Plant Virus Replication (Plant Virus Infection Process)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plant Virus Replication (Plant Virus Infection Process) Plant Virus replication (Plant virus infection process) P.N. Sharma Department of Plant Pathology, CSK HPKV, Palampur (H.P.) INTRODUCTION Virus infection & replication – A synonym Virus is a nucleo-protein having RNA or DNA as a genetic material. RNA or DNA may be ss or ds, ssRNA may be +ve or –ve sense. Most of plant virus infect a limited number of different plant species and a few have a wide host range. Viruses do not produce any kind of reproductive structure, they multiply by using host machinery. CONCEPT Two separate system involved in synthesis of protein and nucleic acid These two components then combine & form a nucleo-protein particle › Thus involves two inter-related biosynthetic mechanisms of the host The n-acid directs the synthesis of progeny n-acid and this in turn, › In association with host ribosome's form proteins by multistep process. Host functions used by plant viruses • Components for virus replication • (amino-acids & nucleotides synthesized by host cell metabolism for virus) • Energy: • involved in polymerization of viral proteins and n-RNA synthesis as nucleoside triphosphate • Protein synthesis • Viruses use ribosomes, tRNA and associated enzymes & factors of host • Involve 80S cytoplasmic ribosome system • Nucleic acid synthesis • Generally almost all viruses code for an enzyme or enzymes involved in synthesis of their n-acids but may not contribute the polypeptides involved • Some viruses need host polymerases like Caulimoviruses the viral DNA enters host cell nucleus and transcribe into RNA form by host’s DdRp II. • In majority of RNA viruses, RdRp is involved in replication complex. • Structural components of the cell • Membrane bound complexes ( endoplasmic reticulum; cytoskeleton REPLICATION STRATEGY • Virus absorption into host cells through wounds • Virus entry into host cells and to replication sites in the cells • Uncoating or disassembly of n-acid • Translation and transcription of the viral genome: • Replication of viral n-acid • Viral genome either translated directly if +ve ssRNA or mRNAs • Gene products like replicases or viral coat protein and other proteins • Assembly or maturation of new virus particles • Transport o infective particles from cell to cell and over long distances with in the plants VIRAL GENOME EXPRESSION • I: is transcription of dsDNA usually by host-DdRP • II: is transcription of ssDNA to give ds template for I (Gemini viruses) • III: is transcription of dsRNA usually by virus coded RdRp (Reoviruses) • IV: is replication of +ve stand RNA via –ve stand template by virus coded RdRp; the viral (+) strand is often the template for the early translation (=ve sense RNA viruses) • V: is the transcription o _ve sense virus genome by virus coded RdRp ( Tospoviruses) • VI: is the reverse transcription of RNA stage of retro and para- retroviruses leading to dsDNA template for mRNA transcription. MAJOR EVENTS Entry Replication Movement MODE OF ENTRY Wounds Mechanically TMV, BCMV, PVX, PYDV, Vectors PLRV,TLCV, WTV Pollen Grain Prunus necrotic ring spot, Tobacco ring spot of soybean Barley stripe mosaic virus Seeds or vegetative propagation BCMV, CMV, Pea stripe virus Pinocyte CPMV, Pea enation mosaic Cowpea Chloretic mottle virus Fungal parasite TNV , Barley yellow mosaic virus Tobacco stunt virus Ectodesmata TMV Epidermal hair TMV UNCOATING OF VIRUS PARTICLE Uncoating is removal of virus protein which is their around the nucleic acid. The ability of uncoating depends upon structure of virus coat protein. Different experiments indicating uncoating of viral RNA TMV multiplication detected some hours earlier when inoculation is done by RNA. Symptoms appears several hours earlier if naked TMV RNA is used as inoculum. Infectible sites produced by TMV RNA inoculum become resistant to UV radiation immediately after inoculation. MECHANISM OF REPLICATION • Production of new RNA molecule identical to template RNA is called Replication. • Viral RNA performs two function • It serves as mRNA, immediately binds to ribosome and directs the synthesis of virus specific proteins. • Among which one protein inhibits host protein and host RNA synthesis, and • other protein is specific viral replicating enzyme i.e. RNA polymerase or replicase. Parental