DOCSLIB.ORG

Salmonella Spp. Contamination in Commercial Layer Hen Farms Using Different Types of Samples and Detection Methods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salmonella Spp. Contamination in Commercial Layer Hen Farms Using Different Types of Samples and Detection Methods Salmonella spp. contamination in commercial layer hen farms using different types of samples and detection methods M. C. Soria,∗,1 M. A. Soria,∗ D. J. Bueno,∗,3 E. I. Godano,† S. C. G´omez,‡,2 I. A. ViaButron,∗ V. M. Padin,§ and A. D. Rog´e§ ∗Instituto Nacional de Tecnolog´ıa Agropecuaria EEA Concepci´on del Uruguay, Ruta Provincial 39 Km 143,5, 3260, Concepci´on del Uruguay, Entre R´ıos, Argentina; †Tecnovo S.A., Parque Industrial C.C. 17, 3116, Crespo, Entre R´ıos, Argentina.; ‡Fundaci´on ArgenINTA, Ruta 11, Km 12.5, 3101, Oro Verde, Paran´a, Entre R´ıos, Argentina; and §Servicio de Ant´ıgenos y Antisueros, Instituto Nacional de Producci´on de Biol´ogicos (INPB) - ANLIS “Dr Carlos G. Malbr´an”, Av. V´elez Sarsfield 563, C1282AFF, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina ABSTRACT The performance of detection methods Agreement was between fair to good depending on the (culture methods and polymerase chain reaction as- sample, and it was good between isolation and PCR (fe- say) and plating media used in the same type of sam- ces and boot-swabs), without agreement for feed sam- ples were determined as well as the specificity of PCR ples. Salmonella spp. PCR was positive for all strains, primers to detected Salmonella spp. contamination in while S. Typhimurium PCR was negative. Salmonella layer hen farms. Also, the association of farm character- Enteritidis PCR used was not specific. Based in the istics with Salmonella presence was evaluated. Environ- multiple logistic regression analyses, categorization by mental samples (feces, feed, drinking water, air, boot- counties was significant for Salmonella spp. presence swabs) and eggs were taken from 40 layer hen houses. (P-value = 0.010). This study shows the importance Salmonella spp. was most detected in boot-swabs taken of considering different types of samples, plating media around the houses (30% and 35% by isolation and PCR, and detection methods during a Salmonella spp. moni- respectively) follow by fecal samples (15.2% and 13.6% toring study. In addition, it is important to incorporate by isolation and PCR, respectively). Eggs, drinking wa- the sampling of floors around the layer hen houses to ter, and air samples were negative for Salmonella de- learn if biosecurity measures should be strengthened tection. Salmonella Schwarzengrund and S. Enteritidis to minimize the entry and spread of Salmonella in the were the most isolated serotypes. For plating media, rel- houses. Also, the performance of some PCR methods ative specificity was 1, and the relative sensitivity was and S. Enteritidis PCR should be improved, and biose- greater for EF-18 agar than XLDT agar in feed and curity measures in hen farms must be reinforced in the fecal samples. However, relative sensitivity was greater region of more concentrated layer hen houses to reduce in XLDT agar than EF-18 agar for boot-swab samples. the probability of Salmonella spp. presence. Key words: Salmonella, detection, sampling, layer hen farm 2017 Poultry Science 00:1–11 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex053 INTRODUCTION range of food products, poultry meat and eggs are among the most frequently implicated sources of human The intense international trade of animals and animal Salmonella outbreaks (Gast, 2013). Therefore, knowl- products facilitates the spread of Salmonella spp., mak- edge of the actual prevalence of Salmonella spp. in ing salmonellosis an international public-health sub- laying hens and the factors that influence the pres- ject, responsible for serious economic losses to the poul- ence and persistence of Salmonella on a layer hen try industry and governments. Although humans can farm are of the utmost importance (Van Hoorebecke become infected by Salmonella spp. through a wide et al., 2010b). Because Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) and other im- portant serotypes do not typically cause mortality in C 2017 Poultry Science Association Inc. layer flocks, samples collected from the environment Received October 12, 2016. Accepted March 2, 2017. tend to more readily indicate the presence of them in 1Present address: INIQUI-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de the flock (Holt et al., 2011). Environmental monitoring Salta, Avda. Bolivia 5150, C.P. 