DOCSLIB.ORG

Ballot Box Analysis of the 23 June Istanbul Election and Voter Profiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ballot Box Analysis of the 23 June Istanbul Election and Voter Profiles KONDA BALLOT BOX ANALYSIS OF THE 23 JUNE ISTANBUL ELECTION AND VOTER PROFILES June’19 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 3 2. BALLOT BOX ANALYSIS OF 23 JUNE ISTANBUL MAYORSHIP ELECTION ...................... 6 2.1. General Result ................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Districts Result .................................................................................................................. 6 2.3. Change in Districts ............................................................................................................ 8 2.4. Socioeconomic Situation of the Districts and Voting Distribution ................................. 9 2.5. Clusterings in the Political Geography of Districts ....................................................... 13 2.6. Vote Shifts ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.7. Vote Shifts Analysis ........................................................................................................ 18 2.8. Analysis on the Basis of Istanbul Neighborhoods ........................................................ 23 3. 23 JUNE VOTER PROFILES ......................................................................................... 39 3.1. Change in Preferences in Istanbul Based on Political Preferences ............................ 40 3.2. Change in Preferences in Istanbul According to Demographic Clusters .................... 42 3.3. Candidate Preference Based on Media and Social Media Preferences .................... 59 3.4. Basic Fİndings in Voter Profiles ..................................................................................... 62 4. EVALUATION ................................................................................................................ 63 5. RESEARCH ID .............................................................................................................. 69 5.1. The General Description of the Survey ......................................................................... 69 5.2. The Sample ..................................................................................................................... 69 6. GLOSSARY of TERMS .................................................................................................. 70 6.1. Questions and Response Options ................................................................................. 71 KONDA JUNE’19 BAROMETER BALLOT BOX ANALYSIS OF THE 23 JUNE ISTANBUL ELECTION 2 / 71 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We are sharing this report with the public following the re-run of the Istanbul Metropolitan Mayoral election. It consists of two main parts and in the first part, "ballotbox analysis", the results of the June 23rd election is compared, at the neighborhood and district levels, with those of March 31st Local Elections and June 24th 2018 General Elections. Besides the actual outcome, the "political profiles" part is based on three field surveys representative of Istanbul and allows you to examine how candidate preferences have changed in various social clusters. The field survey forming the basis of our June’19 Barometer report, the 99th of the Barometer series, has been conducted on June 15-16 only in Istanbul. Within the scope of the research, 3498 people were interviewed face to face in their households in 157 neighborhoods in Istanbul representing Istanbul voter population. After the Cumhur Alliance had submitted an extraordinary appeal to the Supreme Election Council (YSK) over the results of the Istanbul Metropolitan Mayoral election and the YSK decided to repeat the elections, it has become the most important issue of the political agenda in Turkey. Therefore, we made an exception for June’19 Barometer and did our fieldwork only in Istanbul. We shared our election prediction based on this survey first with our subscribers and then with the public. Based on our prediction, we had foreseen that Imamoğlu would receive 54 percent and Binali Yıldırım 45 percent of the votes. According to unofficial