DOCSLIB.ORG

2014–2015 Annual Report/Honor Roll

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014–2015 Annual Report/Honor Roll NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE PAID Enrich and Empower MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION Manhattan Beach Education Foundation P.O. Box 1110, Manhattan Beach, CA 90267-1110 2015 MBEF ANNUAL REPORT & HONOR ROLL A SALUTE TO OUR 2014-2015 DONORS Enrich and Empower Enrich and Empower CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND FACTS 1-2 MBEF FUNDED PROGRAMS 3 About Our Grants 4-8 Private Donations / No Parcel Tax 10 COLLEGE LISTING 11-12 ANNUAL APPEAL 13-42 MATCHING GIFT DONORS 43 BUSINESS SPONSORS 44 MANHATTAN WINE AUCTION 45 STEM Paddle Raise 46-47 Silent and Live Auction 48 MBEF ENDOWMENT 49 Endowment Honor Roll 50-52 Class of 2015 Forever Fund 53 MBEF BOARD AND STAFF 54 MISSION STATEMENTS 55 THERE ARE 5,642 DONORS Since MBEF was founded in 1983, we’ve grown from a group of parents who came together to raise $20,000 for “extras”, to a critical partner that provides over 9% of our District’s annual funding. Today MBEF supports or enhances — in small or large part — nearly every academic pursuit and enrichment opportunity across our District’s seven campuses. MBEF has a profound impact because parents, business leaders, educators, and community members invest their time, talents and financial resources to make our children’s school years exceptional. In 2014/15, 5,642 donors supported MBEF by making a gift to strengthen our schools. This is an incredible achievement that speaks volumes about our collective commitment to our schools and excellent educational opportunities. We are proud that our District’s test scores remain high, and continue to attract new families to Manhattan Beach. Beyond the test scores, however, we are a community that places great importance on the benefits of character development, teamwork, collaboration and innovation. MBEF funds and advocates for a well-rounded, hands-on education that sparks creativity and emboldens every student’s enthusiasm for learning. We hope you will take a moment to browse through this booklet and read about the programs MBEF funds — that you have made possible. It is through your support that our District is able to provide programs that inspire learning, enrich teaching and promote innovation and academic excellence. Our work together continues, year after year, as we are always striving to be better and dreaming of what more is possible. Thank you — 5,642 times — for dreaming with us! 1 $6,000,000 71 MBEF funding to our schools MBEF pays for 71 educators in 2015/16 in grades K-12 9% 3RD Percentage of total District MBUSD is ranked 3rd budget that is covered by MBEF in California 73% 2 2 0 61% of MBUSD teachers Percentage of donations will receive Professional that comes from parents Development funded by MBEF Impressive as these numbers are, they only begin to convey the sheer magnitude of what our students receive as a result of your investment in MBEF. Many of our District’s programs and positions would be eliminated if not for the generous support of our community. Thank you for your partnership. MBUSD FUNDING SOURCES 2014/15 State: $52,070,000 % 9 MBEF: $5,765,000 MBEF Leases and Rentals: $2,001,000 Other Donations: $1,642,000 Federal: $1,409,000 PTA: $707,000 MBX: $136,000 Interest: $50,000 2 — MBEF FUNDED PROGRAMS — 2015/16 SCHOOL YEAR — MORE THAN $6M IN GRANTS DISTRICT-WIDE PROGRAMS: $1,012,000 • Data Evaluation and Program Assessment* • Innovation Grants to Teachers* • Music Teachers (44%)** • Professional Development: UCLA Center X Math** • STEM — Project Lead the Way* • Teacher Leaders: 21st Century Teaching and Writing • Teacher of the Year Stipends* ELEMENTARY: $1,940,000 • Class Size Reduction: K-3 • Library Specialists • MindUP Implementation* • Physical Education Teachers** • Reading Specialists • Science Specialists • Technology Teachers MIDDLE SCHOOL: $1,035,000 • Class Size Reduction: English & Humanities • Extra Period Classes • Guidance Counselors • Library Specialist • Professional Development: Science and Math* • STEM — Additional Classes* • Wheel Electives HIGH SCHOOL: $2,013,000 • Class Size Reduction: English • College and Career Counselors • Extra Period Classes • Guidance and Academic Support Counselors** • Librarian • Professional Development: Counseling* • Science Lab Assistant 3 *New grants in 2015/16 **Grant amount increased in 2015/16 — ABOUT OUR GRANTS — DISTRICT-WIDE: $1,012,000 Data Evaluation and Program Assessment: $100,000* How well do our programs work? What shifts could we make in math, counseling and writing to strengthen our academic outcomes? Is our iPad program achieving the intended goals? So many questions we can’t answer because, until now, we have not had an analyst with the capacity to assess our programs and give our educators the data they need to strengthen them. In addition, this position will give MBEF the data we need to make strategic data-backed funding decisions going forward. It’s a small portion of our overall funding (1.6%), but it could have a tremendous impact on our ability to meet goals and strengthen