DOCSLIB.ORG

Brexit Power Matrix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brexit Power Matrix 20 POLITICO BREXIT JUNE 22, 2017 Brexit power matrix Arrows indicate movement from the initial Brexit power matrix MOST IMPORTANT IN LONDON Theresa May (United Kingdom) Emmanuel Macron Angela Merkel (France) (Germany) Paul Dacre Rupert Murdoch George Osborne House of Lords Democratic (United Kingdom) (United States) (United Kingdom) (United Kingdom) Unionist Party (United Kingdom) Olly Robbins Michel Barnier (United Kingdom) (EU) Jeremy Corbyn David Davis (United Kingdom) (United Kingdom) Parliament (EU) Ruth Davidson Jeremy Heywood (United Kingdom) (United Kingdom) Damian Green (United Kingdom) Boris Johnson Wolfgang Schäuble (United Kingdom) (Germany) Donald Tusk (EU) Gavin Barwell (United Kingdom) Uwe Corsepius (Germany) Peter Ptassek Didier Seeuws Tim Barrow Philip Hammond (Germany) (EU) (United Kingdom) Team DExEU* (United Kingdom) (United Kingdom) Simon Mariano Rajoy Case Manfred Weber (United Alex Ellis (Spain) (EU) Kingdom) Jean-Claude (United Kingdom) Juncker Philip Rycroft (EU) (United Kingdom) Katrina Williams Liam Fox (United Kingdom) Sabine Weyand (United Kingdom) Nicola Sturgeon Mark Carney (EU) (United Kingdom) (United Kingdom) Leo Varadkar Mario Draghi Amber Rudd (Ireland) (EU) (United Kingdom) Court of Justice Alfonso Dastis (EU) (Spain) Keir Starmer MOST IMPORTANT IN BRUSSELS (United Kingdom) Christian Noyer (France) Constitutional court EU presidency Nina Obermaier (Germany) (Estonia) (EU) Catherine Webb Tony Blair (United Kingdom) (United Kingdom) Jorge Toledo (Spain) Sherpa Sarah Healey (France) (United Kingdom) Donald Trump LEAST IMPORTANT IN BRUSSELS (United States) Nigel Farage (United Kingdom) Angelino Alfano Team Barnier* (Italy) (EU) Antonio Tajani (EU) Change Britain Brexit Central Syed Kamall Marco Piantini (United Kingdom) (United Kingdom) (United Kingdom) (Italy) Guy Verhofstadt Hubert Legal Open Britain (EU) (EU) (United Kingdom) Ornella Porchia Martin Selmayr Piotr Serafn Elmar Brok, (Italy) (EU) (EU) Roberto Gualtieri Gibraltar (EU) frst minister (United Kingdom) Luis Romero Requena (EU) LEAST IMPORTANT IN LONDON * — Team Barnier is: Stéphanie Riso, Marco Abate, Georg Riekeles, Eugenia Dumitriu-Segnana, Stefaan De Rynck and Randolph De Battista (strategy, coordination and communication); François Arbault, Ward Möhlmann, Aurora Mordonu, Tadhg O’Briain, Nicola Pesaresi and Marie Simonsen (internal market, sectors and cross-cutting regulation); Philippe Bertrand and Bence Toth (budget, spending commitments and programs); Antonio Fernández-Martos, Stefan Fuehring, Nina Obermaier (trade and external relations, internal and external security); Barthélemy Piche and Justyna Lasik (policy assistants to negotiators). Team DExEU is: Catherine Webb, Matt Baugh, Chris Jones, Tom Shinner, Joanna Key, Susannah Storey, Antony Phillipson. ith Brexit talks underway it is time to recalibrate center of gravity of negotiations, but that national fgures and POLITICO’s Brexit power matrix, which maps the not merely EU ofcials have crucial roles to play. French Presi- Wrelative infuence of nearly 100 fgures spread across dent Emmanuel Macron and Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar both sides of the two-year negotiation. make notable debuts. While instability in the U.K. government could lead to ma- Martin Schulz, the German chancellor candidate and former jor shifts in this ranking, for now both sides are presenting European Parliament president who has sunk in Germany’s complete and stable teams. The complexity of Brexit demands opinion polls, is now of the matrix. Other notable departures both parties ofer their best and brightest. are populists Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders and Steve Ban- We know from Monday’s initial talks that Irish border ques- non, whose political tide has receded for now. Theresa May’s tions have the potential to be particularly fraught. That’s former close advisers Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill, who found one reason why the lead civil servants on these issues — Oli- themselves blamed for part of May’s poor election perfor- ver Robbins for the U.K. and Sabine Weyand for the EU — are mance, are also gone, as is former European Commissioner ranked higher than in the original matrix. The team at the and Peter Mandelson, who failed to strike while the iron was U.K.’s Department for Exiting the EU is now in place, and has hot to make use of the Remain campaign’s database to form a risen along with Team Barnier. new political movement or party. The matrix continues to illustrate that Brussels will be the — Ryan Heath.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Developments in European Foreign Policy
