DOCSLIB.ORG

River Welland Fish Pass Update and Monitoring Report 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
River Welland Fish Pass Update and Monitoring Report 2014 River Welland fish pass update and monitoring report 2014 Tallington fish pass in early June after heavy rainfall. 1 River Welland Monitoring Report Executive Summary Fish and eel passes were installed during 2012/13 on two previously impassable structures, Tallington Gauging Weir and Duddington Mill Weir. To understand how effective the passes have been, underwater video monitoring was undertaken during the spring and summer of 2014. The monitoring has shown that the passes at Tallington and Duddington have provided effective fish passage over previously unassailable barriers. Despite the fact that the monitoring was undertaken outside of the peak migration periods for the main species in the River Welland, the results clearly show a range of species can utilise the passes in both an upstream and downstream direction. Species such as eels whose survival relies on the ability to freely migrate in and out of rivers into saline water are now using the passes regularly. This is vital to maintaining and increasing their numbers in the Welland system and beyond. Resident fish species such as chub and trout are also using the passes to move between river reaches and make best use of their now increased habitat range. This will greatly improve the resilience of fish stocks in the future on a river system that has suffered population declines. These results are encouraging given the short time the passes have been in place. As fish behaviour adapts a higher use of the passes by resident species will become more common. 2 River Welland Monitoring Report Introduction The aim of this report is to: Summarise the progress to date in terms of making existing obstructions passable to fish and eels; Assess the recent monitoring results from two newly installed fish passes on the River Welland; Tallington fish pass in Lincolnshire (pictured below) and Duddington fish pass in Northamptonshire; and Identify any future monitoring plans on the River Welland. Background The River Welland has been heavily modified throughout the centuries for navigation, water resource and flood defence purposes. These modifications saw numerous locks, sluices and weirs put in place within the river to alter, retain and change its flows and depths. When structures like these were installed then there is an instant change in the ability of a fish population to act naturally within their lifecycle characteristics. Fish migrate for a number of reasons, to spawn successfully in particular habitat conditions, to find food, to avoid drought and to access refuge and shelter. The building of one structure can prevent successful completion of fish life cycles. Anadromous fish species such as sea trout and salmon require the ability to swim up freshwater rivers to spawn. Catadromous species such as eels require the opposite, the ability to migrate out to the Atlantic to spawn and for their juveniles to be able to ascend the rivers again upon their arrival at the coast. Resident species in the river such as cyprinids (e.g. roach and dace) need the ability to move to freely around the river as part of their lifecycle characteristics. The key migration periods for fish species in the Welland catchment is as follows: Eel upstream migration – April to September inclusive. Eel downstream migration - October to December inclusive. Coarse fish migration - March to June inclusive. Brown trout migration - September to November inclusive. Sea trout migration – All Year (NB we will be narrowing down the critical period for sea trout with on-going monitoring) Lamprey migration - September – March inclusive. 3 River Welland Monitoring Report Existing Obstructions to fish and eel passage A number of key obstructions to fish passage were identified in the Welland catchment in 2011 as part of a catchment scale approach to improving the ecological status of the river. These obstructions comprise a mixture of weirs, locks and sluices which are shown on Figure 1 below. The aim has been to investigate and provide, if required, fish pass solutions for these obstructions. These fish passes are either delivered as standalone projects or tied into the refurbishment of these obstructions as part of maintenance schemes. As part of the catchment scale approach, these fish pass solutions compliment the wider ongoing works in the catchment. This includes measures to control diffuse / point source pollution and in channel works to enhance degraded river habitats. It is important to recognise that making these obstructions passable is not the total solution to improving fish stocks and the condition of the river so this holistic catchment approach is essential. 