DOCSLIB.ORG

Standards Development Model Final, Version 1.1, 28 January 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standards Development Model Final, Version 1.1, 28 January 2020 Australian Digital Health Agency A Health Interoperability Standards Development, Maintenance and Management Model for Australia Final, Version 1.1, 28 January 2020 Prepared by: Author: Executive Consultant: David Rowlands ADHA Standards Development Model Final, Version 1.1, 28 January 2020 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Document Provenance This document is the final deliverable of a contract, dated 3 January 2019, between the Australian Digital Health Agency and JP Consulting (Aust) Pty Ltd. Document Acceptance A Health Interoperability Standards Development, Maintenance Deliverable Details and Management Model for Australia, Final, Version 1.1, 28 January 2020. Accepted on Behalf of ADHA by: Mr Michael Costello ______ / ______ / ______ Accepted on Behalf of JP Consulting by: Mr Jeff Parker ______ / ______ / ______ Author Contact Details Company JP Consulting (Aust) Pty Ltd. ACN 065 387 573 Postal Address PO Box 512, Albion Qld 4010, Australia Contact Person Jeff Parker, Managing Director. Mobile: +61 411 110299 E-mail address [email protected] Web Address http://www.jpconsulting.com.au Report Author David Rowlands, Executive Consultant Related Documents 1. A Health Interoperability Standards Development, Maintenance and Management Model for Australia, Executive Summary Report, Final, Version 1.0, 30 June 2019. 2. A Health Interoperability Standards Development, Maintenance and Management Model for Australia, Supplement, Final, Version 1.0, 30 June 2019. Document History Version Date Changes Author(s) 1.1 28 January 2020 Updated Final. Included client feedback Jeff Parker 1.0 30 June 2019 Final Version David Rowlands 0.2 30 May 2019 Updated Draft for Review David Rowlands 0.1 14 May 2019 Initial Internal Draft David Rowlands Author: David Rowlands 2 of 154 ADHA Standards Development Model Final, Version 1.1, 28 January 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 9 PART A: ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM ............................................................... 10 2 THE NEED FOR STANDARDS ........................................................................ 11 2.1 Interoperability is impossible without standards ................................................... 11 2.2 Drilling down .............................................................................................................. 12 2.3 Other benefits of standards ....................................................................................... 15 2.3.1 Safety ....................................................................................................................... 15 2.3.2 Comparability .......................................................................................................... 16 2.3.3 Preventing information blocking ............................................................................. 17 2.3.4 Improving economic productivity............................................................................ 18 2.3.5 Simplifying and accelerating product development ................................................ 18 2.3.6 Improving health literacy ......................................................................................... 18 2.3.7 Facilitating international trade ................................................................................. 19 2.3.8 Standards and innovation ......................................................................................... 20 3 THE NATURE OF STANDARDS AND STANDARDISATION ......................... 21 3.1 What are standards?.................................................................................................. 21 3.2 What are interoperability standards? ...................................................................... 22 3.3 What is standardisation? ........................................................................................... 23 3.4 The nature of standards and standardisation for health sector interoperability 25 3.4.1 Market failures ......................................................................................................... 25 3.4.2 Development timeframes ......................................................................................... 27 3.5 Characteristics of high-quality standards ............................................................... 28 3.6 Requirements for appropriate, effective and efficient standards development ... 30 3.6.1 Principles.................................................................................................................. 31 3.6.2 Roles and functions .................................................................................................. 35 3.6.3 Trends in standards development............................................................................. 38 3.7 A complex adaptive ecosystem .................................................................................. 44 3.7.1 Complex adaptive systems ....................................................................................... 44 3.7.2 The ecosystem .......................................................................................................... 45 4 LESSONS LEARNT ......................................................................................... 48 Author: David Rowlands 3 of 154 ADHA Standards Development Model Final, Version 1.1, 28 January 2020 4.1 Lessons from our past ................................................................................................ 48 4.1.1 2010-11 to 2016 ....................................................................................................... 50 4.1.2 From 2016 – ADHA ................................................................................................ 52 4.1.3 Cultural issues .......................................................................................................... 53 4.2 Lessons from overseas ............................................................................................... 53 4.2.1 The UK, USA and Europe ....................................................................................... 53 4.2.2 WHO fora on Health Data Standardisation and Interoperability ............................. 