    HOUSE OF LORDS European Union Committee 26th Report of Session 2005–06 Current Developments in European Foreign Policy Report with Evidence Ordered to be printed 14 February and published 3 March 2006 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 124 The European Union Committee The European Union Committee is appointed by the House of Lords “to consider European Union documents and other matters relating to the European Union”. The Committee has seven Sub-Committees which are: Economic and Financial Affairs, and International Trade (Sub-Committee A) Internal Market (Sub-Committee B) Foreign Affairs, Defence and Development Policy (Sub-Committee C) Environment and Agriculture (Sub-Committee D) Law and Institutions (Sub-Committee E) Home Affairs (Sub-Committee F) Social and Consumer Affairs (Sub-Committee G) Our Membership The Members of the European Union Committee are: Lord Blackwell Lord Maclennan of Rogart Lord Bowness Lord Marlesford Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Lord Neill of Bladen Lord Dubs Lord Radice Lord Geddes Lord Renton of Mount Harry Lord Goodhart Baroness Thomas of Walliswood Lord Grenfell (Chairman) Lord Tomlinson Lord Hannay of Chiswick Lord Woolmer of Leeds Lord Harrison Lord Wright of Richmond The Members of the Sub-Committee which carried out this inquiry (Foreign Affairs, Defence and Development Policy, Sub-Committee C) are: Lord Bowness (Chairman) Lord Boyce Lord Dykes Baroness Falkner of Margravine Lord Freeman Lord Hannay of Chiswick Lord Lea of Crondall Lord King of Bridgwater Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean Lord Tomlinson Lord Truscott Information about the Committee The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by and available from The Stationery Office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Process of Brexit: What Comes Next?
    LONDON’S GLOBAL UNIVERSITY THE PROCESS OF BREXIT: WHAT COMES NEXT? Alan Renwick Co-published with: Working Paper January 2017 All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the UCL European Institute. © Alan Renwick (Image credit: Way out by Matt Brown; CC BY 2.0) The Process of Brexit: What Comes Next? Alan Renwick* * Dr Alan Renwick is Deputy Director of the UCL Constitution Unit. THE PROCESS OF BREXIT: WHAT COMES NEXT? DR ALAN RENWICK Executive Summary The phoney war around Brexit is almost over. The Supreme Court has ruled on Article 50. The government has responded with a bill, to which the House of Commons has given outline approval. The government has set out its negotiating objectives in a White Paper. By the end of March, if the government gets its way, we will be entering a new phase in the Brexit process. The question is: What comes next? What will the process of negotiating and agreeing Brexit terms involve? Can the government deliver on its objectives? What role might parliament play? Will the courts intervene again? Can the devolved administrations exert leverage? Is a second referendum at all likely? How will the EU approach the negotiations? This paper – so far as is possible – answers these questions. It begins with an overview of the Brexit process and then examines the roles that each of the key actors will play. The text was finalised on 2 February, shortly after publication of the government’s White Paper. Overview: Withdrawing from the EU Article 50 of the EU treaty sets out a four-step withdrawal process: the decision to withdraw; notification of that decision to the EU; negotiation of a deal; and agreement to the deal’s terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Dacre Correspondence.Pdf
    Reference: 1269453 Julia Snape Information Rights [email protected] 30 July 2021 Freedom of Information: Right to know request Thank you for your request for information held by Ofcom about correspondence with Paul Dacre. We received this request on 27 May 2021 and have considered it under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the FOI Act’). We wrote to you on 25 June 2021 to say we needed more time to consider your request because the information requested was being considered under one of the FOI Act exemptions to which a public interest test applies. We have now concluded our consideration. Your request You asked: 1. Could you please send me all emails that were sent / received from Paul Dacre or emails in your system that mention any of these terms. 2. Records of meetings, notes or minutes of those meetings and documents prepared for meetings with Paul Dacre, phone logs of calls with Paul Dacre. The time period for these three requests is July 1st 2019 to the date this request was received. For this request I would ask that you limit it to these people: Dame Melanie Dawes, chief exec and her predecessor Bob Kerslake, former Ofcom Chairman Terence Burns, Martin Ballantyne, Ofcom's General Counsel and Legal Group Director, Tony Close, former director of content standards, and the current holder of the post, Alison Marsden. Background By way of background, it is worth clarifying that the appointment of the Ofcom Chair is run independently of Ofcom by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 October 2017 Your Freedom of Information Request