4 River Welland Monitoring Report Figure 1: Key Obstructions on the River Welland 5 River Welland Monitoring Report Progress to Date Of the obstructions identified in Figure 1, the following progress has been made with regard to providing fish passage: Table 1: Progress on fish pass design and construction Obstruction Watercourse Asset Design Complete / Construction Owner Planned Complete / Planned Surfleet Sluice River Glen EA Design underway: Construction planned in Automation and soft 2015/16 close doors Fulney Lock River Welland EA Design complete: Construction planned in Installation of 2015 penstock in tidal door Marsh Road Coronation EA Optioneering No construction Sluice Channel complete but no planned. Will be design undertaken considered alongside any refurbishment Kates Bridge River Glen EA No design work to No construction Weir date planned. Will be considered alongside any refurbishment Nine Bridges Maxey Cut IDB Design complete: Construction date to be Weir extra stop log confirmed with asset required in weir but owner this requires weir to first be repaired Piled Weir Maxey Cut EA Design complete: Construction completed installation of notch in 2014 and adherent nappe Rock Ramp Maxey Cut EA Design complete: Construction completed Installation of pool in 2014 pass, adherent nappe and eel pass Timber Weir Maxey Cut EA Design complete: Construction completed installation of notch in 2014 and adherent nappe Lolham Road Maxey Cut PCC Design complete: Construction planned Bridge installation of eel tiles alongside refurbishment. No refurbishment planned in the short term Tallington Weir Maxey Cut EA Design complete: Construction completed installation of larinier, in 2014 pre barrage and eel pass Newstead Mill River Gwash EA Design complete: Construction planned in construction of new 2015 bypass channel Borderville River Gwash Private Design complete: Construction completed Weir removal of adjacent in 2013 sluice to reconnect bypass 6 River Welland Monitoring Report Obstruction Watercourse Asset Design Complete / Construction Owner Planned Complete / Planned Belmesthorpe River Gwash EA Design complete: Construction completed Weir installation of low cost in 2015 baffles and eel pass Hudds Mill River Welland EA Design complete: No construction installation of larinier planned. Will be and eel pass considered alongside any refurbishment Tinwell Weir River Welland EA Design complete: No construction installation of bypass planned. Will be channel and larinier considered alongside any refurbishment Fosters Bridge River Welland EA Design complete: Construction completed Weir installation of pre in 2013 barrage and eel pass Duddington River Welland EA Design complete: Construction completed Weir installation of pool in 2013 travers pass and eel pass Barrowden River Welland EA Design complete: No construction Weir installation of larinier planned. Will be and eel pass considered alongside any refurbishment Seaton Weir River Welland EA Design complete: Construction planned in rock ramp 2015 Gretton Weir River Welland EA Design complete: No construction Bypass and larinier planned. Will be considered alongside any refurbishment Ashley Weir River Welland EA Design complete: Construction completed installation of pre in 2013 barrage and eel pass Stonton Weir Stonton Brook EA Design complete: Construction completed weir removal and rock in 2013 ramp Langton Brook Langton EA Design complete: Construction completed Brook notch weir and pre in 2013 barrage Market River Welland EA Design complete: Construction completed Harborough partial weir removal in 2013 Weir 1 Market River Welland EA Design complete: Construction completed Harborough partial weir removal in 2013 Weir 2 In summary 13 or the 25 obstructions listed in the table above have now been constructed with several more planned. Other passes that were already in place in the Welland catchment before 2011 include Low Locks, High Locks, Wherry’s Mill, Fletland Mill, and Greatford Cottages. These are currently being investigated by the Fisheries, Biodiversity and Geomorphology team to ensure they are working efficiently and being maintained as required. 7 River Welland Monitoring Report Monitoring the success and efficiency of installed passes at Tallington and Duddington The fish and eel passes at Duddington and Tallington were constructed in 2012 / 13 to comply with the Eel Regulations 2009, the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries Act 1975, and the Water Framework Directive. The fish pass at Duddington comprises a 5 m wide; 45m long pool traverse type fish pass. The eel pass at this site comprises 3 bristle type troughs, one extending the length of the pool traverse fish pass and the other 2 extending over the new weir sills. The fish pass at Tallington comprises a 0.6m wide, 7m long larinier type pass with a timber pre barrage downstream. Alongside this is a vertical brush eel pass.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Welland Water Transfer