54 4.2.3 Global Digital Health Partnership ............................................................................ 55 4.2.4 Lessons from eHealth more broadly ........................................................................ 55 4.3 Lessons from other industries ................................................................................... 56 4.4 Lessons from management science ........................................................................... 59 4.5 Summary – Key lessons ............................................................................................. 59 PART B: CURRENT STATE ANALYSIS ................................................................ 61 5 DEMAND FOR INTEROPERABILITY STANDARDS IS INCREASING ........... 62 5.1 Strategic shifts in the health system ......................................................................... 62 5.2 Tactical pressures....................................................................................................... 64 5.3 Strategic shifts in IT................................................................................................... 66 5.4 Tactical shifts in markets .......................................................................................... 69 5.5 Summary – Demand factors ..................................................................................... 70 6 SUPPLY CAPABILITY IS CONSTRAINED ...................................................... 71 6.1 Suppliers ..................................................................................................................... 71 6.1.1 Data content suppliers .............................................................................................. 72 6.1.2 Health Concept representation suppliers ................................................................. 74 6.1.3 Data exchange standard suppliers ............................................................................ 76 6.1.4 Data integrity standard suppliers ............................................................................. 81 6.1.5 Suppliers of complementary services ...................................................................... 82 6.2 Standards development orientation ......................................................................... 85 6.3 Unbalanced investment ............................................................................................. 86 6.4 Political awareness and will ...................................................................................... 87 6.5 Orchestration.............................................................................................................. 88 6.6 Analysis of Australia’s current situation against success factors .......................... 89 6.7 Strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats ...................................................... 91 6.8 Stakeholder analysis .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Risk Management Standard AS/NZS 4360
    BROADLEAF CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD ABN 24 054 021 117 23 Bettowynd Road Tel: +61 2 9488 8477 Pymble Mobile: +61 419 433 184 NSW 2073 Fax: + 61 2 9488 9685 Australia www.Broadleaf.com.au [email protected] Specialists in Strategic, Enterprise and Project Risk Management TUTORIAL NOTES: THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND STANDARD ON RISK MANAGEMENT, AS/NZS 4360:2004 1 Introduction Dr Dale F Cooper, a Director of Broadleaf, is a founding member of the joint Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand Technical Committee OB-007 that developed the Australian and New Zealand Standard on risk management, AS/NZS 4360:2004 [7], and the associated Handbook [8], and Grant Purdy, an Associate Director of Broadleaf, is currently Chair of the Committee. Dennis Goodwin is also a member of the committee. The Standard was developed in response to a perceived need for practical assistance in applying risk management in public sector and private sector organisations. It has since become one of the most popular Standards in publication, and a range of supporting handbooks has been prepared. At least part of the focus on the importance of risk management and the drive for a Standard was stimulated by the release of the NSW Government Risk Management Guidelines in 1993 [6] and their designation as NSW Government policy for all capital works expenditure above $5 million. Dr Cooper made substantial contributions to the NSW Guidelines, whose structure is very similar to that of the Standard. The approach of the Standard has since been adopted by the Australian Government [2, 3, 4], a range of large public companies [1 , for example] and the UK National Health Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Health Surveillance [Nohsc:7039(1995)]
    GUIDELINES FOR HEALTH SURVEILLANCE [NOHSC:7039(1995)] DECEMBER 1995 1October 1995 2 FOREWORD The National Occupational Health and Safety Commission is a tripartite body established by the Commonwealth Government to develop, facilitate and implement a national occupational health and safety strategy. This strategy includes standards development, the development of hazards- specific and industry-based preventive strategies, research, training, information collection and dissemination and the development of common approaches to occupational health and safety legislation. The National Commission comprises representatives of peak employee and employer bodiesthe Australian Council of Trade Unions and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industryas well as the Commonwealth, State and Territory governments. Consistent with the National Commission’s philosophy of consultation, tripartite standing committees have been established to deal with issues relating to standards development, research and the mining industry. Expert groups and reference groups may be established to provide advice to the standing committees on those issues with which the National Commission is concerned. i December 1995 PREFACE The following is a list of the Guidelines for Health Surveillance [NOHSC:7039(1995)] which are published as part of a series by the National Commission: • acrylonitrile; • inorganic arsenic; • asbestos; • benzene; • cadmium; • inorganic chromium; • inorganic lead; • creosote; • isocyanates; • inorganic mercury; • 4,4'-methylene bis (2-chloroaniline)