4400, Salta, Argentina. is a useful, effective and less invasive method to predict 2 Present address: Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa, Universidad potential infection or colonization of the poultry flocks Aut´onoma de Entre R´ıos, 25 de Mayo 353, 3260, Concepci´on del Uruguay, Entre R´ıos, Argentina. (Waltman and Gast, 2008). Furthermore, a high level 3Corresponding author: [email protected] of environmental contamination of the house is also 1 2 SORIA ET AL. associated with a higher risk of producing contaminated MATERIALS AND METHODS eggs in laying houses (Henzler et al., 1998). Even after cleaning and disinfection among laying cycles, SE can Sampling appear in a variety of environmental samples (Dewaele et al., 2012). Forty layer hen houses belonging to 30 hen farms A wide range of culture methods and polymerase from 6 counties (Colon, Diamante, Gualeguay, Nogoy´a, chain reaction (PCR) assays are available, and sev- Paran´a, and Uruguay) of Entre Rios, Argentina were eral studies had been developed to test their ability to sampled one time, from August 2011 to April 2012. At detect Salmonella in different matrices (Rybolt et al., the moment of sampling, 39 layer hen flocks, housed 2004; Myint et al., 2006; Eriksson and Aspan, 2007; in battery cage systems, were in egg-laying phase. One Love and Rostagno, 2008; Singer et al., 2009). Rou- flock was 4 months old. Without this flock, the average tinely used methods for isolating Salmonella rely on age of the hens was 18 months, with 7 and 36 months as pre-enrichment in nonselective media, selective enrich- minimum and maximum, respectively. Flock sizes were ment, and plating on selective and differential media. between 450 and 30,500 hens. Most of the layer hens Subsequently, the pathogens are identified by biochem- were white egg layers, and they had not received any ical and serological tests. According to Rybolt et al. Salmonella vaccine. (2004), the sensitivity and specificity of the method Automatic and manual battery cage systems for layer depend on the sample type as well as the isolation hens were considered in the sampling. Automatic sys- conditions. Also, the process of isolating Salmonella tems included manure belts, mobile feed chutes, mecha- spp. for environmental monitoring is determinate by nized egg collections, and advanced climate systems for different factors: sampling, level of contamination by cooling and ventilation. On the other hand, the manual the pathogen, or presence of competitors. Depending battery cage farms did not have automated infrastruc- on the type of competitive bacteria, detection of occa- ture and most of the activities were performed manually sional colonies of Salmonella may be easier if the ap- inside the house. propriate plating medium has been used (Busse, 1995). When the farm had 4 or fewer houses, one commer- In addition, processing a greater number of samples cial layer hen house was sampled. If the farm had more with a single effective method is probably more ef- than 4 houses, 2 houses were sampled. When there were ficient than testing a small number of samples us- both manual battery cage and automatic systems on ing complex laboratory protocols (Carrique-Mas and the same farm, one of each type of house was sampled. Davies, 2008). So, 33 and 7 manual and automatic battery cage houses The diversity of sources from which salmonellae can were sampled, respectively. If the farm had animals with be introduced into flocks or houses complicates efforts different ages, the houses that had older layer hens were to establish specific critical control points for preventing selected for the study because they are more likely to zoonotic Salmonella infections in poultry (Gast, 2013). be contaminated with Salmonella spp. (Van Hoorebeke In addition, every poultry farm has its own risk pro- et al., 2010a). file for the introduction of pathogens, subsequent de- velopment of disease, and the spread of pathogens to other farms. This risk profile is determined by a com- plex interaction between the levels of infection in an Number and Sample Types Taken area, the measures implemented on the farm to pre- on Layer Hen Farms vent disease, and other factors including the density of farms in the area and linkages with other farms Feed. Samples were taken from each mobile feed and markets (Sims, 2007). Different countries have dif- chute in manual battery cage houses. In houses without ferent regulations to control Salmonella spp. in lay- any kind of chute, samples were collected from layer ing flocks. Most of them are focused on Salmonella feeders or from the external silo. In automatic house Typhimurium (ST) and SE (Barroso, 2011;USDA, systems, samples were taken from mobile feed chutes. 