DOCSLIB.ORG

Standards for Birds of Prey Sanctuaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standards for Birds of Prey Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards for Birds of Prey Sanctuaries Version: June 2013 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Bird of Prey Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................................................ 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS ............................................................................... 1 STANDARDS UPDATES……………………………………………………………………………………2 BIRD OF PREY STANDARDS .............................................................................................................. 3 BIRD OF PREY HOUSING ........................................................................................... 3 H-1. Types of Space and Size ................................................................................................................................................... 3 H-2. Containment ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 H-3. Ground and Plantings .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 H-4. Gates and Doors ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 H-5. Shelter ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 H-6. Enclosure Furniture ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 H-7. Sanitation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting .............................................................................................. 10 PHYSICAL FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION ........................................... 11 PF-1. Overall Safety of Facilities .......................................................................................................................................... 11 PF-2. Water Drainage and Testing ..................................................................................................................................... 12 PF-3. Life Support ............................................................................................................................................................................ 12 PF-4. Hazardous Materials Handling ................................................................................................................................. 12 PF-5. Security: Avian Enclosures ........................................................................................................................................ 13 PF-6. Perimeter Boundary and Inspections, and Maintenance ................................................................... 13 PF-7. Security: General Safety Monitoring .................................................................................................................. 14 PF-8. Insect and Rodent Control ......................................................................................................................................... 14 PF-9. Record Keeping ................................................................................................................................................................... 14 PF-10. Animal Transport ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................. 16 N-1. Water ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 N-2. Diet .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques ................................................................................................... 18 N-4. Food Storage ........................................................................................................................................................................... 19 N-5. Food Handling ......................................................................................................................................................................... 19 VETERINARY CARE ..................................................................................................... 20 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing ............................................................................................................... 20 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities ........................................................................................................ 21 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program ................................................................................................................................ 21 V-4. Diagnostic Services, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities ............................................... 22 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Birds of Prey ........................................................................................................ 23 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Bird of Prey Sanctuaries V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances .................................................................................................. 24 V-7. Breeding ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 V-8. Zoonotic Disease Program ............................................................................................................................................ 25 WELL-BEING AND HANDLING OF BIRDS OF PREY ...................................... 26 W-1. Physical Well-Being ........................................................................................................................................................... 26 W-2. Social Housing ....................................................................................................................................................................... 27 W-3. Introduction of Unfamiliar Individuals ............................................................................................................... 28 W-4. Behavioral and Psychological Well-Being ........................................................................................................ 29 W-5. Bird of Prey-Caregiver Relationships .................................................................................................................. 29 W-6. Handling and Restraint ................................................................................................................................................... 30 STAFFING ....................................................................................................................... 31 GENERAL STAFFING ........................................................................................................................... 31 S-1. General Staffing Considerations ............................................................................................................................... 31 S-2. Security and Emergency Coverage ....................................................................................................................... 31 S-3. Volunteer and Internship Programs ...................................................................................................................... 32 S-4. Manuals ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 32 S-5. Employee Training and Continuing Education .............................................................................................. 32 SAFETY POLICIES, PROTOCOLS And TRAINING ..................................................................... 33 S-6. Communication System .................................................................................................................................................. 33 S-7. Emergency Response Plans and Protocols ....................................................................................................... 33 S-8. Escaped Bird Protocol ......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Gene Phylogeny of Aquiline Eagles (Aves: Accipitriformes) Reveals Extensive Paraphyly at the Genus Level
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com MOLECULAR SCIENCE•NCE /W\/Q^DIRI DIRECT® PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION ELSEVIER Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35 (2005) 147-164 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multi-gene phylogeny of aquiline eagles (Aves: Accipitriformes) reveals extensive paraphyly at the genus level Andreas J. Helbig'^*, Annett Kocum'^, Ingrid Seibold^, Michael J. Braun^ '^ Institute of Zoology, University of Greifswald, Vogelwarte Hiddensee, D-18565 Kloster, Germany Department of Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Rd., Suitland, MD 20746, USA Received 19 March 2004; revised 21 September 2004 Available online 24 December 2004 Abstract The phylogeny of the tribe Aquilini (eagles with fully feathered tarsi) was investigated using 4.2 kb of DNA sequence of one mito- chondrial (cyt b) and three nuclear loci (RAG-1 coding region, LDH intron 3, and adenylate-kinase intron 5). Phylogenetic signal was highly congruent and complementary between mtDNA and nuclear genes. In addition to single-nucleotide variation, shared deletions in nuclear introns supported one basal and two peripheral clades within the Aquilini. Monophyly of the Aquilini relative to other birds of prey was confirmed. However, all polytypic genera within the tribe, Spizaetus, Aquila, Hieraaetus, turned out to be non-monophyletic. Old World Spizaetus and Stephanoaetus together appear to be the sister group of the rest of the Aquilini. Spiza- stur melanoleucus and Oroaetus isidori axe nested among the New World Spizaetus species and should be merged with that genus. The Old World 'Spizaetus' species should be assigned to the genus Nisaetus (Hodgson, 1836). The sister species of the two spotted eagles (Aquila clanga and Aquila pomarina) is the African Long-crested Eagle (Lophaetus occipitalis).
