Films of the Year, 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Classic Frenchfilm Festival
Three Colors: Blue NINTH ANNUAL ROBERT CLASSIC FRENCH FILM FESTIVAL Presented by March 10-26, 2017 Sponsored by the Jane M. & Bruce P. Robert Charitable Foundation A co-production of Cinema St. Louis and Webster University Film Series ST. LOUIS FRENCH AND FRANCOPHONE RESOURCES WANT TO SPEAK FRENCH? REFRESH YOUR FRENCH CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE? CONTACT US! This page sponsored by the Jane M. & Bruce P. Robert Charitable Foundation in support of the French groups of St. Louis. Centre Francophone at Webster University An organization dedicated to promoting Francophone culture and helping French educators. Contact info: Lionel Cuillé, Ph.D., Jane and Bruce Robert Chair in French and Francophone Studies, Webster University, 314-246-8619, [email protected], facebook.com/centrefrancophoneinstlouis, webster.edu/arts-and-sciences/affiliates-events/centre-francophone Alliance Française de St. Louis A member-supported nonprofit center engaging the St. Louis community in French language and culture. Contact info: 314-432-0734, [email protected], alliancestl.org American Association of Teachers of French The only professional association devoted exclusively to the needs of French teach- ers at all levels, with the mission of advancing the study of the French language and French-speaking literatures and cultures both in schools and in the general public. Contact info: Anna Amelung, president, Greater St. Louis Chapter, [email protected], www.frenchteachers.org Les Amis (“The Friends”) French Creole heritage preservationist group for the Mid-Mississippi River Valley. Promotes the Creole Corridor on both sides of the Mississippi River from Ca- hokia-Chester, Ill., and Ste. Genevieve-St. Louis, Mo. Parts of the Corridor are in the process of nomination for the designation of UNESCO World Heritage Site through Les Amis. -
A Mode of Production and Distribution
Chapter Three A Mode of Production and Distribution An Economic Concept: “The Small Budget Film,” Was it Myth or Reality? t has often been assumed that the New Wave provoked a sudden Ibreak in the production practices of French cinema, by favoring small budget films. In an industry characterized by an inflationary spiral of ever-increasing production costs, this phenomenon is sufficiently original to warrant investigation. Did most of the films considered to be part of this movement correspond to this notion of a small budget? We would first have to ask: what, in 1959, was a “small budget” movie? The average cost of a film increased from roughly $218,000 in 1955 to $300,000 in 1959. That year, at the moment of the emergence of the New Wave, 133 French films were produced; of these, 33 cost more than $400,000 and 74 cost more than $200,000. That leaves 26 films with a budget of less than $200,000, or “low budget productions;” however, that can hardly be used as an adequate criterion for movies to qualify as “New Wave.”1 Even so, this budgetary trait has often been employed to establish a genealogy for the movement. It involves, primarily, “marginal” films produced outside the dominant commercial system. Two Small Budget Films, “Outside the System” From the point of view of their mode of production, two titles are often imposed as reference points: Jean-Pierre Melville’s self-produced Silence of 49 A Mode of Production and Distribution the Sea, 1947, and Agnes Varda’s La Pointe courte (Short Point), made seven years later, in 1954. -
François Truffaut's Jules and Jim and the French New Wave, Re-Viewed
FILMHISTORIA Online Vol. 29, núms. 1-2 (2019) · ISSN: 2014-668X François Truffaut’s Jules and Jim and the French New Wave, Re-viewed ROBERT J. CARDULLO University of Michigan Abstract Truffaut’s early protagonists, like many of those produced by the New Wave, were rebels or misfits who felt stifled by conventional social definitions. His early cinematic style was as anxious to rip chords as his characters were. Unlike Godard, Truffaut went on in his career to commit himself, not to continued experiment in film form or radical critique of visual imagery, but to formal themes like art and life, film and fiction, and art and education. This article reconsiders a film that embodies such themes, in addition to featuring characters who feel stifled by conventional social definitions: Jules and Jim. Keywords: François Truffaut; French film; New Wave; Jules and Jim; Henri- Pierre Roché Resumen Los primeros protagonistas de Truffaut, como muchos de los producidos por la New Wave, eran rebeldes o inadaptados que se sentían agobiados por las convenciones sociales convencionales. Su estilo cinematográfico temprano estaba tan ansioso por romper moldes como sus personajes. A diferencia de Godard, Truffaut continuó en su carrera comprometiéndose, no a seguir experimentando en forma de película o crítica radical de las imágenes visuales, sino a temas formales como el arte y la vida, el cine y la ficción, y el arte y la educación. Este artículo reconsidera una película que encarna dichos temas, además de presentar personajes que se sienten ahogados: Jules y Jim. Palabras clave: François Truffaut, cine francés, New Wave; Jules and Jim, Henri-Pierre Roché. -
