HERTFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Agenda Item No.

CABINET MONDAY, 12 OCTOBER 2015 AT 2.00PM 4

THE CROXLEY RAIL LINK – UPDATE ON THE TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO LIMITED

Report of the Chief Executive and Director of Environment

Authors: Rob Smith, Deputy Director Environment (01992 556121) Richard Boutal, Major Projects Group Manager (01707 281436)

Executive Members: Derrick Ashley, Environment, Planning and Transport Chris Hayward, Resources and Performance Terry Douris, Highways

Local Members: N Bell, S B A F H Giles-Medhurst, K M Hastrick, A Joynes, D T F Scudder, M A Watkin

1. Purpose of Report

1.1 To provide Cabinet with an update on the transfer of responsibilities for the delivery of the Croxley Rail Link (CRL) and the associated rights and powers under the Croxley Rail Link Order from the County Council to London Underground Limited (LUL).

1.2 To seek Cabinet’s approval to the finalisation of the arrangements to achieve the transfer mentioned in paragraph 1.1.

2. Summary

2.1 CRL has faced a number of funding and programming challenges during the detailed development stages. The estimated outturn cost of the scheme has risen considerably since the scheme achieved Programme Entry status from DfT in December 2011. However, in addition to delivering a step change in the quality and accessibility of transport provision in South West Herts, the scheme has been increasingly acknowledged as vital to the economic regeneration of South West as well as being a significant contributor to strategies within the emerging London Plan.

2.2 Ensuring the scheme has the best opportunity to be delivered remains, therefore, a priority for Hertfordshire County Council, Borough

1

Council (WBC), the Hertfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) and the Department for Transport (DfT).

2.3 A delivery model has now been proposed whereby London Underground Limited (LUL) will take on responsibility for completion of the project.

2.4 Since the Cabinet decision on 23 February 2015 officers have been in discussions with LUL and local partners to seek to achieve a satisfactory transfer of the Croxley Rail Link Scheme to LUL. Officers consider that given the details of the transfer arrangements (including the transfer of the transfer of the Council’s rights under the Croxley Rail Link Order and the funding arrangements) which are now proposed that it is appropriate to bring these to Members for consideration.

3. Recommendations

(1) That under Article 34 of the Croxley Rail Link Order 2013, the County Council’s rights and powers to maintain, construct , use and operate the Croxley Rail Link be transferred from Hertfordshire County Council to London Underground Limited (LUL)

(2) That the County Council’s funding contribution for the delivery of the Croxley Rail Link and associated works:

(a) be a fixed sum of £30.635million, which consists of £25 million capital, £2.905m of S106 funds and a land contribution valued at £2.73 million; and (b) in addition to the fixed sum mentioned in (a) above the County Council will provide £250k towards costs of Post Transfer Deliverables

all of which sums mentioned above are subject to the warranties and indemnities as set out in the Transfer Agreement and summarised in section 6.1.3 of this report.

(3) That Cabinet notes that are contributing £9.595 million and the Hertfordshire LEP £87.85 million to the Croxley Rail Link Project.

(4) That in order to facilitate the transfer referred to in (1) above the County Council enter into the following agreements:

(a) Novation Agreement between Hertfordshire County Council, London Underground Ltd and Vinci Construction UK Ltd (b) Article 34 Agreement between Hertfordshire County Council and London Underground Ltd transferring the County Council’s rights and powers under the Transport and Works Act Order entitle ‘Croxley Rail Link Order made on 31 July 2013 to LUL

2

(c) Transfer Agreement between Hertfordshire County Council and London Underground Ltd (d) Funding Agreement between Hertfordshire County Council and (e) Property Agreement between Hertfordshire County Council and London Underground Ltd (f) Escrow Letter between Hertfordshire County Council, Transport for London and London Underground Ltd.

(5) That the Chief Executive and Director of Environment be authorised to finalise the documents mentioned in (4) above and agree such amendments to them as are necessary to achieve the transfer of the Croxley Rail Link project

(6) That the Chief Executive and Director of Environment in consultation with the Executive Member for Resources & Performance and the Assistant Director Property (Resources & Performance)is delegated authority to make such land available as is required for the project. Such land will be transferred to LUL, where required for operational purposes and leased or licenced to LUL where required for temporary construction purposes.