viral RNA is then displaced from ribosome, triggers the replication of viral RNA during which it behaves as a template or plus strand for synthesis of minus strand in presence of specific replicase already synthesized. RNA VIRUS STRATEGIES RNA -> RNA RNA-dependent RNA polymerase RNA -> DNA RNA-dependent DNA polymerase - reverse transcriptase Host cell DNA -> RNA DNA-dependent RNA polymerase ALL RNA VIRUSES CODE FOR A POLYMERASE NEED TO MAKE MRNA PLUS (POSITIVE) SENSE RNA GENOMES (+ve) sense mRNA AAA NEED TO MAKE MRNA MINUS (NEGATIVE) SENSE RNA GENOMES (+ve) sense mRNA AAA (-ve) sense genomic RNA NEED TO MAKE mRNA MINUS (NEGATIVE) SENSE RNA GENOMES RNA polymerase must be packaged in virion (+ve) sense mRNA AAA If used, RNA modifying (-ve) sense genomic RNA enzymes are packaged in virion. NEED TO MAKE mRNA DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA GENOMES RNA polymerase must be packaged in virion. (+ve) sense mRNA AAA If used, RNA modifying Double-stranded genomic RNA enzymes are packaged in virion. NEED TO MAKE MRNA RETROVIRUSES Reverse transcriptase must be packaged in virion. DS DS DNA DNA +VE RNA • Once viral genome enter the cell- replication start • Its mediated by a replicase enzyme, • possibly coded partially by the viral genome and host genome. • In the presence of polymerase, a –ve stand complementary to the genome +ve strand is formed. • -ve strand serve as template for the synthesis of progeny or new +ve stand RNA by means of replicase enzyme forming a partially double stranded, partially single stranded structure, called Replicative intermediate (RI) • A part of viral RNA form coat protein • Synthesis of new RNA is from the 3’ to 5’ ends of the templates. • Replication occurs in a replication complex that comprises of the template, newly synthesized RNA, the replicase and host factors. • The viral RNA synthesizing systems have been shown to produce two kinds of RNA structures: • Replicative form (RF)- it is fully base paired ds and may represent RNA molecules that have seized the replication • Replication intermediate (RI) is only partly ds and contains several ss tails. This structure is closely related to that actually replicating the viral RNA. RI: Protein Synthesis in Plant Cell Infection Cycle of TMV Sites for multiplication Mostly nucleus and cytoplasm serve as sites for replication and assembly of virus. In some cases, chloroplast and other cell organelles perform the same function. In Potex, Caulimo, Gemini and Tobamo virus replication and assembly takes place in nucleus and from where it moves to cytoplasm. In Bromo, Poty, Nepo, Como viruses, replication and assembly takes place in cytoplasm. In Tymoviruses replication takes place in chloroplast. entry/penetration* Attachment/Penetration: bind to specific surface receptors; Entry: fuse with or engulfed by the genome plasma membrane uncoated mechanical introduction initially. NO evidence attach to specific receptor sites on cell wall mRNA replication Transmission: : aerosols, break in proteins skin, blood, sexual contact : insects, fungi, nematodes, abrasion, seeds, pollen, vegetative propagation progeny virion assembly Release: lyse cells or bud through plasma membrane “channel” through “release” * wall (MPs) without lysis CAULIFLOWER MOSAIC VIRUS GENOME STRUCTURE •Seven ORFs on CaMV genome •Translation of seven proteins from two transcripts Translation regulator Movement protein •ORF 2 is the only dispensable ORF Helper component •ORFs 6 and 7 are Inclusion, involved in translation transactivator Replication regulation factor •Packaged genomic DNA has discontinuities Reverse transcriptase Coat on both strands protein •Replication is from tRNAmet primer CAULIMOVIRUS LIFE CYCLE • Virus enters plant cell, capsid protein is removed Helper Inclusion factor • dsDNA enters nucleus; gaps closed; transcription to 35S and 19S RNAs Mature particle with DNA • In the cytoplasm, the 19S RNA is translated to produce protein that forms inclusion bodies •Five ORFs are translated from 35S RNA by complex combination of strategies •Other copies of 35S RNA are reverse transcribed and packaged into virions •Particles exit cells through plasmodesmata or by aphids Rolling Circle DNA Replication • Common in plasmid or bacteriophage DNA and and the circular RNA genome of viroidse.g. geminiviruses • Rolling circle DNA replication is initiated by an initiator protein