Journal # 100 Quantum Entwinement As a Principal of Human Communication 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal # 100 Quantum Entwinement as a Principal of Human Communication 2014 Abstract: A research study first done in 1973 is being redone forty years later in 2013-2014. Volunteer subject teams were chose for their intimacy relationships. Mothers and child, marital partners, and close friends each in a pair are chosen. One member is isolated in a dark room with a stroboscope in front of their face. The other is hooked to an EEG device (the Eductor). The Eductor measures their Brain wave, heart electrical pattern, skin resistance and the VARHOPE of their body electric. At random intervals the strobe light in the room with the remote subject will flash for 30 sec. this will make a subtle shock to the system of the person and induce an ocular evoked potential. In the original experiment in 1973 the system shock to the one member of the pair provoked a similar evoked potential to the other. In our 2013-2014 study we had 33 teams. In twenty eight of the subjects there was an evoked potential at a distance detected in the VARHOPE of the receiver on the first stimulation. On the second strobe stimulation there was a reduced but measurable evoked potential. Verbal mind guesses were inaccurate but a bioelectric response was demonstrated. This can be explained thru a type on quantum entwinement/entanglement principle of the body electric. But since this process is beneath the reticular activating system and thus not connected to the word area. Over emphasis of the word area in science has prevented us from truly accepting the ability of telepathy. Over 20 different research scientists have validated this incredible result in independent medical supervised studies. Introduction: Quantum entanglement occurs when particles such as photons, electrons, molecules as large as bucky balls,[1][2] and even small diamonds[3][4] interact physically and then become separated; the type of interaction is such that each resulting member of a pair is properly described by the same quantum mechanical description (state), which is indefinite in terms of important factors such as position,[5] momentum, spin, polarization, etc. This behavior is consistent with quantum-mechanical theory, has been demonstrated experimentally, and it is now finally accepted by the physics community. Research into quantum entanglement was initiated by a 1935 paper by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen describing the EPR paradox[13] and several papers by Erwin Schrödinger shortly thereafter.[14][15] Although these first studies focused on the counterintuitive properties of entanglement, with the aim of criticizing quantum mechanics, eventually entanglement was verified experimentally,[16] and recognized as a valid, fundamental feature of quantum mechanics. The focus of the research has now changed to its utilization as a resource for communication and computation. Extrasensory perception (ESP) involves reception of information not gained through the recognized physical senses but sensed with the mind. The term was adopted by Duke University psychologist J. B. Rhine to denote psychic abilities such as telepathy, clairaudience, and clairvoyance, and their trans- temporal operation as precognition or retro-cognition. ESP is also sometimes casually referred to as a sixth sense, gut instinct or hunch, which are historical English idioms. It is also sometimes referred to as intuition. The term implies acquisition of information by means external to the basic limiting assumptions of science, such as that organisms can only receive information from the past to the present. Parapsychology is the pseudoscientific[17] study of paranormal psychic phenomena, including ESP. Parapsychologists generally regard such tests as the ganzfield experiment as providing compelling evidence for the existence of ESP. The scientific community rejects ESP due to the absence of an evidence base, the lack of a theory which would explain ESP, and the lack of experimental techniques which can provide reliably positive results.[18]19][20][21][22] In physics, non-locality or action at a distance is the direct interaction of two objects that are separated in space without an intermediate agency or mechanism. Isaac Newton (1642-1727) considered gravity- action-at-a-distance "so great an Absurdity that I believe no Man who has in philosophical Matters a competent Faculty of thinking can ever fall into it". Quantum non-locality refers to what Einstein called the "spooky action at a distance" of quantum entanglement. The reticular formation is a region in the brainstem that is involved in filtering incoming stimuli to discriminate irrelevant background stimuli.