PDF)575KB***Inter Se Online (June 2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Singapore Judgments
This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore Law Reports. Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General [2012] SGCA 45 Court of Appeal — Civil Appeal No 50 of 2011 Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, V K Rajah JA and Judith Prakash J 27 September 2011 Civil Procedure — Striking Out Constitutional Law — Equal Protection of the Law Constitutional Law — Fundamental Liberties Courts and Jurisdiction — Court Judgments — Declaratory — Standing to Seek Declaratory Relief 21 August 2012 Judgment reserved. V K Rajah JA (delivering the judgment of the court): Introduction 1 Ought an action which is not certain to fail, brought by an applicant who has locus standi, be peremptorily struck out by the High Court even though it accepts that it has jurisdiction to hear the action? This is one of the pivotal issues at the heart of this appeal by Tan Eng Hong (“Tan”) against the decision of the High Court judge (“the Judge”) in Tan Eng Hong v Attorney- General [2011] 3 SLR 320 (“the Judgment”) striking out his application in Originating Summons No 994 of 2010 for declaratory relief (“the Application”). Tan Eng Hong v AG [2012] SGCA 45 2 The Application under O 15 r 16 of the Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed) (“the Rules”) was brought by Tan to ask the court to declare s 377A of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) (“the current Penal Code”) unconstitutional under the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (1985 Rev Ed, 1999 Reprint). -
Yunani Bin Abdul Hamid V Public Prosecutor [2008]
Yunani bin Abdul Hamid v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 58 Case Number : Cr Rev 5/2008 Decision Date : 11 April 2008 Tribunal/Court : High Court Coram : V K Rajah JA Counsel Name(s) : Abraham S Vergis and Darrell Low Kim Boon (Drew & Napier LLC) for the applicant; Lawrence Ang Boon Kong, Lau Wing Yum and Christopher Ong Siu Jin (Attorney-General's Chambers) for the respondent Parties : Yunani bin Abdul Hamid — Public Prosecutor Courts and Jurisdiction – High court – Exercise of revisionary powers – Exercise of revisionary powers where there is a plea of guilty – Section 23 Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed) – Sections 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Rev Ed) Criminal Procedure and Sentencing – Revision of proceedings – Appropriate course of action after exercise of revisionary powers – Whether matter should be remitted back for trial or stayed – Section 23 Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed) – Sections 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Rev Ed) Criminal Procedure and Sentencing – Revision of proceedings – Exercise of revisionary powers – Exercise of revisionary powers where there is a plea of guilty – Whether there was serious injustice which would warrant exercise of revisionary power – Presence of serious injustice if pressures faced by accused to plead guilty are such that accused did not genuinely have freedom to choose between pleading guilty and pleading not guilty – Presence of serious injustice if additional evidence before reviewing court casting serious doubts as to guilt of accused – Section 23 Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed) – Sections 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Rev Ed) 11 April 2008 Judgment reserved. -
Prosperity Versus Individual Rights? Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law in Singapore
Prosperity versus individual rights? Human rights, democracy and the rule of law in Singapore July 2008 An International Bar Association Human Rights Institute Report Material contained in this report may be freely quoted or reprinted, provided credit is given to the International Bar Association. International Bar Association 10th Floor, 1 Stephen Street London W1T 1AT United Kingdom tel: +44 (0)20 7691 6868. fax: +44 (0)20 7691 6544 www.ibanet.org Contents Executive summary ..........................................................................................................................................5 A. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................11 B. A brief political and economic history of Singapore ....................................................................1 C. Singapore’s conception of human rights ......................................................................................17 D. Singapore’s international rankings ................................................................................................21 E. Current human rights issues ..........................................................................................................2 1. Freedom of expression ..................................................................................................................2 Singapore’s obligations under international law ......................................................................2 -
Archives Begin Quit Case Law Update in the Know in the News Legislation