2011). In all cases, 3 ± 1 kg of feed were taken and put in Minimizing Salmonella contamination in commercial plastic bags, using disinfected plastic spoons. layer hen houses required a continuous improvement of Eggs. Two fiber cartons of 30 eggs each one were the environmental monitoring process (Im et al., 2015), collected from each house. Mainly, dirty eggs were se- methods used for pathogen detection, and the manage- lected to be sampled. It was not possible to analyze ment measures taken in poultry production. For this eggs from 2 layer houses from different farms. In one of reason, the aims of this work were to 1) estimate the them, the hens were not in laying phase. From the other contamination of Salmonella spp. in layer hens farms house, the farm owner did not authorize egg sampling. using different types of samples, 2) evaluate the perfor- Feces. Pooled feces (300 ± 50 g) were taken from all mance of detection methods, plating media used and belts in each line of the house after running the manure the specificity of PCR primers, and 3) study the asso- removal system (automatic).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Back to the Future of Animal Law ALDF Presents a Weekend of Scholarship and Insights
    10 2010 MMER Victory for More Good News 90 Days 29.2 U Farmed Animals For Kentucky’s In Jail for S 3 In California 6 Shelter Animals 8 Puppy’s Killer ND FU ENSE F DE AL G LE Tails wagging at Harvard Law School for ALDF’s Future of Animal Law Conference ANIMAL HE Back to the Future F T O of Animal Law ERS ALDF presents a weekend of scholarship and insights T OR TAKE MORE THAN 300 ATTORNEYS, law stu- animal law, veterinary forensics and tox- dents, academics and animal advocates icity testing without animals, the confer- UPP from around the globe, gather them at ence addressed what is doubtless the most S one of the world’s most prestigious law pressing issue advocates face: animals schools, and you’ve got more than an used as food. OR international perspective on legal issues – you’ve got the Future of Animal Law at FARMED ANIMALS F Harvard University. Charting a Course for the Protection of ER Sponsored by ALDF and the Harvard Farmed Animals was one of the highlights Student Animal Legal Defense Fund of the Future of Animal Law, and it featured TT (SALDF) chapter, the April 9–12 confer- a panel representing the fields of law, sci- ence was the scene of strategies, panel ence, policy and economics. Speakers discussions and workshops, all aimed at included Patrick Brown of the Stanford SLE educating and inspiring those who want University School of Medicine; Carter W to use the legal system to advance the Dillard, counsel to the Humane Society of interests of animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Egg Production in Canada
    Egg Production in Canada Modern domestic strains of egg-laying chickens (also called ‘layers’, ‘laying hens’, or simply ‘hens’) originate from Jungle Fowl and we know that in the wild, these hens would build a nest in which to lay their egg, would forage for food and would perch up high at night. While modern strains of hens are different from their ancestors, they still retain many of the behaviour patterns of their ancestors and are strongly motivated to perform those behaviours. The Life of an Egg-Laying Hen In B.C., more than 2 million hens are raised for egg production each year. Chicks are hatched at hatcheries where the male and females are separated soon after hatching. Female chicks are kept at the hatchery for up to 2 days where they are vaccinated against diseases. Beak trimming is routinely performed on flocks destined for commercial production. This is a painful procedure that involves removing a portion of the beak using either a blade (hot or cold) or a laser and is performed within the first week of life. Male chicks of egg-laying breeds are of little economic value as they will not produce eggs, and, due to genetics, grow much slower than breeds of chickens raised for meat. As a result, they are all killed after hatching. Female chicks are either transported directly to the farm or, more commonly, to a pullet grower who rears the chickens until they reach approximately 19 weeks of age. At that time, the pullets are transported to the farm. The average hen will begin laying eggs at between 18 - 20 weeks of age (depending on the season and the breed of hen that is raised).
