ME 510 – Gas Dynamics Final Exam Spring 2009 NAME

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ME 510 – Gas Dynamics Final Exam Spring 2009 NAME ME 510 – Gas Dynamics Final Exam Spring 2009 NAME: 1. (20 pts total – 2pts each) - Circle the most correct answer for the following questions. i. A normal shock propagated into still air travels with a speed (a) equal to the speed of sound in the still air (b) larger than the speed of sound in the still air (c) smaller than the speed of sound in the still air (d) all of the above are possible, depending on the air temperature ii. A perfect gas enters a frictionless, insulated passage with a supersonic speed. It is desired to increase the static pressure of the gas as it flow through the passage. The passage area should: (a) decrease (b) remain constant (c) increase (d) be converging-diverging iii. Which of the following is true for a Fanno flow (a) the Mach number always increases as one moves downstream (b) the static pressure always decreases as one moves downstream (c) the maximum length of the duct is the sonic length (d) none of the above iv. A characteristic curve is a curve (a) across which a variable, e.g. the velocity, is continuous, but the derivatives of that variable are indeterminate (b) the governing PDE can be reduced to an ordinary differential equation (c) along which disturbances in the flow propagate (d) all of the above v. For flow of a compressible fluid from a storage tank through a converging-diverging channel operating under choked conditions (a) the pressure at the exit will be equal to the sonic pressure (b) the flow in the diverging section must be supersonic (c) the mass flow rate through the channel cannot be increased by changing the storage tank conditions (d) none of the above Page 2 of 11 ME 510 – Gas Dynamics Final Exam Spring 2009 NAME: 1. (cont…) vi. The conditions across a normal shock (a) lie at the intersection of the Fanno and Rayleigh lines for the flow (b) have the same stagnation temperature (c) both (a) and (b) are true (d) both (a) and (b) are false vii. When using small perturbation theory, the boundary conditions for a flow (a) must be satisfied exactly to prevent unstable solutions (b) become trivial (this is the chief advantage of small perturbation analysis) (c) should be modified to be consistent with the small perturbation assumptions (d) must satisfy the no slip condition at a solid wall viii. Kelvin’s theorem states that for a flow with the following conditions, the circulation about a closed curve (or the vorticity contained within that curve) will remain constant. (a) adiabatic and no body forces (b) uniform flow and no body forces (c) inviscid and the pressure is a function of the density only (d) irrotational and an ideal gas ix. A Mach line (a) is a curve which is everywhere perpendicular to the stream lines in a subsonic flow (b) is a wave which is perpendicular to the stream lines in a supersonic flow (c) is perpendicular to the stream lines when the flow is sonic (d) has the same slope as an arbitrary oblique shock wave x. When heat is added to a compressible flow (a) the flow temperature will always increase (b) the Mach number will always increase (c) the entropy may decrease (d) the flow stagnation temperature will always increase Page 3 of 11 rayleigh_17 A converging‐diverging nozzle with a test section‐to‐throat area ratio of 3.0 supplies air to a supersonic wind tunnel. If there is moisture in the air, it is possible for the water vapor to condense during the expansion process if the local static temperature drops below the saturation temperature. In practice, this condensation process occurs very rapidly, leading to an almost discontinuous change in the flow properties (and thus is referred to as a “condensation shock”). Assume that the stagnation temperature of the air/water vapor mixture entering the nozzle is 600 K and that the mass fraction of water vapor in the stream is mH2O/mmix = 0.01 (the ratio of the mass of water vapor to the mass of the vapor air mixture). The saturation temperature for the air/water vapor mixture is 14 C and the heat of vaporization of water is 2470 kJ/kg (i.e. the heat released per unit mass of water when water vapor condenses to liquid water). You may assume that the