[
Rushcliffe Borough Council
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Report 2019
January 2020 Contents Page
1. Introduction 1
2. National and Local Context 2
3. The SHLAA Process 4
4. Reporting and Continuous Monitoring 9
5. Report Terms and Evidence Sources 10
6. Methodology for Assessing Deliverability and its Role in the Housing Trajectory 15
7. Site Assessment Results 16
8. Broad Locations and Windfall Development 28
9. Housing Trajectory Based on Supply at April 2019 38
Appendices
Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations 40
Appendix 2: Methodology for Assessing Deliverability 45
Appendix 3: Site Location Plans 59
Appendix 4: Site Reports 60
1. Introduction
Purpose of the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
1.1 The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) is an important part of the evidence base to support the delivery of housing. This assessment forms an essential part of the planning process by helping to ensure an adequate supply of land for housing. It uses a robust evidence-based approach, which is a key principle of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
Relationship to the Rushcliffe Local Plan
1.2 The SHLAA provides essential evidence for the delivery and review of the Rushcliffe Local Plan. It is, in effect, a technical evidence-base for the identification of ‘deliverable’1 and ‘developable’2 sites for new housing over a period of around 15 years. Rushcliffe Local Plan consists of Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy (adopted December 2014), and Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies (which is now adopted, but was not adopted at the assessment date).
5 Year Supply of Deliverable Sites
1.3 One of the most important roles of the SHLAA is to determine if the Local Authority has a 5 year supply of deliverable sites for new housing. In order to be classed as ‘deliverable’ a site must be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years. In particular:
a) Non-major housing development with planning permission, and all sites with detailed planning permission, should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that homes will not be delivered within five years. b) Outline planning permission for major development, allocated sites in a development plan, or sites identified on a brownfield register, should be considered deliverable where there is clear evidence that housing completions will begin on site within five years, through evidence of progress.
1 and 2 as defined by the National Planning Policy Framework
1 2. National and Local Context
2.1 SHLAA is the process undertaken to identify sites that have the potential for residential development in local authority areas. It is designed to ensure local authorities maintain a flexible and responsive supply of housing land as required by the National Planning Policy Framework.
2.2 The SHLAA is designed to be a continuous process of managing the supply of deliverable housing land. The National Planning Policy Framework requires local authorities to identify and update annually a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide five years’ worth of housing against their housing requirements. In addition, it states that the SHLAA should identify a supply of specific, deliverable sites or broad locations for growth, for years 6-10 and, where possible, for years 11-15.
2.3 The SHLAA approach aims to result in the following core outputs:
The identification of a minimum of a 5 year supply of deliverable sites in support of the adopted Rushcliffe Local Plan (Part 1 and Part 2)
The identification of a minimum of a 6 to 10 year supply of developable sites or broad locations accompanied by identification of barriers to delivery where it is known at what stage these barriers can be mitigated.
The identification of an 11 to 15 year (or more) land supply of developable sites or broad locations accompanied by identification of barriers to delivery where it is known when these barriers can be mitigated.
A group of sites identified as having the potential for housing development, but on which development is constrained (either physically, due to deliverability constraints, factually due to planning permissions lapsing or being renewed on a number of occasions, or as a result of policy constraints, such as Green Belt or on a greenfield site outside of named settlements). Delivery on such sites will be assessed as ‘May be suitable if policy changes’, or as ‘Unknown’. It is difficult to estimate the timescale for the potential delivery of sites which are categorised as being contrary to current planning policy because their delivery is dependent on policy changing in the future through the Local Plan review processes.
2.4 The key stages of the SHLAA assessment required to deliver the core outputs are as follows:
2 Site Identification - Identify all sites from the full range of sources of housing potential.
Estimating Potential - Undertake a robust analysis of the housing potential of each site identified using an approach consistent between authorities within the Greater Nottingham area, as well as specific to local development conditions and housing needs.
Assessment of Suitability, Availability and Achievability - Assess each site identified against a range of criteria to determine whether and when sites are likely to be developed.
Identify and Overcome Barriers to Deliverability - Set out in the reporting process key actions necessary to maintain the rolling five year supply of deliverable sites and the approach to overcoming specific barriers to the deliverability of developable sites.
3 3. The SHLAA Process
3.1 Site identification is the first stage of the SHLAA assessment. The portfolio of sites within the SHLAA has been updated as new sites have been identified, either through sites that have entered the planning process (e.g. planning permissions) or through sites that are not in the planning process (e.g. sites submitted to the assessment by developers/landowners etc.).
3.2 Where information is held in an existing planning document or the site is already within the development process, the respective figure contained within the document or development scheme will be used to estimate the site’s potential in terms of the amount of housing that could be delivered on site.
3.3 Where no information is held an assumption has been made about the amount of housing that could be delivered on a site. A best estimate has been made taking into account the character of the area, the size of the site, any constraints that the assessment has raised and whether a site is capable of accommodating a mix of uses.
3.4 The assessment of deliverability and whether a site is developable is the most detailed element of the SHLAA process. As set out in the NPPF, the delivery of a site depends on its availability, its suitability and achievability. Figures 1, 2 and 3 below set out the criteria applied to each of these elements of deliverability for every SHLAA site. The assessment of availability and achievability will determine whether the site is considered deliverable within 5 years, 6-10 years, or 11-15 years.
3.5 Developable means a site is in a suitable location for housing and there is a reasonable prospect that it will be available at a specific point in time in the future once known barriers to delivery are mitigated.
4 Figure 1: Assessment of Availability
‘Available Now’ ‘Available’ ‘Not available’ i.e. within 5 years i.e. 6-10 years i.e. 11-15 years Sites with extant outline and Sites with planning permission lapsed or construction activity ceased detailed planning permission Sites with pre-application discussion successful concluded (including those awaiting Other sites i.e. promoted through SHLAA s106) Sites that are currently The determination of the above site availability depends on the following issues:- under construction Sites with Sites with permission Sites with no planning application Existing housing allocations permission lapsed lapsed and no submitted and no information (provided evidence of and new planning planning application provided ‘availability now’ exists) application currently submitted Sites with permission refused and no being determined information provided Sites with pre- application discussion successful concluded
5 Figure 2: Assessment of Suitability
‘Suitable now and Suitable’ ‘Could be suitable’ ‘Not suitable’ Sites with extant outline and detailed Include sites that does not fall on the Isolated land in the Green Belt planning permission (including those ‘suitable’ list with information that Land that has more than one policy awaiting s106) indicate that they could be suitable constraint which cannot be overcome Sites that are currently under subject to a policy change e.g. within 15 years construction Previous developed land (brownfield Sites with pre-application discussion Existing housing allocations site) in the Green Belt that is not unsuccessful concluded Sites with planning permission isolated lapsed Land within the Green Belt and Sites with pre-application discussion adjacent to an urban area or successful concluded settlement Land that has one policy constraint which can be overcome within 15 years
6 Figure 3: Assessment of Achievability
‘Achievable Now’ ‘Achievable’ ‘Not achievable’ i.e. within 5 years i.e. 6-10 years i.e. 11-15 years Sites with extant detailed Sites with extant detailed planning permission awaiting s106 planning permission Sites with extant outline planning permission (including those awaiting s106) (excluding those awaiting Existing housing allocations s106) Sites with planning permission lapsed Sites that are currently Sites with pre-application discussion successful concluded under construction Other sites i.e. promoted through SHLAA Allocated housing sites (where there is evidence of The determination of the above site achievability depends on the following issues:- progression) Sites with extant detailed Sites with permission Sites with no planning planning permission lapsed and no application submitted and no awaiting s106 planning application information provided Sites with extant outline submitted Sites with permission refused planning permission and no information provided (including those awaiting s106) Existing housing allocations Sites with permission lapsed and new planning application currently being determined Sites with pre-application discussion successful concluded
7
3.6 The assessment of suitability, availability and achievability informs the final assessment for each site. The sites are grouped into five categories:
Tranche 1 (0-5 Years) – the sites are suitable, available now and achievable based on current planning policy and there is a reasonable prospect of housing being built in the next five years (see Appendix 2).
Tranche 2 (6-10 Years) – the sites are suitable for development but will not be either available or achievable until the second five year period.
Tranche 3 (11-15 Years) - the sites are suitable for development but will not be either available or achievable until the third five year period.
Unknown - this category is generally used for sites where planning permission has lapsed and there is no indication that there is still interest in developing the site, or where a site has had a series of planning permissions granted over a number of years with no development coming forward on it. These have been discounted from any land supply calculation. Unknown is also determined where critical evidence of suitability, availability or achievability is outstanding.
Maybe Suitable if Policy Changes 5+ Years – the sites may have the potential for development but where there are current constraints in relation to planning policy.
Non-deliverable or developable – the sites are assessed as not suitable for housing development, with an explanation given in the final reasoned judgement as to why this conclusion has been drawn. In addition, please note that in some cases this category is used to avoid double counting where there is site overlap. The reasoned judgement will make it clear where this is the case.
8 4. Reporting and Continuous Monitoring
4.1 The SHLAA assessment and five year land supply assessment will be updated on an annual basis. Key matters for this update are to include any new sites that have come through either the planning application or development plan process, or have been submitted to the council for assessments, monitoring the progress of sites through the planning and development process and changes in circumstances regarding barriers to delivery.
9 5. Report Terms and Evidence Sources
5.1 This section sets out the terms used in the report. The definition for each of these terms and the evidence source used to assess them may be found on the pages that follow.
Assessment Example
10 Key to assessment criteria:
Fields located at the top of the assessment
1. Site reference: The reference automatically assigned to each site by the assessment database. Reference shows the parish within which the site is located and the site number within that parish.
2. Site name: This is the name of the site as suggested by the person submitting the site or taken from the appropriate planning application.
3. Parish/town: The parish or town within which the site is located.
4. Site area: The area of the site in hectares.
5. Dwelling capacity: This gives an indication of the number of dwellings proposed either through information in a planning application or through information provided by the developer or landowner that submitted the site for assessment.
6. Density (dwellings/hectare): Factual information or a judgment on the number of dwellings per hectare (gross) that a site could accommodate.
7. Site source: Whether the site is included as a result of a pre-application enquiry, planning application or site submission (for the SHLAA or emerging Local Plan) by the landowner/developer.
8. Planning Reference: This contains the unique reference that is assigned to planning applications.
9. Allocated site reference: If allocated for development in the Local Plan, this will include the relevant policy which allocates it.
10. Status: Describes the sites planning application and delivery status, for example whether pre-application discussions are underway, a planning application is being considered, permission granted or it is under construction.
11. Number of dwellings remaining: This contains the remaining capacity of the site after assessment. For sites with planning permission where development has commenced, this will contain information on the number of dwellings that are yet to be built. For sites that have been submitted, this will be a judgement of the likely capacity of the site after it has been assessed. For sites submitted to the assessment, this may differ from the information provided by the site promoter where there are considered to be either physical or technical issues that will affect a sites capacity. Sites that are adjudged to be non-deliverable or non-
11 developable and sites where development has been completed are set to zero in this field.
12. Source of number of dwelling: This explains the sources that informed the number of dwelling capacity. For example a pre-application enquiry, planning application, Local Plan, or best estimate.
Constraints Fields
Each of the following fields contains standard information as set out in the Nottingham Core Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Methodology. In addition, each of the fields may be supplemented by additional text where this is considered to be of relevance. For sites with planning permission, the principle of development has already been established. In these cases, many of the fields remain blank, particularly where they relate to the suitability of the site.
1. Green Belt: The field explains whether or not the site is within the Green Belt. If the site is within the Green Belt and has been assessed within the Green Belt Review (which informed the Local Plan), it will include the site’s Green Belt importance, its score (out of 25) and justification for this score.
2. Flood Risk: The flood risk present on sites has been measured using maps showing Flood Zones 2, 3a and 3b, as defined using data provided by the Environment Agency. It may also include Environment Agency information regarding surface water flooding. Further comments have been provided through the use of the Greater Nottingham Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, which builds upon the Environment Agency flood maps.
3. Landscape assessment: Contains information from the Greater Nottingham Landscape Character Assessment and additional observations from site visits where relevant. Sites which were potential housing allocations within the Local Plan Part 2 were assessed within the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment of Potential Sites. The conclusions for these sites within this assessment have been included in this criteria. This includes scores out of 100.
4. Green Infrastructure: This considers the presence of any Green Infrastructure assets within the site, or in close proximity, and whether there are opportunities to create or enhance assets.
5. Historic Environment: This considers the presence of any historic assets (for example Listed buildings or Conservation Areas) within the site, or in close proximity, whether they would be adversely affected, whether these effects can be avoided or mitigated, and whether there are opportunities to enhance assets. The information source for this information include the Nottinghamshire Historic
12 Environment Record, and, where relevant, the Historic Assets Assessment undertaken in support of the Local Plan.
6. Nature Conservation: This category includes environmental designations such as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) and Country Parks. Further designations, such as Tree Preservation Orders and non-designated assets, such as priority habitats (as identified within the Local Biodiversity Action Plan) are also identified within this constraint category.
7. Air Quality: This field identifies whether the site is within an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA).
8. Community Facilities: This field contains information regarding the presence of community facilities, such as libraries, schools, shops, public houses, or a church or village hall. The presence of a range of community facilities indicate the sustainability of the settlement and its capacity to accommodate development.
9. Highways and access: This contains information supplied by the Highways Authority regarding the physical accessibility of the site and capacity of the local access roads.
10. Accessibility: This contains information regarding access to local bus or rail services, and pedestrian or cycling routes, and proximity to local community services and facilities.
11. Other Issues: This field contains any other issues that may constrain the deliverability or capacity of the site (for example the presence of overhead power lines), an explanation of the mix of uses proposed, or the presence of a ‘bad neighbour’ which may reduce the developable area.
12. Agricultural Land: The agricultural classification of the land, where relevant, as defined by DEFRA and plotted on the Land Classifications layer, available at www.magic.gov.uk.
13. Deliverability: Summarises the availability, suitability, or achievability (see Section 3 above).
Fields located at the bottom of individual site assessments:
1. Delivery: This field identifies the five year tranche that development will commence, or whether the site is non-deliverable or developable or unknown.
2. Delivery period: This field provides an estimate of the length of time the development will take from start to finish.
13 3. Overall Summary: This written comment contains the conclusions as to why a particular site falls within a particular development period. It also contains an explanation of the barriers that may need to be overcome for the site to be considered suitable, deliverable and developable.
14 6. Methodology for Assessing Deliverability and its Role in the Housing Trajectory
6.1 The individual SHLAA surveys contain broad information in relation to delivery periods. More detailed year-on-year information is produced to support the housing trajectory contained within the council’s annual monitoring report and to support the review of its planning policy documents. This information is provided in Section 7 of this report. The methodology for assessing when and how much development can occur in a particular year can be found in Appendix 2. Where available, anticipated completion timescales and rates are as provided by the developer/landowner. Where this information has not been provided, or there is a more up to date position, then this methodology has been used.
15 7. Site Assessment Results
The following series of tables contain the 2019 SHLAA results.
