DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Full Article in PDF Format

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Laure Desutter-Grandcolas ASSISTANTS DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Anne Mabille ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Anne Mabille COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : James Carpenter (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Maria Marta Cigliano (Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentine) Henrik Enghoff (NHMD, Copenhague, Danemark) Rafael Marquez (CSIC, Madrid, Espagne) Peter Ng (University of Singapore) Norman I. Platnick (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Jean-Yves Rasplus (INRA, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) Jean-François Silvain (IRD, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) Wanda M. Weiner (Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracovie, Pologne) John Wenzel (The Ohio State University, Columbus, États-Unis) COUVERTURE / COVER : Aerial view of Chukuchipann, inselberg located near the study area in the Mitaraka massif (photo: Xavier Desmier). In medallion: male of Pygidicrana bivittata Erichson, 1848. Zoosystema est indexé dans / Zoosystema is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI Alerting Services® – Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology, and Environmental Sciences® – Scopus® Zoosystema est distribué en version électronique par / Zoosystema is distributed electronically by: – BioOne® (http://www.bioone.org) Les articles ainsi que les nouveautés nomenclaturales publiés dans Zoosystema sont référencés par / Articles and nomenclatural novelties published in Zoosystema are referenced by: – ZooBank® (http://zoobank.org) Zoosystema est une revue en flux continu publiée par les Publications scientifiques du Muséum, Paris / Zoosystema is a fast track journal published by the Museum Science Press, Paris Les Publications scientifiques du Muséum publient aussi / The Museum Science Press also publish: Adansonia, Geodiversitas, Anthropozoologica, European Journal of Taxonomy, Naturae, Cryptogamie sous-sections Algologie, Bryologie, Mycologie. Diffusion – Publications scientifiques Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle CP 41 – 57 rue Cuvier F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Tél. : 33 (0)1 40 79 48 05 / Fax : 33 (0)1 40 79 38 40 [email protected] / http://sciencepress.mnhn.fr © Publications scientifiques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, 2020 ISSN (imprimé / print) : 1280-9551/ ISSN (électronique / electronic) : 1638-9387 Annotated checklist of the Dermaptera (Insecta) of French Guiana Christophe GIROD 42Q rue Gambetta, F-69740 Genas (France) [email protected] Danilo MATZKE D-04347 Leipzig, Stöckelstrasse 19 (Germany) [email protected] Submitted on 10 January 2018 | Accepted on 15 October 2019 | Published on 18 February 2020 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CEEF2677-1D01-4298-A0CF-3B05E1DEF92C Girod C. & Matzke D. 2020. — Annotated checklist of the Dermaptera (Insecta) of French Guiana, in Touroult J. (ed.), “Our Planet Reviewed” 2015 large-scale biotic survey in Mitaraka, French Guiana. Zoosystema 42 (4): 57-76. https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2020v42a4. http://zoosystema.com/42/4 ABSTRACT We establish the first checklist of the earwig species from French Guiana, updating previous works. This list comprises 49 species distributed in five families: PygidicranidaeVerhoeff, 1902, Forficuli- dae Stephens, 1829, Labiduridae Verhoeff, 1902, Spongiphoridae Verhoeff, 1902, Anisolabididae Verhoeff, 1902. Twenty-four species are cited for the first time from French Guiana and five species are only mentioned from bibliographical records. Three misidentified records are discarded. Spe- cies diversity in French Guiana is similar to neighboring countries and a few additional species will probably be found. Some poorly recorded species have been found, such as Cosmogerax araguensis KEY WORDS (Brindle 1974), Cosmogerax doesburgi Brindle 1982, Sarcinatrix quadrimaculata Brindle 1971, Doru French Guiana, Dermaptera, unicolor Brindle 1971, Purex surinamensis Brindle 1971, Spongiphora buprestoides (Kirby 1891). Purex formosus, Purex formosus Hebard 1920, described from French Guiana, has been rediscovered in the Mitaraka Mitaraka mountains, Neotropics, mountains and its female collected for the first time. We provide comments on some species and on a new records. few undetermined specimens and indicate some taxonomic challenges unresolved in French Guiana. RÉSUMÉ Liste commentée des Dermaptera (Insecta) de Guyane. Nous présentons la première liste des dermaptères de Guyane, mettant ainsi à jour les travaux anté- rieurs. Cette liste comprend 49 espèces, appartenant à cinq familles : Pygidicranidae Verhoeff, 1902, Forficulidae Stephens, 1829, Labiduridae Verhoeff, 1902, Spongiphoridae Verhoeff, 1902, Aniso- labididae