encoded by the plasmid or bacteriophage DNA, which nicks one strand of the double-stranded, circular DNA molecule at a site called the double-strand origin, or DSO. • The initiator protein remains bound to the 5' phosphate end of the nicked strand, and the free 3' hydroxyl end is released to serve as a primer for DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase III. • Using the unnicked strand as a template, replication proceeds around the circular DNA molecule, displacing the nicked strand as single-stranded DNA. Displacement of the nicked strand is carried out by a host-encoded helicase called PcrA (plasmid copy reduced) in the presence of the plasmid replication initiation protein. • Continued DNA synthesis can produce multiple single-stranded linear copies of the original DNA in a continuous head-to-tail series called a concatemer. • These linear copies can be converted to double-stranded circular molecules through the following process: • First,
Recommended publications
  • Changes to Virus Taxonomy 2004
    Arch Virol (2005) 150: 189–198 DOI 10.1007/s00705-004-0429-1 Changes to virus taxonomy 2004 M. A. Mayo (ICTV Secretary) Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, U.K. Received July 30, 2004; accepted September 25, 2004 Published online November 10, 2004 c Springer-Verlag 2004 This note presents a compilation of recent changes to virus taxonomy decided by voting by the ICTV membership following recommendations from the ICTV Executive Committee. The changes are presented in the Table as decisions promoted by the Subcommittees of the EC and are grouped according to the major hosts of the viruses involved. These new taxa will be presented in more detail in the 8th ICTV Report scheduled to be published near the end of 2004 (Fauquet et al., 2004). Fauquet, C.M., Mayo, M.A., Maniloff, J., Desselberger, U., and Ball, L.A. (eds) (2004). Virus Taxonomy, VIIIth Report of the ICTV. Elsevier/Academic Press, London, pp. 1258. Recent changes to virus taxonomy Viruses of vertebrates Family Arenaviridae • Designate Cupixi virus as a species in the genus Arenavirus • Designate Bear Canyon virus as a species in the genus Arenavirus • Designate Allpahuayo virus as a species in the genus Arenavirus Family Birnaviridae • Assign Blotched snakehead virus as an unassigned species in family Birnaviridae Family Circoviridae • Create a new genus (Anellovirus) with Torque teno virus as type species Family Coronaviridae • Recognize a new species Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the genus Coro- navirus, family Coronaviridae, order Nidovirales
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis, Distribution, and Characterization of Microsatellites in Orf Virus Genome
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Comparative analysis, distribution, and characterization of microsatellites in Orf virus genome Basanta Pravas Sahu1, Prativa Majee 1, Ravi Raj Singh1, Anjan Sahoo2 & Debasis Nayak 1* Genome-wide in-silico identifcation of microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in the Orf virus (ORFV), the causative agent of contagious ecthyma has been carried out to investigate the type, distribution and its potential role in the genome evolution. We have investigated eleven ORFV strains, which resulted in the presence of 1,036–1,181 microsatellites per strain. The further screening revealed the presence of 83–107 compound SSRs (cSSRs) per genome. Our analysis indicates the dinucleotide (76.9%) repeats to be the most abundant, followed by trinucleotide (17.7%), mononucleotide (4.9%), tetranucleotide (0.4%) and hexanucleotide (0.2%) repeats. The Relative Abundance (RA) and Relative Density (RD) of these SSRs varied between 7.6–8.4 and 53.0–59.5 bp/ kb, respectively. While in the case of cSSRs, the RA and RD ranged from 0.6–0.8 and 12.1–17.0 bp/kb, respectively. Regression analysis of all parameters like the incident of SSRs, RA, and RD signifcantly correlated with the GC content. But in a case of genome size, except incident SSRs, all other parameters were non-signifcantly correlated. Nearly all cSSRs were composed of two microsatellites, which showed no biasedness to a particular motif. Motif duplication pattern, such as, (C)-x-(C), (TG)- x-(TG), (AT)-x-(AT), (TC)- x-(TC) and self-complementary motifs, such as (GC)-x-(CG), (TC)-x-(AG), (GT)-x-(CA) and (TC)-x-(AG) were observed in the cSSRs.
