Land at Whitwell Colliery Environmental Statement Part 1: Non-Technical Summary 13.012/01 NTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Land at Whitwell Colliery Environmental Statement Part 1: Non-Technical Summary 13.012/01 NTS Land at Whitwell Colliery Environmental Statement Part 1: Non-Technical Summary 13.012/01 NTS 18 July 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 4 2. The Site 6 3. Environmental Topics Considered Transport & Access 8 Noise 10 Air Quality 10 Ecology and Nature Conservation 10 Arboriculture 11 Geology, Ground Conditions & Contamination 11 Landscape & Visual Impact 12 Socio-economic Change 13 Heritage & Archaeology 13 Agriculture & Soils 14 Water Resources 14 4. Summary & Conclusions 16 Where can I find out more? 16 Whitwell Colliery Page 3 of 17 July 2018 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Planning permission is being sought by Welbeck Estates Company Ltd for development on land at the former Whitwell Colliery, Derbyshire. The proposals comprise of two separate planning applications, namely: A Full planning application submitted to Derbyshire County Council for the reclamation of the colliery site (“The Reclamation Scheme”); and An Outline (All Matters Reserved except Access) planning application submitted to Bolsover District Council for the mixed-use development of the colliery site, led by housing but also for employment, extensive public open space, convenience retail, railway station improvements and drainage. (“The Outline Scheme”). 1.2 The location of the proposed development is as shown in Appendix A. 1.3 Following discussions with both Councils, only the reclamation scheme requires rigorous and detailed review of the development’s likely environmental impacts through Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). This Non-Technical Summary therefore relates only to The Reclamation Scheme, which in turn will make all of the land suitable for The Outline Scheme. 1.4 The description for The Reclamation Scheme is as follows: ‘Full application for the reclamation of the former Whitwell Colliery site to facilitate mixed use redevelopment, including earthworks, remediation, landscaping, ecological, drainage and other related infrastructural works.’ 1.5 In Appendix A, a masterplan of the proposals shows how The Outline Scheme would be broadly set out. Document Purpose 1.6 EIA is a process whereby potential environmental impacts of development (both positive and negative) are considered, inform the design of those proposals and options to avoid adverse impacts, or remedy or mitigate residual impacts. This Non- Technical Summary document provides a summary of the findings of the EIA. It gives an overview of the main likely environmental impacts of the proposed development land and is intended as a summary of the EIA prepared so that any reader can more readily understand the impacts of the proposed development. 1.7 Details of how to obtain or view a copy of the complete Environmental Statement, that provides full details of the EIA, are included at the rear of this Non-Technical Summary. Whitwell Colliery Page 4 of 17 July 2018 How was the assessment undertaken? 1.8 The EIA considered environmental impacts in terms of the following environmental topics: Transport & Access Noise Ecology and Nature Conservation Arboriculture Geology, Ground Conditions & Contamination Air Quality and Dust Landscape & Visual Impact Heritage & Archaeology Socio-economic Change Agriculture & Soils Water Resources 1.9 Notwithstanding the above topics, the EIA was undertaken holistically, so that any interrelationships between different topics and types of environmental impacts were properly considered. 1.10 The steps taken in EIA are first to understand the current environmental conditions, then to predict any impacts of the development, then to set out options to address those impacts, to avoid, remedy or mitigate actual or potential negative impacts and enhance or maximise positive impacts. 1.11 The process of EIA includes the consideration of any ‘reasonable alternatives’ to the proposed development, to identify if any other options could result in any lesser negative environmental impacts or greater benefits. In this case, the following alternatives were considered: Do nothing; Locate the development elsewhere; Alternative location for development within the site; Alternative access strategy; and Do more. 1.12 The following sections therefore provide a summary of assessment that has been carried out on the chosen development proposals. The existing site environment is described, followed by a summary of the key findings for each environmental topic. Whitwell Colliery Page 5 of 17 July 2018 2. THE SITE 2.1 The site is next to the village of Whitwell but sits entirely within the Parish of Hodthorpe & Belph and is also near to both of those settlements. It measures approximately 46 hectares (114 acres) and comprises of the former Whitwell Colliery site and associated colliery tip between Station Road and Southfield Lane, and land directly north of Station Road. The site is owned entirely by the Welbeck Estate and has laid vacant since 1986, when the colliery closed, and the site was cleared the following year. The site represents one of the last remaining large-scale, previously developed (brownfield) development opportunity sites in the Bolsover District. Plans on the following pages show the site location and surrounding uses. 2.2 The site lies less than 5 miles from Worksop (North-east), 7 miles from Bolsover (southwest), 11 miles from Mansfield (south), 16 miles from Chesterfield (southwest) and 18 miles from Sheffield (northwest). Junction 30 of the M1 is only 4 miles to the southwest, at Barlborough. 