    [Show full text]
  • Melagiris (Tamil Nadu)
    MELAGIRIS (TAMIL NADU) PROPOSAL FOR IMPORTANT BIRD AREA (IBA) State : Tamil Nadu, India District : Krishnagiri, Dharmapuri Coordinates : 12°18©54"N 77°41©42"E Ownership : State Area : 98926.175 ha Altitude : 300-1395 m Rainfall : 620-1000 mm Temperature : 10°C - 35°C Biographic Zone : Deccan Peninsula Habitats : Tropical Dry Deciduous, Riverine Vegetation, Tropical Dry Evergreen Proposed Criteria A1 (Globally Threatened Species) A2 (Endemic Bird Area 123 - Western Ghats, Secondary Area s072 - Southern Deccan Plateau) A3 (Biome-10 - Indian Peninsula Tropical Moist Forest, Biome-11 - Indo-Malayan Tropical Dry Zone) GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Melagiris are a group of hills lying nestled between the Cauvery and Chinnar rivers, to the south-east of Hosur taluk in Tamil Nadu, India. The Melagiris form part of an almost unbroken stretch of forests connecting Bannerghatta National Park (which forms its north-western boundary) to the forests of Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary - Karnataka (which forms its southern boundary, separated by the river Cauvery), and further to Biligirirangan hills and Sathyamangalam forests. The northern and western parts are comparatively plain and is part of the Mysore plateau. The average elevation in this region is 500-1000 m. Ground sinks to 300m in the valley of the Cauvery and the highest point is the peak of Guthereyan at 1395.11 m. Red sandy loam is the most common soil type found in this region. Small deposits of alluvium are found along Cauvery and Chinnar rivers and Kaoline is found in some areas near Jowlagiri. The temperature ranges from 10°C ± 35°C. South-west monsoon is fairly active mostly in the northern areas, but north-east monsoon is distinctly more effective in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Painting in Three Species of Buteoninae: a Cytogenetic Signature Reinforces the Monophyly of South American Species
    Chromosome Painting in Three Species of Buteoninae: A Cytogenetic Signature Reinforces the Monophyly of South American Species Edivaldo Herculano C. de Oliveira1,2,3*, Marcella Mergulha˜o Tagliarini4, Michelly S. dos Santos5, Patricia C. M. O’Brien3, Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith3 1 Laborato´rio de Cultura de Tecidos e Citogene´tica, SAMAM, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Ananindeua, PA, Brazil, 2 Faculdade de Cieˆncias Exatas e Naturais, ICEN, Universidade Federal do Para´, Bele´m, PA, Brazil, 3 Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 4 Programa de Po´s Graduac¸a˜oem Neurocieˆncias e Biologia Celular, ICB, Universidade Federal do Para´, Bele´m, PA, Brazil, 5 PIBIC – Universidade Federal do Para´, Bele´m, PA, Brazil Abstract Buteoninae (Falconiformes, Accipitridae) consist of the widely distributed genus Buteo, and several closely related species in a group called ‘‘sub-buteonine hawks’’, such as Buteogallus, Parabuteo, Asturina, Leucopternis and Busarellus, with unsolved phylogenetic relationships. Diploid number ranges between 2n = 66 and 2n = 68. Only one species, L. albicollis had its karyotype analyzed by molecular cytogenetics. The aim of this study was to present chromosomal analysis of three species of Buteoninae: Rupornis magnirostris, Asturina nitida and Buteogallus meridionallis using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments with telomeric and rDNA probes, as well as whole chromosome probes derived from Gallus gallus and Leucopternis albicollis. The three species analyzed herein showed similar karyotypes, with 2n = 68. Telomeric probes showed some interstitial telomeric sequences, which could be resulted by fusion processes occurred in the chromosomal evolution of the group, including the one found in the tassociation GGA1p/GGA6.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Identification of the Field Identification of the Field
    TOPICS IN IDENTIFICATION he Solitary Eagle ( Harpyhaliaetus solitarius ) is a large raptor that is closely related and similar in adult and immature plum- Tages to the black-hawks in the genus Buteogallus (Lerner and Mindell 2005). It is a rare and very local resident in a variety of wet and dry forested hills and highlands from northern Argentina to northern Mexico (del Hoyo et al. 1994, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001). The species has been collected in Mexico not far from the Texas border (see Discussion, pp. 72 –73), so it is possible that it has occurred in the ABA Area. The handful of specimens and nest records of this eagle are from 700 to 2,000 meters above sea level (Brown and Amadon 