    [Show full text]
  • The P1N-PISPO Trans-Frame Gene of Sweet Potato Feathery Mottle
    crossmark The P1N-PISPO trans-Frame Gene of Sweet Potato Feathery Mottle Potyvirus Is Produced during Virus Infection and Functions as an RNA Silencing Suppressor Downloaded from Ares Mingot,a Adrián Valli,b Bernardo Rodamilans,c David San León,c David C. Baulcombe,b Juan Antonio García,c Juan José López-Moyaa Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spaina; Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdomb; Centro Nacional de Biotecnología CNB, CSIC, Madrid, Spainc ABSTRACT The positive-sense RNA genome of Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV) (genus Potyvirus, family Potyviridae) contains a /large open reading frame (ORF) of 3,494 codons translatable as a polyprotein and two embedded shorter ORFs in the ؊1 frame: http://jvi.asm.org PISPO, of 230 codons, and PIPO, of 66 codons, located in the P1 and P3 regions, respectively. PISPO is specific to some sweet potato-infecting potyviruses, while PIPO is present in all potyvirids. In SPFMV these two extra ORFs are preceded by conserved G2A6 motifs. We have shown recently that a polymerase slippage mechanism at these sites could produce transcripts bringing these ORFs in frame with the upstream polyprotein, thus leading to P1N-PISPO and P3N-PIPO products (B. Rodamilans, A. Valli, A. Mingot, D. San Leon, D. B. Baulcombe, J. J. Lopez-Moya, and J.A. Garcia, J Virol 89:6965–6967, 2015, doi:10.1128/JVI.00 337-15). Here, we demonstrate by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry that both P1 and P1N-PISPO are produced during viral infection and coexist in SPFMV-infected Ipomoea batatas plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Vaccines Against Enveloped Viruses in Plants: Making the Impossible, Difficult
    Review Producing Vaccines against Enveloped Viruses in Plants: Making the Impossible, Difficult Hadrien Peyret , John F. C. Steele † , Jae-Wan Jung, Eva C. Thuenemann , Yulia Meshcheriakova and George P. Lomonossoff * Department of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK; [email protected] (H.P.); [email protected] (J.F.C.S.); [email protected] (J.-W.J.); [email protected] (E.C.T.); [email protected] (Y.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Current address: Piramal Healthcare UK Ltd., Piramal Pharma Solutions, Northumberland NE61 3YA, UK. Abstract: The past 30 years have seen the growth of plant molecular farming as an approach to the production of recombinant proteins for pharmaceutical and biotechnological uses. Much of this effort has focused on producing vaccine candidates against viral diseases, including those caused by enveloped viruses. These represent a particular challenge given the difficulties associated with expressing and purifying membrane-bound proteins and achieving correct assembly. Despite this, there have been notable successes both from a biochemical and a clinical perspective, with a number of clinical trials showing great promise. This review will explore the history and current status of plant-produced vaccine candidates against enveloped viruses to date, with a particular focus on virus-like particles (VLPs), which mimic authentic virus structures but do not contain infectious genetic material. Citation: Peyret, H.; Steele, J.F.C.; Jung, J.-W.; Thuenemann, E.C.; Keywords: alphavirus; Bunyavirales; coronavirus; Flaviviridae; hepatitis B virus; human immunode- Meshcheriakova, Y.; Lomonossoff, ficiency virus; Influenza virus; newcastle disease virus; plant molecular farming; plant-produced G.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of P1 Leader Proteases of the Potyviridae Family
    Characterization of P1 leader proteases of the Potyviridae family and identification of the host factors involved in their proteolytic activity during viral infection Hongying Shan Ph.D. Dissertation Madrid 2018 UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE MADRID Facultad de Ciencias Departamento de Biología Molecular Characterization of P1 leader proteases of the Potyviridae family and identification of the host factors involved in their proteolytic activity during viral infection Hongying Shan This thesis is performed in Departamento de Genética Molecular de Plantas of Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC) under the supervision of Dr. Juan Antonio