air/vapor mixture behaves as a perfect gas and has the same flow properties as air ( = 1.4, R = 287 J/(kg.K)). condensation shock T0 = 600 K ATS/Athroat = 3.0 mH2O/mmix = 0.01 Athroat Acond ATS a. Determine the area ratio, Acond/Athroat, where the condensation shock occurs, i.e. the area ratio where the static temperature of the flow first drops below the saturation temperature of 14 C. b. Determine the test section Mach number when no condensation shock is present. c. Determine the test section Mach number when the condensation shock is present. [Hint: Be careful differentiating between mH20 and mmix.] d. Sketch the process with the condensation shock on a T‐s diagram. SOLUTION: Assume the flow is isentropic up to the point of the condensation shock. The Mach number at the saturation temperature of Tcond = (14 + 273) = 287 K may be found using: 1 Tcond 1 2 1Macond Macond = 2.335 where Tcond = 287 K and T0 = 600 K ( Tcond/T0 = 0.4783) (1) T0 2 The area ratio at this Mach number may be found using: 1 1 2 21 AAcond cond 1 1Ma 2 cond *1 Acond/Athroat = 2.264 (2) AAthroatMa cond 1 2 * Note that in the previous equation Athroat = A . The Mach number in the test section when no condensation shock is present may be found from the area ratio * ATS/Athroat = ATS/A = 3.0: 1 1 2 21 AATS TS 1 1Ma 2 TS *1 MaTS = 2.637 (3) AATSMa TS 1 2 Page 1 of 3 rayleigh_17 When the condensation shock is present, we must account for the heat released by the flow as the water vapor condenses from vapor to liquid. The rate at which heat is released into the flow is the mass flow rate of water multiplied by the heat of vaporization, hfg: qm H 2Ofg h (4) Thus, the flow through the condensation shock may be modeled as a Rayleigh flow. condensation T = 600 K shock 0 A /A = 3.0 TS throat mH2O/mmix = 0.01 1 2 Athroat Acond ATS The stagnation temperature change through the condensation shock is given from conservation of energy as: qcTT12P 02 01 (5) where q mh H 2Ofg q12 (6) mmmix mix Combine the previous two equations to get: mhH 2Ofgm HO2 h fg cTP 02 T 01 T 02 T 01 T02 = 624.1 K (or T02/T01 = 1.041) (7) mmcmix mix P * The Mach number just downstream of the condensation shock may be found using T02/T : TTT02 02 01 * ** T02/T0 = 0.7641 Macond,2 = 2.154 (from the Rayleigh flow relations) (8) TT00T01 where * T01/T0 = 0.7340 using Macond,1 = 2.335 and the Rayleigh flow relations. (9) The sonic area ratio corresponding to the downstream Mach number is: 1 1 2 21 Acond 1 1Ma 2 cond,2 * Acond/A2 = 1.926 (10) *1Ma A2 cond,2 1 2 The sonic area ratio for the test section is: AAAATS TS throat cond * ** ATS/A2 = 2.552 (11) AA22AAthroat cond The Mach number in the test section may be found from the sonic area ratio. 1 1 2 21 ATS 1 1Ma 2 TS *1 MaTS = 2.465 (12) A2 MaTS 1 2 Thus, we see that the Mach number in the test section decreases when there is a condensation front. It would be a good idea to de‐humidify the air before sending it through the wind tunnel. Page 2 of 3 rayleigh_17 Sketch the process on a T‐s diagram. p02 T T01 T02 p01 Rayleigh curve p2 T2 T1 p1 TTS pTS s Page 3 of 3 expansionfan_13 A two-dimensional double-wedge profile is at zero angle of attack in an air stream of Mach number 2.0. Ma∞ = 2.0 10 10 l Calculate the drag coefficient for the airfoil based on the chord length, l. SOLUTION: 2 1 23 12 3 12 Use the oblique shock relations to determine the conditions in region 2. Ma1 = 2.0, 12 = 10 Ma2 = 1.6405, 12 = 39.31, p2/p1 = 1.7066 (1) Determine the Mach number in region 3 using the Prandtl-Meyer angle. Ma2 = 1.6405 2 = 16.0574 (2) 3 = 2 + 23 = 36.0574 where 23 = 20 (3) 3 = 36.0574 Ma3 = 2.3717 (4) Determine the pressure ratio for region 3 using the isentropic relations. 1 2 1 p3 1Ma 2 3 p3/p2 = 0.3227 (5) p 1Ma 1 2 2 2 2 Note that: pp33p2 0.5507 ppp121 The drag coefficient on the object is given by: F c D (6) D 1 2 2 11Vl where 1 FpplD 23 2 tan (7) and ½l 11222p1 1 2211VRTp 11Ma 2 11 Ma (8) RT1 So that: pp 1 ltan 232 p2 p3 tan cD (9) 1 22pp 2 p11Ma11 Ma 1 cD = 0.036 using p2/p1 = 1.7066, p3/p1 = 0.5507, = 10, = 1.4, and Ma1 = 2.0 (10) Page 1 of 2 expansionfan_13 Now solve the problem using thin airfoil theory. 2 2 2 l dy dy cdxD (11) 2 l Ma 1 0 dxupper dx lower where tan 10 0 x 1 l dy 2 (12) 1 dx upper tan 10 lxl 2 dy 0 (13) dx lower Substitute and simplify.