1968). FFiieelldd IIddeennttiifificcaattiioonn ooff tthhee SSOOLLIITTTAAARRRYYY EEAAAGGGLLLEEE Nevertheless, sightings of this eagle are occasionally reported from lowland tropical rain forest, e.g., at Tikal, Guatemala (Beaver et al. 1991) and the Tuxtlas Mountains of south - William S. Clark ern Veracruz, Mexico (Winker et al. 1992). The species has been reported on some pro - 2301 South Whitehouse Circle fessional bird tours at such lowland sites as Palenque and the Usumicinta River in south - Harlingen, Texas 78550 ern Mexico. All of these accounts have relied on large size and gray coloration as the [email protected] field marks to distinguish the eagles from the much more abundant Common Black- Hawk ( Buteogallus anthracinus ) and Great Black-Hawk ( B. urubitinga ). H. Lee Jones Howell and Webb (1995) were skeptical and stated that most lowland records of the 4810 Park Newport, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Sensitivity Index Guidelines Version 2.0
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS ORCA 115 Environmental Sensitivity Index Guidelines Version 2.0 October 1997 Seattle, Washington noaa NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce The Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment (ORCA) provides decisionmakers comprehensive, scientific information on characteristics of the oceans, coastal areas, and estuaries of the United States of America. The information ranges from strategic, national assessments of coastal and estuarine environmental quality to real-time information for navigation or hazardous materials spill response. Through its National Status and Trends (NS&T) Program, ORCA uses uniform techniques to monitor toxic chemical contamination of bottom-feeding fish, mussels and oysters, and sediments at about 300 locations throughout the United States. A related NS&T Program of directed research examines the relationships between contaminant exposure and indicators of biological responses in fish and shellfish. Through the Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division (HAZMAT) Scientific Support Coordination program, ORCA provides critical scientific support for planning and responding to spills of oil or hazardous materials into coastal environments. Technical guidance includes spill trajectory predictions, chemical hazard analyses, and assessments of the sensitivity of marine and estuarine environments to spills. To fulfill the responsibilities of the Secretary of Commerce as a trustee for living marine resources, HAZMAT’s Coastal Resource Coordination program provides technical support to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency during all phases of the remedial process to protect the environment and restore natural resources at hundreds of waste sites each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Conservation of the Hook-Billed Kite Including the Island Taxa from Cuba and Grenada J
    Animal Conservation. Print ISSN 1367-9430 Systematics and conservation of the hook-billed kite including the island taxa from Cuba and Grenada J. A. Johnson1,2, R. Thorstrom1 & D. P. Mindell2 1 The Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID, USA 2 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Keywords Abstract phylogenetics; coalescence; divergence; conservation; cryptic species; Chondrohierax. Taxonomic uncertainties within the genus Chondrohierax stem from the high degree of variation in bill size and plumage coloration throughout the geographic Correspondence range of the single recognized species, hook-billed kite Chondrohierax uncinatus. Jeff A. Johnson, Department of Ecology & These uncertainties impede conservation efforts as local populations have declined Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan throughout much of its geographic range from the Neotropics in Central America Museum of Zoology, 1109 Geddes Avenue, to northern Argentina and Paraguay, including two island populations on Cuba Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. and Grenada, and it is not known whether barriers to dispersal exist between any Email: [email protected] of these areas. Here, we present mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA; cytochrome B and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2) phylogenetic analyses of Chondrohierax, with Received 2 December 2006; accepted particular emphasis on the two island taxa (from Cuba, Chondrohierax uncinatus 20 April 2007 wilsonii and from Grenada, Chondrohierax uncinatus mirus). The mtDNA phylo- genetic results suggest that hook-billed kites on both islands are unique; however, doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00118.x the Cuban kite has much greater divergence estimates (1.8–2.0% corrected sequence divergence) when compared with the mainland populations than does the Grenada hook-billed kite (0.1–0.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Bald Eagle Haliaeetus Leucocephalus