Table 1: Housing Delivery Site by Site 0-5 years
Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/ASL/001 Aslockton Maltings Farm 10 10 SHLAA/ASL/005 Aslockton Land at Cliff Hill Lane 8 8 SHLAA/ASL/011 Aslockton Rear Of The Cottage, Chapel Lane 1 1 SHLAA/ASL/021 Aslockton Hill Top Farm, Cliffhill Lane 1 1 SHLAA/ASL/024 Aslockton 2 Field bungalow Chapel Lane 1 1 SHLAA/BIF/003 Barton in Fabis South of Clifton 3000 400 SHLAA/BIF/004 Barton in Fabis Top Yard Farm, Rectory Place 8 8 SHLAA/BIN/015 Bingham Land north of Bingham (planning application) 1030 650 SHLAA/BIN/025 Bingham Former Police Station, Grantham Road (C2) 39 39 SHLAA/BIN/027 Bingham 23 Derry Lane 1 1 SHLAA/BIN/029 Bingham 15-17 Derry Lane 1 1 Land North of 11 Tithby Road / West of 2 The SHLAA/BIN/030 Bingham 11 Banks SHLAA/BIN/031 Bingham 5 Market Street 1 1 SHLAA/BIN/032 Bingham Chesterfield Arms 10 10 SHLAA/BIN/033 Bingham Land to the rear of 4 and 6 Dark Lane 1 1 SHLAA/BIN/034 Bingham 40 Rockingham Grove 1 1
16 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/BRA/003 Bradmore Land opposite Oak House 1 1 SHLAA/BUN/012 Bunny Wysall Road Farm 1 1 SHLAA/BUN/013 Bunny 16 Loughborough Road 1 1 SHLAA/BUN/014 Bunny Purlston Cottage, 8 Loughborough Road 1 1 SHLAA/BUN/015 Bunny Home Farm, 15 Church Street 1 1 SHLAA/CAR/002 Car Colston Toll Bar Farm, Fosse Way 5 5 SHLAA/CAR/003 Car Colston Foxholes Farm, Fosse Way 1 1 SHLAA/CB/002 Colston Bassett Fernhill Farm 1 1 SHLAA/CB/004 Colston Bassett Willow Brook, Church Gate 2 2 SHLAA/CB/005 Colston Bassett Land west of School Lane 1 1 SHLAA/CBI/005 Cropwell Bishop Land East of Church Street 85 85 SHLAA/CBI/015 Cropwell Bishop Land Adjacent to 25 Nottingham Road 1 1 SHLAA/CBU/005 Cropwell Butler Stovebolt, Hoe Lane 1 1 SHLAA/COS/010 Costock 24 Chapel Lane 1 1 SHLAA/COS/011 Costock Barn to the Rear of Brooklyn, Leake Road 11 SHLAA/COT/001 Cotgrave Land RO Mill Lane/The Old Park 180 150 SHLAA/COT/009 Cotgrave Land South of Hollygate Lane (1) 75 75 SHLAA/COT/010 Cotgrave Land South of Hollygate Lane (2) 40 40 SHLAA/COT/011 Cotgrave Land South of Hollygate Lane (3a) 65 65 SHLAA/COT/034 Cotgrave Land Between 3 and 5 Marlwood 3 3 SHLAA/COT/060 Cotgrave Fosse Farm Cottage, The Fosse 1 1 SHLAA/COT/063 Cotgrave Land West Of Main Road 2 2 SHLAA/COT/064 Kinoulton Woodlands, The Fosse 2 2
17 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/COT/066 Cotgrave Land rear of 59 Bingham Road 1 1 SHLAA/EBR/008 East Bridgford Land to the north of Butt Lane 15 15 SHLAA/EBR/010 East Bridgford Land south of Butt Lane 45 45 SHLAA/EBR/011 East Bridgford South of Closes Side Lane 25 25 SHLAA/EBR/012 East Bridgford North of Butt Lane (2) 40 40 SHLAA/EBR/016 East Bridgford Garage Block South of 55 Holloway Close 5 5 SHLAA/EBR/018 East Bridgford 2 Hackers Close 4 4 SHLAA/EBR/020 East Bridgford 18 Cherryholt Lane 2 2 SHLAA/EBR/026 East Bridgford Longlands, 6 College Street 1 1 SHLAA/EBR/029 East Bridgford Reindeer Inn, Kneeton Road 2 2 SHLAA/EBR/030 East Bridgford Workshop Old Telephone Exchange 1 1 SHLAA/EBR/031 East Bridgford 20 Cherryholt Lane 1 1 SHLAA/EBR/032 East Bridgford The Old Hall, 10 Kneeton Road 1 1 SHLAA/EL/004 East Leake Land off Rempstone Road (north) 235 200 SHLAA/EL/006 East Leake Land north of Lantern Lane 195 150 SHLAA/EL/016 East Leake Land Off Kirk Ley 100 100 SHLAA/EL/032 East Leake The Rectory, 3 Bateman Road 1 1 SHLAA/EL/034 East Leake 28 Main Street 4 4 SHLAA/ELT/002 Elton-on-the-Hill Land North of The Spinney, Sutton Lane 1 1 SHLAA/ELT/003 Elton-on-the-Hill Land south of Elton Manor 1 1 SHLAA/FLI/017 Flintham Skerry Wood 1 1 SHLAA/GOT/005 Gotham Land east of Gypsum Way /The Orchards 70 70 SHLAA/GOT/016 Gotham Home Farm, 10 Kegworth Road 2 2
18 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/GRA/005 Granby cum Sutton Mill Cottage, Main Street 1 1 SHLAA/GRA/006 Granby cum Sutton Orchard House, Chapel Lane 5 5 SHLAA/HIC/004 Hickling Part OS Field 7500 Green Lane 1 1 SHLAA/HIC/008 Hickling The White House, Main Street 1 1 SHLAA/HIC/009 Hickling Hill Top Farm, Melton Road 1 1 SHLAA/KEY/004 Keyworth Land off Nicker Hill 151 142 SHLAA/KEY/008 Keyworth Platt Lane 187 187 SHLAA/KEY/010 Keyworth Land South of Debdale Lane (1) 221 200 SHLAA/KEY/013 Keyworth Hillside Farm 70 70 SHLAA/KEY/036 Keyworth Rebbur House, 108 Nicker Hill 11 11 SHLAA/KEY/037 Keyworth 83 Nottingham Road 1 1 SHLAA/KEY/038 Keyworth 1 Gorse Road 2 2 SHLAA/KEY/039 Keyworth The Hall, Nottingham Road 4 4 SHLAA/KEY/040 Keyworth 51 Selby Lane 1 1 SHLAA/KEY/041 Keyworth 7 Limetree Close 1 1 SHLAA/KEY/043 Keyworth 20 Selby Lane 1 1 SHLAA/KEY/044 Keyworth Buttercups Nursery 28 Main Street 1 1 SHLAA/KEY/045 Keyworth 86 Selby Lane 1 1 SHLAA/KEY/046 Keyworth Land To Rear Of The Plough 1 1 SHLAA/KIN/008 Kinoulton Harboro 1 1 SHLAA/KIN/011 Kinoulton Former Wheelwrights Yard, Main Street 11 SHLAA/KNE/010 Kneeton Farmyard to south of St Helens Church 3 3 SHLAA/KOS/002 Kingston-on-Soar Hillside, Gotham Road 1 1
19 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/KOS/003 Kingston-on-Soar Home Farm, Gotham Road 1 1 SHLAA/LAN/005 Langar cum Barnstone Northfields Farm 2 2 SHLAA/LAN/007 Langar cum Barnstone Bridge House, Cropwell Road 11 SHLAA/LAN/009 Langar cum Barnstone Romnay House, Main Road 6 6 SHLAA/LAN/010 Langar cum Barnstone Land West of Millfield, Langar Road 4 4 SHLAA/LAN/011 Langar cum Barnstone 27 Works Lane 1 1 SHLAA/LAN/012 Langar cum Barnstone Land South of Bridge House, Cropwell Road 1 1 SHLAA/LAN/013 Langar cum Barnstone Land East of 25 Works Lane 55 SHLAA/NEW/002 Newton Land at RAF Newton (phase 2) 550 250 SHLAA/NEW/003 Newton Former Control Tower, Wellington Avenue 1 1 SHLAA/NOS/001 Normanton-on-Soar Bespoke Furniture 1 1 SHLAA/NOS/003 Normanton-on-Soar Overgrown Acres, Cotgrave Road 11 SHLAA/ORS/009 Orston Dovecote Farm, Church Street 2 2 SHLAA/ORS/010 Orston Warehouse Premises, Lombard Street 1 1 SHLAA/ORS/011 Orston Land to South West of Poppy Cottage, Lombard St 1 1 SHLAA/ORS/012 Orston The Gables, Hill Road 1 1 SHLAA/ORS/013 Orston The Gables, Hill Road 1 1 SHLAA/OWT/003 Owthorpe Laxton Farm, Swabs Lane 1 1 SHLAA/OWT/004 Owthorpe 4 Park Lane 1 1 SHLAA/RAD/001 Radcliffe on Trent Land north of Nottingham Road (mixed use) 200 150 SHLAA/RAD/003 Radcliffe on Trent Land off Shelford Road 400 210 SHLAA/RAD/005 Radcliffe on Trent North of Grantham Rd (south of railway line) 240 150 SHLAA/RAD/013 Radcliffe on Trent Land adjacent to Grooms Cottage 50 50
20 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/RAD/021 Radcliffe on Trent 7 Cliff Drive 1 1 SHLAA/RAD/028 Radcliffe on Trent 139 Shelford Road 1 1 SHLAA/RAD/041 Radcliffe on Trent 17a Shelford Road 3 3 SHLAA/RAD/044 Radcliffe on Trent 119 Shelford Road 2 2 SHLAA/RAD/045 Radcliffe on Trent 20 Thomas Avenue 2 2 SHLAA/RAD/046 Radcliffe on Trent 42A Cropwell Road 1 1 SHLAA/RAD/047 Radcliffe on Trent Land North West of 149 Shelford Road 3 3 SHLAA/RAD/049 Radcliffe on Trent 5 Golf Road 2 2 SHLAA/RAD/051 Radcliffe on Trent 3 Walnut Court, Walnut Grove 2 2 SHLAA/REM/005 Rempstone Rempstone Hall Farm, Ashby Road 2 2 SHLAA/RUD/003 Ruddington Land to the west of Wilford Road (South) 167 167 SHLAA/RUD/006 Ruddington Land north west of Asher Lane 175 175 SHLAA/RUD/008 Ruddington Land south of Flawforth Lane 56 56 SHLAA/RUD/010 Ruddington Land opposite Mere Way 180 180 SHLAA/RUD/028 Ruddington 11 Charles Street 1 1 SHLAA/RUD/029 Ruddington 15 Elms Gardens 2 2 SHLAA/RUD/040 Ruddington 15 Parkyns Street 4 4 SHLAA/RUD/041 Ruddington Land West of Malmic House, Brookside Road 14 14 SHLAA/RUD/046 Ruddington 35, 37, 39 Easthorpe Street 5 5 SHLAA/RUD/047 Ruddington 70 Wilford Road 1 1 SHLAA/RUD/048 Ruddington Four Mile House, 38 Loughborough Road 11 SHLAA/RUD/049 Ruddington 20-22 High Street 2 2 SHLAA/RUD/051 Ruddington 8 Shaw Street 1 1
21 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/RUD/052 Ruddington 6 Easthorpe Street 1 1 SHLAA/RUD/053 Ruddington Churchside. 16 Church Street 1 1 SHLAA/SCA/002 Scarrington The Barn, Aslockton Road 1 1 SHLAA/SCR/005 Screveton Manor Farmhouse 1 1 SHLAA/SCR/006 Screveton Land at Hawksworth Road 4 4 SHLAA/SCR/009 Screveton The Cottage, Lodge Lane 1 1 SHLAA/SCR/010 Screveton Whitehouse Farm 2 2 SHLAA/SCR/011 Screveton Paddock to the West of Main Street 2 2 SHLAA/SHN/001 Shelton Wensor Bridge Farm 1 1 SHLAA/SIB/003 Sibthorpe Land South West of Church Lane 1 1 SHLAA/SOS/004 Stanford-on-Soar Five Oaks Farm Main Street 5 5 SHLAA/STA/012 Stanton-on-the-Wolds Adj 178 Melton Road 1 1 SHLAA/STA/014 Stanton-on-the-Wolds Hillcrest Workshops, Melton Road 6 6 SHLAA/STA/015 Stanton-on-the-Wolds Land north west of 130 Melton Road 1 1 SHLAA/SUT/001 Sutton Bonington Land North of Park Lane 80 80 SHLAA/SUT/008 Sutton Bonington 17 Main Street 1 1 SHLAA/SUT/015 Sutton Bonington Sutton Fields House 1 1 SHLAA/SUT/017 Sutton Bonington 20 Landcroft Lane 1 1 SHLAA/SUT/021 Sutton Bonington 18 Landcroft Lane 1 1 SHLAA/SUT/022 Sutton Bonington 40 Main Street 2 2 SHLAA/SUT/023 Sutton Bonington Land at the Croft 1A Landcroft Lane 1 1 SHLAA/SUT/024 Sutton Bonington Treetops, Sutton Fields. Station Road 2 2
22 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
Wysall and Thorpe-in-the- SHLAA/THG/001 Holmcroft, Wymeswold Road 1 1 Glebe SHLAA/THO/002 Thoroton Greenhedge Farmhouse 1 1 SHLAA/THO/003 Thoroton Thoroton Farm, Main Street 8 8 SHLAA/THO/004 Thoroton Fieldfare Cottage, Main Street 5 5 SHLAA/THO/005 Thoroton Greenhedge Cottage Thoroton Road 1 1 SHLAA/TOL/008 Tollerton East of Gamston North of Tollerton 4000 150 SHLAA/TOL/013 Tollerton Tollerton Park, Tollerton Lane 6 6 SHLAA/TOL/014 Tollerton Tollerton Hall, Tollerton Lane 1 1 SHLAA/UB/005 Upper Broughton The Croft, Station Road 1 1 SHLAA/UB/006 Upper Broughton Piecrust Cottage, Station Road 3 3 SHLAA/UB/007 Upper Broughton Southview Bottom Green 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/002 West Bridgford Central College 2 2 SHLAA/WBR/003 West Bridgford South of Wilford Lane 105 105 SHLAA/WBR/004 West Bridgford Land Between Lady Bay Bridge/Radcliffe Road 48 48 SHLAA/WBR/027 West Bridgford 22-26 Radcliffe Rd 9 9 SHLAA/WBR/047 West Bridgford Land at Melton Road 1285 1065 SHLAA/WBR/076 West Bridgford 102 Mona Road 2 2 SHLAA/WBR/077 West Bridgford 67A Melton Road 3 3 SHLAA/WBR/078 West Bridgford Cowans, 41 Abbey Road 2 2 SHLAA/WBR/107 West Bridgford R/O 42 Wilford Lane 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/108 West Bridgford 56-62 Radcliffe Road 9 9 SHLAA/WBR/110 West Bridgford West Bridgford Ambulance Station, Rectory Road 30 30
23 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/WBR/111 West Bridgford John Germans Drovers, 37 Gordon Road 9 9 SHLAA/WBR/114 West Bridgford 31 Wilford Lane 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/116 West Bridgford 63 Alford Road 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/119 West Bridgford 239-243 Melton Road 2 2 SHLAA/WBR/120 West Bridgford Coach House, 108 Radcliffe Road 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/121 West Bridgford 108 Radcliffe Road 2 2 SHLAA/WBR/124 West Bridgford 134A Trent Boulevard 9 9 SHLAA/WBR/128 West Bridgford Caretakers Bungalow, 132 Greythorn Drive 2 2 SHLAA/WBR/131 West Bridgford Hill Farm Cottages, 233 Melton Road 22 SHLAA/WBR/133 West Bridgford Bridgford House Pavilion Road 121 121 SHLAA/WBR/135 West Bridgford 60 Boundary Road 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/136 West Bridgford The Coach House, 52 Loughborough Road 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/137 West Bridgford 100 Melton Road 4 4 SHLAA/WBR/138 West Bridgford 44 Pierrepont Road 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/139 West Bridgford 85 Charworth Road 4 4 SHLAA/WBR/140 West Bridgford 4 Millicent Road 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/141 West Bridgford 125 Melton Road 2 2 SHLAA/WBR/142 West Bridgford 166 Blake Road 1 1 SHLAA/WBR/143 West Bridgford Land South East of 75a Wilford Road 44 SHLAA/WBR/144 West Bridgford Trentside Club, 32 Wilford Lane 34 34 SHLAA/WBR/145 West Bridgford Graphisoft, Springfield house 1 1 SHLAA/WHA/002 Whatton in the Vale Land off Orston Lane, Whatton 33 SHLAA/WHA/007 Whatton in the Vale Dunville, Burton Lane 1 1
24 Number of 0-5 Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings years Remaining
SHLAA/WID/005 Widmerpool Oakland House, Church Lane 2 2 SHLAA/WIL/005 Willoughby-on-the-Wolds Land to the east of London Lane 2 1 SHLAA/WIL/007 Willoughby-on-the-Wolds Chestnut Farm, Church Lane 1 1 SHLAA/WIL/009 Willoughby-on-the-Wolds Land North of Old Hall Farm 1 1 SHLAA/WIL/010 Willoughby-on-the-Wolds Land to the rear of 70 Main Street 1 1 Wysall and Thorpe-in-the- SHLAA/WYS/002 Wynhill 1 1 Glebe Wysall and Thorpe-in-the- SHLAA/WYS/003 Land at Keyworth Road 2 2 Glebe Wysall and Thorpe-in-the- SHLAA/WYS/006 Le Petit Champ, Widmerpool Road 3 3 Glebe Wysall and Thorpe-in-the- SHLAA/WYS/008 The Barns, Scotland Hill Farm 1 1 Glebe Borough-wide Windfall 208 6357
25 Table 2: Housing Delivery Site by Site 6-10 years
Number of Dwelling Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings 6-10 years capacity Remaining
SHLAA/BIF/003 Barton in Fabis South of Clifton 3000 3000 1000 Land north of Bingham (planning SHLAA/BIN/015 Bingham 1050 1030 380 application) SHLAA/BUN/001 Bunny Bunny Brickworks 100 100 100 SHLAA/COT/001 Cotgrave Land RO Mill Lane/The Old Park 180 180 30 SHLAA/EL/004 East Leake Land off Rempstone Road (north) 235 235 35 SHLAA/EL/006 East Leake Land north of Lantern Lane 195 195 45 SHLAA/EL/010 East Leake Bley Avenue Garage Block 2 2 2 SHLAA/EL/027 East Leake Former Micropropagation 24 24 24 SHLAA/FLI/001 Flintham Flintham Islamic Institute 90 95 95 SHLAA/GOT/015 Gotham Nottingham City Transport bus depot 15 15 15 SHLAA/KEY/004 Keyworth Land off Nicker Hill 151 151 9 SHLAA/KEY/010 Keyworth Land South of Debdale Lane (1) 221 221 21 SHLAA/NEW/002 Newton Land at RAF Newton (phase 2) 550 550 300 Land north of Nottingham Road SHLAA/RAD/001 Radcliffe on Trent 200 200 50 (mixed use) SHLAA/RAD/002 Radcliffe on Trent 72 Main Road 5 5 5 SHLAA/RAD/003 Radcliffe on Trent Land off Shelford Road 400 400 190 North of Grantham Rd (south of SHLAA/RAD/005 Radcliffe on Trent 240 240 90 railway line) SHLAA/RAD/012 Radcliffe on Trent The Paddocks 75 75 75 SHLAA/RAD/040 Radcliffe on Trent Pedigree Wholesale, The Crescent 15 15 15 SHLAA/TOL/008 Tollerton East of Gamston North of Tollerton 4000 4000 1000
26 Number of Dwelling Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings 6-10 years capacity Remaining
SHLAA/WBR/001 West Bridgford West Bridgford Depot 75 75 75 SHLAA/WBR/008 West Bridgford City Ground and surrounding car park 250 250 250 SHLAA/WBR/009 West Bridgford Land on Wilford Lane 150 150 150 SHLAA/WBR/047 West Bridgford Land at Melton Road 1722 1285 220 SHLAA/WBR/048 West Bridgford Melton Road Triangle 40 40 40 SHLAA/WBR/075 West Bridgford 46 Adbolton Grove 1 1 1 Borough Wide Windfall 520 4737
Table 3: Housing Delivery Site by Site 11-15 years
Number of Dwelling Site reference Parish Site name Dwellings 11-15 years Capacity Remaining
SHLAA/TOL/008 Tollerton East of Gamston North of Tollerton 4000 4000 1000 SHLAA/BIF/003 Barton in Fabis South of Clifton 3000 3000 1000 Borough wide Windfall 390 2390
27
8. Broad Locations and Windfall Development
8.1 Paragraph 67 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019) states that Local Planning Authorities should identify a sufficient supply of developable sites or broad locations for years 6-10 and, where possible, for years 11-15. For the purposes of the SHLAA, there is a need to establish what constitutes a broad location. In addition, paragraph 70 of the National Planning Policy Framework states that Local Planning Authorities may make allowance for windfall sites in their 5 year land supply if they have compelling evidence that such sites will provide a reliable source of supply. Any allowance should be realistic having regard to the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment, historic windfall delivery rates and expected future trends.
