NATO Infantry Weapons Standardization: Ideal Or Possibility?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NATO Infantry Weapons Standardization: Ideal Or Possibility? University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2016 NATO Infantry Weapons Standardization: Ideal or Possibility? Zhou, Yi Le (David) Zhou, Y. L. (2016). NATO Infantry Weapons Standardization: Ideal or Possibility? (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27061 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2872 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY NATO Infantry Weapons Standardization: Ideal or Possibility? by Yi Le (David) Zhou A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF STRATEGIC STUDIES GRADUATE PROGRAM IN MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA March, 2016 © Yi Le (David) Zhou 2016 ii Abstract This thesis examines the efforts that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has taken regarding the standardization of rifles and small arms ammunition from the Cold War to the present day and the limitations of these standardization efforts. During the Cold War, NATO was unsuccessful at standardizing a common rifle and its member states only agreed to standardize ammunition calibers. This thesis will discuss the factors that prevented all of the alliance’s militaries from adopting the same rifle models and the problems associated with NATO’s ammunition standardization efforts. Many NATO members intend on procuring new small arms during the 2020s period but there are no plans for the adoption of a common NATO rifle. In the absence of a common rifle for the future, NATO needs to undertake efforts that would both modernize its small arms capabilities and improve the degree of standardization within the alliance. iii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank Jim Schatz for everything that he has done to assist me with my thesis. I have learned a great deal from Mr. Schatz and the information and documents that I obtained from him were crucial to my thesis. Thank you Mr. Schatz for your encouragement throughout my research and for taking time from your busy schedule to answer my numerous interview questions and provide feedback on the drafts of my thesis chapters. Many thanks to my supervisors, Dr. Terry Terriff and Dr. Alexander Hill, for offering so much of their time to provide advice and feedback on my research and thesis. Special thanks to my examiner Dr. James Keeley for his insightful feedback and suggestions on my thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Maureen Hiebert, the Graduate Program Director at the Centre for Military, Security and Strategic Studies, for her advice on preparing for the thesis defence. I would like to express my gratitude to Salvatore A. Fanelli and MAJ James Williamson for the important information that they provided for my thesis and their feedback on the drafts of some of my thesis chapters. I have learned so much from my communications with Mr. Fanelli and MAJ Williamson and appreciate them taking time from their busy schedules in order to help me. Many thanks to CWO (Mr Gnr) John T. Yoshida and COL Miroslaw Zahor for taking time from their busy schedules to answer my questions for my thesis and for helping broaden my understanding of firearms related topics. As well, I would like to thank Cris E. Murray for providing me with detailed explanations about certain technical aspects of firearms via email and for giving me permission to include the iv materials on the 7x46mm cartridge that he sent me during my undergraduate years in my thesis. I have learned a lot from my emails communications with Mr. Murray. Furthermore, I would like to thank Per G. Arvidsson for taking his time to answer many of my thesis questions and for providing me with some NATO documents. I would also like to thank the following individuals for taking their time to answer questions for my thesis: Ola Bøe-Hansen, CAPT Robert Bopp, Michal Kuklik, Angus N. Norcross, Ondrej Podel, R. Blake Stevens, Anthony G. Williams and Jonathan Zyto. Special thanks to Dr. Gary K. Roberts for confirming the information from some of his unpublished online materials on terminal ballistics and providing me with some of his unpublished materials from the public domain for my thesis. Also, I would like to thank Lt. COL Ronald McLaughlin and Jack Leuba for confirming the information that they have posted online for use in my thesis. A Canadian defense industry professional, a Canadian firearms industry professional, a French defense professional and a former Canadian Army infantry reservist wanted to remain anonymous in my thesis. Many thanks to those individuals for taking time from their busy schedules to answer my thesis questions. As well, I am grateful to the French defense professional for providing me with many NATO documents that were crucial to my thesis. v Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... xi Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Second World War Logistical Problems and Weapons Developments ................ 