    Wyoming Species Account Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: Delisted; Migratory Bird USFS R2: Sensitive USFS R4: Sensitive Wyoming BLM: Sensitive State of Wyoming: Protected Bird CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: Bird of Conservation Concern WGFD: NSS3 (Bb), Tier II WYNDD: G5, S4B/S5N Wyoming Contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern PIF Continental Concern Score: 9 STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is provided international protection under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended 1. In 1940, Bald Eagle was provided protection under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act 2. In 1966, the southern subspecies was listed as federally endangered under the Endangered Species Preservation Act; the entire population in the contiguous United States was listed as endangered in 1978 under the 1973 Endangered Species Act (ESA). A significant increase in numbers of nesting pairs, productivity, and distribution allowed Bald Eagle to be reclassified from Endangered to Threatened in 1995 under the ESA 3. Bald Eagle was delisted in 2007, and numbers are considered to be stable to increasing across its range 4. The species has been assigned different state conservation ranks by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database for the breeding season and nonbreeding season because the abundance of the species is different between seasons. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: Bald Eagle is a member of the family Accipitridae, which includes kites, eagles, harriers, and hawks 5. There are two subspecies of Bald Eagle; H. l. alascanus is found north of 40 degrees latitude across North America, including Wyoming, while H. l. leucocephalus is found south of 40 degrees latitude in the Gulf coast states 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Avifauna of the Northern Myeik Archipelago, Taninthryi Region
    Tanintharyi Conservation Programme (TCP) AVIFAUNA OF THE NORTHERN MYEIK ARCHIPELAGO, TANINTHRYI REGION REPORT ON HISTORIC AND NEW SURVEYS ALONG THE COAST OF SOUTHERN MYANMAR SAW MOSES & CHRISTOPH ZÖCKLER August 2015 TCP Report No. 18 This is a report of the FFI Myanmar “Tanintharyi Conservation Programme” With funding from: FFI Myanmar, Tanintharyi Conservation Programme The The Tanintharyi Conservation Programme is an initiative of Fauna and Flora program International (FFI) Myanmar Programme. It is implemented by FFI in collaboration with the Myanmar Forest Department and a number of local, national and international collaborators and stakeholders, notably for this survey, the Myanmar Biodiversity and Nature Conservation Association (BANCA) and ArcCona Consulting. FFI Myanmar operates the programme under two MoUs with the Forest Department and the Department of Fisheries, specifically for the achievement of shared marine and terrestrial conservation goals in Tanintharyi Region. Funding This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Commission, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Segre Foundation, Lighthouse Foundation and the Arcadia Fund. Suggested Saw Moses and Zöckler C., eds (2015). Avifauna of the Northern Myeik citation Archipelago, Tanintharyi: Report on Historic and New Surveys along the coast of Southern Myanmar. Report No.18 of the Tanintharyi Conservation Programme, a joint initiative of Fauna & Flora International (FFI), the Myanmar Forest Department and the Department of Fisheries. FFI, Yangon Author Saw Moses is an independent ornithologist and bird tour guide. Christoph details Zöckler (ArcCona Consulting) is an ornithologist specialising in migratory waterbirds and Asia. Both authors are advisers to FFI in Myanmar. Copyright Reproduction of this report in full or in part is granted for the purposes of education, research or awareness, with the sole provision that the authors and authoring organisations be properly credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Bald Eagles Chippewa National Forest “Celebrating 100 Years” 1908-2008