    [Show full text]
  • ARC News a Newsletter from the Animal Rights Coalition
    AARRCC NNEEWWSS The Poultry Issue The Poultry Issue Fall 2007 A publication of the Animal Rights Coalition to promote a compassionate world A Day in a Life in the City with Chickens by Mary Britton Clouse, Chicken Run Rescue It’s just before sunrise. Classical music seeps softly from the clock radio. The floor creaks as I step out of bed and the roosters stir from their sleep just below in our basement. Wings slap a warning that the first crow will come from Roseman – ARK-A-ARK-A-ARKGGG in his old, gravelly voice. We’ve been hearing that crow for almost five years now. Young Bing, named after Bing Crosby, chimes in with a melodious and melancholy greeting that sounds much like the first few notes of the Air Force anthem “Off We Go” – an appropriate way to start a day. I dress and pad downstairs. I sing a good morning song A beautiful day at Chicken Run Rescue to my beautiful birds as I tug on the lights. All seven girls are already up and pacing at their pen door, anxious to Rosco gets his eye drops for a slight infection. Roseman trundle up the stairs to the shed door and outside and see gets a half tablet of Baytril for a persistent foot infection. what garden snacks are left from yesterday’s treats. They Bing has just recovered from a very serious and unsolved have been thinking about them all night. Several also illness, perhaps from some toxic berry he found in the have plans to lay eggs in a little while.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Effects of Furnished Cages and Battery Cages on Behavioral Exhibitions in White Leghorn Chickens
    Research Note Furnished cage system and hen well-being: Comparative effects of furnished cages and battery cages on behavioral exhibitions in White Leghorn chickens K. Mile* and H.-W. Chengf' *Depai.tirient of Animal $renc:es. Purdue University. Wet Lafayette, IN 7907: (lad TLicstocJi Behacior Research Unit. USDA -Aqricuitwr'al Research Service. West Lafayette. IN 47907 ABSTRACT The battery cage system is being banned birds were housed per cage, providing a stocking den- ill European Union before or by 2012, and the fur- sity of 610 (-Ili 2 of floor space per bird. Behavioral ob- nished cage system will be the only cage system allowed servations were conducted using the Xoldus Observer after 2012. This stud y was conducted to exanune the software package. The birds were observed at 5-mm different effects of caging s ystems, furnished ('ages vs. intervals for the entire light period. The birds housed in battery cages, oil behaviors. One hundred ninety- battery cages had higher posture and behavioral transi- two 1 -d-old non-beak-trinuned I-Tv-Line \V-36 White tions and increased time spent walking and perform- chicks were reared using standard nianageinent ing exploratory behavior (P < 0.05. 0.01. respective- practices in raised wire cages. At 19 wk of age, the birds ly) which may indicate they were stressed. resulting were randomly assigned into battery cages or furnished iii restlessness. whereas the birds housed in furnished cages. The battery cages were commercial wire cages ('ages had higher levels of preening ( P < 0.05). Preen- containing 6 birds per cage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Housing System on Salmonella Infections in Laying Hens
    Zoonoses and Public Health REVIEW ARTICLE The Influence of the Housing System on Salmonella Infections in Laying Hens: A Review S. Van Hoorebeke1, F. Van Immerseel2, F. Haesebrouck2, R. Ducatelle2 and J. Dewulf1 1 Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium 2 Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium Impacts • An overview is given of all published observational studies on the influence of the housing system of laying hens on the prevalence of Salmonella. • Based on the available epidemiological data it is unlikely that the move from conventional battery cages to enriched cages and non-cage systems will increase the prevalence of Salmonella in laying hens. • Other factors such as the farm and flock size, the stocking density, stress, the carry-over of infections through pests, hygiene measures, etc., also play a role. Keywords: Summary Laying hens; Salmonella; housing system From 2012 onwards, housing of laying hens in conventional battery cages will Correspondence: be forbidden in the European Union and only enriched cages and non-cage S. Van Hoorebeke. Veterinary Epidemiology housing systems such as aviaries, floor-raised, free-range and organic systems Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics will be allowed. Although this ban aims at improving the welfare of laying and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary hens, it has also initiated the question whether there are any adverse conse- Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, quences of this decision, especially with respect to the spread and/or persistence 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives to the Barren Battery Cage for the Housing of Laying Hens in the European Union