results, Imamoğlu received 54 percent and Yıldırım 45 percent of the votes and this confirmed our measurement. Ballot Box Analysis When we compare the vote rates of E. İmamoğlu and B. Yıldırım considering the analysis results1 of the income distribution in 2017 on the basis of neighborhoods and districts in İstanbul, which is calculated and announced within the scope of al ‘My Neighborhood İstanbul Project’ by İstanbul University Faculty of Economics; ✓ Although there is no special difference between E. İmamoğlu votes and opposing block votes in the lowest and highest income districts, E. İmamoğlu votes has increased slightly in the middle income districts compared to the opposition block votes. ✓ On the other hand, B. Yıldırım's vote rate decreased in all districts compared to the 24 June votes of the incumbent bloc, but decreased slightly at a higher rate in the mid-income districts. - In addition, when clustering analysis is conducted according to the distribution patterns of votes in the districts of Istanbul in the elections, five different political behavior patterns emerged. 1 https://www.mahallemistanbul.com/MahallemSEGE_/ KONDA JUNE’19 BAROMETER BALLOT BOX ANALYSIS OF THE 23 JUNE ISTANBUL ELECTION 3 / 71 ‘The Clusters in District Political Geography’ section, where these five clusters are described in order to realize the basic voter movements, contains important clues. When we compare it with 31 March IBB Mayorship votes, it is seen that the vote of Imamoğlu has increased by 5.4 points and the vote of Yıldırım decreased by only 2.1 points. It can be said that the increase of the vote for İmamoğlu did not have a single source but he increased his votes from all clusters. When we compare it with the distribution of Presidential votes on June 24, 2018, it is observed that the votes of İmamoğlu increased by 8.7 points, of which 6.3 points were caused by Demirtaş or HDP votes. It is assumed that 3.7 points of the 6.1 point decrease observed in the vote of Yıldırım compared to Erdoğan is composed of the incumbent block voters who did not participate in the election, while votes at a level of 2 points have shifted towards Imamoğlu. Based on these two comparisons, it is possible to say that incumbent bloc voters at the rate of 1-2 points have shifted towards the opposition bloc, when Istanbul election was renewed on June 23. On the other hand, even in a period of deep economic and political turmoil, the transition between the blocks is only at the level of 1-2 points, which indicates how strong the polarization still is. Analysis Based on Istanbul Neighborhoods Considering the neighborhoods, we see that the neighborhoods with low participation rates are either in the periphery districts or in the city center, in Fatih. According to the previous election, the neighborhoods where participation increased at most were the coastal districts of Beşiktaş, Kadıköy and Bakırköy, while participation in the periphery districts decreased compared to 31 March. While Imamoglu had high vote rates in the same regions in both elections, it was the first finding that the number of neighborhoods, where he received more than 50 percent of votes on 23 June has increased considerably. Yıldırım seems to have lost votes in almost every neighborhood. In general, the protects his vote rate in the districts such as Eyüpsultan, Arnavutköy, Çekmeköy, Sultanbeyli, Ümraniye, which can be described as the second ring after the city center, whereas he experienced a higher rate of loss of votes in the outermost districts and central districts. In the analysis we made considering the average income level on the basis of districts, the votes of İmamoğlu in the top 10 districts with the highest income level are between 71.1 percent and 49.3 percent and more than Yıldırım in all of them. On the other hand, there is a contentious situation in the last 10 districts where the average household income is the lowest. It is understood that the vote differences in the districts, which are in the middle of household income ranking, are in favor of E.Imamoğlu. KONDA JUNE’19 BAROMETER BALLOT BOX ANALYSIS OF THE 23 JUNE ISTANBUL ELECTION 4 / 71 Political Profiles Considering the analysis of the voter profiles of the candidates and the candidate preference