(7) Where such land mentioned in (5) above is in accordance with the Croxley Rail Link Order Cabinet acknowledges and agrees to such disposal which, as detailed in paragraph 6.1.5 of this report, will not be subject to s123 of the Local Government Act 1972 requirements with regards Secretary of State approval

(8) That the Chief Executive and Director of Environment in consultation with the Executive Members for Environment, Planning & Transport and Resources and Performance and the Assistant Director Finance (Resources & Performance) be authorised to finalise all arrangements and to make any other decisions as are necessary to secure the delivery of the Croxley Rail Link Scheme and to agree any agreements and other documents necessary to give effect to these arrangements

(9) That the County Council’s Chief Legal Officer (and, in her absence, the Assistant Chief Legal Officer (Environment, Property & Dispute Resolution) or the Assistant Chief Legal Officer (People)) be authorised to execute the agreements or documents as are required to give effect to the decisions in the report, so far as such power is not already delegated by the County Council’s Constitution.

4. Background

4.1 Croxley Rail Link is a 5.47km length of twin track railway that will connect the existing London Underground from a point south west of the

3

Watford Metropolitan Station to Watford Junction Station. Its construction will allow the operation of trains in to Watford Junction Station and hence release economic development and growth capacity in that corridor. It has long been an aspiration amongst local stakeholders to deliver this scheme and, in recent years, Hertfordshire County Council has been leading this project in partnership with LUL and Network Rail (NR). The County Council successfully advanced the scheme through a complex Transport and Works Act Order process to secure the powers to construct the scheme and on 31 July 2013 The Croxley Rail Link Order 2013 was made.

4.2 Taylor Woodrow was awarded a two stage design and build contract in early 2013. Stage 1 is to complete the design and produce a target cost for the construction phase. Stage 2 is for construction. The project is currently nearing completion of Stage 1.

4.3 The scheme has proved complex to deliver and has experienced budget estimate increases.

4.4 In February 2015, Cabinet received a report on the project in which a preferred delivery model and a funding package was proposed. Cabinet also considered a Supplemental Report at its meeting which informed Cabinet that LUL and the DfT considered that the split delivery model preferred by the County Council was not the most efficient and effective way to deliver the project. The Supplemental Report stated that LUL would be prepared to lead the project. Members were also informed that there remained a gap between the proposed budget and the then resources available from all parties.

4.5 At its meeting in February 2015 Cabinet made the following decisions:

Cabinet Decision Feb 2015 Cabinet:

a) noted that the Department for Transport (DfT) had indicated that it would prefer London Underground Limited (LUL) to take responsibility for the delivery of the entire Croxley Rail Link project rather than proceed with the proposed delivery model as set out in Annex 1 to the report;

b) acknowledged that there is a funding gap in the forecasted estimates of the outturn cost of the project and requires that the County Council’s contribution to the project, once agreed, will be fixed;

c) authorised the Chief Executive and Director of Environment to communicate the County Council’s position to the DfT; and

d) delegated to the Chief Executive and Director of Environment and the Deputy Chief Executive, in consultation with the Executive Members for Highways & Waste Management and Resources & Transformation,

4

subject to b) above, authority to finalise the arrangements to secure the delivery of an affordable and operational Croxley Rail Link scheme within a mutually satisfactory timescale and to agree any agreements and other documents necessary to give effect to these arrangements.

4.6 Following Cabinet, discussions and negotiations took place with Government departments (DfT and Treasury) and LUL. These culminated in agreement from LUL to take responsibility to lead and deliver the project. This was reinforced by a Mayoral Direction (MD1478), issued by the Mayor of London on 26 March 2015 (see Appendix 1).

4.7 Following HM Treasury Consent to the scheme, the DfT confirmed the funding arrangements for the project by letter to the County Council and the Hertfordshire LEP and , separately, to the Greater London Authority (see Appendix 2) .

4.8. The Chief Executive and Director of Environment and the Deputy Chief Executive in consultation with relevant Executive Members as authorised by County Council in the Integrated Plan February 2015, agreed to allocate further £6m of Council funds in March 2015. This was on the basis that, if the scheme failed the authority would be liable for an additional £3 m of costs. In addition, the relief of the ongoing risk burden on the authority was considered to be worth a further £3 m. This extra contribution would only be on the basis that the scheme is approved and that LUL take all project risk.