December 2007 January mon tue wed thur fri sat sun 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 in the news legislation update calendar in the know case law update Legal news headlines Information on Legislation passed or Catchword summaries of Trainings and in October and Academy activities for revised in October cases from the Supreme workshops calendar November 2007. members at work and and November. Court, organised by subject from December 2007. at play! matter. archives quit begin in the news in the know legislation update case law update calendar in the news December 2007 At Large Headlines in The Straits Times • Headlines in The Straits Times Chua Hian Hou, “Online campaign to repeal Harry Yip Kuan, “Give minority owners • Headlines in The Business Times gay sex law picks up”, The Straits Times exchange option” [En bloc law should be • Headlines in Today (9 October 2007) amended to give minority owners option of asking for one-for-one exchange], The Straits Yeoh Lian Chuan, “Stamp duty on property Times Forum (12 October 2007) At Work deals”, The Straits Times Forum • (9 October 2007) Launch of Lives in the Law – A Ben Nadarajan, “Glenn Knight takes on first Festschrift in Honour of Peter Ellinger, Selina Lum, “Teacher wants Law Society to case – defending Yong's wife”, The Straits Koh Kheng Lian and Tan Sook Yee deal with ex-lawyer first”, The Straits Times Times (12 October 2007) • IBA Young Lawyers Outreach Event (10 October 2007) for ADR Professionals K C Vijayan, “Global law meeting will -
Download Catalogue
Marshall Cavendish International Marshall Cavendish Marshall Cavendish International CATALOGUE Catalogue 2021 20 For all sales, distribution and rights queries, please contact: Marshall Cavendish International (Asia) Pte Ltd Times Centre, 1 New Industrial Road, Singapore 536196 Tel: (65) 6213 9300 Email: [email protected] For more information on our titles and latest releases, visit our website: www.marshallcavendish.com Visit our custom publishing website: www.marshallcavendish.com/custom-publishing Follow us on A leading general interest publisher in Asia, 21we are a trusted brand with a history spanning ISBN 978-981-4928-92-2 more than five decades. Known for our diverse subject areas and pool of dynamic authors, ,!7IJ8B4-jcijcc! our expertly curated books offer readers enriching and memorable experiences. Marshall Cavendish International We are a leading general interest trade publisher in Asia, with a history spanning more than five decades. As a trusted brand, known for a diverse and wide variety of subject areas, and bestselling titles in every genre, we pride ourselves on integrity and are committed to the spread of knowledge. Our expertise lies in the curation of content to inform readers, engage conversations and inspire the future. Our Imprints Marshall Cavendish Editions publishes a multitude of perspectives in a diverse range of subjects. From history and politics to travel, culture, architecture, literature and more, our bestselling books have something to offer every reader. Marshall Cavendish Business titles articulate the thoughts and visions of the people who shape, direct and influence business – in Asia and internationally. Our leading writers range from digital finance gurus and entrepreneurs to leadership and banking specialists, and their insights promise to change readers’ outlooks, careers and even lives. -
We Acknowledge, with Thanks, the Permission of the Author, Editor and Publisher to Reproduce This Article on the Singapore Judicial College Microsite
Supreme Court of Singapore, 1 Supreme Court Lane, Singapore 178879, t: (65)-6332-1020 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ We acknowledge, with thanks, the permission of the author, editor and publisher to reproduce this article on the Singapore Judicial College microsite. Not to be circulated or reproduced without the prior permission of the author, editor and publisher. Our Vision: Excellence in judicial education and research. Our Mission: To provide and inspire continuing judicial learning and research to enhance the competency and professionalism of judges. 14 SAcLJ Approaches to the Evidence Act 365 APPROACHES TO THE EVIDENCE ACT: THE JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENT OF A CODE Introduction 1 Many former students will attest that the Law of Evidence was the most difficult (not a few have said “painful”) subject that they had to study in the Faculty of Law. Their teachers are not disheartened by such a reaction for it reveals a manner of study essential to the proper interpretation of a statute frozen in time in the face of the evolving common law. Some of the challenges may be exemplified by the following questions: What is the relationship between the Act and common law principles established after its enactment? Does the common law apply if the Act does not cover an evidential issue? What if a section does have some bearing on the evidential issue but appears incomplete or imprecise in the face of a related common law principle? What if the Act recognises part of a common law doctrine which has since been developed beyond the scope of the Act. What if a common law principle is not consistent with the pertinent sections of the Act but could operate in the context of another section which is not literally pertinent. -
Singapore Females