our impact. Innovation Grants to Teachers: $25,000* In 2015/16 MBEF will request proposals from teachers for projects that provide innovation and/ or collaboration in learning. These small grants ($500-$3,500) will give our educators an opportunity to exercise their passion for teaching, develop ideas, partner with colleagues and connect with the wealth of knowledge, expertise and talent within MBUSD. Projects will enhance curriculum and align with school and District goals. Music: $430,000** Music, math and science achievement go hand in hand. MBEF funds 44% of music instruction K-12, and as a result, the music program at MBUSD has experienced phenomenal growth and success. All students in grades 1-5 receive weekly music instruction, which forms the foundation for our award-winning middle and high school programs. In 2015/16 MBEF increased this grant by $30K to strengthen instruction. Professional Development — UCLA Center X Math K-12: $100,000 Recent District-wide data and parent feedback has shown that we need to strengthen our Math program so that it is better aligned with Common Core Standards. Through this grant, UCLA Center X, a leader in Common Core implementation and teacher education, connects our District with teacher leaders who provide best practices and coaching for teachers throughout the District. STEM — Project Lead the Way: $130,000* In the next three years our students will experience a significant shift in the way our District teaches Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM). In fall of 2015, we are launching Project Lead the Way (PLTW), the nation’s leading provider of K-12 STEM programs. Their curriculum is hands-on, project-based, and data-backed. We are excited about how this initiative will transform the way our children engage with STEM and innovation. Teacher Leaders — 21st Century Teaching and Writing: $222,000 There have been significant changes in the use of technology and the consistency of writing instruction in schools across our country. In every grade, what is taught is as important as how it’s taught. MBEF funding helps make sure each child’s curriculum keeps pace with the changing world by funding two Teachers on Special Assignment (TOSA) to lead continuous improvement efforts throughout the District in these important areas of growth. 4 Teacher of the Year Stipends: $5,000* Each year MBUSD recognizes one teacher from each school site as the Teacher of the Year, and one of those teachers is selected as the District-wide Teacher of the Year. MBUSD’s 7 Teachers of the Year have not previously received a monetary reward for this significant honor. This is an exciting opportunity to award the teachers, who do so much for our children every day. ELEMENTARY: $1,940,000 Class Size Reduction- Additional Teachers K-3: $711,000 Our recent survey results show that MBEF’s grant to reduce class size is the one parents and teachers prioritize. MBEF is continuing its commitment to keeping our class sizes low. Our K-3 classrooms throughout the District are set at a maximum of 24:1. Library Specialists: $195,000 Having access to a school library and knowing how to find your way around provides endless discoveries for students. This grant funds five Library Specialists – one for each of our five elementary schools. Library Specialists ensure that our school libraries are open every hour that school is in session. In addition to maintaining the libraries, the Specialists work with all teachers to help our students learn research and media literacy skills. MindUP: $40,000* In 2014/15, MBUSD received a grant from Beach Cities Health District to implement MindUP, a social emotional learning curriculum, in grades K-5. MindUP is a CASEL accredited program that strengthens student outcomes and reduces drug and alcohol use and stress levels. MBEF’s $40K grant will support the complete implementation of this program by funding additional professional development, parent education sessions, and program oversight and assessment. Physical Education: $230,000** MBEF is proud to support credentialed physical education teachers at the elementary schools. PE teachers provide 100 minutes of high quality physical education and sportsmanship each week to all students, grades 1-5. We increased this grant in 2015/16 to improve student to teacher ratios. 5 Reading Specialists: $333,000 From K-3, children learn to read and then they read to learn. This grant funds five credentialed teachers who work with students to increase reading proficiency. The Reading Specialists also work with all elementary teachers to promote high quality reading instruction in all schools. STEM Facilitator (MakerSpace + Science + Technology Teachers): $4,000* This small grant will provide a stipend for a current teacher to help coordinate our efforts in STEM K-5. By facilitating bi-monthly meetings across sites that include STEM teachers, Tech TOSAs, and MakerSpace leads, we will be creating an opportunity for all of our teachers to learn from each other and utilize best practices.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abstracts Final SVD 100626 FN