in different profiles together, which we reveal by comparing the data of 3 different Istanbul- specific surveys conducted during the 31 March local elections and the subsequent Istanbul elections, we reach the following findings: • Binali Yıldırım's vote seems to have remained at the same fixed point before March 31 and June 23 process. It is necessary to interpret this situation considering that the rate of swing voters decreased at every stage. If his vote remains fixed in any way, when the rate swing voters decreases, it means that the vote for Yıldırım has decreased. This situation occurs in almost all social clusters. There are very rare social clusters in which Yıldırım has increased his vote in this process. • Imamoğlu's vote, on the other hand, has increased in all components of Istanbul residents both before and after 31 March. Imamoğlu shows a visible increase especially among the youth, students, and unemployed and most importantly among the Kurds. • Binali Yıldırım's vote is in line with the Ak Parti vote in the Barometer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Başıbüyük (Maltepe)-Kurfalı (Kartal) Civarında Istanbul
    İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ AVRASYA YER BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ BAŞIBÜYÜK (MALTEPE)-KURFALI (KARTAL) CİVARINDA İSTANBUL PALEOZOYİK İSTİFİNİN YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLERİ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Jeoloji Müh. Pınar Gutsuz Anabilim Dalı: Yer Sistem Bilimleri Program: Katı Yer Bilimleri Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. H. Serdar Akyüz EYLÜL 2008 ÖNSÖZ “Başıbüyük (Maltepe)-Kurfalı (Kartal) civarında İstanbul Paleozoyik istifinin yapısal evrimi” başlıklı çalışma, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Avrasya Yer Bilimleri’nde Prof.Dr. H.Serdar Akyüz denetiminde hazırlanmıştır. Yüksek lisans öğrenimim ve tezim süresince her zaman bana destek olan, bilgileri ve görüşleriyle beni aydınlatan ve yönlendiren, okulda çalışma ortamına sahip olmamı sağlayan ve ince esprilerini benden esirgemeyen sevgili danışmanım Prof. Dr. H.Serdar Akyüz’e sonsuz teşekkür ederim. Bilgileriyle beni aydınlatan, tezi ortaya çıkarmamda büyük katkıları olan en başta Ar. Gör. Gürsel Sunal’a, Ar. Gör. Cengiz Zabcı’ya, Ar. Gör. M. Korhan Erturaç’a, arazi çalışmalarında bana destek olan arkadaşım Jeoloji Mühendisi Emre Kasapoğlu’na, Ar. Gör. Eşref Aylan’a, Yüksek Jeoloji Mühendisi Aynur Dikbaş’a, ince kesit çalışmalarında yardımcı olan Prof. Dr. Ş.Can Genç’e ve Ar. Gör. Fatma Gülmez’e, ince kesit fotoğraflarının çekilmesinde yardımcı olan Yüksek Jeoloji Mühendisi Demet Biltekin’e, ince kesitleri hazırlamamda yardımcı olan Mehmet Ali Oran’a teşekkürü borç bilirim. Beni her zaman destekleyen, yanımda olan, sevgisinden ve varlığından güç aldığım sevgili Ayda Gutsuz’a ve ev halkına sonsuz teşekkür ederim. Ayrıca, tez döneminde beni anlayışla karşılayan ve destekleyen tüm dostlarıma çok teşekkür ederim. Eylül, 2008 Pınar Gutsuz ii İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ ii İÇİNDEKİLER iii EK LİSTESİ iv ŞEKİL LİSTESİ v ÖZET vii SUMMARY ix 1. GİRİŞ 1 1.1. GENEL 1 1.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rsa 2005 Funda Last Gönderilen
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Yirmibesoglu, Funda Conference Paper Differentiation of Real Estate Market in Istanbul between 1995, 2005 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Land Use and Water Management in a Sustainable Network Society", 23-27 August 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Yirmibesoglu, Funda (2005) : Differentiation of Real Estate Market in Istanbul between 1995, 2005, 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Land Use and Water Management in a Sustainable Network Society", 23-27 August 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la- Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/117731 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 86, 25 July 2016 2