García and Dr. Bernardo Rodamilans Ramos Madrid 2018 Acknowledgements First of all, I want to express my appreciation to thesis supervisors Bernardo Rodamilans and Juan Antonio García, who gave the dedicated guidance to this thesis. I also want to say thanks to Carmen Simón-Mateo, Fabio Pasin, Raquel Piqueras, Beatriz García, Mingmin, Zhengnan, Wenli, Linlin, Ruiqiang, Runhong and Yuwei, who helped me and provided interesting suggestions for the thesis as well as technical support. Thanks to the people in the greenhouse (Tomás Heras, Alejandro Barrasa and Esperanza Parrilla), in vitro plant culture facility (María Luisa Peinado and Beatriz Casal), advanced light microscopy (Sylvia Gutiérrez and Ana Oña), photography service (Inés Poveda) and proteomics facility (Sergio Ciordia and María Carmen Mena). Thanks a lot to all the assistance from lab313 colleagues. Thanks a lot to the whole CNB. Thanks a lot to the Chinese Scholarship Council. Thanks a lot to all my friends. Thanks a lot to my family. Madrid 20/03/2018 Index I CONTENTS Abbreviations………………………………………….……………………….……...VII Viruses cited…………………………………………………………………..……...XIII Summary…………………………………………………………………...….…….XVII Resumen…………………………………………………………......…...…………..XXI I.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA-Based Technologies for Engineering Plant Virus Resistance
    plants Review RNA-Based Technologies for Engineering Plant Virus Resistance Michael Taliansky 1,2,*, Viktoria Samarskaya 1, Sergey K. Zavriev 1 , Igor Fesenko 1 , Natalia O. Kalinina 1,3 and Andrew J. Love 2,* 1 Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (V.S.); [email protected] (S.K.Z.); [email protected] (I.F.); [email protected] (N.O.K.) 2 The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK 3 Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.T.); [email protected] (A.J.L.) Abstract: In recent years, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have gained unprecedented attention as new and crucial players in the regulation of numerous cellular processes and disease responses. In this review, we describe how diverse ncRNAs, including both small RNAs and long ncRNAs, may be used to engineer resistance against plant viruses. We discuss how double-stranded RNAs and small RNAs, such as artificial microRNAs and trans-acting small interfering RNAs, either produced in transgenic plants or delivered exogenously to non-transgenic plants, may constitute powerful RNA interference (RNAi)-based technology that can be exploited to control plant viruses. Additionally, we describe how RNA guided CRISPR-CAS gene-editing systems have been deployed to inhibit plant virus infections, and we provide a comparative analysis of RNAi approaches and CRISPR-Cas technology. The two main strategies for engineering virus resistance are also discussed, including direct targeting of viral DNA or RNA, or inactivation of plant host susceptibility genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Virus World As an Evolutionary Network of Viruses and Capsidless Selfish Elements
    Virus World as an Evolutionary Network of Viruses and Capsidless Selfish Elements Koonin, E. V., & Dolja, V. V. (2014). Virus World as an Evolutionary Network of Viruses and Capsidless Selfish Elements. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 78(2), 278-303. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00049-13 10.1128/MMBR.00049-13 American Society for Microbiology Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Virus World as an Evolutionary Network of Viruses and Capsidless Selfish Elements Eugene V. Koonin,a Valerian V. Doljab National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USAa; Department of Botany and Plant Pathology and Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USAb Downloaded from SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................278 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................278 PREVALENCE OF REPLICATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS COMPARED TO CAPSID PROTEINS AMONG VIRUS HALLMARK GENES.......................279 CLASSIFICATION OF VIRUSES BY REPLICATION-EXPRESSION STRATEGY: TYPICAL VIRUSES AND CAPSIDLESS FORMS ................................279 EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN VIRUSES AND CAPSIDLESS VIRUS-LIKE GENETIC ELEMENTS ..............................................280 Capsidless Derivatives of Positive-Strand RNA Viruses....................................................................................................280