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Machinery and Equipment Safety
    Guide to machinery and equipment safety Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Consulting workers and workplace health and safety representatives ...................... 3 1. Key principles of machinery and equipment safety ............................................ 4 1.1 Mechanical hazards ................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Non-mechanical hazards ....................................................................................... 5 1.3 Access hazards ........................................................................................................ 6 Access.......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Risk control of machinery and equipment hazards ............................................. 9 2.1 Risk control of general hazards ........................................................................... 9 2.2 Risk control of mechanical hazards ................................................................. 10 Guarding .................................................................................................................................... 10 Other mechanical hazard risk control options ................................................................ 13 2.3 Risk control of non-mechanical hazards ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Individual Labour Disputes: a Comparative Overview
    Resolving Individual Labour Disputes A comparative overview Edited by Minawa Ebisui Sean Cooney Colin Fenwick Resolving individual labour disputes Resolving individual labour disputes: A comparative overview Edited by Minawa Ebisui, Sean Cooney and Colin Fenwick International Labour Office, Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2016 First published 2016 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. Ebisui, Minawa; Cooney, Sean; Fenwick, Colin F. Resolving individual labour disputes: a comparative overview / edited by Minawa Ebisui, Sean Cooney, Colin Fenwick ; International Labour Office. - Geneva: ILO, 2016. ISBN 978-92-2-130419-7 (print) ISBN 978-92-2-130420-3 (web pdf ) International Labour Office. labour dispute / labour dispute settlement / labour relations 13.06.6 ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • (GHG) Verification Guideline Series, Natural Gas-Fired Microturbine
    SRI/USEPA-GHG-GD-03 March 2002 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Verification Guideline Series Natural Gas-Fired Microturbine Electrical Generators Prepared by: Greenhouse Gas Technology Center Southern Research Institute Under a Cooperative Agreement With U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA REVIEW NOTICE This report has been peer and administratively reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. SRI/USEPA-GHG-GD-03 March 2002 Greenhouse Gas Technology Center A U.S. EPA Sponsored Environmental Technology Verification ( ) Organization Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Verification Guideline Series Natural Gas-Fired Microturbine Electrical Generators Prepared by: Greenhouse Gas Technology Center Southern Research Institute PO Box 13825 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA Telephone: 919/806-3456 FOREWORD The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has created the Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) program to facilitate the deployment of promising environmental technologies. Under this program, third-party performance testing of environmental technology is conducted by independent verification organizations under strict EPA quality assurance guidelines. Southern Research Institute (SRI) is one of six independent verification organizations operating under ETV, and operates the Greenhouse Gas Technology Center (GHG Center). With full participation from technology providers, purchasers, and other stakeholders, the GHG Center develops testing protocols and conducts technology performance evaluation in field and laboratory settings. The testing protocols are developed and peer­ reviewed with input from a broad group of industry, research, government, and other stakeholders. After their development, the protocols are field-tested, often improved, and then made available to interested users via Verification Guidelines such as this.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 Standards and Standards Organizations
    #24 Standards and Standards Organizations What are standards? Standards are documented agreements containing technical specifications or other precise criteria to be used consistently as rules, guidelines, or definitions of characteristics, to ensure that materials, products, processes and services are fit for their purpose. Therefore, International standards contribute to the reliability and effectiveness of the goods and services we use. ISO, International Organization for Standardization (The most widely recognized standards organization) ISO is a non-governmental organization established in 1947. The mission of ISO is to promote the development of standardization and related activities in the world with a view to facilitating the international exchange of goods and services, and to developing cooperation in the spheres of intellectual, scientific, technological and economic activity. ISO is comprised of three types of membership. 1. Member Body A specific national body most representative of standardization in its country. 2. Correspondent Member An organization in a country which does not yet have a fully developed national standards activity. 3. Subscriber Member In particular, countries with very small economies. The “Member Body” of ISO is comprised of over 95 countries that have established standard organizations. The Member Bodies along with the Correspondent Members and Subscriber Members all contribute to the work and development of a standard. Thus, ISO’s work results in international agreements, which are published as International Standards. Examples of Member Bodies are; from the United States the American National Standards Institute ANSI, from Canada the Standards Counsel of Canada SCC, from Italy the Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione UNI, from the United Kingdom the British Standards Institution BSI and from Germany the Deutsches Institut fur Normung DIN.