    European Working Group European Working Group on on Gaucher Disease Gaucher Disease 9th International EWGGD Workshop Program and Abstracts! June 30th – July 3rd 2010 Cologne | Germany SPonSorS Platinum ConferenCe SPonSor ProGrAm Shared Sponsoring Bronze ConferenCe SPonSor European Working Group on Gaucher Disease 9th International EWGGD Meeting Organizing Group Bembi, Bruno Hollak, Carla Hrebiczek, Martin Manuel, Jeremy Niemeyer, Pascal vom Dahl, Stephan Dear colleagues, physicians and scientist, dear visitors it is our pleasure to welcome you to the 9th Workshop of the EWGGD (European Working Group on Gaucher Disease). This time, the location will be Grand Hotel Schloss Bensberg near Cologne, in Germany. Hopefully, the calm atmosphere and the famous view on one of Germany´s oldest cities, Cologne, will add to your well-being and stimulate scientific ideas. As in the former years, the principal aim of the meeting is to enable a fruitful scientific exchange on Gaucher-related issues. Young physicians and researchers from all scientific backgrounds are encouraged to present their research and to attend our meeting for learning purposes. The opportunity for presenting unpublished scientific data as well as free discussion is a central premise of the Group. A couple of things were novel this time: The European Gaucher Alliance (EGA), the head organisation of patient associations in Europe, was involved into the organisational flow of the workshop from the beginning. Second, a travel grant programme has been set up to support the attendance of young researchers and physicians to present their results. During this meeting, the posters will not only be displayed, but discussed during separate poster tours on Thursday and Friday.
    [Show full text]
  • International Research and Exchanges Board Records
    International Research and Exchanges Board Records A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Prepared by Karen Linn Femia, Michael McElderry, and Karen Stuart with the assistance of Jeffery Bryson, Brian McGuire, Jewel McPherson, and Chanté Wilson-Flowers Manuscript Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2011 International Research and Exchanges Board Records Page ii Collection Summary Title: International Research and Exchanges Board Records Span Dates: 1947-1991 (bulk 1956-1983) ID No: MSS80702 Creator: International Research and Exchanges Board Creator: Inter-University Committee on Travel Grants Extent: 331,000 items; 331 cartons; 397.2 linear feet Language: Collection material in English and Russian Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: American service organization sponsoring scholarly exchange programs with the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the Cold War era. Correspondence, case files, subject files, reports, financial records, printed matter, and other records documenting participants’ personal experiences and research projects as well as the administrative operations, selection process, and collaborative projects of one of America’s principal academic exchange programs. International Research and Exchanges Board Records Page iii Contents Collection Summary .......................................................... ii Administrative Information ......................................................1 Organizational History..........................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Kyoto, Japan
    October 28 - November 2, 2006 ~ Kyoto, Japan ~ Final Program Table of Contents Welcome . .2 Acknowledgements . .3 Organization . .6 MDS .Committees .& Task. .Forces . .9 International .Congress .Registration .and Venue. .12 International .Congress .Information . 13-15 . Continuing .Medical .Education . .13 . Evaluations . .14 . Press .Room . .15 Program-at-a-Glance . .17 Scientific Session Definitions . .19 Scientific .Sessions . .21 Faculty . .51 Committee .& Task. .Force .Meetings . .56 Exhibitor .Information . .57 Exhibitor .Directory . .58 Floor .Plans . 62-64 Map .of .Kyoto . .66 Lunch Map . .67 Subway Map . .68 Social Events . .69 Poster .Session .1 . .72 Poster .Session .2 . .88 Poster .Session .3 . .102 Poster .Session .4 . .117 CME .Request .Form . .133 The Movement. .Disorder .Society’s 0th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Welcome Letter Dear Colleagues, On behalf of The Movement Disorder Society (MDS), we are pleased to welcome you to Kyoto, Japan for the 10th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders . The 10th International Congress has been designed to provide an innovative and comprehensive overview of the latest perspectives and research developments in the field of Movement Disorders . We encourage you to take every opportunity to participate in the Scientific Program which has drawn world renowned speakers and foremost experts in their respective fields . In the next days, the latest research regarding Movement Disorders will be presented and discussed in an open format, offering unique educational opportunities for all delegates . The International Congress convenes with a series of Opening Seminars and then continues with an array of Plenary, Parallel, Poster and Video Sessions, as well as Lunch Seminars, Controversies and Skills Workshops .