    [Show full text]
  • Sequences and Phylogenies of Plant Pararetroviruses, Viruses and Transposable Elements
    Hansen and Heslop-Harrison. 2004. Adv.Bot.Res. 41: 165-193. Page 1 of 34. FROM: 231. Hansen CN, Heslop-Harrison JS. 2004 . Sequences and phylogenies of plant pararetroviruses, viruses and transposable elements. Advances in Botanical Research 41 : 165-193. Sequences and Phylogenies of 5 Plant Pararetroviruses, Viruses and Transposable Elements CELIA HANSEN AND JS HESLOP-HARRISON* DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY 10 UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER LEICESTER LE1 7RH, UK *AUTHOR FOR CORRESPONDENCE E-MAIL: [email protected] 15 WEBSITE: WWW.MOLCYT.COM I. Introduction ............................................................................................................2 A. Plant genome organization................................................................................2 20 B. Retroelements in the genome ............................................................................3 C. Reverse transcriptase.........................................................................................4 D. Viruses ..............................................................................................................5 II. Retroelements........................................................................................................5 A. Viral retroelements – Retrovirales....................................................................6 25 B. Non-viral retroelements – Retrales ...................................................................7 III. Viral and non-viral elements................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Ribosome Shunting, Polycistronic Translation, and Evasion of Antiviral Defenses in Plant Pararetroviruses and Beyond Mikhail M
    Ribosome Shunting, Polycistronic Translation, and Evasion of Antiviral Defenses in Plant Pararetroviruses and Beyond Mikhail M. Pooggin, Lyuba Ryabova To cite this version: Mikhail M. Pooggin, Lyuba Ryabova. Ribosome Shunting, Polycistronic Translation, and Evasion of Antiviral Defenses in Plant Pararetroviruses and Beyond. Frontiers in Microbiology, Frontiers Media, 2018, 9, pp.644. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00644. hal-02289592 HAL Id: hal-02289592 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02289592 Submitted on 16 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License fmicb-09-00644 April 9, 2018 Time: 16:25 # 1 REVIEW published: 10 April 2018 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00644 Ribosome Shunting, Polycistronic Translation, and Evasion of Antiviral Defenses in Plant Pararetroviruses and Beyond Mikhail M. Pooggin1* and Lyubov A. Ryabova2* 1 INRA, UMR Biologie et Génétique des Interactions Plante-Parasite, Montpellier, France, 2 Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPR 2357, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France Viruses have compact genomes and usually translate more than one protein from polycistronic RNAs using leaky scanning, frameshifting, stop codon suppression or reinitiation mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Structure and Organization of a Member of a Novel and Distinct Species of the Genus Caulimovirus Associated with Dahlia Mosaic
    Arch Virol DOI 10.1007/s00705-008-0043-8 BRIEF REPORT Genome structure and organization of a member of a novel and distinct species of the genus Caulimovirus associated with dahlia mosaic V. Pahalawatta Æ K. L. Druffel Æ S. D. Wyatt Æ K. C. Eastwell Æ H. R. Pappu Received: 21 April 2007 / Accepted: 31 December 2007 Ó Springer-Verlag 2008 Abstract The genome structure and organization of a Dahlia mosaic caulimovirus (DMV) is an important viral new and distinct caulimovirus that is widespread in dahlia pathogen of dahlia (Dahlia variabilis) in the US and (Dahlia variabilis) was determined. The double-stranded several parts of the world. First reported from Germany in DNA genome was ca. 7.0 kb in size and shared many of 1928, the virus is considered to be one of the most the features of the members of the genus Caulimovirus, important disease constraints