    Welland Water Transfer A presentation to local councils and groups that may be affected by a proposal made by Ken Otter, the flood warden at Tallington. First presented December 16th 2020 Welland Water Transfer This presentation is in 3 parts. 1. The current position 2. The present situation 3. The latest proposal Thank you for attending. There will be an opportunity for questions after each part but if you need clarification please ask. Welland Water Transfer 1. The current position As we know, our local reservoir is Rutland Water. It is owned by Anglian Water and filled with water abstracted from local rivers under license (and at a cost) from the Environment Agency; the navigation authority for the Stamford to Folly River section of the Welland that we are concerned with. Welland Water Transfer To create the reservoir, the River Gwash was dammed up and it took about 3 years to fill. The River Gwash does help keep it topped up, but 95% of its water actually comes by pumping it in pipes from the River Welland and the River Nene. The map following is the area that affects us. Rutland Water to the Folly River The blue area covers the parish councils alongside the output from the reservoir. The southern edge is also the subject of the Langdyke Trust’s involvement with the John Clare Countryside project. The Folly River is in the bottom right corner. Welland Water Transfer What you see isn’t necessarily what you think! The River Welland here is a managed river. None of the flow is natural from Stamford.
    [Show full text]
  • The Welland Valley Partnership River Improvement Plan
    The Welland Valley Partnership Enhancing the River Welland Our invitation to support a new vision for the local environment January 2013 Foreword The Welland Valley Partnership - Working Together for a Better River The River Welland arises above Market Harborough and flows through the gently rolling countryside of Northamptonshire, Leicestershire and Rutland until it reaches Stamford where it is one of the features that makes the town so attractive. Below Stamford the River continues on its way to Market Deeping and Spalding, where its character changes and the water slows down to become one of the four fenland rivers which drain the Fens and finally enter the Wash. People have relied on the Rivers for thousands of years for water, food, transport and energy; as a result the River Welland and its valley have changed enormously. Even the course of the River Welland has moved; it used to flow through the Trinity Bridge in Crowland, but now runs almost a mile away and the bridge is a dry monument in the centre of the town. Figure 1: Trinity Bridge at Crowland. This triangular bridge once provided a crossing place over two channels of the River Welland. (©Dave Hitchborne and licensed for reuse under the Creative Commons Licence) 1: Trinity Bridge at While many of these changes have been beneficial, such as the creation of water meadows which were an important feature of the English countryside, others have had unintended side effects. For example, land drainage and the extensive dredging of the River upstream of Stamford have left us with an over-widened and over-deepened channel with little of its historic character.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Prepared by: ................................ Checked by: .............................. Roy Lobley Richard Ramsden Associate Director Senior Engineer Approved by: ........................... Andy Yarde Regional Director Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Final to client RR AY April 2011 5th Floor, 2 City Walk, Leeds, LS11 9AR Telephone: 0113 391 6800 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60034187 Reference RE01 Date Created October 2010 This document is confidential and the copyright of AECOM Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. f:\projects\50016i boston sfra (revision)\reports\boston sfra final march11.docx Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Development Planning...................................................................................................................................................... 9 East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Northamptonshire Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Review and Update