5 Future Delivery of the Croxley Rail Link Scheme 5.1 The basis of the agreement for the future delivery of the CRL Scheme is that, within a funding allocation of £284.4 m, LUL will deliver the scheme, defined as follows:

 A viaduct and embankment linking the current Metropolitan line south of the existing Watford terminus to the disused rail alignment between Croxley and Watford High Street;

 Reinstatement of double track on the disused Croxley alignment, including a new junction with the Watford Junction to London DC route at Watford High Street;

 Work to bring the bridges, cuttings and embankments on the disused Croxley alignment into operational use; and

 New stations at Cassiobridge and Watford

5.2 Transport for London (LUL’s parent organisation) will be solely responsible for meeting any expenditure over and above the approved project budget cost of £284.4 m

5

The funding sources are as shown in the table below (an extract from the DfT funding letters at Appendix 2):

Funding partner £m Department for transport 109.82 Transport for London (including fare box borrowing) 46.50 Hertfordshire LEP 87.85 HCC & Watford Borough Council 40.23 Total Funding 284.40

Of the figure in the last line, £9.595m is from Watford Borough Council and the remainder, £30.635m is from the County Council. The contribution from the County Council is fixed and is comprised of:

HCC Contribution £m Capital 25.00 S106 2.905 Land Contributions 2.730

Total Funding 30.635

Contributions in 2015/16 are shown in the County Council’s capital programme. The overall capital programme will be adjusted as part of the 2016/17 IP.. The land contributions comprise the County Council owned land at Ascot Road, valued at £0.93 million and the disused rail corridor between Ascot Road and Wiggenhall Road, valued at £1.8 million. In addition, the Council will allocate £250,000 towards the costs of the Post Transfer deliverables under the Transfer Agreement, which if unused will still be transferred to LUL at the end of a five year period.

The Hertfordshire LEP agreed their funding contribution at their Board meeting of 22 April 2015.

The Herts LEP Board papers are publicly available at the following website address http://mediafiles.thedms.co.uk/Publication/BH- Herts/cms/pdf/LEP%20board%20papers%20LINK%20PAGE.pdf

6 Agreements to secure the transfer of responsibilities for the Croxley Rail Link Scheme

6.1 In order to facilitate the transfer of responsibilities for the project from the County Council to LUL, a suite of agreements have been drafted and are now ready for final agreement that will bring this transfer in to effect namely:

6.1.1 A Novation Agreement that will transfer the current contract (between Hertfordshire County Council and Taylor Woodrow) from the County Council to LUL. Under this Agreement,

6

 all duties and obligations under the contract are novated from the County Council to LUL.  The County Council will make a payment to the contractor of £1,243,189 in full and final settlement of all matters up to the 25h September 2015, on the basis that novation of the Contract would have occurred at or soon after that date.. However, at the time of drafting this report, transfer has yet to take place.  For the avoidance of doubt, the County Council has already paid £23,402,576 over the works contract period.

6.1.2 An Article 34 Agreement between the County Council and LUL to transfer the powers and rights of the Transport and Works Act Order - The Croxley Rail Link Order 2013 (the Order)- from the County Council to LUL.

 In accordance with section 34 of the Order, the County Council may transfer to LUL the County Council’s right to construct, maintain, use or operate the authorised works (or any part of them) or to acquire or use land for the purpose of the authorised works and such related statutory rights as may be agreed between the County Council and LUL, on such terms as may be agreed between the County Council and LUL. Where an agreement has been made references in the Order to the County Council include references to the LUL.

6.1.3 A Transfer Agreement that provides the framework for the transfer of the County Council’s Transport and Works Act Order powers and CRL Scheme related consents, commitments and undertakings. It seeks to transfer to LUL those things LUL needs to deliver the CRL Scheme going forward. The Agreement also provides:

 that the County Council generally retains responsibility for matters conducted before the transfer of these arrangements, with the exception of those matters specifically passed to LUL, with LUL taking responsibility for matters occurring after the transfer;