2.3 The northern part of the colliery site is primarily occupied by the Whitwell Colliery spoil tip, which is steep sided with an uneven plateau top formerly occupied by a number of lagoons. The northern tip slope is densely vegetated with trees and scrub vegetation, the south, east and west more sparsely vegetated with bare soil/spoil. 2.4 To the north of the Whitwell Colliery spoil tip is an area of former railway sidings, which formerly also extended around the tip to the west. A tree line / hedgerow separates the sidings area from Station Road. A sewage works formerly occupied an area at the north-western toe of the tip. It is understood that the sewage works was demolished approximately seven years ago. A small stream flows south in a partially open channel to the east of the former sewage works. 2.5 The environmental characteristics of the site are examined in more detail in the following topic sections. Whitwell Colliery Page 6 of 17 July 2018 3. ENVIRONMENTAL TOPICS CONSIDERED Whitwell Colliery Page 7 of 17 July 2018 TRANSPORT AND ACCESS 3.1 The development is proposed to be accessed at multiple points to cater for the relevant phasing of the eventual mixed-use development. It is proposed to replicate these for access as part of The Reclamation Scheme. 3.2 The main vehicular access will be taken from Station Ra Lane, Whitwell, for access south into the former colliery site. Further points of vehicular access will be taken from Station Road, and a junction on Southfield Lane. It is also proposed to extend the 30mph speed limit along Station Road from the outset of The Reclamation Scheme. Both the Station Road and Southfield Lane railway bridges will be traffic signalled, footpaths widened and carriageway width narrowed for improved traffic management and pedestrian links on approach to the village. 3.3 There will be no ‘through-route’ for vehicles between Southfield Lane and Station Road during the course of the reclamation works. 3.4 The proposed points of access, their location and means of construction have been appraised to ensure compliance with the relevant 6Cs Highway Design Standards for Derbyshire. 3.5 A detailed Transport Assessment has considered the impact of vehicle traffic on key road junctions in the vicinity of the site. As a result there are improvements proposed to a number of junctions in the vicinity to enable them to operate properly with the increased volume of traffic. 3.6 Secondly, a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) has also been prepared as part of the application to address issues of HGV movements and other forms of construction traffic on local residents. It is accepted that there will still be a volume of vehicular traffic from the development that needs to be accommodated on the road network, however the routes that vehicles are permitted to travel, hours in which movements operate, and types of vehicles permitted will all be managed through the CTMP. 3.7 During the course of the application the applicant team has worked closely with both the Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire County Highway authorities and the District Council, given the site’s geography and the likely cross-border highway impacts arising from it. 3.8 At the initial stage during the course of the works it is likely there will be a temporary impact on the road network due to traffic for The Reclamation Scheme. This would be avoided by routing construction traffic to avoid HGV movements along Southfield Lane, Station Road and Green Lane that have an impact on Whitwell and Hodthorpe villages, in favour of routing towards the A60 via Crags Road and the B6042 Hennymoor Lane. Other measures to limit potential adverse effects include wheel washing, avoidance where possible of movements during peak and antisocial hours, and speed limit reductions (as proposed for non- construction traffic), to be covered by the CTMP. 3.9 The traffic and highway effects of the development have been assessed and undertaken in line with the advice contained within the “Department for Transport – Guidance on Transport Assessment” and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment – Guidelines for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic.” 3.10 The potential effects of development traffic on the local road network has been considered and has been informed in part by the findings of the supporting Transport Assessment. Whitwell Colliery Page 8 of 17 July 2018 3.11 Initial analysis has shown that while the proposed development will add traffic flows to Southfield Lane, Station Road and High Street, there will not be any operational capacity concerns raised as a result and no mitigation is required.