6 1.1 Ammunition Supply Problems during the Second World War...................................... 6 1.2 Weapons Development Up To the End of the Second World War .............................. 13 Chapter 2: NATO Ammunition and Weapons Standardization in the Post-War Era ........ 23 2.1 NATO Weapons Standardization Trends ...................................................................... 23 2.2 US and British Post-War Rifle Cartridge Developments .............................................. 24 2.3 Rifle and Ammunition Standardization Efforts ............................................................ 27 2.4 7.62mm NATO Ammunition Standards ......................................................................... 33 2.5 Churchill’s Desire for a Common Anglo-American Rifle ............................................. 35 2.6 US Adoption of the M14 ................................................................................................... 36 2.7 Spanish and German Post-War Rifle Developments ..................................................... 39 2.8 German and Norwegian Adoption of the G3 ................................................................. 41 2.9 Basic Comparison of the FAL and G3 ............................................................................ 42 Chapter 3: US Development of the M16 and NATO Standardization of the SS109 Round 48 3.1 Alternatives to the 7.62mm NATO Cartridge ................................................................ 48 vi 3.2 US Procurement of AR-15 Rifles ..................................................................................... 50 3.3 The Vietnam War and US Adoption of the M16 ........................................................... 52 3.4 NATO Ammunition and Weapons Trials of 1976-79 .................................................... 55 3.5 Weapons and Ammunition Candidates of the 1976-79 NATO Trials ......................... 57 3.6 Challenges to NSMATCC’s Recommendations ............................................................. 63 3.7 Failure to Standardize a Common NATO Rifle ............................................................. 68 3.8 Impact of the 1976-79 NATO Trials and RSI on US Procurement .............................. 72 3.9 Canadian Weapons Procurement after the NATO Trials ............................................ 74 Chapter 4: NATO Standardization Limitations and Post-Cold War Efforts ....................... 78 4.1 NATO Ammunition Interchangeability Procedures ..................................................... 78 4.2 Why NATO Standardization is still needed in the Post-Cold War Era....................... 80 4.3 Limitations of NATO Ammunition Standardization .................................................... 82 4.4 Common NATO Rifle for the Future? ............................................................................ 89 4.5 Eastern European Challenges towards NATO Standardization .................................. 92 4.6 Current NATO Weapons Standardization Efforts ........................................................ 97 Chapter 5: Alternatives to NATO Standard SS109 ............................................................... 103 5.1 Is NATO Standard 5.56mm SS109 Ideal for Rifle Use?.............................................. 103 5.2 The Human Body and Bullet Terminal Performance ................................................
Recommended publications
  • User Instructions for Hollow Pointers Issue 4
    User Instructions for Hollow Pointers Issue 4 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION You can control the hollow point size and depth to fit your own requirements. Control the depth by setting the Stop Collar (CT1010-020) of your Trimmer. Very long rounds The unique Hollow Pointer gives Figure 1. Cartridge with require a Long Case Trimmer Base (CT1010-CTB103). precision shooters the capability Hollow Point Drilled of fine-tuning bullet weight to 2.0 SAFETY INFORMATION improve ballistics, particularly when adjusting for different Always wear safety glasses. Wash hands after handling lead barrel twists. The universal bullets. Hollow Pointer drills cavities in the noses of cast or jacketed 3.0 SUGGESTIONS FOR SETTING THE DEPTH soft-nose bullets. • 1/8" Drill — Tests indicate that magnum loads should This tool allows handloaders to be drilled 1/8" deep for good results. For lighter loads, it bore their own hollow-pointed may be desirable to drill a deeper cavity. cartridges for increased • 1/16" Drill — Drill a maximum of 1/8" deep with heavy expansion on impact from either loads. For lighter loads, it may be desirable to drill a factory ammunition or reloads. deeper cavity. Always approach maximum depths Hand-drilled hollow points with caution. expand better and cost less than manufactured hollow point bullets. Figure 3. Hollow Pointer Setup Two models are available: 1/8" for handguns and 1/16" for rifles. The bushing centers the drill’s tip against the nose of the bullet while centering the cartridge. Figure 2. Handgun Model (Top) and Rifle Model (Bottom) 4.0 PROCEDURE FOR DRILLING HOLLOW POINTS WITH ORIGINAL OR CLASSIC CASE TRIMMER 1.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make Gun Powder the Old Fashioned Way in Less Than 30 Minutes - Ask a Prepper