8.2 The following chapter provides a critical analysis of the role that windfall development and broad locations have as part of the Borough Council’s overall land supply over the next 15 years.
General
8.3 Under the existing policy framework, Policy 3 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy and Policy 11 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies, the Local Plan allows for residential development within villages on sites that meet the criteria within the policies. For the purposes of the SHLAA, it is therefore expected that delivery will continue to occur within towns and villages within the development period. Based upon the policy framework, infill development, exceptional needs housing (rural exception development), conversions and changes of use will continue to be permitted where sites are considered to be suitable in planning terms.
8.4 The following section of the SHLAA examines what quantum of development could be expected from infill on unidentified sites within existing towns and villages. Table 4 and Figures 4 to 6 below outline what has been delivered in terms of sources of supply through an economic cycle. The different categories of site supply that are contained within the table are explained below:
Previously garden land of 10 and more: Residential development of 10 or more dwellings that has occurred within gardens.
Previously garden land less than 10: Residential development of less than10 dwellings that has occurred within gardens.
28
Not previously developed land less than 10: Residential development of less than 10 dwellings that has occurred on land that was previously greenfield (including change of use of farm buildings to dwellings). The category excludes garden land as this is included in a separate category (see above).
Not previously developed land 10 or more: Residential development of 10 dwellings or more that has occurred on land that was previously greenfield (including change of use of farm buildings to dwellings). The category excludes garden land as this is included in a separate category (see above).
Previously developed land less than 10: This category includes redevelopment of land and buildings, conversions and changes of use on brownfield land on developments of less than 10 dwellings.
Previously developed land 10 or more dwellings: This category includes larger scale redevelopment of land and buildings, conversions and changes of use.
Losses: This category includes the demolition of dwellings or changes of use from dwellings to other uses.
Allocated sites: This category includes development on sites allocated for residential development through the 1996 Rushcliffe Local Plan and Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy.
29 Table 4: Development by Site Type 1997-2019
Not Previously Previously Previously Previously Not previously Previously developed Developed Sites Allocated Year Garden Land garden land Developed less Losses Total developed sites less (10 dwellings sites Less than 10 10+ than 10 10+ than 10 and over) 97-98 0 0 0 0 22 23 0 450 495 98-99 14 0 25 0 47 23 0 481 590 99-00 42 0 15 0 30 12 0 407 506 00-01 17 0 31 10 46 57 0 229 390 01-02 5 0 19 0 38 26 0 69 157 02-03 9 0 44 18 86 180 -4 0 333 03-04 15 0 29 13 45 124 0 47 273 04-05 25 22 48 0 47 332 0 0 474 05-06 24 69 21 28 48 131 -60 0 261 06-07 22 12 16 0 51 359 -7 3 456 07-08 38 21 28 27 61 239 0 79 493 08-09 10 0 24 13 46 74 0 24 191 09-10 21 13 17 26 21 84 0 45 227 10-11 18 0 15 62 55 20 -10 56 216 11-12 25 0 37 67 56 67 -21 62 293 12-13 14 0 16 60 33 61 -23 48 209 13-14 4 0 20 28 42 52 -22 75 199 14-15 18 12 29 50 85 152 -12 39 373 15-16 10 0 13 265 80 13 -6 112 487 16-17 9 0 11 180 71 94 -27 190 528 17-18 20 0 20 200 76 51 -24 250 593 18-19 18 0 7 249 88 58 -28 368 760 Average 17 7 22 59 53 101 -11 138 387
30 Figure 4: Residential Developments by Site Category 1997-2019
31 Figure 5: Development of unallocated previously developed sites 10 and over (number of dwellings and trend) 1997-2019
32 Figure 6: Development of unallocated previously developed sites less than 10 (number of dwellings and trend) 1997-2019
33
8.5 It can be seen from Table 4 and Figure 4 that the supply of housing from non- allocated sites contributed on average 248 new dwellings net per annum during the period of analysis. It is considered that, whilst there are variations in delivery over the period, this is reflective of the overall economic cycle. Whilst there are fluctuations in terms of delivery, the provision of new development through sites that are not allocated is a consistent source of housing supply. There is no reason to conclude that a sizeable element of housing supply on unidentified sites will not carry on in the future should the policy framework continue to allow for such development.
Justification for windfall allowance from year 4 onwards
8.6 Paragraph 70 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019) states that Local Planning Authorities may make an allowance for windfalls if they have compelling evidence that such sites will consistently become available in the local area and will continue to provide a reliable source of supply. It is considered that any allowance should be realistic having regard to the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment, historic windfall delivery rates and expected future trends.
8.7 The SHLAA contains details of all extant planning permissions for residential development as of the 1 April 2019. The information on planning permissions is updated on an annual basis to take into account new supply and completions through additional planning permissions.
8.8 It is considered that the information on extant permissions contained within the SHLAA is accurate as a forecast of delivery for years 1-3 as a planning permission lasts for a period of 3 years. It is therefore considered that it would be inappropriate to include an allowance for infill development or change of use within years 1-3 as this would lead to a degree of double counting. It is considered appropriate however to have such an allowance within years 4 and 5 of the trajectory (2022-2023 and 2023-2024), as there is evidence to show that windfall development has been a consistent source of housing land supply for a number of years, and the overall trend shows that this is likely to continue.
Establishing the level of windfall development in the future from infill and change of use within broad locations
8.9 The following section of the SHLAA establishes the likely rate of development that will come through infill development and changes of use within broad locations.
34
1. Contribution from garden land:
Garden land has provided a consistent source of new housing supply, both prior to June 2010 when it was still classed as previously developed land and after June 2010 when the Government took the decision not to classify such land as previously developed. As it stands, however, paragraph 70 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019) states local authorities may preclude development of garden land from being developed to limit harm to a local area. Notwithstanding this, the analysis undertaken through Table 4 does identify garden land delivery prior to the 2010 decision in relation to its classification.
Whilst garden land is not currently included within a windfall allowance, it is believed that it could technically still form a source of housing supply within towns and villages as evidenced in Table 4. Given the changes contained within the NPPF 2019, the inclusion of garden land within a windfall allowance may be appropriate in future reviews of the SHLAA
2. Contribution from not previously developed land:
This category includes a range of land uses taken from the National Planning Policy Framework. This includes the conversion of agricultural buildings to dwellings, the redevelopment of former agricultural buildings, and development on greenfield land that has not been allocated. Whilst providing a consistent source of supply over the years, it is considered that unallocated greenfield development will occur at a lesser rate in the future now that the Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies is adopted. Development on unallocated greenfield sites was often permitted as a result of land supply issues, particularly since the 5 year land supply was re-introduced as national policy. As can be seen from Table 4, development on larger unallocated greenfield sites has significantly increased since 2010, and in particular over the last three years. Presently this source of land supply is not be included within an allowance for development through infill and changes of use, however it does provide a consistent supply of housing land. Given the changes contained within the NPPF 2019, the inclusion of an element of greenfield land within a windfall allowance may be considered appropriate in future reviews of the SHLAA
35
3. Contribution from previously developed sites (less than 10 dwellings):
Whilst there are fluctuations throughout the period of analysis, this source of housing supply consistently delivers with an average rate of around 53 dwellings per annum. It is considered that the trend for development reflects the economic cycle, with a trough around 2009-2010, and a peak during the mid-2000s. Overall during this period the trend for development on small sites less than 10 has increased steadily. Generally, small sites are not submitted to the SHLAA process therefore there will not be an element of double-counting in relation to this source of housing supply. It is therefore concluded that the average development rate of 53 dwellings a year would continue on previously developed sites of less than 10 dwellings in size as part of an allowance for development through infill and changes of use within broad locations from years 4 onwards.
4. Contribution from previously developed sites (10 or more):
The inclusion of this source of future housing supply within Rushcliffe would be in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (2019, p.70) definition. There has been a steady supply over the years of larger previously developed windfall sites coming forward for development. This accelerated during the housing boom in the mid-2000s. On average, large windfall development accounts for an average of 101 dwellings per annum over the study period.
Some, but not all of this supply will already exist in terms of SHLAA submissions. The SHLAA is updated on an annual basis to include such sites. Therefore this source of housing supply should be discounted to avoid the potential of double-counting. It is considered that whilst an element of large previously developed windfall sites will continue to provide a source of housing in the future, any allowance should be discounted by 50% to 51 dwellings per annum within years 4-10 (2022-2029). It is also considered that this source of supply should be discounted by 75% to 25 dwellings per annum in years 11-15 (2029-2033) as it is assumed that there may be a decline in the availability of such sites over a longer period of time.
Conclusion on windfall delivery within settlements
8.10 Following the above assumptions, it is possible that development within settlements could yield in total an average of 104 dwellings per years during years 4 to 10 (2022 to 2029), comprising 53 dwellings per annum from small previously developed sites and a discounted contribution from large previously
36 developed sites of 51 dwellings per annum Thereafter, during years 11 to15 (2029-2033), it is possible that development within settlements could yield an average of 78 dwellings in total, comprising a continued 53 dwellings per annum from small previously developed sites and an even more discounted contribution from large previously developed sites of 25 dwellings per annum.
37 9. Housing Trajectory Based on Identified Supply at April 2019
9.1 The following table indicates the rates of delivery based upon the survey of sites and the analysis of likely rates of delivery within broad locations from year 4 to year 15 contained within Chapter 8.
38 Table 5: Housing Trajectory as at April 2019 Completions Future Years Total 2029- 2030- 2031- 2032- 2033- Total 2028- 2028/29 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2011- 2033 (beyond (beyond (beyond (Beyond (beyond (beyond 2028 (beyond plan plan plan plan plan plan (plan plan 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 period) period) period) period) period) period) period) period)
Completions on non- allocated sites and identified 1 SHLAA capacity 2932091993733753383433922934789041514323419500000004,001 0 Land at Melton Road, 2 Edwalton (1,500) (Policy 20) 40 126 271 198 186 280 241 160 150 70 1,722 0
Land at former Cotgrave 3 Colliery (450) (Policy 21) 112 150 124 77 463 0
Land at Former RAF Newton 4 Phase 2 (550) (Policy 22) 50 100 100 100 100 100 550 0
Land north of Bingham 5 (1,050) (policy 23) 20 100 100 150 150 150 150 150 80 1,050 0
Land south of Clifton (3,000) 6 (Polcy 24) 50 150 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,200 1200
East of Gamston/North of Tollerton (2,500-4,000) (Policy 7 25) 50 100 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 950 1200 Infill and changes of use in 8 broad locations 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 78 78 78 78 78 624 494
Land rear of Mill Lane/The 9 Old Park, Cotgrave 50 50 50 30 180 0
Land south of Hollygate 10 Lane, Cotgrave 20 60 100 180 0
Land north of Rempstone 11 Road, East Leake 50 50 50 50 35 235 0
Land north of Lantern Road, 12 East Leake 50 50 50 45 195 0 Land off Nicker Hill, 13 Keyworth 50 50 42 9 151 0
Land between Platt Lane 14 and Station Road, Keyworth 10 50 50 50 27 187 0
Land South of Debdale Lane 15 Keyworth 50 50 50 50 21 221 0 16 Hillside Farm, Keyworth 20 50 70 0
Land north of Nottingham 17 Road, Radcliffe on Trent 50 50 50 50 200 0
Land adjacent to Grooms 18 Cottage, Radcliffe on Trent 00
Land Off Shelford Road 19 Radlciffe on Trent 10 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 40 400 0 Land north of Grantham 20 Road Radcliffe on Trent 50 50 50 50 40 240 0
72 Main Road, Radcliffe on 21 Trent 5 50
The Paddocks, Nottingham 22 Road Radcliffe on Trent 50 25 75 0 Land west of Wilford Road, 23 Ruddington 50 50 50 17 167 0 Land south of Flawforth 24 Lane, Ruddington 25 31 56 0 Land opposite Mere Way, 25 Ruddington 30 50 50 50 180 0 Land at Asher Lane 26 Ruddington 25 50 50 50 175 0 Land east of Church Street 27 Cropwell Bishop 35 50 85 0 Land between Butt Lane and Closes Side Lane, East 28 Bridgford 15 25 40 80 0 Land south of Butt Lane, East 29 Bridgford 25 20 45 0 Land east of Gypsum Way, 30 Gotham 20 50 70 0 Land north of Park Lane, 31 Sutton Bonington 30 50 80 0 32 Former Bunny Brickworks 25 50 25 100 0 Former Islamic Institute, 33 Flintham 25 50 20 95 0 Projected completions 293 209 199 373 487 528 593 760 611 1,069 1,380 1,752 1,545 1,442 1,273 974 544 504 478 478 478 478 478 14,032 2,894 Cumulative Completions 293 502 701 1,074 1,561 2,089 2,682 3,442 4,053 5,122 6,502 8,254 9,799 11,241 12,514 13,488 14,032 14,536 15,014 15,492 15,970 16,448 16,926
39 Appendix 1: Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2019
Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations
40
Agricultural Land: Agriculture is defined by Section 336(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as including: horticulture, fruit growing, seed growing, dairy farming, the breeding and keeping of livestock (including any creature kept for the production of food, wool, skins or furs, or the purpose of its use in the farming of land), the use of land as grazing land, meadow land, osier land, market gardens and nursery grounds, and the use of land for woodlands where that use is ancillary to the farming of land for other agricultural purposes. The quality of agricultural land is traditionally assessed by DEFRA to fall into one of six grades, in order that the Planning System can consider the effect of development proposals on agriculture.
Authority Monitoring Report: A report which is produced annually to establish what is happening now and what may happen in the future and to compare trends against existing policies to determine if changes need to be made.
Conservation Area: An area designated by a Local Planning Authority under Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act, 1990, regarded as being an area of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which is desirable to preserve or enhance.
Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government / MHCLG: The Central Government department responsible for housing, urban regeneration, planning and local government.
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs / DEFRA: The Central Government department with responsibility for rural communities, farming, promoting sustainable development and achieving a healthy natural environment.
Green Belt: An area of land surrounding a City having five distinct purposes:
1 To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built up areas; 2 To prevent neighbouring towns from merging into one another; 3 To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment; 4 To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns, and; 5 To assist in urban regeneration by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.
Advice on planning and Green Belts is given in the National Planning Policy Framework.
41
Greater Nottingham Area: The Greater Nottingham area in planning terms comprises of Broxtowe Borough Council, Erewash Borough Council, Gedling Borough Council, Nottingham City Council and Rushcliffe Borough Council.
Greenfield: Land that has not been used for urban development, or land that has become naturalised over time, and any other land not defined as previously developed land in the National Planning Policy Framework (2019, p70).
Hectare / Ha: An area 10,000 square metres or 2.471 acres. This is roughly equivalent to one and a half to two football pitches.
Landscape Character Assessment / LCA: A Landscape Character Assessment assesses the landscape quality and character of an area, and measures that may enhance it especially if an area is subject to change. A Landscape Character Assessment has been prepared for the Greater Nottingham area.
Site Specific Landscape assessment: Assessment carried out in relation to specific sites as supporting evidence for Local Plan Part 2 Land and Planning Policies.
Listed Building: A building or structure of special architectural or historic interest included on a list prepared by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport under Section 1 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act, 1990. Consent is normally required for its demolition in whole or part, and for any works of alteration or extension (both internal and external) which would affect its special interest.
Local Plan: The Local Plan is either one document or collection of documents that contains planning policies and allocations of land for the development of an area.
Local Wildlife Site: Site of local importance for nature conservation or geology identified by the Nottinghamshire Biological and Geological Records Centre. Previously referred to as Site for Importance for Nature Conservation
National Planning Policy Framework: The National Planning Policy Framework (2019) (NPPF) is a single document that sets out the Government’s planning policy. The requirement to produce and keep up to date a Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment is contained within the NPPF.
42
Nottingham City Region Employment Land Study: This study considers the quality and quantity of existing employment land in the Greater Nottingham area. The study was undertaken a number of years ago however it was used on the basis to identify potential poor quality industrial sites for inclusion in the SHLAA.
Previously Developed Land / PDL: Used to define land which has been previously developed or contains or contained a permanent structure and associated infrastructure. PDL is commonly known as Brownfield land. It occurs in urban and rural areas but does not include agricultural or forestry land or buildings, or residential gardens. The specific definition of PDL is set in the glossary of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019, p.70).