Recommended publications
  • Dukeries History Trail Booklet
    Key Walk 1 P Parking P W Worksop Café Steetley C P P Meals Worksop W Toilets C Manor P M Museum Hardwick Penny Walk 2 Belph Green Walk 7 W C M P W Toll A60 ClumberC B6034 Bothamsall Creswell Crags M Welbeck P W Walk 6 P W M A614 CWalk 3 P Carburton C P Holbeck P P Norton Walk 4 P A616 Cuckney Thoresby P Hall Budby P W M WalkC 5 Sherwood Forest Warsop Country Park Ollerton The Dukeries History Trail SherwoodForestVisitor.com Sherwood Forest’s amazing north 1. Worksop Priory Worksop is well worth a visit as it has a highly accessible town centre with the Priory, Memorial Gardens, the Chesterfield Canal and the old streets of the Town Centre. Like a lot of small towns, if you look, there is still a lot of charm. Park next to the Priory and follow the Worksop Heritage Trail via Priorswell Road, Potter Street, Westgate, Lead Hill and the castle mound, Newcastle Avenue and Bridge Street. Sit in the Memorial Gardens for a while, before taking a stroll along the canal. Visit Mr Straw’s House(National Trust) BUT you must have pre-booked as so many people want to see it. Welbeck Abbey gates, Sparken Hill to the south of the town. The bridge over the canal with its ‘luxury duckhouse’, Priorswell Road . 2. Worksop Manor Lodge Dating from about 1590, the Lodge is a Grade 1 listed building. Five floors have survived – there were probably another two floors as well so would have been a very tall building for its time.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 18Th January 1991 Post Office
    884 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 18TH JANUARY 1991 Edmund's Road, Worsbrough Bridge, thence southwards along Edmund's Road, Worsbrough Bridge to it's junction with the River POST OFFICE Dove, thence westwards along the course of the River Dove to it's junction with Park Road, Worsbrough Bridge, thence south- POST OFFICE SCHEME L4/I990 eastwards along Park Road, Worsbrough Bridge to it's junction with Doe Lane, Wo.rsborough, thence eastwards along Doe Lane, NOTE: The scheme which follows this note is made under section 28 Worsbrough to the commencement point. (768) of the Post Office Act 1969 and amends the Post Office Overseas Letter Post Scheme 1982. The Scheme, which comes into operation on the 21 st January 1991, revises certain postal charges, introduces a European airmail small packet service and a European airmail BOLSOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL printed packet service and abolishes the European airmail newspaper service, the reduced rate printed packet service and the THE CLEAN AIR ACT 1956 facility for bulk posting in mail bags. Additionally, the Scheme LOCAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING AND LAND ACT 1980 revises references to air letters, air mail packets, small packets, printed packets and literature for the blind. (1) The Bolsover District Council (No. 10) Smoke Control Order (This note is not part of the Scheme) 1990, (Belph, Creswell, Elmton, Hodthorpe. Steetley, Whitwell. Whitwell Common, Whaley (Part) and Surrounding Area) THE POST OFFICE OVERSEAS LETTER POST (2) The Bolsover District Council No. 11) Smoke Control Order AMENDMENT (NO. 12) SCHEME
    [Show full text]
  • Whitwell Parish Council
    WHITWELL PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting of the Council held at Whitwell Community Centre at 19.00 on Wednesday 13 April 2011 Present: Councillor S Maiden (Chair), Councillor K Astle, Councillor J Astle, Councillor S Greaves, Councillor G Maiden, Councillor V Mills, Councillor T Munro, Councillor D Potts, Councillor G Webster, Councillor J Clifton, Councillor D McGregor PCSO 4526 M Wardle, 6 members of the public. 1. Apologies for absence Apologies were received from Councillors I Whyles and R Turner. 2. Suspension of Standing Orders to permit a thirty minutes open forum for: 2.1 Members of the Parish Council and the public to discuss matters of importance with the County Councillor. The following issues were raised:- 2.1.1 There appears to have been little done about the potholes around the village, particularly on High Street and Welbeck Street. 2.1.2 It has been reported that there is £30m available from the Coalfields Regeneration Fund for ex-mining areas. 2.1.3 A member of the public enquired why there was no County Council reported presented to the Parish meeting on 6 April. 2.1.4 The pavement on Hangar Hill (o/s the new development) has still not been attended to. 2.1.5 Cllr J Astle reported on a site meeting with Cllr Stevenson and Eileen Murphy (DCC). It would appear that the count of children, both in the morning and in the afternoon, “fell well short of the recommended criteria”. 2.2 Members of the Parish Council and the public to discuss matters of importance with the police PCSO Wardle reported on the number of crimes for March (26).
