Homework Not Getting Done on Park Tax Proposal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys
Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys Sara Sun Beale* The reputation and credibility of the Department of Justice were badly tarnished during the Bush administration. This article focuses on concerns regarding the role of partisan politics.1 Critics charge that during the Bush administration improper partisan political considerations pervasively influenced a wide range of decisions including the selection of immigration judges, summer interns and line attorneys; the assignment of career attorneys to particular details; the evaluation of the performance of United States Attorneys; and the decision whether and when to file charges in cases with political ramifications. The Inspector General’s lengthy and highly critical reports have substantiated some of these charges.2 The first two Inspector General (IG) Reports found that the Department improperly used political criteria in hiring and assigning some immigration judges, interns, and career prosecutors.3 The third report * Charles L.B. Lowndes Professor, Duke Law School, Durham, N.C. I would like to acknowledge the outstanding research assistance provided by Michael Devlin, Meghan Ferguson, Amy Taylor, and Molly Brownfield, and the helpful comments of Norman Abrams, Albert Alschuler, Rachel Barkow, Anthony Barkow, Candace Carroll, Colm Connolly, Ronald Goldstock, Bruce Green, Lisa Kern Griffin, James Jacobs, Susan Klein, Daniel Richman, and Adam Safwat. Of course any errors are my own. 1 Other serious concerns about the Department have been raised, particularly in connection with its role in the war on terror. For example, the Department has been the subject of intense criticism for legal analysis that led to the authorization of brutal interrogation techniques for detainees. -
Paradoxical Pop-Ups: Why Are They Difficult to Catch? Michael K
Paradoxical pop-ups: Why are they difficult to catch? Michael K. McBeath Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287 ͒ Alan M. Nathana Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 A. Terry Bahill Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 David G. Baldwin P. O. Box 190, Yachats, Oregon 97498 ͑Received 20 September 2007; accepted 9 May 2008͒ Professional baseball players occasionally find it difficult to gracefully approach seemingly routine pop-ups. We describe a set of towering pop-ups with trajectories that exhibit cusps and loops near the apex. For a normal fly ball the horizontal velocity continuously decreases due to drag caused by air resistance. For pop-ups the Magnus force is larger than the drag force. In these cases the horizontal velocity initially decreases like a normal fly ball, but after the apex, the Magnus force accelerates the horizontal motion. We refer to this class of pop-ups as paradoxical because they appear to misinform the typically robust optical control strategies used by fielders and lead to systematic vacillation in running paths, especially when a trajectory terminates near the fielder. Former major league infielders confirm that our model agrees with their experiences. © 2008 American Association of Physics Teachers. ͓DOI: 10.1119/1.2937899͔ I. INTRODUCTION The frequency of pop-ups in the major leagues—an aver- age of nearly five pop-ups per game2—is sufficiently large Baseball has a rich tradition of misjudged pop-ups. For that teams provide considerable pop-up practice for infielders example, on April, 1961, Roy Sievers of the Chicago White and catchers. -
Unofficial Transcript
1 RPTS JOHNSON DCMN BURRELL COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WASHINGTON, D.C. UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT INTERVIEW OF: KARL C. ROVE Tuesday, July 7, 2009 Washington, D.C. The interview in the above matter was held at 2138 Conference Room, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 9:00 a.m. 2 Appearances: For COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: ADAM B. SCHIFF, MAJORITY MEMBER J. RANDY FORBES, MINORITY MEMBER ELLIOT MINCBERG, MAJORITY CHIEF COUNSEL - INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT ERIC TAMARKIN, MAJORITY COUNSEL SAM BRODERICK-SOKOL, MAJORITY OVERSIGHT COUNSEL PHIL TAHTAKRAN, LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR FOR CONGRESSMAN SCHIFF DANIEL M. FLORES, CHIEF MINORITY COUNSEL, SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW RICHARD ALAN HERTLING, REPUBLICAN DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF/POLICY DIRECTOR CRYSTAL ROBERTS JEZIERSKI, REPUBLICAN CHIEF OVERSIGHT COUNSEL ZACHARY N. SOMERS, MINORITY COUNSEL WILL HUPMAN, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT FOR CONGRESSMAN FORBES 3 For MR. ROVE: ROBERT D. LUSKIN, ESQ. KATIE BIBER, ESQ. Patton Boggs LLP Attorneys at Law 2550 M Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037-1350 For FORMER PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY: EMMET T. FLOOD, ESQ. Attorney at Law Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 For WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL'S OFFICE: JASON GREEN, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL CHRIS WEIDEMAN, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL BLAKE ROBERTS, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL For JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: 4 JOHN R. TYLER, CIVIL DIVISION 5 Mr. Schiff. We are here this morning for a transcribed interview of former White House official Karl Rove, pursuant to the March 4th, 2009 Agreement of Accommodation between the House Judiciary Committee and the former Bush administration. Mr. Rove, please state your full name and address for the record. -