Verhoeff, 1902. Vingt-quatre espèces sont mentionnées de Guyane pour la première fois. Cinq espèces ne sont citées que sur la base de données bibliographiques. Trois erreurs d’identification ou de répartition antérieures sont corrigées. La diversité spécifique de la Guyane est similaire à celle des pays voisins et quelques autres espèces seront probablement trouvées. Quelques espèces rarement collectées ont été trouvées, telles que Cosmogerax araguensis (Brindle 1974), Cosmogerax doesburgi MOTS CLÉS Guyane, Brindle 1982, Sarcinatrix quadrimaculata Brindle 1971, Doru unicolor Brindle 1971, Purex surina- Dermaptera, mensis Brindle 1971, Spongiphora buprestoides (Kirby 1891). Purex formosus Hebard 1920, décrit de Purex formosus, Guyane, a été redécouvert dans le massif du Mitaraka, et la femelle collectée pour la première fois. monts du Mitaraka, néotropiques, Nous commentons certaines de ces espèces et quelques spécimens indéterminés, et nous présentons signalisations nouvelles. les problèmes taxonomiques existants en Guyane. ZOOSYSTEMA • 2020 • 42 (4) © Publications scientifiques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.zoosystema.com 57 Girod C. & Matzke D. INTRODUCTION Specimens from the following museums have also been examined, either directly or by the mean of photographs of French Guiana is a French overseas territory located in the type specimens: Guiana Shield, that occupies 83 350 km2. It is mostly com- – Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris (MNHN): posed of primary tropical forests, but some savannas are also all specimens collected in French Guiana and stored at the present around the coast. This territory has been well studied museum, including holotypes of Purex formosus (Hebard, concerning vertebrates, but the invertebrates remain poorly 1920) and Paralabella chopardi (Hebard, 1920). known. Its insect diversity has been recently estimated at – Naturalis Museum, Leiden, The Netherlands (holotype 100 000 species (Brûlé & Touroult 2014). picture of Purex surinamensis) Dermaptera (earwigs) is a small insect order of about 2000 – Maracay Museum, Venezuela (holotypes pictures of Gerax species with a greater diversity in tropical regions, especially fuscum and Gerax lucidum). in South-East Asia and in the Neotropics (Popham 2000). In Pictures of type specimens of other species have also been Central and South America, species knowledge remains poor examined when available in Fabian Haas’ website (ww.earwigs- although several taxonomical and geographical accounts have online.de, no longer available). Location of type specimens been published between 1960 and 1980 mostly (Brindle 1968a, is indicated for each species, when known. b, 1971b, c, d, 1974, 1977, 1982; Reichardt 1968a, b, 1970, More than 1770 specimens have been studied so far among 1971). Many of the newly described species are known by a which 555 specimens are mentioned in the present paper. few specimens only. More recently, a few additional species The specimens are cited in the following way: town, precise have been described from South America (Anisyutkin 2014; location (with GPS coordinates when known), collecting Kamimura & Ferreira 2017). date, collector, number of specimens and storage collections. As a consequence, the species distributions are largely un- Pictures were taken with a Canon EOS1500D using Cap- known although biodiversity estimates have recently been ture One pro software. Digital images were then obtained by provided for nearly all countries (Haas 2018). using CombineZP software. In French Guiana, the only available works are that of Brin- The taxonomy and nomenclature follow the Dermaptera dle (1968b) and Hebard (1920) who cited 14 and 12 species, species file (HoPKins et al. 2013), with some minor changes respectively. The monographs of Steinmann (1986, 1989a, (Engel & Haas 2007; Srivastava 1999). The genera and spe- b, 1993) mentioned 25 species. More recently, Thouvenot cies are listed under their families. The municipalities where (2011) mentioned 15 species but did not establish any de- the species have been found are indicated. The taxonomical tailed checklist. informations are presented in the following way : city, exact We here establish a checklist of the Dermaptera of French place, date, leg. or coll., specimens number, collection or Guiana, based on recently collected material, with comments institution where the specimens is stored. on several interesting species. ABBREVIATIONS Private collections MateRIAL AND METHODS coll. CGIR Christophe Girod, Echalas; coll. DMAT Danilo Matzke, Leipzig; coll. PKOC Petr Kocarek, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic; We have had recently the opportunity to study a very large coll. YKAM Yoshitaka Kamimura, Keio University. amount of specimens, collected mostly between 2009 and 2015 in various parts of French Guiana. Most of the
Recommended publications
  • Insecta: Dermaptera) with a Check·List of Genera and Species