    [Show full text]
  • Apta Rt-Vim-S-017-03
    APTA STANDARDS DEVEL OPMENT PROGRAM APTA RT-VIM-S-017-03 Rev 2 STANDARD First Published September 28, 2003 American Public Transportation Association First Revision November 2, 2006 (Reaffirmed) 1300 I Street NW, Suite 1200 Second Revision January 6, 2015 (Reaffirmed) Washington, DC, 20005 Rail Transit Standards Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Working Group Calibration of Inspection and Maintenance Precision Measuring Devices and Tools Abstract: This Standard covers basic procedures for calibration of inspection and maintenance precision measuring devices and tools. Keywords: calibration, precision measuring device, tools Summary: This document establishes a standard for the calibration of precision measuring devices and tools used by vehicle maintenance departments within a rail transit system. Rail transit systems shall tailor this standard to accommodate their specific equipment and mode of operation. Scope and purpose: This standard, in combination with the ISO standard referenced, includes all essential periodic inspection and maintenance requirements for the calibration of precision measuring devices and tools used to inspect and maintain rail vehicles. This procedure covers all types of electronic test equipment, mechanical tools and measuring devices used to generate quantitative measurements and/or data. Calibration and certification is based on standards set by the National Institute of Science and Technology, original equipment manufacturers’ recommended calibration cycles, and a transit agency’s specifications. This standard is intended for use by the vehicle maintenance department within a rail transit system. It establishes procedures for the periodic calibration of inspection and maintenance of precision measuring devices and tools to ensure the accuracy of measurements obtained by these devices. This document represents a common viewpoint of those parties concerned with its provisions, namely operating/ planning agencies, manufacturers, consultants, engineers and general interest groups.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW ISO RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD Grant Purdy
    Society for Risk Analysis Wellington Meeting, 2009 RAISING THE STANDARD – THE NEW ISO RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARD Grant Purdy Associate Director, Broadleaf Capital International Chair, Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand Risk Management Committee, OB7 Nominated Expert, ISO Technical Management Board Risk Management Working Group 1 The New Standard It is 14 years since the first version of the Australian and New Zealand Risk Management Standards, AS/NZS 4360:1995, was published. It is now be replaced by a new international standard that in Australia will be called AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 and will be published on 27th October. AS/NZS 4360:2004 has been adopted throughout the world. Its widespread acceptance and the respect it has earned over the years are the main reasons that it was used as the first draft of the new ISO standard. The definition of risk in the new Standard is: the effect of uncertainty on objectives. The change in definition shifts the emphasis from, in AS/NZS 4360, ‘the event’ (something happens) to ‘the effect’ and, in particular, the effect on objectives. By way of illustration, risk isn’t the chance of the share market crashing but the chance that a crash will disrupt or affect you or your organisation’s objectives by, for example, limiting capital for expansion. Both the old and new definitions clearly place risk in the context of what an organisation wishes to achieve: its objectives. Risk arises because those objectives are pursued against an uncertain background. An organisation may set its objectives, but to achieve them it often has to contend with internal and external factors and influences it may not control and which generate uncertainty and thus risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property and Ict Standards in India
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ICT STANDARDS IN INDIA Authors: Dr. T. Ramakrishna (Professor of Law, National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bangalore, India) Dr. S. K. Murthy (Research Scholar at NLSIU, Bangalore, India), and Saurabh Malhotra (LLM (Warwick, UK), B.A, LLB (Hons.) (NLSIU, Bangalore, India)) Reviewed by Brad Biddle (Adjunct Professor at ASU Law and Standards Counsel at Intel Corporation, USA) Commissioned by the US National Academies of Science, Board of Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP), Project on Intellectual Property Management in standard setting processes 17 September 2012 Disclaimer: The opinion(s) expressed by the authors in this research paper is in their personal capacity as an individual and does not represent the opinion of the employers of the authors. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ICT STANDARDS IN INDIA Abstract The 2010 “Policy on Open Standards for e-Governance” launched India into the global debate over the definition of open standards. However, the story of standards in India is richer and broader than only the e-Governance policy. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is a standards development organization (SDO), which came into existence through an Act of the Indian parliament. Another important government SDO functioning, in the telecommunications domain, is the telecommunication engineering center (TEC), which was formed under the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) in India. In addition, there has been an increased effort tin setting up public-private partnership organizations for formulating standards focused on information and communications (ICT) standardization. Further, the Indian government has made important contributions on the topic of technical standards in connection with the World Trade Organization’s Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT).