35 Shots of Rum (35 Rhums) 2008 12A Runtime: 100 Mins Director: Claire Denis
keswick film 35 shots of rum Autumn club Season 2009 a world of cinema (35 rhums) Review by Peter Bradshaw, the Guardian: This outstanding new film from Claire Denis, the director of Beau Travail and Vendredi Soir, demonstrates her fluency and mastery in the kind of movie-language that is rich, quietly complex and subtle - and very un-Hollywood in its refusal to cross the "t"s and dot the "i"s. Its theme is the bond between father and daughter, whose intensity speaks poignantly and paradoxically of loss and absence. (There is a similarity here with Abdel Kechiche's 2007 movie Couscous.) Alex Descas is Lionel, a calm and dignified widower who is a train driver in Paris. His daughter, Jo, played by Mati Diop, is a student who lives with him in affectionate, if rather emotionally fraught domestic intimacy. Both Lionel and Jo have a friendship, which is something more than friendship, with their neighbour Gabrielle, played by Nicole Dogué. She was once Lionel's lover when Jo was a child and appears to yearn, still, for a place in his heart, and to be a mother to Jo. Grégoire Colin plays their moody upstairs neighbour, called Noé, who appears also to have feelings for Lionel's daughter, but seems reluctant to change his chaotic home life and is temperamentally unable to commit himself. And in any case, Jo is being wooed by a charming fellow student. Lionel's own life is brought to a submerged crisis when one of his colleagues retires, and Lionel, a shrewd observer of his fellow males, instantly sees that not having a job is a catastrophe for this man, like the most appalling bereavement. -
1 the French New Wave (Revisited)
The French New Wave (revisited) It doesn’t matter where you take things from, but where you take them to. Jean-Luc Godard Dr. Nicos Terzis, Adjunct Professor, Department of Graphic Design, School of Fine Arts, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece Abstract: The proposed paper will attempt to delineate the history and the aesthetic characteristics of the French Nouvelle Vague, the most famous cinematic movement in history. The structure of the paper will mainly evolve around the following questions and topics: where did the name of the cinematic movement ―Nouvelle Vague‖ originate from? What kind of influences ―Nouvelle Vague‖ exerted on other film movements around the world? Which role did the Cinemathèque Française and Henri Langlois, its creator, play in the formation of the aforementioned cinematic movement? What role did the French film magazines of that period (e.g. Cahiers du Cinéma) play in the creation of this new wave? Who are the main representatives of the movement (Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut, Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette) and the Left Bank directors: Alain Resnais, Chris Marker, Agnes Varda? Who are the Precursors of the Nouvelle Vague? What are the modernist aesthetic characteristics of this world’s most famous cinematic movement, in terms of form [mise en scene] & narrative structure [montage]? Phenomenology and diffused existentialism in the movements’ themes and characters. Keywords: Nouvelle Vague, Modernism, Montage, Auteur theory, Camera Stylo 1 Prologue ―Αgainst modern -
The Danish Girl
March-April 2016 VOL. 31 THE VIDEO REVIEW MAGAZINE FOR LIBRARIES NO. 2 IN THIS ISSUE The Danish Girl | ALA Notables | The Brain | Spotlight on Fitness | Emptying the Skies | The Mama Sherpas | Chi-Raq | Top Spin scene & he d BAKER & TAYLOR’S SPECIALIZED A/V TEAM OFFERS ALL THE PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND EXPERTISE TO FULFILL YOUR LIBRARY PATRONS’ NEEDS. Le n more about Bak & Taylor’s Scene & He d team: ELITE Helpful personnel focused exclusively on A/V products and customized services to meet continued patron demand PROFICIENT Qualified buyers ensure titles are available and delivered on time DEVOTED Nationwide team of A/V processing staff ready to prepare your movie and music shelf-ready specifications SKILLED Supportive Sales Representatives with an average of 15 years industry experience KNOWLEDGEABLE Full-time staff of A/V catalogers, backed by their MLS degree and more than 43 years of media cataloging expertise 800-775-2600 x2050 [email protected] www.baker-taylor.com Spotlight Review The Danish Girl is taken aback. Married for six years, Einar enjoys a lusty conjugal life with Gerda—un- HHH1/2 til, one day, she asks him to don stockings, Universal, 120 min., R, DVD: $29.98, Blu-ray: tutu, and satin slippers to fill in for a miss- ing model. Sensing his delight in posing in Publisher/Editor: Randy Pitman $34.98, Mar. 1 Eddie Redmayne feminine finery, she suggests Einar attend a Associate Editor: Jazza Williams-Wood followed up his Os- party, masquerading as a cousin named Lili. Copy Editor: Kathleen L. Florio car-winning turn as What neither of them expects is that demure Lili will attract amorous attention. -