    Insecta: Dermaptera) with a Check·List of Genera and Species

    Rec. zool. Surv. India: 97 (Part-I) : 73-100, 1999 ON THE HIGHER CLASSIFICATION OF ANISOLABIDIDAE (INSECTA: DERMAPTERA) WITH A CHECK·LIST OF GENERA AND SPECIES G. K. SRIVASTAVA* Eastern Regional Station, Zoological Survey of Illdia, ShilJollg INTRODUCTION ~akai (1982) pointed out that family name Anisolabi( di)dae Verhoeff, 1902 has priority 6Verl~arcinophoridae Popham, 1965. Similarly the sub family Anisohibi(di)nae Zacher, 1911 baspriority overCarcinophorinae Hincks, 1954. Accordingly the former are used in the present work. A key for the discrimination of various subfamilies is given. The distinctive characters are based on various morphological character, mainly, on the body shape, shape of thoracic tergites, sternites and the male genitalia. It is proposed to erect a new subfamily Placolabidinae for the reception of Plac.:olabis Bey­ Bienko, 1959 as its type genus. This genus is very distinct from all t.he known genera of Anisolabidinae in having the median posterior prolongation of 8th sternite in males. Is·olaboidinae has been placed under this family by Srivastava (1996) which was transferred under Spongiphoridae (=Labidae) by Steinmann (1990). An attempt is made here to streamline the taxonomic status of various g~nera of AnisQlabidinae by providing akeyfortheirseparation. The main criteria fortheirdiscrilninatioll is based on the relative length of parameres besides its overall shape. The definition of various genera hOas been enlarged. The genera based on the shape of distal iobes and its associated stnlctures such as chiti nons accessory plates, shape and size of virga and the arrangement of teeth on chitinous pad may not prove t~ be stable characters since these vary intraspecifically.
  • Taxonomy of Iberian Anisolabididae (Dermaptera)

    Taxonomy of Iberian Anisolabididae (Dermaptera)

    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 63(1), pp. 29–43, 2017 DOI: 10.17109/AZH.63.1.29.2017 TAXONOMY OF IBERIAN ANISOLABIDIDAE (DERMAPTERA) Mario García-París Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSIC c/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006, Madrid. Spain. E-mail: [email protected] An update on the taxonomy and geographic distribution of Iberian Anisolabididae (Der- maptera) is provided. Former catalogues reported in the Iberian Peninsula three genera of Anisolabididae: Aborolabis, Anisolabis, and Euborellia. A revision of 487 specimens of Iberian and North African Anisolabidoidea permit to exclude the genus Aborolabis from the Iberian fauna, the re-assignation of inland Euborellia annulipes Iberian records to Euborellia moesta, and the exclusion of Aborolabis angulifera from Northwestern Africa. Examination of type materials of Aborolabis mordax and Aborolabis cerrobarjai allows to propose the treatment of A. cerrobarjai as a junior synonym of A. mordax. The diagnostic characters of Euborellia his- panica are included within the local variability found in E. moesta. I propose that E. hispanica should be treated as a junior synonym of E. moesta. Key words: earwigs, systematics, Mediterranean region, Spain, Morocco, NW Africa. INTRODUCTION The Iberian fauna of Dermaptera, including Anisolabididae Verhoeff, 1902, has been the subject of diverse revisionary (Bolívar 1876, 1897, Lapeira & Pascual 1980, Herrera Mesa 1980, Bivar de Sousa 1997) and compilatory works (Herrera Mesa 1999). These revisions together with the monograph of the Fauna of France (Albouy & Caussanel 1990) and the on-line information included in Fauna Europaea (Haas 2010), rendered the image of Dermaptera as a well known group in continental western Europe.
  • Phylogeny of Morphologically Modified Epizoic Earwigs Based on Molecular Evidence