    No. 86 25 July 2016 Abkhazia South Ossetia caucasus Adjara analytical digest Nagorno- Karabakh www.laender-analysen.de/cad www.css.ethz.ch/en/publications/cad.html TURKISH SOCIETAL ACTORS IN THE CAUCASUS Special Editors: Andrea Weiss and Yana Zabanova ■■Introduction by the Special Editors 2 ■■Track Two Diplomacy between Armenia and Turkey: Achievements and Limitations 3 By Vahram Ter-Matevosyan, Yerevan ■■How Non-Governmental Are Civil Societal Relations Between Turkey and Azerbaijan? 6 By Hülya Demirdirek and Orhan Gafarlı, Ankara ■■Turkey’s Abkhaz Diaspora as an Intermediary Between Turkish and Abkhaz Societies 9 By Yana Zabanova, Berlin ■■Turkish Georgians: The Forgotten Diaspora, Religion and Social Ties 13 By Andrea Weiss, Berlin ■■CHRONICLE From 14 June to 19 July 2016 16 Research Centre Center Caucasus Research German Association for for East European Studies for Security Studies Resource Centers East European Studies University of Bremen ETH Zurich CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 86, 25 July 2016 2 Introduction by the Special Editors Turkey is an important actor in the South Caucasus in several respects: as a leading trade and investment partner, an energy hub, and a security actor. While the economic and security dimensions of Turkey’s role in the region have been amply addressed, its cross-border ties with societies in the Caucasus remain under-researched. This issue of the Cauca- sus Analytical Digest illustrates inter-societal relations between Turkey and the three South Caucasus states of Arme- nia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, as well as with the de-facto state of Abkhazia, through the prism of NGO and diaspora contacts. Although this approach is by necessity selective, each of the four articles describes an important segment of transboundary societal relations between Turkey and the Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Movement in Turkey
    #4.13 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES THE GREEN MOVEMENT IN TURKEY DEMOCRACY INTERNATIONAL POLITICS HUMAN LANDSCAPE AKP versus women Turkish-American relations and the Taner Öngür: Gülfer Akkaya Middle East in Obama’s second term The long and winding road Page 52 0Nar $OST .IyeGO 3erkaN 3eyMeN Page 60 Page 66 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 Q Feature articles: The Green Movement in Turkey Sustainability of the Green Movement in Turkey, Bülent Duru 4 Environmentalists in Turkey - Who are they?, BArë GenCer BAykAn 8 The involvement of the green movement in the political space, Hande Paker 12 Ecofeminism: Practical and theoretical possibilities, %Cehan Balta 16 Milestones in the Õght for the environment, Ahmet Oktay Demiran 20 Do EIA reports really assess environmental impact?, GonCa 9lmaZ 25 Hydroelectric power plants: A great disaster, a great malice, 3emahat 3evim ­ZGür GürBüZ 28 Latest notes on history from Bergama, ­Zer Akdemir 34 A radioactive landÕll in the heart of ÊXmir, 3erkan OCak 38 Q Culture Turkish television series: an overview, &eyZa Aknerdem 41 Q Ecology Seasonal farm workers: Pitiful victims or Kurdish laborers? (II), DeniZ DuruiZ 44 Q Democracy Peace process and gender equality, Ulrike Dufner 50 AKP versus women, Gülfer Akkaya 52 New metropolitan municipalities, &ikret TokSÇZ 56 Q International politics Turkish-American relations and the Middle East in Obama’s second term, Pnar DoSt .iyeGo 60 Q Human landscape Taner Öngür: The long and winding road, Serkan Seymen
    [Show full text]
  • DFAT COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 9 October 2018
    DFAT COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 9 October 2018 MAP This map is presented for information only. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade accepts no responsibility for errors or omission of any geographic feature. Nomenclature and territorial boundaries may not necessarily reflect Australian government policy. Provided by the Commonwealth of Australia under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. DFAT Country Information Report Turkey 2 CONTENTS ACRONYMS 4 GLOSSARY 6 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE 7 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 8 Recent History 8 Demography 9 Economic Overview 9 Political System 14 Human Rights Framework 15 Security Situation 17 3. REFUGEE CONVENTION CLAIMS 20 Race/Nationality 20 Religion 22 Political Opinion (Actual or imputed) 26 Groups of Interest 32 4. COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION CLAIMS 41 Arbitrary Deprivation of Life 41 Death Penalty 42 Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 43 5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 46 State Protection 46 Internal Relocation 50 Treatment of Returnees 51 Documentation 52 DFAT Country Information Report Turkey 3 ACRONYMS AKP Justice and Development Party, the ruling conservative political party AKS Address Registration System BTK Information and Communication Technologies Authority CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CEDAW UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women CERD International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination CHP Republican People’s
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Social Vulnerability Using Geographic Information Systems: Pendik, Istanbul Case Study
    Assessment of Social Vulnerability Using Geographic Information Systems: Pendik, Istanbul Case Study Zeynep Haki, Zuhal Akyürek, Şebnem Düzgün Middle East Technical University, Natural and Applied Sciences, Geodetic and Geographic Information Technologies 06531- Ankara, Turkey [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] SUMMARY This study aims to develop a methodology to define vulnerable groups in terms of their social conditions for any possible hazard, with Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technology, in the case study area of earthquake-prone Pendik, Istanbul. In the calculation of social vulnerability certain indicators were estimated and used as criterion data. Criterion standardization, weighting and combining were accomplished by means of multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) methods, the theoretical background being based on the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT). In order to avoid the subjectivity of the assessment, 10 more evaluations are utilized. The results show that, the income- and educational-level indicators are the most important factors in defining the social vulnerability. These outputs are supported with some explorative spatial data analyses to understand global trends and spatial interactions in order to be used in pre- and post-disaster planning. Besides, to determine the physical effects of basic services and transportation, some GIS Analyses are applied. The objectivity of the assessment and the complicated structure of the study data are discussed for an effective disaster management. The main outcomes of the methodology and its applications show that, the southwest part of Pendik is socially vulnerable to any possible hazard. KEYWORDS: Social Vulnerability Assessment, Pre- and Post-Disaster Planning, Disaster Management, Spatial Data Analysis, GIS, Pendik-İstanbul INTRODUCTION Natural hazards are the reality of today’s world, which considerably affect people’s living conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Öğrenen Mahalle Projesi Faaliyet Listesi
    ÖĞRENEN MAHALLE PROJESİ ANA FAALİYET LİSTESİ No FAALİYETİN ADI TARİHİ SORUMLU BİRİM 1 Sağlıklı Beslenme ve Obeziteyle 10- 15 Mart- 2021 İl Millî Eğitim Müdürlüğü (Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Şubesi) Mücadele 2 Siber Güvenlik Mart-Mart -Nisan 2021 İl Millî Eğitim Müdürlüğü (Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Şubesi) 3 Enerji Okuryazarlığı 15- 19 Mart 2021 İl Millî Eğitim Müdürlüğü (Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Şubesi) 4 Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Mart 2021 İl Millî Eğitim Müdürlüğü (Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Şubesi) 5 Masalların Kültürümüzdeki Yeri 29 Mart -2 Nisan2021 İl Millî Eğitim Müdürlüğü(Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Şubesi) 6 Türkülerimizin Kültürümüzdeki Yeri Mart-Ağustos Kadıköy Halk EğitimiMerkezi - Feneryolu Halk EğitimiMerkezi ve Önemi 7 Kültürümüzde Cam El Dekoru Sanatı Mart -Ağustos Kartal Halk EğitimiMerkezi 8 Kültürümüzde Şile Bezi Mart– Ağustos Şile Halk EğitimiMerkezi 9 Öğreniyorum Üretiyorum Mart - Ağustos Şile Halk EğitimiMerkezi-Kâğıthane Halk EğitimiMerkezi 10 Tarım Atölyem Mart - Ağustos Kâğıthane-Arnavutköy- Şile-Çatalca Halk Eğitimi Merkezleri 11 Doğal Oyuncak- Doğal Zekâ Oyunları Mart – Ağustos Şile-Büyükçekmece-Küçükçekmece-Kâğıthane Halk Eğitimi Merkezleri Üretimi 12 Yörelerimize Göre Bebekler (Bez Mart -Ağustos Kadıköy Bostancı Halk EğitimiMerkezi Bebek Yapımı) 13 Nağmelerin İzinde Mart -Ağustos Kadıköy Halk EğitimiMerkezi 14 İlmek İlmek Anadolu’m Mart– Ağustos Kadıköy-Bostancı Halk Eğitimi Merkezleri 15 Bana Hayat Kat Mart -Ağustos Kadıköy Zihnipaşa Halk EğitimiMerkezi 16 Beni Hayata Kat Mart -Ağustos Kadıköy Zihnipaşa Halk EğitimiMerkezi 17 İğne Oyam Mart -Ağustos