An Investigation Into the Removal of Nine U.S
U.S. Department of Justice An Investigation into the Removal of Nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006 U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Office of Professional Responsibility September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 I. Methodology of the Investigation ....................................................... 2 II. Organization of this Report ............................................................... 4 CHAPTER TWO BACKGROUND.................................................................. 7 I. U.S. Attorneys .................................................................................. 7 II. Selection of U.S. Attorneys................................................................ 8 III. Department Evaluation and Interaction with U.S. Attorneys ............. 9 IV. Backgrounds of Department Officials.............................................. 10 A. Alberto Gonzales ................................................................... 11 B. Kyle Sampson ....................................................................... 11 C. Monica Goodling ................................................................... 11 D. Paul McNulty ........................................................................ 12 E. Michael Elston ...................................................................... 12 F. David Margolis ...................................................................... 13 G. William Mercer ..................................................................... -
Baseball World Series Game Tickets and Programs
Baseball World Series Game Tickets and Programs TICKETS 1931 World Series Cardinals at Athletics - Game 5 Ticket Stub Pepper Martin HR [VG-EX] PSA AUTH [Grades Very Good - Excellent, only minor edge and corner wear] 1935 World Series Tigers at Cubs - Game 5 Ticket Stub HR Chuck Klein WP Len Warneke PSA AUTH [Grades clean VgEx] 1936 World Series Giants at Yankees - Game 5 Ticket Stub NYG 5-4 (10) HR Selkirk PSA AUTH [Grades GOOD, creasing, surface wear, sl paper loss on rev corner] 1939 World Series Yankees at Reds - Game 3 Ticket Stub HR Joe DiMaggio, Bill Dickey [VG] PSA AUTH [Grades VG due to rough tear line] 1942 World Series Cardinals at Yankees - Game 5 Ticket Stub HR Phil Rizzuto Red Ruffing vs Johnny Beazley [G-VG] PSA AUTH [Grades G-VG due to rough tear line] 1942 World Series Cardinals at Yankees - Game 5 Ticket Stub HR Phil Rizzuto Yankees Win World Series PSA AUTH [Grades F-G; creasing] 1943 World Series Cardinals at Yankees - Game 2 Ticket Stub HR Marty Marion SP Walker Cooper PSA AUTH [Grades G-VG, minor creasing, rough tear line] 1949 World Series Yankees at Dodgers - Game 3 Ticket Stub HR Roy Campanella, Pee Wee Reese WP Joe Page [VG] PSA AUTH [Light creasing, displays much nicer] 1950 World Series Phillies at Yankees - Game 3 Ticket Stub NY 3-2 Ferrick vs Meyer PSA AUTH [Grades F/G; uneven tear line, creasing] 1952 World Series Dodgers at Yankees - Game 3 Ticket Stub BRK 5-3 HR Yogi Berra, Johnny Mize WP Preacher Roe PSA AUTH [Fair-Good; Vertical crease, sl paper loss, toning on reverse] 1952 World Series Dodgers at Yankees -
First Day Covers
Name Postmark and Theme Rarity 500 Home Run Club-Mantle, Williams & More 500 HR Club with 13 Signatures-Stamped Twice-2/14/89 RARE Tom Seaver First No-Hitter 6/16/78 100 MADE! RARE Ryne Sandberg/Pete Rose Managerial Debut 8/17/84 RARE Joseph W. Sewell 1920 World Series 10/12/85 RARE Elmer Smith 1920 World Series 10/12/85 RARE George Uhle 1920 World Series 10/12/85 RARE Bill Wambsganss 1920 World Series 10/12/85 RARE Joe Wood 1920 World Series 10/12/85 RARE Florida Marlins Opening Day 9 Signatures from Team Members-4/5/93 Cal Ripken Jr. 2,131 GAMES 651/2131 (With Gehrig Stamp)-9/6/95 RARE Magic Johnson Coaching Debut-3/27/94 Nolan Ryan Last Game-9/22/93 RARE Nolan Ryan 5,714 Strikeouts-9/17/93 Mark Whiten Four Home Runs-9/8/93 Magic Johnson All-Star MVP 2/9/92 Ted Williams 50th Anniversary of Batting .400 9/28/91 RARE Bob Cousy & Bill Sharman Backcourt Duo 8/28/91 Larry Bird 100TH Anniversary 8/28/91 Bob Forsch RARE! No-Hitter 4/16/78 (Inlcudes No-Hitter Ticket Stub!!) EXTREMELY RARE 101 MADE Bert Blyleven 3,000 Strikeouts 8/1/86 Wally Joyner Rookie Selection 7/15/86 Rusty Staub "THANKS RUSTY" Day 7/13/86 Rusty Staub REFLECTIONS 7/13/86 Bob Horner 4 HOME RUNS 7/6/86 Don Sutton and Phil Niekro Pitching Duel 6/28/86 Don Sutton 300 WINS 6/18/86 Roger Clemens 20 STRIKEOUTS Clemens adds "20K" 4/29/86 Bret Saberhagen GAME 7 1985 WORLD SERIES 10/27/85 Charlie Leibrandt GAME 6 1985 WORLD SERIES 10/26/85 RARE Willie Wilson GAME 5 1985 WORLD SERIES 10/24/85 Reggie Jackson Mr. -
Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Duke Law Scholarship Repository Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys Sara Sun Beale* The reputation and credibility of the Department of Justice were badly tarnished during the Bush administration. This article focuses on concerns regarding the role of partisan politics.1 Critics charge that during the Bush administration improper partisan political considerations pervasively influenced a wide range of decisions including the selection of immigration judges, summer interns and line attorneys; the assignment of career attorneys to particular details; the evaluation of the performance of United States Attorneys; and the decision whether and when to file charges in cases with political ramifications. The Inspector General’s lengthy and highly critical reports have substantiated some of these charges.2 The first two Inspector General (IG) Reports found that the Department improperly used political criteria in hiring and assigning some immigration judges, interns, and career prosecutors.3 The third report * Charles L.B. Lowndes Professor, Duke Law School, Durham, N.C. I would like to acknowledge the outstanding research assistance provided by Michael Devlin, Meghan Ferguson, Amy Taylor, and Molly Brownfield, and the helpful comments of Norman Abrams, Albert Alschuler, Rachel Barkow, Anthony Barkow, Candace Carroll, Colm Connolly, Ronald Goldstock, Bruce Green, Lisa Kern Griffin, James Jacobs, Susan Klein, Daniel Richman, and Adam Safwat. Of course any errors are my own. 1 Other serious concerns about the Department have been raised, particularly in connection with its role in the war on terror. For example, the Department has been the subject of intense criticism for legal analysis that led to the authorization of brutal interrogation techniques for detainees. -
The Chicago Cubs from 1945: History’S Automatic Out
Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum Volume 6 Issue 1 Spring 2016 Article 10 April 2016 The Chicago Cubs From 1945: History’s Automatic Out Harvey Gilmore Monroe College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pipself Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Harvey Gilmore, The Chicago Cubs From 1945: History’s Automatic Out, 6 Pace. Intell. Prop. Sports & Ent. L.F. 225 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pipself/vol6/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Chicago Cubs From 1945: History’s Automatic Out Abstract Since 1945, many teams have made it to the World Series and have won. The New York Yankees, Philadelphia/Oakland Athletics, and St. Louis Cardinals have won many. The Boston Red Sox, Chicago White Sox, and San Francisco Giants endured decades-long dry spells before they finally won the orldW Series. Even expansion teams like the New York Mets, Toronto Blue Jays, Kansas City Royals, and Florida Marlins have won multiple championships. Other expansion teams like the San Diego Padres and Texas Rangers have been to the Fall Classic multiple times, although they did not win. Then we have the Chicago Cubs. The Cubs have not been to a World Series since 1945, and have not won one since 1908. -
An Empirical Investigation of the US Attorney Firings in 2006
School of Economic, Political and Policy Studies Haphazard, Systematic, or Both? An Empirical Investigation of the US Attorney Firings in 2006 UT Dallas Author(s): Banks Miller Rights: ©2018 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved. Citation: Miller, Banks and Brett Curry, "Haphazard, Systematic, or Both? An Empirical Investigation of the US Attorney Firings in 2006," Journal of Law and Courts 6, no. 2 (Fall 2018): 379-403. This document is being made freely available by the Eugene McDermott Library of the University of Texas at Dallas with permission of the copyright owner. All rights are reserved under United States copyright law unless specified otherwise. Haphazard, Systematic, or Both? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE US ATTORNEY FIRINGS IN 2006 BANKS MILLER, University of Texas at Dallas BRETT CURRY, Georgia Southern University ABSTRACT In 2006, the Bush administration directed nine US attorneys to resign. This decision was a partial cause of the attorney general’s departure from the administration, and it prompted investigations and congressional hearings. Seen as largely ad hoc, we argue that theory predicts a more systematic decision-making process. We investigate this empirically and find, consistent with literature on principal-agent theories and bureau- cracy, that performance on easily monitored metrics and adverse-selection concerns predict the firings. We explore the implications of these findings for efforts to centralize decision-making in the Department of Justice and to exert political control over US attorneys. As the federal government’s principal litigators, US attorneys (USAs) occupy a central role in the justice system. -