    ALTERNATIVES TO THE BARREN BATTERY CAGE FOR THE HOUSING OF LAYING HENS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A report by Compassion in World Farming 3 2007 © Dale Arey (CIWF) ALTERNATIVES TO THE BARREN BATTERY CAGE FOR THE HOUSING OF LAYING HENS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A report by Compassion in World Farming Written by Heather Pickett BSc (Hons) MSc 2007 © Compassion in World Farming, 007 ISBN 900 56 407 Compassion in World Farming nd Floor, River Court, Mill Lane, Godalming, Surrey GU7 EZ, UK Tel: +44(0)483 5950 Fax: +44(0)483 86639 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ciwf.org.uk Registered Charity Number 095050; a Company limited by Guarantee, registered number 4590804. 3 Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 8 2. Alternatives to the barren battery cage for the housing of laying hens in the European Union 8 2. ‘Enriched’ cages 8 2. Non-cage systems 9 3. The ability of ‘enriched’ cages and non-cage systems to meet the behavioural needs of hens 10 3. The natural behaviour and cognitive abilities of hens 10 3. Nesting 10 3.3 Foraging and dustbathing 13 3.4 Perching 15 3.5 Space requirements and social group size 16 4. Addressing key welfare concerns in ‘enriched’ cages and non-cage systems 19 4. Feather pecking and cannibalism 19 4. Bone strength and fractures 23 4.3 Mortality 24 5. Overall comparison of welfare in ‘enriched’ cages and non-cage systems 25 6. Economics of changing to non-cage systems 27 6. Production costs in non-cage systems 27 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Table Egg Production and Hen Welfare: Agreement and Legislative Proposals
    Table Egg Production and Hen Welfare: Agreement and Legislative Proposals Joel L. Greene Analyst in Agricultural Policy Tadlock Cowan Analyst in Natural Resources and Rural Development February 14, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42534 Table Egg Production and Hen Welfare: Agreement and Legislative Proposals Summary The United Egg Producers (UEP), the largest group representing egg producers, and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), the largest animal protection group, have been adversaries for many years over the use of conventional cages in table egg production. In July 2011, the animal agriculture community was stunned when the UEP and HSUS announced that they had agreed to work together to push for federal legislation to regulate how U.S. table eggs are produced. The agreement between UEP and HSUS called for federal legislation that would set cage sizes, establish labeling requirements, and regulate other production practices. As part of the agreement, HSUS agreed to immediately suspend state-level ballot initiative efforts in Oregon and Washington. On April 25, 2013, the Egg Products Inspection Act Amendments of 2013 (S. 820 and H.R. 1731) were introduced in the 113th Congress. The bills are nearly identical to the legislation that was introduced during the 112th Congress (S. 3239 and H.R. 3798). The provisions in S. 820 and H.R. 1731 reflect the 2011 agreement between UEP and HSUS to establish uniform, national cage size requirements for table egg-laying hens. The bills would codify national standards for laying-hen housing over a 15- to 16-year phase-in period, including labeling requirements to disclose how eggs are produced, and set air quality, molting, and euthanasia standards for laying hens.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Safety and Cage Egg Production
    May 2011 An HSUS Report: Food Safety and Cage Egg Production Abstract States have begun legislating against cage egg production and dozens of major U.S. food retailers, restaurant chains, and foodservice providers—as well as hundreds of U.S. universities—are switching to cage-free eggs. Extensive scientific evidence strongly suggests this trend will improve food safety. All sixteen scientific studies published in the last five years comparing Salmonella contamination between caged and cage-free operations found that those confining hens in cages had higher rates of Salmonella, the leading cause of food poisoning related death in the United States. This has led prominent consumer advocacy organizations, such as the Center for Food Safety, to oppose the use of cages to confine egg-laying hens. Introduction How we treat animals can have serious public health implications. The AIDS virus, for example, has killed more than 25 million people,1 and its emergence has been traced to the butchering of chimpanzees for their flesh.2 The emergence of SARS, the contagious respiratory disease that infected thousands worldwide, has been linked to live animal markets,3 and the introduction of monkeypox into the United States has been blamed on the exotic pet trade.4 In fact, many of humanity’s great disease scourges—including smallpox,5 influenza,6 and measles7—likely originally arose from our domestication of farm animals.8 Many current industrial farming practices threaten the health of Americans, including the feeding of millions of pounds of antibiotics
    [Show full text]
  • Battery Cages and the Welfare of Hens in Canada a Summary of the Scientific Literature
    Battery Cages and the Welfare of Hens in Canada A Summary of the Scientific Literature - October 2005 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2 The Battery System ..................................................................................................... 3 International Developments ......................................................................................... 4 Hen Behaviour and Environment ................................................................................. 4 Physical Ailments ......................................................................................................... 8 Industry Practices ........................................................................................................ 9 Role of Genetics .......................................................................................................... 10 Legislation in Canada ................................................................................................ 10 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 11 Literature Cited ......................................................................................................... 11 Other Sources ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Laying Birds in Deep Litter and Battery Cage Systems Inorlu Local Government Area of Imo State, Nigeria: a Comparative Study