[23] It is essential for governing some of the basic functions of higher organisms. It filters and directs signals to the word area versus the other areas of the brain. The reticular formation is one of the phylogenetically oldest portions of the brain. The reticular formation consists of more than 100 small neural networks, with varied functions including the following: 1. Somatic motor control - Some motor neurons send their axons to the reticular formation nuclei, giving rise to the reticulospinal tracts of the spinal cord. These tracts function in maintaining tone, balance, and posture--especially during body movements. The reticular formation also relays eye and ear signals to the cerebellum so that the cerebellum can integrate visual, auditory, and vestibular stimuli in voluntary motor coordination under verbal conscious direction. Sensory data from our olfactory or shape receptor area are directed to nonverbal unconscious areas. Other motor nuclei include gaze centers, which enable the eyes to track and fixate objects, and central pattern generators, which produce rhythmic signals to the muscles of breathing and swallowing. 2. Cardiovascular control - The reticular formation includes the cardiac and vasomotor centers of the medulla oblongata. 3. Pain modulation - The reticular formation is one means by which pain signals from the lower body reach the cerebral cortex. It is also the origin of the descending analgesic pathways. The nerve fibers in these pathways act in the spinal cord to block the transmission of some pain signals to the brain. 4. Sleep and consciousness - The reticular formation has projections to the thalamus and cerebral cortex that allow it to exert some control over which sensory signals reach the cerebrum and come to our conscious attention. It plays a central role in states of consciousness like conscious verbal mind alertness and non-verbal unconscious sleep. Injury to the reticular formation can result in irreversible coma. 5. Habituation - This is a process in which the brain learns to ignore repetitive, meaningless stimuli while remaining sensitive to others. A good example of this is when a person can sleep through loud traffic in a large city, but is awakened promptly due to the sound of an alarm or crying baby. Reticular formation nuclei that modulate activity of the cerebral cortex are part of the reticular activating system. 6. Olfactory stimulus is not wired to the RAS. A fire smell will not wake you up. We need smoke detectors. If you fart while your mate is sleeping they will not know. Olfactory data is mostly wired to the non-verbal gestalt areas of the brain. An evoked potential or evoked response is an electrical potential recorded from the nervous system of a human or other animal following presentation of a stimulus, as distinct from spontaneous potentials as detected by electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), or other electrophysiological recording method. Evoked potential amplitudes tend to be low, ranging from less than a microvolt to several microvolts, compared to tens of microvolts for EEG, millivolts for EMG, and often close to a volt for ECG. To resolve these low-amplitude potentials against the background of ongoing EEG, ECG, EMG, and other biological signals and ambient noise, signal averaging is usually required. The signal is time-locked to the stimulus and most of the noise occurs randomly, allowing the noise to be averaged out with averaging of repeated responses.[24] Evoked potential feedback This technique allows the SSEP to directly control the stimulus that elicits the SSEP without the conscious intervention of the experimental subject.[24][17] For example, the running average of the SSEP can be arranged to increase the luminance of a checkerboard stimulus if the amplitude of the SSEP falls below some predetermined value, and to decrease luminance if it rises above this value. The amplitude of the SSEP then hovers about this predetermined value. Now the wavelength (color) of the stimulus is progressively changed. The resulting plot of stimulus luminance versus wavelength is a plot of the spectral sensitivity of the visual system.[25][27] Visual evoked potential In 1934, Adrian and Matthew noticed potential changes of the occipital EEG can be observed under stimulation of light. Ciganek developed the first nomenclature for occipital EEG components in 1961. During that same year, Hirsch and colleagues recorded a visual evoked potential (VEP) on the occipital lobe (externally and internally), and they discovered amplitudes recorded along the calcarine fissure were the largest. In 1965, Spehlmann used a checkerboard stimulation to describe human VEPs. An attempt to localize structures in the primary visual pathway was completed by Szikla and colleagues. Halliday and colleagues completed the first clinical investigations using VEP by recording delayed VEPs in a patient with retrobulbar neuritis in 1972. A wide variety of extensive research to improve procedures and theories has been conducted from the 1970s to today. There is a distinct dichotomy of the brain in a word area (left hemispheric logic) versus a Intuitive body electric a global Gestalt systemically wired Holistic nonverbal mind. The word area’s logic has dominated over the last few centuries. New developments in Insight Creativity have shown it occurs elsewhere in a nonverbal mind. As we can see, there are basic barriers to acceptance of ESP. most of these barriers are intellectual and come from the verbal mind.