La Nouvelle Vague (Revisited): Nothing Takes Place, but Place
La Nouvelle Vague (revisited): Nothing takes place, but place. Dr Nikos Terzis, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Greece Abstract: The proposed paper will attempt to delineate the history and the aesthetic characteristics of “French Nouvelle Vague”, the most famous cinematic movement in history! The paper’s structure will mainly evolve around the following topics: Where did the name of the movement “Nouvelle Vague” originated from? Which role the German occupation in France played in the creation of this aforementioned cinematic movement, “Cinematheque Française” and Henri Langlois, its creator? What role did the French film magazines of that period played in the creation of this “new wave” [“Cahiers du Cinema”]. Who are the movement’s main representatives? (Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut, Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette) and the “Left Bank” directors: Alain Resnais, Chris Marker, Agnes Varda, e.t.c.? Who are the Precursors of the Nouvelle Vague? Phenomenology and diffused existentialism in the movements’ themes and characters. What are the modernist aesthetic characteristics of this world’s most famous cinematic movement, in terms of form [mise en scene] & narrative structure [montage]? Keywords: Nouvelle Vague, Modernism, Montage, Auteur theory Prologue Αgainst modern Cassandra’s foretelling its doom, narrative cinema during its hundred twenty two years of history, despite the plethora of so many film patterns and styles that coexist in our digital age, presents retrospectively in my opinion, two substantially -
Cinema 2: the Time-Image
m The Time-Image Gilles Deleuze Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Caleta M IN University of Minnesota Press HE so Minneapolis fA t \1.1 \ \ I U III , L 1\) 1/ ES I /%~ ~ ' . 1 9 -08- 2000 ) kOTUPHA\'-\t. r'Y'f . ~ Copyrigh t © ~1989 The A't1tl ----resP-- First published as Cinema 2, L1111age-temps Copyright © 1985 by Les Editions de Minuit, Paris. ,5eJ\ Published by the University of Minnesota Press III Third Avenue South, Suite 290, Minneapolis, MN 55401-2520 f'tJ Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 1'::>55 Fifth printing 1997 :])'''::''531 ~ Library of Congress Number 85-28898 ISBN 0-8166-1676-0 (v. 2) \ ~~.6 ISBN 0-8166-1677-9 (pbk.; v. 2) IJ" 2. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or othenvise, ,vithout the prior written permission of the publisher. The University of Minnesota is an equal-opportunity educator and employer. Contents Preface to the English Edition Xl Translators'Introduction XV Chapter 1 Beyond the movement-image 1 How is neo-realism defined? - Optical and sound situations, in contrast to sensory-motor situations: Rossellini, De Sica - Opsigns and sonsigns; objectivism subjectivism, real-imaginary - The new wave: Godard and Rivette - Tactisigns (Bresson) 2 Ozu, the inventor of pure optical and sound images Everyday banality - Empty spaces and stilllifes - Time as unchanging form 13 3 The intolerable and clairvoyance - From cliches to the image - Beyond movement: not merely opsigns and sonsigns, but chronosigns, lectosigns, noosigns - The example of Antonioni 18 Chapter 2 ~ecaPitulation of images and szgns 1 Cinema, semiology and language - Objects and images 25 2 Pure semiotics: Peirce and the system of images and signs - The movement-image, signaletic material and non-linguistic features of expression (the internal monologue). -
Paris Cinema.1.1
01 02 03 The New Wave Hotel 04 05 Roland-François Lack 06 07 08 09 The association of the French New Wave with the kind of movement through urban 10 space that has been called flânerie is a familiar one. A defamiliarising strategy in this 11 chapter, and in my research more broadly,1 is to examine and occupy the spaces in 12 which New Wave films come to rest, countering a general assumption that cinema is 13 always about movement. The hotel is a peculiarly cinematic stopping place because, it 14 has been argued, it is ‘always already in motion’, a ‘ceaseless flux of reservations, occu- 15 pations and vacancies’.2 By fixing exactly the locations of Paris hotels in New Wave films 16 and by looking closely at the contents of the rooms in those hotels, this chapter will try 17 to resist the appeal of such mobility and fix its gaze firmly on its object, unmoved. The 18 suggestion will be, finally, that the French New Wave is less a cinema of flânerie than 19 it is a cinema of stasis; is as much a cinema of interiors as it is a cinema of the street. 20 What, cinematically, is particular about the New Wave’s use of hotels? New Wave 21 hotels are places of passage, temporary stopping places that signify transience and, in 22 the end, mobility. In her study of cinematic flânerie, Suzanne Liandrat-Guigues defines 23 the cinematographic image as ‘passage’,3 and though she goes on to illustrate the point 24 through New Wave films that follow characters as they walk in streets, fixing on their 25 ‘singular mobility’, here we will be following the New Wave’s characters into spaces 26 where walking is restricted. -