 LUL with a number of warranties and indemnities in relation to the status of matters associated with the CRL Scheme

 that the County Council’s liability under the warranties and indemnities is generally capped at £3 million, with claims having to exceed £10,000 before they can be pursued, and subject to certain time constraints (18 months for all claims other than in relation to Undertakings or Commitments which is 6 years). There are a number of commercially agreed exceptions to this. For example, an indemnity given by the County Council in relation to TUPE liabilities is uncapped; an indemnity 7

given by the County Council in relation to its exercise of powers pre- transfer can be pursued at any time;

 for the assignment of CRL Scheme related Intellectual Property Rights to LUL

 the mechanics for strategic board meetings

 mechanisms for the ongoing co-operation between parties, with certain Post Transfer Deliverables being specified as deliverables. The County Council has allocated a pot of £250,000 towards the costs of such matters, which if unused is to be transferred to LUL at the end of a five year period.

 that the County Council agrees to co-operate and act reasonably with LUL to achieve the objective of successful delivery of the CRL scheme.

 that the County Council assigns, where possible, the undertakings as set out in any Agreement made with third parties to LUL. These Agreements include those made with Newincco, Royal Mail, Canal and River Trust, Council, WBC and Network Rail.

 that LUL covenants that it will not act in an inconstant way that would breach the commitments made by the County Council as part of the Order process.

 the transfer of planning and other applications, consents, approval or permits where the benefit currently lies with the County Council

6.1.4 A Funding Agreement that will formalise the funding arrangements from the local funding partners (the County Council, the Hertfordshire LEP and Watford Council) to the project.

The County Council, in line with the requirements set out in the DfT Grant funding letter of 26 March 2015, is acting on behalf on the local consortium funding partners (Herts LEP and Watford Borough Council) and thus the Funding Agreement is between LUL and the County Council only:

 The agreement makes the County Council responsible for securing the total Local Consortia Funding Contribution (£128.08m) and making that funding available to TfL, irrespective of that funding being withheld by partners. It should be noted that:-

o The County Council has a written commitment from DfT that the £70.7m of DfT Directed Single Local growth Fund is fully committed to the CRL scheme, even in the event that changes

8

are made to the Local Growth Fund and/or the role of the Herts LEP in administering the Fund (see Appendix 3)

o the Herts LEP had previously committed its ‘discretionary’ £17.2m contribution from the Single Local Growth Fund (SLGF) solely to the project.

o A funding agreement between the County Council and Herts LEP has been drafted to reflect the Herts LEP commitments to allow the County Council as accountable body to access the agreed funding from Herts LEP.

o WBC has a Cabinet decision in place dated 13 July 2015 that resolved that WBC Cabinet confirmed WBC’s long term financial contribution to the CRL scheme. An Agreement will be put in place with WBC regarding the WBC contribution to the scheme.

 A Funding profile has been agreed whereby the County Council makes two payments to TfL each financial year (from 16/17 to 20/21), at the start of year (1st April) and at the mid point (1st October). The County Council capital programme will be updated to reflect the agreed profile, which also accommodates the constraints of the SLGF profiles over the period.

 The County Council is unable to clawback any funding payment to TfL, for whatever reason. The Agreement does include an “abandonment” clause, such that if TfL choose not to continue with the scheme, the County Council and TfL can seek guidance from DfT in respect of funding payments made by the County Council to TfL prior to abandonment.

 Under the terms of the Funding Agreement with TfL, the County Council’s full expenditure on the project in the financial years 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15 (£26,189,970), together with the sums paid to the contractor Taylor Woodrow (Vinci) in the current financial year to the Transfer date (£4,340,895, including the final payment currently set out in the Novation Agreement) are to be set off against the contribution the County Council has agreed to make to TfL in 15/16 in line with the funding profile set out in the HCC-LUL Funding Agreement. The total of these two items is £30,530,866. In addition, the County Council has expended a currently estimated value of £2.28m on other costs during 15/16.

 Within 13 weeks of the Transfer date, the County Council will set out those other costs incurred on the project during 15/16 financial year to the Transfer Date (currently estimated at £2.28m). Following Agreement of those costs, TfL will pay the County Council that value within 4 weeks.

9

6.1.5 A Property Agreement between the County Council and LUL to deal with land issues and ensure that LUL has both access to and ownership of land it requires to construct and operate the scheme.

 Appendix 4 is a diagrammatic plan of the scheme with both the Ascot Road land and the disused rail corridor indicated.