Site of Importance for Nature Conservation/Local Wildlife Site: Site of local importance for nature conservation or geology identified by the Nottinghamshire Biological and Geological Records Centre. Now generally referred to as Local Wildlife Sites.
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: The National Planning Policy Framework (2019), paragraph 156 requires Local Authorities to prepare a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment in consultation with the Environment Agency. This should consider all sources of flooding in the Borough and the consequent flood risk throughout the Borough. A Strategic Flood Risk Assessment has been carried out along the River Trent corridor and some of its tributaries in Rushcliffe. This was updated in 2017.
Sustainable Urban Extension: A large extension to the existing urban area. These may be considered more sustainable than small developments, in that they are large enough to support and encompass a range of uses besides residential, such as employment and retail, thereby reducing the need to travel. Also see Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUE) Study.
Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUE) Study: This work was carried out in 2008 by Tribal and Partners to assess potential sustainable urban extensions across the Greater Nottingham Area. The report examined potential locations for sustainable urban extensions on the fringes of the Nottingham built up area and around the sub-regional centres of Hucknall and Ilkeston.
Sustainable Locations for Growth Study: This work was carried out in 2010 by Tribal and Partners to assess which settlements across the remainder of the Greater Nottingham Area were suitable locations for further growth using a number of sustainability factors. It also identifies broad directions where growth should occur around these settlements.
43
Transport Assessment: Planning applications of a certain size must be supported by a Transport Assessment, which would need to be approved by the appropriate Highways Authority before planning permission would be granted. The need for a Transport Assessment where development would have significant transport implications is set out at paragraph 111 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019).
Tree Preservation Order: Tree Preservation Orders are applied to trees that are considered important for their amenity value. The order makes it a criminal offence to carry out any works to a protected tree without consent.
Urban Capacity Study: The Urban Capacity Study approach preceded the SHLAA in considering how much residential development could be accommodated within existing built-up areas on brownfield sites, whereas the SHLAA looks at all potential site sources. Information from previous Urban Capacity Studies were incorporated into the SHLAA where it was considered appropriate.
Viability: In the context of the SHLAA, this refers to the financial viability of a development. In order to be viable a development will need to make a profit for the developer and generate a competitive return for the landowner after all of the costs associated with development have been taken into account. Costs are likely to relate to land costs, building costs, finance costs, highways costs and planning obligations. Known issues relating to specific sites are included in the final reasoned judgements.
44
Appendix 2: Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2019
Methodology for Assessing Deliverability
45
Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment: Approach to assessing whether a site is deliverable and developable
The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment is the mechanism for assessing whether a site is deliverable or developable. The original Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment methodology was produced in 2007 and was drawn up collaboratively by Ashfield District, Broxtowe Borough, Erewash Borough, Gedling Borough, Nottingham City and Rushcliffe Borough Councils. This note provides further clarification in relation to how the assessment judges whether a site is both deliverable and developable so that the Council can identify what supply is available across the Borough.
Assessing whether a site is deliverable
Paragraph 73 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2019) states that Local Planning Authorities should identify and annually update a supply of deliverable sites sufficient to provide a minimum of five years’ worth of housing against their housing requirements.
Annex 2 of the NPPF describes deliverable sites as those that are available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and are achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years. In particular: a) sites which do not involve major development and have planning permission, and all sites with detailed planning permission, should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that homes will not be delivered within five years (for example because they are no longer viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans). b) where a site has outline planning permission for major development, has been allocated in a development plan, has a grant of permission in principle, or is identified on a brownfield register, it should only be considered deliverable where there is clear evidence that housing completions will begin on site within five years.
The following approach to delivery has been formulated with this policy advice in mind.
Sites with planning permission
Sites of less than 10 dwellings or less than 0.5 hectares
46
For outline planning permissions, it is normally assumed that such completions will occur within years 2, 3, 4 or 5 depending on the age of the permission and any other information, such as the knowledge of the planning case officer. For sites where there is a long planning history in terms of renewals of the permission, a judgement will be made as to whether the site falls within the trajectory, with the reasoned judgement explaining clearly the conclusion as to why. Where recent information has been provided by the developer of the site as to when a site is likely to be developed, this information will be used to inform the trajectory.
For detailed planning permissions, it is assumed that such completions will occur within the first 5 years, with the phasing of such development throughout the period dependent upon the date that the permission was granted, the scale of the site and other information such as discharge of conditions or whether a house numbering application has been received.
For all planning permissions, where there is a long planning history in terms of renewals of the permission, or where it is clearly apparent that a site has stalled for a number of years, or planning permission has expired, a judgement will be made as to whether the site will fall within 6-10 years, 11- 15 years or unknown, unless further information is available that offers more certainty to a sites deliverability (such as discharging conditions, a building regulations application and/or a street naming and numbering application).
Sites of 10 or more dwellings or 0.5 hectares or more
For detailed planning permissions, it is assumed that such completions will commence within the first 5 years, with the phasing of such development throughout the period dependent upon the date that the permission was granted, and the scale of the site. Larger sites may extend across a number of 5 year tranches.
For outline planning permission, evidence is required in order to determine that it will commence delivery within 5 years. As set out in National Planning Policy Guidance3, this evidence includes:
current planning status – for example, whether there is a housebuilder involved, how much progress has been made towards approving reserved matters, or whether these link to a planning performance agreement that sets out the timescale for approval of reserved matters applications and discharge of conditions;
3 NPPG Paragraph: 007 Reference ID: 68-007-20190722 47
firm progress being made towards the submission of an application – for example, a written agreement between the local planning authority and the site developer(s) which confirms the developers’ delivery intentions and anticipated start and build-out rates; firm progress with site assessment work; or clear relevant information about site viability, developer ownership/options, or successful infrastructure funding.
Sites allocated for housing within the Local Plan
In accordance with national policy, allocated housing sites can be included within the 5 year supply of deliverable sites if there is clear evidence that delivery will commence in five years. This evidence includes:
evidence of delivery submitted in support of the site’s allocation within a recently adopted Local Plan; whether the plan has been recently adopted, or is close to adoption; whether the site is owned by a developer, or a developer has an option on a site involvement with a delivery partner such eg Homes England current planning status – for example, how much progress has been made towards submitting and approving a planning application, the type of planning application (outline/full), or whether these link to a planning performance agreement that sets out the timescale for approval; progress being made towards the submission of an application relevant information about site viability, developer ownership/options, or successful bids for infrastructure funding.
48
Unimplemented permissions
Table A: Average delivery rate assumptions (DPA = Dwellings per annum) Total Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 onwards Number of number of developers per Entire dwellings on site developer site on site
50-250 1 25 DPA 50 DPA 50 DPA 50 DPA
251-1000 2 50 DPA 100 DPA 50 DPA 100 DPA
1000-2000 3 50 DPA 150 DPA 50 DPA 150 DPA
2001+ 4 50 DPA 200 DPA 50 DPA 200DPA
The start date for such development will be dependent on where the site is in the planning process. Where a site only has outline permission, but evidence suggests it will commence delivery within 5 years, then it is assumed that developments will begin within years 3, 4 or 5 depending on the age of the permission and the evidence of delivery. Where a site has full planning permission or reserved matters permission covering part of it, then it is assumed that the development will commence within years 1 or 2. Where more details are known in relation to number of developers and number of phases, then this information will be used rather than the general assumptions outlined above.
Sites that consist solely of flats may be judged to come forward in one go as completions in one year.
Note: previous SHLAA reports outlined the average delivery rate assumption of 50 – 100 dwellings on sites where 1 developer is involved, whereas it has now been increased to 50 - 250 dwellings. This has been amended to better reflect the number of developers involved in recent developments in the borough. Similarly sites of between 250 and 1000 dwellings are assumed to have 2 developers involved to better based upon recent developments on sites of that scale.
49
Implemented permissions
For sites that are already under construction, the standard approach as outlined above will be refined further to give a more realistic assumption of delivery rates (as additional evidence of delivery will have been provided through previous monitoring). For example, if a site has multiple developers, multiple access points and multiple phases, rates of development may be increased. If there are less developers or phases on a site than anticipated then assumptions development rates may be lowered.
Example 1
If a site has two developers, and one developer is finishing their part of the site whilst another developer is just starting their part of the site, then it will be assumed that development rates will continue on as if there was only one developer.
Example 2
A site has two developers and started more than two years ago, so following our assumption 100 dwellings per annum will be delivered (50 per developer). The site has, however, fewer than 100 dwellings remaining, with one developer having more than 50 remaining and the other having less than 50 remaining. We would therefore assume that the developer with less than 50 remaining will complete within the next year, but the second developer will only have completed 50, with the remaining dwellings carrying over to the following year.
In all cases delivery rates may by altered from this standard approach under the following circumstances.
A change in overall market conditions. Up to date information being provided from developers on delivery Any other circumstances potentially identified as having an effect on delivery rates, such phasing and other factors identified.
Evidence to support delivery rates
Sites of 2000+ dwellings: delivery assumptions
Sustainable urban extensions of the size and scale of those contained within the Core Strategy, in particular Land South of Clifton (Policy 24) and Land
50
East of Gamston/North of Tollerton (Policy 25) are of a size where there are no direct comparison schemes within the area in respect of delivery rates.
A desktop research exercise has been undertaken on delivery assumptions made on sustainable urban extensions across the country. The outcomes of this research identify the examples below (see table below) of situations where evidence on deliverability has been produced, or tested through the Planning Policy or the Development Management process.
Table B Examples of housing delivery rates in other authority areas
Authority Details Timescales Notes Stratford Upon Assessment of 3 2 years Study undertaken Avon District potential assumption for by Peter Brett and Council Sustainable Urban planning process Associates (2013) Extension (SUE) and initial on behalf of sites of 2,000, infrastructure to Stratford upon 3,000 and 5,000 commence. Avon District dwellings. Council. Delivery 8 years build-out rates caveated by time for 2,000 statement that dwellings (250 House Builders average per will build to sale annum) (10 years and build rates will for whole be determined by development market conditions. process)
11 years for 3,000 dwellings (273 average per annum) (13 years of whole development process)
15 years for 5,000 dwellings (333 average per annum) (17 years of whole development process) No breakdown of whether there will be a lead-in time of a lesser rate of development. Rushmoor District Aldershot Urban Estimated Planning Council Extension completions*: permission (Wellesley). 2017-2022: 1,197 granted 51
Authority Details Timescales Notes Allocated in Core (240 per year) (December 2013). 2022-2027: 1,197 Strategy for about (240 per year) Infrastructure and 4,250 dwellings. 2027-2032: 1,318 phasing strategy Planning (264 per year) formed part of permission for planning 3,850 dwellings *Using SHLAA application. (30-80 dwellings estimated delivery per hectare). Delivery currently Completions: commenced, with 2015/16: 21 new reserved 2016/17: 131 matters permissions being approved each year. Ashford District Chilmington 5,750 dwellings Area Action Plan Council Green Area Action through 4 large (AAP) examined Plan phases by Planning Inspectorate and Adopted July Anticipated found sound. AAP 2013. commencement contains proposed 2018/19 delivery rates.
Year 1: 50 Year 2: 150 Years 3-7: 200 Years 8-11: 250 Years 12+: 300
Milton Keynes Eastern 4,000 dwellings 400ha greenfield Council Expansion Area site allocated in (Broughton Gate Annual Delivery: the Milton Keynes and Brooklands) Year 1: 154 Local Plan (2005). Year 2: 359 Includes Year 3: 371 residential, heath Year 4: 114 centre, primary Year 5: 473 schools and a Year 6: 138 secondary school Average (268) South Cambourne new 4,343 dwellings Greenfield site, Cambridgeshire settlement first completion District Council Annual Delivery: 1999/2000 Average over 16 years: 238/yr Peak: 620 in yr 5 Cherwell District North West Up to 6,000 Council Bicester dwellings
Projected Delivery* Year 1-5: 125/yr Year 6+: 220/yr
52
Authority Details Timescales Notes
*Using AMR figures Canterbury City Mountfield Park 4,000 dwellings 229ha greenfield Council (South site Canterbury) Projected Delivery* Anticipated 14 Year 1: 100 year delivery Year 2+: 300/yr period
* Using the Local Expected delivery Plan’s strategic in 4 large phases sites schedule Charnwood North East 4,500 dwellings Allocated in the Borough Council Leicester (3,250 of those Local Plan Core Sustainable Urban during the plan Strategy Extension period) Delivery has not Projected delivery* yet started Year 1: 120 Year 2+: 250/yr
*Using the AMR 2017 housing trajectory Charnwood West of 3,000 dwellings Allocated in the Borough Council Loughborough (2,440 of those Local Plan Core Sustainable Urban during the plan Strategy Extension period) Slightly lower Projected delivery* delivery rates as Year 1: 60 Loughborough is Year 2-3: 120/yr not a large main Year 4+: 160/yr urban area compared to other * Using the AMR settlements with 2017 housing extensions trajectory Delivery has not yet started
It can be seen from examples in the above table that the earlier phase of development will deliver at a lesser rate for the first couple of years of development. The average rates of development on the comparison sites once fully underway are similar to the trajectory assumptions for South of Clifton and East of Gamston/North of Tollerton (which are at a rate of around 250 dwellings per annum). Furthermore, it was confirmed during the Core Strategy Examination by the respective site promoters that both sites are deliverable at the assumed delivery rates.
53
Sites between 501 and 2,000 dwellings.
Research into past delivery rates within the Rushcliffe area has identified two examples of developments within Rushcliffe of a similar size that have occurred within the last 20-30 years. An analysis of their development rates is contained in the table below.
Table C Example of previous housing delivery rates on sites between 501 and 2,000 dwellings in Rushcliffe Location Details Timescales Notes Outline Planning Permission granted 1986. Site had at least 4 Development occurred different during a full economic developers and cycle. 18 month lead multiple phases. in time between Gamston, West All phases. First phase outline planning Bridgford 1,830 dwellings commenced 1987 permission and Complete 1999. commencement of Average achieved first phase of during development construction period 152 per annum. Following outline approval in 2009, significant delays occurred whilst the delivery of infrastructure was agreed and set out Development has in an SPD. taken place during However once the normal housing 3 full planning market conditions. permissions for
927 units were There are five In total 435 units have Edwalton, West granted in developers on been built since Bridgford 2015/16, this site. development development commenced 2016/17. commenced in Delivery to date 2016/17. During indicates a minimum 2017/18 two of 50 units per year house builders per developer on site. delivered 126 homes on the site. During 2018/19 four developers delivered 269 homes on the site Bellway have not
54
Location Details Timescales Notes yet commenced construction on their site.
The above examples achieved similar delivery rates to the assumptions made for similar sized sites considered suitable for development within the SHLAA. 251 to 500 dwellings:
To support the delivery rates contained within the housing trajectory, research into past delivery rates within the Rushcliffe area has identified examples of developments within Rushcliffe which are within the 251 to 500 dwelling range that have occurred within recent times. An analysis of their development rates is contained in the table below.
Table D Examples of previous housing delivery rates in Rushcliffe on sites between 251 and 500 dwellings Location Details Timescales Notes Two developers. Separate phases with full planning applications granted Development has January and June 2015 taken place during respectively. recovery and normal Former Colliery, 458 Development housing market Cotgrave dwellings commenced 2015. 112 conditions. Not units delivered 2015- constrained by one 16, 150 units delivered access point. 2016-17 and 124 units delivered 2017-18. Development completed 2018/19. Three phases with planning applications granted March 2016, October 2016 and Development has December 2017, but taken place during Land off Kirk only one national 300 normal housing Ley Road, housebuilder involved. dwellings market conditions. Not East Leake Development constrained by one commenced 2016-17 access point. with 33 units that year, 67 units in 2017-18 and 93 units completed in 2018-19.
The limited examples identified in the table above show that similar rates of development have been achieved on sites within the development range of 251 to 500 dwellings. Both the proposal at the former Cotgrave Colliery and Kirk Ley Road have two main points of access and two and one developers respectively. This has allowed for at least two phases of development to be
55 underway at a specific point of time, and therefore, allowed for a higher development rate (124 units at the former colliery 2017-18 and 93 units at Kirk Ley Road in 2018/19).
56
Table E. Example of previous housing delivery rates on sites between 50 and 250 dwellings in Rushcliffe
Location Details Timescales Notes Two developers. Planning Permission Developed during granted October 2003. favourable market Development conditions. Phasing Pasture Lane, 235 commenced April 2004 heavily constrained by Ruddington dwellings and complete by April site conditions and 2008. Average rate of having only one development 59 access point. dwellings per annum. Two developers. Outline Planning Permission granted Jul Development took 08. Reserved matters place during deepest granted August 2009. period of recent Development Gotham Road, 152 recession. Phasing commenced East Leake dwellings heavily constrained by September 2009 and site conditions and completed December having only one 2012. access point. Average rate of development 47 dwellings per annum. One developer. Outline granted June 2014. Reserved matters for Development has 102 units granted taken place during October 2014. recovery and normal Meeting House 150 Development housing market Close, East dwellings commenced 2015-16 conditions. Leake and 35 units delivered Development that year, 37 units constrained by only 2016-17, 45 units 2017- one access point. 18 and the final 22 units in 2018-19. One developer. Outline granted August 2013 Development has for 170 units. Reserved taken place during matters for 100 of units recovery and normal Lantern Lane, 170 granted August 2014. housing market East Leake dwellings 49 units delivered conditions. 2015-16, 45 units 2016- Development 17 and 50 units in constrained by only 2017-18. Final 14 units one access point. delivered 2018/19. One single developer. Development has Pasture Lane, 102 Planning permission taken place during Ruddington dwellings granted January 2014. recovery in housing Conditions discharged market. Development
57
Location Details Timescales Notes December 2014. constrained by only Development one access point. commenced 2015. 51 units delivered 2015/16, 41 units 2016/17 and the last 5 units completed during 2017-18. One single developer. Planning permission granted November Development has Central College 2015. 39 units taken place during Greythorn 87 delivered 2017-18 and normal housing Drive, West 46 units delivered market conditions. Bridgford 2018-19. Remaining 2 One point of access units will be delivered 2019-20. One single developer. Outline permission granted December 2015. Reserved Development has matters permitted Land south of taken place during January 2017. Abbey Lane, 74 normal housing Development Aslockton market conditions. commenced 2017-18
with 33 units delivered. Remaining 41 were delivered during 2018- 19. Development Development has Land south of commenced later in taken place during Wilford Lane, 171 2017-18 and delivered normal housing West Bridgford 3 units. During 2018-19 market conditions. 66 units were delivered.