    10/8/2019 How To Make Gun Powder The Old Fashioned Way in Less Than 30 Minutes - Ask a Prepper DIY Terms of Use Privacy Policy Ask a Prepper Search something.. Survival / Prepping Solutions My Instagram Feed Demo Facebook Demo HOME ALL ARTICLES EDITOR’S PICK SURVIVAL KNOWLEDGE HOW TO’S GUEST POSTS CONTACT ABOUT CLAUDE DAVIS Social media How To Make Gun Powder The Old Fashioned Way in Less Than 30 Minutes Share this article By James Walton Print this article Send e-mail December 30, 2016 14:33 FOLLOW US PREPPER RECOMMENDS IF YOU SEE THIS PLANT IN YOUR BACKYARD BURN IT IMMEDIATELY ENGINEERS CALL THIS “THE SOLAR PANEL KILLER” THIS BUG WILL KILL MOST by James Walton AMERICANS DURING THE NEXT CRISIS Would you believe that this powerful propellant, that has changed the world as we know it, was made as far back as 142 AD? 22LBS GONE IN 13 DAYS WITH THIS STRANGE “CARB-PAIRING” With that knowledge, how about the fact that it took nearly 1200 years for us to TRICK figure out how to use this technology in a gun. The history of this astounding 12X MORE EFFICIENT THAN substance is one that is inextricably tied to the human race. Imagine the great SOLAR PANELS? NEW battles and wars tied to this simple mixture of sulfur, carbon and potassium nitrate. INVENTION TAKES Mixed in the right ratios this mix becomes gunpowder. GREEK RITUAL REVERSES In this article, we are going to talk about the process of making gunpowder. DIABETES. DO THIS BEFORE BED! We have just become such a dependent bunch that the process, to most of us, seems like some type of magic that only a Merlin could conjure up.
    [Show full text]
  • Protective Force Firearms Qualification Courses
    PROTECTIVE FORCE FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Health, Safety and Security AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: INITIATED BY: http://www.hss.energy.gov Office of Health, Safety and Security Protective Force Firearms Qualification Courses July 2011 i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A – APPROVED FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSES .......................... I-1 CHAPTER I . INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... I-1 1. Scope .................................................................................................................. I-1 2. Content ............................................................................................................... I-1 CHAPTER II . DOE FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ................................................................................ II-1 1. Purpose ..............................................................................................................II-1 2. Scope .................................................................................................................II-1 3. Process ..............................................................................................................II-1 4. Roles .................................................................................................................II-2 CHAPTER III . GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR FIREARMS QUALIFICATION COURSES.............................................................................III-1 CHAPTER IV
    [Show full text]
  • Small Arms-Individual Weapons
    290 Small Arms–Individual Weapons INVESTMENT COMPONENT Modernization thousand M14 EBRs were assembled be mounted on the shotgun. The bolt • 1QFY09: Materiel release and full- at TACOM Lifecycle Management handle is mountable on either side for rate production decision Recapitalization Command at Rock Island Arsenal in ambidextrous handling. • 3QFY09: First unit equipped response to Operational Need Statements M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun Maintenance requesting a longer range capability. The MASS enables Soldiers to transition System: The upgraded weapons are currently in between lethal and less-than-lethal fires • 4QFY09: Limited user test and MISSION service with select Army units. and adds the capability of a separate evaluation with MP units Enables warfighters and small units to shotgun without carrying a second • 2QFY10: Low-rate initial production engage targets with lethal fire to defeat The M320 Grenade Launcher is the weapon. Additional features include a approved or deter adversaries. replacement to all M203 series grenade box magazine, flip-up sights, and an • 4QFY10: First article testing launchers on M16 Rifles and M4 extendable stand-off device for door complete DESCRIPTION Carbines. A modular system, it attaches breaching. The M4 Carbine replaces the M16 series under the barrel of the rifle or carbine PROJECTED ACTIVITIES Rifles in all Brigade Combat Teams, and can convert to a stand-alone weapon. SYSTEM INTERDEPENDENCIES M4 Carbine: Division Headquarters, and other The M320 improves on current grenade None • Continue: M4 production, deliveries, selected units. It is 1.4 pounds lighter launchers with an integral day/night and fielding and more portable than the M16 series of sighting system and improved safety PROGRAM STATUS M14 EBR: rifles.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Enemy-Threat-Weapons
    UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS THE BASIC SCHOOL MARINE CORPS TRAINING COMMAND CAMP BARRETT, VIRGINIA 22134-5019 ENEMY THREAT WEAPONS B2A2177 STUDENT HANDOUT/SELF PACED INSTRUCTION Basic Officer Course B2A2177 Enemy Threat Weapons Enemy Threat Weapons Introduction In 1979, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. The Soviets assumed this would be a short uneventful battle; however, the Mujahadeen had other plans. The Mujahadeen are guardians of the Afghani way of live and territory. The Soviets went into Afghanistan with the latest weapons to include the AK-74, AKS-74, and AKSU-74, which replaced the venerable AK-47 in the Soviet Arsenals. The Mujahadeen were armed with Soviet-made AK-47s. This twist of fate would prove to be fatal to the Soviets. For nearly 11 years, the Mujahadeen repelled the Soviet attacks with Soviet-made weapons. The Mujahadeen also captured many newer Soviet small arms, which augmented their supplies of weaponry. In 1989, the Soviet Union withdrew from Afghanistan back to the other side of the mountain. The Mujahadeen thwarted a communist take- over with their strong will to resist and the AK-47. This is important to you because it illustrates what an effective weapon the AK-47 is, and in the hands of a well-trained rifleman, what can be accomplished. Importance This is important to you as a Marine because there is not a battlefield or conflict that you will be deployed to, where you will not find a Kalashnikov AK-47 or variant. In This Lesson This lesson will cover history, evolution, description, and characteristics of foreign weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0051236A1 Groves Et Al
    US 2007005 1236A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0051236A1 Groves et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 8, 2007 (54) TRIGGER MECHANISM FOR FIREARMS Related U.S. Application Data WITH SELF-ILOADING ACTIONS (60) Provisional application No. 60/713,722, filed on Sep. (75) Inventors: G. Blaine Groves, Dundas (CA); E. 6, 2005. Charles Franklin, Kitchener (CA) Publication Classification Correspondence Address: BORDEN LADNER GERVAS LLP (51) Int. Cl. WORLD EXCHANGE PLAZA F4C 7700 (2006.01) 1OO QUEEN STREETSUTE 1100 (52) U.S. Cl. .............................. 89/142: 42/69.03; 89/140 OTTAWA, ON K1P 1J9 (CA) (57) ABSTRACT (73) Assignee: Colt Canada Corporation, Kitchener The trigger mechanism allows the firearm to operate in a (CA) closed-bolt mode during semi-automatic fire and in an open-bolt mode during automatic fire. The mode change occurs only after the first round is discharged after the (21) Appl. No.: 11/470,026 selector has been moved instead of when the selector switch is moved, thus avoiding undesirable mechanism noise or (22) Filed: Sep. 5, 2006 motion at the time of selecting the firing mode. Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 1 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 FIG.1 Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 3 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 4 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 5 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 FIG.6B Patent Application Publication Mar. 8, 2007 Sheet 6 of 24 US 2007/0051236A1 54 53 55 52 56 FG.9 Patent Application Publication Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppressor Shootout: Desert Tactical SRS .338
    GUN TEST Suppressor Shootout DESERT TACTICAL SRS .338 SILENT AND DEADLY, three long-range big bore rifle suppressors for today’s sniper! by LT. DAVE bAHDE Dipisim quisit essi tet, senisit il enissi. Onullao rtiscilis eugue doloborpero et, vero diam, conseniam zzriusc iduisi tat la consenibh eniam vulla feum et accum quisse feum duntLitDui tet volorer ip ex eniam ing JET he value of a suppressor on a sniper rifle. At a recent sniper school, driven by a .338 caliber sniper rifle sniper rifle has been subject about a third of the rifles were sup- contract currently in process with the to much debate. When sup- pressed. Years ago, I was the only Army, it is also driven by the need to Tpressors were heavy, short- one with a suppressed rifle and many reach out to longer distances. lived, cumbersome and affected asked, “Aren’t those illegal?” Sup- The .30 caliber cartridges accuracy, there was a basis for argu- pressors are now seen at training, op- even in magnum form are still SUREFIRE ment. However, modern suppressors erations and competitions. Well-made pretty much limited to 1000 help most shooters shoot more ac- suppressors are beginning to show yards or so. If you want to get Ed digna ad tet irilis curately. Improvements in materials up at police departments and military to 1500 yards and beyond you alissim qui endiamc om- technology and design have made units, especially SpecOps units. need more. There are certainly modiamet ad mincipisl ut them virtually maintenance-free, Although the .308 rifle is still bigger guns and cartridges that vullam, commole ssissit lighter and more compact.
