Devarati Mitra1, David E. Fisher1,2, Ryan J. Sullivan2, Keith T. Flaherty2, and Bin Zheng1,* 1Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 2Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA 3Department of Dermatology, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 4Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT Mutations in Cohesin Complex Members SMC3 and SMC1A Cause a Mild Variant of Cornelia De Lange Syndrome with Predominant Mental Retardation
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector REPORT Mutations in Cohesin Complex Members SMC3 and SMC1A Cause a Mild Variant of Cornelia de Lange Syndrome with Predominant Mental Retardation Matthew A. Deardorff, Maninder Kaur, Dinah Yaeger, Abhinav Rampuria, Sergey Korolev, Juan Pie, Concepcion Gil-Rodrı´guez, Marı´a Arnedo, Bart Loeys, Antonie D. Kline, Meredith Wilson, Kaj Lillquist, Victoria Siu, Feliciano J. Ramos, Antonio Musio, Laird S. Jackson, Dale Dorsett, and Ian D. Krantz Mutations in the cohesin regulators NIPBL and ESCO2 are causative of the Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) and Roberts or SC phocomelia syndrome, respectively. Recently, mutations in the cohesin complex structural component SMC1A have been identified in two probands with features of CdLS. Here, we report the identification of a mutation in the gene encoding the complementary subunit of the cohesin heterodimer, SMC3, and 14 additional SMC1A mutations. All mutations are predicted to retain an open reading frame, and no truncating mutations were identified. Structural analysis of the mutant SMC3 and SMC1A proteins indicate that all are likely to produce functional cohesin complexes, but we posit that they may alter their chromosome binding dynamics. Our data indicate that SMC3 and SMC1A mutations (1) contribute to ∼5% of cases of CdLS, (2) result in a consistently mild phenotype with absence of major structural anomalies typically associated with CdLS, and (3) in some instances, result in a phenotype that approaches
    [Show full text]