Kansas City Royals
Kansas City Royals OFFICIAL GAME NOTES Kansas City Royals (1-0) @ Baltimore Orioles (0-1) Oriole Park at Camden Yards - Saturday, October 11, 2014 American League Championship Series - Game #2 TBS, KCSP Radio (610 Sports) & ESPN Radio UPCOMING SCHEDULE Sunday, October 12: Off day in Kansas City (Royals work out at 2 p.m.) Game #3 - Monday, October 13 vs. Baltimore Orioles: TBA vs. TBA, 7:07 p.m. (CDT), TBS, ESPN Radio & 610 Sports Game #4 - Tuesday, October 14 vs. Baltimore Orioles: TBA vs. TBA, 7:07 p.m. (CDT), TBS, ESPN Radio & 610 Sports Game #5 (if necessary) - Wednesday, October 15 vs. Baltimore Orioles: TBA vs. TBA, 3:07 p.m. (CDT), TBS, ESPN Radio & 610 Sports Thursday, October 16 -- Travel Day to Baltimore (if necessary) -- Media availability will be announced at a later date Game #6 (if necessary) - Friday, October 17 @ Baltimore Orioles: TBA vs. TBA, 7:07 p.m. (CDT), TBS, ESPN Radio & 610 Sports Game #7 (if necessary) - Saturday, October 18 vs. Baltimore Orioles: TBA vs. TBA, 7:07 p.m. (CDT), TBS, ESPN Radio & 610 Sports This series is being broadcast on KCSP Radio (610 Sports) and the Royals Radio Network with Royals’ Hall of Famer Denny Matthews, Ryan Lefebvre, Steve Physioc and Steve Stewart, while Don Free controls the dials as the producer/engineer...the ALCS is being televised nationally on TBS with Ernie Johnson Jr., Cal Ripken Jr., Ron Darling and Matt Winer...every game is also being broadcast nationally on ESPN Radio with Jon “Boog” Sciambi and Chris Singleton. THE 2014 KANSAS CITY ROYALS POST-SEASON GUIDE IS AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT MLBPRESSBOX.COM Royals vs. -
The Justice Department's Voter Fraud Scandal
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S VOTER FRAUD SCANDAL: LESSONS Adam Gitlin and Wendy R. Weiser Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice. We work to hold our political institutions and laws accountable to the twin American ideals of democracy and equal justice for all. The Center’s work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from ending mass incarceration to preserving Constitutional protection in the fight against terrorism. Part think tank, part advocacy group, part cutting-edge communications hub, we start with rigorous research. We craft innovative policies. And we fight for them — in Congress and the states, the courts, and in the court of public opinion. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S DEMOCRACY PROGRAM The Brennan Center’s Democracy Program works to repair the broken systems of American democracy. We encourage broad citizen participation by promoting voting and campaign finance reform. We work to secure fair courts and to advance a First Amendment jurisprudence that puts the rights of citizens — not special interests — at the center of our democracy. We collaborate with grassroots groups, advocacy organizations, and government officials to eliminate the obstacles to an effective democracy. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S PUBLICATIONS Red cover | Research reports offer in-depth empirical findings. Blue cover | Policy proposals offer innovative, concrete reform solutions. White cover | White papers offer a compelling analysis of a pressing legal or policy issue. -
Train Wreck at the Justice Department: an Eyewitness Account
Train Wreck at the Justice Department: An Eyewitness Account John McKay † In a series of early morning phone calls on December 7, 2006, seven United States Attorneys were ordered to resign. Despite initial denials, it would later be revealed that two other U.S. Attorneys had also been ordered to submit their resignations, bringing the total number to nine. Each was given no explanation for the dismissal and most were led to believe that they alone were being dismissed, raising the specter of unstated wrongdoing and encouraging silent departures. Those dis- missed uniformly cited the maxim that they “served at the pleasure of the President” and most sought to avoid publicly disputing the Justice De- partment or the White House. So what happened? Why were the nine dismissed? Were political considerations allowed to trump the proud heritage of non-partisan, inde- pendent prosecutions in a Justice Department widely trusted as the guardian of civil rights? Did the White House or senior Justice Depart- ment officials direct the removal of U.S. Attorneys for failing to satisfy local partisans or to retaliate for certain public corruption prosecutions? Have officials lied to cover up wrongdoing and to avoid criminal prose- cution? Can the damage to the Justice Department be undone, restoring the role of federal prosecutors as disdainful of politics and devoted to accountability, fairness, and the firm execution of the nation’s laws? These questions were the subject of a public forum on May 9, 2007, sponsored by Seattle University School of Law, and serve in part as the basis for this Article by one of the participants of the forum (and a fired U.S.