    East Northamptonshire Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Review and Update Final August 2011 Prepared for East Northamptonshire Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Review Revision Schedule Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Review and Update August 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 March 2011 Interim Draft Gemma Costin Michael Timmins Michael Timmins D01 Assistant Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant Fay Tivey Consultant 02 June 2011 Final Draft D01 Fay Tivey Michael Timmins Michael Timmins Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant 03 August 2011 Final F01 Fay Tivey Michael Timmins Michael Timmins Senior Consultant Associate Associate URS/Scott Wilson Royal Court Basil Close Chesterfield This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of URS Scott Wilson's Derbyshire appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed S41 7SL to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of URS Scott Wilson's client. URS Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without Tel 01246 209 221 the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of URS Scott Wilson Ltd. Any Fax 01246 209 229 advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • 656 16 Fish Population Survey Report
    Fish population summary report River Welland, 2017 This report provides a brief summary of results from recent fish population surveys on the River Welland between Market Harborough and Spalding. The surveys were carried out to assess the health of the river and enable successful management of our principal fisheries. Seaton weir rock ramp fish pass (part of several habitat improvements on the upper river). Originating team Lincolnshire & Northamptonshire Analysis & Reporting Team Author(s) Jake Reeds Date January 2018 Summary • Ten electric fishing sites were surveyed during 2017 along the upper Welland (above Peakirk). The wide river downstream of this between Crowland Bridge and Spalding was surveyed using hydroacoustic technology during the night when fish are more active. • Sixteen species of fish were recorded and a total of 1110 fish were captured for measurement in the upper river electric fishing sites. • Chub and dace were the most widespread species, being recorded at seven and six sites respectively. • Roach were the most numerous species. Site locations: © Environment Agency copyright 2018. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100024198. Sites varied between 100 - 200m in length, each site was isolated using stop nets at the upstream and downstream limit. It was then electric fished twice with fish being placed in a recovery tank immediately after capture. All fish are then identified for species, measured to fork length and returned to the river. Survey results - summary Fish density for fish greater than 99mm in length (fish/100mˉ²) from the electric fishing sites undertaken is shown below. Fish lengths for all sizes are given to indicate the overall size range found at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • WRZ Summaries
    WRMP 2019 Technical Document: WRZ Summaries December 2019 Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Area 5 Area 6 Area 7 Contents 1. Area 1: Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire 4 1.1 Overview 4 1.2 Strategic risks and issues 4 1.3 Central Lincolnshire 4 1.4 Bourne 13 1.5 East Lincolnshire 19 1.6 Nottinghamshire 25 1.7 South Lincolnshire 31 1.8 South Humber Bank 37 2. Area 2: Ruthamford 40 2.1 Overview 40 2.2 Strategic risks and issues 40 2.3 Ruthamford Central 40 2.4 Ruthamford North 49 2.5 Ruthamford South 55 2.6 Ruthamford West 62 3. Area 3: Fenland 68 3.1 Overview 68 3.2 Strategic risks and issues 68 3.3 North Fenland 68 3.4 South Fenland 75 4. Area 4: Norfolk 82 4.1 Overview 82 4.2 Strategic risks and issues 82 4.3 Happisburgh 82 4.4 North Norfolk Coast 90 4.5 North Norfolk Rural 96 4.6 Norwich and the Broads 102 4.7 South Norfolk Rural 108 5. Area 5: East Suffolk and Essex 114 5.1 Overview 114 5.2 Strategic risks and issues 114 5.3 Central Essex 114 5.4 East Suffolk 121 5.5 South Essex 127 2 Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Area 5 Area 6 Area 7 6. Area 6: Cambridgeshire and West Suffolk 133 6.1 Overview 133 6.2 Strategic risks and issues 133 6.3 Bury Haverhill 133 6.4 Cheveley 142 6.5 Ely 149 6.6 Ixworth 155 6.7 Newmarket 161 6.8 Sudbury 167 6.9 Thetford 173 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Water Resource Zone Characteristics Contents