Uk / 2018 / 1.66 / 5.1
HIGH LIFE 110 min / Germany – France – USA – Poland – UK / 2018 / 1.66 / 5.1 EVA DIEDERIX [email protected] SILVIA SIMONUTTI [email protected] FANNY BEAUVILLE [email protected] OLPHA BEN SALAH [email protected] PHOTOS AND PRESS KIT CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM https://www.wildbunch.biz/movie/high-life/ Deep space. Monte and his daughter Willow live together aboard a spacecraft, in complete isolation. A man whose strict self-discipline is a shield against desire, Monte fathered her against his will. His sperm was used to inseminate the young woman who gave birth to her. They were members of a crew of prisoners – death row inmates. Guinea pigs sent on a mission. Now only Monte and Willow remain. Through his daughter, he experiences the birth of an all-powerful love. Together, father and daughter approach their destination – the black hole in which time and space cease to exist. How did High Life come about? A while back, an English producer asked me if I wanted to participate in a collection of films called Femmes Fatales. At first, I wasn’t that interested, but after thinking it over, I agreed. The project took ages to get off the ground. There was no money. It took 6 or 7 years to hammer out a coproduction: France, Germany, Poland and eventually America. During that time, I went to England and the States to meet with actors. The actor I dreamed of for the lead role of Monte was Philip Seymour Hoffman, because of his age, his weariness – but he died mid- route. -
BAM Presents Strange Desire: the Films of Claire Denis, Mar 29—Apr 9, the Largest-Ever US Retrospective Dedicated to the Celebrated French Filmmaker
BAM presents Strange Desire: The Films of Claire Denis, Mar 29—Apr 9, the largest-ever US retrospective dedicated to the celebrated French filmmaker February 20, 2019/Brooklyn, NY—From Friday, March 29 through Tuesday, April 9, BAM presents Strange Desire: The Films of Claire Denis, the most extensive retrospective ever presented in the US dedicated to Denis, a filmmaker consistently counted among the greatest living directors by filmmakers and critics alike. Denis’ work is a delicate balance of contradictions: her films are beloved, yet elusive; influential, yet singular; grounded in corporeality, but with a shifting relationship with time. Born in France, raised in colonial Africa where her father was a civil servant, and eventually returning to France as a teenager, Denis subtly explores race and colonial relationships, love and eroticism, the texture of bodies and environments, and the elasticity of time. Following the retrospective, BAM will screen Denis’ critically acclaimed new feature, the poetic science fiction film High Life (2019), starring Robert Pattinson, Juliette Binoche, Mia Goth, and André Benjamin. Denis will appear in person at BAM for a sneak preview show on April 3. The film opens in New York and Los Angeles on April 5. The series begins with Beau Travail (1999), Denis’ masterful update of Herman Melville’s Billy Budd, starring Denis Lavant and regular collaborator Grégoire Colin. A study of jealousy and obsession set among the existential ennui and empty rituals of the French Foreign Legion in Djibouti, Beau Travail captures Denis’ signature elliptical style and hypnotic rhythms. A balletic study of bodies in motion with an unforgettable final scene, Beau Travail is Denis’ most iconic and influential work. -
Foreign Bodies, Community and Trauma in the Films of Claire Denis
Foreign Bodies, Community and Trauma in the Films of Claire Denis:... http://www.screeningthepast.com/2013/09/foreign-bodies-community-... Kath Dooley … if my films have a common link, maybe it’s being a foreigner – it’s common for people who are born abroad – they don’t know so well where they belong. It’s not the kind of thing you find in literature, music or photography – being from abroad makes you look different. – Claire Denis [1] Having grown up in Africa as the daughter of a French civil servant, French writer/director Claire Denis was positioned as an outsider. Whereas this status was clearly marked by her skin colour in early life, returning to France as a teenager also presented challenges in terms of foreignness and identification – despite it being the country where she was born, and of which she is a citizen. Douglas Morrey posits that ‘in the filmmaking of Claire Denis, the body is the limit between sense and world. The body is always other – the means by which the other appears to me but also by which I am revealed to myself, as other’. [2] This statement has resonance not just for the director’s choice of themes, but also for her stylistic choices: the use of cinematography, sound and editing to explore the intersections of foreign bodies. Martine Beugnet makes the point that Denis’ ‘perception of the Other is always complex and ambiguous’, and is ‘that which spurs curiosity and creates desire’. [3] As such, rather than reinforcing binary oppositions that seek to stigmatise, the director is subtle in her questioning of the effects of dominant cultures in multicultural contexts.