 In relation to the Transfer, lease or licencing of the land identified in the TWA Order owned by the County Council to LUL, the principle is that some of the land included within the Order limits is to transfer to LUL free of consideration, with the exception of the Ascot Road land (Plot 61 in part) which is owned by the County Council and is to be retained for use as a car park for the project (see below)  In relation to the assignment of the benefit of the County Council and Network Rail Property Agreement to LUL, where the ownership of the disused rail corridor land between Ascot Road and Wiggenhall Road, valued at £1.8m, will transfer to LUL. Those parts of the Network Rail land not required by LUL (non-operational land) to be retained by the County Council.

 In accordance with section 43 of the Order, section 123(2) of the Local Government Act 1972 (which requires the consent of the Secretary of State for certain disposals of land by a principal council) does not apply to the disposal of land to LUL authorised by the Order.

 Licences, where required, will be entered into between the County Council and LUL for the temporary use by LUL for works site compounds. This also includes any road space booking that may be required.

 The Property Agreement includes at Schedule 1 the extent of the County Council’s land interests. Generally speaking the land owned by the County Council comprises either highway subsoil or very small parcels or landscaped areas.

 The County Council are required to ensure vacant possession and title guarantee.

 Within the TWA Order, the Ascot Road land (Plot 61) was identified to be utilised initially as a site compound during the construction period and then for use as a car park for the new station. As such, a 5 year lease will be entered into between the County Council and LUL for the temporary use by LUL for a works site compound. A 1 year period is to be accommodated in the work programme between LUL vacating the Ascot Road land and the County Council opening a car park. A plan showing the site is included as Appendix 5.  The County Council is committed to provide a carpark for the station and this agreement includes restrictions around the location and operation of the car park, specifically:

10

o The carpark is to be within 100m of the station and is to operate 24hrs per day or within agreed operational hours. o The carpark shall remain in operation for as long as the station or link remains open, unless otherwise expressly agreed with LUL. o Car parking charges are to be similar to those applied at other station carparks in the Watford area.

6.1.6 An Escrow Agreement – between the County Council and TfL  Holds all the above agreements in escrow until they have all been signed and sealed by all parties. This ensures all documents are executed by all parties before they take effect, which given the complex and cross cutting nature of the agreements as constructed by LUL is important.

6.2 When the agreements mentioned above are completed they, will bring about the transfer of the project delivery responsibility the County Council to LUL. All cost risk beyond the agreed level of £284.4m will be borne by LUL.

7. Financial Implications

7.1 The authority has continued to provide its financial commitment to the project to maintain progress and the total investment to the end of September 2015 is estimated to be £32.8m (Invested costs 12/13 -14/15, plus Taylor Woodrow costs and other costs incurred in 15/16 to date, as set out in 6.1.4 above).

7.2 Specific DfT (Section 31) grant of £28m has been received to date for the project, through the LEP. In addition, the LEP has previously agreed to re- allocate £1.4m to the project in 15/16. The LEP contributions are subject to the financial agreement between HCC and the LEP referred to in 6.1.4 being completed. In addition the County Council has allocated s106 funding of £2.905m. The total funding available is thus £32.3m, leaving a shortfall of £0.5m which would be repayable from LUL once the Agreements are in place.

7.3 Whilst the DfT have given assurances about future funding if the LEP ceases to exist, it is currently unclear if the s31 grants and the LEP contributions would be at risk of recall by DfT / LEP if the transfer of the project does not take place.

8. Equal Opportunities

8.1 When considering proposals placed before Members it is important that they are fully aware of, and have themselves rigorously considered the equalities implications of the decision that they are taking.

8.2 The Equality Act 2010 requires the Council when exercising its functions to have due regard to the need to (a) eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and other conduct prohibited under the Act; (b) advance equality of opportunity between persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it and (c) foster good relations between

11

persons who share a relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not share it. The protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 are age; disability; gender reassignment; marriage and civil partnership; pregnancy and maternity; race; religion and belief, sex and sexual orientation

8.3 No major equalities issues have been identified with the proposals outlined in this report at this stage

9. Oversight of the Scheme

9.1 On the assumption that the scheme will transfer to LUL, and this was a condition put on the funding agreement from Government, a Watford Regeneration Board has been established. The role of this Board is to oversee the delivery of the Croxley Rail Link scheme and the various developments in the corridor that it will facilitate and maximise the benefits. It will also form a useful function of co-ordination at a strategic level. The board comprises officers from WBC, the County Council, London Underground Limited, the Hertfordshire LEP. Developers will be invited to attend certain meetings. There will be a standing invitation to Government officials. This Board has been established and has now met. It will meet on a bi-monthly basis.