    [Show full text]
  • PC Mins 10.7.13
    WHITWELL PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting of the Council held at Whitwell Community Centre at 19.00 on Wednesday 10 July 2013 Present: Councillor S Maiden (Chair) Councillor K Austin Councillor J Burdett Councillor V P Mills Councillor T Munro (Vice Chair) Councillor J Raspin Councillor G Webster County Councillor D McGregor 4 members of the public PCSO K Lee 1 Apologies for absence Apologies were received from Cllr S Ellis. 2 To consider applications for Dispensation of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests No applications had been received. 3 It was resolved to suspend Standing Orders to permit a fifteen minutes open forum for: 3.1 Members of the Parish Council and the public to discuss matters of importance with the County Councillor Cllr McGregor reported on the following issues:- 3.1.1. Two potholes on the High Street have been repaired. 3.1.2. Cllr Maiden had informed Cllr McGregor of the pool of water which runs across High Street, possibly requiring a culvert, and this has been noted. 3.1.3. Bollard at Hennymoor Lane/Mansfield Road will be replaced week ending 21 July. 3.1.4. The provision of road markings around the war memorial in the Square – there would be a timescale of 12 weeks to complete this work. 3.1.5. He has inspected a holly hedge at 5 Spring Hill and will report this as a hazard. 3.1.6. The broken bollard near the Co-op has been reported. 3.1.7. The possibility of a covert traffic survey will now be dealt with.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3-Whitwell-Quarry-Southfield-Lane
    Public Agenda Item No. 4.3 DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL REGULATORY – PLANNING COMMITTEE 9 October 2017 Report of the Strategic Director – Economy, Transport and Communities 3 PROPOSED EXTRACTION OF DOLOMITE FROM FOUR EXTENSION AREAS, AN EXTENSION TO THE DURATION OF OPERATIONS AND A REVISED RESTORATION SCHEME AT WHITWELL QUARRY, SOUTHFIELD LANE, WHITWELL APPLICANT: TARMAC LTD PLANNING APPLICATION CODE NO: CM5/0416/4 5.541.24 Introductory Summary This report relates to proposals for the winning and working of a further 3.23 million tonnes of dolomitic limestone from four extension areas, and an extension to the duration of mineral extraction operations at the site from the current 2019/2025 planning permission expiry dates until 2040 with the completion of the whole development by the end of 2043, at Whitwell Quarry, Southfield Lane, Whitwell. The proposed extensions would affect an additional 9.8 hectares of land, the majority of which has been previously disturbed as a result of quarrying activity at the site. The application was accompanied by an Environmental Statement. The mineral resource at Whitwell is considered to be of national importance and there is an identified economic need resulting both from its chemical composition, as well as its scarcity. Its continued extraction would contribute to the local economy, both directly and indirectly as a result of employment of local people, as well as its use of local services and would assist in the safeguarding of mineral infrastructure in the form of the kilns at the adjacent Whitwell Works. Products from the site are exported to international markets and, as a consequence, the proposals would also contribute towards the wider UK economy.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY of JEHYSH AN] I~S BOUNDARY WTH NOT" NGHAMSHHE LOCAL Govehhlfeht
    Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties COUNTY OF JEHYSH AN] I~S BOUNDARY WTH NOT" NGHAMSHHE LOCAL GOVEHHlfEHT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR EMC LAND REPORT -599 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton MEMBERS Mr K F J Ennals Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr C W Smith Professor K Young Hotelnghan.BC THE RT RON MICHAEL HESELTINE HP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF DERBYSHIRE: BOUNDARY WITH NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 2 September 1986 we wrote to Derbyshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the county under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of the letter were sent to the principal local authorities and constituent parishes in Derbyshire and in the surrounding counties of Cheshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire and Staffordshire; to the National and the County Associations of Local Councils, to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests, and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities, water