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Thesis Template
    PREPARING FOR THE WORKDAY: THE EFFECTS OF PRE-WORK STRATEGIES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL ENGAGEMENT AND WELL-BEING A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy August, 2019 PREPARING FOR THE WORKDAY: THE EFFECTS OF PRE-WORK STRATEGIES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL ENGAGEMENT AND WELL-BEING Megan Nolan Dissertation Approved: Accepted: Adviser Department Chair Dr. James Diefendorff Dr. Paul Levy Committee Member Interim Dean of the College Dr. Dennis Doverspike Dr. Linda Subich Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Paul Levy Dr. Chand Midha Committee Member Date Dr. Erin Makarius Committee Member Dr. Amanda Thayer ABSTRACT Recent research on reattachment (i.e., rebuilding a mental connection to work before starting work) has begun to provide evidence that individuals use specific strategies to facilitate the reconnection between life domains. The current study argues that reattachment is just one of several “pre-work” strategies that individuals can adopt to ease the transition between home and work domains and enhance their daily experiences. Pre-work is defined as active daily preparation for a given workday in which individuals bring their attention back to work, mobilize their energy, and/or reflect on the reasons they work. In addition to reattachment, individuals may use energy mobilization strategies to increase their sense of feeling energized and positive about work or positive reflection strategies to increase their sense of feeling autonomously motivated and emotionally connected with their work. The current study developed a psychometrically sound pre-work scale to accurately and reliably assess three distinct pre-work strategies and found support for a three-factor structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 40 (2012)Surname Index
    SanDiego Leaves & Saplings 2jl2.Yolume 40.No.4 Volume40 (2012)SurnameIndex Abbiss 122 Allen t22 Arguirre 42 Abbott 82,122 Allender t22 Argullo z Abell 122 Allengren t22 Arietta 82 Aberle 122 Allis 82 Armandes 123 Ableman 122 Allison 82, t22 Armintraut t23 Ables 42 Allum 7 Armstrong 51, 82, 99, Ablios 82 Almind t22 123 Abrahamson 122 Alms 99 Arnabas Abrams 122 Alvador 82 Arnago I zJ Abrellie 82 Alvarado 2,42,82.99 Arnbort 123 Acebedo 42 Alvarado Arndt 99 Ackard 122 Gracio 2 Arnold 82,123 Acker 122 Alverez t22 Arnot tzJ Ackerman 17.63.122 Alvord 122 Aronson I z.) Acuna 122 Ames 2,42,82.t22 Arostequi I z) Adair 122 Ammann 122 Arrmicia 42 Adames 42 Anderson 2,'1, 17,42, Arvezo 42 Adams 2,42,51,82. 82.99,122 Arzaga I zJ t22 Andeson 82 Ashber 42 Adison 122 Andreen 99 Ashby 99 Adot 122 Andren 82 Ashcroft t7 Adrian 63,99 Andrens 42 Asher t./.) Aguelar 2 Andrew 99 Ashley I z-) Aguero 42 Andrews t22 Asmus 99. t23 Aguilar 99 Andruker t22 Aspray 63 Aguillo 42 Angel 122 Athearn tlJ Aguirre 82 Anger 122 Athem 82 Angier Agular 2 51,123 Atherton I z-t Aichele 122 Anguzate t23 Atkenson 82 Aichle 122 Ankestade t23 Atkinson 42,82,123 Ailes 122 Anna 123 Aton tzJ Ailland 122 Ansley 7 <t Atwater 82.123 Aitkin 122 Antero 82 Atyeo 99 Akerman 122 Antes 42 Auberd I z-t Akers 122 Anthony t23 Auger t'7 Alberti 122 Antonia t23 Augustine I z-) Albright 122 Antonio 82 Auld 82, t23 Alcorn 122 Applegate tzJ Aumann tzJ Alden 63 Araiza 82, t23 Aust lz) Alderson 122 Aramebel 82 Austin 63 Alexander 99,122 Arbelbide tz) Avens t23 Aley 122 Ardans t23 Averbeck 123 Alfbrd 5t,82,
    [Show full text]
  • Bayer Switzerland 2019 [CHF] Individual Named Disclosure