    [Show full text]
  • Mg 34 and Mg 42 Machine Guns
    MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS MC NAB © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS McNAB Series Editor Martin Pegler © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 DEVELOPMENT 8 The ‘universal’ machine gun USE 27 Flexible firepower IMPACT 62 ‘Hitler’s buzzsaw’ CONCLUSION 74 GLOSSARY 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY & FURTHER READING 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION Although in war all enemy weapons are potential sources of fear, some seem to have a deeper grip on the imagination than others. The AK-47, for example, is actually no more lethal than most other small arms in its class, but popular notoriety and Hollywood representations tend to credit it with superior power and lethality. Similarly, the bayonet actually killed relatively few men in World War I, but the sheer thought of an enraged foe bearing down on you with more than 30cm of sharpened steel was the stuff of nightmares to both sides. In some cases, however, fear has been perfectly justified. During both world wars, for example, artillery caused between 59 and 80 per cent of all casualties (depending on your source), and hence took a justifiable top slot in surveys of most feared tools of violence. The subjects of this book – the MG 34 and MG 42, plus derivatives – are interesting case studies within the scale of soldiers’ fears. Regarding the latter weapon, a US wartime information movie once declared that the gun’s ‘bark was worse than its bite’, no doubt a well-intentioned comment intended to reduce mounting concern among US troops about the firepower of this astonishing gun.
    [Show full text]
  • FN P90 Fact Sheet
    SALW Guide Global distribution and visual identification FN P90 Fact sheet https://salw-guide.bicc.de FN P90 SALW Guide FN P90 A personal defense weapon (often abbreviated PDW) is a compact semi- automatic or fully-automatic firearm similar in most respects to a submachine gun, but firing an (often proprietary) armor-piercing round, giving a PDW better range, accuracy and armor-penetrating capability than submachine guns, which fire pistol-caliber cartridges.The P90 was designed to have a length no greater than a man's shoulder width, in order to be easily carried and maneuvered in tight spaces, such as the inside of an armored vehicle. To achieve this, the weapon's design utilizes the unconventional bullpup configuration, in which the action and magazine are located behind the trigger and alongside the shooter's face, so that there is no wasted space in the stock. The P90's dimensions are also minimized by its unique horizontally mounted feeding system, wherein the box magazine sits parallel to the barrel on top of the weapon's frame. Overall, the weapon has an extremely compact profile. Technical Specifications Category Submachine Guns Operating system Straight blowback, closed bolt Cartridge FN 5.7 x 28mm Length 500 mm Feeding n/a Global distribution map The data on global distribution and production is provided primarily by the BwVC1, but also from national and regional focal points on SALW control; data published by think tanks, international organizations and experts; and/or data provided by individual researchers on SALW. It is not exhaustive. If you would like to add to or amend the data, please use the website's feedback function.