authorities, and electricity and gas boards which might have an interest; and to British Telecom, the English Tourist Board, the local government press, and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. To enable the Commission to fulfil its obligations under Section 60(1) of the Local Government Act 1972, we requested the County Councils, in co-operation as necessary with other local authorities, to insert a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers to give wide publicity to the start of the review in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 9 Local Bus Travel Guide for Mansfield and Warsop Area
    Area 9 local bus travel guide for Mansfield and Warsop area August 2014 This leaflet provides a travel map and destination and frequency guide for all local bus services in the Mansfield and Warsop area. Full timetables for these services can be obtained from the relevant operators, contact details are shown below. Service Route Days of Early morning Daytime Evening Sundays operation Every Every Every Every 1 (Mansfield Miller) Mansfield Woodhouse - Mansfield - Sutton - Huthwaite - Alfreton (hourly) Daily 10-20 mins 10 mins 30-60 mins 30 mins 3A (The threes) Nottingham - Hucknall - Newstead - Annesley Woodhouse - Kirkby - Sutton - Mansfield Daily 30 mins 30 mins 60 mins 60 mins 3B (The threes) Nottingham - Hucknall - Annesley - Kirkby - Sutton - Mansfield Daily 30 mins 30 mins 60 mins 60 mins 3C (The threes) Nottingham - Hucknall - Annesley - Kirkby - Coxmoor Estate - Sutton - Mansfield Daily 30 mins 30 mins 60 mins 60 mins 6 Ladybrook - Mansfield - Bull Farm (not Sundays) - Mansfield - Ladybrook Daily 20 mins 15 mins 3 journeys 60 mins 7 Mansfield - Oak Tree - Mansfield Daily 20 mins 15 mins 2 journeys 60 mins 11 Mansfield - Warsop - Meden Vale Mon - Sat 30 mins 30 mins 60 mins ---- 12 Mansfield - Warsop - Shirebrook Daily 30 mins 30 mins 60 mins 60 mins 14 Mansfield - Clipstone - Kirton Mon - Sat 60 mins 60 mins 2 journeys ---- 15, 15A Mansfield - Clipstone - Walesby Daily 60 mins 60 mins 60 mins 60 mins Continued on next page Service Route Days of Early morning Daytime Evening Sundays operation Every Every Every Every 16, 16A Mansfield
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Care Services Directory 2019/20
    Derbyshire Care Services Directory 2019/20 The essential guide to choosing and paying for care and support In association with www.carechoices.co.uk CanalResidential Home withVue Dementia Care • Residential, Dementia, Respite, Convalescence services at Canal Vue, Nottinghamshireg Care Homes, with Nursing Care • Our spaciousEast en-suite rooms areate tastefully decoratedCare and furnishedOur to a priorities very high are standard quality care and comfort for all residents • Fully qualified• All our homesstaff, offerwith Nursing,24 hour Convalescence,care & specialist Respite, call systems Dementia, Personal/Residential care services and have modern facilities • The comfortable welcoming lounges overlook fabulous canal • Our spacious en-suite rooms are tastefully decorated and furnished side viewsto a very high standard • We host• Weregular have visits plenty from of fully local qualified GP’s, chiropodist, nursing staff, optician, with 24 hour care & dentist, physiotherapist,specialist nurse call hairdresser systems and religious ministers • The comfortable welcoming lounges overlook well- tended gardens • Our mealsor area picturesque home cooked waterway and we cater for special diets • Dedicated• We Activities host regular Co-ordinators visits from local & regularly GP’s, chiropodist, organised optician, dentist, pastimesphysiotherapist, and pursuits hairdresser and religious ministers • Our meals are home cooked and we cater for • Our priorities are quality carespecial and comfortdiets for all residents • Dedicated Activities Co-ordinators & regularly organised“The carers trips are andexcellent outings - caring, patient and kind, as too are the domestic staff. The lounges are always welcoming and nicely decorated with bright corridors and the home is clean, warm and welcoming. It was a relief that Mum was content here and I can recommend it to others.’’ Relatives comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining English Surnames: Linguistic Ambiguity and the Importance of Context Part Two Interpreting the Modern Data1 Peter Mcclure University of Hull