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Yılı Ana Arter Listesi.Xlsx
    ÖNEMLİ UYARI: İşyerinin veya reklamın bulunduğu yer aşağıdaki listede yer alan anaarterlere cepheli ise İlan ve Reklam Vergisi Beyannamesinin İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesine, değilse İlçe Belediyesine verilmesi gerekmektedir. İşyerinin bulunduğu binanın anaartere cephesi varsa, bina üzerindeki tüm reklamların (Sokağa bakan cephedekiler de dahil) 5216 Sayılı Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kanun'unun 23/e maddesi gereğince İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi'ne beyan edilmesi yasal zorunluluktur. İSTANBUL BÜYÜKŞEHİR BELEDİYESİ 2021 YILI ANAARTER LİSTESİ İLÇE ADI GRUP ANAARTER ADI ADALAR 3 Akasya Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Alsancak Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Altınordu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Ayyıldız Cad.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Barbaros Hayrettin Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük İskele Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük Tur Yolu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Büyük Tur Yolu Sk.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Cami Sk.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Çankaya Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Çınar Meydanı(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Gezinti Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Gönüllü Cad.(BURGAZADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Gülistan Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 İskele Meydanı(Büyükada)(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Kınalı Çarşı Cad.(KINALIADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Lozan Zaferi Sk.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Malül Gazi Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR 3 Nizam Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-NİZAM MAH) ADALAR 3 Refah Şehitleri Cad.(HEYBELİADA MAH) ADALAR 3 Şehit Recep Koç Cad.(BÜYÜKADA-MADEN MAH) ADALAR
    [Show full text]
  • PENDIK MUNICIPALITY | Erasmus+ Projects
    PENDIK MUNICIPALITY | Erasmus+ Projects The Organisation Erasmus+ Projects in last three years Legal Name Pendik Belediyesi EU Program Year Project ID Applicant / Beneficiary Legal Name (EN) Pendik Municipality Erasmus+ 2017 2017-1-TR01-KA105-044661 Pendik Municipality Address Yeni Mah. Stadyum Sk. No:18 34893 Pendik – Istanbul Erasmus+ 2017 2017-2-TR01-KA105-047556 Pendik Municipality City Istanbul Erasmus+ 2017 2017-2-TR01-KA105-047587 Pendik Municipality Country Turkey Erasmus+ 2017 2017-3-TR01-KA105-048383 Pendik Municipality Website Www.pendik.bel.tr Erasmus+ 2018 2018-3-TR01-KA347-061747 Pendik Municipality E-mail [email protected] Erasmus+ 2018 2018-3-RO01-KA105-061290 Asociatia Be You Phone +90 216 585 11 66 Erasmus+ 2019 2019-1-HU01-KA104-060383 Jó munka szociális szövetkezet Fax +90 216 585 14 86 Erasmus+ 2019 2019-1-TR01-ESC11-065100 Pendik Municipality Type Local Public Body Erasmus+ 2019 2019-1-TR01-KA204-074520 Pendik Municipality Accreditation ESC Erasmus+ 2019 6132019-EPP-1-2019-1-TR-SPO-SSCP Pendik Municipality The LEAR Rüveyda Güzel graduated from Selçuk University International Relations BA degree. She has been working as project specialist since 2012 and leading Project Managemant Unit. Title Mr. She has experience in preparing, implementing, and managing different projects both at Name & Surname Abdulkadir COŞKUN national and international level. She is the coordinator of latest E+ Sport project as well. Position Strategy Development Manager Sümeyye Topal gained her BA from Istanbul Bilgi University – Public Relations and her Phone & Fax +90 216 585 11 00 +90 216 585 14 86 MA Gebze Technical University on Project Management.