    bald eagles Chippewa National Forest “Celebrating 100 years” 1908-2008 RETURN OF THE EAGLE The grace, strength and beauty of the bald eagle has been admired through the ages. It is difficult to believe that this majestic bird, our national symbol, faced extinction just a few decades ago. Bald eagle populations were at an all time low in the 1960's, with less than 12 known pairs on the Chippewa National Forest. Today, the Forest supports one of the highest breeding densities of bald eagles in the continental United States. Over the last 18 years, the Chippewa National Forests bald eagle monitoring shows an annual average of 150 active breeding pairs, and 100 successful breading pairs producing each year. The Chippewa National Forest Biologists gather information on eagles by recording the number plumage and can begin breeding at four or five of nesting pairs each spring, and young years of age. produced each July. The return of the bald eagle is one of America's greatest wildlife Young bald eagles remain flecked with brown conservation success stories. and white and can be mistaken for golden eagles, though golden eagles are not found in Minnesota. Eagles mate for life, and return to BALD EAGLE NATURAL HISTORY the same nest area each year. With a wingspan of seven feet, the bald eagle is Large red and white pines on the Forest make the largest bird of prey in northern Minnesota. excellent eagle nesting sites although aspen and The adult eagle is easily identified by it's striking others are occasionally used. Nests sometimes white head and tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimations Relative to Birds of Prey in Captivity in the United States of America
    ESTIMATIONS RELATIVE TO BIRDS OF PREY IN CAPTIVITY IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by Roger Thacker Department of Animal Laboratories The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210 Introduction. Counts relating to birds of prey in captivity have been accomplished in some European countries; how- ever, to the knowledge of this author no such information is available in the United States of America. The following paper consistsof data related to this subject collected during 1969-1970 from surveys carried out in many different direc- tions within this country. Methods. In an attempt to obtain as clear a picture as pos- sible, counts were divided into specific areas: Research, Zoo- logical, Falconry, and Pet Holders. It became obvious as the project advanced that in some casesthere was overlap from one area to another; an example of this being a falconer working with a bird both for falconry and research purposes. In some instances such as this, the author has used his own judgment in placing birds in specific categories; in other in- stances received information has been used for this purpose. It has also become clear during this project that a count of "pets" is very difficult to obtain. Lack of interest, non-coop- eration, or no available information from animal sales firms makes the task very difficult, as unfortunately, to obtain a clear dispersal picture it is from such sourcesthat informa- tion must be gleaned. However, data related to the importa- tion of birds' of prey as recorded by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife is included, and it is felt some observa- tions can be made from these figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area
    Common Birds of the Estero Bay Area Jeremy Beaulieu Lisa Andreano Michael Walgren Introduction The following is a guide to the common birds of the Estero Bay Area. Brief descriptions are provided as well as active months and status listings. Photos are primarily courtesy of Greg Smith. Species are arranged by family according to the Sibley Guide to Birds (2000). Gaviidae Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: A small loon seldom seen far from salt water. In the non-breeding season they have a grey face and red throat. They have a long slender dark bill and white speckling on their dark back. Information: These birds are winter residents to the Central Coast. Wintering Red- throated Loons can gather in large numbers in Morro Bay if food is abundant. They are common on salt water of all depths but frequently forage in shallow bays and estuaries rather than far out at sea. Because their legs are located so far back, loons have difficulty walking on land and are rarely found far from water. Most loons must paddle furiously across the surface of the water before becoming airborne, but these small loons can practically spring directly into the air from land, a useful ability on its artic tundra breeding grounds. Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica Occurrence: Common Active Months: November-April Federal Status: None State/Audubon Status: None Description: The Pacific Loon has a shorter neck than the Red-throated Loon. The bill is very straight and the head is very smoothly rounded.
    [Show full text]