    [Show full text]
  • USA M14 Rifle
    USA M14 Rifle The M14 rifle, officially the United States Rifle, Caliber 7.62 mm, M14, is an American select-fire battle rifle that fires 7.62×51mm NATO (.308 in) ammunition. It became the standard-issue rifle for the U.S. military in 1959 replacing the M1 Garand rifle in the U.S. Army by 1958 and the U.S. Marine Corps by 1965 until being replaced by the M16 rifle beginning in 1968. The M14 was used by U.S. Army, Navy, and Marine Corps for basic and advanced individual training (AIT) from the mid-1960s to the early 1970s. The M14 was developed from a long line of experimental weapons based upon the M1 Garand rifle. Although the M1 was among the most advanced infantry rifles of the late 1930s, it was not an ideal weapon. Modifications were already beginning to be made to the basic M1 rifle's design during the last months of World War II. Changes included adding fully automatic firing capability and replacing the eight-round en bloc clips with a detachable box magazine holding 20 rounds. Winchester, Remington, and Springfield Armory's own John Garand offered different conversions. Garand's design, the T20, was the most popular, and T20 prototypes served as the basis for a number of Springfield test rifles from 1945 through the early 1950s Production contracts Initial production contracts for the M14 were awarded to the Springfield Armory, Winchester, and Harrington & Richardson. Thompson-Ramo-Wooldridge Inc. (TRW) would later be awarded a production contract for the rifle as well.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Ammunition Data Sheets
    TM 43-000 l-27 TECHNICAL MANUAL ARMY AMMUNITION DATA SHEETS SMALL CALIBER AMMUNITION FSC 1305 . DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release: distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY APRIL 1994 TM 43-0001-27 When applicable, insert latest change pages and dispose of LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES supersededpages in accordance with applicable rcgulat~ons. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES IN THIS PUBLICATION IS 316 CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: Page *Change Page *Change No. No. No. No. Cover 10-l thru lo-24 A 11-l thru 11-32 B 12-l thru 12-8 ithruvi 13-1 thru 13-8 l-l and l-2 14-1 thru 14-42 2-1 thru 2-16 15-l thru 15-16 3-1 thru 3-10 16-1 thru 16-10 4-1 thru 4-12 17-1 thru 17-8 5-1 thru 5-24 18-1 thru 18-16 6-1 thru 6-4 18-17 7-l thru 7-8 18-18 8-l thru 8-18 Authentication Page 9-l thru 9-46 * Zero indicates an original page. Change 1 A :::‘l’M43.0001-“7 Technical Manual ) HEADQUARTERS ) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY p No. 43-0001-2’7 ) Washington, DC, 20 April 1994 ARMY AMMUNITION DATA SHEETS SMALL CALIBER AMMUNITION FSC 1305 REPORTING OF ERRORS AND RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS You can improve this manual. If you find any mistakes or know of a way to improve the procedures, please let us know. Mail your DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms), or DA Fornl 2028-2 located in the back of this nxmual direct to Commander, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the May 2020 Newsletter Here
    MAY 2020 VOL 87 President’s Message Chapter 16 Newsleer Organizaon and Responsibilies: Editor: Glen Craig Secons: Message from the President: Stephen Durfee Treasurers Report: Willi Lindner Sec. Rpt (Staff Meeng Minutes): Mike Barkstrom Sick Call/Obituary: Chaplain Butch Hall Blast from the Past: Glen Craig Special Recognion: Mike Barkstrom Upcoming Events: Mike Barkstrom Calendar: Stephen Durfee Human Interest Story: Chapter at large SFA Naonal HQ Update: Stephen Durfee Aer Acon Report: Stephen Durfee Membership Info: Roy Sayer Adversements: Glen Craig A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one Suspense: another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of st industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the Newsleer published (Web): 1 of each bread it has earned. – Thomas Jefferson odd numbered month Respecully, (Special Forces Associaon Chapter XVI President) th Stephen P. Durfee (DOL) Booz, Allen, Hamilton Inc. Input due to editor: 20 of each Strategic and Operaonal Exercise Planner, Mid [email protected] even numbered month Personal Cell: 208‐530‐5472 Dra due to President: 30th of each Pastor Butch’s Corner even numbered month th Powerful stories, to be so short. Final Dra due 30 of each These twelve short stories are all very good stories and make us think even numbered month twice about the daily happenings in our lives as we deal with others!! 1. I asked my grandmother to define success in her own words, she said; "Success is when you look back at your life and the memories make you smile." 2.
    [Show full text]