Recommended publications
  • Fluid Mechanics
    cen72367_fm.qxd 11/23/04 11:22 AM Page i FLUID MECHANICS FUNDAMENTALS AND APPLICATIONS cen72367_fm.qxd 11/23/04 11:22 AM Page ii McGRAW-HILL SERIES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Alciatore and Histand: Introduction to Mechatronics and Measurement Systems Anderson: Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications Anderson: Fundamentals of Aerodynamics Anderson: Introduction to Flight Anderson: Modern Compressible Flow Barber: Intermediate Mechanics of Materials Beer/Johnston: Vector Mechanics for Engineers Beer/Johnston/DeWolf: Mechanics of Materials Borman and Ragland: Combustion Engineering Budynas: Advanced Strength and Applied Stress Analysis Çengel and Boles: Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach Çengel and Cimbala: Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications Çengel and Turner: Fundamentals of Thermal-Fluid Sciences Çengel: Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach Crespo da Silva: Intermediate Dynamics Dieter: Engineering Design: A Materials & Processing Approach Dieter: Mechanical Metallurgy Doebelin: Measurement Systems: Application & Design Dunn: Measurement & Data Analysis for Engineering & Science EDS, Inc.: I-DEAS Student Guide Hamrock/Jacobson/Schmid: Fundamentals of Machine Elements Henkel and Pense: Structure and Properties of Engineering Material Heywood: Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals Holman: Experimental Methods for Engineers Holman: Heat Transfer Hsu: MEMS & Microsystems: Manufacture & Design Hutton: Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis Kays/Crawford/Weigand: Convective Heat and Mass Transfer Kelly: Fundamentals
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Gas Dynamics All Lecture Slides
    Introduction to Gas Dynamics AERODYNAMICS - II All Lecture Slides N. Venkata Raghavendra Farheen Sana Autumn 2009 Gasdynamics — Lecture Slides 1 Compressible flow 2 Zeroth law of thermodynamics 3 First law of thermodynamics 4 Equation of state — ideal gas 5 Specific heats 6 The “perfect” gas 7 Second law of thermodynamics 8 Adiabatic, reversible process 9 The free energy and free enthalpy 10 Entropy and real gas flows 11 One-dimensional gas dynamics 12 Conservation of mass — continuity equation 13 Conservation of energy — energy equation 14 Reservoir conditions 15 On isentropic flows Gasdynamics — Lecture Slides 16 Euler’s equation 17 Momentum equation 18 A review of equations of conservation 19 Isentropic condition 20 Speed of sound — Mach number 21 Results from the energy equation 22 The area-velocity relationship 23 On the equations of state 24 Bernoulli equation — dynamic pressure 25 Constant area flows 26 Shock relations for perfect gas — Part I 27 Shock relations for perfect gas — Part II 28 Shock relations for perfect gas — Part III 29 The area-velocity relationship — revisited 30 Nozzle flow — converging nozzle Gasdynamics — Lecture Slides 31 Nozzle flow — converging-diverging nozzle 32 Normal shock recovery — diffuser 33 Flow with wall roughness — Fanno flow 34 Flow with heat addition — Rayleigh flow 35 Normal shock, Fanno flow and Rayleigh flow 36 Waves in supersonic flow 37 Multi-dimensional equations of the flow 38 Oblique shocks 39 Relationship between wedge angle and wave angle 40 Small angle approximation 41 Mach lines 42 Weak oblique
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Dynamics and Jet Propulsion
    A Course Material on GAS DYNAMICS AND JET PROPULSION By Mr. C.RAVINDIRAN. ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SASURIE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING VIJAYAMANGALAM – 638 056 QUALITY CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the e-course material Subject Code : ME2351 Subject : GAS DYNAMICS AND JET PROPULSION Class : III Year MECHANICAL ENGINEERING being prepared by me and it meets the knowledge requirement of the university curriculum. Signature of the Author Name : C. Ravindiran Designation: Assistant Professor This is to certify that the course material being prepared by Mr. C. Ravindiran is of adequate quality. He has referred more than five books amount them minimum one is from abroad author. Signature of HD Name: Mr. E.R.Sivakumar SEAL CONTENTS S.NO TOPIC PAGE NO UNIT-1 