Ultimately, delivery rates on any site will be determined by a number of factors, such as how many developers are involved in a site, the number of access points possible at one time to different phases, detailed phasing of infrastructure, and the state of the market throughout the lifetime of development. Delivery rates will be monitored through the Local Plan Monitoring Report and adjustments made through future reviews of the SHLAA where it is considered appropriate.
58
Appendix 3: Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2019
Site Location Plans
The site location plans are now available through our interactive map service.
This link is also available from our SHLAA webpage which can be accessed from www.rushcliffe.gov.uk/planningpolicy
You are able to search for a specific site by typing the site reference number into the search field facility. In order to do this you need to click on the arrow button next to the search box and highlight “SHLAA 2019”.
59
Appendix 4: Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2019
Site Reports
60
Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/001 Site name Maltings Farm Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0.5
Dwelling capacity 10 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 17/02582/OUT
Allocated site reference Status Extant outline planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 10 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Aslockton is not within the Green Belt - No Constraint Flood Risk Flood zone 1. EA map indicates that a small area within the northern section of the site is at a medium risk of surface water flooding. Landscape assessment Aggregate score in LVIA: 48/100. The site comprises one pastoral field with adjoining farmstead. The site lies immediately north of, and is accessed via Abbey Lane. There are a number of PRoW's within the study area as well as conservational interests, but neither are directly related to the site. There is an overall medium landscape value within the study area and an associated scheduled monument 'Cranmer's Mound'. There is a low susceptibility to change due to the perception of the site as an extension of the edge. The sensitivity of the landscape character is low overall. Visually, there are no distinct indicators of value within the study area. There is a medium number of potential receptors due to the site forming part of the village edge, however the overall susceptibility is low. Overall, there is a low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure Existing woodland should be retained as amenity/natural green space. Site is small and only offers limited opportunities to deliver significant open space. However if brought forward with neighbouring development there may be opportunities to provide more significant GI. Historic Environment Maltings Cottages are identified as Local Interest Buildings. Development would impact on their agricultural setting. Nature conservation No designated nature conservation assets within the site or in close proximity. However site contains a small deciduous wood, a priority habitat, which is identified within the Biodiversity Opportunity Map. Hedgerows should be protected and enhanced to aid connectivity of woodland and other habitats. Phase 1 habitat survey at the application stage should determine presence of protected or priority species and priority habitats. Air quality Site is not within AQMA. Community facilities Limited community facilities within Aslockton. Primary school, tea room, Church Hall and the Cranmer Public House. Highways and accesss Access likely to be achievable, close to edge of village speeds may be high. 30mph extents may need altering. Questionable sustainability. Accessibility Bus stops located on Main Street which is a 5 minute walk. Hourly bus service to Bingham and West Bridgford during the day only with no evening or Sunday service. 3 buses weekday and 9 buses at weekends to Newark, 3 services a day to Grantham. Railway station is a five minute walk. Train services to Nottingham, Grantham and Skegness (10 per day). Other issues Agricultural land Land is Grade 2 (best and most versatile) Deliverability Outline planning permission granted for minor residential development. No evidence that delivery could be delayed beyond five years.
Delivery Period 2 Years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
61 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/001 Site name Maltings Farm Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0.5
Dwelling capacity 10 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 17/02582/OUT
Allocated site reference Status Extant outline planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 10 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Overall summary Outline planning permission granted for minor residential development. No evidence that delivery could be delayed beyond five years.
62 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/002 Site name Land to the rear of Acacia House Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0.9
Dwelling capacity 15 Density (dwellings/hectare) 17 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 15 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Green Belt Aslockton is not within the Green Belt - No Constraint Flood Risk Flood zone 1. Landscape assessment Aggregate score in LVIA: 50/100. The site comprises one relatively well maintained pastoral field. The site lies immediately north of a single row of houses of Abbey Lane. There are a number of PRoW's within the study area as well as conservational interests, but neither are directly related to the site. There is an overall medium landscape value within the study area and an associated scheduled monument 'Cranmer's Mound'. There is a low susceptibility to change due to the perception of the site as an extension of the edge. The sensitivity of the landscape character is low overall. Visually, there are no distinct indicators of value within the study area. There is a medium number of potential receptors due to the site forming part of the village edge, however the overall susceptibility is low. Overall, there is a low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure Site is small and only offers limited opportunities to deliver local amenity space. However if brought forward with neighbouring development there may be opportunities to provide more significant GI. Historic Environment There are no designated heritage assets within or in close proximity of this site. Records indicate presence of ridge and furrow within the eastern area of the site. Also possible ring ditches. There is known archaeology located outside the site however. Site does contain enclosure and ring ditch. Nature conservation No nature conservation assets within the site or in close proximity. It is however bounded by hedgerows in varied condition which are a LBAP habitat and the pasture may contain locally important neutral grassland plant species. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced in accordance with Wider Landscape objectives within Biodiversity Opportunity Mapping Report. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Site is not within AQMA Community facilities Limited community facilities within Aslockton, Primary school, tea room, Church Hall and the Cranmer Public House. Highways and accesss Access likely to be achievable, close to edge of village speeds may be high. 30mph extents may need altering. Accessibility Bus stops located on Main Street which is a 5 minute walk. Hourly bus service to Bingham and West Bridgford during the day only with no evening or Sunday service. 3 buses weekday and 9 buses at weekends to Newark, 3 services a day to Grantham. Railway station is a five minute walk. Train services to Nottingham, Grantham and Skegness (10 per day). Other issues Agricultural land Land is Grade 2 (best and most versatile)
63 Site reference SHLAA/ASL/002 Site name Land to the rear of Acacia House Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0.9
Dwelling capacity 15 Density (dwellings/hectare) 17 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 15 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Deliverability Site submitted on behalf of the landowner within the 2014 SHLAA - no further correspondence. Delivery unknown.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary Aslockton is not identified as a Key Settlement within the adopted Core Strategy. As Aslockton has limited services and facilities the village has not been identified in Local Plan part 2 as an other village where additional housing development could occur. The site is not constrained by significant access, heritage, flooding, landscape or biodiversity constraints which cannot be avoided, mitigated or compensated. The site is however identified as Grade 2 agricultural land (best and most versatile) and the loss of this resource cannot be mitigated. Recent planning appeal decisions (including the decision regarding this site) have supported the Council's position that further development (beyond infill or exception sites for local need) should not be permitted in Aslockton.
64 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/003 Site name Land North of Abbey Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 2.6
Dwelling capacity 65 Density (dwellings/hectare) 26 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 15/01204/OUT
Allocated site reference Status Previously refused planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 65 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Green Belt Aslockton is not within the Green Belt - No Constraint Flood Risk Flood zone 1. EA map indicates that half of the site is at medium or low risk of surface water flooding. Landscape assessment Aggregate LVIA score: 61/100. The site comprises one relatively well maintained arable field. The site lies immediately north of a single row of houses of Abbey Lane. There are a number of PRoW's within the study area with Footpath FP3 running along the sites eastern boundary. There are some conservational interests within the study area which are not directly related to the site. There is an overall medium landscape value within the study area and an associated scheduled monument 'Cranmer's Mound'. There is a low susceptibility to change due to the perception of the site as an extension of the edge. The sensitivity of the landscape character is low overall. Visually, there are no distinct indicators of value within the study area. There is a medium number of potential receptors due to the site forming part of the village edge, however the overall susceptibility is low. Overall, there is a low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure Site offers limited opportunities to deliver local amenity space. However if brought forward with neighbouring development there may be opportunities to provide more significant GI. Right of way should be protected and its environment improved. Integration with this route should be delivered. Historic Environment There are no designated heritage assets within the site. The former Maltings are however of local interest. There is enclosure and ring and ditches of unknown date. Archaeological issues have been addressed through the planning application. Aslockton Conservation Area is adjacent to the site however and its setting could be adversely affected. Nature conservation No nature conservation assets within the site or in close proximity. It is however bounded by hedgerows in varied condition which are a LBAP habitat. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced in accordance with Wider Landscape objectives within Biodiversity Opportunity Mapping Report. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Site is not within a AQMA Community facilities Limited community facilities within Aslockton, Primary school, tea room, Church Hall and the Cranmer Public House. Highways and accesss No objection to planning application from NCC. The principle of a residential development on this parcel of land is acceptable from a highway point of view as a satisfactory junction onto Abbey Lane can be provided to serve the site and as a transport statement has demonstrated that the proposal would not have a detrimental impact on highway safety or on junctions in the vicinity of the development. Improvements to footways to the centre of Aslockton.
Accessibility Bus stops located on Main Street which is a 5 minute walk. Hourly bus service to Bingham and West Bridgford during the day only with no evening or Sunday service. 3 buses weekday and 9 buses at weekends to Newark, 3 services a day to Grantham. Railway station is a five 65 Site reference SHLAA/ASL/003 Site name Land North of Abbey Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 2.6
Dwelling capacity 65 Density (dwellings/hectare) 26 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 15/01204/OUT
Allocated site reference Status Previously refused planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 65 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
minute walk. Train services to Nottingham, Grantham and Skegness (10 per day). Other issues Agricultural land Land is Grade 2 (best and most versatile) Deliverability Representations have been submitted during Local Plan Part 2 therefore the site is considered to be available. Planning permission which was refused. The dismissal of the subsequent appeal means that the site is not suitable now.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary Aslockton is not identified as a Key Settlement within the adopted Core Strategy. As Aslockton has limited services and facilities the settlement has not been identified in Local Plan Part 2 as an other village where additional housing development could occur. The site is not constrained by significant access, biodiversity or flooding constraints which cannot be avoided, mitigated or compensated. Impacts on the setting of the Conservation Area are a constrain and the landscape assessment determined that the site was of greater sensitivity than neighbouring sites, due to its close proximity to this area. The site is identified as Grade 2 agricultural land. Recent planning appeal decisions (including the decision regarding this site) have supported the Council's position that further development (beyond infill or exception sites for local need) should not be permitted in Aslockton.
66 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/005 Site name Land at Cliff Hill Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0.9
Dwelling capacity 8 Density (dwellings/hectare) 9 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/02728/REM
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 8 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Reserved matters approved for 8 dwellings. No identified barriers to delivery.
Delivery Period 2 Years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Site suitable for the development of 8 dwellings. No identified barriers to delivery
67 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/007 Site name Land Adjacent Moorends, Chapel Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0.1
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) 10 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 09/02085/OUT; 12/02124/EXT; 15/03075/OUT Allocated site reference Status Extant outline planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Numerous outline applications and extensions since 2000. Although an outline application for a minor housing development delivery is unknown.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Unknown
Overall summary Numerous outline applications and extensions since 2000. Although an outline application for a minor housing development delivery is unknown.
68 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/008 Site name Land South East Of Long Acre Of Long Acre Cliffhill Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares)
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 16/01222/OUT
Allocated site reference Status Planning Permission for Residential Expired
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Planning permission expired. Delivery is therefore unknown
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Unknown
Overall summary Planning permission expired. Delivery unknown.
69 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/011 Site name Rear Of The Cottage, Chapel Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares)
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 08/02081/COU; 12/00982/COU
Allocated site reference Status Under Construction - less than 25% of dwellings or no completions Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Site under construction - delivery of single unit within 5 years
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Site under construction - delivery of single unit within 5 years
70 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/017 Site name Grange Barn Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 15/01877/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Planning Permission for Residential Expired
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Permission expired during 2018/19. No resubmission.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Unknown
Overall summary Permission expired during 2018/19. No resubmission. Delivery is unknown.
71 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/021 Site name Hill Top Farm, Cliffhill Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0.09
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) 11 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 17/01883/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Under Construction - less than 25% of dwellings or no completions Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Single dwelling under construction - delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Single dwelling under construction - delivery within 5 years.
72 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/022 Site name South of Abbey Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 5.5
Dwelling capacity 75 Density (dwellings/hectare) 14 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status Previously refused planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 75 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt The site is not located within the Green Belt Flood Risk Part of the site is identified as being in Flood Zone 2 and 3. Some areas at risk of surface water flooding Landscape assessment SN06 – Aslockton Village Farmlands The overall landscape strategy is ‘Conserve and Enhance’. The landscape condition is moderate. The character strength is strong. The area has a relatively uniform character of arable fields, linear blocks and clumps of woodland and small distinctive rural villages (LCA 2009). Green Infrastructure Existing hedgerows and scrubland should be retained. Historic Environment No Historic Environment Constraints Nature conservation No designated nature conservation assets within the site or in close proximity. However site contain hedgerows and scrubland, which are priority habitats and which are identified within the Biodiversity Opportunity Map. Hedgerows should be protected and enhanced to aid connectivity to other habitats. Phase 1 habitat survey at the application stage should determine presence of protected or priority species and priority habitats. Air quality Not within or in the vicinity of AQMA Community facilities Limited community facilities within Aslockton - , Primary school, tea room, Church Hall and the Cranmer Public House. Highways and accesss Advice from highways on the planning application is that access can be achieved to the site, subject to certain works. Accessibility Bus stops located on Main Street which is a 10 minute walk. Hourly bus service to Bingham and West Bridgford during the day only with no evening or Sunday service. 3 buses weekday and 9 buses at weekends to Newark, 3 services a day to Grantham. Railway station is a five minute walk. Train services to Nottingham, Grantham and Skegness (10 per day). Other issues Agricultural land The site is identified as grate 2 agricultural land (BMV) Deliverability No developer on board, a land promoter is involved. The site appears to be in single ownership and no apparent ransom strips.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary Aslockton is not identified as a Key Settlement within the adopted Core Strategy. As Aslockton has limited services and facilities the village has not been identified in Local Plan part 2 as an other village where additional housing development could occur. The site is not constrained by significant access, heritage, flooding, landscape or biodiversity constraints which cannot be avoided, mitigated or compensated. The site is however identified as Grade 2 agricultural land (best and most versatile) and the loss of this resource cannot be mitigated. Recent planning appeal decisions (including the decision regarding this site) have supported the Council's position that
73 Site reference SHLAA/ASL/022 Site name South of Abbey Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 5.5
Dwelling capacity 75 Density (dwellings/hectare) 14 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status Previously refused planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 75 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
further development (beyond infill or exception sites for local need) should not be permitted in Aslockton.
74 Aslockton
Site reference SHLAA/ASL/024 Site name 2 Field bungalow Chapel Lane Parish/town Aslockton Site area (hectares) 0.16
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/01895/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning application for 1 unit (Minor Development) - Delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning application for 1 unit (Minor Development) - Delivery within 5 years.
75 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/001 Site name Land off Chapel Lane (north of railway) Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 122
Dwelling capacity 2400 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 0 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Green Belt The land is not located within the green belt. Flood Risk Areas of the site are identified as at risk of flooding from watercourses. Areas also identified as at risk from surface water flooding at varying degrees of risk. Some remodelling of flood area on adjacent site may have benefitted part of this area. Landscape assessment SN06 – Aslockton Village Farmlands The overall landscape strategy is ‘Conserve and Enhance’. The landscape condition is moderate. The character strength is strong. The area has a relatively uniform character of arable fields, linear blocks and clumps of woodland and small distinctive rural villages (LCA 2009). Green Infrastructure The site at present is under intensive farming, therefore opportunity to significantly improve the provision of green infrastructure within the area Historic Environment No designated heritage assets available. Flint scatterings discovered during parish project across some on the site. This is relatively common in areas of intensive agriculture. Farm within the site identified as an alert due to its age. Some potential field patterns also identified close to the farm. Nature conservation Land largely in agricultural use. Hedgerow cover is limited and should be enhanced. A number of drains run across the site and these should be retained and enhanced to provide for wildlife corridors. Air quality The site is not within or in close proximity of an air quality management area Community facilities Bingham has a full range of facilities available within the town centre. Highways and accesss The northern part of the site could possibly be accessed from the Chapel Lane Roundabout. Accessibility and connectivity would be more difficult to achieve the further east that you go in the site without new accesses onto the trunk road network and bridges over the railway line. Accessibility The site is some distance from the main town centre and bus and rail routes. In terms of road and footway access, other than at Chapel Lane, there is limited connectivity at present to the rest of the town. Other issues Agricultural land The site is mainly grade 2 and grade 3 agricultural land Deliverability One landowner. No house builders involved at present. Neighbouring strategic site has secured a national housebuilder and is progressing well in its early phases.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Unknown
Overall summary There are a few identified constraints that would require further consideration in particular in relation to accessibility, connectivity and flood risk. Estimated dwelling capacity is a maximum estimate for the site as a whole, although three options have been put forward as site 76 Site reference SHLAA/BIN/001 Site name Land off Chapel Lane (north of railway) Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 122
Dwelling capacity 2400 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 0 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
submissions. Further work being undertaken as part of a forthcoming growth options study, therefore delivery is unknown at present.