    International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry Volume 6, Issue 3, 2019, PP 21-29 ISSN 2394-5907 (Print) & ISSN 2394-5915 (Online) Management of Laying Birds in Deep Litter and Battery Cage Systems Inorlu Local Government Area of Imo State, Nigeria: A Comparative Study Okonkwo, S1and Ahaotu, E.O1 1Department of Animal Production and Health Technology, Imo State Polytechnic Umuagwo, Nigeria *Corresponding Author: Okonkwo, S and Ahaotu, E.O , Department of Animal Production and Health Technology, Imo State Polytechnic Umuagwo, Nigeria. ABSTRACT This paper examines the management of battery cage and deep litter poultry egg production systems in Orlu Local Government Area of Imo State, Nigeria. Structured questionnaire were used in sourcing primary data of 150 poultry egg farmers which comprises of 75each of battery cage and deep litter poultry egg farmers. Descriptive statistics was applied for the study. The mean ages of the battery cage and deep litter farmers were 46 and 44 years respectively implying the farmers are still in their active years. All the battery cage farmers had formal education as against 4% of deep litter farmers. The major constraints in egg production ranked in order of high feed cost, non-remunerative price for egg and birds and supply of poor quality feed and feed ingredients. In addition are high costs of medicines and vaccines, lack of disease control facilities and high rate of electricity tariff. The paper recommends the reduction in electricity tariff, credit provision and subsidy of feed input prices. Also strengthening of existing research centers to develop genetically improved and efficient feed converting breeds of poultry is recommended too.
    [Show full text]
  • Broiler Multi Tier Broiler Multi Tier Broiler Multi Tier
    BROILER MULTI TIER BROILER MULTI TIER BROILER MULTI TIER The Facco Broiler cage originates from Facco’s long poultry farming experience and from the innovative test cycle carried out on broilers of various breeds and weights FEEDING SYSTEM The special plastic material of the floor, together with the mechanical frame, provide a flexible and steady The feed pans (two in each cage - B3 model) or four feed pans support that ensures the optimum development of the animal’s feet. (B3-MAX model) have been developed in order to feed the animals from their first day of life to the end of the cycle, bringing Cage dimensions were selected which would maximize the animals’ welfare and guarantee an optimum use feed wastage down to a minimum. The feed pans is built so that of the space, thereby avoiding unnecessary cage depth. the adult broilers are unable to roost on it and to facilitate the access of the animals from the first days of the cycle. Facco designed two different versions of the BROILER MULTIPIANO “B3”: • B3 classic, module 248x165 • B3-MAX, module 372x196 At the same time, the structure allows the chicks to go in and out of the trough without getting stuck. The height of the whole feeding line may be adjusted. In fact, the BROILER CAGES B3 - 248x165 BROILER CAGES B3-MAX - 372x196 trough has been designed so that the quantity of feed released can be adjusted according to the animals’ age by simply adjusting its height. The feed is transported from the silo to the trough by way of a 410 special system made of spirals that ensure individual feeding on 410 each level of each row.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Welfare of Hens in Battery Cages and Alternative Systems
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2009 A Comparison of the Welfare of Hens in Battery Cages and Alternative Systems Sara Shields Animal Studies Repository Ian J.H. Duncan University of Guelph Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals Part of the Agribusiness Commons, Animal Studies Commons, and the Operations and Supply Chain Management Commons Recommended Citation Shields, Sara and Duncan, Ian J.H., "A Comparison of the Welfare of Hens in Battery Cages and Alternative Systems" (2009). IMPACTS ON FARM ANIMALS. 18. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals/18 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An HSUS Report: A Comparison of the Welfare of Hens in Battery Cages and Alternative Systems Sara Shields, Ph.D.,* and Ian J.H. Duncan, Ph.D.† Abstract Housing systems for egg-laying hens range from small, pasture-based flocks to large, commercial-scale operations that intensively confine tens of thousands of hens indoors. The overwhelming majority of laying hens used for commercial egg production in the United States are confined in battery cages and provided 432.3 cm2 (67 in2) of space per bird. Cages prevent hens from performing the bulk of their natural behavior, including nesting, perching, dustbathing, scratching, foraging, exercising, running, jumping, flying, stretching, wing- flapping, and freely walking. Cages also lead to severe disuse osteoporosis due to lack of exercise. Alternative, cage-free systems allow hens to move freely through their environment and to engage in most of the behavior thwarted by battery-cage confinement.
    [Show full text]