BASIC CONCEPTS AND ISENTROPIC 1.1 Concept of Gas Dynamics 1 1.1.1 Significance with Applications 1 1.2 Compressible Flows 1 1.2.1 Compressible vs. Incompressible Flow 2 1.2.2 Compressibility 2 1.2.3. Compressibility and Incompressibility 3 1.3 Steady Flow Energy Equation 5 1.4 Momentum Principle for a Control Volume 5 1.5 Stagnation Enthalpy 5 1.6 Stagnation Temperature 7 1.7 Stagnation Pressure 8 1.8 Stagnation velocity of sound 9 1.9 Various regions of flow 9 1.10 Flow Regime Classification 11 1.11 Reference Velocities 12 1.11.1 Maximum velocity of fluid 12 1.11.2 Critical velocity of sound 13 1.12 Mach number 16 1.13 Mach Cone 16 1.14 Reference Mach number 16 1.15 Crocco number 19 1.16 Isothermal Flow 19 1.17 Law of conservation of momentum 19 1.17.1 Assumptions
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    BBMIndx.inddMIndx.indd PPageage I-1I-1 111/10/181/10/18 6:536:53 PMPM f-389f-389 //208/WB02304_EVALCS/9781119469582/bmmatter/text_s208/WB02304_EVALCS/9781119469582/bmmatter/text_s Index Absolute pressure, 13, 41 Angular momentum flow, 174, video V5.12 restrictions on use of, 106–110, 222, Absolute temperature Annulus, flow in, 257–258 video V3.12 in British Gravitational (BG) System, 7 Apparent viscosity, 16 unsteady flow, 107–108 in English Engineering (EE) System, 8 Aqueducts, 454 use of, video V3.2 in ideal gas law, 12 Archimedes, 27, 28, 62 Best efficiency points, 564 in International System (SI), 7 Archimedes’ principle, 61–64, video V2.7 Best hydraulic cross section, 460–461 Absolute velocity Area BG units. see British Gravitational (BG) System in centrifugal pumps, 558–561 centroid, 51–53 of units defined, 154, 551 compressible flow with change in, 507–522 Bingham plastic, 16–17 in rotating sprinkler example, 176–177 isentropic flow of ideal gas with change in, Birds, wings of, 429 in turbo machine example, 551–554 510–516 Blades vs. relative velocity, 141–142 and Mach number, 511–513 curved and radia, 561, 562 Absolute viscosity moment of inertia, 52 radial, 561 of air, 620–621 Aspect ratio rotor, 575, 591 of common gases, 617 air foil, 435 stator, 575, 591 of common liquids, 617 plate, 271 turbo machine, 549 defined, 15 Assemblies, 603 Blade velocity, 551–554, 558–559 of U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 622–623 Atmosphere, standard. see Standard Blasius, H., 29, 285, 389 of water, 619 atmosphere Blasius formula, 285, 339 Acceleration
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-709: a Web-Based Solver for Compressible Flow Calculations
    2006-709: A WEB-BASED SOLVER FOR COMPRESSIBLE FLOW CALCULATIONS Harish Eletem, Lamar University HARISH ELETEM was a graduate student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lamar University. He received his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University in 2005. Fred Young, Lamar University FRED YOUNG is a professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lamar University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Southern Methodist University. He has published many technical papers and presented several papers at international conferences. Kendrick Aung, Lamar University KENDRICK AUNG is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lamar University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Aerospace Engineering from University of Michigan in 1996. He is an active member of ASEE, ASME, AIAA and Combustion Institute. He has published over 50 technical papers and presented several papers at national and international conferences. Page 11.144.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Web-based Solver for Compressible Flow Calculations Abstract Compressible flow is an important subject in aerospace and mechanical engineering disciplines. This paper describes a web-base solver for carrying out compressible flow calculations. The main objective of the solver is to provide students with a software tool than can be used in the compressible flow course offered in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lamar University. The solver has a graphical user interface (GUI) for ease of use and interactivity. The solver is capable of solving typical compressible flows such as isentropic flows, Rayleigh and Fanno flows, normal and oblique shock flows, and Prandtl-Myer expansion waves.