77 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/003 Site name Margaret Place Garage Block Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares)
Dwelling capacity 0 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Internally idenitified Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 0 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt Not in the Green Belt Flood Risk The site is not at risk of flooding Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment No heritage assets Nature conservation No nature conservation value Air quality Community facilities Within Bingham that has a number of community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Within walking distance of frequent bus service along Nottingham Road. Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Not being promoted for development
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Non Deliverable or Developable
Overall summary Although a brownfield site within a built-up area, the small nature of the site, the proximity of neighbouring residential properties and the presence of a sub-station (which will require on-going access) means that the site is unsuitable for development.
78 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/004 Site name Oak Avenue Garage Block 1 Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares)
Dwelling capacity 0 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Site Survey Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 0 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt Not in the Green Belt Flood Risk The site is not at risk of flooding Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment No heritage assets Nature conservation No nature conservation value Air quality The site is not within or within close proximity to an air quality management area. Community facilities Within Bingham that has a number of community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Within walking distance of frequent bus service along Willow Road. Other issues Three configurations of the area have been submitted therefore the assessment looks at the area in general terms. Agricultural land The area consists of grade 2 and grade 3 agricultural land. Deliverability Not being promoted for development
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Non Deliverable or Developable
Overall summary Although a brownfield site within a built-up area the site is unsuitable for development as the garages are clearly well used and maintained. There would also be the issue of the proximity of neighbouring residential properties.
79 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/005 Site name Oak Avenue Garage Block 2 Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.03
Dwelling capacity 0 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Site Survey Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 0 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt Not in the Green Belt Flood Risk The site is not at risk of flooding Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment No heritage assets Nature conservation No nature conservation value Air quality Community facilities Within Bingham that has a number of community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Within walking distance of frequent bus service along Willow Road. Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Not being promoted for development
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Non Deliverable or Developable
Overall summary Although a brownfield site within a built-up area the site is unsuitable for development as the garages are clearly well used and maintained. There would also be the issue of the proximity of neighbouring residential properties.
80 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/010 Site name Banks House Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) 0.43 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 08/01012/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Planning Permission for Residential Expired
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Permission expired. Delivery unknown
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Unknown
Overall summary Permission expired. Delivery unknown
81 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/013 Site name 19 Fosters Lane Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.23
Dwelling capacity 7 Density (dwellings/hectare) 30 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 10/00533/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Under Construction - less than 25% of dwellings or no completions Number of dwellings remaining 6 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability 7 units granted planning permission in 2010. One unit completed. Construction of remaining 6 units has still not commenced. Delivery is therefore unknown.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Unknown
Overall summary 7 units granted planning permission in 2010. One unit completed. Construction of remaining 6 units has still not commenced. Whilst permission has been implemented, their delivery is therefore unknown.
82 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/015 Site name Land north of Bingham (planning application) Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 61.67
Dwelling capacity 1050 Density (dwellings/hectare) 16 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 10/01962/OUT, 17/02106/REM, 18/01468/REM Allocated site reference Policy 21 Status Under Construction - less than 25% of dwellings or no completions Number of dwellings remaining 1030 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Car Dyke works now completed to enable phases 2 and 3 of development to be built. Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability 1050 units granted planning permission (18/01468/REM, 18/02630/REM and 17/02106/REM). SUE allocated for 1000. Delivery commenced in 2018/19 (20 units completed). 2 outets building at present with further phases commencing in the next two years. The site is available now, suitable now and achievable now. Deliver rates 100PA for the next 2 years, and increasing as further phases commence.
Delivery Period 8 years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary 1050 units granted planning permission (18/01468/REM, 18/02630/REM and 17/02106/REM). SUE allocated for 1000. Delivery commenced in 2018/19 (20 units completed). 2 outets building at present with further phases commencing in the next two years. The site is available now, suitable now and achievable now. Deliver rates 100PA for the next 2 years, and increasing as further phases commence.
83 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/017 Site name Priory Mews, 9 Fisher Lane Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 12/01843/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Planning Permission for Residential Expired
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Permission expired therefore delivery unknown.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Unknown
Overall summary Permission expired therefore delivery unknown.
84 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/025 Site name Former Police Station, Grantham Road Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.35
Dwelling capacity 39 Density (dwellings/hectare) 111 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference 18/02800/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Planning application under consideration
Number of dwellings remaining Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Counts towards housing delivery under the housing delivery test. The guidance states that each authority estimate the number of net dwellings that would be freed up from the net additional student and other communal accommodation built over the three year period. This is calculated by dividing each authority’s student bed spaces annual net change by the national ratio (2.5) and each authority’s other communal bed spaces annual net change by the national ratio (1.8). 70 bed spaces equals freed up units. Agricultural land Deliverability Planning application for C2 care home under consideration. Agreement in principle to grant planning permission. Site in the process of being cleared.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary C2 so a proportion counts 70 beds is equivalent to 39 units. No identified barriers to delivery as site preparation has started.
85 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/027 Site name 23 Derry Lane Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.13
Dwelling capacity 2 Density (dwellings/hectare) 15 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 15/02794/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Under Construction - over 50% of dwellings completed
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning permission implemented - one unit completed, the other under construction 2018/19. Delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning permission implemented - one unit completed, the other under construction 2018/19. Delivery within 5 years.
86 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/028 Site name Bingham Public House, Long Acre Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares)
Dwelling capacity 3 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 16/01464/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Planning Permission for Residential Expired
Number of dwellings remaining 3 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Planning permission expired Aug 2019. Delivery unknown
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Unknown
Overall summary Planning permission expired Aug 2019. Delivery is unknown.
87 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/029 Site name 15-17 Derry Lane Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.07
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) 13 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 17/01619/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning permission granted 2017. Delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning permission granted 2017. Delivery within 5 years.
88 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/030 Site name Land North of 11 Tithby Road / West of 2 The Banks Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.03
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) 30 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 17/02825/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Planning permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Planning permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
89 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/031 Site name 5 Market Street Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.01
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 17/02320/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning permission for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning permission for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
90 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/032 Site name Chesterfield Arms Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.32
Dwelling capacity 10 Density (dwellings/hectare) 31 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/00298/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 10 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning permission granted 2018/19 and one condition discharged. Minor development therefore delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 2 Years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning permission granted 2018/19 and one condition discharged. Minor development therefore delivery within 5 years.
91 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/033 Site name Land to the rear of 4 and 6 Dark Lane Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.05
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/00677/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Planning permission for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Planning permission for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
92 Bingham
Site reference SHLAA/BIN/034 Site name 40 Rockingham Grove Parish/town Bingham Site area (hectares) 0.02
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) 50 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/02660/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
93 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/001 Site name Bunny Brickworks Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 2.4
Dwelling capacity 100 Density (dwellings/hectare) 30 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference Policy 23 Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 100 Source of number of dwellings Development Plan Document
Green Belt The site will come out of the green belt on adoption of Local Plan part 2 Flood Risk Site not within an area identified at risk of flooding from watercourses. East of the site is identified as a source of potential surface water flooding. Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 52/100. The site is situated on the southern edge of the village of Bunny, adjacent to a landfill site and Bunny Trading Estate, as well as a line of housing. The site includes an area of TPO and slopes gently up towards the south. Within the study area, there is a low landscape value due to the degraded and industrial character of the site's immediate surroundings. The landscape susceptibility is medium as the site would form a block of development and have a perceived increase in density on the sparsely populated village edge. Overall the landscape sensitivity is low. There is very limited visual value associated with the site, as well as a low visual susceptibility arising from the dense vegetation on the site boundaries, which currently screens it from view. The visual sensitivity is overall low. Green Infrastructure Hedgerows could be maintained and enhanced in order to provided enhanced green infrastructure, together with the retention of some of the more established trees and scrub within the site. Historic Environment No identified heritage assets either within the site or within the setting of the site. Nature conservation No identified designations. Part of the site formally a Local Wildlife Site but designation longer applies. Some trees hedgerows and scrub exist within the site which could contain LBAP habitats. Air quality N/A Community facilities Facilities within the village (centre of which is around 1km away from the centre of the site) include petrol station/small shop, primary school and a pub. Highways and accesss Existing access onto the A60. A60 is 50MPH at this point. Accessibility Bus stop 200 metres from the entrance of the site. Half hourly frequency during the day. Site connected to village by narrow footpath alongside the east of the A60. Footpaths along both sides of Gotham Lane serving the north of the site. Other issues Agricultural land The site is identified as Grade 3 agricultural land. However it is not in agricultural use and has areas of hardstanding. Deliverability Pre application discussions underway. EIA screening submitted. No known developer involvement at this stage. There is iikely to be remediation required in relation to the sites former use as a brickworks. Whilst the site is suitable now and available now, it is only achievable given the combination of its planning status, the lack of a known development and likely requirement to remediate the site. 6-10 year tranche.
Delivery Period 3 years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 6-10 Years
94 Site reference SHLAA/BUN/001 Site name Bunny Brickworks Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 2.4
Dwelling capacity 100 Density (dwellings/hectare) 30 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference Policy 23 Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 100 Source of number of dwellings Development Plan Document
Overall summary Pre application discussions underway. EIA screening submitted. No known developer involvement at this stage. There is iikely to be remediation required in relation to the sites former use as a brickworks. Whilst the site is suitable now and available now, it is only achievable given the combination of its planning status, the lack of a known development and likely requirement to remediate the site. 6-10 year tranche.
95 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/005 Site name Bunny Trading Estate Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 2.4
Dwelling capacity 40 Density (dwellings/hectare) 17 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 40 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Green Belt The site is within the Green Belt Flood Risk Site not within an area identified at risk of flooding from watercourses. Small areas at slight risk of surface water flooding Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Hedgerows could be maintained and enhanced in order to provided enhanced green infrastructure. Historic Environment No identified heritage assets either within the site or within the setting of the site. Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Facilities within the village (centre of which is around 1km away from the centre of the site) include petrol station/small shop, primary school and a pub. Highways and accesss Access could be provided onto Gotham Lane however visibility to the east may not be satisfactory given the bend in the road. Road is also 60 MPH at this location. Accessibility Bus stop 300 metres from the entrance of the site. Half hourly frequency during the day. Site connected to village by narrow footpath alongside the east of the A60. Footpaths along both sides of Gotham Lane serving the north of the site. Other issues N/A Agricultural land The site not is not in agricultural use Deliverability Site being promoted. No known developer. Clearance of the site would be required and further investigation into whether a safe access could be provided into and out of the site.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary Whilst the site consists of previously developed land, it is located within the Green belt. Redevelopment may be possible so long as the development meets green belt tests, and also the loss of employment policies within the local plan (CS policy 4 and LAPP policy 15). Development capacity should be treated with caution given the green belt location.
96 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/009 Site name Land to the east of Loughborough Road Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 1.1
Dwelling capacity 9 Density (dwellings/hectare) 8 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 9 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt The site is located within the Green Belt Flood Risk The site is at risk from flooding from rivers and streams, and from surface water. Landscape assessment No detailed assessment undertaken. The overall landscape strategy is Conserve and Enhance. - High quality setting within the former grounds of Bunny Hall within the valley of Fairham Brook. The site lies within the Cotgrave and Tollerton Village Farmlands DPZ. The strength of character of the area is moderate. The area has a relatively uniform character of arable fields with prominent village fringes. Green Infrastructure Area TPO runs along sites eastern and Northern boundary. There are strong hedgerows around the site, together with occasional mature trees along the hedgerow and within the site. Historic Environment In the setting of Bunny Hall (Grade 1). Adjacent to the conservation area Nature conservation Area TPO runs along sites eastern and Northern boundary. There are strong hedgerows around the site, together with occasional mature trees along the hedgerow and within the site Air quality N/A Community facilities Facilities within the village (centre of which is around 1km away from the centre of the site) include petrol station/small shop, primary school and a pub. Highways and accesss Unknown whether satisfactory access can be achieved. Accessibility Bus stops 100m from western boundary of site. Half hourly frequency during the day. Site connected to village by footpath alongside the east of the A60. Other issues Agricultural land Not in agricultural use Deliverability Owner supporting the building of properties on the site
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary Development of this site would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt as it does not constitute limited infilling. The site is located beyond the built-up area of the settlement within the Nottingham and Derby Green Belt, in a location where the Core Strategy identifies that growth will be to satisfy local need and this need will be primarily be met through infill and rural exception development.
97 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/010 Site name Land to the East of Loughborough Road Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 1.8
Dwelling capacity 40 Density (dwellings/hectare) 22 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 40 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt The site is located within the Green Belt Flood Risk Significant areas of the site are at risk of surface water flooding Landscape assessment SN04: Cotgrave and Tollerton Village Farmlands The overall landscape strategy is ‘Enhance and Restore’. The landscape condition is moderate. The character strength of the area is moderate. The area has a relatively uniform character of arable fields with prominent village fringes. Urban elements are frequent and exert a strong influence. Man-made elements and landform have a localised influence on character (LCA 2009). Green Infrastructure Trees and hedgerows should be retained and corridors enhanced Historic Environment Southern part of the site in the setting of the Walled Garden, which is listed. Conservation area adjacent to the site. Nature conservation Large trees in several locations across the site. Hedgerows run around the site in addition to through the site itself. Air quality The site is not within or in the vicinity of an air quality management area Community facilities Facilities within the village (centre of which is around 1km away from the centre of the site) include petrol station/small shop, primary school and a pub. Highways and accesss Unknown if safe access could be achieved onto Loughborough road Accessibility Bus stops 100m from western boundary of site. Half hourly frequency during the day. Site connected to village by footpath alongside the east of the A60. Other issues Agricultural land Grade 2 agricultural land Deliverability Site being promoted as recently as 2013. Unknown if there is a developer with an option on the site.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary The site lies within the Green Belt, on Grade 2 (very good) quality agricultural land. Although there is no risk of flooding from any watercourse, there is a high risk of surface water flooding on part of the site to the south. Bunny Conservation Area lies directly adjacent to the site, so the impact upon this will need to be considered.
98 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/011 Site name Brook View Stables, Loughborough Road Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 3.5
Dwelling capacity 20 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 70 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt The site is located within the Green Belt Flood Risk No risk of flooding from any watercourse. Northern half of the site is subject to high risk of surface water flooding. The majority of the remainder of the site is subject to low/medium surface water flooding. Landscape assessment SN04: Cotgrave and Tollerton Village Farmlands The overall landscape strategy is ‘Enhance and Restore’. The landscape condition is moderate. The character strength of the area is moderate. The area has a relatively uniform character of arable fields with prominent village fringes. Urban elements are frequent and exert a strong influence. Man-made elements and landform have a localised influence on character (LCA 2009). Green Infrastructure hedgerows could be maintained and enhanced in order to provided enhanced green infrastructure Historic Environment The site is not located within the conservation area Or contains any historic assets Nature conservation Local Wildlife Site (Fairham Brook) is adjacent to the most northerly part of the site. Air quality Not within or within close proximity to an air quality management area Community facilities Facilities within the village (centre of which is around 1km away from the centre of the site) include petrol station/small shop, primary school and a pub. Highways and accesss Adjacent to A60. Unknown whether safe access and egress could be achieved Accessibility Bus stops adjacent to the western boundary of the site. Half hourly frequency during the day. Site connected to village by footpath alongside the east of the A60. Other issues Agricultural land Grade 3 agricultural land Deliverability Promoted by landowner. No known developer on board
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary The site is located to the south of Bunny within the Green Belt. Current uses are mainly stables and open grass paddocks for horses, as well as free range hens. Land adjacent the site on the opposite side of the A60 is residential ribbon development. Although not within it, Bunny Conservation Area lies adjacent to the North of the site, so considerations for any impacts on its setting would need to be made. The site itself is relatively flat. The site is in walking distance to Bunny village centre, and half-hourly bus service with connections to Nottingham and Loughborough can be accessed directly adjacent to the site.
99 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/012 Site name Wysall Road Farm Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 0
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 17/01302/PAQ
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years
100 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/013 Site name 16 Loughborough Road Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 0.4
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 17/03038/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning permission granted for minor residential development. Condition discharged - delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
101 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/014 Site name Purlston Cottage, 8 Loughborough Road Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 0.09
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) 11 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/01602/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning permission granted for minor residential development - delivery within 5 years.
102 Bunny
Site reference SHLAA/BUN/015 Site name Home Farm, 15 Church Street Parish/town Bunny Site area (hectares) 0.05
Dwelling capacity 1 Density (dwellings/hectare) Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/01489/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Extant full planning permission, S106 agreed or not required
Number of dwellings remaining 1 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt Flood Risk Landscape assessment Green Infrastructure Historic Environment Nature conservation Air quality Community facilities Highways and accesss Accessibility Other issues Agricultural land Deliverability Full planning permission granted for minor residential development. Two conditions discharged. Delivery within 5 years.
Delivery Period 1 Year Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary Full planning permission granted for minor residential development. Two conditions discharged. Delivery within 5 years.