    Explaining English surnames: linguistic ambiguity and the importance of context Part Two Interpreting the modern data1 Peter McClure University of Hull INTRODUCTION In Part One of this paper (McClure 2013) I showed that interpretation of the medieval data has been seriously affected by problems of ambiguity; that the problems occur at every linguistic level, especially at the morphological, where homonymy is common; and that disregarding the contexts in which names were used and recorded has led to mistaken 1 This article is Part Two of a revised and expanded version of the 2013 Cameron Lecture, which was given at the University of Nottingham at the invitation of the Institute for Name-Studies. Its content and methodological approach owe much to the research of George Redmonds, David Hey and Richard McKinley, and to my experience during the last five years as a member of the Family Names of the United Kingdom project (FaNUK), co-directed by Patrick Hanks and Richard Coates. I am grateful to the University of the West of England for permission to quote copyrighted material from the project’s database in advance of its publication in the forthcoming Dictionary of Family Names in Britain and Ireland. My thanks also go to the anonymous reviewer and to Professor Coates, Professor Hanks and Dr Harry Parkin of the FaNUK team, who kindly read and improved earlier drafts of this article, though they are in no way responsible for the imperfections that remain. Parts Three and Four, which I hope to publish at a future date, will discuss common patterns of phonetic and morphological change in Modern English surnames and the problems of disambiguating names of native English origin from those that were brought in by post-medieval immigrants from Wales, Scotland, Ireland, and elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Regulatory
    Public Document Pack Janie Berry Director of Legal and Democratic Services County Hall Matlock Derbyshire DE4 3AG Direct Dial 01629 538328 Extension 38328 Ask for Ivan Walters PUBLIC To: Members of Regulatory - Planning Committee Friday, 28 June 2019 Dear Councillor, Please attend a meeting of the Regulatory - Planning Committee to be held at 10.00 am on Monday, 8 July 2019 in Committee Room 1, County Hall, Matlock DE4 3AG, the agenda for which is set out below. Yours faithfully, JANIE BERRY Director of Legal and Democratic Services A G E N D A PART I - NON-EXEMPT ITEMS 1. Apologies for Absence To receive apologies for absence (if any) 2. Declarations of Interest To receive declarations of interest (if any) 3. Declarations of Significant Lobbying To receive declarations of significant lobbying (if any) 4. Petitions To receive petitions (if any) 5. Site Visit Site Visit (as determined by the Executive Director – Economy, Transport and Environment after consultation with the Chairman and/or Vice Chairman in accordance with the Code of Practice):- (i) Whitwell Colliery 6. Following the site visit the meeting will reconvene at 1.00pm in Committee Room 1, County Hall, Matlock. 7. To confirm the non-exempt minutes of the meeting of the Regulatory - Planning Committee held on 20 May 2019 (Pages 1 - 6) To consider the non-exempt reports of the Executive Director - Economy, Transport and Environment on: 8. Former Whitwell Colliery Site (Pages 7 - 72) Proposed Reclamation, Cut and Fill of the Former Whitwell Colliery Site to Facilitate Mixed Use Redevelopment of the Site, Together with Landscaping, Ecology and Drainage Applicant: The Welbeck Estates Company Limited Code No: CM5/0818/42 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations for Bolsover District Council
    Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Bolsover District Council Electoral Review April 2017 Translations and other formats To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2017 Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 Who we are and what we do .................................................................................. 1 Electoral review ...................................................................................................... 1 Why Bolsover? ....................................................................................................... 1 Our proposals for Bolsover ..................................................................................... 1 Have your say ......................................................................................................... 1 What is the Local Government Boundary Commission for England? ......................... 2 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]