    Phylogeny of Morphologically Modified Epizoic Earwigs Based on Molecular Evidence

    When the Body Hides the Ancestry: Phylogeny of Morphologically Modified Epizoic Earwigs Based on Molecular Evidence Petr Kocarek1*, Vaclav John2, Pavel Hulva2,3 1 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 2 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, 3 Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic Abstract Here, we present a study regarding the phylogenetic positions of two enigmatic earwig lineages whose unique phenotypic traits evolved in connection with ectoparasitic relationships with mammals. Extant earwigs (Dermaptera) have traditionally been divided into three suborders: the Hemimerina, Arixeniina, and Forficulina. While the Forficulina are typical, well-known, free-living earwigs, the Hemimerina and Arixeniina are unusual epizoic groups living on molossid bats (Arixeniina) or murid rodents (Hemimerina). The monophyly of both epizoic lineages is well established, but their relationship to the remainder of the Dermaptera is controversial because of their extremely modified morphology with paedomorphic features. We present phylogenetic analyses that include molecular data (18S and 28S ribosomal DNA and histone-3) for both Arixeniina and Hemimerina for the first time. This data set enabled us to apply a rigorous cladistics approach and to test competing hypotheses that were previously scattered in the literature. Our results demonstrate that Arixeniidae and Hemimeridae belong in the dermapteran suborder Neodermaptera, infraorder Epidermaptera, and superfamily Forficuloidea. The results support the sister group relationships of Arixeniidae+Chelisochidae and Hemimeridae+Forficulidae. This study demonstrates the potential for rapid and substantial macroevolutionary changes at the morphological level as related to adaptive evolution, in this case linked to the utilization of a novel trophic niche based on an epizoic life strategy.
  • 1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image

    1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image

    1. PaDIL Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Doru taeniatum (Dohrn, 1862) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae: Forficulinae) Common Name Earwig Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/maf-border/Pest/Main/140292 Image Library New Zealand Biosecurity Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/maf-border/ Partners for New Zealand Biosecurity image library Landcare Research — Manaaki Whenua http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/ MPI (Ministry for Primary Industries) http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/ 2. Species Information 2.1. Details Specimen Contact: MAF Plant Health & Environment Laboratory - [email protected] Author: MAF Plant Health & Environment Laboratory Citation: MAF Plant Health & Environment Laboratory (2010) Earwig(Doru taeniatum)Updated on 3/23/2014 Available online: PaDIL - http://www.padil.gov.au Image Use: Free for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY- NC 4.0) 2.2. URL Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/maf-border/Pest/Main/140292 2.3. Facets Groups: Earwigs Commodity Overview: Horticulture Commodity Type: Mango Status: NZ - Exotic Pest Status: 0 Unknown Distribution: 0 Unknown Host Family: 0 Unknown 2.4. Other Names Apterygida taeniata Bormans & Krauss, 1900 Forficula californica Dohrn, 1865 Forficula exilis Scudder, 1876 Forficula taeniata Dohrn, 1862 Sphingolabis californica Bormans, 1893 2.5. Diagnostic Notes **Adult** General colour deep black and bright yellow; 4th antennal segment more than twice as long as broad; pronotum transverse; tegmina and wings always fully developed; tegminae yellow with brown inner margins; hindwings visible beyond tegminae; 2nd tarsal segments dilated and much wider than 3rd, extending conspicuously beneath 3rd. Male pygidium elongate, posteriorly produced into a spine. Forceps typical, slightly arcuate; widely seperated at base.
  • Download Article (PDF)

    Download Article (PDF)