103 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/001 Site name Land RO Mill Lane/The Old Park Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 12.0
Dwelling capacity 180 Density (dwellings/hectare) 15 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference LAPP policy 2.1 Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 180 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt The LAPP removes the site from the Green Belt Flood Risk The site as identified in the SHLAA is not within an area of flood risk. Parts of the site are at risk of flooding from surface water. Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 48/100. The site is comprises two arable fields and some rough ground on the north-eastern edge of the village of Cotgrave. To the immediate north of the site is Cotgrave Country Park, which is a considerable recreational resource for the area. There is an overall low landscape value within the study area and a low susceptibility to change due to the perception of the site as an extension of the edge. The sensitivity of the landscape character is low overall. Visually, Cotgrave Country Park is an indicator of value, but there is little else of value. There is a medium number of potential receptors and the site forms part of the backdrop to the village, but it is of overall low susceptibility. Overall, there is a low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure GI within Cotgrave Country Park and along the Grantham Canal corridor. Potential to improve. Opportunities to enhance the northern and eastern fringes of the site to provide a buffer to these features, together with the public footpath corridor that runs across the western part of the site. Historic Environment Geophysics indicate that there is a high probability of archaeology within the western area of the site Nature conservation Adjacent to Cotgrave Country Park and the Grantham Canal corridor, which are Local Wildlife Site designations. Air quality None identified. Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Access is achievable together with the adjacent sites through the provision of a roundabout. Accessibility Within walking distance of Cotgrave connection, which runs at least 3 times an hour during Monday-Friday daytime, with services in the evenings and weekends. Site is close to Cotgrave precinct and other retail facilities on Bingham Road. Other issues Agricultural land The land is grade 3 agricultural land Deliverability The site was recently promoted through the LAPP examination. Major volume house builder owns and has option on the site. Full application expected Q1-Q2 2020. No major works required to enable development therefore no major issues in relation to deliverability.
Delivery Period 4 Years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
104 Site reference SHLAA/COT/001 Site name Land RO Mill Lane/The Old Park Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 12.0
Dwelling capacity 180 Density (dwellings/hectare) 15 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference LAPP policy 2.1 Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 180 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Overall summary The site is owned by the Boorugh Council and was recently promoted as part of local plan part 2 examination. The Boorugh Ocuncil is in the process of securenf a development partner. Given the sites progression, the site is available now, suitable now and achievable now.
105 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/002 Site name Land at Main Road Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 2.0
Dwelling capacity 50 Density (dwellings/hectare) 25 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/01116/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Previously refused planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 50 Source of number of dwellings Pre Application Enquiry
Green Belt The site (COT/A in the Green Belt Review) performs well against Green Belt purposes. The removal of this site for development would represent urban sprawl in an outlying location beyond the se lement boundary. The site scored 16, placing the site within the medium- high category of Green Belt importance. 2 points higher than the score for the area as a whole, mainly due to encroachment into the countryside, this reflects the overall conclusion that the site is of medium-high Green Belt importance. Flood Risk Site located within zone 1 flood risk area. Parts of the site at risk from surface water flooding. Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 48/100. Site COT/002 is a small rectangular piece of equestrian grazing land just to the north of the Cotgrave village boundary. It is slightly removed from the village boundary, with a TPO on its southern edge. There is a low landscape value and susceptibility in the study area due to the high degree of human influence and the perception of the site as an extension of the urban edge, albeit slightly removed from the existing boundary. Overall there is a low landscape sensitivity. The visual value is low, although the presence of Cotgrave Country Park is a positive factor. There is a low visual susceptibility owing to the limited contribution of the site to the visual amenity. Overall there is a low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure Hedgerows could be maintained and enhanced in order to provided enhanced green infrastructure. Historic Environment Nothing identified in the area. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by established hedgerows which are a LBAP habitat and the pasture may contain locally important neutral grassland plant species. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Not within or adjacent to an Air Quality Management Area. Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. The site is located some distance away from the local centre. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Extend 30 mph limit / Village Gateway to include site. Extend footway to Fields view. Accessibility Within walking distance of main Cotgrave bus service, which runs at least 3 times an hour during Monday-Friday daytime. Relatively close to retail facilities on Bingham Road. Other issues Agricultural land Grade 3 agricultural land in use for grazing. Deliverability Site had developer involved in 2018. Subject to resolving constraints, site is considered deliverable.
106 Site reference SHLAA/COT/002 Site name Land at Main Road Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 2.0
Dwelling capacity 50 Density (dwellings/hectare) 25 Site source Planning Application Planning reference 18/01116/FUL
Allocated site reference Status Previously refused planning permission
Number of dwellings remaining 50 Source of number of dwellings Pre Application Enquiry
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary Site is considered to be of medium-high Green Belt importance due to its outlying location and the effect of urban sprawl. The site is not however constrained by access, heritage, biodiversity or flooding issues that cannot be mitigated. Planning application refused for residential development on green belt and highways grounds.
107 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/003 Site name Land R/O and to the west of Main Road Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 6.3
Dwelling capacity 125 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 125 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt Adjoining Cotgrave on two boundaries, removal of this site would round of the North West edge of the settlement without intruding beyond existing development along Main Road. It would not result in a reduction in the distance between Radcliffe on Trent or Nottingham’s main urban area. However, the absence of encroaching development and close proximity to the historic centre of Cotgrave increase the land’s overall performance against Green Belt purposes. Overall the site scores 13 and is therefore of low-medium Green Belt importance. Flood Risk the site is not identified as at risk of flooding from watercourses. Parts of the site are at risk of flooding from surface water. Environment Agency advises that 10 metre easements would be required adjacent to any watercourses. Landscape assessment LVIA aggregate score: 46/100. The site is a series of arable fields to the north-west of the historic centre of Cotgrave and is part of the setting to 'The Limes', a Grade II listed house. Cotgrave Footpath 15 crosses the site in its south-western corner and contributes to the medium recreational value in the study area. Overall there is a low landscape value. The landscape susceptibility is also low as the site acts as an extension to the settlement with no notable loss of key characteristics. This level of susceptibility occurs despite the proximity of the site to the historic village core. There is low landscape sensitivity overall. Visually, the site has a limited recreational value and does not contribute to the visual amenity for both residential and recreational receptors. It has an overall low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure None identified within or adjacent to the site. There is a small watercourse within the northern part of the site. This corridor could be maintained and enhanced as green infrastructure to the north of the site.. There is also a public right of way, which could also be enhanced as a GI corridor. Historic Environment Nothing on site, but within the setting of listed church which is grade I and the Limes, which is grade II. There is a series of earthworks forming banked enclosures and hollows in southern half of the site. However age and function is unknown. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by established mature hedgerows and contains a small watercourse which are a LBAP habitat and the pasture may contain locally important neutral grassland plant species. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality No issues identified. Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Extend 30 mph limit / Village Gateway to include site. No other issues. Accessibility Within walking distance of main Cotgrave bus service, which runs at least 3 times an hour 108 Site reference SHLAA/COT/003 Site name Land R/O and to the west of Main Road Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 6.3
Dwelling capacity 125 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 125 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
during Monday-Friday daytime. The site is well located to retail facilities on Bingham Road. Other issues Agricultural land Grade 3 agricultural land. Deliverability Site has house builder involvement. Subject to constraints being resolved, the site is considered deliverable.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary The site is not constrained by significant access, biodiversity, flood risk, or landscape issues and is closely located to the settlements services and facilities. Proximity of the site to the historic core and setting of listed buildings (most notably the Grade 1 listed church) is a constraint which would require mitigation. This is recognised in the Heritage Assessment, Green belt review and landscape appraisal.
109 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/004 Site name Land off Woodgate Lane Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.1
Dwelling capacity 80 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 80 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt Whilst the sewage treatment works would physically contain the site to the north, this facility is not prominent and development would constitute an urban intrusion into the countryside along Woodgate Lane. There are no elements of inappropriate development, when viewed from the urban edge the land is open countryside in character. Due to the scale of the site, its removal from the Green Belt would not significantly reduce distance between Cotgrave and Nottingham’s main urban area. However this does not outweigh the intrusive location. The land scored 14 against Green Belt purposes, reflecting the overall conclusion that it is of low- medium Green Belt importance. Flood Risk Not identified as at risk of flooding from any source. Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 46/100. The site is an arable field on the north-western settlement edge of Cotgrave; it is crossed by Cotgrave Footpath 15 and forms part of a strong rural edge to the settlement. There is an overall low landscape value on site due to the low level of conservation interests and the degree of human influence in the study area. The landscape susceptibility is also low, owing to development of the site resulting in no notable loss of key characteristics and an extension of the urban edge. Overall the landscape sensitivity is low. In terms of visual amenity, there is a recreational value and views to All Saints Church, but overall the value of the visual amenity is low. The site is part of the visual amenity for residential receptors and is situated on the village edge; it has a medium visual susceptibility. Overall there is a low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure Existing hedgerows around the site could be maintained or enhanced, together with the public right of way corridor through the site. 10m easement either side of watercourse should be incorporated into the design. Historic Environment Nothing identified. Public footpath provides corridor view towards the church in the centre of the village. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by established hedgerows which are a LBAP habitat. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Nothing identified Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. The site is some distance away from the local centre. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Would require upgrade of Woodgate Lane to bring up to adoptable standard, currently a private road in multiple ownership. Possible legal issues. Accessibility Within reasonable walking distance of main Cotgrave bus service via a public right of way. The bus runs at least 3 times an hour during Monday-Friday daytime. The site is further away from retail facilities on Bingham Road than other sites, and more so in the case of precinct 110 Site reference SHLAA/COT/004 Site name Land off Woodgate Lane Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.1
Dwelling capacity 80 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 80 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Other issues Part of the site adjacent to sewage works, which is a bad neighbour and which Severn Trent advise that there should be a buffer in order to allow for future capacity improvements. Agricultural land The site is predominantly grade 2 agricultural land (BMV). Deliverability Representation received on Publication LAPP. Site is in single ownership. No known house builder with an option. Subject to constraints being resolved, the site is considered deliverable.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary The site is not constrained by biodiversity, GI, flood risk or heritage issues that cannot be avoided or mitigated. The land does however protrude into open countryside and this is recognised within the Green Belt Review. The main constraint is the proposed access off Woodgate Lane, which is currently a private road in multiple ownership. This road would require adoption, resolution of legal ownership, and bringing up to standard.
111 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/005 Site name Bakers Hollow Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 2.4
Dwelling capacity 55 Density (dwellings/hectare) 22 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 55 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt This area of Green Belt land is contained by development on Bakers Hollow and White Furrows. Its removal and development would not result in a prominent intrusion into the Green Belt, or a reduction in the distance between Cotgrave and Clipston. However, due to the weak defensive boundary, the complete removal of this field from the Green Belt should be considered. This would create a larger intrusion and greater settlement sprawl across more open countryside. Having scored 10, if restricted to the SHLAA site, the Green Belt land within this area is considered being of low Green Belt importance. Flood Risk Site not identified as at risk of flooding from any source Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 49/100. The site is an intensively managed arable field located on the western edge of Cotgrave, which forms a small part of the rural setting to the village. The high degree of human influence contributes to the low landscape value, as does the limited number of conservation interests. There would be no notable loss of key characteristics and the site would appear as an extension to the existing urban edge. Within the study area, there is an inherent low landscape sensitivity in the study area, which is derived from the low landscape value and low landscape susceptibility. In terms of visual amenity there is a low visual value, although there is inherent recreational value in the study area. The visual susceptibility is also low; the site has a limited contribution to the experience of receptors. Overall the visual sensitivity is low. Green Infrastructure Opportunity to establish buffer between the site and the wider countryside to provide a soft edge to the settlement Historic Environment The site does not contain or preserve the setting of any statutory or non-statutory heritage assets. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by established mature hedgerows on three sides. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Nothing identified Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Access Ok. Wish to see new footway to connect site to Village. Accessibility The site is around 15 minutes walk from the main Cotgrave bus service, which runs at least 3 times an hour during Monday-Friday daytime. Other less frequent buses run Hourly during Monday-Saturday daytime only. The site is further away from retail facilities on Bingham Road than other sites, and more so in the case of precinct Other issues
112 Site reference SHLAA/COT/005 Site name Bakers Hollow Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 2.4
Dwelling capacity 55 Density (dwellings/hectare) 22 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 55 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Agricultural land Land predominantly Grade 3 agricultural land, with small area of Grade 2 agricultural land at the site's south west corner. Deliverability Land in single ownership however no known house builder with an option on the land. Promoted still at LAPP examination. Subject to constraints being resolved, the site is considered deliverable.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary The site is not constrained by significant biodiversity, heritage, flood risk, or access constraints that cannot be avoided or mitigated. Land is considered to be of low Green Belt importance.
113 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/006 Site name The Brickyard Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 8.2
Dwelling capacity 80 Density (dwellings/hectare) 15 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 80 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Green Belt The site is of low importance when assessed against Green Belt purposes which seek to restrict sprawl and prevent the merging of settlements, consequently it scored 3 points less the wider strategic area. The presence of The Brickyard has reduced the ability of the Green Belt to safeguard the land from encroachment. It is also a local interest building which may be of importance to the special character of the area. The Green Belt score of 11 reflects the overall conclusion that the site is of low-medium Green Belt importance. Flood Risk Site not at risk of flooding from rivers. Area of the site is identified as at risk of flooding from surface water. Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 49/100. The site is situated on the south-western edge of Cotgrave and comprises pastoral land and woodland. There is an inherent low landscape value within the study area, owing to the high degree of human influence and detractors, as well as the lack of tranquillity. Landscape susceptibility is also low, although loss of the woodland as both an ecological and recreational resource and the increased prominence of the site in its surroundings will both be issues affecting the susceptibility of the landscape character to development on site. Visually, there is little value except for a minor recreational value arising from the presence of the woodland on the site and at its western boundary. The susceptibility of the visual amenity to change is also low. Overall the landscape sensitivity is low, as is the visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure There are a number of potential opportunities for the enhancement of green infrastructure on the site, including the retention and enhancement of hedgerow corridors, tree clusters and grasslands around the site. Historic Environment The Brickyard building is identified as a property of local interest. This early 19th century brickworks includes kilns which survive on site. Development of land around the building may affect its setting. Non designated heritage assets also include a WW2 rifle range at west side of site. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by established mature hedgerows which are a LBAP habitat and the pasture may contain locally important neutral grassland plant species. The site also contains trees and scrubland which may also be a LBAP habitat. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Nothing identified Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. The site is some distance away from the local centre. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Access Ok, would wish to new footway to connect site to Village.
114 Site reference SHLAA/COT/006 Site name The Brickyard Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 8.2
Dwelling capacity 80 Density (dwellings/hectare) 15 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 80 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Accessibility the site is within a 15 minute walk to the main Cotgrave bus service. This runs every 20 minutes to Nottingham. Site is comparatively remote compared to other sites to retail facilities within the village, but is well located for the main primary school. Other issues Agricultural land The site is identified as being grade 3 agricultural land. Deliverability No deliverability information within the submission. Wider area not being promoted for development and ownership is unknown (only the area in the centre of the site was being promoted for development). No house builder involvement.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary Site contains a variety of local priority habitats, a local interest building and other heritage assets (WW2 Rifle range). Access issues and flood risk are not however concerns. The Green Belt Review concluded the land is of low-medium Green Belt importance.
115 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/007 Site name Land behind Firdale (2) Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.4
Dwelling capacity 65 Density (dwellings/hectare) 10 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 65 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt Due to its size, outlying location, open countryside character and prominent topography, the eastern half of the site (COT/I) scored highly against Green Belt purposes which restrict settlement sprawl and safeguard the countryside from encroachment. Whilst the removal of this land would not significantly reduce the distance between Cotgrave and Cropwell Bishop, and the land does not preserve the historic setting of the settlement, this does not outweigh the overall conclusion that the land is of medium-high Green Belt importance. The site scored 16 against Green Belt purposes. The land adjacent to Cotgrave (COT/H) scored 12 (see assessment of site RBC/COT/008). Flood Risk Site not at risk of river flooding from watercourses. Site frontage to Colston Gate identified is at risk of flooding from surface water. Landscape assessment As COT7 would not be developed in isolation the landscape assessment has combined COT7 and COT6. Landscape appraisal score 53/100. The area comprises an arable field and a field of rough ground on the eastern rural edge of Cotgrave. The two fields form part of the rural setting to the village, but the human influence within the study area, as well as the lack of conservation interests contribute to the low landscape value. In terms of landscape susceptibility, development of the site would not result in the loss of key characteristics. It would appear as an extension of the urban edge, albeit a finger of development that might increase the prominence of the settlement. Overall, the landscape susceptibility and sensitivity are both low. In terms of visual amenity, there is low visual value, limited to a slight residential amenity. The visual susceptibility is medium due to the relative openness of the site to its surroundings, as well as the moderate number of potential receptors. The visual sensitivity is overall low. Green Infrastructure Opportunities to enhance existing hedgerows around the site. Historic Environment The site does not contain or preserve the setting of any statutory or non-statutory heritage assets. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by some hedgerows which are a LBAP habitat. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Not within or near an Air Quality Management Area Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. The site is located some distance away from the village centre. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Access should be located so visibility is not obscured by bend to the east. Village Gateway to be relocated to incorporate site. New footway to connect to village required. Consideration to be given to impact on Colston Gate Hollygate Lane junction. Accessibility The site is some distance away from the main bus service which runs at least 3 times an hour 116 Site reference SHLAA/COT/007 Site name Land behind Firdale (2) Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.4
Dwelling capacity 65 Density (dwellings/hectare) 10 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 65 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
during Monday-Friday daytime. Other site are closer to retail and other facilities within the village, but it is not too far to the precinct. Other issues Overhead power lines cross the eastern part of the site. The land rises sharply towards the southeast. Would not release the site in isolation. Agricultural land Grade 3 agricultural land. Deliverability Representation on LAPP Further Issues and Options received from site promoter. However no identified house builder for the site.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary The site is not constrained by biodiversity, heritage or landscape issues which cannot be avoided or mitigated. Development would require new footpath and may require improvements to the Colston Gate/Hollygate Lane. Due to its size, outlying location, open countryside character and prominent topography however, the site scored highly against Green Belt purposes.