    Bayer Switzerland 2019 [CHF] Individual Named Disclosure ‐ one line Donations and Contribution to costs of Events Fees for services and consultancy Total per HCP Grants Full‐Name HCx ID Principal Practice City of Principal Zip Code Donations and Events ‐ Events ‐ Events ‐ Travel & Fee for Fee for Total Address Practice Grants Sponsorship HCP Registration Fees Accommodation Service/Consulta Service/Consulta ncy ‐ Fees ncy ‐ Related Expenses Dr. Raffael À Wengen 1055263028 Tièchestrasse 99 Zürich 8037 0.00 0.00 74.40 1,761.60 0.00 0.00 1,836.00 Dr. Haythem Abbes 1051676484 Avenue du Grand‐ Sion 1950 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,016.30 0.00 0.00 2,016.30 Champsec 80 Dr. Marc Abdelmoula 40758485 Rue Des Alpes 2 Gland 1196 0.00 0.00 276.00 748.35 0.00 0.00 1,024.35 Dr. Linda Abrecht 40720858 Sägestrasse 37a Langnau im 3550 0.00 0.00 988.00 1,818.10 0.00 0.00 2,806.10 Emmental Dr. Rainer Adam 40742150 Neuengass‐ Bern 3011 0.00 0.00 800.00 6,298.00 0.00 0.00 7,098.00 Passage 2 Dr. Astrid Ahler 40537226 Vogesenstrasse Basel 4031 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 525.00 0.00 525.00 134 Dr. Friedrich Aigner 40540758 Seilerstrasse 8 Bern 3011 0.00 0.00 0.00 803.20 0.00 0.00 803.20 Dr. Dilara Akhoundova Sanoyan 1060469582 Rämistrasse 100 Zürich 8091 0.00 0.00 66.00 610.70 0.00 0.00 676.70 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 14Th FINA WORLD MASTERS CHAMPIONSHIPS
    14th FINA WORLD MASTERS CHAMPIONSHIPS 50 m Freestyle Women Results RANK SURNAME & NAME NAT BORN CAT TEAM FINAL AGE GROUP 95-99 CR : -- WR : 1:14.38 1 JOHNSTONE Kath NZL 1917 95-99 North Shore Masters 1:44.61 NOT CLASSIFIED NAGAOKA Mieko JPN 1914 95-99 Ksg Kirara Yanai Sc DNS AGE GROUP 90-94 QUALIFYING STANDARD: 1:41.97 CR : 1:02.28 WR : 54.97 1 KORNFELD Maurine USA 1921 90-94 Mission Viejo Nadadores 58.68 CR 2 FRITZE Ingeborg GER 1921 90-94 Duesseldorf Sc 1898 1:18.25 3 BOHM Barbara GER 1920 90-94 Tsv Siegsdorf 1:37.13 NOT CLASSIFIED GUILLAIS Michele FRA 1921 90-94 Entente Nautique Caennaise DNS AGE GROUP 85-89 QUALIFYING STANDARD: 1:24.15 CR : 48.25 WR : 44.70 1 KOKORINA Olga RUS 1923 85-89 Neva Stars 51.05 2 KAPCAROVA Magdalena SVK 1927 85-89 Pvk Bratislava 52.04 3 GJORES Kerstin SWE 1927 85-89 Simklubben Nautilus 52.22 4 WIDAHL Eva-Britt SWE 1926 85-89 Simklubben Nautilus 54.44 5 GENOULAZ Louisette FRA 1925 85-89 Ems Bron 1:14.23 6 KLOOS Kascha RSA 1925 85-89 Cape Town Masters Sc 1:18.42 NOT CLASSIFIED HALTER Susan GBR 1927 85-89 Camden Swiss Cottage Sc DNS AGE GROUP 80-84 QUALIFYING STANDARD: 1:04.35 CR : 41.96 WR : 38.64 1 ASHER Jane GBR 1931 80-84 Kings Cormorants 38.60 WR 2 SCOTT Nancy GBR 1931 80-84 Caledonia Masters 49.49 3 GRILLI Britt SWE 1928 80-84 Simklubben Nautilus 49.93 4 FEITOSA Sonia BRA 1931 80-84 Clube De Regatas Icarai 52.60 5 GRANE Marianne SWE 1931 80-84 Simklubben Nautilus 55.02 6 GOGGIN Georgia USA 1929 80-84 Masters Of South Texas 56.52 7 MURAYAMA Chieko JPN 1930 80-84 Csc Chiba 1:00.66 8 PARODI Marlene ARG 1932
    [Show full text]
  • 1 January 25, 2016 Jami L. Cantore, Deputy Attorney General California Department of Justice Charitable Trusts Section 300 S. Sp
    January 25, 2016 Jami L. Cantore, Deputy Attorney General California Department of Justice Charitable Trusts Section 300 S. Spring St., Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Re: December 11, 2015 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Donor Confidentiality Purportedly Under Title 11, Division 1, Chapter 4 Dear Ms. Cantore: The 63 undersigned nonprofit organizations, entities, and lawyers, as well as the over 1,400 other interested parties concerned about privacy from government and the right of private association, collectively representing millions of donors and millions more potential donors across the country, and having many decades of experience in informing citizens of causes that are important for Americans and their communities,1 as well as having decades of experience developing relationships and private associations with citizen donors, submit these comments in response to the above-captioned proposed rulemaking about confidentiality of donor names 1 The causes of America’s