    46 Rec. zool. Sura. India Genus. Acrania Burr, 1915 Distribution: INDIA (Tamil Nadu, Himachal 1915. Acrania Burr. J.R. micro Soc., 1915: 432, 436 (Type­ Pradesh, West Bengal and Kashmir). Pygidicrana picta Guerin-Meneville) Elsewhere: Pakistan, Uganda and Zaire. 1993. Acrania; Srivastava, Rec. zool. Sura. India, 92(1-4): 44. Remarks : This species is recorded for the first time from Kashmir. 3. Acrania fletcheri (Bharadwaj and Kapoor, 1967) 5. Euborellia annulata (Fabricius, 1793) 1967. Cranopygia jletcheri Bharadwaj and Kapoor, Bull. Ent.,8(2) : 1(0"; India: Meghalaya; Shillong, 5000 1793. Forficula annulata Fabricius, Ent. Syst., II : 4 (sex; ft.) Americae meridionale). 1914. Kalocrania picta (nec.Guerin-Meneville); Burr, Rec. 1867. Anisolabis stali; Scudder, Proc. Boston soc. Nat. Hist., Indian Mus., 8(2): 136 (lO",l~, Kobo). 18: 308. 1993. Acrania jletcheri; Srivastava, Rec. zool. Sura. India, 1910. Borellia stali Burr, Fauna of British India, Dermaptera: 92(1-4): 45. 88. Material examined: INDIA: Manipur: Imphal, Material Examined : INDIA: Chennai, Elliots 16 miles North on Dimapur Road, Alt., 3500 ft., Beach, Radio Station, 10", 18.9.1961. 14.x.1945 (Major M.L. Roonwal). Measurements: (in mm): Male Measurements: (in mm): Male Length of body 10mm Length of body 20 Forceps l.5mm. Length of forceps 5.5 Distribution : INDIA (Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Distribution: INDIA: Meghalaya, (Shillong and Karnataka, Maharashtra, Orissa, West Bengal, Manipur) (Imphal district). Manipur and Lakshadweep islands). Elsewhere: Not yet recorded. Elsewhere: Sri Lanka, Pakistan and China. Remarks : It is reported for the first time from Sub family BRACHYLABIDINAE the state of Manipur. Genus Metisolabis Burr, 1910 Super family ANISOLABOIDEA 1910.
  • Great Pleasure Therefore, C. GEIJSKES, of the Rijksmuseum Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Large and Interesting Dermaptera from S

    Great Pleasure Therefore, C. GEIJSKES, of the Rijksmuseum Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Large and Interesting Dermaptera from S

    STUDIES ON THE FAUNA OF SURINAME AND OTHER GUYANAS: No. 36. The Dermaptera of Surinam and other Guyanas by A. Brindle (Manchester Museum) The Dermaptera of the northern part ofSouth America havebeen little studied. The Dermaptera fauna of Columbia and Ecuador to the east of this region has been investigated to some extent, but ofthis order fromthe western indeed. records countries are very sparse Prior to BOESEMAN (1954) only two species were known from Surinam, whilst 10 species have been recorded from Guyana, and 13 species fromFrench Guiana. These totals obviously represent only a very small proportion of the true fauna, and BOESEMAN (1954) from the total recorded a further 9 species Surinam, so bringing known species from all the Guyanas to 26. It that the kind- was with very great pleasure therefore, through ness of Dr. D. C. GEIJSKES, of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke I have been able examine and Historie, Leiden, to a large very interesting collection of Dermaptera from Surinam, most of the specimens having been collected by Dr. GEIJSKES during the years 1938 to 1964. The collection contains 237 specimens of 33 species, 7 of which and described in the are new are present paper. Including these new species the collection includes 15 species not previously known from the Guyanas, and the present total of Dermaptera from these countries is now 41. Although the present paper is mainly a report of the collection from Surinam, all previous records from Surinam and the other Guyanas are included, so that it presents a complete survey of the Dermaptera of the Guyanas as far as this is yet known.
  • (Insecta: Dermaptera) with a Check-List of Genera and Species