    [Show full text]
  • SPC 407 Sheet 5 - Solution Compressible Flow – Rayleigh Flow
    SPC 407 Sheet 5 - Solution Compressible Flow – Rayleigh Flow 1. Consider subsonic Rayleigh flow of air with a Mach number of 0.92. Heat is now transferred to the fluid and the Mach number increases to 0.95. Does the temperature T of the fluid increase, decrease, or remain constant during this process? How about the stagnation temperature T0? Solution: In Rayleigh flow, the stagnation temperature T0 always increases with heat transfer to the fluid, but the temperature T decreases with heat transfer in the Mach number range of 0.845 < Ma < 1 for air. Therefore, the temperature in this case will decrease. This at first seems counterintuitive, but if heat were not added, the temperature would drop even more if the air were accelerated isentropically from Ma = 0.92 to 0.95. 2. Consider subsonic Rayleigh flow that is accelerated to sonic velocity (Ma = 1) at the duct exit by heating. If the fluid continues to be heated, will the flow at duct exit be supersonic, subsonic, or remain sonic? Solution: The flow is choked, and thus the flow at the duct exit remains sonic. There is no mechanism for the flow to become supersonic in this case. 1 3. Argon gas enters a constant cross-sectional area duct at Ma1 = 0.2, P1 = 320 kPa, and T1 = 400 K at a rate of 1.2 kg/s. Disregarding frictional losses, determine the highest rate of heat transfer to the argon without reducing the mass flow rate. Solution: Take the properties of argon to be k = 1.667, cp = 0.5203 kJ/kg-K, and R = 0.2081 kJ/kg-K.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNDAMENTALS of FLUID MECHANICS Chapter 11 Analysis of Compressible Flow
    FUNDAMENTALSFUNDAMENTALS OFOF FLUIDFLUID MECHANICSMECHANICS ChapterChapter 1111 AnalysisAnalysis ofof CompressibleCompressible FlowFlow JyhJyh--CherngCherng ShiehShieh Department of Bio-Industrial Mechatronics Engineering National Taiwan University 1 MAINMAIN TOPICSTOPICS IdealIdeal GasGas RelationshipsRelationships MachMach NumberNumber andand SpeedSpeed ofof SoundSound CategoriesCategories ofof CompressibleCompressible FlowFlow IsentropicIsentropic FlowFlow ofof anan IdealIdeal GasGas NonisentropicNonisentropic FlowFlow ofof anan IdealIdeal GasGas TwoTwo--DimensionalDimensional CompressibleCompressible FlowFlow 2 IdealIdeal GasGas RelationshipsRelationships 3 IntroductionIntroduction Fluid compressibility is a very important consideration in numerous engineering applications of fluid mechanics. For example, ►►TheThe measurementmeasurement ofof highhigh--speedspeed flowflow velocitiesvelocities requiresrequires compressiblecompressible flowflow theory.theory. ►►TheThe flowsflows inin gasgas turbineturbine engineengine componentscomponents areare generallygenerally compressible.compressible. ►►ManyMany aircraftaircraft flyfly fastfast enoughenough toto involveinvolve aa compressiblecompressible flowflow field.field. In this study of compressibility effects, we mainly consider the steady, one-dimensional, constant (including zero) viscosity, compressible flow of an ideal gas. 4 IdealIdeal GasGas relationshipsrelationships 1/21/2 Before to develop compressible flow equation, we need to become more familiar with the fluid. The equation
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Compressible Fluid Mechanics
    Fundamentals of Compressible Fluid Mechanics Genick Bar–Meir, Ph. D. 1107 16th Ave S. E. Minneapolis, MN 55414-2411 email:[email protected] Copyright © 2006, 2005, and 2004 by Genick Bar-Meir See the file copying.fdl or copyright.tex for copying conditions. Version (0.4.4.2 aka 0.4.4.1j May 21, 2007) `We are like dwarfs sitting on the shoulders of giants” from The Metalogicon by John in 1159 CONTENTS GNU Free Documentation License . xvii 1. APPLICABILITY AND DEFINITIONS . xviii 2. VERBATIM COPYING . xix 3. COPYING IN QUANTITY . xix 4. MODIFICATIONS . xx 5. COMBINING DOCUMENTS . xxii 6. COLLECTIONS OF DOCUMENTS . xxii 7. AGGREGATION WITH INDEPENDENT WORKS . xxiii 8. TRANSLATION . xxiii 9. TERMINATION . xxiii 10. FUTURE REVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE . xxiii ADDENDUM: How to use this License for your documents . xxiv Potto Project License . xxv How to contribute to