affecting dahlias. DMV is a such as the presence of genes potentially coding for the member of the family Caulimoviridae, genus Caulimovi- movement protein, the inclusion body protein, and the rus with a circular double-stranded DNA genome of reverse transcriptase (RT), and an intergenic region con- approximately 8 kb [23]. The symptomatology, propaga- sisting of a potential 35S promoter. However, the virus tive hosts and the role of various aphid species in virus differed from the previously described dahlia mosaic transmission have been reported [1, 4, 5]. The most caulimovirus and other known caulimoviruses in that the characteristic symptoms of the disease include mosaic and aphid transmission factor (ATF) was absent and the puta- vein-banding accompanied by stunting and leaf distortion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interactions of Plant Viruses with the Phloem Svetlana Y
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository Hitchhikers, highway tolls and roadworks: the interactions of plant viruses with the phloem Svetlana Y. Folimonova1, Jens Tilsner2,3 1University of Florida, Plant Pathology Department, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 2Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St Andrews, BMS Building, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, United Kingdom 3Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] Abstract The phloem is of central importance to plant viruses, providing the route by which they spread throughout their host. Compared with virus movement in non-vascular tissue, phloem entry, exit, and long-distance translocation usually involve additional viral factors and complex virus-host interactions, probably, because the phloem has evolved additional protection against these molecular ‘hitchhikers’. Recent progress in understanding phloem trafficking of endogenous mRNAs along with observations of membranous viral replication ‘factories’ in sieve elements challenge existing conceptions of virus long-distance transport. At the same time, the central role of the phloem in plant defences against viruses and the sophisticated viral manipulation of this host tissue are beginning to emerge. Introduction For plant-infecting viruses, the phloem is of particular importance, as it provides the fastest way to spread throughout the host in a race against systemic defence responses, in order to optimize viral load and reach tissues favoring host-to-host transmission [1;2]. Perhaps because it is a gatekeeper to systemic infection, the phloem appears to be specially protected against viruses, as its successful invasion often requires additional viral proteins compared with non-vascular movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus
    Supplementary Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: The Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus Kiran R. Gadhave 1,2,*,†, Saurabh Gautam 3,†, David A. Rasmussen 2 and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan 3 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]. † Authors contributed equally. Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: date Abstract: Potyviruses are the largest group of plant infecting RNA viruses that cause significant losses in a wide range of crops across the globe. The majority of viruses in the genus Potyvirus are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner and have been extensively studied vis-à-vis their structure, taxonomy, evolution, diagnosis, transmission and molecular interactions with hosts. This comprehensive review exclusively discusses potyviruses and their transmission by aphid vectors, specifically in the light of several virus, aphid and plant factors, and how their interplay influences potyviral binding in aphids, aphid behavior and fitness, host plant biochemistry, virus epidemics, and transmission bottlenecks. We present the heatmap of the global distribution of potyvirus species, variation in the potyviral coat protein gene, and top aphid vectors of potyviruses. Lastly, we examine how the fundamental understanding of these multi-partite interactions through multi-omics approaches is already contributing to, and can have future implications for, devising effective and sustainable management strategies against aphid- transmitted potyviruses to global agriculture.
    [Show full text]