    [Show full text]
  • A View of the History of the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine
    A VIEW OF THE HISTORY OF THE ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE Prof. Dr. Nuran Yıldırım The Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, the Department of History of Medicine and Ethics Attributing the roots of the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine to the Fatih Darüşşifa after a great deal of discussion, the 500th anniversary of medical education in Istanbul was celebrated in 1970. The soundest documents showing that medical education was carried out in the Fatih Dârüşşifa were the appointment papers (rüus) of medical students for the dârüşşifa in the 60 years between 1723 and 1783. These nine rüus, which were recently published, clarify that there were positions for six medical students in the dârüşşifa, and that whenever a vacancy came up, a new medical student would be appointed by the chief physician to undergo a systematic medical training. 1-Archival document concerning Ismail Efendi‟s appointment in place of Derviş Mehmet in Fatih Darüşşifa after his death. With the opening of the Süleymaniye Medical Medrese, medical education in Istanbul, which had started with the Fatih Dârüşşifa, became institutionalized. The opening of a medical medrese for the first time in the Ottoman State is accepted as being an important step in our history of medical education. The Süleymaniye Medical Medrese (Süleymaniye Tıp Medresesi) was a medrese for specializing, or a “post-graduate” course, as only students who had completed their classic medrese education could continue. Not only did the physicians that were trained join the scholarly classes, but at the same time they could be qadi or rising even to the level of sheikh-ul-Islam or grand vizier.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Reading Dynamics of the City of Istanbul Through Critical Mapping
    Gazi University Journal of Science GU J Sci 29(2):403-412 (2016) Re-Reading Dynamics of The City of Istanbul Through Critical Mapping Demet MUTMAN1, 1 Maltepe University, Faculty of Architecture and Design, 34857 Maltepe Istanbul, Turkey Received: 18/04/2016 Revised:21/04/2016 Accepted: 26/04/2016 ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to re-read and define differentiating layers of the city of Istanbul through critical mappings as an interrogative socio-spatial research. Through this form of a new city read, information on daily urban and social practices, global impacts and urban and economic effects of consumption over space would be exposed among five different thematic constellations rooted from Guy Debord's The Society of the Spectacle. The author aims to clarify socio-spatial constellations over space, time and current trends by deconstructing the current city formation of Istanbul. Key words: Critical mapping, Istanbul, socio-spatial research 1. INTRODUCTION Maps have been used to represent the urban environment as only geographical conditions, but a hidden socio-political well as the representational structure of a city from information as a tool of a hegemonic strategy. geographical maps and measurements of ancient Babylon, Syria and Palestine, to the topographical representations Through this article maps as strategic tools of the ideology and cadastral maps that were developed by Egyptians. will therefore be used as a potential to criticize a social and Romans developed city maps similar to today’s structure spatial environment by using the potential of its where the detailed construction plans for engineers and the representational techniques however reversing its formation of current city plans were developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey 2020 Human Rights Report
    TURKEY 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Turkey is a constitutional republic with an executive presidential system and a unicameral 600-seat parliament (the Grand National Assembly). In presidential and parliamentary elections in 2018, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe observers expressed concern regarding restrictions on media reporting and the campaign environment, including the jailing of a presidential candidate that restricted the ability of opposition candidates to compete on an equal basis and campaign freely. The National Police and Jandarma, under the control of the Ministry of Interior, are responsible for security in urban areas and rural and border areas, respectively. The military has overall responsibility for border control and external security. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over law enforcement officials, but mechanisms to investigate and punish abuse and corruption remained inadequate. Members of the security forces committed some abuses. Under broad antiterror legislation passed in 2018 the government continued to restrict fundamental freedoms and compromised the rule of law. Since the 2016 coup attempt, authorities have dismissed or suspended more than 60,000 police and military personnel and approximately 125,000 civil servants, dismissed one-third of the judiciary, arrested or imprisoned more than 90,000 citizens, and closed more than 1,500 nongovernmental organizations on terrorism-related grounds, primarily for alleged ties to the movement of cleric Fethullah Gulen, whom the government accused of masterminding the coup attempt and designated as the leader of the “Fethullah Terrorist Organization.” Significant human rights issues included: reports of arbitrary killings; suspicious deaths of persons in custody; forced disappearances; torture; arbitrary arrest and continued detention of tens of thousands of persons, including opposition politicians and former members of parliament, lawyers, journalists, human rights activists, and employees of the U.S.
    [Show full text]