this book . xxvii Credits . xxvii John Martones . xxvii Grigory Toker . xxviii Ralph Menikoff . xxviii Your name here . xxviii Typo corrections and other ”minor” contributions . xxviii Version 0.4.3 Sep. 15, 2006 . xxxv Version 0.4.2 . xxxv Version 0.4 . xxxvi Version 0.3 . xxxvi Version 4.3 . xli Version 4.1.7 . xlii Speed of Sound . xlvi iii iv CONTENTS Stagnation effects . xlvi Nozzle . xlvi Normal Shock . xlvi Isothermal Flow . xlvi Fanno Flow . xlvii Rayleigh Flow . xlvii Evacuation and filling semi rigid Chambers . xlvii Evacuating and filling chambers under external forces . xlvii Oblique Shock . xlvii Prandtl–Meyer . xlvii Transient problem . xlvii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is Compressible Flow ? . 1 1.2 Why Compressible Flow is Important? .
    [Show full text]
  • SPC 407 Sheet 5 Compressible Flow – Rayleigh Flow
    SPC 407 Sheet 5 Compressible Flow – Rayleigh Flow 1. Consider subsonic Rayleigh flow of air with a Mach number of 0.92. Heat is now transferred to the fluid and the Mach number increases to 0.95. Does the temperature T of the fluid increase, decrease, or remain constant during this process? How about the stagnation temperature T0? 2. Consider subsonic Rayleigh flow that is accelerated to sonic velocity (Ma = 1) at the duct exit by heating. If the fluid continues to be heated, will the flow at duct exit be supersonic, subsonic, or remain sonic? 3. Argon gas enters a constant cross-sectional area duct at Ma1 = 0.2, P1 = 320 kPa, and T1 = 400 K at a rate of 1.2 kg/s. Disregarding frictional losses, determine the highest rate of heat transfer to the argon without reducing the mass flow rate. 4. Air is heated as it flows subsonically through a duct. When the amount of heat transfer reaches 67 kJ/kg, the flow is observed to be choked, and the velocity and the static pressure are measured to be 680 m/s and 270 kPa. Disregarding frictional losses, determine the velocity, static temperature, and static pressure at the duct inlet. 5. Compressed air from the compressor of a gas turbine enters the combustion chamber at T1 = 700 K, P1 = 600 kPa, and Ma1 = 0.2 at a rate of 0.3 kg/s. Via combustion, heat is transferred to the air at a rate of 150 kJ/s as it flows through the duct with negligible friction.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes on Gas Dynamics
    LECTURE NOTES ON GAS DYNAMICS Joseph M. Powers Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556-5637 USA updated 28 October 2019, 7:15pm 2 CC BY-NC-ND. 28 October 2019, J. M. Powers. Contents Preface 7 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Definitions..................................... 9 1.2 Motivatingexamples ............................... 10 1.2.1 Re-entryflows............................... 10 1.2.1.1 Bowshockwave ........................ 10 1.2.1.2 Rarefaction(expansion)wave . 11 1.2.1.3 Momentumboundarylayer . 11 1.2.1.4 Thermalboundarylayer . 12 1.2.1.5 Vibrational relaxation effects . 12 1.2.1.6 Dissociation effects . 12 1.2.2 Rocketnozzleflows............................ 12 1.2.3 Jetengineinlets.............................. 13 2 Governing equations 15 2.1 Mathematical preliminaries . 15 2.1.1 Vectorsandtensors............................ 15 2.1.2 Gradient, divergence, and material derivatives . .. 16 2.1.3 Conservative andnon-conservative forms . .. 17 2.1.3.1 Conservativeform ....................... 17 2.1.3.2 Non-conservativeform . 17 2.2 Summary of full set of compressible viscous equations . ..... 20 2.3 Conservationaxioms ............................... 21 2.3.1 Conservationofmass........................... 22 2.3.1.1 Nonconservativeform . 22 2.3.1.2 Conservativeform ....................... 22 2.3.1.3 Incompressible form . 22 2.3.2 Conservationoflinearmomenta . 22 2.3.2.1 Nonconservativeform . 22 2.3.2.2 Conservativeform ....................... 23 2.3.3 Conservationofenergy .......................... 24 3 4 CONTENTS 2.3.3.1 Nonconservativeform . 24 2.3.3.2 Mechanicalenergy ....................... 25 2.3.3.3 Conservativeform ....................... 25 2.3.3.4 Energyequationintermsofentropy . 26 2.3.4 Entropyinequality ............................ 26 2.4 Constitutive relations . 29 2.4.1 Stress-strain rate relationship for Newtonian fluids .