    Political Section UK Representation to the EU Avenue d’Auderghem 10 1040 Brussels Belgium Website: https://www.gov.uk 18 October 2017 Your Freedom of Information Request: 0731-17 Thank you again for your request for information which we received on 1 August 2017. In your request you said: “I am writing to you under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to request the following information from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office: 1. A list of the foreign trips made by Simon Case for the purposes of discussing or negotiating the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, clearly stating the purpose of the trip (e.g. Discussion with relevant parties on the impact of UK exit from EU, or, Discussion on Department for Exiting the European Union Policy), where the trip was to, when they were there, and the time spent in each location (if possible, to the hour) since 29 March 2017; 2. The time spent abroad by each of the following people: Tim Barrow; Katrina Williams; as part of their responsibilities either as the UK’s permanent representatives to the European Union or as part of the UK’s negotiating team for withdrawing the European Union, where they were, when they were there, and the time spent in each location since the 29 March 2017. We confirmed in our letter to you of 31 August that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) does hold information relevant to your request. We have interpreted “foreign” to mean to countries other than the United Kingdom or Belgium, the latter of which is where Sir Tim Barrow, Simon Case, and Katrina Williams are all currently based as part of their roles at the UK Permanent Representation to the EU (UKREP).
    [Show full text]
  • ECON Thesaurus on Brexit
    STUDY Requested by the ECON Committee ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Authors: Stephanie Honnefelder, Doris Kolassa, Sophia Gernert, Roberto Silvestri Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union July 2017 EN DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Abstract This thesaurus is a collection of ECON related articles, papers and studies on the possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU. Recent literature from various sources is categorised, chronologically listed – while keeping the content of previous editions - and briefly summarised. To facilitate the use of this tool and to allow an easy access, certain documents may appear in more than one category. The thesaurus is non-exhaustive and may be updated. This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the ECON Committee. IP/A/ECON/2017-15 July 2017 PE 607.326 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. AUTHORS Stephanie HONNEFELDER Doris KOLASSA Sophia GERNERT, trainee Roberto SILVESTRI, trainee RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Stephanie HONNEFELDER Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies
    [Show full text]
  • Wapping-Gate Exposes Serious Questions About the Ethics of UK Journalism and the Collusion of Media, Politics and Security Forces
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/2011/07/27/ethics-journalism/ Wapping-gate exposes serious questions about the ethics of UK journalism and the collusion of media, politics and security forces A broad debate is needed about ethics in journalism and how to enforce them without impeding on press freedom when it comes to matters of genuine public interest, writes Bart Cammaerts. There is a long standing tradition in this country (as in many others) that if you want to remove something from the public debate because it is too controversial or damaging and there is an urgent need to move on, you announce an all-encompassing independent inquiry preferably broad in scope which will self-evidently need ample time, resources and a more sober, rational, atmosphere to come to any kind of conclusions. Wapping-gate is no different; at least three parallel processes have been put in motion to come to terms with all that happened – or rather did not happen. However, despite the efforts of several actors in this ever- evolving scandal to try and put a lid on it, they failed miserably. “The worst is still to come”, Rebekah Brooks told the flabbergasted journalists at News of the World after the decision to close down the Sunday newspaper. One wonders how much worse it can get? The one chasing the scandals has become the scandal, but one of a much bigger proportion than any scandal it ever reported itself. For many political observers this was a scandal waiting to happen, surprising really that it took so long.