9.2 At a project level, there will be a Strategic Board comprising officers from LUL and the County Council

9.3 A member of staff from Hertfordshire County Council will work closely with the LUL team to ensure that the project fulfils its highway and “good neighbour” responsibilities.

9.4 Henceforth, the project will be known as the Metropolitan Line Extension (Watford)

10. Other Matters

10.1 Future Risks Funding is in place and confirmed through the issuing of the DfT Funding letters. The responsibility for scheme delivery rests with TfL / LUL following the issuing of the Mayoral Decision and all cost risk above the agreed funding package sits with LUL. The transfer process has been undertaken to enable LUL to be fully prepared and informed regarding the project and the risks to the County Council as limited to those set out in 4.8 and 6.1.3 above

10.2 Timing of Project following Transfer The DfT Funding letter to the GLA (appendix 2) stated as a condition that TfL would work to an in service date of 2019 for the project. LUL have refused to commit to that date in subsequent Agreements with the County Council. At the inaugural meeting of the Watford Regeneration Board, LUL tabled a programme that indicated a commencement of the main site works in early 2016, with a target in service date of (December) 2020. The complexity of the integration of the new link with the Network Rail section is cited as one

12

reason for the lengthy build time, along with the requirement that new services being bought into service are tied to fixed points in the year when timetables are changed (traditionally May or December of each year).

10.3 Value for Money In granting Full Approval and agreeing the revised funding package for the project in March 2015, the DfT considered the value for money. Of particular note was the assessment of the wider economic benefits that the project “unlocks” in Watford and across S W Herts, driving significant new development and employment in the area. A study undertaken by Nathaniel Litchfield and Partners identified a total of over 2,500 jobs and a benefit to the local economy of £2bn, which were in fact benefits accrued from a scenario where the delivery of the scheme was not achieved until 2021.

10.4 Alternative Option (Non transfer to TfL / LUL) The delivery of the project can only be achieved through the transfer of the scheme to LUL in line with the proposals set out in para 4.6 and the funding package described in section 5. Not progressing with this proposal is not recommended as the scheme remains a priority for the County Council, WBC , Herts LEP and DfT for the reasons set out in paras 2.1 and 2.2. Progression with the transfer is dependant however on all arrangements being settled in an acceptable form to County Council.

10.5 Legal Comment

Winckworth Sherwood LLP have been retained by HCC to provide legal advice on the TWA process, the Design and Build Contract and in the negotiation and drafting of the legal agreements outlined above in Section 6.

10.6 An outstanding commercial issue arises on the manner in which £2.73m of the funding profile is to be made available by the County Council. Subject to that point being agreed, and properly reflected in the funding agreement, and all other live matters being settled to the County Council’s satisfaction and documented, it is Winckworth Sherwood’s view that:

 the agreements are in an acceptable form for the transactions that they record;  the agreements reflect the terms agreed between the parties and the County Council’s related instructions; and  subject to appropriate internal authorities being obtained, the County Council has the power to enter into the arrangements in the form documented

11 . Conclusion

11.1 It should be noted that discussions are ongoing with LUL regarding the final detail of the Agreements and arrangements to complete the transfer including the commercial matter referred to at 10.6 above.. Subject to the satisfactory conclusion of those discussions, the view of the report author is that the arrangements secure the delivery of an affordable and operational Croxley

13

Rail Link scheme within a mutually satisfactory timescale, as set out in this report.

12. Next Steps

12.1 At the time of writing this report finalisation of the transfer arrangements are continuing between the County Council and TfL /LUL. Any developments which take place after the publication of this report will be reported to Cabinet at its meeting.

Attachments Appendix 1 Croxley Rail Link Mayoral Decision (MD1478)

Appendix 2 DFT Funding Approval letters

Appendix 3 DFT Commitment Letter

Appendix 4 –Scheme layout

Appendix 5 – Ascot Road Land

Background Information Report to and Minutes of Cabinet, February 2012 Report to and Minutes of Cabinet, February 2015

14