117 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/008 Site name Land behind Firdale Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.8
Dwelling capacity 95 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 95 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Green Belt Site COT/H is in a prominent location and its Green Belt designation restricts development that would have a significant effect upon the land’s openness. The removal of this site and its development would result in further intrusive development along Colston Gate into open countryside. Whilst the removal of this land would not significantly reduce the distance between Cotgrave and Cropwell Bishop, the intrusion into open countryside results in an overall conclusion that the land is of low-medium Green Belt importance, scoring 12. Flood Risk Site not art risk of river flooding. The north and west of the site is identified as at risk from surface water flooding. Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 46/100. As Site COT/007, Site COT/008 is a field of rough ground to the immediate east of the settlement boundary of Cotgrave. There is a low landscape value which is contributed to by the lack of conservation interests and the relatively high degree of human influence. The study area is of low landscape susceptibility to development of the site, with no notable loss of key characteristics or out-of-character additions to the landscape. Overall, there is a low landscape sensitivity. In terms of visual amenity, there is low visual value as a result of the site, although it does form a small part of the rural outlook for houses on the edge of Cotgrave. There are a medium number of potential receptors and the site does not contribute to their experience of the landscape; this contributes to a low visual susceptibility. The visual sensitivity is low overall. Green Infrastructure Opportunities to enhance existing hedgerows around the site. Existing playing field adjacent to the site with opportunity to provide connection to it. Historic Environment The site does not contain or preserve the setting of any statutory or non-statutory heritage assets. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by established mature hedgerows which are a LBAP habitat and the rough grassland may contain locally important neutral grassland plant species. The site also contains trees and scrubland which may also be a LBAP habitat. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Not within or near an Air Quality Management Area Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. The site is on the limit of a reasonable walking distance from the village centre. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Access should be located so visibility is not obscured by bend to the east. Village Gateway to be relocated to incorporate site. New footway to connect to village required. Consideration to be given to impact on Colston Gate Hollygate Lane junction. Accessibility The site is within walking distance of the main bus service which runs at least 3 times an hour 118 Site reference SHLAA/COT/008 Site name Land behind Firdale Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.8
Dwelling capacity 95 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 95 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
during Monday-Friday daytime. Other site are closer to retail and other facilities within the village, but it is not too far to the precinct. Other issues Agricultural land Grade 3 agricultural land Deliverability Site last promoted at LAPP further housing options stage in 2017 . No identified house builder for the site.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary The site is not constrained by biodiversity, heritage, flood risk or landscape issues which cannot be avoided or mitigated. Development would require new footpath and may require improvements to the Colston Gate/Hollygate Lane. The Green Belt Review concludes that the land is of low- medium Green Belt importance.
119 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/009 Site name Land South of Hollygate Lane (1) Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.4
Dwelling capacity 75 Density (dwellings/hectare) 17 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference LAPP policy 2.2 Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 75 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt The site is proposed to be removed from the green belt through local plan part 2 Flood Risk Site not identified as at risk of flooding from any source Landscape assessment As COT9 would not be developed in isolation the landscape assessment has combined COT9 with COT10. Landscape appraisal score 47/100. Site COT9 comprises a number of fields laid to both arable farming and rough ground on the north-eastern edge of Cotgrave. The study area has an medium landscape value, partly due to the close representativeness to the prevailing landscape character and the high recreational value in the study area. The landscape susceptibility is low; this is through the development of the site causing no notable loss of key characteristics in the study area and the site being perceived as an extension of the existing urban edge. Overall the landscape sensitivity is low. Visually, there is a low value related to the site - the only aspect of value is the views towards All Saints Church in the historic centre of the village. The visual susceptibility is also low, arising from the low level of visibility of the site and the limited contribution that the site has to the experience of residential and recreational receptors in the area. There is an overall low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure Existing hedgerows could be retained wherever possible and enhanced. Public right of way through the site and enhanced to provide for a green corridor. Historic Environment The site does not contain or preserve the setting of any statutory or non-statutory heritage assets. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by established hedgerows which are a LBAP habitat and the pasture may contain locally important neutral grassland plant species. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Not within or in the vicinity of an Air Quality Management Area Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. The site is within walking distance of the local centre. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Would wish to see the a new road connecting Hollygate Lane and Colston Gate. May unlock other sites in the area by providing alternative to adjacent junction. Accessibility The site is within walking distance of the main Cotgrave bus service, which runs at least 3 times an hour during Monday-Friday daytime. Well located in terms of proximity to the precinct and other community facilities on Candleby Lane. Other issues Agricultural land Grade 3 agricultural land Deliverability The site was recently promoted on behalf of a national housebuilder as part of local plan part 2 examination. EIA screening submitted for this and the adjacent two sites. Given the sites
120 Site reference SHLAA/COT/009 Site name Land South of Hollygate Lane (1) Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.4
Dwelling capacity 75 Density (dwellings/hectare) 17 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference LAPP policy 2.2 Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 75 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
progression, the site is available now, suitable now and achievable now.
Delivery Period 2 years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary The site was recently promoted on behalf of a national housebuilder as part of local plan part 2 examination. EIA screening submitted for this and the adjacent two sites. Given the sites progression, the site is available now, suitable now and achievable now.
121 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/010 Site name Land South of Hollygate Lane (2) Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 1.4
Dwelling capacity 40 Density (dwellings/hectare) 29 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference LAPP Policy 2.2. Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 40 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt The site is proposed to be removed from the Green Belt through Local Plan Part 2 Flood Risk Site not identified as at risk of flooding from any source Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 46/100 The site is a field of rough ground nestled on the north- eastern edge of Cotgrave; it currently has a strong vegetated boundary on all sides and an existing line of houses on the western site boundary. The landscape value within the study area is low, mostly due to the influence of adjacent development, including the business park to the north-east of the site, as well as the lack of conservation interests. The study area is of low susceptibility to development of the site, with development of the site resulting in no loss of kay characteristics and potential having a beneficial effect as the site aesthetics are improved. Overall the landscape sensitivity is considered to be low. In terms of visual amenity, there is a lack of visual value arising from the presence of the site in the study area. There are a medium number of receptors due to the site's presence on the edge of the settlement, but the strong vegetated site boundaries mean that there is a low susceptibility. Overall, the visual sensitivity is low. Green Infrastructure Existing hedgerows could be retained wherever possible and enhanced. Historic Environment The site does not contain or preserve the setting of any statutory or non-statutory heritage assets. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. It is however bounded by established hedgerows which are a LBAP habitat and the pasture may contain locally important neutral grassland plant species. Hedgerow quality and connectivity should be preserved and enhanced. Adverse effects should be avoided, mitigated or as a last resort compensated. Air quality Not within or in the vicinity of an Air Quality Management Area Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Would wish to see the a new road connecting Hollygate Lane and Colston Gate. May unlock other sites in the area by providing alternative to adjacent junction. Accessibility Within walking distance of Cotgrave connection, which runs at least 3 times an hour during Monday-Friday daytime, with services in the evenings and weekends. Well located in terms of proximity to the precinct and other community facilities on Candleby Lane. Other issues Agricultural land Grade 3 agricultural land Deliverability The site was recently promoted on behalf of a regional housebuilder as part of local plan part 2 examination. EIA screening submitted for this and the adjacent two sites. Given the sites progression, the site is available now, suitable now and achievable now.
122 Site reference SHLAA/COT/010 Site name Land South of Hollygate Lane (2) Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 1.4
Dwelling capacity 40 Density (dwellings/hectare) 29 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference LAPP Policy 2.2. Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 40 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Delivery Period 2 years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary The site was recently promoted on behalf of a regional housebuilder as part of local plan part 2 examination. EIA screening submitted for this and the adjacent two sites. Given the sites progression, the site is available now, suitable now and achievable now.
123 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/011 Site name Land South of Hollygate Lane (3a) Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 3.7
Dwelling capacity 65 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference LAPP Policy 2.2 Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 65 Source of number of dwellings Development Plan Document
Green Belt Local Plan Part 2 removes the site from the green belt Flood Risk Site is within flood zone 1 and is not at risk of surface water flooding. Landscape assessment As COT11a would not be developed in isolation the landscape appraisal has assessed COT, 9, COT10 and COT11a as one parcel of land. Landscape appraisal score 54/100. Site COT/011 is a series of arable fields, rough ground and equestrian grazing along Hollygate Lane on the north-eastern edge of Cotgrave. The site stretches from the urban edge towards countryside, but often has a degraded feel with frequent industrial influences. The landscape value of the study area is assessed as medium; this is a result partly of the high recreational value and close representativeness to the prevailing landscape character as assessed by Nottinghamshire County Council. Development of the site would result in an illogical extension of the urban edge as a finger perpendicular to the existing settlement line, extending the settlement into the rural setting. Despite this, the landscape susceptibility is considered to be low and the overall landscape sensitivity is low. Visually, there is a low value, although the Grantham Canal has recreational value. There are a medium number of receptors and a general overall low visibility of the site, feeding into a low visual susceptibility. Overall there is a low visual sensitivity. Green Infrastructure There are no GI or open space assets within the site. If developed alongside COT9 multifunctional GI could be delivered. Historic Environment There are no designated heritage assets within the site. Grantham Canal is located close to the boundary, however it is unlikely to affect the setting of this site significantly. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation assets within the site. Grantham Canal is located close to the boundary, however it is unlikely to affect this site significantly. Air quality Not within or in the vicinity of an Air Quality Management Area Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Would wish to see the a new road connecting Hollygate Lane and Colston Gate. May unlock other sites in the area by providing alternative to adjacent junction. Would require multiple points of access to the highway. As well as footway improvements. Accessibility Within walking distance of Cotgrave connection, which runs at least 3 times an hour during Monday-Friday daytime, with services in the evenings and weekends. Reasonably located in terms of proximity to the precinct. Other issues Would not release the site in isolation. Agricultural land Grade 3 agricultural land Deliverability The site was recently promoted on behalf of a national housebuilder as part of local plan part 2 examination. EIA screening submitted for this and the adjacent two sites. Given the sites
124 Site reference SHLAA/COT/011 Site name Land South of Hollygate Lane (3a) Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 3.7
Dwelling capacity 65 Density (dwellings/hectare) 20 Site source Housing Allocation Planning reference
Allocated site reference LAPP Policy 2.2 Status Pre-Application discussion for residential underway
Number of dwellings remaining 65 Source of number of dwellings Development Plan Document
progression, the site is available now, suitable now and achievable now.
Delivery Period 2 years Delivery 5 Year Tranche - 0-5 Years
Overall summary The site was recently promoted on behalf of a national housebuilder as part of local plan part 2 examination. EIA screening submitted for this and the adjacent two sites. Given the sites progression, the site is available now, suitable now and achievable now.
125 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/012 Site name Land south of Plumtree Road Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 12.5
Dwelling capacity 250 Density (dwellings/hectare) 19 Site source Site submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status
Number of dwellings remaining 250 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
Green Belt This area of Green Belt prevents the expansion of Cotgrave west. The Green Belt in this location prevents the merging of Cotgrave with Clipston and the land, though free from inappropriate development, is visually affected by the prominence of the edge of the town. Whilst identified as being of low-medium Green Belt importance, the prevention of sprawl and subsequent score of 14 indicates the site is of medium rather than low Green Belt importance. Flood Risk Site not identified as at risk of flooding from watercourses, however there is a corridor within the site that is identified as at risk from surface water flooding. Landscape assessment Landscape appraisal score 58/100 The site is comprises two arable fields on the western edge of Cotgrave; they are crossed by a PRoW and have a second PRoW on their western boundary. Overall, the landscape value of the study area is medium due in part to the amount of recreational value and the attractive rural setting that the western half of the study area forms in relation to the village itself. There is a low landscape susceptibility to change, however, as no notable key landscape characteristics are lost through development of the site. The landscape sensitivity is overall low. In terms of visual amenity, there is a low value, but the susceptibility to change is medium as the site forms part of the rural setting for both recreational and residential receptors. Overall the visual sensitivity is medium. Green Infrastructure The existing hedgerows could be retained and enhanced. Historic Environment The site does not contain or preserve the setting of any statutory or non-statutory heritage assets. Nature conservation There are mature hedgerows along some of the boundaries of the site as well as one through it. Hedgerows are identified as a LBAP priority habitat. There is also a wooded area to the south of the site. Air quality Not within or in the proximity of an Air Quality Management Area Community facilities full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. The site itself is some distance from the local centre. It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Majority of facilities are locate at the opposite end of the town. Highways and accesss Access ok subject to visibility being proven. Extend 30 mph limit / Village Gateway to include site. Extend footway to back into village. Accessibility Majority of the site is some distance away from the main Cotgrave Connection bus service. The 822 runs hourly along Plumtree Road during Monday-Saturday daytime and not at all during evenings and weekends. Less conveniently located for access to retail and community facilities than some other sites, although access to main primary school is reasonably short.
Other issues Site could not be released without the release of adjacent site at Bakers Hollow. 150 dwellings suggested by site agent and carried forward into the SHLAA. Possibly could
126 Site reference SHLAA/COT/012 Site name Land south of Plumtree Road Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 12.5
Dwelling capacity 250 Density (dwellings/hectare) 19 Site source Site submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status
Number of dwellings remaining 250 Source of number of dwellings Planning Application
accommodate significantly more as site unconstrained by features and topography. Agricultural land The site is identified as grade 2 agricultural land (BMV). Deliverability Site being promoted for development with no obvious physical constraints, however there is no indication that a house builder is involved at this stage.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary Although the site is not constrained by designated or non-designated biodiversity or heritage assets and there are no significant highways, flood risk or landscape concerns, the land's performance against Green Belt purposes is a notable constraint. 30 MPH limit would need extending.
127 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/013 Site name Land off Main Road and south of Gozen Lodge Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 0.6
Dwelling capacity 15 Density (dwellings/hectare) 25 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 15 Source of number of dwellings Assumption made on best estimate
Green Belt b d . d b v d w d w k v d v d.
I v w d v d v . A v d w d fi d b w C v d v , d d b C v , v ’ d d , d d , d 15. d' w- d . Flood Risk Land is within Flood zone 1 and not at risk of surface water flooding. Landscape assessment Total aggregate score: 50/100. The site comprises an arable field situated on a ridgeline to the north of the village of Cotgrave. It is isolated from the main village edge, but is situated adjacent to an individual residential property. Overall, there is a medium landscape sensitivity in the study area as a result of the low landscape value and medium landscape susceptibility. The study area is fairly degraded and unattractive with few conservation interests; all of which contributes to the low landscape value. However the site's location as isolated from the main settlement edge contributes to the medium landscape susceptibility; however there is a low landscape sensitivity overall. There are no elements of visual value attributed to the site within the study area, and the site does not contribute to local views - these characteristics contribute to an overall low visual sensitivity.
Green Infrastructure Site is small and only offers limited opportunities to deliver local amenity space. Historic Environment Several archaeological features nearby including Medieval Cemetery, a 17th century windmill (destroyed early 20thC in storm) and a disused quarry site of unknown date. All are on the opposite side of Main Road however. Archaeological investigation advisable. Nature conservation There are no designated nature conservation interests within or adjacent to the site. Site is bounded by hedgerows which are a local priority habitat. These should be protected and enhanced to aid habitat connectivity. Air quality Site is not within or in close proximity of an Air Quality Management Area. Community facilities Full range of facilities exist within Cotgrave. Cotgrave is a key settlement with a local centre that includes convenience (local supermarket)and a limited number of comparison shops, public houses and fast food establishments. The site itself is some distance from the local centre It is proposed that the local centre within Cotgrave is going to be refurbished and upgraded in the near future. A leisure Centre and gym is also available. Highways and accesss Questionable from a sustainability and connectivity standpoint. Unlikely to meet visibility criteria at access due to close proximity of crest. Would require 215m x 2.4m visibility to be provided in both directions. Unlikely to be supported by Highway Authority
128 Site reference SHLAA/COT/013 Site name Land off Main Road and south of Gozen Lodge Parish/town Cotgrave S ( ) .
Dw 15 D (dw / ) 5 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission P
A d S N d d v N b dw 15 S b dw A d b
Accessibility COT13 is approximately 1km from the centre of Cotgrave and the nearest bus stop is 400m south of the site on Main Road. Regular bus services to Nottingham can be accessed at this stop that run every 20 minutes during the day. Relatively close to retail facilities on Bingham Road. Other issues Agricultural land Site is identified as Grade 3 agricultural land. Deliverability Land has recently been promoted during Further Options. Site considered deliverable within 5 years if allocated. No known developer on board.
Delivery Period N/A Delivery Could be suitable if policy changes 5+ years
Overall summary The site is not constrained by significant biodiversity, heritage or flood risk issues which cannot be avoided or mitigated. The site's outlying location and unsustainable/unconnected location is a significant constraint. Access onto Main Road is close to the crest on the road and therefore considered unsuitable.
129 Cotgrave
Site reference SHLAA/COT/014 Site name Land east of Hollygate Lane Parish/town Cotgrave Site area (hectares) 4.7
Dwelling capacity 90 Density (dwellings/hectare) 19 Site source Developer/Landowner Submission Planning reference
Allocated site reference Status No formal allocation or no extant planning permission for residential development Number of dwellings remaining 50 Source of number of dwellings Details obtained through external Site Submission
Green Belt The land is located north of the Grantham Canal and east of Hollygate Lane, both of which are robust defensible boundaries. Development in this location would constitute prominent sprawl into open countryside.