    [Show full text]
  • Here: March 2018 the CIVIL SERVICE, Quarterly.Blog.Gov.Uk #Csquarterly BREXIT and BEYOND
    Issue 16 FEATURE Subscribe for free here: March 2018 THE CIVIL SERVICE, quarterly.blog.gov.uk #CSQuarterly BREXIT AND BEYOND FROM ASDA TO BELMARSH – HOW GOVERNMENT IS ATTRACTING THE BEST PRISON OFFICERS ROBOTS LEND GOVERNMENT A HELPING HAND 2 CIVIL SERVICE QUARTERLY CIVIL SERVICE QUARTERLY 3 Issue 16 – March 2018 Issue 16 – March 2018 CONTENTS THE CIVIL SERVICE, BREXIT AND BEYOND Jeremy Heywood, Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service 5 CROSSING THE ‘VALLEY OF DEATH’ Tony Meggs, Chief Executive of the Infrastructure and 10 Projects Authority (IPA) CURIOSITY, CREATIVITY AND A CAN-DO Interview with Andrea Siodmok, Deputy Director, Policy Lab 15 CULTURE – THE LAB COLLECTIVE THE NEW ZEALAND POLICY PROJECT Andrew Kibblewhite, Head of Policy Profession, 18 New Zealand Government PARLIAMENT AND THE CIVIL SERVICE Rt Hon. Andrea Leadsom MP, Leader of the House of Commons 22 FROM ASDA TO BELMARSH – Mark Adam, Prison Officer Recruitment Programme Director, 26 HOW GOVERNMENT IS ATTRACTING Ministry of Justice THE BEST PRISON OFFICERS ROBOTS LEND GOVERNMENT James Merrick-Potter, Cabinet Office Robotic Automation Unit, 31 A HELPING HAND and Daniella Chrysochou, Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Centre of Excellence WHY INNOVATION IS THE KEY Mike Biddle, Programme Director, Innovate UK 34 TO GROWING THE UK ECONOMY LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION – UKGI Digital Land Team 38 TAPPING THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF GEOSPATIAL DATA ACCELERATING INNOVATION Heather-Fiona Egan, Defence and Security Accelerator 42 IN DEFENCE AND SECURITY Civil Service Quarterly opens CONTACT US EDITORIAL BOARD up the Civil Service to greater [email protected] Sir Chris Wormald, Permanent Secretary, collaboration and challenge, Room 140, 70 Whitehall, Department of Health (chair) showcases excellence and invites London, SW1A 2AS discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • WEEK in BRUSSELS Week Ending Friday 23 January
    WEEK IN BRUSSELS Week ending Friday 23 January SMMT strengthens UK auto EU to support studies on dialogue with EU electric vehicle traffic SMMT held its reception in Brussels ‘The UK development automotive industry in Europe’ this week. The reception brought together senior automotive industry The EU’s TEN-T Programme will back a market study executives, UK and EU government officials, MEPs and a pilot on the deployment of electric vehicles and and representatives of the European Commission. A their charging infrastructure along the main highways keynote speech was delivered by Lord Hill, in southern Sweden, Denmark and northern Germany. Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial The €1 million project aims to contribute to removing Services and Capital Markets Union, in which he barriers for long distance ‘green’ travel across announced the re-launch of the European borders. One of the main barriers to the widespread Commission’s CARS 2020 initiative. Also speaking at use of electric vehicles on European roads is lack of the event were Glenis Willmott MEP, Syed Kamall convenient service stations and their incompatibility MEP and Mike Hawes, SMMT Chief Executive. The with other kinds of vehicles. This project will carry out event presented a key opportunity to demonstrate the feasibility studies on consumer preferences and user strength and importance of the UK automotive acceptance of electric vehicles and the related industry to European colleagues, and to emphasise charging infrastructure, as well as the supporting how having a strong voice in Europe is critical to the consumer services. It will also make a pilot continuing success of the UK automotive sector.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the EU Referendum Debate