    [Show full text]
  • AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk Management Process
    AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 - ISO/IEC 31010 & ISO Guide 73:2009 International Standards for the Management of Risk Kevin W Knight AM; CPRM; Hon FRMIA; FIRM (UK); LMRMIA. CHAIRMAN ISO PROJECT COMMITTEE 262 - RISK MANAGEMENT MEMBER STANDARDS AUSTRALIA / STANDARDS NEW ZEALAND JOINT TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OB/7 - RISK MANAGEMENT P 0 BOX 226, NUNDAH Qld 4012, Australia E-mail: [email protected] 06/12 Managing Risk • We all manage risk consciously or unconsciously - but rarely systematically • Managing risk means forward thinking • Managing risk means responsible thinking • Managing risk means balanced thinking • Managing risk is all about maximising opportunity and minimising threats • The risk management process provides a framework to facilitate more effective decision making History of the ISO and Risk Management • Over 80 separate ISO and IEC Technical Committees are addressing aspects of risk management • 27th June 2002, ISO/IEC Guide 73, Risk Management - Vocabulary‖ published. • 2004 ISO Technical Management Board (TMB) – approached by Australia and Japan – AS/NZS 4360:2004 to be adopted by ISO. • June 2005, TMB sets up Working Group (WG) • 15.11.2009 ISO 31000 & ISO Guide 73 published • 19.11.2009 AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 replaces AS/NZS 4360. • 27.11.2009 ISO/IEC 31010 published. Terms of Reference as approved by Technical Management Board • The WG provides a document which provides principles and practical guidance to the risk management process. • The document is applicable to all organizations, regardless of type, size, activities and location and should apply to all type of risk. Terms of Reference as approved by ISO TMB (Continued) The document should: • establish a common concept of a risk management process and related matters.
    [Show full text]
  • NIST Recommended Practice Guide : Particle Size Characterization
    NATL INST. OF, STAND & TECH r NIST guide PUBLICATIONS AlllOb 222311 ^HHHIHHHBHHHHHHHHBHI ° Particle Size ^ Characterization Ajit Jillavenkatesa Stanley J. Dapkunas Lin-Sien H. Lum Nisr National Institute of Specidl Standards and Technology Publication Technology Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 960 - 1 NIST Recommended Practice Gu Special Publication 960-1 Particle Size Characterization Ajit Jillavenkatesa Stanley J. Dapkunas Lin-Sien H. Lum Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory January 2001 U.S. Department of Commerce Donald L. Evans, Secretary Technology Administration Karen H. Brown, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology Karen H. Brown, Acting Director Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 960-1 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 960-1 164 pages (January 2001) CODEN: NSPUE2 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 2001 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: (202)512-1800 Fax: (202)512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Preface PREFACE Determination of particle size distribution of powders is a critical step in almost all ceramic processing techniques. The consequences of improper size analyses are reflected in poor product quality, high rejection rates and economic losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards Australia Submission 4
    SUBMISSION 4 STANDARDS AUSTRALIA Submission to Standing Committee on Economics, Finance and Public Administration Inquiry into the current and future directions of Australia's service industries CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. STANDARDS FOR SERVICES .............................................................................................2 Overview.........................................................................................................................2 Service Standards and Trade Agreements ....................................................................2 International Standards ..................................................................................................4 Regional Initiatives .........................................................................................................5 Initiatives by the European Union...................................................................................5 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE AUSTRALIAN SERVICE EXPORTS ....................................6 Current endeavours........................................................................................................6 Future actions.................................................................................................................6 Summary Australia's service exports were worth around $36 billion in 2005, with the USA being the largest consumer (12 percent), followed by the UK (11 percent), Japan (9 percent) then New Zealand,
    [Show full text]