nonprofit organizations cover many issues -- controversial and not -- such as medicine and science, religion and politics, social welfare, public policy and private actions, cures for diseases, feeding the poor, housing the homeless, caring for wounded veterans and their families, providing care for abused and abandoned animals, and promoting safety in our communities. Cumulatively, they touch on every major aspect of society. Some inform citizens about civil liberties, the Constitution, and other law. Many criticize actions taken by the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, and are independent checks on government. Some even attempt to hold law enforcement officials such as the Attorney General accountable. They are used to criticize large private institutions and even other nonprofit entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Wood Through the Eyes of a Cultural Conservator
    Article Forest Wood through the Eyes of a Cultural Conservator Angeliki Zisi Department of Collection Management, Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, Kabelgata 34, 0580 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] Abstract: If prehistoric and historical time were placed into the time span of the existence of our universe, then the act of archaeology could be defined as the act of digging up what was only buried yesterday. So, conservation is about preserving a moment that has just become past time, yet significant. It is a moment of human creativity and ingenuity. It is not strange that forest wood has become the material to convey such moments. Forest wood is a living, everlasting source growing without human intervention, within reach, easy to use and shape thinking both great and small. It does not have to be a wooden ship; it can be a mere piece of charcoal. For it is what surrounded humans in the past which archaeologists seek and use to weave human history, and what conservators bring back to context by reviving it. This work presents forest wood as an artefact and its preservation challenges as such. It touches on its natural degradation processes through burial, compromised properties and eventual conservation. Both dry and waterlogged wood are included. The overarching aim of this paper is to pay tribute, preserve and inspire the long-standing, open dialog and fruitful collaboration between cultural conservators and forest and wood scientists. Keywords: historical wood; archaeological wood; wood degradation; artefact; heritage; conservation; cultural conservator Citation: Zisi, A. Forest Wood through the Eyes of a Cultural 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Naturalized Citizens 1856-1934 Marin County, California
    INDEX OF NATURALIZED CITIZENS 1856-1934 MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA These records were copied from the original index book, now in the possession of the National Archives, Pacific Branch, San Bruno, California; for ease in researching, I have sorted them in alphabetical order rather than the original chronological order. Catherine L. Gowdy Name Nationality Date of Admission Court Page of Record ACKERMANN, Claus Germany July 21, 1902 Superior Bk. 2, p. 41-Q ADAM, H. O. Germany June 11, 1894 Superior Bk. 1, p. 164 ADAMS, Alvy Gordon Great Britain Sept. 6, 1918 Superior Bk. 4, p. 139 ADAMS, Frank Byzan Mexico May 2, 1892 Superior Bk. 2, p. 27 ADAMS, Gus F. Switzerland July 28, 1906 Superior Bk. 3, p. 203 ADAMS, Josiah Canada Aug. 7, 1900 Superior Bk. 2, p. 96 ADDISON, Robert Martin Great Britain May 3, 1934 Superior Bk. 9, p. 969 AGEZELOW?, William Russia Aug. 16, 1900 Superior Bk. 2, p. 26 AGNEW, James Ireland Apr. 23, 1856 7th District Bk. A, p. 232 AGUIAR, Antonio Victius? Portugal Jan. 30, 1904 Superior Bk. 3, p. 17 AHERN, William Ireland Aug. 6, 1894 Superior Bk. 1, p. 173 AIREY, Henry James England March 6, 1914 Superior Bk. 3, p. 60 ALBERELLI, Rose Italy May 13, 1932 Superior Bk. 8, p. 929 ALBERT, Edward Switzerland July 5, 1912 Superior Bk. 2, p. 71 ALBERTI, Emilio Switzerland July 25, 1898 Superior Bk. 2, p. 3 ALBERTI, Joseph Switzerland July 28, 1884 Superior Bk. 1, p. 53 ALBERTI, Lazzaro Switzerland Oct. 19, 1891 Superior Bk. 2, p. 23 ALBERTI, Paul Switzerland July 29, 1892 Superior Bk.