The women executed in Singapore 1973 to 2004. “I am sending you to a better place than this.” With these words Darshan Singh, Singapore’s hangman throughout this period would release the trap doors of the gallows in Changi prison, plummeting the condemned to their death. 16 women would hear these fateful words and their stories are told below. Seven were to hang for murder and nine for drug trafficking. In April 1978 The Straits Times newspaper gained access to death row and described it as follows: 24 cells are arranged in a horse-shoe pattern around a central exercise yard. This has a mesh roof to prevent attempts at helicopter rescue. Condemned inmates are supervised constantly. During their last week inmates are allowed daily visits from family and friends. These are limited to 30 minutes and are no contact, the inmate sits a metre away behind two mesh screens. A last meal can be requested. Condemned inmates wear white uniforms (scrubs). Around 5 a.m. on the Friday of their execution the inmate dresses in prison uniform. A priest will perform the last rites and then the inmate’s wrists are handcuffed behind their backs and black hoods drawn over their heads. They are then led the 20 metres to the execution chamber where they ascend a few steps onto the gallows. In the room are the prison’s Superintendent, his assistant, another senior officer, the prison doctor and the State Coroner. At 6.00 a.m. the hangman pushes the lever to release the trap doors. Death is confirmed by the doctor and the Coroner certifies that death was by judicial hanging. -
Singapore NIS 2006
National Integrity Systems Transparency International Country Study Report Singapore 2006 National Integrity System Country Studies Lead Researcher Simon SC Tay, Chairman, The Singapore Institute of International Affairs Researchers Gavin Chua Hearn Yuit, Researcher, The Singapore Institute of International Affairs Joanne Lin, Research Associate, The Singapore Institute of International Affairs Singapore 2 National Integrity System Country Studies Contents List of Tables.................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations................................................................................................................... 5 About the NIS Country Studies ........................................................................................ 6 What Is the NIS? ......................................................................................................... 6 Why Conduct NIS Country Studies?................................................................................ 6 Methodology of the NIS Country Studies ......................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 7 Priorities and Recommendations...................................................................................... 8 Country Profile................................................................................................................ -
S.No Name Lawpractice 1 a J Ramachandran AJR Law Practice 2
Annual Election for Council 2021 Category: Senior Nomination Date: 12 October 2020 S.No Name LawPractice 1 A J Ramachandran AJR Law Practice 2 A P M Ferlin Jayatissa Lexcompass LLC 3 A Rajandran A Rajandran 4 A Shahiran Anis Bin Mohamed Asia Law Corporation Ibrahim 5 A Thamilselvan Subra TT Law LLC 6 Abdul Hamid Sultan S/O Yousoof A H Sultan & Associates Sultan 7 Abdul Jabbar Bin Karam Din Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP 8 Abdul Jalil Bin Muhammad Tahir A J Tahir Law Practice 9 Abdul Rohim Bin Sarip A. Rohim Noor Lila LLP 10 Abdul Salim Ahmed Ibrahim United Legal Alliance LLC 11 Abdullah Bin Shaik Abubakar Abdullah Shaik Abubakar 12 Abdur Raheem Bin Mohd Iqbal Advent Law Corporation 13 Abraham Tilak Kumar Abraham Logan & Partners 14 Adam Chong Yew Woon Low Yeap Toh & Goon LLP 15 Aftab Ahmad Khan s/o Teffail A A Khan Law Practice Mohamed Khan 16 Ahmad Khalis Bin Abdul Ghani K&L Gates Straits Law LLC 17 Ahmad Nizam Bin Abbas K&L Gates Straits Law LLC 18 Aileen Chong Nee Lim Aileen Aileen Chong & Co 19 Ajaib Hari Dass Haridass Ho & Partners 20 Ajinderpal Singh Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP 21 Alagappan s/o Arunasalam A Alagappan Law Corporation 22 Alain Abraham Johns Alain A Johns Partnership 23 Albert Yeo Toon Mok LegalWorks Law Corporation 24 Alexander Nathanael Walter Silvester Legal LLC 25 Allagarsamy s/o Palaniyappan Allagarsamy & Co 26 Allen Choong Kean Hin Allen & Gledhill LLP 27 Alli d/o Ruthirapathi Sim Mong Teck & Partners 28 Allister Lim Wee Sing ALP Law Corporation 29 Aloysius Tan Jun Liang Allen & Overy LLP 30 Alyson Lim Pek Bur Allen -
PDF)393KB***Inter Se Online (July 2007
july 2007 online January mon tue wed thur fri sat sun 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 in the news legislation update calendar in the know case law update Legal news headlines Updates on Academy Legislation passed or Catchword summaries of Training calendar for in May and June 2007. activities for members revised in May and cases from the Supreme July 2007 to October at work and at play! June 2007. Court, organised by subject 2007. matter. Catchwords for Subordinate Courts cases coming soon! quit begin in the news in the know legislation update case law update calendar july 2007 in the news Inter Se Revamped: what you can Inter Se Revamped look forward to Welcome to the Academy’s new e-zine, Inter Inter Se Print is a themed publication Se Online. You can now look forward to focusing on analysis and comment. It will At Large reading Inter Se in two brand-new formats serve a knowledge creation and genre-insight • Headlines in The Straits Times and with two fresh looks. It is out with the function on a particular area of the law and/or • Headlines in The Business Times bi-monthly print Inter Se and in with the legal practice. Published every six months revamped, dual-component Inter Se which in a calendar year (once in January and once comprises: (a) a monthly online version (“Inter in July), Inter Se Print will feature the “life” Se Online”); and (b) a half-yearly print version of a particular area of practice with topical (“Inter Se Print”).