    (Insecta: Dermaptera) with a Check-List of Genera and Species

    Rec. zool. Surv. India: 97 (Part-I) : 73-100, 1999 ON THE HIGHER CLASSIFICATION OF ANISOLABIDIDAE (INSECTA: DERMAPTERA) WITH A CHECK·LIST OF GENERA AND SPECIES G. K. SRIVASTAVA* Eastern Regional Station, Zoological Survey of Illdia, ShilJollg INTRODUCTION ~akai (1982) pointed out that family name Anisolabi( di)dae Verhoeff, 1902 has priority 6Verl~arcinophoridae Popham, 1965. Similarly the sub family Anisohibi(di)nae Zacher, 1911 baspriority overCarcinophorinae Hincks, 1954. Accordingly the former are used in the present work. A key for the discrimination of various subfamilies is given. The distinctive characters are based on various morphological character, mainly, on the body shape, shape of thoracic tergites, sternites and the male genitalia. It is proposed to erect a new subfamily Placolabidinae for the reception of Plac.:olabis Bey­ Bienko, 1959 as its type genus. This genus is very distinct from all t.he known genera of Anisolabidinae in having the median posterior prolongation of 8th sternite in males. Is·olaboidinae has been placed under this family by Srivastava (1996) which was transferred under Spongiphoridae (=Labidae) by Steinmann (1990). An attempt is made here to streamline the taxonomic status of various g~nera of AnisQlabidinae by providing akeyfortheirseparation. The main criteria fortheirdiscrilninatioll is based on the relative length of parameres besides its overall shape. The definition of various genera hOas been enlarged. The genera based on the shape of distal iobes and its associated stnlctures such as chiti nons accessory plates, shape and size of virga and the arrangement of teeth on chitinous pad may not prove t~ be stable characters since these vary intraspecifically.
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
  • Earwigs from Brazilian Caves, with Notes on the Taxonomic and Nomenclatural Problems of the Dermaptera (Insecta)

    Earwigs from Brazilian Caves, with Notes on the Taxonomic and Nomenclatural Problems of the Dermaptera (Insecta)

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 713: 25–52 (2017) Cave-dwelling earwigs of Brazil 25 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.713.15118 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Earwigs from Brazilian caves, with notes on the taxonomic and nomenclatural problems of the Dermaptera (Insecta) Yoshitaka Kamimura1, Rodrigo L. Ferreira2 1 Department of Biology, Keio University, 4-1-1 Hiyoshi, Yokohama 223-8521, Japan 2 Center of Studies in Subterranean Biology, Biology Department, Federal University of Lavras, CEP 37200-000 Lavras (MG), Brazil Corresponding author: Yoshitaka Kamimura ([email protected]) Academic editor: Y. Mutafchiev | Received 17 July 2017 | Accepted 19 September 2017 | Published 2 November 2017 http://zoobank.org/1552B2A9-DC99-4845-92CF-E68920C8427E Citation: Kamimura Y, Ferreira RL (2017) Earwigs from Brazilian caves, with notes on the taxonomic and nomenclatural problems of the Dermaptera (Insecta). ZooKeys 713: 25–52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.713.15118 Abstract Based on samples collected during surveys of Brazilian cave fauna, seven earwig species are reported: Cy- lindrogaster cavernicola Kamimura, sp. n., Cylindrogaster sp. 1, Cylindrogaster sp. 2, Euborellia janeirensis, Euborellia brasiliensis, Paralabellula dorsalis, and Doru luteipes, as well as four species identified to the (sub) family level. To date, C. cavernicola Kamimura, sp. n. has been recorded only from cave habitats (but near entrances), whereas the other four organisms identified at the species level have also been recorded from non-cave habitats. Wings and female genital structures of Cylindrogaster spp. (Cylindrogastrinae) are examined for the first time. The genital traits, including the gonapophyses of the 8th abdominal segment shorter than those of the 9th segement, and venation of the hind wings of Cylindrogastrinae correspond to those of the members of Diplatyidae and not to Pygidicranidae.
  • Dermaptera (Insecta), Identified by A. Brindle and Preserved in the Collections of the National Museum of Natural History (Sofia)

    Dermaptera (Insecta), Identified by A. Brindle and Preserved in the Collections of the National Museum of Natural History (Sofia)