    Drought Plan 2019 Appendix 1 Water Resource Zone Characteristics Contents Water Resource Zone Characteristics 3 Area 1: Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire 5 Central Lincolnshire 5 Bourne 7 East Lincolnshire 8 Nottinghamshire 10 South Lincolnshire 11 Area 2: Ruthamford 12 Ruthamford Central 12 Ruthamford North 13 Ruthamford South 15 Ruthamford West 17 Area 3: Fenland 18 North Fenland 18 South Fenland 19 Area 4: Norfolk 20 Happisburgh 20 North Norfolk Coast 21 North Norfolk Rural 23 Norwich and The Broads 25 South Norfolk Rural 27 Area 5: East Sufflok and Essex 28 Central Essex 28 East Suffolk 29 South Essex 31 Area 6: Cambridgeshire and West Suffolk 33 Cheveley, Ely, Newmarket, Sudbury, Ixworth, and Bury Haverhill 33 Thetford 36 Area 7: Hartlepool 37 Hartlepool 37 2 Water Resource Zone Characteristics The uneven nature of climate, drought, growth and List of WRMP 2019 WRZs, in order of discussion: environmental impacts across our region means we have developed Water Resource Zones (WRZs). WRZs Area 1: Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire are the geographical areas used to develop forecasts Central Lincolnshire of supply and demand and supply-demand balances. Bourne The WRZ describes an area within which supply infrastructure and demand centres are linked such East Lincolnshire that customers in the WRZ experience the same risk Nottinghamshire of supply failure. These were reviewed in the Water South Lincolnshire Resources Management Plan (WRMP) 2019 and have changed since the last WRMP and Drought Plan. Area 2: Ruthamford Ruthamford Central Overall, we have increased the number of WRZs from 19 at WRMP 2015 to 28 for WRMP 2019, including Ruthamford North the addition of South Humber Bank which is a non- Ruthamford South potable WRZ that sits within Central Lincolnshire.
    [Show full text]
  • River Welland Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk We Are the Environment Agency
    River Welland Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 managing flood risk We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Kingfisher House Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay Peterborough PE2 5ZR Tel: 08708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. December 2009 Introduction I am pleased to introduce our summary of the River Welland Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP). This CFMP gives an overview of the flood risk in the River Welland catchment and sets out our preferred plan for sustainable flood risk management over the next 50 to 100 years. The River Welland CFMP is one of 77 CFMPs for England of the tidal River Welland between Spalding and Fosdyke and Wales. Through the CFMPs, we have assessed inland Bridge. This could cause flooding to large parts of flood risk across all of England and Wales for the first Spalding. Breaching/failure of embankments that carry time. The CFMP considers all types of inland flooding, the main upland rivers across the fenland area of the from rivers, ground water, surface water and tidal catchment could cause significant flood risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston to Peterborough Wetland Corridor Business Case
    Boston to Peterborough Wetland Corridor Business Case On behalf of Lincolnshire County Council in partnership with The Inland Waterways Association & The Environment Agency Project Ref: 48170 | Rev: V4 | Date: November 2020 Registered Office: Buckingham Court Kingsmead Business Park, London Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP11 1JU Office Address: 5th Floor, Lomond House, 9 George Square, Glasgow, G2 1DY Business Case Boston to Peterborough Wetland Corridor Document Control Sheet Project Name: Boston to Peterborough Wetland Corridor Project Ref: 48170 Report Title: Business Case Doc Ref: Final Date: November 2020 Name Position Signature Date Emma Brown Economist Prepared by: Taylor Klinefelter Economist EB, TK, SF 13/11/20 Steven Findlay Principal Economist Reviewed by: Steven Findlay Principal Economist SF 13/11/20 Approved by: Nick Skelton Director NS 13/11/20 For and on behalf of Stantec UK Limited Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed 1 26/05/20 1st Draft EB, TK, SF SF 2 12/08/20 2nd Draft EB, TK, SF NS 3 30/10/20 3rd Draft EB, TK, SF NS 4 13/11/20 Final EB, TK, SF NS This report has been prepared by Stantec UK Limited (‘Stantec’) on behalf of its client to whom this report is addressed (‘Client’) in connection with the project described in this report and takes into account the Client's particular instructions and requirements. This report was prepared in accordance with the professional services appointment under which Stantec was appointed by its Client. This report is not intended for and should not be relied on by any third party (i.e. parties other than the Client).