    [Show full text]
  • Intro-Propulsion-Lect-22B.Pdf
    22-B 1 Lect-22-B In this lecture ... • Shock Waves and Expansion – Normal Shocks – Oblique Shocks – Prandtl–Meyer Expansion Waves • Duct Flow with Heat Transfer and Negligible Friction (Rayleigh Flow) – Property Relations for Rayleigh Flow • Duct flow with friction without heat transfer (Fanno flow) 2 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-22-B Shock waves • Sound waves are caused by infinitesimally small pressure disturbances, and travel through a medium at the speed of sound. • Under certain flow conditions, abrupt changes in fluid properties occur across a very thin section: shock wave. • Shock waves are characteristic of supersonic flows, that is when the fluid velocity is greater than the speed of sound. • Flow across a shock is highly irreversible and cannot be approximated as isentropic. 3 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-22-B Throat Pe P0 Pb P Pb A P P0 B A Subsonic flow at nozzle exit PB C No shock PC P* D Subsonic flow at nozzle exit PD Shock in nozzle P E Supersonic flow at nozzle exit Sonic flow P F No shock in nozzle at throat PG Inlet Throat Exit x M Shock in nozzle Supersonic flow at nozzle exit No shock in nozzle 1.0 Subsonic flow at nozzle exit D Shock in nozzle C Subsonic flow at nozzle exit B A No shock x 4 Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay Lect-22-B Normal shocks • Shock waves that occur in a plane normal to the direction of flow: Normal shocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Rayleigh Flow of Two-Phase Nitrous Oxide As a Hybrid Rocket Nozzle Coolant
    RAYLEIGH FLOW OF TWO-PHASE NITROUS OXIDE AS A HYBRID ROCKET NOZZLE COOLANT A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering by Lauren May Nelson September 2009 © 2009 Lauren May Nelson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Rayleigh Flow of Two-Phase Nitrous Oxide as a Hybrid Rocket Nozzle Coolant AUTHOR: Lauren May Nelson DATE SUBMITTED: September 2009 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Dr. Patrick Lemieux, Associate Professor COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. William Murray, Professor COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Joseph Mello, Professor iii ABSTRACT Rayleigh Flow of Two-Phase Nitrous Oxide as a Hybrid Rocket Nozzle Coolant Lauren May Nelson The Mechanical Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo currently maintains a lab-scale hybrid rocket motor for which nitrous oxide is utilized as the oxidizer in the combustion system. Because of its availability, the same two-phase (gas and liquid) nitrous oxide that is used in the combustion system is also routed around the throat of the hybrid rocket’s converging-diverging nozzle as a coolant. While this coolant system has proven effective empirically in previous tests, the physics behind the flow of the two-phase mixture is largely unexplained. This thesis provides a method for predicting some of its behavior by modeling it using the classic gas dynamics scenarios of Rayleigh and Fanno flows which refer to one-dimensional, compressible, inviscid flow in a constant area duct with heat addition and friction. The two-phase model produced utilizes a separated phase with interface exchange model for predicting whether or not dryout occurs.
    [Show full text]