    ‘What country, friends, is this?’ A guide to the EU referendum debate ‘What country, friends, is this?’ A guide to the EU referendum debate Foreword 4 Professor Nick Pearce, Director of the Institute for Policy Research Public attitudes and political 6 discourses on the EU in the Brexit referendum 7 ‘To be or not to be?’ ‘Should I stay or should I go?’ and other clichés: the 2016 UK referendum on EU membership Dr Nicholas Startin, Deputy Head of the Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 16 The same, but different: Wales and the debate over EU membership Dr David Moon, Lecturer, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 21 The EU debate in Northern Ireland Dr Sophie Whiting, Lecturer, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 24 Will women decide the outcome of the EU referendum? Dr Susan Milner, Reader, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 28 Policy debates 29 Brexit and the City of London: a clear and present danger Professor Chris Martin, Professor of Economics, Department of Economics 33 The economics of the UK outside the Eurozone: what does it mean for the UK if/when Eurozone integration deepens? Implications of Eurozone failures for the UK Dr Bruce Morley, Lecturer in Economics, Department of Economics 38 Security in, secure out: Brexit’s impact on security and defence policy Professor David Galbreath, Professor of International Security, Associate Dean (Research) 42 Migration and EU membership Dr Emma Carmel, Senior Lecturer, Department of Social & Policy Sciences 2 ‘What country, friends, is this?’ A guide to the EU referendum debate 45 Country perspectives 46 Debating the future of Europe is essential, but when will we start? The perspective from France Dr Aurelien Mondon, Senior Lecturer, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 52 Germany versus Brexit – the reluctant hegemon is not amused Dr Alim Baluch, Teaching Fellow, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 57 The Brexit referendum is not only a British affair.
    [Show full text]
  • DECEMBER 2012 GIFTS (RECEIVED) OVER £140 Prime
    PRIME MINISTER QUARTERLY TRANSPARENCY INFORMATION OCTOBER – DECEMBER 2012 GIFTS (RECEIVED) OVER £140 Prime Minister, The Rt Hon David Cameron MP Date gift From Gift Value Outcome received October President of the Oil painting Over Held by Department 2012 Republic de Cote limit d'Ivoire October President of Yemen Jewellery Over Held by Department 2012 limit October David McGill Whisky Over Held by Department 2012 limit October President-elect of Coins Over Held by Department 2012 Mexico limit November King of Saudi Arabia Jewellery, Over Held by Department 2012 ornament, limit watch November President of the Ornament Over Held by Department 2012 Republic of Indonesia limit November Amir of Kuwait Watch, coins Over Held by Department 2012 and ornament limit December Ambassador of Hamper Over Used for official 2012 Sultanate of Oman limit entertainment December Ambassador of the State Wine and Over Used for official 2012 of Qatar spirits limit entertainment December Sultan of Brunei Hamper Over Used for official 2012 limit entertainment December President of the Council Hamper Over Used for official 2012 of Ministers of the limit entertainment Lebanese Republic GIFTS (GIVEN) OVER £140 Prime Minister, The Rt Hon David Cameron MP Date gift From Gift Value given Nil Return HOSPITALITY1 Prime Minister, The Rt Hon David Cameron MP Date Name of Organisation Type of Hospitality Received 15 United Jewish Israel Appeal Dinner October 2012 29 Pride of Britain Awards Dinner October 2012 12 Lord Mayor’s Banquet Dinner November 2012 6 Sun Military Awards Reception December 2012 1 Does not include attendance at functions hosted by HM Government or the Royal Household; attendance at ‘diplomatic’ functions in the UK or abroad, hosted by overseas governments; minor refreshments and offers of hospitality which were declined.