    Historia naturalis bulgarica, 21: 211-213, 2015 Dermaptera (Insecta), identified by A. Brindle and preserved in the collections of the National Museum of Natural History (Sofia) Petar Beron Abstract: The National Museum of Natural history in Sofia stores a collection of 30 species of earwigs (Dermaptera) from Nepal, Sri Lanka, Nigeria and other countries, identified by A. Brindle 30 years ago. Many other Dermaptera (unidentified) are also housed at the museum. Key Words: Dermaptera, Museum, Nepal, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Brindle In the 1970s I contacted Dr. Alan Brindle Sardinia, North Korea, Vietnam, the Dominican (Manchester) who agreed to identify the collection Republic, Peru, Brazil, Bolivia, Papua New Guinea, of Dermaptera, brought by me from many countries DR Congo, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, (Nigeria, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Canary Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda, Sudan, and the Balkan Islands, Tanzania, DR Congo, Nepal, Burma, countries. This list does not include the entire Thailand, Sri Lanka, Bolivia, Brazil, Peru, Papua Dermaptera material of the Museum, as there are New Guinea and others) and preserved now in the also many earwigs from Bulgaria and the Balkans National Museum of Natural History in Sofia. Dr. identified by other specialists. Brindle (1915 – 2001) was one of the leading world As the identifications by Dr. Brindle were done specialists in Dermaptera. Despite his retirement in by 1985, I tried to actualize the names taking into 1982, he tried to work also on part of our collection account the changes meanwhile. and returned most of the material in Sofia. He Abbreviations: P.B. – Petar Beron, S.A. – Stoitse published one new species from Nigeria (Diplatys Andreev, V.B.
  • THE EARWIGS of CALIFORNIA (Order Dermaptera)

    THE EARWIGS of CALIFORNIA (Order Dermaptera)

    BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 20 THE EARWIGS OF CALIFORNIA (Order Dermaptera) BY ROBERT L. LANGSTON and J. A. POWELL UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS THE EARWIGS OF CALIFORNIA (Order Dermaptera) BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 20 THE EARWIGS OF CALIFORNIA (Order Dermaptera) BY ROBERT L. LANGSTON and J. A. POWELL UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY LOS ANGELES LONDON 1975 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Advisory Editors: H. V. Daly, J. A. Powell; J. N. Belkin, R. M. Bohart, R. L. Doutt, D. P. Furman, J. D. Pinto, E. I. Schlinger, R. W. Thorp VOLUME 20 Approved for publication September 20,1974 Issued August 15, 1975 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS, LTD. LONDON, ENGLAND ISBN 0-520-09524-3 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 74-22940 0 1975 BY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONTENTS Introduction .................................................. 1 California fauna ............................................. 1 Biology ................................................... 1 History of establishment and spread of introduced species in California ........ 2 Analysis of data ............................................. 4 Acknowledgments ............................................ 4 Systematic Treatment Classification ............................................... 6 Key to California species ........................................ 6 Anisolabis maritima (Ght5) ...................................
  • The Potential of Chrysoperla Rufilabris and Doru Taeniatum As Agents For

    The Potential of Chrysoperla Rufilabris and Doru Taeniatum As Agents For

    Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 98: 353–359, 2001. 353 © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. The potential of Chrysoperla rufilabris and Doru taeniatum as agents for dispersal of Spodoptera frugiperda nucleopolyhedrovirus in maize Vasty Castillejos1,LuisGarc´ıa1, Juan Cisneros1, Dave Goulson2, Ronald D. Cave3,Primi- tivo Caballero4 & Trevor Williams1;∗ 1ECOSUR, Tapachula 30700, Chiapas, Mexico; 2Biology Department, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7PX, UK; 3Escuela Agr´ıcola Panamericana, El Zamorano, Honduras; 4Dept. Producci´on Agraria, Universidad P´ublica de Navarra, Pamplona 31006, Spain; ∗Author for correspondence (Fax: Mex(52) 962 81015; E-mail: [email protected]) Accepted: October 17, 2000 Key words: search time, prey consumption, Neuroptera, Dermaptera, Lepidoptera, baculovirus, virus dispersal Abstract The behaviour of two abundant predators in Mesoamerican maize crops, Chrysoperla rufilabris larvae and Doru taeniatum adults, towards healthy and nucleopolyhedrovirus-infected Spodoptera frugiperda larvae was compared. C. rufilabris did not discriminate between healthy and virus-infected prey, although the mean search time was approximately two times longer towards virus-infected larvae. In contrast, D. taeniatum directed a greater propor- tion of their attacks towards virus-infected prey but there was no significant difference in the search time. Prey consumption time did not differ significantly for each type of prey by either predator, although prey consumption was much faster in D. taeniatum. Viable virus was detected in D. taeniatum faeces up to 3 d after feeding on infected S. frugiperda larvae, whereas virus was inactivated in the gut of C. rufilabris. Both predators were shown to have acidic guts. A field experiment demonstrated that D.