    [Show full text]
  • Parkin Binds Toα/Яtubulin and Increases Their Ubiquitination And
    3316 • The Journal of Neuroscience, April 15, 2003 • 23(8):3316–3324 Parkin Binds to ␣/␤ Tubulin and Increases their Ubiquitination and Degradation Yong Ren, Jinghui Zhao, and Jian Feng Department of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14214 In addition to inhibiting the mitochondrial respiratory chain, toxins known to cause Parkinson’s disease (PD), such as 1-methyl-4- phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine and rotenone, also strongly depolymerize microtubules and increase tubulin degradation. Microtu- bules are polymers of tubulin ␣/␤ heterodimers, whose correct folding requires coordinated actions of cellular chaperonins and cofac- tors. Misfolded tubulin monomers are highly toxic and quickly degraded through a hitherto unknown mechanism. Here we report that parkin, a protein–ubiquitin E3 ligase linked to PD, was tightly bound to microtubules in taxol-mediated microtubule coassembly assays. In lysates from the rat brain or transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, ␣-tubulin and ␤-tubulin were strongly coimmu- noprecipitated with parkin at 4°C in the presence of colchicine, a condition in which tubulin exits as ␣/␤ heterodimers. At the subcellular level, parkin exhibited punctate immunostaining along microtubules in rat brain sections, cultured primary neurons, glial cells, and cell lines. This pattern of subcellular localization was abolished in cells treated with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug colchicine. The binding between parkin and tubulin apparently led to increased ubiquitination and accelerated degradation of ␣- and ␤-tubulins in HEK293 cells. Similarly ubiquitinated tubulins were also observed in rat brain lysates. Furthermore, parkin mutants found in PD patients did not ubiquitinate or degrade either tubulin.
    [Show full text]
  • Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument
    Volume V: Response to Comments Comment Category 25 – Research 2) While marine debris is a larger problem in shallow water because many items float rather than sink, at what depth does it cease to be of concern? To our knowledge, there has never been a coordinated depth zonation study for marine debris starting from land and going down to at least 400 m at a site known for its accumulation (e.g., Pearl and Hermes) and/or a site near a monk seal colony. Monk seals, as I am sure most are aware, have been documented to frequent precious coral beds down to depths of 400 m (see Frank Parrish’s studies and his National Geographic Explorer production). We think a study of this type could and should be mentioned in the plan. How much bottomfishing debris (anchors, anchor lines, fishing leads and fishing lines) exists on popular deepwater fishing sites? This might be important to document particularly following the closure of the fishery in the next 4-5 years. In the main Hawaiian Islands, alien species have been documented in deeper than typical SCUBA depths (see Sam Kahng’s various papers on Carijoa riseii). Is this species in the monument and if so, how deep does it go given that monument waters are clearer and thus likely pushing it to even deeper depths than in the MHI (C. riseii is negatively phototaxic). How big of a threat is it to the monument’s black coral beds? Again, we think this should be mentioned as a potential research effort in the plan.
    [Show full text]