    [Show full text]
  • INFLUENCERS on BREXIT Who Is Most Influential on Brexit?
    INFLUENCERS ON BREXIT Who is most influential on Brexit? 1= 1= 3 4 5 Theresa MAY Angela MERKEL Nicola STURGEON Michel BARNIER Donald TUSK Chief Negotiator for the Prime Minister Federal Chancellor First Minister Commission Taskforce on Brexit President Negotiations UK Government German Government Scottish Government European Commission European Council 6 7 8 9 10 François HOLLANDE Philip HAMMOND David DAVIS Jean-Claude JUNCKER Guy VERHOFSTADT Secretary of State for Exiting the President Chancellor of the Exchequer President MEP & Lead rapporteur on Brexit European Union French Government UK Government UK Government European Commission European Parliament 11 12 13 14 15 Didier SEEUWS Enda KENNY Hilary BENN Mark RUTTE Martin SELMAYR Head of the General Secretariat of Chair, Committee on Exiting the Head of Cabinet of the President the Council Special Taskforce on Taoiseach European Union & Member of Prime Minister of the European Commission the UK Parliament, Labour Council of the EU Irish Government UK Parliament Dutch Government European Commission 16 17 18 19 20 Keir STARMER Donald TRUMP Wolfgang SCHÄUBLE Liam FOX Frans TIMMERMANS Secretary of State for Shadow Brexit Secretary US President-Elect Finance Minister First Vice-President Member of Parliament, Labour International Trade UK Parliament US Goverment German Government UK Government European Commission 21 22 23 24 25 Boris JOHNSON Nigel FARAGE Nick TIMOTHY Uwe CORSEPIUS Paul DACRE Joint Number 10 Special Adviser on Europe to Foreign Secretary MEP, Interim Leader of UKIP Chief-of-Staff,
    [Show full text]
  • Le Trattative Tra Il Regno Unito E L'unione Europea Per La Brexit Alla
    9 A G O S T O 2017 Le trattative tra il Regno Unito e l’Unione europea per la Brexit alla luce dei primi due cicli negoziali di Carlo Curti Gialdino Professore ordinario di Diritto dell’Unione europea Sapienza – Università di Roma Le trattative tra il Regno Unito e l’Unione europea per la Brexit alla luce dei primi due cicli negoziali * di Carlo Curti Gialdino Professore ordinario di Diritto dell’Unione europea Sapienza – Università di Roma Sommario: 1. Premessa. – 1.1. Le conseguenze politico-istituzionali del referendum sul versante britannico. – 1.2. … e sul versante dell’Unione europea. – 2. La notifica di recesso del 29 marzo 2017. - 3. La posizione britannica quanto ai profili di carattere generale del negoziato. - 4. … e la posizione negoziale dell’Unione europea - 4.1. La risoluzione del Parlamento europeo del 5 aprile 2017. - 4.2. Gli orientamenti generali del Consiglio europeo del 29 aprile 2017. - 4.3. La decisione del Consiglio del 22 maggio 2017, che autorizza la Commissione ad aprire il negoziato in vista dell’accordo di recesso. – 5. Le squadre negoziali. - 6. L’avvio delle trattative e la condivisione della struttura del negoziato. –- 7. Il secondo ciclo negoziale e l’emergere di talune divergenze fondamentali. – 8. La necessità di procedere alla revisione di alcune disposizioni dei trattati istitutivi indipendentemente dall’esito delle trattative. – 9. L’irrevocabilità della notifica di recesso. - 10. Le prospettive del negoziato all’inizio dell’estate 2017. – 11. Considerazioni conclusive. 1.Premessa Per situare lo stato delle trattative tra il Regno Unito e l’Unione europea sulla Brexit, a quarantacinque giorni dalla loro apertura, conviene ripercorrere, seppure succintamente, i fatti salienti successivi al referendum del 23 giugno 2016 fino alla notifica britannica della volontà di recedere dall’Unione europea (29 marzo 2017).
    [Show full text]