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Living Document – Interactive PDF Northamptonshire County Council October 2013
    Northamptonshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Living Document – Interactive PDF Northamptonshire County Council October 2013 Northamptonshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (LFRMS) (October 2013) Document Status All Lead Local Flood Authorities in England are required to develop, maintain, apply and monitor the application of a strategy for local flood risk in their area, which is consistent with the Environment Agency’s National Strategy. This is therefore a statutory document. In Northamptonshire, the County Council is the Lead Local Flood Authority. The Local Flood Risk Management Strategy is an important document that sets out the management of flood risk in Northamptonshire for the coming years. As part of its development all key partners have had the opportunity to comment on this strategy. Following full public consultation this strategy was reviewed, updated and finalised as a living document. Accompanying Documents The Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (LFRMS) is accompanied by a number of separate documents, as follows: A non-technical Executive Summary of this strategy has been produced as an easy reference guide; The strategy is also subject to Strategic Environmental Assessment and Habitats Regulation Assessment, which have both been produced to support the strategy; An Equalities Impact Assessment has also been undertaken; and A Communication, Engagement and Consultation Strategy has also been developed to support the LFRMS and related flood and water management work.. Northamptonshire Local Flood Risk
    [Show full text]
  • Waterways News 10
    NNEEWW SSLL EETT TTEE RR March 2007 Welcome to our Twelfth LWP Newsletter Many thanks to those of you who returned the questionnaire that was in the last newsletter – a very satisfactory 15.3% response. We welcome the feedback and couldn’t disagree with any of the things that you said we could do better (many of them already on my guilt list) and delighted that this newsletter was one of the things that you all seem to like. See page 15 for a bit of a summary of your comments. For this issue we have taken on board the much-repeated comment that it would be nice to have advance warning of openings rather than just reading about them INSIDE afterwards. So read on for some imminent deadlines on Southrey, Four Mile Bar footbridge and a Tennyson Trail. We have also added in 4 extra Habitat Highways pages to this newsletter – also as requested. G We would like to welcome over 600 new readers to this newsletter – this New Bridge at Sleaford last quarter has seen the biggest increase to our database yet – and if G you are not on it, do fill in the coupon on page 12. Mary Powell Fish in our Rivers Bridge Over the Welland Delighted to be able to announce that the new Four Mile Bar footbridge was completed in the very early New Year. The reach of the River Welland available to larger craft has been limited by the former Four Mile Bar Bridge, which had the lowest air draught on the river at 1.6m.
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Living Document – Interactive PDF Northamptonshire County Council
    Northamptonshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Living Document – Interactive PDF Northamptonshire County Council November 2016 Northamptonshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (LFRMS) (November 2016) Document Status All Lead Local Flood Authorities in England are required to develop, maintain, apply and monitor the application of a strategy for local flood risk in their area, which is consistent with the Environment Agency’s National Strategy. This is therefore a statutory document. In Northamptonshire, the County Council is the Lead Local Flood Authority. The Local Flood Risk Management Strategy is an important document that sets out the management of flood risk in Northamptonshire for the coming years. As part of its development all key partners have had the opportunity to comment on this strategy. Following full public consultation this strategy was reviewed, updated and finalised as a living document. Checked and Rev Date Details Author approved by 16th June Draft report for R Burnham, Senior J Bateman, Flood 1 2016 consultation Flood and Water Officer and Water Manager 9th November R Burnham, Senior J Bateman, Flood 2 Final report for Cabinet 2016 Flood and Water Officer and Water Manager 14th Minor amendments and P Jones, Senior J Bateman, Flood 3 November linked to updated Asset Environment Officer and Water Manager 2017 Register. Accompanying Documents The Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (LFRMS) is accompanied by a number of separate documents, as follows: A non-technical Executive Summary of this strategy, as an easy reference guide; The Northamptonshire Flood Risk Prioritisation Assessment; The LFRMS Action Plan; Strategic Environmental Assessment and Habitats Regulation Assessment reports; An Equalities Impact Assessment report; and A Communication, Engagement and Consultation Strategy, developed to support the LFRMS and related flood and water management work.
    [Show full text]